Keep sharing good news without ads.
No description available
Let's turn over to our Bibles once again to the letter of 1st John chapter 5. 1st John chapter 5 and this time we're going to begin in verse 5. 1st John 5 5 God's Word says. Who is the one who overcomes the world but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.
This is the one who came by water and blood Jesus Christ not with the water only but with the water and with the blood. It is the Spirit who bears witness because the Spirit is the truth. For there are three witness.
There are three that bear witness the Spirit and the water and the blood and the three are in agreement. This is God's Word. Amen. So I Made a slight adjustment to the sermon title for today. It's bearing witness to the truth bearing witness to the truth.
That's what this sermon is about and I'm also going to do a deep dive into what's known as the Johan in common and Much of this is which is all tied together and related by By what a witness is all about biblically.
So we saw last Lord's Day that The one who came is none other is none other than Jesus the Christ the Son of God. Amen, the one true God the eternal divine Son of God the Father not a creation. Not a not a natural.
He wasn't. He didn't come into existence. He always was the logos was God who came to us in water and in blood in water and in blood. And We saw to that verse 6 Here focuses on the beginning and end of Christ's ministry on the earth.
Right his baptism and his death those are bookends their bookends in Christ's ministry and.
And.
They are pointed to by the synecdoches of Water and blood the parts that refer to the whole water referring to the baptism and the blood referring to his death on the cross. We saw too that it is the blood that makes atonement by the life.
Putting something to death by shedding its blood so that someone else can live. It's a vicarious atonement or sacrifice a propitiation for sin a satisfaction of punishment and wrath. Amen, so now. Continuing on to the last part of verse 6.
It is the Spirit who bears witness because the Spirit is the truth. The Spirit is the truth. Now notice a key word there obviously is witness. Witness. The word witness there in the Greek is where we get the word martyr from martyr and.
So what does it mean then that the Spirit of God bears witness? What does that mean? And Gordon Clark's commentary is very very helpful here. He says the word witness is a participle. Meaning he who witnesses.
He who witnesses in a court trial a certain man. Or a woman is called a witness. The witness gives his testimony. His testimony. He recounts something. He swears to its truth. He swears to its veracity or its truth.
Here the Holy Spirit is the one who witnesses and he does so because he himself is the truth. Amen he is the truth. Remember that God is.
Truth.
Jesus Christ is wisdom logos the truth. And. The Spirit is none other than the Spirit of truth. That is what so irritates the irrational and the neo-orthodox and the pietist who make truth some kind of emotional encounter.
Irrational just something much like Emil Bruner did or Soren Kierkegaard did. The Dane the Danish theologian who talked about an infinitely irrational passion. It's not about the external what but the n-word how.
It's not about what you're worshiping, but how you do it. How intensely do you do it? So you can be a Satanist and as long as you're passionate about being a Satanist. You can be more in the truth than a Christian who is not as passionate.
That's the absurdity of what this kind of theology leads to. And. That's not what God teaches us because he is a God of truth. Turn with me in the letter to the Romans chapter 8 verse 15 as we. See more as to what scripture speaks to regarding the Spirit of God.
Testifying in Romans chapter 8 verse 15. God's Word speaks to us for you. Believers have not received a spirit of slavery or of bondage. Leading to fear again. But you have received the spirit of adoption as sons the Holy Spirit by whom we cry out.
Abba Father Father God the Spirit Himself testifies testifies with with our spirit. That we are children of God and if children also heirs. Heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ if indeed we suffer with him.
So that we may also be glorified with him. Amen so this very powerfully tells us a profound truth. We God doesn't leave us to our own devices to figure out if we belong to him or not. God gives to us his his own spirit and his own spirit.
Testifies with our own spirit that we belong to him that we have been adopted. That's a beautiful promise. Amen, that's a beautiful promise from the Lord God Himself.
Similarly our Baptist confession of faith says in chapter 1 that we may be influenced and persuaded by the testimony of the Church of God to hold a high and reverent regard for the Holy Scriptures. Moreover the glory of its contents the efficacy of its doctrine the majesty of its style The agreement among all its parts the expanse of the whole which is to give all glory to God The full revelation it gives of the only way for salvation Together with many other incomparable excellencies.
I'm come it's complete perfection all these arguments provide Abundant evidence that it is indeed the Word of God yet not withstanding.
This.
Our full persuasion and assurance of its infallible truth and divine authority comes from None other than the inward work of the Holy Spirit. Bearing witness. Bearing witness by and with the word in our hearts in our minds.
The heart is the mind primarily according to Scripture. It's not by some mystical irrational emotional Experiential encounter like they often like to say it is by belief in the truth. By belief in the truth just like Jesus said in his high priestly prayer here John 17 17.
Sanctify them in the truth thy word is the truth. God is truth Therefore his word is truth because God by nature is.
So this is what? God is all about. He's all about this. So he bears witness because the Spirit is himself true and the truth and the truth.
Now.
