Provisionist Marshmallow Missiles Incoming! Thinking About Church History and Tradition.

Travel Plans, COVID Mandates, and the Coming Road Trip

Welcome to the Dividing Line. We're gonna try to sneak a program in here at an unusual time and the reason for that is I'm pulling out tomorrow. Sort of the beginning but not completely the beginning of a long trip we'll be doing some programs from from the road and then I'll be home for a few days and then a big trip up to Colorado this one we're doing the Conference with Jason Lyle up at Redemption Hills Church, and I'm not sure where else I'm speaking yet.

I haven't heard back from a few folks, but I imagine I will be in the Denver area probably I think on the 22nd maybe somewhere around there. Anyways, I don't have a calendar in front of me. So. But we're gonna throw a program in here while we can figured I'd wear my Tour de France shirt one last time it ends this weekend.

The 2022 edition has been pretty exciting actually I I don't know who's gonna win yet. It looks pretty good for Jonas Vingegaard, but Tati Pagaccia isn't gonna give up yet. Both their teams are decimated.

I hate when stuff like COVID and COVID rules sort of end up impacting Entire athletic competitions that people have trained for their entire lives. It's Speaking of which by the way, I hate to do this.

But once again. Over the past number of months, there's been a lot of people have been looking at me going, you know. This traveling by road stuff, you know, you don't have to wear a mask on planes anymore.

It's only been a few weeks, but I don't have to wear a mask on planes anymore. And you know, you might as well just be going back to the way you were doing things before and I've explained that. Actually, no, I've lost all my status and it would be quite different actually to be flying around.

But the main thing that I said from the start was Yes, it's temporary this this reduction of Mandates and things like it's temporary. These folks it was never done because of the virus to begin with so When they want to clamp down when they want to do the next step of weeding out.

You know weeding people out from police forces weeding people out from the military. There are the people who you know, you want to have the people in those positions that will do whatever they're told.

They don't have a Set of convictions that would keep them from harming themselves or harming others and things like that. Um, I said it's gonna it's gonna happen again and So LA I think Today didn't they or yesterday?

Indoor mask mandates. Of course people on the left can ignore all that. Anyways, they always do. But in I think starting Monday the San Diego school district back to masking Despite and and I know I know we've all seen them.

Our feeds have been flooded with studies demonstrating this failed this failed this failed this failed this put our students years behind young young kids years behind in developmental abilities as far as speech and Cognition and just just all the negative quackery.

Yeah, all the documentations out there you bet. Do they care? No. Are the current mRNA vaccine vaccines at all relevant to the current virus? No, they're not but they have to maintain fear to maintain control and They have to get you used to just simply doing just jumping whenever big brother says to jump.

The only question is how far and in this situation? It's how many shots do you want me to take? And if I die god bless you big brother you have I will die well because I have died at your hand that really is is where all this ends up going and so yeah, the mandates come back and how long until you're back to Masking on the planes and then vaccine mandates and the whole night.

They didn't give up. It's not like there we didn't we didn't even have a truckers thing in the United States no, they're just. It's a matter of timing. It's just a matter of timing and The same thing with the elections coming.

It's just it's just a matter of timing. That's that's all it is. So anyway Hey, I don't know if you saw this But The the book on Calvinism edited by David Allen and Steve Lemke. Now everybody knows Allen and Lemke provisionist Southern Baptist Leaders, so, you know exactly where this is coming from.

I I really would be stunned if There is anything in this book that has not been Thoroughly debunked and refuted over and over again Over the past number of years by myself and many others I I I don't.

You know, was it what I didn't look it up, but there was a period of time where there there was an attempt on David Allen's part to respond to some of my You know, I I took his printed his published materials.

This is what the other side doesn't do with me that we do all the time I took their published materials and we went on this program and we we documented from the commentaries that dr. Allen cited from Went into the Greek text.

This is all within the context of the challenge that remains unfulfilled. That I will come to Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary I will debate him in his classroom in front of his students and I'll bring nothing but a Greek New Testament.

The the challenge is still there. But it'll never be fulfilled and we all know that but it's there have RV will travel have plenty of places in in Texas that I can I can pull into and hook up and Got my little house right there ready to go anyway, we we went through especially that focus was on the Golden Chain of Redemption and The the verses that follow that which I believe very plainly present not only the sovereignty of God predestination election but the necessity of particular redemption as well and we went in-depth in Responding to everything.

