Acts 2:39 in Context, Interpreted, Applied

Alpha & Omega Ministries

Subscribe

Download

Share

00

Comments are disabled.

00:30

And greetings. Welcome to The Dividing Line. It is a Thursday. I don't have anything up on the screen up there, but welcome to the program today.

00:39

I hope you have your Bible. I want to jump into a quick study and well, quick, it may not be all that quick, but you never know.

00:53

A quick study, get through this, and then we'll see what we have time for after that.

00:59

A lot of folks enjoy when we delve into the Greek text and consider text rather fully.

01:10

And it's something I certainly enjoy doing. And if it is of assistance to others in approaching the text in a consistent fashion, we are big on consistency around here.

01:23

We attempt to do that as much as we possibly can. And so I'm going to, there we go.

01:33

Sometimes, have you noticed, sometimes stuff will come up on Twitter where it's an automatic plays video and it just, you, it's so distracting, especially when you're trying to do something else.

01:44

It's just, it's just all over, all over your eyes. Anyway, there is a passage of scripture, very familiar to many of us,

01:52

Acts chapter 2. The first great sermon of the church, church age anyways, after the coming of the

02:04

Holy Spirit, the death, birth, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, the inauguration of the proclamation of the gospel all around the world to Jews and Gentiles.

02:15

And obviously, this is a very important section. We start getting our first glimpse into what the

02:23

Lord Jesus would have been talking with the disciples about in regards to the fulfillment of Luke chapter 24, where Jesus is saying, you know, upbraids the disciples for not believing all that the prophets from Moses on through had testified concerning himself.

02:41

And so this is where we start getting an idea, well, what was it that Jesus was speaking with the disciples with for the time after the resurrection?

02:50

And we start seeing initially, there in Jerusalem, with all these different people from all over the world, obviously

03:00

God's timing, so that the gospel would then go out into many places from there.

03:07

We get to really get to see how the early church is going to handle opposition, questions, what they're focused upon in their proclamation, etc.,

03:17

etc. So there's much that can be learned, but I want to focus our attention on a text and basically ask the question, how can the application of sound, rigorous, consistent, hermeneutics, the utilization of rules of exegesis, assist us to identify when tradition could be overriding our desire to hear the text in its original context?

04:04

This morning, Brian Zond, in fact,

04:11

I have to look at mine to pull it up here, Brian Zond posted something that had actually been retweeted by Jonathan Merritt, which tells you where Jonathan Merritt's going when he's retweeting

04:26

Brian Zond, but he said, when we form a theological position, this is

04:32

Zond, when we form a theological position by citing scripture, we are interpreting scripture through our various theological, ecclesial, cultural, historic, ethnic, and linguistic lenses.

04:41

We may be right, we may be wrong, but we are not, quote, taking the Bible as it is, end quote.

04:48

And this has been retweeted, like I said, by Jonathan Merritt, who, by the way, still has not answered the questions

04:53

I was asked. That exposes the slander that he aimed my direction last week. He's just going to let that sit there because that's how you push the narrative.

05:02

You don't worry whether you're slandering anybody as long as the slander promotes your narrative. That's how you identify those on the left.

05:10

Anyway, so here's Brian Zond. We all know Brian Zond, you know, sort of part of the emergent church type stuff, squishy stuff.

05:21

And you'll hear this all the time, that, you know, we have these lenses, see? And so you have theological, ecclesial, cultural, historic, ethnic, and linguistic lenses, and you can't escape them.

05:35

And what's the fundamental concept that is being communicated here?

05:41

Which is being communicated in a large number of schools and seminaries in Western culture as well, we must recognize.

05:49

What's being communicated is that there is no objectively true revelation of Scripture that can actually be known.

05:59

Even if there was one, we couldn't know it. It's unknowable. It's Christian agnosticism. Anybody who's gone here is obviously looking for other sources of authority because, you know, you can't get rid of your theological lenses, you can't get rid of your ecclesiastical lenses, or your cultural lenses, your historic lenses, you certainly can't get rid of your ethnic lenses.

06:23

And I'm not sure what a linguistic lens would be unless it's just simply, well, you're understanding things as an

06:28

English speaker, and that's true. And see, there's truth to all these things because there are lenses.

06:35

There's no question about it. You can, that's why church history is so important. When we look back on church history and we look at, for example, how the early church fathers, or even how our own

06:49

Reformational fathers, or the Puritans engaged in the task of the interpretation of Scripture, we very plainly can see lenses functioning.

07:04

We have enough distance going back to them to be able to recognize on particular subjects, particular issues.

07:16

And yeah, I mean, for example, second, third generation Reformers are dealing with the

07:24

Counter -Reformation, and so Rome is pressing them on particular issues.

07:30

Can you see evidence of that in their exegesis? Yes, you can.

07:37

And so, what can we learn from that? Well, you learn from that that when you are in the midst of a battle, a pitched battle with the world, or with false religious systems, or whatever else it might be, the tendency is to start seeing those things in passages of Scripture that may not actually be there.

08:02

And the tendency, the human tendency, is to make application of texts to topics that aren't really being spoken of by the text.

08:14

When you know church history, then you can get a more balanced view because people 300 years earlier, 300 years later, probably aren't dealing with the same issues, and when you look at what they said about the text, you're not going to have those same things going on there.

