Some Insights for Home Schoolers and Whether Calvin Produced Anti-Trinitarians

Well, greetings and welcome to The Dividing Line. I just came running in here just a few minutes ago. I have been running around like a chicken with his head cut off. Which a lot of people never seen a chicken running around with its head cut off when you think about it.

And in fact, you know, there's so many things we say. That we picked up when we were younger and can tell people where you're from, how old you are, all sorts of stuff like that. I was thinking of one just yesterday.

I mentioned something about being and I was talking to myself. And you got nothing to say about that, buddy, because when you're playing Tim, the tool man, Taylor, it is a never ending monologue. It is amazing.

When he's working on something, it's just and he's just I don't know what he's talking to, but not talking to me. He's just talking to himself. And that's just how it works. Anyways, I was talking to myself and I used a phrase that I use all the time.

My kids will tell you, I say it all to this year in a one arm paper hanger. And I've I've came to realize a couple of days ago. There's nobody under 40 that has any earthly idea what in the world that means, because does anyone even use wallpaper anymore?

I mean, everything I see is just all, you know, painting and stuff like that. But, you know, you used to have guys that they they hung wallpaper. And so, you know, it took two hands to put the glue and and hang wallpaper up on a wall.

And if you're a one arm paper hanger, you'd be very, very busy getting that one arm trying to do all that stuff at once. And it made perfect sense when I was a kid. But now we say that and the younger generation just goes, what?

I actually use that phrase in a meeting with one of my pastors a couple of weeks ago. And he looked at me with this. He was like, stop. And I'm continuing on the conversation. He's like, what what did you what is that?

I've never heard that. And I'm like, you're in your 40s. You've never never in his life. Have you ever heard that?

I think it's a Midwestern thing.

I guess. But I tell you what, first of all, I've seen a chicken with his head cut off. I've personally seen it. But that's, you know, where I come from. So like, you know, one arm paper hanger.

I'm not actually with us. Look, normally when you cut off a chicken's head, it just dies. But sometimes if you hit it just right, they just go running around the barnyard without a head on. Yeah.

But yes, we have these colloquialisms.

Colloquialisms. That's what they are. I completely lost. And when traveling back when I used to get to go overseas, I had some I had some dear brothers from South Africa contact me this morning and said, are you ever going to come back?

I'm basically like, no, no, I don't think so. I'm afraid those those days are past. But yeah, yeah, same thing. Same thing there. OK, I've got some stuff for homeschool kids at the start of the program today.

Psalm 119 as an Acrostic Poem for Homeschoolers

OK, so parents, if you've got homeschool kids, the first ones, the first thing is going to be for homeschool kids that are a little bit younger, maybe not not quite as deep a subject. And then the second thing, a little bit older kids, maybe your high school kids, something like that, something along those lines.

I just. I so enjoyed talking with the high school kids a couple of days ago. What was that, Thursday? Yeah, Thursday of last week. And, you know, my grandkids are homeschooled and I think homeschool kids are awesome and they're family people and they take care of each other.

And it's awesome. And I think homeschooling is great. And it's right now about the only option we've got outside of really good, solid Christian schools. I get that. But there is just a there's a quality to homeschooling.

And so I was thinking about. And this would be something I would I would share with my hopefully maybe my daughter will hear this and. Get the get the kids around the computer or however it is they're watching if they're watching the dividing line today or will later.

I was just over there, too, dropping off. My truck smells like Thanksgiving and Christmas because. Last night, my wife diced up the celery and onions for my dad's dressing. Now you had my dad's dressing.

It was special, wasn't it? Yes. He says yes. So because somebody on Twitter said, did you see that? I think that person should be kicked off Twitter. Yes, because somebody on Twitter said stuffing stinks or is horrible or gross.

It's gross. It's gross. I did respond with one word blocked. I didn't block him. I just want people to know that. I mean, there are people who just have really, really bad taste. And some of you are looking at my sweater right now going, yes, that's true.

But anyway, so. There is there are certain ingredients that have to go in that dressing. And my son in law, Eric, is doing the turkey. And we have a photocopy because I have the original, the original.

I mean, 1950s vintage recipe. I still have it. My mom gave it to us before she died. And so Eric's got a lot, a lot of pressure because I tried to do that and I got close a couple of times. But I'm not a cook.

I'm just not. And I might get it one year in the next year. It's just complete disaster, you know, utter disaster. Who knows? But we'll see what happens tomorrow. But you have to you have to slice the onions and the celery.

