Can I Abandon My Pet?

Warning, the following message may be offensive to some audiences.

These audiences may include but are not limited to, professing Christians who never read their Bible, sissies, sodomites, men with man buns, those who approve of men with man buns, man

bun enablers, white knights for men with man buns, homemakers who have finished Netflix but don't know how to meal plan, and people who refer to their pets as fur babies.

Viewer discretion is advised.

People are tired of hearing nothing but doom and despair on the radio.

The message of Christianity is that salvation is found in Christ alone, and any who reject

Christ, therefore, forfeit any hope of salvation, any hope of

heaven.

The issue is that humanity is in sin, and the wrath of Almighty

God is hanging over our heads.

They will hear his words, they will not act upon them, and when the floods of divine judgment, when the fires of wrath

come, they will be consumed, and they will perish.

God wrapped himself in flesh, condescended, and became a man,

died on the cross for sin, was resurrected on the third day, has ascended to the right hand

of the Father, where he sits now to make intercession for us.

Jesus is saying there is a group of people who will hear his words, they will act upon them, and when the floods

of divine judgment come, in that final day, their house will stand.

Pete Slauson.

All right, Tim, the question for today's episode is, can I abandon my pet?

Tim Cynova.

Well, apparently, according to some states, if you abandon your pet, you may get thrown in jail or get subject to a felony,

so I guess it depends.

Pete Slauson.

It depends.

If you're asking like in view of the government.

Tim Cynova.

Right.

Pete Slauson No, no, probably not, right?

I thought it was in most states if you, you know, according to like the laws of our current government, if

you abandon your pet, then there's, you know, it ranges obviously, but typically in every state

there's some form of punishment, whether it be like fines or actual prison time.

Tim Cynova.

Imprisonment, yeah, yeah.

So, you posted a video abandoning a, what was it, a German shepherd?

Pete Slauson.

Yeah, a German shepherd.

Tim Cynova.

Abandoning a German shepherd, and I guess he's facing some kind of, you know, legal ramifications from doing that.

So, yeah.

Pete Slauson.

Which is really kind of dumb on his part, because I'm pretty sure German shepherds are really expensive.

I bet he could have sold it.

Tim Cynova.

Yeah, yeah.

Pete Slauson You know,.

He's facing prison time instead.

Tim Cynova.

Well, yeah, I mean, so from the perspective of the government right now, this is definitely considered a crime, because, I mean, the

assumption that undergirds this is that animals are essentially viewed as family members.

And so, abandoning an animal is basically the equivalent in the minds of the pagans, like it's the moral

equivalent of abandoning a child or something like that.

So, in that way….

Pete Slauson.

I don't know if it's the equivalent, man.

It might be like higher on the list at this point than abandoning a child.

Tim Cynova.

Yeah, no, that's a good point.

Yeah, maybe it's worse.

It would be worse.

You'd get in worse trouble for abandoning an animal at this point than abandoning a human being.

But yeah, if you're trying to answer the question, can, I mean, you can answer the question, can, as it relates to what the

laws currently allow.

And this is, you know, note, special note, this podcast is not encouraging

anyone to break the law for these reasons.

But, you know, so part of it is, is it legal?

Currently, is it legal?

But then if you ask the question behind the question, is, you know, is this a moral issue?

So, what does the Bible have to say about that?

And that seems to be….

Is it like, biblically, what is the answer, right?

Jared.

Yeah, well, I mean, I think we asked this question online and many people brought up, you know, the verse in Proverbs

where a righteous man cares even for his animals, so he has regard even for his animals.

And, you know, this is a puzzling passage to bring up as it relates to this kind of topic because we,

you know, as Christians, we're living in a world right now that basically is treating animals like

humans.

And so, most of our impulses are trained to think of pets as family

members, even.

So, we may not believe that they're actually family members, but then our emotions are trained to think of them in exactly that way.

