Keep sharing good news without ads.
No description available
Let's turn in our Bibles to the last book of the Bible, the book of Revelation, and we wanna read the words of a song in Revelation chapter five to begin this morning. It's a song sung in heaven that John the Apostle heard.
I would assert that Revelation five is a record of the Lord Jesus after he ascended out of the grave, the tomb, and ascended into heaven, came to the ancient of days, and received a kingdom. And that's what that scroll signified that he took out of the hand of the father.
The father gave him that scroll, giving the authority to the Lord Jesus to execute the decrees of God in history, namely bringing salvation to his people and ruin and damnation to his enemies. And so here we have the onset of the promised kingdom of God being realized, and John was a witness to this.
And so in heaven, it's declared to Jesus, "'You are worthy to take this scroll "'and to open its seals, for you were slain "'and redeemed us to God by your blood, "'and out of every tribe and tongue and people and nation, "'and have made us kings and priests who are God, "'and we shall reign on the earth.'".
And so glory is given to King Jesus, the Lord Jesus, with the authority that God the father conferred upon him because of his faithful life, his faithful service to God, obedience to God, and his life even unto death.
Now, with today's message, I thought we were gonna complete our series. I thought that up until last night, then I thought of another topic that we have to deal with, and we will in a couple weeks. And so next week is Palm Sunday, and we already mentioned Jason will be here, Jason Austin, our friend, with his family, and he'll preach for us, Lord willing.
Following week is Easter week, and I'll preach then, Lord willing. And then that following week after Easter, we'll finish this series, I think. At least that's the tentative plan. But today, it's our desire and design to complete this study of the third great spiritual enemy to our souls, that being the devil.
The world, the flesh, and the devil. And we're always engaging in a spiritual battle with the devil. Initially, it was not my intention to take four Sundays to do this. I didn't want to, didn't want to take that much time, but there's so much biblical information about this subject, I couldn't really cut it any closer or shorter.
And even in completing our treatment today, we will not have done a thorough examination of this subject. I think we've done an adequate treatment of it, but not a thorough one. For the Holy Scriptures contain much information about the devil as the enemy of our souls, and it speaks a great deal of our spiritual engagement with him and his forces.
There are numerous Christian books available on this subject. I have a shelf full at home, and I would encourage you not to read any of them, frankly, or accept their teachings regarding the devil and spiritual warfare.
In fact, not only are most of them not helpful, I think most of them are probably damaging to the truth that you have in Scripture. These books are often based on what authors claim to be their own subjective experiences, observations, coupled with shallow and superficial assertions of being biblical in what they teach.
And these things sell, they sell widely. And so stay away from them, except for the few books that I mentioned. I mentioned two a couple weeks ago, and William Gurnall's book, and then Thomas Brooks' book.
However, this week I did obtain an additional book on this subject that I can recommend to you, and this is, the author is Frederick S. Leahy. I think he's still living. He's a reformed Presbyterian from Ireland, I believe, originally.
And his book is entitled Satan Cast Out, A Study of Biblical Demonology. And it's published by the Banner Truth Trust, and I didn't know that until after I received it on Monday. And I can highly recommend this book because it was published by Banner Truth, but also, it's just a thoroughly biblical presentation of the subject from a reformed understanding, and there's very few of those available.
This is one. And so the author not only dealt with the biblical information on the subject, but he also rehearsed a testimony of notable persons through history, Luther, Calvin, others, and whatnot, Edwards.
Their theological assessments and opinions regarding demon influence and possession. And then toward the end of the book, Leahy gave a summary of his conclusions, and I thought that these 10 points of summary was of such value that I actually included them at the end of your notes.
And so the last page, and you don't need to read them now, but the last page are basically 10 summary points that he made. I didn't agree with everything he said, but for the most part, this book was very good.
And so I would recommend it to you. Now, today I'd like us to better understand the victory that the Lord Jesus accomplished through his death on the cross over the devil and his forces. And so this subject falls under the purview of spiritual warfare, which we have addressed primarily as individual Christians, or as a church, engaging the spiritual forces that are opposed to us.
That's how we've been addressing it. But today I would like us to stand back and see the larger picture of God working in history, and in God's engagement against the devil and his forces. And in so doing, I would like us to understand clearly what God has accomplished, and what he will yet accomplish through the present kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ.
I underscore that, present kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ. And so, in addressing this matter, we're standing back, we're seeing the unfolding drama, story of redemption, the history of redemption, and we're even gonna touch on matters of eschatology, or the doctrine of end times.
Lord willing, if we have the time. And so let's first consider the Old Testament promise regarding the kingdom of God. And we'll just say at the outset, we believe the promise of the kingdom of God coming in the Old Testament is realized through Jesus Christ in this church age.
Although there is a future aspect to it, or realization of it. And so it's important that we establish in our thinking a historical, theological, biblical context. The Bible is an unfolding story through history of what God has purposed to accomplish through Jesus Christ.
It unfolds through history. It's a record of historic events, God intervening and working in history. And so we should understand the beginning of the story in the Old Testament, if we're to recognize and understand clearly the climax of the story, which is the cross of Christ, as well as the finale of that story.
The securing and entrance of the people of God into the everlasting kingdom of God, as well as the eternal destruction and setting out the devil and all his minions and those in his kingdom. Now, God had originally created this world and particularly human beings as a kingdom over which he ruled as king.
And the Bible presents God as the creator, king, throughout its pages. And we've given emphasis to this in the past. In the beginning, God created all things good. It's declared that, of course, in Genesis 1.
