El Arca y Las Tinieblas Película Completa - The Ark and the Darkness Full Movie (SPANISH DUB)

Audio by Greg Biza,

financed by Indiegogo and Patreon

collaborators,

written and directed by Ralph Stream,

narrated by Jaron Lewis.

I think people don't believe in the flood today because they don't have access to the precise information

and the evidence that exists.

They are simply captivated by entertainment, social media.

We have movies like Noé, which in a very fictitious and senseless way, totally

distort the Bible.

And for many people it is the only source they have for something they believe is a biblical story.

And we have, of course, all the implicit presupposition of evolution and the geological column

and all these things that tell students that the earth has existed for

millions, if not billions of years.

Man is simply a product of natural succession.

The flood is a supernatural event.

The flood is a divine judgment.

The flood destroyed humanity.

And they are not told that there is evidence of these things.

They are not shown the historicity of Genesis to say that this is very well sustained

in our scientific era.

So on the one hand we have a lack of information and on the other hand the fear of man.

For the same reason why they do not believe in many of the things that the Bible says that are literally true, literally history and

literally science.

The fear of looking ridiculous, the intimidation by people who present science TV shows and

dress in white lab coats.

I think they are afraid of making a fool of themselves.

But when you really go beyond the surface and observe the viability and

historicity, it is almost inevitably plausible.

At the beginning of the 19th century, when the idea of ​​millions of years was developed,

it was developed as a result of a conscious rejection of the flood and biblical chronology.

Most of the church came to the conclusion that the flood was not global, it was not geologically significant,

the age of the earth does not matter and so for the next 100 to 150 years

the flood was simply forgotten.

And even today, to a great extent, it is ignored by most Christians.

They just never think about it and its relationship with the question of the age of the earth, but it is of vital importance.

We can go back and we can see in the fossil record, for example, what happened.

When we observe the world around us and we see those hundreds and hundreds of layers of rock, they are sedimentary layers, that means

they were deposited by the water.

The flood is a reminder that God judges sin and that he is going to judge the world again.

He sent the flood to punish evil.

At that moment, that's why God sent the flood.

It is important to punish evil, that is justice.

What is fair?

The reason why the ark is so incredibly important for the flood is because man's sin

deserves judgment.

The Bible clearly reveals that we are approaching the moment of the second global judgment.

If we do not understand or believe in the first global judgment, then we will not be

prepared for the final global judgment.

The consequences of the next judgment could not be more relevant.

What is at stake is heaven or hell.

The Holy Bible, a book inspired and architected by God

and written by his people, which dates from the beginning of true

human history, from the time of the true origins of man.

A book that teaches us that the earth does not have millions of years as we have been made to believe.

A book that teaches us that we do not come from monkeys or apes or from the primordial broth,

but a book that instead shows us our creator as a loving,

merciful and just God.

A God who created a beautiful world in which the whole planet was once a paradise.

A paradise that he gave us to fill and in which to multiply.

In Genesis we are shown that God had finished all creation in

six literal days and that in effect everything he had created

was very, very good.

In a span of four days, God finished the heavens and the earth.

On the fifth day he began to make the marine creatures, both large and

small.

And on that same day he also made all the exotic flying creatures

that flew through the open firmament of the beautiful sky.

On the sixth day he made all the majestic terrestrial creatures,

all the dinosaurs, along with humanity.

And in the middle of it, the tree of life.

But there was also another tree that God had placed in the garden, one of which God

ordered man not to eat.

Unfortunately, humanity used its free will to sin against its holy and just God.

With free will come the consequences, and in this case the consequences would

befall humanity in the darkness.

Before the fall, God saw everything he had done and it was very good.

It was just as it should have been.

It arose exactly as he intended.

At the end of Genesis 1 it says that it was very good.

God looked at everything he had done and it was very good.

And we get an idea of how good it was in the last three verses when God

says that both man and animals and birds were vegetarians.

They did not eat each other, they ate the plants and the fruits of the plants.

That tells us a lot about how good the world was.

Creation was in a state of innocence.

This affirms a fundamental element of God's character.

He is good.

God is not the author of evil or death.

God entered the garden, had communion with man, and they could communicate with

him and see him according to the way we understand the precondition.

He would have lived forever.

God warned him in advance, if you eat this, you will die.

Well, Adam did eat, and God told him, Adam, you will die.

God said, you came from dust and you will return to dust.

It is physical death.

Through a man sin entered the world and death by sin.

Adam and Eve began to die physically.

The fall of man affected all creation.

The earth was cursed.

All creation suffers under the slavery of the corrupt.

Sadly, the reality of the fall is now easily seen wherever we look.

In this broken world we see death, violence, corruption, lies, hatred and sin.

Man is banished from the place of God's own presence.

And that communion is not restored as it was before.

Man will have to work with the sweat of his forehead and then return to the dust of which he was made.

That is what has happened in the world.

This is how entropy is described.

The idea that things are subject to decay, dissolution, finally death.

The whole world is like that.

It has a limited useful life, so to speak.

The world changed profoundly.

Virtually everything was corrupted.

The human soul, even creatures, suddenly became carnivorous or poisonous.

Diseases and viruses emerged that otherwise would be poisonous.

Everything changed radically.

Even the plants changed.

These suddenly became herbs that drowned the crops.

The earth was cursed.

Thorns and thorns began to grow.

We do not live in the very good original creation, but in a fallen creation, a cursed creation.

The fall was a massive, catastrophic event that changed the world.

Everything was corrupted.

It was a tragedy at the highest level possible.

Evil had to mature before God unleashed the first judgment.

Lord God had created a beautiful world in which everything was once

very good.

But when the first man broke the commandment of God, the domain of man was submerged in sin

and death, which only worsened over time.

Only men had been corrupted, but everything under the domain of

man.

The animals became carnivores and became one against the other and against man,

where once the earth had been full of the goodness of God, now it

was full of the celebration of evil and endless violence.

Paradise, along with the innocence of man, had now

gone.

Lord Jesus would tell us later that, as in the days of Noah,

the world would return again just before his return.

Most flood geologists point out that the world or the earth had a warmer and

softer climate globally, and evolutionists also believe it.

It is not only due to the continental drift that we find pine forests and dinosaur fossils

in Antarctica.

Not only because those continents were before in different places, but because the earth had a warmer

and softer global climate, heavier and more exuberant vegetation,

greener and thicker forests that extended towards the poles and moved away from the equatorial zones.

At this time, we simply do not have the types of forests that could generate the coal deposits that we have

or provide the vast source of coal

that would have been necessary for the layers of coal that we have today.

We would have had to have a more exuberant, warmer, more forested, more

vegetated land.

Clearly, the amount of vegetation in the pre -drug world would have been much greater, much more exuberant.

Today's world is a desert compared to what the pre -drug world would have been.

A softer topography, a much easier climate, a much more prolific animal

life.

We have many creatures in the fossil record that are the same as today, but they were much bigger.

Gigantism in the fossil record indicates that the pre -drug world was more

suitable for biological life.

Originally, at least, it would not have had mountainous, impassable chains or huge desert areas.

God created the world to be inhabited.

Before the flood, humanity had caused significant damage to its environment.

The Bible speaks of the evil of men.

In Genesis 6, it is said that all thought of man's heart was only evil continuously and that the whole

world was full of violence because of man.

And I think it would be a very terrifying place to live.

The intentions and thoughts of the human heart were evil continuously.

