Who was the Founder of Christianity? Jesus or Paul? Part 4

Alpha & Omega Ministries

Subscribe

Download

Share

00

Comments are disabled.

00:00

honoring of the king, we're not talking about offering sacrifices to him, we're going to talk about identifying him as God.

00:06

What Thomas is doing in John chapter 20 is very, very clear, he's applying specific language of deity.

00:13

Kurios is the very word used for Yahweh in the Septuagint translation of the Old Testament, the

00:19

Greek translation. He's applying it to Jesus, and Jesus sees that as faith. That's the point,

00:24

I would just invite everyone to look at John 20, I think you'll see that for yourself. Thank you, James. Okay, now we're going to come to that part of the program where we're going to take questions from the audience.

00:33

If there's anybody that would like to pose a question to any of the speakers, please come to the center of the...

00:41

We've got a rolling microphone there. We're going to take the first question, that's for Bashir, the first question, right?

00:54

Bashir, you... Wait, before we start, just want to make sure I've got some system here. I'm going to do the following,

01:03

I need one question to Bashir, and then I need the question then to go through to James. So, why aren't any

01:10

Muslims asking questions? Come on, folks, am I that mean? I thought it was me and James.

01:15

I'm genuinely limited to the three questions then for Bashir, and three questions to James, and then we will go on to the final part of the program.

01:23

This will not take much longer than this. Guys, I encourage you, if I can't, I'm going to have to then ask the questions to pose questions through to James, to make him faithful this evening.

01:33

So, I've had a lot of questions yesterday when I met James. I'm sure some of you guys have some questions for James.

01:45

Okay, you start, but Brian, before you, if I find a Muslim questioner,

01:50

I'm going to put him there. The space is here. Bashir, you said that before Paul was the

02:02

Apostle Paul, before he was converted, he was a Pharisee, his name was Saul, and he was persecuting the

02:08

Church. So, he was a Pharisee persecuting Christians, and I assume that Peter would be one of those

02:14

Christians that had followed the Church. In fact, he was the first preacher of the Church in the day of Pentecost. So, Paul is a

02:22

Pharisee, the Keeper of the Law of Moses, which he correctly says, Jesus told him to keep the Law because they said to Moses this evening, he said, do what they say, but don't do what they do, because they preach, but they don't practice.

02:35

While Paul, as Saul, before he was converted, he persecuted the Church. If afterwards, when he became part of the

02:44

Church, and you quote it from this, Peter, who was part of that original Church, counts

02:49

Paul and his brother. I just want to read from 2 Peter chapter 3, because it's the second verse of it, Peter writes.

02:56

Sorry, sir, I'm going to ask the actual question in one minute. Okay, I just want to just read from this.

03:01

I'm going to give you 20 seconds to read, if you've got a question. Thank you. In Californians of our

03:07

Lord's Salvation, just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given to him, as he does also in all his letters, he speaks to them of those matters, there are some things in them that are hard to understand, which they're ignorant and unstable towards their own destruction, as they do all the other scriptures.

03:30

Paul, after his, like Peter was, Peter speaks of Paul, after his conversion, and updated after him, as what other people that he would have been persecuting before.

03:41

If Paul stopped Christianity, while it enjoyed murdering people, he was persecuting.

03:48

Thank you, thank you. I think you're asking me now to dissect Paul's personality, and don't feel comfortable doing it.

03:54

I will say that there were problems between Peter and Paul.

04:00

Paul accused Peter, perhaps harshly, and said that why is it when he meets

04:07

Jews, he behaves differently than when he meets Gentiles? James also takes on Paul and says, listen,

04:17

I'm hearing rumours that you are teaching people not to be Jews. You know, and bear in mind, that the earliest followers of Jesus were

04:27

Jews. They followed the Mosaic law, and there was a big council in Jerusalem where they debated this whole issue.

04:36

What do we do with non -Jews who are prepared to accept Jesus as a prophet and as a messiah?

04:43

And they decided, quite simply, according to Paul, James decided, he gave the Tattwa to the Jews, and said, look, we will continue to follow the law of Moses.

04:52

The Gentiles coming to the church, they must follow the Noahite commandments. In other words, as long as they do not worship idols, they do not eat blood, and do certain things, we will accept them.

05:02

But it's not true to simply say that there were no problems between James and Peter.

05:08

Why would Peter affirm Paul if Peter was part of the very people that Paul was persecuting when he was a

05:15

Pharisee? Again, there is debate whether Peter wrote to Peter.

