Is the War in Ukraine Part of the Great Collapse before the Great Reset — Peter Hammond

The Great Collapse and the One-Dimensional Narrative

Is the war in Ukraine part of the Great Collapse before the Great Reset? The globalists have been planning to stage a Great Collapse as a prerequisite for what they call the Great Reset, what we could call the Great Revolution.

With rising resistance to the dragged out pandemic, plandemic, scandemic, panic propaganda, the military conflict in Ukraine is being presented by corporate media as unprovoked Russian aggression. And if you ask almost anyone anywhere what's the story, Vladimir Putin's gone mad, he's another Hitler, he's trying to rebuild the Soviet Union, he's just on Russian expansionism, he's threatening everybody, he's going to try and take over the whole of Europe.

This is just a very one-dimensional story, there's no depth, no context, no history, and there's no two sides about it, there's only one side. One side's totally right, a paragon of virtue and democracy, and the other side is just demonic, evil, and so on.

That's what's being presented in the mass media. But Zechariah 8 verse 16 tells us, these are the things you should do, speak each man the truth to his neighbor. Give judgment in your gates for truth, justice, and peace.

Understanding Russia's Perspective and the Role of Provocation

From the Russian perspective, and it's no good just thinking about the chessboard from your side of the game. You've got to understand, well, what do the other sides say? And it's no good just listening to narrative, talking points, propaganda.

If we believe our own propaganda, we're not going to understand the other side well, are we? So it's important to understand, well, what do the Russians say? What's their perspective? Well, to them, it's actually a logical reaction to deliberate provocation by the Biden-Obama administrations.

Biden's administration has created this crisis to deflect attention from serious political failures at home, serious, catastrophic, disastrous failures at home, and to create a scapegoat for the great collapse which the New World Order is so committed to.

Now President Biden this week gave the first State of the Nation of Ukraine address, and nothing really much about America, overwhelmingly about Ukraine, but he is meant to be giving a speech about the state of the United States, which is actually quite a dismal state.

He's only done catastrophic, disastrous things since he got to power, not least of which was the catastrophic abandonment of Afghanistan in such a catastrophic way that they left thousands of Americans and green card American holders behind in Afghanistan.

And they left over $80 billion of high-tech weaponry behind. Now, bear in mind that Russia's total military budget for the year is only about $51 billion only. So America left more than the total annual budget of the Russian Federation Defense Force, all arms, in Afghanistan.

So the Taliban are now the best-equipped, best-armed terrorists on the planet, courtesy of Biden. But anyway, instead of dealing—not one word about Afghanistan in the State of the Nation address, arguably one of the worst foreign policy disasters of the last few years in American history, but he just gave a whole lot of rah-rah about Ukraine.

The Great Reset, Transhumanism, and One-World Government

Now, the Great Reset is not a theory. It's the title of a book, COVID -19 and the Great Reset by Klaus Schwab, founder and head of the World Economic Forum. And the book articulates how the United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 will reset the world.

According to these globalists pushing what they call the Great Reset, in the future, you will own absolutely nothing, and you will be happy. The Great Reset aims to fundamentally re-engineer industries, societies, education, agriculture, relationships, even human beings, what they call the Fourth Industrial Revolution, transhumanism.

You could call the Great Reset the Great Revolution. Its goal is ultimately a global welfare state where everybody will be dependent upon the global state for everything. Now, we had a whole presentation.

In the past, you can look that up. It's on our web if you weren't there. This Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 will necessitate the abolition of faith, families, and nations. You could turn to Revelation 13, get a bit of an insight what they're after.

They're after a one-world government with a one-world economy and a one-world interfaith religion, which is why we must be fighting against this. In a word, it's communism. We need to smash global communism.

NATO Expansion and the Cuban Missile Crisis Analogy

But enough of the Great Reset. Let's get back to the great collapse they're working on right now. The immediate cause of this crisis was Biden's sudden arbitrary unilateral push to integrate Ukraine into NATO, placing anti-Russian armaments close to the Russian border.

And by the way, do you know that in January, Vladimir Putin asked President Biden for a guarantee that America would not put nuclear missiles in Ukraine, and Biden flat refused to give such a guarantee.

And in February, he asked for a meeting with President Biden, and Biden refused. So, you know, this totally unprovoked and so on and so forth. There's a little bit of context that's missing on the CNN, BBC narratives.