And the smell. And I remember my mom weeping and my wife weeping. And even though we've gotten machines and stuff like that, so the whole house and that's what I brought over today was the turkey pan and stuff like that.

And and yet you I don't care what you do. I don't care what you put a sliced onion inside. It can be triple steel walled. You'll still smell it. That smell can get through absolutely anything. It really, really can.

It's amazing stuff. Anyhow, what were we talking about? Moses was in the bulrushes. OK. Hope you all have a great Thanksgiving tomorrow if you're having that opportunity to do so. We're going to have one, two, three, four families gathering in our place.

And then just if you're praying, folks, I head out very early the next morning on on our next trip, which I'm really, really, really looking forward to. And it's all up on the on the calendar now, too.

If you want to know where I'll be stopping pretty much on the way back, I'm not stopping on the way out when you're trying to get a long distance. You have to make those days a little bit longer driving wise.

And but I will be stopping at a couple of different places, three, three different places, actually, on the way back home in December. Anyways, for our homeschooled kids. Many of you have memorized. Verses from the 119th Psalm, Psalm 119, and many of you will be aware of the fact that Psalm 119 is one is the longest Psalm in the Psalter.

And so one thing that I think you might find very interesting is that the 119th Psalm is an acrostic poem. An acrostic poem. And some of your Bibles, I was looking, interestingly enough, through a number of my English Bibles in accordance.

And it could be that I have a setting someplace where I've turned this kind of stuff off. Maybe, but I know I've seen in printed Bibles. Translations that will, in fact, I think in the new American Standard that will give you the Hebrew letter.

That begins each eight verse section. So depending on how you count them, there's there's 22 letters in the Hebrew alphabet. And Psalm 119, you have eight verses. And they go in the order of the Hebrew alphabet.

So I actually have it on the screen. I don't know if you if you can grab that or not. But if you if you look at the original language, we're going to have to blow that up, I'm afraid, because that's way, way too small.

There we go. OK, so notice over here in the translation, it says A .L .P .H., that's Aleph. And you see in the Greek Septuagint, it's the Greek translation. Here's Aleph. And then Alph is how it's they have it.

But there's this is this is this letter right here. Well, so I can't really just get it to show you that. But you can this is an Aleph that that word starts with Aleph. Now, remember something about Hebrew.

Hebrew is written from the right to the left instead of the way we write from the left to the right. And so the first letter of this word is on the right hand side rather than on the left hand side. That's one of the fun things about learning Hebrew is you got to get your mind going backwards.

And so notice this this word starts with Aleph. This word starts with Aleph. This word starts with Aleph. This word starts with Aleph all the way down through verse eight and then beginning of verse nine, the next letter is Bet.

And so there's your Bet there. There's your Bet there. And it goes all the way through the Hebrew alphabet. So the. Writer of the 119th Psalm. And in case the next column is confusing you over here. Because it says Psalm 118 here.

And it says Psalm 118 here, but it says Psalm 119 here and Psalm 119 there. Why is that? Well, that's because this is the Greek Septuagint, the Greek translation of the Old Testament. And the Psalms are numbered differently in the Greek Septuagint than they are in the Hebrew text.

And hence, in our English translations today, which can make finding references very, very tricky at times. But the point is that the person who wrote this psalm and I had a I had a professor at Grand Canyon College.

And I don't know why I remember this. He was a wonderful, wonderful man. Dr. D .C. Martin. I just realized I forgot my green drinky thingy. The refrigerator, please. Thank you. The older I get, the more I need to wet the whistle once in a while.

Um, D .C. Martin, just a wonderful saint of God. I didn't agree with everything he said about the Old Testament. He was he was really good Old Testament scholar. And I just remember. Out of all the things that the D .C. said, and everybody only knew him by D .C., it's Davis Carroll was his was his old Southern Southern gentleman.

So they Davis Davis Carroll Martin, I think, was what it was. You know, I trust Rich a lot to just hand me something. I just immediately drink it because if he wanted if he wanted to take over the ministry, it's all over with.

Anyway, D .C. Martin said that he thought Psalm 119 was a rabbi's class assignment. And he he assigned all of to one student and bet and then Gimel and Dalit and so on and so forth down the line. And that's how someone came to be.

I don't think that's the case, but. But the point is. You could be it would be really interesting. Oh, oh, man, I might make some of the homeschool students angry with me if I say this, but it'd be an interesting assignment, wouldn't it?

