Keep sharing good news without ads.
No description available
Comments are turned off for this media
Webcasting around the world from the desert metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona. This is the dividing line. The Apostle Peter commanded Christians to be ready to give a defense for the hope that is within us.
Yet to give that answer with gentleness and reverence. Our host is dr. James White director of Alpha Omega ministries and an elder at the Phoenix Reformed Baptist Church. This is a live program and we invite your participation.
If you'd like to talk with dr. White call now at 602 973 460 to or toll-free across the United States. It's 1 877 7 5 3 3 3 4 1. And now with today's topic here is James White.
Test test. Hey, listen to that. It works first shot. We're getting better at this every time. Welcome to the dividing line. Yes, it is a Evening. I'm expecting a rubber band or something much harder to fly around the corner at any moment and smack me in the head.
But it's good to actually start a program and the microphone works first shot. That's a good thing. Hey, let's test the phone lines now. 877 7 5 3 3 3 4 1 may we can have Colin and Katie Colin again, and we can sing happy birthday again and explode the entire thing.
Just watch the smoke come out from the vents and everything. That'd be fun. 877 7 5 3 3 3 4 1 is the phone number if you want to get involved in the program tonight. I don't know about the rest of you.
I have been listening with a Fairly large amount of dismay to the cultural discussion if we want to Call it that. That has been going on. Well, of course for quite some time, but especially that was prompted by the president's press conference Last evening.
I have not had an opportunity. I missed the the today show this morning with all the good morning. Good morning America today something at one on NBC, whatever. I Didn't see any of that because I I'm I'm have grades due tomorrow for a seminary class that I taught during the summer and I've been sitting here working on that and I just I just can't keep up with everything and So I didn't catch all of that and I wish that I had because I heard some interesting quotations out of it today, but but I've been listening to primarily conservative talk show hosts and I've been listening to how they've been responding to this sudden what seems to be massive Forward movement of the gay rights Agenda, in fact, I'm not sure what I did with it here, but the Alliance defense fund.
Let's see here. Here it is reaching reaching. There it is the homosexual agenda exposing the principal threat to religious freedom today. Alan Sears and Craig Austin. This is published by Brodman Holman from the Alliance defense fund.
I just got this in the mail was sent to us. Alliance defense fund was the one that helped us with the Situation with Barry Lynn where he wanted to try to suppress the videotapes of the debate that we did on Long Island and homosexuality and I've been reading through some sections of that and the the tremendous double standard the the the fact that these Individuals do not want equal rights.
They want super rights based upon sexual behavior. It is it truly is just an absolutely incredible situation that our our society is facing today in regards to this and obviously given that you have no more than 3 of the population that Practices homosexuality as a chosen lifestyle a very small minority of people with a tremendous amount a completely out of line Amount of political clout.
They have much more money on average than a heterosexual does for the obvious reason That we heterosexuals who are married Give of our lives to our children and we we have to pay for things like clothing and schooling and food and medical care for our children and they don't have to do that and therefore they've got a tremendous amount of money and So they have all this political clout because money means clout in a corrupted System where where justice and righteousness is no longer the standard what is good for the nation is no longer standard.
It's just I want to be elected and I will do whatever it takes to get elected. Which unfortunately is how it works pretty much on both sides of the aisle anymore. Sadly be that as it may I've been very disturbed as I have listened to conservative voices responding to these issues just today listening to the The ruckus that has been raised over President Bush saying talk about something absolutely radical for a president to say We are all Sinners now, let's face it folks.
That was what made a lot of people really angry is that we are all sinners. Let's face it. That's something you might say in Texas, but that's not exactly what is said in most. Most people's thinking today that was what was offensive.
Especially in the context of addressing the issue of marriage and then the man dared to say That he believes that marriage is between a man and a woman and now I'm not surprised at all that the radical leftists the darlings of the media are running about lamenting such Such a bigotry.
I mean, that's that's just how they do things. That's that's how they talk. That's how they think. That's how they they act. That's just the way things are. What concerns me is how the response is being framed?
To the the this this kind of a situation. I listened because I was. Because I was. I had a dentist appointment today I got to drive halfway across the valley and back again. This is a big valley. So I got to listen to the comments both of Rush Limbaugh and of Michael Medved now most of the time they're pretty much on the same page, but not always and I got to listen to both of them address this issue today on the way out and on the way back.
From my appointment and in the process. Over and over again. I heard the same thing and I've heard this especially With with Michael Medved and this has surprised me just a little bit in the way that he that he approaches this.
But this seems to be the way that things are being stated and from my perspective as I understand biblical revelation and biblical truth. This is not a foundation for doing something that is right and righteous, but in essence what is being said is look.
Marriage should be defined by the majority perspective and the vast majority of Americans believe it should be this way. Now I know people say well, you need to understand the political reality of our society.
You need to understand the the idea of Being elected and then the fact that you know, we're dealing with a certain society. These people have have uh, you know, uh been trained by the uh, the the nea.
Uh trained schools and and all the rest of that stuff. And so we need to be careful how we say things but the fact of matter is folks the only meaningful sound basis. For defining the institution of marriage is going back to when it was established.
