Keep sharing good news without ads.
No description available
The child of reformation. Me a Bible in a bookshelf of dead man cigars bourbons and beer cans bowties tattoos and. Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to open-earth theology. My name is Jeff and I'm one of the co-hosts of this wonderful fantastic show and I'm also one of the pastors Elders of Covenant Reformed Baptist Church here in Tallahoma, Tennessee.
If you like the intro song the single just dropped today I Commented on it in YouTube and also on my Facebook page, please go and check it out. Show your brothers some love. Pass it over to Jack like Brayden this way.
Yeah, I.
Am pastor Brayden Patterson the pastor of Valley Baptist Church in Hagerman, Idaho also being called Starting in December the pastor of Grace Bible Church in Moorpark, California. So if you live in the Ventura County area Please come join the church prior to me getting there.
Come join it when I'm there. It'd be a real blessing to be able to get to know you really looking forward to that opportunity and just to continue to preach Christ crucified from beyond from behind the pulpit and to love the people.
I also have a YouTube channel called reformed ex-mormon. I'm also looking for new friends. These ones are our jack legs sometimes.
Grace Bible Church, I actually attend Grace Bible Church, but actually in Texas in Bernie, Texas. Oh same name different church. So I had to put an evangelism team out of Grace Bible Church of Bernie where I'm a member.
Man, it's it's doing awesome. You guys we had we had such a good turnout. We had two people come from evangelism. Today, it was excellent. So I'm I'm like, you know on cloud nine. You guys know when you see fruit and stuff like that.
So it was a it was a good day today. Yeah.
Man man, yes service went well for us today. I Kind of finished a little section on washing feet. For some reason I can't get anyone in our reformer church to bring out the with the bucket of water and Get in between the toes, right?
But now we just pointed out that you know, I we looked at what a servant is that's. That's Christ what a servant isn't Judas.
And.
What was the other one? How should a leader lead or something like that? But it was a really good message and it was one that I was actually Kind of worried about like entering into the pulpit. I was I just I didn't know how it was going to turn out and While I was preaching I felt pretty good about it.
And then I had a lot of people afterwards approached me just was saying it was a really good message. So I haven't got to hear you heard it hear it yet. But if you want to supposedly hear a good message by me go check out the one I preached today Good Lord's Day though.
We had a week man. I'll tell you what the we had four families Missing today and our whole church was packed. We barely have if they would have came because we have a fellowship mill after every Service.
If those four families would have came and everyone would have stayed and eaten. We wouldn't have had enough room for people to eat. Wow. So we really need this church building. Oh, yeah, and so more announcements on that.
I Am meeting with the so that the church That owns the building receive the deed to the building and I am meeting with them this coming Tuesday at 1030 Central Central Central Standard Time. So if y 'all could if y 'all would excuse me, if y 'all would please be praying that the Lord would be so gracious for us to get this building and We really need it.
We're busting out the seams.
Praise God, that's awesome. We'll be playing praying for sure. How was your day Braden? That was good. I got a preach.
Galatians chapter 3 verse 15 To 23. And so just got to talk a lot about covenants and How the seed is the singular Christ not the plural People of Israel. So that was that was a blessing to be able to go through that.
So Very good. Good Lord. Good Lord's Day. Great time. We'll fellowship and with the Saints. That's good. How about you Tom?
Good earlier today Michael Michael preached and then in our evening worship service Frank preached on memorizing the Word of God how important it is to We meditate on it to read it to study it, but not only to read it and study it but also Memorize it so we have it in our hearts and our minds.
So we can meditate on it. So, you know as we as we take in Christ we can memorize the scripture. It helps us helps us to keep our mind on Christ. So it was it was really good and then seeing the two guys.
It was actually one guy that we met at evangelism a couple weeks ago a young man you know senior in high school. You know built dude. I mean good all the girls are gonna love this guy this kid I mean just built football player and all that stuff and and he came to listen to us evangelize showed up a church brought a friend and Heard the word preached like they've never heard heard before actually verse-by-verse actually.
Looking at at the scriptures and then explaining the text. Or they were just floored and so they said they're gonna come back. So we're just praising God for that. So it was excellent. Really good.
Very good. Very good. I'm glad everyone had a Had a good Lord's Day. There's nothing like the Lord's Day in my opinion where we get to To gather with the Saints and and allow this to be a an overflow of our our continued worship throughout the week.
Yeah, so so today's a topic is we're just going to have a Q &A so we we were going to talk about one thing and we just decided not to we really want this show to be energetic and fun and. So, I mean, I mean you got guys out there, you know, if you're looking for someone to bash everybody that Around like this is not the show for you.
Like if you come in the comment sections running your mouth. But we're not you know, like the the heresy hunters and stuff like that or something like that so. You know, so we just wanted this show to be fun and so because like like you came down to yesterday and was like Well, what are we gonna talk about was and so it was a little let's just allow people to ask questions.
So I have a I have a request. Okay, because. Because I'm married to her. She has a question and I can tell her that tell you guys that we so every every question.
We're gonna have the ones that we answer. We're gonna pull them up on the screen. Okay?
It's Debbie Shepherd there you guys. Yes, go ahead. Now. I'm gonna tell you my wife and I argue about this verse. So I'm not gonna tell you which one I'm gonna leave I want. Prove her wrong guys prove her wrong.
That's all I'm asking. So in Luke Zechariah was unable to speak until the baby was born. Creatures today say that Zechariah was also deaf. Even though the Bible doesn't say anything about him being deaf.
What do y 'all think?
One.
Luke one and I. I've never heard that he was deaf.
Yeah, it doesn't say that he was deaf, but let's read the text.
Sounds like you want to argue for a man deaf. Hey.
Hey.
All right, go ahead and insert your words into the Bible, let's go.
Shoehorn your interpretation.
The best way to open up is the Bible doesn't say but this is where I'm gonna go. Started Braden. You're a good reader started verse 18. Oh, yeah. I am a great reader. Not really I think I have like a.
Wrong you read. Well, it's just your voice. Yeah, your voice. Your voice sucks.
How will I know this for I am I'm an okay read it. You're Braden reading.
Oh, where we at. You started reading it and then you stopped. What?
Oh verse 18. Verse 18.
18 and Zachary chapter 2 or chapter 1 1. Oh.
Crap.
Okay, and Zachariah said to the angel, how shall I know this for I am old an old man and my wife is Advanced in years and the angel answered him. I am Gabriel I stand in the presence of God and I was sent to speak to you and to bring you this good news.
And behold, you will be silent and unable to speak until the day these things take place because you did not Believe my words Which will be fulfilled in their time. And the people were waiting for Zachariah and they were wondering at his delay in the temple.
And when he came out he was unable to speak to them and they realized that he had seen a vision in the temple. And he kept making signs to them and remained mute. Keep going. Okay, and when his time of service was ended He went to his home.
After these days his wife Elizabeth conceived and for five months She kept herself hidden saying Thus the Lord has done for me in the days when he looked on to on me to take away my reproach among people.
Keep going. Debbie, where is it?
Fire Tom. Go ahead. Michelle. Or Melissa. Melissa's the one that keeps on telling me I need to get fired.
There was a part there was a part in there when it says, okay, golly she gave me the wrong word. Verse 63 Hold on let's go down.
Okay.
63 okay. Okay, so let's start at 60, okay, but his mother answered and said no but she'll she shall be called John. He shall she be called John. And they said to her There is no one among the relatives who is called by this name and they were making signs to his father.
They were making sign to his father who was mute, right? We just read that he was mute. They were making signs to his father. He was mute he couldn't talk.
Yeah. During that time of pregnancy, huh? During the time of pregnancy, right?
He couldn't he couldn't talk but and so it was it so keep reading. Let's read it. 61 and they said to her there was no one among okay. So 62 and they were making signs to his father as to what he wanted to be called.
And he asked for a tablet and wrote. Any any wrote as follows. His name shall be called John. And they marveled. Okay, so he he couldn't talk. But why are they making signs to him? Why didn't they just say hey?
But 64 and immediately his mouth was open and his and his tongue.
Yeah, here's why. Are they making signs to him if he could hear. He started saying signs first. Right, so he. He couldn't talk. He couldn't talk, okay. But he could hear if he can hear. Why are they doing this?
Whoa?
You were making no go back. You just said he couldn't hear. You were just making signs to us. It doesn't mean.
All it is is he couldn't speak.
You're talking with your hands.
I'm speaking also.
He was deaf as well. He was deaf as well. Hey, what's the name of that that that that that death people use?
What's a call Braille?
Yeah, people don't need braille us blind people Jack.
We're over. Okay, so let's. Goodness, okay, anybody hear what I'm saying.
My area.
That that they were making signs to him if he was mute that I can see him making signs or hear me out. And we're writing on a tablet and all that or even them writing on a tablet back. But if he could hear why are they doing his name?
You don't know what they're doing.
They just gonna be like don't step up speak. They're making signs right. They're not sitting here doing sign language.
Why would?
All right, come on listen listen this right here, okay, let's go to something else.
You.
Got a weird interpretation was he. I do.
Yes.
Yeah, I mean it's just hand gestures. You were just talking to my. When I preach I'm a hand jester and fools. How many people are deaf in your church.
How many people are deaf in your church church.
No one but today I was like.
Zonal versus vertical. Why are you making those hand signals. Somebody has to be deaf in your?
Ask him if he could hear instead of me. We agree with Debbie, okay.
On the show you're off.
No.
Eyes on your side.
