Matt Slick Live: July 10, 2024

The following program is recorded content created by The Truth Network. It's Matt Slick Live!

Matt is the founder and president of the Christian Apologetics Research Ministry, found online at karm .org.

When you have questions about Bible doctrines, turn to Matt Slick Live! For answers, take in your calls and respond to your questions at 877 -207 -2276.

Here's Matt Slick. All right, everyone, welcome back to the show. If you are interested, give me a call at 877 -207 -2276.

Today's date is July 10th, 2024, and there's a heat wave going on here in the

United States. We're in Idaho, and it's 108, and boy, it's hot, but it's a dry heat, so it's not that bad here.

I know it's real hot for a lot of people, and I hope people are taking care of themselves and situations are okay. All right.

Now, look, if you want, you can also email me at info at karm .org,

info at karm .org, and if you do that, I just put in a subject line, radio comment, radio question, something like that, and I can get to it.

We've got a few waiting. All right. Now, some interesting kind of stuff has been going on.

There's a rabid, rabid anti -Calvinist out there, anti -security, internal security person out there called

Dan Corner, and so I was on a Catholic website, or it was not a

Catholic website. It was a website that deals with Catholicism and some other stuff, and so I made a comment,

Catholicism, this and that. This guy, Dan Corner, comes up, and I've had interactions with him before, and said, be careful,

Matt Slick, once saved, always saved, Calvinist heretic, and I get tired of this kind of stuff, and so I said, okay, let's have a debate, and I challenged him to a debate, and I said, let's have a moderated, public, moderated, timed debate, and he said he would do it, but he would do it on the subject of once saved, always saved, and I said, let's do it, and then he backed out.

I challenged him to debate tonight, but he all backed out. I have it all recorded, the text and everything from Facebook, and it's on a page, and the reason

I'm bringing this up is because there are people who condemn everybody just outright, and who have little, if no grace at all, and who misrepresent other people's positions, and then don't care, and then speak ill and evil of people, and won't back it up, and so he's a, in my opinion, he's a dangerous teacher you need to be aware of, and I've got information on him, so that's that, and on the page today, on the

Facebook page, which I have it all linked and everything, he bailed, he bailed out on his agreement, and I told him,

I said, Jesus says, let your yes be yes, your no be no, you gonna do what you said, and silence crickets for two days, so if he wants to come back and save face, and agree to the debate that he agreed to, and not go back on his word, then we can have a time moderated debate, and I will do my best to dismantle his heretical position, his accusations, his false accusations, et cetera, et cetera, all right, having gotten past that, so if you want to give me a call, you can, 877 -207 -2276, for those of you who support us at CARM, I'll let you know that we're working on a new system, we've begun it today, and it'll take a few weeks, we're gonna get something replacing what we have, and we hope to really advance the site in some particular areas a lot, and I know that there's a bit of an issue,

I don't know why or what exactly, but I'm gonna find it out, with the schools, and a couple of things happened, so I don't know if Joanne's aware of it, but my wife knows, and I'm gonna work on that as well,

I've written enough articles that I've got stuff for another week, that I don't have to do anything, no more writing, and it'll just come out every other day for a week, so I've got a whole week to be able to produce other stuff, and in the meantime, what

I'll probably end up doing is like I did last night, go on Clubhouse, open up a room, and taught some theology, and answered questions, and I'd go on Discord and do that as well, and I've started working on an outline system for videos that we're going to be producing, so I've got a lot going on,

I don't want to use my girl voice, I can't do it.

Alright, hey look, why don't you give me a call, 877 -207 -2276, let's get to Ebenezer from California, Ebenezer, welcome, you're on the air.

Hey, hey Matt, yeah, I was talking to some Catholics on TikTok, and I just, you know, brought up the whole thing on how, you know, because they say that Peter was, you know, had authority by Jesus for the

Catholic Church, and they brought up some passage in Matthew, I think it was in Matthew, or one of the two, and also they said, you know,

Mary was infallible, and it was a lot of things, and they used, for the

Mary was infallible, they used the infallible, they would say that she was sinless, she never sinned.