This this this reminds me of one of my university professors who he taught a it was a religious studies class and He claimed that the Bible It may contain Nuggets of truth here and there But that wasn't it's not its primary focus.
The primary focus of the Bible is not the truth its stories its stories and lessons and and and myths that are Doesn't really matter whether it's true or not. That's not relevant. What's relevant is what they point to or what they're teaching us and You hear this a lot from liberal or unbelieving Scholars professors even so-called Christians who will claim this is how they try to explain away Genesis.
They deny the six-day creation of Genesis and they'll say well, it's you know, it's it's poetic language it's it doesn't really you know, God can use evolution to take to to bring about creation even though flatly contradicts the Genesis account and You have false teachers like Tim Keller and members of the bio logos and Francis Collins all these guys that Teach these falsehoods and they contradict the scriptures Like our confession says the the God is not the author of confusion.
He doesn't contradict himself Why because he is a god of?
Amen, he is a god of truth. So you often hear brilliant men and women and scholars saying very false and foolish things like this. Because what sayeth the scriptures beloved we just we just saw that the Spirit of God.
Contrary to what these people say the Spirit of God is the truth because the Spirit is the truth. Period. No, ifs no ands no, buts no. Yeah, but it's poetic. Yeah, but it's metaphorical. No. The Spirit is literally the truth and bears witness to nothing but the truth.
That's why he bears witness. He is a true witness to the truth and nothing but the truth. Psalm 31 5 Says into your hand I commit my spirit. Remember when Jesus said those words when he was expiring on the cross Into thy hands I commit my spirit.
You have ransomed me. Oh Yahweh God of what of lies of myths of stories. No God of truth Lord God of truth. Amen. That is hallelujah. Amen. Here King David the psalmist entrusts his spirit to God acknowledging him as the one and only God of truth a Testament to God's reliability and to the trustworthiness of all his words and his promises all his words and his promises.
I love how we read also from today's In the psalm psalm 119 how he repeatedly says Psalm 119 142 your righteousness is an everlasting righteousness and your law is.
What.
Truth your law is truth. Thy word is truth. The sum of thy word is Nothing but the truth. So, how can these people say that. Well that it's not so much about whether it's true or not. What are you talking about?
You clearly haven't read the Bible or you don't believe it. You're you're contradicting the plain teaching. This doesn't take a theology degree to figure it out. It's plain old and New Testament. What is God concerned with?
What is God a god of? A god of.
Turn with me to the book of Isaiah the prophet Isaiah 65. Isaiah 65 verse 15. We will see another powerful statement from God himself. Isaiah chapter 50 65 verse 15. God's Word says the Lord himself says You will leave your name for a curse to my chosen ones Lord Yahweh will put you to death But my slaves will be called by another name.
Because he who is blessed in the earth will be blessed by the God of what of truth and he who swears in the earth will swear by the God of what the God of.
Because the former distresses are forgotten and because they are hidden from my sight. Amen. There's a double emphasis there an emphatic repetition that God is the God of truth. It's in the law. It's in the Psalms.
It's in the prophets. It's everywhere and it's in the New Testament as we will see shortly. This verse like many others Recognizes God as the truth and the God of truth and again Exercising the analogy of Scripture it is says repeatedly.
He is God and there is no other. There is no other God. All the other gods are lies. Because there is only one true God like the Bible says one true God and his unique son the Messiah Jesus Christ the righteous.
So This God is the truth the God of truth by whom people swear and bless themselves indicating his supreme authority and the certainty the truthfulness of his words his law of.
Amen, and then the gospel of John. Remember the gospel of John chapter 14. This is a memory verse. We should all have this verse memorized. Verses 5 6. Thomas said to Christ Lord, we do not know where you are going.
How do we know the way and what does Jesus say to him? I? am the way and the truth and the.
Life.
Eternal life. No one comes to the father, but through me. And this is so powerful. So powerful. And yes, there's a sense in which When Jesus or God says that he is the truth It means that he is the source of all truth.
He is Wisdom he is the truth because he contains the truth all truth. He is a source of it and Everything he says is true. This is one thing if anything bothers liberals. Emotionalist Pietist even though they may sound pious and they make you know, they may be very they may very well be Christians, but they are very Shallow in their understanding that the truth is by definition.
Truth is by definition Propositional. You will hear them say truth. What. It's not about belief in a creed. But about trust in a person. They try to make it all mystical. It's not about trust believing a creed but trusting a person.
See they try to make it more personal. It's like but how do you know who Jesus is? It's by trusting the right creed the right propositions the right sentences and declarations proclamations about who Christ is.
Because truth is by definition Propositional. Propositional it is a declarative sentence. Sentences. It is doctrinal. It is intellectual. Belonging to the mind the heart. They'll try to say, you know, oh.
It's.
Trusting a person they try to make it something else and That is nonsense. That is absurdity that the Bible and God himself rebukes repeatedly all throughout the scriptures. God is a God of truth. And for you to know the truth to know Jesus Christ You must believe his words.
