Keep sharing good news without ads.
Join us as we review a debet
What you want but you. Misfits. A misfit in the trailer park at night. A misprint with the six cents. Been sick ever since my brother died of an od. My two cents never made sense. Either to me or anyone else.
Inside of the sheet fence. My knight smith on my right side. Why are you staring at your cop. Dot sign and my john hancock on the dotted line. Tell me what's the bottom line. The bottom line is i'm not right.
I'm not left. But this elephant won't fight. There's nothing left but the spotlight. Hold my beer. You can find me in the moonlight. You can say what you want. But you won't around me. You can say what you want.
You can say what you. I'm whips in the deep end. And i can't find my assigned seat to sit in my theology. Don't fit in black sheep of the reformation sheep pen to the reformed. I'm just another baptist baptized again.
The bastard child of anabaptist host. A child of reformation society. We don't need your education. Give me a bible and a bookshelf of dead men. Cigars bourbons and beer cans. Bow ties tattoos and bearded men making reformation great.
Again. You can say what you want. You can say what. All right. Ladies and gentlemen welcome to the open air theology show. My name is jeff and i'm one of the hosts here of open air theology. I am also a pastor.
Slash elder. Covenant reform baptist church in talahoma tennessee. If you're ever in this area stop by. Hang out with your boy. I'm gonna pass it down to the man the myth the ex-mormon the legend.
I am pastor brayden uh valley baptist church here in southern idaho. It's a real blessing to be able to see you guys tonight. Um our church service is at 11 and if you live in this area i'd love to see you every lord's day.
It'd be a real blessing to worship our triune god with one another. I have a youtube channel called reformed ex-mormon and it's uh like i said before it's a great blessing to be a co-host with these these godly and and wonderful sometimes a little too harsh mean and rude brothers in the faith.
I'm just joking.
Hey everybody my name is tom shepherd. I'm with grace bible church of bernie. I'm an evangelist. There we head out the and uh and share the gospel in the streets of texas. I'm a co-host here uh with these gentlemen here using that word small gentlemen because sometimes they're rude and mean calvinists just saying.
I also host a youtube channel called even if none which is all about.
Evangelism. So glad to be here all right. Sounds good. Hope everyone's having a wonderful day. A wonderful lord's day. I hope you were able to gather together with the saints. Well since we're doing this on a lord's day evening night whatever it is that you are we want to talk about.
We like to begin each uh show talking about how our how our lord's day sabbath went. And mine was really good man. Like i really i really you know like um the worship was really good. Uh man we we just sang such rich and beautiful music man.
Thanks to uh my co-elder pastor cal. He kind of outlines everything that we're going to do and it's just like it just gets you where you need to be. In the spirit. Right. I saw someone say something.
I think there's quoting alice to beg if you want to know someone's theology or something like that. Uh listen to their worship music. I'm butchering the quote but but man it's just like it just reminds me of of you know of of the music that we listen to and it's just christ.
Exalting i felt like my message went really good today. It flowed. Well last week if you heard my message i was really struggling with a migraine. This week was good. I was able to to preach on the triumphant entry.
So i got i went from uh john 12 verse 12 to 19. It was really good man. Through studying it this week the lord opened my eyes on some stuff that i never really saw before. And just grateful for his grace and allowing me to.
Stand before his people and proclaim his name. Amen amen. What do you. What about you brayden. Oh it was. It was a blessed lord's day. I did a uh just just wonderful time fellowshiping with the saints.
We had shared meal today and so that was all. That's always a blessing to sit down and chat and joke and and just just get along with one another. Um today i just preached from daniel 231 to 35 um and then looked at the broader context.
It was a topical message that i gave today just looking and focusing on the kingdom of god. And uh something that a lot of christians especially my my dear uh futurist brothers out there and sisters out there uh there's there's some great spiritual realities that they are ignoring i would articulate and argue for it.
So it was it was a blessing to see those things that christ has earned in this death burial resurrection. And my message was an hour long today so wow there was that i i you're becoming a man. I only got through about 80 percent of my sermon too at that time when i saw like the the people starting to nod off i was like all right.
Well you gotta wrap this up because people.
Are it's all they start nodding off five minutes after i get started. I don't care.
So yeah it was it was a good message it was fun it was fun text to be in so cool. Well so uh today.
We are um our associate pastor frank frank gutting was preaching on the glory of christ or the glory of god. Actually um went to exodus talking about show me your glory. He stayed a little bit in there but it was a topical sermon and uh he went through you know bounced around through the psalms you know scribe to yahweh.
His you know the glory he deserves you know. And then went into ephesians all that. But on top of that uh this was the first weekend that we did evangelism both on saturday and on the lord's day as well.
And so there was a there was a kid and i showed you a photo of a young man yesterday. I mean i think he was maybe 12 years old and he was listening to the gospel being preached in open air and and i could have punished myself for not going over to him and and talking with him a little more he got a bible.
He he met the other evangelism uh that our team which we had 11 people go out yesterday by the way which was awesome. And he was gone and he was just on my heart all night. And we went out there after the lord's day after service.
And sure enough there he was again and got to got to me his name is justin man. He has he has a great understanding of the gospel. He he was able to repeat back i ask him questions as to what he heard and man i i just hope that the lord moved on his heart.
It was such a blessing. It was a great lord's day man. I mean that tops it off right there. Yeah amen amen.
Yeah i was able to go out evangelize on friday and it was it was a very sweet time. We got a new guy at our church jake and he and sometimes he gets on here and watches these. He's a like brayden is an ex-mormon.
Jake is an ex-jehovah witness and hoping to one day ever. Uh have him on here and kind of do an interview. So we'll interview him. I think it's really cool right now like i'm really good friends with an ex-mormon.
And now i got an ex-jehovah witness who's a part of our church. He's out with me evangelizing like this is just great things that the lord is doing. Right. Yeah. Hallelujah. Hallelujah. Well i'm so blessed that the that that the lord has given us this this great commission.
And you know like a lot of people and it is right like like witnessing the people is frightening but man i'm telling you what there's no greater joy. Yeah there's just no greater joy right. I just love being out there doing the lord's work.
Telling people about jesus. Amen. And i try to tell people all the time like listen. I know it's scary. I know it's terrifying. But man if you if you just if you just put yourself out on the limb and do it.
You will want to you will want to keep doing it. God will use you. God. Yeah. God will use you. Yeah. I mean he uses this broken vessel. That's right. I mean if he gonna use jeff he's gonna use me. Right.
All right. So tonight's topic jared longshore should have stayed a baptist. What happened brother. What happened. You let them press fees get to you. Yeah. He changed that number. Right. There. He subtracted.
Yeah. He's trying to go to 1646 mm-hmm. Man. Okay so what we're gonna do here. Uh we. Uh. So so if you don't know if you have if you're if you aren't aware james excuse me. James white and jared longshore had a debate on.
Who is it what would you call it it was it was it was who is uh what is the.
Uh yeah. Who is. Yeah. So to to kind of break it down for you it was it was as if two debates was going on. Right. So you had james white debating from using exegetically using hebrews chapter 7 all the way to chapter 10 and then jared longshore uh is is not necessarily using the hebrews uh text like james is but he's coming at it from a theological view.
Now i think both of them are fine right. I i i would definitely have a debate with someone on this subject just using hebrews 7 through 10 or i will definitely have a debate with someone on this subject just using the theological framework.
The problem was was both of them came at this the way that they wanted to and it. And and it just left a lot of questions unanswered. So i want to give my flowers to both gentlemen. Right. James did what james do.
I mean james did what james. James did what james does. The dues. Right. Games do dude. Right. He takes the the biblical text and he presents it. Right. And then. And then jared longshore did what he did.
Right. He came at it from a theological framework. Yeah. And a couple couple things regarding the.
Debate real quick too. That was uh james white's probably 200th uh debate it was jared longshore's.
First it was correct. Yeah yeah yeah. And as someone who just had their first public moderated debate.
Right. Wow yeah yeah brilliant guy. Yeah both of those guys. Well i don't i i'll speak for myself on this. They're are a million times smarter than me. It's that's what i do though. I mean yeah.
Yeah i mean just find your average everyday doll right point my cricket brayden before we get into it. Do you have any thoughts about it. I haven't gotten a chance to.
Watch the whole video yet i know james white won the debate because he was arguing it from a baptistic standpoint and i already know that and so i've had the the great blessing to study hebrews uh seven to ten in several different contexts and james definitely came at it with with the more biblical view.
But i'm sure that there are some left uh unanswered left uh left.
Unanswered questions that so you can't talk either so i mean we're just a bunch of guys that can't.
Talk yeah then now yeah oh yeah no absolutely we are going to point out that that there are some things that were said that both of them are wrong in just yeah absolutely yeah yeah yeah.
All right. Good brothers in the lord. Absolutely both of them. Listen. I cannot. I cannot tell you how much james white has done for me. Not. Not in just my work right. Like he's helped me provide for my family by advertising me.
But but on my spiritual journey. Right. James white is kind of the godfather. Okay. Right. Like like i love james white. If he called me right now and asked me to do something for him i would 100 see whatever it was that he asked me to do.
But the the deal is is that they're coming at this from two different frameworks. And so it's so when jared says something i feel like it's jane. It's not connecting with james because james is looking at it from a different view.
