Keep sharing good news without ads.
June 14/2026 | Genesis 14 | Expository sermon by Shayne Poirier
This is a sermon from Grace Fellowship Church at Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. If you would like to learn more about us, please visit our website at gfcedmonton .ca. You can also find us on Instagram, Grace Church, Y-E-G, all one word, or on Facebook.
We are also on Spotify, YouTube, or wherever else you listen to your favorite podcasts.
Please enjoy the following sermon. If you were to, sometimes, you know, I like to take us into time machines, right? And we travel, and we go to different times and places. If you were to join me, and we were to go to the study of Martin Luther, or when I say his study, I mean his office, where he did his studies, his work.
If you were to visit the study of Martin Luther at the pinnacle of the Protestant Reformation, it would be interesting, you would find any number of artifacts throughout that room. As we would go, you would find the desk where he spent a great deal of time laboring over God's word, seeking to mine the depths of it, that he might bring it to God's people and advance the cause of the Reformation.
You might remember the slogan that he said, that he did nothing, that he and, I believe it was, was it Philip of Amsdorf, were drinking beer? Who is it? Maybe. One of those guys. As he and his friend were drinking beer, the word of God did it all.
That at the study, at his desk, he labored over God's word. That would be one of the artifacts that you would find. You'd find an inkpot and quill, likely, where he would take his notes, probably much like the one that, as he was translating the New Testament in the Wartburg Castle, feeling that he was being confronted by Satan, grabbed a hold up and cast against the wall, leaving a stain that's still there.
You would see, likely, a copy of his German Bible that, by God's grace, with the help of Philip Melanchthon and others, he translated from the Hebrew and Greek into the German language, that he might bring the knowledge of God to the German people.
And in that study, if we were to look around, not just at the desk and the things on the desk, but on the walls, you would see, on one wall adjacent to his desk, an inscription of Psalm 118, which reads, I shall not die, but I shall live, and recount the deeds of the Lord.
And this text was inscribed by Martin Luther so that, whenever he was in his study, he could see it and be reminded of its truths. I shall not die, but I shall live, and I will recount the deeds of the Lord.
And he had very good reason to have that inscription of all the Psalms, of all the verses in the Psalms, on his wall. Rome's hatred for those who were advancing the Reformation has been well-documented.
History tells us that Rome was more than willing to shed innocent blood to halt the Reformation. If we go just a few years before Martin Luther, to 1415, we can learn of a man named Jan Hus, who took a stand against the Roman Catholic Church.
And as a result, he was summoned to the Council of Constance he was promised safe passage, but alas, as he was on his way to the Council, he was kidnapped by Rome, taken, and burned at the stake. A year later, one of his best friends and followers, a man named Jerome, was likewise arrested.
He was tortured and burned at the stake as well. Then, in subsequent years, tens of thousands of Hussites, followers of Jan Hus, who wanted to see Reformation in the church, were killed mercilessly. And then, in the decades that followed, even as Rome was not able to take the lives of those who protested their doctrine, their methodologies, what they were and what they were doing with the truth, when they couldn't kill people, they would do whatever they could to dishonor them.
So that in the decades after Jan Hus, leading up to the Protestant Reformation, we read stories like that of John Wycliffe, who was one of the earliest translators of the English Bible. Rome could not kill him, so they did the next best thing.
After he died, they dug up his bones, they burned them, they ground them up, and then they threw them in the River Swift in Lutterworth, England. And so, by Luther's day, Rome had a reputation for being cruel, bloodthirsty, and even maniacal in their efforts to stop the growing Reformation movement.
And so, that is why Martin Luther had Psalm 118 inscribed on his wall. I shall not die, I shall live, and I shall recount the deeds of the Lord. And in the words of one biographer, Luther then was cheered by the firm conviction that he was perfectly safe until his work was done.
The author writes, in this full assurance, he went bravely to meet his enemies. Indeed, he went courageously whenever duty called him. And so, Psalm 118 and verse 27, 17, excuse me, gave him then a calm assurance.
And that calm assurance allowed Luther's life to be characterized by what I might call a courageous faith. He knew the truth, he knew what he had to do to communicate the truth, he knew the cost of communicating the truth, but he also knew that God was with him.
And so, he could go with courage to fulfill the will of the Lord, the will that God had established for him in particular. Now, as we arrive at Genesis 14, how does this connect to the story? Well, in Genesis 14, what we find is another example of courageous faith, if I can call it that.
We're now in the second of three accounts that I introduced to you last week, what I referred to as the Abram Lot trilogy. And what this Abram Lot trilogy is, is it's three accounts that demonstrate the wisdom and the faithfulness of Abram in contrast to his nephew, his foolishness and his faithlessness of Lot.
In the second part of the trilogy now, we're going to see a number of things. We're gonna see the destructive effects of passivity and of sinful passivity. We're gonna see that contrasted with the virtue of courageous faithfulness, what it means to trust in the Lord and by faith to act and live with courage.
And then what we'll see is that in this story, as there is this dichotomy of sinful passivity and faithful courage, we will see that both of these accounts do not lead us to behold and stand in awe of a man like Abram or to stand in awe of Melchizedek, this king of righteousness who he has no place of birth or death, no genealogy.
But what we will see is as we look at these two accounts, we will see not the characters of the story, but the author of the story. And as we have traced all through the book of Genesis, that that seed of the woman who was to come, the Lord Jesus Christ himself, that he is the secret to courageous faithfulness or courageous faith.
So Genesis 14, not unlike every other chapter that we have been in thus far is a phenomenal chapter. And what I wanna do is take you like I have the last few weeks, maybe you've gleaned that I am just loving the book of Genesis.
I wanna take you into the story with me and look at this adventure together. And what we see is Genesis 14 neatly divided in more or less into four different parts. And so we'll look at these truths under four different headings.