Wait Jake just said check the lexicons in to.
On the original Greek for that word same same man. I don't have any. I don't have anything out here with me.
It's as some mention it as a somatic cannot talk range including both mute and deaf so he's saying that the I like causing him to be mute.
Yeah, but the issue is.
Even if even if being made mute could mean both not talk or hear the only part that is Restored that's talked about is a totally different Greek word. Which was his tongue and he caused him to speak it was no longer.
Able to talk. I would learn how to. I would learn how to communicate with people around me. So. Was one of these the sign languages.
What's the next question.
All right. Well, so at the very beginning a guy was asking a question. He asked a lot of questions and we're gonna answer one question and see if anyone else comes up with anything else. And then if no, they don't we'll come back to it.
All right, so Clint he has three At the very beginning. Is the one that you want to tackle? Yes, like four in the beginning. Oh, yes more. Wow. They calm down brother.
According to 1689 federalism is the faith that caused Caleb and Joshua to believe in God's promise to take the land the same faith that we have.
Well faith just means trust so they were trusting That God was going to bring them to that land.
And I'd have to I so to be honest with you I would have to have I would have to have some time to study that exact passage to answer that With a surety. We do know that Hebrews 11 the chapter of faith mentions that several.
Abraham and looking for a land that wasn't theirs.
But not even just that. It says that they quench the power of fire escape the sword were made strong through weakness became mighty Foreign armies to flight. So there's there's mentions of this stuff.
And so I.
Think he's getting that is that the Saving faith and I would say saving faith has to concern the seed for so so if this was in 1689 federalism the faith that makes a person righteous has to do with that promise seed, which is Christ.
It's it. Yes. It's speaking of the land. I'm sure that that you know in the sense that they were trusting God for the land. However, were they trusting God for the seed now, I do believe that they were children of spiritual descendants of Abraham.
Not just physical descendants of Abraham, but I I wouldn't I wouldn't base it off of that.
Promise, so I would say on this and if I'm correct me if I'm wrong, but we will rest of the people. Yeah, obviously.
Let me put that up there real quick so people can see it.
So if the Texas and John, I mean did not that that they came back and they went out to spy out the land. Didn't the other people that were with them or the other people were saying? Hey, wait a minute.
They look too big. They look too much. They were doubting everything but Caleb. Yes.
Believed God.
Yes, my if my memory serves me correctly. Yes, which I think goes back to showing and demonstrating a certain level of saving faith. So I I would err on that saying that they had faith in the seed which caused them to be able to act in bold manners.
Just like we trust God when we go out and do evangelism. Which stems from our faith in Christ, right?
So so. Saying what they were seeing with their human eyes. They were right leaving God to do that. So I would say we're resting at least on God on that as well. Yep.
It's so funny, I so at work sometimes we'll go on calls and it's really funny to see somebody that's new. Try to do a patient assessment on somebody that's deaf because they'll just get louder and loud.
She'll like by the end of they'll be shouting what's your medical history? And the person's like I don't have my earring. It's.
Yeah, there's some pretty funny stories I got with that.
For.
Some reason it's not letting me go further in my comments. If you ask the question ask it again because it's not let me see it.
What?
Do you want me to tell us another Clint one that we can answer? This one's a let me see the Clint.
Why are you on?
Right. Absolutely. I don't know. Oh, here's a good one. Here's a good one. Okay, this is what it says. Why are so many Reform Baptists critical of Christian nationalism when the 1689 confession explicitly supports general equity theonomy.
Because it's speaking of the church the church. Okay, so so we're not saying That the government shouldn't use God's law, right. So in 69 in the Reformed Baptist we hope to the three uses of the law first use then a.
Mirror.
Second use is the curb. Third use is the flashlight the curb. The government should use God's law as a way to curb evil. However, we should not implant Moses, right? That law the Mosaic Covenant was only given to the Israelites.
There's never been a. By that I mean the physical descendants of Abraham. That law According to Galatians chapter 3 and 4 was only until Christ now until someone can exegetically deal with that issue.
It was only until Christ. There really isn't an argument to be made. All of us Gentiles have never been under a Mosaic law. We are under the David. I mean that the Abrahamic Covenant and Abraham Moses and David are all administrations of that covenant of works as they all are a covenant of works.
And God now.
Would also still apply moral law. Would still.
Get. The moral law applies to us. However.
So.
You just threw me off. I'm sorry. Jack leg. Sorry. I don't remember where I was going. My bad, I was going somewhere I I can't remember. I'm about to be 45. So my age is catching up with me. Anyways, when do y 'all want to take up the mantle?
I don't. I don't forgot.
Yeah.
So the 1689 chapter 19 of law of paragraph 4 says to Israeli also gave various judicial laws Which ceased at the same time their nation ended. These laws no longer obligate anyone as part of that institution only their general principles of justice continue to have moral values and so.
What's going on in this chapter is there's the discussion of the moral law that's Transcendent it exists and flows from the nature of God. Then there's the ceremonial and the judicial laws. The ceremonial laws are those laws that help cover the the sin of the people of Israel while the And also had foreshadowing and typology of Christ that it would open up a hole.
We've done shows on this topic before. Judicial law is those governing the people laws? Such as Family kinsmen. Redeemer, right those those kind of laws. There's several laws that are mentioned. You can't eat pork.
You can't have mixed linen. You can't have all these examples of things and a lot of those laws. I would argue the majority of those laws They had a specific purpose that was to protect them as a nation to bring about the promised seed.
And so the confession says that they ended with that nation because that nation produced guess what? The seed what the intended purpose of those laws were which was Christ. That's what Galatians chapter 3 verse 19 says.
The law was added because of transgressions previously committed. Until the seed until the seed that law the law of Moses ceased. So the general equity that we would see in there is that we could look at something like a parapet Wall that was commanded to the people that had flat roofs in those day and say It's probably wise to keep my windows locked and shut so that my neighbor doesn't fall out of my window.
However.
The purpose of these things are different because even in the Old Testament it was so that you wouldn't have bloodshed in the land. So that they could remain in the land if somebody falls out of my window and dies.
Do I get kicked out of the land? No, so so so you have to understand that general equity. I would argue that a theonomist is typically going far too. Too too distant for what the what general equity implies and also Jesus when he uses general equity.
It goes against what they're looking at. So the Bible's Old Testament. I for an eye tooth for tooth. Jesus is general equity for the church. It's turned the other cheek. The Bible says to purge the evil from among you.
General equity for the church. It's that we purge the evil from among the church. Again, we think that the government should use the law. However, we should not be trying to establish a mosaic covenant.
Yes, period and that's it because a lot of people think that theonomy they're wanting to go. But not just back to God's moral law, but they're wanting to go back to the mosaic law. They're wanting to go back to and that's that's that's that's a mishandle.
I would say it's a false gospel and you're in your borderline heretics. It's to take it to that limit. Yeah, and I'm gonna be honest with you. I would not. Will not have any fellowship with people that hold to that strong of a view of it.
I mean like none. Absolutely zero.
Now as far as the whole Christian nationalist part of that question. It just really depends on how you define what a Christian nationalization is.
If.
And everybody has a different definition of it. If we just simply mean a Christian nation is a nation that has a law that is influenced by the moral law with using general equity principles from other laws then.
Okay, that's fine. I can get on board with that. But if we're saying a Christian nation is a nation that puts people to death for Walking around carrying a heavy load on a Saturday the Sabbath.
Yeah, no.
Yeah, just look at the Sabbath. The Sabbath has ended in the sense that. That the Sabbath rest was in Christ our Sabbath rest is in Christ now the the general equity of it that we should have. So so we're looking at to tear should someone work seven days a week.
No, you need a day you need a day of rest. And also the the Sabbath in the Old Testament was never instituted as a day of worship. Ever you will not find it in there that came about during the Maccabean period.
Yeah, so. Like my question is is what are we doing? Are we really taking the Bible serious? Galatians tells us it was only into Christ. Corinthians tells us that that covenant was a ministry of death.
And if you look at Romans chapter 6 and 7 like when Paul's saying the things I want to do I cannot do. There's a good chance that he's speaking about that time of being under that. Oh.
Covenant law, right? We just heard that Jeffrey Johnson had a good sermon on that. Yeah.
So real quick. She's on post this twice and she's been. You know, I think we should at least give a thought to it. He's asking about.
Steve Ross, can I can I go ahead and say it for all of us? Here's my thoughts. I think that. That we probably should hold off on this and in the reason why is because there's not not everything has been brought out.
Let's let's hold off before we put our foot in our mouths and say too much. Yeah, and I.
And also with that, I think we should be praying for him and why is family his wife his family, but also I'm not gonna throw the baby out with the bathwater. Like if I do that, I have to not read anything of David not read anything of Peter.
The stories of Samson like what he did was often if it's true what he did is awful. However. It's seeing him. He doesn't need to be in the pulpit so on and so forth. However, we don't need to throw the baby out the bathwater.
He has a lot of good stuff out there and I.
So and he's and he's probably done more for the kingdom than Everybody put together. Watching this show. Yeah, so.
If I could I think the real problem is is that men should not be idolized. So think about like yes If you have 50 men in a room and then you have a guy like Steve Lawson walk into the room and next thing You know all these men who are chill.
They're calm. They're collective. They see Steve Lawson and They start fanboying over getting into a line to shake his hands. What are the women in that room thinking? The man want to be him. So therefore the women want to be with him.