Yeah, sinless, exactly, yeah, yeah, yeah, but I forgot about that, and how there was originally 73 books in the

Bible, and some counseling, and jamia, and yeah.

Yeah, that's wrong, 73 books is wrong, you've been misled by a lot of the Catholics who themselves have bought into lots of lies.

So let me deal with some of these. I mean, I know it's, I know it's wrong, I know it's wrong, but it was like proving it, you know?

Okay, well, you can actually go to CARM, and you can see a lot of the answers to that.

So for example, if you go to my website, CARM .org forward slash C -U -T, the word cut, and it's short for cut and paste, and the purpose of that section is to be able to take paragraphs and cut them and to paste them and put them into chat rooms, well, it turns out that this is just pretty helpful, because it's basic information.

So if you were to go there, and you were to click on the Roman Catholic stuff, you can, for example, click on the link

Peter, it'll scroll it down in there, and Peter and the Rock, Matthew 16, 18, and it tells you how to respond to them.

It's right there. Okay. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I'm on a website.

It was just tough on it. Actually, I like, I use this, this, this site on YouTube called

Christian Vote, and they had, to justify that claim, you know, they had,

I think it's Ignatius's, I think it's

Irenaeus or Ignatius's letter, where, because I was talking to the

Catholic guy, and I told him how Irenaeus even, he didn't, he didn't specify that Peter was the,

Peter was the, had all authority. He did not.

I mean, it wasn't making justified cases for my claims or their claims either, but they automatically assumed, they said it was some fallacy, and they automatically assumed that, oh yeah, it's

Peter, it's Peter, he was talking about Peter here in Polk. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, so here's the thing, you're going to encounter

Roman Catholics who are basically cultists, and when

I say that, I want you to think of them as cult members. They don't know the facts, don't care about the facts, only their church is true, and they believe whatever their church says, and the scriptures can only be understood according to what their church says.

This is typical of cults, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, stuff like that, you know,

Eastern Orthodoxy also. So you have to think of it like that, and what you need, what

I would recommend that you do is go to my website and other websites, and it's really simple to do.

I recommend this to people. You can go to Google, and you can create a

Google Doc, and just store the address someplace that you always have it.

You can get to it on a web browser, you can get to it on your phone, and what you do is you create an outline, and you put answers to stuff in an outline.

That's all, simple. And when you're talking to somebody, you just bring that up, and you just, you put your stuff in there.

You can say, oh, this is this. You can take information from QARM, for example, take a paragraph and copy it in there, and you'd have it ready.

And this is what you do. Yeah, I'm on QARM's website right now, yeah, all right, all right, no problem, no problem, yeah.

I was just, I didn't mean to just blast you with all the information I wanted. No, no, no, I deal with this all the time with Roman Catholics.

I mean, I can answer the issue of Peter, I can answer the issue of the Bible and 73 books that they say we took out, which never happened.

They were never in, go through and explain that. I can explain the issue of Mary and the idolatry that they commit with her.

I mean, idolatry. So the Roman Catholic Church, you've got to understand, is not a

Christian church. It teaches a false god, a false priesthood, a false Mary. It is not

Christian. And all people who die believing official Roman Catholic theology are damned.

Official. That's not to say there aren't Catholics in there who are Christians. But if they believe official

Roman Catholic theology, they cannot be saved. Because it is, it's antichrist. A lot of people think that I'm just being crazy when

I say that. Well, it's not, I'm not being crazy. Because I know what I'm talking about. My notes on Catholicism, my

Word document notes on Catholicism are 228 pages. And it's still growing.

And I have more to research. So I take it very seriously. And the Roman Catholic Church is not a Christian church.

And neither is the Eastern Orthodox Church. Okay? So. And you've got to find out why.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. All right. I will be searching your website. Good, man.

