Widespread Apeman Fraud Detected in Museums

You know, I've never even met Andrew in person. The one thing I've picked up on is everybody picks on the man. And so here's my take.

Oh, that's not true.

He picks on everybody else.

No, no.

See, I think he's an innocent victim of just ruthless people who heartily judge him. He just seems to me so innocent. I don't know. I need to meet him to find out, but yeah, that's just my impression.

He'll have to tell me whether I'm right or not.

That's hilarious.

Wow.

I don't trust Chris's opinion on it.

I mean.

This is Apologetics Live. To answer your questions, your host from Striving for Eternity Ministries, Andrew Rippaport.

Apologetics Live and the Museum Fraud Topic

We are live, Apologetics Live, here to answer your most challenging questions that you have about God and the Bible. As I say every week, we can answer any question that you have about God and the Bible.

And if you doubt that, well, go to apologeticslive .com. You just scroll down till you see a little StreamYard duck icon. Click on that. Make sure you give your browser use or allow it to use your microphone and camera.

Join us. Ask us any question. Most challenging question. I just want you to remember one thing. I don't know is a perfectly good answer. So I agree with Israel Wayne there is that people pick on me. It's not that I'm just the innocent person.

I never pick on anyone, never. But today's topic. So we were going to do things a bit different because my co-host isn't here yet as he's putting his kids to bed. So we usually do an in the news section.

We may pick that up at the end. If there's time at the end, we had some of you remember back in October, we had a gentleman who joined, wanted to try to defend gay Christianity. And well, to say he did a poor job would be an understatement, but he blames us for him doing a poor job.

And so he sent a response that he had made public. And we may try to cover that at the end, along with some of the in the news segment. But first, what we're going to do is we're going to talk about some widespread frauds that can be detected in the museums.

Well, I know you go to a museum to learn. I get it. You go and you feel that I'm going to learn a lot. I'm going to gain information. And it's going to always say true things, right?

Wait, no, no, you don't think that?

Well, some of you don't. But many think that if it's in a museum, it must be true. And there are ways to detect that the museums are trying to present frauds. So I'm going to invite in Dr. Carl Wiener.

If you wouldn't mind just introducing yourself to the audience, because I don't know how many folks know who you are and your background. And if you could give a little bit of an insight into your ministry and what you do.

And then just in the beginning, and I will come back to this at the end, is how people can get a hold of you. Because the reality is people won't go searching you now. They're going to wait till the end and go, man, this guy's really smart.

I got to find out more about him. And so we'll give you that at the end, too.

Well, my name is Dr. Carl Wiener, W-E-R-N-E-R. And it's nice to be here. And thanks for the great opportunity to meet with you and your guests. And I am looking for opportunities to share probably the biggest science story and the biggest news story for the last 20, 30 years.

And in a minute, I'm going to get to this, that we have uncovered widespread fraud in the field of human evolution. But just to give you a background so you have some idea of who I am and why I did this.

I'm a physician and I am a science guy. When I was in high school, I was a science geek. I'm probably the only person I know that had his own animal lab at the University of Missouri while I was in high school.

That's what I would do on my days off in the afternoons. I was doing research on food chemicals. And I got a four-year all-science scholarship for that. And I also got accepted to medical school at age 18.

And it was an accelerated medical school. So I was kind of the science geek that was living next door to you. And the whole reason that I'm here tonight started with a dinner over pizza while in medical school by my medical school classmate.

I was 19. He was 19. And he asked me three questions that started me on this quest, this journey, and actually turned my life around. You know, I grew up in a fantastic home, fantastic parents, a good church, but the church never emphasized the inerrancy of the Bible.

And there was no real intention to teach me that creation was true. And so when I got to college and medical school, there was a sense that evolution was true from what my professors were teaching me about evolution.

And I had no reason not to believe them. I would never been told how to defend against this. And I believed in evolution. My life started sliding. I was actually kind of miserable by my second year of medical school.

I shouldn't have been. You know, I had the world by the tail, you know, but I had all the freedom in the world, but I was more or less a prisoner. I just I just couldn't find that happiness I was looking for.

Then my sophomore year, a classmate of mine took me out for pizza one night at Minsky's Pizza Parlor in Kansas City there on Main Street. And he asked me three questions that flipped me from believing in evolution to realize, no, there's something wrong here.

