95. Traces of Defeatism: A Critique of Amillennialism
In "Traces of Defeatism," I examine how some of the interpretations and assumptions in amillennialism act like trace elements of poison in the Church's bloodstream, subtly undermining our mission by instilling a defeatist mindset. I argue for embracing a postmillennial perspective, which I believe empowers us to actively engage and transform culture, reflecting a more victorious outlook on God's kingdom and our role within it.
--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/datprodcast/support [https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/datprodcast/support]
Transcript
Hello everyone and welcome back to the podcast where we prod the sheep and beat the wolf.
This is episode 95 the traces of defeatism.
Well, hello everyone and welcome back to the podcast where we're in a special series right
now called a practical Post -millennialism and if you're just joining us my
goal in the series has been to help make the end times practical.
Because what we believe about the end times shapes how we live in our time.
And if we think that we're gonna lose down here, then we're not going to work down here if the sky is
always falling.
Well, we're gonna be ever hiding but if on the other hand God has a
plan for victory if he's gonna use his church to extend his Dominion to the ends of the earth then brothers and
sisters you and I are going to live radically different.
Different we're gonna work.
We're gonna build and we're gonna take risk for the glory of Christ and
That's why I've been encouraging this this whole time because I want to see the Church of God invigorated
again.
I'm tired of seeing the church defeated.
I'm tired of seeing the church.
Pulling back from culture and hiding in our little churches.
No, we're the salt of the world.
We're the light of the world.
We need to get out and let the light shine, which is what I'm hoping to accomplish in this series.
Now in.
The first part of this series on a practical post -millennial ism I actually wanted to go back and talk
about the wrong views the views that I believe have crippled the church and Caused her to
become stagnant in her mission.
I had a lady asked me today actually Why do you focus so much on eschatology when there's all of these other doctrines.
And it was a sincere question.
I said great question because I want to see the Church of God thrive and
Anything that's causing her to feel defeated feel like she can't engage like she needs
to hide like an ostrich With her head in the sand.
Well, I want to get rid of that and what I found in my time in the church is.
That.
Eschatology matters and if you have a wrong Eschatology it is going to impact the way that you view Christ
the way that you view your time on earth and the way that You engage in the mission.
So I've made it my goal in this series to Let us look at a biblical
eschatology.
But before we get there, we got to look at what the wrong eschatology is.
Views like Dispensationalism or historic pre -millennial ism and even in some respects all millennial
ism, which we're going to talk about today have produced a disengaged and a
Disinfected and a demoralized church that has abandoned culture over the
last 50 to 100 years.
Instead of the church engaging the world.
She's grown silent and she's become hidden now in.
This.
Series, I want to fix that but we've got to go through the different ways that this has come about in our
first episode Which was called defeating defeatism we dissected the sort of fragmented
topsy -turvy Alice in Wonderland view of eschatology that's called
Dispensationalism and we showed in that episode how it produces a mindset a mindset of
escapism theological withdrawal and even and even victim hood in the world
among the members of the church who ascribed to this sort of view and It leaves those who
believe in dispensationalism looking at the Bride of Christ instead of this glorious Creature that
Christ came to the earth to seek and buy and purchase for himself and to marry as his bride.
Instead of that it views her as this black -eyed Brunette who is just waiting to be
bruised and beaten before she is rescued out of here.
That to me sounds nothing at all like the New Testament.
Now in our second episode along with esteemed Bible teacher Gary DeMar, I would recommend you check out that
episode.
It is excellent.
We started to where we continue down this road of unraveling futuristic.
Thinking and demonstrating one by one through one scripture after another how that gloomy
prediction that that that doom and gloom sort of eschatology where you have a future tribulation and wars
and rumors of wars and false prophets and all those different kinds of persecution and turmoil all of that
stuff already happened in the past in the pages of history and What Gary DeMar did so
brilliantly as he showed how Matthew 21 22 23 24 are all talking about
This happening in their lifetime and in their generation and it all culminated in the destruction of
Jerusalem in ad 70 so all of that that pre -millennial ism punts out into the
future is already happened.
So, why are we so upset and worried and always looking for marks of the beast or Antichrist
or whatever?
So that was episode 2.
Episode 3 is where we turned our gaze toward historic pre -millennial ism.
Which in some way is a bit more rational and reasonable than her younger sister called
dispensationalism.
But unfortunately, she's from the same family and she produces the same Outcome which is
eschatological defeatism now if dispensationalism can be compared to
chugging a gallon of arsenic well Historic pre -millennial ism would only require you to drink a
glass and that of course sounds reasonable sounds like a great improvement but when you realize the
infinitesimal amount of arsenic that it actually takes in your bloodstream to be fatal.
Well, the differences between a gallon and a glass sort of evaporate at that point.
Now having thoroughly dismantled the pre -millennial view and I believe that we did that Jesus's kingdom is
still in the future at some point and it will not be inaugurated until the church collapses and is
Raptured out of here in a heavenly elevator.
Well instead of that.
I would like us today to turn to Millennialism, which I believe is the next wrong eschatological position that we
really need to consider.
Now I didn't want to do this episode to be honest because I have so much respect for Millennialism, but before
turning our sights on the correct view We need to cover all the views and that means we need to talk about our millennial ism.
Now again, I want to lay this on thick because I believe it.
I have great respect for our millennial ism it is it is the majority view right now among reformed
theologians and churches and pastors and even reformed people it gets so much
right about the nature of the millennium and the and the nature of Eschatology and there's different streams
of our millennial ism that are very close to what I believe that are really right and those strands have
Contributed to so many great things in the church and in Christianity, but but there's also these like these trace
elements That caused the church to be weakened and caused the church to feel defeated that I think
our millennial ism is responsible for it.
Even though it is a good view if we go back to our previous metaphor
The arsenic our millennial ism is not gallons of arsenic like the dispensational.
So it's not even glasses like historic pre -millennial ism.
And in some senses, it's kind of like a thimble or maybe even trace elements would be a better example.
There are many good things about this view it produces a sobriety when it comes to
biblical studies a seriousness that I have very much respect for and admire, but
Remember, you don't need glasses and gallons of poison to get you sick even if there are
small Trace amounts of arsenic in the water or in your bloodstream.
