June 5, 2015 ISI Radio Show with Dr. David Wood on “Is Authentic Qur’anic Islam a Religion of Peace?”

Live from the historic parsonage of 19th century gospel minister George Norcross in downtown

Carlisle, Pennsylvania, it's Iron Sharpens Iron, a radio platform on which pastors,

Christian scholars and theologians address the burning issues facing the church and the world today.

Proverbs 27 verse 17 tells us, Iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another.

Matthew Henry said that in this passage, we are cautioned to take heed whom we converse with and directed to have in view in conversation to make one another wiser and better.

It is our hope that this goal will be accomplished over the next hour, and we hope to hear from you, the listener, with your own questions.

Now here's our host, Chris Arnzen. This is Chris Arnzen on the radio.

This is Chris Arnzen on the radio. This is Chris Arnzen on the radio.

I promise everybody I will not do that every day. I just had to do it because my dear friend David Wood is on today on Iron Sharpens Iron, and we are going to be seeking to address the question, is the

Islamic religion, is authentic Quranic Islam a peaceful religion?

And our guest, as I said, is David Wood who hosts Jesus or Muhammad on the

Trinity Channel, which is not to be confused with the Trinity Broadcasting Network, which has quite a lot of heretical content on it.

This is the Trinity Channel, a completely different station, and David is also the operator of answeringmuslims .com.

He's a member of the Society of Christian Philosophers and the Evangelical Philosophical Society.

He's a former atheist who came to Christ while investigating the biblical claims of the resurrection, and David Wood has contributed to such books as 50

Arguments for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science, Defending the

Resurrection, and True Reason, Christian Responses to the Challenge of Atheism.

David Wood has participated in over 40 public moderated debates with Muslims and atheists, and it's my honor and privilege to have you back again and for the first time on the all -new

Iron Sharpens Iron, David Wood. Hey, how's it going, Chris? It's going great.

It's going much better now that you're on the air with us, and the reason why I said to David that I welcome him back is that back between 2006 and 2011,

David Wood was probably my most frequently interviewed guest out of all the guests that I interviewed on Iron Sharpens Iron, and perhaps with Phil Johnson of Grace to You Ministries running up not far behind that, and Christian recording artist and apologist

Steve Camp probably lagging not far behind Phil, but it's always great to have you on the program,

David. First of all, tell our listeners something about the Trinity Channel, where you host

Jesus or Muhammad, and tell our listeners where they can view the Trinity Channel. Well, I think they can just go to TrinityChannel .com

if they want to watch over the internet. Everything is live -streamed there, but the

Trinity Channel was started by Iraqi Christians who came to the United States after leaving

Iraq several decades ago and found out that here in the United States they have the freedom to criticize

Islam, which they didn't over there, so they were thrilled and started a Christian channel so that they could then broadcast to Arab Christians.

For a long time, they only had shows in Arabic, but they started hosting some English shows because the second generation of Arabs in the

United States, their children speak English, and so they wanted some English programs, and they wanted a show called

Jesus or Muhammad. And tell us specifically about your program and what you discuss.

I mean, obviously, you're comparing the claims of Jesus and Muhammad on the show, but anything more in detail you can tell us?

Yeah, well, it's really all kinds of issues, but usually comparing something, you know, comparing the teachings of Jesus and Muhammad, and it's a live call -in show, so, you know, imams call in, well, for a while imams called in, then they stopped calling in.

If you type in, you know, if you go on to YouTube and type in, Muslim Sheikh gets owned or something like that, people started posting the clips like that.

I don't post them like that. I'll post, you know, Muslim Sheikh has a discussion on such and such, but other people post it, you know,

Muslim Sheikh gets owned when he asks about such and such, and so anyway, they stop calling, but regular

Muslims call in and ask questions, and try to argue their case, and there are debates as well.

We have debates on the network, so it's a good time. And you're going to be participating in a conference,

If God, Why Evil, on Long Island, New York, is that correct? Yeah, that's next weekend.

Next weekend. Do you have any more details on that? Um, I can't, uh,

Well, I could tell our listeners to go to newyorkapologetics .com.

That's a website that has all the details, and click on Upcoming Events, and David Wood is just one of the speakers.

Phillip Murray and Marie Wood, David's wife, is speaking, and some other folks, so you should go to newyorkapologetics .com.

If God, Why Evil, the great question that has sparked debate over the many ages since the dawn of history.

Any specific subject that you plan on addressing during this? I'm specifically addressing how consistent atheists are when they use this objection, and I'm going to argue that they're not consistent at all in the way they use the problem of evil, specifically as an argument against the existence of God.

I'm going to argue that atheists are very inconsistent in their use of evidence. And that website, once again, is newyorkapologetics .com.

That's newyorkapologetics .com, and look for Upcoming Events on that website.

And David, we are, as I said at the outset, we are discussing the question, is

Islam a religion of peace? Is authentic, Quranic Islam a religion of peace?

And if anybody listening would like to email us with a question for David, the email address is chrisarnson at gmail .com.

That's chrisarnson at gmail .com. And this is a question that you have seen most of you, if not all of you, discussed and bantered about and debated in the media, especially ever since 9 -11.

And there are people who are advocates on both sides, both on the side that Islam is a true religion of peace, and that those who are violent and involved in terrorist activities are merely extremists who have hijacked the religion, and they are practicing a false caricature or imitation of Islam.

