Radio Lux Lucet 75

You're listening to Radio Looks Loose and I'm your host Steve Matthews. Thanks for joining me for episode 75. The title of this episode is Elite to People, Shut Up and Obey. Well, welcome to the podcast here.

This is the second podcast, already the second podcast I've done here in January of 2022. Well, I think it's practically 2023. It's amazing how fast time flies, right? Hey, you know, I'm not a huge fan of winter.

And of course, we're really just getting winter kicked off here in Cincinnati. But you know, one thing that I like to look at is I like to look at the sunset and the sunrise. That's always something I just kind of encourage myself this time of year, because you gain about a minute of sunlight in the morning and a minute in the evening.

So you're picking up about, well, about two minutes a day, between now and June the 21st. And when I looked at the other day, I think it was a day or two back, I noticed that the sunset was at 5 .31 p .m.

Now, back on December 31st, it was sunset at 5 .15 p .m. So we picked up 16 minutes of daylight in the evening. That means we picked up 16 minutes of daylight in the morning. That means we've picked up a total of 32 minutes, so over half an hour of daytime here in just the past few weeks.

I guess what, it's about three weeks now, I guess, since the 21st, or almost three weeks, not quite three weeks. So that's kind of encouraging, you know, when the weather's cold out there, when you got snow blowing around and all that other stuff, I think, eh, the light keeps getting, staying a little bit more light every single day.

And I use that as a way of sort of encouraging myself, especially through the months of January and February, because quite frankly, the weather's not really all that great in Cincinnati in January and February.

You know, I had that day, it was, I guess, a couple days after Christmas, like the Monday after Christmas, I think the 27th, where it was 70 degrees out. And I actually went biking. I wore a short sleeve and shorts, and I went biking.

And I didn't have to wear any kind of winter gear, any kind of anything like that, which is pretty amazing. It's hard to believe I was doing that just a couple weeks ago. And then I think it was yesterday, I got up pretty early in the morning, it was nine degrees out.

So that's a pretty big change in a very short period of time. But, you know, it is January, and well, you know, single digit temperatures, they do happen around here. We did have a little bit of snow this week, too.

And it really didn't amount to all that much. I mean, it was quite literally a dusting. And it's kind of weird how snow works around here. Because it seems like, and I don't have any stats here to back me up on this, I'm just kind of going by gut feel on this.

But it always seems like when these big storms come through, they either go south of us through Kentucky, or they go north of us through Ohio. But for some reason, there's always seems like there's this gap right where I am.

And somehow snow either misses us one way or the other. Like they had that really big snow. I think it was about well as early earlier this week. And that was one that it snowed in I -95 over there in Virginia, and all those people got trapped and, and they were up in arms.

I think there were some even some important government officials actually got stuck in the snow. And they had to suffer, I guess, along with with with the plebs. And yeah, so there was a there was a big stink about that.

But that that whole system and went south from south of us through Kentucky, we didn't get a get so much as even a flake. On Thursday, we did get a little bit of snow. But like I say, it was just a really light dusting.

All the heavy stuff stayed down in Kentucky. So they're quite welcome to it. You know, there's really not as much advantage to having snow as there used to be. And of course, when I was a kid, you know, snow days, you know, yay, snow days.

I mean, there's I mean, there's nothing better than getting a snow day because you don't you don't expect it. You're not planning on you kind of hoping for it. But you never know if you're really actually going to get it or not.

And, and then those days when we would get it, that was just that was like the best thing ever. That was better than Christmas. As far as I was concerned. There's nothing I love more than getting a snow day when I was a kid.

And, you know, when I was, of course, you get to be an adult and you're working, it's you have to have a lot more severe kind of condition in order to get any kind of time off because of snow. Well, I never really, I think maybe on one or two occasions, I had maybe a day shortened by snow.

