Synoptic Gospels Sections 278-279

Okay, I'm going to have to sort of face this way so that George is still to my left. I'm just going to look over toward that wall. We are a little ahead of time, but hey, that's that's good. That's a good thing.

We are continuing in our study of the Synoptic Gospels. We have already distributed all of the blue books.

So.

It will be a little bit tougher now on. It's very rare that if you look over the rest of the material, it's very rare that any one gospel is all by itself. So there's a lot of parallel issues to be looking at over the next period of time as we seek to finish up.

The Parable of the Wicked Husbandman in Its Temple Context

We are in section 278 and we'll be looking at a number of parables over the course of.

The.

Next number of weeks. This is the parable of the wicked husbandman, a fairly lengthy.

Parable.

Once again, context is vitally important. We need to keep in mind the fact that there is a growing tension here. Jesus has cleansed the temple. He has challenged the authority of the rulers. He has just told the parable of the two sons.

He's answered the question about authority and put the Scribes and Pharisees in a difficult position. He raised the issue of John the Baptist and they gave a good politically correct non-answer. And as a result you then have the parable of the two sons and all of this being applied to the Jewish leadership.

This is a direct invasion.

Into.

Enemy held territory. We are in the temple precincts in Jerusalem. This is not up in Galilee. You can sort of imagine that the rulers in Jerusalem, as long as Jesus is up in Galilee, well you know, they still had their people following him around and stuff, but now this is this is the heartland.

This is right where we live. We can't escape this man any longer. And so the level of animosity is rising and coming to a head as we will see finally in John chapter 19 when we have a law and by this law this man ought to die and they lead the lead the people in calling for the death of Jesus and say we have no king but Caesar.

Which in and of itself was a very politically charged statement as well. So now we have the parable of the husbandman and it seems to be that Matthew gives us the longest version here, which is somewhat interesting in the sense that normally Mark does but I think once again as we think about the audience to whom Matthew was writing it makes some sense because we've got Matthew chapter 23 coming and if you're thinking with me Matthew chapter 23 is the longest section of judgment upon Jewish leaders and their hypocrisy in the New Testament and so it would make sense that Matthew would give us the longest version of yet another parable that illustrates the wickedness of the leaders in possessing the Word of God talking about the Word of God and ignoring the Word of God and so we'll look at Matthew 21 33 through 46 which has parallels in both Mark and Luke.

Here another parable there was a householder who planted a vineyard and set a hedge around it and dug a wine press in it and built a tower and let it out to tenants and went into another country just in case there's a confusion here let means to rent out.

That's a perfectly good British English word. It's not our normal term. I have often commented as I have been spending more time in the UK that when we have different terminology their terminology is normally more logical than ours is and shorter and easier to use.

I'm not sure why that is but you know the first time over there. I'm seeing all these signs to let you know so like put an I in it means something completely different, you know to let you know what and it's it's it's our for rent.

So we use what we use more letters to say the same thing they say in fewer letters. So it does seem to be the way things are but so this this householder has planted a vineyard he's put some time into he set the hedge around it dug a wine press in it built a tower and so in other words, it's it's nice he's he's put a lot of effort into this and He rents it out to tenants not an unusual thing to do.

You.

Build a building. Whatever it is and then you rent it out and went into another country when the season of fruit drew near. He sent his servants the tenants to get his fruit and the tenants took his servants and beat one killed another and stoned another.

Again, he sent other servants more than the first and they did the same to them afterward. He sent his son of them saying they'll respect my son. But when the tenant saw the Sun they said themselves, this is the air.

Come let us kill him and have his inheritance. They took him and cast him out of the vineyard and killed him. When therefore the owner of the vineyard comes. Will he do to those tenants? They said to him he will put those wretches to a miserable death and let out the vineyard to other tenants who will give him the fruit in their seasons.

Jesus said to them have you never read in the scriptures the very stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner. This was the Lord's doing and it it is marvelous in our eyes. Therefore I tell you the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it.

