Debate: Does the Bible Teach a Young Earth?

Your Calvinist iconYour Calvinist

10 views

On this episode, Keith will take the moderator seat for a debate between Matt (Apolojedi) and Adam (Curious Christianity) on the subject of the age of the earth. Does the Bible teach the earth is young (only thousands of years)? Or does it allow for an older earth (millions or billions of years)? Get ready, because this debate will literally be a battle for the ages! If you've been thinking of subscribing to streamyard, click this link and you can support our channel while doing so! https://streamyard.com/pal/d/4810495289458688

0 comments

00:16
Sometimes I feel the weight of the world Fall down on me, so heavy
00:23
And I need a friendly voice with some good theology
00:29
Now the music be speaking, so I mix a manly drink Pepsi, shoe polish, and I hit the
00:36
YouTube link Don't say hit, that sounds violent And I feel my troubles all melt away
00:44
It's your Calvinist Podcast with Keith Barsky Beards and bow ties, laughs till sunrise
00:58
It's your Calvinist Podcast with Keith Barsky He's not like most
01:08
Calvinists, he's nice Your Calvinist Podcast is filmed before a live studio audience
01:19
And welcome to Your Calvinist Podcast, my name is Keith Foskey And as always, I am your
01:25
Calvinist Does the Bible present an age of the earth? And if so, does it present an old earth or a young earth?
01:34
Depending on who you ask, you're going to get different answers Well tonight, I have two men who have come to me wanting to debate one another
01:41
And I am happy to have them on the platform to be able to let them debate this very important subject
01:48
And I'm going to bring them on in just a moment, but before I do that I want to very quickly remind you that this podcast is a ministry of Sovereign Grace Family Church in Jacksonville, Florida So if you're in the area, please come visit us and you can find out more at sgfcjacks .org
02:04
Also remember that we are a partner with tinybibles .com You always see it sitting on the table next to me This is my tiny
02:09
Bible, and you can have one of your own if you go to tinybibles .com And you can get a percentage off by using my name,
02:16
Keith, as a discount code Well again, I'm so thankful to have the brothers with me today
02:22
And I'm going to bring them up now I have Matt, also known as the
02:28
Apollo Jedi And Adam from Curious Christianity Brothers, thank you both for being with me on the show today
02:37
Thanks for having us, Keith Yes, sir Adam, you there?
02:45
Looking forward to the conversation, appreciate it Absolutely Now, I want to also mention that this is a live show
02:54
So if you are watching this show on YouTube, know that this is happening in real time
02:59
So if you leave a comment during the live show, I'll be able to see it here on my computer And during the
03:05
Q &A portion, we're going to take questions from the audience
03:10
So if you have a question that you want to ask either Matt or Adam Please put in the question that this is a question for whoever it is, if it's for Matt or Adam And that will let me know who to direct the question to when the time comes
03:25
Alright, before we get started, I think it would be good to get to know our debaters a little bit So I'm going to ask each of these men to just take a couple of minutes
03:32
Share with us who they are, tell us about their ministries And what position they take in tonight's debate
03:40
Alright, Matt, we'll start with you Alright, thanks, Keith And thanks again,
03:45
Adam Before we get too far into it, this is a brotherly conversation As we both recognize that we are both
03:51
Christians in this conversation But a little bit about myself Mrs. Apollo Jedi and I have been married for 26 years
03:58
Our Padawans are out of the house And so I am a layperson at a
04:04
Presbyterian church in East Texas Faithful Presbyterian church, we're very thankful to be there
04:11
And my ministry, I guess, consists mostly of just writing blog posts and helping out in my local area
04:20
Excellent, brother, thank you so much And Adam? Yeah, so my name is
04:26
Adam and I run the YouTube channel Curious Christianity I'm kind of just getting started on hosting a lot more conversations about Christianity And my passion is really for broadening the conversation
04:39
And having conversations with Christians that I agree with and disagree with I think that that's how we really can help weed out the truth
04:47
And then lastly, you know what? I'm out here to kind of help set the record straight concerning Genesis 3
04:54
I've done primarily a lot of work in Genesis 3, 14 through 19 And I'm really looking forward to bringing that to the rest of the world
05:03
Alright, my friend, well thank you both again for being on the program today And I know the people who are watching came to see a debate
05:11
So we don't want to put it off too much longer But I am going to give them the outline of what to expect Because we're thinking it's going to be about an hour and a half debate
05:19
And here's how we break that down It's going to be two 10 -minute opening statements Both men are going to get an opening statement
05:24
Matt is taking the positive He's taking the thesis that the Bible teaches a young earth
05:29
And so he gets the first 10 minutes He also gets the last closing statement And so he will begin first And then
05:36
Adam will come in with the second 10 -minute opening statement After that there will be a 5 -minute rebuttal period
05:43
After which there's going to be 30 minutes of cross -examination Where it'll be 5 minutes of questions from one man to the other
05:49
Going back and forth until we have exhausted all 30 minutes And then once that is completed
05:55
We're going to look at the audience questions We're going to probably give about 20 minutes to audience questions
06:00
Unless there's just a ton of them that we need to go longer We can, but we'll see how it goes And again, this is the opportunity for you to participate
06:07
So if you're watching, please be watching And leave your questions so we know that you're there
06:13
And then at the very end, each man will give a 5 -minute closing statement Telling the world why they were right and the other person was wrong
06:21
So this is how the debate's going to go And I would like to ask the audience
06:26
Again, please pay attention to what these men are saying If you came here with your own position, that's great
06:33
Most of us do have a position on this But that doesn't mean we don't have anything to learn And one of the things about debates that is sometimes frustrating
06:40
Is people come in and they don't listen to the other side If you came in with a position tonight Please open your heart to the other side
06:47
Not because you think they might be right But because you always have something that you can learn And be listening as both sides present their case in the debate
06:55
So let's get started If you gentlemen are ready You are ready
07:00
All right, I'm going to turn everything over to Matt And he is going to have his opening 10 minutes
07:07
Matt, the floor is yours Thank you The word Trinity does not appear anywhere in the
07:13
Bible But we know from reading the Bible That the Father is God, the Son is God, and the Spirit is God And we know that God is one
07:20
Anyone who denies the Trinity is not a Christian The biblical teaching of a young earth is more clear than the
07:27
Trinity While people can deny a young earth and still be a Christian We must wonder why denial of a young earth is so pervasive
07:33
For 18 centuries, Christians have universally accepted The biblical account that the earth is young But with the advent of the modern scientific paradigm
07:41
Of deep time within the last 200 years Some in the church began to look for ways To bring the biblical account into concordance
07:48
With that deep time paradigm It's a trendy fad With many different ideas on how to do so From postulating that days actually mean eons
07:57
To inventing a billions of years gap Between Genesis 1 -1 and 1 -2 The ideas have been creative The trendiest of ideas
08:06
That is hyperbolically 15 minutes old Is that Genesis is agnostic To the ideas of age
08:12
And does not deal with material creation It's just a functional ordering Due to the influence of the writings of the
08:17
Hittites The Sumerians And other ancient Near Eastern people groups That were judged with destruction for their wickedness
08:25
All of these trendy ideas have one thing in common A specialized guru Who tells you that the words don't mean
08:30
What they are commonly understood to mean They mean something unique That only the guru with his secret knowledge can reveal
08:35
They say that it is the text of scripture That must be redefined So that the Bible can be brought into alignment
08:41
With the emergent dominant paradigm Is it valid to consider trendy ideas To make the
08:47
Bible concordant with worldly philosophies Or should we as Christians Uphold the authority of scripture as the magisterial
08:52
Principium If words have meaning at all Then accepting the
08:57
Bible's clear teaching Of what we now call young earth creation Is self evident It is at the expense of denying language itself
09:04
That fellow brothers in Christ Deny that the Bible teaches What I will defend tonight Does the
09:09
Bible teach that the earth is young I have three points One, the earth, the universe, and everything in it
09:15
Was created in six calendar days As the Bible says Two, the earth was created about 6 ,000 years ago
09:21
Because of the ages given in the corresponding accounts Of the unbroken royal lineage Of the seed from Adam to Abram In Genesis and Chronicles And from Abram to Jesus In Luke as the
09:32
Bible says And third, Jesus confirms that mankind Was made at the beginning of creation In Mark 10, 6
09:39
As Christians, we do not want to hold Things that are demonstrably false Genesis and the rest of scripture
09:45
Very clearly tells us That God created in six calendar days About 6 ,000 years ago
09:51
Most of God's word was passed on to us From the spirit inspiring the prophets and apostles But part of the case for a young earth
09:57
Was literally written by the hand of God In stone This was completely undisputed
10:03
But for the rarest of outliers For about 1800 years Until the end of the 19th century
10:08
And suddenly, when Darwin's idea of evolution Took hold of academia More time was needed to explain
10:14
His biological theory So it became trendy to see if the words in the Bible Could be stretched to accommodate
10:19
These naturalistic ideas Let's look at the text Number one, in the beginning
10:25
This may come up later as we identify That one of the trendy tactics today Is to stretch the word beginning
10:30
Far beyond all recognition The Hebrew grammar and the narrative structure Of Genesis 1 doesn't permit a time gap
10:36
Between verses 1 and 2 The vav consecutive and at the beginning of verse 2 In Hebrew implies a direct sequence of events
10:44
Use of Number two, use of the word yom Meaning day It's literally defined in Genesis 1
10:50
Number three, why did God not use Any of the deep time words That are available in Hebrew Like yamim, which is plural of yom
10:58
Or kadem, the days of old Or olam, the days of old None of those are used And some might object and say that Moses Didn't understand large numbers like billions of years
11:07
So God had to speak to this simpleton With simpleton language But this objection would be ignorant of the covenant
11:13
From Genesis 22, 17 Where God says, I will surely bless you And make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky
11:20
And as the sand on the seashore Number four God didn't communicate to Abram this way
11:25
In Genesis 1 He told him days Number four, sequential days
11:31
Are confirmed by the ordinal usage Of the text Had God wished to communicate non -sequential days
11:37
It would have been quite easy for him to say something like Sometime later or many years later Or as things developed over time
11:44
But instead he used language That we all understand to mean sequential consecutive days The point is clear
11:49
God was not giving some ambiguous myth The words of Genesis Have meaning of sequential
11:55
Consecutive calendar days Number five The days are bounded by evening and morning patterns
12:01
To separate the days Not eons, not years, not months But only days are bounded by evenings and mornings
12:08
