Introduction to Daniel 7 | Adult Sunday School
Introduction to Daniel 7 | Adult Sunday School
Transcript
So welcome to adult Sunday school Kootenai Community Church, I really enjoyed Jeff's Series on first Timothy.
I'm hoping that second Timothy is in the book is in the is in the works But he's not here today so I can pin him down so as if you remember we've been going through the book of Daniel now
I my last time with you was November 21st of 2021 and So we're going to revisit the introduction to chapter 9 to chapter 7 excuse me a couple of housekeeping things after We're done assuming.
I don't run way over and we go out into the entryway out there we need to be quiet for Terran's class because We don't want to interrupt it
So let's open in prayer father.
We are grateful for your word It is life and truth to us It is the revelation of your son yourself and your
Holy Spirit it is all we need for life and godliness in Christ Jesus and This morning as we look into your word.
It is with an expectation that you will teach us Lord I pray that I'm out of the way and you are
Sovereign and majestic in your word so that we get to know you even more today and love you even more today than we did
This morning or yesterday Father it is your word that brings us to you to your throne room.
And as we look into the book of Daniel it is Appropriate for today as all of your word is
So teach us Encourage us cause us to be more obedient and we'll thank you for all you're going to do at Kootenai in Jesus name.
Amen So now some of the stuff we'll be going through we're gonna read through Daniel chapter 7 but some of the stuff we'll be going to you're gonna think
I'm reading from a Current newspaper now not the Daily Bee because I don't read fiction, but it's very appropriate for what's going on today as all of Scripture is but the the prophetic elements in Daniel are
Going to become even more Poignant if you will as we go through it with all that's happening today
Now I say that understanding that they said that during World War one They said that during World War two, and so I'm not one of these that's gonna set a date for you, but we're close.
I Think I'm thinking most of us what's gonna happen is in the rearview mirror That's about all
I will say As far as predictive because I'm not I'm not a prophet. I Didn't even know what
I was gonna have for breakfast this morning. So So let's open by reading chapter 7 of Daniel It's on page 1151
At least in my authorized What do they call it? The non -arminian standard version in the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel saw a dream and visions in his mind as he lay on his bed
Then he wrote the dream down and related the following summary of it Daniel said
I was looking in my vision by night and behold the four winds of heaven were stirring up the great sea and Four great beasts were coming up from the sea differing from one another
The first was like a lion and had the wings of an eagle I kept looking until its wings were plucked and it was lifted up from the ground and made to stand on two feet like a man a human mind also was given to it and behold another beast a second one resembling a bear and It was raised up on one side and three ribs were in its mouth between its teeth and thus they said to it arise devour much meat
After this I kept looking and behold another one like a leopard which had on its back four wings of a bird
The beast also had four heads and Dominion was given to it After this I kept looking in the night visions and behold a fourth beast dreadful and terrifying and extremely strong and it had large iron teeth it devoured and crushed and Trampled down the remainder with its feet and it was different from all the beasts that were before it and it had ten horns
While I was contemplating the horns behold another horn a little one came up among them and three of the first horns were pulled out by the roots before it and behold this horn possessed eyes like the eyes of a man and the mouth uttering great boasts
I Kept looking until thrones were set up and the Ancient of Days took his seat
His vesture was like white snow and the hair of his head like pure wool His throne was ablaze with flames its wheels were a burning fire a river of fire was flowing and coming out from before him
Thousands upon thousands were attending him and myriads upon myriads were standing before him The court sat and books were opened the books were opened
Then I kept looking because of the sound of the boastful words, which the horn was speaking I kept looking until the beast was slain and its body was destroyed and given to the burning fire as For the rest of the beast their dominion was taken away
But an extension of life was granted to them for an appointed period of time. I Kept looking in the night visions behold with the clouds of heaven one like a son of man was coming and he came up to The Ancient of Days and was presented before him and to him was given dominion
Glory and a kingdom that all the people's nations and men of every language might serve him
His dominion is an everlasting dominion which will not pass away and his kingdom is one which will not be destroyed as for me
Daniel my spirit was distressed within me and the visions in my mind kept alarming me
I approached one of those who were standing by and began asking him the exact meaning of all this So he told me and made known to me the interpretation of these things
These great beasts which are for a number are for kings who will arise from the earth But the
Saints of the highest one will receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever for all ages to come
Then I desired to know the exact meaning of the fourth beast which was different from all the others exceedingly dreadful with its teeth of iron and its claws of bronze and which devoured crushed and trampled down the remainder with its feet and the meaning of the ten horns that were on its head and the other horn which came up and before which the