You can become quite ill.
What a day.
I Want to talk about the small traces that have found their way into a
millennial ism that I believe have caused the church To retreat that have caused the church to be sickly and that have caused
the church to feel Defeated and lacking hope so I'm not gonna get into everything that we could
possibly get into this week.
It's way too big of a topic to cover.
There's another episode coming out next week on radical two kingdoms.
I'm a millennial ism that I'm eliciting the help of dr Glenn sunshine to come in and help me on that because it's
it's way bigger of a topic than I can possibly do by myself.
But this week I just want to paint with broad strokes.
I want to describe what I'm a millennial ism is I want to give it great honor and deference is a good reformed view
but I also want to talk about how it's an incomplete view and how it contributes to the Pessimism and
the defeat ism that we've been discussing so far.
So if you're on board with that Let's get started part one
amalani elism described.
Now as the name suggests Amalani elism is one of the four primary views that has something to say about the
nature of the millennium which is found in Revelation 20.
Amalani elism pre millennial ism and post millennium all say something about the millennium which is the thousand
years in Revelation 20.
Now if you think about it these these views sort of make sense.
Pre millennial ism suggests that Jesus is going to return before the millennium pre millennium and
Post millennial ism suggests that Jesus is going to return after his millennial reign or post post
millennial ism.
But amalani elism is a little confusing because it absolutely has something to say about the nature of this
thousand years.
But unfortunately the ah in amalani elism sort of makes things a little bit
a little bit confusing.
Normally the ah coming before a word is known as an alpha privative and it's a grammatical term,
which means that it negates The word that it follows we have a very common word in our
culture called atheism.
It's theism negated by the ah.
A theism means I don't believe in God.
Whereas theism means I do believe in God.
So when you put the a an atheist it negates the word Theism and it makes you
believe that there, you know, it's it's communicating that you believe there is no God.
Well the same way if you put ah in front of millennial ism.
It's almost like you're saying I don't believe in the millennium and that is not what amalani elism is saying.
In fact, that could not be further from the truth.
You see like post millennial ism the amalani el types believe
Revelation 20 is a symbolic period of time.
Just as God is not limited to for instance the cattle on a thousand hills because that numbers figurative
and he is going to bring Blessings to more than and then a thousand generations that numbers figurative.
Well.
Ah millennials and post millennials believe that that thousand -year reign of Christ is a figurative time
period that covers the entire reign of Christ.
He's not just gonna reign for a thousand years.
He's gonna reign for all the years.
His reign is not a future event that we're waiting on.
It's it's an event that's already begun.
That's been ushered in by Jesus by his ascension in the thronement in heaven.
So that we're already living in Jesus's kingdom now a point that amalani el ism and post millennial ism agree
with wholeheartedly.
Now we're amalani el ism and post millennial ism part ways.
Concerns the question of where Jesus's reign occurs or maybe a better way of saying that is
where will Jesus have dominion?
According to the amalani el types Christ is going to have dominion in the souls of believers.
He's reigning now and he's gonna have dominion over the spiritual lives of his people.
The kingdom that they envision is a spiritual kingdom.
It's a kingdom on this side of heaven.
It's a church that Jesus ascended to rule over which involves the gathered people
of God every Sunday morning salvation regeneration the sacraments the praises the
worship and all of that and That makes this kingdom that they're talking about move
forward entirely by the Spirit of God.
Yes, and amen and in this era it moves forward through the proclamation of the gospel to the ends of
the earth and It advances one by one by raising dead souls to life in Christ, which
again the post millennialist will say amen.
But where amalani el ism stops short is in seeing Christ.
Dominion is limited to the spiritual realm and he's only Claiming
back from the curse and from the devil the fallen souls of man.
Now maybe he has some maybe his kingdom has some marginal impact in the world, but it's not going to be much.
It's primarily a spiritual kingdom and to be fair amalani.
Let's do actually believe that Jesus's kingdom is going to reverse the curse in the physical realm.
They just don't believe it's gonna happen on this side of heaven.
They believe it's gonna be in the new heaven and the new earth, which makes their view a bit more pessimistic than
those Optimistic post mill types who see the kingdom of God is impacting the physical world
now as I believe the scriptures say.
Which is which I think is fair and we'll get to later now in summary.
The emphasis that amalani el ism has is a good one.
It talks about God's sovereignty.
It emphasizes the already not yet nature of the Christians current reign with Jesus in
this Lifetime it underscores a view of eschatology that does bring hope and sobriety
to its Adherence and and again, I believe it is overwhelmingly better
than Premillennialism than dispensationalism and it's more consistent with the truths of reformed theology.
Which has made this view a staple in the history of the church.
But.
We also have to examine how it's got things wrong.
But before we do that, I want us to look at what is the history of amalani el ism?
And again, we could talk about so much here.
There could be.
Volumes of books written on this and I am I'm gonna go as fast as I can through this material because I
want you to Understand it at a high level and I don't want to lose you in a podcast.
If you'd like to know more I've written a longer article on this on the website and go to the Shepherd's Church
Blog and you can check that out.
But for right now, we're just gonna paint in really broad strokes so if I don't say this in the in the way that
exactly Captures the exhaustive treatment of amalani el ism in history.
Please show me grace because I'm trying to just do this in summary form so with that
part two Amalani el ism's history the
ancient world.
Now in the early days of the Christian Church There were different ideas about how the world was going to end and what role
Jesus was going to play in that world ending drama.
Two of these ideas were called amalani el ism and post millennial ism and both of these views have
their roots.
All the way back to the early church.
They were influenced early on by Jewish teachings and early writings by Christians.
Including a very important work done by Augustine of Hippo now at first amalani el ism
and post Post millennial ism were basically the same view people didn't distinguish
them.
They didn't start seeing the differences between them until much later, which happened after the Reformation.
So in the ancient world and in the ancient church, these views were the same view.
So when I say amalani el ism in this I'm meaning both that when I'm telling the history of this I'm telling the history of
both because both views especially in the ancient world believe that Jesus is already reigning in a symbolic
way.
