Debunking Evolution Clip: Mutations Can't Create New Genetic Information

And, while lots of small mutations can give a survival advantage in specific environments, virtually all the real-life examples show a loss of genetic information, not a gain. Evolutionists have tried to propose various genetic explanations, like gene duplication, but they are putting their faith in a process that has never actually been observed.

What's gene duplication?

It's when a whole gene accidentally gets copied and then it mutates to become another.

New gene.

Nice story.

Have scientists ever seen that happen?

Nope. Never.

And most examples of supposed evolution in action involve things like chemical pathways and small changes in proteins, but how do you get a fin to turn into a limb and then a human hand? They tell interesting stories about how it must have just happened, but I can't find any evidence it actually happened.

So, a typical mutation removes information, but only a mutation that can add information really explain how philosophers came from fish.

And if you think about it, natural selection can't create anything. It can only deselect by killing whole individuals with traits that are already present in a.

Population.

Wow, you're right.

You can only select something that is already present. How could nature ever add information to some DNA by subtracting some of what is already.

There?

Great question.

And speaking of information, here's another question evolutionists have not even come close to answering. How could chemicals from early Earth spontaneously form molecules with information?

That's a stretch. So natural selection can't do anything without mutations, and mutations can't even happen unless DNA forms from some muddy puddle billions of years ago.

You got it.

There's no known mechanism for creating information like we find in DNA from simple matter. Information always comes from a mind.

And God is the mind behind creating the DNA in the first place.

Yeah!