God was being very clear That yom meant a calendar day In the context And number six
12:14
With the objection, but Matt Can't yom mean a time period Like in Genesis 2 -4
12:20
Yes Notice how they always choose Genesis 2 -4 And no one ever chooses Genesis 1
12:26
Because the context shows us That the usage of yom in Genesis 2 -4 Is completely different Than the usage of yom in Genesis 1
12:33
But I do agree that yom has flexibility Of usage As faithful Christians we should look to scripture
12:39
Rather than some outside false authority Like the scientific paradigm or the modern culture
12:44
Or ancient near eastern cultures Where can we look in scripture To find a usage of yom In the context described in Genesis 1
12:52
To give us the correct boundary of yom Exodus 29 -11 And Exodus 31 -17
12:58
It's very clear When it says, six days you shall labor And do your work For in six days the
13:04
Lord made heaven and earth The sea and all that is in them In the same way that God's people are expected to work
13:10
Each week, we can be certain That it took God the same amount of time To create the entire universe Because of what the
13:16
Bible says Number seven, here's the meat of the matter In Genesis 5 -11 Record the ages
13:23
When those in the unbroken royal lineage Of Jesus fathered their children The summation of these ages
13:29
Confirm that the earth is indeed young And lastly in Mark 10 -6
13:35
For at the beginning of creation God made them male and female Jesus is confirming that it was the beginning
13:42
When he created everything Everything else That he made mankind Remember, Jesus is the creator
13:49
He was there, he would know Those who have fallen prey to the lure of the modern scientific paradigm May say, well this passage is just about marriage
13:56
But this objection ignores The actual words of Jesus Would you contend with him that the very specific
14:02
Words that he used are unimportant If beginning has any meaning at all Then it must be referring to the creation
14:08
Week and not as old earthers claim 13 .787 billion years After creation
14:13
To say that the beginning can mean anything From 14 dozen hours To 13 .787
14:19
billion years Renders the word As meaningless It literally destroys language
14:25
Let's test the consistency If fellow brothers who deny Young earth creation would apply
14:31
The same level of skepticism they do To Genesis 1 and Exodus 20 And to the other parts of scripture
14:37
You might hear something like Well of course the plagues of Egypt Were just symbolic There's no way that an entire river turned to blood
14:45
God was just saying metaphorically That it's the blood of Jesus that saves you Besides There's no record of the
14:51
Nile turning to blood In Egyptian writings Or you might hear something like When we look at the ancient
14:57
Near Eastern writings Like the Sumerians There are many stories like that of Samson Who had superhuman strength
15:03
So the Bible's account of a man Whose strength relied on the length of his hair Is figurative in nature Samson, while interesting, is hyperbolic of a leader
15:11
Who probably existed but never pushed over a building With his hands Or maybe something like Jesus didn't call them a literal storm
15:19
If you look at the Greek You can reasonably surmise that Jesus Comforted the storm In the hearts of his disciples
15:26
The storm was just a picture of the trauma That his disciples felt in knowing that their teacher Would face persecution
15:32
Jesus' words calmed the storm Within his disciples But it's inconsistent
15:38
For YEC deniers to declare God could not have created the universe In six days in the recent past But it's totally possible
15:46
For a virgin to bear a child The text demonstrates That the earth, even though it is the
15:52
Oldest entity in the universe Is young And the Christians should not hold beliefs
15:58
That are demonstrably false We can look at the history of the church as well While the biblical timeline is the
16:04
Ultimate authority, is it worthwhile to see How Christians from the past have understood the text? Of course
16:10
If in my reading of the text I discover something That no one else in the history ever thought or saw
16:16
I should question my own interpretation To my knowledge No Christian before the 18th century is recorded
16:22
To have believed in what we would today Call an old earth To confirm The young earth consensus of the time
16:28
From the earliest Christians To just over a century ago, a span of about 1800 years
16:33
Let's look back at some of those who wrote Irenaeus Theophilus, Julianus Africanus Origen, Augustine, Johannes Kepler James Usher All of the reformers
16:46
Accepted a young earth Charles Lyell, though not a
16:52
Christian Wrote in the 1800s And his desire, knowing that Christianity was the dominant paradigm
16:57
He said in his writings He wished to free the science from Moses, which we know as Genesis In his biography of James Hutton Jack Rapcheck wrote in The Man Who Found Time The age of the earth is the wedge
17:11
That shattered the biblically rooted picture of earth And separated science from theology As Christians Which we both are
17:19
We should want to interpret scripture Consistently and rightly Consistently by offering the same level of scrutiny to passages
17:25
That conflict with modern sensibilities like Genesis As those passages deemed crucial to Christian orthodoxy like the miracles of Jesus We've established throughout that Throughout all of the church history before the dark times
17:35
Everyone understood that the earth was young Because of what the bible tells us And we have clearly established that the bible teaches
17:41
That the earth is young. The language demands it We do not want to hold teachings That are demonstrably false
17:51
Alright, well Thank you so much. I appreciate that Wonderful. Matt, I appreciate that Opening statement
17:59
Could you hear me when I gave you the One minute? Did that come through? I was trying not to just holler
18:04
But I wanted you to be able to hear me Alright Adam, I'm going to turn
18:11
It over to you now. We've got some people that are Interacting. I'm watching the Questions as we go and Starring some questions that I'm going to save for later
18:19
So Keep them coming We appreciate it. Alright It's your turn now. I'm going to turn it over to you
18:25
Adam Tonight's debate is about If the bible teaches
18:35
That the earth is young My opponent will have his work cut out for him Since the bible does not teach an age of the earth
18:42
So if you're a young earth creationist Here's my question for you Are you willing to change your mind If the bible does not teach an age of the earth
18:50
For tonight I am offering a biblical case As to why the bible does not teach an age of the earth
18:56
This debate is not about Adam Animal death, evolution Or even science This is about what the bible teaches
19:03
And if the bible teaches that there was a material Earth created Within six to ten thousand years ago
19:10
My opponent has the difficult task Of showing that the bible teaches an age of the earth And must show that the bible gives us
19:16
Specifics as to when the earth was Materially created If he cannot show when the earth was
19:21
Materially created He cannot declare how old it is For if one does not know
19:27
When something begins How can he know how old it is today The bible teaches that Genesis 1, 1 through 2
19:34
Are the preconditions for the six days of creation Those verses read like this In the beginning
19:39
God created the heavens and the earth And the earth was void and formless Darkness was over the surface of the deep
19:46
And the spirit of God was hovering over the waters Of the surface Over the surface of the waters
19:52
The first two verses are the preconditions Of the earth before day one of the six days of creation
19:57
If there is Earthly matter that pre -exists Day one of the six days
20:03
One cannot know The age of the earth The first day of creation begins in verse 3
20:08
When God says Let there be light The assertion that when God creates He creates from nothing during the six days of creation
20:16
Is a presupposition One should not simply read the text As referring to all matter coming into existence
20:21
Without solid biblical evidence Instead The six days of creation
20:27
All refer back to the first two verses Which is where the material Of the earth is mentioned
20:33
Let's take a closer look at the context Every good bible student Knows that when you read a passage
20:39
You must read it in context Let me ask you this question On what day
20:45
Did God create water? It is not during the six days of creation It is before day one
20:51
In the first two verses Notice Genesis 1 -1 does not say The first day
20:56
God created The heavens and the earth The following The following days of creation
21:02
Are responding and presuppose The first two verses Why does God separate light from darkness
21:08
On day one? That's because there was darkness on the earth In verse two Why does
21:14
God separate the waters In day two? He does so to give form And address verse two
21:20
Each day of the six days of creation Is calling back to Genesis 1 -2
21:26
The days of creation Are addressing the emptiness Formlessness and darkness
21:31
Of verse two The days are complete And accomplished When that task is over Second, the structure and patterns
21:41
Of Genesis 1 Even if one wants to assert that Genesis 1 is history One must consider
21:47
The way this history is being expressed And accept the way The message is being delivered
21:52
To ignore the way the text is written Is to miss out on how And what is being communicated
21:59
Consider this question Why isn't day two good? Each day of creation
22:05
God says is good Except for day two Is day two Less than the other days?
22:12
Was there something wrong With the second day of creation? Perhaps you never noticed Honestly, most don't
22:19
The answer is because Genesis 1 Uses the word good seven times The use of good seven times
22:26
Communicates to the reader That all of the days of creation are good This highlights The writer is intentional
22:32
With the structure and usage of words in Genesis 1 Other such notable word structures
22:38
Are the other occurrences That have symbolic or significant repetition For example
22:43
God said occurs ten times Let there be occurs ten times To make occurs ten times
22:50
According to the kinds Occurs ten times Most recognize ten As well as a significant number
22:58
Which often symbolizes completeness These are not the only ones But it's enough for the listener
23:04
To understand that the structure Of words in Genesis 1 Are intentionally written
23:10
Therefore one should consider the structure That Genesis 1 is written in When seeking to interpret what it says
23:16
There are several elements That are evident in days one through six This creates a tight grouping
23:22
That connects and helps us Understand what should be considered In the six days
23:27
First, each day begins with God said and ends with And there is evening and morning
23:34
Second, days one through three Match with days four through six
23:39
In that there was a creative act In each day With a double act In day three and day six
23:46
Making the days symmetrical Third, in a thematic way Days one through three
23:52
Match with days four through six Day one matches with day four Concerning the light and the darkness
23:58
In that matching with the sun, moon, and stars Day two matches with day five Where it separates the waters below And the waters above Creating an expanse in the heavens for the birds
24:07
And the waters for the sea creatures Then day three matches with day six God separates the waters from the land
24:14
And sent to the earth and produces plants So that the land, animals, and mankind May enjoy the land and the plants
24:20
All of this works on a model In which day one begins with verse three However, none of this works
24:25
In verses one and two If verses one and two are included In the six days of creation
24:31
It is the young earth creationist's assertion That Genesis 1 is largely about Material creation
24:38
If that is the case, then why is there So little material creation Happening? According to days one through three
24:46
There is hardly any material creation Happening at all On the first three days
24:51
Of the primary event that takes place Is the separating of things Not the material creation of them
24:57
God is clearly ordering the earth And arranging it But what is he separating?