And all things were compliant and in submission to God the creator, God the creator, king. And God had created man in a lofty role. Man and woman, Adam and Eve, were to be God's co-regents ruling over the physical creation on behalf of God, the true king of his creation.
When Adam and Eve sinned, the human race lost this lofty position in God of its place, the human race in the place of God's kingdom. And so mankind through Adam became a race of rebels, rebelling against God.
Before the fall of man into sin, all people and things were in lovingly subjection to God the king. After the fall, no one and nothing was in subjection to God the creator, willingly so, although God continued to be sovereign.
The human race was lost to the kingdom of God, excluded from paradise, the Garden of Eden, the paradise of God in which they had lived a blessed existence in fellowship with their God. And so through Adam's sin, all people became citizens of another kingdom.
Rather than the kingdom of God, they became citizens or a part of the kingdom of Satan. Satan became their master. They sold themselves in sin. And the devil became their master. It's described as a kingdom of darkness.
And the devil is set forth as ruling over this kingdom. And so through Adam's sin, the human race became subject to the devil. Since Adam's fallen to sin, the devil has ruled over the fallen world in which mankind lives.
That's what the Bible, the word of God declares. The devil has ruled over all human beings as subjects of his kingdom. He influences them to do evil by coercing them, enticing and tempting them, and controlling them as his subjects who do his bidding.
So in his kingdom, fallen people serve the devil. And the way they serve the devil, they're not aware of it, but the way they serve the devil is a purpose to live for themselves rather than for God who made them.
And so when they serve themselves, they're serving the devil and his kingdom. It's very important. Satan is set forth as the ruler of this age. He's described as the prince of the power of the air. He rules over the fallen kings of the earth through history.
He has his fallen angels, demons influencing and controlling his subjects through deception, subterfuge, through manipulation, false reasoning that's contrary to the will of God. He's a liar, he's a deceiver, he's an accuser.
The devil is said in the scriptures to have great authority and influence in the fallen world through principalities and powers. There's a hierarchy of angels. Some demons are stronger than other demons, Satan, of course, being the most powerful among them.
A hierarchy of angels or demons through which the devil influences and directs fallen authorities who are in positions of influence and power. Most of the time, the human governments of the world through history have been governed, directed, instigated, initiated, inspired by the devil.
Our founding fathers recognized the greatest danger to the liberty of individuals within a nation is the government, and that's why they advocated a limited government with a balance of powers of powers to protect the citizens from the tyranny that government tends to always impose upon its citizens.
It's the purpose of God to glorify himself in history through the recovery and restoration from sin of a people, however, bringing them out of this kingdom of the devil, even as the Lord was reestablishing a kingdom in which his people would love him, trust him, obey him, and rule over his creation on his behalf.
God wanted to fulfill his purpose of man being his co-regents, ruling over his creation on his behalf. And the whole story of Scripture is that of God redeeming and restoring his fallen creation to himself, establishing a mediatorial kingdom, and that's an important adjective, mediatorial kingdom, thereby bringing all of creation into willing submission to the true God.
When Adam sinned, nothing was any longer in submission to God. By the end of the story, everything is under willing submission to God, even those that are cast into eternal hell and darkness. They too go in confessing that Jesus is Lord to the glory of the Father.
Now, by mediatorial kingdom, we are saying that God will restore the creation to himself through an intermediary or a mediator who would affect the restoration of all things into a right and holy relationship to God.
One once wrote, this was an old Baptist, I believe, a couple centuries ago, man was excluded from the kingdom of God at his expulsion from paradise. His restoration to that kingdom has been the grand end of all God's subsequent dispensations, and he means ages by that.
This restoration, according to the divine plan, was to be accomplished through a mediatorial kingdom of which the God-man Christ Jesus should be king. And under this kingdom of the mediator, the universe should no longer be governed immediately or directly by God, but immediately through the God-man, all power in heaven and earth being given unto him.
And so it's through this mediatorial kingdom that God is restoring all things to himself, bringing all things back into submission to himself. The first promise of this mediatorial kingdom is in Genesis 3 .15, in which God promises that the devil would be defeated and that mankind would be restored to God.
This verse is commonly called the Protoevangelium. We've talked about this many times. It's the first promise of the gospel in the Bible. It's the promise of God voiced to the serpent when he was declaring judgment upon the serpent, that this devil would be deposed and a promised son of the woman would ascend as king over the restored kingdom of God.
And it further set forth a veiled prophecy of Jesus Christ's death on the cross that would secure this great victory. And so God declared, I will put enmity between you and the woman, between your offspring and her offspring, he shall bruise your head, you shall bruise his heel.
And by bruising your head, he's declaring that Satan's kingdom is coming to an end. He's taken a big fall. And it's gonna take place through the cross, Christ having his heel bruised, as it were, by the devil.
And so as history began to unfold, God began to call people from the human race to return unto him through faith. And this began to be realized. And you can see it in the Old Testament. First, there were individuals that God called out and some families.
And so we read, for example, early on in Genesis 4, 26, to Seth, that would have been the son to Adam and Eve, also a son was born, he called his name Enosh. And at that time, people began to call upon the name of the Lord.
God was forming a people, but they were mostly individuals. They were individuals coming to him, but from time to time, a family as well, like Noah's family. And so early in history, God preserved for himself individuals and some families.
But when God called Abraham or Abram and Sarai to live their pagan roots and travel to a land that he would one day give to them and their descendants, God made known through Abram that God would save a people, a collective people.
And that's important to understand. And from that people, form them into a nation and establish that nation before him in a place they could live before him in a state of rest and peace. A nation, God purposed to form, a kingdom he would form of a people that were to live before him.