But pretty much when you're an adult that that kind of goes out the window, you know, you just you just don't get a whole lot of benefits out of snow. But you get all the you get all the the negative side of it, you got to go out and shovel and all this other stuff.

And of course, the last couple years I was working from home. And when you're working from home, obviously, you're not going to get a snow day. It's like you get in there and you get your monitor on and you get to work.

So yeah, whatever. So I mean, really, there's not a whole lot of benefit to snow at my age, which is unfortunate. But sometimes I do like a little bit of it, but not too much. Let's see here. Oh, and you know, the other thing too, about snow days is how much they've changed.

I mean, it used to be, of course, way back in day one. I was a kid. What you did, you know, how did you find out whether you had a delay or you were off? Well, you had to listen to the radio and they'd read through the whole list of all the schools that were off or on delays.

And you'd wait for your school district to be called. And either it would be the the thrill of victory you get the day off or be the agony of defeat. They wouldn't call your your school's name. And and then, of course, you'd think, well, these other people are getting off and I got to go to school.

Well, yeah, you know, that's an early lesson that life can be unfair sometimes. There's no question about it. I guess now probably what they do is either they go online or maybe they even get a text alert.

I don't know when I at my at my job, you know, they had a set up with a text alert if there's any kind of cancellations or delays or anything like that. So I suppose probably schools do that, too. Now, anyway.

So enough about that. So back to the the topic, and this was what I was going to talk about here today. There's a I took the title of this particular podcast from a pretty famous headline. In fact, I think this is probably one of the most famous newspaper headlines maybe in at least American journalism history.

And I've got it up here on the on the screen. And it's this headline is from 1975 in the New York Daily News. The headline is pretty terse and it just reads this Ford to City drop dead. Sub headline is vows he'll veto any bailout.

So back in 1975, New York City was on the brink of going bankrupt and they were begging for a bailout from the federal government. Gerald Ford was president at the time, and he refused to bail them out.

Interestingly enough, I'm sure that wouldn't happen today. But back in 1975, a president could still refuse to bail out a city, even New York City. And so they ran this headline Ford to City drop dead.

Well, Gerald Ford never really never told New York City to go drop dead. But what he did do is. Now, let's see. Well, hi, Jennifer. Thanks for thanks for stopping by. I appreciate that. See her in the live stream chat there, Jennifer.

Thanks for stopping by. I always appreciate that. And anyway, so Gerald Ford. Yeah, he he denied denied the bailout. And so the New York Daily News, they come up with this headline and and I guess they wanted to be a little bit dramatic.

They wanted to grab people's attention. So Ford to City drop dead. And that has been a famous headline ever since that it was done on October 30th, 1975, by the the New York Daily News. So there's that.

So anyway, that's kind of the inspiration for today's title, which is elite to people shut up and obey. It's kind of the same sort of a thing. And this is one of the I think one of the things that's very disturbing to me about the way.

The the way politics is handled today, it used to be that politicians, at least maybe some of them still do, but more and more, it seems like what we get is we get diktats from on high rather than anyone trying to to persuade us.

And I find that very disturbing. And there are several examples of this going on right now. And I wanted to just go through a few of these examples and and show you exactly what I'm talking about. Example number one of shut up and obey is this whole stink over COVID.

Now, in my opinion, and I'm giving you my opinion here, I think it's an elite globalist type of an operation where we're told by governments, news outlets, social media, the entertainment industry, schools, universities, and sadly, a lot of churches, even those that claim to be Bible believing churches, that we all must be masked up, vaxed and stripped of our rights to stop the spread.

You know, and if we don't go along with that, we're killing grandma and we're the problem. And just as an example of that sort of thing, there was a headline and this goes back to, let's see, okay, November, it was dated November 12th, 2021.

This is from the New York Times. And I've got that up there on the live stream on the screen. Headline says Biden mandates vaccines for workers saying our patience is wearing thin. Initially reluctant to enact mandates.