And when we do so we have to deal with the fact that either law. Either law is based upon God's revelation of himself and the fact that he is our creator. He is the one who made us he is the one who designed us.
And he has the right to reveal his law to us and say this is what I have designed you to be. This is my intention my purpose you will find fulfillment. You will find happiness when you behave act and think in this way.
You either go back to that or we have anarchy. And to hear conservatives saying that what's right and wrong is dependent upon polls. Is dependent upon the vast majority of americans think. That that is that is an abdication to the very people who have destroyed.
The truth that this was once a nation of laws not a nation of men. I mean the laws that that established this nation. Were based upon the recognition the sinfulness of man the fact that we need to have Law that is unchanging that isn't based upon the whims of men.
But is in fact something that is based upon the revelation of god. That is what constrains and holds man back in his constant desire to rebel. That was part and parcel of the thinking of many of those individuals and even those who were not Avowed christians were still deeply influenced by that worldview.
So to hear modern commentators in essence abandoning ship and abandoning the foundation. And and adopting the very platform of the other side. That says there is no objective truth. There is no revelation from god.
We cannot continue to look at Mankind as if he is the creation of god as if god's law has any relevance here to do that. What what what will be the end result of that? Um There's no possibility Of of continuing to hold these things together and to to defend The christian worldview which really is the foundation here.
I mean when you get right down to it uh, you look at islam, for example, there's the possibility of plural marriage with an islamic law and things like that and and so the idea the american concept of a family of a man and a woman and Commitment and the raising of children and all those things that we call traditional family values.
They had an origin and a source in the christian scriptures and a recognition That god is our creator and god has the right to tell us what's right and what's wrong. And so once you once you stop admitting that then you have cut yourself adrift from history you have no Background any longer upon which to rely and what are we supposed to accomplish here?
Huh, it's it's just It it's just it's just a sad sad thing to hear this taking place and it To see the speed with which is coming now. Some people say it's happening so quickly there may be a backlash and it's true when 97 of the population um does not embrace a a particular behavior the three percent when they start pushing themselves may indeed experience a backlash, but then there's a because of the The adoption of a post-modern mindset a a anti-christian humanistic mindset uh the idea That there is a right and wrong being completely abandoned and rejected by a majority of people you have those individuals Uh who while they are not homosexuals have been quite simply brainwashed have had their minds Uh, just just removed so they do not see how sexual behavior and sexual Activity impacts all of one's life, even though it's obvious that it does and so they'll they will buy into any of this.
They're they're just the people who are just absolutely bent upon throwing off any form of god's revelation of himself And a revelation of his his law in our lives. It is just it is just an amazing thing.
So when we see the perversion of justice going on within our society when we see certain and certain political forces Circumventing the constitution circumventing even the will of the people because they they are even more radical.
They they have not even they don't even have the patience to allow the the poison to circulate through the entirety of the the body politic. Uh when you see them pushing ahead like this, they just they are just expressing their their complete Hatred toward god this this one.
I think it was a congresswoman from uh from uh Uh colorado. I think it was that was saying this morning and I could not help as i'm driving along to just chuckle in sadness. As she is going after Uh president bush and she's saying this is totally wrong.
It is unacceptable. I do not accept it totally wrong. On what basis. What foundation do you have? Totally wrong define your basis of wrong. Where do you get any of this these people are never forced in a situation where they have to actually give some sort of of? meaningful a thought process Behind their their statements.
It's an it's an amazing thing To listen to you know, and it it forces me back into Into the scriptures and to consider the importance um uh of the The concept of justice in regards to god, I remember back in In seminary we were translating from the psalms in one of the many hebrew classes that I took and psalm 97 2 Reads clouds and thick darkness surround him.
Righteousness and justice are the foundation of his throne. Uh and justice justice mishpat. That that concept are the foundation of his throne his very rulership is based upon this concept of righteousness and justice.
And this is to be reflective within within the jewish system the judges who gave out god's Law and gave out god's uh. That they stood in the place of god's that's why they even called god psalm 82 Vindicate the weak and fatherless do justice to the afflicted and destitute.
Who is that addressed to the judges who were called gods? When a person is placed in that position of being a judge They are placed a position of exercising god's very judgment and they are held accountable for that.
I know there's there there are there are christians who would disagree with me with that. They would say oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no a judge will not be held accountable for What he does the judge or she does the judge they'll only be held accountable Uh for what they do as individuals and not their position as judges.
I I don't understand that I don't understand that concept. I guess it comes from maybe some eschatological viewpoints or stuff like that. I don't know Uh, but I I don't understand that I think that a person who is given that kind of authority In god's providence therefore must exercise it in a way Uh that they can give an account unto god for what they have done.
I I really think that that's the case and I know many would say no no, but that's. That's that's my perspective and a a nation that finds itself Filled with unrighteous judges, it's not the unrighteous judges that are going to bring god's judgment upon us the unrighteous judges are the evidence of god's judgment upon us.