Dr. Allen had published at that point and then he did an article and we responded to that and So I'll be really interested in seeing If there's even an attempt, I don't. I do not expect there to be an attempt to respond to those things.

I really do not. But just so you know where this is coming from. We've got Alan Lemke. We know where they're coming. Adam Harwood. We know where he's coming from. He has a critique of total depravity and I've said a long time but I if I recall correctly When I did that one program.

Well, we did what about 40 minutes 45 minutes on Romans chapter 5 and specifically the material in reference to federal headship original sin. If I recall correctly what prompted that was an Adam Harwood article.

It may have been a audio thing, but I think it was a I think it was an article as I recall and So a critique of total depravity. Adam Harwood a critique of unconditional election by Leighton Flowers. So I'm I wouldn't be surprised if you get at least a footnote trying to spin the choice meets stuff.

I would love to see choice meets in a in a Five hundred and twenty seven page long book. That'd be good. Number three a critique of limited atonement. David Allen, of course. Expect that. And again, we already know exactly what's gonna say exactly what it's gonna say.

I don't. I don't know why they bought of this book but you know, they like they would like to do big books because it makes it look like we've answered everything when the reality is they Haven't answered a whole bunch of stuff.

Is God's grace irresistible. A critique of irresistible grace by Steve Lemke. A critique of perseverance of the Saints by Ken Keithley. Now Keithley is the Molinist if I recall correctly. The weak Molinist.

If I'm if again if I'm putting the names together my recollection was I picked up his book and Basically, he said I'm just gonna use this as a as a guide and I'm not really gonna bother defend it. Okay, but that one aside section two historical issues of the Calvinism.

Cal and here we go Calvinism is Augustinian ism by Kenneth Wilson. So we're gonna get a little doopied In in here if you don't know what doopied is that means you were not listening to this program in March of 2020 when we spent an inordinate number of hours on Response to Kenneth Wilson and his amazing statements about church history and and Dug into just all sorts of Sources demonstrating that he hadn't in essence.

But seven descent from Calvinism the Baptist tradition by Pinson. Well, that shouldn't be difficult to do. And then Ben Witherington the third jumped in here with a Wesleyan critique of Calvinism. So he's sort of the outlier here because He's coming from a very different background as the provisionist Baptist and Then Abbaciano does his Romans 9 thing again, nothing new there.

Corporate and personal election. William Klein Character of God in Calvinism. Roger Olson. We know about that one determinism human freedom. Lange evil and God's sovereignty. Bruce Little. I think we've responded to something maybe name rings the bell as far as that topic goes and Then the public invitation altar call by Mark Tolbert.

That may be something we haven't Discussed in a long long time. But basically when you've got flowers Alan and Wilson then you know what this book is going to be about and I you know, I put it on pre-order a long time ago.

You got it Got to have your original sources and things like that and we we will we will do so but We we go from there. I noticed that Yesterday Scott Swain of RTS Posted a picture of Craig Carter and says we are blessed to have Craig Carter on campus this week leading our morning Chapel and teaching a demon seminar on what?

Interpreting scripture in the great tradition and No matter what we do these days we cannot avoid dealing with the issue of hermeneutics. Dr. Brassellus is gonna be teaching a hermeneutics class for founders and dr. Brassellus has openly said that The hermeneutics he was taught makes a mishmash Out of the the confessions and therefore there needs to be this this new method of exegesis and you hear the defense of this from that side of the controversy and Unfortunately, the defense of it is always a straw man.

I have never seen an accurate So far no one including Richard Has provided a meaningful critique of a balanced reformed biblicism of The kind of exegesis that you will find in John Murray's work on Romans that you'll find In Hughes's work on Hebrews now, there's There's a fair difference between Murray and Hughes but both I Think are excellent examples of Exegetical commentaries written in the last century that Exemplify reformed biblicism that exemplify Starting with the text and recognizing that unless you start with the text you will never end up at the text That recognize that the text is supernatural that there is a supernatural unity to scripture as a whole.

And yet you do not start with some type of traditional formulation and then just Collapse that onto the text you You begin with the text you accept the text teachings about itself but your first priority in Handling the text of scripture is to accurately understand What the author was communicating to the audience?

That does not in any way shape or form despite all the straw men despite all the Misrepresentation everything else that does not mean that spirit of God is not involved. That does not mean that you are rejecting That men spoke from God as they are carried along by the Holy Spirit.

