Eli Ayala Joins Matt Slick to discuss many Apologetic Issues | Apologetics Live 0023

4 views

Eli fills in for Andrew but forgot to give the links so it was two brilliant apologists discussing many issues. Apologetics Live 0023 This podcast is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and all our resources strivingforeternity.org Listen to other podcasts on the Christian Podcast Community: ChristianPodcastCommunity.org Support Striving for Eternity at http://StrivingForEternity.org/donate Support Matt Slick at https://www.patreon.com/mattslick Check out all of the great apologetic resources at CARM.org Please review us on iTunes http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/rapp-report/id1353293537 Give us your feedback, email us [email protected] Like us on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/StrivingForEternity Join the conversation in our Facebook group at http://www.facebook.com/groups/326999827369497 Watch subscribe to us on YouTube at http://www.youtube.com/user/StrivingForEternity Get the book What Do They Believe at http://WhatDoTheyBelieve.com Get the book What Do We Believe at http://WhatDoWeBelieveBook.com Get Matt Slick’s books

0 comments

00:03
Now you can't All right, there we go So hopefully you can get in All you got to do is just click on the link you can get in that makes no sense to me
00:34
So I'm gonna do is email you Let's see Eli okay, yeah, there it is and Let's see 314 1921 because we're live man
00:57
Let's see Apologetics live All right sent it.
01:04
There you go. People who are watching this first part of the video going Whoa, this is so fascinating to see how they work things out
01:13
Yeah Not that exciting Junk, how could my emails possibly?
01:26
Because that are junk. Yeah Charlie spines in Charlie's in Yeah, where it says participate what
01:48
I would do is take your mouse I put it over the where the words click here. And then what
01:53
I would do is click and Doesn't make any sense.
02:20
Oh, yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Oh, I always have problems Well, I got both streams going on my end
02:32
Okay. No, it shouldn't shouldn't I don't even know what your password is.
02:38
I can give it to you. No, it's not supposed to be like that Hey Charlie, did you have to put a password or anything in you just clicked on the link and you're in right
02:49
Charlie? Yeah, I just went to apologetics live .com.
02:56
There was the participate here and watch here both links and both links work for me Well, just go to apologetics live and click on the link.
03:08
It should work Yes Yes That is just that's weird.
03:41
Oh I Will have to figure it out and I'll type it
03:46
I'll text it to you. But let me get because I can't say it over the air So, let me try this that should not it happen with you.
03:55
I don't know what's going on why it's doing that Yeah, yeah, but whatever.
04:02
I'll try it. Let's see You need to know the password anyway, could I want you to start entering emails? Yeah You know,
04:16
I I hear lots of excuses from people. That's what I hear lots of excuses
04:24
Yeah, okay. Hold on. Let's see. All right Well, somehow
04:30
I got in so that qualifies it as knucklehead proof Okay, here we go, let's see
04:38
Okay, I'm gonna put the password Okay, I'm typing the password in Into let's see.
04:45
Where's it say Text We're always having problems
04:52
Okay, so here's the password, okay Eli is a
05:06
Doofus All right, all right
05:17
There I sent it to you Try that see if it gets it we're having problems everybody else is getting in and you can't even get in What browser are you on?
05:44
Just use Chrome Is it carnal for me to feel like comfort that I wasn't the last knucklehead
06:02
It is carnal Okay, that feels good Well, wait, you're not even in yet almost isn't good enough
06:25
Boom, there you are. I'm in. Okay. Let me let me hang up. All right, man. Sounds good, buddy
06:30
That was pretty intense. My life was great, but it's all right well, there you go seven minutes of A Apologetics that's how you defend the faith against not working technology.
06:47
Hey, hold on a second answering Somebody said that I'm still teaching the heresy of the
06:53
Trinity. I said call in my show and let's talk and stop hiding behind a nickname
06:59
Yeah, it always gets me as people like to take shots and they don't even use the their real names
07:05
You're right, okay. All right folks we are in we've already prayed and There you go, so Okay, now what
07:19
Now we just talked about like apologetic stuff Apologetic stuff. What would that be apologetic stuff?
07:25
Well apologetics includes so much so it depends where you want to tackle it, man Okay, so what do you
07:32
I'm just have fun here. What do you feel is the best approach in apologetics the biblical approach?
07:39
Oh, there you go It's a good. It's a smart Alec answer. That's what I would say. No. Well, well actually actually it's not
07:45
I joke I I give smart Alec answers, but there's some truth to that and I want to use a technical term, but it's true
07:51
I'm a presuppositional apologist. So I think that the presuppositional method is The biblical one because when you don't follow the biblical method you say stuff like God probably exists the preponderance of evidence
08:05
And we're not arguing for the Christian God. That's the kind of stuff you say when you use an unbiblical apologetic
08:10
Why is it unbiblical? I'm gonna quiz you man. Let's see how you do. Why is it unbiblical? well
08:16
Because the Bible doesn't give us the example of defending the faith in such a way where we actually set our commitment to God aside
08:25
First Peter chapter 3 verse 15 says to set apart Christ as Lord in our heart always being ready to give a reason for the hope that's in us most books on apologetics focus on the always ready and Ignore that first part that we're to set apart
08:36
Christ as Lord in our hearts So it's actually the Lordship of Jesus Christ that governs It's the prerequisite of doing apologetics.
08:43
It governs everything that we do And so if Jesus is Lord over all Then we cannot set aside our intellectual foundations for the sake of neutrality or things like that Well Okay, didn't
08:56
Jesus tell Thomas to look at the evidence of the holes in his wrists and then believe?
09:04
Yeah, well a lot of people bring that up and what's hidden in there is is an erroneous presupposition That presuppositional list don't use evidence and we do use evidence, but it's within the context of the
09:14
Christian worldview Thomas For example came from a I would argue a Christian worldview even though he was inconsistent in his doubt
09:23
So he still have that intellectual background that allowed him to receive and understand The meaning and the the powerful nature of the evidence that Jesus gave him in showing him the holes in his in his hands and so forth
09:35
Well, what about Paul in Acts 17 when he used? Rationality and pagan philosophy in order to get the unbelievers to believe in Jesus Well, when you say rationality we talk about reason in philosophy
09:47
There are over 20 or 30 different kinds of reason you have Kantian reason Cartesian reason it's the kind of reason that's being used and Paul that that same person
09:57
Paul that's speaking in Acts also speaks about the treasures of wisdom and knowledge being found in Christ Colossians 2 3
10:04
And of course, he had the Old Testament background and would have affirmed what the book of Proverbs taught That the beginning of knowledge the fear of the
10:12
Lord So when he tried to reason with people it was not a sort of autonomous reasoning
10:17
He could appeal to the image of God within man to make a connection There is common ground between the believer and unbeliever even within a presuppositional framework
10:26
The common ground is not neutral ground The common ground is actually the fact that both the believer and unbeliever are creating the image of God And so we appeal to that and sometimes we could use
10:36
Examples from our experience examples from the world to kind of draw those connections Well, what do you do if an atheist such as doesn't believe in God or the
10:43
Bible? Well, the Bible doesn't say that doesn't say what well He's denying the existence of God and the
10:50
Bible says all men know that God exists So I'll just reject his statement and explore that with him a little bit
10:56
Okay, so if an atheist says he doesn't believe in God and you say yes you do Yeah, then what then we need to have a conversation because My commitment is to my ultimate authority the
11:08
Word of God and God being omniscient knows the heart of all men And so if his word tells me the nature of the heart of man and the fact that all men know
11:15
God I'm not going to engage in an argument without assuming what God has revealed about the nature of man
11:21
And so I what the goal of apologetics really is to point out In reality the unbeliever is suppressing the truth about God in his unrighteousness.
11:30
And so we'd explore that a little bit I wouldn't just merely make the statement Because we'd have to kind of explore in what way do all men know
11:38
God Okay, so let me ask you a question in what in what way do all men know
11:44
God? Well in well Well, let's talk a little bit about what in what way they don't know
11:49
God because there is a way in which all men know God and there's a way in which men don't know God and if you read
11:56
Cornelius Vantill, he kind of explained a little bit about the different ways in which we know and don't know we don't know
12:02
God in Relationship and that's evidenced by the fact that on judgment Jesus will say to those on his left get away from I never knew you there is no relational knowledge of Of the person towards God they never really knew him and Jesus was never in relationship with them
12:16
But the way in which all men know God is evidenced in that while they reject him with their mouth
12:21
They actually live in ways that only make sense if he does exist And so my job as an apologist is to point out those inconsistencies within his worldview
12:30
But as you are common or you're known for saying people act upon what they believe But it's very interesting that people say they believe one thing but they live their life
12:39
In a way that actually is in conflict with what they say they believe for example an atheist will say there's no
12:44
God But then he'll complain when he sees immoral things in the world And so you have a conflict there the metaphysical naturalist will say all that exists is matter in motion
12:53
Yet he will appeal to the immaterial transcendental laws of logic So those are those are inconsistencies within his own worldview, which is evidence that we could explore that what he says with his mouth
13:04
He actually doesn't really believe in his heart. That's precisely what the Bible says Could you repeat that because you know, that was
13:14
So folks if you're coming in late Elan I we have all kinds of conversations like this all the time
13:20
I'm just asking questions that have him go because Eli and I will talk about all kinds of things
13:27
But we did today presuppositional ism. We talked about Molyneux's and we'll talk about various philosophical issues and things like that And yeah,
13:35
I totally agree. Yeah, I use rational thought I use evidences But I always presuppose that the
13:41
Christian God exists one time with an atheist actually said to me look man I want you to do a thought experiment. I said, okay, and he said
13:48
I'd like you to do is You know, just imagine that God doesn't the Christian God doesn't even exist. I said done.
13:54
I'm not gonna do that We're not going to not going there. I said well, why not just a thought exercise I said
13:59
I cannot violate the Word of God in order to suit your ungodly needs
14:04
It's not gonna happen and so I wasn't gonna let him do that and he you know He didn't like that but the whole thing is that I'm not going to and no
14:12
Christian should Entertain the idea that God does not exist because well to do that is intellectual suicide spiritual suicide as well
14:19
But that's another topic too. But nevertheless, so Yeah, I think that's a very important point to bring out when someone asked the
14:27
Christian to jump into a hypothetical world use They have to understand that the claim of the the presuppositional is the
14:34
Christian is not that the Christian worldview is the most rational worldview We're saying it's the only rational worldview, right?
14:41
And you're hypothetically asking us to jump into this other worldview for us by definition You're asking us to jump into irrationality and then rationalize with you, which is again
14:51
Kind of a contradictory enterprise to begin with. Yeah, it's like saying can you I want you to imagine a round square for a minute
14:56
Let's talk about logic. I'm gonna what will the very beginning of your whole assumption does not work
15:02
Right to abandon God as a necessary precondition for intelligibility is to adopt irrationality and then try and argue rationally
15:09
It's a self -refuting thing. You just want to do that kind of a thing. Very good Important to also to recognize because a lot of Presuppositionalist will say these kinds of things the
15:18
Christian worldview is the only rational worldview and then they'll stop there Because when people hear this for the first time they're kind of you know
15:26
Well, what do you mean? And so it is necessary for us to actually explain what we mean by that and kind of show
15:33
Go ahead explain expand on it. Why is Christianity the only rash the only rational worldview to hold?
15:39
well first one of its truth claims is that it's the only one and when you actually
15:45
Take a look at the Christian worldview as a system It is the only worldview perspective that provides the necessary preconditions for for knowledge
15:53
And that's why presuppositional is tend to focus on discussing the issue of truth A lot of people don't like to talk about truth
15:59
They like to just assume that everyone knows what's true and then argue on that basis But one of the key commitments of the presuppositional list is that we are to begin our apologetical
16:09
Enterprise by setting apart Christ as Lord now, he's the Lord over everything. He's Lord over knowledge.
16:14
He's Lord over truth. And so When we affirm that we cannot grant
16:20
Truth to the unbeliever on their own basis And so what we would do is show that only on the
16:26
Christian system. Can you have something like truth? And that's why you have people say, you know, if if you believe in truth, you know
16:32
How do you get truth in your own worldview? That's not a word game A lot of people think Christians are playing word games there to try to avoid answering questions.
16:39
Actually, it's a very fun Logical question, what is truth if you can't define truth within your own worldview?
16:45
then how can you engage in a discussion over truth when it hasn't been coherently defined and The Christians position of truth is fundamentally in opposition to the unbelievers
16:55
Definition of truth when someone says what's truth? I say it's anything that conforms to the mind of God. They'll be like, wait a minute
17:00
I thought truth is a justified true belief I was like, well My argument is that you can't have a justification for any belief unless you start with my
17:07
God And so we're right there at the beginning at an antithesis We are right there at disagreements over what the nature of truth is
17:14
And so what the unbeliever usually wants to do is just pass that aside. Okay. Well, just give me evidence Well, wait a minute evidence presupposes truth and How do you define truth within your own worldview?
17:25
And how does your own worldview provide the necessary preconditions to to kind of prop that up? Because that's logically prior that question is logically prior to any discussion of that And so I would hammer those things in and show that on your worldview
17:39
You can't have it on my world view you can and it's the only world view that can do that Okay. Well, I'll tell you what let's open up for questions if anybody wants to ask anything, but I got more questions
17:49
I could ask you sure anybody want to say anything anybody got any ideas any comments you can do it in the
17:59
Participation room or in the Video room give them a sec here to do that.
18:08
Yeah, sure. I apologize if I'm yelling like I'm a teacher So when I teach my voice amplifies and I'm not really used to talking through my computer.
18:16
So All you're gonna do is relax and everything will be fine And and because you have a tendency like I used to when
18:21
I was younger just talk very quickly because you're right full of Information that it's like, okay.
18:27
I'm gonna say this guy say that and Yeah, but a lot of people don't understand like for example what the nature of truth is and that's something worth discussing for a while So people can understand so I don't see anybody else with any comments or anything and I'm looking at the video feed
18:42
Let me see here Introduction apologetics being dark understanding read. That's right introduction.
18:48
There you go Okay. Okay. Let's talk about what truth is because You Know people will say different things about truth truth is what you want to believe or truth is what is true for you
19:04
And not everybody else. Oh, yeah, somebody had a question Yeah, well Matt you brought up the whole round square thing again and I'm assuming that Eli would agree with you since he's a
19:14
Calvinist, but Eli I noticed that last week you you did a pretty good job at going ahead and Even though you don't hold to Molyneux's and you did a pretty good job at debating
19:25
Matt slick playing devil's advocate Would you be able to if you could?