And the first heading that I wanna take us to, we'll look at verses one through 12 is this, the consequences of sinful passivity. Sinful passivity and its consequences. And so we'll read verses one through 12, and then we'll look into it.
In the days of Amraphel, king of Shinar, Ariok, king of Elessar, Keterlaomer, king of Elam, and Tidal, king of Goim, these kings made war with Bera, king of Sodom, Bersha, king of Gomorrah, Shinab, king of Adma, Shemeber, king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, that is Zoar.
And all these joined forces in the valley of Sedim, that is the Salt Sea. 12 years they had served Keterlaomer, but in the 13th year, they rebelled. In the 14th year, Keterlaomer and the kings who were with him came and defeated the Rephaim in Ashtaroth-Qarnaim, the Zuzim in Ham, the Amim in Shaveh-Qirithaim, and the Horites in the hill country of Sir as far as El-Paran on the border of the wilderness.
Then they turned back and came to En-Mishpat, that is Kadesh, and defeated all the country of the Amalekites, and also the Amorites who were dwelling at Hazazon-Tamar. Then the king of Sodom, the king of Gomorrah, the king of Adma, the king of Zeboiim, and the king of Bela, that is Zoar, went out and they joined battle in the valley of Sedim, when Keterlaomer, king of Elam, Tidal, king of Goim, Amraphel, king of Shinar, and Ariok, king of Elassar, four kings against five.
Now the valley of Sedim was full of bitumen pits, and as the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah fled, some fell into them, and the rest fled to the hill country. So the enemy took all the possessions of Sodom and Gomorrah and all their provisions and went their way.
They also took Lot, the son of Abram's brother, who was dwelling in Sodom, and his possessions, and went their way. Besides being a tongue twister, what are these first 12 verses about? Well, as we come to verse one, we're transported to a scene that I would suggest was all too common in the ancient Near East at the time of Abram and his contemporaries.
You see, as societies began to reorganize themselves after Noah's flood, the world powers that would eventually dominate the region began to exercise control over local leaders and cities and other places among and along the Fertile Crescent.
And early on, what we see is that this took the form of powerful kings, kingdoms that were growing out of the soil, the wet soil of the flood, the post-Diluvian soil. Powerful kings began to conquer their weaker civilizations around them and made them vassal states to serve their interests.
And so what you ended up with was a dynamic where you had a few growing powers in the world that were dominating all the others that were servile to them. In ancient Canaan, including Sodom and Gomorrah, where Abram and his family find themselves, there's no exception to this.
And so verse one then introduces us to the four powerful kings who held sway over this region that Abraham's lot nephew moved into. And it's really important. You know, we see the names of these kings repeated.
We need to ask ourselves, why is that? Structure conveys meaning. That's an important hermeneutical rule, an important rule in Bible interpretation. When we see structure like the chiasm that we saw last week, it is telling us something.
There is a message even in its structure, even in the repetition. And so what I wanna do is spend a couple of minutes looking at the first verse, those four kings that were introduced to in verse one, and then who are repeated in some length in verse five, and then who are repeated again in verse nine, and then who are mentioned throughout.
The first person that we see in verse one is this. Amraphel, king of Shinar, Shinar. Now, what's interesting is we don't know the identity of Amraphel. That's often the case with these kings, but we know a lot about the places where they come from.
I'm not sure if anyone here knows where Shinar is, but Shinar was just another name for a place called Babylonia. And Babylonia, if you know anything about the ancient Near East and Mesopotamia, Babylonia was located in Mesopotamia, literally between the two rivers, between Tigris and the Euphrates rivers.
And it was located roughly 900 kilometers northeast of Sodom and Gomorrah in what is now central Iraq. Babylonia, as you know, would become the great world-dominating power with its capital Babylon, which we see repeated again and again and again in Scripture, not only in our Old Testaments, but in our New Testaments.
The next king that we're introduced to, not only Amraphel, but Ariok, king of Elisar. Now, what's interesting about Ariok is that Ariok actually does appear at a few places in history. We find him in ancient archives that were in the 18th and 15th century.
And what's more interesting about Ariok is the place where he comes from, Elisar. What this is is likely the Hebrew equivalent of the Akkadian phrase, not Elisar, but Elashur, from which we get the modern word Assyria.
And now this located relative to Sodom and Gomorrah and then Babylon, Assyria was located just north of Babylon along the border of where we would find Iraq and Turkey today. One of the prominent kings that appears in this list is Keter Laomer, the third king of Elam.
And Keter Laomer, my kids and I were joking yesterday, I had them guessing the name of Lol and Lena's son. I said, what do you think his name is? What do you think his name could be? And I'd been studying, I said, maybe they should name him Melchizedek.
That would be a good name. I got to thinking, boy, what a joy it would be if today they had announced that their son's name was Keter Laomer. Now, Keter Laomer might sound like an odd name, but interestingly of the 40 kings that ruled over Elam, many of them have part of that or all of that included in their name.
And Keter Laomer roughly translated from the Akkadian means servant. And I think that that name servant probably serves a purpose because it tells us a little bit about what this man is going to do ultimately in the plan of God in the world.
And he was king of Elam. Now, Elam sounds not all that familiar except when we start to think about the Elamites. The Elamites appear several times in the Bible. One of the prominent places where we learn about the Elamites is on the day of Pentecost as the men were given the gift of tongues and began speaking the praises of God, we're told that the Elamites were there hearing the praises of God in their own language.
And then the last king in this list was Tidal, king of Goim. And we don't know who Tidal was, but we know that Goim was the Hebrew word for nation. So it might've been that the Tidal was either the leader of a group of nations who were all conglomerated together or a nation that we no longer have any record of.
And so what we see in verse one then is this alliance of four kings who are now forming the burgeoning powerhouse of the new world. And when we get to verse two, we see something even more interesting than this.