That's the whole point of it. Is that you do believe that but none of that changes the fact that when men spoke they spoke in human language and Therefore we need to understand what they said in human language give an example we've given you many obviously and And I still find it just astonishing that I'm sitting here in 2022 Explaining this in regards to Ostensibly reformed people who have gone another direction but if you want a Example of exactly how this works.

I got to preach at Apologia on Sunday and I'm so thankful that it was seven degrees cooler in the sanctuary. We We can put too many people in that sanctuary. It's not used to having that many people in there and and it struggles during the summer.

It really really struggles. So it had gotten up to 87 by the end of the service two weeks ago. It's only 80 at the end of this one. So Yay air conditioners ancient aging air conditioners anyway and I Decide to do a sermon on the letter to the Smyrna to the Church of Smyrna Smyrnians in Revelation chapter 2 Part of the reason being that I don't know two three years ago.

We were attacked as a church By someone who said they were gonna burn us down not burn us down physically, but burn us down destroy us as a church. Those particular folks themselves have been destroyed by their own actions, but anyway They they picked on they attacked the fact that our members certificate quotes from Revelation chapter 2 be faithful until death and You will receive the crown of life is what Jesus said to the Smyrnians after telling him.

I know what you're about to suffer and I know your tribulation. I know your poverty, but you're rich the slanders the blasphemies of those who call themselves Jews, but are not and that the devil is going to cast some of you into prison and you're gonna suffer tribulation ten days probably in hearkening back to Daniel chapter 1 and Anyway, I started off the the sermon by inviting everybody to come with me and to Consider what it was like to live in Smyrna in the middle of the the first century.

And a little bit about the history of the city. In fact, the reality is that if you if you speak on any of the seven churches it is painfully obvious that The text intends you to know something about those cities.

In one of the cities that remember off top my head wasn't looking at that particular city this time around. But in one of them it talks about ISAV. Well, everybody in the ancient world knew that that was one of the most famous places where you could obtain ISAV that was that was supposed to have healing properties in the ancient world.

It's just obvious that you are in you're intended to take that kind of information in and Interpret what is being said in light of that and So I Invited everybody just come along, you know Smyrna had this long history of being extremely loyal to Rome called herself the first amongst Asia and Jesus identified themselves the first and last in his introduction to the church and That they had a very large Jewish population.

This was evidently had something to do with the strained relationship that had developed and That the persecution of the the Christians there in Smyrna had something to do with the accusations and blasphemies of the Jews Who were falsely Jews, they're not real Jews that there we did make brief application to how the early church understood The relationship between Israel and the church sort of clear there in well, it's clear all through the New Testament, but book of Revelation, especially anyway point being.

Before we got to any application and we got to application we got to a lot of application look it up. Apology of studios just go to videos. It'll be one of the most recent ones obviously. All sorts of application.

Application to the church through the ages. Application in our personal lives today. I mean I got I Wanted the text to be challenging as well as encouraging we got to all of that, but we got there First by handling the text as it was written in the first century.

Who is it written to. What was their context what's the background what's being communicated and Now that we have an accurate knowledge of that then let's make application in our day at our time. Are there Meaningful parallels that we can draw.

Could there be any situation where our neighbors might be Turning us into the governmental authorities that don't like us. Has that ever happened? Yeah. It has and and it will again and we could see that happening in our own day.

You know, you've got neighbors all around you that if If they thought you were doing something that the government told you not to do as far as meeting together I Look through their window and they're not wearing their triple masks inside the house, you know, they you know You know exactly which ones on your block could be the ones turning you in or your apartment complex or whatever else it might be.

But we got the application after Doing the necessary groundwork. To be able to say this is what? If you had walked in and in fact, I use this illustration if you had walked in To the fellowship of the Christians and you probably would have had to have been Risking Possibly at least your safety to to do that.

To go to that meeting to inquire as to where whose house it would be at because there weren't any church buildings at the time and If you had walked in that day and that short very brief letter Just a short number of words really Had been read in your midst you start off.

Seeking to understand what would the original audience? Have learned understood these words to mean then I can make connection to other passages of scripture and then. And and even when I make a connection of the passage of scripture, I need to know what other scriptures did they have?

A Example that a lot of people found really useful. About a year and a half ago, maybe two years ago when I pointed out that in Isaiah chapter 6 There's a textual variant between the Greek Septuagint and the Hebrew text.