And he who falls on this stone will be broken to pieces. But when it falls on anyone it will crush him. When the chief priests and the Pharisees heard his parables they perceived that he was speaking about them.

Hey good. But when they tried to arrest him, they feared the multitudes because they held him to be a Prophet. Now, obviously we know the end of the story. We know the context so it's easy for us to sort of see this one coming.

But.

You know the first time it was told. You might not necessarily see what's coming. What we have here is a picture of God as the householder and He creates the people of Israel they are his vineyard and He in essence.

Lens lets it out. To tenants that is to the Jewish leaders. We are going to see this. Same kind of.

Differentiation.

Between the Jewish leadership and the people. Repeated in Matthew chapter 23. This is something some of you know a lot about because I Have sort of had to make it part of my life over the past number of years to point out that Matthew 23 37 is one of the most misquoted verses in the Bible.

People will constantly quote Matthew 23 37 and In that text you have Jesus talking to Jerusalem. He says how often would I have gathered your.

Children.

Under my wings as a hen gathers her chicks, but you would not. I cannot tell you how many times I Continue even having made this an issue for a number of years. I continue to hear people Misquote that how often would I have gathered you but you would not.

That's not what it says. It's talking about the Jewish leaders. Matthew 23 is a judgment Oracle on the Jewish leaders and here you have the differentiation between the Jewish leaders and The um audits.

The um audits means the people of the land.

And.

We see.

Over and over again in the gospel presentations. The distinction that is made in the thinking of the Jewish leaders themselves. Well, we have the grace of God. We have the blessings of God we You know, we are the ones that God has favored and the people of the land there's no grace for them they do not keep the 613 laws and and They are not as punctilious as we are in their observation of God's law.

And so we are the the chosen few and then you have the um audits the people of the land that just sort of muddle along and One of the things obviously that caused the greatest Consternation and conflict between The Lord and the Pharisees was who was it that Jesus is always hanging out with.

He doesn't look to to gain some kind of of repertoire and or some kind of of Relationship and Get along with the Jewish leaders get into their circles get their approval. No, he doesn't he doesn't do that instead He is willing to from their perspective profane holy things by discussing them with people they considered to be beneath the grace of God and.

So this distinction is clearly there. It's it's not something we have to only look to the New Testament for you can find this you know, the the prayer of the Pharisee in Luke chapter 16 is Mirrored in prayers that we have found at Qumran and other places where you have these individuals who truly do see their distinction as as indication of their acceptance with God and and so on and so forth and so this is behind all of this and It helps us to interpret the parables and to see what's going on and the sense the growing Anger and hatred that exists in this situation.

And so you have these tenants and the tenants are not the vineyard. But they are the ones who have been placed in charge of the vineyard. There is a responsibility I mean Jesus is going to say in Matthew chapter 23 at the beginning Do what those who sit in Moses's seat say but don't do as they do.

In other words because they had been put in a position of authority because they fit in Moses's seat. Which was this stone seat in the synagogue from which the law of Moses was read. Well when they're doing what they're supposed to be doing in reading the Word of God.

Well don't overthrow the synagogue worship. Don't just because they're hypocrites ignore the Word of God or dishonor the Word of God wherever else it might be. But don't do as they do. Because they're hypocrites and that begins the whole lengthy thing there.

But they're there's still a position of leadership. And so Jesus doesn't come along and say I kill all the scribes and Pharisees overthrow everything burn down the synagogues and startle over again. That's not what he does and so the tenants are the Jewish leaders the vineyard the people of Israel that God has has created and so They don't catch this.

Immediately at the end of the parable they start to catch this and I'd imagine every other parable after this mm-hmm, okay.

But.

At first no and When the season of.

Fruit.

Drew near he sent his servants to the tenants to get his fruit. Who are the servants. Well his his prophets. Those who have been sent by God. Always calling God's people to godliness and to Do that which God's law would call them to do and the tenants took his servants and beat one killed another and so another well you look back over the history of what happened to the various prophets that were sent to the people of Israel and That's pretty much.

