Mailbag Episode! Questions about Deacon Ministry, Church Closings, and Assurance of Salvation

Hey guys, it's Pastor Keith.

Today is another mailbag episode, which means I'm going to the email box and I'm gonna open it up and answer the questions that you all

have sent in.

Well, you can tell I'm not in my normal studio today.

I'm actually coming to you from the office at the church.

Every Thursday morning I go and teach to a men's ministry and then I come up to the church and I work for the rest of

the day and I decided today to make use of my time by giving some answers to some emails that I have received recently.

If you want to be part of a future mailbag episode, you can go to KeithFoskey .com, go to the contact form, send the

email in, it will come to me directly.

If it's one I can use on the show, great, I will, or I'll simply send you an email back with an answer to your question.

Today's questions primarily deal with the subject of the assurance of salvation, even though the first couple questions deal with church

life.

So I'm going to deal with those couple of questions first and then we're going to move to the last few questions which deal with the assurance of

salvation.

So here we go with question number one.

And this one says,.

Hi Keith,.

The role and responsibility and general use of the office of deacon can vary widely between church bodies.

As a new deacon, I'm very interested in how other churches administer the office of deacon.

One, I would love to hear how your church administers the role in office of deacon.

What are their specific responsibilities?

And two, I'm also perplexed and disappointed to see that many churches ignore this important role and

office that God has sovereignly ordained to help build his church.

This is by either completely ignoring the office or not taking it seriously as they should.

I personally know deacons of churches who are not even saved and live lives of sin and rebellion and yet are deacons.

It saddens me.

If you can expound on this, either in a reply or a podcast, that would be cool.

And it says, feel free to give a brief synopsis of your view of the office of deacon.

All right.

Well, this could be a whole episode on its own, but I included it in the mailbag again because it's something I can

answer relatively shortly, but also point you to a resource.

If you are interested in learning about the office of the deacon and really diving into this,

I wrote a book.

The book is entitled, A Biblically Functioning Church.

It is available for free.

You can go to sgfcjax .org.

That's our church's website.

You can go to the section which says books and you can download a copy of this in PDF

format, absolutely free.

And it gives you my understanding of what the scripture says about the office of the deacon.

Also,.

You can purchase a hard copy of it.

I have some on my shelf.

If I'd have been smart, I'd have grabbed one beforehand and had it on the show.

But this is my understanding.

The deacon role is a role of service, diakonos.

They are ministers or servants of the church.

The overseeing role or the leadership role of the church is that of the pastor elder.

And I do believe the pastor and elder are the same in the sense of their role.

They may have different responsibilities.

Like in our church, I primarily am the preaching elder, even though our other elders do preach.

My job is to primarily preach on Sunday morning.

But the deacon's role is to minister to the body, to the needs of the body, whatever those

needs may be.

And so we meet with our deacons once every two months.

And in that meeting, each one of them has a list within the congregation that they're responsible for keeping up

with.

And they report back to us any needs.

And a lot of times we already know what the needs are because it's a small church.

But they are in contact with people.

They're keeping up with people.

They're helping us to know what the needs are so that we ensure that the people of our church needs are being met.

And that is an important part of what the deacons are to do in our church.

Aside from that, we also have a deacon who is responsible for the finances of the church.

We have three finance officers and the head finance officer is a deacon.

We see that as just another ministry in the body, as the ministry of the finances.

And so we have a deacon who is in charge of that.

Our deacons help on Sunday morning.

They read scripture.

They pray.

They help administer the table.

An elder will lead the table because we have the Lord's Supper every week.

But the deacons are the ones who are actually passing out the elements.

They are the ones who are praying with us and for us during that time.

And so our deacons have a lot of responsibility in the church.

We're thankful for them.

We have four deacons.

We also have a ministry called the Pastoral Care Ministry, and that is men who aren't

necessarily deacons, but are basically like assistants to the deacons.

They are helping the deacons do the things that they need to do.

And part of the reason why we started that ministry is some men are not yet ready to be deacons.

And this is sort of an opportunity for them to go through a time of testing.

The scripture talks about a time of testing.

So that's it's there for that.

But it's also there for men who really don't desire the full office of a deacon, but still want to serve

in the church.

And this gives them an outlet to do that.

And so there's a lot, like I said, a lot I could say about how deacon is to be chosen, their

qualifications and things like that.

And that's why I'm pointing you to the book, as I think it would be helpful to you.

The biggest thing I would say is in a lot of churches, you made a good point.