He's not literally sitting on a throne somewhere in the capital city of Jerusalem.
And he's not doing so for a limited number of a thousand physical years.
No, he's reigning in heaven over all the years and over all time and over all things.
Remember, he says in Matthew 28 that all authority in heaven and earth belong to me.
Not just the authority I have on in the city of Jerusalem.
Now both of these views also agree that Jesus is going to come back after a period of time.
The idea of Amalani el ism comes from Jewish writings that talked about the end times.
These are books like Daniel which has much to say about the end times and really informs our understanding quite
well and.
Also from pseudepigraphal books like the book of Enoch.
Which was very influential in the Second Temple Jewish period it was also influential in the early church.
Now these writings did not specifically spell out whether this thousand
-year reign of Jesus was going to be Physically on earth or whether it was going to be a spiritual reign in heaven.
So early Christians who were influenced by Daniel in the book of Enoch plus they were influenced by the
writings of the New Testament authors and The thoughts of Jesus reign being something
more than more spiritual than physical.
Well, this view became sort of the primary view and this is especially true Under the influence of
Augustine in the fourth century now at that time He wrote a famous book, which is you should
read it.
If you have a chance.
It's one of the classics of the Christian faith.
It's called the city of God.
It's a very long book.
It's a great book and he wrote that book where he argued that the Bible's description of the end times
Should be rightly understood as symbolic and not as literalistic.
Now according to Augustine Jesus's reign began with his ascension to heaven
and his enthronement in heaven at God's right hand and That rain is
manifested or that rain is shown throughout the world through the church's presence on
earth.
Now this view ran afoul of a common view at that time called
Chilean or also known as historic pre -millennial ism.
Which argued that no Jesus wasn't gonna return until the very end and he was gonna set up a literal thousand
-year reign somewhere in Jerusalem in the future that view clashed with Augustine
hardcore.
Now Augustine's ideas became more prominent and they became very influential and he suggested that the
church and the world Were going to grow together.
You see pre -millennial ism said basically that the church was gonna grow a little bit in the world was gonna grow a lot and Jesus Was gonna come
and rescue us out of here and that made sense in The first two centuries of the church where the church was getting bloodied
and butchered and beaten.
But in the fourth century when the church was starting to gain ground and was starting to win and it was
starting to spread throughout the Roman world.
Augustine came along and said no, I don't think that the church ends in defeat.
I think the church grows victoriously at the same time as the world.
So they both grow together and they both sort of become more opposite of each other over
time.
So that instead of them coming together and one of them winning out.
What Augustine really argued and it was developed later by other theologians was that the church in the world grew
Simultaneously and they grew more opposed to each other the longer the church age went along to where in the
end.
They were completely and diametrically opposed to one another and there was no one left in the middle.
You were either Fully against God or you were fully for God in these two sort of competing
kingdoms.
Now this was different.
From the thinking that Christians were going to physically rebuild the world and they were gonna reclaim Culture and they were
gonna bring God's blessings physically on earth and that was gonna overtake the curse.
Which is what post -millennial ism eventually began to be seen as but over time.
Especially early in the church this symbolic understanding of Jesus's reign became more and more accepted.
It became the primary view in the early church and it has continued to be the primary view up until the modern
era.
Because it's easy to have a view of victory when you were winning when the Roman Empire is bowing the knee to Jesus and his
Church actually topples it.
It's hard to feel like a loser which I'm sorry to say this but post pre -millennial ism Communicates that it's
hard to feel like a loser when you're winning and Jesus was certainly winning.
So his victory was spreading to the Roman Empire and it was encouraging.
So unlike that literalistic view of the end times which faded away it literally became extinct.
During that time period because again, it was so hard to believe it.
Millennialism and post -millennial ism grew and they grew to become the dominant view and they were the dominant view all the way up
to the Middle Ages and into the Middle Ages the Middle Ages.
Now during the Middle Ages the idea of our millennial ism which is the belief that Jesus's reign is more
spiritual than physical that he really is reigning right now in heaven and It's not a physical throne on earth that became
very popular and that was largely again because of Augustine of Hippo.
He was again a very influential Christian thinker.
He wrote a book where he explained that the Bible's talk about a thousand years should not be taken literalistically instead He said
it's more about Jesus reigning from heaven spiritually through his church on earth and for a long time.
Especially at the beginning in the Middle Ages people did not really question that at all.
And in fact, they didn't build on Augustine's ideas for a long time because Augustine had laid them out
pretty well.
The church had more battles that it needed to focus on so it didn't get back to eschatology for a while so
Augustine's viewpoint sort of became frozen as The view of the church for a long time without
really any extensive development the church was more focused at that time on setting itself up against the
Rising conflicts between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church.
Which called the Great Schism and then you came into the high Middle Ages where?
Scholars started thinking and writing about religion in new ways and that did include some thoughts on
amillennialism.
But again, it was scant Augustine's view was still looming large over the culture of the Middle Ages.
Now it was later in the Middle Ages that a religious movement.
This is late Middle Ages where a religious movement called mysticism became popular and this view
emphasized personal spiritual experiences over and against the physical world.
The people who believed in this would would try to avoid the world abandon the world and live entirely in the
spirit.
Pitting the spiritual life in the physical life at odds with one another which is Gnostic and not even biblical.
I believe at this time amillennialism started to take on some of those elements the
Spiritual side of things become less optimistic about how the gospel will actually improve the
world.
Before Jesus returns.
I believe at this time they begin to focus more on preparing for heaven as opposed to trying to live and be faithful
here on earth which set them apart from the Amillennial Christians who would eventually become
known as post millennials who were trying to build society here and now or at least build society in
conformity to Christ.
Now this shift towards a more spiritual and a less worldly approach it started very slowly
and it did not Separate these two views very quickly so that amillennialism post millennialism all
throughout the Middle Ages were still considered the same view.
But it did lay the groundwork for how amillennialism and post millennialism would diverge in the
future the Reformation to the modern era.
Now from the Reformation in the 16th century to now.
How people think about amillennialism has developed which again is the belief that Jesus is reigning
Spiritually rather than a literal thousand -year period on earth that view has changed a ton
as a result of the Reformation.