And then, of course, you have those who insist that many of the terrorist activities that are taking place are really being perpetrated by authentic Muslims who are actually following their sacred writings, the

Quran and the Hadith and the history of their own prophet. Now, if you could elaborate on that,

David. Is Islam, authentic Quranic Islam, a religion of peace? Absolutely not.

The only way to have peace in Islam would be to ultimately subjugate the entire world to Islam, and even then to only one specific branch.

Because even if there were only Sunnis and Shias left in the world, they would still fight them.

And even if there were only Sunnis, the different branches of Sunni Islam would fight each other, and that's because of the sort of pattern of conduct laid down by Muhammad.

It's important to note that the Quran, chapter 33, verse 21, lays down Muhammad as the pattern of conduct for Muslims to follow.

Muhammad settled almost every disagreement anyone could throw at him with violence. If your wife gets out of line, you beat her into submission.

If someone leaves Islam, you chop his head off. It's beatings and beheadings, and violence is a sort of cure -all for almost any situation that could arise.

But it's good you mentioned the media and how there's this discussion. And really,

I mean, if you read the Muslim sources, it's really clear what Islam teaches.

What you get from the Muslim sources is that jihad proceeds in stages. When Muslims make up a tiny minority of a population, when they're one or two percent of the population, they are taught to promote peace and tolerance.

Islam's a religion of peace. Let's all just get along. Later, in places where Muslims make up, you know, 15, 20, 25 percent of a population, where they're not in a position to conquer the civilization, but they're in a position that they can certainly put up a fight, they are taught to promote defensive jihad.

That's jihad. You fight, but it's only defensively. It's when someone has attacked the

Muslim community or persecuted the Muslim community, or even criticized Muhammad or made fun of Muhammad, things like that, then you can fight.

It's got to be in retaliation to some threat or some assault, whether it's physical or verbal, on the

Muslim community. But even that's not the end. When Muslims are in the majority, when they're actually able to subjugate a population, they are commanded to do that.

And so, that's what you get from the Muslim sources. It's not just me saying that. You can look up Muslim scholars who will say the exact same thing.

So, my method of figuring out what Islam teaches, whether Islam is a religion of peace, is to go to the

Muslim sources and read what the Muslim sources say, and that that is what

Islam teaches. The media disagrees, not because they read the Muslim sources, but because they have a completely different methodology of understanding what

Islam teaches. When CNN or ABC News wants to figure out what

Islam teaches, they go get a Muslim. They go get a Muslim down the street and say, you know, they get a local imam or something like that, and say, hey, come on here, tell us what

Islam teaches. And so, then you get that person's view of what

Islam is. Now, the problem is, as you know, Chris, you can ask a bunch of Christians what

Christianity is, and you can get some very weird stuff. And it's the same thing with Islam.

You can ask Muslims what Islam teaches, and very often, when I hear Muslims telling people what

Islam teaches, it's completely false, not according to me, according to their prophet who said the exact opposite.

And so what you have here is two different methodologies of how you interpret what

Islam teaches. One, which is actually orthodox Islamic theology, is you go to the

Muslim sources, and whatever Allah says or whatever Muhammad says, that's what Islam is.

And whatever Allah and Muhammad didn't say, that's not what Islam is. Whereas over here, it's kind of, you know, whatever

Muslims like and whatever Muslims, and the reason that's a problem is most Muslims in the

West are westernized Muslims. They have views and values that are shaped by all kinds of things.

They're shaped by television and their teachers, and they're shaped by Judeo -Christian values, and so what you get is not actually

Islam being presented. So, undoubtedly, Islam is certainly not a religion of peace.

Now, of course, it's not just the ignorant pundits on television and commentators that are saying that Islam is a religion of peace, and of course, nearly every single politician, both

Republican and Democrat, with some exception, have claimed that true

Islam is a religion of peace, and what we see on the news daily in regard to violence and terrorism is specifically and exclusively the hijacking of the religion by extremists.

But both you and our mutual friend, Dr. James R. White, have debated conservative

Muslims who are very devout in their religion and have studied the

Quran and the Hadith in depth, and they would also argue with you that Islam is a religion of peace, contrary to your claim.

Why is that? Well, here it's going to depend on the

Muslim. I debated Sheikh Omar Bakri and Anjum Chowdhury. They would not say the sorts of things that politicians and the media say about Islam.

They support violence in the name of Allah, they support

Sharia, they support killing apostates and things like that. So you have a kind of spectrum, and the real problem with asking

Muslims what Islam teaches is you can have a sort of spectrum of views and you might get a

Muslim who actually knows what Islam teaches and is willing to say it, but you can have

Muslims who are telling you that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance. The problem is they could be telling you that for two very different reasons.

Lots of Muslims, even lots of Muslim debaters, have been westernized.

They view Islam through western glasses. They go to the

Quran, they pick out peaceful verses which are actually abrogated, they're cancelled by later revelations commanding

Muslims to fight, but they'll go to peaceful verses of the Quran and then use those verses and say, this is what

Islam teaches and any other verse of the Quran which commands Muslims to fight unbelievers or slaughter people.

Well, it couldn't mean that because of all these peaceful verses. So you have Muslims who actually believe that Islam is peaceful and tolerant, but it's because they're just reinterpreting the religion.

The other problem is if a Muslim is in the West, even if he knows what Islam teaches, he's supposed to proclaim that Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance.