Remember and when I when I preached on Isaiah 6 at the g3 conference I emphasized That in John chapter 12 When John says he saw his glory and you spoke about him the Greek translation that his audience would have been reading specifically in Isaiah 6 1 Spoke of the glory of God that's not in the Hebrew Masoretic text.

Now those of you who are big into TR only ism and Empty only ism or whatever else I'll let you deal with when the New Testament writers Went different direction. You've got to deal with that Not get into it right now, but there's another example Where the meaning of the text is clarified and illustrated by doing historical grammatical interpretation.

Recognizing what those contexts were now, let me let me let me run with this for a second. What happens? When in the West Latin becomes not only predominant, but it becomes an article of faith that Latin is the text.

Because that that happened When you have Pope Sixtus Producing an infallible Vulgate which was filled with errors, but an infallible Vulgate. When you when you have the West When you have a fear amongst theologians in the West even make reference to the Greek.

Because that's the language of the heretics the result of that is going to be that there will be many who will read John 1241 in the Latin and Will not see. Because they're not even looking at the Greek Septuagint any longer.

They will not see the variant. They will not see That the glory in John 1241 is taken straight out of the Greek Septuagint. That weakens the identification of Jesus as Yahweh in that text. It does. But what if that interpretation then becomes the great tradition Interpretation because of the last the the loss of the connection to the Greek.

What do you do now Superman? What do you do now. I can think of all sorts of traditional interpretations of texts that missed an Important part of the historical background or the linguistic background due to developments over time and one of the glorious things about the Reformation is we went Advantis to the sources.

That's a humanist saying. Yeah, it was and Luther accepted it and Calvin accepted it and They practiced it. So and as a result we we Rediscovered so much of the beauty of the Tanakh the Hebrew Scriptures that had been Veiled from us By let's be honest.

Hey here here's something for you for all you great tradition Baptists. The great tradition is as anti-semitic as it comes. Yeah. Well, we just filter that out well if you're filtering it out that's the whole point what's the standard.

Anyway. You see my point though, there are there are so many places where you know atonement issues and kafar and Penal substitutionary atonement and the personal nature of that we were able to Return to an apostolic foundation for those realities and they had become encrusted By centuries of tradition and especially in the West a Latin based tradition justificare in Latin is not the same thing is as dikayo in Greek and And Augustine's errors and he had plenty of errors but especially on the doctrine of justification were primarily due to his reliance upon Latin and His ignorance of Greek.

So what do you do? No one has put more Foundational cement into the great tradition than Augustine and If you believe in justification by faith alone by the grace of God alone That's not the great tradition because Augustine believed you could be justified and lose your justification.

Only the elect Received the gift of perseverance, but you can be justified and lose the grace of justification. Now you're wrong about that. But on what basis can I possibly say that once you buy the great tradition stuff I don't have a basis to say that what basis what I have and so if you are a reformed Baptist You must Be a biblicist in the analysis of the great tradition on key issues such as justification baptism the nature of the church.

The office is the church. I mean the list goes on and on the list goes on and on you have to be and you're doing it and We all sit back and go y 'all y 'all see what you're doing there. What you What you?

Try to beat us over the head with these guys for in one area. You're you're doing every place else. You're doing it yourself. And you don't see that. What what's going on? I? Mean I is is it really so central to Theology proper That you absolutely positively must believe That considered inwardly ad intra God views his attributes as As Identical to one another.

I mean in what other area do we have to? Know how God considers himself and even though We aren't to consider him in that way because we can't in fact will glorify him by not considering him that way We still have to know that he considers himself that way and we'll divide over it really.

Really If you want to believe that that's what God thinks internally to himself. Brother, I got no problem, but I what I don't understand is why you think that a the Bible forces you to believe that and Be that therefore I must believe that and see therefore you'll cancel me if I don't.

Because that's what it's all about. That's the only thing all this traditional stuff is all about it's just the theology proper stuff, and it's not everything else Nature of the church and soteriology and atonement and everything else we we go yeah post ten of us locks post ten of us locks.

Anyway, I just right as the theme song was coming up seriously. I hadn't looked at this yet. So we're doing something on that. This is on the fly stuff here, okay? Got a wild hair. Not up here, but um got a wild hair and I thought what does Thomas say about Romans 5 1?