This topic is already huge.
But with all of the debates and all of the important thinkers that have been involved in this since the Reformation until now.
The amount of books and the amount of materials that we could write on this topic really are our Legion,
I would say that in the last 500 years amillennialism has went Through much more development
than it did even in the first 1 ,500 years the church which means that if I was summarizing before that I'm
really summarizing now.
So again, your grace is appreciated.
Well during the Reformation important religious leaders like Martin Luther and John Calvin and
others.
Well, they pushed the idea that we should focus more on what the Bible says rather than church traditions.
Which of course ran afoul of Rome.
John Calvin in particular helped promote the idea that Jesus's kingdom is more about his
spiritual reign than the physical dominance that he saw the church.
Forcing on people here and now now he didn't spell out everything that he believed about the end times.
But his writings do lay the groundwork for future thinkers to build upon his ideas.
After the Reformation there were other theologians and there were important documents like the Belgic Confession of
Faith and The Westminster Standards which further developed these ideas in those confessional
doctrines.
They are documents.
They talked about God's kingdom as something that is both happening now, but it's also something that we look
forward to in the future.
It's an already and a not yet kingdom.
Over the years several key figures followed downstream of the Reformation who added more
details into these into these beliefs.
For example, Johannes a Kosia's.
I'm sure I'm not pronouncing that correctly.
Forgive me he helped blend the end time view of amillennialism with covenant theology
sync retires or Synchronizing it with the full formed reformed
theology.
So he took it and Combined it with covenant theology, which is a way of understanding the Bible's overall story
later thinkers who came after him like Herman Bovink and gear hardest Voss.
Well, they link these ideas about the end times to the broader story of how God saves his people.
Through history, especially true of Voss who is we consider sort of the father of biblical theology.
It doesn't mean his theology was more biblical than anyone else.
It means that it's a type of theology that begins from Genesis to Revelation.
He's telling the whole story.
That's what biblical theology is.
Well, then in the 20th century as a new view called Dispensational pre
-millennial ism which we talked about three episodes prior to this was it became popular especially in the
United States.
Amillennialism needed to be defended and clarified by a new generation of theologians.
Bovink was great.
Voss was great.
But as dispensational ism grew theologians like Lewis Burkhoff and Anthony hoechema
Needed to take the doctrine forward and be able to answer the objections that pre -millennial ism was
bringing now.
They wrote important works arguing for the view of God's kingdom.
That is already happening now because of Jesus being in heaven reigning on the throne.
But not yet fully realized because he hasn't yet returned today.
Modern scholars are building upon that foundation and they're continuing to discuss and refine
Amillennialism to continue to fight the heresy of pre -millennial ism.
Focusing on Jesus's reign now and how it impacts our understanding of the future the
church and biblical prophecies.
Now this belief system that has been developing over the majority of church history.
I would say amillennial ism and postmillennial ism together are the long -standing view of the church.
Even though they're less popular now than other views.
They are the long -standing view of the church.
Well, this belief system is key to understanding reformed theology, especially reformed eschatology.
Which emphasizes God's control over everything even the end and our Jesus's leadership of
the church is going to win the world back.
Now that leads us into our next part part 3.
Amillennial ism's key themes.
Now the central thesis of amillennial ism is that Christ is reigning over his kingdom now from his
throne in heaven.
This means that the millennial kingdom that Exists is right now during a
symbolic period of time, which we know as the church age.
Now that age could last for a thousand years or it could last for a hundred thousand years depending on the will and the plan Of God, we don't
know how long God is going to delay.
But we do know that he is reigning now.
This world does not belong to Satan as John Nelson Darby says it belongs to Christ.
Both Amillennials and premillennials or postmillennials agree with that.
Now the critical point to understand is that one that the 1 ,000 years in the Bible does not
Usually refer to a literal number.
This is so important to understanding this because if you're a premillennial or if you're dispensational you can say see you're not
taking the Bible.
Literally, you don't you don't believe the Bible is literal and that is not what we are saying.
We do believe the Bible should be taken literally.
Which means according to the literature and if the literature is figurative You should understand it figuratively if
Jesus says to pull the plank out of your eye before you get the sawdust out of another person's Eye, I should not expect to
see you pulling a 2x4 out of your face.
It is figurative language.
Well the year thousand or the number thousand is a figurative number.
It's kind of like a child going up to them to his mother and saying that I want a bajillion
Pieces of candy.
We know that he's not talking about a literal number.
He's talking about a big number.
He's talking about something incomprehensible to him.
He's talking about I want all the candy and that's exactly what the Bible does when he uses the word 1 ,000 we
are supposed to know that when biblical authors employ this Thousand -year
term they're using an all -encompassing very large number like bajillion, which means everything.
For instance, I'll give you four examples when God communicates that he is going to increase the population of Israel and make them
fruitful and multiply Before the Exodus and he says I'm gonna multiply you a thousand times
over.
He is not communicating an exact percentage of population growth where he will take them and no
further.
He's not saying I'll grow you a thousand percent, but not a thousand and one.
That's not what he's saying.
He's telling them that if they will remain faithful to him.
Then they're going to undergo the kind of fruitful and multiplied blessings that the
original humanity We're gonna be under if they obeyed God, that's Deuteronomy 111.
That's Genesis 128.
So that's example one.
Example number two is when God tells Israel that he's going to bless their
covenant faithfulness to a thousand generations.
Which if a generation is 40 years in the Bible a thousand generations is 40 ,000 years.
So is God communicating that he is only going to bless his people for 40 ,000 years
when the clock turns to 40 ,001 it's gonna be worse than y2k because God's gonna
take all his blessings away.
That is ridiculous.
That's not what God's saying.
He's simply telling them that if they will be obedient to him with complete and total obedience.
And he will give them complete and total blessings and that he'll pour them out upon them and upon their children.
For ever he's not limiting the amount of years to a fig to a literal number.
He's saying I'm gonna bless you entirely a bajillion times.
So that's the second example number three when God says that he owns the cattle on a thousand
hills.
We've already talked about the Psalm 50 verse 10.
He is not telling them that somebody else owns the cattle on the thousand and first.