The three questions he asked me was, Carl, you believe in the natural origin of the universe, the Big Bang, right? And I said, yes. And he said, well, how do you explain where matter comes from? Because, you know, Carl, that as well as I do, he said that the laws of physics tell you that matter like atoms, hydrogen, helium does not form from nothing.

So how could you get the matter for creating the universe if matter doesn't form naturally under any circumstance? And, you know, I had I had no knew that law of physics. I knew the Big Bang, but I never put them together.

And he was completely right. It's like that would imply that there was a God that created the universe. The second question is, Carl, you believe that life began in a primordial soup billions of years ago and that lightning struck this primordial soup and that the first form of life formed.

But, Carl, how could that possibly be? Because, you know, as well as I see, we're both in biochemistry class at that time. You know as well as I that DNA doesn't form naturally under any circumstance and just like mixing chemicals.

You can't mix chemicals and get DNA. And yet DNA is in all living things. So how could life begin if there's no way to get to DNA? And same is true for proteins and enzymes and RNA and all these other things.

And I hadn't thought of that either. I knew what he was saying was correct, but that would imply that the universe and life itself didn't form naturally. And then his third question was about the fossil record.

He said, Carl, how do you explain the problems with the fossil record in light of evolution? I said, well, what problems are there? I had no idea that there were problems. And he said, the museums are full of fossils.

And right now, the number of museum fossils is one billion, billion, thousand museums, a million fossils each. He said, even though they have this plethora of fossils, great numbers of fossils, in fact, they have so many fossils, they don't want you to bring any new fossils to the museum unless there's something special.

Why can't you see evolution in the fossils? In other words, all the big groups just pop onto the planet. There's no ancestors for the phyla like the arthropods and the vertebrates. They just suddenly appear.

How could that be? And you know what? I couldn't answer one of those questions. And I was a 4 .0 in medical school. I was a 4 .0 in undergrad. I was a biology major. I was there on a full ride science scholarship.

And I couldn't answer any one of these most simple questions. And I realized at that point that I had been duped, but I didn't know what to do with this, because how would you explain dinosaurs? How would you explain millions of years?

How would you explain the origin of the universe? So I just thought about those questions, but they moved me deep in the heart. And I just thought about it. I still had a career as a physician. I still had to pay off my debts.

So I continued to go through medical school. I continued then to be a physician. And I worked on it for 18 years to try to understand how evolution or creation, how it all fit together with this God that I realize exists at this point.

And I couldn't get the answers I wanted, Andrew. So what I did was very unusual. I know you'll think this is unusual, but I talked my wife into forming a television production company. And this was in 1997 for the sole purpose that we would do interviews with the fossil experts, the dinosaur experts, the human evolution experts.

And we would conduct interviews. I could kind of probe, look at the fossils, try to resolve my issues. And it was supposed to be a one year deal. And it ended up being a 27 year deal, 1997 through just present.

And at the end, I realized that evolution didn't occur. That's one. Number two, and the second book that we produced was that I realized that during the time of the dinosaurs, there were modern appearing animals.

And that resolved a lot for me when I realized that, you know, the ducks live with the dinosaurs, the boa constrictors, the box turtles, the possums, the hedgehogs. You know, they just didn't display them.

And so that solved a lot. And the third thing I collected in these 27 years of interview. And again, this is going to be hard to to believe, but I'm going to show it to you, is that there is widespread fraud in the field of human evolution.

And I mean, widespread. And so widespread, you can go into any natural history museum today and I could walk you through and say, this one is a fraud. This one is fraud based. This is a fraud. This is an altered fossil.

And nobody knows this except the few people that have heard me talk so far. The scientists aren't aware of this. The college professors who teach anthropology and human evolution aren't aware of these facts, and they are so stunning and so many that this essentially collapses the theory of human evolution.

And if you like, I'd like to go through and start showing you some of these examples of the fossil frauds in the field of human evolution. And when you see them, you will say, I think you'll agree with me.

These are undeniable and these are many and these are so common. They're the big ones. You know, the big animals that you would think are the big proofs for human evolution. And it's not just currently, it goes back to the beginnings of the theory of human evolution.

And the frauds start popping out around the year 1880, 1885, and they go forward all the way to the fossils that are in the museum. So I'm actually going to cover not only the ones that are in the museums solely, but I want to show you some of the others that got us to this point and to show you.

Oh, my gosh, how did we all miss this?