God had promised Abraham that one of his seed would come to remove the curse of sin and restore his people to God. And later after God had constituted Abraham's physical descendants into a nation at Mount Sinai, Israel, God promised to bring his people into the promised land where they could live before God in a covenant relationship with him.
And so Israel would be a manifestation of a form of the kingdom of God in history where they were supposed to order their life according to God's laws. And later still, God caused kings to arise in Israel who would lead his people in victory over their enemies in order to enable the people of God to live before God in peace and security.
But the mediatorial kingdom of God in the Old Testament was largely in the form of God's promise. It was never realized. It was largely in the form of promise. The kingdom was yet to come. And that promise of the kingdom was taught and illustrated through types and shadows that pointed to the coming of Jesus Christ, the promised king over the one day inaugurated kingdom of God.
Yes, a form of the kingdom of God was seen in ancient Israel. Israel was a political entity comprised of a physical ethnic people, the Jewish people. Israel was to invade and conquer the land that God had promised.
And Israel was to displace the Canaanite peoples of the land and establish a theocracy in which they lived under the authority of the law of God with God as its rightful king. And during the period of judges, God was manifesting himself as king through those judges who were his co-regents within his kingdom.
However, Israel, of course, in the land would prove itself not to be the mediatorial kingdom in which all of its citizens would live in joyful submission and compliance to God and his law. Nevertheless, Israel did set forth in the land in some ways what the promised kingdom should be and would be like one day.
God had given to Israel his moral law, even the 10 commandments to order its national life. And in addition, God gave to Israel the ceremonial laws and the civil laws by which people could serve God in a fashion that foreshadowed the true worship of God through Jesus Christ.
But as we said, in the Old Testament, the kingdom of God was largely in the form of promise. A kingdom that God had promised that one day would be inaugurated and the coming kingdom of the Messiah would be an expansive kingdom, reaching far beyond the physical borders of ancient Israel.
The promised Messiah's kingdom would encompass the entire world. And that passage we read in Revelation 5 speaks of this, people from every tribe, every nation worshiping God. God, of course, had raised up David as king over Israel and it was through David that the nature and expanse of the promised messianic kingdom came to be understood more clearly.
And as the gradual decay and disintegration of Israel unfolded in history, as recorded in the Old Testament, the hope and expectation of the coming son of David and the establishment of his kingdom, the kingdom of God, came to the forefront of Jewish expectation.
But in God's promise of the mediatorial kingdom of the coming Messiah, God declared that he would deliver his people from the control and power of evil forces that had enslaved them. He would do so even as he brings them into the kingdom of his son.
And through the salvation that God would accomplish on their behalf, God would secure their willing and joyful obedience and compliance to his government over which he would install the son of David. And so within the kingdom of the Messiah, both Jews as well as a multitude of Gentiles from every tribe and nation would have a part.
And the prophets speak of that. Particularly, I gave two references there. Wasn't just Jews, but it was going to be Jews plus a multitude of Gentiles that would come into the Messiah's kingdom, the kingdom of God.
Now we would assert, secondly, that the realization of God's promise of his kingdom is in Jesus Christ. The Bible makes it abundantly clear, we would advocate, that when Jesus Christ was born, it signaled the time of fulfillment of God's promise of the long-expected kingdom of God.
The opening verse of the New Testament signals this event when Matthew, in Matthew 1, verse 1, declared the book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham. This is the Messiah.
The angel Gabriel made this clear to Mary that the child that she would bear was the promised son of David who would inaugurate the promised kingdom of God. Gabriel said to her, do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God.
Behold, you will conceive in your womb, bring forth a son, shall call his name Jesus. He will be great. He will be called the son of the highest, and the Lord God will give him the throne of his father, David.
And he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end. He was the promised Messiah who would rule over the promised kingdom of God. And Zechariah, the father John the Baptist, the forerunner of the Messiah, inspired by the Holy Spirit, declared, blessed is the Lord God of Israel, for he has visited and redeemed his people.
The time had arrived. And has raised up a horn of salvation for us in the house of his servant, David. As he spoke by the mouth of his holy prophets who have been since the world began, that we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all who hate us, to perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant, the oath which he swore to our father Abraham, to grant us that we, being delivered from the hand of our enemies, might serve him without fear, in holiness and righteousness, before him all the days of our life.
In other words, living within the kingdom of God. And so, with the presentation of the Lord Jesus in the gospels, the gospel of the kingdom of God is announced. The long-awaited promise of God, of the kingdom of God, had arrived in the life and ministry of Jesus.
And so, we read of our Lord's ministry. Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in the synagogues, preaching the gospel of the kingdom. The gospel, in the gospels, is principally the good news of the arrival and inauguration of the kingdom of God.
And so, he proclaimed that gospel of the kingdom, and healed all kinds of sickness, all kinds of disease among the people. And similarly, we read later, when Jesus went about all the cities and villages, teaching in their synagogues, again, preaching the gospel of the kingdom, the good news of the kingdom, healing every sickness, every disease among the people.
And later still, he declared that after his departure from this world, this gospel of the kingdom would continue to be proclaimed throughout the world. He told his disciples, and this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in all the world as a witness to the nations, and then the end will come.
And I think the end he was talking about there was the end of Jerusalem and the temple that the disciples were asking him about. The point we wish to make is this, and this is important. And by the way, this assertion is not agreed to by the majority of sincere evangelical Bible believers.