25:03
He is separating the stuff From the first two verses The rest of Genesis 1
25:09
Presupposes That which was said in verse two They are the context
25:15
For the rest of the chapter Now the point here Is that verses one and two
25:21
Are not a part of the six days of creation But rather That they precede
25:27
The six days of creation They are the presupposition Which we must now begin with Now at the moment
25:34
We must turn to Hebrew Day one of the six days of creation Cannot consist of verses one and two
25:41
So the first day cannot be Verses one through five But rather it begins
25:48
With verse three Hebrew has something called a Vav Consecutive The Vav Consecutive Serves to create a sequential
25:56
Narrative flow in the Hebrew language Linking actions or events In the story It acts as a storytelling device
26:03
To propel the narrative forward And stringing together actions The first Vav Consecutive begins in verse three
26:10
With God said Let there be light And then it continues Throughout chapter one
26:17
All the way through the six days of creation This shows the connection Between days one through six
26:23
While entirely leaving out verses one and two This shows that even in Hebrew The first two verses were not included
26:29
In the first day Instead the reader is supposed to see That the first two verses are the initial setting
26:35
Which the reader is to understand The six days of creation Lastly if you're not convinced
26:40
I want to try and clear away Two presuppositions that are often brought to the table Many assume
26:46
That day one of the six days of creation Account must be the first Day of all time
26:52
Space, matter, and energy Often it is because of passages Such as Exodus 20
26:58
For in six days Yahweh made the heavens And the earth, the sea, and all that is in them And rested on the seventh day
27:05
Because By pointing out to Exodus 20
27:10
Because of what I've laid out Is correct Then God creates in six days
27:16
The heavens and the earth Using that which was Before day one
27:22
It is assumed but not proved That the first day of the six days Of creation was also the beginning
27:29
Of time and the first day of any creation The text of Genesis Is specific in saying that It is a creation account for mankind
27:37
This explains Why such things as the angels Are not mentioned There are other things that are likely
27:45
Created before the six days of creation For example Job 1 minute 38 says
27:53
Where were you when I laid the Foundations of the earth? Tell me if you Understand When the morning stars sang together
28:00
And all the sons of God shouted for joy Or who enclosed the sea doors When bursting forth
28:06
It went out From the womb When I made a cloud its garment And dense gloom its swaddling band
28:13
This is a creation passage Which speaks of the angels Shouting for joy at the creation
28:19
This passage as well presupposes That the angels were created Before this six day creation
28:25
And were in fact present to celebrate it If the angels were created before day one
28:30
Of the creation account Then the first day mentioned In Genesis 1 is not the absolute
28:35
Beginning of time There is one other presupposition And that has to do with creation
28:40
This is the notion of create or make One may appeal to Exodus and say that It declares that God made or created
28:47
Everything in six days since it uses the term Create or make Talking about materials such as water, earth
28:53
And the like. This is demonstrably false Since day one of the creation is not physical At all. On the first day
28:59
God is supposed to create light Which is then called day The day is simply not the day time
29:05
And the night time It has nothing to do with material creation But the time of day and night
29:14
Alright You both had a lot to say, had a lot to squeeze in there You did a great job. Thank you both very much
29:20
I do want to say this Watching the comments If your questions are not related to the debate
29:26
Please do not continue to vote the comments With things unrelated to the debate It's not helpful and it makes it difficult
29:32
To see what questions really revolve Around this question. So please Ask questions related to the debate
29:38
Don't argue with one another and don't post things That are irrelevant. That would be Unhelpful.
29:44
Alright So moving on now we're going to Do our five minute rebuttals Each man is going to get five minutes
29:50
And we're going to turn it back Over to Brother Matt Thanks Adam for your opening
29:59
A few things That he talked about Were some of the preconditions
30:04
That Genesis 1 .1 and 1 .2 Are actually
30:10
Some sort of time Before time And we may have to talk about that in the cross exam
30:15
But he's Proposed that there is some sort of Matter That can exist
30:23
Without time That God created all this matter But there was no time for it to exist
30:29
When? It's a strange belief And he may be able to clarify
30:35
Further as we go forward The concept Of something prior
30:41
To day one would fit well for Eternity but since The earth and the sea and everything
30:47
In them have to exist At a time and a place Then his
30:54
Proposal is Somewhat strange to say that There's some sort of time Mysterious He'll have to declare that a little further
31:03
Because when we look at the text itself Especially in Exodus 20 We see very clearly God says
31:10
In six days I made The heavens, the earth, the sea and all that is in them There is no
31:16
There had to be a day prior Or some sort of Mysterious time prior
31:21
To day one. God literally says And wrote with his own hand in stone I created the heavens
31:27
The earth, the sea and all that is in them in six days So It's a We'll let him talk about that a little more
31:35
He talked a little bit about The way that there is some Organizations, some patterns
31:41
In Genesis 1 And just because there's a pattern Doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't
31:47
Truly a part of history As we look at the way God would Have expected his people to pass down His words when he revealed them
31:56
They would have been passed down through oral tradition Until it could have come from Writing So a memory technique of remembering
32:04
Certain patterns in the way that he Created makes perfect sense We wouldn't have
32:10
Let's see here if I've got We'll move on I should have looked a little harder on that And then the last thing he said was
32:24
Create and make Don't mean What we think
32:29
Create and make means This is kind of what I talked about earlier All Bible Translations Use the word create and to make
32:39
There's not an English translation anywhere That Talks about these words create
32:45
And make being used as some sort of Ordering or Drawing together from Pre -existent material
32:53
If that were If that was a possible combination Perhaps we would have found a Bible Translation that had that sort of Usage But when we see very clearly
33:04
Look at all, every English translation Is going to have create and make Which we understand to have a meaning
33:10
If we need to have someone Come in and tell us No no it means something else
33:15
Something that is not in the text itself It means something according to this presupposition
33:21
We have to be questionable About it especially since it hasn't Been found anywhere else in Christian history that someone said
33:28
The creation week was just a functional Ordering of things for some Pre -existing matter
33:34
That is a trendy Idea And we can maybe talk about that a little more
33:43
Those are the notes I had I'll turn it back over to Adam for his rebuttal
33:52
Alright thank you brother Well that gives you You came in right at four minutes Held it down good
33:59
Adam I'm going to turn it over to you For your five minute rebuttal Yes so this debate is about what
34:08
The Bible says History and these other matters And regardless of however the church
34:14
Has interpreted history Which I do think there are arguments That can be talked about that but in this case
34:20
The history is irrelevant The fact that many people may have Interpreted the Bible one way or another
34:26
Does not play a role in this debate The first six days of creation Does not entail
34:31
Therefore that it is the first Day of all time That is a presupposition that the reader
34:37
Is bringing to the text If you just ask yourself Well what was the first day
34:43
Well what do we see when we Read Genesis We see in the beginning God created
34:50
The heavens and the earth And then the earth is void and formless And the spirit of God hovers over the surface of the waters
34:56
Okay So then it says And God said The vast majority of people understand that the text
35:03
Is referring to And then God said As the first day
35:09
Therefore the text would even on a plain Reading state that There was something created prior to day one
35:15
Of the six days of creation And That yeah
35:21
There's an indeterminate amount of time And I'm just saying like if you want to read it Plainly and flatly
35:26
Most people understand that Now what does my partner have to say about Oh the idea of structures
35:33
Well he doesn't really say much at all He's like okay well structures don't mean Really that much The point of the structures that I'm pointing out
35:40
Is that the structures show A tightly knit six days of creation All of those six days
35:47
Go together And all of those six days Begin in verse three
35:53
The point is that from verse three To the end of the six days of creation That is how they are connected
35:59
But yet all of the patterns All of the structure They leave out the first two verses
36:07
If they leave out the first two verses Then how can each one of the days Be calling back to verse two
36:13
Verse two is constantly referenced That's what's going on With the separating of things
36:19
Even with the filling in of them So the point here is that My opponent here has completely missed
36:26
That this structure is essential To what's going on It shows that there is prior material
36:33
Before day one Of the six days of creation The six days of creation Are not the first things
36:40
Ever created of all time That's a presupposition that he brings to the table Second, I was very surprised
36:46
To see that my partner said That there is a Vav consecutive In verses one or two I would love for him to show me that As far as I can see in the
36:55
Hebrew The only Vav consecutive begins in verse three This is a Hebrew structure
37:01
That shows a sequence of events It begins in verse three And it goes throughout the six days of creation
37:07
Again, showing the tightly knit connection Of the six days of creation They only work together
37:14
In these days Third, my partner Asserts Mark 10 6
37:20
From the beginning of creation God made them male and female I'm not exactly sure what he's claiming here
37:25
Are you saying that on day one Adam and Eve were made? The fact that you're saying From the beginning of creation
37:33
Again, you're also presupposing That when it says the beginning of creation It's asserting that This must have been the beginning of time
37:41
The beginning of creation Refers to the six days of creation And in this case
37:47
I am saying that the six days of creation All presuppose That verses one and two
37:54
Existed prior To the first day of creation All of the six days of creation Call back to verse two
38:01
They all presuppose the creation Of matter So therefore
38:07
You have these issues Issue after issue In other words
38:12
When was water created? Are you saying that Water was created on day one
38:18
And that day one is completely different And does not fit in with the pattern Of the six days at all?
38:24
I'm not exactly sure I would have to see what my partner is asserting How do verses one and two fit into all of this?
38:31
Are you saying that all of creation Was created on day one? So it doesn't seem like you are
38:37
But it seems to me That you assume Number one That all of creation
38:44
Has to do with material matter And all of creation Must be only in these six days
38:51
Now regarding material matter You say that it's like Well we can't just look outside For order and these other sorts of things
38:57
But when you talk about let us make Let's look at Genesis 11 Verse 34 Let us make for ourselves
39:04
A name What about making for ourselves a name Has to do with material creation?
