Which is more trustworthy - The Qur'an or the Bible?

Alpha & Omega Ministries iconAlpha & Omega Ministries

6 views

Comments are disabled.

00:00
Good afternoon. Welcome along to premier Christian radio I'm Justin Briley with you for the next hour and a half for unbelievable the show that gets
00:07
Christians and non -christians Talking and a big thank you to everyone who turned out for our expelled screenings and debates at Imperial College last
00:16
Saturday The events went very well. Are we bringing some of your feedback from those events? So do you stick around for the end of the program while we'll be hearing some of the attendees and what they thought of the screening and the debates of that Controversial intelligent design film right now though.
00:32
It's time to launch into the program This is as I said The show that gets Christians and non -christians talking to special programs coming up in the next two weeks with one of our guests
00:41
He's in conversation with a Muslim today. Let's find out what they're talking about And today we're doing a
00:50
Quran versus Bible sort of show we often bring in a Christian and a
00:55
Muslim on this program Today's no exception James white the director of alpha and Omega ministries are
01:00
Christian in the studio today He's over from the States and he's going to be with us for the next couple of weeks
01:06
Adnan Rashid is from the Hitton Institute and we'll be finding out about that and we get they're going to be asking which is more
01:13
Trustworthy the Quran or the Bible. What about the different ways that these manuscripts have come to us over the centuries?
01:20
What about alternative readings and versions of them other scriptures that have been around in the past What about particular events perhaps we'll touch on the different ways that they see the crucifixion of Jesus very pertinent as we approach
01:33
Easter do hope you can stay with us right through to the end of the show Well a very warm welcome gentlemen to both of you
01:44
I'll start with you James because you've come the furthest distance in some sense to be with us all the way from across the pond
01:50
You were with us in the studio here a year or two ago and you joined us very kindly just last year by ISDN the wonders of modern technology, but you you run a ministry out in Arizona Phoenix, Arizona I think and alpha and Omega ministries tell us about that.
02:07
What does exist for what what your role with them is? Well often Omega has existed since 1983 I'm the co -founder and it's a
02:15
Christian apologetics organization we initially started off dealing primarily with the subject of Mormonism, which is very large in our area being the state immediately south of Utah with Salt Lake right there.
02:27
So but that has expanded out over the years and as I completed my education and Began the teaching and preaching in the church.
02:36
We've we've expanded out to a number of other subjects especially due to my study of Greek and textual criticism
02:42
Teaching and writing in that area and then the starting about 2005 as I started to prepare for a debate with Shabir Ali at Biola University I really began my serious studies of Islam because I saw that a lot of the key areas that I had studied church history
02:58
Textual criticism the doctrine of the Trinity were the primary areas of concern there as well that combined with my study
03:05
The persecuted church is what really gave me a passion to engage these particular subjects
03:11
Fantastic now last time you were over you were doing some debates with Muslims and Again, similarly on this occasion.
03:18
You've been doing a debate or two What what is it about? You know what?
03:24
Why particularly are you engaging with Muslims here in the UK? What's your particular rationale for that?
03:29
Well It's honestly difficult to arrange these things simply because there a lot of the
03:36
Muslim debaters want to address political Issues primarily and I want to address Theological historical issues primarily and there are a limited number of folks who have experience in doing debates in November of 2008
03:49
In studio, we had Abdullah al -Andalusi and and then I debated
03:54
Anand Rasheed at a church this time we reversed it without not in studio and I just debated
03:59
Abdullah so You know, there there are people here who are willing to engage the issues
04:06
It's how did that debate go down that you know, I thought it was very enjoyable. We had a very good turnout
04:13
And I think it was done the way it needs to be done That is I think the people in the audience could tell that Both of us were doing everything in our power to understand what the other person was saying
04:22
And I think that's when real communication actually takes place is when you when you seek to hear What the other person is saying not in the sense of trying to find a mean of means of compromise
04:32
But so that at least you're speaking the same language and you're addressing the same issues I think very often we end up talking past each other if that type of communication isn't taking place
04:42
Well, thank you for coming in and for making time in your schedule to come in and contribute to a couple of programs
04:49
I'm a regular subscriber to the podcast You've got a guy riding along out there in Arizona in the heat listening to Justin Barley's I get more emails now than I've ever done before from Arizona And I just think it must be something to do with our friend
05:05
Amiga ministries that we've got some listeners Thanks to thanks to your being on the show Thanks for coming in our other guest
05:12
Adnan Rashid Adnan. Welcome back to the program You've been in before.