And so, part of this discussion is just a discussion about human beings' responsibility to care

for animals in general.

So, this is an example I brought up online and I didn't really get a whole lot of interaction on this, but then I am, you know,

interested in thinking through these things without, you know, the filter of emotion with it in

that way and thinking about it just in terms of, you know, what does the Bible say and what is reasonable and what is logically consistent and

everything else.

But, I mean, you can imagine a situation where a man goes out into the wilderness or

whatever and he finds a horse and then he takes that horse and he tames the horse.

And then he decides to take the horse back, like ride the horse back to his, you know, after the process

of him taming it and everything else, he rides this horse back or he leads, you know, with a rope or whatever.

But he tames the horse, he begins to feed the horse, he even gives the horse a name, okay?

So, let's say that he's given this horse a name and then he starts to feed this horse and then he gets into a

situation where, you know, it's just a horse that's constantly kicking him off his back

and everything else.

Would it be immoral for that man to take that horse back to where he found it and

let God care for it, right?

I mean, so that's sort of a question that you have to think through.

Like, meaning, does a human being, once a human being begins to care for a particular animal

and claim ownership of it and say that this is my property, once he does that, is it like a Wookiee

life debt or something like that?

But he's made, you know, he's like, once you become mine, you are mine indefinitely and then I have a responsibility to

care for you indefinitely, you know, period,.

The end.

Pete.

The same way I would a spouse or a child.

Jared.

The spouse or a child, yeah.

So, in a lot of people, that's the way they think about pets in general, you know, whether,

and I mean, if you look at the laws in the books right now, I mean, this is true, like, you may get into

criminal trouble if you abandon like a dog, a cat, or even a

rabbit, a pet rabbit, you know, once it's considered a pet, it's like it's considered family.

And if you were to abandon that family member, it's like, there's all the moral outrage that is going to happen at that

point.

But then you do have to ask, well, is this reasonable?

Like, is this a reasonable thing for human beings to think this way about animals?

And then what are the preconditions that are necessary to go that direction in your mind, right?

So, I mean, like, it doesn't seem to me that if a man were to take that horse and say, this horse is going to be

mine, and this horse is now my property, I'm going to take it, you know, to my

home, and I start to feed it.

I mean, it's not true that, you know, once you start feeding it, like, you've made some permanent commitment that you're going to care for it for the rest of

your life.

But then this is the way people were arguing, right?

So, the people are arguing a righteous man has regard even for his animals, right?

And it's like, well, what if he doesn't want it to be his animal anymore?

That's the very thing that is under dispute, right?

Is there a means of a person saying, hey, I've taken on this responsibility to

care for a particular animal, this animal is no longer benefiting me, it's destructive to either my lifestyle, my

family, my kids, you know, whatever else.

Is there any way to abdicate that responsibility or what are the appropriate ways to abdicate that responsibility in that way?

And so, we have a lot of expectations that our society puts upon us about what is reasonable in this way,

but then you do have to take a step back and ask, well, are these expectations reasonable even at this point?

Or how do we get to where these expectations are reasonable?

So, you know, one argument people would give was a righteous man has regard even for his animals.

Another argument that people gave was, you know, you have to let your yes be yes and your no be no.

Pete.

Yeah, yeah.

Jared.

Which is a Bible verse, you know, that is a Bible verse.

Jared.

It's clearly a Bible verse, but it assumes the Wookiee life debt that, you know, kind of concept that once you begin to care for a

particular animal, you have, you know, made a fundamental commitment to care for them for the scope of their life in that

way.

So, part of it is that, part of it is like, well, you need to count the cost, right?

So, like, the issue is if you say, hey, you decided to take on a pet, care for it, and then you

go back on your word or something like that, you, like, that was a failure of counting the cost.

But it's like, yeah, I mean, but have you never bought a car before?

And it didn't work out, you know?