To try to write a poem. And the subject of all of it is the same, there's there's like five or six words, law, commandments, et cetera, et cetera, that define the 119 Psalm, it's about God's word, God's commandments, God's holy law.

And so. It would be interesting to try to write a poem. That. Every line in the poem begins with a different letter like this does so first. For eight or however long you want to make the thing begin with an A and then a B and then a C and so on and so forth.

While also maintaining, excuse me, the same. Topics that you would be that you would be addressing that would be. Interesting homeschool project for somebody to do. But yes, Psalm 119, the acrostic poem, the long acrostic poem following the Hebrew alphabet, which, of course.

Long precedes the English language. I mean, that that acrostic poem was written in Hebrew two thousand years before the English language came into existence. And even then, you wouldn't really recognize the English language as it first came into existence.

So long, long ago, long, long ago. So that that alphabet is much, much earlier than than ours. OK, you can take that that down. And so the second thing, just for some of the more advanced students, homeschoolers, you you've undoubtedly, I'm sure almost all homeschoolers.

Have had conversations with mom and dad about Romans chapter one. There are. You know, I've. I've been defending and debating the word of God, defending the word of God in debate. For over 30 years. Thirty two years now since started in 1990.

And people often ask me, why do you believe? Why do you continue to believe in the word of God? You've spoken to all these atheists. And they've thrown all these alleged contradictions at you and things like that.

Why do you still continue to believe? And aside from the fact that the contradictions are generally based upon their ignorance or our ignorance as human beings and not problems actually in the word of God.

One of the reasons that I would point to is Romans one. I've said this many times. Romans chapter one. Is supernatural, it it describes. Man. And his thinking. And yet it transcends language and culture.

It's just as true of. The remote. Central American tribe or South Pacific tribe. It's just as true of them as it is, the most cultured Englishman or person from China or whatever it might be. It doesn't matter what the language is, doesn't matter.

The background is Romans one nails. Mankind, it is universally applicable, and I don't think there's anything else like it. I mean, Romans one tells more about mankind than all of the psychology. And psychiatric books that have ever been published that are based upon man's theories and speculations and stuff like that.

And so when we read Romans one. In one of the most important of those verses, verse 20. Well, we. Back up a little bit. The text is talking about how how men suppress the truth, they. They suppress truth and unrighteousness, because that which is known about God is evident within them, for God made it evident to them.

So God has made a revelation. Of certain aspects of his being, and they're listed for us in verse 20. For since the creation of the world, his invisible attributes, his eternal power and divine nature have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made.

So they are without excuse. So his invisible attributes. All of them. All the attributes of God, the the true statements given to us in Scripture about about God's being. Well, no, not all of them. There's specific ones.

And that is his eternal power and divine nature having clearly seen. And what does that hold man accountable to? Well, verse 21, for even though they knew God, they had not honor him as God or give thanks, but they became futile in their speculations and their foolish heart was darkened.

And so the revelation that God has made of himself. In creation is sufficient to teach us that we are to honor God as God and give thanks, which is what. Which is what we'll be doing tomorrow. Since this is the day before Thanksgiving in the United States.

And. It's what secularists who deny God will still feel the need to do without knowing who in the world to address, to give the thanks to. And that's because they're suppressing, they're holding down the truth in unrighteousness.

Now, with all that said, you might ask the question. It says his eternal power and divine nature. Is eternal power and divine nature. Now. What's interesting here is if you have something like the King James version of the Bible.

And I'm not we're not getting into it looks like actually I got word last night that it looks like we are going to be able to have a King James version debate in February in Tennessee. When I go back to do the conference with Jeffrey Rice.

And I need to, you know, I want to let everybody know in the Tennessee area. You know, we need to get folks there to make it work, basically. And so I need to get that. I've already tweeted it once, but I need to get it up on the website so that Jeffrey knows.

See, a lot of a lot of folks these days. You know, there's so many uncertainties. In the future, but it's hard to plan things. And but it's pretty tough for Jeffrey to be planning it without knowing if anybody's going to show up.

So look up Jeffrey Rice on Facebook. Look up Post-Tenniverse Lux on Facebook. He's the guy that does the beautiful, beautiful, beautiful rebinds. You know, here's my Tyndale House Greek New Testament.

Super duper well done. And we're going to have a King James only debate. With a with what should be a well prepared opponent. We can't get a the King James only fundamentalist guys that run around the stage screaming, amen and hey, and stuff like that.

