Joe Carter Tried to Put Me In My Place, Gospel Coalition Leader Exposed

All right, let's get started today. This is a video about Joe, I might be a CIA agent, Carter. Seriously guys, I don't have time for a video on this right now. This is Thursday night. I'm going to do a video on Joe Carter tomorrow morning, but this guy, I'm starting to think that there's some truth behind the people that say he's a bot, he's not a real person.

Has anyone actually ever seen Joe Carter in real life? That's the question I want to know. I mean, this guy can't be, this guy can't be serious. I mean, look at this. So he went back and forth. He does this all the time.

He went back and forth. Ooh, he didn't delete them all. So Tom Askell and him went back and forth. Well, we'll go over these. Don't worry, I'm going to save all this stuff. He's talking about how General Flynn is still guilty, even though clearly he isn't.

All that kind of stuff. Sounds an awful lot like a conspiracy theory, but hey, what do I know, Joe? So anyway, yeah, this guy, man, he's something else. Let's go through all this stuff later. He deleted a ton of stuff here because that's what he always does.

He deletes a lot of stuff. This is what, Big Eva does this a lot. I'll give John Lehman credit. He didn't delete any of his tweets, but Joe Carter deletes a lot of his tweets and he got embarrassed, thoroughly embarrassed by Tom Askell, thoroughly embarrassed.

He was outmatched, outwitted, no question about it. Joe Carter is out of his depth in so much of this stuff, but he thinks he's the smartest guy in the room, which is a very scary place to be. And here's then when he says here, I've decided to delete all of my tweets related to this thread.

Feel free to claim victory, accuse me of slander. I was warned how disgusting. They love that. I was warned about you. I should have listened to my better judgment. We're going to talk all about this.

This is a bunch of tactics here. And let's just face it, Joe Carter's a loser. He's a loser. This is how losers talk. I mean, I don't mean like a loser, like he lost the debate. Like I mean like an actual, like in life, a loser.

Anyway, we'll talk more about this tomorrow. Take care. Yeah. So let's get to it, man. I've always known there was something fishy about Joe Carter. Joe Carter, of course, on his Twitter page, it says that he's the executive pastor of McLean Bible Church in Arlington campus.

Yikes. Pastor Joe Carter, editor of the Gospel Coalition, double yikes, and communication specialist at the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, which means that a lot of you guys probably pay him.

That's something that you should probably rectify right away. This guy is something else. I honestly, as a joke, I said earlier that he might be a CIA asset, but maybe he is. I don't know, because that would make more sense than he actually acts and thinks this way for real.

Like I don't want to live in a world where people actually think and act the way Joe Carter does. He's incorrigible. Yeah. His behavior online is, listen, I appreciate good zings. I appreciate a little spice, you know, and that kind of thing, but he memes and jokes like a liberal.

I mean, it's just like none of it makes any sense. It's not, he thinks it's really good, but it's really not good. It's like reading a liberal meme. Liberal memes are the worst. They're not funny. You don't even understand really what they're trying to do.

They're obviously trying to mimic conservative memes, which tend to be hilarious and it just doesn't work. And so Joe Carter, and by the way, Joe Carter is a perfect example. This guy is connected. He leads the Gospel Coalition.

He's involved in the ERLC. He's a pastor, for goodness sake, a pastor. And he proves that it's really never about tone. Evangelicals like to say, oh, you're toxic. You have a mean tone. You say this, you say that.

Joe Carter's evidence to the contrary. It's not about tone. It's about your message. Joe Carter is one of the most vicious people that I've ever seen online, ever. And I'm talking about village atheists.

I've seen all kinds of stuff. And Joe Carter is one of the worst, but he's connected. He's initiated. He's in the guild. And so nobody calls him out. Why would they? He's in the guild. But someone like me says something a little spicy, which, you know, listen, it's my heritage.

Hey, Macarena. Anyway, and all hell breaks loose. I say something spicy, and, well, I'm toxic. I'm toxic. That's the kind of thing that you hear. But Joe Carter is living proof that that's actually not.

Big Eva doesn't have a problem with that kind of stuff. It's about what you actually say. It's about your message. It's about being on the right team. It's about being in the guild. So what I'm going to do is I took a video.