This has been the political, geographic, and diplomatic equivalent of the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962, when the Soviet Union attempted to establish military bases in Cuba that could threaten America, and America meekly called on the Monroe Doctrine, which for almost two centuries has governed American policies, that no European powers are allowed to interfere in the Western Hemisphere, meaning North and South America and Central America.

Cuba, of course, was in Central America. So the Monroe Doctrine has guided a lot of American foreign policy, and they take it very seriously. In fact, just recently, President Trump, in 2018, said the Monroe Doctrine is as relevant today as it ever was.

Well, the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 was the Soviet Union, at the height of the Cold War, was placing missile bases inside Cuba, which is only a few hundred kilometers from America. And so this led to what they call 13 days in October, where the world was at the closest brink of nuclear war ever.

Although right now we're heading towards that too. Russia's now on DEFCON 2, which is just one step from actual nuclear war. That's the highest state of alert you can be without being actually engaged in war.

DEFCON 1 means the missiles are in the air, basically. So this is the most serious nuclear warfare threat in my lifetime. And they say, since the Cuban Missile Crisis, there's never been another time when we've been closer to nuclear war.

Ukraine, the 2014 Coup, and NATO's Strategic Interests

Cuban Missile Crisis is now similar, but on the other side. Ukraine has been used and abused like a political football by the U .S. State Department for very nefarious New World Order objectives. Do not be deluded into thinking that Ukraine is some golden democracy.

They came to power through a coup that overthrew the elected government, with American aid, of course. The present government, which is winning the propaganda war very well, in fact, they're doing outstandingly, but their president is an ex-comedian who was an actor who, amongst other things, acted, being a history teacher, became president of Ukraine, and walked into the Ukraine parliament with Uzi submachine guns and machine gunned everybody.

This is in the film. And people thought this is such a great idea that they elected this actor, comedian, to be the president of Ukraine, which is a bit bizarre, but he's a darn good actor. I mean, this is a role of a lifetime, and he's doing a superb job in mobilizing public opinion and support for the Ukraine cause.

But one should just say that he locks up his opponents, political opponents, journalists have been locked up in Ukraine. Ukraine is not exactly a model democracy. In fact, it's one of the most corrupt countries in the world.

I think it lists something like fourth from the bottom in terms of corruption stakes in the world. It's one of the most corrupt countries in the world. Ukraine did not ask for this chaos right now, and the European powers didn't even ask for it.

And this is the kind of material you get in the newspapers and magazines of today. It's just absolute warmongering garbage. Back in 2013, 2014, Germany strongly warned America of the potentially disastrous consequence of this policy of trying to absorb Ukraine into NATO.

Ukraine is not just in Russia's backyard. It is actually so integrated and it's so close. The distance between Kiev and Moscow is the distance between the Cape Town and the Orange River if we're driving up the N1, and we're running about the distance from Cape Town to Kolsberg.

That's how close Minsk is from Moscow. Proverbs 26 verse 17 warns us, he who passes by medals in a quarrel not his own is like one who seizes a dog by the ears. Not intelligent. You grab a dog by the ears, you'll get bitten in the face.

Germany also invested 11 billion euro. Euros are what, something like 17 or 18 rand to the euro right now. So it's a lot of money into the natural gas pipeline with Russia. I think Germany's depend for something in the region of 60 of their natural gas requirements for energy coming from Russia right now.

Some even suggest that stopping this Nord Stream 2 pipeline has been the primary objective of the Biden administration, which is one of the most corrupt administrations in American history too. To avoid the influence of Russia, the economic influence of Russia increasing at American expense at the moment, Europe, Western Europe is overwhelmingly depends on America economically.

But at the moment, it's getting to a tipping point where Europe could be more depends on Russia economically. And would the American government risk a war for purely economic ends? Yes, they've done so frequently.

The Maidan Revolution and American Involvement

Setting up Russia and backing them into a strategic corner to essentially have no choice but to respond militarily was precisely what Biden and Obama and Clinton, by that I mean Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at that time, what they achieved in 2014.

Remember, Biden was the vice president of Obama in 2014, and they sponsored and encouraged the violent mob violence in the streets of Kiev in which hundreds of people died. This is a very, they called it the maiden revolution.

They called it the color revolution, the orange revolution, revolution of human dignity. But it was pretty bad. You know, when the police are throwing multiple cocktails as well, it's deteriorated to a hideous way.