Check it out. And, you know, give us feedback and call me up and say, dude, that was so helpful.

Or man, I was reading this one thing, it didn't make any sense. And you just tell me. Because to me, it all makes sense, because it's in my brain.

But I can go and I can fix it. Like someone pointed out a mistake, a typo, a paragraph typo, and I had to go in and fix it yesterday.

It happens. So feedback's always welcome. All right? Most definitely. All right.

All right. Thank you, man. All right, man. God bless. Okay. All right. All right.

Well, that was Ebeneezer. And if you want to give me a call, all you have to do is dial 877 -207 -2276.

Let's get to Paul from Wake Forest, North Carolina. Welcome, Paul. You're on the air. How are you doing?

I'm doing all right. So where are you going? I'm in the middle of getting gas.

I think I'll just sit down and wait for that. I'm in the middle of getting gas. I'm in the middle of getting gas. Okay.

I've talked to you a couple of times before, and that was probably years ago.

But throughout listening to you, I seem to feel that you believe in the post -tribulation rapture.

Yes, that's correct. I believe we're going to go through it. Yep. We're not going to get raptured out before. You do, huh?

Yeah. I hope I'm wrong. You know where it says

God would not allow us to go through His wrath?

No, it doesn't say that. It doesn't? No. Well, what does it say?

The Bible says we're not appointed to wrath, but salvation. Okay? Yeah.

That's what the Bible says. So, oh, there's the break.

So hold on, and then we'll get to it, and I'll address it. Okay. I'll show you what it's really saying and why the pre -trib rapture people take it out of context and misuse it.

Okay? So hold on, buddy. Hey, folks, if you want to give me a call, all you have to do is dial 877 -207 -2276.

I'll be right back. It's Matt Slick live, taking your calls at 877 -207 -2276.

Here's Matt Slick. Welcome back to the show. If you want to give me a call, all you have to do is dial 877 -207 -2276.

We have three open lines. Paul, are you still there? Yeah. Yes, I am.

All right. Now, the Bible verse you're talking about is 1 Thessalonians 5 .9. For God has not destined us for wrath, but for obtaining salvation through our

Lord Jesus Christ. Right? Right. Okay. I'm going to show you a concept here.

I want you to see how God works. In Isaiah 45 .7, notice what it says.

The one forming light and creating darkness. Causing well -being and creating calamity.

I'm the Lord who does these. So the way of speaking is to set one against the other.

Not logically, but to contrast. The one forming light and creating darkness.

Well -being and calamity. Okay? Wrath and salvation.

1 Thessalonians 5 .9. God has not destined us for wrath, but for obtaining salvation.

So if he's not destined us for wrath, but it's salvation. Salvation means a forgiveness of sins, etc.

That's what we're talking about. So what does wrath mean there, then? Does it mean we're not going through a tribulation?

Is that what it means? I guess not, because I go through a lot of it now.

Yeah, it has to do with damnation. Furthermore, let's go to 1

Peter. I'll show you. 1 Peter 3 .20.

Okay? Come on, my fingers aren't working right. There we go. It says in 1

Peter 3 .20, talking about the spirits now in prison. Who once were disobedient when the patience of God kept waiting in the days of Noah during the construction of the ark in which a few, that is eight persons, were brought safely through the water.

Were Noah and his family, were they there during the wrath of God upon the unbelievers?

The answer is, yes, they were. That's right. They were right there. And they entered in the ark and they were delivered in it and through it.

The preacher of rapture says, no, God wouldn't let us go through it. Yeah.

Right there with Noah. In fact, when you go to Matthew 24 .37, for the coming of the

Son of Man, would be just like the days of Noah. For in those days before the flood, they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage until the day that Noah entered the ark and they did not understand until the flood came and took them all away.

That's the wicked who were taken. So in the coming of the Son of Man, two will be in a field, one is taken, one is left.

That's who's taken is the wicked. The parallel passage of Luke 17 says that the flood came and destroyed them all.