Like like it's a slippery slope and all it's going to take for for any guy some pretty woman to wink the eye and Motion them over. Men are weak in the same way that we use creeds and confessions to read our Bibles when we travel.
We need to have other men of God with us to be our craze and confessions and our holiness. But I'll get off my high horse.
Do you mind if we have the question by Jesse Killinger on here, okay.
Which one is it? It's just shortly up from the bottom. Is it. Can you discuss chapter 3? Yep.
Okay, Jesse Killinger is a good friend of mine. Sweet good brother in Christ right there. I work with him. So he says can you discuss chapter 3 paragraph 1 and talk about God's relationship with sin. Is God the author of sin.
Why does he allow it if he is indeed sovereign? Does he just allow it for his glory, etc?
That's a great question. Yeah. Yes. So to begin with I would say that this is actually a topic that I don't think people should tread on. But I will give you my response, but I want to hear what these gentlemen say just case they say something crazy.
I'm at the fire.
Yeah, so it says in there. So I'll read the paragraph. It says from all eternity God decreed everything that occurred without reference to anything outside of himself. He did this by the perfectly wise and hosely counsel of his own free will or his own will freely and unchangeable.
Yet God did this in such a way that he is neither the author of sin nor has any fellowship with With any in their sin. This decree does not violate the will of the creature or take away the free working of contingencies of second causes on the contrary.
These are established by God's decree and these. In this God's decree the gods are in this decree God's wisdom is displayed in directing all things and his power and faithfulness are demonstrated in accomplishing his decree.
And so What the second cause in here I'll just I'll preface this in chapter 5 it talks about that the first cause is Is God is God acting God predestinating God causing something to come about? Secondary causes are all those things that happen within that first cause.
And according to the first cause the confession when it says that he's not the author of sin is defining it author of sin as a Meaning that he cannot be held culpable of sin. Culpability is the attributing wrongdoing to somebody.
Now I can attribute to Tom wrongdoing because him and I are both human men, right we both have a Equal level of authority to be able to offer Culpability towards each other with right. However, how many ants have we stepped on today?
How how many bugs have we smashed while driving our car. There is a level of culpability that cannot be extended to something that is greater than the object or the person or the insect right because the insect is not on the same level of Authority as you and I are and the distance between mankind to that of an insect it God is infinitely greater than mankind than mankind is to an insect.
And so the idea of what's going on in there is that we cannot attribute to God's sin. Because he is far greater than those things. He's not the one that does the sin. We're the ones that are doing the sin.
It's still according to his Predestination absolutely because he is the first cause but that's what Roman 9 is dealing with it says. You old man Cannot answer to God. Why have thou made me like this or why have you made me as this?
It's a love it's an issue of culpability since there's nothing like God. There's nothing greater than God. There's nothing that's on the same equal playing field as God. There's no way that we can attribute to God some some wrongdoing that you and I have done.
So good stuff. I would I would go to James 1 13. And it says let no one say when he is tempted that I'm being tempted by God for God Cannot be tempted by evil. And he himself does not tempt anyone and here's the thing.
But each one is tempted when he the person is carried away and enticed by his own lust. Then when lust is conceived he gives birth to sin. It gives birth to sin and when sin is fully matured it brings forth death.
But are y 'all really touching on the question? That's that's my that's my question. Yeah, so because like he's.
Your answer is going to be yeah. And and and and I would agree with the confession that so it depends on the way you handle the word author. Jeff is going to present it as if if we are looking as an author of a story.
And and God is telling a story in his God's story. This is God's story.
God preordains all things like we cannot say that God preordains all things and he's not the author of the story.
But at the same time I Think I think that the words the words that we're using Are are not capable of actually communicating this. Absolutely.
I'm trying to say this is a dangerous way to tread because if we say that he's not the author Then there's something greater than him. That is the author. Right, that's what I that's what I was trying to say, but that's where you get to that Satan is God's devil.
Right, like like if I if I establish rules in my house like God has a law. So so God so so so sin according to 1st John chapter 3 verse 4 Sin evil is breaking God's law. God doesn't necessarily have to create sin.
All he has to do is create the moral law and when we break the moral law those who break it are evil.
So here's where it breaks down. Where. Where does evil the question. And this is another hard one, where does evil come from. What is evil. So when you look at God is holy God is righteous. God is Magnificent and he is good.
Everything about him is good and holy and righteous opposite of evil. So you have God which is good and holy, but the absence of God is His darkness. The absence of God is evil. That's that's where evil is.
So take God out of it and what's left evil? Does that make sense?
Way to put it. So this this is what I'm trying to get out with it. Is God the author of all things? Yes, as long as we're defining author is not something that we can attribute sin to. Paragraph one is talking about that God is not the author in a sense that we can attribute sin to him that we can hold him.
I'm not saying that. That's what you're saying. I know I know I know I'm addressing the question. I'm addressing the question of author of sin. Yeah, that's the reason that that's said in the confession.
Do we think that God is the author of all things. Yeah, but here's the thing if God's the creator of good. All right, what's absent of good? Yeah, so so so if he creates a law which he did the moral law and to break that.
That's what sin is. Sin is lawlessness.
So I would even say that I would even go far as to say that that that his wrath is an extension.
Of.
His love because of who he is. For sure, okay.
I.
Rath is an extension of his love. I just think it's.
Sin, so the question really dive into it and explain it. It's just as dangerous as trying to explain the Trinity are trying to go beyond the scriptures to explain the Trinity, right?
Because we're talking about things that are to.
Words we.
You know, you know Spurgeon talks about us using baby talk that God has to use baby talk to be able to communicate Things to us that are too too great for us to understand. Okay.
This is where I would go with scripture. It has. Does God predestinate sin? Yes, absolutely. He does Acts chapter 2 in Acts chapter 4. It says that he predestined Pilate Herod and all the people in Israel to do whatever his hand had predestined to occur.
Which is talking about the crucifixion of Christ the greatest evil that has taken place. So does Christ predestined sin? Yes, can any of those men that? Crucified Christ hold God culpable of sin. No, no.
Again, and I'm gonna go back to the greatest theologian, even though she's wrong on the on the the Zacharias thing. She says that God for nays for knows in or in for ordains everything including evil, but that God is not.
The.
Efficient cause of easel. Is this where you get your good theology from. Is your wife?
Let me real quick answer your question from this guy that He said he said Jeff, would you not fellowship with theonomist? I never said I wouldn't fellowship with theonomist. What I said was if someone is looking to Implement right to take if someone is looking to reestablish Moses the Mosaic law I Would not have any fellowship with him and by that I'm not saying he's not a Christian.
I'm not saying they're not Christians. I would not do Conferences, they wouldn't be a lot of my pulpit so on and so forth. Listen, I would go.
I will be confident. I'm preaching through the book of Galatians. Trying to establish the Mosaic law amongst sure.
All tells him that that is a false gospel to not call them brothers and to to cast them off cut them off.
Yeah, but but I don't think Doug Wilson is actually doing that. Doug Wilson is not into a general equity theonomy. He's not trying to reestablish Moses, however, they are people out there his his fanboys who are taking it too far.
And and these guys would not be allowed in my pulpit. Nor would I share a stage with them at a conference period right? Yeah. And if they don't like. Let me say what you want around me, you know, I'm saying.
Doug Wilson does not teach that you should go under the Mosaic law. It's just there's there's hypers in every side of the camp. And if there's somebody is trying to establish the Mosaic law, you have a false gospel.
I mean the Bible calls it a covenant of death. We do not need to establish the covenant of death. We are in the covenant of grace. That's right. Right, we meet Christ. Christ is the answer not that nice is the answer.
Let me ask you is how how okay? So so the Bible says that God did not send an angel angels into the world to Subdue it that word there for subdues the Greek word hypotoss. Oh, it means to take control of he did not send warrior Angels into the world to do that.
What did he do? He sent his son. How does his son? Accomplish conquering the world through his death burial and Resurrection that message of what he has done is putting all of his enemies under his feet and the last enemy will be.
Death. And by the way, that's a long gospel distinction for sure.
And I would say Doug Wilson does not have a long gospel distinction and and so I would not share. I would not be in ministry with Doug Wilson. For that purpose him him and I would not share a pulpit together because he does not have a long gospel distinction.
I don't know if what's his name does but he's passed away. So we ain't gotta worry about that. What's the other question. Let's find one.
What else you guys got I.
Would just I want to I want to just go back and just say this real fast because I didn't get to finish my thought on on chapter 3 paragraph 1. Anybody that says that God doesn't predestine all things aka doesn't predestine sin.
Does God know all things. Does know God knows all things so he knows all things. So he knows the sin that's gonna happen. Does God stop the sin from happening? So he knows the sins gonna happen and he doesn't stop the sin from happening.
You still don't have an a solution to the issue of sin in the world If you say that God didn't predestine all things. What we are doing is saying that the scripture that makes it very clear that God does predestinate all things.
That's our basis. We need to leave our emotions outside the door and just acknowledge the fact God.
Predetermined the worst sin to ever take place and that is the death of this son.
That's right.
And what we doing. And it was good, yeah, it was it pleased the Lord to crush him.
It's coming in good somebody. Somebody asked how my beard was coming in. I just let them know. It's coming in good. It's very spotty.
Someone was asking a question about trans Bible translations and I can't find it.
Yeah, I said, so why do.
Everybody knows the best Bible translation is the ESV.
Paul wrote his letters. There it is. It's Fred. He was asking question my question. Oh, yeah, here it is. You think having multiple English translations causes a lot of confusion? Especially because these translations take away the very important doctrines.
