Athanasius Against the World / Church Creeds & Councils

So let's turn to Colossians chapter 3. We'll look at that in a moment, but picking up where we left off last time in the book

Forerunners of the Faith, we're in lesson number 5, Defending the Deity of Christ.

So we're going to continue to look at the Council of Nicaea, which is, somebody asked me last week, where is that?

And I thought it was in Greece, but it's actually in modern -day Turkey. But this morning we're going to focus also on this man,

Athanasius. For those of you who have studied church history or at least have heard lectures or maybe sermons on church history, perhaps you've heard this phrase,

Athanasius Contramundum. Does that sound familiar to anybody at all? Basically means

Athanasius against the world. So sometimes when you're fighting for biblical truth, you feel like it's you versus everybody else.

And I just want to read this statement about Athanasius. This isn't in the book, but it says,

Athanasius was a Christian bishop who stood against heretics in the church and the power of Rome to proclaim orthodox biblical

Christianity. He is known for his defense of orthodoxy and for helping us understand what

Scripture teaches about Jesus. Athanasius stood, quote, against the world to proclaim the true gospel and opposing those who still held to the

Arian heresy. His epitaph is Athanasius against the world.

And you remember the Arian heresy is from Arius, this priest who started teaching that Jesus was not divine.

He is not God in the sense of being fully divine. And that's what the

Council of Nicaea, at least to some degree, was dealing with. So let's pick up where we left off.

Section number five, the council's conclusion, creedal articulation. There's a few things that you needed to fill in.

It says, at the Council of Nicaea in 325, the true church arose to defend the deity of Christ from Arian attack.

The Council of Nicaea did not, what? What did you fill in?

Did not determine or establish the doctrine of Christ's deity.

Okay, I know I touched on this last week. So the Council of Nicaea did not determine or establish the doctrine of Christ's deity.

Why not? Because it's already established in the scripture and people understood that for hundreds of years even before the council.

It rather affirmed and defended the doctrine that had always been taught by the church going back to the time of the

Apostles and being established in the scriptures. So if you didn't have those filled in, you can fill those in now.

This is in my book, not yours. It says, because the Council of Nicaea occurred in the year 325, the leaders who gathered there were also aware of the teachings of prior generations of Christians.

Though not authoritative, these writings provided unmistakable testimony to the fact that believers from the first century onward worshipped

Jesus Christ as God. For example, around 106, the Roman governor Pliny the

Younger wrote a letter in which he explained that Christians in his region sang hymns to Christ as to a

God. That commitment to the deity of Christ is affirmed repeatedly by earlier church leaders.

Here is a representative list from ten earlier Christian writers.

So you see this list that starts with Ignatius of Antioch. Everyone got that? Okay, so Ignatius, here's what he said.

He lived from 50 to 117 AD. For our God, Jesus the

Christ, was conceived by Mary according to God's plan, both from the seed of David and of the

Holy Spirit. So that's a very clear statement for our God, Jesus Christ.

Okay, this is a couple hundred years before the Council of Nicaea. Next, Polycarp of Smyrna, who we also looked at that was 69 to 155 is when he lived.

He said, now may the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the eternal high priest himself, the

Son of God, Jesus Christ, build you up in faith and truth and to us with you and to all those under heaven who will yet believe in our

Lord and God, Jesus Christ, and in his Father who raised him from the dead.

So he calls Jesus our Lord and God. So these are pretty clear statements so far.

I don't think anyone could say, okay, here's what people do. Well, yeah, that's what he said, but here's what he meant.

And then it's like the opposite or something. The next is the Epistle of Barnabas.

This is from the year 130. If the Lord submitted to suffer for our souls, even though he is

Lord of the whole world to whom God said at the foundation of the world, let us make humankind according to our image and likeness, how is it then that he submitted to suffer at the hands of humans?

So we could go through all of these, but you were supposed to read these during the week, you know, on your own.

So we're not going to read it, read it all. We're just going to go through the names. Justin Martyr affirmed the deity of Christ.

Tashon, Milito of Sardis, Irenaeus of Lyons. There's several quotes from him.

Clement of Alexander, Tertullian, and a man named Caius.

So several men, hundreds of years earlier, affirming the deity of Christ.

Are there any questions on that? I don't think this is news to anybody. So the discussion question is of the above quotes from the pre -Nicene

Christian leaders, which one stood out to you and what did you find compelling about those statements?