You know, it's interesting because, you know, Darwin had argued for that the fossil evidence would bear out his theory of evolution and his argument back then was we just don't have enough fossils to prove this out.

That's right.

That's actually a decent argument to make while you're alive and there's no evidence to support it. You just because by the time you're dead, right, either either everyone's rejected everything you said or not.

But you don't you don't know the difference. And so he put a lot of weight in fossil evidence. And it is interesting you say, yeah, back in the 1800s, after after he lived, people spent a lot of time looking for fossils because the more fossils we could find, the more we could prove Darwin was right.

That is correct. That is a correct assessment of what happened.

Yeah. And yet the more we find those fossils, I think the less we find that Darwin's right. The more it supports creation. I mean, one of the things the more fossils we find is we we still don't find transitional fossils.

The missing links are still missing.

That is absolutely correct. And for example, in in our second, our first book, we went around and interviewed the specialists in each of these fields where the fossils were found. For example, we interviewed the dinosaur experts and they told us that one hundred thousand dinosaurs, individual dinosaurs have been found now.

Only about three thousand of them were skeletons, but there was ninety seven thousand other dinosaur bones, onesies or twosies that have been found. But that's a heck of a lot of dinosaurs. One hundred thousand dinosaurs.

And yet the world's greatest expert in dinosaur evolution, Dr. David Weishample, told us on camera that there was not a single ancestor for any of the dinosaur species, not a single ancestor for any of the dinosaur species.

And that is essentially what the fossil record looks like, with a few exceptions, which turned out to be frauds.

So before before we start with that, someone is asking whether you have been on Donny's YouTube channel standing for truth. They said he has a lot of discussions on evolution. Have you been on standing for truth?

No, but I I would love to be invited or someone could hook me up or this person could hook me up because I am trying to reach as many people as I can with this message.

So, D, if you know who Donny is of standing for truth, if you could just email me at info at striving for eternity dot com and shoot me that contact information, I'll get it to Dr. Carl and we'll see if we can set that up.

And let me know if he's when you say standing for truth discusses evolution, if he's for or against evolution, that would be helpful. I would be going into early territory or not.

I'd be happy to go on to pro evolution site, you know, as long as they're, you know, not rude. No, I'd be happy to share this with everyone.

All right. So I know you had a presentation with some things that sometimes a picture makes it easier. And for those who are listening with the audio podcast, which I know most of you are, if you want to see, you're going to need to go to the website for go to striving for training or YouTube channel.

And so just go to YouTube, search for striving fraternity and dig that up. And that way we could you could watch, see any things, because I think sometimes the slides, you know, I was going to try and talk through them.

But yeah, sometimes you need to see a picture. So and and as he's pulling the slides up, I'll just say we were we were not sure whether we were going to be able to do this show today. Girl called me up, goes, Oh, my computer's not working in a panic.

And he went to his backup computer and that wasn't working. And so he ran to the Apple store and they fixed it pretty quickly for him. And so, yeah, that's always a good thing. Uh, and so D says that Donny is a Christian and has a young is a young earth creationist.

All right, so I don't see your slides popping up yet.

Hold on just a second.

OK, well, one second is up, so you needed more than one second.

Exactly.

Well, let me let me do this while you're pulling that up and see if there's anything. Let me look at any comments. All right. John says, yes, pictures would help me. I'm having a hard time figuring out what Carl has found.

Eight man fraud evidence. So, OK, OK, here we go. I see your slides and pull those up.

There we go. So just for everybody, I have written four books. The first one was Evolution, a Grand Experiment. And that looked at the fossil record where we interviewed scientists about the fossils. And this is just one chapter of the dinosaur chapter.

This chart shows how dinosaurs evolved from a common ancestor. But when we asked the scientists to put in the numbers on to the chart, although you have these thousands and thousands of dinosaurs on the right, like Tyrannosaurus and Sauropods and Ceratopsians, there was not any fossils on the chart lines where you thought they were animals.

You know, they put the lines on the charts in the museums. You just will assume that there's fossils there, but there aren't. And so that's how the whole book is laid out. One animal group at a time. The second book I did was called Living Fossils.

And that was my prediction that if creation was true and if all the animals and plants and humans and dogs all live together, and then they got mixed up in a flood and then dinosaurs went extinct, you should find some animals that are modern next to the dinosaurs.

And in the book and video Living Fossils, we simply compared the fossils that were found next to a dinosaur, like this fossil fern, a redwood, it's a fossil redwood. And then we placed the fossil that was found next to a dinosaur next to the modern plant or animal.