Now, this is the kind of nice picture of the maiden revolution, which shows yay, Freedom Square all filled and so on. And these are some obviously photo ops which were set up. I mean, how's this for choreographed photography?

This is this is what you call a propaganda event. They've just, this is a staged photo. Is this ever staged? These are the kind of photos that they were sending around the world to give you the impression.

I mean, have you ever seen something so staged? Even the color of the piano, it's in the Ukrainian national colors. This is all part of the U .S. government funded, sponsored, orchestrated revolution that brought down the elected president of Ukraine, who was a personal friend of Putin and an ally of Russia.

And this color revolution removed Ukraine's elected pro-Russian president, the man on the left, with a client to the U .S. State Department, the man on the right. They might look very similar to you, but there are different individuals who rejected the economic alliance with Russia in favor of integrating with the European Union and NATO.

And Russia was offering them a really good deal, but apparently a lot of money was swapping hands. This Ukraine administration has been as corrupt as it comes from the beginning in 2014. NATO has expanded from 12 member countries to 30 member countries.

And NATO is one big, colossal money making industry, because by law of NATO, if you're a member of NATO, you must spend at least 2 of your gross domestic product on almonds. And if you're NATO, there's certain almonds you've got to get and they've got to be integratable.

And therefore, who's producing most of these almonds? Well, the United States, America, military industrial arms complex. And so this is a phenomenal amount of money that's coming in from the more countries get joined to NATO, the more weapons they sell.

Proverbs 20 verse 3 says, it is an honor for a man to cease from strife, but every fool will be meddling. That 2014 coup in Ukraine. And I mean, can you just think, doesn't matter how well you cut it out and right there, a petrol bomb with liquid explosive fire going over.

I mean, this is hideous. And, you know, the burns that come from it. I wasn't a fire brigade. Let me tell you, this is not nice. Especially as it threatened Russian interest in the Crimean Peninsula. Now, bear in mind, Crimea is the only warm water port for the Russian Navy.

Crimea, Historical Claims, and the Russian Navy

In fact, the Sevastopol Naval Base is the geopolitical equivalent of if Russia had seized the United States Pacific Ocean Naval Base in San Diego away from the U .S. Well, America could never accept that.

San Diego is the most important naval base that America's got, and that's on the Pacific Ocean coast. And of course, America's got lots of ice free ports. Russia only has one, really. And putting American missiles in Ukraine would be equivalent of Russia putting missiles in Cuba.

And Russia's been making clear for 15 years, since 2008, America announced that they were going to admit Ukraine into NATO. And since then, Vladimir Putin has been saying, Nyet, and Nyet means Nyet, but they've ignored him.

So to protect Russia's strategic national interest, Putin had no choice but to reclaim the territory, Crimea, which had been Russian since it has liberated from the Ottoman Turkish Empire in the 1700s.

The population voted overwhelmingly to support this in a referendum. I was in America in 2014 and I was speaking at very pro-American patriotic groups, conservative groups like the Tea Party. Tea Party stood for taxed enough already, which is the major movement of opposing Obama.

And at these Tea Parties, I'd have Americans come and say, don't you agree we should bomb Russia and reclaim Crimea? And all of a sudden I said, no, Russia's had Crimea longer than you've had California and Texas.

In fact, most of America. In fact, before just about the whole of the West was American, Crimea was already Russian. They liberate from the Ottoman Turks. Ninety five percent of the population there is Russian.

It's demographically, linguistically, culturally Russian and have just voted to stay in Russia. So why would you want to force a war over Russia taking back what's already theirs? Bear in mind, this middle part is what was historically Crimea, Ukraine.

And in fact, if you look at the dark part in the middle, that's what Ukraine was in 1654. But in 1922, Vladimir Lenin, not known for being a Democrat, he annexed a vast amount of eastern and southern Russia into Ukraine.

And Nikita Khrushchev, who was also Ukrainian, he annexed the whole of Crimea into Ukraine back in 1954. Joseph Stalin took a whole bunch of the far West and just annexed it into Ukraine, too. Now, none of this was done with referendums, without regard to demographics or linguistics or anything like that.

So Ukraine is something of an empire, much like South Africa in the sense that colonial powers added and subtracted at will and none of us had a say in the matter. Nobody had a referendum in South Africa in 1910, for example, as to whether to join the Union, which was just done by the Brits who had just brutally crushed the transfer on the Free State and the Anglo-Boer War.