Did any one stand out? Okay, did you find anything compelling?

You know, the thing that stood out to me just with Ignatius, just the clarity of it.

You know, he doesn't hedge at all. He just comes right out and says that Jesus, he is our

God. Really shows there was no doubt in his mind, no hesitancy to proclaim the deity of Christ.

So that's what stands out to me. Anyone else want to add? Mark? I think when you look at the Fathers, and then you look at what the

Church has done, twisting the scriptures and turning it into a bunch of fill in the blank,

I guess, it's kind of discouraging that human beings can take something pure and turn it into what's best for me, myself, and I.

Right. Yeah. If you look at the writings, the earlier you go, it's very

Christ -centered. It's all about him and who he is and what he did.

And then the benefits for us are there. And it's clear that we can be forgiven.

We can have joy. We can have peace. We're saved, have an eternity in heaven. And that's enough.

But, and I don't know specifically what you're alluding to, but just Christianity, the way

I was not brought up here, but just Christianity all around me is very man -centered where, yeah, it's your best life now kind of thing where it's all about you and what you can get out of it.

And then when people don't get that instant result, they drop out because God's not giving me promotions and financial blessings and all the things that the guys on TV promised when that isn't actually what

God promised. So to me, that's like the big problem of what you're talking about.

But yeah, Marcus, you had something. Well, I couldn't help but be reminded. I was trying to remember which disciple it was, but it's in John 20 verses 19 and forward, an event that came to mind.

And when he had said this, he breathed on them and said to them, receive the

Holy Spirit. Oh, I'm sorry. I started reading too soon. It's, it's 24.

I guess I'll just skip right down. It was Thomas. Anyways, and Jesus said to Thomas, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your finger on the cross and say, put your that he was kind of the most doubtful one.

He had to see, he had to see and touch, he had to use his physical senses.

Right, right. So the testimony is clear. Now we can get into number five, the council's conclusion, creedal articulation.

So I already read the beginning there, the affirmation of his deity was overwhelming.

So the Nicene Creed, this is in your book, the

Nicene Creed is one of the most influential creeds in church history. Here is the crux of the creed.

It says, we believe in one God, the father almighty maker of all things visible and invisible.

And in one Lord, Jesus Christ, the son of God, the only begotten of his father of the substance of the father,

God of God, light of light, very God of very God begotten and not made being of one substance with the father by whom all things were made, both which are in heaven and in earth, who for us men and for our salvation came down from heaven and was incarnate and was made man.

He suffered. And the third day he rose again and ascended into heaven. And he shall come again to judge both the living and the dead.

And we believe in the Holy spirit. So it says half a century later at the first council of Constantinople, this is three 81.

The Nicene Creed would be expanded to include more detail on the person and work of the

Holy ghost. All right. So I think most of us are probably familiar, more familiar with the apostles creed, but who has heard, who has been in a church where the

Nicene Creed was recited. Okay. So one or two. Yeah.

Is it, did anything jump out at you about the creed? I mean, it's been a pretty standard

Christian creed. It's like the apostles creed. There's maybe one or two things you could see clarification on, but, um, this has been embraced by Christians ever since it was written really.

Yeah. It's really simple, right?

Be gotten and not made. And of course this is where, uh,

Colossians one, did I tell you to turn to Colossians one? Well, look at Colossians one verse 15.

Uh, this is where, uh, areas and those who still to this day follow the doctrine of areas.

And they say that Jesus isn't God because he is a creature. They would point to this verse,

Colossians one 15. It says he is the image of the invisible

God, the firstborn over all creation.

Okay. But then if you go on, it says that Jesus is the first born from the dead.

So it's not saying that Jesus is the, you know, the first born of God. Um, in the sense that he's the first creation, it's that Christ has the preeminence.

It's like the firstborn son, uh, the firstborn son had a, uh, a status or rank above all the other children.

So Jesus is the only begotten, uh, has nothing to do with him being created, uh, or, um, as areas, uh, and the other heretics would have said that he, he isn't

God. He is a, he is God's first creation. Okay. So the Nicene creed was dealing with this issue.

And it says in my book, though, the victory at Nicaea had been overwhelming. The controversy with Arianism still raged in the

Roman empire over the next 50 years. And like I said, it's still in a sense, maybe not.