Joe Carter and I had a little conversation. We mixed it up a little bit. We matched wits. I'm going to provide some commentary on this conversation. Now, if you go to my Twitter, you won't be able to find this conversation.

Because Joe Carter is notorious for deleting tweets. And so you have one half of the conversation. He deletes all his tweets. And then at the end, he'll put something like this. So this is what he'll say.

I was warned about communicating with you. I should have listened to my first instinct. You're toxic. I should have known what this was going to go like, and all that kind of stuff. And so you don't know what the conversation was like.

You don't know what he was saying. But then at the end, he makes it seem like as if his behavior was as pure as the driven snow. And you are an evil white supremacist. I should have known. That's his shtick.

That's his thing. That's his strategy. What a loser. I mean that, like a loser. This guy's a loser. And I don't mean like he lost the debate. That's up for somebody else to decide, you know what I mean?

Obviously, I think my opinions are correct. I wouldn't have them if I didn't think they were correct. But I don't operate like a loser. This guy's a lightweight. He's a lightweight. And before we get into it, I'm going to say one more thing.

Actually, let's just get into it. I'm sure this will come up in the course of this conversation because this conversation is super helpful, I think. So if you remember, Joe Carter put that article about conspiracy theories and how it's a sin to be a conspiracy theorist.

And you know, many people teed off on that because there was no principles there at all. I mean, you know, things that were called the conspiracy theory yesterday, today have been revealed are completely true.

And so, you know, mainstream media reports on things being, quote unquote, a conspiracy theory that are actually 100 accurate. And so, no, you shouldn't be church disciplined for believing things that are accurate just because CNN didn't believe it, you know what I mean?

So I've been tweeting that, Joe Carter. Yeah, you know, I've been picking at him. I've been trolling a little bit. There's no question about it. And listen, ain't nothing wrong with trolling. I saw another Big Eva minion lamenting that trolls have gotten trollier in this whole coronavirus pandemic.

And it's just like, you're a troll. How do you like that? You're a troll. There's nothing wrong with trolling, so long as you have good intentions here, I think. And this is the thing, I've been tweeting at Joe Carter of all these different conspiracy theories that are not actually wrong, they're actually true, but they used to be called conspiracy theories.

And I've been asking, hey, Joe, was it a sin to believe this back when everyone was calling it a conspiracy theory now that it's come out that it's true? And he hasn't responded, but I finally got him.

I got him to respond, and here's how it went. So Steven Crowder posted this fake poll that CNN did that claimed that 68 of Americans said that a vaccine is needed before things go back to normal. Like, we can't go back to normal until there's a vaccine created.

That's one of the most insane positions I could ever imagine. CNN is saying that 68 of Americans, almost seven out of 10, said that that's the case. And obviously, that was fake news. They just made it up.

It wasn't even like a mistake. They just made that stuff up. The real number was less than 10%, which, yeah, of course, there's less than 10 of idiots out there. No question about it. Anyway, so I tweeted Joe Carter, and I said, hey, Joe Carter, was it a sin to disbelieve CNN when they made this number up of 68 of Americans saying this, or is it a sin now to believe that only 10%, or is it ever a sin to believe CNN or to disbelieve CNN?

That kind of thing, and I finally got him. I finally got him. He decided to respond. He said, when did I say it was a sin to disbelieve CNN? Are you intentionally trying to mislead people about what I said, or do you have an issue with reading comprehension?

Now, this is spicy. It's not a very good joke, but it's interesting. I appreciate a little mockery here and there, but this is something Joe Carter likes to do. Joe Carter's in a very unfortunate situation.

I feel for him. I feel for the guy, because this is the worst position to be in when you're engaging in any kind of intellectual discussion. It doesn't have to be public. It can even be just in your family.

The worst situation to be in is to think that your intellect is up here, but really it's down here, and you don't know that you're actually not as smart as you think you are. You're actually pretty stupid, but you think you're really smart.

That's the worst position to be in because you'll always make a fool of yourself when that's the case. It's really a tough spot to be in. What you want is to have an accurate understanding of your own intellect.