You said that the person who wrote this said that there are people who shouldn't be deacons because

they're living lives of sin or they're not believers, things like that.

I would also say that in some churches, there are some deacons who see themselves as the grand authority of the church, that the deacons are

the ones who rule the church.

And from a biblical perspective, that's just not the case.

The idea of a deacon board who has to be the sole authority or the primary authority in a church is not the

biblical model.

The biblical model is that you have ordained godly elders who are governing the church

and the deacons are serving the body.

And ultimately, they are leaders, they're servant leaders, but they're not in our church.

They're not decision makers, even though they do make decisions about some of the things that they do as far as the needs and how to

help and things like that.

But they're but they're not ruling the church as they do in some churches.

So that would be my that would be my short answer to this.

Maybe at some point I could do a longer episode.

If you're interested in me doing a longer episode on the offices of the church, maybe talking about some of the things in my book, leave a comment.

Be happy to to work on an episode in a future, maybe a future podcast where I just deal with

ecclesiology, as I said, a biblically functioning church.

My book deals with how the church is supposed to function.

Elders, deacons, the ministry of the body, gifts, how gifts are to be used in the body, things like that.

And there's a there's a lot in the book that I touch on.

So that's my and again, don't think that this is not a plug for the book.

It's free.

But if you want to have a more robust answer to this question, I would point you to that resource.

All right.

I'm moving on to the next question.

This question says, first of all, I don't read the whole email.

Sometimes there's like this person wrote a very nice note to me about the ministry and I'm thankful.

Thank you so much for saying that.

But I'm going to get right to the question.

It says our church has dwindled in membership over the last 10 to 15 years.

There's no specific reason I can point to, but rather a combination of events.

Our congregation consists of a number of seasoned saints and then four or five younger families.

Our total active membership is approximately 50 to 60 members.

What we are finding is that we are housed in a building that is soon going to need more repairs than our congregation can afford.

Our missions and outreach ministries are limited because there are only so many people we can physically who can

physically participate.

On the other hand, we have an amazing pastor and some of the most loving people I've ever met.

Our problems all seem to stem from just not having enough people to carry out the ministry we're called to do.

Do you have any experience navigating these kinds of issues and advice for congregations that may be facing these same

difficulties?

First of all, thank you for such a heartfelt email.

I can tell that your heart is for your church.

And as a pastor, that means a lot.

I'm sure it means a lot to your pastor.

And I did email you back.

The person who wrote this knows I sent an email back.

And the first thing I said in the email is that 50

to 60 members is not a dead church.

I mean, you've got enough people that it's reasonable to consider the fact that

your church could go on.

Your church could continue.

And there is potential for growth, especially if you said you have a good pastor and you have a loving group of people.

50 to 60 people is not really that bad because there are times when

you can see that the church is reaching a point where it may need to give

way to either closing the doors of the church and everyone either going to a

different church or something like that.

Because like, for instance, our church has inherited a couple of churches over

the years.

And it's just one of them specifically was a church that the congregation had

gotten elderly and they had another church that was renting the facility that was a larger and younger and

more vibrant church at the time.

And there was only like three families left and they just they could not continue as a church.

And so those families came to our church.

It was a Presbyterian church, interestingly enough, but we were just enough Calvinist for them.

And they're all still here.

We love them to death.

Those families are still with us.

And they came to be a part of our church.

And our relationship would just really blossomed and was great.

And we were thankful to get them.

But their church closed.

Somebody recently sent me a book that he said he had an idea.

A friend of mine sent me an idea for a book.

He said he wanted to write a book on ministering to a dying church because there are churches that do

eventually have to close.

No church is going to last forever.

Right.

So it is a reality that sometimes churches do close.

But looking at your situation, I think the biggest situation you have is a facility issue.

Fifty to sixty members is not bad.

And if you can't necessarily support a missionary or outreach in the way that you want to right now, that doesn't mean you

can't in the future.

That just may mean that it's where you are right now.

Primarily, you need to work on what's going on in the body.

Is your minister being cared for?

Is your are the are the responsibilities of the church being met?

Yes.

Supporting missionaries, supporting outreach is very important.

But you have to take care of those other needs.

First, your mission, your minister is your primary concern in that.

Is he being cared for?

And I don't know if he's bivocational or what, but that that has to be considered.

And so that's the first thing I would say is is if those things are happening, if the building that you're in is going to require more

than you're able to do, if you own the building, perhaps sell it to someone who is.

And again, I'm just throwing out ideas here.