39:11
I would love to hear Because I think that if you look In your Bibles You will find many many examples
39:18
Where make is not referring to material creation At all Thank you
39:25
Perfect you guys are doing great Alright well we are now to The actual debate
39:33
And what do I mean by that? Well in the debate Opening statements are important Because they establish a baseline
39:40
And rebuttals are good because they give an opportunity For interaction But where the real debate happens
39:45
Is with what's about to go on What is about to go on is these men are going to Ask each other questions
39:51
And the way that it's going to work Is during the cross examination period When Matt is asking questions to Adam Matt is only allowed to ask questions to Adam And if Adam is asking questions to Matt He is only allowed to ask questions to Matt They are not going to begin to argue
40:07
They are simply going to ask questions And if Matt Asks a question and Adam Asks him a question back
40:14
I'm going to say can't do that That's my job as a moderator this is the hardest part of moderating Is moderating cross examination
40:20
So I've been sitting back Kind of sitting back drinking my lemonade But now I'm going to get focused in on my part
40:26
Hopefully these men are ready for their part And we're going to have a good time for the next 30 minutes or so Let me get 5 minutes pulled up On my device again
40:36
I apologize for the delay here And we are Ready And we're going to do it this way
40:44
We're going to allow Well I tell you what Is there a preference for who goes first Who asks questions first I know we didn't decide this beforehand
40:52
And if Matt you want to ask first I'm ready
40:58
I've got it ready here You're ready to go alright well you have 5 minutes And then as soon as 5 minutes are up I'm just going to say switch
41:04
And then Adam you can do your 5 minutes and we'll do that 3 times Sound good? Sounds good
41:10
Alright let's do it You are away To accommodate something other than the young earth view
41:18
I can think of dozens of changes That would need to be made to the bible Conversely If God did
41:25
Actually intend to communicate to us That the earth is young What changes to the text of scripture
41:30
Would need to be made I think if he maybe eliminated
41:36
The first few verses Of Genesis 1 So just taking verses away
41:46
If you eliminated Those first few verses Then you wouldn't have any sort of The young earth
41:52
So the entire The entire part of your Argument Is that Genesis 1 .1
42:00
And Genesis 1 .2 Prevent there from being a young earth Yes Well it prevents you from knowing how old the earth is
42:09
Let's see here Do you know what the current Hebrew calendar year is And what is significant about that date
42:16
No It's 5784 The years since creation
42:23
Let's see here I know that you hold to an ancient Near east Temple inauguration view
42:30
And that the bible is Agnostic to ages and times In our previous conversations
42:36
This is something we've talked about Why would the bible Then tell us
42:41
When Solomon's temple Was constructed I'm not entirely
42:50
Agnostic to the idea Of ages of temple construction Why would God give us
42:56
A very specific time When Solomon's temple was constructed To be honest
43:02
I actually think That Solomon's temple actually Gives a great example of The view that I'm talking about here
43:09
So in other words There's an inauguration period for Solomon's temple And there's an inauguration for the tabernacle
43:15
Which lasts seven days And we know that when you look at the temple It is very much focused on creation
43:21
The garden, trees The cherubim, all of those sorts of things Now When a person inaugurates a temple
43:30
Does They always are the ones Who also create it Nobody inaugurates a temple whom they did not create
43:36
And so therefore The idea that God is the one who creates all things And yet inaugurates his creation
43:42
On days one through six Resonates perfectly with Solomon's temple Right So he gave us a very clear time
43:50
When Solomon's temple was created And therefore it would make sense for you To hold your view
43:55
I guess we're not supposed to argue at this time Sorry Keith, strike one Keep the questions coming
44:03
Considering Mark 10 6 That God created mankind At the beginning of creation
44:10
How many years After the beginning was Seth born And how would you know Yeah yeah
44:17
So this question is completely irrelevant To this topic Because the creation of mankind Again, like the idea that it's like Okay, let's say that we just trace
44:25
Adam's lineage All the way to Christ and all the way till today Let's even say that we had A more accurate counter
44:32
We knew exactly how long it was That's irrelevant to the creation of the earth Especially it's irrelevant to all of the arguments
44:38
That I've presented Since I'm presenting that the idea is that the earth Materially existed prior to the creation of the first day
44:45
So I'm more than happy To talk about like Oh yeah yeah Let's say the genealogies were accurate
44:51
Which is why I'm not here debating you How long has man existed I'm here debating how long has the earth existed
44:59
And Keith, I hope you'll note That he did not answer that question Uh Mark 10 6
45:06
Very clearly tells us That God created mankind At the beginning of creation A link to Genesis 1 .1
45:13
The beginning of creation So we'll just note that he did not answer the question He brought his presuppositions into it
45:20
Um Let's see here How many days
45:26
Did it take for God to create the heavens The earth And everything
45:31
The heavens, the earth, the sea And everything in them And how do you know Six days, just as the bible says
45:40
Hey Alright we're making some progress Um We know that Adam was the first man
45:50
Created This is similar to the one I think we're gonna pass over that one as well Um If the bible is agnostic
46:03
To the age of the earth Why are these chronogenealogies With specific ages Mentioned in Genesis Okay this is your last question
46:13
Uh Matt Alright go ahead Adam Answer his question then you can start asking Can I just ask a defining question
46:20
Chronogeologies, are you talking about genealogies of mankind Chronogeneologies The genealogies
46:27
That were defined by time From Adam to Abraham They were given Specific time intervals
46:34
Of when they were born Yes, yeah so again For the topic of this debate
46:39
This question is completely irrelevant I mean it just has to do with Okay so you have a creation of mankind
46:46
And again I'm more than willing To even grant the idea You could talk about the creation of Adam In 6 ,000 to 10 ,000 years
46:54
And I think that would be Possible or probable even So if you want to talk about The creation of Adam in 6 ,000 to 10 ,000 years
47:02
We can be friends And go to the park and drink a coffee We'll be friends anyway And we can still drink coffee
47:08
We will Okay Well that's the end of your questions
47:15
Matt We gotta go now with Adam's five minutes Go ahead Adam Okay So what on your view
47:23
Do verses 1 and 2 mean of Genesis 1 I think it's pretty clear
47:28
That as we read through the text itself And take it all In its context
47:33
Genesis These verses were The Bible was written without verses
47:39
So Genesis is just a letter All the way through and the verses were added later But the first two verses that we see now
47:45
Are like the 30 ,000 foot view God is saying I'm the creator I've created all the heavens and the earth
47:52
And then we go into verse 3 Where he gets into The details, I'm going to go into a little further detail
47:58
On how I did it, we go to Genesis chapter 2 And we get some real detail on the creation Of mankind and marriage
48:06
Are verses 1 and 2 a summary statement? Seems to be Yeah Would you say that any creation
48:13
Actually occurs during verses 1 and 2? Like I said this is This is the overall
48:20
Summary statement of God creating the heavens And the earth This is where I started, I created everything
48:25
And now I'm going to tell you In more individual detail I'm going to make some separations as you talked about I'm going to separate
48:33
By days Show you how I did The creation of the heavens and the earth
48:40
Did verses 1 and 2 Actually create anything Or actually happen? Yes Of course, and that's what the
48:48
Bible says So verses 2 are a literal thing And it's not a summary statement
48:55
They are A summary of the full creation I could say I could say to my wife
49:01
Hey I made your lunch today And that would be the summary statement And then I can go and I can open up the box and I say
49:07
Well first I made your sandwich I got the bread out I put the lettuce and cheese on there
49:13
And then I put some pickled okra In there And then So the summary statement is yeah
49:20
I made your lunch today And so I Yes, of course it means That God created the heavens and the earth
49:26
As a summary statement I'm not going to take your time away But I will say if you put pickled okra on my sandwich
49:31
We can't be friends That's going to be contention
49:38
Don't worry Keith We don't have pickled okra on our side Shout out to my sister by the way
49:47
I apologize I couldn't help myself I'm sorry I won't take your time away I'm sorry Go ahead
49:55
So On the six days of creation
50:00
When is water created? Well according to Exodus 20
50:06
The heavens, the earth, the sea And all that is in them were created within those six days Probably on day one
50:13
I mean that would make sense That it would be on day one So why don't we see the creation of water
50:21
On day one In verses three through five Well God was able to tell us in Exodus When he made the seas
50:30
He made it within those six days Obviously it would have been on day one That he made them In the same way that he didn't tell us when he made barn owls
50:39
Specifically But that they were made on day five The specific of the owls themselves
50:45
Isn't it reading into the text to say that Water is created on day one When it doesn't say so in Genesis 1
50:51
No Because we know from Exodus This is a bit of inference we can learn Of taking all of scripture
50:57
As a young earth creationist I can take all of scripture And understand it better By taking the whole of scripture
51:04
Not just the few individual verses Verses one and verse two
51:09
So since we know that in Exodus 20 He created the waters Within those six days
51:14
Because that's what he said And that he divided the waters On day two
51:20
Then we know he had to have made it on day one When he's talking about When he's talking about Creating the waters
51:27
Isn't it then likely that he's referring to The separation of waters I can't ask you questions
51:36
I would have expected him to say separation Rather than Create In Exodus 20
51:43
He could have said And on the second day I separated the waters within That already pre -existed for Billions of years
51:52
But he didn't, he said I created the heavens, the earth, the sea And all that is in them In six days Shouldn't you interpret
52:00
Exodus 20 In light of Genesis 1 and not the other way around They are equally
52:08
Valid Neither has greater weight to the other But doesn't
52:15
Genesis 1 Set the tone for how Exodus 20 is to be understood It's not a conflict for The young earth creation
52:25
It might be a conflict for the ancient Near east temple inauguration view But it's not a conflict
52:31
For me as a young earth creationist I can read them and see that they're equally Valid and see how they correspond
52:38
Directly Alright, that was the last question from Adam We're switching back to Matt asking questions now
52:43
We are Starting your next five minutes Go ahead Alright, Adam can you
52:51
Describe to us a little bit about this Mysterious pre -time That was
52:57
Before time of The beginning Since day one is the beginning of time
53:05
What is this mysterious pre -time Genesis 1, nor anywhere else in the
53:11
Bible Says that day one of the six days Of creation is the beginning of time Therefore it is not
53:17
Radical or odd to say that there Could be time prior to this As I made a little
53:23
Bit of a case during my presentation The idea that the angels existed At the beginning of creation
53:29
Is logical and completely Consistent with the Bible Okay, let's see here
53:39
There are Let me say that one If I want to know how
53:45
Old the statue of liberty Is, is that a matter Of science or history?
53:53
I don't know I don't really know much about Scientific or I'm not a big science or history person
54:00
So I don't know what the proper method for Gaging the history Of the statue of liberty
54:06
I suppose there could be truth in both If I want to know
54:11
How old my great great grandfather Was when he died Would that be a matter of science
54:16
Or history? I mean
54:22
Again I don't know that much about Aging people or what not My understanding is
54:28
I guess you could know either I don't really know the capabilities Of science or history In this occasion, usually yes
54:35
We just ask our relatives History then If I want to know when
54:40
Genghis Khan Conquered Asia Can that question Be answered with science or history?