As we come to verse two, we were introduced to the names of the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah. Their names are Barah and Bershah. And what's interesting is we can go back into history and look at Sodom and Gomorrah and the records that we do have about them.
And one of the things is we never find kings named Sodom and Gomorrah, but it's very likely that this is the case because Barah and Bershah were not in fact their actual names, but were a play on words.
Aaron, I think of you brother and your studies in Hebrew. When we look at Barah and Bershah, what we see is a remarkable similarity to two Hebrew words that are closely related to the character of this particular place.
The word Barah sounds remarkably similar to the Hebrew word Raah, which means evil. While Bershah can be very closely related to the Hebrew word Rasha, from which we get wicked. And we should not be surprised by this because if you look with me in Genesis chapter 13 and verse 13, we're told, now the men of Sodom were wicked.
And so what we end up having here is we have these world powers that are on the scene. They're approaching Sodom and Gomorrah. And as we're introduced to the kings, we have King Evil of Sodom and King Wicked of Gomorrah.
And it's gonna play an important role as we get further along in our story. And what ends up happening is this. King Barah and King Bershah, and some of the other countries that are in the Valley of Setim, near the Salt Sea, as it were, Shinnab, Shemeber, and the King of Bela, they all came under the punishing control of these superpowers.
And so they do what many would want to do. If you're a young child on the playground and there's some bullies in the playground, you don't wanna take it, you form an alliance, right? You gather your friends and you say, okay, I'll give you my cheese sandwich for protection on the playground.
I'll create my group. And certainly we see this in prison culture, if not in playground culture, though I think there are some similarities. But in verse three then, we see that they form an alliance.
They join forces. And they served Keterleomer for 12 years. But as they begin to grow strong in this alliance, they grow bold and they decide no more after the 12 years. And so the 13th year, they cast off their overlords and they say, we're gonna stand up for ourselves.
We're not going to serve you anymore. We're not gonna give you the profits of our labors. If you want it, you can come get it. And you'd almost think that maybe at this point, they truly believed that they had the military might that was needed to stand up to these superpowers.
But if there was any delusions of grandeur, they're quickly clarified in verse five. Because in verse five, we read, in the 14th year, Keterleomer and the kings who were with him came and defeated the Rephaim.
They've now entered in, okay, you're going to seek to buck our control. We're gonna come and we're gonna take you over. And there's an interesting detail in the story that if Keterleomer and his allies were truly afraid of Sodom and Gomorrah, it's very likely that they would have gone first to Sodom and Gomorrah, right?
The troops are fresh. We have everybody, we have no casualties whatsoever. We're gonna go and we're gonna defeat this mighty force. But that's not the sequence that we see in verse five. What we see is Keterleomer, gotta remember they're located northeast, if you're looking at me, northeast of Sodom and Gomorrah.
And the very first place they go is far southwest. And so they head down towards Egypt. And in verse five, we see that they first land in amongst the Rephaim, in Ashtoreth-Carnaeum. Now, what's interesting is I can take you down all of these little journeys to show you where these things are and what the significance is.
But the Rephaim had a reputation for being giants in the land. We actually see it sandwiched in verse five and verse seven. So they go to what they think is going to be the most formidable foe. And then as they make their way, they begin making their way northward, northward and southward and westward, not only from Rephaim in Ashtoreth-Carnaeum, but then as well to the Horites in verse six in the hill country.
And then in verse seven, to En-Mishpat, that is Kadesh, that's again southwest of Sodom and Gomorrah, to the country of the Amalekites. So again, if you're not familiar with the Rephaim, you're probably familiar with the Amalekites who were also known for being giants in the land as Moses was entering into the land with the people.
And you can picture it this way. As these four kings come down, they begin defeating all of the enemies or to the south. And then Sodom and Gomorrah are simply between them and home. And so their view of Sodom and Gomorrah was not one of fear and of trembling that these men had rebelled, but it's something akin to the husband being asked by the wife to bring home groceries on his way home from work, right?
On your way home, bring this. And so they do, they pass through these lands, they defeat these lands. And then it's kind of cute as we get to verse eight, that the king of Sodom, the king of Gomorrah, and these other kings, they go out to join in battle in the valley of Sidim.
They've mustered their military might, as it were, to take on these other kings. But verse 10 and verse 11 tell us how the battle goes. In verse 10, we read that the valley was full of bitumen pits. And the king of Sodom and Gomorrah and their men, they fled.
It's interesting, this would have been the land that they were familiar with. And yet, nevertheless, in their haste to get away from the four kings, they fall into their own bitumen pits. If anyone works here in petroleum, you'll know what bitumen is.
Bitumen is a product that comes from the soil. It's a petroleum product that we make asphalt out of. And so it's that black, sticky, tarry stuff. And if you were to go to the Dead Sea today, you'd find those bitumen pits are still there.
And so here they are falling, as it were, into pits of wet asphalt. Some have even said, because they were familiar with the land, perhaps they would rather die by the bitumen pits than by the sword. And so they dove into the bitumen pits themselves.
But eventually what happens is these four kings overtake the five kings and all of their military fairly quickly. It's recounted all in a single verse in verse 10. And then in verse 11, the rest happens.
That the enemies take all the possessions of Sodom and Gomorrah, all of their provisions, and then went their way. So quite literally, going, picking up the groceries, and heading back to Babylon and to Syria and all of the other places northeast of Sodom and Gomorrah.
But as we get to verse 12, it's really interesting. The story would almost be over. Maybe we wouldn't have even heard the story if there was no verse 12. But alas, in verse 12, we find something that makes the story significant.
In verse 12, we read, they also took Lot, the son of Abram's brother, who was dwelling in Sodom and his possessions, and went their way. So as they go through the land, they not only pick up their groceries from Sodom and Gomorrah, but they pick up Abram's nephew, Lot.
