Responding to ERLC on Religious Exemptions, Creating Variants, Hank Hanegraaff and Church History

Well, greetings, welcome to the dividing line. We've got a lot to get to today. I've even noticed people that Pointing out that I say that a lot.

But Yeah, it normally means we do have a lot to get to today and a lot of stuff to talk about I hope it will be of benefit and edification to you.

I have on the screen a Quotation that I saw this morning. I don't think this was the exact meme, but I was able to track it down eventually and I thought it was an excellent citation well worth

Reviewing the day after the Biden regime or as Doug Wilson is now referring to it the

Biden cartel Has some merit to it did its thing we had elderly

Joe Biden Saying they're wagging his finger at us saying telling us warning us his patience was wearing thin and And actually all of our patiences are wearing thin we're

I'm personally Struggling with the amount of lies that the regime is dependent upon but Anyway, you'll notice what

CS Lewis said in God in the dock essays on theology the making of modern theology

Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims

May be the most oppressive It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies

The robber barons cruelty may sometimes sleep his cupidity may at some time at some point to be satiated

But those who torment us for our own good Will torment us without end for they do so without with the approval of their own conscience the quote goes on to say

They may be more likely to go to heaven and yet at the same time likelier to make a hell of earth

This very kindness stings with intolerable insult to be cured against one's will and cured of states

Which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason

Or those who never will to be classed with infants imbeciles and domestic animals

I Thought that was a rather appropriate citation given the

Attitude that is now being displayed by the Australian government the government of New Zealand United States, Canada Germany all across Europe This is the tyranny that we are now facing a tyranny

This says sincerely exercised for the good of the victims. I would say personally

What we have here is a mixture. I think we have in many of the bureaucrats

Many of the even the police officers they may sincerely think Because they've been lied to and they've bought the narrative that they are

Exercising that tyranny for the good of those that they are oppressing But I don't think that's the case of the people at the top

I think they are well aware of what the end result of all this must be and So they just they just use other people as useful

Useful tools of their of their seeking of oppression, but it's true That those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end

For they do so with the approval of their own conscience Certainly seeing that a lot these days and one must consider

I think Some of the facts to which we must Make reference on the last program.

I Responded to a man from Duke University Duke Divinity School. I'm sorry

Duke Divinity School. Well, they're associated obviously Who was arguing that there is no such thing as?

a Christian a Christian basis for Seeking to not follow through with a vaccine mandate specific in regards to this particular issue and that is

Kovat 19 or really kovat 19. Is that that's not even a relevant SARS kovat 2

We need to come up with a less year attached Name for this thing, but Yesterday I was linked by the troublemaker from Texas, I believe to a statement from the

ERLC now Russell Moore has left the ERLC the Democratic operatives have left the house as far as being in charge of it

But That doesn't mean that the ERLC is going to change unless the

ERLC has a change in leadership and When you've had the same kind of leadership for over a decade

Then almost everybody you have in the organization is going to be holding the same kinds of views and so as Michael Fallon has

Repeatedly told me this was the operational preparation of the environment In other words, you got to get your people in and prepare things if you're going to be effective at accomplishing

Your goals and that's exactly what they did So in looking at the

ERLC statement in essence what it what it boils down to is This statement after talking about the

JWs and the Amish at least having a basis for Refusing vaccination, but no one else really does because we haven't done it in the past.

So in other words just like the other fellow The idea that there is something specifically about these genetic

Experimental and I don't care what the FDA did. They're still experimental. They'll be experimental for five years minimally

At least any rational person will will recognize that We have no long -term safety data.

So these are experimental genetic vaccines without long -term safety

With a great deal of evidence of short -term difficulties and problems in regards to pregnant women and Heart issues and so on and so forth.

In fact out. There's been many people who have argued that Prior to 2020 if you had had the level of reported problems with these vaccines

Any previous vaccine would have been pulled like that Would would have back to the drawing boards but these are just being dismissed as coincidental

Not having to do with it, etc, etc and We'll talk a little bit more.

We've talked about why that is but looking again at the ERLC article In our experience the reasons appealed to by some even knows by some evangelicals

For refusing vaccinations are not strictly speaking religious, but personal philosophical or political

Now I would point out that one's Worldview if it's a consistent

Christian worldview will impact one's personal philosophical and political perspectives I Don't I don't know how these both these individuals are

Ethicists, I'm not sure how you separate those things out like that This includes objections that invoke religious beliefs in general terms

But upon further scrutiny appeal to other factors some say for example Some may for example express concerns about infertility.

