Responding to The Remanent Radio on Cessationism
We will address The Remanent Radio Podcast's arguments against Cessationism. We will examine their arguments and provide our critic.
Transcript
Mr. Smalley, do you believe that abortion is moral?
Oh, boy.
I'm glad I'm debating him instead of you.
This is Apologetics Live.
To answer your questions, your host from Striving for Eternity Ministries, Andrew Rappaport.
We are live, Apologetics Live, here to answer your most challenging questions that
you have about God and the Bible.
We're here to answer those because we can answer any question that you have about God and the Bible.
And if you doubt that, well, come on in, ask me your most difficult question
that you could think of.
Just remember, if I say, I don't know, that's a perfectly good
answer.
Let me bring my co -host in here, Mr. Drew Von Nida.
How are you, sir?
I'm doing well.
I just ate dinner.
The kids just went to bed.
So, full belly, silent house.
I'm doing pretty well.
And you haven't left the kitchen, we see, so that's good.
The kitchen is the new family room, is what they say.
And we spend a lot of time in the kitchen, mostly trying to keep the kids from trying to get all the hot stuff or
all the sharp things.
So, we definitely have to be in here.
I'm not buying it.
I actually believe what you're doing is waiting for round two for dinner.
All right.
Oh, no, there it is.
I can just go grab it.
I was like, I thought she put it away because she started cleaning out the dish, but it's
sort of close.
All right.
So, tonight on the docket, two subjects.
Originally, we were going to just talk about, well, the Remnant Radio and some
arguments that they make against the cessationist position.
We're going to evaluate them.
And why are we doing that?
Well, a very simple reason.
The guys at Remnant Radio said that they were open to debating someone on the issue of
cessationism.
I raised my hand.
I said, here I am.
We sent them messages.
And you want to know what we have heard so far from them?
Crickets.
Yeah, we've heard crickets.
Sort of like this.
Yeah, there's the crickets.
So, yeah, they haven't responded.
So, what we figured we would do is we would just respond to
things they've said about our views on social media.
So, that's going to be a major thing.
Not social media, but on their podcast about what we believe now.
Until they finally get sick and tired and they go, all right, finally, Andrew, yes, you can come.
Well, I'd rather have the discussion rather than two monologues.
But this is the thing.
There's a lot of people that say, oh, I'll debate you, but I prefer having a monologue.
We just had that actually on my social media guy.
He basically was just slamming the position we had, my position on cessationism.
Blasting me, saying how wrong I am and how I don't understand the Bible, blah, blah, blah.
And I said, well, you're going to come on to Apologetics Live and discuss it?
I'm not going to have to do it.
Okay, then.
I told him, I said, anything you post after this will be deleted because you only want a monologue.
He'd write these really long posts.
And then not obviously read what I say because he just responds with something completely different.
I'm like, okay, I answer your question.
You ignore it and go on.
So I just said, all right, well, we'll deal with this by just, you either come on
or I'm not going to let you have a monologue on my wall.
Right, right.
At least our audience, I know, has seen that on this show throughout the years.
Which is why you try to have kind of some moderation.
Because when you get people who are, what's the guy's name?
Pastor, what was his name?
Pastor something.
The COC guy.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
He would come on and then he would just talk and talk and talk.
And it would be, Justin Pierce would have to go, hold on, hold on.
You said a lot there.
We've let you talk.
Let Andrew respond.
Yeah, oh, I forgot that one.
Pastor Norm, that's his name.
Norm, yes, yeah.
So you highlighted a comment there.
I did.
Oh, you want me to put it up because I highlighted it.
I will.
Scott 0020 says, not surprised, speaking about the Remnant Radio guys not
responding to Andrew.
They want soft targets.
But I am a soft target.
You are a pretty soft target.
I'm a big softie.
I'm not mean.
So before we get to that.
I don't have to deal with you.
Before we get to the Remnant Radio, one of the things that we got asked to address was the issue of
Alistair Begg.
So we will start with that.
But before we start with that, we got a special guest backstage.
We have two special guests.
Yeah, but only one matters.
Oh, OK.
But kind of like theology matters.
Or everything's a matter of theology.
Yeah, a matter of theology.
But the other is just a voice that we just, you know, just a voice.
I love to say he's a good voice of reason, is what I like to say.
I think he would disagree with that.
I think he would say that God's the voice of reason.
I think he's going to correct you, but we will see.
OK, so Scott asks this question.
Would you debate Michael Brown on this, Scott?
It's coming.
Yeah, Michael Brown.
Here's the difference with Michael Brown.
Michael Brown said he would be willing to debate someone who is involved with helping the cessationist film.
And I said, I'll do it.
And he said, sure.
And we've been communicating.
He was headed to India before the end of the year.
And we were supposed to talk afterwards.
And I've been busy.
I'm sure he's been busy, so we haven't gotten a chance.
But you have talked with him a couple of times, though, haven't you?
Only since he asked for the debate.
I've never.
I actually OK, I told him this, but I think that I saw him in an airport.
I was in an airport in I think it was Philadelphia.
And I'm like, well, that guy looks like Michael Brown.
And I really didn't know much about him.
And that was, you know, and I should have just walked up and said hello.
But I didn't.
Anyway, the special guest we have, I actually reached out to brother or I should correct that
pastor, Austin, because he's got a conference coming up.
And that conference is right in line with what we're talking about tonight.
So let me bring in Pastor Austin Higgins.
He is from First Love Ministries.
I'm going to let you, pastor, talk about both both your church, your ministry, who you are,
let the audience know a little bit about you.
And I want folks to know about the conference that you're doing.
I appreciate that, Andrew.
First off, you know, thanks for reaching out to us here and offering the opportunity to be able to talk
about the upcoming conference on the Holy Spirit.
I really do appreciate that.
Yeah, just a little bit of background of who I am.
I'm Austin Higgins.
By God's grace, I have the privilege of serving the dear saints at First Baptist Church Baghdad as pastor,
one of two co -elders in the Lord's kindness and providence, the church that I,
the Lord allowed me to plant for about six and a half years ago.
We were using the building here at First Baptist Church Baghdad, and they extended an invitation to us to merge
and to become one church about a year and a half ago.
And we were thankful to accept that invitation, which has also began a something of a
reformation.
You know, we, they were already moving in a more reformed direction.
And we brought the 1689 with us into that.
And so it's been a very sweet time.
The Lord's been pleased to add a number of brothers and sisters that are hungry for sound doctrine, hungry
for truth.
For those who don't know a little bit of this area, we're in Santa Rosa County.
So we're in the panhandle of Florida, you know, famously known as lower Alabama.
But the county is quite large and it goes, you know, from the Gulf Coast to Mexico, which culturally
you have more probably of a northern atmosphere.
You have the beach community.
You have a lot of atheism.
There's a lot of witchcraft and Wiccanism that's, you know, coming up.
And I appreciate you, Scott, on that.
Yeah, it's a blessing.
Scott, for folks who are listening and not seeing, Scott said, nice bookshelf, sir.
But at the same time, that kind of passive, atheistic, could care less
beach mentality, butts right up against the Bible belt for the rest of the county, which
goes all the way up to the state boundary of Alabama.
And in this big county, you maybe have, even though there's a church every 200 feet, of
every flavor, you know, predominantly SBC, independent Baptist, charismatics of all shapes and sizes.
All the cults are here.
You know, Mormons, Jehovah's Witnesses, Roman Catholicism, the like.
There are probably only maybe four reformed or leaning
reformed churches in the entire county, and they are not very large.
And so we have quite a responsibility in front of us to be able to wisely articulate
the doctrine of our forefathers and of the scripture, to be able to defend sound doctrine
in a land where, you know, Arminianism and pragmatism has pretty much ruled the day for, you
know, the better part of 50, 60 years.
And to be able to shed a light in a bit of a dark place.
We're one county over from our dear friends at Chapel Library and Mount Zion Bible Church.
We're very thankful for their friendship and partnership and those guys.
And so, and all the other pastors locally that we get to labor with.
And really the upcoming conference that we're doing this year, this will be our second annual conference,
is in part aimed to address the lack of doctrinal clarity and the lack
of doctrinal solidity on an array of serious issues.
The first year we dealt with the doctrine of regeneration because in the sea of pragmatism and,
you know, sinner's prayer and altar calls and every other thing, there was no
reality as to the supernatural.
Reality of what the new birth even is, what it means to be regenerate, what it means to be born from above, what it means to be made a
new creature in Jesus Christ.
So we dealt with that.
And that was really an answer to my prayers because, I mean, this is my hometown area.
And for all the mission work First Love has the privilege to do, both locally and abroad,
and in particular in a number of areas that we labor in, one of which I am very
actively involved in, which is Nigeria.
And I get to go a couple of times a year there and I'll be headed back in June.
So keep me in prayer.
I'm able to see a lot of these resources go into some really critical areas in the world, host a lot of
conferences, be a part of, you know, live radio shows where we push back against false doctrine in
some major cities like Lagos, you know, 22 million some odd people within
earshot, and see the good that comes by standing
up, opening your mouth, and articulating even difficult things and being willing to take the shots, answer the hard
questions, show them from the word of God, where the things are contained, where these things are written, and give every man an
answer and give a defense and a reason of the hope that is in us with meekness and fear to testify boldly and
graciously of the truth that is found in the word of God and to push back against, you know, so much what the culture throws at
us nonstop.
In my own sense,.
Just whether it's grabbing from its own traditions or it's grabbing from what it saw some, you know, heretic pastor on
YouTube putting out.
My desire was to see that same kind of, I don't know what to call it, maybe concentrated firepower, you know,
here locally on the ground in my backyard.
You know, there was a night where I remember after being, you know, a pastor in this context for years, you know,
I wept and I got on my knees and I said, Lord, don't allow me to
step over my own feet and to step over my own backyard to bring the gospel to these regions all over the world and
not have fruit and not have a harvest right here.
You know, there were years of struggle, you know, because you're, you're on the
defense so often.
And so,.
You know,.
The tides seem to slowly be changing a little bit and it's been exciting to see, you know, to have all
the first love guys, you know, kind of descend in this little town in Milton, Florida,
and in an even smaller historical village inside Milton called Baghdad.
And it's always a real treat to the African brethren whenever they hear Pastor Austin's from Baghdad, but, you know, different
Baghdad.
But.
To have all the guys here, we're having some of our foreign branch leaders fly in from Nigeria,
Pastor Maroon Kigweta is coming in from Kenya.
We have our guys from Nepal and India coming in.
We have Dr. Dalkor coming from California, Pastor Joe Jackowitz, Pastor Paul Nelson.
We have other men coming in for our breakout session.
So it's going to be a really good time.
And the theme this year that we are going to be dealing with, which is literally point number two, if number one was
regeneration, number two, we're going to be dealing with the person and the work of the Holy Spirit,
dealing with who he is as the third person of the Trinity, dealing with all his work,
all that he is scripturally, we see responsible for and pushing back on an offensive way
and answering a lot of the hard questions.
We'll open up with Q &A panels.
We'll have a number of breakout sessions.
People will have an opportunity to come and ask questions.
The registration is free.
That's kind of First Love's MO.
We don't charge anything for our books.
If they go to firstloveministries .org and order a book, we send it to them postage paid for free every month.
You can go back and order a new book.
The conferences are free.
So if you register for the conference,.
We will be providing literature.
Chapel Library is partnering with us.
They will be providing literature and we've got a couple other ministries that should be doing the same.
So it should be a real sweet time to fellowship with like -minded brothers and sisters in the faith from several counties around us.
We have already a lot of people registered from out of state that are coming in too.
So we're really looking forward to it.
So how can folks register for your conference?
Yeah, I appreciate that.
So if they go to firstloveministries .org and I want to be very specific because
there's a firstloveministries .com there's a firstlovemissions .org and they all go to some kind of
strange wackadoodle places.
But if you go to firstloveministries .org as soon as you
get there on the main page, just scroll down a little bit.
There's a conference flyer with dates February 23rd, 24th, 25th.
If you click the more info or the registration button, that'll take you right where you need to go.
Registration will take you to register and that info will bring up the schedule, all the speakers, all the subjects that we'll be
covering as well as another opportunity to find the registration button.
And so First Love folks, if you're not familiar with First Love Ministries, I encourage you to go there, check it out.
Pastor Austin, we'll talk offline.
I tell you how to get a .bible domain so that you could just say go to firstlove .bible.
If you go to sfe .bible, it's a shorter way to get
and just forward that over.
Yeah, let's talk about that.
I need to complain.
I just went to First Love Ministries and looking at the publications, some of them are out of stock.
They look pretty interesting reads.
Well, you know what?
People have found out about us.
So if it's out of stock, it's because people went and ordered it and drained supplies and so we're reprinting.
I mean, you've got a lot of good names on here.
Ian Bounds, J .C. Ryle, just scrolling through some of the ones I've seen.
So it looks like really, really solid works.
Now, are they more like, are they summary, like pamphlet -like
publications, kind of easy to read or digest or it's the full book?
So it's the full book.
There's a few cases where we took a book and we updated the language a little bit, some of the older
works because we have, you know, A .W. Pink, Sovereignty of God, Union and Communion by Hudson Taylor.
We got the works by Ian Bounds, J .C. Ryle's Holiness.
You know, we have some of the classics in there.
Wherever it was helpful to update some of the language, we did that, but it is the full book.
We have the complete works of Ian Bounds on prayer.
We have a prayerful and powerful pulpits.
You know, we have,.
There are some booklets in there, but by and large, most of our library is large books.
And Drew, they even have What Do They Believe and What Do We Believe from Andrew Rappaport.
Oh, wait, no, no.
Oh, who's, who's, hey, Mr. Jacobs,.
Just,.
You know, that's okay because then they can just, they can just come to Apologetics Live on Thursday nights to hear what we believe.
This is, this is a little,.
You know,.
Inside humor with Pastor Austin and I because, you know, his boss there at First Love is also a
Jewish believer and understands what Jewish guilt is.
And we were going back and forth about the fact that I've been trying to get Pastor Austin to act as a Jewish individual to
provide some Jewish guilt to his boss on my behalf.
I'm an honorary 2%, so I have the, the software to do it.
There we go.
So, so, I mean, I, if it wasn't for the fact that I will be at the Open Air Theology Conference
at the same time, but I mean, just folks,.
If you're wondering, well,.
You know, a conference in Florida in February, if you live, say, north
of Virginia, just saying Florida's pretty nice in February.
Inviting and calling all snowbirds, all snowbirds.
So go to firstloveministries .org check out the conference.
You know,.
This is just knowing the guys involved in it.
I know that, you know,.
It's going to be a good conference.
I know some of the speakers personally.
Excellent, excellent men.
And so, all right.
So Joe is asking this question.
If someone explains cessationism, is that like a new name?
Actually, no, it's, it's not, Joe.
It's so, and we're going to try to give a positive answer to what cessationism is tonight.
And I'm sure that that's probably going to come up in, in Pastor Austin's conference.
But it's not exactly new, but it is.
What do I mean by that?
Before about the early, the late 1800s, early 1900s,
the issue of the continuation of gifts or the cessation of those gifts was not an issue, really.
But after what happened and really, really what triggered it was the 1905 Azusa
Street mission that occurred.
Now, there's, it started before that.
Actually, truthfully, some of this stuff started really in Mormonism and in the 1800s
that bled over into, I want to say
Christianity, but a form of Christianity.
And so,.
Watchtower, too, it started some in there as well.
Yeah.
We started getting into Judge Rutherford and his visions and prophecies.
But yeah, Mormonism, yeah.
Yeah, Mormonism was the 1800s.
And so, so what you see is you started to see.
A,.
What they would call a revival of people having the gifts of the spirit
that really we hadn't seen commonly or normatively being the gift of
speaking in languages, what they would call tongues, the gift of healing,
prophecy, and things like that.
And as that became more, I want to say mainstream, the
response became looking at scripture, no, these things have ceased.
And so, Joe, when we say cessationism, it is the idea of that
the gifts have ceased.
They stopped.
So,.
The idea is that this is a doctrine that was developed
in response to a doctrine that started developing.
And this is what we're going to find with theology.
This is very common in theology.
