Fossil Record: Noah's Flood or Evolution?

Is the fossil record really stacked in a way that proves life evolved on Earth over millions of unseen years?

Or does the fossil record provide evidence that the world was covered by a massive flood in Noah's time just thousands of

years ago?

Actually, the fossil record does not show increasingly complex life emerging over the millennia.

What it shows is a record of death in the order that the creatures were buried during the worldwide flood.

Think about it for a minute.

Genesis 7 verse 11 says that the fountains of the great deep were broken up and the windows of heaven were opened,

creating floods and tidal waves that were unimaginable.

The Bible says the floodwaters increased upon the earth for 150 days until all the high hills under heaven

were covered with over 20 feet of water.

This process successively buried all creatures outside the ark based on where they lived as the floodwaters prevailed,

how smart they were, their means and speed of mobility, and their body density.

This is precisely why the fossil record generally shows the shallow water marine creatures buried in the lower layers.

Then, as the ocean waters rose higher and higher, the suffocated fish were buried, followed by amphibians,

reptiles, mammals, and then birds.

Dr. Carl Werner spent 17 years traveling to museums and dig sites around the globe, photographing

thousands of original fossils and the actual fossil layers where they were found.

His research revealed a lack of evidence for evolution theory, including no transitional fossils and clear

evidence that shows animals have remained the same over the supposed millions of years of evolution.

We went to the Carnegie Museum in Pittsburgh.

We filmed at the Smithsonian, the American Museum of Natural History.

We filmed at the Chicago Field Museum, all of the greatest museums of the world, basically, and photographed their

fossil collections.

Museum Victoria in Melbourne, the Natural Institute in Brussels.

We filmed at the New Zealand Natural History Museum in Auckland and the Redpath Museum in Montreal,

Harvard Peabody Museum, the California Academy of Sciences, etc., etc.

We went to 60 museums, and Debbie took 60 ,000 photographs.

At the dinosaur dig sites, we found examples from

every major animal phyla living today buried with the dinosaurs,

and these animals look the same.

Say that again, it's incredible.

At the dinosaur sites, we found fossils, examples of modern

animals from every major animal phyla buried with the

dinosaurs, and they look the same.

You started out not knowing if there would be any, and then you found them in every group in

the same strata with the dinosaurs.

Yeah, and it's worse than that.

Not only did we find this for animals, then for the plants, we found

examples from every major plant division of plants living today buried

alongside the dinosaurs, fossilized, and they look the same as the modern plants.

So you photograph fossils from dig sites and museums, and you realize that modern animals live

with dinosaurs.

That seems too simple.

You know, Don, there is a rule in science called the rule of simplicity or parsimony or Oskam's

razor that says the simplest explanation for a series of problems is usually

the correct explanation.

So yes, it is very simple.

I love this phrase, simply profound.

What you have found is profound by its simplicity, that here are these animals that are just like they are

today, and they were there then, therefore evolution didn't happen.

According to the fossils that I look at, evolution did not occur.

The plants look the same, the animals look the same.

Sure, some of the animals went extinct like dinosaurs, pterosaurs, but extinction is not evolution.

The animal fauna has not changed.

Look what he found about bats.

Scientists have found over 1 ,000 fossil bats.

Now these, some of these fossils are beautifully preserved, full fossils of bats, even showing

the wing membranes, the gut contents, etc.

If evolution is true, you would expect to find not only bats, but a ground mammal

similar to a mouse, slowly changing over millions of years into a bat.

There should be many, many steps.

If you find 1 ,000 bats, you would expect to find thousands and thousands of each of these steps.

And how many have been found?

Zero.

No ancestors for bats.

Wow, over 1 ,000 bats in museums and not a single transitionary fossil leading to bats.

They just show up, completely formed.

Wouldn't you expect that after uncovering over 1 ,000 bats that at least a few pre -bats would be found?

The same has been said by evolutionists for several other creatures.

Leading dinosaur expert Dr. Weishample wrote this about dinosaur ancestors.

For my reading of the fossil record of dinosaurs, no direct ancestors have been discovered for any dinosaur

species.

Alas, my list of dinosaurian ancestors is an empty one.

Wow, it's almost like a divine designer just put them here, all fully formed, just like the Bible says.

Consider pterosaurs, massive flying reptiles with wingspans sometimes over 40 feet that could

likely only fly in the pre -flood world.