This is the doctrine of taqiyya. Taqiyya is found in the

Quran, chapter 3, verse 28, which commands Muslims that they are not allowed to be friends with unbelievers unless it's to guard themselves against the unbelievers.

In other words, true Islam calls for Muslims to oppress and subjugate

Jews and Christians and other non -believers, but if they're not in a position to do that, if they're actually in the minority, if they need to guard themselves against the unbelievers, then they're allowed to pretend to be friendly.

And the comments of Muhammad's companions on this verse are very interesting. This is where we get, we smile in their faces while cursing them in our hearts, right?

You smile in the face of the unbeliever while you're cursing the unbeliever inwardly. You're pretending to be friendly while longing for the day when you can subjugate him.

So anyway, the problem there is when a Muslim says Islam is a religion of peace and tolerance, unless you know that Muslim really well and can read him, can read his facial expressions, you don't know whether this person is telling you the truth or not.

He might be telling you the truth and he might actually believe that Islam is peaceful and tolerant, but he might know exactly what

Islam teaches and be smiling in your face while cursing you in his heart. And I understand that the reason why people who will defend

Islam, not only Muslims, but perhaps even liberals who are calling for a tolerance of all religions, it seems that they call for a tolerance of all religions except Christianity typically, but they will cite passages from the

Quran that appear very peaceful and loving and gentle and compassionate.

Now, I've heard that a lot of this has to do with the fact that Muhammad started out the religion, as most religions start out, as a tiny minority and it was a persecuted minority and therefore he did want tolerance and peace because they were outnumbered and being persecuted.

But then when they grew in number and strength and military might, that will radically change.

Is that accurate to say that that's why there are Quranic passages that seem to contradict each other on the issue of violence?

Yeah, and you find the same pattern whether you go to the Quran, that's believed by Muslims to be the perfect word of Allah, or the

Hadith, this is where you have the teachings of Muhammad, or the Sira, these are like biographies, or the

Tafir, these are Muslim commentaries on the Quran, you get the same pattern wherever you go.

And that is that when Muslims are in a small minority, then it's peace and tolerance when later on the rules change depending on the status of Muslims in a society.

So based on the number and strength of the Muslim community, that affects what you do.

And there's just, from the perspective of sources, there's no disputing this whatsoever.

It's when Muhammad was a persecuted prophet, when he had about 100 followers and was totally outnumbered, that's when the peaceful verses of the

Quran, to you be your religion and to me be my religion, things like that, that's when the peaceful verses of the

Quran were in play. But here's what we know, even though Muhammad was telling people to you be your religion and to me be my religion, we know from Muslim sources, and not me making this up, we know from Muslim sources that behind closed doors, he was telling people to join him so that he could go subjugate the world.

So when he's talking to pagans of his own tribe, he tells them, hey, just join me and we can rule over, we can rule over other people.

So what even Muhammad in his peaceful phase is trying to build up an army so that he can ultimately subjugate unbelievers.

And what this means is, it's just outright deception. To you be your religion and to me be my religion, but behind closed doors, hey, let's form an army so that we can go out and subjugate the unbelievers.

It's flat -out deception. So yes, and then of course later when

Muhammad forms a majority, then we get the revelations, not chapter 929 for instance, fight those who do not believe in Allah.

Notice it's not fight people in self -defense, it's not fight people who are attacking you, it's fight people who do not believe.

And so the command eventually becomes, we fight people based on their beliefs, even though when

Muhammad's in the minority, it's to you be your religion and to me be my religion. Let's all just live in peace and tolerance.

I'm going to repeat the email address if you have questions for David Wood, it's ChrisArnzen at gmail .com,

C -H -R -I -S -A -R -N -Z -E -N at gmail .com. This is a live broadcast, so these questions will only be answered by David Wood during this program today.

And I ask that you please give the city and state that you're emailing from, or the country, if outside the

U .S., and also at least your first name, unless you request to be anonymous, you can say specifically

I request to be anonymous. Do you think that the

Muslims that you know, even the ones that are more towards the

Quranically faithful group that are not whitewashing anything, do you think that most of those men, especially the ones that you've been involved with in debate in the academic realm and so on, would they be supportive of things like 9 -11, the terrorist attack on our soil against the

World Trade Center and the Pentagon building, and the horrific atrocities that we see being carried out by ISIS and so on?

Well, some of them are certainly supportive of terrorist attacks, people like Anjum Chowdhury and Omar Bakri.

But for the rest of the Muslims, you have kind of a spectrum.

You have Muslims who will support open 9 -11 -style terrorist attacks.

But just because a Muslim rejects 9 -11 -style terrorist attacks does not mean he's a peaceful and tolerant

Muslim, you have degrees. So even Muslims who reject these kinds of terrorist attacks, many of them will still support

Sharia and blasphemy laws and killing apostates and things like that.

So you kind of have to go on a Muslim -by -Muslim basis. So for instance, in Egypt, many

Egyptians would not support 9 -11 -style terrorist attacks, but somewhere around like 90 % of Muslims in Egypt say they support killing apostates and things.

So you have sort of degrees of extremism. You have the most extreme,

ISIS and al -Qaeda and so on. But even people who don't support those kinds of views doesn't mean they're a peaceful and tolerant

Westerner who agree with your average person on how to live.

So I would say for any real Muslim, you have to believe that Sharia is the ultimate goal, just because that's what your sources say.