How did we get the doctrine of the Trinity?
Because it was a response to Arianism claiming that Jesus wasn't God.
Because God's only one.
And in response to that heresy, you have a theological
doctrine that becomes formed.
And now, I'm not saying that believing the gifts continues
heresy.
Okay?
So, let me be clear about that.
But the doctrine of cessationism is a response to that that
started up.
Just like people say, well, creationism is a new word.
We first see it in the Seven -Day Adventists.
Which is really kind of funny because the founder of the Seven -Day Adventists, Ellen G. White, believed in evolution.
But the atheists, it started in Seven -Day Adventism and you guys would say they're a cult.
And I don't, some I would say are a cult, some not.
But that aside, the reason it started was because evolution was being taught.
And as evolution started being taught with the
formulation of a new doctrine, yes, it was first mentioned within Seven -Day Adventism.
But the doctrine of.
Creation.
Was a response to the error of evolution.
And so, the doctrine of cessationism is a doctrine that was brought out from what I would
refer to as the error of the continuationism.
And so, it is a new name, but not a new thought.
Because as we'll talk about later, I will find it in scripture in 1 Corinthians Chapter 13.
So.
Yeah, I like that.
You know what else came out of the 1800s?
Dispensationalism.
But that's another topic for another day.
Well, it's a good thing that you don't know your history because actually it was the 1900s that we see that
formulated in response to the error of reformed.
See, the reformers stopped reforming and the dispensationalists continued reforming.
Reformed and what?
Stopped reforming?
Is that the motto?
I don't know.
I think you're starting to get into the weeds there.
Dispensationalism in that way.
Yeah, well.
You know who I think is talking about that tonight?
I think Keith Foskey is talking about that tonight.
Yes, because he decided, hey, let's have a debate.
Let's do that.
At Thursday night at 830.
OK, so I couldn't tell because remember I posted under his when I posted under a
comment under the post he made.
And when he responded, I couldn't tell if he genuinely felt bad or if he was being goofy.
No, no, I think he I think when you posted and then I said I was going to talk about it tonight.
I think he felt bad like, oh, no, I wasn't doing it on purpose.
And that wasn't the thing.
And so hold hold that one because we got to get back to that.
And Pastor Austin, you are welcome to stay.
I don't know your time frame, but we're going to we're going to talk about, you know, Alistair Begg.
We're going to talk about we're going to talk about some some arguments made responding to cessationist
arguments.
So you're welcome to stay.
But yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, no, I appreciate that.
And I probably will.
I step out.
I've got my family in the other room.
Andrew, I genuinely appreciate having you on allowing me to be on the show with you striving for
eternity and apologetics life.
I pray the Lord continues to bless the work of your ministry.
And again, I greatly appreciate it.
Lord bless you, dear brother.
Yeah, and Lord bless you.
First love and everybody there except that guy at the top.
Well, is this recorded?
Oh, yeah.
You just you just said, hey, hey, you know, Andrew wants a blessing for everybody at
first love except you, Joe, because you blow him off.
Well, since it's recorded, I'll be sure to share it with our dear brother.
For the record, though, I actually love I love Joe.
He's a great brother.
He absolutely he's he is.
He's just great to be around.
But don't let him know I said that.
OK, yeah.
I mean, it's recorded, so he'll know, but keep him in prayer.
The man has survived multiple pulmonary embolisms, leukemia, cancers, bad heart issue that
just came around.
But in God's providence, the Lord's kept that man alive to continue to do the work.
We'll talk about the work of the Holy Spirit then.
Yes, that has to talk about a work of the Holy Spirit then.
Amen, dear brother.
And if I could just throw one last tag on that note, because Drew made a statement I really appreciate.
You know, we're going to have aspects of the conference that do deal with the negative, like what you're talking about, Andrew, where we deal with
the issue of cessationism and defend against some of those heresies.
And that of necessity requires us to take kind of a negative tone of what the Holy Spirit is
not.
Doing.
But one of the things that we as we talked in leadership talk, we wanted to be very clear about was in positive
affirmations.
What does the Holy Spirit do?
Because there are other people on the other side of the lane.
But I don't know how you categorize them, maybe hyper cessationist or something of the like, where they think, you know, the Holy
Spirit is completely no longer at work operationally in the life of saints, that
there's no indwelling power of the Holy Spirit conforming us into the image of Christ, giving us
holy ambitions, holy desires, giving us unction and preaching, empowering us for the work of the ministry
and revealing truth to us that is found in the Word of God in illuminating the text to our hearts and minds.
And so our goal really is to give the saints of God a big view and a wide view
of all that the scripture is clear that the Holy Spirit is doing in the lives of his saints
today.
And this is one of our greatest inheritances that belongs, that we are not striving for
eternity in our flesh.
We are striving for eternity by the enablement of the spirit that dwells within us
and by the empowerment of him who raised Christ from the dead.
And he's given us all things that pertain unto life and godliness.
So I want the saints of God to have a big view of that.
You know, and this is the thing, folks, again, first love ministries .org.
The reason this conference is important is because, you know, realistically, what you saw in
response in the early 1900s was many, many of the fundamentalist churches, which is my my kind of Christian
background, be the fundamentals Baptist.
And yet many of them just in response to the charismatic movement decided to
just ignore the Holy Spirit.
And they're really if you think about it, there has not been much written on the on
the personal Holy Spirit.
Now, you see some, you know, maybe chapters in a larger book.
But I mean, like Ryrie wrote about the book on the on the Holy Spirit.
But how many books are devoted to the person and work of the Holy Spirit?
There's not many, you know, since the beginning, since the 1900s, when the charismatic movement started,
a lot of Christianity just kind of abandon it, put it aside.
And that's why this conference at First Love Ministries is doing is really helpful to say, hey, let's have a
positive view, lift up the Holy Spirit of who he is, what he does, what his ministry is.
Let's stop ignoring the third person of the Trinity.
Amen.
Yeah, you know, we can be highly, you know, as one preacher said before, we can be highly reactionary and the pendulum can
swing so far away from the very real error, from the very real abuses.
I mean, the things that are being peddled out of the especially the extreme forms of charismaticism are utterly appalling
and disgusting.
The NAR movement, I have to deal a lot with what spews out of the mouth of men
like Kenneth Copeland, men like Benny Hinn and all these cats.
It gets on the ground in Africa.
It amalgamates with African traditional religion and which would amount essentially to
to voodoo and animism.
And when that stuff hits the ground, it creates some of the most noxious fumes you could
possibly imagine.
Some of the wealthiest riches, richest pastors, quote unquote, in the world
are Nigerians who are making some of the poorest people in the world for funds and they're doing it in the
name of the Christ of the Bible, though they don't know him at all.
And so in light of that reality of disgusting abuse, the
pendulum can swing the other way and we can be very guilty of abject neglect.
And so it's in light of that neglect, we want to bring the pendulum not to anyone extreme.
We want to put it center in the narrow way of Scripture.
And just, you know, one other statement.
Are you familiar with Ian Murray's revival and revivalism?
Which really dealt with true biblical revival versus that kind of
independent fundamentalist revivalism, the tent meeting revival that kind of took over where we thought we could get
the Holy Spirit on our schedule and pencil him in on.
Friday night, you know.
Well, he did a real good job at showing what a true move of the Spirit was not.
His book after that called Pentecost Today, the Biblical Basis for Understanding Revival, I think is an
excellent book.
I'm working on it right now, kind of reading through it.
You're saying there's not many books out there, but if you want a big view of the reality of what the
Spirit of God is able to do, willing to do, and may do in our day, the likes of
which Whitfield and Wesley saw in their days, I think that's a tremendous book that I think
your listeners would probably enjoy reading.
You know, you mentioned those pastors in Africa, right?
And let's put them also with the NAR movement and those quote -unquote pastors in there.
If you take Murray's book, Revival and Revivalism, Pentecost
Today, but you also bring in Martin Lloyd Jones's Preaching and Preachers,
one of the things Martin Lloyd Jones talks about is the difference between a preacher and a pulpiteer,
and what a pulpiteer is and what he does, and how he is a master of
manipulation of the crowd to get them to do what he wants them to.
Do.
I love you just for saying Martin Lloyd Jones.
I see the commentaries.
So let me just ask you a question that came up before you take off, and this is from our famous
Facebook user.
We see him responding a lot.
We don't actually know who he is because.
I think this is Darren.
See, it's either Darren or Hops that love to come in here and not give their name, but anyone else,
if this is someone else, you just go to apologeticslive .com.
There's instructions on how to get your name to show up.
You got to just tell Facebook to allow it, but Facebook user is asking you, Pastor Austin, will the conference be
live streamed or recorded at all?
The short answer is yes.
All right.
And where would they be able to, so the live stream, where are they going to be able to find that?
Last year, we were able to stream it through both YouTube and the
A Sermon Audio account.
We're going to take a look at that this year.
All the information will continue to be available on that same page I sent you to earlier, but at a minimum, it'll be being
streamed on YouTube.
Okay.
All right.
Good.
Well,.
Thanks for coming on.
We appreciate it and we hope that your conference does well and look forward to
maybe next year.
Now that I know you're doing it on a yearly basis, maybe next year I can make some time to get down there in sunny
Florida for February.
Yeah, brother, that'd be a great.
Idea.
If you live in Florida, you got to have a conference during the winter to get all the snowbirds down.
The Floridians are inside trying to stay warm and everyone else is coming down in shorts.
Going, this is great.
Yeah, it's a bit tactical.
I won't lie.
Well, hey, you might have a competition with all the other.
Conferences in the summer.
Look, can't you just see Andrew going up to the pulpit and he's got his shirt, his blazer, and he's
got his cargo shorts on?
Yeah.
No, no, it will never happen.
It will never happen at a pulpit.
Okay.
You know, we'll see.
Okay.
So thank you.
No joke.
This this I actually I have weird dreams.
But I had a dream that I've had two dreams that both involve R .C. Sproul.
But I had a dream that I was asked to preach at Ligonier and I showed up in
shorts and a T -shirt.
And R .C.
That's a nightmare, brother.
No, it gets even worse.
R .C. Sproul was so upset with me not being properly dressed.
He was chasing me with a machine.
Gun.
That's the only part of this that's believable.
Yeah.
I'm glad you said that because I was going to say you being invited to speak at Ligonier.
That's definitely.
Yeah.
Well, the funny thing is it.
Would have been funnier if he was saying, what's wrong with.
You people?
He's chasing me.
Yeah.
Brother, if you are able to make it down next year, we would be absolutely delighted to have you.
Yeah.
As well, Drew.
Thank you again so much, Andrew, for inviting me and having me on the show.
Yeah.
Pray God's blessings on your dear.
Brother.
Thank you very much.
All right, folks, first love ministries dot org.
Before we get to Alistair Begg, I do want to do a little bit of in the news now.
Some of what we our main topic we kind of covered with Pastor Austin, but it's interesting in the news.
Let me just, you know, maybe I should just bring in the other guest back here.
He is none other than the one and the only.
Mr.
Captain America himself.
Half of the Voice of Reason radio podcast.
Mr.
Chris Honnold.
That is far more interesting an introduction than the guest itself is.
Right.
I figured I'd bring you in because you may have some comments on this.
Just we do an in the news section because what we want to do is is bring up some things that are in the news and
address how Christians should.
View that.
It's usually a shorter segment.
We know we did a kind of a longer segment with Pastor Austin, but I think it was I hope it was well worth it.
I hope you had a just a view of a better view why we should have a high view of the Holy Spirit.
Some of you guys know and I'll just say this.
If you listen to the rap report podcast, I know that I did not have an episode that came out this week.
I am sorry.
I'll apologize to my audience on the rap rap report.
If you don't listen, what's wrong with you?
People rap with two P's are a PP report.
Go search that on on the podcast apps that you have.
But here's the thing.
Dinesh D'Souza had a guy on that was criticizing Beth Moore.
Now, this is a political show, but at the last part of his show, he usually does something kind of reviews,
reads a Christian book or something.
But it was really interesting because he was had Beth Moore on because she was criticizing Christian nationalism.
And though the guest was pointing out that.
So she's criticizing Christian nationalism.
But just like a few months before, when Trump was doing well, like, you know,
in the polls, he was saying Christians shouldn't be involved in politics.
But here's the thing that I really thought interesting, because if you listen to the rap report, you know that a few weeks ago we started a
series called What is a Pastor?
So why did I think it was so neat that Dinesh D'Souza's podcast this week?
Because his guest speaking about Beth Moore and her views and her being a woman who's
preaching, he said that just like Matt Walsh did a show on what is a woman,
we need a documentary called What is a Pastor?
And I feel like going, Dinesh, I'm ahead of you because it's not a documentary.
I would love to do a documentary.
I actually asked the guys that did the cessationist film, I said, hey, when we get done with this, can we do one on What is a Pastor?
And they were like, well, we got some things we're working.
On.
OK.
So anyone that does documentaries, contact me.
I'd love to do that documentary doing a series on that.
But that is the issue, right?
What is a pastor?
I just thought that was really neat that they were doing that.
I will say this, though.
There's there's I've been hearing a silence.
Chris drew.
I know you probably heard this.
Too.
Remember in the last election we heard about the mean tweets.
And I'm doing air quotes, right?
Oh, all these mean tweets.
That was all you heard about.
Do you know the time that Donald Trump called his
opponents domestic terrorists?
You remember that time?
Oh, oh, no, you don't.
OK.
How about the time that he said that his opponents are Nazis?
Oh, no, I don't remember that.
One either.
Oh, I'm sorry.
That was Joe Biden that said those things.
Oh, who's mean?
I'm just saying.
So.
Trump's only mean to people in his own party that.
They drop out of the race and.
Then they're his best friend.
Exactly.
Oh, Kathy.
Kathy, you're saying yes, a very good series on the rap report.
So thank you for that.
So here was an interesting thing that was in the news.
There was a two there was a same sex wedding that was going to
take place.
So two people of the same gender that wanted to get married, they rented this barn
that would do weddings.
And so they rented this barn and the owner of the barn realized that it was going to be
a same sex couple.
And now we know that legally there's this law that, you know, you can't discriminate.
OK, he could fight the issue of, you know, his his views.
But here's what this gentleman.
Decided to do.
He decided to write a very nicely worded letter to the to this
these two people, letting them know that they have they have the use
of the barn for their wedding.
But as a Christian, he wanted to let them know that he felt that by
God's word, what they were doing was sinful.
And so what did they do?
They went to such a meeting.
And cried in front of everybody.
Yeah, they cried.
And now someone offered them a different venue for free.
And you'd think they'd be happy, but they weren't.
And they weren't because the thing is, is what we see going on with this whole
transgender movement and all is they do not want us as Christians
to disagree.
That is it's not enough to be silent.
They want you to celebrate their perversion.
Now, here's the thing.
It's interesting.
Did the guy tell them that they could not use the barn?
No.
He said, you're still you still have it.
But he wanted to share his views.
And his views made them cry on social media.
They took it to social media to cry to make to get attention for themselves because he shared his
views.
Now, I'm going to ask you, who is the tolerant one and who's the intolerant one?
You see, they will not handle him having his views that disagree with
theirs.
That is the difference that you see.
This gentleman is saying you have your view.
He's not stopping them or even trying to stop them.
He's just saying, I disagree.
And that's enough to make them cry.
Go to social media and whimper about it.
And what are they upset with?
That he does not celebrate what they do.
That he is not bowing down to their superiority in having their views
superior to his.
And yet, if we had the same exact view they had, we would be going to
social media saying, oh, they're so wrong.
Let's cry about it.
Let's get attention for self because they won't accept my view.
You said he wrote this in a letter to them, right?
Yeah, like a letter or an email.
So he wrote it in a private correspondence to them.
What does this movement do?
They turn around and they have to blast everything on social media.
To the public.
Look at me.
I'm the victim.
Woe is me.
And it just shows you how soft that this movement is.
That you can't say anything to them without offending them.
Without them crying.
And when you think about it, 1 Peter 4 actually addresses this specifically.
Peter writes,.
Since therefore Christ suffered in the flesh, arm yourselves with the same way of thinking for
whoever suffered in the flesh has ceased from sin so as to live for the rest of the time in the flesh
no longer for human passions but for the will of God.