19:33
Even though you may not hold that view Would you be able to argue that view that God could make a round square if he so choose to do so no, because that presupposes an unbiblical and illogical view of God's omnipotence a lot of people think that when we say that God is
19:53
Omnipotent that that entails that he should be able to create a round circle But the reason why he can't create around circle is because around circle is not a thing that can be created
20:02
It's it's not a thing. So it's like asking can God create this thing? That's not a thing It's just a jumbled, you know mixture of words
20:09
And so the biblical view of omniscience does not necessitate that God is able to do the logically impossible
20:16
But here's a question if God's so powerful that he could strip himself of his own divinity. Well, no He doesn't
20:23
God doesn't violate the laws of logic Not because there's there's not an external law that he follows called logic
20:30
Logic is a reflection of his mind and his thinking he can't violate his nature But that's not an impingement upon his omnipotence because omnipotence doesn't entail that you can do the logically impossible
20:40
And here's here's a problem to people who think well omnipotence should entail that God does the logically impossible
20:47
Someone asked me one time. It's a famous philosophical question. Can God create a rock so big that he can't lift?
20:53
And so my answer is well, you know, it's a contradictory question, but then they demand what
20:58
God can do anything I'm like fine. God can create a rock so big that he can't lift. I'm like, uh -huh. He's not all powerful
21:04
Oh, yes, he is, but he can't lift the rock. I'm like he can lift it and then not lift it Well, that doesn't make sense. It's a contradiction and I say well, so was your question so if you ask a contradictory question you're gonna get a contradictory answer and that's why we affirm that God doesn't violate his nature because if he does violate his nature does
21:20
Violate logic then you have meaning and truth is all garbled up and you can't really make sense out of anything. Does that make sense?
21:32
Yeah. Yeah, but uh, see the way I Perceive it is that the logic that we understand with regards to the mechanics of our universe our natural universe
21:41
It's a presupposition to apply that logic to God's nature because we don't know what logic is
21:48
Involved with regards to God's nature. We do know that with regards. He cannot violate his own nature, but I think it's
21:55
It's wrong to go ahead and object that's involved with the natural universe is
22:02
Somehow tied to God's own nature. I think to do that is a is a form of quasi pantheism
22:08
I'm not calling you a pantheist or any sure that I'm just saying that it it it seems strange to do that When as y 'all said before and in last week's conversation
22:20
We're not to know God from a bottom -up approach But from a top -down approach and I think we can only know
22:26
God from what is revealed and I think for us to go ahead and make a presupposition that God cannot make a round square because it would some like you said it
22:34
It's something that is an absurd idea, it's it's non -existent Well, we don't know that you would presuppose that it's something that's incapable of Coming into existence because it doesn't make any sense
22:48
But when you say quantum physics it it's possible even in quantum physics for there to be around square
22:55
No, that would mean that I would disagree that that that's that's false just real quick just to back up real quick You said that it's just a presupposition.
23:04
It actually isn't when we say that God reveals himself in the Word Would you agree that the
23:09
Bible is the inspired Word of God? I do right and so if you take a look the
23:15
God inspired a book with language, right? Yes. Yes, and that language presupposes certain structures of logic, right?
23:25
I Don't believe that the language itself Simply focusing on the language and thought behind it language the thought behind the world
23:34
I believe well, for example, like when he spoke about the laws of God there was the letter of the law and there was the spirit of the law and I think if you equate the linguistics of the language with the spirit of the message,
23:47
I think that is the same as going ahead and saying that the Logical laws that govern the mechanics of the universe is somehow equatable to the spirit of God the very nature of God And I think again,
24:01
I think that's sort of like a quasi pantheism approach to understanding God I don't see how example, but I'm having difficulty following your connection there with pantheism well, for example
24:16
For example You it's an absurdity it's an absurd idea for there to be a round square
24:22
I would agree but it's also absurd to say that God could go ahead and create this natural universe from nothing because I've heard
24:33
Matt slick and I've heard other Psychologists, yeah, I don't think I don't think that's absurd at all and I don't think they're the same
24:40
I don't think the creation God creating ex nihilo is violating a law of logic I don't
24:46
I don't think that it's that that's illogical at all when you say absurd I think I I'm understanding you to mean that something that's a third is something that's logically incoherent
24:55
Now around circle is most definitely logically incoherent But creation ex nihilo is not even if someone didn't believe it to be true
25:02
There's nothing there's nothing in the idea of God creating out of nothing that violates the second law of logic
25:11
I can't really hear you your voice kind of muted down there. I'm sorry I'm sorry. Can you hear me now?
25:17
Am I coming in? Yes, sir Yeah, well, the thing is I've heard Matt slick and I've heard other apologists even
25:22
Catholic apologists in debates with atheists Actually ask him.
25:28
Well, can some it's actually make the claim that it's absurd when they make the claim the That something can come from nothing
25:36
So it's the Christian side that is saying something did not come from nothing But God could created it from nothing
25:45
But God is not nothing God created so it's not but not nothing from nothing from nothing, right?
25:54
So there for that same as Since we're talking about logic if we apply that same logic
26:01
God could go ahead and create a round square That doesn't follow at all. I don't see how you when you say that I don't see how that followed from anything
26:09
You said here's a question. Can God can God create a being that is completely equal to himself in every way?
26:17
No, because that would violate The very nature of God because there's only one
26:22
God But can God violate his nature and not violate his nature at the same time and in the same way? I can't hear you
26:32
I'm sorry your voice muted again God God can never violate his own nature But making a round square would not violate his own nature is what
26:40
I'm trying to make the point um, I Think it is outside of God's nature to perform irrational things because God is an eminently rational being anything
26:53
He does is rational. He's always rational So to create a square circle square circle is by definition irrational
26:58
And so God can't do it because God always asked acts consistently with who he is
27:05
That's like saying, you know, can God lie? Well, no God can't lie. Why well because it goes against his nature Well, if God can come if God can perform
27:13
Logically incompatible things and we could affirm that it's possible given his omnipotence that God can both lie and not lie at the same time
27:19
In the same way, which is which is absurd We couldn't even understand what that means, which is precisely what a logical absurdity is.
27:25
There's no meaning or content to it Well, there's numerous PhD scientists physicists quantum physicists if you look at some of the videos they have many videos on YouTube where they actually speak about The physics the the mechanics of the quantum universe compared to the macro universe and they themselves
27:46
Said that you could have two things existing That are exactly the same one thing in the quantum universe and they said the logics the logic of the macro universe does not conform
27:58
To the quantum universe, but we know that God created the quantum universe and the macro universe
28:03
I would be careful because the PhD scientists don't even fully understand quantum events for example
28:10
Some PhD physicists will say that in the in the the field of quantum mechanics things come into existence out of nothing and that's that's not true, even when they say that because the
28:21
Cosmic vacuum is not nothing. It's a sea of fluctuating energy and actually within that sea of fluctuating energy
28:27
You have subatomic particles that come into it appears to come into existence, but it's not coming into existence from nothing
28:33
But you have PhD scientists using that language as though that's actually the case And so I'd be very cautious of a quantum physicist talking about Two things that are two things but also one thing
28:45
Even if there were multiple logics, you still need the basic Aristotelian laws of logic to even talk about them which
28:52
I would argue is necessary because you need logic to talk about anything and to understand anything if Nature at base is logically incoherent.
29:00
Then we have a problem how do we get logical incoherence and then move from that state into a state of coherence if it's the fundamental aspect of reality
29:08
God being a rational being created the world to function in certain ways and Because as human beings at least if we're not talking so much about, you know nature external to ourselves
29:17
We're creating the image of God. I would argue that the image of God entails Rationality and the utilization of logic and so when we think logically, we're actually not using a different logic than God But we're actually thinking
29:29
God's thoughts after him and that's how we honor and glorify God in the way that we think I think there's a connection there when the
29:36
Bible says that we're to love the Lord our God with all of our minds When we think rationally and logically we honor
29:42
God because that's how God thinks but when we're irrational We're not thinking like God and so we're not honoring
29:48
God in the way that we think Well, I think when it comes to truths and morals
29:53
I would agree with you But when it comes to the logical laws of the mechanics of the universe the physics of the universe
30:00
Apologize, I apologize. You said truth and morality, but then you you said you agree with truth and morality that that's the case
30:06
But then you talked about quantum mechanics, which presupposes truth So quantum mechanics is an element of truth and if truth presupposes the logic that you just agreed
30:15
Holds then in any discussion of quantum mechanics would have to include that and presuppose that But we have to distinguish the truth the truth that applies to the mechanics of the universe
30:25
Versus the truth that applies to God and that's that's where I believe that there's a mixing of those two truths that shouldn't take place for example
30:36
I'm sorry. I don't know is it rational for a man to walk on water? Yes, it doesn't violate any logical law whatsoever
30:45
It violates natural laws as we perceive them But there's not for example a man walks on water that proposition does not violate the second law of logic
30:54
Namely that a statement cannot be both true and false at the same time in the same way There is a way in which natural man cannot walk on water, but there is a way in which he can
31:04
IE divine intervention, so there's no there's no logical contradiction in in stating that someone walks on water
31:11
Okay, so therefore I would agree exactly with what you said because okay, you're you're brought into Natural terms you made a distinguished distinction with regards to the logic
31:23
That applies to the natural universe Versus what God supernaturally is capable of doing but they're the same.
31:31
I don't differentiate between the logics. I like God Interacts with us in logical ways when he manifests himself he's he can't he can't reveal himself if he's using a different logic than than we are because We have a logic that we function under and outside that logic we couldn't understand anything
31:50
So God interacts with us in his divinity in his essence in a logical fashion
31:55
Otherwise, we wouldn't be able to understand what he's doing. Your voice is muted again.
32:02
I'm sorry I'm so sorry.
32:11
I can't hear him at all There you go, you're back I Know you could repeat what you said.
32:20
Sorry. So applying the mechanics that governs the laws of the natural universe a
32:26
Man cannot walk upon water you would agree with all the divine intervention of God well,
32:32
I have to actually be careful with the use of intervention because I I I don't think laws are
32:39
Autonomous things that govern until God interacts with them For example someone asked me what what is my definition of miracle my definition of miracle
32:48
Which is related to how I understand laws is a lesser way in which God governs the universe
32:54
So he functions in a particular way. That's very rare And so when it happens, we notice it as a miracle
33:00
But God is always in control of everything and so the laws of nature as we call them are not these
33:05
Autonomous things that just govern the world. It is the common way in which God governs the world And so I don't think the quantum mechanics have these natures of themselves and that they can produce these
33:16
Irrationalities like logical incoherencies because God is governing Both the laws of nature and everything else
33:24
They're always based upon rationality since God is rational as a being
33:30
Right, and I absolutely agree with that But the norm of the natural universe the logic that governs the mechanic
33:37
So the net is that a man cannot walk upon water and as you said before no, no, no No, no, I would disagree with that because when you talk about quantum mechanics, you're talking about science and you're talking about induction
33:48
We observe that men normally don't walk on water But you can't use induction to say look this tells us that man can't
33:56
Can't doesn't belong in science because science does not give you absolute knowledge about something since it's based on inductive inference
34:03
Which actually could only get you to probability Sean Carroll who's an atheistic Cosmologist says that science doesn't give you truth.
34:10
It gives you theories that work So scientists who actually understand science don't make those wide -ranging claims that science tells us that this can't happen
34:20
Science can't tell us that man can't walk on water Science tells us that normally men don't walk on water and I think that's a that's a huge difference
34:31
So if we don't normally see a Round square and have never seen a round square.
34:37
It doesn't mean that a round square doesn't exist somewhere in the universe No in that case, we know that around square doesn't exist because around square isn't a thing.
34:46
It's irrational It's just you just have a sentence with words that have the word round and square in it there's there's no such thing as a thing of Around square like no one can look at it.
34:57
Look there's a round square. It doesn't it doesn't exist That's like saying what about saying something similar like there's something it doesn't exist
35:05
But it also exists that and from what he's saying that that's possible. What it doesn't exist. It also exists and what does that look like?
35:13
Yeah, have you ever seen something that exists and doesn't exist at the same time in the same way that would be It's logic impossible you can't have a round square because it can't exist
35:21
There's no it does and also doesn't it just yeah. Yeah, you know, I've gone over this many times.
35:27
So have Adam and and then Scientists, I don't I don't believe in this but they also put forth this whole multi -universe thing where they say that there could be laws of physics
35:39
That are completely different from our own universe. So just you know If there are you know other universes out there obviously they would all have been created by God as well and Really part of the universe itself
35:54
Don't make a mistake of thinking Don't make a big of thinking that logic in the universe are the same thing or physics and logic are the same thing, right?
36:03
I Would say logic Governs if there is a multiverse logic would govern would would be binding on all of them since logic is not something that's a property
36:11
Of our universe rather. It's transcendent. It's not limited by our own physical cosmos So the rest of the mind and heart of God and if God's everywhere then all universes are subject to that same logic
36:21
Exactly. Yeah, and and we have to be careful to when scientists say there may be other universes that are governed
36:28
Oh, well, there may be unicorns on the dark side of the moon. There's no basis for them to say that at all
36:35
I Understand but the thing is if there are other universes out there with Physics or laws that are completely different from our own universe, right?
36:44
Then we can't necessarily say that a round square couldn't exist in that universe Yes We can because if the laws of physics are different the laws of physics are different than the laws of logic
36:54
But just because the laws of physics might be different in another universe that does not logically entail that therefore that includes
37:00
The laws of logic being different because I think what's implicit in your statements is The idea that logic is the is a property of a universe and that there's another universe out there
37:11
That has a property called logic and it's different than the property of logic that we have over here And I and again that is to ignore the reality that logic is transcendental in nature.
37:20
It's not limited to universes two plus two must be for either here or on the other side of our universe or if there are other universes that Exist two plus two would have to be you know or over there now now in another universe
37:34
If there's another universe with the different laws of physics, maybe perhaps that that universe someone could walk on water
37:42
That's possible. If the laws of nature are different that might allow for it if we can kind of you know
37:49
Speculate a little bit, but that's not the same as saying that different universes can have different logic Yeah, explain to him why logic is what it is the transcendental nature
37:59
Which which is a property of God's mind and you and ubiquity because he doesn't understand that it's good for others to know that as well
38:06
Yeah, well, I always I was thinking as logic as the the laws of thinking but in a theological sense
38:13
It really is a reflection of God's thinking and so logic is is you would often say it's an abstraction
38:19
But it was it's also a concept and it and concepts necessarily reside in minds But the issue with logic is that it's a universal concept
38:26
And so if concepts necessarily reside in minds and this is a universal concept Then it seems to follow that logic would act would have to reside in the universal mind of God or is the mind of God Really reflection of his thinking we can't separate logic from God's mind.