You could sell your building to another church that has the money to come in and make those improvements and use that money to

put towards a smaller but better facility in that would fit what you have

and be within your budget.

So there are some things I just, you know, I look at what you've written here.

You got some younger four or five young families.

That's great.

50 to 60 members.

That's great.

I can tell you, I've been the pastor of Sovereign Grace for 18 years.

There have been years where we were at 50, 60 people on a Sunday morning.

It was not uncommon.

And, you know, now we're a little, a little bigger, but we're still right at 100 to 120 on Sunday morning.

It's not, it's not a big church.

And so I, at this point I would say, I don't think it's time to give up,

but if you do, if your church decides that you're going to close at

some point, then, you know, you have to, you have to have some conversations about, you know, what

that's going to look like.

Are you all going to join another church together, which is what happened with that church that came to our church?

Or are you going to do something?

Is everybody going to go their own way?

And there are some legal things that come with closing a church, like because it is the money that's come in has

gone to a church.

Typically that money would be donated to another like -minded church, which is what happened again, when we've had churches that have

closed and they donated money to our church because their church budget, when it ended,

it just, they just donated.

To us.

So there's some, there's some legal things that go along with that, that you have to consider how that money is spent and things.

But all that to being said, I don't think you're there yet.

And I pray that God would continue to give your minister a willingness to serve

and a heart to serve and to love the people well.

And I know a lot of churches with less people and they're continuing to

flourish in the kingdom.

So just be encouraged, my friend.

All right.

Okay.

Now I'm going to get to the questions about the, as I said, about the subject of

assurance.

The first one, very heartfelt, very short, says, I hope you're well.

I've hit a bit of a low point recently, and though things around me are going, are going well,

I often return to brooding and self -loathing to cope with my own disappointment and my sin and failure to be good enough for

God.

How do you exercise joy and strive for holiness even when your sinful nature seems so apparent?

And I wrote back to this person, I want to read a little bit of what I wrote.

I said, you'd be surprised at how many believers deal with this very same thing you described.

And I think this can help a lot of people because, and this is what I wrote, I said, Christ wants us to rest in him.

We are called to repent of our sin.

We are called to wage outright war with our sin.

But we are not saved by that.

We are saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ alone.

The comfort that we seek will never come from us being good enough for God.

I cannot stress this enough.

You will never be good enough in your estimation.

You'll never be good enough in God's estimation.

And that's why he doesn't, he does not require our goodness.

He requires that we lay hold of the goodness of Christ, that we

receive the righteousness of Christ, and we be found in him,

having a righteousness that is not our own, but a righteousness which comes through faith in him.

And so I'm not discounting the importance of sin.

I'm not discounting the place of repentance in the life of the believer.

In fact, I'm doing a debate in a couple of weeks.

Is repentance a part of the gospel?

I absolutely believe repentance is a part of the gospel.

But at the end of the day, perfect repentance is not required for salvation any more than perfect faith

is required for salvation, because neither of those things are possible for a person.

You will never have perfect faith and you will never have perfect repentance.

And this is why faith is a daily thing.

We believe every day.

We believe in the Lord Jesus Christ.

And every day we repent.

And every day we live a life of repentance.

And we fight the battle of sin.

I love this illustration, and I hope maybe this will be helpful for you.

The illustration is of a river that is flowing in one direction

and there's dead fish in the river and they're all floating in the river.

Well, this is where we were before regeneration, before we were brought to life in Christ.

At a certain point, God gave us life.

He regenerated our hearts.

And then we are now not like the other fish who are going downstream dead.

We are now swimming upstream.

We are now fighting the battle because we have been given life in Christ and we're now swimming.

But we're running into other dead fish and we're swimming against a current that's pushing us the other way.

And sometimes it can be hard and sometimes we fail.

And this is not an excuse.

It's just the reality.

If any man says he has no sin, he's a liar.

And if we do sin, we have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ.

And if we repent of our sin and we confess it, the Bible says he will cleanse us of all

unrighteousness.

So my encouragement to you is to find your rest in Christ.

It must come from him.

And this is going to move into the next question.

So, again, thank you for sending in that question.

The next question is, I recently came across a video where someone claimed that Reformed Theology teaches salvation and the perseverance of the

saints, which means you're preserved by your works.

Of course, this is a false accusation.

And I promptly commented to correct this misrepresentation of fault of Reformed Theology.

This is the person's comment here.

He says, I was wondering if you might be interested in addressing this topic.

And he shared with me the video.

Well, I watched the first portion of the video and the guy who was responding was responding to Jeff Durbin.