But this is what the Bible teaches, I would assert. The kingdom of God of the New Testament, that God inaugurated through the ministry, death, resurrection, and enthronement of the Lord Jesus is the promised kingdom of David of the Old Testament.
We are privileged and blessed to be citizens of the kingdom of God. Living in the kingdom of the son of David, foretold and foreshadowed in the Old Testament. But what God brought before his people through the coming of Jesus Christ was not what the people of Israel were anticipating or looking for or even desiring.
Their expectations were far removed from what God had inaugurated through Jesus Christ. The Jewish people of New Testament days expected a restored earthly political kingdom with physical borders. A deliverance from the Roman oppressors, liberty, political liberty.
But what God had actually promised ancient Israel was a kingdom that was spiritual in nature. And the reason for this was because the real problem that brought an end to Israel's kingdom in the Old Testament was a spiritual problem.
It was a sin problem. It was a problem with their sin, which had alienated them from the life enjoyed by those who know God and live before God in his kingdom. And so the Old Testament record of the physical enemies of Israel, their defeat of Israel, and the subsequent oppression that all Israel had experienced were God's just punishment upon Israel for its sin.
Israel had broken the Mosaic covenant with God and therefore God's promise of a restored kingdom of David would be spiritual in nature, not physical in nature. God having brought a remedy to their backsliding and rebellion, causing them to love him and serve him in faith and obedience.
And so the Messiah would restore believing Jews to that promised kingdom, but he would also deliver believing Gentiles from their sin, bringing them into his kingdom. We read it in Luke 13, and here is the passage in Matthew 8, the parallel.
Jesus said, I say, and this was upon the Roman centurion expressing faith in Jesus. I say to you that many will come from the east and west, in other words, Gentile lands, and sit down with Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob,.
Where?
In the kingdom of heaven, which is Matthew's reference to the kingdom of God. But the sons of the kingdom, those would have been natural born Jews, will be cast out into outer darkness and there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.
And so all true disciples of Jesus would enjoy the spiritual and eternal blessings of God for being in a new covenant relationship with God through Christ. And the reason would be is that the son of David would secure the obedience of his citizens through their conversion by imparting to his people the Holy Spirit who would ensure their faith and obedience to their king.
And moreover, the enemies from which God would deliver his people were not political enemies. The physical powers of Rome that ruled over Palestine, that's the kind of kingdom Israel was looking for. The deliverance that Jesus would accomplish was from the principalities and powers which the devil employed to keep his people enslaved in their sin and powerless to escape.
And Jesus would set his people free from the bondage of sin and the devil, enabling them to live before him in faith and love and obedience. And so Jesus told some Jewish leaders who wrongly thought they had salvation.
We read, Jesus said to those Jews who believed him, if you abide in my word, my disciples, indeed, and you shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. There's where liberty is found. And they answered, we're Abraham's descendants.
I've never been in bondage to anyone. How can you say you'll be made free? Jesus answered, most assuredly I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. A slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever.
Therefore, if the son makes you free, you shall be free indeed. He's talking about the liberty of the children of God within the kingdom of God. The spiritual freedom in which the disciples would live before God in faith and liberty of conscience was the blessing enjoyed by those who entered the kingdom of God through faith in Jesus Christ.
And our Lord taught his disciples throughout his earthly ministry the true nature of the kingdom of God. It was far different than what the Jews had anticipated. It was not a physical political nation as once existed under King David.
It was a spiritual kingdom in which people are set free inwardly to live and serve God. And so the parables of the kingdom in Matthew 13, our Lord, through those, corrected and instructed his disciples as to the true nature of the kingdom of God, and every one of them were correctives as to the current expectation of the Jewish people.
In the parables of the kingdom, our Lord corrected and instructed his disciples in the true nature of the kingdom. And so when our Lord first told his disciples, say, the parable of the sower, it prompted their question.
In chapter 13, verse 10, that'd be Matthew 13, 10 and following. Then the disciples came and said to Jesus, why do you speak to them in parables? He answered them, to you it's been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven.
And again, that's Matthew's description of the kingdom of God. He was writing to Jews. He probably used the word heaven to avoid the repetitive use of the term God because it was regarded as so holy. It's for you to know the secrets of the kingdom of God.
But to them it has not been given, for to the one who has, more will be given. He will have an abundance, but from the one who is not, even what he has will be taken away. And so it was through the death of Jesus Christ on the cross that the Lord Jesus fully and finally defeated the devil and his forces, breaking the devil's authority over his people and thus setting them free, enabling them to come in repentance and faith unto him.
And we read of this in Paul's letter to the Colossians in which he tells of the work of God the Father in saving his people through Jesus Christ. He, that is God the Father, has delivered us from the power of darkness, that's the kingdom of the devil, and conveyed us into the kingdom of the son of his love in whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins.
And in Colossians 2, Paul wrote of the believers union with Jesus Christ in his life, death, and resurrection thus being set free from the principalities that had bound them. And you being dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, he is made alive together with him, having forgiven you all trespasses, having wiped out the handwriting of requirements that was against us, which was contrary to us.
He's taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross. And here it is, look at verse 15. Having disarmed principalities and powers, he stripped the devil and his forces of any kind of spiritual weapons to defeat his people or keep them from coming into his kingdom.
And he made a public spectacle of them triumphing over them in it. King Jesus conquered the devil and his forces on the cross. The devil and his forces could no longer prevent the kingdom of God from expanding throughout the world.
And so through his cross, Jesus stripped the devil of his power to prevent God's elect from coming to salvation. In order for the Lord Jesus to bring salvation to his people he had to deliver them from the power of the devil.