It's not raging today, but it's still an issue today because the Jehovah's witnesses, some seventh day

Adventists, and there's other groups that still believe in the area and heresy that Jesus is not

God. He's the highest created being that's true, but he's not

God. Okay. So here's the discussion question for this section. Earlier in the lesson, we noted that the authority for what we believe must be what the authority must be the

Bible, not a church council. Why is that principle important to remember, especially when studying the council of Nicaea and the

Nicene creed? Why is that important to remember? Because Larry, they're men and the word is not from men.

Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So the scripture is inspired of the spirit and the scripture is from God.

It's God's word, the church councils and the creeds they produced. That's not

God's word. It's a summary. It's meant to be a right summary of, of God's word and what God's word teaches.

But the, the creeds are not authoritative in the same sense as the scripture.

And of course, there's been other church councils that have put out different statements that we would totally disagree with.

I matter of fact, I'm sure there's, if we looked at the first, whatever, seven, eight councils, there'd be several things you would wonder, is this really, is this really biblical, but it's all about your source of authority.

If we have the Bible as the authority, you know, we just can't go wrong. You can misinterpret it, but, uh, creeds, what men produce, it's just not at that same level.

Okay. All right. So this is the next section, number six, standing against the world.

So this is what we talked about. Athanasius, a contramundum Athanasius against the world.

Uh, though he was only a Deacon at the time of the Council of Nicaea. So this was 325

AD Athanasius spent most of the fourth century fighting against the false teachings of Arius.

He became the Bishop of Alexandria just a few years later in 328 over the next 45 years of his ministry, he would be exiled five times, uh, totaling 17 years.

So 17 years in exile. I mean, that's, you know, a good long time over the next, uh, let's see, despite being denounced at the

Council of Nicaea, Arianism continued to be a popular view in the Roman empire.

As a result, Athanasius repeatedly found himself in the political crosshairs of his enemies.

So in 336, Athanasius was falsely accused of kidnapping another

Bishop named, uh, Arnesius and cutting off his hand for use in magical incantations.

Now that's a pretty strong accusation. And if true, uh, that would totally safe to say, ruin, uh,

Athanasius is a reputation, which I'm sure is the whole point. I mean, if he actually kidnapped the person and did all this was practicing sorcery.

I doubt Christians would care what he said. Now, do you, do you believe that accusation?

Of course, you know, we can't go back in time. Uh, but this is what happened with the early

Christians and Christian leaders. You know, if you want to take them down, then you just make these accusations against them.

And, and that's it. Remember the accusations against Christians themselves that they were what cannibals because they're eating flesh and drinking blood.

Now they're eating bread and drinking, you know, uh, whatever wine or grape juice, depending on who you talk to.

But, uh, you understand that, that, that accusation wasn't true and it's believed neither was this, but you had a,

I saw a hand in the back biggest ways that the devil works today too.

Yeah. Everything you say, they twist it. Right. And when they can't prove it wrong, make a lie about it.

Right. Yeah. I mean, today there's all sorts of accusations, you know, evangelical pastors are called racist, you know, all that, all the is in the isms that they get accused of.

And, you know, every once in a while, I, you know, an accusation is true, but, uh, this is, this is an attempt of the enemy to kind of knock down, uh,

God's generals as someone once said. Yes. Which creed was it that said that Jesus descended into hell?

That's one. And I heard Joyce Myers expounding on that, how he was being tortured by the demons and they were having just a gay old time torturing

Jesus. And, right. And I no longer listened to her. Yeah.

That was a, you know, that was Aaron was right. That's the, that's the apostles creed where it says, and he,

Jesus descended into hell. Some, some versions of the tree of the creed say he, he descended into Hades.

Okay. Is that in the back of the hymnal mark? Yeah. Seven 16 is the apostles.

Okay. If you want to look at that, what does it say? Christ descended into what?

Hades is all right. Hades and shield are all right. Hell is not.

All right. All right. So what page was that again? Seven, seven 16.

Let's just read. I'm not so sure this book covered the apostles creed page seven 16.

Yeah. Well, that's not right. Seven.

What did you say? Seven 16. Okay. I've always understood that how

Hades shield, they were all interchangeable in our language in English. And when it says that he descended into hell, it was literally to set the captives free.

Yeah. And so that doesn't bother me at all. When she goes into expounding on what that means now, she's going into her own fancy.