He must be. Are you okay. I Can't find what you said, but this question says. My question is what makes you guys not stick with one translation, right? I think the ESV now. I do have other translations that I refer to but I preach and read from the ESV.
English languages.
Yeah, so here's what here's where you were reading, right? Is this what you were reading? Yeah, Mike. Yes.
My question is I don't you think that multiple English translate. Actually. No, I think it actually helps. Every English translation is is 100 accurate. There are there are other. There there are things that we can find the LSB that are more accurate than the ESV.
There are things in the ESV accurate in the LSB.
And if you're particularly just speaking of the KJV. Like when you put that with the Greek, I think it's a good translation. It's very archaic I don't. I don't really understand it. However. Whenever you put it to the Greek like it messes.
Oh, there's a lot that it messes. I mean just in you know, like it. So in Isaiah chapter. Isaiah chapter 14 verse 12 it calls it says Oh Lucifer how you have fallen. Well, the context is speaking of King Nebuchadnezzar.
Like that is not talking about Satan fallen. It's speaking about King Nebuchadnezzar and you read about his fall and Daniel chapter 4. That's right. I just read the context.
She loves the King James Bible and I know she loves the king. But I'm telling you there are more problems with the King James the Bible. Then there are the ESV the NASB and the LSB.
But so so there there's several several arguments for it. There's the manuscript arguments that you can make for not only that English like every language. Changes over time and so in a hundred years from now, there's going to be need to be a new updated ESV.
There's gonna be a need to be a new updated LSB.
Why?
Because our English words don't mean the same thing in a hundred years from now than what they do to you and I today.
Yeah, just take the word words.
Right. So so perfect example the word gay. I've heard Jeff say I'm gay and he's meaning that he's. I've heard him say it. But no seriously, so so but this is the issue so in the King James Version There's these Mark Ward is his name not or yeah, no Mark Ward.
He has a great book out there and he talks about the King James Version and the need the need to go to a modern translation because there's these. What are they called? What does he call him in the book?
I cannot remember. They are words that have had minor changes in English definitions that when you and I read we don't think that changed. We don't think that the words have changed and so then therefore we read it with a modern lens and then it Gives us a different doctrine than what it was first originally written as in the 1600s and that's just how English that's just how Language works like this.
That's just the way it is.
There's.
Why do we have a Greek Septuagint?
Okay, great point right. So you asked me. I think my Old Testament should be translated from the Greek Septuagint. So that's what I'm not asking you that.
If we have an English translation from the 1600s do you and I talk like Shakespeare. So we need a modern translation to be able to read the text in a modern context.
All right, so let's go to Matt's question about six-month-old.
Do y 'all believe the six-month-olds at your church are a part of the local body? If not, do you say y 'all are their pastor? Or are you only their past the parents pastor?
All right. So first of all Matt you started going back to a Baptist Church boy. You need to be consistent with your life.
You ain't a true presby. Start being gay.
Are a part of your local church, so.
Yeah, so here's the here's the thing here's the thing. Our six-month-old the infant that was just born so Jake a member of our church. They have an infant. I'm not I'm not exactly sure how many like like weeks like like infant infant, right and and and and the pastors of our church are that child's pastor because we are.
Because Jake is a member of the church. Jake is that child's federal head in the home. Yes, and so by virtue of being Jake's child, I am I am pastor. Cal is that child's pastor? However, they are not members of the church.
It just goes back this is what it is.
It.
Goes back to the invisible church versus the visible church. We have people in our church right now that are a part of our visible church that ultimately might not be a part of the universal.
Church.
Well, the question is this is should a six-month-old Be considered a member of the even the universal church. No, no.
Yeah, I mean should we still our kids baptism. That's a really good question answer. No, right. You have to be born in order to receive the sign of the Covenant. You know what we believe about this. Yeah, so what is you got my Baptist Church?
So it's chill out. I Love Matt.
So here's a question though, because here let's say because here's where he's going. Let's go with this. A 14 year old boy. Comes to saving faith. You know it has a good articulation of the gospel. Would you allow that?
14 year old boy to be a member of your local body. Even though he is we would believe that he has saving faith and in the universal church.
Would you allow him to be a member of your local body? No, and here's why here's why here's why I would baptize him. And he would be able to partake and we would minister to him fully just like we would all the other men.
But but but here's why if that 14 year old boy when he turned 16 and his hormones start to rage And he goes out and does some dumb stuff if we try to Execute church discipline on him then it's going to be you know, the parents are going to be hot about it.
And so what I see is that the doors Hold on the discipline. The discipline needs to come from the parents In that situation because we don't want to overstep our boundary in that but once that child turns 18 and they join the church We tell the parents to keep their mouth out of it.
What's your thoughts on that Brady? I would say both end.
Absolutely. Church discipline when it comes to minors should not be happening from the pastor to the minor. But it should be a conversation that happens with the pastor the parents and the minor. Yeah.
That is. It will be going through the parents. It would not be us calling them in there without like, you know separated from the parents.
I I hear what you're saying, but I want to answer on this. Would you allow a 14 year old boy Credible profession of faith baptized to take communion all that stuff. Would you allow that young man to be a member of your local church?
Not I.
Know I know Jeff's answer. What's yours? Yeah, so.
It court it's according to whatever bylaws of a church would say. So it I Think there's arguments to be made on both sides of the aisle. But if I and I'm not I'm not I wouldn't die upon any of those heels if that makes sense.
I because let me explain what I'm saying with this. 18 is Arbitrary number that we in the United States have come up with being able that you can vote for a president and therefore now it's Influenced how the church is supposed to operate and vote.
That's garbage period. I'm just saying that that's how most churches bylaws have come about.
I'm not looking at. You got a Cali clicker over there. Yes.
No, so that's a really good point though, so and I hear what you're saying to you but so so what is the what is the deciding factor. What is there an age limit that a person who's making a credible Profession of faith that you guys truly honestly believe that is articulated the gospel.
Witness fruit of a changed life. You don't have to witness fruit of a changed life. I don't know where you get that in Scripture.
I'm asking I'm saying that everything that you can see about this guy as a covenant member of Christ.
Should they not be a member of the local body and they receive all they receive all the benefits of a member. They receive every benefit of the member outside of voting whenever they turn whenever they turn an adult and.
Voting so this goes back biblical thing in the church. Should be an elder led thing. And so if a church is elder led and the members shouldn't be voting except for maybe very very minor things within the church.
Well, that's what we have it at our church.
Most churches today. Operate. Hey, we need to change the carpet. What's your vote? Hey, we need to know we don't do animals. What's your vote? Hey, the pastor's gonna preach in a new book. What's your vote?
No, we don't.
Garbage.
Now that being said though if that is what membership is is that it gives you a vote.
Then okay.
I could see the argument to say that then it's probably fitting within our nation to be consistent within our nation and say 18 is What we need for a member of a voting member, but like Jeff said if a 12 year old comes to faith in Christ They can be a member in every sense of being able to partake in the table baptism.
All those things that we'd see within the church counseling everything that. Because they're still under the federal head of their of their parents. And so we would treat them as members. However, they wouldn't officially be on the membership row until they themselves turned of age and Applied for membership, that's a good argument there as far as so.
So I think it's a.
If the child is under the authority of the apparent if they are dependent on their parent. If they're if their father is still their federal head because they're not on their own then then they don't.
They would not count as a. They would state they would stay under the federal head of their their their parent. No, I agree.
Absolutely. Yep.
Would you say okay. Matt's asking another question. Do you say you were the pastor of the children or the infant?
I just answered that question because of the the authority of that part that that person's parent so if the parent is a member of our church, we would treat that child and as a member being On the benefactory of the parents.
So, however, you would pastor that child, you know pastor take care of nurture Counsel, whatever that child needs we would be there for them. However, they wouldn't be on the row as an active member not until they were of age to apply for membership, right?
Good answer. All right. Let's go to somebody else Matt. You get on my nerves, bro. People coming brother. I just mess them. All right. Y 'all see anything else.
Brandon Barak.
Imagine the membership. Yes, they could call us pastor.
Brandon Barak, can you guys know the other father?
This is good. So where's that Barak?
Can you guys elaborate? From an all-male perspective on 1st Corinthians 15 that Jeff quoted earlier. He must reign until he has put all his enemies under his feet. Last enemy to destroy to be destroyed is death.
Elaborate from an all-male perspective.
You just quoted the text. That's the all-male perspective. That's all male man. You read the Bible. Come on over. The water is good over here.
So all male so so all male and post male would say this. Premal doesn't say this. But all male and post we'll say that at the second coming of Christ there is no more sin. There is no more death all of creation is renewed back into a state that was like prior to the fall of Adam and so There's no sin.
And so therefore there's no death. However premillennialism Especially that of dispensational premillennialism says that people are still having kids having being married. Sin is still taking place. Creation is still groaning for the revealing of the Son of Man, right.
Because there's still sin and therefore there's still death. That's taking place, which is a huge issue because it says that when Christ comes Death is put away. There is no more death and there's a new song that says Oh death.
Where's your sting? Oh death, where's your victory that we are singing? And so Premillennialism does not fit within first Corinthians 15. So you have to ask yourself also.
Why is sin and death done away with how well first you have to say well, how does sin and death enter into the world? Romans chapter 5 verse 12 through one man's sin. Death and sin entered into the world right?
And so and so what Christ is doing as our last Adam he is he is he he kept the law that Adam could not keep and and so as as we. So the covenant of redemption the father purpose to save a people the son comes in time.