05:17
I think we were debating Jay Smith and Beth Grove last time which it was a long time ago actually
05:25
But tell us a little bit because I've said you're from the Hitton Institute All I know that as at the moment is something on the bottom of your email
05:32
But tell us a little bit about what the Hitton Institute is and what you do there. Bismillah Rahman Rahim Alhamdulillah was salatu was salamu ala rasool
05:41
Allah my but thank you very much Justin first firstly For inviting me to this
05:48
Positive interaction between me and dr. James White. I'm privileged to be here With such a scholar
05:56
Hittin Institute is an institute which was initiated to tackle some of the misconceptions about Islam Deliberately or Unconsciously Pumped against Islam and Muslims in the media, so The role of this institute is to demystify those misconceptions about Islam and clarify the position of Islam as it stands
06:24
I Mean a lot of people obviously do Pick up a negative view of Islam from certain aspects of what the media broadcast.
06:32
I mean today We're doing particularly theological debate Do you think people are aware of the theology of Islam what
06:37
Islam stands for generally or do you think that's an area that needs? demystifying as well I Agree with you that that's that's another area which needs to be
06:46
Elaborated upon by the scholars and and the preachers in general we need to See each other we need to converse we need to interact so that we can learn about each other to have better understanding and then
06:59
Consequent consequently to coexist with each other in peace if we don't understand each other
07:05
It would be it would be very difficult for societies to come about and live in peace as they were living in the past During the
07:12
Golden Age of Islam in Islamic Spain, which I have spoken about Yeah, well, thank you for coming in and I'm looking forward to today's discussion
07:22
We are inevitably gonna have disagreement here in the studio that's really to some extent what the program is about but we about airing those disagreements in a frank and open and honest way and It should be a very interesting interaction as we ask today
07:35
Which is more trustworthy the Quran or the Bible and we're going to be touching on a few different areas in the course of the program
07:42
If you want to get in touch with anything you hear today, you're more than welcome to drop me an email That's unbelievable at premier .org
07:50
UK You can phone and leave me a voicemail message on oh eight four five six fifty two fifty two fifty two and select
07:58
Option eight to do that and don't forget you can find us online and many many podcasts in our archive there at premiere org .uk
08:06
forward slash unbelievable Unbelievable with Justin Briley Well, I mean sure we maybe kick off with with you
08:25
James I Can guess what your answer is going to be which is more trustworthy the
08:30
Quran or the Bible? What's your view overall of the States in which we find the
08:37
Bible to start with? You did a very quite a high -profile debate with Bart Ehrman who of course has been noted has been on this program talking about whether the
08:45
Bible is Transmitted in a trustworthy way down the centuries. I hope you saw
08:50
Justin that your program got quoted in my debate with Did you see that? I Was a direct quote from unbelievable
09:05
Regretted coming on No Obviously I think in this in this particular
09:12
Conversation the primary thing that we have to deal with is the fact that people don't understand where their sacred texts came from they they tend to think most
09:20
Christians tend to think the Bible floated down of heaven in a calfskin cover with gold edges and thumb indexing and Replete the first time it appeared.
09:28
That's not how it came to us That's not how it's been transmitted to us. And that's the same thing with the Quran. It's it's not like there was a
09:34
Muhammad left a Perfectly inscribed codex and said here just photocopy this and everything will be fine.