And there's something that we might be keen to overlook in this whole passage if we read it quickly. But if we slow down just a moment, I wanna ask you, where was Lot? You might recall that in Genesis chapter 13, he moved into the valley adjacent to Sodom and Gomorrah.
But as we get into chapter 14, verse 13, verse 12, excuse me, we read this, that Lot, the son of Abram's brother, was dwelling in Sodom. This is interesting, that Lot had moved in. He had made friends with the wicked city and was now dwelling passively in it.
Now, what's interesting about the Abram-Lot trilogy as we go through, remember, these are found in chapter 13, chapter 14, and then chapters 18 and 19. Every time we encounter Lot, what we encounter about him is this, that he gets closer and closer and closer to Sodom.
In chapter 13, in verse 12, we read that he settled among the cities of the valley and moved his tent as far as Sodom. So moved his tent as it were to the border of Sodom. In here in chapter 13, in verse 12, we read that now, or chapter 14, verse 12, we read that he was dwelling in Sodom.
And then if you go with me to Genesis chapter 19, and verse one, where do we find Lot? Genesis 19, one, and Lot was sitting in the gate of Sodom. When Lot saw them, these are the men that were coming in, he rose to meet them and bowed himself with his face to the earth.
Now, what's interesting is where did the respected men of the city, the citizens of the city sit? They sat at the gate, right? Dealing with the affairs of the city. It's almost like town council, as it were.
And so what we see in Lot is this passive drift, not just from a dweller in the valley as far as Sodom, but a man living in Sodom, and then eventually a respected citizen of Sodom. A fixture in the city.
So that each time we find Lot in these situations, that the consequences or the drift into the association with sinful Sodom gets worse. And the consequences get more severe. Now eventually, we'll see that it not only leads to his kidnap, it not only leads to the plundering of his property, but the death of his wife, the despicable actions that he commits with his daughters, and then the shame that would be forever immortalized in God's word as a warning to any who would follow after him.
As we look at these first 12 verses of Genesis chapter 14, what do we find? What do we make of this? What is the so what of this passage? This long list of kings and a short account of military conquest.
Brothers and sisters, one of the things that I think we see, what's held in juxtaposition to what we will see in the life of Abram is this. It is a cautionary tale of the deceptiveness and of the destructiveness of sin.
Here is a man who passively tolerated sin near him, and then who passively tolerated sin around him, and then engaged in the sin himself until his life was destroyed. I think of a quote by the Puritan Thomas Manton that describes this well.
He says, it is Satan's custom by small sins to draw us to greater. It is the little sticks that set the great ones on fire. It is the wisp of straw that kindles a block of wood. And we need to see this, that one of the great, often unrecognized causes of sin, and the difficulty, the judgment, the challenges that come with that sin.
In this world, it's not just intentional acts, but it's passivity and it's cowardice. That here we have Lot, who should have known better. He should have seen what Sodom was like. He should have known not to live in the midst of Sodom.
He should have seen as the four kings began to approach Sodom, knowing what alliances were taking place, what vassals, vassal covenants had been broken. He should have seen this and he should have fled.
But alas, he grew comfortable in that sinful place. And we need to see this, that one of the greatest contributors to sin and to sinful actions and to sinful omissions in our life is the very thing that led to the fall in the garden.
That it was Adam who was with his wife Eve, who watched her take the fruit, who took of it himself. It's passivity. It is cowardice. But to resist sin is not something that can be done passively. It's not something that we can do simply by staying put.
As I've heard, or as I've said, as you have heard so many times before, we don't drift towards holiness. We drift towards sin. But to go to holiness requires action. That's why we see in places like 1 Corinthians 6 .18, flee from sexual sin.
Or James chapter four and verse seven, resist the devil and he will flee. Or Hebrews 3 .13, but exhort one another every day, as long as it is called today, that none of you may be hardened by the deceitfulness of sin.
Or places like 2 Corinthians 6 .17, therefore go out from their midst and be separated from them, says the Lord, and touch no unclean thing, and then I will welcome you. That passivity and drifting and a lack of doing leads to sin.
And what we see, what's remarkably interesting about this is Genesis, as I've sought to point out over the last number of weeks, is biblical theological in everything that it does. So that every thread, that every highway, every redemptive historical highway that we see in scripture, every thread that we see drawn through the whole text of scripture, all of God's redemptive history begins in the book of Genesis.
That's why it's such a wonderful book, because we come place after place after place, as it were, to a brand new highway that's going to take us somewhere. And what we see here is this. Maybe I'll ask you this question.
Who are the nations that would eventually be used to discipline the northern kingdom in Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah? Does anyone recall? Assyria and Babylon. Then in Isaiah chapter 10 and verse five, God would say about Assyria, that Assyria was the rod, he says, the rod of my anger, that he would use them to discipline the nation.
Meanwhile, he spoke of Nebuchadnezzar in Jeremiah chapter 25 and verses eight and nine, calling Nebuchadnezzar his servant, much like the name Keter Laomer that we see in this chapter as well. That perhaps there is here a precursor of future judgment, not only for Sodom and Gomorrah, who they would meet their final end in Genesis chapter 19.
Here's a warning, I'm gonna send my messengers, but it's a messenger as it were as well to the nation of Israel, that this is the consequence of sin. I will send my rod, I will send my servant. If you do not address your sin, they will address your sin for you.
There are consequences for sinful passivity. But then we see a second truth here. And this is courageous faithfulness and its results. The results of courageous faithfulness. We read it in verses 13 through 16.
Then one who had escaped came and told Abram, the Hebrew, who was living by the oaks of Mamre, the Amorite, brother of Eshcol and of Anur, these were the allies of Abram. When Abram heard that his kinsmen had been taken captive, he led forth his trained men, born in this house, 318 of them and went in pursuit as far as Dan.
