Debunking Evolution - Common Ancestors (Lesson 5a)

1 view

This video is one of twelve in our Six-Lesson Program that contrasts Evolution with Biblical Creation. This program (including book and Student Guide) can be downloaded free from our website: www.genesisapologetics.com

0 comments

00:02
Is it just me, or does the evolutionary tree seem more like an orchard?
00:33
All right, let's see if we can do this. Nope, that doesn't stay up.
00:38
No, you've gotta stay. Stay. Hey, Jane. So, gotta be honest,
00:44
I haven't really had a chance to study too much. Uh -huh. But... Jane!
00:50
Sorry. I was just taking a break. I got this new makeup case, and I'm having a hard time figuring out where to put everything.
00:58
Now, I could put this lipstick here. Or, no. No, no, no.
01:03
No. I'll handle this. So, we could organize it as simplest to most complex.
01:10
Or, by color. Ugh. See, organization just is not my thing.
01:15
Once, my little sister asked me to organize all her little tiny plastic animals. Took me two days.
01:22
Organizing animals? That's like Carl Linnaeus. Who's that? Yeah, he was the first guy to classify animals.
01:28
Oh, oh, oh, yeah, I remember him now. His motto was, God created,
01:34
Linnaeus ordered. Yeah, his work is the basis for the classification system we still use today. Later, Charles Darwin sketched a diagram to show how life started simple and then branched out to every creature on Earth.
01:46
He said the different branches represent the different levels of classification. A tree of life, if you will.
01:53
Oh, yeah. I keep seeing this over and over again in our textbooks. Really? Yeah. Ah, here we go.
02:02
Check out this one. Are researchers still trying to figure out how it happened? There are a lot more of these diagrams.
02:09
I think they change as different researchers group them based on different features.
02:15
These charts show groups of organisms they believe share a common ancestor. Yeah, a group like that is called a clade.
02:22
And these diagrams are called cladograms. Man, and I thought organizing my makeup was hard.
02:31
So do they. Well, not your makeup, classifying animals. Okay, so remember that modern evolutionary classification is a rapidly changing science with a difficult goal, to present all life on a single evolutionary tree.
02:48
As evolutionary biologists study relationships among taxa, they regularly change not only the way organisms are grouped, but also sometimes the name of groups.
02:59
Remember that cladograms are visual presentations of hypotheses about relationships and not hard and fast facts.
03:06
Whoa, whoa, whoa. You're saying our textbooks say that cladograms are based off hypotheses, not facts.
03:14
Yeah, I'll show you why. Flip forward a page. That's because they only have living animals or fossils for certain places on the branches.
03:23
These are real animals or fossils we've actually discovered. But these branching points are just imaginary lines that represent the hypotheses about which animals evolved from a common ancestor.
03:37
No facts support them that can't also support different links or no links. The transitional fossils they represent have never been found.
03:45
If they were, well, we'd see their pictures here, right? Though evolutionists point to a few examples, there should be thousands.
03:55
Genesis 121 says, From the beginning,
04:10
God created fully formed kinds of animals. So it isn't a tree like Darwin thought.
04:16
Instead, it's an orchard. God created the different kinds of animals, and then they expressed all types of amazing variety as they bred within their kind.
04:27
And recombining genetic possibilities that God packed into the original kinds produced that variety?
04:33
Exactly. We see variation happening all the time. But we've never seen the evolutionary process of mutations and selection creating new kinds.
04:43
So dogs, apes, and people can show variety but can never morph into a new kind.
04:49
Yep, just like the orchard. One basic tree kind can never become another.
04:56
Scientists seem to name something a new species, even if there's only a minor change. And in the fossils, the smallest variation is classified as a different species, even though we see lots of variety with some species today.
05:09
Like what? Like in dogs. Just think about all the variety in the breeds of dog kinds, canis familiaris, in the last 200 years.
05:19
If future paleontologists dug up the bones of a bulldog, a chihuahua, and a great dane, they would surely classify them as three different species.
05:29
But they are all the same kind. Whether beaks of a finch change shape or a color of a moth, the changes are limited.
05:37
When it's just expressing variety within the created kind. Yep, so evolutionists consider adjustments to existing traits evidence that evolution made those traits in the first place.
05:49
So, what if God made each basic kind with potential to change some of its traits, but no potential to morph into a different kind?
05:58
Dogs can breed with coyotes, and coyotes can breed with wolves. They're called a kaiwolf, so they must all be part of the same created kind.
06:06
So they have a common ancestor, but it was the original dog kind that God created, not the transition between a reptile and a mammal like they show in these textbooks.
06:17
So fossils, the classification of animals, and the Bible are all in harmony. That's what it looks like.
06:23
Well, all of that gives me an idea. What if we organize your makeup by kind?
06:29
All the nail polish in one spot, all the eye stuff in another, and all the lip things elsewhere.
06:36
That's brilliant! We do an orchard, not a tree. Kind of makes you think, doesn't it?