Three of them fell which three of them fell Namely that horn which had eyes and a mouth uttering great boasts and which was larger in appearance than its associates
I kept looking and that horn was waging war with the Saints and overpowering them until the ancient of days came and Judgment was passed in favor of the
Saints of the highest one and the time arrived when the Saints took possession of the kingdom Thus he said the fourth beast will be a fourth kingdom on the earth
Which will be different from all the other kingdoms and it will devour the whole earth and tread it down and crush it
As for the ten horns out of this kingdom ten kings will arise and another will arise after them and he will be different from the previous ones and will subdue three kings and he will speak out against the
Most High and wear down the Saints of the highest ones and He will intend to make alterations in times and in law
They will be given into his hand for a time times and half a time
But the court will sit for judgment and his dominion will be taken away annihilated and destroyed forever
Then the sovereignty the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be given to the people of the
Saints of The highest one his kingdom will be an everlasting kingdom and all the Dominions will serve and obey him at this point the revelation ended as For me
Daniel, my thoughts were greatly alarming and my face grew pale, but I kept the matter to myself
Think I would be alarmed too so this is uh, the entire chapter gives us an overview of Daniel's view of what happens in the end times and as many of you who study prophecy know there are quite a few differing opinions and So one of the things we're going to do as we go through this
I'm going to we're gonna have kind of a mini class on what the various views of the end times are
Without any without any commentary as to who's right or who's wrong just so that we we understand the players and the understanding of understand the understanding if you will of chapter 7 and later chapters in Daniel and Revelation and we'll talk about the different dispensations or the different manifestations of the tribulation those kinds of things just so we have an
Understanding of what the church today believes and I'm going to repeat something that I've repeated before there are different views of the end times and These views are held by our brothers and sisters in the
Lord who simply have a different view of how things are going to Manifest themselves and how they're going to complete but I will say this that at the end the most important part of that whole chapter
That we need to keep in mind well, how can you say that there's a most important part of God's Word for today's purposes?
it says Then the sovereignty the dominion and the greatness of all the kingdoms under the whole heaven will be given to the people of the saints of the highest one his kingdom
Will be an everlasting one an everlasting kingdom and all the dominions will serve and obey him that Will be our focus that the culmination of everything as it comes in Daniel and Revelation and the prophecies that we have is
That God will be sovereign and he will be obeyed and he will be and preeminent in all the earth and in all of the universe in the
What as he should be so those are the most important things to remember and I forgot my little do
I need a clicker? Let me grab my clicker, it's a technological term clicker and we're assuming
I know how to work it Yeah, I didn't do that So closing out remember some of the book of Daniel was written in Aramaic Which was the language of the court at the time which was the language of the people?
Closing out the Aramaic section of the book of Daniel chapter 7 details a vision that fairly closely
Corresponds to the vision Nebuchadnezzar had in chapter 2 So chapters 7 through 12 contain dreams or vision that came to Daniel in the years of his later life in the later years of his life
Some were received before the events that we read about or read about in chapter 5 and 6
At least one came after these events. Remember that chapter 5 was the story of the writing on the wall
It's been a while since we read it, but I'm sure you've all read Daniel several times If not many times and chapter 6 was the story of the lion's den
Counting the dream Nebuchadnezzar had there are five visions or dreams in the book of Daniel The first of course is
Nebuchadnezzar's dream Which details the general sweep in general the sweep of history with the
Gentile nations ending with the kingdom of God The second is the vision in chapter 7 of the four beasts also ending with the dominion of Christ The third vision occurs in Daniel chapter 8 and describes the
Medo -Persian Empire and the Grecian Empire The fourth vision occurs in chapter 9 and is most often called the 70 weeks vision which details a period of 490 years between the reign of our deserts the art of Xerxes and the baptism of Christ and The fifth vision comes in Daniel chapters 10 through 12
Where Daniel is shown historical progression from his time until the final days the general consensus of conservative scholars
Bible scholars is that Did we lose me? No the general consensus of conservative scholars is that the vision this vision covers the history or the trajectory of the four world empires
Babylon Medo -Persia Greece and Rome with the culmination being the second coming of the
Lord Jesus Christ and the introduction of the fifth and final kingdom the eternal kingdom of God The idea that this chapter fleshes out the begin the happenings in chapter 2 has not been without challenge
But the similarities are simply far too close to be easily explained away
Okay, just go to the next one. There are only there are only two major differences or differences in this particular view
Chapter 2 details the dream of a heathen King Chapter 7 is a vision of God.