They ruled over them. And so when we read in the gospels of our Lord casting out demons, Jesus declared it was proof that he was inaugurating the kingdom of God that God had promised to Israel. We read several times in the episode of Matthew 12.
We've read this episode several times in the last few weeks. One was brought to Jesus who was demon possessed, blind and mute, he healed him. So the blind and mute both spoke and saw and all the multitudes were amazed and said, could this be the son of David?
There was the evidence, but it didn't fit their conceptions. But when the Pharisees heard it, they said, this fellow does not cast out demons except by Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons. But Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation.
Every city or house divided against itself will not stand. If Satan casts out Satan, he's divided against himself. How then will his kingdom stand? The devil's kingdom. And if I cast out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your sons cast them out?
There are Jews that claim to be casting out demons. Therefore they'll be your judges. But if I cast out demons by the spirit of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you. He's talking about the kingdom promised in the Old Testament, the kingdom promised to David.
And then he said these words, for how can one enter a strong man's house and plunder his goods unless he first binds a strong man? And then he will plunder his house. He who is not with me is against me.
He who does not gather with me scatters abroad. So after our Lord declared the present reality of the promised kingdom of God, the Lord Jesus spoke of the necessity to restrict and restrain the devil in order to set his people free from their sin, enabling them to become the citizens of the kingdom of God living under him.
And so our Lord spoke of first the necessity of binding the strong man before Satan's house could be spoiled. In order for Jesus to become the savior of his people, he had to first strip the devil of his authority and his ability to keep his people in bondage.
And this was accomplished on the cross. He in effect deposed Satan's authority. When our Lord was raised from the dead, he ascended and was enthroned in heaven. He thereby vanquished the devil as a conquered enemy.
And as a result, the Lord was able to expand his kingdom throughout the entire world. Hence this church age. Take note in the passage that we read above referencing two kingdoms. He mentioned the kingdom of God in verse 28, and he alluded to the kingdom of Satan in verse 26.
If Satan casts out Satan, he's divided against himself. How will his kingdom stand? Our Lord made it clear that through his ministry, the kingdom of God was defeating the kingdom of Satan. The Lord used the metaphor of a man who intended to rob another man's house.
If the thief were to be successful in his plan to rob the house, he must first be the stronger man in order to overcome and tie up the owner of the house who would attempt to defend his goods from being taken from him.
To bind the strong man, therefore, is a metaphor to describing the preventing of Satan from defending his house, that is, keeping his kingdom secure. When our Lord delivered this man from demon possession, this event, Jesus declared a signal that he had rendered the devil bound, unable to prevent the release of the one that he had held captive.
No demon had any authority to resist Jesus. The devil himself had no authority to resist Jesus. And the casting out of demons was indicative of the fact that the devil and the demons no longer had power to keep his people enslaved.
He had authority. And so the Lord Jesus clearly defeated the devil. And again, the kingdom was inaugurated when King Jesus rose from the dead, ascended into heaven, and he came up in fulfillment of Daniel 7, took that kingdom, that scroll from the hand of the Father from the Ancient of Days, and he was given a kingdom over which he now rules as King of Kings and Lord of Lords.
Now, with this in mind, what we've said thus far, we want to take a few minutes and talk about the binding of the devil and the doctrine of the millennium. And here we get into the doctrine of last things.
And again, I realize, you know, our position, my position, I should say, I don't want to voice, you know, on behalf of anybody else, we recognize as a minority position of today's evangelical churches.
And so I realize the burden of proof is on me and us to set this point. But we need to consider the binding of the devil and the doctrine of the millennium. Again, we've asserted that God's promise of a coming kingdom in the Old Testament has been realized in the life, death, resurrection of Jesus Christ.
It was due to Jesus' obedience unto his Father, even unto his death on the cross, that led to and resulted in the enthronement of Jesus Christ over the kingdom of God when he ascended from the dead and ascended into heaven.
When Jesus received from the Father the promised kingdom, he sat down on his throne and commenced his reign over the kingdom of God that had been promised to and through King David. And so we read of Jesus, he's gone into heaven, he's at the right hand of God, that's the place of authority and power, angels and authorities and powers having been made subject to him.
The devil and all his dominion is made subject to King Jesus. But in contrast to what we've set forth and affirm regarding the present kingdom age of the Messiah's reign, most evangelicals do not affirm the teaching that we've already presented.
They do not believe that the kingdom of God that was promised to King David was inaugurated by the risen and enthroned Lord Jesus. Rather than understanding the kingdom of God to be the restored kingdom of David, which is holy spiritual in nature, they advocate and promote a yet future literal kingdom, their words, of David that will be inaugurated at the second coming of Jesus Christ.
They believe that the throne on which the Lord Jesus presently reigns is not the promised throne of David, promised in the Old Testament. They believe and teach that the nature of the future kingdom is just like the ones that the Jews anticipated when the Lord Jesus conducted his ministry.
They look for an earthly political kingdom, which will be given to a renewed political state of Israel, a kingdom whose citizens will be predominantly ethnic Jews. And they say that the capital of this earthly kingdom will be the city of Jerusalem, and that Jesus will one day take a seat on an earthly political throne of David to rule over the world for 1 ,000 years, the millennium.
And they actually advocate two future kingdoms, the kingdom of God during this church age, and then a second kingdom, a future earthly Jewish kingdom of David. They think there are two kingdoms prophesied in the Bible.
We would argue there's only one kingdom, one stone taken that arises and becomes a great mighty mountain over all the kingdoms of the world. And so here then is where the matter of the millennium comes into view.