And if you could define Sharia, please. Sharia is Islamic law, but it's basically the collection of commands by Allah and Muhammad.

So there's a bunch of commands on various things you're supposed to do and things you're not supposed to do in the

Muslim sources. And if you lump all that together, Sharia means sort of a path to a watering hole in Arabic.

And so it's sort of the path that Muslims are supposed to follow. And so, but unlike, if you look at Jewish law, if you look at the law of the

Torah, that's for the land of Israel. That's for the Jews. The Jews weren't told, oh, and by the way, go out and subjugate the entire world to this legal system.

If you're staying on this land, you're under this covenant. Therefore, you have to follow these laws. Christians, the harshest penalty

Christians could impose in the New Testament is, hey, if you don't want to act like a Christian, there's the door of the church. Go ahead.

Go, go out. You're out of there. And so it's not, if you don't want to follow the teachings of Christianity, there's the door of the church right there.

In Islam, it's not. There are laws for believers. There's laws for unbelievers.

And basically everyone has to be following the law. Everyone has to be following Sharia, whether they like it or not, whether they're

Muslim or not, in the whole world. And that's the goal. Now, the reason you have some

Muslims who support terrorism and others who don't could be all kinds of reasons, but I've talked to Muslims, I've talked to Muslims who don't support the open terrorist attacks, not because they're against violence, but because they don't believe that's going to be successful in getting

Sharia, right? They believe it's actually going to incite other nations against Islam and other nations are eventually going to crush the terrorists.

And so you can't do that. You can't do that in a situation where Muslims are not more powerful militarily than non -Muslims.

And so I've had Muslim friends who just sit down and tell me, of course I want Sharia, but these guys, these terrorists, matter of fact,

I had a friend who worked with Homeland Security, right? He worked with Homeland Security trying to find and locate

Muslim terrorists. When I talked to him, I was like, hey, given what the Muslim sources say, how can you, you know, justify, you know, trying to, you know, expose these other guys and get them caught and get them arrested?

His response was because these other Muslims are going to incite people against Islam and they're going to prevent the establishment of an

Islamic caliphate. So here's a guy working for Homeland Security and his goal is a caliphate, you know, a

Muslim, a Muslim government, a sort of one world Muslim government, where all, with which unites all

Muslims under its banner. And that's what he wants. But even though he wants that, he doesn't believe terrorism is the way of achieving that.

And so you've got to weed out the terrorists to get that obstacle out the way so that other Muslims can have time to sort of regroup and establish a

Muslim government. And so, yeah, that's the stuff. And of course, most of us that live at least in near urban areas or we visit urban areas or work in urban areas, we have come to know

Muslims that are wonderful, gracious, kind, hospitable folks.

And some of them, perhaps many of them even are religious and attend services at their mosques and so on.

Would you say that these many, which from what I'm understanding from everything

I hear about missionaries and people involved in the apologetics realm, that would be the vast majority of Muslims globally is that they are not really following these violent tenets of the

Quran and the Hadith? Would you say that they're nominal Muslims?

Are they just cultural Muslims? What explains this phenomenon that you have so many, perhaps even the majority of millions of Muslims being wonderful, peaceful individuals?

Well, if you're talking about in the West, you certainly have many nominal

Muslims who they don't even do the basics.

They don't do their daily prayers. They don't do the things that would be required even at the most basic level of Islam.

But even Muslims who go to the mosque every week, they do their prayers, you'll find they're not following full -fledged

Islam, where you're actually obeying Muhammad's command. But part of the reason for that is notice they're doing exactly what they're doing, what they're supposed to do.

Muslims in the West who are promoting peace and tolerance and saying Islam's a religion of peace and we just want to all get along, they're doing exactly what

Islam commands. Now, they're doing it for different reasons. They might actually believe that, whereas according to Islam, when you're in the minority, you're just supposed to pretend to be peaceful until you can get into a position where you can actually subjugate the unbelievers.

But I think what you have is the leaders, many of the leaders who know what

Muhammad said, who know what Islam commands, who know that Islam calls for the violent subjugation of unbelievers, they still preach peace and tolerance in the mosque, even though they know it's not.

And they want Western Muslims to be preaching peace and tolerance because that's what's in the best interest of the community.

So, even many Muslims who, many Muslim leaders who know that they ultimately want

Sharia, they ultimately want the West to fall, they want these things, they will still, they want the people who are under them, the people who don't know what the

Muslim sources say, your nominal Muslims or your Muslims who are somewhat practicing but not really, haven't really studied the sources, they want these

Muslims saying that Islam is peaceful and tolerant because that's what they're supposed to do. That's their role in a Western society is to preach

Islam and to keep people believing that Islam is peaceful in order to lull them to sleep until the

Muslim community is strong enough to actually fight. And so, I think that's what you have.

If you could just very, as briefly as you can, explain the difference between the major sources of Islamic teaching, the

Qur 'an and the Hadith. Yeah, Muslims are supposed to believe in both.

The Qur 'an would be a slightly higher authority. But, you know, lots of people think, oh, you know,

Christians have the Bible and Muslims have the Qur 'an and they're somewhat similar. They're very, very different. Um, the

Qur 'an is supposed to be the actual word of Allah that is eternal.

It's Allah's eternal word. It was revealed to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel. So, Muhammad had no input into the

Qur 'an. It's not Muhammad's teachings. It's not claims that Muhammad invented. It was just revealed to Muhammad to give to his followers.