So I stop right there. So fertility is not a religious issue

Having children is not a religious issue. Well, I suppose in some forms of evangelicalism.

It isn't the in fact if you hold To certain forms of Evangelical Christian theology from the past 40 50 years whether you have children family all those things would be completely separated out because Christian theology is just a spiritual thing.

It doesn't have anything to do with real life stuff but if if you for example believe that it is your responsibility as a parent to protect your children's ability to likewise have children

That's not religious That's not a part of the creation mandate There's no there's no basis that really.

Oh, that's interesting hmm Express concerns about infertility or the lack of longitudinal studies

You mean safety studies? so your own life your own health

I've pointed out more than once. I take heart medications. I have not seen a single study and anywhere

That even begins to look or could even possibly begin to give any kind of long -term safety data in regards to the interaction of these vaccines with the

Single drug that I take Because I had cardiac ablation in 2011. Not not a one but that's so fulfilling the command not to because at least historically anyways people have indicated that The command not to commit murder is a foundational broad

Command to honor life and To not take other people's lives

To not endanger other people's etc, etc So that has a long history long history minimally

I know in reform theology for at least 500 years goes back to Calvin but it goes back earlier than that and That's that's not a sufficient ground to go.

I have sincere concerns That these vaccines may unnecessarily take life

I mean a study just came out was published in the UK for teenage boys and This was a bit of an argument for a while It's not an argument anymore for teenage boys.

It is more dangerous to take the vaccine than to get COVID Significantly more and the study is there now the study would be ignored.

The study will be censored. The study will be suppressed and That immediately makes you go.

I wonder why well, no, I don't wonder why Hundreds of billions of dollars is a more than sufficient reason for why in almost everything we're talking about right now

Nobody wants to talk about that no one wants to recognize that This massive transfer of wealth has taken place and continues to take place all across the globe

But there it is so The Paragraph completes with but none of these reasons are overtly related with the individual's religious beliefs

Well, only if you have an incredibly shallow view of Christian worldview issues. Can you make such a statement?

How does that how does that even Process there are undoubtedly people of faith with relevant moral and or theological concerns that could merit religious exemption.

Thank you This is why when appealing religious liberty as the basis for an exemption Christians should proceed carefully seeking a religious exemption should very clearly rest on apparent and applicable religious beliefs as Well, it should but once again those

Real solid foundations aren't addressed here goes on thus a strong religious exemption would be based on recognized scriptural precept

Okay, save life or a particular church or traditions confession or teaching.

Well That needs to be biblical from my perspective, but I get what's being said In its most robust form such an exemption might rely on a provision within a church's confessional statement explicitly forbidding vaccines or other medical interventions

Well timeout here we go again What we're what we're what's being ignored here is the unique clear documented nature of the experimental genetic vaccines that are being forced down our throats by armed governmental entities

We this is not the same thing the vast the vast majority of the hesitant quote -unquote vast majority of us

Have taken all sorts of vaccines in the past. So you might say well, you're being inconsistent.

No, I'm being very consistent those vaccines had long term

Medical studies behind them. They had been approved over not at warp speed

But at space normal speed for those of you the Star Trek universe and They had a tremendous amount of evidence behind them.

So like ivermectin Been prescribed hundreds of millions if not billions of times and it works and So take that anyway

That's different. We are in a different situation here. And in fact, we're in it's we're in a situation

Where the Variants that are coming out are coming so fast

That the current vaccine that we're currently being mandated will be irrelevant. In fact may already be irrelevant.

I Was looking at an NPR article. Yeah NPR. Okay. NPR is not exactly

On the side of people that are hesitant here, okay But NPR admitted let me let me see if I can if I can pull this up here

NPR admitted. Yeah, here we go Looking at Israel They they do want to say that They Remember the goalposts keep moving the goalpost the goalpost today is not on the same football field

That it was on when we started would you not agree? I mean, I can't see how any rational person would would disagree with that statement a two weeks to flatten the curve

That's it. That's different County. It's different state the goalposts move daily and the initial goalpost for the vaccines is

It has now been reduced all the way down to well, yeah, if you get the vaccine you can still get kovat you can you'll actually pass it on to others hundreds of times more effectively than you did before and And You can still get hospitalized and you can still die but Not quite as badly

Okay, that's where we are now That's we've gone from oh, they're safe and they're effective to They'll still tell you they're safe But now safe means our models do not predict anything rather than we have five or ten year safety studies.