James is not looking at it from a 1689 covenant baptist covenant theology. Or you would call a federalist a 69 federalist and so and so. Um jared longshore is is able to say things and i don't think it's connecting with james.
Right. And so it's not that james messed messed up. I.
Just missed it so we just had a wonderful question asked that i i hope we answer later but i don't think it's the right time to answer it quite yet. But that is a great question that that was just.
Asked by mr hudson. On mr hudson. Mr hudson welcome. If you've not i've not seen your your name here.
But welcome. Thank you for joining us. Do you guys know mr hudson. I don't i do not. Great question though. Well let's try to address that later. But all right. Well remind me we'll pull it up on the thing and look at it.
Yeah. All right. Well let's get started gentlemen. All right. We're going to uh go and we're going to so so uh. Tom will you uh introduce this first section while he's pulling.
It up. Yeah so. So this is a a one minute section. One minute clip of james white basically summing up his opening statement in his argument. Who is in the new covenant. What is it made up of. Is it made up of just regenerate people or is it a mixed congregation the same way old testament.
Of israel would be so. He's going to answer that question. What do you got your hand up for. I don't.
Know if you can see my hand or not just because of how small my hand is but yeah what's the minute.
Marker that i'm going to with this one. I can get it. Let's go let's go 26 45 and let's go through 26 45. Yeah and we'll go through 27 55. It'll it'll probably close before that but.
Ready. Yeah there we go. Christ actually is. But this is a singular argument from chapter 7 to chapter 10. Chapter 8 is the longest biblical citation. So here's the issue if we're going to identify the id who is in the new covenant.
Who is in the new covenant in our day today are those whose sins have been forgiven whose iniquities have been taken away from the least the greatest of them they know god. And therefore those the people to whom you give the covenant sign.
You don't give the covenant sign to people who do not make a profession of faith in jesus christ in hopes that someday they will. And if you do then you've got to ask answer some some questions. Are you saying that for example when when two when a christian husband and wife have children the church grows.
Jared has said that we need to understand how that works because hopefully as reformed people we don't want to go to any type of sacerdotalism. We don't want to go there. So how do we avoid doing that.
That can be the question for the rest of our discussion. Since i didn't start my timer on time i don't want to go over time so i will stop there and hopefully remember to start the timer next time. So i don't have this problem.
But uh there's a quick introduction to the biblical argument and i'm looking forward to hearing jared's response. You want me to pause it. Yeah. Yeah.
That was great. Yeah amen. I i would i would just clarify real fast for the audience if they don't. If this is completely foreign you don't know who james white or jared longshore. You have no idea of the differences between uh reformed baptist covenant theology versus presbyterian covenant theology it all is dealing with especially in light of the covenant of grace that which is is clarified in the new testament who are the members of that covenant and who is to receive the sign because of those members being in that covenant.
And so as reformed baptists we're saying all the elect are part of the covenant and you only give to assign to somebody that you can ensure is in the covenant. And so therefore it is credo. Baptism versus the pedo baptist is saying that children are included in this covenant regardless of profession based off the merit of their parents they're included in this and therefore they should receive the sign before a profession of faith that shows their elect nature in god.
Right. So that that's really the argument that's going on here. And so what james has just elaborated on is saying only those that are in the covenant should be receiving the sign and only those inside the covenant are saved and none are saved outside of it.
None aren't saved inside of it. And so it's reformed baptist covenant theology that you walk.
Right. And one of the proofs that's outside of the the verses that he used i would go to romans chapter 8 verse 9 it says however you are not of the flesh in the spirit but if indeed the spirit of god dwells in you.
But if anyone does not have the spirit of christ he does not belong to him and so the spirit of christ is only for the regenerate. So if we don't have christ if we don't have the holy spirit we've not been born again.
The holy spirit doesn't reside reside in us and we should not be partaking in the sign. Yeah another scriptural proof that i i.
Think it's matthew 21 verse 43 to 47. I'm going to totally butcher the quote so forgive me ahead. It's the area of scripture where christ talks about him being the stone that is rejected by the builders and that anybody that falls upon the stone will be broken into pieces and anyone that stone falls upon will be shattered to dust.
It says that this this in in relation to the vine grower parable he says this kingdom is being taken and given to another nation producing the fruit of it. Now if you consider that it's a singular nation but we know that the gospel which is what's being talked about the kingdom of god mark 115 that the kingdom that jesus goes into the city of galilee saying that the kingdom of god was at hand repent and believe the gospel this kingdom is the gospel going forth.
Right. This is this comes from my sermon today. The kingdom is the the stone is christ. The kingdom is all the people of god in christ. And so when it says one nation uh well we know that romans one uh that there's no distinction between jew or gentile for we're all made one in what christ jesus.
So that's the the nation the nation right there the the israel of god the people of god that this kingdom is being taken from the jews in that day and given and so there's several scriptural proofs that you can go to for this and and so what.
The what.
Jared is trying to do before his argument he's holding. He's trying to show continuity. From the old testament. From the old testament where were the where the scripture used the the term the people of god the nation of israel which was made up of people who believed and who did not believe.
There were people within that nation that were a mixed congregation of people. Some of them had saving faith pointing to christ that's how everybody is saved is through christ. And then there's another group of people within that nation.
And where it gets confusing is because the scripture talks about the nation israel the people of god the nation israel. But within that community within that community there are both believing and unbelieving people.
Yeah and so like.
Just to kind of say something that we've said before right. Because he's going to be jared's going to be walking like talking about the continuity and discontinuity. And this is where i think presbyterians actually fall on their face because that it's.
It's kind of like they're uh again. And i've used this analogy before. Right. You have uh the guy chasing after the coyote. Right. And he's trying to. Or the the guys. No. No the guy that's trying to shoot the rabbit.
Are are you watching any of those cartoons. They stick a gun into the hoe and the barrel comes back out points at them. They pull the trigger and they shoot themselves. Right. Simply because of of the continuity aspect of those that were in the old covenant they would enter the old covenant through birth and then they will part then they would take the sign.
So in the old covenant you had to be born if you were a male child. Then you eight days later you were circumcised. You were given the sign of the covenant. Right. And so the new covenant has continuity with that.
The only discontinuity would be the the sign is different. It's no longer circumcision. It's baptism. And it's no longer uh the the natural birth. It's the spiritual birth. It's pauline ganassia. It's regeneration.
It's the new birth. You must be born again. And those who are born again right infants in christ they receive the new covenant sign which is baptism. So birth before sign. Right. Right. Covenant natural birth sign.
New covenant spiritual birth sign. Amen. Good. We missed we missed such a.
Like jeff how dare you not bring up that analogy of elmer fudd. I know you've said it before but that would have been the perfect thumbnail for this elmer fudd with jared uh jared longshore on.
It's just so everybody knows the graphic. You guys might have known that it was done by an amateur this last time and and jeff was just being nice but um it it was it was found wanting it wasn't it was no one was sitting on.
James white was sitting on. No yeah he was sitting on.
That was good that was that was good. Yeah the idea was good yeah yeah yeah it was good. So you're.
Right it is absolutely braden's fault. It's all it is. You didn't have time for us. No he's got too.
Much going on when you're always carrying these guys it's really easy to point blame.
These shoulders with those hands you couldn't carry anything.
Look look do you guys see how i'm holding you guys up right now. I can't even see your hand.
I'm sorry. Where were we where were you.
All right. I'm pulling this back up. Look at that. All right.
Okay so we need to go. So now we're going to go to uh jared's kind of opening statement you want.
To start i believe at 28. Right. Jeff. Well if we're going to go through his whole opening statement we're going to need to speed up the uh his his talk right. Um and again we might not get. I don't. I'm not sure if we're going to get done completely with this tonight.
Yeah. So here's the other thing.
Because there's a couple of pay i mean if you guys would pay attention here minute 30 20 we're going to hear jared say something. See if you guys check catch it. Um i caught it these guys are going to catch it uh and i won't say any more on there but there's look through these things and if you have any questions or say hey stop or have a question.
You know. Yeah. Hi brian do you know how.
To speed up the. Uh i do all right. Yeah. So speed it up a little bit and then you see you see how.
I'm still underneath you guys. I'm carrying you right now don't you worry. I got you i pulled.
This thing up on the video screen. Look at. I got. I got jeff. Right there. I'm holding them up. Look. All right. Y 'all. So i i just let me know when to pause. All right. You just do what we tell you to.
Being able to have something to always protect myself with this bruna allows me to have that peace of mind.
Like a pro with 10 seconds to go. Dr white. Very nice. Well that's fast. Good lord. And uh same goes for you. Uh jared i will. Um i'll come on give you a one minute one. Like i have to slow that down a little bit.
Your timer. Your time will begin as soon as you start speaking. Okay i'll read this.
Let me begin by thanking james for having 1 .5 and a good man my brother in christ which makes.
Debating. Oh my lord. Everybody welcome to open air theology. We are professionals.
Good lord that was fast. That's the micro machine. Man that was good you you would have said.
Minutes on that intellectual privilege at the door winning guys i can't get it to go.
Okay so start start around. Minute. Oh we're losing people as we speak.
All right. Let's try it here we go. All right while all of our good listeners know that.
Intersectional teams and victim identity are the devil you must adopt them. Just this one.
For this debate only slow down brother. Guys i don't know how to get. Go back to middle top 1 .5. I have it. Look look jeff normal real fast and see if it fixes it. How about that.