What did Jesus say? My words are spirit and life. So what me we must believe are the propositions That Jesus Christ taught in his word. That is what Christianity is all about. That is why God put it in a book for us to read and absorb and preach and understand and hear and believe.
It's it's not about giving us ecstatic visions and things. Yes. Sure those things happen. But those visions even those visions were meant to portray or to relay a message from God to be communicated and understood rationally.
Consistently, this is what God is all about. Take note of this. Later on too for the rest of this passage because the Apostle will continue to draw this out. Truth then is the ultimate primary concern and Claim of God.
What are we saved by? Belief in his truth. It is the primary concern and claim of God and of all his word. It is his very nature. For it is impossible for God. To what? To lie. Amen, and we who have taken refuge in him would have strong encouragement to take hold of the hope set before us in God's promises.
A True hope. Sound hope. Why is it true? Why is it sound. What why is this hope something that we can take? Encouragement and refuge in because it is true. You can't take refuge in a lie. A lie is not true.
That's why we can't trust lies or believe lies because they lead us to error and sin and self-deception. There's no refuge in the in lies. And by God's grace the Spirit bears witness with us that we.
He causes us to believe the truth. Regenerates us our wicked sinful nature regenerates our Minds and causes us to believe the truth like scripture says. Praise God all glory be to God. Now us from Hebrews 6 18.
Now that we come to a very important aspect of this passage this verse. Specifically the next verses 7 through 8. I want to read it again in the legacy standard version. So verse 6 it is a spirit who bears witness because the spirit is the truth.
For there are three that bear witness the spirit and the water and the blood. And. The three are in agreement. The three agree as one in other words.
Pay careful attention here because some Bible translations include additional words Known as the Johannine comma or in Latin known as the comma Johannine Johannine meaning for the Apostle John. So in the New King James for example You will find verse 7 says this.
For there are three that bear witness in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Spirit and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness on earth The spirit the water and the blood and these three agree as one.
So it adds extra witnesses their heavenly witnesses and earthly witnesses on earth and they all agree. So which version is correct is The modern textual version correct which removes which doesn't have those or.
The.
King James Family tradition that includes these extra words. What is which one is correct? How do we know? How do we know that?
This brings me to my past. In my previous years when I was younger in the faith. I was persuaded by King James only ism and.
This frankly is it can be a very dangerous thing because We have to be very careful with these movements because oftentimes you will find that they rewrite history or they deny history or they They don't speak.
It's not true what their arguments are not true. They are false and They'll make claims like I used to I used to preach this I used to share this with folks and I had my King James Bible defenders said and everything.
I was hardcore. I was all-in and.
You know, I used to say things like all the other. I actually convinced my wife in college to throw away all her Bibles that weren't King James and She had trust with issues with me after that, but we worked it out eventually.
We.
They I used to say like all these other Bible versions are they're corrupt because they remove verses they remove The Trinity they remove the Trinity from the Bible, how dare they right. They they remove Several verses and they change them and all this stuff and It's based on assumptions.
About.
The underlying Greek texts of the New Testament and the Hebrew of the Old Testament.
So.
This is we have to examine this carefully because this is very common today there's a lot of cult-like movements and false movements that we have to watch out for and Because this passage in particular is one of the most controversial textual variants of the New Testament Because it deals with a weighty issue it's the issue of the Trinity right the doctrine of the Trinity so there is some Controversy a lot of controversy behind it.
Even though we will find that there really shouldn't be in a sense now what is the textual variant. I've mentioned this before some time ago a Textual variant are Textual variants are places in biblical manuscripts.
Okay copies of the scriptures where there is a difference between the texts between the same passage or verse or word or in the Bible. Oftentimes they're spelling differences or word order differences but the vast majority of these textual variants or Differences are not viable meaning that they do not affect the actual meaning of the text.
So you'll find liberal scholars and Muslims and people who deny the scriptures. They'll say well there look at all. There's hundreds of thousands of variants. It's like yeah, but Like not even 1 of them make any difference not even 1
So they're very misleading. Only not even 1 of them of all textual variants are Actually viable meaning that they change the meaning or there's a different meaning or sense of what it says and even those Differences those 1 differences do not affect the actual doctrines of Scripture.
Like this one this one teaches the Trinity, okay. There's other passages that teach the Trinity. We don't lose the Trinity by not having that verse. But it's there and it teaches the Trinity. Okay, great so and some of the other main major variants are the longer ending of Mark the Gospel of Mark and The pericope adultery which is the story of adultery in the latter part of John chapter 7 The woman caught in adultery those are the biggest variants, but they're they don't affect any doctrine.
So this is an amazing testament to God's omnipotent providence Governing and preserving the scriptures for us. It's an amazing testimony to his truth, which I preached on the previous series on scripture alone.
So this question will require us to dig into some history and church history and textual criticism a lot of churches neglect us, but we cannot avoid it because the liberals the the cults. These King James only is the these the Muslims they're all going to go there.