Well, this is somewhat similar. A lot of Ukraine was just summarily added to by dictators. And we need to bear in mind that that's not the way things should be decided. So the vast majority of the population of Crimea was ethnically, linguistically, culturally Russian and still are.

And these are just some of the most important naval bases in Russia's entire geographic area. And Russia, therefore, re-seized Crimea. In fact, they didn't have to invade it because they really had it.

It was Russian, simple. And the difference was that Ukraine before let Russia lease those areas. But after the coup in 2014 and an anti-Russian president was installed by the Americans, then Russia said, well, we'll just keep it, thank you.

And then they formally annexed it after referendum. So that is not recognized worldwide at this stage. But bear in mind that these are famous places. Balaclava and Sevastopol should remind people of Charge of the Light Brigade, 1850s, Florence Nightingale, all of that.

So the Russian Navy is deeply embedded in Crimea. By the way, notice St. George's cross flag is the is the naval flag of Russia today. And so they have no intention of giving up the Crimea and they would fight for it, of course.

And so this is just showing at that stage in 2014, the forces arrayed and Russia had no intention whatsoever of moving. These are the kind of what CNN put up, Russian invasion of the Crimean Peninsula.

Well, the invasion of the Crimean Peninsula actually happened back in 1780s. Barack Obama, who came to hate Putin for posing his LGBTQ agenda because Putin banned gay propaganda for children in Russia in 2013.

Russia, Christianity, and Opposition to the LGBTQ Agenda

Now, when you had Obama pushing heavily for the LGBTQ, Putin said there's not Russian, there's not Christian, we won't accept it. And so at one stage, you actually had these sort of characters who could be carrying on in Red Square.

Well, Putin soon put a stop to that. You won't see people doing this for very long in Russia these days. They'll get arrested pretty quick. But now a whole campaign has developed to the extent that they're now books out on a campaign of hating Russia and gay propaganda, because that's what's going on right now, is Russia is being hated today, not because they used to be communist, not because Putin used to be a KGB agent, but because they are now Christian and not communist and anti the gay agenda.

Vladimir Putin is supremely popular in Russia. Whether everyone supports him in this particular war right now is another matter. It's too early to tell that. But Barack Obama set up a series of provocative and threatening events like a row of dominoes so as to be able to accuse Russia of aggression.

You know, it's just like someone who provokes you, provokes you, provokes you, pushes you, push you, push you. At a certain point, you hit back the next thing. They're the victim and you get into trouble.

The principle, you know, it's that sort of typical thing that you get these people who just provoke and provoke and goad. And when you react, it's your fault. 2 Chronicles 19, verse 2, should you help the wicked and love those who hate the Lord?

Therefore, the wrath of the Lord is upon you. That Russian military aggression could then be used to restart the Cold War and justify US military intervention in Ukraine as a pretext for plundering. Make no mistake, Ukraine is being plundered and there's a lot of corruption taking place and American hands are full of it and the Biden family more than most.

Corruption Allegations and the Biden Family

This initiated a campaign of mafia style piracy, a protection record on a national scale headed by Joe Biden as the godfather and his son Hunter serving as his in-country enforcer. And this is incredibly corrupt.

So take Hunter Biden, who earned 156 million dollars, according to this report from Ukraine corruption. He was getting millions of dollars for a no show job. How would you like a job like that? You get paid millions of dollars, but you don't have to show up at work.

And how could he do that? Is it because he's supremely talented? No, he is just the son of what was then the vice president, now the president. And so he was on the board of this Ukrainian oil company.

So Hunter Biden, at age 49, joins the board of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas company. This is in 2014. Oh, what a coincidence. That's the very year that America staged a coup there. What a coincidence.

Well, the owner of Burisma Holdings, Mykola Zolokovensky, is under investigation for channeling government contracts to his business while he is ecology minister. And so Viktor Shonkin was the prosecutor general between 2015, 2016.

And Joe Biden forced the Kiev government to sack their prosecutor general because he was investigating the company that his son was a board member of. And so you can actually see this video, it's out there, where at a meeting in the Council of Foreign Relations, 23rd of January 2018, Biden, who was the previous vice president, said, I said, you're not getting the billion dollars.