54:47
Best answered I guess Best answered by science History for sure And I would argue that all those are best answered
54:54
By historical documentation So why is it if we wanted to know the age of the earth We would discount the historical records of Scripture in favor of science
55:05
This question To me is simply kind of a A non -starter for this
55:10
Debate, again like I'm not here proposing a scientific answer Our debate is on what does the bible teach
55:16
And I am claiming The bible teaches that the earth Is, the age of the earth is
55:21
Completely agnostic It doesn't tell me when the age of the earth is It doesn't tell me when it begins So therefore
55:27
I cannot calculate How old it is today Why do you think it is that No English translator
55:38
Ever used The A &E definitions that you gave us For Create and make
55:45
Which you said was the functional ordering In bible translations So I didn't really make a lot of claims
55:53
Concerning ancient near eastern interpretation And stuff, I made a few biblical claims Which I gave examples for And that would be very simple
56:01
It would say what is day one Like on day one of the six days of creation When God says let there be light
56:07
He says the light is day Day is not a material object It's a frame of time
56:13
Day and night Okay so what is Particularly unique About that interpretation
56:20
I also gave the example of Genesis 11 .4 In which
56:25
I explained that it says Let us make a name for ourselves What about that has to do with material creation
56:31
Using the same words for make and create It's not that make and create
56:38
Can't mean I think the case you were trying to make Was that When we read these words make and create
56:46
They're always that It's never functional ordering So why wouldn't a Why wouldn't the
56:51
English translators have used that word As ordering Pre -existing material
56:57
As you claimed In Genesis 1 .1 and 1 .2 You said it had existed for And you didn't give a time period
57:04
You said that the material Was always around But that the
57:10
Creation and making of it That he talked about through the rest of scripture That he was just functionally ordering it
57:16
But no Bible translator Ever uses ordering Or making it functional It always says create and make
57:24
Why do you think that is This will be his last question Adam go ahead Answer and then you
57:31
I don't think anyone Needs any special glasses To read the Bible in Genesis 1 So for example
57:38
The first three days there isn't really Much being made God separated the waters above from the waters below He separated the water from the land
57:46
What about that sounds like material creation Nothing There's nothing in that that's really talking about Oh wait a minute
57:53
I'm seeing this material creation Again even day one God separates the light from the darkness
57:58
That sounds like he's separating things And my question ultimately Is going to be
58:03
How about I just move right into my first question Keith is that alright That's podcasting right there
58:10
Man that's a great segue So my first question is What does
58:17
God create On day one The earth and water Okay Is that all
58:28
Space and time When he separates The light from the darkness When he separates the light and the darkness
58:35
What is he separating You may have to Give me a little further
58:41
When you say he's separating light and darkness Here here Is that material
58:49
That sounds like A scientific question Light can behave as both a wave and a particle What is
58:55
The light in day one The light source What is it
59:02
The text is very clear what it is What is it I can read it for you if you like Go for it
59:10
I'm not supposed to It says that the light is the day
59:17
And the darkness is the night How is that material I think what
59:24
You may have the presupposition That I think That That light had to have a material
59:32
Creation God made
59:38
The earth and the water on day one As we know from exodus And the way that it was separated
59:44
On day two so it had to have been made on day one So the light Would have been essentially
59:50
God energizing his universe Creating the imbuing His creation with light
59:57
And he separated The light and the darkness The text says The light is the day
01:00:03
And the night and the darkness is the night How is day Time and night time
01:00:09
Material I don't think I don't think that Alright we can move on Validity We can move on Alright does day one of the creation
01:00:22
Mean it is the beginning Of all time space matter and energy This is what we would understand
01:00:30
From the text yes God gave us the summary view In the beginning I created everything
01:00:35
And then this is how I did it On each day Do you agree Do you agree that the six days of creation
01:00:44
Presuppose versus one and two Being real And existing I can only go by what the text says
01:00:54
And the text says that In the beginning he created the heavens and the earth And then when
01:00:59
I look at Exodus 20 that heavens and the earth Were created within The six day time frame
01:01:06
It is irrefutable That the beginning the heavens And the earth were created within those six
01:01:12
Days because that's what the Bible Says doesn't matter What the presuppositions either one of us
01:01:18
Are bringing the Bible says The heavens and the earth were created In days one through six
01:01:24
And that's that's what we have to Go by we have to go by what the text Says doesn't your view
01:01:30
That include the angels And that's irrelevant to this debate It's the
01:01:35
Entirely relevant Okay, but I'm asking About What about the creation of all things
01:01:45
So if Like your Job 38 Passage I mean that was it that was a pretty good Younger patches it was bold of you to bring
01:01:52
A younger bring my side into it As if it was something that you The foundations of the earth we know
01:01:58
The foundations of the earth were worth With on day one so if the Angels were there singing and singing their
01:02:04
Praises in heaven for the foundations Of the earth they're not they're not necessarily Bound by space time
01:02:09
They might have been created before but on day one For the for time They were the the age of the
01:02:16
Earth would have been within the Six days and that's what we're arguing that The days of creation
01:02:22
Is it your View that time Can exist Or that time can
01:02:29
Be non -existent Even during a creative act This is your last question on this round Could you clarify that I'm not sure that I understand fully can
01:02:43
God create something outside of time Not materially
01:02:48
Materially it would have to fit within space Time according to the what The universe that we know he can
01:02:54
Create he has created heaven heaven is not Bound by space time But it's unreachable
01:03:00
From us materially But material Stuff has to have a time element
01:03:06
To it the fourth dimension Alright so gentlemen we are now
01:03:13
Moving into Our final round Of cross -examination where Matt gets
01:03:19
Five more minutes and Adam gets five more Minutes you guys have asked some great questions We've got a lot of people interacting
01:03:25
In the comments so Take a deep breath guys Because this is the last five
01:03:31
Minutes for each of you and it Begins right now I am going to go ahead and ask these
01:03:37
Questions again even though Maybe we'll get some more Progress on it we know from First Corinthians 15 45 that Adam Was the first man
01:03:47
And we know from Mark 10 6 That mankind was created At the beginning of creation
01:03:53
So how many years After the beginning of creation was Shem Born I would
01:04:00
I would look in the Bible To see whatever that number Is I don't have it off the top of my head but I'd be more than happy to call
01:04:07
You Matt and ask you how many years It's right here The answers are all
01:04:13
Right here Adam Open book test no that's 15 58 and if And the same thing if we know that Adam Was the first man that was created
01:04:22
And from Mark 10 6 we know That mankind was created at the beginning Of creation How old was
01:04:31
Creation when Abraham Was born I mean again 150 years these these questions
01:04:39
You can all file in but if What I'm arguing is true in Genesis 1 And 2 these questions are irrelevant because They are appealing to the six days of creation
01:04:47
That that God has chosen To lay out for us so I completely Agree with that where we disagree
01:04:53
Is that verses 1 and 2 Show that there is pre -existing Matter especially
01:04:59
The earth the waters the land That pre -exists day one And we know from well
01:05:07
I can't argue sorry that's two Strikes Keith you got to keep note of these Okay We know there are 1440
01:05:17
Minutes in a day a yawn And we agree that our Closing statements will be 5 1 ,440th of a day
01:05:27
Are we to understand that day to be A young earth day Or by some other hermeneutic because I've got
01:05:33
A young earth time frame that would be five minutes And I've got one that would last three million 470 ,000 22 years
01:05:40
That was kind of a joke so I'll turn it over to All right
01:05:46
Okay, so where is the Vod consecutive in verses 1 and 2 So I Got my notes.
01:05:53
I don't speak Hebrew Hebrew I got my notes from Online Okay All right, so All right, well, you know what we
01:06:04
Won't dwell on that too much I guess So Okay, so Do you see any correlation
01:06:14
Between Do you Do you
01:06:19
Do you accept the Structures that I've laid out for Genesis 1 No, I do not believe
01:06:27
That material That definitely the earth And the heavens and the water were not created
01:06:33
Out before day one because the Bible says they weren't Yeah, but do you accept the structures
01:06:39
Do you accept the structures That how day one Lines up with the rest of the day.
01:06:44
So in other words You have day one two and three and they match With days four five and six Again, this is not really a problem for Young earth oral traditions
01:06:53
God could have made framework Easy to remember Before writing so Whether it is or not.
01:07:00
I don't have a Strong opinion. Is that a yes? I don't have a strong opinion I don't
01:07:07
I don't think it's as clear -cut as you may think That it's perfectly framework There are there are some incongruities
01:07:15
To that Hypothesis So If If the first two verses
01:07:28
Are not real Or if they're not literal Or are you saying that Are you saying the first two verses are material
01:07:35
And that they should be there and understood Throughout the rest of the creation They're important because that's what
01:07:42
God told us They're the They're the summary I made your lunch, this is how
01:07:48
I made it Can you understand That day one Is the creation of the waters
01:07:54
And all of these notions without Exodus 20 I don't see why not
01:08:02
It is further clarification And it's repeated in Exodus 31 17 So if we didn't get it the first time
01:08:08
When he wrote it in stone We can see it in Exodus 31 But how is that not reading
01:08:14
Exodus 20 into Genesis 1 As opposed to exegeting Exodus 1 They are
01:08:21
Of equal weight Some people like to think That the red letters of a
01:08:26
Bible Carry greater weight than the black letters And this is not true God's revelation is consistent and clear throughout
01:08:32
So it could be that before Moses wrote Genesis All they had was
01:08:38
Genesis to go by But they would never have thought Well that was a billion years ago Because from the text
01:08:45
It's pretty clear that Adam was created on day 6 And then you can read his
01:08:51
Genealogy and add up all the years And see that the earth is very young Do you believe that More recent texts
01:08:59
In the Bible can reinterpret With new meaning older texts No But Most would have written those at the same time
01:09:09
I mean Genesis and Exodus That's the law The Pentateuch would have been Presented to the people at the same time
01:09:17
Should you understand the text chronologically There is a pretty good case
01:09:25
For chronology throughout We see consecutive Sequential days We see and then and then
01:09:32
Very historical writings throughout all of Genesis As if it were an account of history So and then and then
01:09:38
Makes sense to me And listen all of this goes to Jesus All of this is building
01:09:44
The foundation for the perfect The royal lineage of Jesus That's what we're ultimately trying to get to So yes
01:09:51
I think chronology is very important So when Exodus 20 Speaks of creation Should we not go back and see what it's referring to in Genesis Yes It's exegetically
01:10:03
We definitely see the patterns Corresponding one to one
01:10:09
So therefore Do you see all of the 26 days of creation referring back To Genesis verses 1 and 2
01:10:20
We are Seeing When God says in the beginning The first verse that you keep trying to Segment and separate
01:10:28
There's no separation there When we look at the text itself In the beginning
01:10:34
God created the heavens and the earth And then in Exodus 20 God created the heavens and the earth
01:10:39
There's a definite correspondence There That Limits them to be within those 6 days
01:10:45
There's no mysterious Pre -time or pre -billions of years I know you keep trying to push us that direction
01:10:52
But the text doesn't allow it That's why we have to go By what it says I know you're trying to bring that Presupposition in but it's not there
01:11:01
This is the last question Adam You have one last question Do you agree that days 1 through 6
01:11:07
All call back to The void, formlessness, and darkness In verse 2
01:11:17
Day 1 is That's a part of day 1 Is that a yes?