And Jeff Durbin said this.

Jeff Durbin said that.

We are saved by grace through faith and not of works.

We are saved by faith alone, but faith that is true faith will never be alone.

And I don't remember who the first person to say that is.

I've said it before.

Many people who believe in Reformed Theology would say that that genuine saving faith will never be devoid of

works that accompany salvation.

We call these works fruit of repentance.

And of course, we're referring to James Chapter two.

James Chapter two tells us there are going to be works that accompany genuine faith and faith that is not genuine,

which is James refers to as dead faith, will be marked by a

faith that is only words.

James says, can that faith save you?

And the the the insinuation of the question is no.

That faith, the faith that is merely words will not save.

And so faith is going to produce in us a changed life.

It's going to produce in us a desire to follow after Christ.

And this is where the accusation, well, how do you know you're doing enough?

And this kind of goes back to the last question.

How do you know you're pleasing God?

How do you know you're making it?

How do you know you're going to you're going to to to do enough good works?

And the and the answer is that misses the entire point, because while we say

that salvation produces good works, we still are adamant that those good works

do not in any way contribute to our salvation.

They are simply the fruit of the of the salvation that we receive.

I remember the William Tyndale movie.

The actor who played in it was a Hollywood actor, a great actor, and he

played William Tyndale.

He played he he played the sheriff of Rottingham in the in the

the spoof Robin Hood Men in Tights.

So that's the actor.

And I just can't think of his name right now.

But he was playing William Tyndale.

William Tyndale was brought before the the governing authority and he was being accused of being a false teacher because

he taught justification by the law.

He taught by faith.

And they said, do you believe a man is saved by faith apart from works?

And again, I remember this from the movie.

I don't know that William Tyndale ever said this.

I just know that it was in the movie.

But it's absolutely true.

He said the fruit of a tree does not.

What did he say?

Goodness.

Now, now I want to make sure I get the quote right.

The fruit of the tree does not make the tree good or bad, but the fruit of the tree does show whether the tree is

good or bad.

And I remember that line.

First of all, it's so well delivered by the by the actor.

He's a great actor.

But the point of it is, is the fruit.

The fruit doesn't make the tree good.

But the fruit shows the tree.

It is it is it is a byproduct.

And so there is a sense in which we can say that there are there is value in in what we do in

that it, as James says, it shows that our faith is is genuine and not merely words.

But then we get into the issue of, OK, well, now I've got to be so rigorously introspective that

I'm examining everything that I do.

And if I see anything that doesn't look like good works, it looks like bad, then I'm not saved.

And we get into this whole circle of of misery trying to trying to

determine our assurance based on what we do.

And again, this is the wrong way.

We do not find our assurance in what we do.

Our assurance has to be Christ.

We have to understand that our salvation is in Christ, what he has done,

his obedience, his work is what is credited to us as

righteousness.

Our works that flow out of that are merely the expression or

the result of what has happened in our life.

And I want to say this about about kind of more about this

question in the video that went along with it.

The accusation against Reformed theology is that because we teach the perseverance of the saints, we're teaching justification by works.

That's not true.

Perseverance of the saints simply says that a person who is genuinely born again,

who has been given the gift of the Holy Spirit of God, will continue in the faith

and will continue in the faith imperfectly because no one has perfect faith.

I mentioned that already, but will continue in the faith and will not apostatize because

and this is again, this is a doctrine among most Reformed people, at least Calvinistic, particularly

Baptists.

We believe that there is something called eternal security, which means that if a person is genuinely saved, he will

continue to be saved.

And someone says, well, what about the person who says he was saved, but then at a certain point rejects

Christ, becomes an apostate, meaning he abandons the faith.

He turns his back on Christ and walks away.

Well, then we would say if that is the case and the person abandons the faith and is

absolutely an apostate, that that person was never saved.

Now, things like I, I, I, some of the confessions reference seasons of

sin where someone would fall into a time of sin.

And I think that, again, I think that that's possible for a believer to do.

I think a believer can fall into a season of sin, even gross sin.

But I don't believe they would, are going to remain there and there's some, you know, we can

talk about lengths of time and things like that, but ultimately the issue of

perseverance of the saints is more about whether or not a person will continue in the faith or whether a

person will abandon Christ.

It's one thing to say a person has fallen into a sin.

It's another thing to say a person has refused to continue to believe in Christ.

And the person I always think about this, and it's a sad story, but Dan Barker, who

was, um, he's, he's one of the most, one of the most well -known atheists in,

in, in the world today.

He does debates.