I Prefer the old -style definition of safe personally, I think most people do But the effective thing is now well

You won't get quite as sick But you'll pass it around a whole lot more. Okay, great

So they're talking about for example The rate of serious cases among unvaccinated people in the under 60 crowd

Was it a little more than double the rate amongst vaccinated people in that age bracket So cuts it by half don't know what its long -term safety effects are but cuts it by half

That's that. Can you imagine if that had been the initial? Presentation of this stuff would anybody have gotten it the bad news,

I'm quoting again doctors say listen to this is That half of Israel's seriously ill patients who are currently hospitalized were fully

Vaccinated at least five months ago. Most of them are over 60 years old and have comorbidities

The seriously ill patients who are vaccinated are mostly I'm sorry The seriously ill patients who are unvaccinated are mostly young healthy people whose condition deteriorated quickly

Half of Israel's seriously ill patients fully vaccinated at least five months ago

So what you're being told there is you've got a half -year shelf life and it's going to get shorter and shorter in fact eventually

I Would predict personally by the time boosters are rolled out later this month in in the

US Two months Maybe two months of any relevance to them and the reason for this is the

Prevalence and the rise of variants. We'll look at here in a moment. I want to try to get through this because I want to get to a completely different subject before we

Run out of time today so as It as I mentioned they said

The Amish Jehovah's Witnesses, I'm back to the ERLC statement, the Amish Jehovah's Witnesses are examples

No such direct prohibition exists within wider Christian theology But these religious groups are able to appeal to a unique teaching wholly adopted by their specific faith tradition again

The this argumentation is fundamentally Either you are against all vaccines or you're against none

You cannot make a case against this specific vaccine and I say to you you better believe you can and you should and you must and you must

Now I would love to play this whole thing. I really really would But I think it would get

I don't know YouTube would have a hissy fit or something And it'd end up getting this taken down faster and it'll get taken down anyways, but I saw someone claim and I've not verified this.

I saw someone claim that Joe Rogan has Three and a half times the number of listeners and watchers as Fox News.

Oh, it's huge I don't watch it not for any particular reason.

I mean suppose profanity, but My understanding is that he tested positive for COVID -19 and crushed it using ivermectin and like five days just just Yeah, and he took the as they said horse dewormer.

So there's a video that came out yesterday just mocking and properly so ripping to shreds on a

Factual foundation the horse dewormer narrative which we talked about on the last program how you take a

Drug that is listed in In every meaningful human drug catalog as just almost a wonder drug

Nobel Prize winning hundreds of millions of if not billions of doses just a extremely wonderful thing and all of a sudden

Because of vax only ism and vax only ism the idea that the only way to deal with COVID -19 is vaccine vaccine vaccine vaccine

Genetic vaccine genetic vaccine genetic. That's what we are being told We've never done this with anything else

If it's really necessary, then mankind shouldn't have survived this long But the whole idea is just laughable horse dewormer

So I guess on the same program It looked like the same episode as far as I could tell there was an excellent

Clip Let me see if I can at least Yeah, and Here's Okay, this is this is a fellow being interviewed by Joe Rogan He's the guy from that.

What's the university you got kicked out of? Had all that rioting and all the rest of stuff that names escaping me at the moment.

I apologize anyway He has interviewed this particular individual who predicted a

While back we're able to show that so people could see it I made reference to it.

So people could people need to see it if we're gonna put it up there He interviewed a fellow who there we go

He interviewed a fellow who predicted exactly what's happening right now and In brief form

He was a little clearer than I was on the last program when I tried to and I hadn't heard this then but when

I tried to Communicate similar concepts. Let me try to Be brief and to and just look it up it look up look up Joe Rogan Virus variants,

I'm sure it'll pull it up if it hasn't been removed already If and if it is up my suggestion to you download and store

Put on jump drives hide them in the basement Whatever, so maybe someday we can document everything that happened in this crazy insane revolutionary time, but Here's here's what the guy said was going to happen

The vaccines that have been developed are very narrow There they they are they focus upon a

Subset of what's called the spike protein. It's just one portion of the spike protein

There are specific Complex numbers that identify exactly what protein subset it is of the spike protein and Because they are extremely narrow this creates

What we might call genetic pressure they use the term evolutionary pressure I Don't object to that.

It's natural selection pressure It is not something that is in any way opposed to a creation model

In fact, it's predicted by the creation model better than it's predicted by the evolutionary model but the point is that when you are vaccinated for measles rubella mumps, whatever

Polio When you are vaccinated for things like that, the assumption is That you are not going to be immediately exposed.