So by the way there is the echo over against james's hegemonic power. Okay so that is at 1 .5.
It's just the okay do two five yeah the echo is going to be there like 0 .25 so then it goes real.
Slow. Yes that's no. No jack leg. You mean 1 .25. Yeah that's some rolling papers. Getting the side we.
Should get right down to it. I want to get into the hebrews. We should do that. In the rebuttal i'll touch on it here but i have a this statement i've prepared here. The prompt states the new covenant consists of only regenerate persons and that is the crucial question.
I grant that if this is true then the rest of the prompt follows. So i will focus all of my attention on the central thing disagreeing with the prompt in favor of the claim the new covenant does not only consist of but those who profess faith in christ and their children.
The first thing to do in order to determine who new covenant members are is to define the new covenant itself. A member is one.
Thing and cost all right. So he's talking about a costco member is one thing or i meant a costco is one thing but then the member is another. So he's speaking of the covenant as a membership.
With costco right. So as if so like what i would used to do is i would i would want to go in when i was with my brothers uh to costco when where we live to go get free samples and what we would do is we'd say oh yeah mom and dad are inside and so because of mom and dad having the membership we could go in without a membership to get the snacks right.
Is that kind of what he's getting at.
I that's that's it. Yeah there you go here's your sign. Can you play that at normal just because my.
Brain is not as smart as you guys all right. Well if we have to play it at normal maybe we shouldn't go over everything because this it'll take. But there's okay. Yeah but there's i mean there's good stuff in here that needs that needs to be spoken on.
Yeah but i don't think. James white.
Touched because it would just right. It wasn't what he was talking about. Okay and play so am i going.
Normal play normal play.
Let's go itself is another. So it is with the new covenant and new covenant members and that word new and new covenant implies that there was an older version of it. The bible has an old testament and a new testament but only one lord one one gracious redemption.
He says that there's a new version of it right. All right. That's not what the new covenant is. The new covenant is not a new version of the old covenant right. So this is like if you grew if if you know i was a child in the 80s right.
And there was this this game and i was talking about today in sunday school but those i can't remember what i think. There's this game to where you. You had these these like little toy monkeys and their arms were shaped like this.
And you would connect and you would try to pick up a monkey with the monkey right. By by trying to get the arms. Never mind. Whatever. Anyway thank you. This is why by the way just listen. Don't bring bigfoot into it.
Okay. He's done nothing to deserve your ridicule. You're right. He's done nothing. Except anyway. So they would see. Well y 'all all right. So they would see the old covenants as you know like so so the covenant of grace beginning in genesis 3 15 so that is its conception and that all the other covenants so that abrahamic uh mosaic davidic they're linked to the to it right.
Right. But they also would say that as ministrations. But they would also say that the new covenant is also just an administration of that one covenant of grace where all the other covenants are linked to right.
And so he's going to say that here in a minute too in minute 30 so let's play this to you about minute let's play it to a minute three uh 30 20 both the 1689 baptist confession 7 -2 as well as.
The westminster confession affirm god's one covenant of grace and in order to define the.
Covenant we need. Okay 30. Now now he's saying here that both the the 1689 and the westminster both affirm the one covenant of quite of grace of grace. Yes. Now how he defines it. Now. You just said that it's inaugurated.
It's inaugurated. Or it's conception. Genesis. Yeah genesis 3 15. Which.
It's not which i'll um. So so let me read genesis 3 15. Dude look at you bro look at you man.
Oh guys little hands you can do whatever you want. Okay so now remember guys you guys remember this is that jared is saying and and and james heard this that 1689 and westminister hold to one covenant of grace and what he's saying is is that one covenant of grace spans old covenant or old testament and new testament.
That's what he's saying and that's where he's going with that.
Correct. And the argument would be that it was inaugurated. The conception of this one covenant began in genesis 3 15. Here's what genesis 3 15 says. So this is after adam and eve have been deceived and have eaten from the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil whatever that fruit was it says i will put enmity between you speaking to the serpent and the woman and between your offspring.
So that's the offspring of the serpent and her offspring the offspring of the woman. He shall bruise your head and you shall bruise his heel. So there's going to be an offspring from the woman who is going to bruise the head of the serpent and he is only going to bruise the heel of the serpent.
So he is saying that this right here is the conception is the inauguration of the covenant of grace. It was announced. Yeah it was so. So. So if you watched our previous conversations about this we showed how there's certain things that has to be in the text in order for something to qualify as a covenant.
And we walk through all of them to show you that all these things are there. Right. But you're told what you're going to do and what not to do. And if you do what you're not supposed to do then a punishment will be given that those three things are not found in genesis chapter 3 verse 15.
And so our view as reformed baptists we don't believe that the inauguration of the covenant of grace is right here but the announcement of it the promise right here we see a promise of a covenant. The promise is that that an offspring is going to come from the woman that will bruise the head of the serpent while only bruising his heel.
And that took place on calvary's heel when christ was crucified. So when christ was crucified that's when the inauguration of the covenant of grace.
Began. Yeah that's a good question mr hudson. Just real fast he's asking if if if an old covenant when a new covenant comes if it ends that other covenant. And no it does not. Um so no noah's covenant is not ended.
That that covenant still exists today. Um the you would see that they're they're the. The mosaic covenant is ratified re-ratified in abraham right. So no a new covenant does not end an old covenant. However in hebrews 8 it's saying that that covenant that included law and obedience that produced life but death upon breaking it has become obsolete because the covenant of grace has now been initiated or inaugurated.
And that was where grace and life.
Are given thus producing obedience. Right. So i would just look at it like this. So the so so the noahic covenant is a is a covenant that's always going to be here. Right. All right. So you have the adamic covenant.
When the abrahamic covenant came it did not get rid of the adamic. When the when the mosaic covenant come it did not get rid of the abrahamic or the adamic. And when the davidic covenant was given it did not get rid of so on and so forth.
But when the new covenant is given the old covenant ends. The scriptures tells us in license chapter 3 that the law was only until.
Price. Right. So go ahead. So i was going to say hebrews 8 is also very clear in this. It says. What is ever growing old and obsolete is ready to disappear. So so and i'll read it verbatim here. And speaking of a new covenant he makes the first one which is referring back to the laws of moses and the the covenant therein the first one obsolete and what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.
So scripture says that this covenant the covenant of law.
Is gone in christ no longer existing. Yeah because he fulfilled it right. He lived the life that we could not live right. That's keeping the law right. Not to earn righteousness for himself. He is righteous.
But so that we can be merited with righteousness credit it. Well abraham credited. We debit it and then he takes upon himself the punishment that we deserve. So are we making a.
Distinction between the old covenant and the mosaic covenant. Okay so that's a kind of a loaded question.
And i would say no because in galatians and galatians also so in galatians 3 it's speaking of the mosaic covenant being added to the abrahamic covenant and it says that it was that it was only until christ.
Now are we saying that the 10 commandments have ended. No that's not what we're saying right. We're saying also moses as moses by way of covenant.
Has ended. So it was introduced. It was. It was introduced in in in uh genesis 3 and then in genesis 12. What happens in genesis 12. What happens in genesis 15 and what happens in genesis 17.
You want to go through that. Well i mean i don't i don't think it's necessary for this for this conversation but i mean i mean we have previous videos that we have done so and we can do again. Okay if we're going to get anywhere in this tonight we need to right.
Yeah it's it's.
Going to be hard i would say just real quickly. So so jared's uh argument about one covenant of grace you are correct. He is correct in saying that there is only one covenant of grace that is talked about here but it's the way that the covenants the covenant of grace is handled.
Notice. I have right here a a wonderful document that i would highly encourage anybody that is watching to save to your desktop or your phone browser. It's a tabular uh comparison between the 1689 the savoy here in the center so the 1689 is over on the right savoy is in the center and the west minister is on the left.
And i would just i would just show you uh look at what how much different each one of these paragraphs are from another especially when it comes to paragraph three for the 1689 compared to that of the five five and six of of the others.
Um what's being done in here is that this is worded in a way that that it was very clear that they were wanting the the other reformed individuals at the time to say that they could say amen to this but also distinguishing their view of the covenant which then is further elaborated on in the confession.
But i do think it's helpful to read this right here it says this covenant is revealed in the gospel. So pause. We got to remember what the gospel is for this to make sense the life death burial and resurrection of jesus christ our lord and savior.
Right the good news of salvation found in that federal head. And so that that's when the covenant is revealed that's where the covenant is revealed at. And it says first of all so that covenant which was future for adam was first of all to adam in a promise of salvation by the seed of a woman and afterwards by further steps until full discovery thereof was completed in the new testament or inaugurated or instituted or cut in the new testament.
Right and it is found in the eternal covenant transaction that was between the father and the son about the redemption of the elect. So notice in here the baptist is trying to say that only those in the covenant of grace this covenant right is the elect but that that's the only members of this and so that's where credo baptism is going to play into it.
And it says and it alone by the grace of this covenant that all the posterity of fallen adam that have ever ever were saved did obtain life and blessed immortality being a man being now utterly incapable of acceptance with god upon those terms on which adam stood in his state of innocence.
Now when you look back at the west minister in savoy they keep on referring to this covenant as being re-administered re-administered re-administered whereas the 1689 is making it very clear that no one was saved under a law covenant no one was saved under a covenant that that required lawful obedience.