And he divided his forces against them by night, he and his servants and defeated them and pursued them to Hobah, north of Damascus. Then he brought back all the possessions and also brought back his kinsmen lot with his possessions and the women and the people.
Now what's really interesting about the story is that these four kings probably would have had a trouble-free exit from the region if not for that one passenger that they brought along. That they bring Lot in verse 12, off they go, and in God's good providence and God's kind providence, one man escapes.
And that man goes to, we read, Abram, the Hebrew. Now that word Hebrew, that's the first time we see the word Hebrew in all of the Bible here in Genesis chapter 14. It's the Hebrew word ivri, which likely refers to Abram being a descendant of Eber, from which we get Hebrew.
And we're told that Abram was living amongst his allies. These were people that he was living in, they were bound likely by a treaty as they lived together. And as Abram hears about his nephew Lot, he gathers together his 318 trained men and off they go.
Now there's some significance there. It's funny when you look at this text and various commentators, they will say that 318 has to do with numerology and we can trace the numerology of that number to various things.
I went down that rabbit trail this week and decided I'll just mention that there's something there, but I'm not sure that there's a whole lot there. But it is significant, the number 318, because on one hand, if we had a church of 318, we would say that's a fairly sizable church.
But if we had an army of 318, we'd say that is a very significant, insignificant army. And so Abram takes his insignificant army of 318 trained men and off they go in pursuit of the four kings who remember, starting in the south, defeated the regions of giants and then other regions in between and then another region of giants and then five cities with their alliance and off they go.
And here Abram with his 318 men are in hot pursuit. And as they go, we see the lengths to which Abram goes to rescue Lot. It was not an insignificant distance to go as far as Dan. Oftentimes when we see Israel measured, it speaks about Dan as the northernmost part of Israel.
And so to travel from Sodom and Gomorrah, that region there or where Abram was in Mamre, to up to Dan would have been about 180 kilometers from the southern reaches of Canaan all the way to the northern part of the land.
And something unique happens in this account that up until now, we've only heard of Abram, the man of faith. We've heard of Abram, the sojourner. We've heard of Abram and his many possessions, his animals and some of his people.
But we get a new picture of Abram and it is this, it is Abram, the warrior. And we see the exceptional military prowess of Abram in this passage. We see it in the language of verses 14 and 15. When he heard, he took his kinsmen.
And we read, he went in pursuit as far as Dan that about 180 kilometers or so. He divided his forces against them by night. So using the cover of darkness and the element of surprise. And we read these words, he defeated them.
And then again, that he pursued them. And so in an act of courageous faith, Abram leads his men. He uses this element of surprise, the cover of night, and he overtakes these four kings and their army.
And then if that weren't enough, as he defeats them, pursuing them further, he goes as far as Damascus and a little bit further north, which would have been about another 100 kilometers. So to put it in perspective, it's like learning that your nephew has been taken.
He's made all the wrong decisions in the world. He's placed himself in the worst possible situation. The trouble was coming. The writing was on the wall. You knew it, it was gonna come. And yet he's taken captive and Abram and his 318 men against a military of an untold number, pursues them roughly the distance of Edmonton to Calgary to overtake them and get his nephew Lot back.
And then what we're left with then is this picture of Abram, the man of faith, but also Abram, the man of courageous faith. Abram, the warrior. Now, what do we do with all of this again? Well, I think it's helpful to understand that there was a reason why this account was recorded in such detail.
But if someone, this is a question I'm looking for an answer for. Who was the inspired author of the book of Genesis? Moses, right? And what was Moses doing as he was writing this? He was leading his people through the wilderness.
And where were they going? They were going back to the promised land. And who were they going to encounter? They were going to encounter giants. They were going to encounter warriors. They were going to encounter leaders of city states with all of their military might.
So that what we see here is that as Moses is recounting Genesis chapter 14, and this is why I've titled this sermon courageous faith, is he is seeking to impart courage in his readers. That as we cross the river, as we go into this land, as we encounter giants, as we encounter foes, as we encounter enemies, what do we have?
We have the same God and that same God who is on our side. And I shall not live, but I will live. I shall not die, I will live, and I will recount the deeds of the Lord. And so here we have Moses writing this account, bringing it to the nation.
It's intended to be a story to inspire courage in his readers. And it should instill, brothers and sisters, that same courage in each of us. Maybe you wondered where I was going when I'm talking about just Lot sitting there in Sodom, talking about sinful passivity.
I mean, what is the big deal about that? Well, the big deal about that is if you are sinfully passive then you are not courageously faithful or faithfully courageous. If Lot's passive life in Sodom is the problem and the sin to be avoided, then Abram's courageous faith is the solution to be imitated.
And brothers and sisters, as I stand before you, one of the things that I wanna say, one of the things I think I need to say as a result and implication of this passage is this, we are not cowards and we must not be cowards.
Our brother prayed about Bill C -9 as we were in our pastoral prayer time. That's something that I've been thinking about. No doubt many of you have been thinking about. What if it becomes illegal for us as Christians to hold to biblical views?
What if it becomes illegal for us to evangelize? What if it becomes illegal for the man who stand behind this pulpit to speak truths about what scripture teaches? If ever there was a time perhaps to be reminded of our call to a courageous faith, maybe this is another one of those times.
It might not be the time. Maybe it's a semicolon rather than a period, but it is a time to be reminded that we must be prepared to do whatever the Lord calls us to do in order to be faithful. That we must have a courageous faith, not because we possess anything in ourselves, but because the power, the force behind it is God.
That we serve the same God that Abram served. We serve the same God that Moses served. We serve the same God who all the courageous men and women of faith throughout the Bible served. And I was thinking about, I'm always seeking to illustrate this point, and I thought there is just no shortage of illustrations in the Bible that speak to what it means to have a courageous faith.