And you can see, Andrew, that there's no difference between a modern dawn redwood tree and this fossil dawn redwood, same way with the cones. There's no difference between the fossil cone and the modern cone.

And we just went through group after group after group, like this is the modern nautilus at the top and below it is a fossil nautilus that was found next to dinosaurs. And you'd say, well, gosh, that looks like the same animal.

But they changed the name of the fossil. So you would never know it was the same animal. And then if you find if you if you were to cut these fossils in half and look at the inside, here's the modern nautilus over here on the right and the nautilus shellfish.

And you can see it looks exactly like the inside of a fossil nautilus that was found next to the dinosaurs. And we found all examples of all the major groups of animals and plants next to the dinosaurs.

We didn't find all of them, but we found mammals like possums and hedgehogs. We found bird fossils of birds that were modern next to the dinosaurs like ducks and loons and avocets. All the reptile groups were represented, the plant groups were represented, et cetera, et cetera.

Then I wrote this book called Untold Stories of Human Evolution, which this first book, it's volume three in the series, is basically all the ape men that were accidentally inadvertently created out of mammals that weren't primates.

In other words, there were five ape men, these ape men on the left here, the Libyan ape man, the Orsi man, the Nebraska man, Australopithecus prometheus, and the Orsi man. These ape men in this book, and they're shown here on the left, were made out of these mammals.

These ape men were made out of dolphin bones, cat bones, pig bones, hippo bones, donkey bones, bovid bones, dog bones, horse bones, and raccoon bones. It's hard to imagine that a scientist could take a raccoon leg bone and say it was an ape man, especially if he's a trained anthropologist, but that is the reality.

Scientists named this fossil Tetraparthoma argentinus and said it was an ape man that lived in Argentina, but it was.

Actually a raccoon bone. How do they do that? Just for folks who are listening, because we're seeing all the pictures on the left of different depictions of something that's between an ape and a man. You look at a raccoon, it doesn't look anything like a human.

The pig I know, Nebraska man was, I believe it was the one where it was from one pig tooth. They developed the whole thing. How did they do this? Because for people who are hearing it, who may not realize, because we think of when we see the skeletons, it looks like, oh, they have the whole skeleton.

How do they take the skeleton of a raccoon to create an ape man?

Yeah, so they don't take the full skeleton. In fact, an evolution scientist, his best friend is just a partial skeleton. The less of the skeleton he has, the more he can conjecture that it was an ape man.

For example, this one at the top here, the Libyan ape man, that red collarbone, they thought they had found the red, I mean, this collarbone of this ape man found in Libya. In fact, it was the rib of this dolphin.

So all they had is a rib, and they made this entire drawing, and they took the rib thinking it was a collarbone, and then came up with this entire drawing. That is one of the problems in this field. There is so much creativity in a bad way.

There's no limits. If you just have a little bone, you can make up an ape man. That is an entire book that I made here of just mammals, dog bones, horse bones, donkey bones, pig teeth, that were created into ape man.

It's a fascinating read. It's not the point of the discussion.

Tonight. It is helpful for folks to realize that when they see this stuff, I love to go into museums. I have a loud voice, so it carries. It's an advantage when you're in a museum, and I'll see Lucy. I'll read out loud their description of Lucy and how they know that this was something evolutionary between ape and man because of its pelvis.

It describes the bones. Then I like to point out, notice the bones that they say that it's all dependent on are missing. Those aren't original.

I would just like to tease the audience here at this point. I told you I had found 150 frauds Dr. Johansson's Lucy was three of these frauds. I'm going to do his three frauds, which you've never heard tonight towards the end here.

Hang on to your seat because we're going to get to the frauds in just a minute. The second book I wrote on human evolution is this one. It's called Nine Categories of Overturned Ape Men. Basically, I counted how many ape men had been overturned.

That number is 232 species names. 232 species of ape men turned out to be not ape men. I was fascinated by that. What did they turn out to be? This isn't a fraud thing yet. This is just my thinking, the pre-work.

What did those 232 species of ape men turn out to be? Well, there were so many I had to group them into nine categories. Some of the ape men, especially Raymond Darts, turned out to be monkey bones. Some of the ape men, like Pleopithecus, turned out to be just straight ape bones.

Some of the ape men turned out to be straight humans that lived during the Ice Age, but they're just purely humans. Then some of the ape men were just ordinary humans that had recently been buried, just a couple hundred years old.