He's not saying I own these thousand hills, but Jim Bob down the street owns the others.
No, it's not what he's saying.
It's ridiculous.
The fourth example I'd give you is when David exclaims Lord better is one day in your courts
than a thousand elsewhere.
Psalm 84 10.
David again is not communicating that one day is good for a thousand.
But don't ask me to stay a thousand and one God.
I've got work to do.
That's not what he's saying.
He's saying a single day in your courts in your temple is better than all the
days anywhere else on earth a Bajillion days.
That's sort of what he's saying.
And those are examples.
Again, there's more of them.
I could give you so many more examples of a thousand years not being a not meaning literal number.
It's a figurative number with a literal meaning.
But I think you get the point.
Well.
Post -millennials and Amillennials take that number as a very figurative number and we say that if it means this and
all these other scenarios.
That it must mean that God rains from heaven for all the
years.
Whether it's a thousand years or ten thousand years or whatever.
Amillennialism rightly understands that God is not setting limits on the time of Jesus's reign to a
measly thousand years.
God's not doing that.
God is saying that his son when he ascends to the throne He is going to reign on flinchingly for
every year until he decides to return his rule isn't is gonna be unchallenged.
It's gonna be unbroken.
It's gonna be unrivaled.
It's gonna be without end.
Again without rival without end without limit until he decides to return
yet.
While amillennialism sees that so rightly and they get that so right.
They comprehend that so well.
They unwittingly put limits on the nature of his reign.
They don't put limits on the length of his reign they say no, no, no, he's gonna rain all the years, but they do put limits on the
Degree or the nature of his reign saying that his reign his post incarnation
Empire is only going to affect the spiritual world and it may only
marginally impact the material world before eternity begins now in this
sense amillennialist Actually are more like pre millennialist because they agree that the
physical blessings described in the Bible Described in the prophets described on the lips of Jesus
are not going to happen until Jesus returns in that sense.
They're just like pre Millennials.
In the meantime they agree with Postmillennials that that the Bible says Satan has
been bound and the rulers and the authorities have been disarmed praise God.
They believe that that's good and that the enemy cannot stop the advance of Jesus's Church.
So that's good.
But again, they limit the effect of that advancement or the nature of that advancement to
mean only spiritual victories.
Instead of the church seeing the curse by God by the Holy Spirit pushed back in
every realm such as politics and governments being discipled and Christianized or
education being Christianized music to the glory of God art and Advancement by
Christians medical and scientific breakthroughs coming at the hands of the church technology and
architecture all that instead of seeing Believers the church by the spirit bringing the
blessings of God to the nation's and obedience to the cultural mandate and the
and the Great Commission Amillennialist adopt a very unhelpful and limiting binary
Formula a rigid kind of two kingdoms that originated more from Augustine than it does
from Holy Scripture.
For this reason amillennial pastors theologians churches and members are less Interested in
engaging with culture since the subtle fatalism of the Augustinian view Necessitates that
the kingdom of man is going to continue to grow without end right alongside of the church
and if it's gonna grow right alongside the church and The church really isn't gonna have much impact on it.
Then why engage it?
Let's focus here on what we can do in the here and now and let's leave them alone to do what they do.
That is not in my opinion what the Bible says.
You see without the hope of of that kingdom of man shrinking and without the hope
of Jesus advancing on that kingdom through his church and and his dominion actually
infiltrating that kingdom well Amillennials have sometimes adopted a posture of
isolationism.
From cultural avoidism where they do good and faithful works in their churches
praise God for that and Yet they're less involved in the world because that's the kingdom of man and we
don't belong there and we don't work there in my opinion.
That has led to so much problems in American culture because as the church has pulled
away even for good reasons like Building up the church as the church has pulled away the
society has decayed.
Now I want to be fair here.
This is not to suggest for a second that Amillennial Christians are Necessarily
always aloof and always unengaged in culture.
That's not my point.
My point is is that the subtle trace elements in the bloodstream of amillennialism the
assumptions in their Eschatological system can cause them to be aloof and it
can cause them to be unengaged in culture.
And I would even go as far as to say that when they are faithfully engaged.
They're not acting like amillennialist.
They're acting more like post millennialist.
When they do those things furthermore because some amillennials attempt to read a coming
future Antichrist and a rapture of the righteous a rebellion of the wicked Armageddon
a great tribulation a great apostasy.
And they try to read all these things like Kim riddle Barger who wrote the case for amillennialism when they read all those things Into the future of the
church instead of seeing them rightly as things that have already been fulfilled in the first century AD.
Well, they also tend to be less optimistic about how far the church can Realistically advance
on earth before the forces of darkness take over and kick us out of here which is gonna force
Jesus to return and eradicate them which agrees more with pre -millennialism as well and That
way that form of amillennialism functions with a veneer of pre -millennialism hiding
underneath the fat of good reformed theological categories.
But unlike pre -millennials who ferociously argue that the promises of God are going to come true on earth.
That brand of amillennialism says nope those things only occur in heaven.
So in that sense, they actually believe the promises the Bible less than the pre -millennials.
Which is sad and in some ways makes pre -millennialism more exegetically faithful, but
only in some ways.
Now as mentioned before these are the trace elements of spiritual anthrax That have left our
amillennial brothers and sisters a little limp and a little sickly when it comes to bringing all of Christ
to all of life and for all the world, but I'm not gonna just leave it in the general
realm here I'm actually gonna tell you I think three reasons or three trace elements that
specifically have affected the amillennial view and have caused it to
Leave the church impotent.
So let's go with that now part for identifying the trace elements now as I
mentioned moments ago the same poison that totally infected dispensationalism and pre
-millennialism which shows up in trace amounts in the amillennials blood work and while amillennials have been
responsible for many gains within the Kingdom of God.
This is an area where critique and reversal are needed and what follows I'm gonna sketch out a
few examples.
Three to be specific of where amillennialism tends towards an over
spiritualized interpretation of Scripture, which I think runs afoul of the text in
Conclusion of this section.
I'm gonna show how this stifles the church.
From vibrantly engaging in culture and the world and why we need to repent so element one.
Overspiritualization of prophecies.