The earth was full of violence and all flesh had corrupted its way into the earth.

There was an excess of sin, violence and evil.

And God said, I'm going to destroy the earth.

The remnant, there is no family, found grace in the eyes of God.

Apparently they were not from those who were corrupted.

God took that remnant of humanity and was able to preserve it.

One of the things that people find interesting is the longevity of humans before the flood.

Noah was 600 years old and after leaving the ark, he lived 350 years more.

He was 950 years old when he died.

His children who left the ark did not live that long, but they lived until they were 500 years

old.

And then the next generation and the next generation until the 400s and the 300s.

We are reaching Terah, the father of Abraham, who lived until the 200s.

Abraham lived until 175 and there was an exponential decline in longevity.

Adam and Eve did not have mutations.

The first 10 patriarchs before the flood had very low rates of mutation and therefore they all lived approximately

the same age.

Something happened at the time of the flood and it was then that this incredible degeneration of humanity

happened.

There was this incredible decline in longevity.

When you trace the data, it's amazing because these come directly from the Bible

and you wouldn't expect scientific data in the Bible, but these follow a strict curve of decline

and this is impressive.

In the Bible we are told that before the flood, men lived almost a thousand years.

The average age of men at that time was so amazingly high compared to today that some

have difficulty understanding how such longevity was possible.

However, an important clue is found in the ages that are given to us in the book of Genesis.

In an almost computerized way, the book of Genesis reveals that the hopes of life after the flood of the

genealogical line of Adam follow mathematical concepts known as exponential decay.

What it means is that if you graphically represented the longevities of all men after the flood,

you would not see a linear line that descends gradually, as you would probably see if the ages were

invented, but rather what you would see is a curve of exponential decay with minor variations,

since not even two people are the same.

The men who recorded these ages throughout history would really have conspired together to create

data that follows an exponential decay curve?

Instead, what we see is exactly similar to the data we would expect in the sequels of a global flood,

revealing a strong initial decline in life expectancy just after the flood due to catastrophic

environmental changes, no more access to rich food and nutrients from

the world that was lost, and genetic mutations that were not present before.

The truth is that no one at the time of recording these metrics would even think of representing

them in an exponential decay curve if they were creating a fiction.

This sophisticated decay curve is actually the result of a real and

fictional easily demonstrable.

And then they showed the real story.

And Noé was dressed in a tunic, he was shirtless, he had a shaved head, he looked like an

Egyptian.

And the Noah's Ark was one of those boats where people go to drink beer.

I'm not kidding, look it up.

Discovery Channel, the Noah's Ark, the real story?

How do you know that?

To claim that this is the real story and then see how it crumbles into pieces since of

course it was not structurally solid, ridiculing the structure of the ark.

When I was a master's student at the State University of Ohio, I studied the geometry of the

transverse section and the length of the simple reading of the

Bible.

And I discovered that it is dynamically stable, 90 degrees in

inclination mode and 90 degrees in rotation mode, which means that it can reach up to 90 degrees and

then return.

It's stable.

It's not that that wouldn't have caused problems for people and animals in the ark if it had tilted so much, but that shows the

stability.

Certainly, anything they could have experienced in the turbulence, the ark could have supported it structurally.

This is an ark that scales at 200 and I put it in my pool.

And we put a one -inch measuring device here and we were able to scale the waves.

It was designed to withstand waves up to 500 feet in height and still remain stable.

It never turned 500 feet.

A tsunami, by the way, is about 100 feet.

It gives you an idea of ​​the dynamic stability.

Most of the biology did not need to be in the ark, nor most of the plants, nor most of the

insects, only the creatures that breathe through their lungs.

Most species live in the ocean and develop well in a flood.

The Bible does not say that Noah had to take two of each species to the ark.

He had to take two of each type.

The same word that is used in Genesis 1, which speaks of God creating different types of plants and animals to

reproduce according to the species.

We believe that there were perhaps only around 1 ,400 species and 7 ,000 animals in the ark.

On average, perhaps a large sheep or a small cow, but most of the creatures were much

smaller.

We are not talking about, for example, two Great Danes, two German shepherds, two wolves, two

coyotes.

He carried two types of dog in the ark.

And we know from modern genetics that there is a tremendous genetic variation incorporated in

the DNA of each type of creature.

And so the scientists of creation have been studying what the type created was compared

to our modern classification system.

And they think that in most cases it was equivalent approximately to the

family level.

Evolutionists simply exaggerate because they focus on the species.

Evolutionists often claim that it would not be possible to fit all the species of life on Earth in a ship the

size of the ark, even taking into account how huge Noah's Ark really was.

With approximately 50 feet in height, 85 feet wide and more than 500 feet long, the ark is the

largest wooden ship known to have been built by man.

With the USS Wyoming, a gigantic wooden sailboat built in 1909, occupying second place

with 450 feet long.

However, regardless of size, imagining how the ark could house 18 million species of all

life on Earth is a fairly basic way of understanding the excellent efficiency of the ark's economy.

The reality is that marine creatures, insects, invertebrates and plant species did not need

to be included in the ark.

God instructed Noah to take only terrestrial vertebrate animals.

And when you simplify those animals to their genealogical class structure found in Genesis, which is known as

a type, you can reduce even more significantly the number of types of necessary animals to

around approximately 1 ,400 types or approximately 6 ,750

animals in total.

Of those animals, you don't need to bring completely mature adults either, when younger individuals would

fit better, eat less, waste less and live longer while reproducing in the

post -diluvian world.

With approximately 6 ,750 animals aboard the ark, we can now also estimate

that approximately 1 ,400 cages were needed.

And considering that only 20 of the volume of the ark was needed for food storage, we can see that we

have a lot of space left for cages and infrastructure, with the remaining area capable of

housing the equivalent of 483 trucks within its volume.

It is not a surprise either that the dimensions that God gave for the ark turn out to be optimal for

stability.

In fact, if we scale the ark, it seems that modern cruisers have taken notes of the dimensions of the

ark, and we can see surprising similarities in shapes and proportions that they share.

As can be seen, the influences of the ark are alive and present today and have long -term

implications in practically all fields of science, including barominology,

botany, hydrodynamics, anthropology and more.

But because it is convincing that it is science behind the ark, we must not forget that it is God who

orchestrated the events.

It was God who decided that the time had come to judge the world.

And it was God who was finally responsible for the salvation of all who were aboard

the ark.

In the second book of Peter, we are told that in the last days

before Jesus Christ returns, people would deliberately ignore

the evidence of the flood.

Or as the Bible says, they would be ignorant volunteers of the flood.

Peter tells us that in the last days men would make fun of the Bible and of the

second coming of Jesus Christ, and instead they would follow their

own lusts, as they did in the days of Noah.

And so, as Noah had faith to carry out the commandment of God

to build the ark, and as Noah had faith that God would save him from the

flood, we must also have faith

that God was perfectly capable of preserving Noah, his family

and all the creatures aboard the ark.

It is too difficult for the God who created the universe and

everything that is in it to preserve the life that he chooses?

Of course not.

So let us not count among those whom Peter prophesied that they would

ignore the evidence of the flood, since we are living near

the end.

Let us be named among those who believe in God and his

word.

The Bible says that on the day when the rains of the flood began, all the

animals, with the breath of life, were aboard the ark with Noah and his family.

And it was God himself who locked them all up and saved them from the coming

judgment.