For the time that has passed suffices for doing what the Gentiles want to do.
Living in sensuality, passions, drunkenness, orgies, drinking parties, and lawless
idolatry.
With respect to this, they are surprised when you do not join them in the same flood of debauchery
and they malign you.
That's exactly what their sin -hardened heart, it screams, how dare you not only
say what I'm doing is wrong but you're not part of it.
You're not celebrating it.
You're not being edifying and affirming of this.
You have to be.
And that's exactly what the sin -hardened heart leads them to do.
But I love what he says in verse 5.
But they will give an account to him who is ready to judge the living and the dead.
They think they're one -upping us.
They think that they're able to shut us up and shut us down.
But they're going to stand before God one day.
And so this couple who takes, as you said, Drew, this private correspondence to simply say, look, you still
have it but as the owner, I have a right to say something to you so I'm going to.
And I'm going to share the gospel with you and I'm going to tell you that what you're doing is sinful.
They use it in that 1 Peter 4 mindset.
We're going to malign this person because how dare he expose our sin
and our desperate need for Christ.
Yeah, and as Dee says here, Dee says, but he hurt their little feelings.
And as Melissa says, the 11th commandment, thou shalt be nice.
That's the thing, right?
Back to Dee's comment and Melissa's comment right there is that I'm not
obligated to care about your feelings.
I'm obligated to give you truth.
So if I'm obligated to care about your feelings, that's going to
hinder me in giving you the truth because then I'm going to be so concerned about how you
respond or how you react or what you think of me.
Well, then I just care too much about myself because I want to care too much about you because I care about how you think about me
and your feelings and all of that nonsense.
No, I should be consumed with truth because the truth is what you need
not your feelings to be coddled.
Yeah, and I'll just put this up and then we'll move to the next section.
Of our show tonight,.
But Melissa says, we have freedom of speech just like they do.
And that's the thing.
They seem to forget it.
No, the thing is.
They don't think.
We deserve.
Freedom of speech and that's the thing.
They haven't realized.
There is a,.
You know, a lot of people.
Are struggling because we tend to be thinkers and they tend to be feelers and a lot of people
don't understand this.
When you're a thinker, you try to think through issues, think of both sides.
But they're feeling their way.
Through arguments and feelings give you the sense of a moral superiority just because you haven't thought
about it, you just feel it's right.
And if someone doesn't agree with you, that's why they call it violence and
because it hurts their feelings.
They actually put it in the same line as violence because their feelings.
Are hurt,.
But their feelings.
Are everything.
When you're thinking.
Through things,.
You can separate your feelings from that and this is something we see in scripture and this is, so
in James, it would say the first defense against sin is your mind because if
sin can get past the mind, it gets to the feelings which is closer to the volition and so the biblical
way of counseling is you counsel the thinking because if a person thinks right, they'll feel right and then they'll
do right but the way the world does counseling is to tell you to feel or to
just do what's right and if you do right, you'll feel better about it and the feeling better
will then change your thinking and then they can't figure out why people keep coming back to them because they're using the
wrong model and they're not using a biblical model, the model God designed and so they just keep
trying to do right and try to get themselves feeling better.
They never feel better so they keep going back to the doctor and paying them more money.
Hence the reason pastors,.
You know,.
They give you the counsel for free because they go, here's what God says and you don't have.
To come back week after week.
Well you know,.
And so Chris can attest to this as well as being on Twitter.
Everyone responds to everything, sorry,.
X.
Everyone responds to everything with emotion.
They will completely disregard everything that you say and they will respond with emotion
and then to go back.
What you're talking about with counseling, last year when Aaron Brewster and I did an
episode on biblical counseling, I loved listening to what Aaron said.
When he's sitting with someone and they're telling him what's going on, his response is,.
Okay,.
Is this an appropriate response to what's going on?
So the stop,.
The stop,.
To think about it, is this appropriate?
And oftentimes, what's the answer?
No,.
This is not an appropriate response to what's going on.
So I need to reevaluate some things.
Well,.
And we've incentivized emotional response in this culture.
One of my,.
You said it yourself, I know what this is like in trying to, and by the way, Christians, we are just as
guilty of this as anyone else.
All you have to do is put a semi -rational point out.
And watch everybody.
Attack you.
Because they didn't.
Like you.
But one of the most frustrating aspects for me is when I'm on social media trying to make,
and I'm not pithy, I write really long stuff because I try to, I've learned how to build a case.
That's what I did for 25 years writing reports was build a case.
And no matter how balanced you can be, there's always that somebody that goes, but you're not, and it's
like,.
Oh man,.
You're not, they looked at all this,.
Went,.
Nah,.
Not going to address that, then go for something else.
Why?
Because that bothered them.
And we've incentivized that because the people that get bothered are the ones that get all the attention.
The people that get upset and boisterous, they're the ones that get all the likes and the hits and the shares.
What we do not incentivize is rational, balanced thinking.
Anybody who's taken any time, even as Christians, to write anything out that is,
that's lengthy and it has, you know, several points.
We'll all get almost crickets in response, but all you have to do is drop a hot take.
And that hot take is gratifying to the person who drops it because look at all this interaction I got.
We have incentivized emotional thinking and we do not incentivize rational
biblical thinking.
And that's just part of the problem.
Yeah.
And I was going to give an example of this because it's not just.
On Twitter.
I'm just, I'm looking for it so I could share this with folks.
But, you know, when Chris posts something, there's just so many, just hundreds and hundreds of
comments.
It's hard to find the one that I was looking for,.
But...
Hundreds of comments.
Well,.
I'm looking at 300 and some comments, so yes.
Okay.
And I can't find the one comment that I wanted.
You know,.
You've made this hard to do here.
I'm trying to remember.
Any time I...
You're talking about this, Chris, right?
Yeah.
So let me share.
I will present it.
So you posted...
This is me.
Yeah.
Well, this is what you posted.
You know, don't blame me,.
But...
Oh, no.
You posted this picture right here.
And you said...
Oh, that one.
Your exact words on this, on this post.
Was...
If I can find it.
Look at all these comments.
He said,.
You said...
Oh, no.
It must be a different one. That's why.
That's why because I've never had one.
That big.
Yeah. You know...
Oh, this is from...
Where's your comments?
Mine was the show where I said, it looks like fun.
Yeah.
Here we go.
Yeah.
There it is.
It says, looks like fun.
Oh, just seven comments.
No wonder.
Okay.
So here's...
Yeah.
So you post something.
With this gun on it and you say,.
Looks like fun and look at that first response there.
Guns are not supposed to be fun.
They are only desirable to killers and evil wicked people that have evil
intentions.
You should know that.
Can you read.
Who it was that posted that, please?
I'm glad that everybody knew.
That I was joking.
The sad part is, is in that 300 comments on the Smith and Wesson, I would not be shocked if there were people that did.
I'm telling you, that is a beautiful...
I don't have $1 ,300 to spend on it, but that's a beautiful looking rifle.
I want one of those.
So let's get to...
Someone was asking earlier if we did this.
So Melissa said, did Andrew talk about Alistair Begg thing yet?
No, but we're about to right now.
So let's address this.
I think that this has been a hot button issue.
Like all of a sudden now.
Yeah.
For the record, this is something that was put out.
I think this interview was like a year or so ago.
It was back in September.
It's back in September.
September of 23 or 22?
23 is my understanding.
Okay.
For some reason, I thought it was 22,.
But okay.
So not as far back as I thought.
I thought it was more than a year ago.
And I'm just going to say, we here at Apologetics Live are part of the Christian podcast community.
It's a community of Christian podcasters of which both Drew, as Matter of Theology, with his
co -host Chris Hough, they're on with us, along with Chris here with
Voice of Reason Radio with his co -host Richard Story.
We all are part of a community of podcasters.
And it's not a competition.
So I'm going to recommend two podcasts for you to listen to.
That I have been sharing with people saying, I think that this is a good, balanced view
of this thing, of this issue.
And I'm just going to,.
Drew,.
I'm just going to mute you until you're ready just because there's, for some reason, we get a hum from
you.
I don't know why.
That was the TV in the other room.
It's trying to, so it's hearing the voices.
And trying to pick up that sound.
Okay.
Got it.
So,.
I think if you listen to the latest Voice of Reason Radio podcast where Chris
was by himself, he didn't have his co -host.
He did an excellent job, I think, of giving a good, balanced view of this.
I also want to recommend another podcast and it would be Nathaniel Jolly's podcast, which is
Truth Be Known.
And he and Eki, again, just like Chris, though Chris beat them to the punch,.
Did excellent.
You know,.
Like, look,.
You got to be first,.
Right?
But,.
So we're third.
But I think I will say that because we're going to do a shorter segment on this, we may not answer
all of the issues, but I wanted to say that if we don't cover everything you
want to know about this, those would be two podcasts that I will
recommend you go listen to.
They're most recent ones that came out.
And when I say recent, because people are listening on podcast and it could be months later,
we're recording this as of January 25th.
And so if you go back from there, you can go to christianpodcastcommunity
.org and what you'll see is all of the
shows, so you can go back and find the shows.
All right?
So,.
This,.
So,.
Drew,.
You were the one that said we needed to address this first.
And then after you and I talked about that, we've gotten a number of people afterwards that had
contacted me asking me if we would address it.
So I'm going to let you set this up for us.
Yeah.
So,.
Again, you know, this was sometime back in September of 23 and
Alistair was doing his radio program and he was,.
He,.
It started off kind of like he was giving advice and giving an example, but, you know, he had someone that
was a grandmother who had written in, either emailed in or called in or something, left a
message, but was looking for advice on what to do because her,
her grandson was about to marry a transgender
person.
I don't know if this was a, a girl trying transitioning into a boy or a boy transitioning into a girl.
And so she was looking for advice on what to do because as a Christian, we cannot,.
Let me,.
Let me say it this way.
We cannot participate in those events.
And really Alistair's position was, have you explained
to your grandson how you feel?
Have you told him your beliefs?
Does he understand?
And everything was, yes, yes, yes, yes.
Okay.
Then it's okay to go.
And by the way, take a gift.
I'm sorry, but no,.
That is,.
And I'm going to quote one of these podcasts that I heard, Chris Honholtz, where he said, that
is bad advice.
Absolutely bad advice.
Actually, both the podcasts I mentioned said.
Well,.
I didn't listen to Nathaniel Jolley's, but I did.
I mean,.
Yet,.
Yet you will.
So,.
So let's,.
Let's,.
Let's deal with this.
So I had several people that reached out to me,.
You know,.
Some people who went to Alistair's church, some people who have read his books and followed the
ministry and all said, I was blessed by him.
What happened?
And here's the thing that I want to say, we do not throw out 40 years of
ministry, of good ministry over one piece of bad advice.
Okay.
If you don't think it's bad, then that's a different issue,.
Right?
Then you don't have a problem with it.
But the, the issue is this,.
And I'm going to,.
I may take a different take than my brothers here.
And so we'll see.
And,.
And,.
But I have two concerns.
Do I have a concern with the advice Alistair Begg gave?
Yeah.
I think there's, there's probably would have been better ways of handling that.
But I understand his intent.
His intent in there was to say,.
Hey,.
Look,.
You've already told this grandson that it's sinful.
He knows it's wrong.
So you shared the gospel.
Hopefully,.
You know,.
I'm assuming with, with your grandson and with that in mind, he says, they expect
you not to show up because that's, that's the way they picture it.
So surprise him, do the opposite, do something to show love.
And we should be showing love,.
Right?
We should be finding ways to do it.
Now there's different ways of doing it.
I'll just say for my own family, when my cousin decided she divorced her husband, and when it's going to
claim to get married to another woman, I love my cousin.
I can talk openly with her.
I,.
I feel like I can talk openly with her, her partner there.
I won't call it a marriage.
And I told him that they, they invited me and they, we sat down and my cousin said, I understand if you
don't want to come, but I wanted to invite you.
And,.
And I said,.
Look,.
A big reason I won't be able to come is not because I don't love you.
I care for you.
I care where you spend eternity,.
Right?
But it's not a marriage.
A marriage is defined by God and not the state.
And so when you get up there and say, you're getting married, it's not
that you're trying to make some social contract.
What you're really doing is spitting in the face of my Lord.
You're taking what he defined and what he has done.
And because you could, as this from a state level, you could call it anything.
They could have same sex unions and call it that, but they don't, they call it marriage for a
reason, because the agenda that we have is to trample everything.
Everything that God upholds.
Yeah. One of it.
Yeah.
There's a couple, a couple of things I want to say, and then I'll turn it over to Han holds.
Well,.
Let me,.
Let me get to my second point then real quick.
Oh,.
And it'd be this.
So that's the one aspect.
My second point is this.
I think,.
And,.
And this is where my brothers here may disagree with me or maybe agree, but we'll see.
I really think that COVID has changed us.
It really has.
In,.
In some ways, very badly because what I have seen since COVID is a Christianity.
That is so much quicker than it used to be.
It used to be quick, but now it's so much quicker to criticize any little thing that may
even seem like someone's going a little bit woke and we're just going to throw you out
completely.
We are going to cancel you like the left does that.
We complain about, because we don't like what you said.
And I really think we, as believers need to slow up a bit.
We should not be a canceled culture.
We should be if there's heresy,.
Right?
I mean,.
When you have people getting up saying heresy, teaching false teachings,.
Yes, we,.
We separate, but Alistair Begg is a brother in Christ.
He has been a faithful minister for 40 years.
We've,.
That I know of now,.
I'm not,.
I haven't really followed him that much and things like that, but I have not heard that he has had
any other issues over the long time of his career.
And I know there was a comment.
Let me find it real quick here.
Dee had said, I read today that Alistair Begg was confronted and refused to change his position on what he
said in regards to Christians attending a trans wedding.
And so, okay.
Does that mean we throw everything out?
No,.
Because we all are disagreeing with each other somewhere.
Okay.
We have to recognize that.
I don't,.
I don't think this is an issue that we suddenly say everything he's done has.
Done.
We throw to the wolves,.
You know,.
Toss him out.
He's gone.
He's dead to us.
But that is how a lot of people are reacting.
And I,.
I'm going to say, I think both of those reaction, both of those advices would be
wrong.
So Drew, what say you?
Yeah.
So I completely agree.
We don't throw out 40 years of faithful gospel ministry.
And the thing, and just in case you haven't followed Alistair Begg and picked up
on this, he is a man who tends to be very gentle when dealing with
certain topics.
He wants to be cautious.
He wants to tread lightly.
He wants you to hear his heart.
He wants to be gracious.
So,.
So he kind of approaches things in a different way that, that others probably aren't used to in the reformed
community, right?
He doesn't, his first, his first response isn't pick up my sword and shield and immediately start cutting throats.
He takes a more gentle approach.
And I think that's one reason why a lot of us, when we hear him saying the same, like a Sinclair Ferguson, right?
When we hear him, who are both Scottish, by the way, it's not just the,.
You know,.
Maybe it's just the accent.
I don't know,.
But,.
But they, they take a little more gentle approach, which I, I think is very, when we hear
that it, it kind of draws us to it.
And it causes us to question what are my motives, right?
What is my intent?
So that's what I'll say about just about Alistair, his, his, his ministry.
But to go to kind of some of the things that he said, if they're
expecting me not to come, if they're going,.
Oh,.
Well we expected you not to come because you're a Christian.
Okay.
That,.
That means you understand my conviction about it.
You may, you may think little of it, but that means somewhere along the lines, I've done a good job in relaying to you
my convictions and why I can't support this.
Because if I do attend, this goes to the second thing I want to say, not it's not
so much that I'm, I'm telling my grandson,.
Hey,.
I love you.
And you know,.
I,.
I can't support this, but I do want to show you, I love you.
What am I testifying to, to the other people who are in attendance that also know my conviction?
I'm telling them that I'm affirming this union because they don't know the conversation I've had with my
grandson or, or whoever, and what it, what it may be.
And I've explained to them my conviction.
They just know that I'm a believer.
I don't think this is right, but yet I come.
And so if I come, then I must be affirming somewhere, somewhere I'm going to start changing is probably their hope.