That's too far. That's okay. I will try it. Okay, here we go
Chapter 2 details the dream of a heathen King chapter 7 is the vision of a man of God in the dream in the dream
In chapter 2 presents the history of the nations as though they are wonderful and majestic What has been called their outer aspect?
Chapter 7 looks at the inward spiritual aspect of the nations and renders them as though they were wild beasts
This has been likened to their inward spiritual aspect one commentator said the first is a view of the history of nations as man sees them and The second is a view as God sees them
God sees the inner he sees the real man He understood who nebuchadnezzar what he was and all the remaining or continuing
Empires as they succeed one other one by one Chapter 2 views world history from a human perspective and paints it is glorious and majestic a
Panorama of power and wonder chapter 7 views history from God's perspective as immoral brutal and depraved
Chapter 7 has far more detail than chapter 2 and as one commentator notes is something of a commentary on chapter 2 7 is
Critics have reserved some of their greatest contempt for chapter 7 demonstrating again Their artificial criteria for judging the book of Daniel as a 2nd century
BC history rather than the 6th century BC prophecy remember we've talked about that there were
Daniel was too accurate and so people said he couldn't have been that accurate therefore This is not this was written in the 2nd century and not the 6th century
BC because nobody could be that accurate well, God can be that accurate in case you were wondering
I Know you weren't Critics believe that it was originally written in Hebrew and then translated into Aramaic There is absolutely no historical justification for this and it is simply an assumption
It is much more likely that it was written in the language of the time which was Aramaic Conservative scholars then look at the vision in this chapter and the vision in chapter 2 as Directly related so that the four beasts of chapter 7
Correspond directly to the four parts of the human statue in chapter 2 Thus the winged lion represents or corresponds to the
Babylonian kingdom of Nebuchadnezzar the bear corresponds to the Medo -Persian kingdom and the winged leopard corresponds to the
Grecian Empire and Finally the unnamed fourth beast Corresponds to the Roman Empire Culver Daniel Culver in his commentary on Daniel observes
He says this since the same general subject is treated in this vision as the dream of chapter 2
It is natural that the same general principles present in that prophecy Present in that prophecy should follow here the same series of powers the same continuity of rule degeneration of character of authority
Division of sovereignty and increasing strength of the kingdoms However, it is not to be expected that this will be a mere repetition of the prophecy of chapter 2 under different figures
We might expect some elaboration and enlargement of details And this is what just what does take place in chapter 7 the fourth or Roman Kingdom?