05:21

But again, it says more about Peter than it says about Jesus. But Peter is affirming Paul as being part of them.

05:28

Simon, enter into a debate from the floor. I'm going to ask that the other speaker be given the opportunity of one minute just to rectify anything, give me a question and answer, so James, you go ahead.

05:39

Yeah, I think the point is very clear. According to the text, Peter identifies Paul as our dear brother, first of all, not as an opponent of his teachings or his beliefs.

05:51

And Peter would have been one of the people that Paul was persecuting who were Christians, which means the

05:57

Christians existed before Paul came along and was converted, which means Paul could not have been the one who founded

06:02

Christianity. It's pretty clear, it's pretty obvious. The text is straightforward and I think it pretty much establishes the thesis of the debate.

06:10

In the technical sense that clearly Paul was not the quote -unquote founder of Christianity. James, when we get to the circumcision, okay, why do you believe it's not a necessary part of Christianity today?

06:31

Okay. It is actually something that is, a person is free as far as his sons, whether they will or will not engage in that.

06:41

But the point is that circumcision, very clearly, both in the Old Testament, because it's fascinating, in the

06:47

Tanakh, the Torah, the Nevi, the Ketan and the Hebrew Scriptures, circumcision very often, even in the

06:54

Law of Moses, is said to be circumcision of the heart. What does that mean? It had a clearly spiritual aspect to it.

07:02

And so you had the physical people of Israel from whom the Messiah was to come.

07:07

But the biblical narrative is that once the Messiah comes, that covenant becomes a new covenant, which is with all people and it's no longer associated just with one land.

07:18

And so the idea of identifying a particular people, for example, by not shaving the size of their beards, by circumcision, by the meat issues when

07:29

Jesus declared all meats to be clean, so on and so forth, that is fulfilled in Christ and it's not a part of the

07:35

Gospel that goes forth to the whole world, because God is now forming a people in Jesus Christ who are identified not by the outward signs in their body, but by the inward purity of their heart and the presence of the

07:46

Holy Spirit. So the only way to understand it, and I think it fulfills the prophetic element of the

07:52

Old Testament as well, is to see that the fulfillment has been found in Christ in the New Covenant, which you can read about in Jeremiah chapter 31.

07:59

Because every person in the New Covenant knows Yahweh. That circumcision of the heart is taking place for every single one of them.

08:06

So you don't have to identify specific people in the land of that mark of the Lamb. Okay, but Prophet Jesus, Son of Mary, peace be upon them, having gone through the circumcision, would you not find it unnecessary to have that, you know, equality?

08:21

No. I realize that's probably a taken too, but since we don't have a whole lot of Muslims in Atlanta, if you don't mind.

08:28

You're taking the assumption that you have as a Muslim, that you are to emulate Muhammad in his life, and applying that to us.

08:37

When we look at Jesus, we do want to emulate Jesus in what he taught us to emulate him in, not in his

08:44

Jewishness. You see, we had something called Acts 15 that you never had. In Acts chapter 15, there was a church council that met under the leadership of the

08:52

Holy Spirit, and it was determined that a person did not have to become a Jew to become a Christian.

08:58

And so the Gospel can transcend every language, every culture, it can go everywhere. You never had something like that.

09:05

And so there's a fundamental difference in how we see how evangelism, or the proclamation of our faith, is to take place all across the world.

09:16

And so when we want to emulate Jesus, we're not emulating his Jewishness, how he dressed, how many times a day he prayed, whether he was circumcised or not.

09:27

What we're emulating is what he taught us to emulate in regards to the inner part of the heart, the circumnaval, things like that.

09:33

Okay? Thank you. Okay, quick one. I would like to ask that you go to the

09:40

Holy Synod of the Muslims, and that we should find an opportunity before going to the Holy Synod, we should find an opportunity of one minute to respond to that question.

09:47

Jesus was not present at the Council of Jerusalem. At any rate, the Old Testament tells us that physical circumcision was an everlasting covenant.

09:56

Physical. Jesus never spoke out against the circumcision. Jesus, while he walked the earth, he followed the laws of Moses.

10:05

And he encouraged others to do so. He even said it. Heaven and earth will pass away, but not one dot of the law will become void.

10:14

Jesus says, I give only for the children of Israel. So, you know, while Jesus walked this earth, he followed the

10:21

Moses law, this idea that at the Council of Jerusalem, Gentiles were brought in and somehow circumcised.