The global nature of the flood is given in the biblical text, and it is quite clear, especially taking into account the original

terms that are used.

The term for the flood is Mabul.

The only Hebrew word, Mabul, is used only elsewhere in the Old Testament.

That is in Psalm 29, verse 10, where it says that God sat like a king in the flood.

It is a very unique term that distinguishes this story from other types of flood.

This was a unique flood.

First we could talk about the flood itself, the purpose of the flood.

Contrary to what many think, it was not simply to destroy the sinful man, but also, as Genesis 6 tells us,

to destroy all the terrestrial animals and birds that were not in the ark with Noah, and to destroy the surface

of the earth.

And only a global flood would achieve that purpose.

Then we can talk about the ark, the purpose of the ark.

It was not to save a few animals so that Noah could start a farm after the flood.

It was, as it says in Genesis 7, 3, to keep the offspring alive in the face of the earth.

And then we have the repetition of universal terms.

Everything that is under the whole sky, under the whole earth, everything in which there is a breath of

life.

Those words appear 60 times in Genesis 6.

Everything, each one, under the sky.

And when you have a repetition of words, an emphasis is generated.

Secondly, we have the duration of the flood, 370 days.

Why such an extensive flood if it was only local?

Why that duration of the flood?

Why would it take so long to recede and dry up?

There is no way that a local flood lasts so long.

There is the depth of the flood.

It covered the high mountains everywhere under the skies.

And since the water seeks a leveled plane, it would have to be a global flood.

When Scripture says that the waters rose up to about 24 feet above the mountains,

and even with the idea that the mountains were not as high as they are now, they rose up after the flood.

It is still water that only rises to its own level.

If we had a local flood, then obviously there is no need to build an ark.

If the flood was local in the Middle East, the ark was totally unnecessary.

The animals did not need to enter there.

And he could have told Noah and his family to go on vacation to Europe or Egypt.

Noah and his family could have walked to a safer place.

And then why an ark?

Why such a large ark?

Why all the animals?

Why the birds?

The birds could fly far away.

After all, there are animals in other places if it is a local flood.

This idea of ​​including everything in the ark, two of each species, implies that you were trying

to preserve all life at that moment.

Only a global flood adjusts the purpose of the ark.

Then we could talk about the volume.

It was too big if it was only a local flood.

You also have the very clear theological concept that if there were men in other places who were not

part of the flood judgment, then the whole idea of ​​judgment over humanity for the corruption of

the earth would not make any sense.

God says, I have seen the evil of man, which is great on earth.

Not only in a local place, but on earth.

When we get to the New Testament, we have a passage like 2 Peter 3 .5 -7.

Compare a flood that destroyed the world that was with a future judgment in a future

world or in the world that is now.

If you had had a local judgment in the past, you would have to have a local judgment in the future.

But of course, this is the second coming of Jesus Christ to judge his world and it has to be universal.

Well, if the flood was just a local event, what do you think?

Maybe when Jesus returns, it will only be a local event?

Or no, it will also be a world judgment.

And I would add one last thing, and that is that we cannot find the Garden of Eden.

People look at the description of the geography where the Garden of Eden was in Genesis 2.

The reason why we can't find the Garden of Eden is because the world before the flood was totally destroyed.

Now it is buried under thousands of feet of sedimentary

deposits.

So the flood was not a local flood.

The Bible tells us that God looked at his creation

and here everything was corrupt.

Flesh had corrupted its way on earth.

The day of the final judgment had finally arrived.

Non -flooding geologists on our planet believe that planet Mars had a global flood.

Creationists believe, like the unbelievers, like the secular geologists believe, that Mars had a flood.

We believe it happened at the same time as our flood.

Maybe a storm of asteroids falling from the inner planets of the rocky planets.

Here on our planet, we are currently covered with 70 % water, 2 miles deep.

And they can't believe that we ever had a flood?

It is very, very easy for them to believe that Mars had a global flood, but for some reason they can't accept that there is a lot of evidence that

we had a flood.

Where did all the water come from for the flood?

Where did it come from and where did it go?

Well, look at the globe!

Now we are covered with 3 quarters of water, 2 miles deep.

Everything is still here.

The most frequent questions are where did the water come from for the flood and where did it go?

And the answer is easily explained in the tectonic model of catastrophic plates.

The tectonic process of catastrophic plates is very similar to the tectonic process

of conventional plates.

The main difference is the speed or rate at which these processes develop.

Today, the plates are moving around a few centimeters per year.

However, during the flood, a billion times faster.

When the flood began, it began in the sources of the ocean's depth.

Even the Bible says the sources of the great abyss were opened.

The oceanic dorsal is 70 ,000 kilometers long.

Most of it is underwater.

That's why it's called the oceanic dorsal.

And if everything exploded at the same time, it would have caused the ocean floor to do this.

Boom!

And then, pfff!

The oceanic dorsal would have exploded all over the world at approximately the same time.

But that first phase, boom!

It would have caused the sea level to rise a mile.

Plow!

Then this giant wave that emerged from that sudden rise in the ocean's bottom headed towards the

continents.

That would have been the first phase of the flood.

The second phase of the flood, it says, was when the windows of heaven were opened.

It is no coincidence that there is an order given there in the scriptures.

The sources of the abyss were broken.

It is the crust opening up, the water shooting itself, the supersonic steam jets and carrying that

water from the ocean up.

Then it fell like a global torrential rain.

Everyone knows that the floods were 40 days and 40 nights of rain, but the waters prevailed over the earth for

150 days.

When the sources of the great abyss were broken, as described in the Bible, that is the description of the fracture

of the pre -flooding crust.

We have a molten material that expands as it solidifies.

The new ocean floor expanded, that raised the sea level, which means that the ocean floor is

going to rise.

The oceanic waters rose to cover the continents.

The new ocean floor cooled and contracted, and therefore the sea level dropped and the

oceanic waters drained.

The waters of the flood are still present on the surface of the earth today.

They went to the new oceanic conches that occurred as a consequence of the flood.

In fact, the earth is covered in 70 % water.

Yes, the water is still here, it is deep in those trenches.

Some of the trenches have 8.

Now we discover that they are 10 miles deep.

If we had lower land formations and a higher oceanic bottom, we would probably be an aquatic

planet today without land surface.

They are desperately looking for an explanation as to where all the water went.

It is still here and it is very easy to explain that the same water in its majority that is here would have been enough to

flood the earth at a given moment and the situation has changed so that now the water is in deeper basins.

It is not a problem in the flood model at all.

We are all familiar with the theory about Pangea that maintains that the continents were

once connected to form a supercontinent that then separated through a process called plate tectonics.

The catastrophic plate tectonics is essentially the same idea as conventional plate tectonics,

except that the timeline and events are all centered around the year of the flood

instead of millions of years of slow processes.

You may be surprised to know that it was a man named Abraham Ortelius, a famous cartographer of

the 1500s who first proposed the idea that Noah's flood could have been

responsible for separating the Americas from Europe and Africa.

Hundreds of years later, another Christian named Antonio Schneider Pellegrini would be the first to

theorize the modern concept of continental drift, in which he illustrated two maps

representing the continents of the world as if they had ever been united.

This was decades before the German geologist Alfred Wegener proposed his own

version of the theory known today as Pangea and was erroneously nicknamed the

father of continental drift.

Antonio denied this honorable title.

His crime was to quote the book of Genesis, in which he said he made the discovery

that at the beginning of creation, there was only one continent.