They were eating, they were drinking, giving in marriage. They entered the ark and the flood came and destroyed them all.

And then it says two men will be taken, one is left, one is taken. And then they ask Him, where are they taken?

Well, they're taken to where the body is. Where the bodies are, the vultures gather.

That's what Jesus answers them. Now, I'll show you one more thing. Because people say we're not appointed to wrath, but salvation.

So that means we're not going through the tribulation. Well, check this out. I'm going to show you a few things here. A lot of people don't like this, but that's what it is.

So this is in Matthew 24. Therefore, when you see the abomination of desolation,

I'm just going to skip through stuff. Whoever's on the housetop, don't go down, don't get your stuff. Woe to those who are pregnant.

Flee, lest those days be cut short, no life would be left. If anyone says, you behold, there's a

Christ, don't listen. False prophets will arise. He's telling us, just as the lightning comes from the east and flashes even to the west, so will the coming of the

Son of Man be. Where the corpse is, there the vultures will gather. And then verse 29, but immediately after the tribulation of those days, the sun will be darkened, the moon will not give its light, and the stars will fall from the sky, and the powers of the heavens will be shaken, and then the sign of the

Son of Man will appear in the sky, and then all the tribes of the earth will mourn, and they will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of the sky with great power and glory, and he will send forth his angels with a great trumpet, and they will gather his elect from the four winds, from one end of the sky to the other.

That's the rapture. After the tribulation. But before that, there was, reading

Matthew 24, before that mention of the rapture, there was another mention.

Nope. No, there's not. There's only one return of Christ. Because in Acts 1, 9 -11, it's prophesied how he's going to come back.

I thought that there was the coming of Christ before the rapture, and then seven years were worth the

Lord, and then we come back with him again. So to me, there was like two coming to Christ.

One before the tribulation, one after. And that's not in Scripture.

It's just not there. There's only one return of Christ. Yeah, it's a common thing, and I believe that pre -trib rapture is very easily destroyed.

So, here's something else to think about. In Matthew 13,

Jesus talks about the parable of the wheat and the tares. And the tares are the wicked people and the wheat are the good people.

Because they're wicked first. The wicked are the ones taken first, that's right, when he comes back.

And they're taken out of his kingdom. Yeah. And it's just like Matthew 24 and Luke 17.

The wicked are the ones taken. That's what it says. Do you have a lot of this on your website?

Yes. So, if you were to go to Karm and look up this article, just type in this age and the age to come in support of Amillennialism.

Now, I'm an Amillennialist, which I believe, and if you're not, that's okay. That's not a big deal.

But Amillennialism says the future thousand -year reign of Christ, literal 1000 years, is not real.

But that we're in the reign of Christ now. And people say, well, how come things are so bad? And there's very good answers because even

Jesus says he'll take out of his kingdom the wicked. His kingdom is now. That's in Matthew 13.

So, what I do is I show people the scriptures on this, and a lot of people are just stumped and blown away by what it says.

But the argument, I don't care if you're Amill or not, this is about the rapture stuff.

So, I think the preacher of rapture is potentially dangerous in the Christian Church. Because, in my opinion, it gives the false security blanket that we're going to be taken out of everything.

So, don't be that concerned with the world. And I think that is a very bad thing.

Yeah. 90 % Go ahead. 90 % of the

Christians I know, or every Christian I know, believe in pre -tribulation

Pre -tribulation I'll tell you what, we've got a break.

If you want to hold on, please do. If not, you can hang up. I'll go with what you told.

Thanks. God bless, buddy. Hey folks, you want to give me a call?

877 -207 -2276 We'll be right back. It's Matt Slick Live!

Taking your calls at 877 -207 -2276 Here's Matt Slick.

Alright, buddy. Welcome back to the show. If you want to give me a call 877 -207 -2276

Easy to do. That's all we're going to do. Alright, just give me a call. Hold on one sec here. I had to clear my throat.