So, Muhammad, as far as the Qur 'an is concerned, is just a mailman. He received the revelation.

He then passed it on. So, he's like a mail carrier with respect to the Qur 'an.

But the Qur 'an also, in the Qur 'an, in Allah's words, it tells Muslims, chapter 4, verse 65, that they have to obey all of Muhammad's decisions.

So, the Qur 'an is not Muhammad's decisions. This is Allah's word. But the

Qur 'an commands Muslims to obey Muhammad's decisions. And in chapter 33, verse 21, to follow

Muhammad's example. So, notice what you have. You have Allah's words. That's, you know, that's something that Muslims have to believe in.

Um, but Allah's word also tells Muslims that they have to obey Muhammad's decisions and they have to follow

Muhammad's example. Well, Muhammad's teachings and example aren't in the Qur 'an. Those are in a different source.

And the main source Muslims will go to for Muhammad's example and teachings would be the

Hadith. So, basically, after Muhammad died, his followers started passing on stories of everything they could remember about him, down to details about how he would go to the bathroom.

Because if he's the pattern of conduct, then, you know, the better Muslim you are, the more you're going to be like him. So, if Muhammad stepped into the bathroom with his left foot first, then you as a

Muslim want to do that as well. So, the Hadith were eventually written down and you have massive collections of multi -volume stories.

They're not arranged like biographies. They're arranged like topically. So, you'll have a section of a book of Hadith that's, you know, marriage and it'll be everything

Muhammad said about marriage. You'll have another thing, you know, section on jihad. You'll have everything he said about jihad. So, you have, those are the two basic sources that Muslims would go to.

You go to the Quran, that's the word of Allah. You go to the Hadith for the teachings and pattern of conduct of Muhammad.

All right, we have to go to a break right now. And as I said, if you'd like to join us on the air with a question for David Wood, the email address is chrisarnzen at gmail .com.

C -H -R -I -S -A -R -N -Z -E -N at gmail .com. Please include your first name at least, the city and state you're from, and the country if you're outside the

U .S. And let us know if you want to remain anonymous as well. We'll be right back after these messages, so don't go away.

I'm James White of Alpha Omega Ministries. The New American Standard Bible is perfect for daily reading or in -depth study.

Used by pastors, scholars, and everyday readers, the NASB is widely embraced and trusted as a literal and readable

Bible translation. The NASB offers clarity and readability while maintaining high accuracy to the original languages which the

NASB is known for. The NASB is available in many editions like a topical reference Bible. Researched and prepared by biblical scholars devoted to accuracy, the new topical reference

Bible includes contemporary topics relevant to today's issues. From compact to giant print

Bibles, find an NASB that fits your needs very affordably at nasbible .com.

Trust, discover, and enjoy the NASB for yourself today. Go to nasbible .com.

That's nasbible .com. Tired of box store Christianity?

Of doing church in a warehouse with all the trappings of a rock concert? Do you long for a more traditional and reverent style of worship?

And how about the preaching? Perhaps you've begun to think that in -depth biblical exposition has vanished from Long Island.

Well, there's good news. Wedding River Baptist Church exists to provide believers with a meaningful and reverent worship experience featuring the systematic exposition of God's Word.

And this loving congregation looks forward to meeting you. Call them at 631 -929 -3512 for service times.

631 -929 -3512. Or check out their website at wrbc .us.

That's wrbc .us. Introducing 1031

Sermon Jams. Sermon Jams. Now for the good news. That sounds like sweet music in the hell -bound sinner's ears, especially if you're like me and you know that you don't need

Romans 3 to remind you of how wicked you are. If you'd like to learn more about 1031

Sermon Jams, visit us at our website at 1031SermonJams .com or follow us on Twitter or Facebook.

It's about God and His glory and the gospel is about man and his sin. Welcome back.

This is Chris Arnson. If you've just tuned us in to Iron Sharpens Iron, our guest today is David Wood, who is an apologist that specializes in participating in debate with Muslims and atheists.

David is actually a former atheist himself who came to Christ as a result of investigating the biblical claims of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Our email address is chrisarnson at gmail .com. If you have a question, chrisarnson at gmail .com.

We already do have some questions from our listeners. The first one is from all the way in KwaZulu -Natal,

South Africa. Yusuf believes that you, David, have an atomistic interpretation of scripture and engage in cherry -picking scripture, and the fact that you believe that God, Yahweh, Jesus, at some point in history, prescribed sanguinary warfare, mayhem, and mass murder, such as the

Amalekite massacre in 1 Samuel 15 3, rape, which is being prescribed in Numbers 31 17, and we have

Deuteronomy, that a rapist should live with his victim for eternity.

If you could comment on this listener's comments, because it's really not a question there, but I can't really tell if this is a conservative or liberal

Muslim. I'm not really sure, but if you could comment on that. Yeah, well, there's sort of two claims there.

One is that I'm being, I guess, atomistic, and I'm cherry -picking, and the other would be that I'm being inconsistent, because there's violence in the

Bible, and these are really the two most standard claims. Now, the problem with the first claim, that just cherry -picking and things like that, is

I'm not cherry -picking. I'm not going to the Quran and saying, you know, let me pick out which verse

I want to, you know, accuse Islam of being violent or something like that. I'm saying, according to the methodology laid down by Muhammad and his followers, what are the final marching orders of Islam?