Like a guy like me, I don't think I'm the smartest guy in the room. I'm not the stupidest guy in the room either, but I think I have a fairly accurate analysis of my own intellect. I don't jump into situations that I don't know about.

I try to avoid that kind of thing because I don't want to put my foot in my mouth. I'm sure I've not done that perfectly every time. That's for sure. But what you want to do is have an accurate view. It's actually better to have a lower view of your intellect than it actually is, than a higher view, because if you have a lower view of your intellect, there's a lot less likely chance that you'll put your foot in your mouth and look like an idiot, like Joe Carter does in this thread.

But that's the situation that Joe Carter's in. And so he often tries to remind you that he's better than you, that he's smarter than you, that he's more moral than you. This is something he does regularly on Twitter.

And he does it in a variety of different ways. This is one of them. He tried to zing me and ask if I knew how to read, which is interesting because if you read my tweets, I didn't say he said it was a sin to disbelieve CNN.

In fact, I was just asking him if it was a sin to disbelieve CNN. So someone might have a reading comprehension problem, but it's not your boy. So I called that out. I called that out. And so, oh, before I move on, the way he framed his little question there too, is like, there's only two options.

Either I'm immoral trying to spread disinformation or I'm an idiot, I can't read. Very clever, very clever, Joe Carter. I don't think many people bought into it, but hey, you know, you do you. I responded, I said, I don't believe CNN's reporting on Epstein's death.

Like that other chap that you talked down to on Twitter the other day. Also, by the way, he deleted those tweets as well, where he was insulting this guy on Twitter. Anyway, so I said, I don't believe CNN's reporting on Epstein's death.

Would you like my pastor's number so he can start up the steps of church discipline? That was a good one because obviously he's not gonna do that. He's not really that interested in people's morality or people's sin, no, no, no.

He's just grandstanding, obviously, obviously. So Joe goes, hey, you didn't answer the question. When did I say it was sinful to disbelieve CNN? For someone so focused on the misinformation of the media, you seem to not care much about truth.

Why should anyone trust you when you yourself spread misinformation? Now, if you notice here, there's an accusation here that I've spread misinformation because, ready? Because I said that Joe Carter says it's a sin to disbelieve CNN, which if you remember what the tweet actually said, it didn't say that.

It just asked a question of Joe Carter. So I'm being accused of spreading misinformation when it's actually, in fact, he's the one who's spreading misinformation. I never said that he said it was a sin to disbelieve CNN.

In fact, I was asking him, and the reason I was asking him was because of the conspiracy theory article that he wrote. I think everybody could see that very easily. So let's move on here. I said, Joe, you seem to have overlooked that my tweet was, in fact, a question itself, and so it did not state anything about you.

I simply asked you when it was okay to disbelieve CNN. Perhaps you were referring to my video. Would you timestamp, please, so I can respond? Now, I didn't, in the video, either say, listen, I know what I said in the video.

So in the video, I didn't say he said it was a sin to disbelieve CNN always, but I wanted to hear how he worked through this, which is, how does he decide what's a conspiracy theory and what's not when CNN reports incorrectly?

But what I was asking here is, and he didn't bite. He didn't bite. But what I was asking, I wanted to know if he watched the video because I know a lot of these guys watch my content. I don't know for a fact that Joe Carter does, and so I was wondering if he did, and that's why I said that.

It was a little bit of a sneaky question. I was trying to gather some information, but he didn't bite. I'll give Joe a little credit there. He's somewhat intelligent. He didn't bite. So here's how he responds.

He says, your tweet implied that I said it was a sin to disbelieve CNN. I sort of expected you to dissemble when confronted because that's your pattern, and no, I didn't watch your video. I have a sneaking suspicion that he did, but he said he didn't, so I'll go ahead and accept that.

What I found so interesting about this tweet, though, is that he used a word that I don't understand. At the time, I did not know what dissemble meant, which I found very spicy because when you get insulted using a word you don't understand, it's actually kind of like a double insult because Joe Carter used that word intentionally.