08:28

Obviously, what our goal is, what the goal should be, is to always strive to handle the text in such a way that if the original author was standing there, they'd go, yeah, that's what

08:42

I meant to communicate. And to make application of the text in such a fashion that the original author and the original audience would be able to see that you've understood what they were talking about and then are making a proper application within a context that they couldn't have possibly known.

09:03

So, if we try to make an application of biblical categories of creation to the issue of genetic manipulation, anybody, any writer of the

09:16

Old or New Testament, and any audience of the Old New Testament is just going to be sitting there going, genetic what?

09:23

They have no possible way of knowing that. So, the point would be that we got them right and are now making a proper application in the context in which we now live.

09:36

So, as I've said many times, we truly show respect for God's Word, as God's Word, when we do the work of exegesis hermeneutics, proper application, but you start with the hard work of understanding what was being said initially.

10:02

That's why it's very hard for me to have a lot of respect for the standardized evangelical

10:13

Bible study methodology of read a text and go, what does this mean to you?

10:20

Because it had a meaning before you were born, it will have a meaning after you're dead, and the reality is that the meaning to you,

10:30

I'm not denigrating the importance of you coming up with a meaning for yourself, but that is way down the road.

10:39

And when that's the first thing that you think of, you've missed the boat completely, and you're probably not going to end up with a proper and sane text anyways, if you're primarily focused upon what this means for me.

10:53

The reality is you show respect for God's Word and God's speaking by beginning with doing the hard work.

11:02

Oh, that doesn't sound very spiritual. I know, I know. You know,

11:08

I look at these folks that sell millions of copies of books based upon pandering to people's wanting to be the center of all things, and I go, man, if I could just sell one book like that, then we could go back to consistency.

11:23

No, we can't do it. Can't do it. So, there you go.

11:30

We show respect for God when we do this in such a way that we are really handling the

11:43

Word for what it is, and it is not meant to be a self -help, a meet -my -needs manual.

11:53

It is a revelation that is intended, when properly handled, to reveal

11:58

God's will to men and women living in incredibly diverse situations, incredibly diverse cultures, at incredibly diverse times in world history.

12:10

And it has functioned to do that because it's divine in its origin. So, with that having been said, we turn to Acts chapter 2, and we just dive into Peter's sermon in verse 34, for it was not

12:31

David who went up into heaven, but he himself says, and then we have one of the many citations, and it is the most cited text from the

12:46

Old Testament in the New Testament, Psalm 110.

12:53

The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet.

13:02

And now, we could diverge from this particular text to discuss that entire topic and its meaning, and the fact that it is frequently abused.

13:20

Still want to do that. There's an article I want to introduce you to on that subject, but it would take us far afield from what

13:26

I'm trying to get to here. But the early church, plainly, and this is, again, this is within a matter of days of Jesus' ministry to the disciples after his resurrection, where he is opening their minds to understand the scriptures and their testimony concerning him.

13:44

So, to see Psalm 1101 that early on and central in Paul's preaching,

13:52

Peter's preaching, very, very, very important that they see this as a fulfillment in Christ.

14:00

So, therefore, let all the house of Israel with certainty know that God has made him,

14:12

Kurios and Christon, has made him both Lord and Christ, this

14:22

Jesus whom you crucified, whom you crucified.

14:31

Now, you don't allow that to just run by you. That is extremely, extremely important.

14:42

I'm sure Peter would like to have avoided having to say what he just said there, but he doesn't.

14:49

He pronounces to the entire house of Israel, and this is a Jewish audience to whom he is speaking.

14:55

It's not a mixed audience, not a Gentile audience, Jewish audience. Let the house of Israel know with certainty that God has made him both,

15:08

Kai Kurion Auton, Kai Christon, has made him both Lord and Christ.

15:17

Now, this is in regards to what? Sit here at my right hand to make it.

15:27

This is in light of the resurrection. The resurrection from the dead demonstrates that this one who was crucified, which is the lowest form of crucifixion for the most common criminal, has been seated at the right hand of God, that his claims have been vindicated by an empty tomb.

15:48

This does not mean that he was not Lord or Christ before these things, but there has been a clear demonstration through the empty tomb and the exaltation of the

15:59

Son to the right hand of the Father that he is both Lord and Messiah, Messiah, just as he indicated through the use of Old Testament texts.

16:14

So, imagine what this is saying to the Jewish people, whom you crucified.

16:22

Now, when they heard this, they were stabbed to the heart, and they said to Peter and to the other apostles, men and brethren, what shall we do?

16:40

We've crucified the one who was sent to us. The one we were looking for, we crucified him.

16:49

What shall we do? And what would be the thinking if you were in their shoes, and you're a

16:58

Jewish person, and you have been a part of the generation that turned the

17:03

Messiah over to the Romans to be crucified? We're toast. I mean, your mind's going through all the ways in which people in the past have felt the judgment of God.

17:18

You've got fiery serpents, and you've got leprosy, and flesh -eating diseases, and hey, the ground opened up and ate a few people.