You're not in the middle of a pandemic and We are vaccinating into a pandemic

Into an explosion of these cases or at least that's what we're being told There has never been any

Vaccine that has Had the kind of global not just national but global push behind it

That we've we've seen for this there have been other vaccines have gone around the world, but this has been unprecedented

So we are vaccinating into an infectious cycle and so what this does is it places a

Massive amount of natural selection pressure upon the virus and The natural result of that is going to be the proliferation of variants lambda mu

Already who knows what's next on the on the docket after that lambda and mu will probably be

Off the radar for these vaccines don't know that for certain but in all probability

And so we are in essence Causing the rapid creation of variants

By Not encouraging natural immunity because natural immunity is much much broader that's why it's minimally 13 times better than anything that the vaccine can provide and I guarantee you once you get boosters.

It'll be even more than that It'll just get better and better and better in comparison to the

Vaccination as time goes by as the vaccine becomes less and less and less relevant Which is why?

The only future for this methodology for vax only ism is

Constantly Untested new genetic vaccines literally every few months

Because there's no way around it. We've never treated a respiratory virus this way not once and Now we're in the middle of it, and it's not working

It's not working, but we can't admit it and as even he pointed out if We started going another direction if we started going another direction

This would interrupt the heavy flow of financial resources into Big Pharma love of money is the root of all kinds of evil and so Here here is

Here's where we are and If this was about health if this was about science if this was about any of this stuff

Then people who've been raising red flags and waving them around and then getting cut off of YouTube and Facebook for so doing

These individuals would have been listened to and we'd be changing the direction that we're going we would be recognizing the need

To alter our path, but instead what are we getting? vaccine mandates useless vaccine mandates

That are turning into the most tyrannical methodology of absolute government control over a populace we ever seen and we can all remember and They're already putting out there and nobody cares

They were already putting out there the quotes from Joe Biden saying no. No, no, we can't do that. We can't mandate vaccines

I did it now we do it and The the Canadians said the same thing and all around the world.

You're gonna I remember January February All the political leaders were oh, that's right.

No, we know it that that'll never happen But we're just gonna hope that everybody does this and now

You unvaccinated pigs you You are killing all the rest of us.

Well, that's simply not true. And in fact by promoting vax -only ism

I Would say far more people have died because of vax -only ism Then if this had been treated in a balanced and meaningful fashion

But that's where we are so You can make a very strong case

Against these vaccines on a very rational level. The problem is

Who's being rational today? Who even has who who can even have a conversation with people today?

The stuff that I'm seeing from the left absolutely shocking

What what is out there the things that are being said, but there you go now, he's not on the left

Last weekend, I drove down to Tucson and had a great time with the brothers down there well up until almost getting washed away by a monsoon storm anyways and on the way down I listened to a

Video that had actually been recorded at least a year ago. I Am not sure

I'm not certain whether I heard this last year or not To be honest with you we're shifting gears by the way those of you who were doing the rah -rah -rah

We're shifting into a theological thing those who are going I don't want to think about this anymore We're shifting into something logical so you might be more interested now

Or if you were just scanning through real fast to see when something changed this is where it where it changes

I listened to this and I may have heard it.

I may have even thought to myself. I I need to respond to that I Don't know. I've seen a couple of these ask

Hank videos where he's talking about he's promoting Eastern Orthodoxy and and Dealing with issues of sola scriptura, and I am pretty certain that I did see this

I just don't believe that I made any comment on it and if I did well there you have real evidence that my memory is

Definitely failing me And the next number of years is going to result in you hearing a lot of things more than once It's sad anyway

Rich is gonna have to start taking up the mantle and Listening carefully and going yeah cut it you already talked about that But then again if it was a year ago, he'd forget about it too, so Yeah, you're older but Anyway We especially

I have especially provided responses to Hank in his attacks upon Sola scriptura for obvious reasons

Having defended the doctrine in the studio of the Bible Ants Man broadcast many years ago more than once With Tim Staples and Jimmy Akin and phone callers and all sorts of things like that So there is an element of you know

We addressed this with Hank and He agreed and maybe he wasn't listening

Maybe as mine and other things don't know But you know here we go again, so let's let's address it, but this is there's

Francis Chan there you can see Francis Chan and Metropolitan Ioannis I think is the guy's name that Uh Meanders around toward the end and and eventually says something that I thought about responding to but it's