Right. But cause she's not, she wasn't shouldn't know. One is

Greek and one is Hebrew. They both mean that. But Jesus said to the thief, today you will be with me in paradise, which is why there is the compartment theory, which

I believe is not a theory, but true that there is. It's the same. If you look at Luke 16 where Lazarus, the rich man,

Lazarus and the beggar or the beggar was Lazarus and rich man ascended. They were both in Hades, except one was in torment.

The other was in the bosom of Abraham. So descending into shield or Hades just means yes, the place of the dead, but there is a place of the dead or there was a place of the dead that was paradise.

And there was a place of the dead that was torment. Okay. In my opinion, what

I'm trying to say is in the English language, those three words are interchangeable.

In the linguistics, you have to understand the roots of all of the words. Well, they should throw paradise in there too, because paradise was a part of it because that's where Jesus and the thief on the cross went.

All right. Does everyone, there's two seven 16s. That's what threw me. But does everyone have the apostles creed?

So let's just read it. I believe in God, the father almighty maker of heaven and earth.

And in Jesus Christ, his only son, our Lord, who is conceived by the Holy spirit, born of the virgin

Mary suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried.

He descended into Hades the third day. He rose again from the dead.

He ascended into heaven and sitteth on the right hand of God, the father almighty. And from thence, he shall come to judge the quick and the dead or the living and the dead.

And I believe in the Holy spirit, the Holy Christian church, the communion of saints, the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body and the life everlasting.

Amen. And I like how they said, we believe in the Holy Christian church instead of the

Holy Catholic church as some of the creeds say, but as far as this statement, uh, that Jesus descended into Hades, right?

He descended into the place of the dead shield in the old Testament, Hades and the new Testament.

Um, yeah, in, in Latin, there's one translation that comes from infernos and it it's translated that Christ descended into hell.

It does not mean he descended into the lake of fire. Like we would think of where, you know, demons are torturing him.

So what Joyce Meyer, uh, taught, uh, is it's considered heresy to teach that, but, uh, that's no surprise.

That's not the only heresy she taught, but anyways, as tempted as I am to go on, on, on about that.

I won't, but good. But that's some clarification. So obviously the creeds need some clarification as well.

Okay. So standing against the world, Athanasius was accused of kidnapping.

The next thing, although he was able to prove his innocence, he was still sent into exile.

I mean, go figure. Uh, when his opponents, uh, accused him of interfering with wheat shipments from Alexandria to Rome, he was able to return to Alexandria two years later when

Constantine died. So he's accused of some other things. Uh, a short time later, a supporter of areas convinced, uh,

Constantius the second Constantine son to get rid of Athanasius. This resulted in the next two exiles of Athanasius from three 39 to three 46.

And then again, from three 56 to three 61. So clearly Athanasius, because he's fighting for biblical truth, there's a target on his back.

And that's true for anyone who fights for the truth. You know, everyone who's on the other side, which is let's face it, the majority, uh, they don't, they don't like men or women who do this.

The book continues on one of those occasions, a Roman soldier stormed the church during a communion service, forcing

Athanasius to flee and to go into hiding in the Egyptian desert. In three 26,

Athanasius was again forced into exile by the emperor, Julian. Unlike Constantine, Julian did not claim to be a

Christian. He attempted to take the Roman empire back into paganism. When it became obvious that Athanasius was resolute in his

Christian convictions, Julian drove him out of Alexandria. The exile ended when

Julian died. So it's like, you just have to wait these people out, wait until they die, and then you can come back.

The fifth and final exile occurred under the emperor Valens, who simply evicted

Athanasius because he had been, uh, been earlier exiled by Julian. When Valens realized that the people of Alexandria loved

Athanasius, he had him restored to office in order to garner popularity with the citizens of Alexandria.

During these times of exile, it sometimes seemed like Athanasius was alone in his fight for the doctrine of Christ's deity.

It seemed like that it was Athanasius against the world. That's the way it seemed, yet he refused to waver in his commitment to the truth.

Okay, so can you think of any examples, maybe in your lifetime, when there was a person really fighting for biblical truth, whatever it is, whether it's a particular doctrine, and all of a sudden accusations started coming against them and it may have resulted in harm, or maybe it didn't.

Can anyone think of any examples in the past, whatever, 50 years or so? Yeah, you.

Me? Yeah, well, over BLM or over the heretic or the gathering or whatever.

Right. Yeah, I mean that, well, any other examples before?