17:26

Are you starting to look down at the ground, wondering if that's what's going to happen to you? I mean, there's a lot of ways that God can bring his judgment to bear, and who could even begin to argue that it would not be appropriate for God to bring judgment to bear upon the people who killed the

17:48

Messiah? And I know it's extreme. Ever since, over the past 75 years, because of what happened in Europe, passages like this have almost been excised from the

18:04

New Testament. There is an incredible reticence, hesitation, to even read

18:16

Peter saying, you crucified him, because taken out of its context and applied in some other fashion, and ignoring what's about to be said, then you turn the

18:27

Jews into the Christ killers and all the rest of this kind of stuff. And for some reason, there are evil, insane people out there who are anti -Jewish just simply because they hate

18:41

Jewish people, which I've never understood, but it's out there.

18:46

There's various reasons for it, but it's out there. So they ask, what should we do?

18:54

And it is a cry of desperation. So everybody knows

19:00

Acts 2 .38, especially if you live in the South, you happen to know the Church of Christ guys. It's still about the only verse in their

19:07

New Testament, and it's the one that they want to debate for three or four days in a row, and things like that.

19:13

But try to lay that aside because it's a blind alley, it's not what's being discussed.

19:20

Let's stick with the context because I'm convinced that what we have here in its context is a tremendous illustration of the fact that in the very first sermon of the

19:38

Infant Church, the Apostle Peter anticipated the teachings of John Calvin 1 ,500 plus years before he ever put pen to paper.

19:53

It's a Reformed sermon. It's focused upon God's sovereignty and election.

20:01

And the amazing thing is, because so few

20:07

Christians read the Bible as a whole, and so few

20:13

Christians read the Bible contextually as a flowing piece of literature, even within a single book, because Christians don't do that, because we buy into the

20:27

Western mindset that compartmentalizes everything. That's why

20:35

I've said many times we have chapters and verses and it makes it easy for us all to get the same text the same time.

20:42

That's great, that's fine, that's wonderful. But we allow the chapters and verses to compartmentalize and break up the flow.

20:54

And so that's why it's insane to have a three -night debate on one verse.

21:03

I mean, it just doesn't make any sense. But for many people, if you want to see this in its grossest form, gross not as in ugh, but as in big, pervasive, takes over,

21:19

Joe Ventilacion, INC. You want to see what an absolute destruction of the context of the

21:29

New Testament looks like? Look at INC. They have maybe 12 verses that they all know.

21:36

Not a one of them knows what their context is, not a one of them knows what the flow is around it. But they've got those one verses, those few verses that are crammed in their mind.

21:46

You would think that that wouldn't be the case amongst Christians who are going to church with freedom and not in a cult for years on end, but that's frequently how our sermons handle things.

22:04

And we in the pulpit are the ones that teach the people in the pew by example. Just some thoughts there that might be helpful to somebody.

22:15

So, let's look at Acts 2 .38, leave that out of sight. You have Jews asking men and brethren, we are convicted, we have been pierced through the heart, that our leaders and our people crucified .

22:32

. . the one that God has made both Lord and Christ. What shall we do?

22:40

And the first thought across their mind is not that there's going to be anything they can do. I mean, you go back and read the curses and blessings of Deuteronomy, and there really isn't much there to go, hey, and if you just happen to mess up and crucify the

22:57

Messiah, don't worry, everything will be cool. That's not, no, that's not the first thought across everyone's mind at this point in time.

23:05

So, they're desperate. And Peter's response is, repent, turn, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins, and you'll receive the gift of the

23:19

Holy Spirit. So, notice, repent, so much for that not being a part of New Testament teaching and a proclamation of the gospel, in the very first Christian sermon in the sense of after the resurrection of Jesus Christ, his ascension into heaven, the outpouring of the

23:39

Holy Spirit, when people say, what should we do? The first word out of an apostle's mouth, repent, repent, and be baptized, each one of you, in the name of Jesus the

23:57

Messiah. See, it's easy for us, because of our tradition, our familiarity with the text, to use the term

24:10

Jesus Christ as if Christ is Jesus' last name, which in no way, shape, or form is accurate.

24:18

The very utilization of the phrase Jesus Christ at this point would have been heard by the audience,

24:26

Jesus the Messiah. And by putting them together, you are making that a profession of faith.

24:33

The very thing that was denied about Jesus is now being proclaimed about Jesus.

24:41

But now it's able to be put into the context that God intended. Because see, Jesus himself said, you know, don't tell anybody that I'm the

24:48

Messiah. It's not that he denied being the Messiah, but there were so many political ideas about what the

24:56

Messiah was that you had what's called the secret of the

25:03

Messiah, the Messiah secret. Now it is proclaimed as part of his designation,

25:10

Jesus the Messiah. But it is important that we always recognize that Christos, the

25:17

Greek term for the Anointed One, is simply the representation of Mashiach in Hebrew, the

25:25

Messiah, the Anointed One, the Jewish Messiah, the one prophesied in the

25:30

Jewish scriptures. That's very important to keep in mind. So, here's what you, if you have been pierced through to the heart, repent, turn, and be baptized.

25:47

Each one of you, each one of you who repents is to be baptized in the name of Jesus the

25:59

Messiah. Now, immediately think about what that means. You weren't baptized in the name of Moses, Abraham, David.

26:08

You have sinned against God of Israel, but you are baptized into the name of Jesus the

26:14

Messiah. That's extremely important for the forgiveness of your sins.