10:30

It wasn't. I mean, Jesus accuses the Pharisees. You know, you travel over land and see, you know, for a convert.

10:38

And there were Jewish converts. And although their burdens were fewer, so were their privileges.

10:45

You know, Jews felt that they are the chosen people. You are welcome to convert.

10:54

Good evening, Bishop. Good evening, James. Bishop, this is the second time I hear you say, even at our den side, that there is no parable when

11:04

Jesus says that he will die and rise again. So I just wanted to read to you how you came across this in the

11:14

Scriptures. John chapter 12, Jesus replied, The hour has come for the

11:19

Son of Man to be glorified. I tell you the truth, unless a grain of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed.

11:30

But if it dies, it produces many seeds. The man who loves his life will use it.

11:38

The man who hates his life in this world will keep it for eternal life. Whoever serves me must follow me.

11:46

And where I am, my servant will also be. My Father will honor the one who serves me.

11:51

In that same portion of the Scripture, he continues in verse 31, Now the time of judgment of the world has come.

12:03

I just want to finish your teaching. Well, you wrote the rules, not the questions. But here is a parable.

12:11

Here is a parable followed up by an explanation. That Jesus will die and rise again.

12:18

I said, it's not a parable of Jesus being God, Jesus dying for the sins of humanity.

12:27

That was my question. If that is the fundamental thing about Jesus.

12:34

Look, rising again from the dead is not a big deal. No, no, no.

12:42

According to Jesus, it's not a big deal. Jesus said, even if somebody comes back from the dead, the unbelievers will not believe.

12:55

So for Jesus, somebody coming back from the dead, rising from the dead is not a big deal.

13:03

It doesn't mean that somehow that person is God. So, it's quite simple.

13:10

Give me a parable where Jesus says he is God, where he is going to die for the sins of humanity, and that somehow his blood will expiate the sins of humanity.

13:21

There isn't one. And I think James knows the Bible a lot better than you, and he is that person.

13:27

There isn't one. One minute response. Number one, demanding parables is a misuse and abuse of Jesus' words.

13:39

I've pointed that out, and hopefully we can stop doing that. We're going to have to find a parable for Jesus to have taught it.

13:44

The entire Sermon on the Mount is not a parable. And Jesus taught it. Point number two, rising again from the dead is not a big deal.

13:52

When you say you're doing it by your own power, it is. And when Jesus says, no one takes my life from me,

13:59

I have the authority to take it up. This is the Father who has given it to me. When the

14:04

Bible describes the Father as raising Jesus, Jesus as having power to raise himself, and the

14:11

Spirit raising him now as Trinitarian, that's a real big deal, because all the rest is to get raised up.

14:16

Somebody else is doing it. We're not doing it ourselves. That's what makes it a big deal. Thank you.

14:23

This question is for James. This is for James. The next question is for James.

14:30

James, as well. The next question, no. This is a little tricky. I'm sorry.

14:35

Can I get some audio? So this is for James. And then we've got a Bashir. No, no, no. It is for James.

14:42

Okay. It's not an issue at all. No, no, no. Because you asked him. But he said it.

14:47

Oh, okay. No, no, no. One thing is that the two questions are there for James. It's not like it's a problem at all.

14:54

The question after you will then be for Bashir. So you've got a question. No, both of them are for James.

15:00

Both of you are for James. Okay. Let's continue. I think there's more questions after this. No, that's the thing. You should ask a question to me.

15:08

Why? I'm Muslim. Ask a question to James.

15:17

You could ask a question to James. You don't have a problem with me. Because you assumed the opposite of my purpose.

15:23

But here's your opportunity to ask a question. James, I have a question for you from Matthew, chapter 22.

15:30

Can you please explain the parable that commences. Jesus says, there was a landowner who planted a vineyard and put a wall around it and dug up a winepress.

15:42

Eventually he goes on to say that the owner of the winepress had sent his workers and slaves there, his workers there, but they were stoned and killed.

15:55

Again, he sent another group of slaves, slaves, larger than the first, and then did the same thing, but afterwards he sent his sons, saying they were as quick as sun, but when the vine growers saw the sun, they said among themselves, this is the age, let us kill him and seize these inheritors.

16:12

What was the reference on that? I think it was 21. 21 versus 33. Oh, that was in chapter 22.