Alright, let's get on the air with let's see Rebecca from Salt Lake City.

Rebecca, welcome. You're on air. Okay. The radio is different than the phone.

Okay, Matt. I just wanted to ask you if you heard about the so -called evangelist

Robert Morris? I can't say I have. Maybe I have, but I don't recall now.

Okay. Well, he was just on television yesterday where this young lady and others say that she was molested by him and his staff.

I just wanted to get your comment on that. By him and his staff?

Yes. That would be an issue for the police to look into. Right. I just wanted to get your feedback on it.

Yeah. It's always difficult if he's a pastor. Biblically, not to bring charges on an evangelist.

It falls under one of the offices given, but we need to make sure that we don't spread false gospel.

I'm not saying he is or has not, but I haven't heard those things. If it's corroborated and there's attestation that it's the case, then it would need to be brought out and examined and the police would need to be getting involved in that and get to the bottom of it.

Accusations can easily be made. There are plenty of cases where people just make an accusation and other people's lives are ruined because of it.

Just an accusation. His life was ruined because of an accusation by a neighbor of something he didn't do.

His house was broken into. His car was vandalized. He lost his job. He had to move.

This young lady, she's now in her 40s where it happened she was only 12 and then she talked to a few other girls which were around her age that also were molested by either him or the staff.

You're right, that is for the police to take care of, but it just threw them away. The police would need to be involved with that and if it's the case, they need to be dealt with legally and then have the fathers talk to him in private.

Yeah, that's part of being a false prophet or false teacher. Okay Matt, I just wanted to get your feedback on that dear.

You have a good day and bless you. You too, thank you. Alright, God bless you.

Thank you, bye bye. Alright, now

I was going to get to something here because I have my windows open. And I know that a lot of people hold to the pre -trib thing.

I also know that I step on a lot of toes and I know that a lot of people listening they might continue to listen because well, that guy on the radio, you know he does quote the scriptures and it does seem to be right there, but I'm still just not sure.

Well, that's okay. I mean, you know, last name Slick, you gotta be careful. But I will say this, the pre -trib rapture idea didn't exist, as far as I'm aware of, until about 200 years ago.

And it became popularized here in America through the Schofield Reference Bible later at one point.

And I hope that pre -trib rapture is true. I just don't see it.

I would suggest that if any of you are interested in doing a study, that what you do is you begin with the time division that Paul and Jesus taught.

That time division, the division of history, is this age and the age to come.

It's taught in Matthew 12, Mark 10, Luke 18, Ephesians 1, Luke 20,

Luke 16, 1 Corinthians 1, chapter 8, 2

Corinthians 4, Galatians 1, Titus 2, Luke 18, Mark 10, I mean, it's all over the

Bible. Let me ask you something. If your pre -trib rapture studied eschatology, and people have listened to them, read stuff, have they ever talked about this age and the age to come?

If you've heard that before, besides me, and you've heard it, well then, praise God. But if you have not, that's a serious problem.

It's a very serious problem because it would mean that the teacher has not done his homework, or her homework. You see, this age and the age to come is critical because in this age, blasphemy is not forgiven.

We are married, and we are given in marriage. In this age, there's power and superiority of God in this age.

There's a present evil age. There's the rulers of this age. There's the god of this age, which is

Satan, and there's the wisdom of this age. But in the age to come, blasphemy won't be forgiven either.

But in this age, or the age to come, says Jesus, we receive the completion and totality of our eternal life.

There's no marriage because we're in heaven with the Lord. Power and superiority of God in the age to come.

So the question then becomes, well, what happens at the end of this age? Because in the new age, that's when new heavens, new earth, all that kind of stuff.

Well, what happens at the end of this age? Well, I've got information for you.

You can go to my website, you can look it up, you can check it out. But the wicked are gathered at the end of this age.

The judgment of the wicked occurs at the end of the age. The elect are gathered.

The harvest occurs. Jesus' return occurs, and the rapture occurs at the end of the age.