Because I want to look I want to get back to. I Got distracted from the Vandrunen Article really we really should call it the Lance English article. Because I would say Lance English of Credo magazine Formed this article to go the direction.

He wanted it to go and we remember remember when we talked we looked at all the click-to-tweet things. So this is this is the message that you want people to be sending out to all the rest of the world.

For example the first click-to-tweet. Oh Part of the straw man. Thomas was undeniably one of the most brilliant and influential theologians the entire history of the church. It's first click-to-tweet.

That's. And like I said This article why Protestants have always stood on the shoulders of Thomas Aquinas and still do it's just it is a massive advertising puff piece. For Thomism in our day, it's nothing more than that it to call it imbalanced is to be kind is to be very very kind.

There isn't even an attempt To to be balanced as to how we should get these things. I want to get back to this and look at it, but In light of that if Thomas was undeniably undeniably One of the most brilliant and influential theologians in the entire history of the church.

Then do you think when that person looks at one of the clearest Testimonies to how you have peace with God in inspired scripture. Do you think maybe they should be able to get it? Should should catch it should understand it that's all sort of been my standard and Look Taught church history for years and years and years and I somehow have the ability to teach students to deeply appreciate So many of those who've come before us without idolizing.

Without idolizing and to recognize. Okay, here's here's a place that There's real weakness in fact, there's. That's really problematic and in fact taking that position will eventually lead to this down the road Without going and therefore just dismiss him as irrelevant dismiss him as a unbeliever blah blah blah never have any Thanks for what God did in this person's life.

No. Been doing that for a long long time. But if you're If you're the greatest Some of these people greatest theologian ever lived. Um. You think you should get the gospel straight. I Mean when you're looking at it, so I was thinking about Romans 5 1.

You know Romans 5 1 right? I'm thinking about 1990 and I am thinking about my debates with Mitch Pacquiao. I hope Mitch is doing well.

In fact, I.

Talked with a friend for about half an hour today. And I'm not gonna say who that is because He does watch this program and so he'll know exactly who it was and so I'm gonna ask my friend To See if maybe I could pass on a word of greeting and Felicitations to Father Mitch.

He had a bad heart attack a number of years ago and I haven't seen him much but You know, he he wanted to go out to get a drink after one of our debates it was after midnight on Long Island and I was just way way way too Baptist back then back then and I declined.

That's one of those things where I wish I hadn't now that I think about it. I would like to have dinner with Mitch Pacquiao. I really would. That would be that'd be really cool. I'm not sure that I would drive into California to do it.

I'm not sure I drive into California for anything to be pronounced with you. I Don't. I don't trust the authorities there as far as I can throw. And I feel for those of you who are there I'm just gonna say I got a text and dude you are so cool.

You really are you just Most unusual guy I've ever met but you are cool. That's all there is to it. Anyways How did I get there, I don't know I the nice thing about getting older is you can it was. Everybody and Y 'all gonna have to testify to this because you those of you there you knew it.

The saying was back in the olden days when I would speak at the same conferences with Dave Hunt. Before Dave Hunt came to detest me since the 1990s we all said the same thing. Dave Hunt never finished a talk on the same subject that he started on.

If he hadn't assigned subject He would finish at least four subjects away. Sometimes on your subject you're supposed to speak on later in the day, you know. Didn't matter but Dave was a little elderly.

So you you let folks with this much white hair just wander where they want to and start telling stories and do whatever they want because That works once you I mean, I've been doing that with rich forever.

I mean Wow that guy will just all over the place. Okay, so Cornelius Van Till was taken out of the Nile by the Pharaohs. What were we talking about? Okay. Yes, all right. Thomas Aquinas Romans 5 1. Romans 5 1 first therefore he says.

It has been stated that faith will be reputed as justice now reputed as justice. Remember these are translations from Latin and Imputation. Like it's a my has Aspects to it that the Latin does not fully express and so reputed as Justice Can carry a concept that is below the fullness of the Greek expression.

He says it has been said that faith will be reputed as justice to all who believe in Christ's resurrection. Which is the cause of our justification. Okay, that's that's true without the resurrection. There could be no justification.

But the object of faith is Christ himself. Yes, the risen Christ. You can't separate that out, but I am uncomfortable with the idea that it's That there would be any element of saving faith that would be laid aside being justified thereby for by faith the quotation from Romans 5 1 In as much as through faith in the resurrection We participate in its effect.