So what am I saying to the people that are around in attendance to the wedding as well?
Amen.
Absolutely.
And I, I fully agree with that.
I know that when it comes to Aller's Beg, there have been some people who have said they've had concerns.
I think his involvement with the gospel coalition is one of them.
I'll be honest.
I,.
How he or Kevin DeYoung or anybody can continue to maintain an association with them mystifies me, but they stay
solid.
So I'm not going to do a guilt by association.
I'm sorry.
If you want to fire that missile good on you, but I'm not going to do that.
But when it comes to this issue first, he put it out there and let me, let me
just say what I said something earlier.
I said on social media today, we all learned about this about five minutes ago.
Okay.
This,.
This happened say back in September and we all learned about five minutes.
Ago.
That's why I brought up the time because that's the thing that surprised.
Me.
Like no one had an issue until I, I don't know who it is that I think it was protest the, that
released it.
Yeah.
And what's funny is protest.
He had defended him, defended him against this insane attacks that came against him immediately thereafter.
So,.
But yeah,.
No,.
It's a great point.
We've,.
We've known about this for like five minutes and then everybody's upset.
Well,.
He's doubled down.
Yeah.
You learned that about 30 seconds ago and you know why?
Because American family radio did the right thing.
And they went and had a conversation with his ministry staff and they said, we're really concerned about airing you.
If this is where your position is and his ministry staff related back, this is where he stands.
And they gave an explanation why I think they, it was a matter of Christian conscience issue
as opposed to a hard and fast.
Rule.
Now I would disagree with them, but I'm also going to say that's not the same as doubling down and slamming your
fist and saying, this is what a Christian must do.
That's not the exact same thing, but we learned about that less than five minutes ago.
So now we're, we're screaming, he's doubled down.
He's,.
He's clearly knows better.
And I've had people respond to things I posted online.
Well,.
I'm done with him.
He should know better.
Yeah,.
I agree.
He should know better.
As a minister of the gospel, he should know better.
You know,.
It's first Thessalonians five 22 that tells us abstain from every form of evil.
And I think some translations even say every appearance of evil.
So we're not to, to support that, which we know to be sinful goes back to what we learned from first Peter
four, that they get mad at us because we won't support it.
So when a Christian says, do they understand where you're at?
Do they understand why do, do they understand that this is why you can't support it?
And you go,.
Yes, yes, yes.
Then the answer should be good.
You've fully explained it.
Now,.
In order to maintain that position you have with this family member, just keep that bond
of love.
Let's talk about things that you can do rather than going to this wedding.
Cause I, it's exactly what Drew said.
When I go to a wedding like that, what am I saying to the people there?
I affirm this.
I support it because I'm agreeing.
I think some people ask the valid question.
When, if I,.
With the transgender wedding, I doubt this question gets asked, but if anybody has a reason why these two
should not be married, speak now forever, hold your peace.
Now I'm going to guess they're probably not going to ask that question, but if they ask that and you're a Christian,.
What do you do?
Are you going to sit there and say, I'm going to be silent for the sake of love.
I think you would, you would be sinning against your own conscience.
You would,.
You would have a problem there.
So this is,.
This is hugely problematic advice on the part of Alistair Begg.
And I think he's wrong in this.
And I think he needs to back it up and go, what did I do?
Why did I do this?
And then reconsider what he needs to do next, but give him more than 30 seconds before you
throw him to the outer darkness.
Well,.
I think this could have been just a,.
Hey,.
This is the advice I gave.
Maybe not well thought through, but what do we do?
We get,.
There's a lot of different ways of dealing with this,.
Right?
I mean,.
Like for me, for instance, how would I deal with it?
I don't think I would.
Well, I wouldn't go to the wedding, but I think what I would probably do is,.
You know,.
Invite them over my home and have a meal so that I could share the gospel with.
Them.
Maybe the grandson knows, but the partner doesn't.
And,.
And express why it's wrong.
And express God's view on it.
Express why,.
I mean,.
This is what I did with my cousin.
I expressed why I couldn't go to their quote unquote wedding.
And so she understood why I wasn't going to go.
She actually knew, she kind of expected it up front.
So there's, there's someone backstage that is, was asking a question online.
His camera's off right now.
So I don't know if he's,.
If he's still there,.
But I could put his question up.
But Pastor Joe Conkle had, had asked this and Joe,.
If you're,.
If you are backstage and there, just put your camera on and we'll bring you in to ask the question.
But he says, couldn't the same logic be used to condone Begg's officiating
that wedding?
And so I, I'm going to say this just because I know my two brothers here with me, we're only going to give,.
You know,.
Like maybe five to 10 more minutes on this so we can get to the main topic for the evening.
Cause we're, we've done a lot of different segments, but so is it the same thing as condoning a wedding?
I would say no.
I would say if you officiate the wedding,.
You're,.
You're definitely affirming it.
I mean,.
You could be in a, you could be in attendance of something.
And yet,.
I mean,.
I went to a friend of mine who had a wedding in a Catholic church, my wife and
I sat in the back.
And when they got up and did the mass, I purposely did not stand,.
Did not move.
And I sat.
Now,.
Did I participate in the Catholic wedding?
Yeah,.
But I'm not going to participate in their Catholic ritual.
Okay.
Is that condoning their ritual?
I didn't think so.
And my wife and I discussed whether we were going to go to the Catholic because it was in a Catholic church.
So we struggled with that.
I mean,.
This is, if we struggle with going to a Catholic, you know, opposite sex wedding,.
You know,.
Same sex is going to be more issue.
But if you're officiating it,.
Joe,.
I think it's, I think you're, then you're blessing it.
And I would, I would think that that is a higher level.
And I would also add one more thing to that is think about the extent to which Alistair Begg
made it clear.
Does your grandson know where you stand and why?
He is making, and then you look at what he has said consistently about, you know,
sexual immorality.
As a pastor, he's clearly stated,.
These are,.
These are sins.
So with that said, you're not going to find someone like Alistair Begg condoning the
officiating of a sinful union.
He's not going to do that, nor would he counsel someone to do that.
His specific intent as stated in that particular interview was for this
grandmother to maintain that connection,.
To have that,.
That to demonstrate her love for her grandchild there.
That's the point.
And so we, we've got to be really, really careful when we, when we look at what he said and went, that's
bad advice, bad counsel, it's not biblical.
And then it's, and it's, I'm not saying Pastor Joe has said this, but we have a tendency to do this.
We've now generalize it.
And we say,.
Well,.
That could be for this.
And that could be for this.
And it's like,.
Whoa,.
Back up.
There's a context here.
I think the context clarifies, it doesn't excuse it, but it clarifies.
So I would just say, let's be careful when we start saying,.
Well,.
His argument could be used.
No,.
It couldn't because he's not going to use that same argument for a pastor to bless two, two people in
an act of sin.
Yeah.
And,.
And so there's a specific reason I did the segments.
That I,.
That I did, because when you look at what we did in the, in the news segment, and now we take this,.
Right?
So what do we have?
We have a guy who's saying,.
Yeah,.
You can use my building,.
But I'm going to tell you what, that I think it's sinful.
Right now,.
What was their response?
Their response is you must submit to us.
You must celebrate what we're doing.
And that is part of an issue that I think plays into it more than just saying, have you shared
with your grandson that it's wrong?
I would, I would definitely, one of the questions I would ask someone is, does your grandson expect you to
go to affirm his behavior?
Because that makes a major difference now.
Yeah.
Because now if, if he's expecting you to celebrate what these doing and you go,
that becomes,.
You know,.
In,.
In his mind, yes, he knows.
You say it's wrong, but you're affirming them and celebrating it.
And,.
And that then I think becomes a different issue.
Now,.
On the flip side, I also want to say this, Alistair Begg is scheduled to be at shepherd's conference in March.
And I am watching good men who are like,.
They better cancel him.
They better remove him.
You know,.
If, if they don't remove him, they're hypocrites.
Again, we,.
We don't throw out years of, of good ministry just because he gives bad advice once, because guess
what?
Every person that,.
You know,.
That pastors has given bad advice.
I'm sure of it.
All right.
Myself included.
I'm sure of it.
I may not know what it is, but I'm sure of it.
Okay.
So let me go through some of the comments we have.
Dee said, we should avoid the appearance of evil.
Um,.
We have, Kathy, you said,.
Uh,.
We each have our own convictions.
It's not a gospel issue.
And I agree.
It's not a gospel issue.
Um,.
But in, in here's the thing.
Hold on.
You've got, you've got someone backstage.
Who's waving you off.
He's going to say it is a gospel issue.
Hold on.
Uh,.
Let me,.
Let me respond to it and say this.
It's not a gospel issue.
Okay.
But in the first century, we see in the scriptures that people held baptism.
They said, if you basically, they put baptism, almost linked it with salvation.
In other words,.
If you weren't willing to be baptized, people questioned your salvation.
After a couple hundred years, there's persecution coming in.
The Romans come in and say, give us your Bibles.
If you don't give us your Bible,.
You know,.
We're taking you off the prison.
And so there, you had people who said, you're not taking my Bible, take me to prison.
And they take them to prison and they take the Bibles anyway.
And others who said,.
Well,.
You know,.
You're just going to throw me in prison and then go take my Bible.
Anyway,.
I might as well give you a book or one of my Bibles or part of my Bible and keep the rest.
When, when,.
You know,.
Uh,.
Constantine says,.
Oh,.
We're all Christian.
And those people who were in jail were freed.
You know,.
What became a watershed issue?
Did you give up your Bible or not?
And the people who went to jail because they refused to give up their Bible question, the salvation of
those who didn't go to jail and gave up their Bible and, and said like, they're not saved.
It became a watershed issue.
Now,.
Why am I saying all that?
Because in our day and age, this is becoming a watershed issue.
If you are unwilling to stand strong on what the Bible says against homosexuality and
transgenderism, because they are pushing it on us, they are making this a
watershed issue for Christians.
So is it a gospel issue?
No,.
But I would say it's a watershed issue that people end up tying so closely to.
It,.
Just like baptism and whether you'll give up your Bible, it's become so close to it that
it is something that I think is very similar looking to a gospel issue.
And,.
And it's something I, and that's why I defined it as a watershed issue.
I will seriously question any person who says they're a Christian, especially at the
pastorate level, a theology theological level that starts to say that
homosexuality is okay.
I'm going to have to start questioning that because they should know better.
Let me just, I want to rattle off some of these just to get to them.
And then I want to bring Chris Huff in real quick.
And it's hard to say for Chris Huff to be quick, but I'm glad he's laughing
backstage.
Frank says,.
It's not a Ravi Zacharias issue.
That's true.
It's not, but Ravi had bigger issues,.
But it's,.
It's a different issue.
And again, the Ravi Zacharias issue was different.
It was disqualifying, but this is becoming a watershed.
And so I do think it's different.
And I would say, do I think that Alistair Begg has gone woke?
No.
Is he gone off the wrong side of this?
And,.
You know, he's a bad person.
No,.
I think that we, we just have to realize that
this is an issue that for our generation is different than it is in
previous generations.
All right.
Hearing that Ravi Zacharias comment.
I mean,.
It just seems like there's some category errors when just all over the place.
Like what,.
Between what Alistair Begg said and then throwing in the Ravi Zacharias situation, the two aren't even comparable.
Correct.
Which is what I think he's trying to say, but people are probably responding in a similar manner as to though,.
Well,.
Ravi was this and we just, you know, we've ripped down his ministries.
Alistair Begg is being treated in the same way.
And it's like, I think that's his point.
These are not the same situation.
But as, as Dee is saying here, but this is the first step down a slippery slope.
And actually where I think the slippery slope always seems to begin with this is allowing women to preach.
But Chris, I'm going to bring Chris in and he made a good comment in the private chat that maybe he's going to want to talk about, but
a watershed issue we see in the scripture circumcision.
Right.
Yeah. Yeah.
So,.
I mean,.
It's the same kind of thing.
It's the same kind of concept.
It's like,.
You know people would all the time ask.
And that's,.
That's why Paul addressed it in Romans chapter four, you know?
So,.
So it was Abraham saved.
It was Abraham granted faith and righteousness before or after he was circumcised.
And so Paul, Paul addresses that in Romans four.
So a couple of things about Robbie or not Robbie,.
Listen to me,.
Like you guys are talking about Robbie.
I'm like, no,.
It's not the same thing.
A couple of things about Alistair.
Number one, he should not be removed from the chef con preaching schedule.
I think it would be an absolute blessing and a treat for everyone in attendance and everyone watching on live stream.
If you've never heard Alistair preach, go listen to him preach.
And I'm sure it's going to come up in the Q and a.
Oh,.
I'm sure.
Especially if my Johnson questions.
Yeah. Yeah.
So Q and a shut around the world.
Yeah.
So, so,.
So a couple of things, I mean, a couple of things about this is something else that I heard someone say.
Is,.
You know, okay, so if you voiced your opinion and I put this in the private chat too, if you voiced your opinion and sorry about my
voice, my throat is killing me.
If you voiced your opinion to this person, this family member, and you've let them know that it is a sin against the Lord.
And then I do not support this union.
It's not a union.
It's not,.
You know,.
The state may recognize it as a marriage,.
But before, before the Lord, according to the word of God, you are entering into a covenant that he does not
recognize.
And that he abhors and he hates.
And in turn,.
He hates you for,.
For the sin in your life, just like he, you know, apart from Christ hates me and hates the sin in my life.
And so,.
But in someone, I saw someone in the comments say,.
Well, well,.
If you've voiced that and then you go and attend and stuff, could that be a salt situation
where they see you and their conscience is pricked and it, you know,.
Kind of,.
Kind of rubs that in a little bit more.
Sure.
It could be,.
But,.
But that also does go against the clear commands of scripture.
I think of,.
You know,.
Ephesians five,.
11,.
And do not participate in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead even expose them.
Paul said in first Corinthians five, to have nothing to do, do not associate with sexually immoral
people.
Second Corinthians six 14, do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers for what partnership is right.
Have righteousness and lawlessness or what fellowship is like.
So, and,.
And,.
And that's that there are multiple other passages of scripture you can look at and go to, but we have to remember too, like someone said that it's not a
gospel issue.
No, it's not.
It's not from a salvific issue.
Sure.
It's not,.
But what is marriage?
Marriage is to be a picture of the gospel.
Marriage is the,.
I can't remember who it was.
A song I heard years ago.
Marriage is the picture of the story that heaven tells.
Right.
And so if you're going in attendance and it's just like, it's the same concept as,.
As, as,.
You know, playing Bethel and Hillsong,.
We don't,.
We don't support their theology, but we're still going to play these songs.
Well,.
You're given that stamp of approval, whether you realize it or not, it's the same kind of concept.
And so by going and doing that,.
It's,.
It's that, but then on the flip side, right on the flip side, I think of I'm, I'm studying Romans right now.
And this week in reading Romans 13 through 16 and Romans 14 talks about weaknesses and
weaknesses and fellow believers.
And earlier in Romans and Romans 12, it talks about giving preference to one another, outdoing
one another and good and showing good to one another.
And so you also have to ask the question is, you know for the believers in attendance at this
wedding,.
Is this,.
Is this an opportunity to grow in sanctification?
I mean, so I think overall scripture is pretty clear that we shouldn't attend.
Obviously someone mentioned something about, about officiating.
Absolutely not.
I don't, and I have a very good friend of mine who is personal friends with Alistair.
Beck.
And trust me, Alistair's not gone woke.
Um, uh, D D,.
You know,.
Said,.
D said, this is the first step in the slippery slope.
Sure.
It could be, or it could be an issue of just like,.
Hey,.
I'm just trying to, I'm just trying to go above and beyond and showing love and, and looking at the example that our Lord
left and, and, you know, going and eating with tax collectors, eating with centers, eating with prostitutes,.
Et cetera,.
So on and so forth.
Now, again,.
He's the Lord Jesus Christ.
We are not, that's a narrative,.
Not,.
Not a, not a prescriptive command in scripture.
We,.
We defer to those instead of the narratives.
Um,.
You know,.
But,.
But I think here's something else that really bugs the crap out of me.