Like, you drive that, I mean, you drive that car for a little bit and you realize it's giving you back pain and back aches and, you know,

it's a lemon, it has all sorts of problems that you can't keep up with.

Like, is there any way to get rid of the car, you know, without sinning?

Can you say, hey, I just made a bad call on this one, right?

You know, maybe it's just beyond my, I didn't have any way of knowing it was going to break down every few weeks,

right?

So, you know, part of it is like, there's just a property discussion in general,

like, and animals are certainly forms of property in this way.

So, then if you're thinking through what are the rules, the entailments of property in general, we don't typically think of

ourself as having a responsibility to care for a particular piece of property the whole

entire scope of our life, right?

So, like, if you were to go buy some land and you say, hey, this land is no longer pleasing to me, I'm

going to move, you could just kind of let it be.

You don't necessarily even have to hand it off to someone, you know what I mean?

Like, in terms of, you know, the way it would actually work, you know, pre -law and everything else.

I mean, there is like the idea of, you know, surrendering property.

But then, you know, beyond that, then what you had was the emotional kind of arguments.

So, then people would say, hey, if you abandon your dog in the middle of the

woods or something like that, what if a bear eats it?

Pete.

Uh -huh.

Yeah.

Which is,.

I guess, you know, that is a possibility.

Jared.

And I mean, you know, because then.

You're subjecting it to cruelty, right?

Like a cruel death by getting eaten by a bear.

And it's just like, but that really, you have to kind of step into that.

And you have to ask, like, have you guys never watched like National

Geographic before?

Have you ever watched.

The Lion King, you know?

Pete.

Yeah, the Lion King, yeah.

You know, what does he say?

What does he say in there?

I've forgotten.

Something about like, hey, we grow old and we die and yeah, we eat the antelope and then we die,

we become the grass.

Jared.

The antelope.

Pete.

And the antelope eat the grass.

Jared.

It's the grass.

Yeah.

So, I mean, like, the idea that, I mean, so, the idea there is kind of a bizarre idea.

I mean, it's like, if you take a step back and you like remove the emotional like human attachment you have to

particular kinds of animals and you just think about it logically, it's just like, well, look, this animal,

yeah, they may get eaten by wolves, they may get eaten by a bear.

It's like, well, yeah, those wolves and those bears, they have to eat too, right?

And God feeds them.

Pete.

How do you think that they get food to begin with?

Jared Yeah, they're predators.

Pete.

You think it's like Yogi Bear, he just goes and he steals the picnic basket every single time.

Jared.

Well, I mean, that's where, yeah, I mean, that's where you've just left the realm of anything biblical at that point.

It's like, well, what?

Do human beings have a responsibility to protect all herbivores from carnivores now?

Like, what is going on?

Like, what are we signed up for?

Yeah, I mean, there is like a circle.

Pete.

Hey, don't start giving them ideas, Tom.

Don't start giving them ideas, please.

Jared.

Because it would be mean, you know?

And so, I mean, but then what that all kind of reduces to is that there is this emotional attachment that you have

given to a particular animal that in a lot of ways is very inappropriate.

And, you know, so I don't feel like a lot of that is, a lot of those things are good

answers.

Now, I mean, the one that's maybe slightly more compelling is the idea that, I mean, I think cats

generally survive.

They're better suited to surviving in the wild than a dog might be.

So, you know, I think if you're thinking about like a biblical case, God feeds the birds of the air.

And so, I mean, I think God can figure out how to feed pets too in that way.

But then if you have like a domesticated animal that you've bred that is utterly and completely helpless and dependent

apart from human care, like a lot of dogs are

said to be in that way, you know, I don't particularly know.

I've never like abandoned a dog out in the woods and put a video recorder on it and see how long it would

survive or something before it gets eaten by a hawk or something.

But, you know, I mean, if it were to get eaten by a hawk, I would say, well, that's a victory, right?

That's certainly a victory.

Pete.

You enabled the circle of life to continue.