Now one of the most common critiques that's leveled against amillennialism centers on its approach to interpreting
prophetic passages particularly those within the Old Testament instead of seeing
these things though what the prophets prophesy as Coming physically upon the earth as the
kingdom of God advances.
I think that the prophets argue for while amillennialism sees them through a
Spiritualistic lens or they maybe even relocate these promises to heaven.
Let me give you a few examples.
I Let's start with Isaiah 2 2 through 4 Now there the prophet describes that in the last
days the mountain of the Lord's Temple is going to be Established as the highest point on earth and
all the nations are going to stream to it.
Well.
Isaiah also foretells that the Lord himself is gonna rule over the nations from that mountain and he's
gonna bring his justice and his peace upon the earth and he's gonna end war and he's gonna end violence and the
Nations are gonna come to his people the church in order to learn the law of God.
Now while amillennialism interprets the first two verses correctly seeing that Christ first coming
in his incarnation Established his church as the place where the nations are gonna come for salvation, which is the spiritual
fulfillment.
They ignore that in this passage.
The warriors are gonna beat their swords into plowshares.
Which is not figurative and that all the nations are gonna be under the rule of the Messiah who will bring peace.
Which is not figurative and that they the nations are gonna come to his church in order to be discipled
according to his law.
Instead of a world growing more and more wicked this passage actually communicates a world that
increasingly is growing Smaller in its wickedness and more in submission to King
Jesus.
Unlike the amillennial view where the kingdom of man and the kingdom of God grows simultaneously at the same time, which again
is augustinian.
No, this passage is talking about the kingdom of man shrinking and even running eventually to
the church in order to know God.
Which the text gives us a perfect exegetical warrant for thinking this way.
Amillennialism on the other hand has no warrant for spiritualizing that passage.
Here's another example take for example Psalm 72, which is a royal Messianic Psalm and
that passage the Messiah is gonna come and restore justice on the earth verses 2 through 4.
He's gonna bring physical peace and material prosperity to all the people.
Verse 3.
He's gonna comfort the poor and the afflicted verse 12 through 14.
He's gonna bring abundance to their fields verse 16.
His physical reign on earth is gonna extend to all the nations verse 8 11 and 17.
And those who come under God's blessing by being under the reign of Jesus verse 17
are going to be blessed on a material earth and not a Disembodied heaven.
The only way to make sense of these very material promises is to see them Occurring
like they're described physically here on earth.
You either have to have that happening in the future like pre -millennialism does or these things are
going to have to Increasingly come through the reign of Christ in his current reign on earth, which is post
-millennialism.
Or you're gonna have to ignore these things like the amillennials.
You're either gonna have to believe what the Bible says in this passage that it is physical or you're gonna have to spiritualize it.
Which is what traditional amillennialists do with no adequate answer or reason for
how they do it Just must be spiritual because it doesn't fit with our worldview.
Here's another example.
Look at Isaiah 9 6.
This passage is so critical.
It says that a child is gonna be born to us.
That's Jesus and Everybody says that post -millennial pre -millennial amillennial.
We all say that that's Jesus, but then right after that Isaiah says that that same
child who's born is gonna have the government on his shoulders.
Which means he's gonna grow up to be a king who rules and he's gonna be both a human king and a divine king.
He's gonna be wonderful counselor mighty God Prince of Peace everlasting father.
Then the passage says this very curious thing about in verse 7 how this baby who's
born in Bethlehem is gonna grow up And take over the world.
It says there will be no end to the increase of his government or of his
peace on The throne of David and over his kingdom to establish it and to
uphold it with justice and righteousness.
From then on and forever more now, there's two things that this passage actually does not
say.
First he doesn't say that there's going to be a multiple thousand -year gap between Jesus's birth and his
universal total dominion.
He is gonna step into King into his kingship immediately and it's going to grow from
there.
That kind of nonsense that pre -millennialism believes.
It's just not in the Bible.
There's no multiple thousand -year gap between his first coming in a second coming in Isaiah 9 7 his kingship
Begins with his royal birth for sure but it grows deeper in his adulthood and it's inaugurated more fully in his
Ascension and it's gonna be increasing here on earth in every decade in every century and
every millennium since then until one day all The things that Isaiah promises are
going to come true his reign will come in full.
That's what it says.
The second thing that it doesn't say is that you have a Exegetical right to spiritualize
the extent of Jesus's kingdom as many amillennialist are so prone to do.
He does not say that this king will have a spiritual reign that takes over the hearts of men and will only affect
the church and his Government only applies to the church and his reign is only applying to the spiritual
world.
That's not what it says.
This passage includes how he's gonna reign over both the spiritual and the physical realms.
He's gonna rule over everything.
Which is why post -millennialism has a better answer to this passage than amillennialism does.
You can look at another example Daniel 235 where the kingdom of Jesus Was
inaugurated by God himself verse 44 of that chapter during the Roman Empire.
Which most people believe maybe the dispensationals don't but they're wacky.
Well, anyway, God himself Inaugurates Jesus's reign in the Roman Empire, which is precisely what happened in
Jesus's death.
His reign began then when he ascended into heaven, but now notice in Daniel that the
kingdom Begins in a particular way.
It doesn't begin in full form it begins like a little pebble and Then that little pebble grows a
little bit more and eventually a little bit more and it becomes a mountain that takes over the entire
World starting with the Roman Empire and it's gonna eventually topple all the nations.
This is precisely what Christianity has been doing for the last 2 ,000 years and all of that began in the first century.
This is not a spiritual takeover that has no impact on the world.
No, this is an actual takeover that Literally toppled the Roman Empire which fell at the feet of
Jesus in the 4th century and it's Constituted one of the most epic fulfillments of prophecy that's ever
been given.
Why do we need to spiritualize these passages when we have no warrant to do so and the physical reality of them
is far bigger.
And better and greater.
Anyway, it doesn't make any sense.
That's maybe the second to last example.
I'll give you one more think about it.
Zechariah 14 9 Which says that the Lord is gonna be king over all the earth.
Let's just keep going.
The Lord's gonna be king over the all the earth.
That's not spiritual.