So we need to be prepared and other Christians. I have misunderstandings of this a lot of Christians have no idea what this is about. Let it not be so among us beloved. We cannot be ignorant of these things.
Because they are dealing with the very foundation of our faith of the scriptures the ultimate authority of our faith in life the scriptures it behooves us to know then how the scriptures came about and How do we?
Choose, how do we know how do we determine what variants are correct? So I'm going to need to refer to some solid reliable sources. To explain these things because it is a complex advanced field of study.
This does require advanced training and learning and knowledges and in textual criticism. Which is very difficult very difficult to do it is not easy and a lot of these Christians who may they may have Good good.
They may have good intentions. They don't realize oftentimes that this is a very complicated subject and it requires expertise acquires skills many skills. To know how to decipher ancient texts that are very hard to read even if you know the ancient languages.
It requires a lot of skill to do these things properly. So that you don't end up doing what Jehovah's Witnesses do and they corrupt the Bible because none of the translators were translators they corrupted it because none of them were trained in the languages and They imposed their own agenda into the translation the mistranslation.
This is no trivial matter. So what is Textual criticism then I kind of already explained it just now Rip and if you remember the sermon series that I preached on scripture alone.
I.
Refer to the tens of thousands of Biblical Old and New Testament manuscripts ancient ones in Greek and Hebrew and in several languages Syriac Targum Latin and so on. All of those manuscripts. Textual criticism is the study of those thousands and tens of thousands of various manuscript Witnesses.
They're called witnesses very fittingly witnesses to the scriptures. Yet another example of how these things bear witness, okay?
These.
Because things can bear witness It's not just It's not just The it's not just people that bear witness that's very important to understand. Things can bear witness as well Which we saw the water and the blood the baptism and the death of Christ bearing witness to the Son of God Being who he says he is.
We can have We the the manuscript copies Ancient versions and medieval manuscripts all of these things are all witnesses That bear witness to the truth of the scriptures. Because they are the scriptures they bear witness to the truth of it.
That's very important to understand. Beloved so Pastor Colin Smith Says this very helpful. What explanation in his introductory series to textual criticism. I recommended you check that out. It's included in the sermon notes.
He says. He explains that textual criticism is of the most critical importance for the Christian Church. Most critical importance for the Christian Church. For the Christian the text under Examination is God's words communicated through men and to men to us.
If these words are inspired are Breathed out by God then it is of paramount importance of supreme importance that the Christian know exactly which words God intended The God-breathed authors to write.
Right.
Indeed the question of what the pastor is going to preach to his congregation In terms of the biblical text should drive the Christian textual critic to pursue excellence in this field of study. We need to know what God's Word is.
Amen. Because there's different Variants out there. We need to know what the words of God are. There is almost unanimous Certainty that given the quantity and quality of New Testament manuscripts that have been preserved throughout the world and We're talking tens of thousands beloved over 25 almost 30 ,000 New Testament witnesses tens of thousands of Old Testament witnesses.
Over.
6 ,000 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament of the original language beloved These manuscripts that have been preserved whether entire Bibles or small fragments. Within all of these Manuscripts the exact wording of the original New Testament text has been preserved.
It has been the work of the textual critic is to sift through the manuscripts and To determine the best to the best of his ability. Given the evidence available the witnesses available. The Manuscripts which ones contain the original words of God?
Are they all contained in one manuscript a family of related manuscripts or perhaps a lot of extremely diverse manuscripts. And by diverse. There's very little diversity in most in though the manuscripts.
The manuscripts all agree in over 85 The major variants like I mentioned are stories or statements that don't affect really the meaning of The the context or of the doctrines of Scripture. Rightly understood.
This is a path. It's One of the scholars that I'll also refer to Daniel Wallace. He's also a textual critic and that's not a bad thing. A textual critic is just somebody who engages in this work who tries to?
Determine what the original variants are. Because there's differences and we can't ignore those differences, okay, it's not a bad thing. That's a good thing. That means that we have a crossword puzzles say you have a crossword puzzle of 500 pieces.
You have a crossword puzzle of 600 pieces and you need to determine which ones are the original ones. That's what we have. We have the original pieces. We just need to determine which ones are the original ones.
We know we have them and We have that certainty and we can tell that's the science of in study of textual criticism. That helps us to determine which readings are Authentic which ones are original which ones are more ancient and more closely attest to the original.
Because we don't have the originals anymore. We only have the copies. But these copies are faithful witnesses Amen to its truth and we can know that because they have been preserved Tenaciously through God's providence and they say the same thing that they said Thousands of years ago.
It's amazing. It's amazing no other work of antiquity Comes even close to this like I mentioned in the previous series. I encourage you to check that out if you want to review those amazing Testimonies.
So what is the textual support for the Johan in comma then for these extra words about the Trinity in 1st John 5 7? What support is there in these witnesses? Are there ancient witnesses that attest to these words?