What happens. Jeremiah's thrown into a pit and According to book of Hebrews and tradition. You know some were sawn in half and some were run through the sword and so on and so forth. Again, he sent other servants more than the first and they did the same to them.

You know we don't even know all the prophets that were sent. I mean we can tell from from the records that we do have from what God has preserved for us that There were quite a number some toiled in anonymity and we will not know of them until eternity itself.

Afterward he sent his son to them now. This is very interesting. Read that and go well, that's clear. And again, we know the end of the story already. So it's easy for us to just put the theological bricks together in essence and go ah Jesus the Son of God, and he's self-identifying himself as the Son of God so on so forth, but Again, they didn't even know who this is being applied to at first.

So one can imagine that what actually happens is once Jesus says in verse 43. Therefore I tell you the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given a nation producing the fruits of it. They're like all right if he's making application to us.

If we're the tenants then who's the son and They start to see What it is that Jesus is claiming for himself and they understand this.

As.

Application is made. After he sent his son and saying they'll respect my son, but when the tenant saw the Sun they said to themselves This is the heir come. Let us kill him and have his inheritance now.

Again, you do not want to make a parable quote-unquote. Walk on all fours, so I'm not really sure where that comes from either. Walk on all fours, but what it means is you don't want to press everything to a literal point to where.

God was like Well.

I'll send my son and surely they'll respect him. Because from the beginning Jesus is saying this is what's going to happen. He knows what's going to be taking place and It's necessary to go Jerusalem be betrayed etc. Etc.

But the point is that when you would send the Sun there should be a certain level of Respect on the part of anyone in fact anyone who would behave in this way Is demonstrating their their utter depravity not just from a personal behavioral perspective.

But from any culture of that day to behave in this way Was just completely beyond Beyond anything that could be Accepted or be conscionable. When the tenant saw the Sun they said of themselves this is the air let it become let us kill him and have his inheritance.

What is this? What is this actually. Communicating is communicating their attitude. They don't care about The landowner they don't care about the one who's built what they themselves did not work to get.

But they want the inheritance and So they'll do anything to obtain that inheritance. I mean talk about a picture. That's just about to be fulfilled. This is a prophetic parable. What's gonna be happening this very week this is passion week that we're talking about here and they took him and cast him out of the vineyard where's where's Jesus crucified outside of Jerusalem and Killed him.

They didn't kill him and then cast him out of the vineyard. They take him out of the vineyard and then they kill him. When therefore the owner of the vineyard comes what will he do to those? Tenants and So the question is then thrown to them what is the righteous thing to be done here and I cannot help but think of When Nathan is sent to David and he tells the parable of the man who has you know, the one little One man has a huge flock and one has one little lamb and he takes one the lamb David's righteous indignation is is is brought forth and then you are the man.

Here's here's the same situation. With the judgment with which you judge you shall yourself be judged and.

So.

He says they said to him. He will put those wretches to a miserable death and Let out the vineyard to other tenants who will give him the fruit in their seasons. Now mark and Luke just simply have he will come and destroy the tenants and give the vineyard to them And give it in each other's.

I'm sorry.

And.

But Matthew has More of the flavor maybe reflecting the the language they used or the the tone of voice that they used in saying these things. He will put those wretches to a miserable death and let out the venue to other tenants who will give him the fruit in their seasons and so he allows them to utter their own condemnation in their own words and That's what takes place.

Because Jesus's response is to want to get once again point to their own incredible hypocrisy. What truly makes the Jewish leaders? Worthy of the strongest language from Jesus is their possession of so much light.

Which should make us think all the more carefully about these parables because Jesus called for repentance from all sinners when he spoke to prostitutes and To tax collectors and to people who were engaged in the lowest forms of Sinful behavior in the society his was still a message of repentance.

He never said well, you know, you're just you're just the down-and-outers and so it's understandable that you do these things. No, that's that's never what he says. That's never the the attitude that he portrays in any way shape or form.

