What "The Matrix" Is REALLY About | A Christian Analysis

Twas the month before christmas when all through the house not a creature was stirring except.

There's a brand new matrix movie coming out.

What?

We can't see it.

But we're all trapped inside these strange repeating loops

billions of people just living out their lives.

Oblivious.

But this is the moment For you to show us what is real.

Oh, man, we are about to take the blue pill and go down the rabbit hole.

Okay, but before the fourth matrix movie comes out you have to understand.

I mean really understand the first three films.

Well, that's what i'm here for.

So let's get right into it.

Perhaps you're thinking what else can be said about the matrix?

I mean 20 years later, there's been a whole lot of ruminating on the philosophical.

Religious slash fill in the blank themes found in the 1999 film that became a cultural phenomenon.

For example in faith film and philosophy david p hunt argues that the matrix and its sequels is a

retelling of gnostic mythology.

In flickering reality f david pete suggests that the film is really about the hindu understanding of maya.

Or the illusion of the phenomenal universe.

I once heard an itunes podcast speculating that the matrix is really a story about the illuminati.

For reasons that will come up later.

I believe the wachowskis which were the creators of the trilogy.

Chose to appropriate religious symbols and religious imagery to further their story.

But I do not believe that they were selectively utilizing one particular religious theme.

Therefore they would be just as happy with the gnostic interpretation of the film as well as with like the hindu

interpretation of the movie.

I would imagine just about anyone's religious interpretation of the trilogy is equally welcomed in the wachowskis minds.

However, I will argue that the wachowskis had a decidedly non -religious idea in mind for

the underlying allegory of the matrix.

We're going to explore that but first let's revisit the story.

Thomas anderson hacker named neo played by keanu reeves is the typical everyman struck by a sense that

something is wrong with his world.

His boss treats him like a number his clothes don't quite fit him properly and he can't quite shake the disoriented

feeling of being caught between wakefulness and sleep.

His search for answers leads him to morpheus played by lawrence fishburne and trinity played by carrie ann moss.

These are two leather -clad fugitives that have actually been searching for neo as well.

It turns out neo's world is a false construct created by sentient machines to keep human beings

asleep.

But the deception is much more sinister.

The machines are in full control pulling the strings of power while the people are exploited for their energy.

Agent smith played by hugo weaving is followed by his gang of smiths.

Which are guardian programs tasked with policing the matrix from troublemakers like morpheus and

trinity.

And neo the smiths can be anywhere and anyone at any time.

Their mission is to destroy the last bastion of humanity the city of zion.

If you watch the movie, you'll find the story and fight sequences are still just as captivating after all these years.

Although bullet time has pretty much been run into the ground at this point Reeves portrayal of neo still effectively comes

across as it should he is subdued unsure of himself yet.

Rebellious and curious enough to swallow just about any old pill placed in his hands.

Fishburne is inspired as morpheus neo's mentor and friend a kind of smoother wiser han

solo Moss is equal parts elegant vicious and vulnerable as trinity the motorcycle riding

acrobatic heroin and neo's love interest.

The reveal at the end.

That neo is the one pays huge dividends.

The shootout at the police station the the face -off at the subway the the final confrontation between neo and the

smiths.

It satisfies our desire as an audience to see where his training is leading.

And of course in the last minute of the movie neo's final threat and his ascension like his literal ascension into

the air Wets the audience's appetite for the coming war and the sequels.

Even though the matrix world is programmed for 1999 The look of the film still feels rather contemporary.

The set designs and the costumes they capture a timeless undercurrent relevant to the plot.

That is the real year is closer to 2199.

The dark streets and the shadowy rooms are of a richly noir -ish texture.

The colors of the matrix world the blacks the the browns the greens they're juxtaposed with the pale

flesh of its human inhabitants.

It's as if to reflect that their energy is being robbed by the machines in the real world.

The wachowskis have not wasted any shots here as a matter of fact.