We've had some nasty things said about it. Sure. Erin. My former pastor was accused of being like Absalom, leading the flock away from David because he took a stand on what he felt was scriptural point against the denomination, and when he separated from the denomination, the church went under.

Yep. And so he's kind of being spoken poorly of by those who stayed with the denomination due to that.

He's been accused of flock stealing. Yeah, Absalom, that's it. Yeah, I haven't heard that one.

And David is the denomination, I guess. The Bishop of the denomination or something.

Yeah. Yeah, that's, I mean, that is a good example. And of course him entering into that fight,

I'm sure he knew there'd be some people that would ridicule him, but Hey, the truth is worth fighting for.

If the truth isn't worth fighting for, I mean, what do you do? You shouldn't be in leadership if you're not willing to take a stand for what's right.

But, uh, I saw another hand, Mark. Yep. Uh, specifically during the

COVID, uh, the COVID crisis as they, uh, put it on the news,

John MacArthur, uh, you know, he, he kind of became the figurehead of, of the church, uh, fighting against the state and basically the, the mayor of California, the mayor of Los Angeles and the governor of California.

Uh, basically he, he could have gone to prison. They took away the church parking lot, which they had a lease from, from the state and they just took it away.

And that now people couldn't go to church because they had nowhere to park, you know, in the city.

It's a big, that's a big problem, but, uh, yeah, thankfully he didn't go to prison, but someone who went to his seminary, uh, who was a pastor in Canada did go to prison for about, uh, six, at least six weeks.

I think I forget his name, uh, at the moment, but, um, yeah.

Uh, but during 2020, when somebody decided to take a black lives matter sign and come on to church property and, you know, nail it into the ground.

And I asked them politely to remove it, which seems pretty reasonable that we don't want, you know, political slogans and, uh, stuff like that.

Oh, I was accused of what? Cause I, cause I'm not fully supporting the black lives matter movement.

I'm of course racist. Right. But, uh, yeah. But I think a lot of the people that might've bought into that, um, some people, you're not going to change their mind.

Well, you are kind of racist in a way, because it's your desire that the human race would come to know

Christ as savior. Well, I don't know. Yeah. But, um, what was

I going to say? It totally threw me, but, but people realize,

I think a lot of people realize the black lives matter organization that it was all a grift.

I mean, they were just making money hand over fist, and it really didn't help black people at all.

And when you looked into it, it was not a charitable organization. It was a corporation. Right.

Yeah. Nobody bothered. Right. But at the time, not everybody knew that. So yeah, but that was one charge.

So the parents that are fighting for, when people are trying to convince their kid that they're not the gender they were born and all of that, when they fight against, if there's a father in Canada that's not allowed to see his own kid.

Right. Um, parents are having their parental rights terminated by the state for not supporting their child's, you know, their three, four, five year old child saying that they're a different gender than they were born, which

Which was a thought that was put into their head, not by them. But everybody who's ever raised a child knows that their kid will pretend to be a different gender at some point.

They'll be like, I'm going to be a boy today. And they don't mean it. They're playing, but these parents, you know, somebody takes it seriously.

And then these parents are losing the rights to their kids. They're standing for biblical concepts, even if they don't realize they are being persecuted.

Yeah. There was a law passed about conversion therapy to where if, if, if a child wants to go from being a boy to a girl and you try to stop that or to, or if someone is a homosexual and you try to witness to them and convert them to Christ and say, you should live a straight lifestyle.

That's actually illegal. I think there's a few States. It's definitely that way in Canada.

And I think it might be, they're looking to pass it here. If they haven't already in some States, but you have to realize that, okay, you could look at it.

Like if they're going to take some 10 year old who a parent wants, then they're bringing them to this place and connecting him to like electric shock therapy is like converting.

There are some things you could imagine that, okay, I would be against this or I'd be against that. But really, if you look at the way the law is written, preaching to them could be considered illegal.

So the law, my point is there are laws in place right now where if the government wanted to enforce them against Christians for doing simple things like evangelizing or preaching a sermon, they could do it with the laws that are in place now.

And I suspect that will happen if things keep going the way they are. But thankfully in this country, you don't see too much.

It's, you know, it's accusations, not exile or prison terms, but this stuff has happened throughout history.

And of course, in the Protestant reformation, which I don't think is part of this, this is more early church history.

We might get to it, but a lot of people died simply for defending the gospel and Athanasius, something as simple as the deity of Christ.