It's always a message of repentance and it's always a message that is received only by those Who are looking? For a message of grace Jesus. I see no evidence that Jesus is. Talking to people who are seeking to justify their sinfulness.

Seeking to defend their sinfulness seeking to say it's not sinfulness at all. See that's that's one of the problems I think that modern Protestant liberalism has developed is that we live in a day questions whether God has spoken with clarity or not and There are so many today who simply seek to justify their sin.

To question God's ability to give his law or to apply his law. God would never be just he would never be holy. You know some of you know that over the past number of weeks I've sort of been rather unwillingly.

Dragged two different directions away from where I'm supposed to be writing a book right now. But one of them is In responding to some things that happened recently in the emergent church movement and the emergent church movement.

Is a movement that is primarily populated by former Conservatives normally Fundamentalists who have found a whole new world out there and. A book came out a few weeks ago I've mentioned to you love wins by Rob Bell and and I did some responses to that and things like that.

But then this past Tuesday I got up it Goes 340 in the morning something like that. And went down to the office and at five o 'clock was on the air. Well actually recording it only aired yesterday, but recording a program in London on the unbelievable radio broadcast.

I've been on a number of times, but normally while in studio only twice that I've been on from over here. And that was from a radio station, so the quality would be good, but quality turned out really good anyways thankfully I was happy about that, but I did a dialogue with the leader really that the best known person in the emergent church movement a man by the name of Brian McLaren and Mr.. McLaren and I very similar backgrounds when he mentions going to church wearing slippery socks and slippery shoes.

Wearing a clip-on tie. You know I'm just going yeah, yeah only difference is Brian McLaren doesn't do any more, and I still do so. But my thighs are not clip-on even the bow ties are not clip-on. That's exactly right.

They're the real thing now, but.

Anyway.

In in having to interact with with these folks one of the marks of the emergent church is Just a real detestation of the concept of a God who would in in Any way bring final judgment upon someone who despises his ways?

The big thing that has gotten Rob Bell a lot of money In the sales of love wins is this whole idea of well You know love wins and God sets his love upon Every single individual. There's no Differentiations and love of God whatsoever.

I mean just because there was a special love God had for Israel in the old testament. It didn't obviously have the Egyptians. That doesn't really matter. That's not a paradigm for anything else. God's love is a peanut butter love.

There's no distinctions in it. He's actually not capable of having the kind of love human beings have. We're supposed to have a certain kind of love for our wife. We don't have for anybody else's wife, but God doesn't have that kind of love.

He has to have this. It's all out for everybody and that means that love wins that means God's never gonna give up and that means everyone's gonna get saved because that love even after death is just gonna keep working on people and working on people is eventually gonna wear everybody down and eventually love wins.

And that's a people like that idea.

That that sounds really neat. We don't have to have any eternal punishment. We don't have to have anything like that because eventually love wins.

And.

When you hear especially people calling in on these programs, it wasn't a call-in program. We did obviously since we were recording it, but.

Well.

It's interesting right in the middle of all this. I happen to be watching O 'Reilly and He had had something on about Easter I forget what it was and he was answering emails and this guy wrote in and said Jesus said he is the way the truth in life.

No one comes the father but by him and a riot just looks in the camera and says God's a just God and he's a loving God and he would never leave just one way to come to him. You know, that's the attitude of man, you know, God has to provide us in many ways not just one.

Sure, the one way is, you know.

He and the person of his son entering into human flesh and giving his life, but you know, that's that's just that's too narrow. There needs to be more. See it's the idea. Well, that's what Protestant liberalism has always been about.

There is no concern about the holiness of God or the freedom of God or.

Anything else.

And.

As a result It just seems to me that those churches today that you know still Read the Bible They still have it up on the altar someplace. They they they are comfortable with the old traditions and Yet so they have this blindingly bright spiritual light and yet They don't walk in it.

They don't want even it's not there. I don't care. We don't really believe what it says about this whenever we believe what it says about that. Um, there's great condemnation there I Don't know if any of you saw it.