Hank's response to Francis Chan's and again

Chan My recollection is graduate of master's Clearly When he was there

Did not have the advantage that I had in seminary and that is I already understood the importance of apologetics and hence had

Really focused I focused in very much in my seminary education on the topics that would be most important in what

I already knew I was going into and I recognized that a lot of people who take church history and things like that Are just trying to survive they're just trying to get through And many of them don't really see how this is gonna be relevant to their ministry and a lot of church history professors aren't good at communicating

Why you should be passionate about church history and why you should study these things But be as it may he you know sort of just throws it out there and and Basically says well,

I've just always viewed it as just a symbol a memorial You know

Using the terminology of the Zwinglian understanding, which I don't I Understand When someone refers to Zwingli Well, I'm gonna hold off on that because Hank gets to it.

Anyways, so I'll just hold off on that and then we'll get to it I I want to listen to what

Hank has to say and I want to respond to it because it needs to be responded to and And You know could certainly hope to see

Hank Recognize the error of his ways, but This is not really for him.

It's for everybody else in the process I Don't think Hank would debate these topics.

I can't see that happening but Be it as it may this is for the edification of everybody

So this is where Hank starts responding to Francis Chan and starts Talking about church history

It's interesting in the years that I knew Hank and the many times I was on the Bible Answer Man broadcast That was not his area at all

I Still don't think that it is to be perfectly honest with you as we will see with the comments here.

So let's Let's start with respect to church history, I think that we have to first of all look at the centrality of the church in church history the church was the epicenter of everything now

I want to Point out as we go through Various imbalances that lead to errors or just straight -up errors.

It is very common for people to say things like in church history this now

Anyone who is a church historian? Who has read widely in church history?

Knows that that kind of a statement is Highly questionable and easily abused different people at different points in time or in different geographical areas will have differing emphases and Differing understandings of phrases and terminology and while you can generally say

That for example in the first 500 years of church history

Schism was considered a tremendous scandal that in comparison to what we experience all the time in Western culture where you have all sorts of different churches on all sorts, you know, three churches on a on a street corner

And I'm not even talking about what you can get down in Georgia where you'll have three Baptist churches

On a street corner first second and third and they've all split off from each other I'd even mean that but during that time period the idea of schism of A disruption of the unity of the church was considered a true scandal hence the

Novation schism the Donatist controversy Both by the way produced by how the church responded to persecution

It was more it was it was not theology that caused divisions It was not the color of the seats on the pews that caused division back then

It was how do we respond to? Persecution and specifically how do we respond to people who want back into the fellowship after a period of persecution

Where there was compromise on their part in some fashion Don't have time to go to that right now. I'm just using it as an illustration

And so you can make general statements that in general in the church in the second century

There was a strong emphasis upon unity due to this understanding but to just Broadly say well the church is the epicenter of all things.

Well, what do you mean by that? Do you mean the local church? Do you mean the Universal Church and Is that not actually something that develops in some areas at a later period of time that one could say that you could certainly make an argument that Christ is viewed as The epicenter of all things that the the risen

Savior Is seen in that way and and hence The church as it is his body

Then you could At least try to do that but this kind of broad

Generalization is just really easily abused and will be abused

Here, unfortunately, it was the epicenter of the universe. And why is that it is because Paul in his didactic epistle 1st

Timothy chapter 3 says that the church is the ground and the pillar of truth

The problem, of course, is that 1st Timothy chapter 3 verse 15 Actually is referring to the local church.

It's not referring to the Universal Church. I don't see the people who continuously

Abuse and misuse this text ever dealing with the fact that when you walk through 1st

Timothy 3 Paul is talking about how Timothy is to behave in the local church.

He's dealing with local church issues He's talking about the qualifications for deacons and elders and he's talking about how the older women are to be treated in the young That's all local church stuff folks.

That's not Universal Church stuff That's the local church and a lot of people really really really struggle with the idea that you could ever look at The local assembly as the pillar and ground of the truth until you think about what pillar and ground means

A pillar and a ground hold something else up They don't define what that is

They don't give rise to what that is. They hold something else up And so it is in that God ordained local assembly where the

Word of God is being preached Where the ordinances are being practiced the supper is being taken people are being baptized.

Those are the only ones That is where you have the truth of God being proclaimed

Amongst the people of God where the where that church then is existing. It's proclaiming

The kingdom of Christ to the world now,

I know Hank did not have That kind of ecclesiology

When he was still a Protestant and so if just as with Roman Catholic converts

There's very very many parallels between Converts to Orthodoxy and converts to Roman Catholicism.