Always at the end of the age. And, it talks about it happening on the last day.

Because when it says at the end of the age that even the judgment of the wicked occurs, that's called the last day.

The judgment of the wicked occurs on the last day. Which is also the end of the age.

Well, if it's the judgment of the wicked occurs at the last day, it also says the resurrection occurs on the last day.

All this points to a single time, not a seven year period of different times where different things happen, different times where we're caught up, and then people stay here on earth, and the people who are up in heaven in glorified bodies, or they're not glorified bodies depending on which view they go to, and then we return with Christ kind of, excuse me, we return with Christ at the end of the seven year tribulation, then people are raptured up at that point again, and or enter into a literal thousand year period where people will then live for a thousand years who were not raptured, were glorified or transfigured, but they live and become believers during the tribulation period, and they go through the thousand year reign not dying, and are in physical bodies, and then the enemy, the antichrist arises up, and Satan rises up, and wars against Jesus, and all this stuff.

I mean, where is that in scripture? That's all I say. This is important stuff.

Let's get to Sarah from Raleigh, North Carolina. Sarah, welcome. You're on the air. Hi, how are you doing?

I'm doing okay, hanging in there, just stepping on people's toes. So, what do you got? Okay.

I recently got a used book, and the title was The Mysticism of Paul, and I'm just I don't remember who the author was.

I think it was originally written in the 30's and then the edition I had was from like 1958 or something, but I started reading it and I was just kind of wondering if you have any thoughts or know much about that?

No, I don't. I don't know what the book is, and I would like to, you know, be able to know, but what does he mean by it?

But that topic isn't something you necessarily know? Well, it just depends on what he means, what you mean by mysticism.

That's all. Okay. If he's defining it as a New Age sense, then that'd be a problem.

If he's defining it as his union with Christ and his experience through him throughout

Scripture, then it'd be okay. Okay. Well, I'll call another time after I've read a little bit more and have it in front of me.

Again, I was just wondering if it was something that just kind of popped in your head that you thought about or knew?

No, off the top of my head, nope. Oh, no. I've got so many books to read. I think I'm behind 50 books.

I think you're 60. I know. Seriously. I know. You're always behind. Well, thank you for all you do.

I appreciate it. Well, good. Thank you. All right. Well, God bless. Have a good day. Thank you.

All right. Hey, folks, we have about a minute before the break or so, and if you want, you can give me a call.

877 -207 -2276. You can also send me an email. All you have to do is direct it to info at karm .org.

And in the subject line, put in radio comment or radio question, and we can get to it.

Maybe we'll do that after the break because we don't have anybody waiting right now. Nobody's online. So there you go.

Now, look, if you want to have your toes stepped on in eschatology, go look at my article on karm, an examination of this age and the age to come.

Go look it up. Print it up. Go through it. And see if you scratch your head a lot.

I'll be able to challenge you. Hey, there's the music. We'll be right back after these messages. Please stay tuned. It's Matt Slick live, taking your calls at 877 -207 -2276.

Here's Matt Slick. All right. Welcome back to the show. We've got one caller coming in and an email came in.

It's a good question, and I'm going to tackle it because I think it's a good question here. It's about Philippians 129, which states, "...for

to you it has been granted on behalf of Christ, not only to believe in him, but also to suffer for him."

Jennifer asks, "...I've heard skeptics say that this verse is not sufficient to prove faith is a gift from God."

I wouldn't say it's a gift. I'd say it's granted. That's what I would say, because the Bible says it's granted, or you could say given.

And that's what I would say, because notice the subtlety of what they'll do sometimes. They'll take a verse and like this, it doesn't agree with them, and they'll say, well, it doesn't say

God, it doesn't prove it's a gift. Well, that's not what it's saying. They change it because they're interpreting it, and then you argue against what they've changed, and you don't want to do that.

I would say to them, no, it doesn't say that faith is a gift here. It says that faith is what's granted.