It's just like,.
Okay,.
I understand this is on a podcast.
I understand it was released publicly.
I get that.
But part of me brothers is so stinking sick of when somebody says something
like this,.
That doesn't,.
That goes against the clear commands of scripture.
I'll, I'll,.
I'll give up, but not everything has to be tried in the court of public opinion.
Thank you.
And that's,.
That's the point that I think.
That's the thing that has bothered me the most.
Now I'm,.
I want to move to the next segment.
I'm just going to read because this could be concerning.
Melissa Owen says this, not to stir up controversy here, but Alistair did allow a woman to be
in the pulpit at a Sunday serving.
Now.
So Melissa, I would want to know more context to that because that could be now that could be a different
issue.
Like, was she just getting up and sharing a testimony or making an announcement or was she preaching
that that would become a big difference.
And then if he starts waffling on that, like if he waffled on that and now we see this, then yeah, that could
be the slippery slope.
Right.
So that was one of the things that I tried to make a point of on the voice reason radio episode.
We could,.
This be a, an indication of him going a certain direction possibly, but that means giving it
time and seeing what happens, which is why so emphasized.
We learned about this five minutes ago.
The doubling down was 30 seconds ago.
Y 'all need to stop.
And I'm not going to argue this with anybody because we've all said what we need to say.
Now we need to let time go forward.
And,.
And it, this goes back to what you said,.
Andrew.
And I think you're absolutely right.
I actually don't disagree with you.
I,.
When it comes to the issue of COVID, it did change us because that was a watershed moment where
churches closed.
Some didn't, some did.
And many Christians went on the attack against one and other without giving
due credence to the possible reasons why.
And now we've got that divide and we have, we have yet to go back.
So it could be, but it's going to take more than five minutes worth of analysis
and a week or two of, of us discussing this on our own podcast.
And aren't we so great.
We're talking about the hot button issue of the week or whatever we need to.
Stop.
We need to be patient.
We need to trust the Lord.
And if he is indeed going the wrong direction, God will reveal it in his time.
Okay.
So here's, here's the thing,.
Right?
And I know Andrew, we need to move on, but like I'm reading through these this quarter, the Christian complete armor, the
three volume set that came from Alistair's ministry.
Like that,.
That's where I bought these.
Listen to what William says in here.
Our love for one another is the insignia of our allegiance to him.
If Satan can set us at odds with a brother, he gives us, he gives a deep wound to our godliness and
to the whole cause of Christ.
He knows we will hardly join hands in a duty.
If we cannot join hearts and love, where is Christ's compassion in the church today?
It is evident the lack of this last piece of armor gives Satan the great advantage in our time.
We've become penny pinchers with God's mercy for fear.
Our charity will be too broad.
Whereas in a biblical sense, if it's not as wide as the world, it is too narrow for the command, which bids us
to do good to all.
So yeah.
And,.
And all.
Right, let me just, I want to get some of these things really quick after now, because we've been using some terms.
Melissa is saying, what does watershed moment mean?
Watershed.
It's basically like, this is a turning point.
This is a, you cannot go beyond this point where they're forcing this to be an issue of
kind of questioning, like where it becomes sign of, if you are weak on this,
we even question whether you're, you're in the, in the faith.
That's kind of,.
You know,.
What ends up happening?
Kathy is saying,.
Amen.
Christians are becoming like sharks, sharks in the water, seeing blood.
And that's,.
That's part of the thing that,.
That,.
That I've been, that I was wanting to address.
Now,.
The last comment, and I'm not even going to pry answer it, but these just asking what about the fact that Alistair was on the board of the gospel
coalition?
Is that a cause concern?
Actually?
No,.
Because the gospel coalition itself is the cause for concern.
Like, yeah,.
It is a cause of concern.
Why is Alistair on that board?
Not the concern is not with Alistair.
The concern is with Alistair being like, he should know better to be on the board.
All right.
So I wanted to get to this.
So we, we want to deal with the remnant radio.
Okay.
I have five clips from their first argument.
They're making arguments.
Now,.
Let me, I want to preface this by saying I,.
I,.
I have never listened to the remnant radio before.
I have about 60 hours that are downloaded that I started
listening to.
And so I,.
I,.
And I will challenge.
If, if they want to critique me at all, I will challenge them to first listen to 60 hours of me
before they, they critique.
That is no simple task.
Well,.
The reason being is we gotta be, we gotta,.
I want to know where their heart is.
I want to know that I'm not misrepresenting them.
Okay.
It's easy to grab a clip and play it or like a ballast or beg, play a clip and then start
making all kinds of accusations or conclusions.
I want to make sure I hear them out before I start,.
You know,.
Chris.
And if they said,.
Yeah,.
We're willing to debate you.
I would,.
I mean,.
I would listen to all that.
I got,.
I have, I think 80 hours of, of Michael Brown downloaded.
I haven't started listening to that yet.
I have what his books are like 800 and 400 pages on like that, that I have
to read through in prep because I want to make sure that I'm properly representing his position.
Cause what, what good is it doing a debate and arguing?
It's a straw man.
That's not good for the audience.
It's not helpful for anybody.
So I will say this.
I found them to be refreshing.
I think that they try to be very balanced.
Okay.
I don't agree with their conclusions.
We'll go through that, but I did find it to be,.
I,.
I see,.
I,.
They're,.
They seem like very likable men.
That,.
Um,.
They have their views and I'm going to show where we dis I disagree or we disagree with it.
Um,.
So let me play this first clip.
The first clip is,.
Uh,.
Where they're going to introduce the first argument.
It's 53 seconds long.
And then we can address this,.
Uh, together.
These,.
These postures are hermeneutics.
So I think it's probably important to start in, in telling our audience that not all cessationists are going to have the same kind of arguments.
Not all cessationists are,.
Uh,.
Formed at the same kind of theology.
It's not a monolith.
Um,.
Some are going to make the case that the gifts died out.
Some of the gifts, some cessationists are going to make the case that the gifts are tied into the apostolic ministry.
And when the 12 apostles ceased and those gifts see, some will say that it's with the closing of the Canon.
Uh,.
Every cessationist is going to say different things.
Uh,.
Cessationists don't mean that they believe that the Holy spirit is no longer operating in the church, or they don't believe in the baptism of the
spirit, or they don't believe in supernatural miracles.
They still believe God can do miracles today.
They still believe God is working in his church.
So there's no reason to create cessationism in this monolith and, and beat up a straw man.
We don't want to do that.
What we do want to do is try to take some of their argumentations.
And.
And address,.
I, sorry,.
Cut it off, cut it off shortly,.
But, but,.
And that's what we're trying to do here as well,.
Right?
It is about hermeneutics.
We're going to get into the issue of hermeneutics,.
But.
We look just like there.
He's saying rightly that not all cessationists are all monolithic.
Neither are all continuationists.
And so you're hearing that here with him.
Like it's refreshing to hear a continuationist admit that not all sensationists are,.
Don't, you know,.
Deny miracles.
That was a question that I saw in the chat earlier.
Something about, you know,.
Do,.
Do we, you know, do we believe in it?
You know,.
I'm trying to see if I can find it.
If I, yeah, Joe,.
Joe had asked.
So,.
So gifts, not miracles.
Or, or does the doctrine believe miracles have also stopped?
This is the way many people describe it.
Like if you believe that certain of these.
Gifts.
I'm really surprised because I call them revelatory gifts.
I have never heard anybody use it that way before me.
And I was glad when the cessationist film came out, but when they did that and they were like,.
Wait,.
What gift?
There's a first that they had heard that term.
I had to explain that.
And I was glad that I saw that that got into the film.
This clip was long before the film was even a concept.
So they did not get this language from the film cessationist, which if you haven't seen the cessationist film,.
Okay,.
Go do that.
But so they got it from somewhere.
Now,.
I don't know where they got it.
And so maybe you're like, it's one of these things where you think something originates with you.
And then you realize,.
No,.
It didn't.
Others have really have come to the same conclusion.
So.
Not all.
Charismatics and the carrot.
When we say charismatics, we're talking about people that believe the gifts continue.
There is no middle ground here, by the way.
You either believe the gifts continue or you don't.
I mean,.
It's not like they do both.
These are,.
This is a mutually exclusive thing,.
Right?
But for those that believe there's, they continue, there is a wide spectrum.
There are those who will say that if you don't have the gift of speaking in languages, you are
not saved.
That's an extreme position.
And to characterize all charismatics.
With that extreme.
Would be just as wrong as the charismatics telling you a cessationist that you don't believe in miracles.
Today.
We believe God does miracles.
We just don't believe God gives a gift of miracles.
And I think I could support that in scripture.
Just go to strike .org slash miracles.
You could read and actually watch these,.
My,.
My talk at the cessationist conference and, and see that.
So.
So I,.
So I just want to point out it is a harmonical issue.
And so.
I want to be fair with them as I think they're trying to be fair with.
Us.
So let's, let's dig into this first that there's going to describe the first.
Argument.
So here it is.
And this is a minute and 15 minutes and 15 seconds.
First Corinthians 13, eight predicts the present cessation of apostolic signed gifts, such as
tongues and prophecy.
It does talk about the, the ceasing of the gifts for sure, but it's not because
God suddenly withdrew those gifts.
It's because of when that prophecy or the perfect comes, all gifts will cease.
Cause we'll have no need for them.
And when Jesus returns and judgment has happened and all that's left are those who believe in Christ and
are part of his body.
Will you need the gift of evangelism?
No.
Will you need the gift of healing?
No,.
Because we'll have resurrection bodies.
Will you get need a gift of tongues?
No,.
Because at that time we can pray or I guess you say our ability to commune with God
will be perfect and complete.
Unlike it is today.
And so the scriptures themselves don't suddenly make all of those gifts unnecessary.
And also they'll point to the perfect being the canonization of the.
Scriptures.
But the problem is we still need healing today.
Like people's bodies are still broken down.
We still need it.
We still need the gift of evangelism today.
People are still lost and outside of the community of faith.
In the same way, I would say all the gifts are actually needed.
Okay.
So we talked hermeneutics and I want it.
I want you to see what this brother has done.
He said that when you look in first Corinthians 13,.
Eight,.
The teleos, the word translated perfect, that word doesn't mean perfect.
It means complete or mature.
It's it's perfect in the sense of something that's completed or matured.
That's the way it's used throughout the scriptures.
So when we see this, he's saying it cannot be the canon.
Why?
Because we need healing today.
Okay.
What he did without realizing it is he's allowing his, his preconceived ideas
to interpret scripture.
One of the first things I teach when I teach hermeneutics, which is the art and science of interpretation.
When I teach that the first principle, and those who have taken the classes with me, you know,
this, the first principle I teach is to question your own pre subpositions.
You let the scripture do the teaching.
You don't bring your preconceived ideas into the scripture.
You question your preso your presuppositions or pre conditions by the.
Scripture.
And what he's doing is he's, he's bringing something in.
Now I will challenge you to look through first Corinthians 13, specifically eight and
following and show me anywhere where healing is mentioned.
It's not there.
Now I will also challenge you.
You tell me where, where we need healing.
Notice what he said.
We need healing.
Really?
Why?
Because we want healing.
We don't need healing.
You know what we, you know,.
We need, we need to suffer eternity in a Lake of fire because
we are horrible, rotten, wicked sinners who have broken God's law
over and over and over again.
We do not need healing.
In fact, we do not deserve healing.
We deserve God's judgment, but he gives us salvation.
He doesn't always heal.
Now the fact that he,.
Okay.
He says we need healing.
Does,.
Is the body feeling the effects of sin?
Yes.
And so,.
Yeah.
And,.
And so we looked this Kofi says, so YouTube didn't notify me.
The show was on.
What did I miss?
A whole lot.
You missed everything.
Kofi.
We saw, we solved about nine different world problems.
So, so,.
So what we have here is I want you,.
You know,.
When we hear an argument, one of the things,.
And,.
And these guys make arguments that if you listen just to their arguments, you can be
convinced.
Let me be fair.
If you listen only to my arguments, I believe that I can convince you.
But what you should do is look at scripture and look at how we, how we make the arguments.
Okay.
So when I make a case that the teleos is the Canon and that these gifts
are revelatory, how do I make that?
Well,.
If I look at first Corinthians 13, eight and following it, some clear things he's saying here, he speaks of a gift
of prophecy.
Okay.
Let's hold off on what the prophecy is for a moment, but a gift of prophecy that'll be done away.
And he mentions a gift of knowledge that'll be done away.
Both of those things, the way it is worded in the Greek, those stop because something
happens.
What happens?
The teleos, whatever that is, but it says,.
Uh,.
Tongues will cease.
Now it's interesting because the cease here is a future middle indicative, which means
they cease on their own.
They cause themselves to cease.
So if you're given this gift, what this is seeming that you're given this gift.
If God stops giving it, it will cease on its own as people die out, which is different than the
other two gifts, which are the other two gifts are what we see.
What reason I call them revelatory gifts is because they're tied to revelation, new revelation of
scripture.
And it says,.
But when the,.
Uh,.
For we know in part and we prophesy in part, see the knowledge and the prophecy are partial.
Now that is the following.
The very next verse,.
Verse,.
But when the completion comes, let me use that word, which is a
fair reading of teleos to be complete or mature.
When the maturity comes, the partial will be done away.
So whenever this thing is completed,.
Whatever that is,.
The partial things go away.
So whatever the teleos is, it is directly tied to the knowledge
and prophecy.
So if knowledge and prophecy are revelation, something that gives
revelation from God, then that is directly related to
that.
You can't suddenly say it's something else.
The context immediately does not give you.
This is Christ.
Just because the word perfect is used in English and Jesus is perfect because that word is not
used that way elsewhere.
And so, okay.
We just can't jump into something like that.
So when it comes to the prophecy and this, he's going to bring this up later, but I want, if you guys
don't mind, if you're not driving the car, just open your Bible to Exodus chapter seven.
I know, I know that's old Testament.
You don't get there often.
Oh, okay.
Maybe you do because you started your Bible reading and you're, you're, you're started from Genesis and you're right about
Exodus seven by now.
Right?
Almost.
Almost.
There you go.
So the first four verses say this, then the Lord said to Moses,.
Quote,.
See,.
I make you as God to Pharaoh and your brother, Aaron shall be your
profit.
You shall be all the, that I command you.
And your brother, Aaron shall speak to Pharaoh that he let the sons of Israel go out
to his land.
But I will harden Pharaoh's heart that he may multiply my, that I may multiply my
signs and my wonders in the land of Egypt.
When Pharaoh does not listen to them, then I will lay my hand on Egypt and
bring out my hosts,.
My people,.
The sons of Israel from the land of Egypt by, by great judgments.
Unquote.
So what you have here is a couple of things.
One,.
First off side note, the signs and wonders did not lead Pharaoh to evangelism and
salvation.
It hardened his heart.
So the argument is.
Yeah.
The LSV says,.
I love that.
Yeah.
So,.
So miracles don't lead to salvation guaranteed,.
Right?
In Pharaoh's case, it led to a hardening, but I want you to notice we're having prophecy here.
He's a prophet.
What is a profit?
You shall speak all that I command you.
This is not, and we'll get to this in later episodes when we, as we respond to them, but this is not
that Moses is interpretation of what God says.
Prophecy is the direct revelation from God to man.
That is relayed directly as God gave it.
There is no interpretation here.
God doesn't say Moses, I'm going to tell you and you give your interpretation to Aaron.
No,.
He says, you shall speak all that I command you and your brother, Aaron shall speak
to Pharaoh.
No,.
What?
Because Moses was like,.
Oh,.
But I stutter.
God said, okay, I'm going to use Aaron as the profit.
You are going to be the mouth.
You're going to say, I'm going to tell you exactly what you're going to say.
You're going to say exactly that to Aaron.
And Aaron is going to say exactly that to Pharaoh.
There is no interpretation.
There's no mixing of words here.
That's what prophecy is.
It is a direct revelation.
Okay.
And so we have to understand that.
So if this is direct revelation, then the direct revelation stops at some point.
So if it's the Canon,.
Well,.
When the Canon is a complete, you don't need the prophecy anymore.