President is now moving aggressively to require a vaccination as the Delta variant races across the country. Well, you know, here it is. It's two months later and everybody's forgotten about the Delta variant.

Now it's Omicron, Omicron, Omicron, Omicron, Omicron. It's all Omicron all the time. You know, how quickly these things move, you know, and of course, Biden had promised months early, oh, there's not going to be any kind of, there's not going to be any mandate.

Oh, no, no, no. And then he gets up there and he decides he wants to lecture the Americans and tell them, you know, that their patience is wearing thin. There's no good reason for them not to have been vaccinated.

Your refusal has cost us all. He's talking about those who are not vaccinated. I mean, where do presidents, I mean, no president has ever talked to the American people like that in my lifetime. I mean, who does this guy think he is?

You know, he thinks he's, I don't know, he thinks he's Pharaoh. He thinks he's, I don't know, the king of Siam or something. I mean, the arrogance, the extraordinary arrogance that comes out of his mouth is frankly just truly shocking to me.

I mean, this is not the kind of government that the United States was set up to have. This is not somebody who's displaying, who's behaving like a servant leader of any sort. Now, in my opinion, there's a number of problems here with the whole COVID issue.

And I think there's some very, very good reasons why people would be hesitant to take the vaccine. I mean, we know, number one, that the government, you know, through Tony Fauci, funded the development of the COVID virus.

They funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In my opinion, I don't have proof to back this up, but I'm simply just, I think based on the entire COVID narrative being a construct, being a plandemic, as some people call it, that I think it was released also by government officials at a time of their choosing.

I think it was probably in part, it was part of the rig of the 2020 election. It was in, the reason I say that is because it was used as excuse for changing election day into election month, massive mail-in ballots, which created all kinds of room for the Democrats to create fraud.

Governments locked down healthy people and lied that it was 15 days to slow the spread. Never, as far as I am aware, is there ever been a case where you have quarantined healthy people. I mean, the basic idea behind quarantines is you quarantine the sick.

You don't quarantine healthy people. You see that all the way back in scripture when it talks in Leviticus about the laws of dealing with leprosy, there was no provision to lock down all of Israel to prevent the spread of leprosy.

No, I mean, if there was a law and someone could be quarantined, but that person first had to voluntarily come forward. He didn't, it wasn't forcibly test. He voluntarily came forward, showed himself to the priest.

He was examined by the priest. If he was found to be with leprosy at that point, yes, he was quarantined until such time as he was better, until such time as he had recovered from the disease. But there wasn't any general lockdown of Israel to prevent the spread of leprosy.

That didn't occur. And this has always been the way that diseases have been handled, or at least that's the standard practice. And that's the proper practice. You don't punish people with quarantines who aren't sick.

So, I mean, the fact that the government did do that is, I think, quite alarming. And I think that ought to send up red flags and say, and tell you, hey, there's a problem here. Something's not right.

There's something going on. Maybe there's an ulterior motive, which I think that there is. Mask mandates. And mask mandates do nothing to prevent the spread. The virus easily goes through the masks. That's admitted.

I don't think there's a single study out there that shows that masks do any good. And when those people who are actually being honest about it will tell you that it doesn't help. But those mask mandates have helped to bring about what Dr. Robert Malone called mass formation psychosis, which is essentially driving an entire society mad.

Then you've got the vaccine mandates, not just in the United States, or at least Biden is attempting to initiate one here in the United States, but you've got them all over the world. Austria is talking about implementing vaccine mandates.

So is Italy. So is, you know, I think the Great Britain has done that. I know Germany has talked about doing that. There are huge threats of punishments and all this in Australia if you don't get vaccinated.

Demands to set up vaccine passports. So not only do you have to get vaccinated, but if you want to just engage in normal activities, if you don't have a vaccine and you haven't been vaccinated, you can't buy or sell.

I mean, that whole thing with COVID, I mean, it sounds to me like these politicians have taken their policy prescriptions straight out of the book of Revelation. No one may buy or sell unless he receives the mark of the beast.