Dr. Weishample, curator of the famous Jura Museum in Germany, said,.

Yes, I must say we know only little about the evolution of

pterosaurs.

The ancestors are not known.

When the pterosaurs first appear in the geological record, they were

completely, they were perfect.

They were perfect pterosaurs.

After finding so many specimens in complete form, shouldn't some predecessors have been found by now?

If museums have over 1 ,000 fossilized bats and many pterosaurs, why haven't they found any fossils

that have been classified as pre -bats or pre -pterosaurs?

Why are they always found in complete form?

Where are the millions of transitional fossils that should exist if evolution theory is true?

Why don't we see a reasonably smooth continuum among all living creatures or in the fossil record or

both?

Even Charles Darwin said, as by evolution theory, innumerable transitional forms must have existed.

Why do we not find them embedded in countless numbers in the crust of the earth?

And why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate.

Links?

Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain.

And this is the most obvious and serious objection, which can be urged against the theory.

Darwin expected that these challenges would be resolved after more research was conducted.

But today, 150 years and millions of fossils later, the proof still doesn't exist.

When the famous Dr. Colin Patterson of the British Museum of Natural History was asked why evolutionary transitions

were not included in his book titled Evolution, Patterson said, I fully agree with your comments on the lack of

direct illustration of evolutionary transitions in my book.

If I knew of any, fossil or living, I would certainly have included them.

You say that I should at least show a photo of the fossil from which each type organism was derived.

I will lay it on the line.

There is not one such fossil for which one could make a watertight argument.

Wow!

After working with thousands of fossils for over 16 years in one of the largest natural history museums in the world,

he makes a statement like this.

Even the two leading supposedly transitional fossils that are used in school textbooks today are falling apart.

The Archaeopteryx supposedly shows the transition between dinosaurs and birds, but now leading experts regard

it as just a bird.

Paleontologists have tried to turn Archaeopteryx into an earthbound feathered dinosaur.

But it's not.

It is a bird.

A perching bird.

And no amount of paleobabble is going to change that.

Archaeopteryx was further disqualified as an evolutionary ancestor for birds when scientists found a crow -sized

bird and extinct four -winged birds in rock layers designated to be below those containing Archaeopteryx.

Next, there are supposed evolutionary fish, like Tiktaalik, typically shown in textbooks as

a 375 million -year -old fossil that was on its way to progressing into a land -dwelling creature.

Sometimes the coelacanth is also shown in this same lineup, supposedly living about the same time frame.

Now, however, both of these have been ejected out of the evolutionary lineup.

Evolutionists used to think that Tiktaalik's strong front fins did most of the work to pull this transitional fish up

onto land, leaving the hind legs to evolve later.

But now, after more investigation of the pelvis and fins, the discoverers of Tiktaalik have developed

updated illustrations showing how it used its strong pelvic structure for paddling.

Even more amazing is the fact that scientists announced in the 2010 Nature Journal that they had found footprints of a

four -legged land creature in Poland that are supposedly 10 million years older than Tiktaalik.

So, if Tiktaalik was supposedly the ancestor of land creatures, how could land creature fossils sit 10

million years earlier in the rock layers than their ancestor?

There goes Tiktaalik as a clear transitional fossil, yet it's still found in school textbooks today.

Coelacanths have also been used for promoting evolution because their fins looked like they were becoming arms and legs.

But all of this changed in 1938 when a museum curator in South Africa found a living one stacked up with a

bunch of other fish on a fishing dock.

They've since found a lot more of these fish.

You can even go swimming with them near the Comoros Islands.

So much for that sea -to -land transition.

Next, there's dinosaurs.

When we look at the dinosaur fossil record, we see that they were buried furiously, rapidly, and simultaneously,

oftentimes found fleeing in groups, even leaving their youth behind.

Take this massive bone bed in Hilda, Canada.

Thousands of centrosaurs were catastrophically buried over an entire square mile.

Or this one in China, where thousands of different kinds of dinosaurs were simultaneously buried in a single 980

-foot -long ravine.

There are hundreds of dinosaur bone beds all over the world, including the U .S. where the Morrison Formation covers 13

states and 700 ,000 square miles.

Thousands of torn -apart dinosaurs are buried here in hundreds of mass graves, with many found in the classic death pose

with their necks arched back, choking as they died.