They may try to argue that point, but I've seen too many of them and In in that context

I frequently find that people that did not not that they hadn't heard it but did not practice appreciate have a passion for a meaningful biblical

Ecclesiology will be glad to throw it off and embrace a

Hyper -ecclesiology an ecclesiology that goes beyond what the pages of Scripture would give to us and that's what you have with this use of 1st

Timothy 3 15. So That's just allowing the scripture to speak for itself

Against a an abuse of the text and an over generalization on Hank's part

It is the church if you look at early church history that gave us the

Bible Without the church, we would not have the Bible now

We have already refuted Hank's abuse of this error as well. So I'll be very very brief.

The early church was a faith of the book You start with the earliest documents that we can

Identify outside the New Testament and they are documents that are soaked in reverence for Scripture the

Constant confusion on the part of Roman Catholic converts and Eastern Orthodox converts between Bible and New Testament Bible and Old Testament is a

Demonstration of where the problem here lies Because there is no question that there is a period of time just as there was in the

Old Testament Between the writing of the last book and The recognition of that book by the entirety of the people of God There's about a 200 year period between Malachi and the laying up of the

Old Testament books in the temple during the intertestamental period in the Old Testament and Muratorian fragment about 175 200 similar time period

Interestingly enough in a moment, maybe even next moment Hank is going to amazingly say that it was

Bishop Athanasius That defined the New Testament Canon, I am sure that Bishop Athanasius Would stand there aghast at such an assertion

He never made any such claim like that. His 39th Festal letter Does not say

I hereby define these books. I have the authority to do this as a bishop of the church blah blah blah blah blah blah

That is not what he was doing. It was a recognition of What was already the practice of the

Orthodox churches at that time? It was not thereby a definition of any quote -unquote infallible sense

The Orthodox may have more of a Willingness to go this direction than for example

Roman Catholics. Roman Catholics can't do Athanasius this way. Not only Does Athanasius not have what

Trent eventually defines dogmatically in 1546? But their much stricter standards of evidence would preclude a

Festal letter as being a Sufficiently clear definition shall we say but there is a

Recognition that there is a period of time Where the New Testament books are being distributed, copied.

There are some New Testament books that are Resisted in certain areas,

Revelation being one of them and there is a period of time Where that that takes place, but that does not mean that during that period of time the church was a bookless organization.

The Church from the beginning knew that God had spoken in Hagia Grafe Hagia Grafe the

Holy Scriptures and Never ever questioned the centrality and authority of the

Grafe That which is written Gegrepti final argument and Doesn't matter what early source you look to this will be seen in all of them and all of them from the beginning are likewise quoting from Gospels Paul are there some books aren't quoted really early on?

Yeah there are But you have a very early recognition that there are covenant documents outside of The old covenant documents because this is now the new covenant church and those old covenant documents are still

God speaking So the idea of a church that has ever been her own voice

This is you need to understand when we talk about the Reformation. This was one of the key issues and Very very few of us stay aware of this.

This is one of the key issues From whence comes the scripture? does the church come from scripture scripture come from the church, and he just said it's the church and produces scripture and Hence the foundation for a denial of sola scriptura

Both in word and in deed people think that the Bible fell out of the sky, you know Many people think that the

King James Version 1611 is an autograph it fell out of the sky hot off the port

Same for used. Yeah, exactly But the truth of the matter is there was no

Bible in the early church fallacious on an inexcusable level

There was Anyone who Studies those documents knows

That the Old Testament Not again. This is where he may be equivocating

There was no Bible in the church as in all of The Old Testament New Testament collected into one volume.

Well, duh, but that proves nothing That's just a historical observation

About what took place in history No one's saying otherwise No one is saying that the

Bible did float down out of heaven on a on a pillow But again

Hank Hank never really meaningfully interacted with serious

Christian scholarship reformed Christian scholarship And so dealing with a war field

Dealing with a modern scholar like Kruger These just weren't things that that Hank did before his conversion and it comes out in just amazing statements like this

The early church was a church of the book and All you've got to do is read them read the early fathers to see it do it in such a way that you see when they are quoting from Scripture and from where they're quoting and It's obvious.

In fact, the Bible was not codified as the 27 books of the

New Testament now, did you catch that? There's the there's the equivocation There's the equivocation.