26:25

So, Peter is not here discussing baptismal regeneration.

26:32

He's not discussing anything other than this involves a confession that Jesus Christ is the

26:40

Messiah and faith in that truth and obedience to his command, which is both repent, believe, be baptized, all these things are

26:51

Jesus's commands, results in the forgiveness of sins. That's what they needed to hear. We are so accustomed to hearing about the forgiveness of sins and the ease with which it can be obtained that it's difficult for us to even think about a situation where someone would be going, there can't be any forgiveness for this.

27:11

We crucified the Messiah. How can there be forgiveness?

27:19

The apostolic answer is repent and let each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Messiah and the forgiveness of sins and of your sins, specifically, and you will receive the gift of the

27:40

Holy Spirit. So, there had been, back up here in verse 33, right before we started, it should have started 33, forgive me for that, it's therefore having been exalted to the right hand of God and having received the promise of the

28:07

Holy Spirit from the Father. So, here you have the word epangelion, the promise, the promise of the

28:16

Holy Spirit from the Father, and he has been poured out, the

28:21

Holy Spirit has poured out, he has poured out what you have seen and heard.

28:27

So, because remember, they had come together, tongues aflame, speaking in tongues, etc., etc., speaking in languages that people understood because they were communicating these things.

28:34

So, here you have the use of the word promise, and so, that's what's important here when we get down to verses 38 and 39, and you'll receive the gift of the

28:46

Holy Spirit, which is what they themselves had received.

28:54

So, the apostles received the gift of the Holy Spirit, those who repent and believe likewise receive the gift of the

29:03

Holy Spirit for, verse 39, and this is where I want to camp, for the promise is to you, plural, and to your children and to all who are far off as many as the

29:24

Lord our God shall call, as many as the

29:30

Lord our God shall call to himself. Now, with many other words he solemnly testified, kept on exhorting them, saying, be safe from this perverse generation, and you'll notice verse 41, so then those who had received his word were baptized, and that day there were added about 3 ,000 souls.

29:55

So, here you have a signal text, and what I'm going to do is, we looked at it there, but I want to minimize that, bring up a word processor, put it on a word processor that I have here, and we'll maximize that.

30:13

Oh, thanks a lot. It had been nice and big. There we go.

30:21

Now, it's nice and big. Is that nice and big? Let's hope it's nice and big. Here is verse 39. Verse 39, and I removed the textual critical stuff for now, we won't get into that, for the promise is to you and to your children and to all who are far off as many as the

30:49

Lord our God shall call, shall call. All of that background just to get to one verse, but it's an important verse, and I have broken it up into the relevant sections here so that we can apply the same rules of interpretation, analysis, context to this text that we would to any other text to seek to understand what the original hearers would have understood.

31:37

We want to know what was Peter's intention in saying these words?

31:44

What would his hearers have understood? We begin with, for the promise is to you.

31:55

What promise? Well, we already saw the promise up in verse 33.

32:01

It's a promise to receive the Holy Spirit, the pouring out of the Holy Spirit, and that's what had just immediately preceded this.

32:10

You repent, you're baptized, receive the gift of the Holy Spirit, and you would expect that these individuals who would have understood fully a message of judgment,

32:30

I mean, I think there would have been some of them who went, there's nothing, if Peter had said there's nothing you can do, this generation is toast, just like the generation that questioned

32:42

God's promises and hence could not enter into the promised land, neither can you, you'll be destroyed, but there's hope for your children.

32:52

Don't you think they would have understood the possibility of that? Were they expecting so quickly?

32:59

You can be forgiven of this incredible sin of participating in the crucifixion of God's Messiah, and you can receive his

33:08

Holy Spirit. You want good news? That's about as good as it's going to get. Wet the whistle?

33:17

Sorry about that. Four, the promise is to you.

33:24

That was a tremendous extension of grace. The promise is to you.

33:31

Were some of these men in the crowd that said his blood be upon us?

33:39

We're not told. I don't know. It's possible. Had some heard

33:46

Jesus' teachings? Had some heard secondhand that there was a false Messiah amongst the people?

33:53

Were some just now hearing about it, but because of their understanding of federal headship and knowing they're part of the

33:58

Jewish people, they were accountable for what their leaders had done? We're not given any names.

34:06

We don't know the specifics of who these 3 ,000 are and what their personal experiences were, but what we do know is they were pierced through the heart.

34:17

They were stabbed in the heart by the message that Peter delivers. They hear the testimony of the prophets, and they say, what shall we do?

34:26

And they are told, and then they have this incredible promise that is given to them.

34:33

The promise is for you. You have not been left without a promise from God.

34:40

That was grace, and like I said, we can think of numerous ways in which

34:47

God could have said, that generation, no, I'm not going to save anybody out of that.

34:55

There were just a few that had been saved out of the unfaithful generation that came out of captivity and never entered into the promised land.

35:03

They wandered in the wilderness 40 years until they buried their bodies. But the promise is for you.

35:12

Then we have the next phrase, and your children, and your children.

35:23

Now, as you know, we've talked about this many times in the program, you put these two phrases together, and it is one of the very favorite phrases of our dear

35:33

Presbyterian brothers and sisters who all have memorized the promises for you and for your children.