The issue at stake is the nature and identity of the kingdom of God to which the Holy Scriptures speak. We who are thoroughly reformed in our understanding of the Scriptures advocate that when our Lord spoke of the necessity to first bind the strong man before his house could be spoiled, that it speaks of what our Lord actually accomplished when he died upon the cross and rose the third day.
The kingdom of our Lord was inaugurated. The Lord Jesus was enthroned in heaven, and Satan was bound with respect to his ability to prevent his kingdom from being spoiled. The Lord Jesus, in effect, deposed Satan's authority when he ascended above him in authority, vanquishing him as his conquered enemy.
Satan's kingdom continues to exist, obviously. But because the Lord Jesus had bound the strong man, the devil was rendered incapable to prevent the reception of the gospel by the people of the world. And as a result, the Lord Jesus was able to expand his kingdom throughout all the Gentile world.
The stronger man had come, even Jesus Christ, and through his life and death, he bound the strong man and then proceeded to make a spoil of his house, the unbelieving world. So let's make some general considerations regarding the teaching of the millennium.
The only place in the Bible where 1 ,000-year millennium is described is in Revelation 20, one through 10. That is where it's described as 1 ,000 years. Only place in the Bible. Let's read the passage.
John was writing. I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand the key to the bottomless pit in a great chain. He seized the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for 1 ,000 years, and threw him into the pit, and shut it and sealed it over him, and I am bold and italicized the verse for emphasis, so that he might not deceive the nations any longer until the 1 ,000 years were ended, and after that he must be released for a little while.
Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed, and also I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for the testimony of Jesus and for the word of God, those who had not worshiped the beast or its image and had not received its mark on their foreheads or their hands.
They came to life and reigned with Christ for 1 ,000 years. The rest of the dead did not come to life until the 1 ,000 years were ended. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is the one who shares in the first resurrection.
Over such the second death has no power, but they will be priests of God and of Christ, and they will reign with him for 1 ,000 years. And when the 1 ,000 years are ended, Satan will be released from his prison and will come out to deceive the nations that are on the four corners of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them for battle.
Their number is like the sand of the sea, and they marched up over the broad plain of the earth and surrounded the camp of the saints and the beloved city, but fire came down from heaven and consumed them, and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and false prophet were, and they will be tormented day and night forever and ever.
That is the only place in the Bible where the millennium is described as 1 ,000 years in duration. What is the definition of millennium? When people speak about the second coming of Christ, often the idea of the millennium comes into the discussion.
What is a millennium? It is the belief that the Bible teaches that there will be a 1 ,000-year period of peace on earth when Jesus Christ will reign as king over the nations. That's how people understand the millennium.
The concept of a coming millennium is part of our Western culture, by the way. It has been for hundreds of years. The Battle Hymn of the Republic during the Civil War was a millennial hymn. Even non-Christians think in terms of a millennium.
Hitler had the idea of a 1 ,000-year Reich, a 1 ,000-year kingdom, a millennial idea. Woodrow Wilson wanted to make the world safe for democracy. He was a premillennialist, and he was motivated a lot by his millennial views of the world and history.
Where, again, where else in the Bible is a kingdom taught as being 1 ,000 years in duration?
Nowhere.
Revelation 21 through 10 is the only place. This is not to say that there are not many biblical passages that various Bible interpreters assign to be a prophecy of the millennium, but this is the only biblical passage that speaks of a period of history being 1 ,000 years in duration, and I think that it's important to note that.
There are different views of the millennium, and there have been these different views predominant at different times in church history. What are the historical Christian views of the millennium? First, you have premillennialism, and this is the predominant view in today's evangelical world.
This is the belief that the millennium will begin immediately after Jesus Christ's second coming. Jesus' return comes pre, before the millennium. And so they believe upon Christ's return, he will reign over the world for 1 ,000 years in a kingdom which is characterized by peace and righteousness.
A cursory reading of this chapter as it follows the description of the second coming in Revelation 19 seems to lead readily to the logical conclusion that the millennium is a literal period of time and will immediately follow Christ's coming.
Premillennialists, as do the believers in other views of the millennium, believe the Lord Jesus will return literally a second time, and they all believe, all these positions believe that. At that time, the Lord will resurrect the dead, they say.
Premillennialists believe, however, that only true believers who died throughout history will be resurrected at the second coming of Christ. All unbelievers, they say, will not be resurrected and brought to final judgment until after the 1 ,000 years.
And so they separate the resurrection of the just at the beginning of the 1 ,000 years and the resurrection of the unjust 1 ,000 years later. Premillennialism has existed throughout the Christian era.
The early church fathers mostly were premillennial. They were not premillennial in the sense of today's dispensational premillennialists, but they were premillennial. They believed in a future 1 ,000-year kingdom.
And this was the predominant position of Christians from the second to the fifth century. Premillennialism is the predominant position held today by most evangelicals. The modern form of premillennialism is the view of the future perpetrated by the popular book series Left Behind, written by Tim LaHaye, Jerry Jenkins.
Most premillennialists are only familiar with their position, however. It's like they've never heard of anything else. And this position is widely held by some of the most highly regarded and respected, and I say that not in a derogatory fashion, but very commending of their ministries, like John MacArthur, Charles Stanley, so many others.
But I believe they're mistaken in their understanding. Premillennialism was also advocated by many fine people in history. Charles Spurgeon was premillennial, not according to the premillennialism taught today of a revived Jewish kingdom, but he was historical premill, as was John Gill.