Right so that that's that's the.
Distinguishing factor. Yeah excuse me yeah so we would say that abraham was saved in the old covenant.
Through the new covenant. Excuse me if i misspoke on that but that that is what.
Troy real quick. I'm sorry troy. Yeah he said that what we're explaining is progressive new covenant theology or progressive covenant theology and it's not what we're explaining to you is 1689 federalist federalism or i just like to call it baptist covenant theology right.
So just in case people don't. Yeah just in case people don't understand it. So there are some reform classic covenantalism that some reform baptists that would hold to. Uh what do they call it what's the what's the uh the term uh.
New eight what is it not.
Oh holy oh my lord oh boy look at that good looking guys just oh my lord.
Hey listen i was doing good things i messed up once. That's my fault. Yeah so so the the classic.
Covenantalism is is a is a position that reform baptists will hold to where they would believe and they would hold to like jared pointed out um that the one covenant of christ spanning through the old testament and new new testament 1689 federalism would not say that.
Yeah and eric.
Yeager might be able to answer this question for us. Which which i don't believe james white holds to 1689 federalism. I believe he holds to 1689 covenant. The classical. Yeah the 1689 classical covenant and and so and i think that's why he didn't really give any pushback to jared.
On that point regarding that point. So why does. Yeah michelle just asked why does the old covenant remain if we are under a new covenant. The old covenant doesn't but the old covenant is over.
It's dead the moral law remains and we can use the old covenant by way of general equity.
And and so also also the 1689 also lays out that the law existed before the covenant was given right with it transcends it transcends it. So it it it clarifies. And it says that there's three divisions of the law.
And this is where the 1689 federalists would highly disagree with the new covenant theology because they would say that this this doesn't exist. But we would argue from a tri-part division of the law.
Right being that of the moral law that always existed. It existed in the garden when adam was was there created by god. It existed because it transcends from god's nature. God has transcended. Thus is his law is.
And that's the moral law that holds all men bound to being falling short of the glory of god and being held to be accountable to him. Right from that it is given to moses officially formally there on the mountain.
It's the very person piece of scripture that is recorded for us and it is by god's own finger given to moses upon mount sinai. And then following that. Then you have two additional things that have done.
Ceremonial law that is given that we can clearly see in the new testament is then done away with so sacrificing animals circumcision so on and so forth. Ceremonial law done away with and then underneath that also you had judicial law that was a multi-purposed.
Uh reason for that law being given in the old testament. One of the reasons it was given was it was to protect them. So relations three that jeff already mentioned earlier the law was added because of the transgressions formally committed.
Meaning what. How could there be transgressions if there wasn't a law. There was a transcendent law that was being committed that was being broken. And so therefore additional law was given to hold them secure as a nation to protect them as a people to produce what.
Until the christ is what galatians says. So the whole purpose. One of the main purposes of the old testament judicial law was to protect them as a nation to bring about and protect the promised future coming seed which was the christ.
Once christ comes that that law is done away with and there were other there were other physical promises that were promised through the old covenant of works you know that the stay in the land of canaan uh to have peace to be fruitful you know and all that stuff.
And if they disobeyed well then they would be out of the land. They would be out out of the land so that's what happened in judges. They disobeyed god they went after idols and they they they were oppressed by by a people they called back on yahweh and so that's why it kept on going over and over.
This graphic is awesome.
That brayden made right here. Yeah so this this is a graphic i put together if you want to. If you want to save it it's on my facebook somewhere you can dig through my pictures or you can just message brayden and he'll send it to you.
I'm sure i can send it to you. But so right here. 1689 federalism it's just showing that. The umbilical cord. So in scripture we have the analogy given in revelation 12 about the woman giving birth to the seed.
Um so that's kind of what this is playing off of. The woman is not the same thing as the seed. They're very similar in a lot of ways. But they're not the same. They intertwine with one another in a lot of ways but they are still distinct in nature and substance.
The adamic noahic abrahamic mosaic davidic all give birth to the covenant of grace for different reasons and so i just have a different comparison here of what each one of.
These covenants can you pan out so he can see the whole thing. Because this will ask mr has some questions right here talking about the re-administration to find the promise of abraham. So what is the substance of the promise.
The substance of the covenant of grace is life in christ. Okay. So the substance is christ. Okay. What's the subject. Look at the covenant of works there all the way back. If you go back on your screen the abrahamic these are covenant of works the noahic i'm sorry that they that the the adamic.
Right. And so that that's obviously it's all pointing they're subservient to the new covenant and everything. So the substance is the new covenant.
Of grace which is found in christ and i would also say to like just to just to see this if there's any work required any work to to obtain blessedness it is by nature. It is by definition not a covenant of grace because grace is unmerited favor meaning you didn't do anything for it.
By definition if a law is given like do keep these laws do this and live anything like that by definition it is a covenant of works. The only covenant spoken in scripture where there is no works required is hebrews 8 and jeremiah 31 which is the covenant of grace that we were talking about.
That's the whole reason. By definition it's different. Yeah if you don't understand the.
Theology of what he was just mentioning you can look it up. It's it's called law and gospel distinction right. And so we believe as reformed baptists you have to have a law and gospel distinction. If you don't have a law and gospel distinction uh like doug wilson would say.
Which again i love doug wilson. I'm not bashing on doug wilson. This is what he says. He says it's all law and it's all gospel. Right. And and it's not. It's just it's just it absolutely isn't. The imperative is not the indicative.
And and so um um whenever i talk to someone and i'll say something like when jesus says follow me is that law or gospel. Well he's telling you to do something right. So he's you a positive command. It's it's a law all right.
If you're unregenerate you cannot. You know you cannot obey that law right. But if you are regenerate you have the holy spirit in you you can obey that command and follow christ. Now if i was to say to you um by grace you have been saved through faith.
That is not of your own doing. Is that law or gospel. Well that's gospel. By grace you have been saved. It's not something you did. And so and so when you read scripture. So this is a part of that. The third use of the law we call it a flashlight.
When we read scripture we need to read scripture in light of what christ has done for us. So that the law as braden would.
Say does not become the rope to hang us right. Amen. Yeah so also i see that he talks about me.
He made he quoted to you and your seed. So what is the seed. Okay. Well there's a physical seed. That's what the old the old testament believers are. The old testament's uh people of god were and people israel.
If you were born of natural generation and everything that was a natural seed. So isaac ishmael you know all these. But then go. There's a spiritual seed as well. So what's the spiritual seed talking about.
Those are the people that are found in a new covenant. Gentiles. That was the mystery that was known that it's not just the jews but it's for all people. All nations will be saved. Everybody will come or not everybody all all nations will be able to come to christ those whom he pointed appointed unto eternal life.
That's right. All right. That graphic is incredible.
Yeah yeah that graphic's really good i love it. Yeah good job. Next don't let me you guys have.
Told me a lot of good things so far and i i understand it's really hard to like find bad things today with brayden but i you know well i mean you'll be if you have some things out for.
You real quick. Yeah. No we're good. Let's continue. Uh jeff you did a wonderful job on that graphic.
By the way what you did. Oh yeah i tried. It's these big hands right. It's just these big old hands. You did a good job all right. Bring longshore back. Go ahead. Jeff. Hit play.
Listen this is teamwork. Okay. We're doing a new net marker we just planned. Hold on. There's another question. Real quick. And uh mr hudson. Okay so abraham was saved by grace. Okay so just because he was saved by grace.
Yes he absolutely was saved by grace. And everything. And through faith. And what was the substance.
Of his faith the promised seed the promise so abraham was promised to see that would come from him that would keep the law inherit the keep the law inherit the land and bless the nations and so abraham had to believe in the seed that would come from him that would keep the law inherit the land and bless the nations.
And if you believe that, which is Christ, he was credited with debit. I mean, he was credited with righteousness, right? He was looking forward to something that has not happened yet. We're looking back at the same event that has happened.
So we are debited with righteousness. That's right. And Abraham, that's very clearly clarified in Romans four, that Abraham was justified apart from the works, but through faith in Jesus Christ, the future, the promise, right?
He was reckoned with righteousness through faith. However, it references circumcision and then James two references the offering of Isaac. So there was still the aspect of which was required obedience in that covenant that produced life in the land.
Abraham, because of his faithfulness, received the faithful blessings there in the land, but it was only through faith in the coming covenant seed, the coming seed, cutting covenant of grace. However, you want to word that to make it sound good, that's how he was reckoned with righteousness, not through the works of circumcision or offering Isaac.
That's a weird way to spell Braden, Michelle, but yeah, I agree. Braden makes the.
Dream work. Yeah. Different blood, different covenants. Jeremiah, we probably should have had you on the night, brother. I thought your wife had you under a leash tonight. She put the dog up. All right, y 'all ready?
Oh yeah. Hit play. All right.
Give a solid definition of this one covenant of grace, which I define as follows. The covenant of grace is the heavenly father's solemn oath to man on earth of saving grace in and by Jesus Christ, conditioned upon faith, a bond in blood that constitutes an organization over into whom God says, I'm y 'all's God and y 'all are my people.
I like the brilliant second person, plural of the Southerners there. The new covenant then is the same in substance, it being simply a new and better form of this covenant of grace just defined. The new covenant then is the heavenly father's solemn and better oath to man on earth of saving grace in and by Jesus Christ, conditioned upon faith, a better bond and better blood that constitutes a better organization over into whom God says, I'm y 'all's God and y 'all are my people.