Anyway, it goes on, "...since Paul does not use the noun faith to believe..."

Yeah, it's the infinitive form. "...to believe." Right. So the question is, is the infinitive form to believe still sufficient to prove that faith is from God?

Well, what I would say is, instead of saying faith is from God, I would say faith is granted from God.

I stick to what the Scripture says, because if it says that,

I'm reading the text to them, and they have to then disagree with what it actually says.

I'm not going to let them alter it, and then argue what they alter. It doesn't say that faith is from God, it says that God grants that we have faith, grants that we believe.

That's what I would say. That's what it says. I say, do you agree with what the text says? I'm always doing this, and I always require them to read the text and stay as close to what it actually says.

The question goes on, "...does the Greek word for belief here equate to faith?" Yes. Because there...

Let me show you something here. To believe. So, we have belief and faith.

They're different words. In Greek, the Greek word for to believe is pestouin.

But the Greek word for faith is pistis. It goes from the same root.

Pi, iota, sigma, tau, I believe it is at this point, these four letters. So, what it's saying is that the root is from the belief issue.

So, pistin is the infinitive form, which means to eat, to walk, to do. And it comes from the verb pistouo, which is the first person singular present active indicative.

And that means, literally, it's I believe. Okay, but it's just Greek stuff.

So, what's going on here is that God is the one who's granting that we believe.

Now, what's important is that it says it has been granted. That's what's called the aorist active indicative.

Excuse me, aorist passive indicative. My mistake there. Aorist passive indicative. Aorist means past tense.

And passive means it happened to you. That's passive voice. So, it has been granted.

You were granted it. It was granted to you by God. It happened to you that he granted it to you. That you believe.

So, the belief that you have is so and true because God granted it to you. That's what's going on.

That's what it says. So, the skeptic, she says, goes on, translates the verse by saying they were given the opportunity or the privilege to believe.

I would just say it's not what it says. It does not say privilege or the opportunity. I say you have to change

God's word in order to make it fit what you want. You're committing a sin by doing this.

Because the Bible says do not change the word of God. You gotta believe it. In fact, if you go to Romans, not

Romans, but Genesis chapter 3, when Satan came to Eve, God had told

Adam, don't eat of the tree. Don't eat of it. But when Satan came to Eve and said, well, did you say don't eat from it?

She said, don't eat or touch it. All she did was add the words or touch it.

She was interpreting what God said and just changing it slightly for clarification. At that point,

Satan then knew to contradict because she was no longer trusting what God exactly had said because he said it for a reason.

What these guys do, it makes me mad, what they do is reinterpret

God's word in order to make it fit their theology, which means their theology is wrong and I know who did this.

It's Leighton Flowers. And I had a personal conversation with him about this exact verse and it's exactly what he said.

I said, here it says that God grants that we believe. He said, no, God grants the opportunity to believe. I said, that's not what it says.

That's what it means. How do you know what it means when it's not what it says? See, when you have to change

God's word, now, I'm not saying that you can't interpret things in light of other things and that's certainly the case, that we need to do that, but when it says it has been granted to believe, it's very clear that God's the one who grants that we believe and we do the believing.

And God grants it to whoever he wishes. That's the sovereignty of God, not the sovereignty of man.

At the root of the problem here is that people want their own sovereignty. They want their own privilege.

They want God to bow to their own egos, to their own pride, to their own will.

They want God to be fair on their terms because they don't like the idea that God is the one who picks people for salvation.

They don't like it because that's not fair. They are in privileged position to know how

God ought to behave. And I've had this kind of discussion hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of times with people who do not like the sovereignty of God, but they want to follow the blonde -haired, blue -eyed

Caucasian surfer dude dressed in a woman's nightgown, standing at the door of your heart asking permission for you and your wisdom to let him in.

But the God of Scripture is the one who grants that we have repentance, 2 Timothy 2 .25, grants that we have faith,

Philippians 1 .29, and Jesus says, you cannot come to me unless it's granted to you from the

Father. John 6 .65. That's it. Jesus didn't say you can't come to me unless God granted you the opportunity to come to me.