35:42

They all quote it just like that. Within the past couple of weeks, I've been amongst my dear

35:47

Presbyterian brothers, and that's how they quoted it. It's partial quotation.

35:54

It's partial quotation. Because please notice here that we have a gar beginning the first line.

36:05

That's a post -positive connecting term for, so there's your connection, for the promise is to you,

36:16

Chi and Chi tois technois humon, to your children,

36:23

Chi posin tois ais macron, and to those who are far off.

36:30

You have two Chi's, and so if we were looking at the deity of Christ, you're looking at some other standard issue, we would recognize that all of this means one group.

36:49

You, your children, and to all who are far off. The promise is to you and to your children.

36:59

Now, how would they have understood that? Well, again, probably covenantally, in the sense that they had sinned in cutting off the

37:09

Messiah, so it would have made sense if God had actually just cut off they and their children.

37:18

But what's the promise? The promise is to you and to your children that if they repent and are baptized in the name of Christ, they'll receive the gift of the

37:30

Holy Spirit. That's the promise. God will be forgiving to those who repent, to those who are baptized, they'll receive the gift of the

37:42

Holy Spirit. There will be no distinction. There still is hope.

37:49

Again, it would have been easy for them to accept the idea, we've been cut off, my children are going to be without hope, my people are without hope, because God's judgment has come upon us.

38:04

And the answer is no. To you and to your children, the promise is sure.

38:12

Repent, believe, be baptized in the name of Jesus the Messiah, which is a confession of faith.

38:19

That's where the believe part comes from, in case you're wondering about that. And you'll receive the forgiveness of your sins and the gift of the

38:28

Holy Spirit. But it's all one sentence, because it's the next line that's going to end up being so controversial and to all who are far off.

38:45

Now, there have been some who would say, given the

38:53

Jewish context in Jerusalem, that what you have here is you and your children in Jerusalem and in Viren's, and all who are far off, the whole diaspora.

39:12

And this is all simply speaking of Jewish salvation.

39:20

But given that central to the

39:27

Apostle's understanding of the Old Testament text, and what's going to be coming out throughout the Book of Acts, is that the

39:34

Old Testament text, itself, directed us to the Gentile mission of the Church, to the reality.

39:42

And those who are far off is much easier to define and defend in New Testament usage as those that are outside the covenant people of Israel, the specific nation of Israel, the circumcised

39:59

Old Covenant people. To all who are far off would probably be much better understood, as the promise is to anyone who will repent, be baptized in the name of Jesus the

40:13

Messiah for the forgiveness of their sins, they will receive the

40:18

Holy Spirit. And I wonder if when Cornelius and his household, who were not

40:27

Jewish, they were God -fearers, which, by the way, is a specific group. I was listening to a, I was listening to Hernandez and Ruggerio in a debate

40:37

I'll make some comments about later. But the issue of God -fearers came up, and nobody on either side seemed to know that that is a technical term for individuals who attended synagogue but would not be circumcised.

40:59

They were God -fearers, they were attracted to the message, but they did not go through the rituals to become a part of the community.

41:08

And there were a lot of them. We see them a number of times in the Book of Acts, they're very, very important, but it was a specific people.

41:14

And there was something to define them that didn't come up in the debate. So, to those who are far off are the

41:23

Jewish people, I'm sorry, are Gentile people. So, the proclamation of the apostles is that this promise is wide in its application.

41:38

You haven't missed out. Your people will not be banished.

41:45

God's not going to say, I'm done, I'm not going to save anybody out of the Jewish people, they're all destined for the fire.

41:53

No. But it's important to see that this promise includes repentance and understanding that Jesus is the

42:04

Messiah, baptism into his name as the Messiah, and to receive the

42:10

Holy Spirit. And who receives the Holy Spirit in New Testament theology? The redeemed.

42:18

Who do we understand them to be? God's elect. And that's exactly what the last phrase says.

42:25

Because I want us all to look, I mentioned on Twitter that we're going to be looking at that phrase right there.

42:33

Hasushan. Hasushan. This is a correlative term, and when it's used as a phrase like this, it's the only place in the

42:46

New Testament where this particular form is used.

42:53

That's so that it matches what has come before. And it is a phrase that is translated as many as, and then whenever you have hasa, hasus, hasa, it's going to be translated based upon the character of the verbal form that it's used with, whether it's in a parcipial form or a finite verb.

43:26

And it generally, I think every time, but at least generally, didn't look to see if every time, but generally takes the subjunctive, which is what you have with praskalesetai, that lengthened thematic vowel is the sign right here, the eta is the sign of the subjunctive.

43:48

So, this is a correlative, and so it is defining something on the basis of the verb.

44:00

And the verb is to call. You can see kaleo, praskaleo, so kaleo would mean simply to call, prask, to, hence, whom the

44:10

Lord, our God shall call to himself, comes from really the form of the verb, praskaleo, to call to oneself.

44:22

So, this phrase here at the end, using hasus on, is telling us something about everything up here.

44:38

The promise is for you and your children and all who are far off.

44:45

Does that mean that everyone's going to receive forgiveness of sins, that everyone's going to receive the gift of Holy Spirit?