I think of Joshua and the nation of Israel, but perhaps taking some inspiration from this very passage, from this very account, stood before his people in Joshua chapter one in verse nine and said, have I not commanded you?
Not suggested, have I not suggested? It's my opinion that maybe, have I not commanded you? Be strong and courageous. Do not be frightened and do not be dismayed. Why? For the Lord your God is with you wherever you go.
This is the strength behind the Christian's courage. This is the power behind the one of courageous faith. It is not that we possess it, it is that God possesses it. I think of David when he went before Goliath.
Only a boy named David, only a little sling, right? He goes there with his stones before this giant of a man. And where was his confidence? His confidence was in this. You are a blasphemer of the God of gods, of the one true God.
And I know because you are a blasphemer and I am on God's side that you will lose the battle. Elijah, before the prophets of Baal, if you've been reading in our Bible reading plan, we just read that passage, Goliath and the prophets of Baal.
What does he do? He sets up, there are two competing altars that are set up. We see the prophets of Baal cutting themselves with lances, crying out. Elijah says, what is he relieving himself? Has your God gone on a journey?
Where has he gone? And then what does he do? He sets up his altar, he places the wood upon it, they pour water on top, he calls out to God and boom! Exactly, Daniel six in the lion's den. Or the Lord Jesus Christ.
In Luke 9 .51, when we read, when the days drew near for him to be taken up, he set his face to go to Jerusalem. What was in Jerusalem? The cross, Golgotha, the jeering crowds who spat on him and who tore out his beard, that was in Jerusalem.
Brothers and sisters, whatever the Lord calls us to do, he will provide the strength to accomplish that very purpose. And we need not fear anything. As a matter of fact, the cowards, when we read in the book of Revelation, that the cowards are depicted as those who do not inherit eternal life.
Cowardice is not one of the characteristics of a person of God, of a man or woman of God. Proverbs 28 .1 tells us, the wicked flee when no one pursues, but the righteous are bold as a lion. Psalm 112 and verse seven, he is not afraid of bad news, speaking of the righteous man, his heart is firm, trusting in the Lord.
Isaiah 26 .3, you keep him in perfect peace, whose mind is stayed on you because he trusts in you. We've been called to a courageous faithfulness. And some people have looked at this passage and said, Abram, as he goes and pursues Lot, he is a type of Christ.
He's a picture of what Christ does for us, that he pursues at great length. And while I think that that's an interesting interpretation, I'm not exactly sure that that's what God is getting at here. But I do agree with Calvin, which is maybe he takes a mediating position.
He says, God out of compassion to Lot, raised up Abram as his avenger and liberator to rescue him when a captive from the hand of the enemy, in which acts the incredible goodness and benevolence of God towards his people.
That when we act with courage, courageous faith, we glorify God in it. Now, having looked at these two things, the question we might ask is how does this point to Christ? And beginning in verse 17, I wanna show you what I'm calling the necessity of divine deliverance.
And we'll read verses 17 through 20. After his return from the defeat of Keterleomer and the kings who were with him, the king of Sodom went out to meet him at the valley of Sheveh, that is the king's valley.
And Melchizedek, king of Salem, brought out bread and wine. He was priest of God most high. And he blessed him and said, blessed be Abram by God most high, possessor of heaven and earth. And blessed be God most high, who has delivered your enemies into your hand.
And Abram gave him a 10th of everything. There is, it's been said that there is one enigma or one primary enigma in the book of Genesis. And Melchizedek is that enigma. What do we do with this man? Probably every time you read the book of Hebrews, you read about, you read in Hebrews chapter five and Hebrews chapter seven, or maybe you're in Psalms, you go to Psalm 110, you read about this man named Melchizedek, you go, okay, Christ is a priest forever in the order of Melchizedek.
I'm not sure what that means, but I gotta keep reading, right? I think most people, they look at Melchizedek and he is the enigma of Genesis. I remember hearing John Piper speak about Melchizedek once, and he said, I don't know what to do with Melchizedek.
What do you do with Melchizedek? Well, I want to give you at least, I'm not going to, this probably could be at least five sermons based on my finite mind, what I could say about Melchizedek, but I'll say these things.
When we get to verse 17, it's important, sometimes it's good to read your Bible with a Bible atlas because it'll tell you where you are. But in verse 17, we read that they go to the Valley of Sheveh, that is the King's Valley.
Now, where is the Valley of Sheveh? If you were to go to Israel today and you were to go to Jerusalem and go to the wall outside of the old city, the valley that is adjacent to the wall, that's where you would find the King's Valley.
It was a valley exactly next to Jerusalem, or at that time, a place called Salem, of which Melchizedek is king. You can see where Salem might fit into Jerusalem, right? Jerusalem. Salem. And so they go in verse 17 to the Valley of Sheveh, the King's Valley, and they're greeted by this man named Melchizedek.
And it's important for us to see this, that Melchizedek, as he comes, he brings bread and wine. And what does Abram do with it? They receive the bread and wine. And he blessed him and said, blessed be God.
Now, what's interesting is that Melchizedek, if we were to translate his name, it comes from two Hebrew words. The first one is Malki, or Malki, which meaning my king, and tzedek, which means righteousness or justice.
That's why in Hebrews chapter seven and verse two, we see that Abram, or that Melchizedek, sorry, is called the King of Righteousness. And that as King of Salem, he is the King of peace. Shalom, right?
Shalom, Salem, peace. And so Melchizedek, as we look in the Bible, it's only mentioned in Psalm 110, in Hebrews chapter five through chapter seven. And so Melchizedek, the King of Salem, the ancient King of Jerusalem, if I can say it that way, and Psalm 76 takes us there, you can write that down and look that up at some point.
