August 3, 2017 Show with Phil Johnson on “Tim Keller & the Pressure Against Christian Leaders in the Public Eye to Cave In to the Leftist Agenda”

Live from the historic parsonage of 19th century gospel minister George Norcross in downtown

Carlisle, Pennsylvania, it's Iron Sharpens Iron, a radio

platform on which pastors, Christian scholars and theologians address the burning issues

facing the church and the world today.

Proverbs 27 verse 17 tells us, iron sharpens iron, so one

man sharpens another.

Matthew Henry said that in this passage, quote, we are cautioned to take heed whom we

converse with and directed to have in view in conversation to make one another

wiser and better.

It is our hope that this goal will be accomplished over the next hour, and we hope to hear

from you, the listener, with your own questions.

Now here's our host, Chris Arntzen.

Good afternoon, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, Lake City, Florida, and the rest of humanity living on the planet

Earth who are listening via live streaming at IronSharpensIronRadio .com.

This is Chris Arntzen, your host of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio, wishing you all a happy Thursday on this third day

of August 2017, and I'm so delighted to have back on the program someone who is

surely one of my favorite guests, and if you take into account my old program that

broadcasted out of New York, he is certainly one of my most frequently interviewed guests ever,

and that is Phil Johnson, executive director of Grace to You, the radio, television and literary

ministry of John MacArthur.

Today we're going to be speaking on a very controversial issue that may get me some hate mail,

as did my last interview with Phil, but today we are going to be

discussing Tim Keller and the pressure against Christian leaders in the public eye to cave

into the leftist agenda, and it's my honor and privilege to welcome you back to Iron Sharpens Iron, Phil Johnson.

Hey, thank you, Chris.

Good to be with you.

And in studio with me is my co -host, the Reverend Buzz Taylor.

And it's wonderful to be on the program again.

And if anybody would like to join us on the air, our email address is ChrisArntzen at gmail .com, C -H -R -I

-S -A -R -N -Z -E -N at gmail .com, and I do have a caveat in regard to your

questions.

My guest today, Phil Johnson, does not profess to be some kind of a thoroughly knowledgeable expert on

the life and teaching of Tim Keller.

We are going to be playing a clip of an interview, and we're going to keep

the clip in context so it'll be long enough where no one can accuse us of

taking the clip out of context.

But we're going to be airing a clip of an interview that Tim Keller had with David

Eisenbach on homosexuality.

And the responses that Tim Keller give to Mr. Eisenbach regarding

this sin are quite remarkably sad and tragic, in my opinion.

In fact, I think it should be sad and tragic in the mind of any

biblically -minded Christian, anyone who would call themselves a believer in the inerrancy of scripture,

and anyone who has actual love and compassion for the never -dying souls of those involved in homosexual

activity should also be appalled by the answers given in this interview.

But so I would rather, if you send in questions to Phil Johnson today, that you not be asking a

myriad of questions regarding Tim Keller because Phil may not know the answers to them, and

basically stick the questions as much as you can to the pressure against Christian leaders in the public

eye to cave into the leftist agenda.

But before I even play that clip, Phil, I just want to introduce you to our listeners.

I mean, it's a given that the vast majority of my listeners would be very familiar with you, and

grace to you and John MacArthur, but something remarkable in a positive way has

occurred recently, Phil, in that I am getting new listeners contacting me every single day.

So there's obviously a rapid growth or an explosion in our audience, and there may

be people who are very new Christians who are not familiar with you.

There may be people who are not Christians at all who are listening who are not familiar with you.

I have Muslims even who listen to my program, and I have Roman Catholics and those of other

religions and no religions at all listening to the program who from time to time

will send in an email with a question or a comment.

But if you could, let our listeners know about grace to you.

And what your duties are there.

Yeah, grace to you is the media ministry of John MacArthur.

He is, for the past nearly 40 years, pastor of Grace Community Church in

Sun Valley, California, and perhaps the best -known Bible expositor

living in the world today.

He's preached verse by verse through the entire New Testament and written a series of

commentaries that covers the entire New Testament, and so he's one of the most highly

I would wholeheartedly concur with that,.

So would everyone that I have any respect for.

He is certainly one of my modern -day heroes, and in fact it's interesting how Dr. MacArthur,

although he is a thoroughgoing dispensationalist, simultaneously being a thoroughgoing

Calvinist, there are people across the board, even those that tend to be somewhat anti -dispensationalist,

who love Dr. MacArthur.

Yeah, yeah.

And I think it's because he's so Bible -based and he's, you know, so thoroughly

entrenched in the scriptures that it just pours out of him whenever he gets up to a pulpit or has a book

published or what have you.

And I know that you happen to be the one, the key figure, that actually takes his.

Sermon notes and turns them into books.

Well, as long as we're on the subject of John MacArthur, I might as well confess to you also that he totally ruined me years

ago.

In what way?

Well, I was happy as a nice little independent fundamentalist Baptist pastor, and I listened to a lot of John MacArthur

tapes and I heard him on the radio, and I changed a lot of my views because of.

Him, and I got into a lot of trouble.

And Phil, you were about to say that you are one of the key figures involved, if not the figure involved in

turning his sermon notes into books.

Yeah,.

Right.

My background is publishing, and so that's how I originally got connected with John.

I was an editor at Moody Press, his preaching, and he liked

my editing, and so we got together in 1983, and I moved to California and have been here ever since.

Okay, I'm going to play a clip now.

It is.

From the Veritas Forum, and the title is Exploring True Life.

For more information on this forum, go to veritas .org, V as in victory,

E -R -I -T -A -S dot org.

And the person conducting the interview is David Eisenbach, and do you

happen to know if this is the same David Eisenbach who is involved in the liberal party, the political party,

the liberal party in New York City?

Yes, I believe it.

Is.

And he's in the history department with Columbia University?

I believe that's right, and this, if I'm not mistaken, this is a Veritas Forum that was held at Berkeley

University in California around 2008, in March of 2008.

Okay, it's interesting that I'm just.

Seeing it now for the first time, because if I had heard about this in the old Iron Sharpens Iron Radio, I

certainly would have addressed it.

I found out about it when just recently Robert Gagnon

posted it, and with very critical and disapproving commentary on it.

As some of our listeners might know, Robert Gagnon is a scholar within the most

liberal of the Presbyterian denominations, the PCUSA, but he himself has much more of a conservative

and evangelical bent, and is very open to speak out against the sin

of homosexuality.

He has not caved in on that issue as many in his denomination have.

So we're going to be listening to this interview that David Eisenbach is having with Tim Keller, and Tim Keller is a

highly respected Presbyterian author and pastor and conference

speaker.

He is considered by many to be a conservative.

The denomination that he is a member of is certainly considered to be a conservative Presbyterian denomination.

It's the PCA, Presbyterian Church in America, and he has people who

are his allies and friends and supporters that are amongst very

conservative individuals who I happen to highly respect, like D .A. Carson.

But Tim Keller certainly has a bent to him

that is troubling to many of us, very troubling, and that's even putting it very mildly, in

regard to some liberal aspects that are existing within

Christendom.

And I use the term Christendom for a reason, because I don't think that you can embrace

homosexuality as an alternative activity or lifestyle than those commanded in the scriptures

and be a biblical Christian.

I think that would put you outside of the realm of the body of Christ.

But we're going to hear this interview that I am mentioning, and the reason why it's startling is not because it is an

openly liberal theologian answering the questions.

It's not because it's somebody who is a liberal pundit in the

mainstream media, but this is a person who is a beloved figure within the realm of conservative and

reformed Christian circles, which makes his answers all the more

utterly remarkable and frightening, in my opinion.

But here is at least a reasonable portion of that interview between David Eisenbach and

Tim Keller.

I wrote a book about the gay rights movement.

Because I was appalled by the oppression and the discrimination against homosexuals in

my America.

And this questioner asks, what do so many of the churches have against

homosexuals, and what about your church's approach to homosexuality?

Is it a sin?

Are they going to hell?

Let's talk about my church first, which will be a little easier than trying to answer for all the other churches of the world, but I'll

try.

I'm representing all the churches of the world, all right, you know?

But Christianity, I mean, let's start with mine.

You go to the Bible quite often, and there are many evangelicals who will say it is

listed as a sin in the Bible, and these people are.

Going to hell.

Right.

Now, first, let's talk about my church again.

Let's go back here.

What we would say is, I think it's unavoidable, I think most Protestant and Catholic and Orthodox Christians over the years have said,

you read the Bible, and the Bible has reservations.

The Bible says homosexuality is not God's original design for sexuality.

Okay, there you have it.

The Bible also says love your neighbor.

The Bible also, in fact, the Good Samaritan parable, which is how Jesus tells us to love our neighbor, you put a Jew

and a Samaritan there.

So what Jesus is trying to say is, everybody is your neighbor.

Gay people are your neighbors.

People who are of other faiths are your neighbors.

People of other races are your neighbors.

And it's the job of a Christian to do what Jesus did on the cross, which was to give himself for people who were opposing him,

and people who didn't believe in him even.

And so a Christian is supposed to say, I serve the needs and interests of all of

my neighbors in the city, whether they're gay or straight, whether they're Hindu or Muslim.

I mean, Hindus, for example, don't believe in the Trinity.

It's a different view than what the Bible says.

Gay people have a different view of sexuality than generally what you see in the New Testament.

I'm supposed to love my neighbors.

So what I don't see is, at this point, I see some churches that are

basically ignoring the places in the Bible that talk about homosexuality in order to love their

gay neighbor.

And I see other Christian churches taking very seriously what the Bible says about

homosexuality, but in a very self -righteous way.

So they actually do single out gay people.

I mean, there are a number of conservative churches that will love their Hindu neighbors, and will love their Muslim

neighbors, and not their gay neighbors.

And I really don't think there is any excuse for that.

Therefore, I have to take some responsibility of being a member of the Christian church for the oppression of homosexuality.

Are committing homosexual acts sin against God?

What do you mean by sin?

The answer is yes.

Yes.

Now the reason, see, here's the problem with that.

You don't go to hell for being homosexual.

But committing homosexual acts will get you to go to hell?