38:41
We are not I hate to use the term but we're not Platonist if you take a look at the philosophy of Plato where they he believes that abstract objects kind of exist out there
38:51
You know, there's this thing out there called logic logic independent of mine
38:58
Which is why a round square can't occur because by definition
39:04
They exclude each other as being what they are. So you can't have the things that are said to be
39:11
Neutrally exclusionary as being a true thing So it doesn't work a lot of atheists for example will often say something to the effect that you can't just you can't just prove a universe or prove a universal negative
39:25
That's actually false. You can you can Prove universal negative by showing that something's logically incoherent.
39:31
So so I say that a square circle can't exist Well, like well, you haven't been anywhere in the universe doesn't matter because the very concept is logically incoherent and can't exist anywhere
39:40
So that that's that's an important point. I mean because logic applies everywhere if something is incoherent
39:45
It that's something of which we speak besides it being not a thing can't exist anywhere right, and that's very important if you affirm that contradiction can be true, then you run into some problems because Then it can be true in some universe that God exists and doesn't exist at the same time in the same way
40:02
Which is which is absurd Is it possible for a person to exist at two places at the exact same time?
40:09
two places at the exact same time a physical person or divine person
40:16
Yeah, no because I think if they're two if they're two individual persons again
40:22
I'm arguing from the Christian perspective here that as an image bearer of God. I am NOT equivalent with my body
40:29
I am a body with a soul And so when I die, there's a separation of my body and my soul my soul goes to be with the
40:35
Lord So I am my soul Okay, and so if there are two bodies
40:42
Separated. Well, where's my soul you say both of them? Well, I have two different souls then they're not exactly the same person you know, you're talking about two different people
40:50
That's why I kind of talked about this with my documented There are documented cases where Catholic Saints were it's what it's what's called by location
40:59
They were at two different places at the exact same time and this is throughout
41:04
Catholic Church's history. Well I'm not Catholic. So I Would have to look at those particular instances and again
41:12
I already have a belief as to what the Bible says about certain things that caused me to disagree with certain
41:18
You know arguments and things that Catholics bring up But I do think that there's an issue of identity if a person is two places at once Again that that again if someone could be at two places at once then it's possible them to be at three places at once or Four places at once or five place at once what we're doing is actually giving one of the incommunicable attributes of God his omnipresence to created things
41:40
And that is an incommunicable attribute. And so that's not communicated to creatures
41:45
Only God is everywhere And so I would say that that's problematic saying that someone is two places at once and both of those people are the same person
41:55
Well, it is documented but listen, I wanted to tell Matt Prove anything if it's documented all you have is you could have a demonic manifestation
42:06
Trying to fake people out to think that Catholicism is true by having someone in two places You don't know what it did sure that truth is
42:13
But even if he disagrees with that even if you say well I don't believe it's demonic But the reality is if it is demonic then that would explain that what there's something that appears to be a manifestation of these things
42:24
You can't know that merely by documentation because documentation you need a reader
42:29
To read the document and the reader comes to the paper With his own presuppositions his own worldviews and his own commitment or lack thereof sure
42:42
Your voice kind of went down again. I can't hear you. I'm sorry Can't hear you
42:52
Yeah, I can't hear you, bud There you go
42:59
Nope can't I'm sorry. I can't hear you What about now?
43:07
There you go No, yeah, we can hear you, okay, so yeah
43:13
Matt since last week you voice interest in At Catholic answers yeah
43:24
Trent horn of Catholic answers since he's presently seeking the persons to Fight on podcast show which happens to be called the council of Trent I went ahead and dropped your name.
43:35
You know on his Twitter page and He said that he tried contacting you, but he hasn't heard anything back from you
43:41
So I just I don't know if he sent you an email or called you or what? My wife read it to me today
43:50
And I said yeah you know I just gonna decide in what venue either by Skype or actually because he invited me down to go to San Diego and So we'll just say is dependent a few things, but yeah, that's fine
44:03
I'd be glad to expose the the lies of Catholicism Well I see there's other people that just joined into the
44:14
Yeah, I think Nathan had a question for you guys sure go ahead
44:21
Nathan Can you hear him
44:29
Matt? I can't hear him. No Nathan. He's just muted himself Hello There you okay.
44:36
Go ahead Nathan, so I think we talked a little while back So I had a question on Job Chapter 26 verse 7 if you know about that one
44:48
All right Job 26 7 He searches out the north over empty space and hangs the earth on nothing okay, right?
44:57
so I've been researching it quite a good bit, and I Had a theory that it well.
45:03
I had a belief that it was referring to a literal God suspending the earth upon nothing, but I'm really not too sure what to make of it now because I did more research on the
45:13
Hebrew side of it, and it seems to be I guess different now I'm not sure to tell you it's
45:22
I've known about this first for a long time and It seems to support the idea that that the earth it dwells in space.
45:30
It's not hung on anything Right yeah, and there's he stretches the north over empty space.
45:37
It's perfectly consistent with what we understand So not a big deal, I don't know so why do you know something else about it?
45:45
Yes, so the word tohu in Hebrew t -o -h -u
45:50
Means void and There's quite a few different references to void
45:56
There's a Deuteronomy chapter 32 and chapter 10 for Sam 1st Samuel 12 21 and a few other verses, but anyways the way that is translated in Job chapter 26 verse 7 is a parallel of hanging the or hanging the earth over the void and Basically, it's saying on nothing so the
46:21
Hebrew translates on nothing Bailey ma and in in the
46:28
Hebrew scriptures the Parallel here is not referring to a earth flowing in outer space, but tohu which means deep
46:39
In Hebrew tohu means deep and not like our spaces we would conceive it well
46:47
Words be with you mean in context or to have a semantic domain and you can find out that tohu has is
46:53
Translated as confusion as without form In other things it's translated in different ways
46:59
Right it'll be careful. What you know what is what you think it means? But I'm not sure
47:05
I understand what you're getting at though, so I was doing some research again and basically it it's kind of confusing on this because When it says free flow you would think that like it's literally referring to a free flow, but it seems like What's referring to here is
47:30
Different I suppose I'm not sure
47:36
I'm following you, but um let me uh You know look at it again, but in a different translation just say the same thing you know it's
47:46
Let's see how does the Septuagint do it? Yeah, it stretches out the north upon nothing
47:59
It be who days He hangs the earth upon nothing who days
48:05
So the Septuagint which is the Greek translation of the Hebrew The Jews understood it to just to be that he stretches out the the north north wind
48:15
Boreas Aurora borealis, which is interesting the Boreas upon nothing epic who days and he hangs the earth
48:25
Upon nothing at the who days again, so it's just saying that it just they're just there. They're not suspended on anything
48:31
I think the idea of what's going on in joke 26 -7 is that it's the earth is not a round disc on back of turtles
48:38
Things like that. It's out there in nothing That's just what it seems to be saying that's what the
48:44
Septuagint is clearly teaching as well right, do you think that there's a possible different translation that That you could get out of it because it seems like It I mean just by the look of it
49:00
You know like there's so many other verses that seem to indicate like I'm not saying that this is the case But it seems in can indicate like a flat earth or so like if you ever read
49:12
Yeah, that's not this is not supporting a flat earth anything hope you're not leaning towards that no not at all
49:20
I was just wondering though because if the Bible talks about how You know, the earth cannot be moved and all it seems very confusing like some of the verses because it's hard to decipher at times metaphorical between Historic right exactly.
49:35
He moved the earth can't be moved. Well, what does it mean? We have an earthquake see it moved It's not talking about that kind of sense
49:42
It's solid. It's structured. It's it's immovable. But of course God knows it's orbiting around the
49:48
Sun I mean, he's not talking about that kind of a sense Did the solidification the solidity of the of the world of the earth?
49:56
It's you can trust it It's gonna be there, you know, it's kind of thing is what's being being spoken out there have to be careful, too
50:02
Biblical text also, you know The idea that the Bible is inspired does not negate that allowed the writers to utilize the language
50:11
Structures of their day. There's definitely that perspectival issue that people are writing from their perspective as they observe it
50:18
Matt has made mention of this, you know the Sun rising the Sun especially when you study a word too and you explore its semantic domain
50:25
You got to be careful that the semantic domain does not mean that the word can mean all of those things all the time
50:31
The way you pick within the semantic domain needs to fit the context and of course when we're reading the scripture
50:36
We believe that it's inspired by God 2nd Timothy 316 and that God doesn't contradict himself. So when there's enough in amongst the words that if we adopt if we
50:46
Accept that the word means one thing within its semantic domain and adopting that particular option
50:52
Causes us to contradict other areas of Scripture. That's a warning sign We want to be able to read things in context and in ways that don't contradict clearly what the
51:01
Bible teaches elsewhere and taking into that Perspectival issue where people are writing from their perspective
51:09
I think that's very important when you're in Scripture. You're right and you know, it confuses me though because you know
51:16
Joshua it says that the Sun stopped moving and you know, like why would God allow
51:23
Joshua to write something like that in a metaphorical sense and then it Always gives me the question is
51:29
Job chapter 26 verse 7 to be taken Literal is it really meaning what it says it means or is it trying to say a metaphorical thing that we don't understand?
51:39
Yeah, it may be that you have to be careful though, too That the Bible is not a science text. And so whereas it tells us true things about Nature it's not doing that exhaustively and so we have to be careful
51:51
It takes training to to differentiate between a poetic kind of something being described poetically
51:56
Perspectively and things like that and that takes work But yeah It can be challenging But we don't want to make the
52:02
Bible say what it doesn't say and we don't want to impose our Understandings on the ancient context kind of looking at things anachronistically, right?
52:11
Personally interject. I do believe the Sun stopped Mm -hmm. I believe what happened is that the earth's angle of rotation or axis was changed
52:20
I think God did this kind of thing. There's no problem with that at all And and I like that you said that Matt because most apologists don't say that now
52:28
I don't know how to understand that passage right off the top of my head, but there is no there's nothing illogical
52:35
With the idea that God could have done that It's just it's just against what we know of nature
52:44
But that doesn't make it that doesn't that does not necessitate and God could do that if he so does
52:50
Why not a guy could just take the earth and have it tilt so that the earth the
52:55
Sun's looked like it stood still or He could have stopped the earth So it did stand still in the earth, you know, no big deal
53:02
Which If the earth is rotating could God stop the rotation of the earth while also allowing us not to feel the fact that it stopped
53:10
Yes Exactly. So there are a lot of things that God can do You know,
53:16
I'm not saying that that's exactly what he what he did in that case But I mean we can't we can't cancel those out because your presuppositions in worldview will dictate what is possible and impossible
53:24
What seems irrational? Right a while back. I was speaking to an expert on this and Just just some person and anyways what they were saying since they studied
53:36
Hebrew is that basically from Joshua's perspective the Sun did stop but you know,
53:42
God wanted people at that time to understand it because of You know people from back then who really didn't understand all the things in the solar system read it who may not have been
53:51
Joshua or so, you know many people would probably question it or so and that's what that guy was saying.
53:58
I Think it stopped Something actually happened and they recorded it
54:04
I don't think we have to subject the Bible to what the modern physics says can and can't happen
54:09
Well, if we were to do that, then Jesus didn't rise from the dead. He didn't walk on water right
54:17
Physics can't tell us what can and cannot happen and only can tell us what happens I I've also had this other question.
54:28
This has been bugging me for so long now But are there any and this kind of goes back more?
54:33
Well actually forward more into the New Testament, but are there people who were secular?
54:39
Writers other than Tacitus who wrote about Jesus's miracles Around the time of you know, his crucifixion and all because you know, like the things they did were just amazing
54:49
So, I mean I've always wondered Why aren't there that many people writing on him other than you know,
54:55
Josephus and Tacitus and Josephus wasn't until much later Well, you got to understand in the culture of the
55:01
Roman Empire. There was a doctrine called Cesaro papism Cesaro papism is Emperor worship and so it would be politically incorrect and suicidal for a
55:11
Roman citizen to start saying that Jesus Christ was doing all these things and Writing about it because if he wrote about it
55:18
Which most people didn't write and they hire someone to do the writing hire a scribe or an amanuensis to do that To do that would be to incur an expense and then to publicly say we saw this kind of a thing
55:29
And they would risk being persecuted by the Roman Empire. The reason the Roman Empire allowed the
55:34
Jews to do what they were doing was because of their history the Jews hit their history of fighting against oppressors in order to hold of their
55:42
God and Plus was wet in the middle of nowhere. And so the Roman Empire let them do the things that they were going to do.
55:49
So the Romans the Jews themselves were in a kind of a a
55:56
Tenuous relationship with the Roman Empire and so they didn't want things to go south either.
56:01
So what happened was The Jews as well as the Roman citizens and most of the
56:06
Jews were Roman citizens because they're born in the Roman Empire Roman Occupation then they were not going to want to make waves
56:14
So if you go around saying hey Jesus did all this stuff with the Jews would be after you and the
56:19
Romans would probably be after you So it's one of the reasons you're not going to get a whole bunch of writing about stuff like that But it did exist and we do have those things written in the
56:29
Gospels. We have other documents gathered and understood I think an important thing to what's your name again?
56:37
I'm sorry. My name is Nathan If you don't mind me asking how old you 15.
56:42
All right. Great questions, by the way, that's awesome. You're thinking about those things Um, I think it's also important to recognize too that it is quite amazing that we have anything from the first century
56:51
That's you know, it's amazing that why don't we have sources outside of the new? It's amazing that we have 27 things written.
56:59
Is there anything important working on right now? I'm sorry Christopher what it's actually new.
57:06
I actually need it for about 15 20 minutes or so Can you what?
57:18
Okay. Yeah, I wasn't sure what you were saying What I was trying to say is that it's amazing that we have anything come out from the first century.