Make Genesis 12 3 the Abrahamic promise or the seed of Abraham the seed of Christ is gonna bring blessings to all the people on
Earth that's not just spiritual.
What about the global transformation?
That's echoed throughout the Psalms and the prophets like Psalm 2 8 Psalm 22 27 through 28 and
Psalm 72 8 through 11 and 16 how they depict a future where the Messiah is gonna
reign and he's gonna bring Universal peace and prosperity and righteousness on earth.
What do we do with those passages if we just spiritualize them?
Because that's not what those passages are talking about.
This is further elaborated in Psalm 1 10 1 through 2 which portrays a triumphant kingdom under the reign
of a triumphant Christ.
Remember the prophets like Isaiah and Micah.
Offer some of the most vivid pictures of this era and they're not spiritualized visions.
They speak of a time when the nations are gonna seek God's wisdom where there's gonna be real peace on
this earth.
Real prosperity is going to abound with the knowledge of the Lord covering the earth as the water covers the seas.
That's a back at 214 that universal Acknowledgement of God's sovereignty is
further anticipated in the prophecies like Jeremiah 31 34.
Where the New Covenant renders the teaching about the Lord Unnecessary because
everyone on earth is already gonna know him.
Everyone on earth.
Daniel's vision of God's everlasting kingdom.
Daniel 235.
Zephaniah's promise of worldwide worship.
Zephaniah 3 9.
Zechariah's prophecy of Gentile seeking God all across the world.
Zechariah 23 and the Lord's universal kingship.
Zechariah 14 9 all of that reinforced the hopeful optimistic
outline that Amalani lism cannot account for.
They understand the success of the gospel goes so far.
Which is the spiritual world but not any further which I think Dishonors what the gospel
actually means and what the gospel is actually saying.
They understand the success of the gospel goes forth in the salvation Of sinners, but they miss the fact that the
effect of the gospel is gonna be more than just salvation.
It's gonna disciple people.
It's gonna disciple nations and that's gonna produce post millennial fruit in a post millennial world.
Not Amalani lism and not pessimism now said this earlier, but even the Great Commission this one last example.
It's what I said earlier even the Great Commission.
The command to make disciples out of every nation.
Matthew 28 19 assumes a long -term rigorous successful
Physical takeover of the world and its ethnoi its people its nations.
That's gonna come under the Lordship and the blessings of Jesus Christ.
In some ways pre Millennials take these passages far more seriously than the run -of -the -mill Amillennialist
because they at least Have the cojones to say that these promises
are not spiritualized.
They are actually going to occur on earth, even if we have to punt them into a very
remote distant future.
Amalani lisms tendency to allegorize and spiritual eyes.
These passages causes them to minimize the scope of Jesus's kingdom and to ignore the
promises that his kingdom is going to usher in and Overall, it causes them to live in
a sort of subtle Nagging unbelief in the power of God.
Can he really accomplish the things that he said or not?
I believe that he can Element to pessimistic view of the
church's influence.
Now along with understanding or Underestimating even the scope of Jesus's kingdom through the
spiritualization of the prophecies.
Well Amalani lism also underestimates the church's role in transforming the society
beginning with the cultural mandate Which is Genesis 1 28 and that mandate humanity was designed
by God to steward and cultivate Creation to actually extend Yahweh's rule and his
dominion on earth by bringing life and blessings Into every square inch of the material world.
They started in a garden, but yet they were supposed to make the entire world a garden which meant that they needed to
take the blessings that God gave them and Multiply them physically here on earth.
Now that project I believe was not abandoned by God after the fall.
God did not call that project of physically decorating the world with his glory
With worshipers.
I don't think God Abandoned that good plan for no reason.
I think it shows up again and again all throughout the Bible where God is literally showing you that he's reinvigorating that plan.
He's not giving up on it for instance look at how he decorates the temple like a garden in Exodus 25
through 27 or in the Building of houses in the urban and pagan Babylon for the good of the
city.
That's Jeremiah 29 7 or in the way that he commands his people to act Justly and
to love mercy in society and for society which Micah 680 doesn't tell them to
abandon it.
It tells them to infuse it with his justice Jesus's directives to his followers to be the
salt of the earth and the light of the world Matthew 5 Further amplify that the
mission is to the world not to abandon it.
The church's call is to influence and Transform culture around us not to
abandon it.
The Great Commission as we said before is Our charge to be witnesses to the
world Acts chapter 1 a also to extend the mission of God Globally to expand and to
emphasize discipleship to all the nations that impacts every single area of life
and that includes.
Culture.
Like Moscow says all of Christ for all of life for all the world James his
definition of pure religion in his book involves that very thing caring for the physically
vulnerable.
James 1 27.
Peter's encouragement to live honorably among the pagans first.
Peter 2 12 Highlights that our witness is actually done in Culture our
Christian conduct is exposed in the towns and the byways at our work at our job.
Wherever else the sacred and secular collide beneath our feet.
Together these passages articulate a vision for the church's mission
that encompasses both the spiritual Renewal and the societal engagement.
It's both spiritual and physical and embodies.
The kind of hope that we see through the Gospels influence that the church is actually going to play a pivotal role in the world's
transformation before Jesus returns that he is going to through the power of his
spirit by the obedient Church.
Usher in a kingdom that grows and that flourishes in every corner of human
existence again.
Amillennialism just does not have an answer.
At least not a good one for these verses in their context in any meaningful way.
Element number three the lack of progressive victory the amillennial emphasis on a
gradual Polarization of the world and the two opposing kingdoms does not align with how the Bible
speaks of Jesus's coming Kingdom and that's why I call it a trace element of poison in their
theological system.
Jesus kingdom comes in a different way.
It comes like a mustard seed that eventually fills the entire garden.
It comes like yeast that eventually works itself through the entire lump of dough.
It comes like a pebble that eventually overtakes the world with a global mountain it comes
filling the world with as much of God's glory as.
There is water in the sea and if you've ever been to the ocean, it's all water.
So his glory is gonna cover everything.
His kingdom comes like 1st Corinthians 15 25 through 26 says where Jesus must
reign and he must reign.
Until something happens.