No. Wait a minute.

Wait, wait, wait.

Right.

No, because, you know, some people say, no, it's not the homosexuality or being gay.

It's being, doing gay stuff.

That's the problem.

No.

No.

First of all, heterosexuality does not get you to heaven.

I happen to know this.

So how in the world can homosexuality send you to hell?

And actually, the Bible, listen, this is true.

Jesus talks about greed ten times more than he talks about adultery, for example.

Now, one of the problems Christians have here is partly, let's be nice to Christians.

You know when you're committing adultery.

I mean, you don't say, oh, you're not my wife.

I mean, you know you're committing, but almost nobody knows when they're

greedy.

Nobody thinks they're greedy, you know, because everybody is comparing yourself to other people.

And so it's a frog in the kettle kind of thing.

However, the fact of the matter is, the Bible is much harder on greed materialism, and it's a horrible sin, terrible sin.

Well, will greed send you to hell?

No.

What sends you to hell is self -righteousness, thinking that you can be your own savior and Lord.

What sends you to heaven is getting a connection with Christ because you realize you're a sinner and

you need intervention from outside.

That's why it's very misleading actually to say, even to say homosexuality is a sin, because most

people, yes, of course homosexuality is a sin, because greed is a sin, because all

kinds of things are sins.

But what most Christians mean when they say that, and certainly what non -Christians think they hear when they hear that is,

if you're gay, you're going to hell for being gay.

It's just not true.

Absolutely not true.

So then how is homosexuality a sin?

Well, greed's a sin.

In other words, it doesn't help human flourishing.

Basically, Christianity has an account of what we think human beings were built to do and what will

therefore help human flourishing.

So we would say if you spend all your money on yourself, that's bad, not only for your own soul, but for everybody else's.

We would say homosexuality is not the original design for sexuality, therefore it's not good for human flourishing.

We want people to do things that are good for human flourishing, but that's not what sends you to heaven or hell.

Now there, maybe we ought to talk about that.

What sends you to heaven or hell really has to do with your faith in the gospel, which is that you can't

be your own savior through your performance in your good works.

Now here, I'm coming at this like a Protestant now.

Everybody's got to be a particular kind of Christian, and there's difference of opinion within Christianity about this.

But no, being gay doesn't send you to hell, and sin doesn't send you to hell like that.

The sin underneath the sin is, I am my own savior and my Lord.

And that's the reason why Phariseeism, moralism, Bible -believing people who are proud and

think God's going to take them to heaven because they're good, that's sending them to hell.

I mean, I know this is a lot to take in at once.

It's a lot.

Yeah, I mean, inside our church, therefore, there's just not

going to be this disdain of homosexuals.

It just can't be, not when I'm teaching the gospel like that.

Well, basically, Phil, I'd like you to begin

by just giving your own overall commentary on what you heard, and then I will also

begin to ask you questions about specific things that were said.

So.

If you could, just give us your overall reaction to this.

Yeah, let me start with where I think he's right.

It is true that we're to love our neighbor, and Scripture does not, in its condemnation of

homosexuality, Scripture does not give us any mandate to be rude to our

homosexual neighbors or to treat them with disrespect or any of those things, which,

frankly, are all too common among evangelicals.

We don't necessarily do that when we're dealing with homosexuals face -to -face, but if you watch

social media comments and stuff like that, that evangelicals... I

think we could be more cautious in not sort of

broadcasting a sense that we see homosexuals as a fodder for

ridicule and condemnation and that alone.

They are people, and they are people who need to hear the gospel and,

you know, for whom the gospel is for

homosexuals.

Like, you know, the Westboro Baptist people and just write homosexuals off as if there's no hope for their

eternity and no salvation for their sin.

I think he's right about that, and I think he's right to want to put up, you know, safeguards and say, look, evangelicals should not

treat their homosexual neighbors.

He's also right to say that homosexuality in and of itself isn't like the

pinnacle of sin, it's... he compares it to greed, and he says some things that I'm going to

critique in a minute, for example, where he says the Bible's much harder on greed than

homosexuality.

I don't think that's true.

And I also don't... what I think is a common misconception among Christians, that all

sins are equal.

So if you're guilty of greed, you're... you are, you know, just as... you're in bondage to a sin that's

just as serious as homosexuality.

I don't think that's true.

Homosexuality is one of those sins that Scripture does put in a

class of abominable sin, and you see that in Romans 1, even in the New

Testament, where Paul is talking about the decline of humanity into the depths of sin,

and God gave them over to the lusts of their heart and all, and it specifically mentions

homosexuality

as...

I think it would be wrong to say that all sins are created equal, but on the other hand, it's

also true... sins that are

cultured and even tolerated among evangelicals that are equally abominable.

Pornography and all... by many of the same

people, he's right that we as

believers need to be cautious and, you know, not be trying to take the speck out of our

neighbor's eye when we've got a plank sticking out of our own eye.

That's a good caution and all that.

But overall, I think this is a muddled answer to what was a very straightforward question.

Is homosexuality sinful?

Scripture gives an unambiguous answer to that question.

You know, beginning all the way back in Leviticus, you shall not lie with a male as with a woman.

It is an abomination.

Leviticus 18, 22, if a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination.

Leviticus 20, 13, and you have that theme throughout Scripture.

Every time the

question to answer is, is homosexuality sinful?

The right answer is, the Bible says it is.

I mean, even if Tim Keller didn't want to say, you know, this is my conviction, he could

have easily simply said, Scripture is very clear in calling it a sin.

That's what the Bible teaches.

But he says things like, the Bible has reservations.

The Bible says homosexuality is not God's original design for sexuality.

That's a very weak and ambiguous way to deal with it.

If it's not God's original design for sexuality, is he suggesting, okay, it's a plan B?

There are all sorts of loopholes like that for people who want to sort of get in step with what's

politically correct, and there are lots of evangelicals, unfortunately, who

take that attitude.

They're looking for the easiest way to sort of coast through their Christian life, not looking to

Scripture for the standards, but listening to

things and finding loopholes,

and it just lacks the clarity that it ought to have.

Jesus did not use nuance or ambiguity to shade the hard truths he

proclaimed.

If you listen to Tim Keller very long, and this is not the

only example of this, it's really throughout some of the YouTube videos you'll see us,

but he doesn't want to declare any truth or defend any

doctrine, have already branded unsophisticated.

I think he's too concerned about what people are going to think about his convictions, and that comes through

when he answers a straightforward question like, is homosexuality sinful?

The other question he was asked was, are homosexuals going to hell?

And his answer there is just patently wrong.

He says, you don't go to hell for being a

homosexual.

In 6 .9, do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God?

Do not be deceived.

Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality will

inherit the kingdom of God.

Now, in fairness, in that same context, it also says, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor

drunkards, and so it includes greed, you can go to hell for being greedy, but if I

heard right, he even denied that along the way, that greed is a sin, but you don't go to hell for it.

The fact is, Scripture teaches that sin does send people to hell.

Sin is precisely what puts people under the condemnation of God.

So I don't understand his answer there, but it's a total non -sequitur.

He says, you don't go to hell for being a homosexual, and then he says,

heterosexuality doesn't get you into heaven.

He gets a nice little laugh about that.

And it's a clever statement, but it is still a non -sequitur, because he turns around instantly and

says, so then, how in the world could homosexuality send you to hell?

If heterosexuality doesn't get you into heaven, how could homosexuality send you to hell?

Well, the answer to that is clear, and it goes back to the first question.

Homosexuality is a sin.

It's an abomination.

That's how it sends you to hell.

Heterosexuality, as he says, won't get you into heaven.

There's no salvific value to it, but it isn't ever labeled a sin in

Scripture.

Adultery is.

So even heterosexual sexuality

doesn't send you to hell because it's not a sin.

And he leaves all that in a very murky fog of ambiguity and

just unclear...

You know, we need to learn how to speak the truth without mincing words, but without

being personally insulting, and it's possible to do that.

You will be accused of being mean -spirited if you speak the truth these days unambiguously,

but it's still possible to speak the unvarnished truth with respect, without any sort of

insult, and although people will take offense, and Scripture acknowledges

that, that the Gospel itself is a stumbling block, but we still need to learn how to get back to

speaking the truth without tiptoeing around the hard parts.

And Tim Keller's sort of the living mascot for the opposite view.

I think he thinks, and based on other things I've heard him say, I think he thinks that

we have a duty as Christians, and in fact our first duty as Christians, is to

minimize any possible offense in the teaching of Scripture.

That sounds like Robert Shuler to me.

Yeah, I wouldn't put him in the same category, because I don't think Robert Shuler really...

Paul, and if you take Tim Keller at his word, and listen when he does preach the Gospel,

don't think, I don't think, yeah, I don't think he's liberal in the same sense that Shuler...

Now he thinks it's an evangelistic strategy that gets around the

offense of the

cross...

By the fact that the Christian message itself, the idea that Christ died in the place of sinners,

and as an offering, a sin offering offered to God, and that he did so to

fulfill the will of his own father, that's a huge offense in the world today, and I think

Kel's mindset seems to be that we need to tip as much

as possible.

And just to let you know, years ago, I don't.

Know if you ever heard, it took place in the 90s, that interview that Michael

Horton had with Robert Shuler, but when Robert Shuler stormed

out of the studio, and you actually heard the door slam, and then he came back in, but

Robert Shuler, if you recall, during that interview, now I'm not, I don't know if he was being completely

honest or honest at all, but he said that he believed in the three forms of unity

of the Dutch Reformed tradition, the...

Yeah, he did.

I heard that.

My interpretation of that was, what he meant was those were the formal doctrinal statements of his church.

I don't think he could credibly make the claim that he could sign off on everything in those

doctrinally reinterpreting the language.

Oh yeah, I agree with you, but he did say that he affirmed those things, and he said that he liked to word

things differently, like he didn't like total depravity, he preferred total inability.

And things like that.

Yeah, but here's why I would classify Tim Keller slightly differently from the way I'd classify Robert

Shuler.

And by the way, I do think Keller influences people in a way that's going to put a lot of young men

who follow his lead on the same path as Robert Shuler, so I don't think the connection you're making there is

totally invalid.