Joe Carter is very much the kind of guy that uses big words to confuse his prey. I don't do that. I'm the kind of guy, I wanna be understood, and so I use words that I'm pretty sure everyone will understand.

Nope, Joe Carter, on the other hand, he'd rather use words that you have to look up, which is interesting because he's already insulted my intelligence once in this tweet, and then he uses a word that I don't understand, which is extra good.

I will give him credit, that was a good zing because I had to look, I had to look this one up on dictionary .com. Dissemble, if you don't know what that word means, is to try to hide your intentions. So what he's saying here is that I did say, even though I definitively, according to any rules of grammar did not say that he believes it's a sin to always disbelieve CNN, he's saying I actually did, and in fact, I hid my intentions, I dissembled when confronted.

What's interesting about this as well is that he likes to make it seem like he doesn't follow me. I didn't watch your video, AD, but he definitively does follow me because he said that dissembling is my pattern.

How would you know my pattern if you didn't watch, Joe? Maybe you don't watch, maybe you've hired someone to watch me. But anyway, I just found that interesting, he knows what my pattern is. Dissembling is clearly not my pattern, but that's what Joe says, so there you go.

All right, so then I responded to that here, I said, here's the thing, Joe, I answered your question, would you answer mine about CNN's reporting on Epstein's death? So I answered his question, he wanted to say, when did I say, he wanted me to answer, when did I say that it was a sin to disbelieve CNN?

I said, I didn't say that, that's the answer to his question and I just wanted him to answer, is it a sin to disbelieve the CNN report that Jeffrey Epstein committed suicide in jail? All right, so this is where we get into the, this is where we get into the, he starts to avoid answering this question.

It's really painful, it's like pulling teeth, really. And so we're gonna see Joe dance around this for quite a few tweets and it's gonna be very annoying, but we just gotta go through it because this is the kind of man that Joe Carter is.

So I asked him, I asked him to answer the question about Epstein's death. And so he says, what is it that you want me to answer? Do you have some knowledge about Epstein's death that the rest of us do not have?

What is the point that you're trying to make? So he's trying to cut to the chase here, but I'm not ready to cut to the chase yet. So I'm gonna just ask him again the question. I said, the question, Joe, is this, am I in sin?

I don't believe CNN's reports on the Epstein's death. I think it's preposterous. Am I in sin? This is a yes or no question. I say, I'm saying I don't believe the report. That's all I'm saying, by the way, I don't believe the report.

Am I in sin? This is where the dancing begins. He says, you're in sin if you publicly claim or imply without evidence that the jailers had a role in murdering Epstein. Have you done that? So if you notice, he hasn't answered my question yet, but he's asked me another question, and I'm a generous guy.

So I'll answer. I said this, no, I haven't done that, Joe. But please answer the question. I don't believe the reporting that Epstein committed suicide in a cell. Am I in sin for that? That's been called a conspiracy theory by some, which is why I'm interested in your opinion.

So I'm helping him out here. I'm giving him my angle. The reason I'm asking you, Joe, is because some people say that if you don't believe the CNN report on Epstein, that that's a conspiracy theory. What do you say?

This is where Joe tries to, when you're talking to Joe Carter, you have to realize that everything that he's doing, pretty much, is attempting to trap you, right? Because I've already said, all I'm asking is, if I don't believe the CNN story, period, I'm not saying anything else, if I don't believe the CNN story, am I in sin?

That's the question I want answered. That's an important question. I'll tell you why later. And he's saying, have you implied that someone was participating in the death because that would be a sin? And I said, no, I'm not implying that.

I'm just saying I don't believe the CNN report. He's trying to trap me here. He's trying to get me to promote a conspiracy theory. He's trying to get me to say something like Hillary did it, or he's trying to get me to say something like the jailers killed him in his cell, something like that.

But I recognized it right away, because the reality is, Joe Carter thinks his intellect is up here. It's really not, you know what I mean? It's really not. He thinks this is a sneaky attack, but it's not a sneaky attack.

So he asked me, he's baiting me here into a conspiracy theory. He says, how did he die? You are saying that you don't believe he committed suicide, which implies that either the jailers killed or had a part in his death.