And the final marching orders of Islam would be the commands that are the ones that abrogate other commands, but are not themselves abrogated by later commands.

And so here you would go to chapters like chapter nine of the Quran, which is the last of the major chapters of the

Quran to be revealed. There's only one chapter that came after that, and it was only a couple verses long, chapter 110.

But chapter nine, it's the last major chapter of the Quran to be revealed. That's where you get fight those who do not believe in Allah, fight the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness, strive against the unbelievers.

This is where you get these these commands to subjugate, and these are the places where Muhammad actually had an army around him.

He was actually able to fight. Now, you can go there, or if you want to go into the hadith,

Muhammad repeatedly says, I've been commanded to fight people until they say la ilaha illallah.

There's no god but Allah. So what do you have? You have Allah saying, fight those who do not believe in Allah.

You have Muhammad saying, I've been commanded to fight people until they say there's no god but Allah. The Quran claims over and over again to be clear in its commands, to be perfectly clear.

If Allah didn't mean fight people who do not believe in Allah, what did he mean? And if he meant something else, why in the world did he say that?

So when I say here's what Islam teaches, this is exactly what Ibn Kathir said

Islam teaches. That's considered the greatest Muslim commentator of all time. So when I say this is what

Islam teaches, I'm telling you what Allah says, what Muhammad says, what Islam's greatest commentators say it teaches, what the

Quran says, what the hadiths say. I'm telling you exactly what the final marching orders of Islam are.

So if you think Islam teaches something else, all you have to do is say, no, 929, that doesn't apply,

David, because this other chapter came later and said don't do that anymore. That's all you have to do. But you can't do that as a

Muslim because I'm right here. I'm right. And any Muslim who really knows the sources will have to acknowledge that.

So as far as, you know, cherry -picking and things like that, I'm not. It's actually when Western Muslims quote a peaceful verse of the

Quran to say this is what Islam teaches, they're the ones that are cherry -picking, because according to their own prophet, according to their own god, according to their own prophet's companions, and according to the greatest

Muslim scholars in history, those peaceful verses are abrogated or canceled by later revelations, and they could only apply in situations where Muslims are just completely outnumbered, but that's not what

Islam teaches. It's what Islam commands you to do in certain situations in order to deceive unbelievers.

So I'm not the one cherry -picking. It's people like Yusuf there who are cherry -picking.

The other charge is inconsistency, that there's violence in the

Old Testament. Now, notice right here, right here, right off the bat, this is a huge problem for him, for claiming this, because if you're pointing to the

Old Testament, if you're saying, ah, well, look at numbers, look at this, look at that, look at the wars, if you're complaining about the

Old Testament, guess what? Islam affirms that the Old Testament, that the Torah, that the scriptures of the

Jews are the inspired, preserved, authoritative word of God.

Chapter 5, verse 43 of the Quran, some Jews come to Muhammad to, because he's a leader now, some

Jews come to Muhammad to pass judgment, and Allah commands Muhammad, chapter 5, verse 43, he says, why do they come to you when they have the

Torah? Now think about this, he's saying, these Jews don't need you, they have the Torah. Well, guess what?

What's that doing? It's saying Jews need to judge by the Torah. According to chapter 3, verses 3 to 4 of the

Quran, Allah inspired the Torah. Right there in chapter 5, verse 43, he says that the

Jews still have it, and what's interesting is that Muhammad himself, Muhammad himself was subject to the

Torah, to the teachings of the Torah. Chapter 10, verse 94, Allah tells

Muhammad, if you are in doubt as to what we have revealed to you, ask the people who read the book before you, talking about Jews and Christians.

So Muhammad, he is supposed to subject his revelations to the authority of the

Christian and Jewish scriptures. So this Muslim, by attacking and criticizing the teachings of the

Bible, actually just condemned his own prophet. Now apart from that, we would have to say that a lot of what he just said is nonsense, that these chapters aren't advocating rape.

You had, after battle, there would be women whose families are dead, but notice in the

Muslim sources, you take those women, you rape them, you sell them at the next town, right?

There's no mercy here. It's these are the women who survived, their husbands are dead, you rape them, and then you sell them at the next town.

We even have Muslim sources saying these men would practice what they called Azl. It's also called coitus interruptus, where you don't finish the sex act so that you get the woman pregnant.

And the reason they don't want to finish was because they didn't want to get them pregnant because they wanted to sell them in the next town, you're not going to sell a pregnant woman for very much.

So in the Muslim sources, you had a sad reality of war, that there are women who their husbands have been killed.

But in Islam, you could take these women, rape them, sell them in the next town. And even according to chapter 4, verse 24 of the

Quran, even if they're married, so even if their husbands aren't dead, you capture the husbands and their wives, you can still rape their wives and sell them in the next town, even though they're still alive.

What you have in the Torah is a much more humane practice in that there's a battle, a group gets wiped out, there are still women who have survived.

If you wanted to take one of those women, you had to marry her, right? She was given the status of a free woman now because she's marrying you.

You had to give her a full month to mourn for the loss of her husband who died in battle or her father, whoever died in battle.

You had to give them a month to mourn, then they become full wives. And what else would they do? These women would have just starved to death on the desert.

So this is actually a mercy to them, and if things don't work out with the marriage, you set them free as free women.

You don't go and sell them in the next town. So even this guy saying here's what the Bible teaches, for someone who's trying to accuse me of distorting scripture, this guy's doing a phenomenal job of it.