57:25
So You know a lot of what we have Was recorded and passed on and a lot that has been written has been lost there there is a library in Alexandria Egypt, which has been referred to by many of the
57:39
You know the early church fathers and things like that that contain really juicy information that we would have loved to have had
57:45
But the library was burnt down if you're right, it's the history of the church He actually makes reference to a letter
57:51
Correspondence between Jesus and some ruler that wanted to him to come in and heal one of his family members now
57:57
How amazing that we can find a correspondence letter written by Jesus so we don't have those things
58:03
But that doesn't mean people didn't write them and Jesus didn't write or had someone write for me We know there's a lot that we don't know but it's amazing that what we have is what we have in the condition that it's in right and you know,
58:14
Like I I'm the type person who if I don't understand some I do like three to five hours of research on it like I just have to get the answer to it of some variety and Isn't an answer to right away
58:26
Or there might not be an answer at all to that You know, we can actually get so like when I actually do the research and all
58:33
So, you know like sometimes it's a year later and I'm like man I finally got the answer to it But a lot of things would you like, you know the early church and all
58:41
I've had lots of questions on and I've I've I think I've studied a little bit on the reference books and all how they've been lost throughout the
58:49
Centuries of some of the writers during the time of Jesus and I think that's pretty amazing that there were reference books and all that we're almost like commentaries to the whole
58:57
Bible, but you know when it comes to the resurrection and all it always just gives me questions though because The miracles that are like being observed in all by all the
59:08
Apostles like, you know Paul it's quite amazing because like, you know, I was discussing this with the person in school today, but you know, so Paul was beheaded and he was a
59:18
Pharisee. He had everything he wanted Why would he be beheaded for something, you know that seemed almost?
59:25
Futile if it was wrong, so I mean that that's just one thing, of course There's many other examples that are just amazing that make any stand out but I You know, like I do have questions mainly on Jesus's miracles
59:41
Especially corresponding to other Apostles like Luke or so Like how did Luke write so much on Jesus or so when he never even saw
59:49
Jesus like until much later well, Luke is a Traveling companion with the
59:55
Apostle Paul. Are you familiar with that? Yes, I think I am and Paul Not only witnessed the risen
01:00:02
Lord because he appeared to him on the road to Damascus, but we know that all that Contact with the other Apostles which which didn't know he didn't know
01:00:10
Jesus And so he actually spent time with them and could have easily gotten information firsthand information by eyewitnesses
01:00:17
And I think that's what makes the New Testament so fascinating is that I mean it's very clear indication that there are these are
01:00:24
Eyewitness accounts or written by people who knew eyewitnesses Which is unheard of when you get things that come out of the first century think copies of these things that we have today
01:00:32
So yeah, he might have he might not have known Jesus personally But the connection he has with Paul and Paul's connection with the
01:00:40
Apostle Peter And I think John was it John also that he met. I'm not sure. I don't remember Matt when he went so Well, he was a researcher and he apparently was commissioned
01:00:50
There's a theory about it commissioned by Theophilus to write and both wrote the book of Luke and Acts and some people think that it might have been in support of Paul's legal defense when in act 17 when he
01:01:03
Appealed to Caesar went to Rome where he wrote like Philippians for example So something it might have been a legal document, but he was a researcher would have access to the
01:01:12
Apostles and others So he did a very good job of researching right and you have someone like Mark who is very well known to be the
01:01:21
Immanuensis of Peter Immanuensis of someone who would write while someone is dictating to them and oftentimes they can use their own stylistic
01:01:29
You know ways of writing to kind of convey what the speaker is saying But there's again the connection to an eyewitness is so close there if if it's not already written by an eyewitness, for example
01:01:39
You know, I believe at least John the Apostle wrote the Gospel of John So right there you have eyewitness account
01:01:45
What's interesting about the Gospel of John is that it gives you details of a pre a Pre ad 70
01:01:52
Israel and the temple and things like that that only a first -hand witness would would know because in 80 70 the temple was destroyed and so the
01:02:01
Landscape of Israel at that time was was very different than during the time of Jesus yet here You have the
01:02:06
Gospel of John giving us very very great details as to what? Jerusalem looked like prior to its destruction things like that So there's a lot of indication within the text itself that we're getting really good eyewitness
01:02:19
Information, right? So did Luke you said the road to Damascus? So did Luke actually see
01:02:25
Christ when he was resurrected or because I know that Mark saw Luke for I meant
01:02:30
Jesus for part of his life And Matthew was basically his whole life on well most of his life now his whole life, but a lot more of his life and And you know, then then there's the main followers and all but it's made me wonder because I think
01:02:44
Luke also went to other people who also like not the apostles but people in the area who reported on Christ's miracles
01:02:53
Right, you have Luke writing an account and that he acknowledges that other accounts were written as well
01:02:59
So yes, he's drawing from information other people but his primary information is coming from from eyewitness
01:03:06
Because he's writing what he's writing a more sure account, right? There's many things that have been written but here
01:03:12
I'm giving you the juicy details because I'm getting it from from a good source And if anyone doubts that source is good, we can just recognize that Luke knew
01:03:21
Paul I think it's very interesting in the way that the book of Acts is written You have a narration of the growth of the early church and then you have the switch in language they they they they they they and then we we we we we we where Luke is actually writing in a fashion that he himself is an eyewitness to the very events that he's recording and that would include the witnessing of certain miracles and things that God did through the
01:03:45
Early church and through the Apostle Paul and so on and so forth right, so I Didn't think
01:03:53
I worried this is really that clearly but in fact, I did not word it now that I remember but Didn't the
01:04:01
Bible record like who Luke talked to other than the twelve apostles or was it just the twelve apostles? He got the information from yeah,
01:04:08
I don't think it mentioned them by name Yeah, but I wouldn't say that that's not mean again the ancient writing wasn't like, you know,
01:04:17
Chicago style Essay papers now we have notes where he got I say
01:04:23
Chicago because that was when I was in college. That was the Bibliographical format we had to write in where you kind of have the reference they didn't do that back in the day
01:04:31
All we know is the information that he does have is accurate and touches the eyewitnesses
01:04:36
But of course, there was probably many other eyewitnesses that aren't mentioned by name, but that's kind of a moot point.
01:04:42
I think right yeah, that that is interesting for sure and Wait, cool.
01:04:49
You said your name was Nathan. Yes. My name is Nathan. Yeah Think about it, dude
01:04:55
The New Testament there were 2 ,000 years old and we and we have these documents that can be traced into the very
01:05:04
Lifetime of the people who claim to have witnessed it I mean taking that by itself is not a knockdown argument for the truth of Christianity, but that's really unique You have nothing like that coming out of the ancient world
01:05:15
Which shows how carefully and meticulously the document preserved and copied and things like that I think that's from a historical perspective like super awesome and interesting and from a
01:05:26
Christian perspective very comforting that God has given us these documents and there's really good reason to Put our trust in them, right?
01:05:35
For sure, you know, I do a lot of Research on history of the
01:05:41
Bible itself and you know There's always these one thing that there's one thing or so always one simple thing that People try to use to disprove different things and a while back
01:05:54
I think Matt and I were speaking on Jericho and I was saying about the carbon -14 date giving a different a year range
01:06:02
From the actual event, even though it really adds up perfectly everything. It seems to be
01:06:07
Joshua for sure Well, what are we to do in such cases when you know carbon -14 is different There's some little thing that just they say contradicts the whole thing and all like what were we to do and like Such, you know
01:06:23
Like the minuscule things seem to like be the things that just seem the most confusing at times Well Nathan when you say contradiction a contradiction implies a violation of the second law of logic
01:06:32
And so it's very important that we define what that is and then go back and explore whether carbon -14 quote
01:06:39
Contradicts the data a Contradiction is when a statement cannot be both true and false in the same way and in the same at the same time in the same
01:06:47
Sense, so just because carbon dating might give us something that's contrary Carbon dating is not an ultimate absolute standard by which all truth is measured
01:06:59
Great, you can trust carbon dating and I'm not you know I'm not talking against carbon dating But it doesn't end all debate when something is part of dated a certain way because even carbon dating comes along with its you know
01:07:10
The data has to be interpreted, you know You approach the whole issue with presuppositions and commitments and that's gonna affect the way you look at the data
01:07:18
Are you gonna say something that yeah? Carbon dating assumes that there's a certain rate of carbon decay that occurs that there's no been there has not been an external force of carbon introduction or such
01:07:30
Removal through external means that's one thing plus they have found They have found they've dated live things to be 14 ,000 years old.
01:07:42
There are some problems with it, but you don't really hear about it Yeah, carbon dating is applied to organic materials.
01:07:48
Mostly it has nothing to do with history. That's right, right in fact Just recently
01:07:54
I researched this but I found out that there's this eruption that happened I forget the name of the actual eruption that where it was
01:08:02
But anyways, they carbon -14 dated it and they gave about the exact same age range
01:08:07
Difference that you know Jericho gave to this mountain or this eruption
01:08:13
They knew the exact date of the eruption yet about hundred years earlier. So it was incorrect and and this was something that they had trust in so that you know, they either have to reject the dating methods or they have to Reject that that actually happened at that time and you know, it's it
01:08:30
Or we take carbon dating with a grain of salt and we hold a balanced view What when you challenge the results of carbon dating?
01:08:38
We're not you know, we don't want to come across as rejecting science Yes, science is useful, but it always needs to be placed in the proper context.
01:08:45
It's not absolute I I because Christians will say carbon dating is not accurate and then when it seems to support their own view
01:08:51
Carbon dating is accurate. You have to have a balance we use it It's helpful, but it's not the absolute and final word
01:08:58
And so it was important to keep in mind science needs to be put in its proper context
01:09:03
You know when people say something has been proven with as a scientific fact You don't speak of a hundred percent certainty in science
01:09:11
It's impossible because that's not what science gets you the very method does it never gets you to certainty?
01:09:17
And so we got to be careful how much? How much we give over to science we usually give more than what science itself actually tries to guess it's useful
01:09:26
But it's a practice. It's a practical tool. You know, it's not enough. It's not an absolute truth -finding tool.
01:09:32
That makes right Oh, yes, that makes complete sense. And as I do more research on this
01:09:38
I find compelling evidence that again these archaeological dig sites do really mount up to Joshua, but Or not
01:09:48
Joshua by any other event and you know, I think there was one thing that I was studying a little while back
01:09:54
But it was the Tower of Babel If I'm not mistaken It was a real thing because of some of the people back in you know earlier times reported on Seeing it on their way to Babylon Right, but but you have to be careful, too
01:10:07
It's a real thing because it's also recorded in the Bible You see a lot of people think that if something outside the
01:10:14
Bible mentions it that that somehow validates it because there is that the Bible mentioned certain things that it's not mentioned anywhere in in other sources and only later to find that when people say see look
01:10:27
Bible is the only place that it mentions it then They discover something and say oh actually other people acknowledge it as well
01:10:33
So sometimes the Bible can be the only source where we have this information and later demonstrated Well, the Bible was actually correct when everyone thought the
01:10:40
Bible was wrong because it was the only source This isn't a point in case with the the Hittite people, right?
01:10:46
I studied that with that. Yeah, so I have to be careful We don't think that certain things are true in the
01:10:51
Bible Merely by an external reference by some other source because that's to give that external reference more authority than the
01:10:57
Bible itself. Mm -hmm Right, and and that's very that that would make complete sense and many things
01:11:05
Like you were saying have been proven later in time And you know the
01:11:10
Bible mentioned it, but there's no proof of it outside the Bible. So you're right the Bible does hold true
01:11:18
About that real quick You said it it there's no proof of it except the Bible as though the
01:11:24
Bible is not its own proof You see that there's an issue there. There's almost a bias, you know people say, you know, one atheist told me
01:11:31
You know demonstrate to me the truth of the Bible without using the Bible and I said I'd be happy to do that if you can
01:11:36
Demonstrate the truth of atheism only using the Bible and he was like, I'm like, well, so was your request we can't ignore
01:11:44
The Bible as a source of information you see when people say there's no proof outside the
01:11:49
Bible that already presupposes a bias Against the Bible. In other words, it's not a reliable source.
01:11:54
And that's that's a bias, right? We sometimes engage in that kind of Interaction and what we do is we we kind of look at history as as this this sort of neutral thing
01:12:06
Where we need to look at these things in an unbiased fashion Listen when someone says let's be neutral they're being biased because they're biased against the
01:12:14
Bible which says we can't be neutral committed to Scripture even when we do history, we need to hold firm to the
01:12:21
Word of God and Even if the world says there's no evidence We hold on to God's truth and because God's truth will true all truth is
01:12:29
God's truth We know that information will come out later on. We don't need that information to confirm something that's in the
01:12:34
Bible right that's very true and You know like so so much to me confirms the
01:12:41
Bible and so little is confusing not that doesn't confirm me I would never say such a thing because to be honest with you
01:12:49
I believe that sooner or later or even in the very end or so, you know It will come out to be true and it's it's always true.
01:12:56
It's always been true, but There's different things. I have questions on and I think
01:13:02
When I start to actually understand things better and I do more research I get more questions by get more answers and right
01:13:10
I don't know if there's a certain way I should be researching because you know The way I research is
01:13:15
I just go on, you know I look on one site than another site than another site and I I use like I give you a can
01:13:23
I give you a really important advice and it's gonna sound really Christian II, but it's it's it's really important Sure, the way to do history as a
01:13:32
Christian is to be fully committed and relentlessly consistent with this statement
01:13:38
Jesus Christ is Lord over all That includes the very historical process because a lot of people engage in history as though it is this
01:13:50
Discipline and methodology that is independent of our religious commitments When you and here's an is it important because we tend to be swayed this way and that by evidence, right?
01:14:01
Well, I have evidence here Well now there's doesn't seem like there's evidence here and we're we're we're kind of flowing back and forth over evidence evidence evidence
01:14:09
We need to be committed to Christ And he is our unwavering foundation and he is the
01:14:15
Lord over evidence evidence itself can't make sense Without Jesus Christ being Lord over it
01:14:20
So if you look at history through the lens of a Christian worldview, not only will you find that the study of history is very fruitful
01:14:27
But you'll also understand that history is to be interpreted in light of God's sovereignty and providence and you begin to see the wonderful beauty of God's plan unfold throughout history
01:14:37
So even in the Scholarly discipline of the study of history You're now also being moved to worship the
01:14:43
God that sovereignly moves throughout history And so it is more enriching than just dry in a dry way kind of looking at historical events and you know
01:14:51
Kind of piecing things together that have no real connection Do history is a united whole and unfolding and unraveling of God's Beautiful plan, right?