Now that's a stout definition, but it's warranted given the word covenant appears 284 times in the old Testament and 33 times in the new Testament. And I should highlight certain aspects of that definition before proceeding a three, three dimensions of it.
First, I've made the point that this is the heavenly father who covenants with man on earth. That is because the divine covenant with man is executed in history. What is in view is not the idea of a covenant.
It is not a covenant simply up in the heavens. A covenant is cut on earth. Covenants must be established or they are not divine covenants with man. This matters because some of my 1689 Baptist brothers say that the.
Okay. I think he's missing a point at what we believe, but I think he's going to butcher it, even though he wants to tell to it. Right. It's funny how people do that. Yeah. All right. So he said that a covenant just, well, I want to make something real clear.
He said the covenant had to be cut on earth. Did I hear that wrong? No, that's what he said. All right. Where's that? Right. It's not there. It's not there. No, listen, if, listen, if you're a Presbyterian brother, listen, I will, I'll, our church will be called covenant reform Presbyterian this week.
If you can show me in three 15, Genesis three 15, where that is the, the inauguration of the covenant of grace where it was cut. Didn't happen. Yeah. Where it was cut. I will bend the knee. Yeah. You will baptize babies.
Yeah. But I'll hold them under today. Bubble. Oh, we're not supposed to do that. Sorry. My bad. I think they sprinkled. Yeah. Yeah. So.
He also said that it was in three 55. He said that it was the same substance.
Same substance. Yeah. Listen, the, the, the Pascal lamb was not Jesus Christ, that's right. But the Pascal lamb pointed to Jesus Christ. Amen. It was a huge difference. That's a huge difference. They, they're messing the type antitypes, the two tier typology.
Yes. Huge. Which he knows this. He was the one that, that encouraged Samuel Renahan to put out that book, which he put it out with founders when he was a part, when he was a Baptist. That one. I don't get how you can be a part of something and then misrepresent the something.
That you were once a part of. Right. Well, it doesn't fit his argument.
Well, shouldn't argue that way. Yeah. All right. Go ahead.
The covenant of grace was never inaugurated, formalized or cut on earth in the old Testament. This not happening until the new covenant itself in Christ. But this would leave Abraham, Moses, David, and all of our other old Testament brothers being saved outside of God's covenant of grace, which according to them had not yet arrived on earth yet.
And I held something pretty much that position. Yeah. All right. We done answered this question. Yes. And he's, and I'm glad that we answered it earlier. So, and he said that he used to hold to something similar to that.
No, he held to that. Not similar to that.
So what I have pulled up here is chapter 26 of the 1689 confession. It is on the church. And so I would define the church just on the topic of covenant here. I would add that it is all those who are a part of the covenant of grace because therefore they are saved.
And so paragraph one says this, the Catholic that is universal church may be called invisible with respect to the internal working spirit and truth of grace. It consists, listen to this, of the full number of the elect who have been, are, or will be gathered into one under Christ, her head.
The church is the spouse, the body, the fullness of him who fills all in all. Hebrews, there's several places that we can go to discuss this, but the point of that I'm trying to make with this, yeah, Hebrews, Hebrews, listen, Hebrews is a wonderful, wonderful, wonderful book.
But Hebrews, Hebrews 12, 23, it says all those enrolled in heaven, and it speaks to the blood of Christ speaking a better word than the blood of Abel. Abraham, Moses, Isaac, anybody saved in the old Testament was a part of the church through their federal head.
Christ, Christ, before Christ was even born. There's no other name. There's no other.
Name under the, under the heavens by what you see. If anyone is to be saved, they are saved through Christ. In order for Christianity to be true, Christianity has to be owed. The same way that Abraham is saved is the same way we are saved by grace through faith in Jesus Christ.
There was a point in time that the lamb had to be born and, and die that this had to happen in time at some place, but it didn't happen right after the fall of Adam. It happened several years after 2000 years ago for us, right?
All those saved before the cross were saved in the same exact means that the, the, the new, the new Testament post cross church is saved. And that is through faith in the federal head, Christ Jesus, who cuts a covenant in time there, but through his life, death, burial, and resurrection.
And the people prior to that covenant being cut are credited.
With that same righteousness of her federal credited on credit. Yep. Absolutely. It's just.
Simple enough like that. And so like, I don't know what else to say, because in fact, let me go to chapter 26 of the tabular comparison real fast between the 1689, just see what you send me that link to you.
I forgot it. I've sent it to you so many times guys, but I haven't figured out how to save it. Y 'all are crazy. This is the best website ever. Look at this. So there's, there's, there's not a difference between the West minister, the Savoy or the 1689 and acknowledging this.
So they, the West minister, I'm going to just say it upright. The 1689 has the correct view of the church here. And so does the Savoy. And so does the West minister yet they're being inconsistent in their own confession, right?
The 1689 is holding that all the elector in the church, all the elector are part of the covenant of grace, right? Period. Like, I don't know. Like, is there anything else that needs to be said on this?
Right?
Not, not that they were saved by the old covenants and the old covenant works. They were saved under it, but not by it. They were saved by what is the substance covenant of grace.
In who. Jay, who did you say? Braden. Christ. Now, to be fair, they believe that you can be in the covenant and not be of the covenant. So they believe that you can be in the covenant, participate in the covenant and not be born again.
Right. And then again, that's where we would say, you know, you quoted it, or you quoted the verse earlier from Romans eight, I think it's verse nine. If you do not have the spirit of Christ, you have no part in Christ.
That's right. That's right. And listen, we would say the exact same thing for the church. You cannot be a part of the invisible body of Christ without being born again and having faith in Christ. You just can't be like, why, why, why would we be consistent?
And that's what I understand that they would say, well, the visible body is made of, of mothers and children, right? But we're talking about the invisible, all those that are actually saved and they're saying it's only the elect prior to Christ, post Christ.
Yeah. Prior cross post cross. Why aren't we being consistent in our theology and saying that's the exact same language we should be using with the covenant? Yeah. I don't know. It blows my mind sometimes.
So, um, right. I'm going to copy this and I'll put it in the comments for everybody that's watching on, on YouTube and I'll, I'll try to put it on Facebook as well, because I think it's important, but we'll come back to the, we're back on that now.
Yeah. You want me to hit play? Hit play.
When I was a cradle Baptist, um, second, the covenant of grace and new covenant involves the creation of a constituted people. Theologians often use the language of administration, which means more than getting thing a to individual B, like I administer lotion to my daughter's knee.
We use the word minister in the English language in that sense, but we use it in another sense as well. And that other sense is more faithful to the covenant administration idea. Um, this covenant administration is more like the Washington or Jefferson administration, the Washington or Jefferson administration refers to an entity, a people, an organization, or a corporate reality.
You can be a member of such an administration or not a member of such an administration. Covenant membership implies that a covenant is more than a promise to an individual. It is an administration and organization or a league like little league membership and an administration involves rights and responsibility.
And none of that comes through when we conceive of a covenant as a mere promise from God.
To an individual. Can we pause that real quick? So typically, and I don't agree with him here. I mean, typically when you talk about an administration, you're talking about a way in which God administers grace upon his people.
Another word might be dispense, dispense grace. So you have the word dispensation. You have a word administration. That's why they.
Would say this is getting ready to say amen here in a moment. I know. Right.
Melissa is going to be a reformed Baptist here.
So that word, this dispensation that God dispenses his grace on a certain particular people at a different time, that's where he's going with it. But he's, he's defining it completely different. Not, not in the way that God administers grace, you know?
So yes, there's grace administered to two people in the old Testament.
What does that say? Absolutely. Eric is just dropping some more good stuff.
Absolutely. Eric brother, I've been saying this for a while. We need to have you on here. Yeah. Come on, bro. Yeah. What's up, man? You can't hang out with us.
Yeah. No, we, we a hundred percent credo. Yes. We just need to work on your covenant theology.
You could be a hundred percent confessional. It'd be a lot cooler too.
That's right. Yeah. You can be credo, credo,.
Calvinistic, cessationist, creationist. We'll just throw all the C words in there.
Christocentric. Yeah. Yeah. It's all good. Yeah. All right. Let's hit it.
Wait, do you want to go ahead and fast forward to the questions. Where, so?
I mean, I think we really have pinpointed his opening statement. I think we've nailed down in his opening statement, right? Let's, let's, let's get some of the questions.
Yeah. We'll try to end it at one 30. Okay. One hour, 16 minutes and 20 seconds.
Just wait one second. Trying, trying, trying. Get them little hands to working.
I'm trying. Those are big buttons. He's got to push. What is that?
Oh, sorry. That's a picture of us beating a dead horse. My fault.
Oh yeah. Sorry, Jason.
That's a good time to chime in on Jason not representing as well.
Oh yeah, man. We got, I got, I got, I'll stay silent for now. If you, but if y 'all watch Jason's videos, he did not represent what we said. You want to bring that up at the end or what? Yeah. Well, we'll just keep going right here.
What minute mark am I doing? One 1620. One 1620.
I'm fine with one 16. All right. Yeah. All right.
Wix gives you the power of AI to build the website you need. Here we go. Mark to the base. Full business functionality. Larks.