The book of Genesis detailed exactly what happened to the earth in the past during the

flood.

Starting with what the Bible calls the sources of the great abyss opened.

It would not be until the 1950s that the technology initially developed to detect

submarines underwater would come across these gigantic scars of the sources of the

great abyss that had opened exactly as the Bible had described it.

How a thousand -year -old book knew exactly what was

at the bottom of the ocean?

The Bible says that first these gigantic cracks of the abyss opened,

drilling the earth's crust, expelling magma that created steam jets that shot

into the sky.

Then the book of Genesis says that the waters fell like torrential rain through the windows of

heaven that opened and that the rain lasted 40 days and 40 nights.

The supercontinent that the book of Genesis described is now beginning to crumble.

At first, the newly divided continents oscillate, colliding with each other

before beginning their last separation journey.

This closes the sea routes and forms volcanoes and mountains in America and

Europe, like the mountain ranges of the Appalachians and the Caledonians.

The marine background expands, forming from molten magma, expanding the separation between the

new continents.

Scientists would discover later that the marine bed on the Mesoatlantic back is much

younger than the marine bed in other parts of the world, exactly as the Bible suggests.

As this new volcanic soil emerges and expands, it subdues under the west coast of

North America, uniting and liberating, causing massive tsunamis that

drag mud mixed with marine creatures, totally flooding the earth.

As what is known as the conjugated ascent of Chatsky, rises during subduction, the

rocky mountains also began to form, along with the Independence Dike Swarm, a volcanic

region 400 miles long that expels ash that covers half of America.

As the western interior sea emerges during this time, the last dinosaurs are flooded,

mixed with marine life, and are buried in mud, sand and ash in Central

America.

As we approach the end of the flood, the activity begins to cease, the marine background stops

expanding and begins to cool, and as for the new and massive ocean floors, they cool and

retract, the waters retreat to the new ocean basins and retreat up

to a mile.

All over the earth, billions of fossils are left behind as incredible evidence of the

catastrophic world flood.

The most convincing evidence of a global flood is the sedimentary record itself.

All over the planet, what's under your feet?

Hundreds of different horizontal layers, generally with soft interfaces

between the layers.

The only way that such a record could have existed is

through global -scale processes that produce the entire record in a

single global event.

All over the world, the layers are flat, and there are no river channels in them.

Think about what you see in the Grand Canyon.

You see these flat pancakes on top of each other, simply flat, flat, flat.

Basically, they are without erosion.

That's how they formed.

At the beginning of the flood, there were crust movements.

The crust movements cause earthquakes.

Earthquakes in the water cause tsunamis.

The tsunamis originate in oceanic areas.

Then they would precipitate across the continents.

Once the tsunami lost its strength, the sediment would settle out of the water and form

a flat layer at the bottom.

That's the first layer.

Then another earthquake in a different part of the world causes a tsunami.

Maybe a week later or a day later, it brings a different sediment.

The tsunami loses its strength in that area.

The sediments in the water settle at the bottom and form another flat layer.

There is no erosion.

Again, you have a third tsunami bringing these sediments, a third layer.

My simulations indicate that these tsunamis will be large enough for a single

tsunami to sweep across a continent.

These layers formed underwater.

That's why they are so confusing for so many people.

It's fascinating to see scientists of evolution explain their excavation sites.

For example, in the Dinosaur Provincial Park, 10 ,000 dinosaurs are buried in this

flat layer.

And you ask the paleontologist of the place, well, how did these 10 ,000 dinosaurs get to this flat layer?

Well, they died in an overgrown river.

Or what was the shape of the riverbed?

It was a flat riverbed.

So you're saying that this river, which was so strong that it could bury 10 ,000 dinosaurs in a 5 -mile width, which would be a furious

river, wasn't strong enough to cause an erosion channel?

Why isn't there a channel eroded by this river in its bed?

Why isn't there erosion of that river?

The answers don't make sense in light of this flat problem, the problem without erosion.

What we see in the Great Canyon is that the layers folded at the edge of the plateau.

Because the folding was soft, when the sediment was still soft, the whole sequence had to

form quickly during the flood.

And then they folded at the end of the flood while they were still wet.

Therefore, these folds are strategic evidence that unites all the layers and shows

emphatically that millions of years never happened.

Or the fact that you have what are called polystrate fossils.

They are usually trees that go through more than one layer.

These trees have three layers that supposedly represent 30 million years of rocks around.

You know that if you start accumulating sediment around the base, that sediment would wear down the bark.

The bark would rot and the tree would die even sooner.

It would fall even in less than 100 years.

But here we have vertical trees fossilized with three layers.

In the world flood, the trees were dragged and floated on the surface.

Now, over time, the trees were soaked in water and sank to the bottom.

Normally, the trees sink horizontally.

But some trees, as Dr. Steve Austin discovered, when they sink, they sink vertically.

If a tsunami wave arrives, and there were many tsunami waves during the flood, and it

brings sediments, when the tsunami wave loses strength, the

sediments in the wave settle in a flat layer at the bottom.

Maybe a week later or a day later, another tsunami wave arrives from a different direction.

When the tsunami wave loses its power, the sediments begin to fall.

And now a second layer is formed on top of the first.

Between this vertical tree, which had not yet been fossilized, now, if that tree could be buried,

with 30 feet of sediment in just, let's say, a week, you could easily accumulate all the layers of the

Great Canyon in a year.

It is the explanation that contradicts the time of evolution and contradicts the theory of

evolution.

This is the most important geological fact.

And it seems that nobody teaches this in the university or in the world of evolution.

Evolutionists affirm that the Earth is millions of years old.

And one of their supposed proofs are the layers of stratified rock found inside the

geological column.

Evolutionists teach that each layer represents millions of years of rock formation, based

on their uniformitarian vision, which says that you can make assumptions about the past based on current

processes.

But by doing so, you are assuming that there were no catastrophic events such as a global flood.

Evolutionists also ignore the evidence of the flood contained in these layers of rock,

such as marine creatures mixed with terrestrial creatures.

Just ask any coal miner.

Anywhere on Earth where they dig, they find countless marine creatures embedded in the rock.

The Bible refutes the theory of evolution, stating that only approximately 6

,000 years have passed since the beginning of creation, giving the true story of how sedimentary

layers were formed, since sedimentary rock is rock that is formed in water.

Which is also an incredible testimony of a global flood, since the surface of the

Earth is mostly composed of layers of sedimentary rock formed by water.

The fact that the layers were actually formed in water also explains why there is no erosion between

the layers, as there would be if the layers took millions of years to form.

Then there is the problem of the bent and folded rock, which could only occur if the layers

were malleable and soft at the time of the flexion, which is exactly what would cause a

global flood.

The bent layers also show that their formation was rapid, with multiple layers

quickly forming one on top of the other because the lower layers would still have

to be saturated with water and did not have enough time to dry.

As the forces acted on the layers, they bent in unison from top to bottom.

Claiming that these layers folded together for millions of years while they were still forming

cannot explain what geologists are observing.

Only a quick burial under water could explain these phenomena, remembering that

layers of sedimentary rock like these are formed in water in the first place.

To show even more that these layers of rock formed quickly and in the flood is the

fact that in countless places around the world we find polystrate trees.

Poly means many and strato referring to the multiple layers that these trees cross.

If you understand something about how organic matter is decomposed, you know that it is impossible for trees to

remain intact for millions of years while layers of dirt and debris slowly accumulate

around it and rain and moisture rot in the wood.