You don't need that direct revelation because the Canon is complete.
That makes sense with this.
He says it doesn't make, it doesn't make any sense.
What makes perfect sense?
Because when that, when that revelation is completed, you no longer need the partial.
That's exactly what the text says.
Right.
And so it's, and notice what I'm doing,.
Folks,.
I am fitting exactly with the context.
I'm walking through verse by verse, and I'm looking at the immediate context, which is exactly how you
interpret scripture.
You don't jump somewhere else.
You don't insert something in that,.
You know,.
Like healing into this.
Okay.
Well, and this,.
This highlights, Andrew, this highlights the importance of,.
I mean,.
You already said it's hermeneutics,.
But,.
But deeper study go deeper than just the, your surface level reading and you approaching the
scripture with framework instead of gathering your framework from what the scriptures teach implicitly.
So it's,.
We,.
We do need healing.
We do look at Romans three.
There is no one righteous, not even one.
The poison of asks is on our lips.
And then we see in Romans five, the healing, the healing that we receive is the heat, the true healing we need.
And that is how can a simple man be made right with a Holy God.
So that's the healing we need, you know, healing from the temporal healing from the temporal still happens.
And I think that you, what's interesting about his argument here is he's saying that categorically with
cessationists that not all cessationists believe that all miracles have ceased yet.
His first argument is cessationists believe that all healings and miracles have.
Ceased.
What?
No,.
No,.
No,.
No,.
We do not.
It's any time,.
Drew,.
I think I've heard you say this man, when we've talked about this, like anytime there is healing, like I'm sick right now, I got a
massive sore throat and running a fever off and on all day.
I feel like I've been run over, but Lord willing, when I am healed of that,.
That's a,.
That is the miracle of the body that the Lord created, even though it is wrapped in flesh,.
Even though it is,.
I still wrestle with sin on the side of eternity.
The fact that the Lord would be gracious to allow my temporal body to be healed of this temporal sickness is a miracle.
So let me, let me, let me emphasize, cause I wanted, I knew this would come up at some point.
I have it.
I was going to bring it up in a later clip, but you mentioned it.
So anyone who's a regular watcher of this show, you may have
not even noticed that something's different with me.
Now,.
Something had changed and it's now different.
I am not wearing glasses.
I don't know if any of you picked up on that.
I did.
I had double vision.
I had to get special glasses to solve the double vision.
Sunday, I went for a run.
I took the glasses off.
I,.
I don't want the run and jumped in a sauna.
I didn't have the glass.
You can't bring glasses in the sauna.
It doesn't, doesn't not good.
That doesn't work.
And so I was three hours.
I forgot to put them on and went ahead dinner.
And all of a sudden I turned my wife.
I'm like,.
I've had no glasses on for six hours.
I don't have any issue with double vision.
And so I left them off.
My wife's like, maybe leave them off on Monday.
Okay.
Tuesday, Wednesday,.
Thursday,.
Right?
Now we're going to the doctor, the eye doctor tomorrow.
I'm going to talk to the eye doctor because now, is this a miracle?
No,.
Because the doctor said this is the, it could have, it could heal itself.
Does this mean I could get the problem again?
It could.
Yep. Yep.
But did God heal me?
Well,.
Yeah,.
Because God,.
Every,.
Everything that happens is from God,.
Right?
That either allows it or brings it to be.
But is it a miracle?
I'm not going to say it's a miracle because this is the way the human body works and God can work within the way
the human body works.
So, no, Well,.
There was something I wanted to say in terms of,.
Um,.
The hermeneutics,.
The,.
The verse we're looking at prophecy,.
Uh,.
Tongues being done away with the thing that is perfect, right?
And so one of the things that these guys talk about in this,.
Uh,.
Podcast is that they'll mention it.
They'll say scripture is sufficient.
Okay.
But is the question is, is scripture sufficient enough to do away with prophecy,.
Right?
Is it sufficient enough to do away with tongues?
Because if it's not, then it's not sufficient.
Now,.
I'm sure that they would agree if,.
If, if,.
If I say is scripture and it's autographs as written by the apostles,
is it perfect?
Because it is from God.
It is from the mind of God, breathed out by God.
Is it perfect?
Yes.
Okay.
Well then there is something else other than Christ that is perfect.
And that is Christ words.
That is the words of God, right?
So, so this, and this goes again, back to this sufficiency of scripture.
Do you believe it's sufficient to do away with prophecy?
Because if it is sufficient to do away with prophecy, what do the scriptures not have that you
need extra biblical prophecy for?
There it is.
Yeah.
And let me,.
Let me just bring this up.
Joe says, as far as healing first Corinthians 12,.
Eight.
So if Paul still talks about the gifts have not stopped there.
That's right.
We, we,.
We agree.
Everybody agrees that that the time of Paul's writing of this, that the gifts have not stopped.
One of the earliest books that he wrote.
Later, he's going to talk about someone who,.
You know,.
Nearly died, taking care of him.
And he doesn't heal him.
He just go home.
So everyone's not so worried about you.
So I just wanted to throw two cents in on something, because something you said with regard to Pharaoh and the,
and the signs done before him, that Pharaoh's heart was hardened.
There's this hermeneutic of,.
Well,.
We need these gifts because these things are still going on.
For example, healing.
Well,.
If we need the gifts and the, and the gifts are necessary for evangelism and other things, let's, let's look at what
scripture says with regard to.
When Christ performed healing, he healed a man's hand on the Sabbath.
And what was the reaction?
They were angry with him.
He cast demons out of a man, a legion of demons, cast them into the pigs.
The people saw the man in his right mind.
What was that?
What did they do?
They were afraid and told him, get out.
It wasn't because the pigs went in the water.
It's because the man was healed.
You see over and over again,.
Where,.
You know,.
And also,.
Okay,.
Casting out demons.
Oh,.
He does it by the power of Satan.
So over and over again, while yes, there were people who saw the signs and
recognize them for what they were, testimony to who Christ was. There were just as many
people who were angry, afraid, or despising of him for
those signs.
The idea that we need sign gifts in order to do evangelism is
fallacious because we can actually see in scripture, the signs themselves do not, are not some
de facto way of turning someone to Christ.
You know, we actually see where it does the opposite effect.
It is the words of Christ that actually bring people to salvation.
That his, his sign gifts were that which testified and later to the apostles testified that they were called of
Christ, but it was the words that they preached that brought people to salvation.
It was not the signs.
And let me touch on the, the context again,.
Real quick,.
Andrew,.
Just because,.
Because it deals with the hermeneutics and what you brought up.
Because.
They,.
They said in the clip that you played, they they're bringing in healing, right?
They're bringing things that the text doesn't talk about later.
They're going to talk about how we introduce ideas that are not into the text.
We read them in the text, but that's exactly what he did here.
And how do we know?
Because the context continues into chapter 14, where he talks about
prophecy and tongues, two specific gifts and how that
the church and he's rebuking him, rebuking them.
By the way, first Corinthians is a book of rebuke.
They're going to mention,.
Right, right.
But for their desiring of these gifts, rather than
as it begins in 13, focusing on the love that that should be focused on.
Well,.
That's because we're going to get,.
Yeah,.
That's the, I don't want to go ahead.
Cause I want to take it where they're, where they go.
But I, so before I, and by the way, I am playing longer clips.
I have cut this down because I cut out some of where,.
You know,.
They're stumbling or they, they misquoted reverse or they're like trying to figure it.
Yeah.
I don't want to, I cut some out, so I'm going to be fair, but I'm playing the large
portion of their, their quotes because I want you to get the context.
I don't want to misrepresent them.
So you can hear,.
I mean,.
You can go back and listen to their whole thing, but that's why I'm playing longer, longer clips.
This next one is nearly a minute and a half.
And so we're going to walk through the passage, but I want you to notice what I had said.
When I'm looking at what does the word perfect tell us, what is it referring to?
What am I tying it to?
The immediate context before verse nine, for we know in part, and we prophesy in part and the
immediate verse after the partial will be done.
Away.
What is the partial?
The text says it.
Knowledge.
Prophecy.
That's the partial.
I mean,.
The verse before says those are, they are going to cease.
They're going to be done away.
Right?
And so this is now saying,.
Yeah,.
These things, these things are going to be done away.
They're partial.
And the partial will be done away when,.
Well,.
Verse 10, when the teleos comes.
So whatever the teleos is, it is not direct.
It is not tied to the end times.
It is not tied to the second coming of Christ.
It is not time to the person of Christ.
It's not tied to your death.
It is directly tied to the partial being done away.
Partial completion.
The word means complete,.
Complete,.
Partial.
They kind of go together when something is partial and it's completed.
The partial is done because it's completed.
It's fitting perfectly with the context.
Drew's just sitting there laughing and smirking.
Sorry.
All right.
Sorry.
It's in the private chat.
Oh,.
Okay.
So now you're going to make us have to read it.
Yeah.
So what the fact that Chris is saying I got to leave shortly,.
Brothers,.
Is that.
And then my response,.
Your response was,.
No,.
You don't.
If you leave your support, trans rights.
So Chris,.
If Chris,.
Not just brutal here, golly,.
Man,.
If he leaves, that means that he supports trans rights.
According to Drew.
Okay.
Oh,.
So this is how,.
How,.
You know,.
This is how Twitter is done.
And by the way, by the way, for the record, since we talked about this, and this was brought up, Melissa did some research.
This is what I love about our audience.
They don't, they double check their own work, their own things that they said.
So Melissa said, I think I was mistaken about Alistair.
He had Helen Rose come to his church and speak.
It could have been in regards to her testimony.
I know that many people were upset about it.
And so she then said to Kathy, gotcha,.
Kathy.
I only knew that people were upset about Alistair, allowing her to be at the pulpit.
But I guess Kathy had said, she's a missionary speaking and reporting.
I don't see a problem with that depends on the church.
So just, just for the record, as I had said, it depends on the context of a woman speaking that I might,
or might not have an issue with it.
If a missionary sharing what she did on the mission field, I may not have an issue with it.
It depends how it's done.
So let's play this next clip from there.
It's about a minute and a half.
Yeah. I mean,.
That's a,.
That's a strange argument to make because why would the canonization of scripture suddenly make the need for
words of knowledge?
Gone.
Like what, what is it about the fulfillment of all the scriptures being collected suddenly making that
absolute.
I mean,.
We still need words of knowledge to demonstrate the power of God.
We still need prophecy to demonstrate the power of God.
If you look at first Corinthians 14, he'll say, if an unbeliever run, get the person walks into your community
and all are prophesying, will that person not fall on their face declaring God is surely among you because the
secrets of his heart are laid bare.
So do we not need that anymore?
Because we have the scriptures.
It literally uses the word prophecy.
So the prophecy ceasing is not having to do with anything with the.
Scriptures.
It has to do with Jesus returning.
Wow.
Wow.
Wow.
Now we know, or we see in a, a mirror dimly.
Then we shall see face to face.
What is the face to face?
It's speaking to God.
Like Moses did.
And perfect.
And in friendship.
And Moses was the only person that got to do that.
And yet we're told that that's going to be us one day, but it hadn't happened yet.
The scriptures haven't all of a sudden replaced that.
Okay.
So the guys are like losing it here.
Does this not do everything?
He just said the Bible.
This is the prophecy.
Everything in here does that.
And I want to point something out that drew said earlier, is it sufficient enough?
Because what is he saying here?
We he's admitting we have scripture, but we need more prophecy.
Well,.
If we need more prophecy than this prophecy, the Bible,
then it's not sufficient.
Let's just take into consideration.
Paul.
Okay.
He wrote another letter.
All right.
It's a little bit after first Corinthians.
We call it,.
We call it,.
You know, the pastoral epistles.
Okay.
In there, he says, give some instruction to a guy named Timothy, where he says,
uh, do the work of an evangelist, but it's within the context
of what the scriptures, preaching the word.
So if someone, a nonbeliever, I don't know, comes into your church, how are you going to evangelize to
them?
I'm probably going to proclaim the word of God to them.
The same way I know evangelists like Andrew, like Brian nine, like
other faithful men who go out into the streets, and preach.
They don't just go with just, just to go with, with their own assumption that,.
Oh,.
Well,.
The Lord will give me a word to prophesy out.
No,.
They go with the word to proclaim.
That's what they,.
What,.
Oh,.
What am I ever going to do?
If I go to preach in a church service and a nonbeliever is not there, I'm probably going to rely on the word of God.
Yeah.
I want to, I want to walk through this.
Okay.
Chris,.
Go ahead.
I just want to say this.
And then I really do have to jet guys.
What was the right?
No,.
Because I,.
No,.
I don't.
If he leaves, if he leaves,.
He he's,.
He he's going to watch elf.
No,.
Absolutely not.
I'm going to go eat dinner with my family is what I'm going to do.
What, what was the,.
What did the prophet, what were the prophets do?
Thus sayeth the Lord, whether it was a commandment from God, regarding the law,
whether it was a judgment for the disobedience or whether it was future prophetic revelation, it was always
a direct word from God.
Thus sayeth the Lord.
What does the new Testament church have?
Why is it so necessary to say the word that the scriptures is enough, and we don't need God's revelation because
that's what this is.
Thus sayeth the Lord, everything that they said we need is contained in these 66
books.
Every prophetic revelation that we need, every judgment for sin that we need,.
Every,.
You know, every commandment of obedience, which then reveals to us our need for salvation,
which then is the gospel, which is in here that everything you need, everything they say that
you need is contained in here.
What more would be necessary?
And it goes back to,.
As you said,.
Andrew, quoting Drew, do you believe it is sufficient enough?
And that's the point,.
Right?
This,.
This is everything you need is here.
Why do you need more other than,.
Well,.
I want to be able to say, I spoke to God or God spoke direct to me and thus says this.
Well then why do we need this?
Yeah.
Well,.
Now let me, but I just, cause I probably just need to apologize in case those guys hear this, because
I know I came off a little snarky, right?
But it's just, when you, when you make a claim
that scripture is sufficient, but then your entire argumentation
exposes that you don't actually believe scripture is sufficient, right?
Those are things that just kind of drive me up a wall.
And when we have scripture that can back up what we're saying in scripture that disproves
what you just said.
And like Chris said,.
Everything that,.
That they just said is in here, right?
Those are things that my first reaction is to be kind of snarky.
So I apologize.
All right,.
Brothers, I have got to skedaddle, so I'm going to leave you guys here.
I pray you guys have a great show.
Well,.
Thank you.
Chris,.
Chris,.
We're going to talk behind your back.
Yeah.
Chris said he was only going to come on for like 10 minutes,.
But I was,.
And then I got stuck here for the whole show.
So,.
All right.
God bless.
So,.
So let me, let me walk through some of this,.
Right?
So,.
Cause I want us to see,.
You know,.
What, some of what, what he's doing.
And,.
And I'm, I'm going to give the benefit of doubt and point out that oftentimes
many people will do interpretation, not even realize what they're doing because it's just,.
We,.
We can be blinded by what we believe.
Okay.
And so this is why what we must do is, is learn the rules of interpretation.
Take the, we have a free class.
You can go to strivingfraternity .com or .org, whichever,.
Uh,.
Go to our Academy.
Actually, you can go to strivingfraternityacademy .org, go to our Academy, take our courses for free.
Take our course on biblical hermeneutics, 20 lessons, walk you through it.
It's free.
And we'll give you the rules, some basic rules to interpretation that will help you to see like
following immediate context.
Okay.
Interpreting words,.
You know,.
They got to be interpreted from the Greek, not the English.
Okay.
And so what you, you see him do is he, he's saying when that beginning of that clip, like
it makes no sense to him that we would say it's the Canon.
Why?
It doesn't make sense because he's starting with his conclusion,.
Right?
What he's not doing is understanding how we are understanding it.
And I'm not faulting him.
I'm not,.
You know,.
This happens with a lot of people.
Okay.
I,.
I know I just, I always have to remember and recognize that I was raised differently.
You're being Jewish, you're raised to debate.
You're,.
You're raised to be able to see both sides of an issue to argue either side of an issue.
And so I didn't know that everyone doesn't have that ability.
I think that's what people tell me makes me a good counselors because I don't just jump to a conclusion.