44:51

No. There is a specificity as to this promise, and the specificity of this promise is found in the sovereign right of the

45:06

Lord, our God, to call unto himself.

45:11

This is where Peter's theology is shown at the very beginning of the Church, before the conversion of the

45:20

Apostle Paul, before Saul of Tarsus holds the coats of the people stoning

45:30

Stephen, that's still future, and hence, before the conversion of the guy who's going to tell us in Romans 11 that there is a lemma, there is a remnant, there has always been a remnant people that God's calling to himself, even out of all those horrible kings and all those people under the old covenant who bore the covenant signs but did not have a changed heart.

46:00

There is always a remnant that God called unto himself.

46:07

Here you have the Apostle Peter speaking consistently with what the

46:13

Apostle Paul is going to expand upon much later, years later, and why is that important?

46:21

Because you're going to hear it all the time that it was Paul that invented all this stuff, that Paul forces on us the

46:29

Church, that Paul was the innovator, but here in the very first sermon recorded for us on the day of Pentecost itself, you have

46:41

God's sovereignty. You have whether people are going to repent, whether people are going to believe, confess that Jesus is the

46:52

Messiah, whether they be obedient to command to be baptized in his name, is all dependent upon what?

46:58

The calling of the Lord our God to himself. As many as the

47:05

Lord our God shall call to himself. So, there is, just as you have in John 3, 16, and 17, an in -the -text limitation.

47:27

I think a lot of the discussions that we have within social media, blogs, debates, would be different if more

47:45

Christians engaged Universalists. They're out there.

47:52

They tend to, you know, I ride my bike past a Unitarian Universalist church over on off of Greenway, Greenway and 16th

48:02

Street, I think, and sometimes the light will change. I'm stuck there. It's a long light. I'm looking over there, you know, at this sign and just going, what are these people even, why do they even bother?

48:13

I mean, Unitarian Universalism has always just gone off to the left and eventually just become a semi -religious social club.

48:24

But there are some sharp, biblically aware

48:31

Universalists out there. I'm not talking about Pope Francis either, though he may be one of them.

48:40

And Universalism has been a subject that people have had to argue against in past generations, but most people

48:48

I know of have never had to take on a Universalist. And I think a lot of the provisionists,

48:55

Arminians, synergists, if they had to go up against a sharp

49:02

Universalist, would start to realize how much their position is of two minds, how inconsistent it is with itself.

49:13

And they might not be quite as quick to make some of the objections that they do against Reformed theology.

49:24

The point is that Hasusan takes the tenor of the verb proskaleo, to call to, and it plays off of that so it is translated as many as the

49:50

Lord our God shall call to himself. There is your delimiter. Just as in John 3, who gets eternal life?

49:58

Those who believe, as many as believe. Here you have as many as the

50:04

Lord our God shall call to himself. Three lines forming one group.

50:11

You, your children, those who are far off. As many as the

50:17

Lord our God shall call to himself. Now, there would be some who would argue, well, he's going to call everybody because that's what

50:22

John 12, 32 means. Well, that's not what John 12, 32 means in its context, and that's certainly not what it would mean here.

50:31

The beautiful consistency is that, as I said, here you have in primitive, short, brief explication in the first sermon, once the

50:47

Holy Spirit comes, the first sermon, you have Peter laying the same foundation in the sovereignty of God and his divine calling that Paul will expand upon in Romans 8, 9, 10, 11 in discussing the very

51:04

Jewish issue, and that remnant is central to an understanding.

51:12

I mean, it was central to the apostolic experience. They were Jews, and the question was constantly being asked of them, why are you guys so much in the minority?

51:24

Why does the Jewish leadership reject you? Why is the

51:29

Jewish leadership saying you're a cult? You're following a false messiah? If all this fulfillment language is true, why are these things?

51:37

This was their constant experience, and so the idea that the Lord our

51:43

God is calling from you and your children and those who are far off, that becomes the church, isn't it?

51:52

Isn't that the whole issue of the church? How could this not have echoed in the ears of Peter in Acts chapter 15 in light of his own teaching?

52:04

Yeah, God's going to have to drop a sheet down three times, because tradition is tradition, and tradition can be powerful, but the point is it's as many as the

52:15

Lord our God shall call to himself. There is divine election in Peter's answer.

52:25

Peter's answer is not. And that's the irony, is how many Church of Christ ministers will pound away on verse 38 within the context of free will and miss what's found in verse 39.

52:49

I know what they'll say, he calls everybody, but he doesn't. How was the

52:57

Lord our God calling people in China in the days of the apostles?

53:04

What was the mechanism? Well, that's why we have to send missionaries, but the point is he's the one who gets to make those choices.

53:14

He's the one that chooses. And the Jewish people had no problem with that. The Jewish people that time had no problem with the idea that God gets to choose.

53:26

That was the point. They thought he had chosen and he was done, and they hadn't seen that the gospel would, that they would become a light to the

53:35

Gentiles. The gospel would go out to the Gentiles, but the idea that God has the right to choose like that, that would be central to their understanding.

53:45

That would not be shocking to them in any way, shape, or form. So, this is an important text for us to consider as we look at the message of the

54:02

New Testament. And so, the last thing I would say in regards to application is, to my dear

54:10

Presbyterian brothers, you just need to understand that when

54:16

I hear you, and I hear you, if you're meeting up with some of us

54:28

Reformed Baptist guys who actually believe in covenantal theology—you may not read our books about it, but we do— and you're talking with us, and then you use the partial phrase to you and to your children, and then you break it off.