Well, no one may buy or sell unless he's vaxxed. And I would say to politicians, I mean, if you are really thinking seriously and speaking this way, you really need to go back and rethink your ideas because you're, frankly, what you're doing is tyrannical and it is terrifying.

And people do not trust you. You know, there was a great quote, this is Patrick Henry, he says this, he says, guard with jealous attention the public liberty, suspect everyone who approaches that jewel.

That was Patrick Henry. And he was absolutely right about that. And the threats to our liberties, to our lives from these COVID nuts ought to set off screaming alarm bells in everybody's head. You know, these people are approaching the jewel of liberty and they are trying to take it from you.

They're trying to take your liberty and then they want to sell it back to you bit by bit. That's what they're looking to do. And these people cannot be, they must not be allowed to get away with this.

And they have to be rebuked from the word of God for their tyranny. And this nonsense that somehow, unless you go along with them, unless you accept their arbitrary dictates, that somehow you can't buy or sell is absolutely evil.

It's one of the vilest things that I've ever heard. And the thing is, of course, anyone who speaks out against that narrative is canceled. You're removed from social media, you're publicly shamed. For instance, you know, there was a big stink here recently.

This is the latest example. I mentioned Dr. Robert Malone before. He's someone who is credited, he's got the patents apparently on the mRNA technology that underlies the COVID vaccines. And I think it was on the 31st of December.

So it was just, well, I guess, what a week ago, roughly a week ago, I guess, eight days ago, he went on The Joe Rogan Show, gave a three-hour interview. And I'm going to actually put the link to the interview in the show notes here in case you like it.

He went on, Joe Rogan is on Spotify. And I was listening today, I think I listened about the first two hours of it so far. But it's an interesting interview. But Robert Malone was canceled. He was pulled off of Twitter.

And he doesn't even know particularly what comment he made that got him kicked off Twitter. Twitter doesn't tell people. And this is the kind of thing that is deeply disturbing. And it makes me suspect the people who are pushing this narrative.

I mean, when you cannot discuss science, when you cannot question scientific results, that's not science anymore. That's propaganda. You know, that's dogma. That's like medieval dogma. I think Aaron Rodgers, the quarterback of the Green Bay Packers said something like that.

He said, you know, if you can't question science, it's not science anymore. It's what he's called. Yeah, I think he called it propaganda. He said, it's not science. It's not propaganda. It's superstition.

So the idea that somehow you can't question science, and if you do, you're going to get flushed down the memory hole. You're going to have your accounts pulled. You're going to be canceled. You're going to be shamed.

You're going to be unpersoned. I guess that's like what they used to do in the Soviet Union, they used to unperson people. That right there, once again, makes me question every single thing these people who are pushing the vaccines are doing.

I mean, just for a thought experiment for a moment, I mean, you could say, well, let's suppose for a moment that the vaccines were 100 perfectly safe. They were no more dangerous than, say, getting a shot of, say, saline solution.

So it's guaranteed that nothing bad could happen if you got a COVID vaccine. I still wouldn't take it just because they have linked my liberty to my doing this. And they have acted in such an underhanded way, in such a guilty way.

I mean, I have never seen people look more guilty than what Tony Fauci and these other people who are pushing the vaccine mandates look. I mean, I think some of it is driven by money, certainly profit driven.

I don't think there's any question about that. But I think there's something more to it. I mean, when you start trying to institute these vaccine passports, when you start trying to say, well, you can't have a job if you're not vaccinated, or you can't go to the store if you're not vaccinated, or you can't fly on an airplane if you're not vaccinated.

There's a darker agenda at work here, especially when you look at the fact that these vaccines do not do what they say they do. The basic rule is the more vaccines, the more COVID. The more vaccines, the more COVID.