I mean, people hated him for standing up for that basic, most basic of biblical truths.

So in the book, it says on a human level, their faithfulness was rewarded in 380 when the emperor

Theodosius the first outlawed the heretical views of Arius and declared Nicene or Trinitarian Christianity to be the official religion of the

Roman empire. Yeah, Athanasius was justified. He was rewarded.

He ended up being on, as they say, the right side of history. And we can look back at him and say, what a strong, courageous defender of the faith.

But at the time, there was a lot of people who despised Arius. And that's always the way it is.

Men throughout church history, now that we're way past that, we can look back.

There's a safe amount of space in between us and them. And we can sort of lift these men up and admire what they did.

But while they were alive, if you did that same thing, you'd have a fight on your hands.

So you just have to remember that when there's a battle going on right now. It doesn't really matter if people 500 years later think you were right.

I mean, it really should matter right then and there. Do Christians support you now during the fight?

So what's the main battle we're fighting today in churches?

I mean, I think the whole trans, LGBT issue is probably, it's the one that'll get people's tempers fired up the most.

Just one simple statement, people can be enraged. I think that's the biggest issue that we're dealing with now.

Certainly top three. Anyone else, any other big battles

Christianity is facing? Mark? Abortion.

I mean, that's kind of, those two have been the big cultural issues for sure. Deconstruction is a lot sneakier.

Yeah. Yeah, well,

I think, of course, the guy that refused to bake the cake, he ended up winning the case. But then they just filed another lawsuit.

And then another, and it's just about bankrupting the guy and making his life as miserable as they can.

So that's, if they can't put you in prison, they'll try to get you some other way. But yeah, it's...

And they've expanded the tools by which they attack people. Right now, they have vastly greater influence with social media and through the educational system.

They've been working for years and years to tilt the game so that it's not just a, well,

I believe this, and I believe that. It's now under nearly the force of law, because they can literally ruin your life.

Using no means that are not lawful, but have the same effect, like the cake guy, literally bankrupting him.

Should that be legal? Absolutely, in our view, because we believe that he's right.

But we don't have that force. We don't have an equivalent means of connecting all

Christians together so that we can...

Like what you do, somebody is preaching against the faith. You can say, okay, that's wrong, and we're not going to accept it.

You can control that in this room. But you can't necessarily control it in a wider context.

So the people who would try to convince others using propaganda and force, they've been working at all the different means that they can do that legally for a lot longer than we've had our eyes open to it.

It's mobilizing a group of people and getting that pressure. And then, obviously, if the people in power support that cause, then it's game over.

But the encouraging thing is Christianity has always been in the minority.

We've always had to contend with the same things. So even though it looks like Athanasius was losing, guess what?

In the end, he won. And in the end, God wins. So we're just going to have to fight a lot of battles between then and now.

So let's just finish this up. This is the legacy of Athanasius.

Here are a few lessons we can learn from the man nicknamed the Saint of Stubbornness.

Number one, we should be willing to contend earnestly for core Christian doctrines.

See Jude 3 and 4. A right understanding of the person of Christ is not peripheral, but central to the faith.

Athanasius recognized the importance of that truth and he was willing to sacrifice much to defend it.

Number two, at times being faithful means you will also be unpopular. Right, that's what we've been talking about.

Athanasius became the object of political attack and public scorn because he refused to compromise.

His tenacity provides a compelling example for us to consider. Number three, the key of honoring

God is to hold firmly and faithfully to what the Bible teaches. The pastors who signed the

Nicene Creed did so because they saw the deity of Christ clearly taught in the scripture. That same

Bible -based conviction fueled the dogged determination of Athanasius even in the face of great opposition.

And then the fourth and final thing, the examples of faithful men in generations past should motivate us to stand faithfully against the world in our own generation.

And that's really why I want to talk about this, you know, kind of the application of, okay, where is that happening now?

How is that happening today? Because it's great to read about Athanasius, but what are we learning from it?

Well, we should do, take the same approach he did. Athanasius lived out his convictions with consistency and courage.

His commitment to the truth did not waver. His example should motivate us to do the same in our day.

Biblical truth is constantly under attack. The question is, are we willing to stand for what we know is right and true?

And let me just ask you, are you willing to stand for what you know is right and true?

Because if you do, it's going to be Marcus against the world. Linda against the world.

That's the way it's going to seem, but hey, if God is for us, what? Who can be against us?