09:41
That's not how it works Any book that has come to us from antiquity has a history to it and the primary difference between the
09:48
New Testament prime and I'm focusing on the New Testament, especially and The Quran is the methodology by which has been transmitted to us
09:57
One is a controlled methodology with the Quran The other is an uncontrolled methodology with the
10:03
New Testament And that has a lot to do with the fact that the early history of both religions is very different that is
10:11
Christianity is primarily a religion of The the poor the slaves and it is illegal from the time of Nero in the seventh seventh decade of the first century up until the peace of church in 313 under Constantine and While that persecution is not consistent during all that time it's actually the worst at the end of that time period and What does this have to do the transmission of the text?
10:37
Well, it was illegal to even copy or own the the Christian scriptures and especially at the end of that period of persecution
10:44
We know historically from records that have only recently been translated that literally thousands of codices of The Christian writings were destroyed by the
10:54
Roman Empire They knew that the Christianity was a religion of the book. There was some connection here. And so there was a there was a
11:02
Transmission of the text not by controlled scribes not by professionals But you'd have portions of the text that people would literally risk their lives to copy
11:13
Can you imagine Justin if if on Sunday next Sunday morning at your church? Everyone was asked only to bring a handwritten copy of the
11:21
Bible that they himself themselves had copied out It'd be pretty difficult. Don't you think? And yet that's what the early
11:28
Christians had to do It was a tremendous risk on their part, but that creates this rich manuscript tradition
11:33
The important part is it's not controlled. There was never any one person group of people
11:40
Group of churches anything else that controlled the text in New Testament had multiple authors Writing to multiple audiences at different times
11:48
The books of the New Testament had a life of their own before they became collected into one edition
11:54
And what's important about that is that we've all heard the claims that well, you know the
12:00
Bible used to contain Reincarnation but the Council of Constantinople took it out and things like that That kind of claim is just from his historical perspective completely fallacious.
12:11
It never could have happened Because not only do we have texts that predate those councils so we could compare to see you know
12:19
If any type of major changes took place But it would simply be impossible for a persecuted minority
12:25
To gather up manuscripts and be making changes as they as they did So you have this free open transmission which results in textual variation
12:34
They didn't say show me your scribe card your training in the Institute card that you're gonna make a perfect copy here
12:42
Instead of someone came into Christian fellowship and you heard someone a reading from a book. I've never heard that before Well, this is this is
12:48
Peter's these are Peter's epistles. We don't have that in our fellowship. Can I copy that? Manuscript p72 is a good example of that When I've seen myself that's obvious a guy who was not trained as a scribe
12:59
I think I would have beat him in penmanship back in first grade But but he loved the Word of God and so he makes this copy
13:05
The result is there are textual variations that we have to examine Spellings of words skipping a phrase because you're copying from one thing to another that's very different than a controlled transmission of a text where you have a powerful organization that in essence can gather up the materials create a formal version and then promulgate that version because once you have that kind of editing going on if You don't have access to the previous materials that becomes the earliest point you can trace the text to And that then becomes the locus of inspiration and authority at that point and this presumably is is the way you see the
13:45
Quran is having developed well the hadith of themselves record in In al -bukhari six five one nine and five ten the process by which this takes place and that's not the only place we find from other historical sources the same story just for those who aren't immediately aware the hadiths are is there were a commentary on the the traditions
14:03
The traditions that are collected over the two to three hundred years after the time of Muhammad they're not commentaries in the
14:10
Quran That's that's that's that's tafsir literature The the hadith sahih al -bukhari sahih al -muslim are probably the two best -known
14:17
Collections of hadith and in six five one nine five ten you have narrated there what happens under Uthman two different Time periods and to make it just just as simple as possible.