But nevertheless, I'd classify them differently, because you could listen to Robert Shuler forever, and you would never

hear him preach the Gospel.

Right.

He had a skewed idea of the Gospel.

But you listen to Tim Keller long enough, you'll hear Gospel truth come out, and I don't really

have any significant doubts that he believes the Gospel.

I just think he has a very low view of the authority and efficacy of Scripture.

I don't think he has the confidence that if I

proclaim the Word of God without apologizing for it, it is efficacious for the saving of

even the most hostile

will do that.

Yeah, and some people might say, oh, you're just misunderstanding

Dr. Keller.

Well, should any Christian, especially a seasoned preacher, a

seasoned Christian author and communicator, should a Christian ever be

misunderstood when it comes to a question like this, which is a very simple and basic question?

Well, not only that, it's a very important question today, because even in the secular world, this is where the center of the

debate is.

And if we can't make the truth clear on a question like this, is homosexuality

sinful?

It's such a straightforward answer, even if it makes the person uncomfortable who

asked the question.

Yes, and that was a very artful dance that Tim.

Keller did throughout that entire interview.

He was just dancing around that question, and even the interviewer knew that.

You could tell, but he kept prodding him for an answer to the very simple question.

But we're going to be going to a break right now.

If you would like to join us on the air with a question of your own, our email address is ChrisArnzen at gmail .com, C -H

-R -I -S -A -R -N -Z -E -N at gmail .com.

Whether you agree with what's being said, whether you disagree, whether you admire

Tim Keller greatly or not, whether perhaps you don't even know who he is, whether or not you are involved

in homosexual behavior, or whether you denounce it, or whether you don't have an

opinion on it, we would welcome your call, or your email, I should say.

Still thinking back to the old days in New York when I took phone calls.

We will welcome your email at ChrisArnzen at gmail .com, ChrisArnzen at gmail .com.

And obviously, I could fully understand that a subject like this would lend itself to people asking

personal and private questions.

So you may remain anonymous if that is the case.

But if it's not the case, please include at least your first name, city, and state, and country of residence.

And please keep the questions primarily to the

real subtitle of the topic today, the pressure against Christian leaders in the public

eye to cave into the leftist agenda, because my guest today, Phil Johnson, does not pretend to be an

expert on the life and teaching of Tim Keller.

But we look forward to hearing from you and your questions for Phil Johnson after these messages.

So don't go away.

Chef Exclusive Catering is in South Central Pennsylvania.

Chef Exclusive's goal is to provide a dining experience that is sure to please any palate.

Chef Damian White of Chef Exclusive is a graduate of the renowned Johnson and Wales University with a degree in

culinary arts and applied science.

Chef Exclusive Catering's event center is newly designed with elegance and style and is available for

small office gatherings, bridal showers, engagement parties, and rehearsal dinners.

Critics and guests alike acknowledge Chef Exclusive's commitment to exceeding even the highest

expectations.

I know of their quality firsthand since Chef Exclusive catered by most recent Iron Sharpens Iron radio,

Pastor's Luncheon.

For details, call 717 -388 -3000.

That's 717 -388 -3000.

Or visit chefexclusive .com.

That's chefexclusive .com.

Charles Haddon's Persian once said,.

Give yourself unto reading.

The man who never reads will never be read.

He who never quotes will never be quoted.

He who will not use the thoughts of other men's brains proves he has no brains of his own.

You need to read.

Solid Ground Christian Books is a publisher and book distributor who takes these words of the Prince of Preachers to heart.

The mission of Solid Ground Christian Books is to bring back treasures of the past to minister to Christians in the present and

future, and to publish new titles that address burning issues in the church and the world.

Since its beginning in 2001, Solid Ground has been committed to publish God -centered, Christ -exalting

books for all ages.

We invite you to go treasure hunting at solid -ground -books .com.

That's solid -ground -books .com and see what priceless literary gems from the past to

present you can unearth from Solid Ground.

Solid Ground Christian Books is honored to be a weekly sponsor of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.

One sure way all Iron Sharpens Iron.

Radio listeners can help keep my show on the air is to support my advertisers.

I know you all use batteries every day, so I'm urging you all from now on to exclusively

use batterydepot .com for all your battery needs.

At batterydepot .com, they're changing the status quo.

They're flipping the script.

They're sticking it to the man.

In other words, they'd like to change the battery industry for good by providing an extensive inventory

of top -of -the -line batteries that are uniformly new, dependable, and affordable.

Ordering from batterydepot .com ensures you'll always get fresh, out -of -the -box batteries you

can count on to work properly at competitive prices.

Whether you need batteries for cordless phones, cell phones, radios, PCs,

laptops, tablets, baby monitors, hearing aids, smoke detectors, credit card

readers, digital cameras, electronic cigarettes, GPSs, mp3 players,

watches, or nearly anything else you own that needs batteries, go to batterydepot

.com.

Next day shipping available.

All products protected by 30 -day guarantees and six -month warranties.

Call 866 -403 -3768.

That's 866 -403 -3768.

Or go to batterydepot .com.

That's.

Batterydepot .com.

Hi, I'm Pastor Bill Shishko, inviting you to tune in to A Visit to the Pastor's Study every Saturday

from 12 noon to 1 p .m. Eastern Time on WLIE Radio,

www .wlie540am .com.

We bring biblically faithful pastoral ministry to you, and we invite you to visit the Pastor's Study by calling in

with your questions.

Our time will be lively, useful, and I assure you, never dull.

Join us this Saturday at 12 noon Eastern Time for a visit to the Pastor's Study,.

Because everyone needs a pastor.

Welcome back.

This is Chris Arns.

And if you just tuned us in, our guest today for the full two hours with a little less than 90 minutes to go is Phil

Johnson, Executive Director of Grace to You, the media ministry of John MacArthur.

We are addressing today Tim Keller and the pressure against Christian leaders in the public eye to

cave into the leftist agenda.

And we're also going to be discussing for a little bit the G3 Conference in Atlanta, Georgia,

where Phil is also going to be speaking again in

2018, in early 2018, the 18th through the 20th of January, to be precise.

And if anybody would like to join us on the air with a question, our email address is chrisarnson at

gmail .com, chrisarnson at gmail .com.

And as always, please remember to give us your first name, city and state and country of residence, unless the question compels you to

remain anonymous.

And before I take any listener questions, because we already have a number of them, I wanted to go through

some of the things with you.

First of all, you did rightly say that it is dangerously

ambiguous to be saying things like homosexuality is not a part of the

original design that God had in mind for sexuality, because there are

even liberal and pro -homosexual and homosexual or professing

homosexual Christians.

I understand that that's an oxymoron, but there are people who identify themselves as both

Christians and homosexuals who will freely admit that

heterosexual activity was the original design to populate the earth.

There seems to be no problem with them admitting that, because they realize they wouldn't exist themselves

if it were not for heterosexual activity, and that being a part of the design of

God.

But you even have you even have people

who are professing homosexual Christians and activists in that area who will say that the

reason why the Apostle Paul came down so hard on homosexuality is because there was

no such thing, they will say, as committed, loving, monogamous homosexual

relationships back in the apostolic era.

So they will say that of course, you know, language like the original design is completely appropriate, but that

doesn't mean that God does not open up his children to a new way

of thinking and life and activity in a modern age.

If you could comment on what I just.

Said.

Well, there's several problems with that.

It's purely speculative in the first place, there's nothing in the scripture that would suggest that, okay, that's an

exception to the rule against, you know, the rule in Leviticus, which

says, you know, it's an abomination for a man to lie with a man.

It doesn't talk about multiple relationships or anything other than the homosexual act

itself, and so that would of necessity apply even to a monogamous relationship.

It's the corruption of the body's intent that makes it a sinful act.

And that's important, too.

I thought one of the things that Keller said, and he says frequently, that sort of sends shivers

down my spine, is when he defines what is sin, what makes a thing sin,

again, he departs from what scripture says, and he says it's sinful because it doesn't help human flourishing.

That really seems to be his overriding idea of what sin is.

A thing is a sin because it doesn't promote human flourishing.

Scripture says sin is the transgression of God's law, and that sin is sin because

it is a rebellion against God's...and

what makes sin so exceedingly sinful is the fact that the one we are sinning

against is not humanity, creator of the

universe, almighty God we sin against, and that's why the guilt of sin is an infinite

weight that it cannot be atoned for by us, because we sin against an infinite

creator, an infinite lawgiver, and therefore the

greater weight of guilt that it can't be wiped out by any sort of

good deed or self...and that's essential to the gospel, by the way,

and, you know, not to single out homosexuals, scripture condemns us all.

Every human being is born in a fallen condition.

We all sin, and we sin in different ways, we're in bondage to different kinds of sin, but every sin

is an infinite weight of guilt, and that's why every person needs a savior,

and that's part of the message of the gospel.

I mean, consider this, what was the original sin?

If you take the Bible at face value, what was the original sin?

Adam and Eve ate a forbidden fruit.

That seemed like such a paltry, petty thing, and it would be hard to make an argument that this

singular act, to eat one piece of fruit off a forbidden tree, somehow was against human

flourishing.

It was against human flourishing, but it was a

sin against God, and so God cursed them for it, the whole race, and you might ask,

well, such a paltry little thing, but look at all the evil potential that came out of that

one act, because Adam fell, the entire universe of evil was unleashed on this earth,

and everything we suffer from, every evil thing that happens in one way or another goes

back to that as its genesis, and so there is no such thing as a trifling sin,

and so if that's the case, then you have to look at a sin that Scripture calls particularly

abominable, and say that there's just a universe of wickedness in that, and it should not

be blown off lightly to say things like, you know, well, that won't send you to hell, or

I think it's to miss one of the most important

doctrines in Scripture, and that is the sinfulness of sin.

Yes, indeed, I agree with you, and by the way, it might interest our listeners

to know that quite a while ago, over a decade ago, well over a decade ago, I arranged a

debate on Long Island, New York at the Central Presbyterian Church in Huntington, Long

Island, a debate between our mutual friend Dr. James R. White of Alpha Omega Ministries and Barry Lynn,

who was at that time anyway, he may still be, but he was the president of Americans United for Separation

of Church and State, and he was an ACLU attorney and

also an ordained minister in the United Church of Christ, known as the UCC.