Which in chapter 2 is given no more particular treatment than the first three is here picked out for special treatment furthermore
The final Antichrist who does not appear at all in chapter 2 is here introduced as a little horn
And identified as the final king of the fourth kingdom Careful conservative scholarship also rejects the idea that the fourth kingdom is
Greece and not Rome The idea is completely unsupported by the book of Daniel and is contradicted by New Testament revelation for example
The abomination of desolation spoken of by the Lord Jesus Christ in Matthew chapter 24 is spoken of as future
Which would preclude the idea that Antiochus Epiphanes fulfilled that prophecy? Further as John Walvoord explains in his commentary many other parallel predictions between Daniel and other biblical books demonstrate that much of Daniel That much that Daniel predicted is yet to come prophecies in the book of Revelation Written in the late first century also anticipate as future the fulfillment of parallel prophecies in Daniel for example
Revelation 13 parallels the final stage of Daniel's fourth Empire the Roman Empire This could not therefore refer to events fulfilled in the 2nd century
BC Daniel 9 26 announces that the Messiah will be cut off and the city of Jerusalem destroyed events that occurred in the
Roman period The Jewish historian Josephus believed that Daniel had predicted the rise of Rome and the
Roman destruction of Jerusalem And he said this in the same manner Daniel also wrote concerning the
Roman government and that our country should be made desolate by them Unquote the author of the apocryphal book 2nd
Esdras Who lived near the close of the 1st century AD clearly identified the fourth kingdom of Daniel's vision as the
Roman Empire in? Chapter 12 verses 11 and 12. It's not scripture, but it's a historical book
To these arguments may be added the details of the second third and fourth empires throughout the book of Daniel which harmonized
Precisely with the Medo -Persian Greek and Roman empires the alternate views of the critics can be held only
If Daniel's prophecy is considered in factual error in several places
Since the details of the prophecy do not really coincide with the critics theories for these reasons conservative scholars have held firmly to the traditional identification of the four empires in Daniel 7 or excuse me in chapter 7 of Daniel which mirror those of chapter 2 and finally
It is notable to remember that the stone made without hands in Daniel chapter 2 that suddenly and completely
Destroys the fourth the final kingdom does it in an instantaneous fashion? It is not accomplished over a long period of time
Slowly but surely but rather all at once This will become important as we compare
Daniel to revelation and to the predictions that the Lord Jesus Christ himself made So that would be a reintroduction of the introduction of the book of Daniel that we did back in probably late
October I'm slower than Jim, huh? Of course if you take a six -month hiatus you end up slower.
So let's look at chapter 7 verse 1 We'll start into this in chapter 7 verse 1
The Word of God says this in the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon Daniel saw a dream and visions in his mind as he lay on his bed
Then he wrote the dream down and related the following summary of it. Have any of you ever had a dream and You it was kind of vivid when you got up, but by noon you had forgotten it
I actually have had some interesting dreams that I thought to write down and didn't and Promptly forgot them.
I did have a dream one time when my brother -in -law shot me. I remember that one and And he's we're actually good buddies, so I'm still wondering about that dream
You know, but that's about all the I don't attach any significance to dreams
The dreams in Scripture that are interpreted in Scripture great stuff dreams today. They're just dreams
Some make some become Jurassic Park, you know So Daniel had this dream and he wrote the details down The first year of Belshazzar was most likely 2553
BC this dream would have come to Daniel in a period of time between the events of chapters 4 and 5 about 14 years before the fall of Babylon so Daniel actually had this dream between the recording of Nebuchadnezzar's vision and The event of the handwriting on the wall.
It was in between those Daniel actually took the time to write down a summary of this dream
Which was an excellent idea since like I said dreams escape us if we don't write them down. We don't chronicle them
It should be noticed also noted also that this was a dream that occurred while Daniel slept on his bed as Opposed to a series of visions that came to him while he was awake
The dream came to him a few years after the dream Nebuchadnezzar had Daniel was in his late 60s when he wrote in this book in his book about the dream
But he had the details that he had written down earlier So he was able to bring them to mind and I myself find if I make notes to something
I'm far more likely to remember and that's why I take notes in here. Not so much that I Yeah, so much that I forget
I was gonna say but if I take notes somehow It seems to cement some things into my mind a little bit better Of course,
I don't know if I can really call what I have a mind, but I use it for that so Daniel Took those notes and then later on recorded them
The subsequent verses that detail the dream are actually only a summary of all that he dreamt note also that Daniel names a specific time which
Permanently roots this vision as happening in the 6th century BC Contrary to the critics who would say
Daniel was written in the 2nd century BC Daniel leaves no room for that He roots it in at the 6th century
BC It was king of Belsh's king of Babylon Belsh's are that's when he had the dream
Now those who would say this was written in the 2nd century would have Belsh's are 400 years out of place easily
Chapter 7 verse 2 Daniel said oh, are there any questions? So there are many of you in here
I know who have spent more time studying prophecy than I have and I welcome your your comments unless you disagree with me
Then shut up. Not at all verse 2
Daniel chapter verse 7 verse 2 Daniel said I was looking in my vision by night and behold the four winds of heaven were stirring up the great sea in this vision
In this vision some of the things Daniel saw are symbols the four winds of heaven Symbolized the chaotic conditions that characterize the nations of the world you think
How many nations do we have that are just quiet and subdued and Pacific not the ocean?