I'm leaving in six hours. And if the prosecutor is not fired, you're not getting the money. And then he, in his quote, says, well, S .O .B., would you know it, they fired him within the hour. And the whole audience burst out laughing.

Now, here's a man who was vice president of America at the time, laughing about how he got a sovereign, independent democracy to fire their prosecutor general, like the attorney general, for trying to investigate his son's corrupt dealings in that country.

The whole thing is just disgusting. And a lot of people know this, these sort of cartoons have been out for a long time. When you talk about the swamp, Washington, deep state swamp, Biden is a long time, typical corrupt career politician who's never had a principal.

And he and his son are really incredibly corrupt. I mean, to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars. And you can be sure the people in Ukraine are not getting much of this. They poor, most of the people in Ukraine are suffering.

But there's a lot of people in D .C. who've gotten super rich on this. 2 Timothy 2, verse 19 could be written over a lot of governments while they promised them liberty. They themselves are slaves of corruption and depravity.

The more you look into Hunter Biden's missing laptop and all that, who wants to go there? So this is the capital of Ukraine, Kiev, or Kiev, depending how you pronounce it. And this is what democracy looks like.

Language Rights, Donbas, and the Civil War

This is the result of the orange color Maiden Revolution coup in 2014 as a direct consequence of the Obama sponsored Orange Revolution coup, whatever you want to call it. One of the first things they did February 2014 already was they abolished the minority language rights in Ukraine.

Now, just notice the Ukrainian language is the majority where you see the yellows and the red is where Russian is the majority language. And then you see the brown spots where both are spoken. And there's other minority languages like Polish, Romanian and so on.

So canceling minority language rights, which affected the Russians the most, was not the most intelligent thing to do. Here you can see a less complicated just showing between Russian and Ukrainian. So the more blue, the more Russian, the more green, the more Ukrainian.

And you can see that obviously eastern and southern Ukraine is very Russian. Western Ukraine is more Ukrainian, which fits with the historic position. And so by the new unelected government that's been brought in by the Orange Revolution in February 2014, they abolished not only minority language rights, but also autonomy for those areas with an overwhelmingly Russian majority, such as Donetsk.

Here's Donetsk and Luhansk. And so both of them declared independence from Ukraine. Well, wouldn't you under the same circumstance? And so Luhansk and Donetsk are in the extreme east of the country and overwhelmingly Russian majority as a 90, 95 percent population of Russian.

So they declared independence. And this triggered a civil war which led to a ceasefire by August 2014. And it was brutal. A lot of people died. Shelling, rocketing, air attacks on civilians in this separatist area.

And it was so hideous, something in the region of 15 ,000 civilians were killed by the Ukrainian forces to try and stop these people from seceding. And I've got letters from good Christian reform missionaries, friends of mine who have given me direct from their relatives in eastern Ukraine, the stories of how the Ukrainians were targeting, bombing, murdering civilians in the Donbass region in Donetsk and Luhansk during 2014, 2015 in particular.

And nobody seemed to care. Nobody cared because they weren't worthy victims. They were like white South Africans or white farmers. Who cares? And so you could murder eastern Ukrainians because they're Russian.

So it's fine. And that was the kind of activity. So nobody has particularly now they're concerned about Ukrainians dying in 2022. But apparently Ukrainians dying in 2014 was not newsworthy. Here are some Ukrainian prisoners captured by the separatists, the secessionists in eastern Ukraine, being paraded through the streets.

They were later released and allowed to go back to Ukraine. But they were, first of all, to show we've captured these Ukrainian regulars and then released them. And of course, in these Donbass regions, the eastern regions of Ukraine, the people fly the Russian flag enthusiastically because they see Russia as mother Russia and their savior and their protector from the Ukrainians who hate them and want to kill them.

Ethnic cleansing and so on. So these are some of the separatists in eastern Ukraine, very serious. And they've got a Russian flag up there and they're armed and they're ready. And these are the people who've been fighting for their independence since 2014.

And so the boundaries were recognized early in 2015 in the Treaty of Minsk, where basically it was agreed to leave it at that. But it didn't last long. Regularly, there's been artillery attacks, rocket attacks and even aerial strikes from Ukrainian forces against the people in what they call the separatist regions, or what Donetsk and Lugansk are calling independent secessionist areas.

