Debunking Evolution - Common Ancestors (Lesson 5a)
1 view
This video is one of twelve in our Six-Lesson Program that contrasts Evolution with Biblical Creation. This program (including book and Student Guide) can be downloaded free from our website: www.genesisapologetics.com
- 00:02
- Is it just me, or does the evolutionary tree seem more like an orchard?
- 00:33
- All right, let's see if we can do this. Nope, that doesn't stay up.
- 00:38
- No, you've gotta stay. Stay. Hey, Jane. So, gotta be honest,
- 00:44
- I haven't really had a chance to study too much. Uh -huh. But... Jane!
- 00:50
- Sorry. I was just taking a break. I got this new makeup case, and I'm having a hard time figuring out where to put everything.
- 00:58
- Now, I could put this lipstick here. Or, no. No, no, no.
- 01:03
- No. I'll handle this. So, we could organize it as simplest to most complex.
- 01:10
- Or, by color. Ugh. See, organization just is not my thing.
- 01:15
- Once, my little sister asked me to organize all her little tiny plastic animals. Took me two days.
- 01:22
- Organizing animals? That's like Carl Linnaeus. Who's that? Yeah, he was the first guy to classify animals.
- 01:28
- Oh, oh, oh, yeah, I remember him now. His motto was, God created,
- 01:34
- Linnaeus ordered. Yeah, his work is the basis for the classification system we still use today. Later, Charles Darwin sketched a diagram to show how life started simple and then branched out to every creature on Earth.
- 01:46
- He said the different branches represent the different levels of classification. A tree of life, if you will.
- 01:53
- Oh, yeah. I keep seeing this over and over again in our textbooks. Really? Yeah. Ah, here we go.
- 02:02
- Check out this one. Are researchers still trying to figure out how it happened? There are a lot more of these diagrams.
- 02:09
- I think they change as different researchers group them based on different features.
- 02:15
- These charts show groups of organisms they believe share a common ancestor. Yeah, a group like that is called a clade.
- 02:22
- And these diagrams are called cladograms. Man, and I thought organizing my makeup was hard.
- 02:31
- So do they. Well, not your makeup, classifying animals. Okay, so remember that modern evolutionary classification is a rapidly changing science with a difficult goal, to present all life on a single evolutionary tree.
- 02:48
- As evolutionary biologists study relationships among taxa, they regularly change not only the way organisms are grouped, but also sometimes the name of groups.
- 02:59
- Remember that cladograms are visual presentations of hypotheses about relationships and not hard and fast facts.
- 03:06
- Whoa, whoa, whoa. You're saying our textbooks say that cladograms are based off hypotheses, not facts.
- 03:14
- Yeah, I'll show you why. Flip forward a page. That's because they only have living animals or fossils for certain places on the branches.
- 03:23
- These are real animals or fossils we've actually discovered. But these branching points are just imaginary lines that represent the hypotheses about which animals evolved from a common ancestor.
- 03:37
- No facts support them that can't also support different links or no links. The transitional fossils they represent have never been found.
- 03:45
- If they were, well, we'd see their pictures here, right? Though evolutionists point to a few examples, there should be thousands.
- 03:55
- Genesis 121 says, From the beginning,
- 04:10
- God created fully formed kinds of animals. So it isn't a tree like Darwin thought.
- 04:16
- Instead, it's an orchard. God created the different kinds of animals, and then they expressed all types of amazing variety as they bred within their kind.
- 04:27
- And recombining genetic possibilities that God packed into the original kinds produced that variety?
- 04:33
- Exactly. We see variation happening all the time. But we've never seen the evolutionary process of mutations and selection creating new kinds.
- 04:43
- So dogs, apes, and people can show variety but can never morph into a new kind.
- 04:49
- Yep, just like the orchard. One basic tree kind can never become another.
- 04:56
- Scientists seem to name something a new species, even if there's only a minor change. And in the fossils, the smallest variation is classified as a different species, even though we see lots of variety with some species today.
- 05:09
- Like what? Like in dogs. Just think about all the variety in the breeds of dog kinds, canis familiaris, in the last 200 years.
- 05:19
- If future paleontologists dug up the bones of a bulldog, a chihuahua, and a great dane, they would surely classify them as three different species.
- 05:29
- But they are all the same kind. Whether beaks of a finch change shape or a color of a moth, the changes are limited.
- 05:37
- When it's just expressing variety within the created kind. Yep, so evolutionists consider adjustments to existing traits evidence that evolution made those traits in the first place.
- 05:49
- So, what if God made each basic kind with potential to change some of its traits, but no potential to morph into a different kind?
- 05:58
- Dogs can breed with coyotes, and coyotes can breed with wolves. They're called a kaiwolf, so they must all be part of the same created kind.
- 06:06
- So they have a common ancestor, but it was the original dog kind that God created, not the transition between a reptile and a mammal like they show in these textbooks.
- 06:17
- So fossils, the classification of animals, and the Bible are all in harmony. That's what it looks like.
- 06:23
- Well, all of that gives me an idea. What if we organize your makeup by kind?
- 06:29
- All the nail polish in one spot, all the eye stuff in another, and all the lip things elsewhere.
- 06:36
- That's brilliant! We do an orchard, not a tree. Kind of makes you think, doesn't it?