Accomplishes the purpose to his life. Death burial and resurrection. The Holy Spirit applies that purpose. That the purpose of the father saving that people through the message of what was done for us by Christ.
All right, and so and so and so as this as this Message is being spread people are coming to Christ. He is putting all of his enemies under his feet. I was an enemy of God. I was footstool. These gentlemen were to if you're a Christian you were an enemy you were footstool.
The last enemy to be footstooled is death. And so if there is no more death, that means there is no more sin because the wages of sin is death. That's right. So this means that God that that God through Christ and the Holy Spirit through this message that's been spread has in fact placed all of his enemies under his feet.
And that'll take place at the resurrection of the dead, right?
So the backtrack. I love you and I'm gonna say the exact same thing you guys basically said but in just in a different way. You contrast this age on this side of heaven before before Christ comes back.
There is sin and suffering age to come. No sin and no suffering this age. It's corruptible bodies age to come. Glorified bodies. Perishable gives way to air in pair or imperishable. Corruptible gives way to incorruptible mortality.
A lot of death gives way to Immortality. Eternal things. Temporal things give away to eternal things. Well, that's the omnipotent perspective. Simple. It's right there. So in other words when. So I'm the pre-milk.
Melissa Owens. Listen up here in the pre-meal dispensational.
Don't be calling her out like that.
No, seriously in all seriousness with Considering that that that mortality gives way to immortality that your your corruptible body gives way to glorified Bodies, okay. In the pre-meal in the pre-meal Dispensational system you guys are going to be coming back to a millennial kingdom Where there's still sin where there's still people living having sex next door to you being tempted by sins where things Die and and you're gonna be living in your glorified bodies next to people in their natural bodies.
It's an absolute Impossibility Happen it cannot happen.
She's now a mill and 1689. I told her she knows to our conference. We're gonna all Miller to death. She'll leave our conference at 16 and I'm federalist.
So this is so I tell you this brothers flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God nor does the perishable inherit the imperishable. This is the reason I'm not post mill. They're trying to make the the kingdom of God something that you can walk and see today.
This text is Currently. Behold, I tell you a mystery we shall not all sleep but we shall be changed in a moment and in the twinkling of an Eye at the last trumpet for the trumpet will sound and the dead will be raised imperishable and we will be changed.
So this is the resurrection.
The perishable body must put on the imperishable and this mortal body must put on Immortality. When the perishable puts on the imperishable and the mortal puts on immortality. Then shall come to pass the same.
So pause there this happens when the resurrection happens. Mm-hmm. Death is swallowed up in victory. Oh death. Where is your sting? Oh death. Where or where is your victory death? Where is your victory?
Oh death? Where is your sting? Death can't happen anymore because the resurrection has happened. Right doesn't exist that does not work. This text does not work in pre-millennialism. It does not at all.
Yeah, and that and that's coming straight from the scriptures. Not only that you you look at a when when When we have our corrupt when we have our glorified bodies and we are in the new heaven generated are on the other side.
It's not a kingdom. It's Eternity is on the other side, right? It's not Pre-millennialism and the Millennial Kingdom has a time stamp on it if you believe in the literal thousand years. That's gonna end.
Well, where's eternity you have glorified bodies and then that's gonna end.
There's no time stamp on eternity. You would have to insert a. That's why it's called the gap theory. Is that what it's called in pre-millennialism? You have to insert a gap into this text. You have to put in the parentheses here in the text saying that the Resurrection takes place and then there's a gap with another resurrection at the end of that because people were dying in that period.
Then death.
So the parentheses was originally added in Daniel chapter 2 and with the statue and then it Translates over to Daniel chapter 9 and I would argue that in Daniel chapter 9 The the person that they're calling Antichrist is Christ.
So all these pre-millennial dispensational preachers who preach from Daniel chapter 9 They're calling Christ Antichrist, which is very very dangerous and very very concerning and so I would personally run from this position.
And it just doesn't hold water the 70 weeks end it and 8034. No, I don't problem. No. Yeah. Yep, right around 80 34 80 35 so yeah, no 80 34 because I believe Christ was crucified in 80 30 and Then 80 34 would have been the end of the 70 weeks and that's where we see Peter going to Cornelius.
Proclaiming the gospel. The Gentiles are brought in so on and so forth. Paul. Paul is saved. Commissioned to the Gentiles. Yeah, but but we probably should do a show to where we actually walk through that parentheses.
Concerning Daniel chapter 2 and Daniel chapter 9. We don't have time to really do it tonight, so next question. Y 'all help me look for one. Okay, we got more comments than questions.
Questions guys. What size gloves does Braden wear? No you guys mediums?
Baby babies.
Do you know what another word for me? Average their average hands. So you guys have to go to.
These only has a thumb and it has like the one cover.
Hey, these mittens can throw paws dog. I'm coming after you. Hey, that's another word for average I'm okay with it.
Melissa.
Any solid advice so Ashley Renee and s. Any solid advice for a Christian couple about to enter into marriage? Thanks. Yeah, I got it I got it, and I'm not even a biblical counselor.
Jeff's gonna interrupt you so.
You want to go first. Go first? No go ahead. I mean I've been doing a lot of marriage counseling so.
I just got so mine's gonna be based off of a marriage conference that I just My wife and I just went to and it was by dr. Street. He's a he's a biblical counselor through a CBC out of the master seminary Qualified guy really was a good conference.
And he said so if you're gonna be looking for a wife if you're looking for a spouse. But the number one thing that we should be looking for is not not through human eyes. Not what the world says to look for a spouse as not for necessarily passion or Attraction physically which which you still need those things, but the most important thing would be to look for a wife that That her number one goal is to live holy for the Lord and that she's gonna help you Live holy for the Lord that the number one thing that we should be doing for each other is Pointing each other to Christ in our daily life and that and that and that would be the the number one thing that I want to live a pleasing Pleasing life to my my Savior and I need my wife To help me live that way and I need to point my wife and present her holy unto Christ.
That's my role as a husband to her to love her and to point her to live a holy life towards Christ beat that.
Yeah, I would also just add that that in marriage we have to remember the curse we live in a a Curse world a fallen world and in this cursed world. So the one that the curse that the woman was that was pronounced on a woman was that she would With bill pain and childbearing, right?
And so this is not only whenever you're having Having the baby but also in your cycles that you your monthly cycles these cramps these headaches that you're Experiencing all of that is from the curse, right?
But also something else that's given to the woman in the curse is that she's she's she desires to be the man, right and so a Woman has to whenever she enters into marriage she has to understand that there's going to be times where she's desiring the position of her husband and She needs to put herself in check and times like that and the husband when all this is happening.
The husband also has to remember that she is the weaker vessel. And so we we constantly have to give one another grace. And so like when my wife starts tripping and trying to be the man, I have to tell her listen this is my role as The man.
But also as I'm Correcting her. I also have to remember to give her grace. And vice versa any time that the you know, like the Bible calls the man to do something that's that's counterintuitive to himself and that is to love his wife as Christ loved the church and the Woman is having to do something counterintuitive to what she stands and that is to honor respect and submit.
It's easy for guys to honor respect and submit right whenever we're around other men. It's easy for me to respect other men because like that's just kind of like the life that we live. Especially like I'm an ex-game banger and as a game banger we had total respect for our homies.
Right love on the other hand was harder for. Especially to express like you can love someone but to actually express this love and so a man has to remember the curse as well. And he has to hurt like like like purposely Show affection to his wife to love her.
And I would also say whenever he's not doing these things the woman needs to remember the curse. Correct her husband and also be gracious Because we're told to do something that's counterintuitive to our nature.
Amen, good stuff Jeff. So somebody else asks are you guys pro-life or abolitionist.
Well, it depends on what you mean by abolitionist. Because I've heard some some some Things that I wouldn't I would be I want right now.
So I would so my definition would be an abolition that I believe in 100 the abolition of murder against any any unborn Baby that life begins at conception and I believe in equal justice that That women should be held accountable for getting a boyfriend an abortion.
They they should be. They should be charged with the crime of murder That so yeah, I'm not an incrementalist I think that murder in the womb is wrong.
Stop. What do y 'all think about this? Oh, go ahead. Go ahead bright. I'm sorry, Brayden.
The the con the question are you pro-life or abolitionist. I think it's really a question of are you an incrementalist or an abolitionist. The. I've been seeing a lot of things. Recently, I just watched a debate today on this and.
The abolitionist would say that if a Christian ever voted for a heartbeat bill you are sinning against God. That's the argument that's being made by the abolitionist if that's the only bill that's being voted on and if you vote Yes for that.
You are sinning against God. It would be better for you to say no to that bill on the premise that you're saying great. You think it's sin to say no to that. You're.
You're right.
So by you. So this goes back to this. So by you know, no, no, no. If you said no to it, that means that babies in the eighth month are getting murdered tomorrow.
For sure. Are you okay with that? I'm not okay with any of it.
The one.
Virgin said Spurgeon.
I can't go and and tell Spurgeon. What's up?
So well, I could you could tell me. That's fine Spurgeon said. If the choice is between two evils choose neither.
Yeah, he was wrong.
Stronger evil wins. I disagree with you guys. I mean, well, I'm here's the thing. I disagree with you crises everything you Disagree. Christ sees everything and you guys are gonna go vote on a on a bill that says.
Says go ahead. I'm not voting for that bill.