01:15:02
That's very true and you know, I I've always had this tough problem though Because I've always like I always want like if I hear one side of the argument
01:15:12
I always want to go to the other side I always want to see the other side and I want to make sure that like I can find arguments against the other side if What I'm believing is true and and that's always been my problem and when
01:15:24
I do that, I seem to get into more conundrum because I I Guess I pursue so much of an answer that I go to 20 different sources and I have no answer
01:15:35
Right, right And again, you have to understand there's no scholar who again This is just the nature of history the nature of history you're dealing with high probability
01:15:45
Except when you're dealing with divine history, you see because when we do history from an autonomous
01:15:51
Man -centered finite perspective you can only have probability But when you take God's Word at his word and it's based upon the all -knowing
01:15:59
God who created everything and moves history in the way That he does the statements historically that are given to us in Scripture We can trust with you know
01:16:07
Knowing that we have a strong foundation for believing that because it is the omniscient God who tells us you see the secular historian
01:16:14
Doesn't presuppose that and so history by its very definition must be probabilistic All right, and there's there's a problem that sense
01:16:21
Since probability Presupposes certainty which comes from their own philosophical perspective, which is itself not subject to the historical
01:16:32
Investigation so even the secular historian, you know Confronts his historical studies with a whole worldview that dictates how he interprets certain things
01:16:40
So we need to recognize our own intellectual framework Which is which is itself grounded in the
01:16:46
Word of God and then engage in the study of history Unto the glory of God. I think that's hugely important Never never separate your studies from the
01:16:55
Lordship of Jesus Christ over that area Once you do that, then you're swayed this way that will this evidence that evidence this evidence that evidence in reality
01:17:03
All evidence belongs to God. I don't think that you know History is one way of pointing to Evan I think everything is evidence for God and if everything's evidence for God, then there's no such thing as evidence against God That's a strong point you make
01:17:20
Really strong I think that a lot of this
01:17:26
You know a lot of the things I've been researching over the probably four or five years I have been researching all this.
01:17:32
I found some really strong arguments for Christianity And you know, it's not even just going out to sources and all
01:17:41
I mean some of it can be but you know It can just be as simple just reading the Bible I I think that when
01:17:46
I actually read the Bible and I actually start to do the Studies on it and not just read it from a standpoint where I really know what
01:17:53
I was reading I was just reading it because I thought was interesting but I actually knew the background to it and the history, you know, like again like with Paul being a
01:18:01
Pharisee or Luke being a Gentile or so, you know all these different things seem to play a huge role into You know what the
01:18:09
Bible is and the fact that it is the way it is I find quite amazing.
01:18:15
I think that If it was any other book of some sort like the Quran or so, it wouldn't be pieced together like this
01:18:21
It's not by other With you know other witnesses and I don't know if you mind me bring this up But a while back when
01:18:29
I was in Scouts this one kid said that Jesus You know didn't speak his own testimony.
01:18:36
So therefore he's crazy. He he said that in another way He said it in more of a mocking way and I can't remember the exact words, but I thought to myself
01:18:45
You know like was he trying to say here Jesus is illiterate and I Did research and all and I realized hold on a second
01:18:51
The whole point of Jesus not writing the Bible is just that the Apostles were there to actually give
01:18:59
Reasons, you know the evidence right there reasons that Jesus really was a son of God because if Jesus wrote the whole thing
01:19:05
Is it really credible? I mean it it would seem a lot more credible to me if other people wrote it and gave
01:19:14
Testimony to what Jesus did than just Jesus writing it. Yeah, that's it. That's a very interesting point I think that's a good perception on your part and it's very interesting when someone says
01:19:21
Jesus couldn't write My first question is and you you know, you know this how?
01:19:28
Then it's like listen there people I can go through to a group of people that are known to be illiterate
01:19:33
Generally, that doesn't mean everyone in that group literally can't read or can't write or whatever I think people are presumed especially when when people are putting so much purchase in this whole like empirical investigation
01:19:44
If you're so much into empirical investigation, why are you making statements about what Jesus can or cannot do?
01:19:49
That's not itself based on observation. I don't know I don't know how many languages he knew
01:19:55
Uh, he might have known more languages than we think he knew he might have been able to write, you know Right, I think where people are being very presumptuous and their and their presuppositional bias comes out when they say stuff like that Right, that that's definitely for sure and um and I think that's really the way it is like in general like I I I try witness to people sometimes like at my school and I go to a public school
01:20:21
So like when I witness to people it's not really super Easy all the time because a lot of people are very mocking
01:20:27
I mean some people are very kind and like they're not even christian some of them but they're very kind because they listen and they actually try to hear what i'm trying to say and not just uh mock me for what i'm saying, but then there's other kids who are very mocking like I I Don't even understand why they're mocking when really they didn't hear my side yet, you know, right, right and you know what and i'm actually happy that you said that because it's it's hard I work at a middle school high school
01:20:53
I've worked I've worked in the uh, can you hear me? I hear talking at the same time. I'm, sorry Oh, no,
01:20:59
I think uh, there was a lag right there. Oh my bad I thought someone was trying to say something. I didn't want to know
01:21:05
Someone else does want to get in there Let's give it another five minutes and see if anybody else wants to ask anything, but go ahead keep going
01:21:10
Yeah well What I wanted to say was I wanted to uh Because I work in a school and I work with kids middle school high school and kids can be rather harsh
01:21:18
And I just want to commend you for standing up for the truth in that in that context and don't be discouraged
01:21:23
When people are mocking, uh, one guy told me a quick story where um Two guys went hunting one used one guy used a bow and arrow and the other guy used a gun and they were kind of Kind of competing with one another who can shoot the deer first and and all of a sudden, you know
01:21:38
They heard a loud sound and the guy ran they ran over to see who killed the deer first And the guy with the arrow says
01:21:44
I got him. I got him and his friend with the gun says No, you didn't I have your arrow right over here Um, what actually happened was that the arrow went right through the deer it went right through the deer
01:21:56
So it was actually the arrow that that hit and later on the app where they found the deer up the road And he ended up, you know dead and the point of the story that they were that they were bringing to me when
01:22:06
I heard this story was that Your arguments may not seem as though they've hit the mark
01:22:12
But if you actually present a strong case for the gospel God can use the arrow of your words
01:22:20
To actually produce really the the intended result later on when that person is lying home in bed thinking about what you did, you know
01:22:28
For all intents and purposes you failed because they rejected you and mocked you But god still uses the wound of the arrow that you shot in their heart
01:22:36
Because you were using god's word and and firmly standing up for it So I I encourage you and uh, you know, don't judge success in defending your faith
01:22:43
Um by what you can see empirically because god works in the heart oftentimes he's doing things you can't see
01:22:49
Right, i'm i'm gonna let you guys go and that's that's a great point and i'm gonna have to reflect on everything that I heard over these past a few minutes and Uh, i'm gonna let you guys go though for a night and god bless you guys and have a great night
01:23:03
Good conversation. Anybody else have any good anybody else have any comments or questions you want to ask?
01:23:10
We have morgan in here elias, I believe christopher wanted to talk
01:23:17
Go ahead. Christopher Can you hear me?
01:23:23
Unmute him. I had to mute him earlier because of something. Okay, great christopher. You should be able to talk now Okay.
01:23:29
Yeah this I have a question for you man I know you're on your website. You mentioned that you're a continuationist in regards to the apostolic sign gifts, right?
01:23:36
Yes Why do you say why do you say apostolic sign gifts? I guess
01:23:42
In regards to that debate, that's the term i've heard at least among people I follow
01:23:48
Well, if you say apostolic sign gifts and that automatically means that they're for the apostles So I would just say the charismatic gifts are for today
01:23:59
Okay, well, I guess my question is more in regards to from since you're from a continuationist perspective How would you respond to a guy who claimed to have seen like a demon attracted to some burnt eggs or at the guy's house
01:24:11
Well, I can't understand you. He says what? Oh, sorry okay, um a few weeks ago, there was a
01:24:17
Bethel church pastor Um who wrote an article claiming that um, he saw demons in his house because the demon was attracted to some burnt eggs
01:24:30
Okay I know it's crazy Article matt. Yeah, this is silly
01:24:36
Yes So i'm okay. I guess the short story is i'm a I come from the cessationist standpoint
01:24:41
So I I would have I would I would know how to respond to that But i'm actually curious to understand your perspective.
01:24:47
How would you respond to a claim like that? I say show me in the bible where it says demons are attracted to burnt eggs
01:24:55
I mean, uh, just show me the bible, you know That was hard for you to say it wasn't a match.
01:25:01
Yeah, like they're burnt eggs. What happens to burnt toast? Burnt toast repel them
01:25:06
If someone saw a demon, how could they actually observe the reason why the demon's there?
01:25:12
How do they know the demon's there because of the burnt eggs? There's so many things wrong with that Yeah I agree
01:25:19
And I don't think I don't think there's anything to do with the gifts I mean, what do what do spiritual gifts have to do with the reality and that they interact with with with people
01:25:32
You know what I mean Yeah, that's a good question and let me ask you Why are you a cessationist?
01:25:41
I guess when it comes to the um, the sign gifts and stuff I guess i've been convinced by scripture through like um people from like say master seminary and also through my own study that You're over modulated or something.
01:25:53
Let me turn you down or something because it's hard to understand. Okay now say something Okay, um, basically from first corinthians 14 all those passages.
01:26:01
I've I've just been think that the well, do you know of any? Do you know of any verses in the bible that say the charismatic gifts are going to cease?
01:26:10
I thought in first corinthians 14 like when you go like when they talk about Yeah, I guess it's been once i've been in that chapter, but I thought it was somewhere in there
01:26:19
First corinthians 13 the perfect when the perfect comes the imperfect shall pass away basically
01:26:25
Yeah here. Let me show you something um I'm going to go to first corinthians 1 7 i'm going to read it to you.
01:26:32
I have it memorized but I want to Read it to you. I want you to understand what it's saying So that you are not lacking in any gift
01:26:42
As you await for the revealing For the return for the revelation of our lord jesus
01:26:49
You're not lacking in any gift charisma The corinthian church is written to the corinthians, but to all of us also because it's universal
01:26:58
That you're not to lack any gift while you're waiting for jesus to come back any charismatic gift. All right
01:27:05
Now you see that yeah okay, so Right with the very beginning what paul the apostle does is he equates the continuation of the of the gifts
01:27:17
To the issue of the return of christ, doesn't he? So that you're not lacking in any gift awaiting eagerly the revelation of our lord jesus christ
01:27:27
You're not lacking in any gift the word gift. There's charisma where revelation is apocalypsis
01:27:33
So we're not to lack any gift any charisma awaiting eagerly the revelation of our lord.
01:27:38
Jesus christ All right Are you with me so far? Yes, I am okay, so what paul the apostle is doing is equating and There's not equating but relating the two of them uh together
01:27:55
Okay, there's uh Let me get this. Okay. There's uh, just you know, not like lacking any charisma while you're waiting for the revelation of christ his return
01:28:06
That's what it's talking about. All right Okay Just so you know the wages of sin is the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of god is eternal life
01:28:16
The word gift there is charisma The wages of sin is death, but the free charisma of god is eternal life
01:28:23
If all the charismatic gifts have ceased then there's a problem. This is why the guys who formate Formate wow formulate the argument will say
01:28:32
The apostolic sign gifts what they'll do is they'll say this is what they are by definition
01:28:38
That's a problem That's not what it's there for Okay now when you go to first corinthians 13 8 through 10
01:28:48
It says and i'll read it to you and i'll show you something Let the scriptures speak I would debate macarthur on this if you would have me debate um first corinthians 13 eight
01:28:59
Uh, let's get nine for we know in part we prophesy in part But when the perfect comes a partial will be done away
01:29:04
So they're perfect that they they're going to say is the the completion of the bible, right? Yeah, specifically what they would say yes.
01:29:11
Yeah, so when the bible is completed, okay, that's what he's talking about Okay When as a child
01:29:16
I spoke as a child, etc We can skip verse 11 because this talks about putting away childish things verse 12 for now
01:29:22
We see in a mirror dimly, but then Face to face. So when the perfect comes then we see face to face when the bible's completed then we see face to face
01:29:33
That makes sense Now when you say face to face are you talking about like the return of christ thing that you mentioned earlier or something differently?
01:29:41
There you go, you're asking the right questions i'm just saying right now when the when the bible is completed Is that when we see face to face?
01:29:48
i'm, just asking the question What about this now? I know in part but then when the bible is completed
01:29:53
I will know just as I have been fully known well Just so it happens when you do a search for the word face to face um
01:30:05
It uh, let's see it almost always means a personal encounter It's when god references it to himself in x genesis 32 30 x 33 11 number 12 8 deuteronomy 5 4 jeremiah 32 4
01:30:22
It speaks of personal encounter in new testament second corinthians 10 1 2nd. John 12 3 3rd.
01:30:28
John 14 so The perfect if it's the bible are we seeing face to face?
01:30:35
Or is the perfect the return of christ as first corinthians 1 7 seems to allude When jesus returns
01:30:42
Then we will see face to face That makes sense All right Also the second part now,
01:30:50
I know in part but then I will know fully just as I have been fully known I'm, not sure if you're aware of this
01:30:57
But jesus does not know everyone. Did you know that? I mean, yeah, I mean I hold to the five points of doctrines of grace and stuff.
01:31:04
So yeah, I agree with you Okay, so he just when he says I don't know you means you're not saved So if he says
01:31:09
I know you it means you are saved we see that pattern in scripture and I can go through it more But okay, so that's where we will be fully known
01:31:18
When we find the phrase of being known by god, we only find it in reference to the believers
01:31:24
In a salvation sense. This is how the bible uses it So when jesus returns the fullness of our knowing and having been fully known by christ will be manifested
01:31:35
Not when the bible is completed So the cessationist position
01:31:42
Doesn't work exegetically in my opinion. All right Plus not that this makes doctrine but you can find charismatic experiences all over the world
01:31:51
In third world countries things happen people say well, they're not documented. Well, yes they are and I can tell you for example
01:31:59
That once and I did this myself Very clearly I took a girl home from a bible study.
01:32:06
She wanted a book So I stopped it off at my place and gave her the book we got talking Her name was tony.
01:32:12
She was short blonde hair And she said that she was going to go to australia in two weeks to go on a mission out of nowhere
01:32:20
I just said you're not going to go you're going to stay in five months. You're going to meet a guy He's going to become your spiritual mentor in 18 months
01:32:28
You and he are going to have a special bond and you can do mission work together And then this presence was so to speak gone.
01:32:34
I couldn't believe what I just said Two weeks later she got on the plane and went to a jet when it went to australia
01:32:42
She got off the plane and or the jet and realized she was supposed to be there. She said it just was
01:32:48
Solid she just was supposed to be there. She got right back in the plane. It came right back home Five months later she met a guy and he became her spiritual teacher
01:32:58
At 18 months they got married and they went and did missionary work together in england Now the reason i'm saying it is this isn't hearsay.
01:33:06
I did this and hopefully you can trust me that i'm intelligent spiritual Not lying to you, etc
01:33:13
And I would ask a person i've done this before if this if charismatic gifts are done How is it possible for me to do it?
01:33:19
This is not me saying I read it in a book third hand. I did it And i'll say so how do you explain that and what they usually do is say?
