Debunking Evolution Clip: Species vs. Kind

1 view

This short feature makes the distinction between an evolutionary species, and a Biblical kind. To view the complete Debunking Evolution series, please visit: www.DebunkEvolution.com

0 comments

00:09
Scientists seem to name something a new species, even if there's only a minor change.
00:15
And in the fossils, the smallest variation is classified as a different species, even though we see lots of variety with some species today.
00:23
Like what? Like in dogs. Just think about all the variety in the breeds of dog kinds,
00:29
Canis familiaris, in the last 200 years. If future paleontologists dug up the bones of a
00:37
Bulldog, a Chihuahua, and a Great Dane, they would surely classify them as three different species.
00:43
But they are all the same kind. Whether beaks of a finch change shape, or the color of a moth, the changes are limited.
00:50
When it's just expressing variety within the created kind. Yup. So evolutionists consider adjustments to existing traits evidence that evolution made those traits in the first place.
01:03
So what if God made each basic kind with potential to change some of its traits, but no potential to morph into a different kind?
01:12
Dogs can breed with coyotes, and coyotes can breed with wolves. They called a kite wolf. So they must all be part of the same created kind.
01:20
So they have a common ancestor, but it was the original dog kind that God created, not the transition between a reptile and a mammal like they show in these textbooks.
01:31
So fossils, the classification of animals, and the Bible are all in harmony. That's what it looks like.