Instead, what the tests show is that the trees were torn by the flood and

dragged and as they soaked in water, they sank.

Some trees sank uniformly while other trees contained more water saturation in

what was left of their lower roots.

These trees would be heavier at the bottom and would float to the ground, remaining in a vertical position.

The tsunami waves would carry sediments that would quickly bury the trees in multiple layers.

In fact, geologists discovered that the same sand on the east side of America had been

carried by tsunami waves to the west side of the continent.

This explains how the layers of rock contain fossils of marine creatures mixed with terrestrial plants

and explains why trees lack their root systems and more importantly, why trees

cross directly multiple layers of rock that evolutionists claim are millions of years old.

Let's not forget that some of these layers are the size of continents, indicating that these

trees and rocks were deposited in a single catastrophic event and not in

local floods at different times.

Today we assume that fossils are a normal part of the life cycle since we see so many of them all

over the world.

However, fossilization is not at all what we see when something dies today.

Fortunately, dead matter is not fossilized today in normal conditions, but

instead, God made dead matter decompose and return to Earth.

The fact that we see so many fossils indicates that there was a global event that caused the massive

fossilization of all life on Earth at a given moment.

Think about it.

If the Earth today is covered in 71 water, the layers of sedimentary rocks

formed by water make up most of the rock on Earth.

Within these layers of rock are marine creatures mixed with terrestrial creatures.

Some of these sedimentary layers cover entire continents, which means that they all formed together in a single

event.

Several layers are bent and folded together, demonstrating that rapid burial events created them.

We find trees that cross several layers of rock, and throughout the globe we find large

areas of erosion, such as large carved canyons.

It is obvious that God left all these evidence as testimony of the biblical

flood.

The second most powerful evidence is the fossils found in these

sedimentary layers.

To produce a fossil, it is required, in most cases, especially for larger organisms,

it requires a complete and rapid burial, and that

automatically speaks of catastrophic conditions.

So the fact that we find so many fossils so well preserved, many of them with evidence

that the animals were buried alive, is another powerful evidence of a flood cataclysm.

There are many fossils in museums.

In fact, museums are full.

They don't want more fossils.

Basements are full.

Museums have collected thousands of millions of fossils.

And scientists suggest that in the rocks, and we could find them, there are billions of

fossils.

If you see an animal die next to the road, like a stag or a deer, soon that deer or stag

disappears.

The bones disintegrate.

The carts come.

The rats eat the bones.

The skin decomposes.

Ten years later, there is only dust.

There is nothing left.

And yet there are these billions of fossils.

Here is the reason why we have a billion fossils.

There was this huge flood.

It was a global flood.

The tsunamis advanced rapidly, bringing sediments with them, and quickly burying these animals.

As the flood receded, all this ocean water was filtered again through

the sand that covered the animals and provided the minerals to transform the bones into

fossils.

And that's how you have billions of fossils.

You have to have a global flood.

What we often observe is that fossils have been exquisitely preserved.

What do I mean by that?

We find all the details preserved in their place.

For example, a fish about to bring another fish.

And it has been buried.

This indicates that it had to be very fast to preserve those details.

In another example, we have ichthyosaurs, which are marine reptiles.

Some are up to six feet long and have been buried in the process of giving birth to a

baby.

Another case of fish is 10 to 12 feet long, with a fish not digesting its stomach.

The details of the wings, of the wasps.

The wings are open and the legs are in flight position.

What can we think of?

They were flying.

And those insects were trying to escape.

They are trying to go somewhere, but they were simply trapped with all the sediments of the flood waters.

That's why we can study them.

All these details require an extremely fast burial.

It fits exactly with what the Bible says.

It's coherent.

The destruction of the flood was fast, sudden, catastrophic, on a global scale,

preserving these creatures, sometimes in life positions, trapped in the action of doing

something.

And the exquisitely preserved details are coherent with the biblical story of the flood.

You may be surprised to know that all the layers of rocks in the world, the layers of rocks named

like the Cambrian, the Jurassic, all the layers of the world have salty water

creatures.

Well, what more proof would you need that this was caused by a global flood,

that there are salty water creatures in all the layers?

It's in the middle of the continents.

How did these salty water creatures get here?

It should have been a flood.

Evolutionary scientists have to explain where these salty water creatures came from.

How did they get there?

Are you saying, Mr. Evolutionary Scientist, that there are salty water creatures in all these layers?

And are you saying that the oceans rose?

They covered the center of the United States and then they went down again, went up again, went down again several times, at least a

dozen times.

Ockham's razor would say that it is easier to believe in a single flood than in more than a dozen world floods.

It was in the 1980s when secular geologists began to lean towards catastrophism

and move away from uniformitarianism.

As soon as they felt like it, they switched to catastrophism when it served their purposes to help explain

the extinction of dinosaurs.

Noah's flood provides a better explanation for the disappearance of dinosaurs than the impact on

Yucatan.

Simply because that event is so small, so localized, there is no way that it could have a

physical effect that would cause the dinosaurs to be buried the way we find them.

And nobody in the secular world even affirms that.

They say, well, it produced a climate change that caused the dinosaurs to starve to death.

If you go to Wikipedia today and look for the extinction of dinosaurs or the

Chicxulub crater, an asteroid hit the earth, caused a global cooling due to all

the dust in the air and the dinosaurs went extinct at that time.

We have simulations where we have launched a meteorite the size of Chicxulub directly on the earth using high

-performance computing.

We get the subduction event and we get the rupture of the lithosphere.

The earthquakes began, the volcanoes began.

Actually, the meteorite impacts could have started that event.

But it has no power to explain the burial of these huge animals in the sedimentary record.

In the 1980s, secular scientists began to theorize that it was an asteroid that hit the

earth and annihilated almost all life on its surface.

The theory postulates that massive tsunamis and the air full of volcanic dust as a result of the

impact are what destroyed the dinosaurs and most of the other lives in a world disaster.

Secular scientists could not escape the fact that water and volcanism played a massive role in

how life was once eliminated on earth.

But the Bible had already written that the earth had been catastrophically destroyed through volcanism

and water.

And they did not want to validate the Bible.

So they invented their own catastrophic version of the events, that is, the theory

of the impact of an asteroid.

The book of Genesis of the Bible had already made clear what happened in the past in detail,

describing the volcanic activity that exploded from the oceanic depths, recording when

it began and ceased volcanic activity.

How long did it rain?

How far did the waters go?

As well as giving the exact reason why God judged and destroyed the world with the flood in the first place.

Basically, today you have two options.

On the one hand, you have a book written thousands of years ago that gives an amazingly detailed

description of a world flood that practically annihilated all life on earth.

On the other hand, you have theories made by man.

In this case, one that was only postulated for the first time about 40 years ago due to the

insufficiency of its previous non -catastrophic models that they know did not really work.

Both perspectives require a catastrophic event with global implications, but only one

has the power to really explain the stratification of the surface of the earth and the

billions of fossils.

Along with cultures from all over the world that cite a global flood in their historical writings and legends.

While the other simply reorganizes elements of the true story to invent its own

story.

Think about it.

The Bible already said a long time ago that the entire surface of the world was destroyed in a catastrophic way.

They have no other option than to make the same affirmation.

The Bible said that the continents were together at the beginning.

It seems that they also have to share that.

Almost all animal life on earth was annihilated during the destruction.