What is the evidence for your view? Do you see what he's doing here? He's assigning a belief to me and saying, what is the evidence for this belief? If you've noticed, at no point in this conversation, no point in my entire life, have I said the jailers killed him or had a part in his death?

At no point have I said that, but he's assigning that to me. He's assigning that belief to me. That is the very definition of slander. He's saying that I said a lie that I did not say. And then he's insisting that I provide evidence for a view I do not hold.

This is sneaky. Well, he thinks it's sneaky. It's not. Everyone can see what he's doing here, I think. But I think it's worth calling out. I think it's worth calling out the kind of bad actor that Joe Carter is.

This is who he is. Sorry, I think my son was doing something dangerous up there, my wife sounded scared. Anyway, but this is who he is. You see that he's assigning a belief to me, insisting evidence for that belief, and I don't hold the belief.

So let's continue, see what he has to say next. I said, Joe, oh, I'm sorry. Let me, so that way you can see, okay. I said, it's not my story, Joe. I don't know what happened. I don't know, and I don't have to provide a theory.

What I do know is the story offered by CNN and the rest of the guild is preposterous. And when an untrustworthy person says a preposterous thing, I don't believe it. Am I in sin? Because this is the point.

Like, it's not that I just decided, up and decided one day that I don't trust CNN, and I'm just not gonna trust CNN because I just don't want to. No, no, no, it's because there's a pattern of fake news, there's a pattern of lying, and it's not just mistakes, it's like intentional lies, a pattern that CNN and MSNBC and Washington Post and all these mainstream legacy media guild members, there's a pattern of lying about all kinds of stuff, including Jeffrey Epstein.

There's a pattern of lying about Jeffrey Epstein. And so I don't believe someone when they lie a lot, and then they tell me something that's outlandish. I don't believe it, that's it. I don't have to have a theory.

So this is the thing, guys, and I want you to believe this because I feel like I have a lot of people in my audience that are interested in things that have been labeled conspiracy theories, right? And I'm being careful to call it that because some of them aren't conspiracy theories, but they're labeled conspiracy theories.

And what you don't wanna do is you don't wanna say things that you don't know are true. So for example, it's not a conspiracy theory to deny CNN's reporting on Epstein, but it is a conspiracy theory to say, and I know for a fact Bill Clinton was the one who did it because you don't really know that for a fact.

You know that, you don't trust CNN. That's something that you can know, but the theory is that's when you get into trouble, right? You can look into people, of course, you can say, well, yeah, I mean, Hillary definitely had reasons to want Jeffrey Epstein dead, but that's all you got.

You know what I mean? You don't have much more than that. So you wanna be careful with that kind of thing. It's not my story. That's what I always say. It's like, I don't know what happened, but I know that didn't happen.

That's crazy what you just said to me. And that's something that is healthy and I think is right. And Joe doesn't want you even doing that. That's the thing. And that's why he's trying to bait me here into a conspiracy theory so he can call me a sinner.

Joe wants to call me a sinner. He is so much smarter than me and so much more moral than me and so he assigns a position to me, insists that I have evidence so that he can call me a sinner, a position I do not hold.

Let's continue because he doesn't stop trying to do this. This is really kind of sad. So actually, let me jump back for a second because there was a couple threads going on. I hate Twitter sometimes, it's hard to organize.

But anyway, right after he told me he didn't watch my video and that I was implying something that I didn't say, I said, hey Joe, that sort of smacks as a conspiracy theory. Joe, do you have evidence that I said something I clearly didn't say?

How do you know my pattern of dissembling? And so I'm basically calling him out for his own nonsense. He likes to say, well, you're slandering if you don't have evidence of something that you say. And clearly he doesn't have any evidence that I said something I didn't say.

That's how it works when I don't say something. And this is where he gets his moral robes on. This is what he, he often does this kind of thing when he's interacting with someone and losing the conversation.

This is what he says. Forget it. It's silly of me to assume that just because somebody calls themselves a Christian, that they will be willing to correct their dishonesty when confronted. I knew better than to engage with you.

I should have avoided getting sucked in. So thank demonious. He did the same thing with Tom Askell yesterday. I should have known better than to engage with such a commoner like you. This guy's a joke.