He's very outspoken and he was once a minister.

In fact, if I remember correctly, I think he was associated with Catherine Kuhlman, who was a

basically like a female version of Benny Hinn.

And he would have at one point in his life confessed Jesus Christ as his savior.

I mean, he was going to be, uh, he was in line to be a minister, but now he's an atheist.

He is an example of someone who confessed faith, but I don't believe truly possessed.

It.

I don't believe he had a genuine saving faith that came from being regenerated by the spirit and being filled with the Holy

Spirit.

I don't think that he had that.

And so, and based upon his, the external reality, I can say, I think that that's the.

Case.

And so when we talk about perseverance of the saints, that's what we're referring to.

Someone who abandons the faith and does not persevere in the faith has demonstrated that their faith

is not genuine.

Um, we're not saying that if a person falls into sin or struggles with sin or battles with sin or, or, or, uh, any of that,

that means they're not a believer.

That's not, that's not the reality.

It's, it's the category of apostasy that really is the issue.

And so I hope that that demonstrates the distinction there.

And, um, again, when, when someone says, well, how do we, how do you know you're.

Safe?

You're saved by trusting in what Christ did.

Not trusting in what you do, no matter how good your works are, no matter how faithful you are, no matter how much you attend church,

none of that is going to save you.

The work of Christ ultimately is what saves you.

It changes your life and it should change your life, but it's not what saves you.

All right.

Um, and this goes into the next question.

And that is my, my question is this, how do you respond to the idea that the reformed

understanding of unconditional election actually undermines assurance of salvation?

We just talked about this, but I want to read the question.

I've seen this countless of times on YouTube and I heard it from close friends who are a little less reformed than I am.

My general approach is to say that I'm not super into overly introspective tendencies that are common in our tradition and

would argue that the atonement is a bit more subjective than some make it out to be.

Um, basically I argue that one can pretty confidently know that he is elect because he's trusting in Jesus for his salvation and

believes that he is the son of God.

Am I wrong for maybe pushing back against the sort of introspection that seems to drive a lot of reform fruit checking?

And how would you respond to these claims?

Yes, I think I, and this is why I wanted to put all these together because I think they do all really kind of go

together.

And that is the question of, okay, should I be looking at myself?

Should I be inspecting my fruit for, to, to see if I'm saved?

And the, the issue of this, and some of you are familiar with the history of this, so I don't want to belabor this too

long, but there's a historical question here.

And that's the question between what's become known as the Lordship salvation

side versus the, the carnal Christian side.

And this is an issue which has given way even to now a new, uh, uh, sort of,

um, argument whether or not the, the, the Lordship side is, is, uh, justification

by works, things like that.

There's a lot of arguments going on, but I just want to give a sort of a history of the, of that, of that debate.

There was, there was a very popular teaching that came into the church during the middle of the last century, the

second half of the last century, where the idea was that you could, you could be a Christian and not have any

change to.

Your life.

You could, you could say, if you said you were a Christian, if you confessed to be a Christian, no matter if

your life continued with the same trajectory of sin that it was going in beforehand, that you

could say, as long as you said you were a Christian, then that was it.

And that became, and what the argument was sort of first, first Corinthians three was that if you were a

carnal Christian, because Paul says to the Corinthians and first Corinthians three, I think it is, he says, I can't speak to you

as a spiritual, I speak to you as carnal.

And so people said, well, that must mean there's two types of Christians.

There's carnal Christians, and then there's spiritual Christians.

And so, uh, we have to be, we have to accept that there are people who are, who are truly Christian, but who are

carnal Christians.

I don't think that's Paul's argument there.

I preach the first Corinthians.

I have a whole sermon on it, and I'd be happy to send it to anybody who's interested.

If you, if you are interested in that sermon, leave me a message below and I'll send it to you.

Uh, but ultimately the, the pushback against that,

uh, primarily came from like Dr. John MacArthur, who wrote a book, uh, called, uh,

the gospel according to Jesus, I think was the first book on this issue.

Then it was the gospel according to the apostles, the gospel according to Paul, ashamed of the gospel.

There are several books that came out on this issue, and it was the issue of what he referred to as lordship salvation,

that, that to truly be a believer, Christ must also be your Lord, meaning you must submit to him in

every area.

And, and, and so the idea of having a carnal Christian was a, was a

inappropriate category.

Well, uh, again, there are extremes.

I talked about this recently in my funeral, uh, message, my, or no, on my, my NT Wright, Doug Wilson video, I

talked about the two ditches.