When the scientists dug up a modern skeleton, like Aunt Jane, or Uncle Billy, or whatever, they thought they had found an ape man, which again speaks poorly of their science. Then other categories of ape men, there was one that was made out of a reptile.

There was a category of ape men that were fossils that had been altered, et cetera, et cetera. You know what? Up to this point, this was like four years ago, I did not realize that I had 158 frauds in human evolution.

I wasn't paying attention, but as I wrote the back cover material for this book, I wrote this sentence that during the interviews for this book, which is volume four, that there were several instances of fraud that were revealed by the scientists themselves.

I thought to myself, you know, Carl, that's kind of a weak sentence to put on the back cover of a book. You need to count them up and how many frauds you ran across during these interviews. We interviewed 43 scientists all over the world, Africa, Europe, Australia, South America, and all throughout North America.

All these interviews were typed out. Some of them were 40 page interviews that lasted hours. I said, okay, I'll start counting them. I started counting them. This is when you can tell when you've found a scientific truth, when it jumps off the page and slaps you.

I started counting. I was like, okay, there's one there for Dr. Dar. There's one here for Dr. Brain. There's one here for Dr. Johansson. It was two here, four here, five here, nine, four, one third. I was over 100.

Then all of a sudden, I said, oh my gosh, there was 150 frauds. This is newsworthy. This is the most important thing you're going to hear this century. This is going to alter the evolution creation debate.

It is going to be the beginning of the end of this whole evolution scam. Human evolution was the linchpin that, well, the fossils for dinosaurs don't show dinosaur evolution. The fossils for bats don't show bat evolution.

The fossils for seal don't show seal evolution. We have all these ape men, hundreds of ape men. When you find out that 232 have been overturned and that there's 150 frauds in human evolution, the entire theory of human evolution collapses before your eyes.

Just a few little mop-up operations you have to do. This is so incredible. Everybody needs to, if you're just listening to this on the podcast, you need to come back and watch the video on his YouTube channel to watch these pictures.

I wouldn't believe me if somebody was speaking this way. I certainly wouldn't believe me, but once you see these photos, you're going to believe me. This is as vetted as you're going to ever see because our bibliography for this, it's the volume five on this series, is 432 pages.

The bibliography is 432 pages. I'm not pulling these facts and these pictures just out of thin air. This is all material that we investigated that nobody, most people have not figured out. If you don't mind

So Carl, before you go on, let me do one thing. You stopped sharing probably accidentally, but Dee is asking, I missed the info on your website. Not sure if I did it right. I had searched it and put this up here while he's pulling up.

It's called thegrandexperiment .com. That's up on screen for those folks who want to look for that, but I will have it in the show notes of the podcast, thegrandexperiment .com. That is the website to get all the information, get his books, which I would recommend you do.

I know I have one of yours, but I'm trying to look so I can just kind of peek over here and see some of them, but I can't find which one I have of yours. I know I have one of your four volumes there. Am I sharing the screen yet?

Yeah, there.

We go. Okay, good. Andrew, would you please help me if I lose screen sharing? Because sometimes I do and I don't realize. Just cut me off and let me work on it because my computer can sometimes.

Lose the screen share. Yep, not a problem. I never want my audience to lose what's going on.

Tumai and the Claim of the Oldest Ape Man

Here's the first ape man that's in museums that is a complete fraud. This is called Tumai. Now, most people don't know Tumai, but it's the latest and greatest ape man. Here is a cover of Time Magazine and the cover of Nature, the most prestigious science journal in the world from 2002 with this ape man called Tumai on the cover.

This is supposed to be a 7 million year old ape man. It's supposed to walk upright even though it looks kind of like an ape. I want you to pay attention to the facts, his four facts that I'm going to lay out here because they're all going to be frauds.

The facts are, one, he found this fossil skull embedded in rock and he had to dig it out. Number two, when he dated the rock layer, the rock layer dated to be 7 million years old. He knew it was a 7 million year old ape man because it came from that rock layer.

Number three, he made the point that the skull was the only bone found at the site. There was no other bones from this animal found. No other bones were found of this animal at the dig site. Four, he said the hole at the bottom of the skull where the spinal cord enters, that's called the foramen magnum, the hole wasn't in back like an ape but the hole was in the center like a human.