You know, there was a, it was kind of interesting, let's see if I can find this here. Maybe I can bring this up while I'm talking. But there are certain countries that are, oh, I guess you might call them almost test cases for all of the, I guess I'm not going to be able to do it because I'm not logged into my account.

But there was a chart that I saw the other day. And it was of the COVID cases in Israel. And COVID cases in Israel are now at an all-time high. And most of the people in Israel have not had one shot, not two shots, not three shots, but actually four shots.

They've been, they're double boosted now. And they've got COVID cases soaring through the roof. So again, you know, how effective are these vaccines? I don't think they're very effective. They don't seem to be.

And on top of that, they're pretty dangerous. You know, the FDA historically has used the two criteria for drugs are safe and effective. Well, when I'm looking at the results of these vaccines, it appears that they are neither one of those.

And it's surrounded by a lot of mystery, a lot of mandates, and a lot of attacks on basic liberties. And this entire thing screams red flags all over the place. And I do not trust the people who are pushing them.

And as I said, I would not accept a saline solution injection from Anthony Fauci, because I do not trust him. He has forfeited the public trust with contradictory statements, with mandates, with all of the just, I mean, if we followed Anthony Fauci, I mean, it would be, you know, this would be the most depressing, boring country, most oppressed country that you can imagine.

It would be absolute tyranny. I mean, notice, here's the thing, you know, evangelical Christians used to always get this bad rap that they're out to ruin everybody's fun. Oh, you know, you Christians, you just, you know, you want to take away everybody's fun.

You know, you're always complaining about, you know, all the immorality of this or that or the other thing. Well, let me ask you this, you know, who is pushing lockdowns? Who is pushing fear? Who is lying?

Who is contradicting themselves? It's not the people that are standing up against these COVID mandates. It's not the evangelical Christians who want to go to church. You know, people like, say, John MacArthur at Grace Community Church out there in LA, and they never stopped holding church throughout the entire pandemic, and they want a judgment in court against the state, I think, and against the city of Los Angeles.

It's not to endorse everything that John MacArthur's ever said or done. I have my disagreements with him, but he was definitely right about that, and he was definitely right to take the stand that he did.

And it's not evangelical Christians that are pushing COVID tyranny. You know, it's all these people who like to posit themselves as, you know, liberals. Oh, you know, we just want everybody to be free and flourish.

You know, we don't always stodgy old rules and regulations and blah, blah, blah. Well, I mean, these are the very people that are cracking down on liberty and destroying it. Now, it looks right now like the Supreme Court, and I'm going to bring this up here.

Yeah, this is a story on CNN. It says, Supreme Court appears poised to block Biden's vaccine and testing rules for businesses. Well, that's good because the tyrant Biden wants to force everybody who works for a company with 100 or more employees to get the vaccine, and if you don't get the vaccine, you can't work.

You cannot sell your labor into the market. You cannot earn money to be able to go buy things. You can't buy or sell. You're completely locked out of mainstream society because you don't want to take this unsafe and ineffective vaccine.

Hopefully, let's pray that the Supreme Court does do what this headline says they're probably going to do, but here's the thing that concerns me. It says, but in a separate challenge, some justices seem more open to a vaccine mandate aimed at certain healthcare workers.

Well, I don't think healthcare workers should be mandated to take vaccines either. They have rights just like everybody else. The truth is there's nothing, there's not one statement anywhere in the constitution that speaks about vaccines or required medical care.

There's no authority given to the federal government to do these kinds of things. It's a principle of, if it's not given, it's not given. That authority does not exist. It's pretend authority, and they are trying to steal Joe Biden and the people that work for him and his regime are trying to steal our liberties and parcel it back to us.

As Christians, we have to rebuke these people. We have to rebuke them from the word of God using logic, and we can't back down. We have to keep speaking out about this. We have to keep writing. We have to keep doing the things, talking to our neighbors, talking to our friends.

We can't lay down on this. We have a job to stand up for liberty. So that's shut up and obey number one. Now, shut up and obey number two is election fraud. There was a, let's see here, got the story here.