Unrighteous judges are a plague on the land. The perversion of justice is a part of god's wrath being poured out against the godlessness Of western civilization as a whole and let's face it at least we haven't gone as far as most of Western nations have today look what's going on up in canada, and I know we've got some friends up in canada.
There's some folks listening right now up in canada, but they will tell you this whole concept of of gay marriage the total disregard for god's law in regards to The very nature of sexuality the very nature of the marriage covenant.
All of that is simply being thrown out and The the the leftists in in our nation Are absolutely determined to follow in line with what goes on north of the border and in europe. And we see that those nations have truly uh, just simply uh With with with abandon and with glee and thanks to the educational system ignorance on the part of most people Completely and totally overthrown their own history.
They have overthrown their own foundations and what system can possibly Continue on over time when you destroy your own foundations. No system can no system of government can do so. And we in the united states are actively seeing Large groups of people seeking to destroy the foundations upon which this nation was built.
That is absolutely positively Unquestionable we see it all around us. And so what are christians to do? Well You know, I there there are some who Who will say well, you know, we we need to we need to be wise and how we respond to this.
And of course we need to be wise. There's no question of need of wisdom. Uh, but what does that mean? Well, you know, we we need to recognize that people don't respond well Uh to to black and white thinking.
That's because their minds have been muddled. You know those who say well, you know, we need to try to adopt the tactics of the other side. Well, then if you adopt the tactics of the other side if you adopt the tactics of the enemies of god and god's law.
Who are seeking to pervert god's law and and destroy the institution of marriage and and force? Uh homosexual rights quote unquote down our throats and abortion rights down our throat. And and corrupt our children our marriages and our families and and don't you think for a second?
They're not going to then seek as they are in canada as well. To take away our free speech, right so that we will not even have a right to do this. We'll have to go underground to say the kind of things we're saying right now in the not too distant future.
And there's many people who would like to see that uh, if we if we adopt their tactics. Can we promote god's truth? Through a system that is that is opposed to his truth. That I do not understand that I cannot begin to understand.
I don't see how the prophets did that. It's not a matter of embrace. It's not a matter of of saying well, we need to Treat them as post-modernists. No folks remember something. Man. Whether he wants to acknowledge it or not is still Created in the imago dei the image of god.
That remains the apologetic point of contact. And you see no matter how often the the natural man seeks to banish the thought Of the creator from his mind it is still there. It is still part and parcel Of his created nature and that becomes the point of apologetic contact.
Man knows homosexuals. Know that homosexuality is wrong. They know it's wrong the the guilty conscience that they have. The fact that they have to band together in groups to to go out and do their public displays of their perversion uh in their gay pride marches uh is further testimony that they recognize The sinfulness of their actions and it's a fulfillment of romans one.
They know that those who practice these things are worthy of death, but they not only practice them. But they encourage others to engage in those very same activities. This is what we see going on around us all the time.
These people are still created in the image of god. That is the contact that's the contact point That you have with the unbeliever. It is not adopting his methodologies. It's not adopting his perspectives and approaching him as if we try.
As if we in some way shape or form can convince them through non-spiritual means to adopt truth uh, that makes no sense and so It is it is a sad thing to hear. And I know michael medved is is not a believer in jesus christ.
Uh, I don't know what the what rush limbaugh's State of soul is. I don't get the feeling that he is either um, and so I I guess I shouldn't be overly surprised but certainly Uh those of us who look to the word of god should see What the real issues here are and should recognize and and I know in our society.
You're you are going to be looked down upon fine. We're already looked down upon. Why should we care if we're looked down upon more? We need to start saying look you folks are anti-christian bigots. You do not want me to exercise my religious rights.
You do not want me to have the freedom to believe what I believe. And i'm not going to act like a second-class citizen anymore. I'm going to use the rights that I have while i've still got them and i'm going to speak out and i'm going to say That you are wrong.
You are morally wrong to say and do what you're doing. You've got to do that. I just well anyways i've been I guess i've been preaching haven't I? Uh, it's it's troubling. It is very very troubling to me to see um people defending a position.
That is true. But defending it in a way that is inconsistent with the truth that's being defended. You know what I mean? Um, it's Marriage is not defined as one man and one woman because the majority of people think that.
That is the the myth that this somehow is a greek democracy. Where majority determines truth? That has never been the case and the fact of the founding fathers Did not give the vote to everyone. They designed it in such a way that people who would know something about Responsibility and the law that those are the ones who made those kinds of decisions.
Might tell you a little something about where they were coming from. There has been and i'm not the first one to say this many people have said this but there has been A not overly silent, but pretty much ignored by everyone revolution in this nation.
If you if you define a revolution as a as a change In the foundations of the governing system that has already taken place. We're just seeing the results. And we may well be facing a day when our freedoms the freedoms we have.
To say what we're saying right now will be challenged and taken away. Uh, and that's already taking place north the border where you cannot even publish certain i'm not sure. You know, how do they get away with publishing bibles in canada?
Do they publish bibles in canada? Uh, do they have to take out? Uh Deuteronomy 22. And romans 1 and genesis 18 and 19. Isn't amazing you can publish books uh. In a certain nation, but you can't Buy space in a newspaper to publish the same stuff.