Let us have peace with God namely by submitting ourselves and obeying him Agree with God and be at peace Job 22 21 who has hardened himself against him and been at peace Job 9 4 and This through our Lord Jesus Christ who has led us to that peace.

He is our peace Ephesians 2 14. That's it. That's it. There's there's nothing more the key issue of What it means to be justified the key issue the whole idea Let us have peace with God now May June July somewhere May June July of 2020.

I preached on Romans 5 1 at apologia is when we were At a different church because of the kovat stuff. But it's it's still up there and I did a sermon on The textual variant. I didn't do the sermon on the text variant, but I addressed the issue of the textual variant at Romans 5 1 and Really I think Whether it's the indicative the subjunctive ends up coming to the same the same issue.

The issue is do we have peace? Do we possess peace and on what grounds. The grounds that Thomas Aquinas sees is By submitting ourselves and obeying him Therefore having been justified by faith. We have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.

So what's the what's what the automatic essence for Thomas now again Luther is still many years in the future and Even though there are clear statements Clement of Rome, for example Clear statements on the nature of what justifying faith actually is once you get to where Thomas is you have so many centuries of a traditional understanding now if I Don't know if anybody knows because I don't know and I would be very interested in knowing But not I've never even heard anyone even ask this question.

But I will Throw it out there for the fun of it because we get we have some really interesting people that watch this program is there has anyone ever done a study or just I suppose I could just do a search of all my Thomas stuff for myself.

Did Thomas know Fulgentius of Rusp and you all just got a glazed look in your eyes, but Fulgentius of Rusp Was a Just a fantastic writer Again a shining light half a millennium after the time of the birth of Christ giving the lie again to those Silly booklets and pamphlets that You know try to say once Constantine came along then The true church died and blah blah blah all the rest of that slaying us Fulgentius is a Shining light.

I've just never seen him cited in anything that I've read in Thomas and If what what if Thomas had been more influenced by someone like Fulgentius? What if later tradition Was more influenced by that would you have had the Radburnus Ratramnus Controversy later on.

Would you have? Had would Gottschalk has suffered the way that he did for taking the positions. He did we don't know. The point is That the guidepost for what is true in any century Is always what God has said Not what someone said in the previous century.

But once what someone said in the previous century is repeated for enough centuries. It can become such a thick lens That even an insightful mind Can look at Romans 5 1 and Not see what it's saying Therefore having been justified by faith.

What was all of Romans 4 about? Abraham's made righteous in God's sight by faith before circumcision comes along. It can't be as a result of these works. It can't be a result of his faithfulness. It has to be faith.

That's all it was in Genesis 15 6. It's the empty hand of faith grasping the sufficient hand of grace if you've got something in that hand. You're never gonna be able to grasp that grace. So it has to be the empty hand of faith.

Therefore being justified by faith We have peace with God. That becomes the introduction that's the whole issue is how you have peace with God and for for Thomas We have peace with God by submitting ourselves and obeying him and that's exactly what Luther believed, which is why he never had peace.

Because he knew he was never perfectly submitted and he knew he did he every day. He disobeyed as hard as he tried not to. That was the whole point. So when someone says here's the greatest theologian and when the greatest theologian looks at a text like this and Doesn't see it.

I don't do the Dave Hunt thing and just I Never read another word the man says and he's just the worst thing that ever happened. But what I'm asking is why is there this? Sudden influx of Advertisements for Thomas I don't get it.

I just I just don't get it. Um. Okay, I didn't mean to spend all that time. I really really was gonna do that first stuff in just a matter of minutes and it's like All right. So let me just dive into some of this.

I'm not gonna get very far cuz Well, I've got a lot to do there. RVing is great. I Love getting the opportunity of being in the churches and stuff like that. I'm gonna be in a lot of churches, especially in the trip back to g3 and things like that, but it takes some time.

You got to have all you got to have what you need, but only what you need in that van and in that fifth wheel for me and I will be loading a lot of stuff in there and it's About 109 degrees outside right now.

So yeah, you sweat a lot and it is the humidity's way up here for us. Anyways, all right again the credo Credo article why Protestants have always stood on the shoulders of Thomas Aquinas and still do.

We looked at the call-outs the tweets. Which would not have come from dr. Ventura. They would have come from Lance English, I would. I would assume so they were. Thomas was undeniably one of the most brilliant influential theologians entire history of the church.