There could be extremes on both sides and there are extremes on the lordship side, which can lead to a hyper

introspective view where you were, where you are basically looking at a workspace salvation where

what you do is, is going to save you.

And ultimately, and that, and that can be very dangerous.

Again, I'm not, I'm certainly not saying MacArthur teaches that or any, any notable teachers would, I'm just saying there's

a ditch on the other side.

And there's certainly a ditch on the, I think, I think the carnal Christian itself is, is not good.

So either side, um, there can be some issues that you have to address, but

ultimately the question is the question of, well, should we be

looking at, at our lives?

Well, the Bible tells us to examine ourselves.

The Bible does tell us that we are to, uh, do things like make our calling.

And election.

Sure.

Right.

Right.

Like, like that we are to examine certain things.

But I think the ultimate point of passages like that is asking the question

of who or what are we trusting it?

Are we trusting in Christ or are we trusting in what we're doing?

Because I will say this as, as bad as someone who is licentious is, and that's a

person who's just given to sin and calling themselves a Christian, but they're living a life, life of just pure

sin.

Legalism is just as bad.

And that's the person who says, look at what I've done and how I have accomplished this thing.

Neither one is right.

We must lay hold of Christ and we must continue to lay hold of

what he has done and not what we are doing as a result.

What we are doing is important.

What we are doing does matter.

And I do believe Christ will change your life.

And sometimes that's the very question I ask people when someone comes to me and they're, they're struggling

with their assurance.

I'll ask them, how has Christ changed your life?

It's amazing often how people can begin even then to say, you know what?

I used to have no desire for Christ and now all I want to do is please him.

I fail and I'm struggling with my failures, but I, I have a desire to please.

The Lord.

And I will say, where do you think that desire came from?

Where do you think that desire to please the Lord?

Do you think that came out of your sinful flesh?

Or do you think maybe, maybe that's an evidence

that you are his, that you desire him and that you desire to please him?

And so again, when I ask somebody, how's Christ changed your life?

I don't mean, you know, did you become perfect overnight?

Did you, you know, did you stop having, you know, times of anger?

Did you stop having, uh, using bad language all the time?

Or did you stop doing any of these terrible things?

You know, a lot of times what I'm saying is, did your affections change?

I, I've, I've, I've told this before from the pulpit.

I don't know if I've ever said it on a podcast, but one of the things my professor used to say, Professor Jerry Powers,

love that man to death.

And he said, when, when I came to Christ, he gave me a new wanna.

He says, what I want to do now is not what I want to, what I wanted to do before.

I got a new wanna.

And, and, and I tell you, if I asked somebody, how's Christ changed your life?

And they say, I got a new wanna.

I mean, they wouldn't say it that way, but if they say my affections changed, my desires changed, I want to

be serving Christ, man.

That's, that's, that, that, that's huge.

That's, that's, there's a lot of value there.

And there's something to say, Hey, look, this is how Christ has changed me.

But again, at the end of the day, our assurance, our salvation is based on what he did,

not on what we've done.

And so I continue to encourage people to find your comfort in Christ, find your rest in Christ,

seek to do the things that Christ has called us to do and repentance and faith and acts of good works and acts of repentance.

All of those things are true.

What are the fruits of repentance?

I preached a sermon on that recently.

What does repentance look like?

All those things are important.

But, you know, at the end of every worship service, our, our, our, our church gathers around the Lord's table.

And the reason why we gather around the Lord's table is to remember what Christ did not to

celebrate what we did not to show off, Hey, look at us, but to say, you know

what?

And the final analysis to quote my favorite teacher, Dr. R .C.

Sproul.

And the final analysis, when I stand before my God, it will not be what

have you done, but will be, have you trusted in what Christ has done?

That's how we have our assurance and what he did.

So I hope that's helpful for you.

I hope answering these emails is an encouragement to you.

So if you have an email, please send me an email.

And if it's something that I can answer on the show, I'll do it.

If it's something that I can send you an email back, I'll try to do that.

And the more emails I get, the harder this gets, but you know what?

I'm going to try to start doing these as much as I need to.

So whenever I get enough videos or enough emails to make a video, I'll make a video.

So keep sending them in and I'll keep trying to answer them.

And if you like this video again, hit that thumbs up button.

If you didn't hit the thumbs down button twice, leave me your comments below.

I'm always interested in what you have to say.

Even if I can't always respond to every comment, I do try to read them.

And I'm very thankful for them.

Thankful for your interaction.

So thanks for watching.

I'll see you next time.

God bless you.