Great men. That's the premillennial position. Then there's postmillennialism, which is not very popular today, but during the 19th century, most Baptists were postmillennial, interestingly. This is the belief that the second coming of Christ will occur, not before, but rather after the millennium.
The 1 ,000-year millennium will be ushered in through the salvation of the world, through the gospel, basically. The world's gonna be transformed. And then after the 1 ,000 years, the Lord Jesus will return.
They differ as to how this period of peace will have brought into history. Some believe, again, that through the influence of the gospel, the world basically, in mass, will be converted, not everyone, but for the most part.
A few postmillennialists, like Boettner, for example, believes that the millennium will be ushered in through the works of common grace, technology and whatnot, that the world will be transformed into an ideal kind of life for 1 ,000 years.
Again, this position might seem quite strange to us who are living now at the beginning of the 21st century. This was the predominant position throughout the 19th century, as the gospel was going out into the world, the great mission movement, transformation was taking place, societies were being transformed, and the thing that brought an end to the dominance of postmillennialism was World War I.
And people were completely disillusioned as to that. There's still some postmillennialists around. I know a few. And there's some very articulate, intelligent men that popularize it, too. I don't believe it, however.
And then the third position is the amillennial view. And the ah, of course, has that letter A at the beginning of the millennial, millennialism, which literally means no literal millennium. They believe there's a millennium, just not a literal 1 ,000-year millennium.
And so this position holds, there is no literal 1 ,000-year kingdom on Earth, taught in the scriptures. The 1 ,000 years of Revelation 20 is a symbolic number signifying this current gospel age. The 1 ,000 years is to signify the present kingdom age of long but unspecified duration.
The Lord didn't want us to know exactly how long this church age would take place. And so he just expressed it in apocalyptic language of 1 ,000 years to show it was gonna be an extended period of time.
He wanted everyone, however, to be ready for the second coming of Christ. Amillennialism became the predominant position of the Christian era beginning with the Protestant in the 5th century AD. Roman Catholicism is amillennial.
It's one of the doctrines that many Protestants agree with Rome regarding Bible's teaching, largely because of Augustine's influence. He was a sharp guy. Most of the reformers were amillennial, including Luther and Calvin.
The position is most commonly held today by evangelicals who were reformed or Calvinistic in their theology. J .I. Packer, R .C. Sproul, who's with the Lord now, were amillennial. The amillennial position is held today by Protestants who are Presbyterian and Reformed Baptist.
But it's a minority position. And although I had read and devoured and believed the premillennial return of Christ in the first years I became a Christian, I came to abandon that probably in about 1982 or 83, quite a long time ago, and have embraced this amillennial view because I believe, foremostly, importantly, that God inaugurated the promised kingdom of God through Jesus Christ, death, burial, resurrection, ascension, and enthronement in heaven, and that this kingdom of Jesus Christ answers to everything that the promises of the kingdom down in the Old Testament prophecy speak to.
We would acknowledge Revelation 20 is one of the most difficult passages of all scripture to interpret rightly. Care and caution should be exercised, but I would argue that this passage is a problem for all three positions.
If we had time, we'd explain why. Let's just briefly and quickly consider some of the teachings. The binding of the dragon, Revelation 20. I saw an angel coming down from heaven, holding in his hand a key to the bottomless pit and a great chain.
He seized the dragon, the ancient serpent, who is the devil and Satan, bound him for 1 ,000 years, threw him into the pit, shut it, sealed it over him so that he might not deceive the nations any longer until the 1 ,000 years were ended.
And after that, he must be released for a little while. What's the view of the premillennialists? Well, this view, again, believes the millennium will take place after Christ's second coming. Upon his return, Jesus Christ will reign over the world from his throne in Jerusalem for 1 ,000 years, characterized as a time of peace and righteousness.
They view chapters 19 and 20 of Revelation to be chronological. Since chapter 19 describes the second coming, chapter 20 describes the millennium. They say one follows the next. Reasonably, they argue.
The millennium takes place immediately following the second coming. They would argue, just take it literally and accept what it says at face value. The problem is that what they see as being quite clear is not that clear on closer inspection.
For example, if one takes the premillennial view, particularly if one is dispensational and holds to two second comings of Christ, a rapture seven years later, the second coming, and a seven-year tribulation in between, problems arise.
We can pose a couple questions. How many physical resurrections will occur in the future? The rapture at the beginning of the tribulation? At the second coming at the end of the tribulation? Christians who died during the millennium, when are they raised?
And then at the end of the millennium? And yet, we could show from the scriptures that there's one resurrection of the just and the unjust, when Christ calls them forth from the graves and he separates them as a shepherd does his sheep from his goats.
There's problems with this. How many judgments will transpire in the future? Judgment at the beginning of the tribulation, judgment during the tribulation, judgment after the tribulation, judgment during the millennium, judgment at the end of the millennium.
How many judgments does the scripture speak of coming? One final judgment, the judgment seat of Christ of which we must all appear. And so there are questions that they have to deal with that is difficult for them if they dealt with them honestly.
Pre-millennials would argue against the Amaliel position as ludicrous in what verses one through three says about Satan being bound. How can you possibly believe Satan is bound? Because they assume what you mean by that is Satan is taken completely out of the world and he no longer has any influence whatsoever to cause harm.
Who could argue that for this current church age? Problem is nobody teaches that. I was sitting with quite a well-known pastor. This was 10 years, 12 years ago at a luncheon and somehow eschatology got in.
I don't think he even knew I was a pastor. And a matter of eschatology came up and I said, do you believe eschatology should be a test of fellowship, the doctrinal last things?
