Was the Cross Cosmic Child Abuse? | Michael Horton
Are Progressive Christians correct when they claim that the cross of Christ was essentially a form of cosmic child abuse. To answer this question, I chatted with Dr. Michael Horton, who teaches Systematic Theology and Apologetics at Westminster Seminary. He's also one of the hosts of The White Horse Inn, which is a great podcast! Check out his response :)
Here's the full interview: https://youtu.be/fEkhXxF1Zfs
Check out our Wise Disciple merch: https://wisedisciple.store/
Want a BETTER way to communicate your Christian faith? Check out this video: https://youtu.be/OHC7Zpgvq6Q
Check out my website: www.wisedisciple.org
OR Book me as a speaker at your next event: https://wisedisciple.org/reserve/
Check out my latest Q&A where I take your questions: https://youtu.be/n_Hiq0GZOnA
Got a question in the area of theology, apologetics, or engaging the culture for Christ? Send them and I'll answer on an upcoming podcast: https://wisedisciple.org/ask/
Transcript
Again sort of anticipating what progressive Christians will say or progressive people who are taking a progressive theology will say
One of the things that they really say a lot is that the cross was essentially a form of cosmic child abuse where a wrathful vengeful bloodthirsty
God has Demanded I think you said this at the top of the the interview demanded his ounce of flesh, you know to satisfy his wrath
Can you explain why exactly that is way off? Sure Nate, um, well it
It's first of all, um a pretty faulty view of the Trinity You know you have
God the Father God the Son and God the Holy Spirit all being equal three persons But one in essence they all have the same attributes of justice mercy love
Holiness and so forth, but they they they are distinct persons and The Son is
No lower than the Father in the you know that there there is no higher and lower in the
Trinity. They are all equal And so the Son and the Father Agree together in the councils of eternity before the world was even created
Knowing that we would fall into sin agreed to For the son to to have a bride be given a bride chosen from The foundation before the foundation of the world by the father as a gift to the son.
Here is his bride Even as he's being given this bride by the father he knows
What's going to happen to her and that he's going? To come and save her he doesn't have to he could he could he could say, you know,
I The father and the son could could have decided not to say
Father could have decided not to give a bride to the son But that all humanity would be judged and maybe start another human race but instead
Instead the father gave the son a people and the son Voluntarily Accepted the burden as well as the delight that came with that Isaiah 53 again.
He He will see his seed and be satisfied Because he poured out his life as a guilt offering for sin
He will he will see the work he even from eternity. He he was looking forward
To becoming flesh in order to save human beings people from every tribe and kindred and tongue and people and nation because he knew
He knew what would be the result of his work. So You have to start start with the
Trinity's idea of of God the father kind of beating up this this man Jesus or No, his his poor son
Jesus said in John 10 No one Takes my life from me
So let's get that straight. No one's no one's going to kill me. No one's going to you know
I'm not gonna be I'm not gonna be a hapless victim here. I'm going to give my life
Sure, I'll be arrested. I'll be handed over and so forth, but Jesus didn't say a word. He didn't defend himself
And Is that powerlessness? No, that's power. That's Jesus being in control of his destiny and Saying I am going to the cross.
I'm not going to fight this thing. This is why I've come into the world and So no one takes my life from me.
I Have the authority to lay it down Mm -hmm, and I have the authority to take it back up again.
So we're not talking here about any kind of You know whipping post any idea of a pound of flesh
Furthermore the father so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son not the father was so angry
He beat up his son But the father so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son.
You don't have an angry dad right and a a Brutalized victimized son
You have the father so loving the world that he's giving his only begotten son and his only begotten son
Saying no one takes my life from me. I lay it down and I'll take it back up again
Do you think also this kind of way of characterizing it? slips in the idea of Unitarianism, which is to suggest that God isn't the one going to the cross that it's actually
God the father just punishing Somebody else. Yeah, just some dude
Yeah No, exactly. It's it's God versus man here.
No, it's it The person who died on the cross the person who bore our sins
Is God right So, you know R .C. Sproul had that great line
God God saved us from God Yeah, at least from his wrath from his justice
But God's love is what? Moved him to save us. And so It's it's it's not that God the son saves us from God the father.