Listen, I if that if that was on the docket and I voted yes for it. It means that tomorrow a six-month-old baby in the womb can't die. I'm probably gonna say yes to it. Is there anything that's gonna say the six-month-old baby tomorrow?
What about the rest that are gonna that your approval?
Okay, so then you vote no for it because you don't want to sin against God, but then the six-month-old baby dies tomorrow.
It's all gonna happen so that. No, it's not. Not if you say yes.
As lying a sin like if someone tells a lie is that a sin it's a sin against God. Yes. Well God blessed the ladies. And in Exodus. Yeah in Exodus the The midwives who lied about Moses I'm just saying I'm just saying it's a lie.
All right, it's it's breaking God's law. But they but they lied in order to save the life of a child Moses.
So so let me ask you this. Would Jesus do that? Would Christ the author of life. Vote for that. If you guys can say yes, you guys do what you guys need to do. I'm saying no.
Well, it's it's not see. So here's the problem you're saying that you know to.
Hurt one of these little ones. I would put a millstone around his neck and drown him. You're saying that you would vote no to a bill that could save a six-month-old baby. Oh, I'm saying that I would vote.
You just said no our abortion on on any age listen.
This is this is where I think the abolitionists and the incrementalists are talking past each other. Both groups want the end of abortion. Today, right? Okay. So but this is both are saying today. I'm not saying I'm picking the heartbeat.
Land that we're gonna be taking. Absolutely. Yeah, if we're talking about a piece of land I'm gonna take a little bit here and a little bit here and I'm gonna gain that ground. But that's not what we're talking about.
We are talking about life.
We're talking yeah, and if you vote the wrong way all babies most.
Here's the results. Here's what the results. What's been happening with the the pro-life bills right now is that people are going outside. Outside of those means to still abort their babies. To still abort their babies.
It's just not being recorded because there's no facility to go do it. They're doing it on their own. That's the way.
Happen murder should happen in the dark alleys. Absolutely. I'm saying that they shouldn't be doing it, but we shouldn't be promoting it for the six-month-old.
Next week we would disagree.
Listen, if I see an abolitionist bill or a heartbeat bill, I'm gonna pick the abolitionist bill every time.
But if I just have the option of doing a heartbeat bill I must do the heartbeat bill because that saves the baby tomorrow. That's six months old in the bit in the womb. Yeah, that's not say it's sinful to the Christian for voting yes to it.
That's wrong that is. That is allowing somebody to harm a baby tomorrow.
If you allow Kamala Kamala, however Trump says it right in like a no vote. Listen, I've never said this now. I really try to stay out of political things. I guess however, okay I am saying at this time if you do not vote for Trump, you are voting for Kamala.
Okay, let me ask you let me ask you guys this and then you guys you guys come back legitimate question if the standard if the standard for the reason why you guys are not voting for Kamala and not voting for Abortion because in the third trimester if if the standard that you're going by is what scripture says about murdering a baby.
And you guys are gonna say absolutely not. We're not gonna vote for Kamala. Kamala based on that on that standard. Okay, the only difference is that you guys are arguing about is an age in which you should be able to murder a baby.
Yes, I don't think any. I don't think it's right to murder at any time. Oh that same standard.
By the same Biblical standard. How do you say that? It's okay to do it at at at at a heartbeat as long as we don't.
I'm not saying that's okay. Listen, don't put words in my mouth I said. If an abolitionist bill and a heartbeat bill were right before me, I would say yes to the abolitionist.
Right now. If I only have the option the way you're presenting the way he's presenting it's like what do you want to be stabbed to death or to be shot. Both of them are wrong, but I would rather. But if I had to make a choice, I will make a choice and the one that's gonna hurt me.
The less would be to shoot me right. Shoot me in the head.
Trump's bill is better than Kamala's bill. It's a better bill. There's no doubt about it. Strategy-wise and everything.
But but here's the thing. It's it's still not abolition and I cannot I cannot.
I won't. I want it to stop today. I don't think killing anybody. I know you.
This this goes back to the definitions of a Christian nationalist if we're saying an abolitionist is somebody that wants to stop all abortion today. Then I am unequivocally an abolitionist, but if I'm going to assign sin to a heart thought.
Issue that is a very difficult issue to somebody when they're trying to make the best decision to promote life.
I'm not an abolitionist. Yeah, so you're you're. Let's go to a different question. All right, Patty asked. What do y 'all think about the lost books and the Bible's what the lost books of the Bible series?
What do y 'all I don't know what that's speaking of. Yeah, y 'all know what that's speaking of. I don't see it. Hold on.
By the way, I got another saying that that I'm a stick with Doug Wilson on this. He's an ink. He doesn't go all the way on the abolitionist up. So yeah, I disagree. Yeah.
You're voting for Kamala. Now for this one Patty. I. I Don't know. I I haven't looked into that.
I think that's the the but it's a book that talks about the Apocrypha and the book like the gospel of Judas and the gospel of this and the gospel. Okay.
Yeah, so I believe the 66 books in the Bible is what is authoritative there. There are some Of the books that I would say are That we can use for history, but they're not authoritative but but some of those books that they're talking about are actually garbage.
Just see the book. Hey, do we have a Jehovah's Witness on here William Graves?
God.
Huh, I think so. Are you Jehovah's Witness William Graves? Repent, bro Jesus.
Can't beat God. What is that? Hey William who was on the throne in Isaiah chapter 6. And I want to ask yourself Is there anyone greater than the God that is on the throne in Isaiah 6. And the answer is no.
The God on the throne high and lifted up with seraphims around him hiding their selves reminding each other how holy holy holy He is. What you would say is Jehovah would say is Yahweh. John chapter 12 says it's Jesus that's right.
Philippians chapter 2 says that God He he exalted Christ so that his name would be above every other name name. So What are you gonna do with that.
Jesus is God and we don't allow heretics on this.
Huh, yeah. Yeah, William Graves reprint, bro. Jesus is God. Listen if Jesus is not God. He doesn't qualify to. To matter of fact, he's not qualified to die on the cross to pay for our sins. Oh, you're gone.
Anyway, so somebody booted him Demi.
If Jesus is not the one and only God, yeah, then Then he couldn't forgive sins. We couldn't.
Because.
Forgiveness means that the person who was wronged is the one that's forgiving. Is the one that's doing the atoning. That's the one that's letting you go free. If if Jesus is not God, there's.
Brother you barely make it. Okay. Okay, let's see. Any questions, you know the least. Are y 'all enjoying y 'all selves. Speaking to the audience. I know I'm not Eternal supporters do we.
Hmm is.
Okay. So so the question you're asking is is is Jesus eternally subordinate to the Father? So anyone.
Okay, so so let me lay out a biblical concept of the Trinity one God. Three persons one being okay. So so so so RC Spro I don't know I don't know who got who he got this from but this is what I use. RC Spro says that they're the one.
What. And. The three who's the one what is the being of God God? Right, there's only one God the three who's are the three persons and each person.
Is.
The one being All right, and there is no Hierarchy meaning there is no alpha God. There is no alpha member of the one being now now they are Positionally father son and Holy Spirit, but concerning deity.
Concerning deity. There is no hierarchy when Jesus was on earth in the flesh. He he the father was greater in position because he was in heaven on on the throne but once Christ Resurrected went back to the father.
He's not greater. All right. Good question.
Yeah, what is it in John. Glorified me with the glory that I had with you before the foundation of the world. Is that the quotation? It's from John I can't remember.
Yeah, John 17 John 17.
The father didn't become incarnate. The father did not get made underneath the law Jesus the son did.
Mm-hmm. So like I just got done preaching through Jesus washing feet. All right, so you had the master the there there there their leader Step so during supper he steps down from his position as leader wraps himself in a towel and Begins to wash the feet of his servants and at the moment of him washing the feet of his servants He is putting himself as a lesser position because because this was a position for slaves, right?
And immediately once he's done he goes back to his position. He takes off the towel. And you know, he he unwraps himself in a towel. He puts back on his garments. That's how it took place. So Jesus enthroned in heaven.
Isaiah chapter 6 the angels are surrounding him. They're hiding themselves. They're calling to another how holy he is. Jesus steps down from the throne. He takes off his his royal garments and he becomes humanity.
Right, and when he does that he steps down from his position and so in his position the father is greater. But once he puts he takes off humanity right in the resurrection in the sins. He goes back to his rightful position and the father is not greater.
Well, he still keeps his humanity. First yeah, but it's a resurrected humanity. Yes.
Permanent two natures.
Absolutely hundred percent. However in Deity as in Deity. They are just one God. There is no there is no alpha God, right? Like you're the same with alpha male where people try to outman one another. I can't stand alpha males.
All right. We are all equal. That's wrong. And and that's how it is in the Godhead there is no alpha person.
Oh God, so the reason why Christ came right if we're gonna hold to baptist covenant theologies is because we needed a Mediator. We needed a new covenant head. The first covenant head failed. We needed a new covenant head.
And so Christ Humbled himself became a man. God became a man to live as a man to die as a man for men. So that's that's it. But but he is God and he is on his throne and he is not eternally subordinate to the father.
Favorite term of covenant between Christ.
What's y 'all's favorite term for the covenant between Christ and the father in Psalm 2. The covenant of peace, but I use the covenant of redemption. I believe that this. So I believe that the covenant of redemption is a blood covenant.
And I also would say that it is an extension of the covenant of grace. In doing so he accomplishes the covenant of grace the father. Purpose. I said this earlier. The father purposes to save a people.