The Bible is not 27 books in the New Testament Okay The the

Old Testament canon is not up for grabs here so that was already established and the church had it and the church saw it as Absolute Theanostos revelation so the equivocation is

Quite damaging to his argument canon that we enjoy today Until 367 it was it was codified formally by Athanasius Okay, as I said

That's just false Athanasius was not making that claim He did not claim to have the authority to codify for the church or anything along those lines

It was the 39th festal letter. He goes to the canon because there's been questions about certain books that are being distributed and Gnostics had written books and so on and so forth, but this is not any type of formal codification

This is not Athanasius claiming that he has the power and authority to do this kind of stuff

It's a this is this is how you elevate a historical event Because in these in these epistles what

Athanasius would do is he would address various issues that would be relevant to his fellow bishops and That obviously at getting toward the end of the fourth century is an important issue especially right after the final defeat of the

Well, not even final they were still right toward the end of the Arian controversy at that point in time

Much of their energy had been focused upon that and Hence other areas need to be addressed.

And so this was a bishop edifying his other bishops This was not Athanasius claiming some power to create the

New Testament canon letters circulating throughout the churches, but formally codified by Athanasius and by the way,

Athanasius was the one who fought the Arian heresy He was the one who said

Athanasius against the world. He was willing to stand against the world for the deity of our

Lord and Savior Jesus Christ so I'm not sure what that has to do with the false claim that Athanasius defined the

New Testament We can be thankful that his 39th

Festal Letter does contain a Listing of books, but it's old in New Testament So was he codifying the

Old Testament too? It hadn't been codified until near the end of the fourth century No, they've been codified long before that That those were those were things that were already known during the ministry of Jesus You don't see

Jesus sitting there having arguments about the canon with the with the Scribes and the Pharisees. Do you? No, those books have been laid up.

So To list these things does not mean that Athanasius was claiming some kind of authority to create canon.

That's just a misrepresentation The Bible then is codified and it takes centuries quite frankly before Those codified books become prevalent in the

Eucharistic assemblies throughout the then known world And again, you will not find any

Patristic writings during this time period That are absent of scriptural citations and the recognition of the ultimate authority of Scripture itself

So this is just simply a an attempt It's it's an attempt an abusive attempt

It abuses church history to lessen the clarity of the testimony of the early church to the authority of Scripture so as to elevate the alleged authority of the church and Then of course, you're gonna identify your particular church and its particular teaching and that way you don't have to actually substantiate these things solely from the revealed

Word of God so You look at many many centuries of church history in which there is no no

Bible. I Don't even know how you say things like this.

This is the this is the former Bible answer man, I would submit to you That someone who says something like this many many centuries church history where there was no

Bible Should not call himself the Bible answer man Really shouldn't

This is this is just I I don't even I don't even know what to say in Response to something like this.

It is simply untrue on a fundamental level All I can figure out what the only the only defense of this is to say that there were many centuries of church history before there was a collection in one bound volume of the

Old and New Testament scriptures as a whole basically is If you want to say that that has nothing to do with what he's now going to say about the church church authority interpretation of Scripture and eventually getting around to the subject of The Eucharist has nothing to do with any of that.

But there you go. That's That's what you what you have going on there Well, God has not ceased working.

He's worked through the church The Holy Spirit working through the church is continuing to communicate truth the truth not only of Scripture But a proper understanding of that Scripture and you can kind of get this just okay to catch that here's here's the key issue and all of you who have

Followed our responses to everyone who denies solo scriptura whether Orthodox or Roman Catholic have seen this is

This argumentation you you try to historically argue well, the church can't be completely under the authority of written scripture as the

Bride of Christ being under the Spoken Word of Christ there has to be this tradition.

There has to be this further elucidation of truth because they didn't have the

Bible and so This is how you lay the foundation for the elevation of your particularly chosen tradition now

You gotta understand something here When people join these various groups

Roman Catholicism Orthodoxy they like to pretend that the particular group that they joined is the representation of The truth

But not only do you have all sorts of forms of Roman Catholicism today

Just look at Pope Francis Look at Francis look at Ratzinger Benedict, and then look at John Paul Major major variations between them very very different understandings and perspectives

Eastern Orthodoxy all you got to do is

Start listening to them going at each other on Calendar issues and holiday issues and you might say that sounds minor

Yeah to us it does it ain't to them. Oh Goodness, it isn't to them

And of course, they look at some of the things we argue about and that sounds really minor and we go No, no, this is a gospel issue.