First of all before we get to that is the Johan in comma a sound expression of Trinitarian and biblical theology. What does it say? We saw that it says there are three that bear witness in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Spirit and these three are one and There are three that bear witness on earth the Spirit the water and the blood.
So there's nothing false about that. Amen that this is a true statement. This is a true statement although bearing in mind that the three divine persons of the Trinity are Not necessarily the only witnesses in heaven okay, and Also, the Holy Spirit is not the only divine person of the Trinity that bears witness on the earth.
So as long as we don't understand it in exclusive terms there are other witnesses besides what these extra words say that the Johan in comma States and In order to prove that let's go to the gospel of Matthew chapter 17.
The gospel of Matthew chapter 17. I think you'll enjoy seeing this beloved as we bring about Harmonize these things together by the analogy of Scripture. So it says there are three that bear witness in heaven and three that bear witness on earth.
But notice here in the gospel of Matthew verse chapter 17, I'll start in verse 1 and Six days later Jesus brought with him Peter and James and John his brother and led them up on a high mountain by themselves and he was transfigured before them and his face shone like the Sun and his garments became white as light and behold who appeared Moses and Elijah appeared to them taking talking with Him with Jesus.
Where did they come from? They came from.
Heaven.
What were they doing? Talking with Christ and bearing witness to the Son. Verse 4. And Peter answered and said to Jesus Lord It is good for us to be here. If you wish I will make three booths or tabernacles here one for you and one for Moses and one for Elijah.
They appeared they literally appeared with Christ and the transfiguration. From heaven, okay. While Peter was still speaking behold a bright cloud overshadowed them all and behold a voice out of the cloud said This is my beloved Son with whom I am well pleased.
Listen to him who is speaking God the Father. And When the disciples heard this they fell on their faces.
Terrified.
Terrified of what what was going on? The voice from heaven was God the Father bearing witness to the Son to listen to him on.
Earth.
The Father was bearing witness on earth. Beloved not just in heaven, but on the earth. Just like he did in his baptism. The voice cried out and said this is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased once again.
And Jesus verse 7. And Jesus came to them and touched them and said get up and do not be afraid and lifting up their eyes. They saw no one except Jesus himself alone. Wow, what an amazing passage. Imagine being there.
Imagine being there. What do we see here both? Moses and Elijah were other additional heavenly witnesses. Bearing witness to the Son on the earth. Okay, uh, so it's not just the spirit and the blood and the Water that bear witness on the earth.
There were multiple witnesses on the earth including Moses and Elijah. Who appeared with Christ? But not only them. Not only them. Beloved. Remember also the entire heavenly host of angels at Christ's birth in the Gospel of Luke.
Remember chapter 2. When suddenly there appeared with the angel who did what. Who announced Christ's birth? On where the earth. To Mary. A multitude of the heavenly host. Praising God and saying glory to God in the highest and peace on earth among men with whom he is pleased.
What were they all doing? Bearing witness to the Son. Just like the spirit and the water his baptism and the blood his death. Amen. The multiplicity of heavenly and earthly witnesses. Beloved witnesses on in heaven and on the earth and.
Not only that. But the divine Son of God also himself. The second person of the triune. Godhead Jesus Christ bears witness of himself on Earth through his works and his miracles and his prophetic and typological.
Fulfillments, what does he tell them? Do not put if you don't believe me believe the works because the works do what they bear witness of the Son. Christ himself bears witness on the earth. Not not not just the spirit and not just.
Yeah, not just a spirit.
That's.
There's multiple the entire Godhead bears witness on the earth. So. And of like I mentioned already like we saw God the Father himself Also bears witness to his own unique only begotten Son on.
Several times in Christ baptism when he announced this is my beloved Son in whom he is well, please and in the transfiguration when he says Listen to him. He bore witness to Christ on the earth Objectively and and so much so that it terrified the Apostles.
The witness of God the Father on the earth Terrified the Apostles and they fell on their faces. Amen. Now aside from all of this amazing Events and witnesses that is not the main issue here. This is not the main issue of 1st, John 5 7 through 8 that the jaw the Johan in common the main issue is Is the verse are these verses authentic?
Were they the original words of the God-breathed Apostle? That's what we need to find out. Now in order to figure Determine this help us to make wise Decisions on this I want to quote from The Bible scholar and textual critic Daniel Wallace.
He is a very conservative Bible scholar and critic Textual critic and he is also the founder and executive director of the Center for the study of New Testament manuscripts. It is an excellent website.
You can see all those copies ancient copies. He copies of the scriptures online. And you can see just how difficult it is to read them for you with your own eyes. It is not an easy thing to do. Is it but it is a we have them we have thousands of them catalogued Amazing through the work of these men like Daniel Wallace and the technology advancements, too.
Daniel Wallace says and and that's not to say that I agree with him on everything. He has some views that I don't necessarily agree with but nevertheless He says some very sound and true things with respect to these matters.