1st Corinthians 15 tells us what that is until he has put every single one of his enemies under his feet.
So Jesus must reign until he has completed the mission.
Did you catch that that he must reign until the entire world is under his dominion.
Before the new heaven in the new earth and the final resurrection will come my dear friends.
We must stop expecting defeat like our pre -millennial friends like they
expect and we must stop and we must stop expecting the Polarization
or the minimal impact that the church is actually going to have on the world as our millennial brothers expect and
we must widen our lens to see the complete and the Total
work that God is doing that he's going to keep doing and that he's going to finish doing
before he returns.
Conclusion.
The consequences of trace elements.
Now in these three trace elements that we have mentioned there are more that we could speak about obviously.
But Amal Niel ism has accepted an overly idealized interpretation of prophecy
about the end times they've adopted a pessimistic view of the spread of Jesus's kingdom here on earth
and the influence that the church could actually have and In that hyper spiritualized and
pessimistic view.
They are not Consistent with what the Bible says or with a biblical vision and they
have caused some of their inherent their adherence to ignore deprioritize
or misinterpret explicit biblical promises that he will come and that his
peace and his justice and his mercy and his blessings and his Prosperity will come on this earth
as it is in heaven before he returns.
More specifically.
While all millennial ism again is so much more faithful and far more biblical than the
dispensational ism.
Or the historic premillennial ism that we've talked about those eschatological tendencies.
Those eschatological views are foolishness to be honest but I'm a millennial ism does have tendencies that have caused her at
times to isolate herself from culture and to Deprioritize how effective the
gospel is going to be in both the spiritual in the physical realm.
It has caused her to retreat which has caused the culture to further decay.
If you don't believe me just look around now today as we conclude most
Amillennials are cautious about cultural and social engagement.
Rooted in the belief that the kingdom of God advances primarily in the spirit world instead of
seeking Or seeing the gospel as the kingdom of God and as the as bringing God's redeeming power and
redemption to every area of life.
Well, they see the kingdom of God as being primarily about redeeming immaterial souls
this renders societal transformation efforts secondary at best.
Because the more important work of saving the souls and participating in God's spiritual renewal the
church the sacraments and personal piety Well that takes priority in this life above all else in.
Fact.
Postmillennialist would agree that evangelism and discipleship are Essential that the church and sacraments and
personal devotion to Christ are our primary labor.
We would agree the difference.
However, is that post millennial people recognize?
When you prioritize these things that when souls are actually saved
that when men and women are Discipled that you do not arrive at an amillennial
eschaton.
But a post millennial one instead think about it like this.
If the hope of the amillennial worldview came true and
every member of the church was fully engaged in worship and regularly participating at
the Lord's table and being actively Discipled at their churches and in their homes and they were
personally devoted to Jesus in every area of their life.
Then wouldn't that actually bleed over and have an impact in the way that they vote?
Wouldn't that change the way that they go to work and the way that they live and the way that they interact with their Neighbors and the
way that they talk to lost people.
I mean wouldn't that that level of discipleship that our amillennial brothers embrace and and
and Look forward to.
Wouldn't that invigorate Christians to create?
God honoring technologies in the tech businesses or God honoring hospitals that charge a
fair price for health care or music and arts that scream to the heights of the of
the ceiling like handle and Bach of previous generations and Art that filled the world with the beauty and the
anthem of Yahweh's praise in every industry and in every field and in every job.
Wouldn't discipleship and evangelism fill the world with more ardent and faithful believers
who are seeking to consistently live out their Christian faith in every square inch of life and
when that happened wouldn't it produce postmillennialism.
If the dream of amillennialism came true that the church was rigorously discipled and prepared and
Equipped for the mission of God then wouldn't postmillennialism actually be the natural outcome.
It's for that reason brothers.
I love amillennial.
I love you all millennial brothers and sisters and I want to show deference to you and honor to you.
Especially since your understanding is robust and articulate, but I also want to grab you sometimes and I want to
shake you and say perk up little buddy Jesus is winning.
Pull your head out of the eschatological sand and look around his kingdom is
taking back Territory the world and the church are not growing simultaneously.
Jesus's kingdom is becoming greater and the world's kingdom is becoming less.
You can look at history and it's proven for the last 2 ,000 years.
His gospel has Impacted this earth for the last 2 ,000 years
and guess what in 2 ,000 more should the Lord wish to tarry.
Even more progress and more gain is going to occur.
Why do we believe that it's going to stop just because we're going through a rough patch in our country.
Doesn't make any sense.
I believe what the Bible says and by the end of it.
Whenever that end is the entire world is gonna be under the thick Covenantal blanket
of God's incredible blessings that are gonna be ushered in by the reign of Christ in heaven
over his spirit -filled bride on earth and Until then until all that happens
come back next week is we're gonna consider a particular kind of amillennialism with our friend Dr. Glenn
sunshine that is way more wrong than the others.
Regular amillennialism is great.
This view is radical.
That's why they call it the radical two kingdoms view come back next week as we dive into that but until then.
Be hopeful.
Remember God is in control and that he's sovereign you are Millennials you believe in the sovereignty of God hold
fast to it believe that.
Believe that you can work now and that your labors will be fruitful and be multiplied by your king.
Who instead of you burying your talents is gonna find you working?
Hope in that hope and God get to work do faithful labor for the king and we'll see you next time
on the broadcast.
Thank you so much for watching another episode of the broadcast my joy to put these episodes out
there and I just want to brag on you for a moment our Audience this show
was not even on YouTube until December.
I posted one video in December for this show and then I've been posting ever since.
Since then we went from zero to 215 subscribers that is a
215 Percent increase maybe I'm not sure.
I'm not a mathematician.
But that's a lot of growth and I have no doubt that as we continue to post faithful conduct our content.
You will continue to like share subscribe and help us get this out to more people.
My goal is to invigorate Jesus's Church to godly action to really be
salt and light in the world.
So if that is your jam then like us subscribe us share it.
You can even give to help support it by going to www .theshepherds .church and click on the
give tab every dollar you give goes to ministry that's going to help revive, New England
and Beyond until then God richly bless you and thank you so much for
watching the broadcast.