Uh, oh my my my my my and if you think that the people who defend free speech will come to our aid remember barry lynn. Uh barry lynn the great defender of the first amendment uh, but in reality. Uh that first amendment is only in their thinking meant to defend their freedom to say whatever they want.
It is not meant to defend our freedom of speech at all. And his actions made that very very clear. So um. Yes, one of our our faithful friendly canadians is glaring at me in channel. But if that individual would like to explain to me where i'm wrong In what I have said concerning things north of the border.
Then I would be happy to hear what he has to say. Uh, but uh that seems to be the situation well anyway I I now feel better. Uh, but that doesn't really accomplish a whole much a whole lot eight seven seven seven five three three three four one I don't see any indication on ye olde computer screen.
That anyone has picked up their phones to join us this evening. Yes, there are none eight seven seven seven five three three three four one you don't have to uh, you don't have to uh. You know comment on that if you have other questions on other subjects that we've addressed that's fine.
Uh, no problem whatsoever uh, but um. That's right i'm not wrong and I know you hate it just as much as uh as I do but it's. You're stuck with it my friend since you live up there and it's it's like, uh.
What was it back in the 70s acid rain? Uh, it is now Coming our direction and eating away at the fabric of our society. Just as it has done. So, uh up there north the border and in europe and yes in jolly old england uh, it is amazing to think that in the lands of of charles haddon spurgeon and in the land of john knox and and uh people like that that uh,.
That this kind of utter degradation now now reigns supreme. Well. Uh, it seems that americans are absolutely intent upon Well quite simply upon ignoring that. And as long as our 401ks are doing fine all is well and our 401ks are doing better.
So Must be must be a good thing 877 -753 -3341 we're going to take a break and give you all time to go running to your phones. Uh so that you can join the program today. And when we come back if uh that hasn't taken place.
Uh, we'll press on from there 877 -753 -3341. We'll be right back.
Answering those who claim that only the king james version is the word of god James white in his book the king james only controversy examines allegations that modern translators conspired to corrupt scripture.
And lead believers away from true christian faith. In a readable and responsible style author james white traces the development of bible translations old and new. And investigates the differences between new versions and the authorized version of 1611.
You can order your copy of james white's book the king james only controversy by going to our website at www .aomin .org. What is dr. Norman geisler warning the christian community about in his book chosen but free a new cult.
Secularism. False prophecy scenarios. No, dr. Geisler is sounding the alarm about a system of beliefs commonly called calvinism. He insists that this belief system is theologically inconsistent. Philosophically insufficient and morally repugnant.
In his book the potter's freedom james white replies to dr. Geisler. But the potter's freedom is much more than just a reply. It is a defense of the very principles upon which the protestant reformation was founded.
Indeed it is a defense of the very gospel itself in a style that both scholars and laymen alike can appreciate. James white masterfully counters the evidence against so-called extreme calvinism. Defines what the reformed faith actually is and concludes that the gospel preached by the reformers.
Is the very one taught in the pages of scripture. The potter's freedom a defense of the reformation and a rebuttal to norman geisler's chosen. But free you'll find it in the reformed theology section of our bookstore at a omen .org.
This portion of the dividing line has been made possible by the phoenix reformed baptist church. The apostle paul spoke of the importance of solemnly testifying of the gospel of the grace of god. The proclamation of god's truth is the most important element of his worship in his church.
The elders and people of the phoenix reformed baptist church invite you to worship with them this coming lord's day. The morning bible study begins at 9 30 a .m. And the worship service is at 10 45. Evening services are at 6 30 p .m.
On sunday and the wednesday night prayer meeting is at 7. The phoenix reformed baptist church is located at 3805 north 12th street in phoenix. You can call for further information at 602 -26 grace. If you're unable to attend you can still participate with your computer and real audio at prbc .org.
Where the ministry extends around the world through the archives of sermons and bible study lessons available 24 hours a day. Millions of petitioners from around the world are employing pope john paul ii to recognize the virgin mary as co-redeemer with christ.
Elevating the topic of roman catholic views of mary to national headlines and widespread discussion. In his book mary another redeemer James white sidesteps hostile rhetoric and cites directly from roman catholic sources to explore this volatile topic.
He traces how mary of the bible esteemed mother of the lord obedient servant and chosen vessel of god. Has become the immaculately conceived bodily assumed queen of heaven. Viewed as co-mediator with christ and now recognized as co-redeemer by many in the roman catholic church.
Mary another redeemer is fresh insight into the woman. The bible calls blessed among women. And an invitation to single-minded devotion to god's truth. You can order your copy of james white's book. Mary another redeemer at aomin .org.
And welcome back to dividing line. My name is james white and we are Talking about. Well, we're going to talk about whatever the callers want to talk about this evening. I got to uh get on my soapbox for half an hour and uh, you endured all of that.
And so now we let the callers sort of drive The car here and let's start with jonathan in southern florida. Hello jonathan.