16:22

Yes, very quickly, again, though we shall not be limited to the parables as our basis of Jesus' teaching, clearly in the parables,

16:37

Jesus identifies himself as the son sent by the father, and pictures Israel in rebellion against their

16:45

God because they're rebelling against the one he has sent to fulfill the scriptures and to be the

16:52

Messiah, who the Messiah is. And so you could make, I think, a fair argument, allowing the text to speak for itself, that here in a parabolic format, you have

17:04

Jesus being identified as the son, which, of course, Muslims would never accept as far as the terminology is used there.

17:11

But then you would have to demonstrate from the scriptures that that particular use of the term son is not just sons by the tons, but has the specific identification of deity attached to it.

17:26

And given that the son brings judgment and that there is then the connection to the son of man that Jesus then uses of himself in Mark chapter 14, that's where you really find,

17:36

I think, the strong connection that Jesus does identify himself as the son of God in a parabolic statement at that particular point, that's true.

17:45

The parable of the vineyard, the study of it, it's quite simple. There is no intention of the name

17:50

Lord that is called for the son to die. It doesn't say that the son has to die. The motive of the son's death is not mentioned.

17:57

No resurrection is mentioned. Here it implies inheritance, not ownership.

18:04

The labels talk about taking the inheritance. It cannot mean taking Godly power.

18:09

It can mean taking prophetic power. So, no. Nothing to do with Jesus being divine.

18:17

It's death or resurrection. Thank you. Thank you, Bishop. The question is for Bishop Ewell. The next question now should be towards Michele.

18:29

Is there a question like that? I could ask a question and you could go to Michele. Okay, so why don't you introduce that.

18:36

And then, sir, you're going to be the last questioner because that will be for James. The lady behind you, unfortunately, will be taking any more questions after this.

18:44

I apologize for that. Please have a seat. Okay. Did Paul not mutilate in the story of the original message of God by bringing out the true idea of Trinity?

18:56

Because the idea of Trinity only appeared 300 years after his departure. That's a question for me.

19:03

Sorry. That really is a question for me. Give me 60 seconds to answer that. He intended that for me.

19:10

Yeah, exactly. Three years after the time of Paul.

19:30

That is a common misunderstanding, but I can quote to you. If you reject the New Testament being immersed in the doctrine of Trinity, which

19:37

I can show you here as fast as, even if you reject that, I can give you references from the earliest

19:43

Christian writers right after the New Testament, speaking about Jesus Christ as their God.

19:48

Ignatius, Bishop of Antioch, murdered in 108 AD. Over ten times, he refers to Jesus Christ as his

19:55

God. He refers to him as the God -man. Two natures. Everything I believe, he was affirming in the first generation after the

20:02

New Testament. So it wasn't Council of Nicaea that made up the doctrine of Trinity. Anyone who studies church history knows that's the case.

20:10

And so it's not just Paul who is making reference to Jesus as Yahweh.

20:16

He identifies him as Yahweh. He identifies him as the Creator. Peter does this.

20:22

Peter identifies him as his Lord and God in 2 Peter 1. John does this.

20:29

Luke records the sermon where it talks about the deity of Christ.

20:37

Acts chapter 20, verse 20. So it's ubiquitous. So there was not a perversion of anything.

20:42

It is the fulfillment of the prophecy that we saw in Isaiah 9, that we see in Micah chapter 5.

20:49

It is consistent from Genesis to Revelation. It's not something that was made up 30 years later.

20:55

It's just not the case. Well, according to James, everybody talks about the Trinity except Jesus, which is interesting.

21:02

I don't think Paul, on the New Testament, really talks about the Trinity. There's no verse which talks about the

21:07

Trinity, to be clear. I think Paul's teachings perhaps may lead to the conclusion.

21:13

And when James says that Paul talks about Jesus being

21:19

God and so forth, again, it's a debatable thing. I think he's talking about the Lamb of God. Again, that's for another debate.

21:27

No, I think Paul's teachings ultimately lead to that conclusion. But Paul himself doesn't quite talk about the

21:33

Trinity. His teachings lead to that conclusion. And as I said, it's interesting. Everybody talks about praising the

21:40

Trinity except Jesus. I need my book again. I just want to know, is there a book by Jesus and a book by Paul that are exactly the same?