Yeah.

And then we didn't have to feed it anymore, you know, so that would be a good thing.

Like in my mind, that would be a win -win, you know, hawk, win for hawk, win for us, win for, you know, God

feeding the birds of the air, you know, win, win, win, win, win.

Pete.

What about the dog?

Jared Well, I mean, you know, not everyone gets to win.

Pete.

Not everybody can win, huh?

Jared.

I mean, if it was a nicer dog, then we wouldn't have got rid of it anyways, you know?

So he got what was coming to him.

Pete.

Now, what about, you know, so in modern society, at least, we do

have the option of like shelters or, you know, trying to find a different owner on your own.

What about someone coming along, making an argument, saying, hey, wouldn't it be better to,

you know, try and put the dog in a situation where it's more likely to survive?

Jared.

Yeah, I mean, I think so.

I don't, so I'm a little bit sympathetic to the idea, hey, if you breed a domesticated animal,

and they're utterly helpless and dependent apart from human care, then just kind of abandoning them in the middle of nowhere in order

to starve, like one that could, like, that may not be the best kind of

situation in general.

Just, I mean, causing needless suffering, you know, in terms of just causing it the starve to death or something like

that, like slow kind of painful death, like maybe a bullet to the head would be a little bit better in that way.

But then the other thing is, yeah, well, hey, maybe if you abandon your pit bull and, you know,

it's just roaming the woods, it could be a liability to other people in that way, because it turns

feral or whatever.

And so, I mean, I'm sympathetic to those kind of arguments in general.

And, you know, I don't, but I think you do have to think about this, like in

terms of objective principles that apply.

Like, you don't want to have like a situation -based morality, you have to think about how, what are the expectations that people

throughout the history of the world would have expected related to this kind of topic?

You get what I'm saying?

Pete Yeah.

Jared.

So you don't want, like, principles of ethics that only apply in our unique and particular situation right

now.

So, I mean, I think a lot of this reduces to what is the best case scenario and what is the worst case scenario.

But then part of the problem is that we so idolize animals that sometimes you back people in a corner

to where, you know, I mean, we've counseled a girl who, functionally, I mean, she

was in a pretty awful situation.

We won't go into great detail about that to just shelter the situation.

But I mean, essentially, she's, you know, a younger girl who is basically starving herself

to death in order to feed the stupid cat that she has, because she's in a

situation where care for her is not going the way that it should in that way.

And, you know, so like, there's a lot of people in COVID, like during COVID, who were basically

just strapped for cash, strapped for money, losing their jobs, out of work and everything else.

And a lot of people were trying to bring their pets to shelters during

that time, and the shelters were full, they just stopped taking them.

And so there's, you know, so yeah, I mean, if you can bring it to an animal shelter, possibly rehome it, I mean, they're going to kill it in a few

weeks if no one comes to get it anyways.

So, I mean, yeah, they're dead at that point, right?

I mean, they're going to be dead at that point.

And so I think, yeah, that would be a better scenario.

I mean, it could be argued that possibly that's a better scenario on one axis,

on one axis, if that makes sense.

Like, meaning, like, it would cause that particular animal less pain and suffering, right?

If you were to do that kind of thing, like put it out in a slow, painful death.

But then, I mean, you do have to think about the bears and the hawks and the wolves and everything else.

I mean, you know, on another axis, you deprive them an opportunity for a meal, too.

You know, so there's that.

But, I mean, you do.

Peter.

And what are they going to eat if they can't eat your poodle?

Jared.

If they can't, yeah.

So, I mean, like, that would, you know, advance God's purposes too to, you know, send them out in the woods helpless

and defenseless and, you know, give the predators an opportunity to do what they're designed to do and hunt something, you know?

So, like, that's a fail on that end.

But then it would, yeah, I would certainly restrict some of this particular suffering for this one particular animal, for sure.