Polite to one another and get along and and don't need any mediation Yeah, that's what
I thought They also this vision also
They it symbolizes the power that God exerts on the nations. The sea is often use
Symbolically representing the world of nations Isaiah chapter 17 verse 12 and 13 alas the uproar of Many peoples who roar now who roar like the roaring of the seas and the rumbling of nations who rush on like the rumbling of Mighty waters the nations rumble on like the rumbling of many waters
But he will rebuke them and they will flee far away And he chased and be chased like chaff in the mountains before the wind or like whirling dust before a gate
Revelation 17 1 then one of the seven angels who had the seven bowls came and spoke with me and saying come here
I will show you the judgment of the great harlot who sits on many waters And then Revelation 17 15 and he wrote and he said to me the waters which you saw where the harlot sits
Are peoples and multitudes and nations and tongues so symbolism abounds in this section
Now here begins the detailed chronology of the end times with which Daniel is most concerned chapters 1 through 6 are considered by both conservative and Other scholars liberal scholars as being the first half of the book and is general in tone with few specific stories
Chapters 7 through 12 is more specific with its series of visions and historical references to world rulers and kingdoms
Culver in his commentary separates Daniel into three sections the first section being an introduction in general chapter 1 and the second section chapters 2 through 7 being the times of the
Gentiles and which is written in Aramaic in the third section which details Israel's relationship to the
Gentiles written in Hebrew chapters 8 through 12, and that's fine whoops Technology got ahead of me there in any event no matter how you divide it
We are heading into the part of the book that is now controversy that is most controversial and is also very encouraging and exciting as all of God's Word is
So before we go any further as I did in this first time I introduced this I want to revisit the issue of Daniel being an historically correct book actually
I didn't go into this this is something that was for the next session, which would have been the 21st of November, but but Rick took over then
So we're going to revisit the issue of Daniel not being historically a historically correct book For this is the crux of the issue that leads to the idea that Daniel was a 2nd century
BC author rather than 6th century BC other critics assail the idea that Daniel Was incorrect in his statements that have historical import one of the more egregious
Charges made was that Daniel could not have been a 6th century BC writ writer because he got history wrong
This was early on when there seemed to be no record of Belshazzar many years ago But I think prior to 1920 when some of the more important Discoveries about King Belshazzar were made
This The idea was that Daniel did not properly arrange the history and the lines of the kings of Babylon Medo -Persia
And it's dealt with the simple fact is that Daniel was a careful historian and most certainly had access to volumes
No longer that no longer exist which informed his understanding of the histories involved one man put it this way
He said one of the worst errors of modern critics is in their supposing that one can posit the sources
From which a writer who lived 2 ,000 or more years ago must have derived his information
The complacence and self -assurance with such a knowledge of such sources as assumed might be dismissed with a smile
Were it not that these suppositions are often put forth Forward as arguments to prove a proposition the proposition that Daniel was wrong that Daniel didn't know his history
It seems marvelous that anyone today should fail to recognize that the ancient writers of history whether sacred or profane
Had access to many documentary sources that have long since ceased to exist
Many of these writers claim that they use such sources thus in the introduction to his exposition of Alexander Adrian says that he used he made use of the words of Ptolemy the first king of Egypt and of Aristobulus both of whom accompanied
Alexander on his campaign and Also of many others whose names he does not mention
Joseph Josephus in his treatise contra a peon Gives the names of about 40 historians of different nations from whom he called he called his statements
And he asserts again and again that a large part of the material used by him had been derived either by himself
Or by authorities directly from written officials whose records were possessed by the
Egyptians the Babylonians the Tyrians and the Jews Polybius gives the names of more than 20 historians from whom he derived his facts
Pliny the Younger in the first book of his natural history gives the names of the sources of each book that follows
For the fifth book which contains his account of Palestine He mentions the names of 60 historians and others from whom he derived his information and for the whole 37 books
He had names hundreds of authorities. It is noteworthy also that Neither of the historians named as the sources of that sources of Arian is mentioned by either
Josephus Polybius or Pliny and that each of these three last given names Names among their sources the names of some who are not apparently used by others
So they had access to books that no longer exists historical books libraries that have burned down Cities that were conquered and the conquerors destroyed the works they had access to these now
Remember, I am NOT. I am NOT placing any more Reliance on these than I am on scripture.