Most Congregationalist churches that you see today that have the actual word

Congregationalist on their sign are a part of that denomination, but not all.

There are Bible believing churches that have Congregationalist on their signs, but just to give you an idea of the

background of Barry Lynn, but Barry Lynn, during that debate, he would have agreed that

homosexuality was a part of the original, well was the, I should say, the original design of

sexuality from what the Scriptures teach us, but he believed that through new revelation,

God has taught his church that it is now an acceptable practice that makes that activity

acceptable for Bible believing Christians, authentic Christians,

to participate in.

And so that language of original design doesn't get

one out from underneath the charge that

you are diluting the truth in regard to this sin.

Right, yeah.

In fact, I would say that

homosexuality is okay.

Yeah, and there's another thing that disturbs me,

and even some of my friends who I highly admire use the term gay.

I don't know why we capitulate to those promoting this sin and who are

involved in this sin by using a term that they use to identify themselves, which is

a term that's palatable to humanity, the word gay.

Does it bother you when professedly conservative Christians will refer to

those involved in homosexuality as being gay or part of the gay community?

I might be nitpicking here, but I don't personally think I am.

Well, no, I don't think it's nitpicking.

I was making the same argument 15 years ago.

I've sort of given it up, because I think we've lost the word.

And even in dictionaries today, it defines gay as a synonym for homosexual.

So I think that's a battle we've lost, and I don't know that it's to

make a big deal out of it, because that's so much into the common usage today that you can't use the word

gay nowadays to mean anything else.

Uh, Reverend Bustiller.

I would like to hear your comments on what he said concerning the, he made it sound, the sin that

sends you to hell is trying to be your own savior.

Would you comment on that?

Yeah, I mean, I took that down when I listened to this.

He said, no, being gay doesn't send you to hell, and sin doesn't send you to hell like that, he

says.

The sin underneath the sin is that I am my own savior and lord, and that is the reason why Phariseeism,

moralism, Bible -believing people who are proud and think that God is going to take them to heaven because they're good, that's

sending them to hell.

There's a germ of truth in that.

That sort of self -righteousness is sin, and this is sort of a blinding sin.

It's what Paul is describing in Romans 10 when he talks about the remnant, the mainstream of the

Jewish nation, the Pharisees in particular, who had sort of pursued their own

righteousness and neglect the righteousness of God, and Paul said that's sending them to hell, self -righteousness.

Self -righteousness is a horrible sin, but you can't say self -righteousness is sending you to hell

a sentence after you've said sin doesn't send you to hell, because self -righteousness is one of the sins that will send you to

hell, and when Scripture describes this, you know, I'll read it again, 1 Corinthians 6, 9, do

not be deceived, neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice

homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit

the kingdom of God.

He's saying, and in the end of Scripture it says all liars and drunkards and so on will have their part in the lake that

burns with fire, Scripture is very clearly telling us that sin will send you to

hell, and not just the sin of homosexuality, but all these other sins including greed

can send you to hell if you don't repent of them and trust in the one who paid

the penalty for those sins on the behalf of those who believe in him.

This isn't only about homosexuals.

There's no salvation for anyone outside of Christ.

The problem with Keller's statement, one of the major problems is,

I'm my own Savior and Lord.

Look, there are plenty of people who don't even think they need a Savior and Lord.

They're not trying to atone for their own sin.

They're not self -righteous.

They're just wallowing in sin, and their sin will send them to hell.

And by saying what he said here, he sends an entirely wrong signal to those people.

If this is all I ever heard, some total of Tim Keller's teaching that I

heard, and I've never been exposed to any other Christian doctrine, I would think that if I accept his

worldview, the best way for me to stay out of hell is that I

need to be righteous.

Right.

And it's interesting, on that same note, you could tell, in fact he even said, that he was

speaking, when you talk about the sin, the ultimate sin being that you are your, thinking that you're

your own Savior, that you are your own Savior.

He separated himself from Christendom by saying that this was a

Protestant teaching.

He was certainly, I'm assuming, referencing justification by faith alone,

and that nothing that we do could possibly assist in meriting

heaven for us.

But then he just totally diffused the truth and the power of the

Protestant gospel by saying, well, you know, basically this is just one branch of Christianity.

You know, if you remember during his comment, when he started to identify himself as a Protestant, he really was saying,

now this is just the way I look at things as a Protestant.

Well, first of all, do we really care about what your personal opinion is?

Isn't the matter what is the truth as God has revealed it, not what you think as a

such -and -such?

That's the way Joel Osteen very often answers questions.

My personal opinion is, well, who cares what your.

Personal opinion is?

Yeah, that's a really good point, Chris, and that disturbed me as well, too.

It's as if he's saying, well, here's one version of Christianity, this is the one I hold to, and all I can speak for.

He started out that way, saying, I can only speak for my church.

How about giving us the biblical view, right?

How about...

I mean, that goes back to what I first said.

It would have been very easy for him to say, here's what the Bible teaches.

He doesn't have to act like he's the final authority, because he's not.

But you get the impression that he thinks that if he declares any truth with too much finality

and dogmatism, he's pretending that he is the authority rather than

Scripture, and therefore he thinks the solution to that, rather than quote Scripture

and show that this is what Scripture teaches,

tone it down as much as possible to make it as politically correct as possible.

And my own strong suspicion is that this stems from a desire to have some

level of academic credibility.

He is doing the very thing, in my judgment, he is doing the very thing that

Paul renounces in 1 Corinthians 2.

Right.

And he said that there's differences.

In Christianity.

Well, there really isn't.

There's differences in Christendom, but not in Christianity.

There's no difference of opinion in Christianity, and I'm sure you would agree that when we speak of the term

Christianity, if you're talking about a truthful definition, we're talking about those in the body of Christ

who have been born from above,.

Those who are regenerate.

Right.

And you know, that would be the logical conclusion to draw.

If he followed his own logic, if thinking that you are your own Savior, in whole or in

part, is enough to send you to hell, then he'd have to say even these

massive arms of traditionalist Christianity that teach you have to do these sacraments

and supplement the righteousness of Christ in order to get to heaven, and to some

degree be your own Savior, atone for your own sin.

Anyone who teaches that, according to what he just said about what sends you to hell,

wouldn't be a genuine Christian, wouldn't be someone who's heaven -bound, but someone who's self -deceived and

quite possibly on the way to hell.

So it's confusing.

It's very confusing.

On the one hand, he says don't be self -righteous.

On the other hand, he seems to extend the peace pipe to large

arms that have been obscured under centuries of

traditional.

Self -righteousness.

Amen.

We are going to a break right now, and we will get to as many of you as possible who have written in questions, so

be patient.

And if anybody else would like to join them and get online, our email address is chrisarnson at gmail .com.

Chrisarnson at gmail .com.

Don't go away, God willing, we'll be right back with Phil Johnson and more of our discussion.

I'm James White of Alpha Omega Ministries.

The New American Standard Bible is perfect for daily reading or in -depth study.

Used by pastors, scholars, and everyday readers, the NASB is widely embraced and trusted as a literal and readable Bible

translation.

The NASB offers clarity and readability while maintaining high accuracy to the original languages which the NASB is known for.

The NASB is available in many editions like a topical reference Bible.

Researched and prepared by biblical scholars devoted to accuracy, the new topical reference Bible includes contemporary topics

relevant to today's issues.

From compact to giant print Bibles, find an NASB that fits your needs very affordably at nasbible

.com.

Whichever edition you choose, trust, discover, and enjoy the NASB for yourself today.

Go to nasbible .com.

That's nasbible .com.

Decks, porches, windows and doors, roof and siding, and more.

For a clear, detailed professional estimate, call this trustworthy team of problem solvers

who provide superior results that stand the test of time.

Call Solid Rock Remodeling at 717 -697 -1981,

717 -697 -1981, or visit

solidrockremodeling .com.

That's solidrockremodeling .com.

Solid Rock Remodeling, bringing new life to your home.

On Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio.

Second, whenever possible, purchase the products or use the services that our sponsors advertise,

and then let them know that you heard about them on Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio.

Thirdly, you can also donate to Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio by going to our website at

ironsharpensironradio .com and click support at the top of the page.

But most importantly, keep Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio in your prayers.

We hope that Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio blesses you for many years to come.

We do than how men view these things.

That's not the best recipe for popularity, but since that wasn't the apostles' priority, it must not be ours either.

We believe, by God's grace, that we are called to demonstrate love and compassion to our fellow man, and to be

vessels of Christ's mercy to a lost and hurting community around us, and to build up the body of Christ in truth and

love.

If you live near Norfolk, Massachusetts, or plan to visit our area, please come and join us for worship and fellowship.

You can call us at 508 -528 -5750, that's 508 -528

-5750, or go to our website to email us, listen to past sermons, worship songs, or watch

our TV program entitled, Resting in Grace.

You can find us at providencebaptistchurchma .org, that's providencebaptistchurchma .org,

or even on sermonaudio .com.

Providence Baptist Church is delighted to sponsor Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio.

Community centers, high schools, middle schools, juvenile institutions, coffee shops, and local

hangouts, Long Island Youth for Christ staff and volunteers meet with young people who need Jesus.

We are rural and urban, and we are always about the message of Jesus.

Our mission is to have a noticeable spiritual impact on Long Island, New York, by engaging young people in the lifelong

journey of following Christ.

Long Island Youth for Christ has been a stalwart bedrock ministry since 1959.

We have a world -class staff and a proven track record of bringing consistent love and encouragement to youths in

need all over the country and around the world.

Help honor our history by becoming a part of our future.

Volunteer, donate, pray, or all of the above.

For details, call Long Island Youth for

Christ at 631 -385 -8333, that's 631 -385 -8333, or

visit liyfc .org, that's

liyfc .org.

I gain insight from the analysis, and World provides clarity to the news stories that really matter.

I believe you'll also find World to be an invaluable resource to better understand critical topics with a depth that's

simply not found in other media outlets.