01:33:27
Well, I can't exegete your experience. I can't refer to it In other words, it doesn't fit in their worldview. So they just dismiss it with a sentence
01:33:34
I guess probably my question for you then is like, how did you know? They got that information directly from god versus like your own deducing, um capabilities
01:33:43
Uh, well if if that's the case then I I should be in a las vegas show where I could deduce things
01:33:50
But I can tell you that what happened was I remember a presence other than me
01:33:57
And I just knew and I spoke well real quick He just said how you know, you didn't deduce it when you deduce you have
01:34:07
Premise one premise two and based on those you deduce but based on your experience There is no information that could have been given to you that you can deduce that specific information.
01:34:16
That's right It's not the same as deduction. You're you're literally getting information that you could not have known
01:34:22
Nor could have deduced based on just driving someone home, you know five months and then 18 months
01:34:30
It's just not possible, right? So and this happened and I've had other things like this happen.
01:34:38
I can talk about this and say here's my personal experience Not that not that it makes uh doctrinal truth, but when you look at what the word of god says
01:34:48
Uh, it never says that the charismatic gifts are going to cease when the bible's completed You have to assume that the word perfect means the completion of the bible
01:34:56
But if that's the case, then how are we fully known? When the bible's completed How is that the case?
01:35:02
Uh, how is it that it says when the bible's completed that's when we see face to face How does that work?
01:35:08
It doesn't make sense to say it that way and first corinthians 1 7 We are not to lack any charisma while we're waiting for the return of christ
01:35:17
So Uh, I just And plus you're reformed, right?
01:35:24
Yes, I am. Okay here watch this. Okay You knew john knox was right?
01:35:30
Yeah, scott's presbyterian, um did a lot of open air preaching back in the day. Yeah, he's a hardcore calvinist, right?
01:35:37
Yes Uh John knox was an eminent wrestler and got of with god in prayer.
01:35:43
All right I'm going to read you something. I'm going to take a bit here. He was like likewise warm and empathetic in his preaching, etc, etc
01:35:51
Uh as an instance of this when he was oh, let me back up He was likewise warm and empathetic in his preaching in which such prophetical expressions
01:36:01
As dropped from him had the most remarkable accomplishment As an instance of this when he was confined at the castle of saint andrews
01:36:09
He foretold both the manner of their surrender and their deliverance from the french galleys
01:36:16
At another time he thus addressed himself to her queen mary husband lord Henry lord darnley while in the king's seat at the high church in edinburgh
01:36:26
Have you for the pleasure of that dainty dame cast a psalm book into the fire the lord shall strike both head and tail
01:36:35
End quotes what john knox said Both king and queen died violent deaths He likewise said when the castle of edinburgh held out for the queen against the regent that quote the castle should spew out the captain
01:36:48
With the shame to see him That he would not come out over the gate But over the wall at the tower called davis tower should run like a sand glass
01:36:57
Which was a few fulfilled a few years later Uh crookedly being obliged to come over the wall on a ladder with a staff in his hand
01:37:05
And said for work of castle running down the sandbrake uh The truth, okay, he said, uh, but he's seen pulled let's see get to the sentence
01:37:16
Go he said on the day of this david lindsay. He he spoke. Uh, well brother I thank god. I desire all this day to have had to you etc
01:37:24
Go, I pray and tell them for me in the name of god that unless he leave that evil course
01:37:30
Wherein he has entered neither shall the rock meaning castle edinburgh Uh, nor the carnal wisdom of man whom he counteth half a god
01:37:38
Uh, but he shall be pulled out that next And brought down over the wall with shame and his carcass shall be hung before the sun so god has assured me
01:37:51
This is john knox saying that god is speaking a prophecy to him that god had assured this of john knox
01:37:58
The truth of this seemed to appear in a short time thereafter for it was thought that Leffington poisoned himself to escape public punishment.
01:38:06
He lay unburied in the steeple of lathe Until his body was quite corrupted But sir, william kirkedly of grange was on the 3rd of august next executed by the cross of edinburgh
01:38:16
Accordingly when he was cast over the ladder with his face toward the east when he present Uh thought was dead lifted his hands, etc.
01:38:23
Just like he said Um, that's george that's john knox
01:38:30
John fleming in 1630 to 1694 uh He left behind a writing and in it the string he talked about the strange and extraordinary impression
01:38:41
I had of an audible voice in the church at night when being a child I got up to the pulpit calling me to make haste the extraordinary dream and marvelous vision
01:38:50
I had twice repeated with the inexpressible joy after the same The dream at bouce where and I got such expression warning as to my wife's removal.
01:38:59
Let's talk about her death Which the lord marvelous with the lord's marvelous appearance and presence the thursday after at st
01:39:06
Johnston the great and signal confirmations gave me at my wife's death the great extraordinary voice, etc.
01:39:13
I can go on and on These are called the presbyterian divines I got this information out of the book called the scots worthies by john howey of lock going edinburgh, london printed in 1870
01:39:30
Okay And it talks about these things. So here's a question with those people
01:39:36
With those people john knox. Someone's Someone might turn their mic off or whatever
01:39:47
Okay, so I'm going to tell you a little bit of a story. Thanks when
01:39:52
I was at seminary and um I Lost my pastorate over this issue and I went back to sem west metro theological seminary
01:40:03
And they had a meeting on the charismatic gifts They almost asked me to come and speak and defend the charismatic side, but they didn't
01:40:10
Wish they had I would have been engaged in a debate with them a polite debate with professors and they had some excellent guys there and they presented information of um,
01:40:22
Of the cessation of the gifts I had this documentation That I just read to you and another one which
01:40:28
I haven't read to you yet But I had the documentation in my hand in a notebook And I raised my hand and I asked these guys
01:40:37
I said I have in my hand right here a Excerpt from a book
01:40:43
I got behind that wall behind that wall. I pointed was the library I got the book the scotts worthy's from that library right back on the other side of that wall
01:40:53
And in that book it talks about george wishart. John. Fleming. Um, george, uh, john.
01:40:58
John. What was it? Oh, who was the other guy the three guys? Anyway, I said
01:41:04
I have these books. Okay, and I said it talks about them Experiencing the charismatic gifts prophesying words of knowledge the whole bit.
01:41:12
These are calvinists Who did this? I said, how do you explain this? You know what?
01:41:18
They said I guess They said well, we haven't really looked at it too much. We're not sure what to do with it.
01:41:24
And that was it They knew about it And it didn't fit their paradigm
01:41:30
So they basically ignored it And the next version of the book scotts worthy's had those things omitted out of them
01:41:38
Now, why is that reform people would do that? I guess it kind of depends, you know, sometimes people are convinced in their own positions
01:41:46
So they may not think the other side has anything worthy to offer. I know. Um, I know I know for me.
01:41:52
It's been a little while since i've done research in this top and in this particular topic, but um Yeah, I guess that might be why
01:41:59
Well, you check it out, you know and see but what does the bible say that we're not to lack any charisma while we're waiting for the return of christ
01:42:06
And here's another thing you can do Check this out. I did this. Um What you could do is actually go to For example, you could print it up.
01:42:16
You can um, just copy the text of the bible first corinthians 12 13 and 14 Just put them into a word document, whatever just as an experiment
01:42:25
And to keep this mindset you cross out The verses that no longer apply for us today
01:42:32
Because if the charismatic gifts have ceased So you don't seek to prophesy.
01:42:38
Nope can't do that now A word of knowledge is for the church. Nope cross that out
01:42:44
And you'll find that if you do that, there's an awful lot of stuff to cross out Then I got a question
01:42:51
What is the only protestant new testament, excuse me protestant contemporary teaching that invalidates large portions of scripture?
01:43:01
Cessationism Okay, all right before I forget when you talk about words of knowledge.
01:43:09
Is there a particular like a particular? verse within like first corinthians that Comes to the term word of knowledge just so I know where you're coming from Yeah, first corinthians 14 word of knowledge word of wisdom
01:43:19
There's first corinthians 12 romans 12 and what you can do is you can go through those chapters and you can look and see what?
01:43:25
the scriptures teach But no one knows exactly what those are But let me give an example of something.
01:43:31
I was at a swap meet ministry Which I did for two and a half years back in the early 80s And I my roommate dave and I would go out there at o dark 30 and set up a booth and pass out literature
01:43:43
Oh, you went out into the marketplace. So that's what we were doing Dave still in front of mine.
01:43:48
I can call him up I can call him up on the phone put him on speakerphone and he can tell you the story
01:43:54
And I was talking to a guy and I remember it very clearly this guy was telling me how Um, he would no longer believe in god and I was just talking to him and all of a sudden this presence
01:44:08
And I looked at this guy and I started telling him things That only he knew in his relationship with god and the things that god was pointing to him pointing out to him in his own heart
01:44:19
That he was denying before god And I remember just the knowledge of knowing this
01:44:26
I don't know how to describe it. It was a presence I was there saying it and I knew it for a fact
01:44:32
And then all of a sudden this presence just stopped. I was stunned and this guy literally stumbled backwards
01:44:41
His mouth was just he's like He was stunned And he didn't say a thing
01:44:48
And he i'm not kidding when I say he stumbled. He actually stumbled backwards. He was stunned and he just walked off And I just turned to my roommate
01:44:59
And I said david Did you feel that? And he said yes,
01:45:06
I did. What was that? I said, I don't know I was talking to dave.
01:45:11
He's still a friend of mine talking to dave about this last year and he told me one other thing He said matt he goes because I remember he was sitting down.
01:45:18
He said matt. Don't you remember what happened? I said what? He said while you were speaking there was something around you
01:45:26
As though light was moving around you or like a heat wave as light was kind of being altered
01:45:32
I said really I said, I don't remember that he goes. Yes. I saw it What do you do with that?
01:45:40
I guess when you talk about the presence, I know you mentioned that in two of the stories you've mentioned How do you know for sure that the presence was from the lord or how do you know that the present existed to begin with?
01:45:52
Well, I know the presence was there because I was there and experienced it. All right Well, how do you want me to prove it?
01:45:58
Want me to write it on a piece of paper and sign it to you and mail it to you see? No, that's what it is. Um, if it wasn't from the lord, then what was it?
01:46:09
I guess for me, I guess, um, even not even though I do trust you and I don't and obviously would not Accuse you or anything or whatnot.
01:46:15
It just seems like whenever I hear like, um Other charismatics talk about them feeling the presence of lord or whatnot
01:46:21
I tend to be really skeptical of that because I know we all have emotions. We all have feelings and stuff like that I guess for me my first go -to, um would be like Was there some sort of whether just some sort of feeling you had up or was there something that?
01:46:34
the lord the lord Put in you like that you all were able to deduce together. That'd be my first go -to
01:46:40
Let me just tell you I can't give you my experience, but i'll tell you this if it happened to you
01:46:45
You'd never doubt it That's all I can tell you. All right Um, it's like being in love, you know what it is when it happens.
01:46:53
How do you know you just do well prove it to me It doesn't work like that So the issue though i'm just giving you experiences
01:47:01
Look, i've got a master of divinity. I'm an ordained minister been defending the faith for 39 years I'm, just telling you that there's somebody here who's reputable
01:47:09
Who's had this experience? It's not third hand second hand. I did this I'm, not using those as proofs of anything.
01:47:15
I'm just saying here we go. What do we do with these things? We have to compare them to scripture Well, the issue is of course does the scripture affirm or deny that the gifts continue?
01:47:25
Well, uh They don't They don't say they stop Except when jesus returns that seems to be the implication of the first Corinthians 1 7 and 1st
01:47:35
Corinthians 13 And if the gifts have ceased then go through your bible and mark out the verses that no longer apply
01:47:41
Oh And seriously And you know don't and also they'll say well if it's inspired of god, then it threatens the canon.
01:47:50
No, it doesn't Because in first corinthians 14, they were talking very clearly about things that were coming from the lord and they weren't canonized
01:47:58
So, you know the arguments that they have it's ridiculous. And another thing is This is just my observation that the people who hold a cessationism
01:48:07
I don't see them out there risking anything I don't see them out there risking in evangelistic contexts
01:48:15
Going out there day after day and something happens not that that's that's a guarantee of anything But i'll tell you there are lots of stories of people when you're doing nothing
01:48:25
But trusting god and things happen not that it's going to happen all the time But calvinists we calvinists we often tend to sit in our chairs
01:48:34
And then we pontificate about doctrine And we're comfortable and we live in america and everything's nice We turn the lights on and we don't have to pray for miracles.
01:48:45
We've got everything we need So let's exegete Very confidently why the gifts have ceased why because when the perfect comes that's the bible
01:48:52
And then we don't need anymore because those are revelatory gifts. Those are sign gifts. That's what they'll say
01:48:59
And then you can if you want you go to my debates. I did a public debates. Um I know you did one with Waldron wasn't that like a year or two ago?
01:49:09
I'm, sorry Oh, I know you did one with sam waldron like was it a year or two ago in houston? Okay Yeah, yeah,
01:49:14
I heard I heard about that one. You can check it out, you know And and i'm not saying I got it all down and I destroyed him.
01:49:20
I'm not gonna you know No, no, no, you know, we had lunch together or dinner together. He's a nice guy But i'm just telling you look at what the scripture says.
01:49:27
What does first corinthians 1 7 say? That you're not to lack any charisma
01:49:33
While you're waiting for the apocalypsis of jesus What do they do with that Well, I guess how do we like when it talks about any gift?
01:49:42
How do we know that words of knowledge are part as part of the any? I'm, sorry, what? Okay. Um I guess
01:49:50
I said it's a muffled connection. I didn't send the words. Okay. Sorry. Um Is this better?
01:49:56
Yeah, I think so Okay So we were talking about the first corinthians 1 7 with the charisma when it talks about the
01:50:05
How do we know that the words of knowledge fall under the charisma category? Because it says not like any charisma
01:50:18
Okay, okay So, let me ask you If you're looking at first corinthians 1 7, okay.
01:50:25
I'll look at the greek. Okay, and what it says is
01:50:34
Let me start at verse 4 I thank my god always concerning you for the grace of god, which he's given you in christ Jesus now some people say this is only to the corinthian church
01:50:41
But let me back up i'm going to i'm going to answer some stuff here Some people say no, this is only to the corinthian church and only apply to the corinthian church for that time
01:50:50
Okay Now start at verse 1 paul called as an apostle of jesus christ by the will of god and sauce that needs our brother
01:50:56
To the church of god, which is at corinth To those who have been sanctified in christ jesus saints by calling with all who in Every place call upon the name of our lord.