Speaking of redemption. This is election for all my Calvinist out there. He sends his son to accomplish the purpose. What was the purpose to save a people? He he accomplishes it through his death burial life death burial and Resurrection.
The Holy Spirit applies that purpose this purpose of saving the people. Through the message. And you and I who are filled with the Holy Spirit are to preach the gospel. The gospel is God's power for salvation.
When we preach the gospel the Holy Spirit applies That purpose to those whom the father chose to save.
Absolutely, and we could read you could read that in Ephesians chapter 1 if you want to. If you guys need the text. Ephesians chapter 1. Just as he chose us in him before the foundate. Well, let's go back to chapter verse 3.
Blessed be the God and father of our Lord Jesus Christ who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ just as he Chose us the father just as he chose us in him the son or in him the son Before the foundation of the world that we would be holy and blameless before him.
We love by predestined us to adoption as sons through Christ through Jesus Christ. To himself according to the good pleasure of his will. The praise be the glory of his grace and his graciously bestowed on the Beloved in him.
We have redemption through his blood the forgiveness of our transgressions according to the riches of his grace. He can't continue on there and he talks about what the Holy Spirit is has done as well as by by drawing us and sealing us knowledge.
This understood in eschatology in the light of Trinity 1st Corinthians 15 27 28.
For God has put all things in subjection under his feet. But when he says all things are put in subjection as his plane that he is expected. Who put all things in subjection under him when all things are subject to him then the son himself? Will also be subjected to him who put all things in subjection under him that God may be all in all speaking of the resurrection.
And so this is the question is How's this understood in eschatology in light of the Trinity. I Think the the when Paul is saying God there. He's talking about the father. We see from several passages in the New Testament that the second coming is is the equivalent of marriage language and Traditionally in that day of the true Jewish tradition the father is the one that got to decide the wedding date the wedding day and the things that happen on it and so.
When Christ is going to come again after all things have been put underneath his feet Then Christ will be subject to him the father and will come again to meet his bride. That's the way I would answer it eschatologically.
Yeah, that sounds right. So I want to ask a question to see what y 'all think about this. What do y 'all because Braden? I know that you Have a Mormon background. What's your thoughts on? Baptizing for the dead.
What do you think that speaking of? Yeah, so I. I am a holder of the Aaronic priesthood and.
The bishop gives me the right to be able to go in and baptize in behalf of somebody that has passed away.
No, it says verse 29.
Otherwise, what do people mean by being baptized on behalf of the dead if the dead are not raised at all? Why are people baptized on their behalf? Why are we in danger every hour? I protest brother my pride in you which I have in Christ Jesus our Lord.
I die every day. What do I gain if humanly speaking fought with beasts at Ephesus if the dead are not raised? Let us eat and drink for tomorrow. We die. Do not be deceived. Bad company ruins good morals.
Wake up from your drunken stupor as is right and do not go on sitting for some have not have no knowledge of God. I say this to your shame. Is that the the portion of text that you're referring to at the baptism of the dead?
I've heard it. I've heard a lot of different arguments for it. I've heard that Near Corinth. There was a pagan religion that taught Baptizing on behalf of somebody that has died. I've also heard that people were being baptized in the name of dead gods or dead deity.
There's a lot of different answers that I've heard To this text and a lot of it has to do with cultural premise of what was going on around the Church of Corinth in that day, which seems to make sense because he says Wake up from your drunken stupor as is right and do not go on sitting for some have no knowledge of God.
I say this to your shame. So he's talking about people that are in that community people around the church people that are in the church that are influencing the way They're acting regarding baptism within the church.
Well, I would say that you and I were baptized into the death of someone.
Right.
Like when we're baptized. We're baptized into the death burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ. All right. So let's look at so there's two questions. I think that we need to answer. Sam has a question and I also want to answer Melissa's question.
Real quick. So let's look. So Sam's a little more tougher. So let's look at Melissa's real quick. She says off-topic. Curious as to your thoughts on head covering for women. My wife covers her head. We come to this agreement at the same time and then it wasn't long ago.
She kind of fell off and didn't think that she should have to cover and I said no.
You're covering and.
So here so here's the thing without getting too much into it. It says that a man should not cover. I'm going bald. I wish I could wear my hat. The scripture says not to cover so I take off my hat. It says that a woman should cover so I.
And so my wife being in submission to me. I make her cover. However, I do not make Men that come to my church take off their hat nor do I make a woman cover? That's up to their own conviction but my wife covers.
And I take off my hat in church.
So. So my wife does not cover.
Although.
Cover, although I I think that she should. But I've left it up to her conscience that if she if it's her conscience that she is sinning by not covering. So I'm I leave it totally up to her. I also look at it.
It is a matter of conscience.
So also looking like this if I can obey this if I can't obey the small things. How am I going to obey the bigger things? And so when I see something when I see something very simple like man should not cover I say That's simple enough.
So when I go to church, I don't cover right? All right, and so I'm trying to train myself in The small things so that when the big things come I have all these small. So it's like when you lift in weights, right if you're gonna start lifting weights.
You don't want to start out heavy you want to start out light and you work your way up to the heavier weights right and and the Bible has Some some pretty hard positive commands for us to do such as evangelism.
Evangelism is a is a big command. This is flesh-eating. It's really hard to do. I do those things however, I think in the reason why I'm able to obey these harder commands is because I obey the Smaller commands as well such as when I enter into church.
I'd take off my hat. I.
Would agree with you. I like the answer I do. Leave it up to my wife.
She's gonna have to answer to her Savior, yeah, but the way I rated it should be up to you I.
Agree, but If she says she's not gonna cover I can't I can't force her so. You know I'm saying I Can't. But I I do I do I do think that she should cover.
Now real quick. Let's get to Sam's question.
So federal vision is basically faith plus works. Good it's it's it's. It's convoluting both justification and sanctification together in a way. It's it's that your your. Your federal vision is saying that you're you're justified by faith and your works as well, and yeah, it's conflating the.
Antithetical to the long gospel distinction. Yeah, yeah.
Like this is a lot of what Catholics the Catholics can fate complete. Justification and sanctification. Let's see.
Let me see everything. For some reason. Should reform Baptist. Smoke cigars.
Absolutely, what's that on there? No, I just.
Know Melissa, I'm just curious. What do you do? Do you cover never really understood that?
Does it take from just back to Genesis chapter 6. So? I have a different interpretation of Genesis chapter 6.
Wait.
And I think that's a big topic if we get into that we're going to be arguing about Genesis chapter 6. And I think that we should argue about it, but I don't think we have enough time to argue about it tonight.
Let's put that on pause. Genesis 6. What's the question on Genesis 6?
Because because like who are the angels. Right because it says God saw the daughters of men and saw they were beautiful and took them to be their wife I would say that the sons of God are not the sons of Seth that they are actual angels who took the form of men and Had had sex with with earthly women and and their children were the sons of renowned not the Nephilim.
The Nephilim are not the sons of renowned. The Nephilim could be Bigfoot. I don't know.
Know when you read It's a first Peter second Peter it touches on it and also Jew touches on those angels that were that were disobedient. And that in Genesis chapter 6 is the only place that I can truly find in Scripture where it speaks about disobedient angels.
But if you want to argue about that, we got to do that another time.
Somewhat holds of that position that that had covering was a cultural distinction. Yes. Yeah, I don't. I would I would say it was a creation.
Creation mandate. I hold to it as a cultural thing. Yeah, most people I would say most people today do.
Absolutely, yeah, I. I don't I don't make my wife cover. I think her long hair is the covering.
No, but if you follow the text, it's not you follow the text. It's not the covering.
Yeah, that would be my wife's position, right?
Sweet. I'll be willing to have a debate on this. Just like the Genesis 6 passage, I'd be willing to have a debate on that as well.
I I am I am not fully convinced one way or another if it's if it's angels or if it's talking about Kings.
So Melissa you you attend a Reformed Baptist Church 1689. We have both on male and pre-male.
I'm assuming email historical or dispensational Dispensationalist and be a Reformed Baptist. It goes against the Covenant and he goes against chapter 7.
It would have to be historical pre-male. It would have to be.
Yeah can't be MacArthur ish. John MacArthur is not Reformed. No, he's a Calvinist at Baptist.
Are you allowed to name your church? Melissa. Historical. Yeah, how are you dis be in a 1689.
Never mind, but they must not be really pushing the Covenant really hard. I was a part of a 1689 church that didn't push the Covenant and it was a mixed bag of nuts. So.
Yeah, and I'm wondering if they would hold do Classic covenantal ism or are they really 1689 federalists?
Who's throwing my name around. I already won the Bigfoot debate. He does.
He's a demon. He's a demon if he exists. He might be a demon. What's.
What you just said it I?
Say, I don't know what it is. I mean, I don't think he is but it might know the whole time. You were arguing that he was a real thing. I'm saying I do believe. I do believe it's a real thing. I believe.
That walks up, right?
He's so you think you think he's a real thing that you can go out and find with sonar radar thermal stuff right now.
Listen, if I had the money to invest and go out there and do it, I would.
No, listen, he comes out when people are in the woods doing seances. That's a demon.
We've already had the show on Bigfoot. I will go back and watch the show.
I was right.
Now I'm pretty sure the Loch Ness Monster does exist. Yeah, you catch one. I had a line once. There's no. I agree with you there. Melissa, let's see who else we got here.
Someone say my name.
He really believes in Bigfoot, I don't know.