Those were the facts of the case. He said because the spinal cord hole or the foramen magnum, it's also called, is in the human position, that means that this creature walked upright. The problem is that this scientist alienated his colleague.

His colleague, Dr. Alain Bouvillon, who I interviewed, said this whole story is made up. He was upset that he got sidelined in this project. He shared the pictures that he took the day that the fossil was found.

In fact, Dr. Alain Bouvillon, who we interviewed, was there when it was found. The scientist who's promoting the fossil, Dr. Michelle Brunet from Paris, wasn't even in the country at the time. Dr. Bouvillon took this picture of Tumai on the day of discovery.

This was taken hours after it was found and this was how it was found. Here's the skull and you'll see it is not in rock layer. It's laying on top of the sand. This is in Chad, northern Africa, and it's in the Girab Desert.

Most of the fossils you find there are just laying on the sand. He did not have to dig it out of rock. It was laying on top of sand. Dr. Bouvillon's point was you can't date something that's just laying on top of sand.

You don't know what rock layer it might have come from, how many miles it got, how many miles it traveled to get there. You see, even in the desert, the Girab Desert, there are these flash floods, seasonal flash floods, where rivers form, bones get moved around.

There's torrential winds that move bones around. There are animals around there like dromedaries so they can move bones around. There's no way to know the date of this fossil even though he claimed it was the oldest.

Ape man ever found. Let me ask this. Does he get paid or get notoriety or get published if he says what everyone else is saying or does he get all those things if he discovers something.

No one else has discovered? He gets to be famous in 20 seconds and travel around with champagne glasses and be hosted everywhere if he says he found a new ape man. That's all you have to say. If you say you found a new ape man and if you say it's the oldest ape man, then you are the king of the pile and you knock out even Dr. Johansson.

Now he is the king. You get UNESCO involved, you get money coming in, you get movies made by saying he had found an ape man, a new ape man, and saying it was the oldest. He was the king starting in 2001 when he found it.

I want to show you something though, his second lie. If you look at the picture here, you'll notice there's a bone over here and that is a femur and it's a femur of a primate. In fact, this femur looks like a chimpanzee femur, but see he published in his science journals that this thing was found in rock, had to be dug up, that's not true.

He said specifically there were no other bones found like extremity bones when the skull was found, but here it is. Here's a picture taken just hours later and here is this femur and he kept it hidden for 17 years until someone called him on it and then it got published in Nature as like this big cover-up deal.

I want to show you why he would hide this femur. I took a picture of a modern chimp femur from four different directions, the front view, the back view, the inside view, and the outside view. This is that bone that was laying out there in the previous picture next to the skull.

This is the same bone, but it's only one bone, but he's turning it four different ways so you can see the four different views. If you'll notice, there are similarities between the four views of this femur found next to Tumai and this chimp.

In fact, when you lay it on top of it, it's indistinguishable. Can you see that laid on top of there? It's like they look, and I don't know what you would call it other than a chimp femur.

Do you happen to have a picture, and maybe you don't have it here, but do you have a picture of a human femur? For folks who don't know, what would be the difference between a chimpanzee.

Femur? How would it look different than a human? Believe me, the differences are subtle. The differences are subtle and a lot of times the difference is the angle of the kneecap area here on the lower part.

The differences are subtle, but the problem is that it looks like a chimp and he lied multiple times on camera saying there was no femur found. That is very problematic.

Your assumption, because we don't know the man's heart, but your assumption I guess is that he lied because if there was the femur, it would reveal that the rest of the story he's telling is.

Not true. Yeah. If he says, well, here's a femur and everyone says, that looks like a chimp femur, it's indistinguishable. Why don't we call this a chimp-like animal? Then he gets knocked out. It just turns into an ape.

No, you do not want to mention this if you're trying to promote the idea that you found, because by the way, a chimpanzee walks on all fours. It's a quadruped and a human walks on all twos habitually and it's a biped.

If you have a femur from an animal that walks on all fours, you can't go around telling everybody that it's an animal that walks upright.

Yeah. One of our watchers here, John, is saying, wow, great job, Carl. Love this guy.

So hang on to your seat because this is going to get incredible. In fact, once you watch this video and finish it, you need to start sending it around on social media because I am just getting started.

I got 150 feet fraud so far and I've only done two or three so far. I'm not counting. The next thing he did was he claimed that the hole on the bottom of the skull, called the foramen magnum, where the spinal cord enters, was in the ape position.