A fact that they could not ignore either.

Marine life was dispersed all over the world.

The Bible says that the waters rose above the highest mountains.

The secular scientists formulated their own theories on how to explain the disappearance of marine fossils.

The original environment of the earth was permanently destroyed.

The pre -flooding paradise had disappeared.

In the secular world, they refer to this as the extinction of the prehistoric world.

And let's not forget that the flood started the processes for a large part of the world to be

frozen.

The warm oceans produce evaporation and major snowfalls.

Volcanoes send large volumes of aerosols into the atmosphere, blocking the sun.

Larger snowfalls with cooler summers result in layers of global ice.

The evolutionists have called these results of the flood, the age of ice.

One of these is constantly proving to be true as more and more evidence is discovered

over time.

While the other was only invented after the evidence was unearthed.

And even more, contained within the Bible is also the prediction that all

this would happen.

In Peter's second book, we are told that in the last days, which is the time that is approaching rapidly,

the unbelievers would be consciously ignorant of the flood.

Which means that men and women would consciously choose to create and create

lies that allow them to relegate the catastrophic event to the distant past.

So far and so long ago that it ceases to be scientific history and becomes scientific fantasy.

Irony can only be described as biblical.

The Bible makes it clear that the end times would be characterized by an increasing incredulity in the biblical story of

history and the very event of the flood.

Sadly, the religion of evolution is one in which its priests are constantly updating their

obsolete theories.

While in the Bible we are given the final story, true and

unnoticeable.

And as the evidence is unearthed over time, the biblical story always proves

to be true.

If you go to a museum today and look at the exhibitions of dinosaurs, you will notice that the animals

seem strange and unusual with the dinosaurs.

Have you ever seen a boa constrictor in a museum exhibition but wrapped around the leg of a T -Rex?

No, but they have found boa constrictors with dinosaurs.

Have you ever seen a box turtle at the feet of a stegosaur?

No, but they found box turtles with dinosaurs.

Have you ever seen a T -Rex with a duck flying over it?

No, but ducks with dinosaurs have been found.

The seven groups of animals of today have been found with dinosaurs and they

look the same.

The exhibitions in museums do not show that.

If they really put the animals they found with the dinosaurs, people would look at those

exhibitions and say, well, evolution has not occurred, it is just that the dinosaurs extinguished.

But scientists have excluded modern animals from their dinosaur exhibitions to

promote the idea that evolution occurred.

The soft tissue analysis in dinosaurs that have been recent has been an

enigma for those who believe that the earth and the universe are very old.

Mary Schweitzer in the 90s and early 2000s was the first to find this

elastic material in the arteries.

Elastic material means that you stretch it and it returns to its original state.

Is the dinosaur soft tissue a very recent discovery?

Don't they really want it to spread?

There is no such thing in any of the textbooks.

This lady cut one of the bones and

you could smell.

The rotting.

Dinosaur bones should not smell as if they were dying because they have been dead for millions of years, right?

Well, a little later Mark Armitage began to examine the horn of the Triceratops but he found

bones, tissues and bones.

The bones that you stretch and have tension.

The tension is how much something is deformed.

It had up to almost 100 % tension.

Muscle tissue in the fossil of the Santana raptor and it was like a dinosaur killer in the bone of

a dinosaur's leg.

It was the real muscle.

This bone of the Triceratops is the same.

We started looking inside this bone and we found, using electronic scanning that had elastic material,

it had tissue.

You separate it and it goes back to its place.

If it were mineralized or if it were a fossil that turned into rock, you couldn't do this.

So it was never mineralized or petrified, it was still elastic which means it was not yet woven.

That means this thing is not 100 million years old.

The biblical version expects to find some of that.

So what was it?

Bone marrow?

Red blood cells.

Cartilage?

Collagen?

Hemoglobin?

And muscle fiber proteins.

These things shouldn't be able to last a maximum of 100 ,000 years.

But these things were 100 million years old.

Well, 68 million years but closer to 100.

The amino acids in the protein chains would break down and decompose into protein powder and there is no

explanation to this day.

Nothing that has a decent scientific meaning and has simply been left as an anomaly.

Neil deGrasse Tyson interviewed Mary Schweizer and some others and then he directed attention to the

medullary layer.

They tried to divert the attention of the red blood cells.

The medullary layer was there and showing that the t -rex from which this bone came was at that moment carrying

eggs.

That's what we call a game of traps.

A game of smoke and mirrors.

A show to divert the attention intended to distract the presence of the elephant in the room, which was that

there were proteins in that t -rex bone.

Mark Armitage, working at the University of California, found soft tissue inside

a horn of triceratops and when he published that find, he was fired.

So they are voluntarily ignoring, suffocating the truth.

And this is not science.

It's propaganda.

We are talking about the control of thought and mental policy.

They wanted to fire him because they felt that this was a religious position when in reality he had only presented a scientific

discovery.

In 1993, a movie titled Jurassic Park presented a quite

famous scene in which the remains of an old mosquito were preserved, locked in a ball of hardened

amber.

The film continues explaining that the way scientists could resurrect the dinosaurs of the past was by

extracting blood from the remains inside this mosquito, in which the DNA

of the dinosaur combining what was missing with that of a modern frog.

This idea arose because in the 90s the writer Michael Crichton was having a hard time

finding a concept to explain how dinosaurs could somehow be reverted to life

in his book of the same title.

What the creators of Jurassic Park could not have imagined was the discovery of soft tissue

inside a dinosaur bone.

A discovery that since then has been replicated by other scientists, such as this triceratops tissue

stretched, discovered by Mark Armitage.

These discoveries surprised the entire paleontological community and probably had

rewritten the original Jurassic Park film if they had known that this was possible at that

time.

In fact, scientists have encountered great challenges when trying to publish these discoveries due

to the total rejection that soft dinosaur tissue could still exist.

The consensus at that time was that it was completely impossible because

everyone clung to the general belief that the bones were millions of years old,

which would require that all its biomaterial had been fossilized a long time ago.

There was simply no way that these dinosaur bones contained biomaterial such as blood

vessels and proteins such as collagen.

In fact, of these 16 types of bioorganic materials that have since been discovered inside

dinosaur bones, collagen alone ends the debate about whether these bones are

millions of years old, since the maximum expectancy of collagen is not as low as 10 ,000 years,

according to some estimates, and as high as 900 ,000 years, according to others, with 100

,000 years being the maximum age generally accepted.

To put this into perspective, if each of these small bars represents a period

of 100 ,000 years, then only one of these bars represents the maximum age

that collagen could survive over time.

If we enlarge the view of the lapse of time of 100 million years, then we can see that the useful life of

collagen is 1 ,000 times shorter than the general age that evolutionists affirm that dinosaur

bones have.

Another way to say it is that collagen does not even last 0 .001

of the time it would have to last for the theory of evolution to work,

showing that it is not even remotely within the scope of possibility that collagen

could survive so long.

The relatively short useful life of collagen shows what the Bible has been saying about these bones

all the time, that they are approximately 4 ,400 years old and were buried

all over the world around the time of Noah's flood,

since

the waters of the flood began to recede, the earth was in a state of chaos.

Dinosaur cemeteries like these would be found later throughout the earth, and the secular

paleontologists agree that these sites worldwide share one

thing in common, the state in which the bones are found all show

evidence of having been buried by flood.

Now.

You understand exactly where the water came from,

water that would eventually dry up because it did not belong there in the first place.