They're just too busy running around stages screaming, hey. Hey, man. Hey, man. I I've retweeted that one. Remember, remember, they I did that whole thing where I played. That guy's sermon and then. Kuiper Belt went ahead and found that and and put up a counter.

How many times he said amen and hey and amen and all the rest, that kind of stuff, it was it was great. But anyway, so keep an eye out for that. And if you're if you're making plans for I think it's the second, third weekend.

It's sort of somewhere on there in February. I need to get the exact stuff up. Make sure to let Jeffrey Rice know and go on the website and say, yep, I'm coming and stuff like that. But. So I'm not trying to.

Go after that particular issue right now and talk about King James only ism and all the rest of that kind of stuff, but in the King James. The word is translated, it's even his eternal power and Godhead.

Godhead. Now, that's not exactly the language that we use today in in our. English language, but that's what it says, the true power and Godhead in the King James version of the Bible. And if you were to look up the term Godhead.

You would find the King James also uses it to Colossians 2, 9, for in him, all the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily. So what is Godhead? Well, it was obviously a much more commonly used term in the past than it is today.

And the important thing, again, speaking to our homeschool kids, the important thing. Is to remember that. When Paul wrote Romans one and when Paul wrote Colossians two. There was no English language.

English language didn't exist yet. I'd say the earliest you could posit the existence of a distinctly English language is 1000 A .D. for the most primitive, but English is a. Is a mixed bag from Germanic tribes and Latin, and it's just all sorts of stuff that came together to form this very, very odd language.

And so. The real issue isn't what is Godhead mean? The real issue is what terms did Paul use? And what did he mean to communicate? Because when you think about it. Colossians 2, 9 says, for in him. All the fullness.

Of and the Greek term is they are TATOS. Dwells in bodily form. And this is meant to point out that. The standard is Christ, the standard for all mankind. The standard for non-Christians. Is Christ, why?

Because in him, all the fullness of deity, that which makes God, God dwells in bodily form and. And. So that that's referring to the very essence of God. Is that what Romans one is talking about? Presents creation of the world, his invisible attributes, his eternal power and divine nature.

So do trees reveal the very essence of God that which makes God, God? Well, no, they don't. There is a limitation to what the created order can reveal because it's created, it's finite, it's limited. So obviously Paul's thinking of different things.

And when you go back to the original languages, that's why he didn't use the same words. They're very close. They're very close. They are TATOS, Colossians 2, 9. Thyates, there's an extra iota, one little stroke.

What we would call the letter I. In Romans 1, 20, but it changes the meaning of the word. It's now talking about divine nature in a much less specific, much more general sense than the much stronger term, Thyates, Colossians 2, 9.

So modern translations recognize that and translate them accordingly. And you might ask, well, why the King James translators translate two different words with the same English word? Well, that's not the only place that happens.

But the problem here is doing that when it's the same author in different contexts, communicating something different, that's where it has led to certain levels of confusion. And if I recall correctly, there was only one committee in the King James, in the work of the King James that did Paul.

And so you would think they would have caught that, but they didn't. And so it's there. So what's important is, the point to communicate is, it is important to know what the underlying text says, because translations don't always get it right and don't always give the most clear and compelling translation in the process.

So I think that's something to keep in mind. All right, switching to other topics. I hope you're with me and you are sitting here, seeing the story of this high market company, I'd never heard of them, that sells ridiculously priced stuff, that put out an advertisement that was plainly seeking to promote.

And in fact, parents, we're gonna have to, for a second, we'll be talking about something you might not want the kids around. Trying to promote pedophilia, grooming, sex of minors, all this kind of stuff.

And thankfully, one news outlet, Fox, especially Tucker Carlson. Now I'd seen it first on Twitter. Gotta admit, I don't care what anybody says, Twitter has changed over the past couple of weeks. In fact, Twitter is now marketing and showing as much savvy as Facebook.

I don't do much on Facebook. You know I've never been a big Facebook fan. You dragged me into that kicking and screaming. But Facebook monitors everything you hit like on and tries to throw stuff at you based on that.

And so you can learn to play games with Facebook. For a while, I was liking every watch ad that came by. And so all I got were really pretty watches. Nothing else, especially the stuff I didn't like, wasn't popping up anymore.

So it's, oh, okay, that's one way of doing it. Twitter is now throwing ads at me that are actually relevant to me. I understand he's like fired 90 of the people in that company. Man, did those people have it good and easy for a long, long time.

But now they're working at McDonald's.