Hi there james. Hi, um, can I say first and foremost that I appreciate your ministry so much. Well, thank you for calling in today. Yeah, and by the way, you're very faint on the phone. I can barely hear you.
All right, well, I don't know if that's my phone or yours, okay. Go ahead. Okay, um just a quick question concerning the uh, The transitional issue of I've recently listened to all your uh teachings on reformed theology and uh become a convert Consequently, which is rather awkward since i'm in a pentecostal church.
Ah, okay. Yeah, but my question is i'm struggling with like act eight for instance when uh, simon seems to make a conversion to christ. And then uh, it seems to vote in defending the reformed position.
Uh in light of those verses if you're talking about simon maggis, uh, I don't know anyone who would think that the man was a Was a believer in christ. I mean, uh, obviously there are many people who who uh confess some sort of a Religious experience but that's that's the whole point of the parable of the soils is that uh when the when the word goes out, there's all these different kinds of responses to it and uh, many of those responses simply do not uh result in any fruit.
Uh, and they uh, the individual is is you have the shallow soil the rocky soil the thorn so on so forth but none of them result in any fruit and so uh, that's what you have with uh with people in jesus ministry and the disciples experience the same thing.
So I I certainly wouldn't think that anyone would argue that simon, uh was actually a regenerate individual.
Yeah, I would hold the same position. You just given me there. Um, I just found it a bit difficult to explain that for you because He seems to make an outward profession to uh water baptism.
Well, so there does water baptism isn't what saves you. There are many a person who has walked through the waters of uh, baptism. And uh that baptism does not change the heart so uh. The fact that he's called the called by the the apostles what he is, uh shows the the nature of his heart.
Yeah, that's what that's what I thought because I believe uh a few verses down it kind of says that uh. He had wickedness in his heart. So therefore obviously not regenerated. Yep, quite true. So within the context it is explainable.
Yes, it is most definitely. So where are you at in southern florida? Okay, um, i'm living in uh, uh walk of time.
Okay, because i'll be in uh, the big debate coming up, uh, december 5th in tampa uh with uh with uh, Uh, gregory stafford on the subject of the deity of christ. So, uh, hopefully you'll you'll be able to make that.
I would love to do that. All right. Thanks a lot. Jonathan. Thanks for calling today. Thank you. All right. God bless. Bye. Bye. Eight seven seven seven five three three three four one. That's the number that joanna in michigan called.
Hello. Hi, good evening. How are you? Good. Good. Good. You got to turn that uh, that computer down the background or it's gonna sound really weird.
Yeah, hang on. Let me turn that down here. Okay.
Do that's much better. Thank you. Okay. Um.
Yes, ma 'am, okay. Yeah, the reason I was calling um. The um I. I have a copy of a book Um called spurgeon and hyper calvinism.
Are you familiar with that book at all? Uh, who's it by? It's by a guy named ian murray and uh, I thought that was called the forgotten spurgeon.
I think they're two separate books. Okay. Um, I think the forgotten spurgeon is where he talks about How spurgeon defends against arminianism and then this one is where spurgeon Sort of defends against hyper calvinism.
Uh-huh. And the reason i'm calling is In this book he Seems to represent the spurgeon. Um. Kind of take like in with regards to first timothy, uh, two four, um in this book He seems to take the position that spurgeon Um says that like That god desires all to be saved that all means all.
Yeah, that's what spurgeon said about first in the two four. He was wrong I mean, let's face it. Uh spurgeon, uh did not interact with uh, any exegesis of the text deals with the uh context of all men Rulers knows an authority what comes before what comes after he didn't interact with uh, two five and the issue of mediation so, uh Why he didn't interact with those things.
It's not like those those, uh Understandings were not already available at least in latent form and john owen and others. I do not know but uh Spurgeon was not infallible and uh, he did take the view, uh, the first timothy two four expressed and others I think john murray took the view that first timothy two four expresses a A a some some kind of a universal salvific will.
That for some reason god does not choose to uh act upon and does not choose to bring to fruition uh that it is it is a more of a decretive will not a decree of will but a It's more of of saying it's it's like god Uh says do not murder and yet part of his his decree is that murder will exist.
And so they would say this is similar to the same thing is that there's this this general Uh salvific will but it's different from the specific uh decree of god that includes the elect that spurgeon speaks of in other places and so Uh, there are those who take that view.
I I do not take that view of the passage. I think that exegetically Uh when you look at the passage and allow it to speak for itself in regards to what all men means um that uh that that's that's self-evident as to what it's referring to exegetically but Spurgeon did not say i've looked at that and I reject it.
He just simply Said what he said. Okay. All right. Well, thank you. You're most welcome. All right. Bye. Bye. All right. Let's uh, keep those phone lines buzzing. We've got two more of calls online. That means Folks are coming in they're calling in this evening and that's great.
Uh, let's talk with uh, jesse in utopia I have no idea what o n is Ontario ontario. Oh, someone could have said something about canada. That would have helped me to understand that but anyway Yes, the utopia, uh, the utopia where where where men can marry men, right?
Uh, uh, unfortunately, yeah.
Yes Yes, we. Uh, I actually heard your comments and then I had to click off the computer because i'm on dial up.