The earth would suffer a massive restart as the vegetation grew

slowly again and the water would find its final resting places.

Sadly, the earth that once was a perfect habitat for dinosaurs

was now irrevocably ruined and those dinosaurs that could survive

would be hunted to extinction over time.

We know them as dinosaurs, but the legend would remember them as

dragons.

And so it was, when on the seventeenth day of the seventh month, the ark

rested on the mountains of Ararat.

It was a little more than a year after the flood began that Noah, his family and

everyone on board the ark would finally return to step on solid ground.

This group of eight people would repopulate the earth, as quoted by the

legends of the whole world in their historical literature.

And science would later show that this genetic bottleneck really

happened.

Exactly as the Bible had told us from the beginning.

In terms of observing how ideas progress, we know that history can become more

mythical.

The myth as a central idea cannot become more historical, it does not work the other way around.

History can become more historical, the myth becomes more mythical and if you start with a myth, you end up with

a myth.

You can never go in the other direction.

We can see as a genre how different they are.

About 200 traditions about floods have been discovered by anthropologists, missionaries and others,

and many of these traditions come from groups of people who do not even live near the ocean.

There are hundreds of legends about floods all over the world, but in many of these cases there are huge similarities with the biblical story.

A just family was saved and the reason for the flood is because God was angry.

The gods were angry for something humanity had done.

They all talk about how man and animals survive in some kind of boat.

There are many similarities, but the true story is in Genesis.

Some proof of this is in the description of the ark.

The epic of Gilgamesh has a cube for the ark.

Well, that would simply roll in the water and everyone would die.

The biblical story has a flood that lasts 371 days, but when we get to the epic

of Gilgamesh, it's only 6 days.

It only took a week to build a huge ark, while Noah probably took him 55 years or

something like that to build his ark.

The biblical story is the true one and these other stories are the result of the migration of people

from the Tower of Babel after the flood and preserving in their memory an

echo of the true story that is recorded in Genesis.

And the further they went from the Middle East and any contact with the true story,

the more the story changes over time.

And that explains the differences as well as the similarities.

The biblical story in all aspects remains independent of the others.

It certainly has a common core in history.

There was an event that happened.

We have recorded about 23 different stories that are very similar to Babel, where people tried to build

this tower and the gods were angry or God was angry and forced them to disperse confusing their language and

then from Genesis 2 on we no longer see similarities.

There is no legend of Abraham, Isaac or David or anything like that.

But from Genesis 1 to 11 it seems that people from all over the world know it.

Why?

Well, because what the Bible is telling us is true and until Genesis 11 in the event of Babel humanity had a shared story and then

they took that story with them and transmitted it and it is distorted as the years go by.

After the flood, God blesses his children and tells them to multiply and fill the earth and it was the same thing that Adam and Eve said.

In a way, man has the opportunity to start anew and let's go to a few generations later.

People refuse to disperse.

They said, no, we are going to stay right here in the valley of Mesopotamia and they began to build a

tower.

They had a unified world government.

Genesis 11 tells us that God stopped that construction project creating supernaturally

different languages to force people to separate according to their families in

different nations.

People who were biologically and genetically very close began to get married within

their linguistic group and from what we know about genetics that would make the

recessive genes become dominant and the physical characteristics associated with them manifest.

But the Bible is very clear there is only one race, the race of Adam.

Paul says that God made of a man or a blood all the nations to live on

the face of the earth.

So there is absolutely no basis to say that a group of people with a certain shade of brown

skin are superior or inferior to other people with a different shade of brown skin.

We have no basis to hate people different from us because in reality everyone looks

different to me.

So if I were to hate people who look different to me I would have to hate everyone.

Therefore, we should give love and accept ourselves because we all descend from the same

couple, Adam and Eve.

The interesting thing is that most of the evidence shows that humanity began in the Middle East

which we would expect if the Tower of Babel were true.

All these languages seem to diverge from that region.

What was now left of the ark rested in the mountains of Ararat.

God made a pact with Noah promising him and all his

descendants that he would never again destroy the earth and all life in it

with a flood.

Then God blessed Noah and his sons and ordered them to

multiply once more and spread over the earth.

But in the plains of Sinai the men disobeyed the commandment of God and instead

joined together to build a city and a great tower that they

wanted to reach the heavens in a final act of rebellion and

rejection of God.

He descended and put an end to his tower dividing his

unified language in many languages.

And due to confusion and fear, they stopped building the tower and dispersed

in what would become the nations of the world.

It was in the course of a few centuries after Noah and his family abandoned the ark that the people of the

world spoke a single language.

But today there are more than 7 ,000 languages in the world that refer to an

ancestral family group to which each belongs.

For example, Italian can be traced to Latin, its linguistic family.

However, when linguists tried to track the linguistic families above,

they found a serious problem.

Language families would eventually lead to dead ends, also known as isolated languages.

This directly contradicts the alleged shared ancestral language that evolutionists hoped to find

or what some linguists theoretically call the proto -world language.

Instead, what they find are a lot of languages that seem to have emerged out of nowhere, unless,

of course, they take into account the events that took place in the Tower of Babel,

which provides an incredible explanation that evolutionists refuse to accept.

Even more, we must consider that when we track the languages ​​known on a map, something

very revealing happens.

Many of the oldest languages go back to a single place on Earth, a place commonly known as

the cradle of civilization, Mesopotamia.

And what is also revealing is that the temporal framework of many languages ​​also goes back to that

approximate point in time, which is just after the flood and the Tower of Babel in the

third millennium BC.

In addition, linguists believe that there should be approximately 94 families of proto -languages in theory,

and they also believe that this number can decrease over time as more research leads

to more fusions.

It is not a coincidence that there are approximately 70 ethnic groups mentioned in the table of

biblical nations, recorded in the Bible around the time of the Babel event.

What are the probabilities that the estimated linguistic families reflect as closely the same

number of nations that the Bible lists at the time of the Tower of Babel?

And what is more, is that these groups of people also have myths and legends in their cultures, both of

an ancient flood that destroyed the world, and of a time when their ancestors tried

to build a tower.

These stories, of course, vary, but the central elements tend to remain intact, with the

Cherokee and other Native American tribes, even including that their language was changed once long before

in history, as just an example of hundreds.

Similarly, human genetics also reveals a pattern similar to languages, since the

genes extracted from more than 100 human remains of the so -called Bronze Age revealed

that the further back in time you go, the less genetic mixture there was,

with their data showing genetic lineages relatively unmixed around the time of Babel,

which, of course, is not a coincidence.

Only God's supernatural intervention can explain the multifaceted we see in so

many fields of science.

It was in this event that God changed the complete course of human history once more.

It was also after Babel that God instituted the human government, and at a time when

nationalism is being attacked by those who want to establish a world government, it is

important to remember that it was God who divided the world into nations.

It was God who was against man -centered society, and without God that humanity was

beginning to form.

And as any historian will tell you, history has a way of repeating itself.

When we get to the history of Noah's Ark, it is more than just a story.

It is certainly a vital part of history.

There was an ancient world, and in that ancient world, due to corruption, it was destroyed by a flood, and that

was the judgment that fell on humanity.

Since man does not change, there is still a future judgment to come.

It will be as it was in the days of Noah.

They will get married,.

They will have a marriage.

They formed families, did their job, they just lived life as usual.

They did not believe that the judgment was coming.

The flood came, and the people were not prepared.