01:51:08
Jesus christ our lord and ours So that makes it universal. Would you agree? Yes good verse 3 grace to you and peace from god our father in the lord
01:51:20
Jesus christ I thank my god always concerning you for the grace of god Which was given to you in christ jesus that in everything you are enriched in him in all speech and all knowledge now
01:51:28
He's speaking to the corinthians specifically. No problem Even as a testimony concerning christ was confirmed in you so that you're not lacking in any gift awaiting eagerly the revelation of our lord jesus now
01:51:39
There's ways you could interpret this you could say you're not lacking any charismatic gift while you're waiting for jesus to return but it doesn't mean that once they
01:51:45
The apostles die that the gifts cease when they come when the can is completed because they're waiting there during that whole time
01:51:51
That's what's going that's what they'll say That's the best argument they've got out of that to say no
01:51:57
It's only for the corinthian church that he was talking about And so therefore when the apostles died the canon was completed see during that process they're waiting for jesus to return
01:52:07
So they're not lacking any charismatic gift during that period of time until the apostles died the can is completed.
01:52:14
You see what i'm saying Yeah, I do That's not what it says though So that you're not lacking any gift while you're waiting for the return of jesus and or the apostles die and the can is completed
01:52:28
Who will then also confirm to the to the end? That's not what it says What they'll do is they'll say this is what it means and they'll read all the stuff into there
01:52:36
Why do the calvinists do that? They should know better than that. What does it say? You're not lacking any charisma awaiting eagerly for the revelation of our lord.
01:52:45
Jesus. Is it only for the corinthians or is it for everybody? If they want to say it's only for the corinthians then let's continue
01:52:53
Verse eight who will also confirm you to the end blameless in the day of our lord. Jesus christ. That could be the corinthians only
01:53:00
God is faithful through whom you are called into fellowship with his son christ. Jesus our lord. Is that only for the corinthians?
01:53:06
Of course not It's called that's that's for everybody. This is a universal letter So now are we to say well, uh verse one and two is is
01:53:17
Universal verses three four five six seven eight are only for the corinthians verse nine is now universal
01:53:25
Then we have what's called the j -e -d -p theory yahwist elohist, uh petraeus and deuteronomist, uh, the graph wellhausen
01:53:34
Theory of the pentateuch that there's four different authors. You see they wrote for this That's how you tell because it meant this in this sentence is this in this sentence is this in this sentences
01:53:42
The same kind of thing because what they're doing now is saying well look it just means this uh one issue for them at that point, but the other verses are you know,
01:53:51
Anyway, so what paul's doing is relating the charisma to the return of christ I've got a strong argument that this means it's universal
01:54:00
And therefore not to lack any charisma and if the charismatic gifts have ceased then eternal life is ceased
01:54:07
Now here's something else to show you and this is not What you call the best argument, but I want to show it to you
01:54:15
Are you familiar with abraham and isaac, right? Yes, and how abraham and isaac abraham offered up isaac
01:54:24
Right. Yes Be familiar that that's a typology of the father and the son and the holy spirit
01:54:33
I'm not kind of know that it's a picture of like substitutionary atonement when they the ram comes
01:54:39
Um, let me explain some stuff here for you. I want to show you something This is a roundabout way to do it, but and it's a lesser support but God said to abraham take your only begotten son isaac
01:54:53
Okay Offer him on a hill Jesus crucified on the hill and most scholars think it's the very same hill uh
01:55:02
Isaac took a donkey to the place of sacrifice. So did jesus Two men went with them with isaac the father
01:55:11
Abraham and eliezer the servant the helper the servant
01:55:18
Okay, you get the typology Yes, I do. Okay Three day journey to get to the hill.
01:55:25
Jesus was in the grave three days Isaac carried wood on his back up the hill
01:55:31
Jesus carried wood on his back up the hill And when isaac said to the father to abraham, where is the sacrifice abraham said god will provide for himself the lamb
01:55:42
Jesus is the lamb Abraham, excuse me. Isaac was offered on wood. Jesus was offered on wood so They caught a ram in a thicket of thorns.
01:55:53
Jesus bore kind of thorns on his brow He said to isaac your seed will be multiplied we are the multiplied seed of of jesus
01:56:02
It says in in genesis 22 19. It says abraham went down the son didn't
01:56:09
He didn't say that isaac did not come down. It just says and abraham went down. It doesn't mention isaac coming down from the hill
01:56:17
Jesus did not come down from the cross isaac represented The the jesus it's a typology
01:56:23
Yeah, no, you just didn't come down. You see the typology is good Now they go down to the bottom of the hill and the servant gets a bride for the son genesis 24 1 through um 4 the bride was a beautiful virgin genesis 24 16.
01:56:40
We're the virgin of god and getting all this way to this the servant Offered 10 gifts to the bride
01:56:51
The servant offered 10 camels 10 gifts of the bride now
01:56:57
If you go through romans 12 1 corinthians 12, etc And you look up the listing of cares of the gifts
01:57:04
You'll find two categories two types charismatic gifts And non -charismatic gifts non -charismatic gifts or helps administrations things like that Okay charismatic gifts word of knowledge word of wisdom interpretation of tongues prophecy, etc
01:57:22
Guess how many charismatic gifts are listed in first corinthians 12 4 through 31? Where where the charismatic gifts are listed guess how many are listed if I guess 10
01:57:32
That's a good guess And that's what I guessed But it's not correct. There's only nine
01:57:38
And that really puzzled me I couldn't figure out wait a minute
01:57:45
Why would if the typology is so good why there are only nine lifts it It took me a while to figure it out and I finally did romans 6 23
01:57:56
The free gift of god is eternal life That's the greatest gift to the bride
01:58:03
That's 10 charismatic gifts Now people say to me the charismatic gifts have ceased
01:58:12
I chuckle one because That's not what the bible teaches They have to read the end of the text.
01:58:19
Well, the perfect is the completion of the canon Oh, and when the canon's closed, that's when we know perfectly
01:58:25
That's where we're known as we're fully known you never find that scripture or that phraseology used in reference to a book but you do find it in reference to salvation knowledge
01:58:36
And face -to -face is not used of of anything other than relationship Is that how we have it when we see see the bible the bible's completed now?
01:58:43
We have a relationship with god no a relationship through christ and the return of christ when the perfect comes when the completion of all things occurs
01:58:51
That's jesus return just like it says in first corinthians 1 7 It makes solid sense
01:58:57
That my position is the right one and if it's not then john knox george wishart John, fleming would not be welcome in most secure most reformed churches today, would they?
01:59:10
I guess so. I mean I would I guess going off what your logic is. Yeah Okay All right.
01:59:20
Um, yeah, thank you. Thanks for letting me know about your position your position and I guess i'll definitely be looking in those first corinthians
01:59:27
Verses and go from there. I really appreciate that. Sure. No problem Yeah All right.
01:59:33
Yes. Have a good night Okay Hey, here's one. I'm gonna read one more thing. This is from uh, george wishart uh from 1513 to 1546
01:59:43
Uh, and it's in that book scott's worthies, um when he had finally captured was captured at Mermiston, he was taken to saint andrews and burned at the stake blah blah blah blah
01:59:54
Just he died for the faith The and this was written the plague being now considerably abated.
02:00:01
He determined to pay a visit to the town of montrose He received a letter directing him
02:00:08
From his intimate friend the liard of kenai are Acquainting him that he had taken a sudden sickness and requested him to come to him with all diligence
02:00:17
Upon this he immediately set out for his journey Attended by some honest friends in montrose who out of affection would accompany him part of the way
02:00:27
They had not traveled above a quarter of a mile when all of a sudden he stopped saying to the company
02:00:34
I am forbidden by god to go this journey Will some of you be pleased to ride to yonder place and see what you find for I apprehend.
02:00:44
There's a plot against my life Whereupon he returned to the town and they also went forward to the place found about 60 horsemen ready to intercept him
02:00:53
Etc. Etc How do you guys this charismatic gifts don't work do they
02:00:59
Yet in our own reformed history we find the contrary anyway
02:01:07
Yeah, I never read that before that was really good Huh, it does and I understand, you know the hardcore
02:01:14
Cessationist reformed person will say well, that's not the bible and that's not our standard and I don't think that's what you're saying But we're not just you're not discarding evidence that supports your particular understanding of those texts,
02:01:27
I mean You know if the charismatic gifts were for today
02:01:33
How would you know it if you don't allow you know the evidence
02:01:39
For that to support what the text is teaching You know, I was talking to some reformed guys
02:01:46
And I think I forgot what denomination been so long And I said do you guys realize that you wouldn't even allow john knox to preach in your pulpit they go that's right
02:01:57
From what they were reading about the charismatic stuff Yeah I said oh, so you're better than john knox
02:02:03
There's actually stories of these guys these predatory and divines They would pray one guy who prayed for eight hours a day
02:02:12
And one guy there's reports of um Of him saying i'm going to go down and spend time with the lord in the garden
02:02:20
And they would go down in the garden and witnesses would say there was a figure walking with him in the garden Now what we could do with that?
02:02:27
Okay, but Yeah Yeah, it's a touchy subject for me.
02:02:33
It's a little bit. It cost me a great deal I haven't told a story too often about what happened and how much it cost me, but it did
02:02:40
And it's one of those very very dramatic times of my life extremely so and years of consequence
02:02:49
In effect because of my decision To be truthful to what I believe the word of god said just the same as the cessationists do the same thing
02:02:57
But it cost me it didn't cost them It cost me And uh, so it's still
02:03:05
I you know, I guess I should admit a little bit of a sore spot still with me but I don't hold any grudges against anybody, but I just Do not believe the cessationist position is can be biblically defended
02:03:18
Interesting stuff I'll carry binge do I oh we gotta get going here We do have morgan though morgan has been waiting for a bit with a question.
02:03:28
Okay, go ahead morgan Yeah, i'm so sorry. I don't want to take up too much of your time. Are you able to hear me?
02:03:33
Yes Yeah, thank you guys so much. Um for what you're doing. This is truly in divine order
02:03:39
Um, I didn't know about this until like one minute before I logged on so i'm just gonna ask these questions.
02:03:46
Um, Really quickly and then i'll probably be back every thursday for as long as I possibly can so just thank you guys so much
02:03:53
Um, yeah, and normally eli's not the other guy. Normally we have a really ugly guy I'm here.
02:04:01
I'm here. I'm the ugly guy Hey, he'll be back on next week, but anyway, it doesn't matter if you're ugly as long as you can help me defend the faith
02:04:09
So it doesn't there we go. Amen But um just more recently um, i've just found myself surrounded by a lot of non -believers who are willing to engage in conversations with me and so i've been looking more into you know studying
02:04:26
Apologetics and defending the faith and I have my toes in it in some regard but Good questions are getting deeper and deeper.
02:04:33
And so, um, yeah, this is that's what I said right on time so just one of the questions that I was recently asked was about the lost books of the bible and of course, you know, it always just kind of comes back to how can we trust the word of god and um the person and i'm gonna
02:04:50
Misquote it was just basically saying if there were if there were books that were left out of it.
02:04:56
How can we You know say for sure that this is what that the books that we have is what god intended to be in the bible since man got together and decided what went into it, so I'm, just looking for a way to kind of come against that even just start my own study around that sure
02:05:15
There are no lost books of the bible Okay So for people to say the lot what about the lost books of the bible presupposes that god wasn't capable
02:05:26
Of ensuring that what he wanted to be scripture and included in the bible was there And mere people were able to thwart his divine intention
02:05:34
That's a presupposition that they're having And if they're going to say there's a lot of lost books in the bible say show them to me
02:05:39
Now if you go to my karm website and you look up lost books of the bible got articles dealing with this kind of stuff
02:05:46
I just read it Yeah, we're good Now so let me so there's ways of looking at things but when they say that I say no, there's no lost books
02:05:55
But are you saying god made a mistake? You're saying god's going? No, it's supposed to be in there. Oh, don't oh, man
02:06:02
Dang it. Oh boy Dang, is that what you're saying about god? That's what I tell him. Is that what you're doing?
02:06:08
The infinite god of the universe can have his inspired word collected and people are going to get is that what you're saying?
02:06:13
You don't have you don't apparently don't understand what the christian god is Let's talk about who the christian god is the one who ordains the location of every atom in every universe in all the universe
02:06:23
Simultaneously in all time in all places. This is the god you're talking about and he couldn't keep his word together
02:06:30
No, it doesn't work like that Now here's something else for you um
02:06:35
This is fun. Okay now when jesus Uh at the in john 21 and he um
02:06:44
Told the disciples to cast his net on the other side of the boat
02:06:49
He did that because at the end of the um The ministry right and they caught 153 fish
02:06:57
Right, why 153? Please tell me
02:07:04
That's a good response Well the word fish
02:07:11
Is the word ikthus right now didn't jesus say i'll make you fishers of men Yes. Yes, he did.
02:07:17
Okay It just so happens in the four gospels. I'll talk about the four gospels here a little bit the four gospels
02:07:25
You take away the five thousand that were fed the four thousand that were fed in the four separate gospels
02:07:31
Guess how many people received a blessing from jesus in the four gospels? How many individuals?
02:07:38
153 yes Wow She knew the number
02:07:47
So 153 individuals now, wait a minute How did that happen with those four gospels?
02:07:53
Okay, how'd that happen the four gospels? Now i'm going to show you something about the share the screen to do this
02:08:01
Okay Gotta get to it Okay, here we go
02:08:09
Now what I do is I don't want to see my ugly face. Well, you already see my ugly face
02:08:15
All right Come on slimeball you can do it computer. Oh, man.
02:08:22
Come on. So now what I uh, yeah Okay, I want to share my screen i'm going to do this hold on I just lost my my window there we go.
02:08:34
All right Now share the screen I'm going to share that And Come on Can you guys see it?
02:08:46
Yes. All right now This is what's really interesting The arrangement of the men around the tabernacle of the wilderness.
02:08:54
Okay Get this got it. Okay so To the west 108 100 men 151 000 to the south 157 000 to the north and 186 000
02:09:09
There's more written on the tabernacle than any other Topic in the entire bible it goes on for chapter after chapter after chapter now also just so you know
02:09:18
It says in john 1 14 and the word became flesh and tabernacled among us
02:09:25
Okay now If we do a proportional arrangement That's what we get
02:09:34
You see the cross Yes That's really interesting A proportional arrangement of the men numbered gives you a cross with a tabernacle in the middle
02:09:47
The tabernacle represents christ on that cross Four groups of people there were there were uh
02:09:58
The eastern tabernacle there were there was judah issachar and zebulun that's there are 12 tribes of israel arranged around the uh arranged around the tabernacle four groups
02:10:12
There were three groups to the west three groups to the south three groups to the north three groups to the east
02:10:18
That's 12 tribes. All right And they had four banners lion a man an ox and an eagle
02:10:26
It's their flags that represented them Okay lion man ox eagle.
