When Someone Has Committed Ad Hominem

Ad Hominem as a Logical Fallacy

Hello, fellow internet user! If you're watching this, then I'm sorry to say that you've committed the logical fallacy known as AD HOMINEM. So what exactly does this Latin word salad even mean? It literally means, to the man.

In layman's terms, you've committed a logical fallacy whereby you have definitively lost the argument. But why have I lost the argument?

I hear you scream!

Well, you've failed to engage with the content of your opponent's argument and have instead engaged in a personal attack. Which means, you don't get to pass. Go, you don't collect $200, or even $400 if you're playing the current year gender discrimination version.

A Comic Example of Ignoring the Evidence

Okay, you may still be confused. I'll break this down Barney style. Let's say that the Dread Pirate Roberts is having a discussion with a man named, uh... Mr. Chauve. Roberts has just stated that Benny Hinn is a heretic and a false prophet.

All while standing in front of a.

LITERAL MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE.

Mr. Chauve, intimidated by the.

LITERAL MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE.

Decides to completely ignore it and says.

Well, you're... you're a Pharisee.

THAT is an ad hominem attack. Albeit, not a very good one. On a sliding scale of insults from say, R .E .O. Speedwagon to Van Halen, there's somewhere between Milli Vanilli and, uh... Striper. Calling someone a Pharisee objectively makes no sense.

Pharisees were heretics who did not care about sound doctrine and just made up rules and stuff. Not unlike Kat Kerr thinking she can gander off a hurricane with a stick. Regardless, even if the Dread Pirate Roberts happened to be a Pharisee, it still wouldn't negate his argument or the.

LITERAL MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE.

He's compiled.

Why the Insult Does Not Refute the Argument

Sorry, Mr. Chauve, but even the Huffington Post thinks your ad hominem is fake news. If you found this video helpful, please leave a like, a comment, and feel free to share it with any and all internet acquaintances who are guilty of behaving in a logically fallacious manner.

Thank you!