Oh yeah, here it is. This is a, in fact, this is from today, January 8th, 2022. This is an article by Jonathan Turley, who's a pretty well-known public, well, he's a law professor, I think, at George Washington University, and he's pretty well-known as a public commentator.

I think he shows up on a lot of TV stations. He appears on Fox News. He's got his own, this very popular blog that he has, and here's the article he posted here from today. Democratic governor calls for criminalizing lying about election results.

Now, one of the things that's interesting is that Jonathan Turley himself is a Democrat, but unlike most of his fellow Democrats today, he's actually pretty good. He's actually, he's quite good on the issue of free speech.

Let's read a little bit of his article here, and then we'll comment on it. So this is a quote, quote, for years I've lamented how the Democratic Party has embraced censorship and the criminalization of speech.

I come from a liberal Democratic family in Chicago, and the Democratic Party once championed free speech as the defining value of the party. Democratic politicians now lead calls for censorship to silence their opponents and corporate regulations to protect citizens from dangerous choices in reading material.

Insert there, I think he's being a little sarcastic about that. So Turley continues here, quote, the same concerns were raised this week after Washington governor Jay Inslee called for the criminalization of lies, quote lies, about election results.

Inslee wants to convict people who raise election challenges or allegations. Such a law would threaten political speech and create a chilling effect for those who want to raise such concerns in contested elections.

Inslee made his comments as part of the January 6th anniversary. It appears to follow Speaker Nancy Pelosi's to preserve the narrative of that day. According to the Seattle Times, Inslee declared that it should not be legal in the state of Washington for elected officials or candidates for office to willfully lie about these election results.

He would make such comments a gross misdemeanor subject to incarceration. Okay, so end quote of all that. So this Democratic governor wants to toss people in jail for, I guess, willfully lying about election results.

Of course, the problem is who's going to determine whether they're lying or not? That's the real question here. And Turley acknowledges that. Turley continues here, he says, quote, such a criminal law would be ripe for abuse and would create a chilling effect that would be positively glacial.

We have seen other Democratic leaders use the criminal process in similarly reckless fashion. This country has a long history of election fraud from Tammany Hall in New York to the Daily Machine in Chicago.

Raising doubts over such elections often forces greater public scrutiny and marshals resources to contest results. Indeed, Democratic lawyers like Mark Elias have challenged Republican victories as he and others denounced such GOP challenges as attacks on democracy.

End quote. Now, I think it's very interesting here that, of course, and again, Turley is a Democrat, but he strikes me, and I have some of my disagreements with him on some things, but I believe he's a fair-minded man.

And he is really good on free speech. And he freely admits he talks about this country has a long history of election fraud. It's just interesting. He talks about Tammany Hall in New York and the Daily Machine in Chicago.

Now, both of those political machines were Roman Catholic controlled. And they were famously massively fraudulent. If we're to take Inslee's approach to things, nobody would ever be able to say anything about that.

You could send your thugs out and steal an election, and you just have to sit there in your hands, I guess, and sit there quietly and, I guess, applaud politely when the winners announced, and even though there's substantial evidence that he won by fraud.

So, I mean, you've got this Democratic governor out there. He actually wants to make free speech he wants to criminalize it. You know, the First Amendment was not put in the Constitution so we could talk about the weather or maybe, you know, argue about, you know, who's the best baseball player or who's going to win the Super Bowl or something like that.

That's not why it's there. It's put there to protect people to be able to talk about difficult things, about things that are unpopular. I mean, this governor wants to attack the First Amendment. And I think that's an absolute outrage.

You know, again, it's just shut up and obey. This is the way it is, and all you people out there that have questions, silence. Just go away, pleb. Go away, peon. Send the unwashed hoi polloi back to their homes, and we're just going to do what it is we want to do, and you just have to accept it, and that's just the way it is.