21:57

Because you said Paul taught by Jesus, taught me, and it doesn't matter which. Jesus says no,

22:02

Paul taught something else. So is there a book by Jesus? It's exactly a book by Paul. Okay, look, this is what

22:08

Jesus said, this is what I'm saying. First off, Jesus didn't write any books, so there's no book by Jesus. The point is that everything we know about what

22:16

Jesus taught is found in the New Testament. And those New Testament records, primarily the four

22:24

Gospels and Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, are everything that the Christians had to whom Muhammad was speaking and said, you are responsible for what's in the

22:31

Injeel. So they possessed it. So there's no way around this. And let me point out a real problem here.

22:37

If you have a problem with the recording of Jesus' words by somebody else, why do you not have a problem with the fact that Jesus is quoted in the

22:45

Qur 'an? Over 600 years after he went to heaven, you accept everything that's in the

22:50

Qur 'an that allegedly Jesus said. And yet, historically, no critical scholar on the planet would agree that that's valid.

22:58

So, it doesn't apply. Jesus didn't write a book? No, he did not write a book, no sir.

23:05

Look, I think it's ridiculous to compare the Qur 'an with what the

23:10

New Testament was of Jesus. Clearly, you know, when the Prophet spoke, he was speaking in Aramaic, Arabic, and the scribes were there.

23:20

No, Jesus did not speak Greek. He spoke

23:25

Aramaic. You know, Jesus was not around when these books were written.

23:34

So, you have to compare apples with apples. I think, again,

23:41

I will leave the rest of my comment for the summation. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen.

23:47

You've been at the recording, so if you have questions, we're coming to the last ten minutes. I need you to bear with me five minutes, five minutes from each of the speakers.

23:55

In this session, I will pass it over to James White, who will present the summation to us. Thank you. I would like to begin by thanking you all for being here, sticking it out to the very end.

24:12

I appreciate your interest. In fact, you've been an excellent audience and asked excellent questions. I would like to thank

24:17

Dr. Shear once again for engaging in debate here in South Africa with me.

24:23

I normally bring a book, and I have a book with me. It's a book I wish I could have written, but it's far better than anything

24:30

I could write. It's On the Holiness of God by Christian Archbishop R .C. Sproul. It has very little to do with what we're talking about tonight, but hopefully it's something that you will enjoy.

24:44

As Shear had said a few moments ago, Jesus was not at the Council in Acts Chapter 15.

24:49

From a Christian perspective, you've got to believe he was. Because Jesus promised to send his Spirit to be with his disciples, and it was the

24:56

Spirit of God that convened that Council and guided that Council. That's filled with a promise in John Chapter 14.

25:02

There's that John Chapter 14 text again. May I invite all the Muslims in the audience to go home this evening and read

25:08

John Chapter 14, and then ponder it in light of what's been said this evening. I really invite you to do that.

25:16

A few moments ago also, as Shear said, Jesus came only for the house of Israel. Folks, we're not going to advance the conversation if we keep using the

25:26

Scripture as it is. It is unfair, it is isogenical, it is not proper to read the

25:36

Gospels, to take a statement of the Gospels that was about a particular point in Jesus' ministry, then in the same

25:43

Gospel later on, the same prayer says the Gospel is for all people in Jesus' Messiah. For all people, ignore that and quote this.

25:51

That is an abusive Scripture, and we need to stop it. We need to stop it. Read the

25:57

New Testament for what it said. I tried to read the Qur 'an for what it said. For example, it was ridiculous for me to say what

26:03

I said about the Qur 'an. But he wasn't responding to what I said about the Qur 'an. Did you all hear what I said? I was asking the gentleman, if you believe that Jesus is quoted properly in the

26:14

Qur 'an, 600 years after he left this earth, then you logically have no basis for objecting to the

26:21

Gospel writers actively quoting Jesus only 30 or 40 years after he was on the earth.

26:26

That's a perfectly logical statement. It wasn't ridiculous. If we're going to move this conversation forward, we have to do so with respect and with listening ears to hear what the other is saying.

26:42

I know there's a lot of people on my side of the fence that don't want to hear what you believe. I know that.

26:48

They tell me that. I take heat for trying to tell people that there's all sorts of different kinds of Muslims and we need to talk to Muslims as to where they are and who they are as individuals.

27:00

And I know that they're evangelicals. They just want to say, all Muslims are the same. Just paint with a broad brush.

27:06

I resist that. We as Christians should never do that. But you as Muslims, one of the beautiful names is

27:14

Ahak, is it not? The truth. That means you need to be consistent. You need to be always looking for the truth.

27:20

And that means you should only lead the truth about what the Bible says, not what someone tells you. What have we looked at this evening?