No, no, not at all.
People are free to believe what they want whether they're post-millennial or pre-millennial. But those Amillennialists, they don't believe the Bible. I didn't address it or whatnot, but I thought, what's the point?
What's the view of the post-millennialists regarding the binding of the dragon of Satan? How do they deal with this? Well, they deny Revelation 19 speaks of the second coming of Christ, which is amazing to me.
They say that it tells of the advance of the gospel in this age. And so they say the second coming of Christ is not mentioned until verse seven of chapter 20. It's to me, it just makes no sense to me.
What is the view of the Amillennialists? Amillennialists see the binding of Satan to be limited in scope. It's not saying he's removed completely from the world. They would say the passage does not say Satan's presence or power will be removed entirely from the world.
Rather, it said that God places a limitation, he's bound. Just like Jesus said, coming into the house, you have to bind the strong man and then you can spoil his goods. Until the cross, Satan had blinded the Gentile nations to the message of God's salvation.
Salvation was limited to the Jewish nation. The Gentiles were blinded by Satan, held in bondage by him. But because Christ conquered and subjected Satan to the authority through his death and resurrection, this power of Satan was broken.
And so we read that the devil was bound for 1 ,000 years so that he could no longer deceive the nations, is what Revelation 20 declares. The devil can no longer blind the Gentile nations to the kingdom, the gospel of the kingdom.
What about the 1 ,000 year reign? Verses four through six. Again, the view of the premillennialists, they believe this to be a literal 1 ,000 years to take place and they believe that two kinds of people will exist.
There will be Christians in glorified bodies, resurrected, and then there will be non-Christians in their physical bodies and they will dwell together throughout this 1 ,000 year reign. They would argue the text clearly states the kingdom will be 1 ,000 years in duration.
Does it not say Christians will reign 1 ,000 years? How can anyone dismiss this and not take it literally, they say? But we would argue that much of the Revelation is not to be taken literally. Numbers many times are symbolic.
John spoke about the seven spirits of God in the early part of Revelation. Are there seven Holy Spirits? No, seven was a number to signify fullness, the fullness of the Holy Spirit. To take that literally, you'd become a heretic.
View of the postmillennialists, they would argue that God limits Satan's authority through the gospel so as to secure advancement in history. Again, a transformation of the world for 1 ,000 years. What's the view of the amillennialists?
Again, we would argue the 1 ,000 years is a symbol for a period of long duration. It signifies the current church age. Those of the first resurrection speaks of the new birth, a spiritual resurrection.
The second resurrection is the physical resurrection of the entire human race. And they'd argue everywhere the scripture speaks of a single general resurrection of the dead and all believers and unbelievers will rise on that occasion and undergo a general judgment of mankind.
Premillennialists believe the resurrection of Christians and non-Christians are separate, separated by 1 ,000 years. We don't have time to look at those verses, but they speak about a general resurrection and general judgment.
And lastly, what about Satan being released again for a little season in Revelation 20, verses seven through 10? View of the premillennialists, they see a final end battle when Satan is loosed at the end of the 1 ,000 years.
Even though Jesus is physically reigning over the earth from his throne in Jerusalem, they teach, Satan will lead the people of the world to rebel against King Jesus, only to be defeated by him, bringing an end to world history.
I cannot fathom King Jesus ruling on a throne in Jerusalem over a 1 ,000-year earthly kingdom and the mass of the world rebelling against that at the end of 1 ,000 years. No way can I understand that being fit into the biblical setting forth of history.
What is the view of the premillennialists? Many see that at the end of the age, the devil being loosed once again will blind the Gentiles. The times of the Gentiles will be fulfilled, which will then lead to the Jews in mass becoming Christians.
It's a fulfillment of Romans chapter 11. The natural branches that had been broken off through unbelief are grabbed back in by God after the times of the Gentiles comes to an end. And they're being grabbed back in, they become Christians through faith in Jesus Christ, either will occur at or signal the second coming of Jesus Christ.
And so we see that it's a, you know, the intention of God through history to save his people, both Jew and Gentile, and a worldwide kingdom that we're seeing unfold even now and have for these last 2 ,000 years.
Conclusion, it's a difficult subject. Eschatology, the doctrine of last things should not be viewed as a test of fellowship, and we don't. Christians should not separate from one another based on disagreements about end time events.
As long as there is a belief in the literal physical second coming of Christ, when he will judge the world in righteousness, we should be able to abide with one another. And I have friends, you know, of these positions, various positions, and we agree to disagree.
It's a difficult matter. And I've been working through this for 40 plus years. And anyway, what we set forth today, I think, is the most reasonable way to understand the Bible consistently throughout.
The kingdom of God is a present reality. It's a future, you know, full realization when Jesus returns. You know, the kingdom is going to be fully realized at the second coming of Christ and on into eternity.
But the kingdom of God now is ruled over by King Jesus. He is Lord, and he's saving a people. And all over the world, there are people worshiping God through Jesus Christ today because Jesus is Lord, and the devil has no power to prevent the Lord Jesus from expanding his kingdom.
And God the Father has given him this authority, and he will accomplish that work in history until it's pointed in. Let's pray. Father, thank you for your word. And we confess, Lord, that it's difficult to work through all of these details, especially as we're taught, Lord, and we hear such sincere teaching from such good people through their preaching, teaching, and books.
But we pray that you would help us to understand your word rightly. Forgive us, Lord, for our error, our ignorance, and help us, direct us in truth. For we pray in Jesus' name, amen.
Amen