I try to hear someone out.
It's why there was a comment in here.
Hold on.
It was from Scott.
Oh,.
Here.
So this guy, Scott says, I don't see how you, you stand and listen to the whole
episode of that.
Andrew,.
I do.
I do because I want to make sure I didn't just one episode.
I listen to like 60, 70 episodes because I want to make sure that I have them in context.
I want to make sure I don't misrepresent them.
Okay.
And so what am I trying to do?
I'm trying to get into their mindset.
So,.
So I'm not saying that he's, and I, I don't know the guy's names.
I forget which voice was which,.
But I,.
I am not saying he's doing this on purpose, but what he's doing is he starts with this
conclusion.
He goes,.
Well,.
Then this makes no sense because he's not trying to understand how we're looking at it.
And I laid out why I think that it is the cannon.
It is the completion of prophecy and knowledge.
And so what does he then do?
He,.
He brings up this mirror dimly and face to face.
Now this is very commonly a common mistake people make.
Oh,.
Face to face must be a personal encounter.
That's how many will say it.
Now.
He went even further that face to face means our relationship with
Christ and all.
And Moses is the only one that actually had this face to face relationship.
Um,.
I don't know that we can say he's the only one just saying, because Enoch walked so closely with God, he just was
taken up with him.
But in fact,.
Moses couldn't look at him face to face because he would be dead.
He just looked at the glory of God passing by.
And so what we end up seeing with it, and we're going to go long tonight,.
Folks,.
Cause we had a lot of segments and I really want to finish out this one argument.
That they make.
And we'll deal with their other arguments in the future.
And they're trying to answer the arguments we make, and they're trying to give answers.
And so we're looking to respond to that.
What you see when he says,.
Um,.
Looking at a mirror, but then face to face, there's a word he skipped when he said that.
Or now we look in a mirror dimly, but then face to face.
You know why so many people don't understand this?
Because they don't understand what a mirror was in that day.
The word dimly could, you can literally be in a riddle, by the way,
the idea is that you look at polished metal, not the mirrors we have today.
They didn't have mirrors like we have today.
They had polished metal where you couldn't really see clearly, but you see vaguely.
Now that's a incomplete view versus seeing face to face.
That's the way we look in a mirror today.
Go grab a spoon or some polished metal, like a pot.
Look at that, then look in a mirror.
Are you going to see a difference?
One's not so clear.
One's very clear.
That's what he's saying.
How do I know that?
Because that's the context.
Partial to complete.
And what does he do?
He talks, this word for teleos means to be mature or complete.
What's the first illustration he uses?
And this is what he does.
He makes a statement and gives three illustrations.
A child to an adult.
What is that?
Maturity.
Looking at polished metal dimly versus looking face to face.
What is that?
Partial to completion.
How do we know?
Well, he goes, I know in part and then fully, I will know just as I am fully
known.
Partial completion.
What do you see?
You have three illustrations there teaching the same exact thing.
Partial to complete.
So what you do not do when you interpret is take an illustration and make it the main thing.
You also don't take an illustration or a parable.
Layton Flowers, this is a lesson for you.
You don't take a parable and make it say something it's not meant to say.
When you have an illustration or a parable, the way to interpret it is to look at what it's illustrating.
And you stop there.
So what are these three things illustrating?
Partial to complete.
Child to manhood.
Looking at something vaguely versus looking clearly.
Knowing in part versus fully known.
Partial to complete.
That's the thing.
That is fitting with the context that we see in verses nine and 10.
So when you take the face to face to be literal and now say that that's a personal relationship,
that's a problem.
Now I'll just say for the record, for those who know, I mean I've debated Matt Slick on this.
Matt would say face to face is always used as a personal encounter, except for a verse in
Proverbs where it says looking at water face face.
That's the same thing here.
What is he doing?
Looking at the reflection of his face.
That's what you're looking at here.
Looking at a mirror versus looking at a reflection clearly.
Yeah, Andrew.
I just looked up.
First I pulled up my Logos Bible software.
And then I...
Which by the way, if you didn't have Logos Bible software or wanted to upgrade it, you could go to
Logos .com slash S -F -E for Striving for Eternity and get yourself a nice discount and
five free books on Striving for Eternity.
Continue.
Yep.
Well, when you were talking about the word that they skipped, right?
Dimly.
And you said that could be used in a riddle.
Well, the word...
And so to elaborate on what you were saying, why that can be used in a riddle is because the word that's used for dimly,
and this will make sense, is in the Greek enigma, which is where we get our English
word enigma, which means a mystery, right?
So the mystery, the thing that you don't understand will be made
clear to understand now.
Yes.
So, folks, look.
What am I doing?
I am staying right within this context using the exact words that we see in the scripture.
I'm not bringing anything in.
I'm not inserting things.
And I'm also following the rules of interpretation.
I'm not taking an illustration and making it say something it isn't.
Okay?
And again, I'm...
This is very common with people to do, so I don't want to say, oh, look, these guys are so wrong.
This is something that people do.
It happens.
All right?
Now I forgot if I am on clip four or five.
This next one's two and a half minutes, so I don't think I played this one yet.
So you're gonna just have to hold yourselves there.
But we got three more clips,.
And the next two get longer and longer.
So here we go.
You don't understand how hard it is for me and Chris to go through these long clips and not say anything.
This is torture for you.
But I want to give them their context.
So get out a piece of paper and just take your notes.
All right, here we go.
Just to your point, I want to make sure that I clearly articulate the cessationist's role.
And I'll play the role of cessationist, and you can challenge me on that, okay?
So if I'm a cessationist, I'm going to say, Michael, this doesn't have to do with the fact that we don't need healing today.
This passage is talking about specifically revelatory gifts such as tongues, prophecy, and
words of knowledge, okay?
And of these three gifts, these are revelatory gifts that the body of Christ needed in the days
when the canon was not complete.
They had the Old Testament scriptures.
They had Exodus and Leviticus and Numbers, Deuteronomy.
They had enough to know what was moral, but how were they to conduct themselves in the local church?
First Timothy hadn't been written yet.
Second Timothy hadn't been written yet.
Titus, Revelation.
They didn't know what to do and how to practice and govern in the local church.
So God was present day speaking to the local church on how to govern themselves, how to practice
their Christian life.
But now all that we need to practice the Christian life is sufficient and found in the New
Testament scriptures.
We no longer need prophecy and tongues and revelatory speech to guide us because we have a
sufficient guiding now found in scripture.
That would be the argumentation.
So the problem is that you're saying that prophecy is unto the guidance of a pastoral service, a
believer's meeting.
But actually when you look at the believer's meeting in 1 Corinthians 14, 26, that's not what it says prophecy is for.
It actually says that if unbelievers come into that meeting, evangelism happens.
It opens the doors for evangelism.
People fall on their face.
They declare God is here because suddenly their secrets are laid bare.
So I think that the premise that they're making is that prophecy,
words of knowledge, revelatory gifts like tongues are unto the conduction of a
service or a Christian gathering so that we know how to do that.
But that's not what that's saying in scripture.
It actually says that these things are done as part of the liturgy.
You sing a song.
You have a teaching.
You give a revelation.
You have a tongue.
You have an interpretation.
This is 1 Corinthians 14, 26.
So Paul is himself in scripture saying what is to happen in a believer's meeting.
So you have to in some sense say, well, that was only good for Paul's
day.
Okay, so let me break some of these things down and look at them.
First off, I like that they said revelatory gifts.
I don't know.
They're responding to someone.
So there is someone else out there that uses that term.
But why do I say they're revelatory gifts?
Because that's what prophecy is.
But that's what the teaching that he said in verse 26 says.
One has a psalm, has a teaching, has a revelation.
Has a tongue, has an interpretation.
Those are all.
A psalm is instruction through singing, teaching,
revelation, tongues, interpretation.
Those are all revelatory gifts right there.
Yeah, and so that's giving of revelation.
And look, and we'll get to this in later episodes.
So I don't want to harp on this now because I want to make sure that it's when they bring this up.
But they're going to make a distinction between the prophecy of Old Testament and prophecy today.
And they're going to say that prophecy is not equal in authority to Scripture.
But what makes Scripture authoritative?
It's that it's the words of God.
What is prophecy?
The words of God.
That's why they are equal.
Because they're directly related to Scripture.
And that's what I wrote down.
That's what I wrote down.
What is prophecy, biblically?
What is Paul talking about here?
Biblically, not.
The Lord has told me that Drew is going to drink another sip of water in 3 .7 seconds.
No.
No, because he's going to have a fresco.
Sorry.
That's right.
So no.
Uh -oh.
So no, prophecy is the heralding of the very words of God.
So what is prophecy, biblically?
What are tongues, biblically?
Not some gibberish, not some private prayer language.
But tongues are other known languages that people there, and Paul talks about that, having one or more
interpreters so that it can be understood.
What are those things categorically that we see in Scripture?
How do we define those?
Something else he said.
And I know he was just kind of being kind of slapstick about it.
But we didn't have Timothy.
We didn't have Titus.
But we had Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Isaiah.
Hello, you have the gospel in the Old Testament.
Like, we have the law.
We have the law.
But it's what he says it's the purpose of, right?
So first off, he was saying that
prophecy is only enough to give.
So they had some of the books, but it was only for morality, not practice?
No.
If that was the case, then Abraham—I'm reading, I just read this.
If that was the case, then Abraham would not have been counted as righteous.
If it was just merely moralism, it's just as damning as atheism.
Let's put this in context, right?
So at this point, the earth and people have been around, by the time of this writing,
for like over 4 ,000 years.
And you're going to tell me that in 4 ,000 years of history, God
never gave them an understanding of practice, just morality?
Now, maybe I'm going to try to give—maybe he's saying just the church.
Okay, that may be.
But yet, here is the book of 1 Corinthians that he's writing, and what is it
all about?
It's all about practice.
Right?
And a rebuke of the practice of the Corinthian church.
A rebuke of the hyper -focus of the gifts.
Every single chapter is a rebuke.
And yet, what you see is that people will take these chapters, these 12, 13, 14, and go, oh, this
is what we should do.
Well, if Paul's been condemning throughout the book the behavior, why do you suddenly think this is something we
should do and not something we should do?
Yeah.
Nope.
Missed it by eternity.
So, here's the other thing.
He said—I don't know if you picked up on this—that we need these gifts for guidance.
You know whose job it is to give us guidance?
That's the job of the Holy Spirit.
How does he do it?
By illuminating the Word of God to our minds and the application thereof.
And so, if you're looking for some gifts that humans are given to be
the guidance, that's the Holy Spirit's job.
And how is he going to do it?
He does it through the Word.
We don't need a gift for guidance.
He said that in—.
We have the law, the testimony, the precepts, the commandments, and the fear of Yahweh.
That's what we have.
And it restores the soul.
It makes wise the simple.
It rejoices the heart.
It enlightens the eyes.
It endures forever.
And they are righteous altogether.
Not only that—.
Proverbs.
Go ahead, bro.
Well, not only that.
Let me throw in some things in there that are often neglected within those practices you just mentioned.
Right.
Prayer. Meditation.
Yes.
Because meditation—what are we meditating upon?
The things of Scripture.
Mm -hmm.
And those are things that help guide us.
And it's not just, well, I think about this about what I just read.
No.
It's taking what I just read and saying, how do I apply what I just read?
Yeah.
Yeah.
And this is the thing.
I mean, as I listened to what he said, and I kind of mentioned this earlier, but what do you have?
He said prophecy is for what purpose?
Evangelism.
What did we read in Exodus 7?
It wasn't evangelism.
No.
The purpose of it was not evangelism.
Now, one thing we have to be careful with, so I want to make sure that I'm not doing this as well,
is to say, well, you know, because, you know, maybe this guy, I think the one that
said it was Michael, I don't remember.
But, you know, he may listen and say, well, hey, you're going too far.
I don't want to be guilty of trying to say, oh, that's what he's saying.
Like, this is the only thing that it's for.
Because I'm going to guess that he's probably going to say, no, it's not just for evangelism.
But he's going to say it is for, that that is a purpose of it.
And that was a purpose that we see like in Acts where this miraculous
gift of languages occurred so that they could evangelize.
I will agree.
Okay.
But I want you to notice something.
When they evangelized, what was happening?
They were speaking a language they didn't know to people who did know the languages.
You cannot do a miracle of speaking in tongues
and speak gibberish and suddenly have someone, you
know, go, oh, that's, I'm going to believe.
No, the reason that it was amazing to them is because they heard it in their own language.
They also said it was part of the church service.
Now, again, I don't want to, I don't want to say he's saying this, that like, that it's everything.
But what I'm not sure of and what I'd like to, if we had a dialogue instead of monologues, which I'd
prefer, so I could get more accurate questions answered.
I would ask him, does he believe that every church service must have the speaking of
languages and the interpretation of it?
Okay.
Because that becomes interesting.
By the way, I don't hear people mention this a lot, but you know how that interpretation occurred?
Most people think it's one person speaks in a language and then two people
do the interpretation to vindicate one another and vindicate that it was
translated rightly.
But when you look at the text, it's two people speak in the language and one person interprets.
Hmm.
So you have to have two people that have this gift and they're speaking the same language.
Isn't it at least two people?
Like two or three.
So I think it's at least two people.
At least two people.
And what I'm going to say, and if we, here, maybe we'll dig into that to the next chapter, chapter 14, and
look at it in more detail.
But what I think Paul's doing here is he knows these gifts are going to cease because
he says that.
Okay.
And I think what he's doing is he's trying to be careful with it and give
instruction to be balanced with the church.
And so he's saying, look, if you're going to say you have this gift, because people do have that gift, here's how to do
this if it's within the church setting.
I don't think he's saying it can only be in the church setting.
And I don't think he's, Paul is saying that it should be in every church setting.
And I would ask Michael if he thinks, I forget which guy's which, but I'm going to say Michael and hope I got it right.
I got a 50 -50 shot.
But what I would want to do is say, you know, do you believe that every church service should have that?
Because he's saying it's part of the liturgy.
And this is the thing that you see is where they, like Matt Slick will say that not every church will have these gifts, but it
should be in the church universal.
But if the church needs it, if there's a, you know, when it says the church won't lack
these gifts, well, that means there's a need.
Right?
I would say there's no more need because we have a completed canon.
But if, but every church has a need to hear from God.
So every church should be having revelation.
But then if it's direct revelation, we should be writing it down.
And part of this is, and I'm going to be fair with this as well.
We'll get into this more as we dig into their arguments, you know, throughout the year.
But I believe that part of the problem, and as you talk to people that
are continuationists, if you're a cessationist or vice versa, I want you to think about this.
What do I do on this show regularly?
I go to the definition of terms.
Why?
I believe when I'm listening to these guys, the issue that we're hearing
is this.
What I define or what many cessationists would define as
providence is what they would define as prophecy.
So when we hear them talk prophecy, we're thinking Old Testament prophecy, direct
revelation.
And yet what are they doing?
They're defining it as providence.
And there is a difference between providence and prophecy.
Okay?
And so what I'm doing when I'm listening to them is I'm interjecting the
word providence to what they're saying.
Now, there are times where they use prophecy two different ways.
They define it as prophecy, but then use it as Old Testament prophecy.
And so it makes it a little bit hard
to really ration through this.
And this is where it would take a discussion.
This next clip is two and a half minutes.
The last clip is 30 seconds, so I know it's a longer one.
Take your notes.
Here we go.
So typically a cessationist would say prophecy is infallible revelation that establishes
the foundation of the church.
So in Ephesians chapter 2, they would say the apostles and prophets laid the foundation of the church.
And the reason that we needed prophecy back then was because there were things about New Testament
practice that we weren't aware of that the spirit needed to guide us through.
But now that we have the scriptures, we no longer need those revelations.
However, what then you have to say as a cessationist is that every single prophecy ever given from
the time of Acts chapter 2 to the closing of the canon was infallible
revelatory speech with equal authority as scripture.
Which means in Joel chapter 2, I'll pour out my spirit on all flesh.
Your sons and daughters will prophesy.
Your old men, your young men.
It is including that of children, and it is including that of women.