27:28

We've seen clear evidence that if you will allow the New Testament to speak for itself, there is a consistent message from Matthew and Revelation that Jesus, the

27:38

Messiah, sends His Spirit, guides His apostles, and one of those special apostles was

27:44

Paul. And they taught the same message. And the only way to get around that is to not let it speak in its own language, but to interpret it in the light of something that comes 600 years later.

27:58

That does not move the discussion forward. I hope you will listen. I hope you will consider these things. My friends, I hope you sense the respect that I have for you.

28:08

I want to actively understand what you believe and interact with it as a person who loves you and cares for you, as a follower of Jesus Christ.

28:17

I hope you hear that this evening. Thank you for showing me so much hospitality and having me here this evening.

28:23

I hope you get a chance to come back in the future. Thank you very much. Thank you.

28:33

I'm going to try to be very brief. I think James misunderstands the point.

28:39

I think he misunderstood the question. I don't have a problem. It wasn't the topic of the debate anyway.

28:47

I don't have a problem with the words of Jesus. In fact, I quoted Jesus extensively.

28:53

I'm not sure if James was listening. I quoted him. I don't have a problem with that.

28:58

I'm simply saying that we don't have the original words of Jesus in Aramaic, the language in which he is taught.

29:05

What we have is Greek, Koine Greek, what we call the Fana of the Lord in South Africa, Koine Greek, and Jesus has no

29:14

Greek. Nevertheless, I'm quite happy and I think it's quite remarkable that the letters of Paul were written before the books of Jesus.

29:28

And yet, you find that very clearly, the books of Jesus contradict what

29:37

Paul had to say. They don't follow Paul. It is almost as if they go out of their way not to.

29:44

And I think that's remarkable. And on that basis, I'm quite happy to generally accept the words of Jesus, even though I have heard that he is not in the original language.

29:59

So, I think that is the ultimate point that I've been trying to make.

30:07

James said, I must go to the Bible when I said, you know,

30:12

Jesus came only for the Jews. Jesus said that. Jesus said it. He didn't say it.

30:17

He didn't make it up. Jesus said it. And he did exactly to quote the verse where Jesus said,

30:23

Go out into all the world and be baptized in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The problem is that none of the disciples knew of this commandment.

30:36

So, when they went out, according to the book of Acts, they didn't baptize in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They only baptized in the name of Jesus.

30:44

And... Oh, well, Acts, check my English. I think it's interesting. And further, you know, the

30:53

Jews who accepted Jesus were having a problem with going to Gentiles.

31:00

So, if there was a clear instruction from Jesus, that, listen, go into the world, you know, make the

31:07

Gentiles into my followers, they don't have to follow the Mosesian global, then there would be no problem with Peter.

31:16

There would be no problem with James. And, you know, if you look at James chapter 21, James instructs

31:22

Paul, he says, listen, people are saying that you are following the Mosesian law. I demand that you go out there and wash yourself, purify yourself, and make the people believe that you are following the

31:35

Mosesian law. And you know what Paul does? He does what James instructs him. He doesn't tell

31:40

James, I don't want to. I, you know, I don't want to do that. I don't accept circumcision.

31:47

I don't accept the rules. Again, I have a problem with the way

31:53

Paul interacts with James and with other disciples. Nevertheless, I wish all of you would go, take off your garments, do what

32:05

I did, put the teachings of Jesus side by side, and decide for yourself,

32:12

I want to thank James, you know, always, always was great, and always a pleasure.

32:18

We were very strongly, and I want to thank you, the audience, and I hope that when James comes again, possibly we will have another debate.

32:26

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we're really blessed to have been in the company of these two fundamental and key speakers on comparative religion.

32:43

I think we can take a lot away from them this evening. I've got a fortunate job in that I don't have to declare a winner, but the winner is truly you because at the end of the day, you now have the information to go back home and do your own contemplation.

32:59

So ladies and gentlemen, in conclusion, you be the judge. You consider the facts. I can only pray that God guides us to His way.

33:09

As a thank you, the Islamic Information Center would like to thank our sponsors, Namo families,

33:14

Mr. Fiya Dayak, Rupert Ali, who has the community newspaper. I also wish to thank

33:20

Mr. Rupert and the community members for providing us with this hall this evening. To UNWORLD, PACT, Proclaim, Alpha and Omega, Omega Ministries, for their support.

33:30

Finally, to both speakers for their excellent presentation and well -thought -out processes. Thank you to you for being an excellent audience.