They brilliantly give us clues before the big reveal that neo's world is a binary

simulation.

Two quick examples of this first Neo's apartment number is 101.

As in the binary code of computer programming.

Second all of neo's digital contraband is stored inside a hollowed out copy of simulacra

and simulation by jean Baudrillard, so it is obvious that a lot of attention and care was given to not only the

story but each specific shot in general.

Some believers like to tout the film in the trilogy as a christian tale or at least a story rife with biblical

themes.

Unfortunately, as I mentioned a moment ago, the main allegory has nothing to do with religion.

The religious aspects of the film are there specifically because the wachowskis have adopted

Particular language and imagery connoting those concepts like savior like trinity and

the one.

But and this is an important distinction for those of us in the audience who are christians.

To be aware of the matrix is not espousing the christian message.

It is using christian and other religious motifs to tell a different story.

This is not to suggest that we cannot use the movie to further our particular theological agenda in

conversations.

I'm, just simply suggesting that we should be aware that we do so in spite of the movie's purpose not because

of it.

Largely the movie is a sociological commentary on the control of the masses through imagery in a consumer driven

society.

As I mentioned earlier jean baudrillard's work simulacra and simulation rests on neo's bookshelf.

But this book is not an accidental prop piece.

In an interview for the documentary the matrix revisited Keanu reeves admits that the wachowskis told him to read

baudrillard before even opening the script.

The central idea of this book is that innumerable simulations of objects have saturated us all.

Such that we no longer have a grasp of what is real or the real concepts like the desert of the

real and models of control or Matrices they come directly out of the book and on to the screen

in morpheus's human battery speech.

What is the matrix morpheus asks?

It is control a control brought on by a system of simulation causing a full disconnection

from truth and reality.

Baudrillard argues that his third order of simulacra has no referent at all.

Now this comes directly from his writings think of a simulation as the television show keeping up with the kardashians.

And it's referent as the real kardashian family.

The television version is essentially a bad copy of the real family since it can only present them in a very

limited skewed way.

Baudrillard says that since people only know about the kardashians through the bad copy.

Well, then the only thing the bad copy can represent is itself more important to note.

The bad copy is so pervasive and influential that it can actually turn the real into a copy of

the simulation as well.

Therefore people no longer have a grasp of real truth only simulated truth.

Baudrillard initially applies this notion of simulacra to Media that is movies and television and by

extension to literature to history to politics to social groups and you name it.

I mean he's talking about things that are prescient right now in today's culture.

Essentially he is suggesting that there can be no correspondence between what people perceive

via the simulation.

And true reality that is truth is no longer an objective fact that holds regardless of the shifting

realities of the simulation.

Truth is itself constructed by the simulation.

However, if truth no longer corresponds to reality.

Well, then it has become relativistic.

So the first thing that we christians must distinguish is that the bible rejects baudrillard's worldview.

John 1 3 says that jesus created the universe and everything in it.

Jesus also said that he is the way the truth and the life.

No one comes to the father but through him.

But these are not words spoken by a character in a postmodern narrative.

Jesus is a real historical figure that walked the earth in the first century.

What he said about himself and the world were spoken.

At a real time and geographical location in the past since the bible purports to be true.

And treats truth as a historical reality to be reckoned with.

Jesus words are meant to match up with the world as it is.

This corresponding relationship trades on philosophical realism.

Otherwise known as the correspondence theory of truth in light of this relationship.

The bible instructs us to value truth such that we keep it very close as well as to seek it as something

objective to be.

Grasped beyond mere appearances it therefore rejects baudrillard's theory.

Interestingly enough the first installment of the matrix veers from a crucial aspect of baudrillard's theory.

Remember neo wakes up from the matrix into an objectively real world of human vats and spider creatures.

That is he awakens to discover that there is a referent after all to the simulation.

But this referent is in utter ruin after the humans blotted out the sun to thwart the machines.