This guy's a joke. And then, you know, of course he questions my Christianity as well, which is pretty typical from people at this level, these lightweights. When a lightweight doesn't have much to offer in terms of rationality, logic, reason, arguments, nothing like that, what they do is they attack your character.

That's how it works. When you don't have anything really to say rationally, they attack your character. Here, he's questioning my status as a Christian because I refuse to admit I said something that I clearly didn't say.

I mean, everyone saw the tweet. I didn't delete the tweet because I don't have to delete the tweet. It doesn't say what he said it said. Anyway, let's continue. So after I said, hey, Joe, it's not my story.

I don't have to have a theory because I knew exactly what he was trying to do. He's trying to bait me into spinning a yarn about how Epstein died. I said, no, I don't believe the CNN report. That's all I'm saying.

I don't believe that. I think it's preposterous. I think CNN is untrustworthy. I'm not saying anything about what happened. I'm just saying, I don't believe that story. And here's what he does. He's still trying to trap me.

He doesn't get it. He doesn't get it that he's not dealing with a lightweight here. And so he tries again to bait me. This is gross, man. This is gross. He's baiting me into a sin here just so that he can put his robes on again and call me a sinner.

This is so gross. He continues. He says, are you in any way implying the guards were involved? You say you don't think he committed suicide. So it would seem you are claiming the guards were involved unless ninjas snuck in somehow.

I think the problem is you don't even understand what you're saying. This is the pattern. Joe thinks he knows my pattern. Well, I definitely know his pattern. Insults, questioning your intelligence and baiting you into sin.

Joe is trying to bait me into sin so he can call me a sinner and put his mighty robes on while doing so. I'm not gonna fall for it, obviously. He still thinks he's dealing with a lightweight because Joe's got this problem where he thinks he's the smartest guy in the room.

Don't be that guy. Never be that guy where you think you're the smartest guy in the room. You're sure to look like a fool if you do that. It's much better to underestimate your intelligence than to overestimate your intelligence.

In any way, you see here, he says, I'm so stupid, I don't even know what I'm saying. He's trying to, I mean, this is kind of like gaslighting a little bit. I don't even know what I believe is what he's trying to tell me.

And he's trying to tell me what I believe. I believe the guards killed him or the guards had something to do with his death. And so he's trying to get me, again, he's baiting me into a conspiracy theory, but your boy's not gonna fall for that.

Come on, man, this is not my first rodeo. Now, I did not get every single tweet in this conversation. I missed a couple that he has since deleted, which makes this kind of hard because now he can say I slandered him if I misquote him.

But the thing is, the internet doesn't forget Joe and everyone knows what you're up to here. We went back and forth a couple more tweets where again, he's trying to bait me into some narrative that I don't believe.

And then finally I said, Joe, let me just ask one more time. I said, Joe, I've answered probably 10 of your questions. You've not answered one of my questions. My question is for the last time, if I don't believe CNN's reporting on Epstein, am I in sin?

And his response was, I can't tell if you're in sin because you're being incoherent. And the reason I was being incoherent according to Joe Carter is because I refused to put forward a theory that he could call me a sinner on.

I refused to do it. All I said was, I just don't believe CNN's report on it. And so he didn't even have the decency to say, no, based on what you said, you're not in sin. No, he said, I can't tell about that because you're incoherent.

Again, because I'm super smart and you're just a moron. And so that's kind of where it ended. I said, thanks for sort of answering Joe. That's where that conversation ended. And then, and then there was another interaction.

One of my followers said, the real purpose of Carter's article isn't to start calling out sin and putting people on church discipline, but rather it's to make Christians with sensitive consciences feel guilty if they're ever tempted to question the establishment narrative.

Simply put, it's gatekeeping. And I agree with that. I think that is the purpose of his article. It's not really to have any principles that you can use, anything meaty, anything really biblical. Really what it is is so people that they really don't want to sin, they won't even look into anything that has that stigma of conspiracy theory.

That's what he wants. He wants official narratives only. That's my opinion on his article. And it doesn't seem to serve any other purpose, in my opinion. And Joe Carter, he saw an opportunity. Joe, super intelligent, super moral Joe, put his robes on again.