I It did make me feel very old This past week because I remember when Princess Diana got married and it was shortly after I got married and People were staying, you know getting up at one o 'clock in the morning.

We had these things called videotape machines VHS it was a really neat thing and lots of people were banging their heads against the wall trying to figure out how to program it to get the start right and and you know and So the royal wedding this week No, I did not stay up to watch it, but I do have a DVR so I Threw it and it was it was interesting because I was I was honestly concerned About an attack taking place because I mean talk about a huge target and a lot of space to try to defend but anyway I'm thankful that didn't happen, but What struck me? was in watching the ceremony and and Of course, you know, like I said, I I really like London.

I've spent I've walked down those streets and and it's a beautiful place and So it was interesting to get to watch it knowing no, okay, that's you know, the Unbelievable studios over that direction and that's over that direction the tubes over there and that kind of thing.

But watching the actual service I was struck by how.

Distinctively Christian it was I.

Mean the music. I mean, I don't know if you listen to the music, but the.

The.

Choir that sang during the wedding itself. You listen to the words. It was it was a psalm. I mean it was. It was extremely. You know, you just went. Wow there is. I wonder what most Brits are thinking in light of how secular the society has become.

And you know allegedly the Kindly little lady in the yellow dress is the head of the Church of England and.

The.

Kindly old man doing the ceremony. Rowan Williams Archbishop of Canterbury is More pagan than he is Christian in his theology. It's amazing. And yet here's the old words and And they're comforting and they're beautiful and yet what does God think about having the words without the reality.

Because the people were talking about here Had all the pomp and circumstance, you know, these Jewish leaders had more flowing robes than Rowan Williams was wearing and They had the sacrifices and they had the temple I Mean as beautiful as Westminster Abbey is.

They had the town and Get Jesus's words them is have you never read in the scriptures? What what an insult? I? Mean, you know, I I Can always tell when a conversation is probably not going to be going real.

Well. When I'm talking with somebody and they say Well, haven't you ever read the Gospel of John, you know?

Yeah a few times.

Translated a few times. Yeah. Okay, you know, but the very fact that they're gonna say something like that means Your position is so far out in my opinion from what the Bible says. Have you read it? And that's what Jesus says.

Have you never read in the scriptures? Oh.

Wow, I mean that is.

That is Take off the glove and That is the gentleman's insult right there. Have you never read in the scriptures? Can you imagine saying that the Scribes and Pharisees the people who prided themselves on?

Their knowledge of the scriptures slap across the face and Then you have the citation the very stone which the builders rejected has become the head of the corner. This is Lord's doing and it is marvelous in.

Our.

Eyes, and you just you you go. Hmm. All right. Do they understand what is being said has in Psalm 118? There is a stone which the builders rejected. There is going to be a rejection on the part of the leadership.

There's going to bring condemnation and yet it is the Lord's doing and it is marvelous in our eyes. Well, who is the our eyes? Well, it's the remnant. It's not it's not the leaders and having quoted that You then have therefore I tell you the kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it and then you may have.

I was going to look at the textual evidence on this but it's put in brackets in the. In Matthew, it's probably from the parallel Luke. He who falls in a stone will be broken to pieces when it falls on anyone that will crush him.

When the chief priests and Pharisees heard his parables. They perceived that he was speaking about them when they tried to arrest him they feared the multitudes because they held him to be a prophet and.

So there is a very clear prophetic element to this text and the conclusion is The kingdom of God will be taken away from you and given to a nation producing the fruits of it. They say nation. Well, what Italy is no a people a group of people that will produce the fruits of being the people of God and.

How how is that going to happen? This is so important to see this. We have we're told in New Testament. These things are written for our Encouragement for our learning for our understanding. What do we see constantly over and over again in the Old Covenant?

We have the people of God called me of people of God and yet they stumble and they fall and they stumble and they fall and there's this this constant rhythm of you know, the Prophets are sent and there's gonna there's a brief repentance and sometimes a glorious period but normally you have a majority.