Melchizedek, King of Salem, comes to Abram. And there's something highly unusual about Melchizedek. That Melchizedek is called a priest-king. Now, in that world, it was common to have a priest. It was common to have a king, but it was not common to have a priest-king, a king who serves both the function of leading the people militarily, governmentally, as well then as a priest, spiritually.
And so Melchizedek comes and he blesses Abram. And it's interesting that he blesses Abram in the name of the Most High God. Now, different people have looked at this and said, well, Melchizedek, he's a pagan king, right?
He's living in the land of Canaan. He can only be a pagan king. And so we can't be blessing Abram by the name of the true God, but it is interesting. He's a priest of the Most High God. And then in verse 19, blessed be Abram by God Most High, and blessed be God Most High, who has delivered your enemies into your hand.
Here, Melchizedek uses a, or at least the text uses the phrase, for God Most High, El Elyon, which is a very similar title that we see used all throughout the book of Genesis. And we know, in fact, that Abram receives this, not as the words of a pagan king, but as the words of a true follower of God, because he adopts the language himself.
In verse 20, let me see this here, excuse me, verse 22. But Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lifted my hand to the Lord, God Most High, possessor of heaven and earth. So Abram adopts the language of Melchizedek, this king of Salem.
But it's interesting, I said this last week. I said, if you have an LSB, you'll see the word Yahweh in place of Lord. And that can be really helpful, that a person is a worshiper of Yahweh, not just a worshiper of any other God.
If you have the LSB, or if you have a version that does that, you'll actually see that Abram, in verse 22, takes the covenant name of God, the covenantal name, the Tetragrammaton, Yahweh, and includes it with El Elyon, so that it is Lord, God Most High.
Now, there's so many rabbit trails I could chase here, but what I want to make the case is this, that what we see in Melchizedek is a true follower of God. That there is Abram in the land, he is a man, he is a true worshiper of God, he has been called out of Ur of the Chaldees to worship God.
There's another man in the land who worships the same God. His name is Melchizedek, he is the king of Salem. And so he is a man who, like Abram, is a man of the true God. Now, that tells us maybe a little bit about Melchizedek, but I don't think it has yet satisfied your question and my question, who is Melchizedek?
Who is he actually? Why is he invoked in Psalm 10? Why is he invoked in the book of Hebrews? There are many, I think, as I looked, there are nine different, how many, that's nine, there are nine different perspectives on who Melchizedek is.
If you ask some Jewish rabbis, they would say that he is Michael the archangel, that he's an angelic being, he has no genealogy, he's, in some ways, it's kind of like the Jehovah's Witnesses, I suppose, but you've got Michael the archangel, he appears, and he appears now to bless Abram, and that these rabbis would ascribe to Michael the archangel as Melchizedek, the power to make atonement for sin and to punish the wicked.
I don't know how they get that, but they get that. During the intertestamental period, another theme or another theory emerged amongst the Jews in that time, and they said that Melchizedek was, he was actually the son of Noah, the man Shem.
Now, Shem would have been alive during that time because he lived 600 years, and this was well within that 600-year period after the flood, and so they said, well, it's obviously Shem. Again, I don't know how they reached that conclusion.
In the early centuries of the church, what we see is that there were certain heretical groups that began to say, well, Melchizedek is actually the incarnate Christ, and they went so far as to say, this is a direct quotation, Melchizedek was God the Word before he took flesh or was born of Mary.
Who was Melchizedek? Was he an angel? Was he Noah's son? Was he God incarnate, or was he a guy? What does scripture tell us? Well, if we go to Hebrews chapter seven in verse three for a moment, let's do that together.
I'm almost done, I promise. In Hebrews chapter seven in verse three, we read this. He is without father or mother or genealogy, having neither beginning of days nor end of life, but resembling the son of God, he continues a priest forever.
Well, we see that Hebrews chapter seven clarifies that early church heresy, or at least I shouldn't say it's a church heresy, but the view of those early church heretics. We also read that he resembles the son of man, but also that, what does it mean that he is without father or mother?
Well, I think that the Syriac Peshitta, which is another translation, it's interesting. You look at other translations to see how they interpreted things at their time. The way that they interpret that passage is that they say that he was a man whose father and mother are not written in genealogies, that he was a man that we simply have no genealogical record for.
In God's good providence, he made it so that we don't know where he came from. We don't know where he goes, but alas, he is a priest king. He's a man who is a king. He's a man who is a priest. He's blessing Abram.
So that R .C. Sproul, he concludes this, that Melchizedek was probably a Canaanite who knew the true God. He was a guy. He was a man who worshiped God just like Abram. Another commentator says, "'We can see in him nothing more "'than one perhaps the last of the witnesses and confessors "'of the early revelation of God, "'coming out into the light of history "'from the dark night of heathenism.'".
Another follower who knew of this God and who worshiped him. In Hebrews 7 .15, tells us that Christ would come in the likeness of Melchizedek. He is not Christ. John MacArthur says the Levitical priesthood was hereditary, but Melchizedek's was not.
His parentage and origin are unknown because they were irrelevant to his priesthood. Melchizedek was not the pre-incarnate Christ, as some maintain, but similar to Christ in that his priesthood was universal, royal, righteous, peaceful, and unending.
And so what we have then in Melchizedek, praise God, every time you read Psalm 110, every time you read Hebrews chapter seven and you try to make sense of this, you can ask yourself, who is Melchizedek?
He was a faithful Canaanite in a pagan land, the last bit of light in a world of heathenism. We don't have his genealogy, and we don't have his genealogy for good reason because his priesthood demonstrates that there can be priests who are not part of the Levitical genealogy, not part of the Levitical lineage, but you can have a true priest and a true priest-king.