01:11:24
You do believe they all call back to that? No, they do not Only day 1 is
01:11:29
Only day 1 talks about the Formlessness and void Alright gentlemen that is
01:11:40
A complete 30 minutes Of cross -examination Each of you got 5 minutes to ask questions
01:11:46
And 5 minutes to answer questions Now we are going to move To the fun part
01:11:52
Which is the interacting With the audience We have 17 questions that have come in You're each going to have
01:12:01
For the question that is Asked to you, you're going to have About a minute to answer the question
01:12:06
And then your opponent Has a 30 second Opportunity to respond
01:12:13
And then we'll move on We don't want to make these Too long, if you need more than a little
01:12:18
Bit of a minute, that's fine But we will Try to keep these right around a minute
01:12:24
A piece, this will put us right at the time frame We want to stay at Alright, the first question
01:12:30
Is for Adam And I can put it on the screen here
01:12:36
It says, if the tree of life That would grant eternal life If the earth is billions of years
01:12:42
Old, how do you reconcile The existence of this tree with the current Under of human lifespan
01:12:49
Order I'm thinking of Or length of human lifespan The tree of life would grant eternal life If the earth is billions of years old
01:12:57
I mean I guess I don't find this to be in conflict Because if we're to talk about Let's just say, again,
01:13:03
I'll take a page Out of Matt's book Let's say that man is created 6 to 10 thousand Years ago, and likewise, the tree of life
01:13:10
Is also created in a similar time span So if the earth is billions of years old That doesn't say anything about the tree of life
01:13:17
Being created billions of years ago Okay, so to clarify
01:13:22
You would say the garden could be young But the earth is old? Um, again
01:13:28
My position here is actually to be agnostic Concerning the age of the earth I'm actually not here espousing that the earth
01:13:34
Is billions of years old I'm here claiming that the bible does not say How old the earth is
01:13:39
It does not give a beginning of the earth As far as material creation goes Therefore, one cannot count
01:13:45
To how old the earth is Since we have no beginning Okay, and I'm not trying to Engage my part of the debate
01:13:54
I just wanted to clarify that for the audience Sure Matt, did you want to follow up on that About the tree of life, or are you going to move on to the next question?
01:14:02
I don't know anything about that question But it's strange that Adam would say We have no beginning When the beginning is repeated several times
01:14:08
I don't think there's anything about that question That would be against young earth Alright Well, the next question
01:14:16
Is for you Mr. Matt, this is for ApolloJedi It says
01:14:22
What is the context of Exodus 2011? Do you think the context makes referencing Exodus 20 in this debate
01:14:29
Problematic? The context Is God Giving the laws
01:14:37
To Moses So it's definitely not poetic It is a matter of God giving
01:14:43
Moses I'm sorry Giving Moses direct information
01:14:49
These are my expectations My expectations are for God's people To work for six days and rest on one day
01:14:55
In the exact same way That I worked for six days and rested on one day So it's not problematic for me
01:15:01
It may be problematic for the other views But it's definitely Right in line with what
01:15:06
I would expect As I read through the whole of Scripture Alright Adam, you want to say anything about that question?
01:15:13
Yeah, so This points out that there is a pattern That the point of Exodus 20 is that it's giving us The pattern that God made in creation
01:15:20
That is not that we're actually following Exactly what God did If we were doing exactly what
01:15:26
God did During the six days of creation Nobody would go to work the next week However, all of us go to work the following week
01:15:33
Why? Because we're not actually following The literal pattern that God laid out Because God doesn't continue creation
01:15:38
Day after day after day, week after week after week He creates one time And then comes his rest, and that's it
01:15:45
Okay Alright, so the next question then Is for Adam It's a
01:15:52
Short question Is Mark 10 6 wrong? I think this is a yes or no question
01:15:57
Why don't I say it like this, why is it not wrong? Well Of course it's completely correct
01:16:03
Mark 10 6 is absolutely correct But the main thing that I'm saying here Is that it is a presupposition to say that The six days of creation are the creation
01:16:11
Of all things The other thing is that when you read Mark 10 6 I want to know, like, are you saying that Adam and Eve are created on day one?
01:16:20
It says the beginning of creation So I don't understand how this is supposed To be a gotcha question when
01:16:25
Mark 10 6 Is like, oh at the beginning of creation God made Adam and Eve, he made You know, all these sorts of things
01:16:30
And it's like, okay, well obviously It wasn't the beginning Instead it's just using a general
01:16:38
Span Referring to Genesis, it's just referring to Like, hey, in Genesis, in the beginning When God made
01:16:44
Adam and Eve That's what happened He's talking about them as the primordial pair The primary ones
01:16:50
So I don't see this as a problem for the Young Earth discussion Okay All right,
01:16:57
Matt, do you want to follow up on that? Yeah, it's definitely not a problem for Young Earth It's a problem for everybody else when they try to bring in Well, the beginning is not really the beginning
01:17:04
And they try to bring in these mysterious definitions That could be this part of the The beginning is obviously
01:17:10
The first week Jesus was there So he can refer to the beginning week Uh, you know, it was 4 ,000 years from when he said it
01:17:18
So I don't have time to go into my full analogy I've got a racing analogy If you think about the time when a sprinter Runs a hundred meter race
01:17:25
He can't start out of the starting blocks For one -tenth of a second Any time before one -tenth of a second
01:17:31
That he breaks out of the blocks Is considered a fault Well, one -tenth of a second
01:17:37
Is definitely the beginning of the race And from the time Jesus said back to creation Is 2 ,000 times
01:17:43
Smaller than that one -tenth Of a second So definitely when
01:17:48
Jesus was referring To the beginning of creation It definitely includes that first week So it's silly to say that It had to have been created the first picosecond
01:17:58
Of the creation It is the first week We can trust Jesus' words And what he is doing
01:18:05
Is he's tying back the creation of mankind To the beginning of creation Just like he said, the heavens, the earth, the sea
01:18:11
And all that is in them in six days This is so hard for me To understand why people don't get this
01:18:18
That's when the runner starts the race When did the runner start training for the race? Alright Well Bring your presuppositions in Alright, so we're going back to Matt now
01:18:31
Matt, referencing the prequels Was not a good start You said, oh wait, that's not a good question
01:18:37
I'm just kidding That's right When you called him the Padawan The Padawan Alright, I'll take that one out
01:18:46
I did say the dark In my opening, come on Ben Hey Ben, good to see you buddy
01:18:57
Here's a real question for Matt This time It doesn't say it's for you, but I'm assuming It's for you, and I have to on a few of these
01:19:04
Because some of them didn't put names on It says, if suffering, disease, and death are a result of sin Which I know is the
01:19:10
Position of the young earth How would you explain Suffering, infection, disease, cancer And death in the fossil record
01:19:17
That is presumably before Adam and Eve Presumed to have occurred before Adam and Eve You know,
01:19:24
Adam did a good segue Earlier to go and write Into the questions and answer, I'm going to segue a little bit Into this idea that we may be
01:19:31
Talking about this, Adam and I, in the future Sometime We have another debate, we're going to argue
01:19:37
About this topic About whether or not There was death before the fall Animal death
01:19:43
Yeah, so a little preview for an upcoming debate But the answer to the question
01:19:48
As was asked God created His creation Very good, we see as Adam mentioned
01:19:54
Seven times we see good, good, good, good And the seventh time it was very good So before mankind sinned
01:20:00
There was no death or suffering For the nefesh animals, the air breathing Soulish animals that we see
01:20:06
So when we find That we are facing these things today The infection and cancer and disease
01:20:11
All these terrible things in the fossil record We can look, again, to scripture This is our principium
01:20:18
We look in Romans chapter 8 For the creation was Subjected to frustration
01:20:23
Not by its own choice, but by the will Of the one who subjected it in the hope That the creation itself will be liberated
01:20:30
From its bondage to decay And brought into the glorious freedom Of the children of God We know that the whole creation has been groaning
01:20:37
As in the pains of childbirth Right up until this present time So when God finished His creation, it was very good
01:20:42
But after the fall, everything in creation Faced difficulties
01:20:48
Infection The bondage to corruption This disease and cancer That the fossil record was created
01:20:54
In this global worldwide flood we read about In Genesis 7 -9 So it makes perfect sense
01:20:59
If we start with scripture And look at the things we're dealing with today It perfectly aligns with what scripture says
01:21:07
Okay Do you want to add any thought, Adam? Yeah, yeah, number one Watch me and Matt's debate
01:21:13
We will be debating animal death Does the Bible teach there could be animal death Prior to sin
01:21:19
I will be arguing that the answer is yes I will be taking the affirmative And Matt will be taking the opposition
01:21:25
I think it is incredibly relevant To talk about the notion of There is a distinct difference between humans and animals Man is created in God's image
01:21:33
The animals are not Therefore there is a significant difference concerning The relationship between the two
01:21:38
The idea is that when a human is killed There is to be significant Serious consequences
01:21:44
There is not to be the same kinds of consequences For the death of animals So that's the short answer
01:21:50
No, that's wonderful And anxious to hear you guys debate that other topic Very good So let us now move to Some of these questions do not have names
01:22:01
But I'm trying to get to the ones that do first So this is for Matt The question is
01:22:08
And this is probably just a quick one It says Matt, do you know that Augustine believed
01:22:14
In instantaneous creation Not creationism As a moderner sees it
01:22:21
And I guess the follow up question Of that Because it's a yes or no Does that matter to you
01:22:27
Joe, thank you for your question That's a great question And we had a questioner earlier who was picking on me
01:22:32
But I'm going to go and direct you to his website Macrophage Strategy has about a 30 minute video
01:22:38
On Augustine It's great The reason Augustine believed in instantaneous creation Was probably, likely
01:22:44
Due to his worldview He was influenced by the modern paradigm Of his day
01:22:50
Which was Ptolemaism Or Geocentrism And so there was no way he could visualize Days actually existing
01:22:57
Prior to the creation of the heavenly luminaries So He Proposed an instantaneous creation
01:23:06
There's more to it than that I think Ben does a great job expounding on it But It brings my point further into focus
01:23:14
That we should not be influenced by the modern Paradigms of our age Augustine had problems with his biblical interpretation
01:23:20
Because of the modern paradigm of his age The modern paradigm of our age Is deep time and evolution
01:23:26
And some of these other trendy things We need not let those things influence Our biblical interpretation
01:23:32
Thank you Matt Adam I want to just piggyback off of what Matt just said And that's that we should not allow our presuppositions
01:23:40
To overcome us too much And that's my encouragement for the Young Earth Creationists And I'm just appealing to the
01:23:46
Bible I want you to go back And let's look at the Bible Yes, it's my understanding that Augustine largely believed in this notion
01:23:55
And again Rather he did or he didn't What matters is the Bible So it depends on what the text says
01:24:02
It doesn't matter what Augustine said Or Thomas Aquinas Or fill in the blank with your favorite theologian