I'm on it because it's the way you say believe. I don't believe in like I trust in Bigfoot. I don't like to use the word believe.
Believe that there is a creature. That's a flight that walks upright. That we haven't discovered it was not. It took to 19. Oh, we denied the existence. Up until the 1960s. If I was to take it, let's I could get a video camera and and kill an ant right here.
I can kill an ant and take a video camera. And then you'll see other ants come because the ants give off a smell that it attracts the other ants. The other ants will come grab their homeboy. Come back and bury.
Whoa, you just say you can get a video of something and let me see it. Show me the video Bigfoot. I set up an ant.
Kill an ant and and then other ants will come and pick up their homeboy and Take him back to where his body will not be there, but you can find an ant. You can't find Bigfoot. That's the issue Jeff. Look at their tree climbers.
I can't climb a tree. I Do good getting up without hurting my back. I pulled up. I don't watch when I roll over at night.
But now he's assigned what they do. They're tree climbers, maybe.
You got evidence that they're not.
Maybe.
Demons.
They're Nephilim.
About those what do they call those those those those ghosts like things? What do they call them dog ghosts and all that?
Yeah, I hadn't looked into those. All I know is this chupacabra. Thousands of people. I'm talking thousands of people have had experiences and seen something.
A thousand.
Jeff I'm just saying yeah, but that's fight. I mean, they are speaking gibberish. I mean, they're forcing.
Speaking gibberish. Hey two or three witnesses. Jeff.
I'm not saying that they're not doing so. Have it have a dude type of thing, right? But it's not a real. It's not a real language. Tongue.
You know and in Dubai the Dubai people they really like cartoons. But they don't like Flintstones. The Dubai people the people that live in Dubai. They really like cartoons, but they don't like the Flintstones.
But the people in Abu Dhabi do.
Then you had too much to drink.
Water.
People in Abu Dhabi do. I'm happy that you thought that was funny Tom.
Like water it's not it's just I don't think. Orange orange LaCroix.
You know something I mean like I was a part of a church that would teach people how to speak in tongues and all it was was just Some kind of weird syllables that people were saying. But I would say I would say that they were really speaking it was just not of the Holy Spirit it was gibberish.
That's not according to the two or three witnesses I talked to.
Listen, if you don't understand what they're saying.
That's not one of the two or three. I've talked to. They say they understand everything.
My biggest argument against the people speaking in tongues is that you have three songs. So let's name three sets of grace. So you have Trinitarian Pentecostals, which will say symbols of God.
Baptists.
Listen be quiet Jacqueline, and then you have and then you have a One this Pentecostals and then you have another group called way internationals. Which is a quarter. They're kind of like a mixture between Pentecostals and Jehovah's Witnesses, right?
They all three believe in the gift of the Holy Spirit with the evidence I mean the gift the baptism of the Holy Spirit with the evidence of speaking in tongues. All of them speak in tongues. And they sound just the same except they all believe in a different God.
Two or three witnesses though.
Yeah, yeah. The witnesses is they're all they're nutso's.
Yep, so the thousands of people that have seen Bigfoot.
All nuts. Oh, yeah, listen. Brighton. They are the same people. Yes, yes, I was out in the woods and I saw Bigfoot and I reported it to you. Would you believe me. No.
Why are you. I would I would ask why are you summoning demons out in the woods?
Nobody's summoning demons. I wouldn't be a bigfoot. You did. I Wouldn't be out there knocking on trees. I'm out there on my 12 gauge pop. No, what would you be doing? I wouldn't be knocking on trees. No do the noise again.
My 12 gauge. No do the other noise I don't know. I'm not doing it.
You know remember last week my computer died and I ended up leaving. It's not ready to do this again.
Well, you know you need to charge your stuff I know already so we've been on here an hour and 55 minutes.
No, he's in trouble.
Serious question. Pastor announced his immediate unfit for office. He proceeds to preach for.
Five that is a hundred percent wrong.
Wrong.
Absolutely wrong. Yeah, if you are if you have done something to disqualify yourself. You need to sit down. Yeah.
Well, he announced it too, that's weird. Is this somebody in Tulsa.
Tulsa. I believe Orthodox MacArthur is from Tulsa, right? Don't you go to stop shirts? I know you're not talking about scalp, but I'm just asking. I know there was another person in in Tulsa that announced that he was gonna be.
Oh, you're close to Jeff. Never mind. Okay.
Do you know of any pastor Jeff that announced five months ago and still preaching.
No, I don't I don't I just might not be in the same circles. Give me a name. Be brave.
He's gonna DM you the name.
Well, we'll out it. We don't care.
Any other questions. Any other questions? Are we gonna sign off? Oh.
TDJ is no, I thought you put TD J's. Was he had a DD party.
Did you guys see all the baby oil that they confiscate.
Thousand bottles. Hey, we gotta be careful about this. Your butts gonna start hurting Jeff.
Pop your seal.
Is right.
Now but did he. Man I tell you what, it's made me question Hip-hop are all these gangsta rappers that I grew up listening to like like I just I don't know anymore, right? Diddy's gay in a not-so-happy way.
Yeah. Yeah. He's not gay heavy gay queer.
W.
Do stop speaking and in weird languages just come out and say it. We're not a popular YouTube channel people don't watch this show.
Now he said NSF Y FG I.
I got nothing.
Now say for your fellow guy, that's what it means.
There's absolutely no shame with those folks. You guys work him by the way.
Orthodox MacArthur. The first one means not safe for work. The second one means not safe for your F 'ing grandma. Oh.
Okay, what I don't get it. Yeah, I don't speak in code man. I think I don't know what any of that stuff means.
There's cool brother in Christ. Okay, cool. I Just I didn't know who Tim was. Well, how do you. Howdy Tim?
Time man, we don't get butthurt. I grew up in the trailer park and I wrote a song and it was and it mentions that there's no safe spaces and places. Would you when your place is on a hitch? So we didn't have all that stuff.
Now.
Braden he might have grown up in a place where there was safe spaces. Yeah, he had no safe spaces. I grew up in Albuquerque, New Mexico in the body of homes.
I grew up in the body White kid growing up in there. You better fight.
I grew up as a Mormon.
My grandparents.
Ever said was don't get hit first. We were swinging.
Joseph Smith, baby.
The Senate of Brigham Young, yeah.
Why gang. I don't even know what GTS. Why me oh.
We talked about this one the other time. What was it. Good to see ya.
Yeah, I remember that one good to see ya is it. Yeah, are you good to see you or good to see ya.
I'm pretty sure it could go either way.
I'm okay. I'm gonna stick with the yeah with the trailer park. It's yeah. Great to see you all. Good to see y 'all. See y 'all. Don't even know what it means. One person says good and the other one says great great great to see you.
Great. See y 'all.
So, yeah, I'm currently auditioning for new friends if anybody would like to hit me up.
We're taking applications for open-air theology.
Have a backbone and they'll take criticism and and and argue. That's why hats had to go. He couldn't argue.
Someone was it was half those rapture. I think. Yeah, I think that's the reason why Braden is so intimidated by Bigfoot. It's because if someone that big with big feet and big hands like Brian just don't want to be a part of it.
He's not jumping on that train. He's afraid of heights too, and they're trick climbers.
Maybe it could explain a lot. You can hit me up for friendship.
And blocking you I'm about ready to get raptured on my computer battery guys.
Well, let's just sign off any last words. Braden.
Go get your ticket to the open-air theology conference. Sanctification. It's going to be called war. Go get your tickets. We hope to see you in February. You I I'm just gonna say. These guys keep on pushing these buttons, they gotta look out for these small paws.
Come watch the throwdown. Put me now. Listen. Open-air theology conference is turning into the new MMA. Come watch it. War 2025. February told him in Tennessee. Tallahoma. Tennessee not Tallahoma. It's Tullahoma.
Tallahoma, that's called Tullahoma. It's not cool.
How do you spell it? Ma Tullahoma.
Whatever that's how we say it down here. Philip I Phillip E. What the heck is that?
Watching a.
Balachi anyways. Tom last words. Yeah.
Yeah, go go. No, I don't have any. Yeah, I do. I do I. Go tell someone about Christ. Go tell go tell your neighbor. This week make it a point to go tell your neighbor a friend. Somebody you don't know.
Strike up a gospel conversation and tell them and then the next time we're on this is your homework. Tell us how it went. Let us know what happened whether they rejected you or not, but go tell someone about Christ.
For sure for sure. Don't don't do seances in the woods looking for Bigfoot. He's a demon. No. Yeah.
Yeah, well, he's not a demon but don't do seances.
Like.
And knocking on trees with wood like that's just that's that's demon stuff. Oh, we lost them.
That's fine. He was wrapped. He's gonna be calling my phone here in a minute. Yeah. All right. Well, if y 'all it's again, like Brandon said y 'all need to come check out the the conference in February.
If you don't I don't. I don't even know what you're doing with your life. Like it doesn't make any sense. So, so we're not a big conference, right so so so no one's too big for their britches. All the speakers you'll be able to hang out with not just walk up and talk so you'd be able to hang out with.
We're just man. We're not trying to be put on a pedestal. The only thing great about us is the God that we serve. Hallelujah hollaback. Y 'all should come hang out with us. It's going to be a blast. It's a small conference, but it's the it's the most fun conference that's out there.
And so I want to encourage y 'all to come check us out here in, Tallahoma. Anytime come check us out. Come be a part of our the church that we have here. It's growing Covenant Reformed Baptist Church and as always hallelujah hollaback.