Oh guys, we got a lot of ads. To build the website you need. I'll get through it real fast for us so you guys don't have to listen.
Take the punishment for us. Are you, are you taking the wrath of the commercials for us? I did. Y 'all are welcome.
Taking one for the team. I, let me just do another demonstration of this, this ad here for us.
How they dispense the ads on us. That's right. Look at Dr. White. That's kind of like you, Jeff. Gotcha.
Gotcha, Jared. We need a new tech boy. Get out of here, Melissa. No, they don't. That is for sure. I got Brayden Patterson. You can't ask for that. Screenshot that.
I'll start in Hebrews. I do want to. I think that would be distracting personally, but anyways, go ahead. You got all those lights back there.
I want to, I want to talk about. Chalice, come on, you know it. I want to talk about more than Hebrews 8 at some point, but I'll start with Hebrews. Of course he does. Do you, do you agree that the central apologetic argument in Hebrews is, don't go back to the old covenant because there's nothing there to go back to.
There's nothing there to go back to because it has been fulfilled in the incarnate son of God, who then by one sacrifice perfects those who are united with him. Yeah. So it's, it's a full argument starting all the way back in chapter one.
Yeah, man.
Yeah. But you've said it, you've said it before. I've heard you and you said it in your opening that kind of the central thrust is don't go back because there's nothing there to go back to. It's like, it's a collapsing house.
It's not going to, there's nothing there. Right. The, the old, the, the, the earthly tabernacle pointed toward the heavenly tabernacle, which he has now gone through and is seated at the right hand of the father and all the rest of that stuff.
Sure. Yeah. And would it then... I just want to say, amen. A lot of people miss that.
Amen. Amen. The betterness of the new covenant is that it will remain.
That's one of the aspects of the new covenant. That's not all that. It's not just that it will remain. It's who it's made in, what it accomplishes and the perfection of that accomplishment.
Okay. Could we get, could we give it that the new covenant remains like pride of place? Could it be kind of like, could it be like the central argument is the old will not remain and the big focus of the betterness of the new is that it will remain.
Could it, it doesn't have to be the soul betterness, but could it be the...
But that's not even what the emphasis, for example, and right before he says the old is obsolete and about to pass away. What's his emphasis? His emphasis is the covenant results in the writing of God's law upon the heart.
It internalizes that. That's the language of the old Testament. Circumcised your hearts. The old covenant didn't bring that about for everybody in it. The new covenant does. That's its supremacy and its betterness.
So what Dr. White don't understand right here is that he's agreeing with us concerning that, you know, was talking about earlier about how that covenant has ended.
What he just said, there was 1989 federalism. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's what I'm saying. Like he right there, Dr. White was being a federalist and he doesn't even know it.
You talking about, so again, you go to Hebrews eight. It says, this is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel. Right. And this is to the church, to all the both Jew and Gentile, those in Christ.
Romans two says the Gentiles who were not given these laws, they do by nature, what those laws demanded. And then right after that, it says those who have been circumcised of the heart. Why do you think it's talking about that?
Because it's saying that the law of God was written on those Gentiles hearts. What he is arguing and says, those who have been circumcised of the heart, they are Jews. So the house of Israel, right? So exactly what James just said is a spot on the covenant of grace is full of regenerate circumcised of the heart believers in Christ Jesus.
And the circumcision of the heart that is regeneration. That's right. That is Ezekiel 36, 25 through 27. Yeah. Now, let me ask you something, Tom. Is there a point because I'm trying to figure out like, are we going to answer the questions or like what's going on here?
So, yeah, I mean, so this is as far as I go. This is just where he started questioning him and he was going to go through it. So this is as far as I didn't know how far you guys wanted to go.
So where do you want to go, Jeff? Do you got a time marker?
I don't know. Like I saw a lot of things in his opening statement that I wanted to point out. However, I can't remember everything now. You see, my problem is that as I'm working, I'm trying to listen and write things down.
James handles him the way he just did here. James handles him throughout the whole thing. I mean, look at him. Look at his face.
He's nervous. And James is like, he's like, so hello. Yeah, you know what?
Yeah, now we're at a we're at a we're at.
So I would like to get to him asking James questions. Do you have that? Because I would like to answer because I know he's going to be coming at it from. That's one of them right there. This again. Yeah, no, no, no.
So I know that he mentions like I can't remember if it's his opening statement or what. But he mentions the yeah, OK, I can't remember the minute mark, but he talks about how. His view works better with Hebrews simply because that Hebrews has warning passages of being able to lose your position in the covenant.
So he's not saying that you can lose your salvation. So he's looking at the Hebrew warning passages that you can lose your position in the covenant. And then he also throws in that passage from Peter where it talks about the master who bought you.
Yeah. And so he does that in there. And then like there's a couple of passages in Hebrews that he speaks about about it. And then someone else talks about I think it's in John 15 where it talks about.
The pruning of the vine, how you can be removed, your vine can be removed or whatever. Yeah. And so I was really wanting to hit on that to show that that's.
So we would say that those are professing believers, but never in the new covenant.
Right, well, so specifically in John, I think, you know, so Jesus is there, right? He's there at the house of Israel and he's letting them know that a new covenant is coming right. And in them as being physical descendants of Abraham, in some sense, like they were a part of that new, I mean, that old covenant, the pruning takes place as this new covenant is taking place and only those that are connected to the vine, the new Jesus Christ, the new covenant are going to be a part of it.
And so it has absolutely nothing to do with those in the new covenant being taken out of the new covenant. It's speaking about those that were a part of the physical descendants of Abraham. They are not necessarily taken out of the old covenant, but they have no part in the new covenant because they're not connected to the vine, which is Christ.
That's right. So just to answer Dan, let me put it up there.
Danine, yes. Just send me a friend request. I don't have mine as like a, I don't consider myself a public figure, so there is no follow button on my Facebook page.
So, but yeah, just in case, just watch your purse when you follow that guy.
Yeah. He's got little hands. You can't even, you can't even feel that it goes in.
It's not good. It's not good. Yeah. You'll have to watch my testimony videos, what Michelle just said. So thank you, Michelle. So Matthew 21, I already brought this up earlier. It comes right after what text?
The vine dresser. And he says, I'm taking this kingdom from this nation and giving it to another. Well, that will be producing fruit of it. So what is that nation he's talking about? The ethnic people of Israel.
Is he saying, I'm going to give this to the ethnic people of Israel? No, he's saying, I'm giving it to the elect. This, this is going to be given to the people of God. All those that are a part of the federal head.
I'm giving it to you. And the reason that Christ is speaking like this is he's speaking to the Pharisees or the he's speaking in the front of Jews right there. And he's saying that you are a people who have been not bearing fruit.
You've been killing the prophets. You've killed the son. You're going to kill the son. It's being taken from you and being given to another people. The way that God has brought about the Christ was through natural means, which was including a nation that was often rebellious and hateful and spiteful and evil towards him.
So when Christ is right, which that absolutely right. There's, there's aspects of grace in this, that God kept on being, uh, he kept on bringing them back into the land. He kept on being kind to them and why, why?
So, so God promises to Adam and Eve, they're in the garden. I'm going to, there's going to be a seed that crushes the head of the serpent. Noah in Genesis six, it says that there was no one righteous on the earth.
They're all, their thoughts were continually evil before him. God could have wiped out everyone, including Noah and would have been just in doing so. However, what would have been done in the process?
There would have been no promise seed left, right? God was faithful by preserving and reckoning Noah with righteousness, bringing Noah and his family, the covenant Noah being all the seven other people onto the arc.
And that's how the line of the sea kept on going. So then you think about it. Okay. What about Abraham? Abraham was a wicked man.
He basically treated his wife as a prostitute.
God gave him grace. He found favor in the eyes of the Lord, unfaithful all the time. I just preached in the book of Daniel and there's like four faithful men in all of Israel at this time, all of Israel and they're all into slavery and all into captivity.
And if you were the devil, you would be rejoicing. You're like, man, we got him. There's no seed coming in this people, but God preserved as a people by showing them this common grace to the people that continually.
Rejected him. So what you just said goes back to Genesis 3 .15. I will put enmity between your.
Seed and his seed and hers. So then what does Matthew 21 say? These Jews who I've been calling to be gathered under my wings continually, they have hated me and rejected me and they've killed the son that has been set to them.
The kingdom's going to another people. Yeah, that's right.
So chapter two, verse 15, by abolishing in his flesh, the enmity, the law, the commandments contained in the ordinance so that he himself might create the two into one new man, making peace and might reconcile them both into one body to God through the cross, having put himself,.
Having put in himself, put to death the enmity. That's right. Yeah. Also in Hebrews. So, so who was Paul writing to in Hebrews? I'm sorry. Say that again. Who was Paul writing to in the Hebrews.
And Hebrews? Oh yeah. Yeah. He was, he was writing to Jews that have converted to Christianity.
All right. So who was Peter writing to in first Peter? So generous. Yeah. But, but specifically he's, he speaks to the Jews. Yeah. Like, okay. So, so in both cases, all three cases, so you got John 15, Jesus speaking to the Jews, Hebrews, Jesus speaking to the Jews.
And then Peter, master that bought that might be second Peter. He is speaking to the Jews, right? Who have, who, who, who by profession are going after Christ, but their actions, they're still looking back to temple.