So I think that's really cool. And the timing of it is really incredible because Facebook's laying off. Right. So what's the parent company that they came up with? I can't remember. Yeah, Meta. Meta is laying off.

So it's like the entire tech sector is shrinking while these people are sitting back going, I'm not coming to his meeting. Well, you're fired.

What you gonna do now, hero? Yes, it is fascinating. Anyway, I had seen this story first on Twitter about the, it's a company that starts at B. I, again, never heard of it. If you've got the kind of money to be able to buy baby clothes that cost 1500 bucks, when that kid's gonna grow out of it in about two and a half weeks, well, okay, that's not my world.

Anyway, these evil, vile people are, and of course, they've now come out with statements and saying, we've fired the person responsible for this and la, la, la, la. Oh, come on, you know what you're doing.

You're throwing somebody out of the bus, but you knew what you were doing. Don't give us that. Just boycott that company. Drive them into the ground. But it won't happen. And we have so many people in Western society today that are now, you know, with the Colorado Springs shooting, the narrative was one thing, immediately.

One thing we certainly should have learned over the past decade, whatever the first story is, is a lie. It's not even worth interacting with. It's not gonna be the final thing. In fact, that reminds me, there's a 30-minute video that somebody put out called the Broken Boys of Kenosha.

Did you see it? Called the Broken Boys of Kenosha. John Cooper sent it to me a couple of weeks ago and I hadn't seen it yet. And so Luke sent it out and I said, okay, all right, I'll take a look at it.

And it's really good because it goes through the Blake shooting, which was in Kenosha, which started all this stuff. Remember the NBA, you know, NBA teams refusing to play and protests, all the rest of the stuff.

It goes through the seven points that were put out immediately and documents all seven of them were lies. That he was armed, that he wasn't, that wasn't his car. He was stealing his wife's car and he was supposed to have the kids and he had a knife in his hand and all this stuff that he had been tased and continued to resist and all the rest of the stuff.

But then what they did that nobody will do on any news outlet is they went through how he came to be who he was. His father had, you know, fathered him and then just left. That is a massive major problem in the black community.

I remember the program a couple of years ago where they brought all these young black men in and one guy had 28 kids by about 14 different women. And, you know, baby mama, baby daddy, that's the terminology you use in a completely broken community where the family's gone.

And so it goes through and documents this guy grew up without a father. It's fatherlessness. We've been saying this for a long time and you get accused of everything under the sun. And then they go through and they talk about the guys in Kenosha that got shot by the young white kid.

Now, they also put out the young white, Kyle was Rittenhouse, Kyle Rittenhouse. They talk about how his family's broken and both of the guys that ended up dying that he shot talk about completely messed up families, no fathers.

And one of the two had been released from the psych ward. And in fact, in one of the pictures, he's swinging the bag from the psych ward that had his stuff in it at somebody. That's how he had been literally hours.

And the whole film, I think it was the second guy. I'm not sure. I'm not sure. Maybe. But the whole point of the film was, this is what fatherlessness and the breakup of the family does. This is what it created on both sides of the events.

And it was powerful. It'll be completely ignored, but it was very, very powerful in the process. So anyway, we are seeing this society because of its abject rejection of God's will, God's way, God's law, deciding that children are abusable, throw away things.

You can use them as you wish. We literally are becoming a society of people anybody who can sit there and talk about family friendly drag queen story hours just has absolutely no morality, no moral compass, no system of ethics left.

I cannot imagine. And I'm a child of the sixties. Okay. I was born in the early part of the 1960s and my parents talked about how society was changing. It was going crazy and all the rest of that kind of stuff.

Nobody in that day, nobody would have ever dreamed of the kind of blatant sexualization of young people that we're seeing today. Nobody. And still today, you get thrown into prison doing something like that.

You ain't gonna last long because even the prison inmates have enough morality left to know that's wrong. That, no, you don't do that to kids. No, no, you do that. And you're not gonna get out of here in one piece, functional anyways.

And so, but today the leading voices in media, they're all, if you dare speak out on any of these things, if you dare oppose the LGBTQ revolution in any form whatsoever, you should be sued into oblivion.

You should have charges brought against you, whatever it might be. And once the constitution is truly just shredded, which unless there is a massive change of things is going to happen. I mean, you might be sitting here going, yeah, we've got five conservative Supreme Court justices.

A bunch of them are really old, okay? And we saw in the midterms, the fully secularized, fully ethically lobotomized 18 to 29 year olds voted. And they're gonna keep voting. And that means eventually all the old guys on the court die off.