If you actually read what the passages say, yes, there are bad things that happen in war.

And back in those days, it's much worse than it is today, where you have organizations that can often help after battles and so on.

Back then, yes, it's a sad reality. There's a war, women, children, they can't fend for themselves, they're going to die.

But you can see a much more humane practice of now take them in as your own family versus rape them and sell them at the next town to buy more weapons so that you can go out and do the same thing.

So I'd have to reject both those claims against me. Well, of course you would. And we have another listener,

Dorothy in Boulder, Colorado, wants to know if Muslims believe they will ever have peace in this life on earth while they are still alive.

Well, you can have individual Muslims who believe in peace, and you have plenty who do.

I'm assuming she's asking, you know, according to Islamic theology, is there going to be peace?

I think there's a... I haven't been able to make sense of what Muslim sources teach, because Muhammad, there are passages where Muhammad says that he's been shown the entire world in a vision from Allah, and that he saw

Islam ruled over the entire world. So Sharia was enforced all over the entire world.

And so Muhammad believed that a time was coming, that Islam was going to dominate the entire world.

But he also says things like, you know, as Islam, you know, as history progresses, that more and more people are going to leave

Islam, and that people are going to be fleeing from Islam, like, you know, as fast as an arrow shoots out of a bow.

And so it's kind of inconsistent there. But if we took passages where Muhammad says that Sharia is going to rule over everything,

I guess you could say that. Now, after Jesus returns, you could say, he's going to kill all the

Jews, going to kill all the Christians. That's the Jesus of Islam. Muslims believe in a second coming of Christ.

But he's going to come back, he's going to destroy Jews and Christians, and only, you know, only

Muslims are going to be left. Now, the problem with all of that, with any scenario of ever achieving peace in this world is that, given the pattern that you find laid down in the life of Muhammad, is you solve problems, you solve any difficulties that come along through violence.

Muhammad said that the best generation of Muslims would be the first generation. So according to Muhammad, the best generation, he's asked, what's the best generation of Muslims?

Is it going to be like the first generation? Is it going to be the last generation? What? He says the first generation of Muslims is the best.

And what's amazing is the first generation of Muslims almost annihilated itself with violence.

After he died, there were all these battles over leadership, and eventually you had Aisha, Muhammad's child bride, who eventually led an army against Ali and his supporters, and about 10 ,000

Muslims died in battle. And so you have Muslims who were on, who were some of Muhammad's closest companions, and they're out there killing and slaughtering each other over a leadership dispute of how

Ali handled the, you know, handled the people who had killed the last

Muslim leader. And, you know, so you had the best generation of Muslims as a generation that almost annihilated itself through fighting.

And this is the pattern of, by the way, if people want to know, hey, why are, you know, Muslims in Iraq blowing up each other's mosques and so on?

Because that's what the best generation of Muslims did. If you say, no, that's bad, that's evil, you're condemning the best generation of Muslims.

So if you're a Muslim and you want to know what you're supposed to do that would have Muhammad's approval, you'd have to say, well, we need to live like that first generation.

Well, that means if you're a Sunni, you go out and kill Shias. If you're a Shia, you go out and kill Sunnis. And so as far as realistically, is there ever any sort of path to peace apart from some sort of divine intervention?

It looks like, it looks like it's going to be endless bloodshed until one small group, you know, manages to take over the entire world.

And, you know, if that were to happen, I think that one small group would then find something to fight over.

We have to take our final break. It's just one commercial. We'll be right back after these messages. So don't go away.

Linbrook Baptist Church on 225 Earl Avenue in Linbrook, Long Island is teaching God's timeless truths in the 21st century.

Our church is far more than a Sunday worship service. It's a place of learning where the scriptures are studied and the preaching of the gospel is clear and relevant.

It's like a gym where one can exercise their faith through community involvement. It's like a hospital for wounded souls where one can find compassionate people and healing.

We're a diverse family of all ages. Enthusiastically serving our Lord Jesus Christ. In fellowship, play, and together.

Hi, I'm Pastor Bob Walderman, and I invite you to come and join us here at Linbrook Baptist Church and see all that a church can be.

Call Linbrook Baptist at 516 -599 -9402. That's 516 -599 -9402.

Or visit linbrookbaptist .org. That's linbrookbaptist .org. Welcome back. This is

Chris Arnzen. If you've just tuned us in, this is the

Iron Sharpens Iron broadcast, and our guest is David Wood, who is a

Christian apologist, and he has a special focus in his ministry on Islam, and he has debated over 40

Muslim clerics and scholars and atheists, and we are discussing the theme,

Is Islam Genuine, Authentic, Quranic Islam a Religion of Peace?

And before we go back to that discussion, I just promised that Dominic Rimaldi, who is going to be filling in as a host on 1360

KPXQ in Phoenix, Arizona, he is going to be filling in as host to discuss

Understanding Homosexuality with guest Alan Schleman, and that is going to be this coming

Monday at 2 p .m. Arizona time. And I just wanted to let all of our

Arizona listeners know about Dominic Rimaldi's guest hosting on that program on 1360

AM KPXQ, and hope that you enjoy that broadcast.