Armed with this coverage, World can help you to be a voice of wisdom in your family and your community.

This trial includes bi -weekly issues of World Magazine, on -scene reporting from World Radio,

and the fully shareable content of World Digital.

Simply visit wng .org forward slash iron sharpens

to get your World Trial and Dr. Sproul's book all free, no obligation with no credit card

required.

Visit World News Group at wng .org forward

slash iron sharpens today.

Welcome back, this is Chris Arnson.

If you just tuned us in, our guest today for the full two hours is Phil Johnson.

We have about an hour to go on our discussion with Phil Johnson, and he is

executive director of Grace to You Ministries, the media ministry of

world -renowned Bible teacher John MacArthur.

We are discussing Tim Keller and the pressure against Christian leaders in the public eye to cave into

the leftist agenda.

And we're also going to be talking about the G3 conference where Phil is

participating, God willing, in early 2018, January to be

precise.

So we hope that you stay tuned for the remainder of the hour.

But before I return to our discussion, I have

some special announcements to make.

First of all, coming up next month, September 29th to start

with, September 29th through the 30th, actually, the Gospel of the Reformation's

500th anniversary is an event being held at the Word of Truth Church in

Farmingville, Long Island, in cooperation with the Long Island Spurgeon Fellowship.

Speakers include my very dear friend Dr. Tony Costa, who is professor of apologetics and

Islam at Toronto Baptist Seminary.

And other speakers include Pastor Caleb Bunch, Pastor Bruce Bennett, and Pastor Dave Corson.

And again, that's at the Word of Truth Church in Farmingville, Long Island, New York, September 29th

through the 30th.

It is free of charge and a love offering will be taken.

And if you'd like to join me there, I intend to be there, God willing, call area code 631

-806 -0614 to register.

That's 631 -806 -0614, and it is free of charge, as I said.

And the website for the Word of Truth Church in Farmingville, Long Island, if you want to get

more of a sense of directions and so on, it's wotchurch .com, W -O -T,

standing for Word of Truth, church .com, wotchurch .com.

And then the very next day, the first day of October, Dr. Costa will be preaching

at Hope Reformed Baptist Church in Medford, Long Island, New York, and that will be at 11 a

.m. on the Sunday service.

If you want more details about Hope Reformed Baptist Church and about that event with Dr. Tony

Costa, call area code 631 -696 -5711, 631 -696

-5711, or go to hopereformedli .net.

That's hopereformed, L -I, standing for Long Island, dot net.

Then coming up in November, we have an event being

run by the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, and the Alliance of

Confessing Evangelicals is running their annual Quakertown Conference on

Reformed Theology located in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, and that

specifically would be held at the Grace Bible Fellowship Church in Quakertown, Pennsylvania, November 17th through the 18th,

on the theme for Still Our Ancient Foe, obviously referring to Satan from the classic Reformation hymn by

Martin Luther, A Mighty Fortress.

Speakers include Kent Hughes, Peter Jones, Tom Nettles, Dennis Cahill, and

Scott Oliphant.

If you'd like to attend the Quakertown Conference on Reformed Theology, go to alliancenet .org,

I'm sorry, yeah that's right, alliancenet .org, the net and the org confuse me, alliancenet .org,

alliancenet .org, and click on Quakertown Conference on Reformed

Theology.

And then coming up after that is the aforementioned G3 Conference,

returning to Atlanta, Georgia, and I am so delighted that our friend and our

guest today, Phil Johnson, has joined the roster of speakers again.

He was there last year when I was in Atlanta, and thankfully he has once again joined the roster of

speakers at the G3 Conference.

So not only will Phil Johnson be speaking at the G3 Conference in early 2018, but Stephen

Lawson, Vody Balcom, Keith Getty, H .B. Charles Jr., Tim Chalies, Josh Bice,

our mutual friend Dr. James R. White of Alpha Omega Ministries, Tom Askell of Founders Ministries, Anthony

Mathenia, Michael Kruger of Reformed Theological Seminary, David Miller, Paul Tripp, Todd Friel

of Wretched TV and Wretched Radio, Derek Thomas and Martha Peace are all a part of this conference from

January 18th through the 20th.

On the theme, Knowing God, A Biblical Understanding of Discipleship, there will be a Spanish

edition of the conference on January 17th.

To register, go to g3conference .com, g3conference .com, and that's the

number three, g3conference .com.

And you can, please, I would appreciate it if you would

make sure that if you register for any of these events, or if you even just contact the

organizations having these events, make sure that you tell them you heard about the events on

Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio.

And now allow me a brief moment to beg you for money.

The sponsors, the advertisers that keep Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio on the air have

compelled me, have urged me to make public appeals for donations after

years of being completely silent on the issue publicly.

Those that have spent their hard -earned money to help this program remain

in broadcasting want you to know that we are in urgent need of more finances

to remain on the air.

So if you are blessed above and beyond your ability to provide for your local church, and if you're not a

member of a local church, please prayerfully rectify that very quickly, because no Christian should be

without membership in a local Bible -believing church under the authority of its elders.

But if you are blessed financially above and beyond to support your local church, as you always have

been, and also provide for your family, then please consider sponsoring or

donating to Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio.

Go to ironsharpensironradio .com.

That's ironsharpensironradio .com.

And click on support, and then you will find an

address where you can mail a check made payable to Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio for any amount,

and we would be very grateful for you to do that.

And in fact, I am already grateful beyond description to all of you,

or for all of you, who have already donated to Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio, and some of you have been giving

every month, and that is a blessing beyond words.

But remember, never siphon money out of the giving to your local church, and never take food off of your family's dinner table if you're struggling to

survive.

But if you are able to bless Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio because you're financially blessed above and beyond your

ability to obey those two commands, because those two things are commands, funding Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio is

not a command, but we would love for you to help us, if indeed you can, without sacrificing from

those other two responsibilities.

And if you want to advertise, send me an email to chrisarnsen at gmail .com and put advertising in the subject

line.

And whatever it is you want to advertise, whether it's your church, parachurch, business, professional practice, or special

event, whatever it is, as long as it's compatible with the theology expressed in Iron Sharpen's Iron Radio, I would

love to accommodate you and have Iron Sharpen's Iron be blessed by your

advertising dollars by working out some kind of an ad campaign with you.

Now you can send your emails to that same address if you have a question for our guest, Phil Johnson.

And Phil is speaking, as I said earlier, on the

troubling issue of Tim Keller and the pressure against Christian leaders in the public eye to cave into the leftist

agenda.

If you'd like to send in a question regarding the issue, our email address is chrisarnsen at gmail .com.

And Phil, a couple of more things I just wanted to have you address before we go to our listener questions, because we do have a number of

them and I will try to get to as many as possible.

There is this constant drumbeat that Christians

single out homosexuals and homosexuality as this primary sin, a

sin that is worse than all other sins.

And I believe that that may be true of certain individuals or churches.

But to be reasonable about that and to be

logical, the fact of the matter is that sin is bombarding us in every

sphere of life every single day.

I mean, it's constantly brought up in the media.

There are constantly people who are involved in that sin, demanding more and more rights to be

involved in that activity and still have access to any other

sphere of life, responsibility or duty that they choose to in spite of that activity.

There are people being sued and losing their jobs who oppose that way of life or

death, if you want to phrase it more properly.

It's a sin that is in the forefront of the American

mindset every day.

I mean, you have little children now asking questions about things like that.

My mother, who is now in heaven, died in 1995 at the age of 70, went

home to be with the Lord at the age of 70.

She told me that she had never even heard of a homosexual until she was in

her 20s.

She didn't even know that they existed or what it was.

You have little tiny children talking about it today.

I mean, isn't this really a sin that needs to be discussed frequently because of that very

issue?

Yeah, in fact, there's no way to avoid it because it will

agenda has been pushed on American popular culture with

an aggressor media of all kinds.

Even if you wanted to avoid talking about it, you really couldn't.

You just couldn't.

I think I was in fourth grade before I ever was aware of homosexuality and what it was.

I don't think you could even make it that far these days.

But it stems back from the fact that there's just been this massive public relations campaign.

And, you know, to talk about the broader topic that we're talking about, one of the failings, I

think, of evangelicals today is that we look at that and try to mirror it.

There are lots of Christians today, and I think this explains the approach that Tim

Keller takes.

Lots of Christians today think of evangelism as a public relations

problem, you know?

So we live in a media world.

We see this media to push spiritual values and

worldviews and all that oppose Christianity.

And it's commonly thought, I think, that the only way we can answer that is through our own public

relations and all the things that are being done,

change in moral values.

We should push back through those same media.

The problem is, that's not what Scripture teaches.

Evangelism is not a public relations issue.

In fact, in 1 Corinthians 1, Paul denounces that approach.

He denounces the idea that the scandal of the cross is something that we need to preach around or paper over with

words of eloquent wisdom.

Those are his exact words.

I don't use words of eloquent wisdom.

He points out that God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, so that by

God's design, the church is not supposed to be like a country club for the rich and powerful and beautiful people,

but it's a fellowship that is open even to people who are low and despised in the world.

And he condemns boasting and all of that.

And then in chapter 2, he repudiates.

I referred to this earlier, but in 1 Corinthians 2, he repudiates every attempt to try to attract the

admiration of the world by using lofty speech or wisdom,

and he disavows all the wisdom of this world and the values intact

of this age.

And he says in 1 Corinthians 2, 5, that all of this is not done just to

irritate the beautiful people.

It's so that our faith as Christians might not rest in the wisdom of men, but in the power of God.

And I see the opposite thing happening.

And even among elite evangelical leaders today, the idea

is that we academically

respect

as well people who want to take the early chapters

of Genesis at face value.

We lose credibility with the world, they say, when we do that.

So we can't believe Scripture as God gave it to us because

we're afraid the world will think we're foolish.

Scripture never warns us against that.

And in fact, Paul is barely three pages into 1 Corinthians, when he

has, you look back on what he has said.

In fact, this is the chapter that brought me to Christ.

Reading this, it just destroyed my confidence in human wisdom and

sophistication and all that.