It can be safely said He says that there are no there are no Greek New Testament manuscripts which have the Johan in comma dated to the first millennium AD. What does that mean that means that there is not a single Greek manuscript Within the first thousand years old that is within the first 1 ,000 years.
That has this Johan in comma not a single one within actually the first 1 ,300 years so what he said is an understatement. Okay, in fact the earliest Greek manuscript that has the Johan in comma is a Latin Greek manuscript dated to 1362 one the year 1362 that's the latter part of the medieval age.
Okay, this is not an ancient manuscript. This is a medieval a late medieval manuscript at that and most of them. Which they're not many are late like this. This is the earliest one. Okay, take note of that Further only nine.
Late.
Manuscripts half of which are not even Greek ones. Okay. Versus hundreds of manuscripts of first John. There's over 500 Manuscripts of first John and only half. I mean only nine of them Contain this Johan in comma half of which are not even in Greek raging from the 4th century on On really it's the 5th century the 400s is Rare hardly a confidence builder that the comma the Johan in comma is authentic.
This is not this is not. Hardly any support for this at all. That's what these manuscripts help us to figure out. This is how the work of textual criticism helps us to determine was this authentic or was this added later.
Later on much many years later hundreds of years later. So out of over the out of the over 500 manuscripts of first John only nine late Manuscripts contain the Johan in comma. Half of which are Greek the other half are like they're mostly in Latin.
They're not even original languages. Their translations so Bruce Metzger another very highly influential Bible scholar translator and textual critic Whom Daniel Wallace? Describes as a fine godly conservative scholar.
Although his view of biblical authority is not quite the same as many other evangelicals. So again, we may not agree with these men on everything. But nevertheless they have very these men are highly skilled and trained in the languages and the manuscript.
Evaluation. What does he have to say the passage the Johan in comma is Quoted by none of the Greek fathers. None of them. None of the ancient church quotes it none of them. Who had they known it would most certainly have enjoyed it and employed it in the Trinitarian controversies and heresies.
Like Sabellianism and Arianism, which is modalism you know that that God is only one person and not three persons or that Arianism where Jesus where areas denied that Christ was God truly God. Its first appearance.
Notice these words carefully that Metzger says its first appearance in Greek appearance. Not manuscript in appearance in Greek is in a Greek version of the Latin Acts of the Lateran Council in 1215. It's not even a manuscript.
It's not a textual manuscript of The Bible of 1st John it comes from a Lateran Council that from a church council document the passage is absent from the manuscripts of Every single ancient version that we have Extant and Known and discovered the Syriac the Coptic the Armenian the Ethiopic the Arabic the Slavonic.
None of them contain the Johannine comma except for some Latin ones a handful a small handful of Latin ones at that and It is not found in the old Latin in its entire in its early form. That is the form of Tertullian Cyprian and Augustan or in the Vulgate the Latin Vulgate as Issued by Jerome, so it's not even found in the better Latin versions.
Of these early church leaders and translators Jerome is the one who translated the Bible into Latin the Latin Vulgate. It's not there and so The earliest instance of the passage being quoted as a part of the actual text of the epistle Is not even in a manuscript it's in a fourth century Latin treatise entitled Lieber apologeticus or it's Latin for apologetic book basically attributed either to the Spanish heretic Priscillian who died about 385 AD or to his follower Bishop instantius.
So this is earliest case was quoted by a heretic. Ironically. Apparently the gloss. So gloss means that it's an interpretation. It's not original. It's an interpretation that was added it arose when the original passage was understood to symbolize the Trinity Through the mention of three witnesses.
So it makes sense that some church some church leaders early church leaders may have alluded to this passage because it contains Three witnesses and they all agree as one. So obviously the Trinity is three in one so they may try to draw parallels from that passage.
Even though the those words the Johan in comma weren't there but the gloss probably arose from that because of what the original actually states. That there are three witnesses the spirit the water and the blood and they all agree as one just as God has three persons and one God an Interpretation that may have been written first as a marginal note That afterwards found its way into the text and this is similar to like the Amplified Bible.
Which I often use and I highly recommend to you all the Amplified Bible has inline commentary. That's bracketed. It's not original but it's like a commentary that expands on what the original text says.
That's what that's how it originated. It was an expansion of the original text like an interpretation or a commentary a gloss in other words. In the 5th century the 400s the gloss was quoted by Latin fathers in North Africa and It in North Africa and Italy as part of the text of the Epistle and from the 6th century onwards It is found more and more frequently in manuscripts of the old Latin and of the Vulgate in Those later versions in these various witnesses the wording of the passage differs in several Particulars, so they're not even the same wording and You can tell that a lot of these variant readings are not original when they have a lot of very different renderings or or Versions this is very similar to the longer ending a mark.
There's there's like five different Versions of the longer ending a mark. There's a shorter ending. There's a longer ending. They're different endings and it's not all this. It's very different that gives you that helps us to realize that okay.
Somebody probably added this stuff later on trying to explain something or to finish or to close something out.