01:24:07
You know So even Keith Fosk So you just want to You want to pay attention
01:24:15
To the Bible The Bible is what matters the most Just remember you're messing with Superior theology over here
01:24:22
So just be careful Alright Question for Adam What is your interpretation
01:24:31
Of Romans 1 20 With respect to the age of the Earth I'm assuming you'll have to look that one up real quick A little
01:24:38
I mean I know the general passage But I don't think I've heard it often referenced In this case
01:24:43
Me either For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes His eternal power and divine nature
01:24:49
Have been clearly seen Being understood through what has been made Yeah, I mean Yes, I don't think that it holds any respect
01:24:57
Concerning the age of the Earth God is great His invisible power His eternal
01:25:03
Yeah Nature is invisible attributes and divine nature Are all clearly seen through creation
01:25:09
So I don't know how that is supposed to I think I can interpret what he's asking
01:25:15
Now that I've read the verse I think he's saying If there is nothing there to witness
01:25:20
If there's nothing there to Interpret what's around it Because it says the visible attributes are clearly perceived
01:25:27
In the things that have been made Who's the perceiver, right So if man's not there in the beginning If man's not there
01:25:32
Then does that relate to the end That's my only way I understand the question If there's no one there to see it
01:25:39
Then How can that be true Prior to the creation of man
01:25:45
Yeah, so Interpreted the way that you've expressed I mean
01:25:52
Like There was no one there to see it Like all of us agree with that Like there's no man created until day six
01:25:58
So it's not like anyone can see the creation itself The only creation that we're supposed to see
01:26:03
Is that which is finished And it's just the notion that I could be wrong too I mean,
01:26:08
I'm just saying that's the only way I can see that being relevant Yeah Yeah, it was a better try
01:26:13
Trying to explain it and stuff But the primary point of the verse is to say that We can see it now
01:26:19
When we as humans look at it We can see it now And again, I just don't think that The fact that humans are created
01:26:26
You know, on the sixth day That doesn't play a role in the age of the earth Especially with the arguments that I put forward
01:26:33
Alright, Matt You want to say anything about that or move right on Well, I think it kind of goes back to the Stretching of this beginning
01:26:39
You know, when we're trying to stretch this beginning Over billions and billions of years
01:26:44
Or some unknown time quality Beginning loses its Meaning It doesn't mean anything
01:26:51
Unless it is tied to that First creation week Then it makes sense
01:26:56
And this verse fits very nicely into that The first week, the perceivers Were created on day six
01:27:02
And now they know that there is At the beginning of creation That the earth glorifies
01:27:07
God Everything glorifies God Gotcha Alright, Matt How could days one through three
01:27:18
Have been real days Since the sun wasn't created Until day four? That's a pretty common
01:27:24
Young earth question So, let them have it And this is not
01:27:30
Specific to Adam's view But most of the old earthers They don't realize this is actually a problem for them
01:27:36
Because Days one through three A day is not defined by The light source
01:27:43
That's like saying that there could not have been time Before there were watches Because the sun is the time -keeping piece
01:27:49
As the earth rotates on its axis The sun is our reference point That we see what a day and a night is
01:27:56
But the sun is not needed For the earth to rotate on its axis To have a regular day The reason it's a problem for old earthers is
01:28:03
They presume there were Nine point something billion Time units
01:28:09
Before the earth -sun combination By which we measure what a year is So how do they determine what a year is
01:28:16
Prior to the sun -earth combo Emerging from the noxious clouds Of the solar system
01:28:22
They have a problem Determining what a year is Okay Not a problem for young earthers on day four
01:28:29
Go ahead For this question, of course, answers could range To be much, much longer
01:28:35
But I think the primary purpose of Genesis 1 Is that it is referring to things related to mankind That's why it doesn't mention the angels
01:28:41
It's not supposed to be focused in on the angels It's focused in on mankind It's focused on things from mankind's perspective
01:28:48
For example, night and day Those are only relative to mankind's perspective What is night and day
01:28:54
In a galactic Intercosmetic Scale Nothing There is no night and day
01:29:02
It's only night and day in reference to mankind As the sun moves Or as the earth moves around the sun
01:29:09
But By and large This is sort of a funny question
01:29:15
And I just think that I don't know It doesn't really play a bearing again On the creation of the earth
01:29:23
All right This question is for Adam What are your views
01:29:29
On fossils And the dates assigned to them Did the dinosaurs live among people
01:29:36
Yeah So I'm really sorry to disappoint anybody But I'm just not a science person
01:29:42
That's really the short answer I don't really have any research on behind it I'm not really familiar with any of the research
01:29:48
Concerning fossils And the dates there So I'm not here defending a strong Billions of years view
01:29:55
I'm here defending that the bible doesn't teach the earth is young And it doesn't teach the earth is old The bible is agnostic on the topic
01:30:01
If you want to ask me a biblical question I'll be a little better at answering those But I'm sorry I just don't really have a strong opinion
01:30:07
Concerning fossils Gotcha Matt did you want to tell them
01:30:12
Well I have some good news because this answer Can be answered by the bible We know in Genesis Seven through nine that there was a worldwide
01:30:20
Flood covered all the earth All the high mountains under the entire Heavens So we would expect to find as a
01:30:28
Christian As a creationist I would expect to find billions of dead things Buried in layers
01:30:33
Of sedimentary rock all over the earth Including on mountaintops And this is something we definitely expect to find
01:30:39
So It was telling With the line of questioning
01:30:44
I asked Adam earlier Was this a science question Or a history question His default to anything in the past is what's a science question
01:30:51
And I want to propose That all these questions in the past Are answered by history questions
01:30:57
And so the bible is not a science textbook It deals with history And if we want to know questions about age
01:31:03
And history The best source is a historical document You just did your best
01:31:09
Ken Ham impression I just want you to know that Billions of dead things laid down in rock layers all over the earth I ain't letting that go
01:31:15
I think you lose points for that one Wait a minute He's probably going to want a cut of the money that you make
01:31:21
Of this piece You may have to filter that out When I did my denominational video
01:31:27
At the ark I was changing And a friend of mine
01:31:33
Sent the video to him that day I was afraid I was going to get in trouble For filming on his property
01:31:39
Especially the Methodist guy But he laughed and thought it was funny So I got away with it
01:31:46
I don't agree with everything Ken Ham says but I love Ken Ham I pray for him I think he loves the
01:31:52
Lord I'm the same way I think we can disagree on some things and still be appreciative of what he does Alright So We got just a few more
01:32:02
We're not going to get to every single question Because of time But I want to get to the ones that seem to be most relevant
01:32:07
To the things that you gentlemen have said Alright So we left off Who was the last person
01:32:16
Adam Matt gets the next question Alright Apollo Jedi Do you believe that if God created everything in one day
01:32:27
As he could have easily done Would we debate today If it was one day
01:32:33
Or would other sides say One day is figuratively A billion years
01:32:38
This seems sort of like an esoteric question But we'll see if you get Anything out of that The old what if question
01:32:45
I'm thankful we have The All of scripture there for us
01:32:51
If God created everything In one day As he could have easily done
01:32:57
Would we debate today If it was one day You know
01:33:03
I don't know how to answer that question We would go to scripture We would let scripture decide for us
01:33:09
The way we do with the The question that we have today And I'd look at Exodus 20
01:33:16
To see if it said And in one day I created all the heavens the earth the sea And all that is in them And if that's what
01:33:21
Exodus said Then that's what we would argue We want to argue what scripture says And that's what I've done today
01:33:27
Argue what scripture says Adam I'm with Matt on this one
01:33:35
Sorry Wally But unfortunately Especially for this debate Neither one of us are here standing on And purely arguing
01:33:43
Science We're arguing what the Bible says And that's where be our reference point So concerning how old we would say
01:33:50
Oh one day or this It would depend on the exegesis of the text It would depend on what the Bible says And that's what we'd be arguing over Neither one of us are primarily arguing
01:33:59
Science is how we determine the age of the earth So I think that you would have to ask Somebody more like Hugh Ross Or somebody else who is more focused in On what science says about the age of the earth
01:34:11
Alright I'm going to give Adam your last question And then we have one question I want you both to answer
01:34:17
Because it's very important But it's a single question Doesn't have a person Alright so Adam question
01:34:22
Isn't it a possibility for God to supernaturally Create the heavens and the earth The waters without taking into consideration time
01:34:29
Could be an instant right No I don't think this is possible
01:34:36
So I think that every moment of creation When anything happens God creates
01:34:42
It must begin time So in other words the notion is God creates the angels
01:34:48
That had to happen in time I don't believe that there is any sort of notion In which God could have created
01:34:53
There could have been a created act In which that being existed eternally To say that it was created outside of time
01:35:00
Is almost as if to say that like It always existed There's a lot that can be said about time
01:35:06
And that's a much deeper subject But the short answer is no There is no empty time in which God could have
01:35:11
Created the earth in some sort of Empty time and then time only begins Later So are you saying that the moment
01:35:19
Something is created time begins Yes Okay because that's another question that was there
01:35:24
Was when does time When did God create time You would say as soon as the first thing was created time began Time has to begin at the first Act of creation at a minimum
01:35:33
Okay that answers two questions Alright Matt you want to opine
01:35:40
I don't really have anything to say About that one Like Adam said we go with what God's word has said
01:35:45
I don't have a strong feeling on The bounds of time I mean try to think of a definition of time
01:35:51
Without using time It's very hard to define it So it's probably something
01:35:57
That can be discussed by people Much smarter than me Okay last question
01:36:02
I want you both To answer this I don't care who goes first But this is probably the most
01:36:08
Important question of the night In regard to someone's Watching this and they're concerned about their soul
01:36:15
And the question is Am I in sin If I don't believe in a young earth
01:36:21
So I think I want to ask Matt to go first Because you're the one arguing for young earth Let me go first I mentioned this in my opening
01:36:30
Definitely We are saved By grace through faith
01:36:36
In Christ alone That is our only hope If salvation relied on me
01:36:42
Being able to believe a certain Amount of correct things I would utterly fail and would be dead
01:36:48
In my sins So no believing in a young earth Is not a salvation issue
01:36:54
It is important because we want to interpret The bible correctly But praise God I don't have to Believe all the right things
01:37:01
It is by grace through faith in Christ alone Thank you Matt Adam Yeah so of course
01:37:10
I certainly couldn't hold to This view that it would be a sin Not to believe in a young earth Because I'm here proposing that the bible doesn't