54:54

What's your basis for breaking off after humon and not continuing with the next kai?

55:04

Because the phrase, and to your children, begins with kai. Kai, tois, technois, humon.

55:10

Kai, pasen, tois, ais, makon. And, to your children, and to all who are far off.

55:19

It's all one group. Syntactically, grammatically, however you want to go at it, the way that Peter expressed it put these all together.

55:31

And so, it does, every time I hear it, make me wonder why the partial citation.

55:39

Why only a part of the phraseology, and I can tell you my understanding of why it's a partial citation, is tradition.

55:54

It's tradition. You've heard it that way? I can't tell you how many times I've heard it.

56:01

Out of a hundred times that I've heard it cited by my Presbyterian brothers, 98 to 99 percent of the time, the last phrase, and to all who are far off, isn't there.

56:15

And that's with men that I honor greatly. R .C. Sproul, okay?

56:23

Honor his memory, wonderful man, but you'll catch him doing it when you listen to his talks.

56:31

And guys, you may not know it. You may be thinking, no, no, no, no. Just listen, man.

56:37

Just put yourself in our shoes and listen, and you'll hear it. Over and over again, that last phrase is cut off.

56:45

Because the text is being used to promote something that I don't think Peter was even beginning to address. And I'm just simply suggesting to you who is actually, honestly, presenting a more

56:59

Reformed understanding of this text. Because what I'm saying is, that as many as the

57:07

Lord our God will call to himself is election language. That's salvation language.

57:14

That's divine sovereignty language. And it therefore lays the foundation.

57:23

This is very similar to what we're going to have from Paul in Acts 13 -48.

57:31

Where, actually it's not Paul, but situation with Paul, but where Luke's commentary is, and as many as were appointed unto eternal life believed.

57:41

It was the appointment unto eternal life that resulted in the believing. It is being called unto the Lord God that results in repentance, confession of Jesus the

57:50

Messiah, faith, salvation, forgiveness of sins. It's all based on the calling of God, just as it was based upon the appointment of God in Acts 13 -48.

58:01

This makes this consistent. If you apply this to some type of situation where you're giving the new covenant sign to infants, and then they turn out not to be called by God unto himself, and hence they are only becoming more guilty for violating a covenant that they never entered into themselves, but were entered into it by what somebody else did, which is nowhere in Acts 2, then

58:33

I see some real issues there. So, who's actually,

58:39

I think, being more consistent and more reformed in the sense of being sensitive to when the text is plainly promoting the sovereignty of God in salvation?

58:58

Something to think about, something to consider. I didn't expect to take the entire hour, but I should have probably predicted that it would probably take the entire hour.

59:12

But there you go. It's not that there wasn't a bunch of other things to be getting to today there. There are, but sometimes you just gotta shut it all out.

59:23

I mean, I'll be honest with you. I have absolutely no intentions this weekend of even tuning to certain major events, whether they be political, don't care, or whether they be sports, too perverse for me.

59:47

I'll just be honest. If the people who will profit monetarily from my watching will not allow abortion survivors to tell their story, but will allow drag queens to promote theirs, not gonna do it.

01:00:11

Just not gonna do it. I mean, I don't happen to care who's playing this year, so it's easier for me.

01:00:17

And I understand if you're sold out to it, I get it, but I hope you understand me, too.

01:00:24

I'm just not gonna do it. Not even gonna turn it on. Lots of good books and other things coming up.

01:00:33

And by the way, I said I'd hope by today to have some dates for you.

01:00:41

I didn't in the last email say, okay, can we announce this? But the last email seemed to indicate that we are pretty much there.

01:00:51

So I'll just say this is tentative, and we'll try to put it up as soon as we've actually got it nailed in stone.

01:01:00

Nailed in stone? That's called mixing metaphors right there. That's not a good thing to do. Written in stone, or nailed to the ground, or set in stone.

01:01:10

Set in stone. There you go. Anyway, but you might want to start making some plans if you are the traveling type person.

01:01:19

But it looks like right now that on March 20th and 21st, so that's only a month and a half away,

01:01:33

March 20th and 21st, we are planning right now to have a debate that will be relevant to what we just got done talking about.

01:01:54

So I have now helped the other side with some of their preparation on the subject of paedo -baptism and paedo -communion.

01:02:04

And you can guess it'll be between myself and Doug Wilson, and it will be in Moscow, Idaho.

01:02:10

I've never been there. It will be colder there than it is here, I can assure you. But that's our plan right now, is to have a debate on paedo -baptism and paedo -communion.

01:02:24

I think doing both the focus even more clearly upon the foundations and issues related to it, because the vast majority of Presbyterians do not practice paedo -communion, and the paedo -communionists say that the non -paedo -communionists who are paedo -baptists are using

01:02:45

Baptist arguments against paedo -communion. And what that allows is a discussion of what the ordinances are actually about, and especially the

01:02:59

Lord's Supper, and what it is to mean, and what it represents, and how could it represent something to someone.