Even the New King James translators who kept this in there in the version in the New King James version Acknowledged the lack of support for the Johan in comma. In a textual note on this passage, they say the Nestle Allen United Bible Society text which is the modern critical text that includes all the different manuscripts that we have and it uses that to determine the original text and the majority text.
Okay, the majority text is the text that contains The readings of most of the manuscripts. That's one view or school of textual criticism criticism that says what most of them say is likely the original neither one of those texts.
They have a slightly different methods for determining what was original. Neither one contains the words of The Johan in comma neither one. Only and these are encompassing thousands of manuscripts. Remember that tens of thousands.
Okay, they don't contain them. Only four or five very late manuscripts contain these words in Greek like we saw and they admit this. So then to sum up the matter beloved. I hope you're enjoying this. This is very important stuff.
There's a very helpful summary here from the net Bible, which is also a very helpful Translation it contains very helpful textual notes like this one. It says and by the way, Daniel Wallace is the main the main editor of the net Bible modern advocates of the Textus receptus, which is Latin for received text.
This is the underlying Greek text of the King James versions.
Okay.
Which were edited by Erasmus Stefanos and Beza in the time of the Reformation. So these advocates, so basically King James only is these these folks and those varieties of people who think that the King James Bible Is either the best translation or the only translation of the Bible that is valid.
These folks generally argue for the inclusion of the of the Johan in comma on the basis of fact Heretical motivation by scribes who did not include it. So they're saying that these monks had nefarious Motives to take out the Trinity from the Bible however, these same scribes elsewhere include Thoroughly Orthodox readings about the same thing even in places where the text is receptus or the Byzantine manuscripts Which are which are also pointing to the received text don't have them so that doesn't make any sense see this is where they start contradicting history and Church history and the witnesses that we have.
Further these advocates argue theologically from the position of divine preservation Since this verse is in the received text. It must therefore be original. But that's That is circular reasoning. They're presupposing that the received text is the original text without looking at the ancient manuscripts that we do have.
You're you're putting the heart but car before the horse. You can't do that without seeing what the ancient manuscripts say and You find that they don't say it the early church didn't have them and didn't use them.
That's beyond confirmation none of the manuscripts that we have The vow the best ones have them. Most of them don't have them at all and the early church never used them. What more confirmation do you need.
They'll also say that oh, well It's possible that there's other manuscripts that we haven't discovered that contain this Johan in comma, it's possible that there may be some here and there and elsewhere or maybe they got lost from the manuscripts that we have.
That beloved is called Speculation there's no basis for it. In fact, everything that history and the textual evidence that we do have Directly contradicts it. Okay. This is why this is important to understand so that we would not be deceived by foolish and false Arguments, okay.
They the the note continues here very helpfully. In reality the issue is history not heresy. Not you know claims of heresy that are not Substantiated by history. How can one argue that the Johan in comma goes back to the original text yet does not appear until the 14th century the 1300s like we saw in any Greek manuscript whatsoever and that form that the King James Version has is Significantly different from what is actually printed in the received text the Greek version.
The wording of the received text is not found in any Greek Manuscript until guess how late? Until the 16th century until the.
1500s.
Erasmus did not even he did not include it in his first two editions of the received text. He's the one who compiled the Greek received text that the King James is based on because he said there's no witnesses for it.
There's no manuscripts for it. And he made a comment saying if I can if somebody can produce one then I'll put it in there. So what happens. Some monk? dutifully produced it which he probably Translated from a Latin version from a Latin Vulgate a later Latin Vulgate version into Greek.
And that's how it made its way in there. It's from the 1500 from the 1500s this is not I Hope this is clear for all of us. They continue such a stance does not do justice to the gospel or to truth or to history or to reality.
Faith must be rooted in history and not just in history, but in reality in truth and In the words of truth and in the God of truth and in how God uses History to Providentially preserve his words. It's not like they say The reality is very different and we cannot turn a blind eye to the blatant reality that the textual witnesses speak to.
Significantly also the German translation of Luther was based on Erasmus second edition of the received text in 1519 and it didn't have the Johan in comma either. We again because Erasmus didn't have a manuscript for it.
But.
The King James translators basing their work principally on Theodore Beza's Edition of the Greek New Testament a work which itself was fundamentally based on Erasmus third and later editions as well as Stephanus's editions Popularized the comma the Johan in comma for the English-speaking world.
This is an English This issue is more of an English Translation issue because of this history because of this history in the church. The thus the comma the Johan in comma has been a battleground for English-speaking Christians more than for others.
It's not really as much of an issue in other translational translations outside of the English.
Speaking of battlegrounds. I want to close us out with these very wise and helpful words from James White the Christian apologist James White Who very helpfully sums up the the danger of? misunderstanding this or believing false revisionist history and propaganda from these movements and I'm going to quote from His excellent book the King James only controversy.