Museum signs everywhere even admit they died in a watery catastrophe.

Is a worldwide flood the best explanation for this?

Let's drill down on just one of these massive bone beds in Wyoming where over a million dinosaur bones have been buried

over an 80 -acre area.

This is a upper Cretaceous sedimentary deposit, and what we have here is what's

called a bone.

Bed.

It's an accumulation of bones that's about a meter thick, a little less than a meter.

And in this meter, we find the bones present as a graded bed with little bones at the top and bigger bones at

the bottom.

These animals had to die, and then their carcasses had to have time to rot.

So we're talking days or weeks or months, during which time the bones and

tissues were either eaten away or rotted away, and then the bones that remained were deposited

instantaneously in this environment because they're in a graded bed with big bones at the bottom and little bones at

the top.

And you can see that here.

The big bones are all down at the bottom, and when they start digging up here, they start to find smaller bones.

So that condition requires a sorting process that can only take place during a

catastrophic emplacement.

We hear a lot about transitional forms.

What's the real story there?

Scientists have been able to lay out some forms they think are transitional, and

some of them are very interesting, some even challenging.

But they are the exceptions to the rule.

The rule is there are no transitional fossils, and what we find in the fossil record, and

contrary to Darwin's hopes, this is the rule, is that a form exists in the fossil record.

It basically stays unchanged, and it disappears from the fossil record without having been changed.

That's got to mean something besides evolution, because we don't ever see changes from this form into this

form in the rocks themselves.

So it's coming from somewhere else.

It's a paradigm that's being imposed on the data rather than the data

providing the paradigm.

So I think it's very easy for me to be a creationist just based on my understanding of the

complexity of life forms.

And when we look at the fossil record, we can see that the complexity is all there from the beginning, and this begs the

question of where did all this complexity come from?

It's one thing to have faith.

I have faith that God was the creator.

But that's substantiated by what I see around me.

To say I have faith that evolution produced this when I can't even see how it could have happened.

There are hundreds and hundreds of similar mass graveyards around the world that have been catastrophically deposited by

water.

Scientific journals have now even documented 14 fresh bioorganic materials from dinosaur bones that

simply can't be millions of years old.

While doing his research, Dr. Warner noted, if evolution was not true, and if animals did not change over

time, I should be able to find modern appearing plants and modern appearing animals in the dinosaur rock layers.

And this is in fact what I found.

In fact, Dr. Warner has documented 432 mammal species in the dinosaur fossil layers.

But after visiting 60 museums around the world, he did not find a single complete mammal skeleton from the dinosaur

layers displayed at any of these museums.

Some mammals are even found in the stomachs of dinosaurs.

Mixed in among dinosaurs, Dr. Warner found all of today's reptile groups, as well as birds including

parrots, owls, penguins, ducks, loons, albatross, cormorants, and sandpipers.

How does this work if dinosaurs supposedly evolved into birds as evolutionists claim?

Something's not lining up with evolution theory.

The latest findings continue to confirm the recent demise of most of the dinosaurs by a massive flood.

Consider this 3 ,000 -pound nodosaur fossil just found in Canada.

Evolutionists date this fossil at 110 million years old.

But how did everything stay intact for so long?

Skin pigment, guts, scales, full bony armor, keratin, even its last meal was

found in its stomach.

Paleobiologist Jacob Vinter said, the dinosaur is so well -preserved that it might as well have been walking around a couple

of weeks ago.

I've never seen anything like this.

Rather than being scavenged after death, this dinosaur was rapidly entombed by Noah's flood just thousands of years

ago.

If the Genesis account is true, and we believe that it is, we would expect the fossil record to bear out a wide variety of

various kinds of animals that lived in a pre -flood world much different than today.

Animals that were catastrophically buried quickly and in many cases torn apart, grated, and sorted, buried

with marine life, mummified, unfossilized, and discovered with many bio -organic materials that simply can't

last for millions of years.

We would expect to find massive bone beds all over the world and covering hundreds of thousands of square miles like the

Morrison Formation.

We would also expect to find that even leading transitional examples like Archaeopteryx, Tic -Talic, and Coelacanth

would not hold up over time as true evidence of evolution.

Download our mobile app for this video and others that address the key evolution teachings in public school.