So every cessationist who believes that prophecy was the equivalent authority of scriptures
must believe that the daughters of Philip, women, were prophesying in such a
way to give authority that was equal to the binding authority and power of scripture.
Whereas a complementarian, I see Paul in First Timothy, preventing.
I do not permit a woman to preach, teach, or exercise authority over a man, the apostle Paul would say.
Which would then suggest that a woman could ultimately prophesy something that has the equal
authority of scripture, but they couldn't teach it.
And there seems to be a disconnect there for me.
It seems as if prophecy in the New Testament was actually submitted to the local church,
but scripture seemed to have an authority over the local church.
I would consider you to think of the apostle Paul who is combating the super
apostles in 2 Corinthians or affirming his apostleship in 1
Corinthians.
And he says let those who are spiritual know that the words that I'm writing are scripture.
You don't get to go and get together with a group of prophets and determine whether my words
are accurate or not.
I'm speaking the words of God.
So I would just affirm that there is a difference to
New Testament prophecy and scripture in the New Testament.
That the early church acknowledged that there was a difference between prophets in the New Testament and the
apostle Paul writing the words of God.
Okay, so a couple things that we have here.
Sorry about that.
I shouldn't cough into the mic, right?
So he says, he's looking at
the prophecy.
What did I say out of Exodus 7 prophecy is?
Direct revelation from God.
So he's saying, why do we need?
Well, we needed it because the canon wasn't complete.
It's just that simple.
That's exactly what the text says in 1 Corinthians 13.
It's partial.
It's completed.
Once something is complete, do you need the partial anymore?
No.
If I had a, let's say for example, that I'm putting
together a jigsaw puzzle with really small pieces or my eyesight is bad
and I need a magnifying glass to see the pieces to put them in place.
Once I have the jigsaw puzzle all put together, do I need the magnifying glass anymore
for that puzzle?
No.
Why?
The puzzle is complete.
And the tool that I used to work at completing it is not necessary
once it's completed.
So when he's like, he's saying it, you know, we, why do we need this?
Why would we need the gift of prophecy?
Well, we need it because it's not completed yet.
And once it's completed, it was done.
That's why he's saying, he was saying, you know, like he's making this distinction with the scripture and, and
prophecy, but prophecy being direct revelation from God is what the Bible is.
It's God's very word.
And so all scripture is inspired.
What does that mean?
God breathed.
That's what makes it authoritative.
It's not because it's written down that it's authoritative because it is God breathed.
It is the direct revelation from God.
It's coming directly from him.
That's what makes it authoritative.
And therefore, yes, any direct revelation is authoritative because it
comes from an authoritative source.
Now he mentions, you know, the, the, the daughters of, of Philip.
Now here's the thing.
If the daughters of Philip are giving direct revelation, that's coming from God.
I'm saying if then, yes, it is authoritative because it
is direct revelation from God.
Why do I say if you know what the Bible is recording there again, how do we do hermeneutics?
You have a historical narrative.
Historical narratives do not teach what you should do, but what did happen.
They are as Drew, sorry, not as Drew as Chris said earlier, prescriptive versus descriptive.
Descriptive just describes what happened.
That's historical narrative.
But a book like first Corinthians is prescriptive instructional.
That's different.
So what you have is the fact that this is
what actually happened, what we've seen in acts.
But could someone believe they're getting direct revelation to be wrong?
Yes.
You want proof?
Okay.
Jesus calling.
Yeah.
In the introduction that she closes her mind and the spirit takes over and writes
that a spirit takes over.
That's for sure.
Yeah.
He spirit takes over, but she's claiming that to be direct revelation.
Then she's saying that the spirit is writing through her.
That's direct revelation then.
So that would be equal in authority to scripture if that's from God.
But was it from God?
Well, no, because there was guess what?
There's things that disagree with the Bible in there.
And therefore it was not direct revelation.
She thinks she's giving prophecy, but she's not.
Who are the daughters of a Philippi in the same boat?
Because they say something about Paul that didn't
actually happen.
Right?
Well, maybe not because he didn't exactly do what they said.
So were they really prophets?
See, the Bible doesn't say it came from God.
It just says that they prophesy.
What we're seeing here, man, I wrote this down and Jason K. brought it up in the chat.
He just said complementarian.
He mentioned that.
Brothers and sisters, I'm a very simple man.
We don't believe that.
We've heard your podcast.
We've heard you here.
So it all goes back to this.
If you're a complementarian and you are making the argument that God's ultimately.
Let's just be honest.
And this is what I said to Matt Slick.
And it kind of upset him at the time when I said this to him.
Scripture is obviously not enough for you.
It's not.
God's holy, inerrant, infallible, and sufficient word is not enough for you.
And so what you're doing, what these guys are doing.
And I hope they listen to this.
And I hope they hear the plea that's coming and the compassion that's coming from my heart here.
You are aligning with Satan.
Because you are asking, has God really said?
That's what you're doing.
You're complementarian.
You're twisting scripture.
You're twisting the words of scripture in order to fit a framework that you want.
Instead of having the humility to go, I was wrong about this.
I can say that because I was in their position to where I believe that the Lord would speak audibly.
I believe that the Lord would give me something to give to someone at church.
I've been there.
I've done that.
But that's what this is.
By saying you're complementarian and by saying that your
prophecy means this and this.
No, no, no.
You're not reading the scriptures.
And so I challenge these brothers.
I'm not going to say brothers.
I'm going to say I challenge these guys with this.
Our Lord's words.
Why do you call me Lord, Lord and not do what I say?
So just take it back to the very foundation.
We're taking it back to what the serpent did to Eve in the garden.
You're reading this and you've twisted scripture in order to fit a framework that says scripture is not enough.
Yeah.
And now I will call them brother because I listen to enough of them.
I do think they're...
I don't have it.
I'm just going...
Yeah.
He brought up an interesting point about a disconnect between women being able to
prophesy but not teach.
And this is where I think I can help him understand this disconnect.
The reason he has a disconnect is...
We talked about that in the head coverings episode.
Yeah.
He has a wrong understanding of prophecy.
Once you understand prophecy as direct revelation, can a woman get up at church,
open the Bible and read?
Yeah.
I don't think there's anything wrong with that because she's not teaching.
She's reading the direct revelation from God.
So could God do that?
In fact, we know for a fact that happened.
How?
Jesus instructed the women at the tomb to go back and
give direct revelation to the disciples.
You go tell them this and they go back and instruct the disciples what?
With their own words?
No.
With the direct revelation they heard directly from God, Jesus Christ.
And that would also be called prophesying.
Yeah.
It would be forth telling.
Yeah.
And this is why definitions matter, right?
And so we would not have an issue with a woman being a prophet.
And if you listen to my podcast, my rap report podcast, in the series I'm doing on what is a pastor, I
just dealt with women pastors and I discussed that.
I discussed the women who were prophesying and I mentioned what it is and said why we don't have
issue with it.
Can a woman prophesy?
Yes.
She's not interpreting.
She's not teaching.
She's giving.
She's telling you what God told her.
Okay.
That's not a problem.
Women can get up and read the Bible.
And I want you to notice in that at the end, I can't be 100 sure in that clip,
but there's enough others that I think it is happening.
He's making a distinction and there he's making a distinction between what he's calling New Testament prophecy and scripture.
But they make it, it's like he's making a distinction between scripture, prophecy and the prophecy
done today.
We'll get to that in more detail in future episodes.
So let me play this last 30 second clip so that we can let them round, finish out their first argument.
And right.
Their first argument is that people say that we cessation say that gifts have ceased according to first
Corinthians 13, 8 to 12.
We do say that and we say it's the canon.
Now, not every cessationist believe it is the canon.
I understand, but I've laid out why from the context, I think it is.
But here's the last 30 second clip.
He does that in the same book, doesn't he?
That's right.
It's kind of, I hope we're not being redundant in this because this feels like an argument we addressed in a former episode when we
started talking about the biblical arguments, cessationist arguments, not biblical arguments, cessation arguments against prophecy.
Prophecy.
That's right.
Which I guess we got to do that because they sort of lump tongues in with prophecy.
And so we're not trying to be redundant intentionally.
It's just because those two things get associated in that camp.
OK, so I just I find it very interesting.
And I'm going to try to get back to this one part.
I hope we're not being redundant in this because this feels like an argument we addressed in a former episode when we started talking about the biblical
arguments, cessationist arguments, not biblical arguments.
Biblical arguments.
He was right there, by the way.
He's already in slip.
OK, yeah.
But where is it that we get this connection between prophecy and tongues?
Hold on.
Let me let me think about this.
Love never fails.
But if there are any gifts of prophecy, they will be done away with.
If there are any languages, they will cease.
Where where do we get that connection?
Paul.
God.
I mean, he's the one that put the connection there.
It's not me.
I didn't make a connection.
Like this is the thing where I really get puzzled, like when he says, I don't know where they get the connection.
I read the next line.
You know, and so now why is it hard?
Again, I think the reason it is hard for this brother is because.
He's starting with a preconceived idea.
He does.
I don't think he even sees that he's reading that idea into into the text.
OK.
He's using his preconceived conclusions to draw his conclusions.
Correct.
Right.
So that's their first argument.
We will come back either next week or, you know, we'll see if we do something else next week.
But we'll we'll continue with these arguments.
I want to just backstage.
Joe is here.
I see him.
So Pastor Joe Conkle, I got the privilege of preaching at his church.
Two weeks ago.
Right. Yeah. Yeah.
Jonah. So. Jonah chapter two.
So.
So did you have any more questions?
I know you came in with Alistair Begg, but I just since you went on screen, I just wanted to see if we answered
everything fully for you.
No, no.
Yeah.
I just wanted to see all the you know, how you addressed because I sent you a text
about the remnant radio.
So I had just listened to you said you were going to do it Thursday.
So I was kind of excited to jump in as a former charismatic for
31 years who's spoken and can still speak in tongues.
Oh, yeah, I could do it.
I still could do it.
It's easy to do.
Yeah.
Very easy to do.
So anyways.
Yeah, it's I have you.
You actually sent me so.
So for folks to understand, you sent me a clip not knowing what we were going to talk about.
But you sent me a clip and said, you ought to ask these guys on Apologetics Live to discuss the issues
with them.
And this was them responding to the cessationist film.
And we will get there.
I grabbed.
I mean, I grabbed a number of episodes that I want to go through with this audience.
So we'll get to their critique of the cessationist film.
But that's probably going to be a ways down the road.
Just by the time we get to it, the cessationist conference will probably be going on that G3 is putting together.
So let me I want to end the show.
I know we've gone long, folks.
There's been like a mega episode.
And so I appreciate you allowing us to go long.
I think it was some good stuff here.
We didn't get to all the questions that came.
Actually, I love our audience.
I mean, like you did.
If you're not watching this live on Thursday nights, man, are you missing out on things?
And Joe, I'm just going to mute you just because we're getting a lot of hissing noise there.
But the chat has their own.
I couldn't even keep up with everything.
So if I sometimes get distracted, it's like I'm trying to catch up with what's going on in the chat.
Great discussion in the chat.
I know Melissa saying my pillow, my pillow.
I won't.
We don't have time.
We did do the Logos commercial or support.
But the one thing I do want to ask this audience, I got two things left to say.
One, I want to share and kind of said that I'm going to share it at the end just came up.
But I want this audience to contact me and I'll tell you why.
What I'm noticing, and this goes back to what we said in the very beginning with the Thursday night and other
people scheduling things.
Thursday night has become a night where I'm noticing a lot of fellow ministries
are doing live streams and different things.
So when we started this, we used to have a very large audience that watched live.
And we've watched that kind of kind of peel off in different directions just because fellow people in ministry that we
love are doing similar things.
And Thursday night works.
Right.
Matt Slick started doing a Bible study and they asked for it to be on Thursday night.
So, OK, he did that on Thursday night.
Same time, like an hour after us.
And we used to see where we had this big audience for the first hour.
And then they all shifted over to to Matt's Bible study because we have some of the same audience.
We've seen a similar thing with the guys from Open Air Theology.
They have stuff going on Thursday night.
Right.
830.
So it's right.
It's like half an hour.
So we have a lot of that.
So what I'm what I'm asking is and I'm going to ask you guys to email me your thoughts.
OK, because I want to hear from you.
And so the way to contact us is info at striving for eternity dot com info at
striving for eternity dot com.
What I want to know is your thoughts on changing Apologetics Live to a different night.
And if so, which night would you prefer?
OK, I'm thinking we might want to go back to where Matt and I started on Sunday nights.
That might be good, especially when there's the Super Bowl.
So someone has something good and wholesome to do on that day.
All you pagans know.
But but I want I want to know which night
would work for folks.
Wednesday night's probably going to be out because, well, most people have church, including me.
So I couldn't do it.
You know, so we want to find a good night.
So Thursday night seems to be getting packed.
And I want you guys to contact us.
Info at striving for training dot com.
You don't want to look.
You can contact me on Facebook or whatever else.
But the email would work best so we could track it.
So info at striving for training dot com.
If you're watching on or if you're listening on podcast, it's in the show notes.
So we really want to know what you guys think for that.
With that, one more thing.
Very sad note.
And thank you, Melissa, for saying she's just saying whatever day is convenient for you.
Well, I want to know what day you're going to want to listen.
Right.
And so and because we have a large audience that don't watch live, but they go
and listen to the podcast afterwards because they know we turn it into a podcast and some other streams don't.
So I get that.
And so for the podcast listeners, hey, this would be helpful.
Let me give a sad bit of news right now.
Many folks in this audience will know of the Ministry of Living Waters
with its founder, Ray Comfort.
Ray Comfort's son in law, who is now the president of Living Waters, is Emile Zwayne, known as easy.
He just posted something just a few hours ago that I would like to read.
OK.
And I should also mention this is a side note.
Last week, Drew, you read, thankfully, the text from from Grady Adams.
He came through surgery.
Well, he's recovering.
So that's good news.
Answer to prayer.
Here's something for you guys.
Easy.
Put this out.
My dear father, Francis, entered into the Lord's presence at twelve twenty six
a .m. yesterday morning.
I was holding him and praying over him when he passed.
He was at peace and free of pain.
I'm so thankful to God for the one hundred and thirteen
years he gave him on this earth.
Wow.
He earned the title of, quote, oldest man in America, unquote, and
landed in the top five in the world.
He was one of the warmest, kindest and most generous men that
I that I ever graced that ever graced this planet.
He will be deeply missed and his memory will be forever cherished.
I can't wait to walk the streets of gold with him in our father's kingdom.
And so the thing that's interesting is Francis got that the oldest man in America.
So here's the thing.
They didn't have birth certificates back then.
So they actually he never knew what his birthday was.
So the way they do the oldest person in America, it's by the year.
So every January.
That's that's it.
So the oldest person in America was one hundred and twelve years old.
Until this January.
So he doesn't know what his birthday is, but this January that counted.
And so once you pass into December, they add the year.
And so as long as he was alive by January 1st, he became the oldest
man in America.
And only there's only four people ahead of him in the world.
And so he is, you know, you know, think about what he has
seen in one hundred and thirteen years.
Right.
And think about the fact that at one hundred and
thirteen years old.
He was born.
Are you ready for this?
Nineteen eleven.
Think about that.
We we started this show talking about the cessationist, the continuationist movement that
started in what?
Nineteen oh five.
Six years before he was born.
And we look at 1905 like a really long time ago.
To him, that was just six years before he was born.
Right.
So we praise God that he is in heaven.
And I believe it was easy that led him to the Lord.
He was easy was I think easy was he was he gave he.
Easy was when he was born.
I think his father was like sixty five or something.
So he was still having children late in life.
I think easy's older brothers and sisters, which I think there's like 13 of them are much older.
So yeah.
Yeah.
So so with that, we're going to end a bad day.
Not bad.
No, it's not really bad.
It's kind of good.
He's in heaven.
So pray for the family.
And so and for those who have been texting like in the chat, giving me the dates, please email me.
That will be very helpful for us.
All right.
So with that next week, we're probably going to continue in argument number two of this
of this podcast.
And so I know we went longer.
It's a mega episode, three hours.
But I hope this was helpful.
And we look forward to seeing you next week.
Have a good night all.