Russian Justifications for the Military Operation

So earlier this year, when President Biden of America rejected Russia's demand for a promise that Ukraine would not become a base for anti-Russian nuclear missiles. Putin's predictable decision was to formally recognize Donetsk and Lugansk as independent countries and enter into mutual defense agreements.

That, from the Russian perspective, justified the current military incursion to these two states. And by the way, on Russian TV, they are not calling it a war. They're not calling invasion. They're calling it a military operation.

They're calling it a specific targeted operation. And they claim to have limited goals, temporary goals. They're trying to establish the security of Russians in Ukraine and they want to withdraw as soon as they've established that.

That's what they're stating. As to the truth of all sides, I have no idea. We're just reporting what's being said. We all know the other side. So, according to the Russians, their military incursion into these two states was to attack the attackers who were attacking the people that they now have a defense agreement with.

These states that they recognize as independent, which by self-determination have voted to be independent and who want support from Russia. And so when the Ukrainians continue to rocket and to straff and to send in artillery strikes on people in the Donbass region, then Russia counterattacked.

So geographically, Donetsk borders with Russia and has a stretch of coastline on the Sea of Azov. Now, Azov is the sea that's formed between Russia and the Crimean Peninsula. So you've got the Black Sea, you've got the Sea of Azov.

So they have access to the Black Sea and they're very close to Crimea. So Luhansk is immediately to the north of Donetsk and it also borders with Russia. These two states now form a friendly buffer zone for Russia between itself and the United States-controlled Ukraine.

That's the way they see it. So the Putin strategy, they point out, is similar to what America has done in the Balkans and other places and is comparable to similar U .S. action. So when this wave of outrage against Russia bombing targets in Ukraine, these posters were being sent all over saying, Democracy will tour, U .S. bombing list, countries that America's bombs and second world war.

NATO's Wars and Claims of Moral Superiority

It's actually quite a long list and it's quite tragic. I mean, bear in mind, we're not just talking about hundreds of thousands of people who've died in the bombings listed here, but millions of people have been killed.

This is not small. Just think of the bombings of Iraq. Think of the huge amount of devastation caused in Libya and in Syria, for example, and a lot of damage done. Can anyone tell me which city this is being bombed here?

No? Another guess? Which city? Same city. It's the capital of Serbia, Belgrade. That was the bombings of Belgrade, bombings of Yugoslavia, March to June 1999, done by America and NATO, British and French were part of it, too.

And Serbia launched a legal case against NATO over the 1999 bombings. Now, notice RT, this is Russia Today television. And this is the bombing of NATO, so by NATO of a European city. So when the news headlines in Slime magazine and Communist News Network and the Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation come out, this is the first bombing of any city in Europe since the Second World War.

No, not even close. We won't even talk about Budapest back in 1956 and so on. We won't talk about Prague in 1968. But how about Serbia, Belgrade by NATO in 1999? How can they just ignore all that history?

But, you know, who cares about facts? We've got a narrative to spin here. And then you've got these people saying, but there's no threat from NATO. NATO's only defensive. To which Russia Today says, well, what about NATO's invasion and occupation of Afghanistan for 20 years?

What's that got to do with Europe? That's pretty far from the North Atlantic. And look at all these different countries that were involved in Afghanistan and what did they actually achieve? Afghanistan's worse off now than it was before, except they've got a lot more weapons.

They've left 85 billion dollars of the best high tech weaponry in the hands of the Taliban terrorists. So they're now the very best armed terrorists in the world. And how many trillions of dollars were pumped in and how many hundreds of thousands of people died for what?

And this was orchestrated by, well, what about the bombing of Libya, which had won the highest stands of living in, well, in the whole of Africa for sure. And now it's won the worst. And the British and French and American NATO forces bombed and bombed and bombed around the clock and levelled so much of Libya and created a tsunami of millions of African refugees who've been pouring into Europe ever since as a result of the destabilising of the whole of North Africa and the Middle East by America under Obama and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.

So NATO's a defensive alliance. That's why NATO bombed Serbia, invaded Afghanistan and destroyed Libya. And then they start looking at numbers of airstrikes. Look at this down here. Kosovo, 19 ,484 airstrikes.

That's 250 airstrikes a day. Afghanistan, only 6 ,500 airstrikes, only 83 airstrikes a day. Libya, 2011, was only 9 ,700 airstrikes, 43 airstrikes a day. Iraq and Syria, 2 ,796 airstrikes. That's down to just 10 airstrikes a day.