02:10:32
I learned them just by saying a lion ox eagle and a man That's how I learned to say that at order
02:10:38
Ezekiel 1 10 that's where the form of their face is in ezekiel the vision of the four -faced creature a man a lion an ox and an eagle
02:10:49
Interesting in revelation 4 7 the first creature was like a lion. The second creature was like a calf or like an ox like a man and an eagle
02:10:59
Okay So guess what the four gospels were known as in code lion ox eagle and man
02:11:11
I think god knows how to keep his words secure Not only that but each gospel portrays jesus in a separate in a different way yes
02:11:21
Image that matt just showed uh where where it says jesus was
02:11:30
In matthew he presents himself as a king right And right go back to that one and john has the eagle he has a man.
02:11:39
Yeah. Yeah. Yeah as a man So Yeah, matthew Let me show you some more.
02:11:45
Uh, anyway Here's the list out of those out of the four gospels of the individuals that received a blessing totaling 153
02:11:55
Now yeah here let me back up okay check this out i'm gonna have fun okay might as well do this
02:12:03
Trust you Backing up i'm backing up ting ting ting
02:12:11
I I get into the prophecies won't do that. It'll take too long. Let me get into some other stuff. Um, Who's got the noise going got the noise?
02:12:20
You got making noises and stuff now while you're looking for that I just want to suggest to morgan an awesome book on the topic of the canon and how we know
02:12:28
No, we got the right books and things like that. You want to check out the book the canon?
02:12:34
Revisited by michael krueger. He is The man on this topic.
02:12:39
That's one of the best books on the topic of the canon and how it was developed The canon revisited by michael krueger.
02:12:46
I'm reading it, too It's a little heady. I'm extracting information out of it to break it down for people
02:12:53
On on rts and on youtube kind of summarizing each points, but definitely helpful book. Thank you so much so check this out look at this and And uh in genesis 1 1
02:13:05
Uh in the beginning god created the heavens on the earth, that's the hebrew notice this
02:13:12
There's seven words The number of the letters is 28, which is four times seven
02:13:17
The first three words are 14, which is two times seven The last four words are 14 the fourth and fifth words are seven the sixth and seventh word are seven letters
02:13:27
Uh the nouns god heaven and earth equals 14 letters total and the words remaining are 14 letters not a big deal
02:13:33
But it's kind of interesting. Yeah Okay Yeah, it's too much complicated watch this
02:13:43
So here's the genealogy of of matthew of jesus in matthew 1 through 17 In greek, okay there it is in english.
02:13:51
All right, not a big deal Well Each greek letter is also a number
02:14:00
Yeah, so when you it's called a gematria So for example the word for yesu christos the two words jesus christ has a gematria of eight eight eight
02:14:08
The gematria for the word fish ichthus is one thousand two hundred twenty four anyway
02:14:14
The number of words in that genealogy is 72. All of these are divisible by seven. Okay? Well except for the first one it's 72 which is eight times nine, which is really interesting
02:14:24
It's two times two times two times three times three. Not a big deal. But that's how many words are there the number of nouns divisible the total number of nouns divisible by seven 56
02:14:35
The greek word the occurs 56 times the different forms of the word the is seven I can explain what that is uh, like we have boy boys
02:14:45
And we have it's called declension girl girls Singular plural the nouns in greek change forms a lot of different ways and there's seven forms.
02:14:54
Okay The number of greek words before the deportation was 49 Of those 49 words the number of the words that begin with a vowel is 28
02:15:03
That begin with a consonant is 21 The number of letters in that 49 words is 266
02:15:09
Of those 266 letters number of vowels is 140. The number of consonants is 126
02:15:15
The number of words that occur more than once is 35 the number of words that occur once is 14 The number of nouns is 42 uh
02:15:24
Number of words which are not nouns is seven number of nouns that are proper names is 35 Number of male names 28 number of times these male names occur is 56
02:15:33
And then the gematria of the word babylon is seven That's extremely difficult to do
02:15:40
There we go, it's very difficult to do mathematically I tried to do something like this.
02:15:45
I got stuck after the third level Seriously, I did and i'm not dumb
02:15:51
And uh, that's debatable though. Hey, hey, I heard that Are you getting all this morgan?
02:15:58
Are you memorizing all of it? Yeah, i'm gonna release this on the website so you guys can go to it but here's some more
02:16:12
The account of jesus birth, right? This is in matthew 1 18 through 25 the number of words 161 number of letters 896.
02:16:22
So all these are divisible by seven Of the 161 words that occur 105 forms are there of those 105 forms the number of verbs uh is 35 the gematria value of the 161 words is divisible by seven the gematria value of all the letters divisible by seven
02:16:39
Uh, the six read words here are found nowhere else in matthew In other words in a genealogy six words appear only there and their value is divisible by seven
02:16:49
The total letters of the six words is divisible by seven as are the number of proper names number the letters of these seven names
02:16:57
Emmanuel occurs nowhere else in the new testament. The gematria is 644 Speaking of joseph the number of words the angel uses is 77
02:17:05
Uh, the gematria of those 77 words is divisible by seven now You know, there's more
02:17:10
I can go through more things like this. Okay I think uh, i'll do one more for fun
02:17:18
Just for fun from the issuing of the this is uh, daniel 9 24 to 27 70 weeks
02:17:25
From the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild jerusalem until messiah the prince. There'll be seven weeks and 62 weeks
02:17:32
Okay That's where the messiah will be cut off So the 69 weeks of they're of years.
02:17:38
That's what it means And um, the week of years is called the shabuim. That's how they talked seven weeks.
02:17:45
Well, they meant years It's like we say yeah beat him till he's black and blue. It's a phrase. It's a it's an idiom.
02:17:51
Okay Until the messiah is cut off They used a 360 day cycle
02:17:57
Not a 365 that's another topic which is really interesting. That's where we get 360
02:18:03
Degrees in a circle. Okay, but nevertheless Um, whoops When you take the number of years that those 69 weeks are
02:18:15
All you do is take the years times the days And you get 172 880 days
02:18:23
And it's you'll notice um It's from the decree
02:18:36
Uh the decree where's it? I haven't supposed to have it listed there at 25 from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild jerusalem until messiah the prince
02:18:45
There'll be seven weeks and 62 weeks Saying how many years? The decree they know for a fact march 14th
02:18:55
Dang it 445 bc March 14th. That's interesting. Yes, march 14th 445.
02:19:02
Why is that your birthday? No, because that's today Oh my goodness, I didn't even think about that Oh Man, that is cosmic.
02:19:12
Hi, David No, I didn't get that. That's right Okay. Wow. Okay That's funny
02:19:19
Divine order, that's right. God has his way of doing things So they know archaeologically exactly the date guess what happens when you add?
02:19:27
173 880 days to march 14th 445 bc You get the day that jesus came into jerusalem on the donkey
02:19:37
Wow god, who knows it's all just made up Or or morgan
02:19:47
There's a simple way Now this is actually a great detail. I mean it just shows the the depths of the issue but Um, just from a simple if you haven't if you didn't remember all of that When someone makes a statement like, you know, what about the lost books of the bible?
02:20:01
I mean just take a look at that statement the lost books of the bible the phrase itself presupposes that these
02:20:06
Part of the bible when that's the very thing that they're Patriot, so don't don't feel like you're pushed in the corner as though you need to demonstrate that they're in the bible
02:20:15
They're the ones making the claim and most people who use that are just parroting somebody else And so it'd be interesting to put them on the run and have them demonstrate that these quote lost books
02:20:26
Were supposed to be in the bible to begin with And you'll find historically there's no foundation for that whatsoever
02:20:31
And most people who ask won't even know where to begin once you turn the tables on them yeah, and that's good and that was gonna be one of the the last questions that I asked and um
02:20:42
I think you you do make a good point. I did I you know J. Warner wallace says the best type of We have an investigatable faith and what
02:20:51
I appreciate about that is that we don't have to tell people Well because I said so, you know, you can send people on a mission to search for themselves.
02:20:59
It's just Needing wanting to know how much you need to know to kind of engage people so that you're not just dismissing them because well
02:21:06
It's the bible you know, um But you know really kind of being able to give people um legitimate answers, but Um, I just discovered i'm gonna put gomantria you said gomantria gomantria last week, um, so I'd love to hear a resource where maybe
02:21:26
I could explore that a little bit more because I am very interested in that but Just look up gomantria on the web on google.
02:21:32
You'll find a lot of stuff Bible gomantria and you'll find also and uh, the guy who really uh, what's his name?
02:21:40
panin Panin is a in 1800s. He was a brilliant mathematician. He's the guy who
02:21:47
Out of these things and patterns and it goes exceedingly deep Uh the patterns some of them
02:21:53
I think much I don't get it I'm, not a good mathematician like he was But some of them are like, oh my goodness and out of the things out of matthew
02:22:00
I showed you He discovered those got you. I will definitely look into that the one
02:22:07
Yeah, please well morgan just also Just to be a little more practical too because that all again all that stuff is awesome
02:22:14
But it will very rarely you'll have the opportunity to kind of go through all of this with people
02:22:19
A really good book to get to help you practice navigating conversations, especially when you hear things like what about the lost books of the bible
02:22:26
You know these basic questions that skeptics will ask is the book tactics by greg coco It's a very easy to read book but teaches you how to Navigate through a conversation ask questions, you know shift the burden of proof not putting all the weight on yourself
02:22:42
You know for answering all the questions and things like that tactics. It is a Immensely helpful book that teaches you how to talk and argue in a skillful way um while not being disingenuous but teaching you how to think and really
02:22:55
Making the other person kind of think for themselves and not just uh, you're there answering all their questions
02:23:01
But definitely this whole stuff with the you know prophecy and all these things within scripture. They all do have their place
02:23:07
Um, but just within a practical setting It's not all the time. You'll have the opportunity to go through all of these things
02:23:13
That's good. And could you just uh, would you mind spelling his last name? Sure, coco is k -o -u
02:23:20
K -l you could buy that on kindle I think for like either 5 .99 or 9 .99 awesome book if you're doing like a
02:23:26
You know a book study with a group of people like a small group or something or just your own personal study great resource
02:23:32
Great, and so I and this will be my last question and I thank you guys so much again
02:23:37
I I pray god willing i'll be on next thursday as well um, and you're already kind of speaking to this and maybe this book tactics will also do that but I was gonna ask how do you defend the faith to people who don't honor the bible as a true source?
02:23:52
So, you know some people say you you reference in the bible, but I don't View that as a valid reference point is there a way to kind of engage people in those conversations when you
02:24:02
Can't automatically start with the bible as a point of reference if that if that makes sense
02:24:08
I think just because someone says you can't start with the bible doesn't mean that you
02:24:15
Can't start with the bible That's like that's like coming to a gunfight and they say wait a minute.
02:24:21
You can't use a gun who says uh The bible provides for you the foundation for your worldview
02:24:28
It's the lens through which you reason and understand the world So basically what they're saying is don't come at me with your ultimate commitment and so You could say the same thing then don't come at me with yours
02:24:39
We're going to be at an impasse here because it they're speaking as though they themselves do not have a bible
02:24:44
Namely their own ultimate authority the reality everyone has ultimate authorities.
02:24:50
You just should be honest about yours It's the word of god and you need to expose what their ultimate authority is and tear it to shreds because the bible says that we
02:24:57
Tear down arguments so we do not move the bible aside We stand firm on it.
02:25:03
Know it well and challenge the assumptions and and You know worldview perspective of that particular unbeliever make him defend his worldview and you can engage in apologetics without throwing away
02:25:14
Really the thing we're supposed to be standing on which is the truth of god's word your foundation also morgan I am and the other outside uh, google hangouts chat.
02:25:22
I gave you a link to another book called always ready by greg bonson Yes, it's right there.
02:25:29
And uh, it's really good because what they'll do What the atheist will always do is they'll try to pull you away from From from your side into some kind of neutrality or that they'll try to get you on their side
02:25:42
And then the thing that bonson always taught was Neutrality is a myth
02:25:48
Okay, and so you have to you know, you have to be Stubborn basically and tell them i'm not going to go into the neutral.
02:25:56
Okay. I'm not going to give up my my uh, my scriptures you know, I I The thing is is that you have to you have to uh prove to me uh
02:26:07
Or you have to show to me that your your logic is valid First before you even decide to even you know
02:26:16
Question my my faith um, so, you know, there's a lot of things to go to but anyways, uh, the link is on the outside chat of the um,
02:26:25
Of the of the google hangouts there Thank you so much. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you all so much.
02:26:30
I really appreciate it Good and one more last thing. We're just going to throw a little bit of of uh sprinkling on the topping here, um
02:26:38
God says in isaiah 55 11 that his word will not come back empty without accomplishing what he desires
02:26:44
So even though they'll say I don't want to hear the word of god's speak It's still don't be pushy about it, but still use the word of god.
02:26:50
Well, the bible says blah blah blah blah Let the word of god accomplish its power Never give it up And say
02:26:57
I won't use the bible to defend god He has spoken and that's what i'll do with the atheists.
02:27:02
I'll say look god has revealed himself in two ways Well three ways through nature Through the word of god the bible and through the person of jesus christ and um
02:27:13
I presuppose these work with those and I use I quote the scriptures anyway, because they have power
02:27:19
All right Thank you so much. I really appreciate it Okay I'm about ready to start the after show guys.
02:27:27
So i'm i'm gonna go in and get out and uh, give you the link matt I want i'll either email it to you or it'll be on my side chat, whatever
02:27:35
I'm gonna check on my wife though. I'm gonna see what's going on and make sure she's roger that But yeah, just let you guys know and morgan.
02:27:41
You can always join up here on my my chat also or my hangout. Um, but there's
02:27:47
Um the council is what we have out there after for like an hour And so you're more welcome to join in and along with um, um
02:27:56
Debra you like it's yeah, elias cat all the other people there. Um, i'm gonna go ahead and set up the uh, the uh,
02:28:02
The hangout there. So thanks Okay, i'll email it to you too so folks, um, we're gonna close it out and eli
02:28:12
Thanks for coming in and doing this again. Love to sit back. Listen to you talk man. You're doing great Well, thank you.
02:28:17
It's a pleasure I like it. You look better than me, too. I'm i'm old you're just you know, you're young and stuff like that, but Um, anyway good stuff man.
02:28:25
Good stuff. I think eli should be on more often and eli discord Go to discord .com
02:28:33
Sign up Trust me, you're gonna want to get into the in there because there's some really good conversations we can have
02:28:39
Okay. Okay. It's a good place All right Check it out. All right. Well, take care. I'm gonna sign off now