Crickets, because this is just stuff, you throw it out there, you just, you just, they've seen their favorite apologists doing this, and they've never seen, they don't take time to listen to the other side, and so they don't realize that there's another argument, and look, people on our side do the same thing, I get that, people on our side do the same thing, remember the guy did the Isaiah scroll thing in debate with Ehrman, I'm sitting there going, I know it's gonna happen here, and Ehrman does the Jeremiah thing, and he'd never heard of it, and that's why I keep warning people, you need to be aware of, you know, the fields a little more in depth to use this type of argumentation, but that's what they're doing, and they don't take the time to understand or hear what's being said on their side, so this T .L .M. Ryan guy, then why did no early Christian believe in faith alone, again, I quote these, you quote stuff to these guys, and they just, um, why did no early Christian believe in the Bible alone, a physically impossible thing to do is the Bible wasn't compiled until 382 A .D., well again, this kind of reasoning, it's just, these folks don't do history, they don't read the early church, and there was a convert guy, I don't think I have a quote here, but there was a guy I responded to a couple days ago, who has just converted to Roman Catholicism, and I just basically said, your argument is full of hot air, he said that the church thrived just fine without the Bible longer than the United States has existed, I'm like, how can you make a statement like that, because these are the same people saying, I don't know, I read the early church fathers, you did, and you didn't notice how many times they were quoting the Bible, because for them, the Tanakh isn't the Bible, if it's not in the Gospels, it's not the Bible, I guess, I don't know, I said, how, the church has always been a faith based upon the book, thus saith the Lord, and you find that throughout the early church, now the earlier document is, it may have less and less of the New Testament available to it, but Clement, one of our earliest writings, replete with Old Testament citations, from the Greek Septuagint, that was the Bible, the early church, we know this, why don't you know this, well, you must not believe in Sola Scriptura then, no, I don't believe in your twisted fantasy version of Sola Scriptura, I know what Sola Scriptura is, I've defended it many, many, many times, and then, of course, why did no early Bible contain 66 books but 73?