This actually upset baudrillard who went on to bemoan the movie's misappropriation of the

virtual for an irrefutable fact.

But notice what baudrillard has done to himself here according to his own theory baudrillard must assert that the

matrix movie And sequels is part of the system of simulation.

That is it presents a a slightly skewed or bad copy of his original theory.

Remember according to the theory a simulation can only represent itself.

Not its referent, but baudrillard argued in his interview as if the wachowskis had not represented his book

accurately.

So baudrillard does not consistently live in the world that he envisions and I believe it is our duty as christians to point this Out to

others who also commit baudrillard's mistake in similar ways.

The bible makes it clear that we are being controlled.

We are either controlled by our flesh.

We are controlled by sin.

We are controlled by the devil.

Or by the spirit of god.

This control is not necessarily due to imagery according to the movie's allegory but influence.

Influence from the temptations of our flesh influence from the enemy and his schemes or influence

from the holy spirit.

Solomon said that like a city that is broken into and without walls is a man who has no control over his

spirit.

In other words in order to withstand the influences of evil we must control ourselves.

Since self -control is a fruit of the spirit galatians 5.

Well, then it follows that the way to control ourselves is to be under the influence of the spirit of god.

Romans 12 2 says that we can render ourselves immune to the conformity of this world by being

transformed by the renewing of our minds.

At a more fundamental level if we renew our minds through various techniques.

So for example like dwelling on what is true.

Which is what philippians 4 8 teaches we will be able to identify The lofty things raised up against the knowledge

of god.

Now what I just quoted was second corinthians 10 5.

Now what's interesting about second corinthians 10 5 is this description of what spiritual battle?

Entails is one of the only ones paul gives in the new testament.

And for good reason ideas and speculations are what we christians have always been facing.

False ideas about the beginning of the universe the nature of the world.

The existence of god jesus divinity the plausibility of miracles.

I mean the list goes on and on.

And each new false idea pulls someone away from the truth and further into the world's

system of control.

We cheer for morpheus's nebuchadnezzar crew because we must be like them.

We must always be ready to make a defense to everyone who asks.

To be alert and sober and to extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one.

We must be vigilant and on the lookout for those who are willing to wake up from the world's system of control.

I mean this comes through much prayer through reading scripture and familiarizing ourselves with

crucial subjects like philosophy and science.

If we can do these things We will then be able to stand firm in the faith and be strong.

This notion is expressed in a quick exchange during neo's training.

Neo asked morpheus if what he's being trained for is to dodge the smith's bullets.

To which morpheus replies when you're ready, you won't have to.

Likewise, if we can always be ready to make that defense and stand firm in our faith.

Then we won't have to dodge the enemy's arrows.

We will extinguish them.

In my opinion the matrix is one of the greatest movies of all time particularly because it contains.

Such rich fodder for thought along the lines of spirituality and religion.

But remember the main allegory for the film has nothing to do with religion.

And everything to do with control of the masses in a consumer driven culture.

That's where baudrillard's book simulacra and simulation has a lot to do with the film.

And that's why a lot of his concepts are spread throughout the movie.

But that doesn't mean that the movie itself cannot be used as a conversation piece to talk about christian themes.

Because some of the themes in the movie run directly parallel to what we find in the scripture.

So I encourage you as the fourth film is about to premiere in theaters.

Go back and watch the first movie and see the rich imagery, but when you do Understand it for what it is.

If you like this video i'll make another one looking at the matrix reloaded.

Okay, and we will descend further down the rabbit hole with a discussion on its particular philosophy as well as the

wachowski's appropriation of religious imagery and how Christian theology connects to the film's question

of control.

I get a lot of thoughts on all of that like this video.

So I know that you want to see the next one also.

Tell me what you think in the comments.

Did you like the matrix?

Did you think it was a horrible movie?

Are you ready for the fourth one?

What do you think is going to happen in the fourth one?

Let's have that discussion.

I would love to but in the meantime, i'll say bye for now.