And this is the sinful, rebellious attitude that too many people have when they go to God's Word and they submit it to their ideas, to their teachings, to their sentiments.

And I wish they would stop. So that's what I have to say about that.

Let's get to Martin from Charlotte, North Carolina. Martin, welcome here on the air. Good man, how you doing?

Doing alright. I haven't seen you in a while. That's the only reason

I listen. I don't care if they don't like it. That's what it says. You don't like it?

I'm listening to somebody else who can tingle your ears. I'm not going to do that for you. If you didn't do that, I wouldn't even listen.

That's right. Okay, good for you. Okay. Okay.

Some of the stuff in the Bible is symbolic and some not, right? I'm sorry, say that again.

Some of the stuff in the Bible is symbolic and some not, right? Yeah. Okay. Alright, I have,

I've always I've always believed that Okay, may I do the scriptures that where I'm kind of it makes me a little in Revelation 12 9 and the great dragon was cast out that the old serpent called the devil and Satan was deceiving the whole world.

It's clear to me that Satan the devil they're all the same people and the serpent

The same beings, we don't call them people we call them just beings. Okay, right.

That's right. And then like 11 it says and they overcame him by the blood of the

Lamb so we call Christ the Lamb but what kind of kind of confused me so I've always argued people when they say when they would say a snake

I was like, well, he ain't really a snake you know, he's I would say well, he was an angel because of the scriptures that talk about him being this beautiful angel and then and then in the

Genesis where you just talked about but Genesis 4 where it messes with me is it says when you talked about ease and then you said in the curse because thou hast done this thou art cursed above all cattle and above every beast of the field and above thy belly shall thou go and the dust shall thou eat all the days of thy life so that kind of mess why would he say above every beast and it's like it's kind of like he is calling him a snake but because of the scriptures that talk about him being this beautiful angel

I would always you know, mess with people sarcastically and go, well, you know he really wasn't a snake, he was an angel right it's a tough thing to get through to the

Lord God said to the serpent now the word serpent is kawash kawash and it's translated as serpent and snake in the

Old Testament it occurs, I can even tell you how many times it occurs but not a big deal there's been some discussions about exactly what it was was it a snake?

we don't know, it's translated as, but we don't know if that's exactly what it was and just one of the issues that are there hold on one second, let's see it's 5175 and that word that's used there occurs 31 times when it's translated, at least in the

NASB, it's translated as serpent every single time and snake, serpent and snake and so it looks like it's that creature the snake but it's possible that it could be something else that it was and that it could be that something that existed that we don't know about or not familiar with or became extinct because 98 % of all species that have ever lived are now extinct so there's just some discussion about this and we just don't know exactly what it is so what's interesting is when the serpent was lifted up on the cross and they would look upon the serpent and they would be healed well why would they do that?

because it represented sin, sin being crucified Jesus became sin you're healed and so it's a typological representation so there's a sense in which the snake represents

Christ, believe it or not, in that context of being lifted up so this is part of it so this is a really interesting topic and it's not easy to get to now here's another question if it was, let's just say,

Satan entering a serpent why would this serpent be cursed?

because when demonic forces enter human beings, are all humans cursed? well of course not so what is this creature?

that's why we're not that's why we're not that's what's confusing I'd always tease people because of the scriptures now he's supposed to be this beautiful angel more beautiful than any other angel and he's like this big lieutenant or whatever you want to call him but then in 11 the word does say,

I mean in 9 at the end it does add angels it said he was cast out into the earth and his angels were cast out with him now they're turning him back to angel in verse 9 of Revelation we're out of time brother there's a call back tomorrow you can see this is an interesting topic and I rarely talk about it like this, but it's an interesting topic and we can't get to the bottom of it, we don't know what it is call back tomorrow if you want me to continue got to go hey folks, there you go, we're out of time may the