And he said, how do you know my real purpose? What are you basing that on? I'm sure you have solid evidence for your claim. If so, I'm interested in hearing what it is. Now, Joe forgot for a moment that he wasn't dealing with the lightweight here.

And so he thought he had them. I finally get to call someone a sinner. That's how perfect, I found an opportunity. And so I responded because this was very interesting considering the very first tweet in this conversation.

If you remember, he erroneously said that I called him I said that he said it was a sin to believe CNN, which I definitely did not say. In fact, he was interpreting my tweet to say that even though it didn't say that.

And so I responded. I think he was expressing his opinion after reading the article, Joe. I don't think he was claiming any secret knowledge. Opinions are still okay, right? Kind of like you had an opinion about what my tweet implied earlier.

Obviously you weren't claiming to have read my mind. Right, Joe? So you see the thing with Joe Carter is the things he wants to apply to you, he refuses to have applied to himself. This is the definition of someone who is inconsistent and really just an ideologue.

If it's against the right person, then it's fine. But if it's not against the right person, if it's against the wrong person, he hates it. And this has been demonstrated in another thread. He got into the mix with Tom Askell as well about General Flynn.

And I'm not gonna go through the whole tweet log. There's a lot of people that have been kind of quoting the tweet log and stuff like that. But General Flynn is the right target. And so all kinds of shenanigans, all kinds of evil, all kinds of lies are acceptable against General Flynn.

Let me show you what he said about General Flynn. Actually, I don't have those tweets. But basically what he said about General Flynn is that he was a foreign asset. That's a wild conspiracy theory. There's no evidence of him being a foreign asset.

And there's lots of evidence that he was entrapped, entrapped by the FBI. And that's why the case against him was dropped. But no, no, no, to Joe, if it's the right target, then a wild conspiracy theory is okay.

But if it was, I don't know, an Obama guy or something like that, well, then that would be, he'd get a sanctimonious, how could you be such a conspiracy theorist, QAnon? It's a, oh my goodness, you're a conspiracy theorist.

You see, this is who Joe is. This is who Joe is. And I don't know if this video was helpful. Maybe this was a little bit of catharsis for myself here. But this is who Joe is. He's a guy who thinks he's a lot smarter than he actually is.

He tries to bait Christians into sins so he could call you a sinner. He then deletes the evidence of all this. This is the kind of guy that we're dealing with here. He doesn't want people to see what his activities were online.

He's obviously ashamed of himself, but he doesn't apologize. Like, it's like, when I'm ashamed of myself, you know, I try to muster enough, you know, courage to apologize to the person that I've wronged.

You know, sometimes, I've done this before. I mean, there was a, you remember, Joel Askell called me out for saying something about, oh my goodness, was it, I think it was Thabiti's daughter or something like that.

Joel Askell reached out to me and he said, dude, that was wrong. You shouldn't have said that. And he was right. He was totally right. So I reached out to Thabiti's, not Thabiti, oh my goodness, Vati Bakam's, not Thabiti's daughter, Vati Bakam's daughter.

I reached out to her. She was super gracious. I apologized. Like, that's what you gotta do when you're ashamed of your words. You've wronged somebody. That's what you gotta do. Joe Carr's not gonna do that.

Joe Carr's not gonna do that. He just deletes the evidence. This is the kind of guy we're dealing with. He thinks he's smarter than you. He's not. He thinks he's more moral than you. He's not. And then he deletes the evidence as if the internet's not gonna remember.

The internet remembers, Joe. This is not, this is not behavior that's becoming of a Christian, right? And the other thing is partiality all day long. I mean, yeah, you know, conspiracy theories that I believe, well, that's okay.

But conspiracy theories that you believe, well, you're just a sinner, slander. All this kind of stuff, Joe. Joe, you know, I know you think we're stupid. We're not stupid. You can't get away with calling Tom Askell a white nationalist.

Well, you didn't say white nationalist, but that's the dog whistle that you were sending, Joe. Let's just be honest. That's the dog whistle. You can't call him something that he's not. You can't call me stuff that I'm not.