We don't know where he came from. We don't know where he's going, but he is in fact a true priest-king. And Matthew Poole, another commentator, says Melchizedek then is an illustrious type of Christ, that he is a type of the Lord Jesus, that as we see Melchizedek, we don't see Jesus, but we see a type of Jesus, a man who points us to Jesus, who points us to the ultimate priest-king, the Lord Jesus.
Melchizedek is a type of Christ who came as a priest-king to bless unworthy sinners, as it were. He's a typological Christ figure who arrives on the scene to remind Abram that it was God Most High who delivered Abram.
We see that, that he has delivered your enemies into your hand. And what's interesting is that we see another highway, another redemptive historical highway of what has been called the royal priesthood.
This line that runs all throughout scripture. But Melchizedek, I suppose, isn't the beginning of the highway, he is an on-ramp back onto that highway. You see, when Adam and Eve were put in the garden to work and to keep the garden, it was priesthood language.
They were put there in the presence of God, in the garden temple, as it were, to know God, to minister to God. But alas, what did they do? They fell from that place, so that they forsook their duties as priest-king.
We see some of that picked up elsewhere, but Melchizedek is another example of that priest-king lineage. We see it again in parts of Abram, some suggest in David, but most certainly we see it in the Lord Jesus Christ.
In Hebrews 7 .21, we read, "'But this one was made a priest with an oath "'by the one who said to him, "'The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind. "'You are a priest forever.'. "'This makes Jesus the guarantor of a better covenant.'".
That Melchizedek points us to the priest, who in Hebrews 9 and verse 24 tells us, he entered not into the holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf.
What did that priest-king do? Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world.
But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself. And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ having been offered once to bear the sins of many will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him.
That Melchizedek pictures a priest. We don't know where he came from. We know where Jesus came from. The world doesn't know where he came from. They don't know where he went. We know where he went. And he will save those.
He is coming back. He will appear a second time, not to deal with sin, but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him. And then in this last part of the whole chapter, I said to Sam, I think we're getting to the place we can't do whole chapters at once.
Verse 20, and Abram gave him a 10th of everything. And the king of Sodom said to Abram, give me the persons, but take the goods for yourself. I should say, Abram gave Melchizedek a 10th of everything.
And then the king of Sodom comes. Give me the persons, but take the goods for yourself. But Abram said to the king of Sodom, I have lifted my hand to the Lord, God most high, possessor of heaven and earth, that I would not take a thread or a sandal strap or anything that is yours, lest you should say I have made Abram rich.
I will take nothing, but what the young men have eaten and the share of the men who went with me, let Aner, Eshcol, and Mamre take their share. What's interesting is this. We see Abram, he comes into contact with Melchizedek, this priest king, and what does he do?
But he gives a 10th of everything that he has earned. We know that the king of Sodom is going to come and say, you can take it all. Just give us back our people. Abram will have nothing of it, but he gives a 10th to Melchizedek.
It's an act of worship, not to Melchizedek, but to Yahweh, God most high. Again, just like we saw last week, the scene leaves us, it ends with worship. And this is remarkable, that the priest king that Melchizedek was points us to the priest king who Christ is, and if I can go so far, points us to the priest kings that we are on this earth.
What are you talking about? First Peter chapter two and verse nine. But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness, like Abram, into his marvelous light.
Once you were not a people, but now you are God's people. Once you have not received mercy, but now you have received mercy. It's remarkable. Abram is dealing with Melchizedek, the king of righteousness.
He gives a 10th of everything. And then you have king evil from Sodom who comes, he says, I don't want anything that you have to offer. It is worship without compromise. Abram recognizes who these two kings are, what they represent.
He sees in one, the offspring of the woman, and the other, the offspring of the serpent. He's happy to receive bread and wine from Melchizedek. He will receive nothing from King Barah. Abram shows his integrity by not receiving anything.
One says this, God, or goods from Sodom, would be the ultimate in all that was desirable in the luxury of the time. Abram had no use for them, as he worked out a counterculture on the bare hills. His logic was explicably one to the eye of faith, but the Lord was not slow to see and reassure him.
Where I wanna take us is this, as we see Abram worshiping, worshiping God, not Melchizedek, worshiping God, I wanna tell you that as we live a life of courageous faith, it's not just about avoiding sinful passivity, but it's about engaging in courageous faith, it's about looking to the object of that faith, the ultimate priest, King Jesus Christ, and it's about worshiping him without compromise.
We owe nothing to the world, we need nothing from the world, but we owe everything, everything, everything to Christ. Psalm 110, one of those other strange Melchizedek passages, if you turn there with me, I know I'm going long, I gotta keep you awake, but Psalm 110 in verse three, we see a picture of the way that God's people interact with this priest, King Jesus, who comes in the order of Melchizedek.
Verses one and two, speak about the Lord, sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool, your footstool. The Lord sends forth from Zion, verse two, your mighty scepter, rule in the midst of your enemies, and then what in verse three?
Your people will offer themselves freely on the day of your power. In holy garments, from the womb of the morning, the dew of your youth will be yours. What we do when we see this priest, King Jesus, we do what Abram did, we give 10%.
I don't believe in a New Testament tithe, but sure, give your tithe, but then you give it all. That Christ, who is your life, he gets it all. He gets everything. He's the King of kings and the Lord of lords, and he deserves our all.
You wouldn't believe how much of my notes I didn't say today, but I'll leave it this way. Shouldn't Psalm 118, should not just be on Martin Luther's wall, it should be on the wall of your heart as well, that so long as we serve God, we shall not die, we shall live, and if we live, brothers and sisters, let us recount the deeds of the Lord.
Let's pray.
Thank you for listening to another sermon from Grace Fellowship Church. You can find us on our website at gfcedmonton .ca, or you can find us on Instagram at gracechurchyig, all one word, or on Facebook at Grace Fellowship Church.
We pray that you have been thoroughly blessed by this recording. God bless you and take care.