So Greek Orthodox versus Russian Orthodox That those schisms and divisions you can try to paper them over all you want but they can be vicious and so Everybody wants to you know, once you start talking about tradition

Who gets to decide that tradition well you did You're the one that chose to do so and So when you say well,

I got past the problem that sola scriptura Presents. No, you didn't all you've got is your personal interpretation of Scripture all you've got your personal interpretation of tradition

Where'd that get you? no place Got you no place at all. All you did was you move the line back and you sort of Broom the sand down so you couldn't see what the line used to be, but you're still the one making the choices you're still the one making the choices and That's that's the problem.

I thought I was gonna get a lot farther in this I really really I figured half an hour, but that was that was dumb

I do many dumb things. I am very frequently a dumb person. So I will admit that publicly yet again

I've did it many many many times. I thought I was gonna get a lot farther than this, but I didn't

I will try to Make a good note and and press on and continue on Because I think this is important and it also is

I don't know about you helpful One last last thing let me go a minute or two over it is helpful

When we are in the midst of a cultural and political revolution Which we are

It is helpful To think back on history Because the tendency for us is to become so focused in the moment

That what's happening now is more important than everything. It's ever happened in history. And so it's easy for me to say, you know what?

500 years from now and there Certainly have in the audience that don't believe there'll ever be another 500 years from now or could even possibly be and If there isn't 500 years from now

Hey, I'm ready to go that's fine, that's cool. I'm ready But 500 years from now what we're going through now may be

Two paragraphs in a history book if paragraphs are still a thing at that time Maybe or it may be a turning point in history and it gets its own chapter.

But the point is it will be a part of history and We live in history because history is simply the recognition that God is doing what will glorify him and We live in the midst of it.

So try not to become consumed in the moment

Try to realize that when we look at history itself Everybody in the past Believed that what was going on in their day was the most important thing that ever happened and We have 2 ,000 years of church history

There have been deep and dark times and there have been bright and beautiful times and in all probability same thing in the future

I'm one of those people. I'm a Scotsman for crying out loud. I think it's I think it's the weather in Scotland I think it just genetically makes us gloomy and It's easy for me to only see the negatives

To only see the worst -case scenarios coming as quickly as is humanly possible.

I get that At the same time. I'm a realist.

I believe Romans 1 is true and I see it played out every single day in front of my eyes and my confidence is

That Christ's kingdom cannot be destroyed now your eschatology is going to inform whether you believe that's solely a spiritual kingdom or whether The son asks the father to give him the nation's as his inheritance and the father gives it to him

There's all sorts of applications in between but the point is that our inheritance is sure and If you in these days find it

Hard to pray anything other than imprecatory prayers Please be aware that there's many who understand that But also be aware that a mindset that fundamentally destroys

The peace that is to pass all understanding is a sinful mindset I'm pretty much looking in the mirror when

I say that you get up in the morning. You can't believe what's happened overnight

What happened yesterday? you take the moment to sit back and realize what's happened over the past two years and It's easy to become consumed easy to become consumed and yet as A believer

I am supposed to have a peace that passes all understanding. That's not a

That that's not a drug induced euphoria That is not something that makes you useless in this world

But you are to have a peace and a joy That the world cannot understand if the world takes that from you.

The world is winning The world is winning And so only you can look at yourself and analyze why that might be and Maybe I'm the only person

I'm preaching to you right now, but I don't think I am. I don't think I am.

I think there are a lot of folks who are hearing exactly what I'm saying and You recognize that in your own experience

That peace and that joy It's not there It's not there It needs to be

Need to repent of that thing called worry. Oh There is a besetting sin if I've ever heard of one repent of that thing called worry and Recognize that if Christ has called you to be his servant at this time, he will equip you to do so He will give you the strength to accomplish the task.

You've been called to perform So that little mini sermon was just like I said primarily for me

If it helps you, that's great. All right, I'm gonna make a mark at that point Seven minutes and 22 seconds

All right, seven minutes of 22 seconds in and we will we will press forward with that just as eventually

I'll get back to Trent Horne and Jimmy Akin and it's all on lists right there on my screen

Problem is I put them on those little sticky notes on your screen Not the sticky sticky notes, but the electronic sticky notes and you just get used to seeing it there

You ever notice that if you write yourself a note and it just stays there and stays there It just sort of it's like it disappears.

It just becomes part of the background and it just doesn't function anymore. And Yeah, that I'm confessing a lot of things today, aren't

I? Yes All right. Well, thanks for watching the program today again,

I hear the music I Managed to get a cross -politic episode kicked off of YouTube, so I don't know why we're still here