By the time you get three chapters into 1 Corinthians, Paul has attacked every favorite tool in the

toolbox of the 21st century church growth expert.

He rebukes the celebrity culture and everything goes with that, factions and boasting and the country club

culture and the obsession with human personalities.

He disclaims the entrepreneurial spirit and everything that goes with that,

the preoccupation with worldly ideas of success and human cleverness.

And his tendency to tiptoe around the hard truths of Scripture.

He says he wouldn't do that.

And those first two chapters of 1 Corinthians alone are sufficient to refute practically every major

manual of church growth strategy and ministry philosophy that has been written in the past 40 years.

So I don't get the continuing popularity of what

we need to do today is exactly the opposite.

We need to be unashamed in our proclamation of what Scripture teaches.

Amen.

Now, one last thing before I take listener questions.

There's another drumbeat where we are being asked or compelled as

Christians to apologize to some kind of or for some kind of grotesque, horrible

oppression that the Christian church has been guilty of in regard to homosexuality.

I don't really know what these people are talking about, especially since they seem to

insinuate.

In fact, the interviewer in the clip that I aired who was interviewing Tim

Keller, he was very clearly making it clear that he was talking about things going on today.

What is he talking about?

I mean, I think that people think that if you have to put a church

organist under discipline and fire him or her if they are involved in

homosexual activity, that that's the horrible and disgusting oppression and other things like it.

But do you know what he could be possibly referring to?

Well, it's possible he's talking about that.

It's also possible that he sees things like the Westboro Baptist Church people.

Now, that's a very small cult.

Most of their members are from the same family.

They live in a little compound in Topeka, Kansas, and they picket funerals and get a lot of news

coverage by being just really mean -spirited in their condemnation, not

only of the sin of homosexuality, but it's a sort of personal attack on homosexuals,

like they will go and celebrate at the funeral, you know,

any homosexual who dies, that sort of thing.

If that is what somebody thinks evangelical Christians stand for, it's a real

problem.

And I do think, as Christians, we ought to be unequivocal in our condemnation of

that, as well as any other sin, pretending to speak for Christ.

And so, in that sense, they're worse than the homosexuals that they're condemning.

Right.

Well, they have never had a position of authority to be oppressing homosexuals, anyway.

They just publicly humiliate them.

Yeah, which is a kind of persecution.

I wouldn't necessarily use the word oppression.

That's a kind of thing.

We want to make a political point.

What those people do is deplorable, no question about it.

And we ought to say that, and we ought to steer clear as

sending that kind of message to a world that's confused by all that they see, anyway.

But, bottom line is, we have a duty to speak the truth without

apologizing for what Scripture says.

And we need to get back to doing that.

Right.

Well, I'm going to go to our questions now.

An anonymous listener says, My church has lost several people due to one homosexual

couple.

These folks have begun attending a large church that caters to the masses with a lukewarm

gospel that has no gospel at all.

I find it remarkable that influential ministers like Tim Keller, wavering on straightforward

issues, can stand before their congregations and be delivering a message worth hearing.

The more the church caves into these pressures, the more the left will gain the young upcoming

ministers.

Actually, you already said that, didn't you?

Yeah.

Do you have anything further?

She's right.

Is that a she?

It's anonymous.

It's anonymous, so I don't know.

All right.

Whoever wrote that is absolutely correct.

And it's a huge problem that's not just in that one community, but

that is, I think, a worldwide tendency, if not an American,

certainly a strong American tendency.

You can see it in the pages of Christianity Today, which purports to be the house organ for the

evangelical movement.

There has been visible and obvious, and sadly, lots of churches are

following that path.

And I'll say what I've said, I think, on your program before.

We are in need of a new Reformation.

We need a few voices to stand up and proclaim what Scripture

says and not try to twist it or soften it so that it's more powerful.

Amen.

Well, thank you, Anonymous.

And give me your full name and address off the air, of course.

You will not be identified publicly.

But you have won a free copy of The Gospel According to

Jesus, What Is Authentic Faith?

Compliments of the publishers, Zondervan.

They heard that Phil was on today, and they were more than happy to provide some copies of this

wonderful, this really outstanding book by Dr. MacArthur, for whom our guest

Phil Johnson works.

And perhaps you could very briefly just describe this book for our listeners.

Yeah, that is a book that I would say is probably the most important book, John MacArthur.

I think for the first time in 1988, what you have there now is, I think, the

third edition.

And they've added at least two more chapters and an appendix to the original book.

But it is an attack on the sort of lazy evangelicalism that predominates in

America, where the idea is if you say a prayer and ask Jesus into your heart, you could be confident that you're saved.

And don't worry too much if you live in sin and disobey Christ and all.

If He's your Savior, He doesn't need to be your Lord.

And that sort of thinking was a major problem in the 1980s.

John MacArthur wrote that book saying, no, if Christ is who He says He is, He is not only

Savior, but also Lord.

And though our obedience doesn't earn us salvation, we owe Him our obedience.

And those who are unwilling to obey Him can't claim that they actually believe He is who He says He is.

So an unbroken pattern of disobedience and

rebellion against Christ is a sign of unbelief, not faith.

So if you're not obedient to Christ, if you don't love Christ, if you don't pursue

obedience, not to say that you have to be perfect because obviously none of us are,

and if you don't truly love Christ and seek His righteousness, then you really don't have any basis.

And I think that this book actually is very relevant to our discussion because you have multitudes of people, even

in churches that are professedly conservative, reformed, and evangelical, that are being told

that homosexuality is not something that you need to repent of, that it may be

your mindset, it may be your heartfelt desire,

but that is not sin if you remain chaste, and you can live your life as a productive member

of the body of Christ as long as you remain chaste.

Now, I understand that people battle with temptations and sins, I'm not going to deny those things,

but isn't it wrong to view a sin that's an unnatural sin like homosexuality as

something that is completely neutral or acceptable as long as you don't act upon it physically?

Yeah, and in fact, if there is a sin that defines your lifestyle and character, if that's what

defines your lifestyle and character, the sin, whether it's being gay or, you

know, being... if the sin is what defines your

character and your lifestyle, then you're not a Christian.

And that's what you meant earlier, and I agree, when you say there's no such thing as a gay Christian.

Wage contender against evil temptations like that,

but those who've just sort of sat back and indulged in their sin and think, this is nothing for me to battle against or

worry about, they're not truly believing in Christ.

In fact, the scriptures themselves, don't they condemn and even reveal as a sign of judgment the

fact that there are men burning in their hearts for other men and women who are doing the same?

Right, yeah, Romans 1.

So when that book came out in the 80s, it unleashed a massive discussion, and I've lost count over the

years.

The book's been out more than 30 years now, and I've lost count of the number of people, but it's

probably in the thousands of people who have written us to say, I'm so glad I read that book because

it shattered my false assurance, and now I'm a genuine Christian.

Amen.

In fact, let alone people who are, quote, quote, in their heart and

mind but chased, there are fundamentalists who are teaching that somebody could

respond to an altar call, get genuinely saved, and then live unrepentantly, physically,

with the activity of homosexuality for the rest of their lives and go to heaven because of that altar call

experience.

Yeah, you're right.

Actually, some of the strains of fundamentalism that were dominant back in the 70s

were the worst advocates of that position.

Antinomianism often go hand in hand.

Amen.

And of course, I'm not broad -brushing.

There are fundamentalists who are vehemently opposed to that mindset and condemn it, and in fact, there are even fundamentalists

who are thoroughgoing Calvinists, so I don't want to make it like they're all in that camp.

I'm going to read a question, and then we're going to go to our final break and have you answer it when we return.

Rose in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania says, Hello, Brother Phil.

I listened to the Tim Keller clip and I was left confused.

You're not the only one, Rose.

Would not Keller's thoughts and teachings concerning homosexuality fall under the latter part of

Romans 132?

Though they know God's righteous decrees that those who practice such things deserve to die,

they not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.

Is this something that Tim Keller should be held accountable for or disciplined for, or does he get a pass,

so to speak?

And we'll have you answer that when we return.

We're going to get our final break now.

If anybody else would like to join us, our email address is chrisarnson at gmail .com.

Chrisarnson at gmail .com.

Don't go away.

We'll be right back, God willing, right after these messages from our sponsors.

Are you a Christian looking to align your faith and finances?

Then you'll want to check out Thriving Financial.

We're not your typical financial services provider.

We're a not -for -profit Fortune 500 organization that helps our nearly 2 .4 million members be wise

with money.

We provide guidance that reflects your values so you can protect what matters most.

We help members live generously and strengthen the communities where they live, work, and worship.

Learn more about the Thriving story by contacting me, Mike Gallagher, Financial

Consultant, at 717 -254 -6433.

Again, 717 -254 -6433.

Hi, I'm Pastor Bill Shishko, inviting you to tune in to A Visit to the Pastor's Study every Saturday

from 12 noon to 1 p .m. Eastern Time on WLIE Radio,

www .wlie540am .com.

We bring biblically faithful pastoral ministry to you, and we invite you to visit the pastor's study by calling in

with your questions.

Our time will be lively, useful, and I assure you, never dull.

Join us this Saturday at 12 noon Eastern Time for A Visit to the Pastor's Study, because everyone needs

a pastor.

Charles Haddon Spurgeon once said, Give yourself unto reading.

The man who never reads will never be read.

He who never quotes will never be quoted.

He who will not use the thoughts of other men's brains proves that he has no brains of his own.

You need to read.

Solid Ground Christian Books is a publisher and book distributor who takes these words of the Prince of Preachers to heart.

The mission of Solid Ground Christian Books is to bring back treasures of the past to minister to Christians in the present and

future, and to publish new titles that address burning issues in the church and the world.

Since its beginning in 2001, Solid Ground has been committed to publish God -centered, Christ -exalting

books for all ages.

We invite you to go treasure hunting at solid -ground -books .com.

That's solid -ground -books .com and see what priceless literary gems from the past to

present you can unearth from Solid Ground.

Solid Ground Christian Books is honored to be a weekly sponsor of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.

Iron Sharpens Iron Radio is sponsored by Harvey Cedars, a year -round Bible conference and retreat

center nestled on the Jersey Shore.