I mean, so I think, yeah, I think it would be better to shoot it, but then part of the problem is if you're living in a residential area,

you can't just shoot your dog in the backyard or something like that without going to jail anyways.

And so, then, you know, you're left in a situation where you're going to have to, you know, drive out into the middle of nowhere somewhere and shoot this

thing and, like, hopefully no one sees you anyways, you know?

So, I mean, like, there's a lot of situations like that, like, you know, with the girl we're talking about, I don't think she would have had the stomach

to shoot a dog or something like that.

Jared.

Someone's going to have to take on the animal for them, you know?

And so, I think what's happening is you have a lot of people who are painted into a corner in this topic to where

they take on this responsibility that our society says, hey, this is a lifelong, you know, life debt you're making to this animal,

which is really irrational and really unreasonable.

You know, like, it's not really a good thing to do anyways, say, hey, this is going to be a part of my family and you're going to be a part of my family for

life and, like, your life changes.

You may have kids, you know, you may, like, have kids and realize that I don't like the way that dog's looking at my kid anymore,

you know?

So, there's a lot of, like, circumstances that change and we're not like an animal -centric, like, religion here.

You know, it's not like the two great commands in the Bible are love the Lord your God with all your heart and soul and mind and strength and

love your dog as you love yourself or something.

Like, it's just not, like, I mean, it's remarkable.

It's like the whole Bible is written and it gets two great commands that summarize the whole Bible are love

God and love neighbor and then we've added dogs in there as if they're like some kind of, you know, more.

Poor….

Pete.

Oh, people love their dogs more than they love their neighbor.

Jared Yeah.

Pete I promise you.

I promise.

Most people today don't even, at least in the U .S., don't even know their neighbors.

Jared That's right.

I mean,.

Pete.

They're literal neighbors.

Jared.

They literally would, you know, greater love has no man than to lay down his life for his pet like on Man of Steel or whatever,

you know?

So, that's where we're at.

But, I mean, I think you can be backed into a corner where you're in, like, there's no good out here, you know what I

mean?

Like, there's no good out.

Like, shelters aren't going to take the thing.

No one wants it because everyone's broke, like, in the pandemic and things like that.

It's like, what are you going to do?

Like, you're just going to sit there and starve to death for the sake of this dog?

You know, I think there, you know, if a person in that kind of situation were to say, hey, I'm done with it.

I can't do this anymore.

Maybe at least they have a hope of surviving if I drop them off somewhere, you know?

Maybe not, you know, maybe they're food for the bears or something.

It's just like, well, I mean, that's, yeah, God's instituting the world in such a way that, you know, He

cares for the birds there.

He feeds animals too, but I don't know that any human being takes on, like, a unique obligation to care for a

particular animal for life.

So, I think it can be, I think it can be a little messy, you know?

And I think when you're living in a society like that, you can kind of, you can back people into certain corners to where there's no

good way out.

And I would say that, yeah, that should caution people to think, if you're living in that kind of society, maybe

you shouldn't be, you shouldn't throw yourself into pet ownership, you know?

Because we have, you know, we now, we have so many breeders who are creating so many

animals to meet, like, this huge demand that, I mean, it's probably not like a wise, I

mean, it's obviously it doesn't reflect very wisely on us as a society in general, for sure.

Pete.

Okay. Fair enough.

This has been another episode of Bible Bashed.

We hope you have been encouraged and blessed through our discussion.

We thank you for all your support and ask you to continue to like and subscribe to Bible Bashed and share our

podcast with your friends and on social media.

Please reach out to us with your questions, pushback, and potential topics for us to discuss in future episodes

at BibleBashedPodcast at gmail .com and consider supporting us through Patreon.

If you would like to be Bible Bashed personally, then please know that we also offer free biblical counseling which you can

take advantage of by emailing us.

Now, go boldly and obey the truth in the midst of a biblically illiterate world who will be

perpetually offended by your every move.