Before the flood, people ate and drank, and they got married and got married, with a total contempt for the

construction of the Ark, for what was preached to them, and for all the things around it.

And Jesus says that, just before his return, people will be in rebellion,

ignoring God, simply living their lives as if God did not exist.

They will be surprised when Jesus comes and brings the judgment.

There was a judgment that happened.

There is a future judgment, and we need to be prepared.

The Bible does talk about the last days, the end of times.

If you look at all the different accounts of the Old Testament, it would be

idolatry, witchcraft,.

Occultism,.

Worship of demons,.

And things like that,.

And the perversions that go hand in hand with these things.

Public schools are now teaching against the idea of

​​marriage.

They want to corrupt the minds of innocent hearts long before they even thought of sex at the

earliest age possible, not only sexualized, but sexualized in terms of all possible forms of debauchery.

Of course, we have the plague of abortion, the sins of Moloch, the burning of

children, the plague of the treatment of people, and the exploitation of the

vulnerable.

These things are the evil and darkness of our time, and have become more prevalent, even massively

institutionalized.

It is a very good sign, not a good sign, but a precise sign that we live the same type of darkness that there

was in the days of Noah, and you see that we are in the same darkness now.

When will the Lord return?

The Bible says that no one knows, but when he arrives, everyone will know at once, like a

ray through the sky.

And I want to be on the right side.

Who doesn't like to be in the winning team at the end?

I know that in this case it is especially vital, in the sense of eternity.

Eternity is atemporal, we do not understand the infinite, but we know that it is

permanent.

The second coming is a wonderful, wonderful image, but it is also a time of

judgment, it is also a time of purpose, it is also a time of justice.

Just as the flood came suddenly, so will be the second

coming of Christ, just as the flood was true, the second coming of Christ

is true and will really happen.

That judgment of the flood is a warning of the judgment to come.

Jesus Christ is the most written and influential person in all the history of the world,

but what has made so many throughout the millennia believe that he is who he claims to be?

God in human flesh, the Savior of humanity, the Messiah

who was prophesied in the Bible.

The Bible is the only book on earth that has repeatedly demonstrated its

inspiration of God by the fact of telling us the future in advance.

For example, around 626 BC, the prophet Jeremiah predicted that Israel

would be conquered, Jerusalem and the temple would be destroyed, and the

Babylonians would rule over the people of God, taking the captives to exile for 70 years.

And shortly after his prophecy was written, that is exactly what

happened around 587 BC.

Then there is Isaiah, who wrote that the gates of Babylon would open to Zerubbabel, a

king who would not be born until more than 150 years later.

And in 539 BC, the gates of the formidable city effectively opened to a

king named Cyrus and his army.

And as predicted, Babylon was destroyed, which both Jeremiah and Isaiah prophesied that would

happen.

And then there is the famous prophecy of Daniel in which he predicted the appearance of the Messiah,

stating that he would come 483 years after the decree was issued to

rebuild Jerusalem, which is exactly the moment in which Jesus appeared.

And when it comes to Jesus fulfilling the prophecies, there are hundreds of them just about him.

The scriptures said that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem, that Christ would live in Galilee, would

teach parables, would be rejected by the rulers, would be betrayed by 30 pieces of silver,

and it was even prophesied that he would be crucified, not stoned to death, at a time when

crucifixion had not yet been invented.

In addition, there are other prophecies very similar to those of Daniel that also indicate the

timeline of the Messiah.

His birth had to happen before the scepter of Judah was removed, while the

temple was still standing, but before it was destroyed.

And very notably, he had to come while the genealogical records

still existed to show that his lineage was of the line of David.

Those records perished when the temple was destroyed in 70 AD.

Surprisingly, Jesus Christ walked the earth during exactly the critical period

when a multitude of prophecies about the Messiah converged.

Jesus warned us that in the last days, the time we are living at this moment,

a false Messiah would come who would deceive many to believe that he

is the prophesied.

Scripture refers to this false Messiah as the Antichrist.

The Bible says that during this short period of time that is to come, the

Antichrist and his system of government will ascend to power.

Like what happened in the Tower of Babel, this singular entity will rule with nationalism in many

places being abolished, since its sovereignty will collapse in a single system of total control.

Many who do not think and believe as the Antichrist declares, will not be able to buy or sell.

Many will be condemned to death.

Today a massive global awakening is taking place where individuals, regardless of

politics, perceive the growing infrastructure similar to the Antichrist that is developing around

them, with many recognizing that plagues, starvation, wars, hyperinflation,

anarchy and acts of nature prophesied in the Bible seem to be orchestrated by design,

a deliberate transition, since we are on the edge of a satanic increase in power.

A time that the Bible calls the Great Tribulation.

It is a moment in which God will focus his attention again specifically on Israel, since Israel is at the

center of many of the biblical prophecies that have not yet been fulfilled.

Even now we can see one of those prophecies found in Zechariah, in which God said

that in the last days Israel would become a nation of anguish for all the

nations that surround it.

Incredible perspicacity to consider that such a small place on earth will be at the center of a

next global war, since

the climatic end of God's prophetic plans is approaching.

The return of the Lord and the redemption of Israel are yet to come.

For a deep love, God postponed the return of his Son for earthly judgment.

All humanity is guilty of committing terrible sins before a holy God.

If each person had to account individually to God for their own merits, they would certainly face a

terrible judgment.

But here are the good news.

God's masterful plan, as revealed in Corinthians, reveals that while humanity collectively

inherited the condemnation through the disobedience of a man, Adam, now

they can find forgiveness and salvation through the obedience of a man, Jesus

Christ.

If a man can bring death to all through his sin, then it is deduced that a

man without sin can bring life to all through his obedience.

Fortunately, God in his wisdom and mercy has given us a simple and easy way to be

justified to his eyes, and it is through his Son, Jesus Christ.

...

...

The

only way to the ark, to be saved.

The real problem for us is not the only way to God, it is God.

We want to get closer to someone who tells us what we need.

We need his salvation.

He tells us that we are sinners, which we do not want to hear.

He tells us that we need to depend on him.

And I believe that ultimately, all of us, deep down, we know that we are not what we should be.

That there is a God who did all these things, we certainly did not.

All creation, all the irreducible complexities, all the things that exist, simply

argue that there is a creator.

If that is the case, then we are creatures.

And what better place for the creature than in a relationship with the creator?

The creator made that possible by going through all the things we go through, but finally dying in our

place, because that is what our sin deserved.

Jesus himself said in John 14, 6, I am the way, I am the truth, I am the life, and no one

comes to the Father but through me.

So if we go to the one who is God in the flesh, the one who came to give us

redemption, and we trust in him, and we take his word, he says, I will save you.

That is the way to God, and I am the way.

Come to me and you will have everything that was promised in the Bible.

Eternal life, a relationship with God, and everything that goes beyond what we can

imagine in this life.

There is a whole life to come that God has promised to those who love him.

Two thousand years ago, God the Father sent his Son to the world

to inaugurate a new era of justice and peace.

But they rejected the true Messiah.

They hated the one who the Bible says created love,

joy, beauty, and life itself,

and crucified him in the same place where he was to establish his glorious

kingdom.

God the Father resurrected him from the dead and made of his sacrifice

salvation for many.

Because Jesus Christ is the light of the world, and there is no

darkness.

He has given his only begotten Son, so that all who believe in him may not be lost, but have

eternal life.

John 3 .16.