I also want to let our listeners know that our sponsors, the

Cumberland Valley Bible and Book Services in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, have just begun offering a wonderful way to help

Iron Sharpens Iron remain on the air and flourish. Anytime that you go to their website and purchase any item at CVBBS .com,

that's CV as in Cumberland Valley, BBS, Bible, BookServices .com, any purchase you make,

Iron Sharpens Iron will receive a portion of those funds from your purchase. And I also, of course, want to enthusiastically announce that our newest paying sponsor of Iron Sharpens Iron is

Solid Ground Christian Books, Solid -Ground -Books .com.

Solid -Ground -Books .com, where you have a wide variety of books, including those that they publish by authors from history as well as the best of contemporary living authors.

David, we have a listener, Rob on Long Island, New York, who wants to know why you have focused your studies and your apologetic ministry on the religion of Islam, in addition to atheism, of course, but it seems to be the main emphasis is

Islam. Why is that? Yeah, I'm actually more interested in atheism just because of my background.

But in college, my best friend was a Muslim named Nabeel Qureshi. And so I'd studied

Islam a little bit before that, but basically, you know, read a little bit here and there. But when

I was actually in college, when I start really going through the Quran and the Hadith, and it wasn't because I was interested in Islam.

It was just my best friend was a Muslim. He's telling me that Islam is true. And we, you know, we kind of agreed that, hey, if we're here, and if I'm right, then maybe

God put you into a relationship with me so that I can share the gospel with you. And if you're right, then, hey, maybe

Allah wants you to show me I'm wrong. And so we agreed we're going to sort of get to the bottom of that.

It took about four and a half years. I went off to graduate school in philosophy, and he went off to medical school.

And it was after his first year of medical school when Nabeel became a Christian.

And when he became a Christian, I actually thought, cool, I'm done with Islam, right? That was the entire reason I was studying

Islam was because my best friend was a Muslim. My best friend had been, you know, Mormon or Jehovah's Witness or a

Buddhist or something like that. My history might have been very different. But my best friend was a Muslim. And now that he was a

Christian, you know, hey, I was done. I can get back to atheism. But then Muslims started challenging both of us to debate because Muslims don't like it when you leave

Islam. So they started challenging us to debate because they wanted to show the world that he didn't know why he left

Islam. And they wanted to show the world that I'm an idiot and that, you know, he shouldn't have listened to me and he made a mistake in listening to me.

And so they wanted to expose both of us. And it was, you know, after going through several debates,

I'm still thinking, hey, you know, I'm eventually going to get away from Islam. But it was along the way I realized, you know, there are thousands of Christian apologists who are focusing on atheism.

There's almost none dealing with Islam, even though you have, you know, about 1 .6 billion

Muslims in the world and not nearly that many atheists. And so, you know, why do we all want to deal with atheism?

So I deal with Islam primarily because I think people need to deal with it.

I think that the church hasn't put enough emphasis on Islam and apologetics towards Muslims.

And so that's the main reason I've been. I'm still involved mostly with Islam. Very quickly, our last listener who has emailed us,

Sharon from Fergus Falls, Minnesota. She asked a question you already addressed. She wanted to know if Muhammad wrote the

Quran. They claim he didn't. I'm assuming your view is that he did write it, and that I understand when he was receiving this communication that he believed was, well, that eventually was believed was from God, that he originally believed he was demon -possessed, did he not?

Yeah, when he first began receiving revelations in the cave, he thought he was being sort of attacked by a demon, and he tried to hurl himself off a cliff.

He wanted to commit suicide because he didn't want people to make fun of him for being demon -possessed. Interestingly, it was his wife and her cousin who convinced him that he's not demon -possessed, he's a prophet, right?

Now, who is Khadija and her cousin Waraka that they get to say who is and who isn't a prophet?

They weren't there. They had no idea what he experienced. Muhammad's interpretation of what he saw was that it was bad, and it was other people who weren't there who were trying to calm him down from trying to kill himself that tell him, no, you're actually a prophet of God, and that's where you get

Islam. Now, I believe that Muhammad came up with the revelations in the

Quran. I don't believe he did it intentionally. I believe he had some sort of mental health issues, perhaps with some very serious spiritual issues.

But we know that the people around Muhammad, they didn't think very highly of his revelations.

They accused him of plagiarism. They said, look, we know you just talked to that guy over there, and now you're coming up with these revelations that are, you know, we've heard this all before.

So, they believe he's plagiarizing stories from earlier religions like Christianity and Judaism and so on.

That's exactly what you find in the Quran. But according to Islam, Muhammad didn't write the

Quran. He just received it and then delivered it to his followers. Well, thank you so much, David.

You've been an excellent guest, as you always were in the past when the show ran several years ago for its first five or six years.

And we look forward to having you back next Thursday, and you're going to be discussing atheism, and specifically the book that you have written on atheism.

And the book that you have written is, what's the title of that book?

I'm not sure which one. I haven't written an entire one by myself. Yeah, I've contributed to various volumes.

Yes, and we're going to be discussing basically answering the claims of atheists. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And this

Monday, we have the brother of Ray Romano, Richard Romano, is discussing his book, or actually,

I'm sorry, his movie, The Investigator, which chronicles his conversion to Christianity as a result of some tragedies he experienced while a

New York City police detective. So I just want to thank everybody who wrote today with their questions.

I want to thank especially, obviously, David Wood for being our guest, and I want to thank our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, for making this possible.

I hope you all have a safe and wonderful weekend, and always remember that Jesus Christ is a far, far greater

Savior than you are a sinner. God bless. Enjoy the weekend, and have a very blessed