Harvey Cedars offers a wide range of accommodations to suit groups up to 400.

For generations, Christians have enjoyed gathering and growing at Harvey Cedars.

Each year, thousands of high school and college students come and learn more about God's Word.

An additional 9 ,000 come annually to Harvey Cedars as families, couples,

singles, men, women, pastors, seniors, and missionaries.

90 miles from New York City, 70 miles from Philly, and 95 miles from Wilmington,

an easily accessible scores of notable Christian groups frequently plan conferences at

Harvey Cedars, like The Navigators, InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, Campus

Crusade, and the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals.

Find Harvey Cedars on Facebook or at hcbible .org,

hcbible .org.

Call

609 -494 -5689, 609 -494 -5689.

Harvey Cedars, where Christ finds people and changes lives.

Welcome back.

This is the last half hour of our interview today with Phil Johnson of Grace to You on the

subject Tim Keller and the pressure against Christian leaders in the public eye to cave into the

leftist agenda.

If you'd like to join us, I would do it quickly before we run out of time.

If you have a question, our email address is ChrisArnzen at gmail .com, C -H -R -I -S

-A -R -N -Z -E -N at gmail .com, and please only remain anonymous if it's about a personal and private matter.

I do want to clarify something.

I did not want to mislead anybody to think that I was opposed to churches

disciplining and firing the church organist or anyone else employed or in an office

of a church if they are found out to be guilty of homosexuality or

adultery or fornication or any sin that is warranting such action,

drunkenness, etc.

I was put under church discipline for being a drunkard, habitual drunkard, and thanks be to God

that my church did that because that's, I think, one of the reasons my heart is still beating and I still have

air in my lungs and you're hearing my voice right now.

But what I meant before was that that is, I think, what your typical liberal or

homosexual advocate will be referring to when they say that the church has been

grossly involved in oppressing and

being hateful toward homosexuals or those involved in that behavior.

By disciplining them, excommunicating them when unrepentant, firing them from jobs, removing them from

office.

That could be the very thing that saves their lives as well because it is no mystery or

there's no question attached to the fact that homosexuality is not only

deadly in regards to eternal life, it is also deadly physically and anybody who denies

it has got their head in the sand.

But going back to the question that we heard earlier from Rose

in Harrisburg, she says, I listened to the Tim Keller clip.

I was left confused.

Would not Keller's thoughts and teachings concerning homosexuality fall under the latter part of Romans 1 .32?

Though they know God's righteous discrease and those who practice such things deserve to die, they

not only do them but give approval to those who practice them.

Is this something that Tim Keller should be held accountable for or disciplined for or does he get a pass, so to speak?

There's several parts of that question.

Let me answer them in sort of reverse order.

No, I wouldn't give him a pass, but I think we need to evaluate carefully what he's saying.

My first complaint was he leaves us in a muddle of confusion and the question itself

illustrates why this is confusing.

He says, for example, in one place he says, what most Christians mean when they say

and certainly what non -Christians think they hear when they say is, if you're gay, you're going to hell for being gay.

And then he says, it's just not true.

Absolutely not true.

And then the interview, Mr. Eisenbach at that point jumps in and says, so then what's, how

is homosexuality a sin?

I'm not, he thinks that by saying that, that

Keller and Keller is leaving this impression.

You don't go to hell for being a, that's absolutely not true.

He says that you go to heaven for being a homosexual.

He's giving the impression that God doesn't really necessarily disapprove of

homosexuality, but that's not what Keller intends.

That's not what he believes.

And I don't think that's what he intends to communicate.

He's just trying to soft sell his opinion so much that he confuses his hearers.

Because earlier in the interview, he says, Eisenbach asks him, so is it a sin to commit

homosexual acts?

Is that a sin against God?

And Keller's instant response is, what do you mean by sin?

Which again, sounds like a dodge.

And, and yet, but without pausing, and it struck me that Keller must have realized how that would sound to his

Christian constituents.

So without pausing, he goes on his very next sentences.

The answer is yes.

In other words, yes, it is a sin against God.

And I'm, I'm quite certain that Tim Keller understands that scripture teaches, and he believes that

scripture teaches that homosexuality is a sin against God.

I'd, I'd be very surprised to learn that he waffles on that.

I suppose it's possible because there is so much ambiguity in, in answers like this.

It's not the only time he's addressed the question.

And there is some ambiguity in it.

But I don't think, and I wouldn't assume, and I don't think it's charitable, charitable to assume that he

is actually giving approval to people who practice homosexuality.

I don't think he's guilty of that.

Well, one thing he is certainly guilty of confusing his listeners enough that some of them might

think he's giving approval.

One thing I can say for certain is that what he is teaching publicly is

not striking fear in the hearts of those involved in that activity that would cause them to repent.

One particular famous example is Matthew Vines.

Matthew Vines is leading a movement of, of those involved in

homosexual behavior.

Well, Matthew Vines would claim that they are, the movement that he is championing, I'm not saying

that he would call himself championing it, but he is, the movement that he represents would be

in favor of, what's the word I'm looking for,

monogamy amongst homosexuals.

And it would be an evangelical Christianity that accepts

those with a homosexual proclivity who should be free to act upon that if they get married.

He is not someone who's, he's not someone who...

And admittedly, it's hard for me to imagine that Tim Keller is going to come out

and argue strongly against that.

I think he wants to remain sort of in a cloud of ambiguity, and that's bad.

So back to the original question, would I give him a pass?

I don't know that I would propose him for church discipline at this point, but he wouldn't be invited to

preach in our pulpit.

Well, one of the reasons I brought Matthew Vines is that he publicly, I heard him with my own ears from

his lips, he was declining any invitation by

our friend Dr. James R. White to engage in a public debate, moderated debate,

because he viewed Dr. White as someone who is bigoted and mean -spirited and hateful and so on.

And yet, at the same time, now Tim Keller, he said that he highly respects Dr. Keller, read

what he has written on the subject, and heard what he has spoken about.

And although he disagrees here and there with Dr. Keller, he was not offended by anything Dr. Keller said.

I think that that speaks volumes.

It does, it does.

And I think probably Keller was no doubt happy to hear that, because I think that's his aim, to

be not perceived as a bigot.

And so when someone says, look, if you disagree with me on this issue, if you just say flat out that homosexuality is a

sin, then you're a bigot and there's no way around that.

And Keller clearly wants to avoid having that charge leveled against him.

And my response to that is, look, if that's what the world is going to call us bigots, they do that anyway.

Christians have never been embraced by the world and praised for our intellectual

accomplishments or whatever.

And the scripture makes it very clear that that's okay with God.

You know, look around yourselves, brothers, Paul says.

There's not many wise, not many noble.

God chose the weak things of this world to confound the wise.

And so the idea that, you know, we have to impress the intellectual elite, or we're not going to be

able to see the kingdom advance in this hostile world, that's just clean contrary to what scripture

tells us to think like.

Well, thank you, Rose in Harrisburg.

You have also won a free copy of The Gospel According to Jesus by John MacArthur.

This is a beautiful hardback edition.

Compliments of our friends at Zondervan Publishing and compliments of our friends at Cumberland Valley Bible Book Service.

CV, bbs .com, CV for Cumberland Valley, bbs for biblebookservice .com.

So make sure we have your full mailing address so that Todd and Patty Jennings, owners of Cumberland Valley Bible Book Service, can

ship that out to you as soon as possible.

We have Osanachi from Lagos, Nigeria, Africa, who

says, I confess to personally having issues with some of Dr. Keller's positions on

certain issues, but the biggest of them all is the social gospel.

Can Mr. Phil please address the dangers this poses to

the gospel and Christ Church, if any?

Yeah, and that's a great point.

History is full of lessons that when churches begin to substitute social

justice for the righteousness of God, they've actually

corrupted the gospel message, and churches that embrace that, and you see a large

picture of that at the beginning of the 20th century when most of the mainstream denominations in America

embraced various levels of social gospel -type thinking, and within a generation

all those denominations had gone liberal.

It's a straight path to liberalism, because it replaces what Scripture says about the

righteousness of God and true justice with a humanistic view of justice,

and true justice doesn't need any modifiers.

Social justice implies that, and you know this if you just pay attention,

in the minds of those who use that expression, social justice implies a sort of almost

quasi -Marxist view of seeking equality through financial, you know, through

the redistribution of wealth and laws that outlaw, you know,

I don't know, racism and whatnot, and some of those things are valid goals, but to group it all as

social justice and make that your aim instead of genuine justice, because biblical justice,

real justice itself,

requires the punishment of evildoers, and you never hear people who talk about social justice focus on that aspect

of justice.

In fact, people who get enthralled with social justice often become a

government authority, when in fact Scripture

assigns to the government the right to bear the sword of justice.

Amen.

And that's a Romans chapter.

Well, thank you, Os...

Yep, whatever.

Thank you, Osinachi, in Lagos, Nigeria, Africa, and thank you also for giving

us an American address for a pastor you know here in the States who will bring you

the book that you have just won when he makes his annual trip to Nigeria, that would be The

Gospel According to Jesus by John MacArthur, the book that you've just won, compliments of Zondervan Publishing

and also compliments of CVBBS .com, CV for Cumberland Valley, BBS for BibleBookService .com, who will

be shipping that out to you at no charge to you or to Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.

Keep listening to Iron Sharpens Iron and keep spreading the word in Nigeria and beyond.

We have Jeff in Clinton Township, Michigan, who says, muddled

speech seems to be the right term for those who seek to blend biblical language and popular culture.

It will never be clear and thoughtful.

In line with this conversation, Russell Moore in 2015 stated publicly that he would not attend a same -sex

wedding but would attend the reception since it is different.

This too is confusing speech.

Both of these men have lost my trust and this playing both sides of the fence is nothing more than a

slow slip back to liberalism.

Thank you both for your clarity of thought, which is so needed today.

And by the way, our listener in Clinton Township provided a link documenting Russell

Moore's statement in 2015.

So your comments, Phil Johnson.

Yeah, I mean, I remember when Russell Moore said that and it confused me as well because the reception is where you actually celebrate the

marriage.

Yeah, right.