The point is is that today when people make Accusations that so -and -so couldn't have known his history
It's usually made stupidly If not always made stupidly because we have no idea what kinds of sources they had 2 ,600 years ago a few more things about this furthermore both
Polybius and Josephus from that they themselves had access to and Frequently consulted official records that have been preserved to their time and Josephus reiterates the fact that his chief
Authorities made use of the archives of the respected countries respective countries whose histories
They had written so he had access to the history books of the countries that he was talking about Thus of man the
Manifold. He says that he was a man who was by birth an Egyptian yet he had made himself master of the
Greek learning as Is very evident for he wrote the history of his own country in the Greek tongue by translating it as he says himself
Out of the sacred records of deus. He says that he was quote one that is believed to have written the
Phoenician history after an accurate manner and and of Menander the Ephesians that he wrote the acts that were done by the
Greeks and the barbarians under every one of the Syrian Kings and Had taken much pains to learn their history out of their own records of Berossus he says that he was by birth a
Chaldean well known to the learned on Account of his publication among the Greeks of the Chaldean books of astronomy and philosophy
This Berossus therefore following the most ancient records of the nations gives us a history Moreover many other eminent office authors who wrote in the
Greek language were known to Josephus such as Zephyrus 400 to 330 BC Theopompus that's an interesting name 380 to 330
BC Hecateus 6th and 5th century BC Herodotus 464 to 424
BC and Thucydides 471 to 400 BC a certain caster also is
Named by him as one of his authorities a man so utterly unknown to the classical writers that his name given is not even given in Adele and Scott's Greek dictionary in the
Encyclopedia Britannica nor in classical dictionaries all this just to say that Daniel most certainly
Being the astute man of God and scholar that he was had access to lots of information that is no longer in in existence
Imagine if the Smithsonian was destroyed today Now in our society we have computer backup on stuff on a lot of many things but just imagine if if there was an attack on this country and the victors who wanted to make monuments to themselves and one of those monuments is the history of the attack and subjugation of a nation they destroyed all the existing information so that 300 or a thousand years from now people would read about the destruction of the
United States And it might very well be very different from what actually happened But at some point all those histories existed and people wrote from them.
That's what this is pointing out Daniel was an accurate scholar He had access to information that we don't have access, but more importantly he had
God. Yes Rick. Yes I do most of the great nations in the past had the question was do you think the
King might have had a library most if not all of those nations had libraries We actually read about the libraries and some
Archaeological expeditions are exciting because they find a library they find Underneath this and underneath that tell they find a room that is full of information now a lot of it is is in poor shape
But enough of it is there to reconstruct much of what happened during that time This would have been
Daniel would have had access to the libraries of of Babylon and neighboring countries He was in a government employee and he traveled he was probably given authority to travel and he was in he was in charge
Remember, he was second in charge of the entire nation. So he would have represented Nebuchadnezzar to other countries regularly.
He would have been in those countries and probably had great access to their written volumes So at any rate,
I just wanted to dispel the notion that Daniel was a poor scholar He was a fabulous scholar, but he also had
God himself to to give him this information The point of fact is that ancient writers had at their disposal sources that very likely do not exist today
Daniel would have had access to the written histories of the countries and nations that came before him
He would have had access to the great libraries of the day to answer your question to information about Adjacent nations and even distant nations his histories are correct and they comport to what we know but more important they are scripturally sound
Any questions about that So libraries are important chapters
Yes to I couldn't hear you we will be going through that as one at a time one verse at a time
Yeah, but thanks for the question Yes, correct right
Correct. So how it relates is as the critics attack
Daniel for not being a 6th century BC writer Prophesying these things but rather being a 2nd century
BC writer writing the history Whenever Daniel tags something from the 6th century
BC. I was simply making the point We can trust that he had information that we do not have for historical statements not for prophetic statements
God gives him the prophecy But he is anchored into his time so that what he says is indeed prophecy
When we talk and when we go from The next well the next were the rest of the chapter pretty much.