And then run over to the phone and call in. Uh, you're not the only one. Uh, that that's how it works. But anyway, yes, sir. What can we do for you? Um, yeah, I was uh, I was just going to uh,.
Mention a couple things in in keeping with the whole homosexual issue. Then I had a quick question. And hopefully I don't monopolize the time too much. Sure. Um. We uh, you probably heard about the stars stock this big concert that they had in toronto here yesterday.
No, I didn't tell me. Well they they had a big they had a big concert in toronto to uh, Uh, I guess get popularity for toronto after it had after it went through the big hit on tourism dude.
Oh, yeah, I did hear about that. Yeah. Yeah. Well anyways, um.
Right now in vancouver, they're having gay pride week.
Oh, it's now up to a week now a whole week. Yeah, soon. It'll be a month and then it'll be. You know, here's the time.
Anyways, but but they are complaining out there and i'm not exactly sure. If they're complaining that the government didn't throw enough money into gay pride week. Or if they're complaining that the money that the government didn't throw.
Money at them to hold some sort of a similar concert gain approval and tourism popularity for vancouver thing but if it is. You know if it's the whole We need more money for our gay pride week. I mean that's kind of in keeping with.
Yeah bc out there. Well, and that's just there. Yeah, and it's becoming more and more across canada.
Well and across the united states, especially california. California and canada both start with ca and.
There is a hidden agenda. There is.
Well, it's not very hidden anymore and uh, sadly in in both those places uh your money, um the morality of of the The left is that your money should be used to promote Worldviews that are directly abhorrent to your religious beliefs.
Yes. We just need to understand that is honestly what is being said and people need to start saying that and saying it repeatedly. And out loud, uh, because it's wrong to do that even on their basis. It's wrong.
So You know, it's it's it's amazing.
Yeah, it really is. And uh at least on the books right now in ontario if I was to stand up and preach against Homosexuality From the pulpit on the books legally. I could be charged with a hate crime.
I I know it's common in our own nation and has nothing has been done along those lines yet. Is is someone going to try to in essence? bring it into the court to force a A decision or is that given the nature of the supreme court in in canada?
Is that not what you want to see happen?
Probably not what we want to see happen right now actually but it is actually that's the way. That the laws would read and uh, thankfully they're not enforcing it. But should they desire to do so they have the legal right?
Oh my what was your question. Because we've got uh, gary and adam online waiting as well.
All right. I'll fire this one off quickly. It has to do with uh, the dreaded l on the acrostic. Yes.
Um, let's go ahead and switch topics while we're at it. Let's make sure everyone knows there is no really direct or logical connection between particular redemption the previous topic.
Anyways, um, yeah I uh, I was recently talking with someone and just to make a long story short He did not subscribe to limited atonement. He was a twipper, but he held to a belief that there is a real Uh propitiation a real redemption not just a potential one for all men without distinction and exception.
And he held this, uh, the only sin that would Condemn a man is not accepting jesus christ, right? And he had this this belief that all men are really and truly redeemed all men without exception and I took him to revelation 5 9 Uh where it says they sang a new song saying you are worthy to take the scroll and open it feels for you were slain And have redeemed us to god by your blood out of every tribe and nation.
And uh tribe tribe and tongue of people and nation and I suggested to him that this this verse would In my opinion be a death blow to his opinion. Because it says that they are redeemed out of every kindred tribe and nation.
Now am I exegetically weak on that or is that highly suggestive in the time? Well, it's interesting.
I I had up because you know. You never know how many calls we get or what kind of calls we get and so I had up More of dave hunt stuff and I I a couple weeks ago had put this material together. And I had 13 cliffs.
We've done the first seven of them and the 11th which I was going to get to this evening if we didn't have calls the 11th. Here's what I had put as my notes. So I could sort of introduce it and make comments on after it played.
This is the 11th cut. What is your view of limited atonement mainly mcmahon commenting then hunt says christ paid the penalty? For every man. Note revelation 5 and how silly the statement is. If universal atonement is correct so that i'm reading you what I wrote a couple of weeks ago.
And that's exactly what you just said and that is if there is a a true substitutionary atonement That is made so that this redemption is not just a theoretical redemption, but it's a real redemption. Uh, then revelation 5 does strike me as being a death blow because it it becomes a nonsensical passage if in point of fact, um.
What you have going on is is that this this redemption has to be somehow differentiated from purchase? Hello from purchased with your blood. You still there? Yeah. Okay. I'm not sure what happened. I don't know either I I must have been uh, someone on the other side of the wall, uh experiment.
I wonder what this button would do um. Anyway, uh, uh, I I agree a thousand percent the the if in fact what we have in revelation chapter 5 is a reference um to the the Relationship between christ's atoning work and the actual accomplishment of salvation itself.
Uh, then yes revelation 5 is directly addressing that and it just simply makes no sense. Uh if a a universal substitutionary atonement is actually the biblical teaching so I I think you're you're right on right on the ball there.