That's right. They're still looking back to the old covenant, showing themselves that they've never really entered into the new covenant, right? Like it's, it's, it's not that in the text that it's talking about new covenant regenerate members are being taken out of the new covenant, but it's by with profession of mouth, because if you just look at, you know, a Romans chapter Romans chapter 10 versus nine through 10, so there's a lot of people, they don't catch what's going on here.
So let me read that real quick. Romans chapter 10 versus nine and 10. It says, if you confess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord. And so there's a second, second thing that has to happen. Believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead.
You will be saved or with the heart one believes and is justified and with the mouth one confess and is saved. There's like, I know a ton of people who have professed faith in Jesus Christ and have walked away from the faith, right?
But what this is saying is, is if you believe in your heart that God actually raised this Jesus from the dead, you will be saved. It's, it's, it's not about just professing faith, it's about actually believing something that is scientifically impossible in our day, right?
That, that God himself took on flesh, became flesh, lived the perfect life, died a sinner's death, was buried and on the third day rose again, right? If you will actually believe that, that, that belief has to be given to you.
That's what regeneration is. Once you believe that you have the Holy spirit, you're in the new covenant. Someone who is in the new covenant cannot be taken out of the new covenant because they have eternal life.
However, you can profess with your mouth that Jesus is Lord and not believe that. That's right. And that's what we see taking place in John. Well, not necessarily John 15. So he's, he's necessarily speaking of those in the old covenant that do not go into the new covenant.
They've been pruned, but particularly speaking in, in, in Hebrews, they were professing with their mouth that Jesus is Lord, but they were looking back at the temple. That's right. Right. If they truly believe that Jesus Christ was raised from the dead, they would not be looking back at that temple.
So on and so forth concerning the master who bought them. Right.
Good. I was just going to say that the, the context of Hebrews really elaborates that, that whole point. And, and we can speak as this, Jeff and I was being pastors, right? And, and knowing people who we've seen have a profession of faith, maybe even we've given the sign of baptism to, and then years later they go and they fall away.
Right. Right. We don't know all things we go off of professions, right? The book of Hebrews is speaking to a people who have had a profession and through years of either struggling, having Judaizers, try to talk to him so on and so forth.
They're starting to be like, man, my family is back there. I could go, if I joined back in this old covenant, I could go back to my family. Like that's a tempting thing. If you've suffered the sword of Christ and Paul in this is saying, if you do that, you're trampling upon the blood of Christ, what you have.
And that's what he's, that's all of chapter all of chapter 10, 11, because he's comparing what we have today compared to the saints of old and then a 12 and 13. He's saying, you have something that is so much better though.
You might not see it though. It might not be a tangible kingdom. You are in something that is so much better because you're with Christ. And that's the whole point of this. In fact, I would look at Jared Longshore and say, if he, if he's intertwining these, these, these texts of Hebrews and saying, this is only covenant language that it's not talking about the church as being the elect, like we would read what from the confessions, he is misreading this text completely.
This is the covenant of grace is intertwined identically with the church. And so all these passages in here that are talking about people trampling upon the blood of Christ or, or falling from grace or so on and so forth.
It is talking about those that have had a public professional faith and Paul is begging them,.
Don't go back on your public profession of faith. Right. So one of the questions that Ben had,.
Yeah, let me pull it up. You come on this one. Right. Yeah. So, so one of the questions he was.
Asked, he believed that he would baptize his unbelieving wife. And he said, yes, he goes, why would he do that? The only thing I could think of the reason where he's going with that in first Corinthians chapter seven, verse 14, it says for the unbelieving husband is sanctified through his wife and the unbelieving wife is sanctified through her believing husband, which is a wrong interpretation of that.
He's basically saying that, that because they are spouses of believer, that they're going to be set apart in some way at the holiness, that more than likely that this person, uh, and they would use that exact same argument for the children that if you have two believing parents, uh, that they are now qualified to be under the covenant of grace because of their parents.
But this is not, this is not, I think there's some.
Stipulations there. So like if an unbelieving wife, like, like, like, let's say if Jared was to be, you know, agreed to baptize someone's wife, right. That was an unbeliever or a husband. And, and Jared says, are you willing to be baptized?
And they said, yes, I am willing. He would baptize them. But if Jared was to say, or Doug or any of them was to actually say, do you believe in Jesus Christ? And they say, no, but I'm willing to be baptized.
I don't, I don't necessarily, I don't think that they would actually perform the baptism. Uh, at least I would hope not. I thought I heard him say that they would not if they profess no faith, but if they didn't pose that profess at all, if they said nothing at all, they would.
And again, you're baptizing, you're giving.
Somebody the sign of the covenant before on a presumption that they will come to Christ later.
Down the road. Does this, does this also span, does that answer of saying, yes, I would baptize an unbelieving, uh, wife, does that span from that view of federal vision with them that the,.
That, that, that does that come from federal vision with Doug Wilson is more of a sanctification.
Thing. I don't, I don't, I don't, I don't. Yeah. So like I would take that sanctified in there as, as, as not in the same way that I would, I would take how we are being sanctified in Christ.
No, they would, they would look, use it as set apart that they're going to be set apart. And so, so how, how, how did the, uh, how, how did, uh, God's people, Israel, how were they set apart.
In a way? Well, they had the oracles of God, right? Yeah. They had the oracles of God in that same way, in that same way, his wife and kids are going to be set apart because he's a believer. He's going to be raising them up in the nurture of the Lord, which whether you're Presbyterian Baptist or if you're assemblies of God, whatever it is that you dangle with, right?
You need to be having these gospel conversations. You need to be reading the Bible, having a family worship song and so forth. Right. And in one sense, you're being set apart. Right. Absolutely.
A hundred percent. What a huge bit. I mean, if you're raising up your children and you're evangelizing and you're reading the Bible, I mean, golly, I mean, just imagine you're, you're sharing the gospel with your children every day.
And there's just the power of God.
Going to salvation. If they didn't have that. Yeah. So they're being sanctified is not the same as what we talking about as we're being sanctified, being conformed to the image of Christ. Yeah. Right.
They're being sanctified as being set apart, being able to be under something so glorious. However, that also would be condemnation to them. Boy. Yeah. And, you know, at the judgment, having all that light and never come into repentance.
That's right. So which person, this is a perfect segue into this. So Mr. Hudson asked a question.
Earlier. He said, thank you, pastors looking forward to the discussion. You might have to sift through it to be able to pull it up. Let me get to it. So looking forward to the.
Discussion question, New Testament slash covenant parable was the prodigal son, a participant in the covenant prior to his returning to the father. The reason I say this is a perfect, perfect segue is that in that story, the brother that never left the house when the brother returns and is welcoming and given a feast and given the father's robe.
The son is bitter and doesn't go into the house. He had more light and yet rejected the blessings.
Right. We have to also understand that it was a parable. He was talking to the Pharisees.
He was talking to the brother. I'm trying to fix it. Go ahead. Keep on going.
So the brother represented the Pharisees and everything. And they were matter of fact. And but he talks about the brother who was jealous. Why are you giving it to this people? These Gentiles, that's the representative of us being saved that the repentant sinner, the people who didn't deserve it the same way the prodigal didn't deserve it.
He squandered everything and you're going to dispense grace on him and not, I said dispense again, administer grace on him. Sorry. I mean, she ruined it, Tom. Yeah.
Ruined it. You're going places. You ruined it all. Yeah. I'm sorry. You squandered the inheritance.
Squandered the inheritance. So yeah. So there's, so there's grace on the son who didn't deserve it. And, and the Jew is looking at him. The self-righteous Jew is looking at him. What are you doing? Giving it to that guy.
I want it all. And so that's, that's where that's going.
That's right. Yeah. The kingdom is being taken and given to another nation producing fruit of it.
Exactly right. That's the parable. Amen. Well, we're at hour 31. Yeah. I feel like we did justice. Yeah. Talk about Jason now. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So Jason Brita, if y 'all remember last week, he, he was commenting back and forth with us.
We was having, you know, and I thought that was really cool. Right. Was, was talking about him. Like, like if Jarrett would have got on here tonight, we would have, you know, had some interaction with him.
I mean, we don't, we don't mind. We like that kind of stuff. And if he really wanted to, it would have sent him a link to get on here as we would have Jason Brita last week. Right. We, if you, if you've been following us for a while now, we've done stuff like that, right.
If someone has a problem and they really want to get on here and discuss it, we'll send them a link and, you know, because at open air theology, anything can happen. Right. That's just how we wrote. So he ended up doing a video on us calling him to repentance and which we did, which we did right to him.
Like, this is not something that we was hiding behind anyone's back or anything. And so he misrepresented. So first he said that, that I mentioned that because, because his confession had some, you know, because for the majority of the time we were looking at the confession that he sent us on salvation.
And so we were looking at that and picking it apart. And in this video, he says, well, it's, it, it words things in a way in which he wouldn't have worded it. But he said, he said, but Jeff Rice said the same thing concerning the 1689.
And, and I have said that. However, I would not say that concerning an, an, an, an, an important, an important doctrine, such as salvation, an essential, important doctrine concerning salvation with the 1689 says about salvation, I 100 agree with every word.
Now, speaking about things that I would work different, let's just talk about like where it says that the Pope is the Antichrist. I would work that different and say, the Pope is an Antichrist, not the definite article Antichrist, right.