It is not history. It is prophecy He lived in the 6th century
BC and these kingdoms were still to come is the point I was making does that make sense?
Okay so verse 3 Now he's going to talk about what's going to happen and four great beasts were coming up from the sea different from one another
The parallels to Nebuchadnezzar's vision in chapter 2 will be noted as we go
But it should be apparent at the outset that the tone of each is different Nebuchadnezzar a pagan
Visualized the succeeding great empires of man as glorious and represented by different kinds of valuable minerals and metals
Daniel a man of God has a different view. The succeeding nations are represented by rapacious beasts and their destruction is chronicled in Chapter 2
Daniel is the interpreter here in chapter 7 an angel is the interpreter The detail here is significantly greater than in chapter 2
So critics have attacked this section of Daniel repeatedly and doggedly throughout the millennia
It has been revealed clearly that the critical attacks are based on artificial criteria more often than not and are more often than not completely subjective
Conservative biblical scholars. However, see it as a key to God's program from Babylon to the second coming of Christ When read and understood in context it is a magnificent prophecy that demonstrates
God's omniscience and gives him great glory The charge that this section was originally written in Hebrew and later changed to Aramaic has no basis in history there's nothing that suggests that and It's simply based on the idea that Daniel the book is a forgery in dealing with the
Gentile world It is natural that this book would be written in the language of the day in the language of the government in the language of the people which was
Aramaic So the four great beasts represent as we will see the successive empires of Babylon Medo -Persia
Greece and Rome the sea actually represents the great mass of humanity always boiling and in tumult
Daniel makes it clear that there are four beasts and that they are all different from one another This establishes that the ruling dynasties that are represented here were at odds with each other and were different Any questions about that Comments verse 4
The first was like a lion and had the wings of an eagle I kept looking until its wings were plucked and it was lifted up from the ground and made to stand on two feet like a
Man a human mind also was given to it. So this beast Represents the kingdom of Babylon and Daniel's time winged lions were one of the main symbols of Babylon as was the eagle its ability was reduced by the plucking of the wings and then it was made into the
Similitude of a man this follows the life and actions of Nebuchadnezzar as Daniel watched in his dream
This seemed to be a fleshing out of what happened to Nebuchadnezzar in chapter 2 the plucking of the wings
Seems to be reminiscent of the humiliation of Nebuchadnezzar before the sovereign God during the interim of Nebuchadnezzar's insanity
He seems not to have had the mind of a man His mind was given back to him and the last phrase in this verse is reminiscent of that Other scriptures compare
Nebuchadnezzar to both a lion and an eagle. I want to move to the next one anyway
Jeremiah 4 7 a lion has gone up from his thicket and a destroyer of nations has set out
He has gone from his place to make your land away. So your cities will be ruins without inhabitant
Jeremiah 49 9 behold One will come up like a lion from the thickets at like that of the
Jordan against a perennial perennially wasted pasture Watered pasture.
Let me read. Let me reread that behold one will come up like a lion from the thickets of the Jordan against a perennially raced
Watered pasture for in an instant. I will make him run away from it and whoever is chosen I shall appoint over it for who is like me and who will summon me into court
Who then is the shepherd who can stand against me Jeremiah 50 verse 7
Israel is a scattered flock the Lions have driven them away The first one who devoured him was the king of Assyria and this last one who has broken his bones as Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon Jeremiah 50 44 behold one will come up like a lion from the thicket of the
Jordan to a perennial I just read that one from to a perennially watered pasture for in an instant I will make them run away from it and whoever is chosen
I will appoint over it for who's like me and who will summon me into court and Who then is the shepherd who can stand before me verse chapter 49 verse 22 behold?