And once you have five or six, like the ideologues we already have on the court, like Brown and stuff like that, who have absolutely positively no concept of the constitution at all. Once they're in the majority, the constitution is just a piece of paper.

If it will be interpreted by the people in that fashion, there's nothing that can be done. It's done. And so once that happens, then these people will take all the political power and they will take the police power and you know what they wanna do.

You know what they want to do and what they're gonna try to accomplish. So Lord help us, Lord help us truly. I mentioned this Thomas Horrocks guy on the last program. And I may have even mentioned this tweet.

I'm not sure, but I don't remember going to this text. But a progressive, a little strange that so many of the folks who want to swing their Bible around to protest civil protections for gay marriage seem to skip right over the part where scripture explicitly says that Christians aren't supposed to judge the sexuality of outsiders.

Did I read that before? A little strange that so many of the folks who want to swing their Bible around to protest civil protections for gay marriage. This is not David French, by the way. Though David French is heading this direction quickly.

Seem to skip right over the part where scripture explicitly says that Christians aren't supposed to judge the sexuality of outsiders. The only thing I can think of here, the only thing I can think of is he's talking about first Corinthians and judging those that are on the inside, not the outside.

That's it, no reference was given. So as if what that means is that Christians aren't supposed to recognize the utter depravity of the immorality of the nations. I don't know. But the first thought across my mind when I saw this was, have you read Leviticus 18?

Leviticus 18 specifically lays out the sins that were committed by the people who lived in the land of Canaan, the Canaanites, for which God was judging them, for which God said to the people of Israel, wipe them out, man, woman, and child, because of the sins that they have committed.

And what were those sins? Everything promoted by the LGBTQ revolution. Homosexuality, bestiality, incest, it's all there. And it says literally that the land spewed them out. The land spewed them out.

It was so unnatural, what they were doing, that nature itself spit them out, spit them out. And so I'm looking at this and I go, you know, quote unquote progressives. And of course they always try to use terms like that.

The only direction they are progressing is toward utter apostasy. I mean, that's all there is to it. There's no other way to put it. But the way in which they read scripture is truly, truly amazing. It really, really is.

So just a couple of other items, because I'm actually going to be joining Ryan Aris with the Ezra Institute. And I'm wondering if Joe will actually, no, I don't think Joe's going to be able to make it, but who knows, maybe he'll surprise us.

But we're going to be talking about Thomas and the Baptists, basically. The Ezra Institute's been doing some programs on the subject of the Renaissance of Thomism amongst Protestants. And so we're going to record something just after we finish the program here.

So a busy, busy day right before Thanksgiving. But I wanted to actually, you know what? We should have tested this. And I now have the audio going the right direction. Let me see if I can, I had this queued up.

Yeah, there was a, the Southern California Reformed Baptist Pastors Conference took place recently at Trinity Reformed Baptist Church in La Mirada, California. And during the Q &A period, there was a interesting discussion.

And I wanted to play a portion of it just to give you a sense of some of the things being said. I hope I have it queued up here. I hope it's going to play because I queued this up for the last program.

And you know how that works. Very often it just goes, what? We broke that connection a long time ago. But let's see if this works. And the first time I ever learned about the Ezra Calvinistic, I'm like, no, the church had been confessing that for centuries at that point, millennia.

They like to make Calvin a whipping boy because they called him a Judaizer too in his Old Testament commentaries because he didn't see Christ there often enough. He was a Judaizer though. Not intentionally.

That's for another discussion. Okay, now I just want to point out what's going on here and I can't turn it up any louder. It's as loud as it gets. They're talking about Lutherans and Reformed at the time of Reformation.

The extra Calvinisticum was the language that Lutherans used. And then I think that was Jim Renahan. This isn't a video, so I'm just going on voices. I think it was Jim Renahan saying, well, you know, Lutherans accused Calvin of being a Judaizer.

And over him, Richard Brassella says he was. He was a Judaizer. And you can hear Jim just stop. It's like, what? What did you just say? So I love you. Confessing that for centuries at that point.

They like to make Calvin a whipping boy because they called him a Judaizer too in his Old Testament commentaries because he didn't see Christ there often enough. He was a Judaizer though. Not intentionally.

That's for another discussion. Did anyone define the term? What? Extra Calvinisticum. No, Rich is going to define it for you. I'm going to let somebody else define it. Calvin is a Judaizer. The doc? I'll explain myself.