Which has, which is not an essential doctrine to the Christian faith. Right. So something like that, I would rework not the like, like I wouldn't reword anything concerning the Trinity. I wouldn't word anything concerning justification.
I wouldn't word anything concerning sanctification, right? Like these essential doctrines. And so, so he misrepresented what I was saying there. And also he said that our attack on him had to do with his view of justification.
Now, if you go back and you watch our video from last week, it wasn't about justification. It was about the conflation of justification and sanctification and glorification together, because they actually believe if you have been justified, you will in your own walk be sanctified.
So your sanctification is by you walking and working, by you walking and working. And that's where we came down and told him that's bootstrap theology. That's pat yourself on the back theology. And then Brayden mentioned how that was, uh, um, what'd you, um, I can't think of the, the Judaizers.
Oh yeah, absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. That's yeah. Oh, who has bewitched you? Who do you,.
Do you think that you were being, uh, does it say that you were being sanctified in the, in the spirit or, or let me look here real fast.
In Galatians, the Judaizers were not saying that they didn't come to Jesus by faith. Yeah. Oh, okay. Faith. Okay. However, you also have to be circumcised and become a Jew going back real fast. Yeah. And so you had anything to those, to sanctification, I mean, salvation and sanctification, my dear friend, you are a Judaizer.
So let's pull that back up real quick. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So real quickly,.
I'll read Galatians before I zoom in on this Galatians three, Oh foolish Galatians, who has bewitched you. It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified. Let me ask you only this.
Did you, so Paul, Paul saying, let me boil down the entire part of my letter and just ask you this, right? Did you receive the spirit by the works of the law or by hearing with faith? Are you so foolish having began by the spirit begun by the spirit?
Are you now being perfected by the flesh? Wow. Now with that in mind, let's go and read Rosendale network of churches. I I'm not on the screen where I can see you guys. Is that visible for you guys?
Well, it's very small, but go ahead and read it though. I personally cannot read it. I can't. I wonder if, can I, if I do something like that? Yeah, but you have to move with it, but it's fine. It looks better.
Does that look better somewhat? I don't know.
All right. Let me read it for you. I'll read the whole portion. So this is, this is, this is a part of a network that Jason's a part of. And again, this is, this is a pretty core, this is salvation. This is a pretty core doctrine, right?
Or I would hope it's a central, uh, salvation is a free gift of God's grace based on the work of Jesus Christ. The shedding of his blood on the cross. His resurrection is present in an accessory ministry and the ministry down to normal,.
Not 1 .5. You're a fast reader who receive.
God's brain. We just, we barely graduated high school.
Oh my goodness. All right. Those who receive God's gift of salvation by faith become children of God justified in their relationship to God, sanctified in their walk and work and secure in an ongoing faith expressed and fostered by obedience to Christ.
Yeah. And listen, this is again, what is this? We're saying that they're conflating sanctification and justification. It's in his own confession. It's here in salvation. Right after talking about what we would talk about is sanctification, ongoing faith, right?
It's saying that it's expressed and fostered by obedience. Justification is extended to all people in regards to the endemic guilt and by personal repentance and faith in Jesus Christ and his provision in regard to personal guilt.
Wait, you guys are misrepresenting him again.
The problem is you cannot conflate justification, sanctification and glorification together. So the way that they would put it is saved, being saved, to be saved. Like those three, although are together, they're separate, right?
My sanctification is not my justification. Although the moment I was justified, if I would have died at that moment, I would have been fully sanctified and would be glorified. And that comes, a lot of that comes.
From that video that we were discussing and pointing out, right? That guy was a heretic.
Through and through with that little thing. It was bad. If you haven't seen that show,.
Go watch that show. It was real bad. But if you want to say that there's, which there is, there's Bible verses that say you have been saved, that you are being saved and you will be saved. What should be the Christian's response?
I was saved by Christ. I'm being saved by Christ. I will be saved by Christ. Not, I was saved by Christ. I'm being saved by myself and I'll be saved by my endurance in the future. That's garbage. That's the same thing the Judaizers.
Were saying. That's where this comes from. It's the conflation of sanctification and justification. It's being saved from the penalty of sin. It's being saved from the power of sin. And it's being saved from the very presence of sin and glorification.
Right. Because once we're glorified, once we resurrect from the grave, the way that our flesh fights against our spirit will be no more.
That's right. We will be perfected in a way in real time. Yeah.
Yeah. And so that's what we were saying. If you go and listen to the video that he did, he totally misrepresented us in that. And then what we said about our confession versus his.
We need to get Jason on here. Send him a message. Hit him up.
Well, I will if y 'all want me to. Well, I guess that's all we got for the night. Any last words? Can we go?
Can we get a picture of us beating a dead horse again?
Yeah. Yeah. I mean, I told you to put one with his face on it.
I can't do it that quick. Give me give me give me 10 minutes. I get that done.
No, it was a great show again. You guys. Good stuff. Hey, real quick. We need to know what you guys want us to do. What?
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Go ahead. I had something pop in my mind. I'll write it down. Go ahead.
Oh, OK. We need to know. We need to know what kind of topics would you guys like us to discuss on here? We want to keep it fun. You guys know how we are. We rag on Braden a lot because he's got teeny tiny hands, but we can't just do a show on tiny hands.
You can. It's just short.
It's small shows. Yeah. Yeah. It's TikTok videos. Yeah. We could do we could do.
Gay beard shows. So this is two hands. Tell us. Tell us what you guys want us to discuss.
Yeah. If there's a topic out there that you want us to to to destroy, right?
If there's people you want us to beat up. Yeah.
Bring it. You're welcome, Tom.
So I want to I want to ask everyone to be in prayer for our church. There's a an opportunity maybe that that that we're looking to get in a new building. I'm talking to the church that's receiving the deed.
So there is this really, really beautiful church over here where I live. And it was planted in 1969. And it just shut down June 30th. It went from 200 people to seven people. And these seven people were unwilling to get out and reach the community.
And as you all know, we are active in our community, reaching out, preaching the gospel, so on and so forth. And there's a really good chance that we could have an opportunity to get this beautiful building.
And if you know where my church is, it's kind of like in a hole in a wall here. No, someone said we're going to this karaoke spot. It's a hole in a wall. Like this really is a hole. It's right beside a bar that has a karaoke.
Okay. So we're right beside a tattoo parlor and we're right beside a bar. And every Sunday morning, I got to go into the church and try to get the smell of weed out of the church because people have been up partying all night and the smell has absorbed into my church.
And it would be great to have a building where we wouldn't have to. And I had to get out there and sweep the parking lots, clean up chicken bones, cigarette butts, beer cans. It's just a mess every Lord's Day morning.
I'm having to get out there and clean. And it would just be a blessing to not have to do that stuff and to have something that actually looked like a church, right? It is a beautiful church too. It's a beautiful church.
And if y 'all could be praying that the Lord would bless us with such a blessing, I would really appreciate it. Yeah.
Pray up. So I will say, Troy said more Baptist covenant theology. Melissa asked for a show about Mormons and how to reach them. We can do all those things. Absolutely. Maybe next week we can do something on Mormons.
Maybe not what I was wanting to talk about today, but yeah.
Testosterone, wouldn't it? You want to talk about testosterone or something like that?
I'm going to throw up. I'm going to throw up. You don't make me throw up.
That's what we're talking about right now. Don't explain it, Tom. No.
So you had two ex-Mormons, you see.
Look, we were wanting to do a show on this really bad scandal that's just come out about a really well-known ex-Mormon. This ex-Mormon ministry that has just completely invalidated itself from a lot of things.
Being in ministry and most likely even being considered brothers in Christ,.
It's bad, bad, bad, bad stuff. They're not brothers in Christ. They're sisters in Christ. They're not even sisters in Christ. They're just sisters. They identify as sisters. It's not good. It wouldn't have been a good show.
It would have been a great show, dude. Jeff would have been thrown up.
He would have thrown up. Listen, I have such a weak stomach. My wife scratches her finger and shows me, and I get a pain in my butt, a literal pain in my butt, and I start gagging. That's kind of what the show is going to be.
Jeff, what are you talking about right now, dawg?
I'm just saying, even changing diapers. I've thrown up on my kids by changing their diapers.
You have a pain in your butt when you change your diapers?
Like the butt cheek. If I see someone get cut, I can watch UFC all day long.
Are you hearing? He's getting a pain in his butt.
What butt cheek gets a nod on it? Is it your left one or your right one, Jeff? Please tell us. It's usually my right. It's like how people can be like, oh yeah, it's going to rain. I can feel it in my bones.
I can feel it in my butt.
Like we can be watching a TV show and someone gets impaled or whatever. I can't even look at it. I get sick. I got a really weak stomach, and I do get a pain in my butt. I don't know what it is. Right now, Braden's a pain in my butt.
Eric, look at Eric.
Jeff's road. That's the ministry. Because it was Adam's road that was doing all the grease.
Well, it is what it is. I got a weak stomach. I can't handle it. It's way too much information. Braden's going to have to go on the Reformed Ex-Mormon to talk about that one.
Yeah, it's bad stuff. Please do subscribe to this Open Air Theology page. Share it around with.
People. If you don't, we understand.
I wouldn't want to associate with me either. Jeff's screaming in his chair. We know what's up.
All right. Anyways, if you're ever in Tullahoma, come check me out. We're out of here. Hallelujah.