01:03:10

And so it seems to me there is a consistency in being both paedo -baptist and paedo -communionist, but that consistency eventually leads you down the road to places that, thankfully, most of my

01:03:25

Presbyterian friends don't go. But the question is, why not? And that will allow that type of conversation to take place.

01:03:35

Then a slightly less formal, but still, I raised this issue myself.

01:03:42

Doug and I did the written debate on the ecclesiastical text, but it was very limited, very short.

01:03:51

And like I said, I'll bring the 1550 Stephanus, and I'll make sure it comes back too.

01:03:57

But I'll bring the 1550 Stephanus, and we can discuss that issue. But we're looking at that for March 20 and 21 in Moscow, Idaho.

01:04:10

And the immediate question from everybody is, well, will that be live -streamed?

01:04:16

I don't know. I have no earthly idea what the facilities can and cannot do.

01:04:23

There's always a cost to live -streaming as far as servers goes and things like that. I don't know what

01:04:28

Canon Press has along those lines. I cannot answer that question right now. Obviously, we will seek to have that answer before the debate takes place.

01:04:39

But as I asked Doug on the first sweater vest dialogue, if he had debated anyone else more often than me, he said no.

01:04:50

And so this will definitely give me the record along those lines as far as that goes.

01:04:58

But unlike most of the deranged internet, these will be just like the debates that Michael Brown and I have had.

01:05:12

And that's what will drive people absolutely insane, is because there are just sadly so many people out there that unless I am sending flaming anathemas across the stage with every other sentence at Doug Wilson, then they're just not...

01:05:36

Because that's all they would do. That's all they could do, rather than actually addressing the issue and doing so in a collegial and, in fact, brotherly fashion.

01:05:45

Because let's just face it, the vast majority of those types of folks do not believe that Doug Wilson is a

01:05:52

Christian and therefore should not be treated in that fashion. And they're the same ones who don't think that you should be respectful to any unbeliever in a debate.

01:06:04

And they've made that very, very known. And we stand against that.

01:06:09

And that's why we do debates and they don't. It just sort of works out that way.

01:06:17

So that's coming up. And then we are putting together a debate immediately preceding the

01:06:27

General Conference of the Mormon Church in Salt Lake City, again featuring myself and Jeff Durbin.

01:06:35

We will be debating two philosophers on the subject of morality without God, whether morality is possible without God.

01:06:46

That, again, will be at the University of Utah, maybe in the same room, but we are asking that there be guards making sure that no antifreeze is allowed into the facility this particular time around.

01:07:01

It is my understanding that Alma Alred has agreed to sit down with me again.

01:07:08

We haven't discussed the subject yet, but given that it's April of 2020, my suggestion is going to be the

01:07:16

First Vision, obviously. The week following the conference, be looking for and praying toward a historic event in Utah.

01:07:33

That's all I'm going to say about that right now. There may be, and given that it's up to Jason Wallace to do these things, and Jason seems to be able to get almost anybody to do almost anything, there may be another debate shortly after the conference.

01:07:55

We'll see if that works out. But April is going to start off pretty crazy, and then

01:08:03

I'm hoping within two to three weeks after that, another major debate in the

01:08:10

South Central area of the United States that we'll hopefully be able to give you information on when we have that lockdown that I think a lot of you will find to be very, very useful as well.

01:08:23

So lots of stuff coming up. Lots and lots and lots of stuff coming up. That means,

01:08:30

I don't mention this very often, that means the travel fund at aomin .org

01:08:37

could use your support because you got to get where you're going to do the debates.

01:08:46

We've got a lot of traveling to do this year, especially later in the year, multiple trips to London, Australia, sometimes within 10 days of overseas trips.

01:08:59

I don't think I'm going to have any problem with keeping my flight status for this year either.

01:09:07

But again, all of these wonderful opportunities from the

01:09:13

Lord, we do not take these things for granted. I personally can remember the days when things like this were but a dream.

01:09:23

Oh, but Lord, it would be wonderful if we had the opportunity to do something like this, to engage such a person, to have an opportunity at the

01:09:31

University of Utah to talk about it. I remember those things were dreams. And they're now happening so often that I think there's a tendency on the part of many of us just to start taking them for granted.

01:09:46

That debate with Doug will be my 175th. And you start getting up in those numbers.

01:09:53

And I'll be honest with you, I now have people coming up to me and say, remember such and so?

01:09:59

And I have to sit there and go, oh, yeah, we did a debate. And I know you 30 year olds, you'd remember every one of them.

01:10:11

Wait till you're pushing 60. And you won't remember quite as clearly.

01:10:17

Well, some of you will. Some of you are savants. But you have no social life and you'll never get married either. So I'm not very far away from 40 years married.

01:10:32

So there you go. I'll trade that off. Okay. I'll trade married life for being able to remember every single thing that I ever said in my life.

01:10:42

The worst thing is when it's when your wife can remember every single thing you said in your life and you can't.

01:10:48

So you're at her mercy. You're dead. Anyway, how do I get on that? Lots of stuff coming up, folks.

01:10:55

Pray for us, support us. We're here because you want us to be here and you continue making it a possibility by supporting

01:11:02

Alpha Omega Ministries. And we very much gratefully appreciate that. And Lord willing, we will see you again next week here on The Dividing Line.