01:37:18
And so yeah I think That there are lots of things Regarding theology
01:37:23
That we all get wrong And that is not the major problem The major thing for all of us as Christians And believers is to follow
01:37:31
Jesus To follow Jesus and we interpret And try and understand scripture As best as possible
01:37:36
We grow in the knowledge and faith of Jesus Christ But I think what is so much more important is that Often is how we're
01:37:44
Following Jesus and how our character Is reflecting him And so if you're not following Jesus then
01:37:50
You should because Not only will you find Life and love and happiness
01:37:57
And joy and peace But it's the only truth That will never let you down Amen Alright my friends well that ends
01:38:09
The audience Question portion that we are going To do and so now
01:38:15
We are going to move to our Five minute closing statement So the five minute closing
01:38:21
Statement will begin with Adam Because we're going to give Matt the final Word since he had the burden of proof
01:38:27
Tonight so let us Turn our attention To Adam here you are my friend
01:38:34
Tonight's Debate is about What does the bible say Now my proponent
01:38:41
My opponent has proposed that Of course all of the days of Creation the six days of creation
01:38:46
Are the absolute beginning of time However he doesn't have any way For accounting for the angels
01:38:52
Being created prior he doesn't have Any account for the angels being There at the beginning of creation
01:38:59
He doesn't have any real Account for many of the arguments that I've Laid forward and what I want to propose is that The arguments that I've put forward
01:39:06
Are a much more straight forward hermeneutic And biblical study way What do
01:39:11
I mean by that I mean that In verses one and two It is the setting that the rest
01:39:16
Of the six days of creation are calling Back to It presupposes That it is not one of the days of the six days
01:39:24
Of creation Now why would we think that Because there is a structure
01:39:30
To Genesis 1 There are structures and patterns There are usages of words
01:39:36
Over and over again And so it is very important That we pay attention to those structures
01:39:42
So that we might be able To see and understand What is the text emphasizing
01:39:48
And what is it telling us Each of the days Calls back to verse two It is answering the question
01:39:54
How are we going to deal with the void Formlessness and darkness from verse two And so as a result
01:40:01
We should understand that It presupposes its existence And these notions that it's like Well we should read
01:40:08
Exodus 20 Exodus 20 is what is going to Explain to me Genesis 1
01:40:14
But this is Backwards hermeneutics If I read Exodus 20 and it just has a summary
01:40:20
Statement about creation I then have to go back to Genesis 1 And look closely
01:40:25
What is Genesis 1 saying And then interpret Exodus 20 By Genesis 1
01:40:30
Not the other way around We are not going to use newer passages
01:40:36
To reinterpret old passages Now My opponent and I have a disagreement about the
01:40:41
Vav Consecutive but I encourage anybody To go and look up in the Hebrew I know it might be a little bit technical
01:40:47
The first Vav Consecutive begins in verse three With And God said let there be light
01:40:53
That is where you find the first Vav Consecutive And this follows throughout The six days of creation
01:41:00
Again linking and showing The consecutive line Of actions that are taking place
01:41:05
By God from Verse three through the end of the six days This shows us again
01:41:11
What the author has in mind These are the six days of creation Now My partner is also asserted that There must be material
01:41:21
Creation going on here I think this is actually even more odd Given that what he has actually said
01:41:27
Is that oh verses one and two Are the first day of creation And therefore it is
01:41:32
All of that stuff The water, the darkness, all of that stuff Is already created by the time
01:41:38
You read verse three Again this is completely Out of sync with all of the rest
01:41:44
Of the patterns, it's completely out of sync With every proposal that I made So therefore if you see patterns
01:41:50
In Genesis, if you see the connection Between days one through three And four through six, if you can tell
01:41:56
That it's like oh wait, you've got all of these Connections, you'll notice that those connections Only take place if you begin
01:42:02
Day one in verse three Instead of verse one My partner also has
01:42:08
Asserted that it's like okay well Yeah the separation and all of these things Days one, two, three
01:42:13
Those all must be physical creation And he says like Well when it says create, what do you think
01:42:20
It means? Why didn't the translators Retranslate this In some sort of ancient
01:42:26
Near eastern way What I'm saying is you don't have to go anywhere Outside of your bible, it's very clear
01:42:32
That throughout scripture, scripture Uses make, create In ways that are not meant to be
01:42:38
Material, and I think That when you look at the first three days of creation What do you see? The separation of light
01:42:44
And darkness, the separation of the waters From the waters above Separation of the waters from the land
01:42:51
What about those Three explanations Rings to you as material creation I don't see it
01:42:58
And then yes, on the end of day three He talks about Let the earth bring forth vegetation and plants
01:43:03
Again, this matches perfectly With the pattern that I've lined out That says that there's an act of creation
01:43:09
On the first three days, and a double act In day three Follows exactly with days four, five, and six
01:43:16
Which there's a double act On day six Again, these are all parallel And match
01:43:22
Only on my view But they seem rather out of sync and disjointed On my opponent's view The point here is that The earth
01:43:32
Is in existence Concerning its material being And all of the days presuppose that Therefore You cannot conclude that the earth is young But instead
01:43:44
You must conclude that we don't know When the earth is After all, the first act of creation
01:43:51
Must be the beginning of time And if there is any matter That preexists the first day of creation
01:43:58
Therefore we don't know How old the earth is Subsequently He presupposes
01:44:05
The idea that there is Creation, and that The only way that we can talk about this
01:44:11
Is through the six days of creation And nothing else All right, and Matt, before you get going
01:44:20
I just want to say one thing to the commenters We had a person blasting in here With a bunch of stuff,
01:44:25
I had to ban him And I accidentally put G10 In time out So G10, if you're there,
01:44:31
I can't untime out you So I just want to apologize publicly That was a mistake, I was trying to do the other guy
01:44:36
So I apologize But all right, my friend Mr. Matt Your five minutes begins
01:44:44
Right now Thank you,
01:44:49
Keith For hosting this debate You are an above average timekeeper And thank you,
01:44:54
Adam, for a brotherly conversation On this important topic Why is it important? I'm a Christian, Adam is a
01:45:01
Christian I love God's word, Adam loves God's word It is a matter Both of authority
01:45:07
And meaning Dear Christians, if words have meaning If language can communicate ideas
01:45:13
And since God has revealed history in his word Then we must Hold to a young earth creation
01:45:19
In today's culture, redefining Words to accommodate formerly Abnormal views has become pervasive
01:45:26
And acceptable Abortion is healthcare, trespassing is an armed Insurrection, sexual perversity
01:45:32
Is normalized by asserting That love is love Anything certain parties don't
01:45:38
Like is now racism A woman is whatever the person feels like In their mind Weird is now being described
01:45:45
As the nuclear family These words used to have meaning that Have been given totally new definitions
01:45:50
And sadly this kind of thinking has leaked Into the church when the foundations of scripture Are compromised
01:45:55
People are now saying that a day can be redefined As billions of years Good has been redefined in John Walton's book
01:46:02
As a functional ordering God's creation of the universe In Genesis 1 has been redefined
01:46:08
As a temple inauguration It might be that But there's no
01:46:13
Clear description in scripture That would demand that And as we saw tonight, the beginning
01:46:20
Has been redefined as Some mysterious eon of time In which virtually all of the supposed billions
01:46:26
Of years of history have been hidden from us As shown Tonight, the plain reading of the bible
01:46:31
In its context, what some would call The young earth creation understanding Of God's revelation in the bible is the correct
01:46:38
Understanding Young earth creation has been clearly understood Since Moses penned those words
01:46:43
And in Christendom until the dark times Until it became fashionable To reinterpret the meanings of words
01:46:49
To accommodate modern sensibilities If you need a guru Like John Walton or Hugh Ross To give new definitions to words
01:46:57
That no one in Christian history has ever Believed Simply to accommodate modern scientific
01:47:03
Or cultural paradigms Take caution, brothers As Paul warned the
01:47:08
Colossians See to it that no one takes you captive By philosophy and empty deceit According to human tradition
01:47:14
According to the elemental spirits of the world And not according to Christ If you start with human traditions of evolution
01:47:21
Or ancient near east hermeneutics It will never lead you to Christ And that is not their purpose
01:47:27
But the purpose of God's word Is to lead us to Jesus Just as the Bereans were called
01:47:33
Honorable for searching the scriptures To see if what Paul said was true We too should test
01:47:39
Ideas by what is demonstrably true In God's word The Bible tells us that God created the universe
01:47:45
Very good Which is completely absent of evil, harm, and destruction But sin
01:47:51
Affected all of creation And right there in the garden after the fall God promised a redeemer
01:47:57
To heal that bondage to corruption Against which we all groan today But because the
01:48:03
Bible can be trusted About God's revelation of the past We can trust his revelation
01:48:08
About the future As we eagerly await the redemption of our bodies And the end of harm and destruction
01:48:14
When the knowledge of the Lord Fills the earth as the waters cover the sea As Christians We do not want to have views of demonstrably false things
01:48:22
And it is demonstrably false That the Bible is agnostic To the age of the earth Because the text of the
01:48:28
Bible itself Says that the earth is young Thank you Well gentlemen,
01:48:37
I don't have an applause button But if I did, I would hit it right now Because you both did a fantastic job
01:48:44
And you were both very respectful And godly to one another Demonstrating your differences
01:48:50
And at the same time Upholding brotherly love While doing so So I want to applaud you both
01:48:56
And thank you both for coming on the show today I know this is going to be a great benefit to my audience And I know we've had plenty of people
01:49:04
Interacting in the comments And I guess some of these guys Are maybe people that you know I've seen a few of them seem like Maybe they watch your channel
01:49:13
But if they don't, let me go ahead And give you the opportunity here as we close To tell people how they can find you
01:49:19
And what you do online And we'll close out with that Alright, Matt Yes, you can find me
01:49:26
Adam, go ahead Yeah, you can find me At CuriousChristianity On YouTube, you'll see my squirrel
01:49:34
Power squirrel And you can also find me on Twitter I think it's Curie What is it?
01:49:43
Underscore Christian And Matt You can find me at ApolloJedi .com
01:49:50
On Twitter Or X, sorry Elon It is ApolloJedi With an underscore
01:49:57
I got it here, ApolloJedi underscore Someone is squatting on the ApolloJedi Without the underscore But ApolloJedi .com
01:50:05
Without the underscore For my blog posts Thank you Keith for having us Adam, thank you for the debate
01:50:11
Yes, thank you so much Absolutely, and again
01:50:16
Thank you audience If you guys weren't out there We wouldn't have anybody to do this for So this is a good thing
01:50:24
Always nice to know that people are out there watching Thank you for the comments Thank you too gentlemen for your study and your time
01:50:30
And thank God For giving us this opportunity to be together So thank you all