He will mound up and swoop like an eagle and spread out his wings against Basra and the hearts of the mighty men of Edom in that day will be like the heart of a woman in labor
Lamentations 4 19 our pursuers were swifter than the Eagles of the sky. They chased us on the mountains
They waited in ambush for us in the wilderness Ezekiel 17 3 Saying thus says the
Lord God a great eagle with great wings long pinions and a full plumage of many colors came to Lebanon and Took away the top of the cedar and Habakkuk 1 8 their horses are swifter than leopards and keener than wolves in the evening
Their horsemen come galloping their horsemen come from afar. They fly like an eagle swooping down to devour so common
These animals were commonly used to depict rapacious nations Chapter 9 chapter 7 verse 5 and Behold another beast a second one
Resembling a bear and it was raised up on one side and three ribs were in its mouth Between its teeth and they said to it arise devour much meat
So with an insatiable desire to conquer everything in its path in front of it the Medo -Persian
Empire is Represented here the bear was considered a voracious powerful animal in ancient times this directly corresponds
To the land -hungry Medo -Persians further the bear corresponds to the torso and arms of silver and Nebuchadnezzar's vision critics
Ascribed the bear simply to the medians with no reference to the Persian element They they strike out the
Persian element and just ascribe it to the bear some critics Do the simple fact is though that there was never a time when the
Median Empire ever ruled? Individually over any part of the ancient Near East the history that Herodotus wrote
Clearly indicates that Cyrus conquered the Medes if you want to read that it's it's online It's in Herodotus 1 130 it's quite a it's quite a long read here, so I'll leave that out
But and that the Medo -Persians themselves conquered Babylon And I think you just what
I did is I just typed in his name and Conquering a Babylon and it brought up that section so if you want to read that it's very instructive
Herodotus's history is this is the story of the birth and upbringing of Cyrus And how he became king and afterwards as I've already late related how he sub how he
Subjugated Croesus in punishment for the unprovoked wrong done him and after this victory he became sovereign of all
Asia That's that section of Herodotus talked about here Thus the conquering of the Medes by Persia and their subsequent melding together precludes the idea of the liberal scholars that the bear represents
The Medes only the bear was considered a powerful animal ancient in ancient times second only to the lion in power
They were also considered slow and ungainly the beast mentioned in Revelation chapter 13 verse 2
Received his power from the dragon that received his power from the dragon is said to have had the feet of a bear
The bear also said to have been raised up on one side. There are a number of observations about this
Was it rising up on its hind legs? Was it laying down with one paw lifted up one theory is that this was referring to a physical abnormality
Resulting from one side being more dominant than the other the Persian ascendancy over the Medes in their alliance
The best that scholars have come up with is the idea that this represents the one -sided union of the
Persian and Median empires Though later in time historically Persia was far more powerful than the
Medes cut that kind conquered them We see this also in chapter 8 when we get there Represented by the two horns of the ram with the last being greater and higher
The ram there was identified as the kings of media and Persia in Daniel chapter 8 verse 20
This view also accepts the facts of history as they have played out Keep that in mind the three ribs in the bear's mouth have been represented as media
Persia and Babylon which were the three major components of the Medo -Babylonian
Empire a More likely interpretation is that the three ribs represent the Medo -Persian conquests of Lydia Babylon and Egypt this makes the bear a symbol of government and Conquest and the three ribs are those countries nations that were subdued by the
Medo -Persian Empire It has been observed that this prophecy accurately shows the character and history of the
Medo The Medo -Persian Empire which began in Daniel's time and continued for 200 years until Alexander the
Great in 336 BC Historically the rule in these ancient times went from Assyria to Babylon in 612
BC from Babylon to Medo -Persian in 539 BC and from Medo -Persian to Greece in 331
BC and we'll look later on the change from Medo -Persia to Rome any questions about that.
We're gonna close out here So as we're reading in your
I guess if you have an assignment, I don't give assignments, but just read Daniel chapter 7 several times and Maybe look into Matthew chapter 25 and Revelation chapter 13
Revelation 20 and make some comparisons on your own We're going to be looking at the play out in history of these empires as they succeeded one another keeping in mind that when the
Lord Jesus Christ conquers and Ends them it will be instantaneous. It won't be a slow succession.
It will be an ending boom and he will come and rule Let's pray thank you
Lord for this interesting and Incredible book help us to be careful in our understanding of it not to go too short or too far in anything
We look into it and receive from it. We pray that it will deepen our love for the
Lord Jesus Christ and our awe of your majesty and sovereignty over every single aspect of history from the very beginning until the very end
When you will be displayed as the sovereign ruler of the universe and we look forward to that time in Jesus name.