Now, you just think, when our country was getting a car bomb like Church Street bombing and so on, we were all horrified. A car bomb. I mean, that's terrorism, putting a car bomb to explode in a church like Church Street, 1983.

OK, now think of airstrike on a civilian centre. OK, this isn't quite like the Second World War when the RAF and USAAF came over whole cities like Dresden and Hamburg and Cologne and Berlin and Dresden, just flattened them with tens of thousands of tonnes of high explosive incendiary bombs, flattening whole suburbs, inner cities, killing hundreds of thousands of people in a night, such as in Dresden.

But still, there's a lot of civilians dying in these bombings. So forgive some of us for being super cynical at all this outrage over ah, Russia's bombing Kiev. Well, it's more precision in some of the things these characters have done.

There's not as many civilian casualties. It's a tragedy. It's a human tragedy. It's a war that shouldn't be taking place. It should end as quick as possible. Any loss of life, and especially civilian life, is to be condemned.

But where's this moral superiority coming from? Does the West, does NATO, does the United States of America really have the moral grounds to condemn what Russia is doing when they've done vastly worse in the last 30 years?

By the way, the number of countries being bombed by the US under Barack Hussein Obama, who got a peace, a Nobel Peace Prize, by the way, I don't know what he got it for. He bombed seven countries. I don't know.

In the past, you got peace awards for doing something for peace, but bombing things to peace. And by the way, these are just some of the wars that American presidents that are now alive have accumulated.

This is not, it's interesting that President Trump is the only American president since Herbert Hoover, which was before the Second World War, who didn't start a new war. Sadly, he did allow himself to get talked into sending some missiles into Syria, which is disgusting and ill-advised.

But he didn't start a new war. He did continue some of the old wars, although he's winding down Afghanistan and so on. But still, these presidents bombed how many countries? A lot more than Vladimir Putin has done.

But Vladimir Putin is a thug, a war criminal. He's, you know, etc., etc. for what he's doing in Ukraine. But these people are heroes, apparently, or Democrats or something. But by the way, Putin's got expansionist tendencies.

How many countries has he invaded? This, by the way, is where America has military bases. Bear in mind that America's first president, George Washington, before he left office in his farewell speech said, avoid entangling alliances and never get involved in Europe's wars.

So that was what the first president of America, George Washington, said in his farewell address. If only America had done that. But what can justify having bases in all these different countries? Now, with the world's attention now riveted on Ukraine, the United States media has begun blaming America's internal economic troubles, which long predates it, and all its failings on the Ukraine-Russian conflict.

I mean, isn't it nice to have a war to blame, even though they were just like the ANC government? Blames now COVID lockdown, which they brought about, by the way, for the chaos and failures in so many fronts.

But it was like that before they came into the lockdown. Nevertheless, the U .S. elites now have their distraction from their domestic disasters and they have their scapegoat in a form of unprovoked Russian aggression.

Propaganda, Rhodesia, and the First Casualty of War

It is said that the first casualty in war is truth. In fact, it's like there's a firing squad lined up of the mass media to kill truth. And if you want to see what propaganda is like, just listen to the garbage on CNN and BBC.

And I know it and I've experienced this because I was brought up in Rhodesia and I remember the one-sided garbage that they would put out about these evil, nasty, racist, white supremacist, Rhodesians and all the evil things.

The Rhodesian army is 85 percent black and they were volunteers, by the way, and we were fighting communist aggression. There were Cubans and Russians on the other side arming the terrorists. And the weapons came from the Soviet Union and from China.

And and we were being demonized like there was nothing justifiable. They had no problem. The communist terrorists could shoot down Rhodesian civilian airliner Viscount on internal flight, did it twice.

And the first case killed, cooked and ate the survivors. And there wasn't a word of condemnation, not from the Pope, not from the Archbishop of Canterbury, not from London, not from Washington, not from the U .N.

Nobody condemned. Why? Because they're Rhodesians. They're like Eastern Ukrainians. They don't matter. It's like white South African farmers. They're not worthy victims, not worth even mentioning because, you know, we don't like them anyway.

They deserve to be murdered and tortured before they get murdered, by the way. So that was that. Same with us in Southwest Africa and fighting in Angola. The South African army apparently never once killed a terrorist, only killed innocent refugees.