It seems to me that sitting at a wedding and merely observing it is not necessarily

sinful.

I don't think I would do it because you give the impression that you're supportive of it by your attendance.

But to go to the reception is to celebrate with those people this abominable act that just took place.

So I think Russell Moore had it backward in the first place.

Although I think a safer policy would be not by your presence to encourage marriage

that you know is...

That is more and more of us.

We need to think it through carefully.

But I would say the last thing I want to do is give the impression that I'm celebrating this event and therefore

I couldn't go to the reception.

Yeah, I won't go to the wedding ceremony but I'll go to the reception and eat the cake that one baker

was fired for not baking.

Yeah, there's Romans 13 that talks about submission to the authorities.

I had a little bit of brain freeze there for a minute.

Romans 13.

Well, everybody who listens to this show knows that I have about two hours of brain freeze every day hosting this

program.

We have Pastor Sterling Vanderwerker of Shepherds Fellowship in Greensboro, North

Carolina who says, Great.

Hi to Phil and a question for Phil.

Would it have not been better for Tim Keller to have answered the question like this?

All men sin and therefore are due the judgment from our holy God.

There are also different sins that have more and less degrees of severity and God will judge each with

consideration for the type of sin.

The scripture demonstrates this with specifically the sin of homosexuality and a few other sins.

So the question is not one better.

So the question is, not is one better than the other or sin and require

God to rightly judge each one.

Thanks for a great show.

You could respond to Pastor Sterling.

Yeah, that's actually a very good answer.

And, you know, those are the sorts of things that with my mind, I have to sit down and write it out.

I can't think it up on the fly and be that articulate.

But that would be a very good answer.

And combining that with the text that an earlier questioner pointed out at the end of Romans, where

those who even give approval to such things are, it says, worthy of condemnation.

I would also point out that in this culture where there has been an overt and deliberate

campaign to promote sins of sexual perversion, I wouldn't even single out

homosexuality, but now it's, you know, transgenderism and all the sins that are related to sexual perversion

then, yeah, I think those sins do deserve to be,

in the context of our culture, those sins do deserve to be singled out

with an absolutely clear condemnation.

I wouldn't downplay the guilt of, say, greed.

That's the one that Keller went to.

Greed is an abominable sin as well, and I wouldn't want to downplay that.

But in our culture right now is, well, there are certain segments of our

culture that promote greed as well, but if I were living and ministering in the midst of

a greed -saturated culture, I would definitely preach against greed.

I think you need to focus on the sins that people are in bondage to, and when it's clear that they're in

bondage to some sexual perversion, it's absolutely the most unloving thing you can do to

tiptoe around that issue and pretend it's a sin you don't notice or you don't have to speak about or

to just...

Yes, you've actually said something that hinges on

a question from Christopher in Suffolk County, Long Island, New York.

We keep hearing about loving our gay neighbor from folks like Tim Keller.

Isn't true love involved in commanding them to repent lest

they spend eternity in hell?

Isn't that really the loving thing to do?

Obviously, we don't just do that.

We perform acts of kindness and deeds of compassion and demonstrate love in many ways, but

must that not be a part of it?

Yes, and in fact, there are believers who realize that and watch what Christians talk about and do

and have condemned the evangelical movement for that very thing, one of them being Penn Jillette, the magician of

Penn and Teller, illusionist, whatever he wants to call himself.

He's been very candid about this, where he says, he points out, look, if you really believe,

genuinely believe that people are going to be punished in hell for

eternity for their sins, then you have an obligation to warn them and to plead with

them in the most heartfelt tones.

And in fact, Penn Jillette has, there's a video out there where a guy gave him a Bible and he

talks about this and he says, I'm not buying that guy's worldview and belief system, but

he says, I can tell he believes it.

And I was impressed by his sincerity and his genuineness and all of that.

It's a good lesson to the rest of us that it's never loving to shut up in the face of impending disaster.

If your neighbor's house is on fire and he's asleep inside, the most

loving thing you can do is to wake him up and warn him that he better get out of there.

If you just let him burn to death because you didn't want to interrupt his nap, you can't call that love.

And thank you, Christopher.

You have also won a free copy of The Gospel According to Jesus by John MacArthur, compliments of

Zondervan and compliments of cvbbs .com, Cumberland Valley Bible Book Service.

We'll be shipping that out to you.

Please make sure we have your full mailing address.

We have Joe in Clifton, New Jersey.

At what point do you take words like those of Keller to ultimately be a denial of scriptural

infallibility?

It seems that teachers gradually deny scriptural infallibility in practical ways, teaching, interpretation,

long before they embrace it theologically.

And yet, aren't these positions essentially denials of infallibility, given that they

know the clarity of scripture on the issue they are discussing?

Is this a distinction we should make?

I wouldn't necessarily accuse Tim Keller of denying biblical

infallibility.

I do think he encourages other people to question the authority and

infallibility of scripture.

I think it's a valid point to suggest that that's where this leads, this sort of cowardly preaching, this sort of

timid, over -concern about what is academically respectable is the

very thing that opens the door for the next generation to just come right out and flatly deny the

authority and infallibility of the scripture.

I don't think you're going to hear Tim Keller speak that boldly.

I think it is a fair question to say how much confidence does he really have in the

authority and efficacy of the scripture if he has to invent a strategy for evangelism that goes,

you know, just dramatically against what the Apostle Paul lays out in 1 Corinthians 1 and

2.

Well, thank you, Joey.

Joey and Joisey, you have won the last copy that we have available of The Gospel

According to Jesus by John MacArthur, so please make sure you give us your full mailing address in Clifton, New Jersey, where

Cumberland Valley Bible Book Service can ship that out to you.

Thanks again to Zondervan Publishing for providing that book.

Let's see here.

We have another listener that I just had in front of me and it somehow escaped my

view.

Let's see here.

We have Gordy in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania.

Let's see here.

I have to enlarge Gordy's email because it's microscopic and the font

is...

You might as well just use a telescope to look at this thing.

All right.

It seems difficult to even pin down just what Tim Keller even believes.

I read a random blog he recently posted and he must have mentioned the gospel eight times

in that short piece.

It was almost as if he and his followers have faith in the gospel, not the Jesus Christ,

who is the focus of the gospel.

Can you shed any light on this?

I'm not sure I understand the question.

I don't have any reason to think that he's trying to...

Is the question whether he really believes the gospel?

I don't know, but it could be, and I could be wrong.

In fact...

Let me just back up and sort of answer the question, hopefully answer the question in a different way.

I do think he's sending mixed signals because he does frequently talk about his confidence in the gospel,

and the gospel is the power of God unto salvation.

It's not wrong to talk about the power of the gospel to change hearts and all that.

Scripture does talk that way, and Keller was one of the co -founders of the Gospel Coalition, whose

focus is supposed to be the gospel.

But if you look at all the material coming out of the Gospel Coalition and from Keller's pen,

it doesn't seem to me that it really is always gospel.

The definition of the gospel enough that gospel -centered material can include

things like reviews of the latest popular movies and things like that.

I've criticized that trend online, and I don't want to make anybody unnecessarily angry with

me for hammering the same theme.

But that is something that I think all of us who talk about gospel -centered ministry need to really watch

carefully.

If we're going to say that we want to be gospel -centered, if we're going to say we really do believe the gospel is the power of God unto

salvation, we can't act like we think human wisdom is necessary to open

doors for the gospel.

It's an easy thing to say you are committed to gospel -centered and

yet forget that the gospel is supposed to be, then, at the center of

every message we give.

Yeah, I was at the Gospel Coalition conference in Indianapolis, and there were some

outstanding men, especially in workshop discussions, like Michael Haken, for instance,

who had a wonderful class during that event.

But I was disturbed by some of what was said during the primary sessions, and Tim Keller

concluded this conference that was on the theme no other gospel.

And during his final message of the conference, he's lovingly quoting from a Roman Catholic

who was an apostate from the Presbyterian Church, Elizabeth Elliott's brother,

Tom Howard, I believe his name is.

He was quoting lovingly from this Roman Catholic who was an apostate from biblical Christianity who he

says he meditates on.

I mean, what kind of signal, what kind of message are you sending when you say things like that?

Yeah, and that's the sort of thing I'm talking about.

And I definitely don't want to leave the impression that I don't like anything comes out of the Gospel Coalition.

They do publish a lot of really good stuff and very helpful stuff and some excellent gospel

-centered stuff.

But you can take the original, back to the original YouTube video that we started two hours ago with this broadcast.

There are some nuggets of gospel ideas in there, the notion that, you know, you can't be your

own savior and that the essence of disbelief in Christ is thinking that you can be your own

savior.

There's a nugget of gospel truth there, but in this whole discussion of homosexuality, it

doesn't really come back to the gospel ever.

It doesn't talk about how Christ died to pay for guilt and sin.

It doesn't even really talk about guilt, which is Paul's starting point in Romans when he talks about

the gospel.

The gospel is God's answer to how we deal with human guilt.

And you can't really credibly claim to be

gospel -centered.

And so if you expand your definition of the gospel to include, you know, your politics and social

justice, and you haven't really made yourself gospel -centered.

You've simply defined what gospel -centered means in a way that's a catch -all for anything you want to do.

And in fact, I just saw an ad on the Grace To You website, gty .org, for

divine design, God's complimentary roles for men and women.

What an excellent segue.

I guess that's something new by Dr. MacArthur's pen.

But I know that the Grace To You website is gty .org, gty

.org.

I know that the G3 Conference, where Phil Johnson will be speaking, can be found at

g3conference .com.

That's g3conference .com.

Do you have any other contact information that you care to give?

No, that's great.

Anybody who wants to write me a direct question can contact me at phil at gty .org.

Gty .org, phil at gty .org.

Well, I want to thank you so much, Phil, for being my guest today.

If you wouldn't mind holding on, because I want to schedule you for another interview.

All right.

And I want to thank the Reverend Buzz Taylor for being our co -host today.

I want to thank all of our listeners, especially those who took the time to write in questions today.

And I want you all to always remember for the rest of your lives that Jesus Christ is a far greater Savior than

you are a sinner.