I have a copy here. You're welcome to take it home if you like. It's an excellent book and it's also a very helpful introduction to the study of textual criticism. This is the book that helped me to convince me out to Realize the falsehood and the absurdity of the King James only ism.
He says this if indeed the Johan in comma was a part of the original writing of the Apostle John in 1st John we are forced to conclude that entire passages rich in theological meaning Like the Trinity can disappear.
Can disappear from the Greek manuscript tradition without leaving a single trace of it of the evidence for it. In Reality, the King James only advocates are arguing for a radical viewpoint on the New Testament text, which is actually very liberal.
A Viewpoint that utterly denies the tenacity of it. The pressure of the persistence and preservation of it because they're saying it's not because it's not there. So they're saying somebody took it out.
It disappeared. They have to say those things because they have to defend it in their version. Even liberal scholars will admit the outstanding purity of the New Testament text and the validity of the belief in the tenacity of that text of the of the preservation of that text here we find Otherwise very conservative people Who defend the King James Version?
Joining arms with the most destructive liberal critics and presenting a theory regarding the New Testament text that in reality destroys undermines and undercuts the very basis upon which we can have confidence and Certainty that we still have the original words of Paul or John or the Bible.
Surely this is not their intention. But in their rush to defend what is obviously a later addition to the text that entered into the King James Version by unusual circumstances with Erasmus and the monk and all those other things.
They have had to adopt a position that does this very thing it undermines the Bible itself. It's you okay. So then I guess Dan Brown was right in his Da Vinci code that Constantine edited the Bible. Took all this stuff out of it.
That's what they're saying. That's what what their position entails. What what then do we make of all of this beloved? Just like the Apostles repeatedly state in the scriptures. I Would not have you to be ignorant brethren.
I love how the King James puts it and I'm not saying that the King James Version is not the Word of God. The King James Version is the Word of God. There's only minor differences there. Between that version and the more updated textual versions that have more manuscript witnesses.
That are much better attested much more ancient thousands more. They're all it's the Word of God. It's all the Word of God. There may be a few added words there that were glosses. But it still contains the Word of God.
So I Would not have you to be ignorant like the Apostle said beloved about these important matters that affect the life and doctrine of the church and of our very foundation of the truth the words of God and our understanding of and trust in God's providence in preserving his words and his holy word.
Amen. Textual criticism is a good and necessary discipline therefore. Which enables us to know exactly what words God wrote down and preserved for us. Other religions don't have this beloved the Quran.
They edited the Quran and burned a bunch of other Differences. There was a revision in the medieval ages and Now we they don't know we don't really know if which one was authentic which one was more original, but we have So many manuscripts that we can tell which one's straight.
That's the beauty of it. We can tell which one's straightaway which one's different and these oddities. Like the Johan in comma helps us to see look none of them have this so we can tell yeah, it was added later.
We can therefore confidently say that the Apostle John did not breathe out the Johan in comma by God. But is a later interpretation by Christians About the Trinity that found its way back into the manuscript copies and mainly Latin translations of John's letter beloved.
That's the beauty of all of this We can have confidence. This is a good thing. It's not a bad thing that we have Variant readings of the text because those variants help us to determine the original ones.
That's what's so amazing. It seems counterintuitive, but that's the beauty of all of this beloved. Let us rejoice in God's Providence and preserving his words through these thousands and thousands of manuscripts beloved.
Let us rejoice and take heart that we have God's words. We have them and they haven't changed. They have not changed how do we know because the manuscript witnesses all attest to that reality Such that even the Liberals have no way around it.
Let us bow our heads in a closing word of prayer now Our precious gracious Heavenly Father. We thank you Lord for this beautiful Testimony multiple that tens of thousands of testimonies Lord in your providential Preservation of your very Breathe out words father the words that you gave to the Apostles and the prophets of old To write down for us and preserve for us So amazing is your truth and your and the preservation of it father.
Help us sort to understand these things and to seek to give us a desire for The truth of these matters father to seek to understand them as best as we can According to your words According to the the testimony of the early church as well and of the people that you've used in history To preserve and to translate for us your words father.
We thank you for all of these multiplicity of witnesses in heaven on earth.
In.
These manuscripts in The prophets and Moses Elijah and Christ in your spirit and you father with your thundering voice Crying out and declaring from heaven on earth that your son is your beloved son Christ Jesus the Savior of the world and Who satisfies all our Punishments deserve worthy of your wrath.
We thank you father for these blessings. And we thank you and we ask these things in Jesus mighty precious name. Amen. Thank you for listening to the sermons of thorn crown covenant Baptist Church where the Bible alone and the Bible in its entirety Has applied to all of faith and life.
We strive to be biblical reformed historic confessional loving discerning Christians who evangelize. Stand firm in and earnestly contend for the Christian faith. If you're looking for a church in the El Paso, Texas area or for more information about our church Sermons and ministries such as Semper Ephraim on the radio and thorn crown network podcast Please contact us at thorn crown ministries.
Calm and may the mercy peace and love of our triune God be multiplied to you.