All righty. All right. Well, you keep uh serving lord up there in canada and we'll pray for you and your foreign missions work. Thank you very much. All righty, sir. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. Bye. All right.
Uh, the the calls keep on coming. Uh, let's go on to gary in abilene, texas. Hello gary, hello, dr. White. How you doing? All right. How you doing doing you down there in texas? I'm down here in texas.
Yes.
Where it's as much a state of mind as it is state of the union. Hey, uh, well, you know.
I I think y 'all should just you're big enough. I think y 'all could secede and get rid of all this weirdness. And and I think I think we might just move on down there except it's just too it's just too flat my thoughts.
Exactly, sir. I'm sorry, I I am just so politically incorrect when I start making Making comments about someone's accent. But uh, hey, you know, I just I just I drove from houston home last month and that was that, you know.
There ain't much in west texas. Did you know that? Have you ever been to ozona texas. Ozona, texas? Yes. I have used to hunt there. You used to hunt there. Well, what were you shooting? Four-legged bambi four-legged bambis.
Let me tell you something. There ain't a whole lot there. Oh sure. There is. Oh, please.
A whole lot of sheep. Well, there you go. Anyhow, well anyway the girls in arizona love us they love our accent. Oh, yeah. Well.
Sure, yeah. Uh-huh. Okay. Anyways, you want you'd want to talk about john 3 16? Yes, sir. I did.
Okay, uh before I get into that could I throw something in right quick? Sure on the idea of homosexuality.
Uh, well coming from texas you that is the same state where the president's from so. That might give you uh, even more of a basis to say something.
I think everybody ought to send in a letter to the bravo channels. About three weeks ago after they passed that sodomy law. Yes. Uh on one particular sunday the whole day was nothing but gay marriages.
Oh good grief, and i've never seen nothing like that in my life. Well, didn't. Aren't they the ones who started this? Uh, gay.
Gay gay guy gay eye for the straight guy or it's. Didn't that come from it initially come from bravo as well. I I was my recollection that it first. Yeah, see, um rich says i'm right I think that's where they they that started that what did it get pick up picked up by the national media nbc or something?
I don't know. Anyway. Yeah, these these media types are very much Very much supportive of all this kind of stuff. So it's uh, you know, I I agree we should but anyways on to john 3 16. Because we've uh, amazingly enough have lots of callers today.
It's lots of fun.
So why I wanted to talk about john 3 16 is uh, james is uh, god's laid this on my heart several months ago this particular scripture. And uh, i've been struggling with it and everything i've listened to your ministry and your sermons from your church.
And as well as the one that you did on the 22nd.
And did you read uh. The fairly lengthy discussion of this passage verses 16 and 17 on our website in my response to dave hunt. Yes, okay. Good. Yes.
And I was wondering if have you ever written a book um pertaining to this issue.
To john 3 16. No to just the verse.
Just well just the verse and just the way you describe it. So.
So eloquently and no, I mean i've addressed it within the context of uh,. Well, you know now that I think about it, uh, probably just just basic comments. I don't think i've put anything In a book whether it's god sovereign grace or the potter's freedom.
Um, that was as full as the open letter now I did in the um, Debating calvinism book will be coming out in february from multnomah with dave hunt. I obviously had to address this rather fully but Um, I only had the opportunity of addressing it within a 2000 word response to one of dave's presentations, so I had to cut out.
Uh, probably about 40 percent of what's in the open letter response. So the open letter response is probably the longest. Um, Section and that's why i'm seeing websites popping up. Well, not websites, but individuals popping up responses to it on various sundry websites.
In fact, I got an email from a guy Uh just yesterday that said hey i've i've refuted you here and and I go and look at it. He says now i've not read dave hunt's book and I I don't know anything about this argument's going on.
However, here's my comments and i'm like, oh great. That's that's real useful.
So I think that's about the longest thing. The way you describe it and talk about it. Like on the 22nd is the best i've ever heard anybody put it and that's the way god put it in my heart. Is the way he wants it understood but so many people misinterpret it.
Oh, I I know and it's like it's brainwashed into them. Well, it's not just brainwashed tradition, man.
It's tradition. That's that's what we're looking at as tradition.
But what i'd like to see james is maybe if you couldn't put that. The way that description into some type of handout booklet you mean like a uh, like a track type thing. Yes I think so many people fall short because of john 316 because it is the first verse we learned.
Well, you know, that's not a bad idea because one of the things we started doing and uh, you know. Uh, you're you're you're talking to half of the staff and you talk to the other half of the staff when you called in.
So uh, we're small ministry. One things we we did start doing once was Putting together these what we call electronic tracks and and even now they exist on the website. And uh, hence it'd be something that you could um, uh download and print in a in a Uh in a format that would allow you like to fold it up or give it to somebody or something like that.
And uh that that's certainly an adobe pdf format and that would be something it wouldn't be all that difficult to do to take. The comments as I gave them to uh to dave and to present it in a in an understandable way.
That's that's certainly something we could put on the uh, put on the table and try to get done.
Because really the way that you teach it is it's so hard for the common person the common believer to to Get that understanding across to another person.