We're not even going to argue or discuss it with you. So, I mean, the 2020 presidential election thing, if Inslee were to get his way, and I don't think he probably will, but if he does get his way, that's another thing that you're not allowed to talk about.

It's just a baseless conspiracy theory. Now, in my opinion, and this is an opinion, but in my opinion, there is more than enough reason to question the 2020 presidential election results. There are several statistical oddities.

I mean, one of them is that Donald Trump won 18 of 19 what they call bellwether counties, and these were counties that every year from 1980 through 2016 always picked the winner of the presidential election.

So, I mean, that's 1980, 84, 88, 92, 96, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016. So, that's what? Did I count that right? Is that 15 presidential election cycles? Let's see. Let me do that again. 80, 84, 88, 92, 96, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2000.

That's 10. I'm sorry. So, for 10 straight elections, and in fact, this one county here, this is the Wall Street Journal, it says Vigo County in Indiana previously sided with the White House winner in all 16 elections since 1956.

So, that's even more. This one particular county goes back to the 1950s, but in 2020, these bellwether counties failed, except for one to pick the winner of the presidential election. So, that's pretty weird.

I mean, when Donald Trump wins 18 of 19 bellwether counties and loses the election, that's kind of weird. Now, does that in and of itself, is that slam dunk proof that Joe Biden or that Donald Trump was cheated in the election?

Well, no. I mean, you can find some other explanations for that, but it's not nothing. It's a data point. Let's continue to build our case here. Here's another item. This is a headline here. This is from the Quad Cities newspaper, I guess, out in Iowa.

It's got a headline that says, Trump not first to win Iowa, Florida, and Ohio and lose the election. President, and this is from December 11th, 2020, so about a month after the election, says President Donald Trump on Thursday claimed that no presidential candidate ever came close to losing an election who won Iowa, Florida, and Ohio.

That is wrong. With less than five minutes of research, anyone, even Trump, could discover that Richard Nixon won Iowa, Florida, and Ohio in 1960, but lost the election to John F. Kennedy. Well, you know what's interesting about that?

Now, I know the Quad Cities want you to think that they just dunked on Donald Trump's head or dunked on the head of any Republican out there who thinks that Donald Trump won the election, as I do. They think that they dunked on their head, but it's really not as much of a slam dunk as they think.

And here's why. They go back to the 1960 election. Well, the 1960 election was famously fraudulent. There was a lot of indication that that election was stolen in Chicago and stolen in Texas. There was a man, Earl Mazzo, he was a journalist with the New York, I think it's New York Herald Tribune.

I'm going by memory here. I think that's the correct newspaper. But I read a comment. He wrote a series of articles talking about the election theft back in 1960 in the month or two after the election, and he was going to write a 12-part series, and he was told to cease and desist.

I guess the order came down on high. But he was finding all kinds of serious election irregularities. And of course, he went to Chicago. Now, Chicago was run by the Roman Catholic Daily Machine, which even Jonathan Turley admits was famous for being fraudulent.

So it's not at all surprising that there were election irregularities in Chicago in the 1960 election. It's not at all surprising. And later, and I think Earl Mazzo is deceased now, but I read an interview with him.

I think it was maybe in the Washington Post. I've got it somewhere. I don't have it handy here. But he made the comment in 2000. He was still alive at that time in 2000. He said that they stole it like crazy.

They stole it like crazy in Chicago and in Texas. Those are his exact words, or I think pretty close to his exact words. So yeah, I mean, you've got this Quad Cities going back and saying, well, you know, Richard Nixon won Iowa and Ohio and Florida in 1960, and he lost.

Well, yeah, he lost because that was a fraudulent election. If anything, I think it maybe strengthens Donald Trump's case that he was cheated out of the election. Again, we're talking here about opinion.

We're talking about strengthening the case. Now, does that absolutely, is that the only possible explanation that you can put on that? No, you could come up with other explanations. But what we're trying to do is determine what seems likely.