Who just do not have a heart for the things of God and a minority who do and what's the difference? Well the remnant who has kept the remnant for himself. God has it's always grace.

And.

It's never a matter of possession of The scriptures or possession of a genetic relationship.

And.

Genealogy it's never any of that type. There's never a basis for boasting. It's always based upon grace. And. How then does the church produce? The fruits of it in this prophetic utterance.

Well.

We know the only time the church produces the fruits of being the kingdom of God is When the Holy Spirit of God brings that about. It's the Spirit's work. It's never due to possession. These people possessed all the parts all the positive possibilities in the world.

They had the scriptures. They had the Covenants at the temple. They had the worship. They had all the pictures right there in front of them as we've been seeing as we go through the book of Hebrews. Had all the advantages.

But apart from the Spirit of God making those things to come alive in a person's heart and mind. Just so much religious hypocrisy and. That's what it led to in this situation. So the chief priests. Pharisees.

Figure out. They perceived that he was speaking about them. Yeah, well good. But when they tried to arrest him they feared the multitudes because they held him to be a prophet and. So even though they have much authority You'll notice what they have to do is they sort of have to do things on the sly.

They do things that at nighttime. Do things when the the amha audits aren't around? Because while they don't know what's really best for them and we do. Still we don't want to get them too upset because we're the minority and they are the majority.

When it comes to that.

As they want to have him arrested, but Could not and of course as John would probably put it for his hour had not yet come as we see in John's recording of a lot of this. So we have enough time actually.

You'll next one the parable of the Great Supper you'll notice it says CP number 216 now when you see that and We're in 279. What does that mean? Then they're done that already did the parable of the Great Supper.

But we did it and again, I'll just just mention Luke has this in Luke chapter 14, which is why we did it then. We did do it did we not. Oh great keeper of the notes back you're looking for section 216 right now I don't want to skip over it.

And then we Realized that actually when we got to 16 is that well, we're gonna cover this later on when it's a two. Section 279. That's normally not how we've done it. Normally we cover it as it comes up as the synoptic presents it.

Why have This parable in two very different places. Mark doesn't even give it. Luke has it at a much earlier point in time. Well again, it is very very doubtful that Jesus told these stories only once.

And.

The application of the story in light of the context and light of the ministry in Jerusalem.

Would be.

Very appropriate as well. Place even in a different in a different book. Huh? That's that that means it was it was a while ago. Yeah, it'll be interesting to see when it's when it was when you've been doing this for.

Eight years, I think now that's fairly fairly amazing that I can remember any of it, but.

I do.

Specifically. Remember making application here and let me just go ahead and mention. Maybe it would be good to take about five minutes just simply to make application or something here. Yes, June 14th.

So I'm almost two years ago. We've only done 53 sections in two years. That's no, I'm a gold preferred flyer with us airways. You got you guys spend some time in an airplane to get that get that first-class seat.

Anyway, I I did want to make one application real quick because I do recall this. We we did discuss the the casting out of the man who had no wedding garment. Friend how'd you get here without wedding garment?

He was speechless and the king said the attendants bind him hand and foot and cast him in the outer darkness. There men will weep and gnash their teeth for many are called if you were chosen. It does seem to make application once again.

To.

The desire that many people have to have a God who again has.

No.

Kingly holiness or majesty. And in reality man is the. It's sort of scary to be honest with you man is the the focus of the God of so many people. Rather than God need to be our focus and God accomplishing his own self-glorification being his Primary goal and our primary goal.

What makes me think of this is I've been recently dealing with Mormonism again far more than I expected to and I and I need to wrap up what I've been doing, but it's been a while since I spent a lot of time on the subject of Mormonism and Oxford graduate Mormon Commented on one of my videos and so I'm I'm on the 10th Installment of my response.

It's a small book at this point.

But.

As part of my response I quoted from a Section of LDS publications that contains a part of their scriptures and one of the scriptures in the Doctrine and Covenants. It talks about how it is God's purpose.