It's not because the text is difficult. It's just because of the the presence of having heard it used in another way over and over and over again. That's what that's what makes it difficult. It's not that language is difficult.
It's just the tradition stands right and you just you just you just breeze right through it. And it's just it amazes me and and i've i've sit there and listen to it and listen to it. And i've wrote it down so I can learn to Explain it the way you do and it's but i'll tell you what I what i'll do for you.
There is that uh, you know, I could maybe I could just record it in in sort of for texans, you know. We could we could give john 316 for texans. How does that sound? That sounds great. In fact, we got somebody in channel named cow poet.
He writes cowboy poetry.
Maybe we could have him help us out with that a little bit and I am in channel every once a while under fishermen.
By the way, oh, okay. Well, you've may have seen cow poet in there, you know. We could we'll get a picture of him on the front of it because he looks like a cowboy.
And I hope to make that cruise with you guys in december. Well good. Uh, that's uh, i'm looking forward to it myself.
I was talking with michael fallon about today. So Excellent brother. Well, thank you very much. We're going to try to sneak adam in real quick here. So i'll need to let you go gary and talk to you later.
God bless you. And let's go ahead and real quickly run over to adam. Hey, what is this. Two texans in a row? Uh, texas has risen again. How are you doing adam? I'm i'm doing really well. Dr White well see that I can tell you're in texas, too.
How far from abilene is vernon. Um.
My goodness, I you know, i've been to abilene several times but never from vernon. Okay, so I you know.
Just a general. Is it east west north or south? I think it's kind of.
To the west southwest. All righty, sir, what can we do for you? Well, I've got a question about romans 1 26 and 27 right and uh. Just uh and a seeming coincidence somebody sent me the other day. Uh, just a question about that and they sent me a bunch of links to some I guess pro homosexual interpretations of those texts.
Okay, let me ask you real quick where adam. Have you um seen my book called the the same sex controversy.
I was considering buying it. Actually yours was the first site. I went to after. Right, right.
Uh, one of the chapters, uh, jeff neal and I co-wrote that one of the chapters that I specifically wrote Uh myself was on romans chapter one. That was one of the focuses that I I worked on and so there's a there's a lengthy section there.
Obviously, I went over it in the debate with barry lynn as well. Uh, but you're right. There's a tremendous amount of stuff written out there that basically tries to Remove this from being relevant to the issue of homosexuality.
Was there a particular perspective of that you wanted to ask about? Yeah um the.
The the interpretation. That a lot of the it was mostly just like I said websites a lot of things that I read were the direction they were going was um Because it's natural for a gay person to be gay right.
They could not actually commit an unnatural act by um Having sex with another man, right? and so. Yeah, I mean, I mean that was basically the argument but it's not that doesn't have anything to do with with Genuinely homosexual people because it wouldn't be unnatural for them to do that, right?
So they're yeah as if the apostle paul would have that concept within his own thinking. It's interesting When you if you would start to list the arguments that pro-homosexuals use on a biblical basis one of the one of the Normal arguments about romans one is that paul could not be addressing modern concepts of homosexuality.
Because he did not know of modern loving Committed homosexual relationships. I would dispute every one of those terms by the way. But that's the terminology they'll use when you think about it. That's an argument against what you just said.
Because the only way that the argument that you just presented could have any meaning in the text is if paul did know. And in fact believed that there was this natural concept. The problem is when you look at natural function uh.
For example verse 27 the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman. Well, what is that? That is natural sexual intercourse between male and female. That is clearly. What is what is uh, Presented there and so then when it says for their women exchange the natural function for that which is unnatural.
And the same way also the men abandon natural function of the woman and burning their desire toward one another. If you put those three phrases together Then the unnatural has just been defined as men burning in their desires toward one another, right?
So you have both male homosexuality adult by the way because the third Common argument here is that paul's only talking about a a situation of pederasty here uh and not about uh adult male with adult male homosexuality.
All of those fall when you simply allow those the the text to define itself um the natural function male and female so the woman Abandoning that is lesbianism the men abandoning that male homosexuality men with men committing Indecent acts and receiving their own persons due penalty of their error.
When I asked barry lynn About that phrase when it talked about degrading passions and indecent acts, you know what his argument here was that that there is that that Paul is only talking about sin. Before verse 26 and after verse 27 and he literally said in the debate degrading passions and indecent acts are not sins.
If you can believe that well You might want to listen to that debate because it might be very very interesting. And I did address that in the book and I hope you can get uh, get hold of that. Thank you adam for calling from texas tonight.
Gary, uh, jessie everyone else who called in joanna. Thank you very much for making the program, uh what it is. Thank you for listening and lord willing. We'll see you next tuesday morning here on the dividing line.
God bless.
The dividing line has been brought to you by alpha and omega ministries. If you'd like to contact us call us at 602 -973 -0318 or write us at p .o Box three seven one zero six phoenix, arizona eight five zero six nine.
You can also find us on the worldwide web at aomin .org. That's a o m i n dot o r g where you'll find a complete listing of james white's books tapes debates and tracks. Join us again next tuesday morning at 11 a .m for the dividing line.