14:30
There is a real concern Amongst the Muslims that the
14:36
Muslims would end up arguing about their scriptures like the Christians and the Jews did and so there is a
14:43
Collection initially a collection very shortly after the death of Muhammad and then about 20 years later approximately
14:50
There is a renewed concern about differences and how people are reciting the Quran And so there is a gathering together of all the materials both interestingly enough record
15:01
Sections that were found with only one person at that particular point in time Even 20 years later one verse is found with only one person
15:08
But a an official version is made it is distributed to the primary centers of Islam and then most importantly according to Sahih al -bukhari six five ten.
15:20
There is a burning of the previous materials the destruction of those materials
15:28
Specifically quote Uthman sent every Muslim province one copy of what they had copied in order that all the other chronic materials whether written in Fragmentary manuscripts or whole copies be burned that is
15:40
That's massive for a textual critic for someone who is studying the transmission of the text
15:45
That's massive that has a big impact on what scholars discover when they examine the earliest manuscripts of the
15:51
Quran Palimpsest manuscripts where you've you've had the original washed off because you're the leather manuscripts
15:57
And then you read that something written over top of it. You can frequently read what's underneath it by ultraviolet light
16:03
They give evidence that there were other streams of readings specifically coming from Ibn Masud and by Ibn Ka 'b
16:10
That persisted in the manuscript tradition for a hundred two hundred years after that period of time So it does have a textual history, but it's a very different textual history
16:18
Results in us in significantly fewer variations as you would expect. It's a much younger text. First of all, the
16:24
New Testament has to go Approximately 600 to 700 years longer in handwritten form
16:31
Then then the Quran does but still you would expect because of that editing that it would be a much narrower
16:38
Range because it's been controlled from the beginning. The question is is that the best way to transmit a text or not?
16:44
Fascinating stuff. Do you broadly agree with the way James has sort of outlined the Two different ways that you might see the the transmission of the two texts there.
16:54
I agree with parts of what James actually said Firstly coming to the
17:00
Bible itself because James talked about Bible first and then the Quran after and I'll do the same
17:07
We have many issues with the Bible firstly how the Bible was written down number one
17:15
James is a man who believes in a concept called Sola Scriptura and and and he also believes that the
17:23
Bible is the infallible Word of God as he stated in one of the debates with Pastor Sabian he had a debate some time ago
17:30
So for him to believe in the in the infallibility of this word this word must be proven to be infallible
17:38
Otherwise his claim his belief is worthless So one once we go to the Bible itself to scrutinize it to see the text and see you see the authenticity and the transmission
17:47
Of the Bible we come to realize that there are major problems with the text of the Bible firstly
17:53
Bibles are attributed to four evangelists Matthew Mark Luke and John the manuscript tradition
18:00
Tells us that the manuscripts were manuscripts which we have today at our disposal cannot could not have come from them
18:08
Because there are so different When we when we study them, how do
18:15
I know this major scholars in the field such as Bart Ehrman whom? James White has debated and he states in his book misquoting
18:24
Jesus Page number 89 to 90 with this abundance of evidence
18:29
What can we say about the total number of variants known today scholars differ significantly in their estimates some say there are?
18:36
200 ,000 variants known some say 300 ,000 some say 400 ,000 or more
18:42
We do not know for sure because despite impressive developments in in computer technology
18:47
No one has yet been able to count them all perhaps as I indicated earlier
18:52
It is best simply to leave the matter in comparative terms There are more variants among our manuscripts than there are words in the
19:01
New Testament. This is a major issue This is a big problem now another
19:06
Christian show source the interpret interpret is the dictionary of the Bible states
19:11
It is safe to say that there is not one sentence in the New Testament in which the manuscript tradition is wholly uniform There is no comparison between the
19:21
Bible in this sense Let before we go on to the next issue Those are obviously two big things and and will allow
19:28
James to respond to them in a moment Moving on to the Quran what did you feel James sort of?
19:33
Represented the way that that I think James had a lot of time to address the issue of the Bible as well as the Quran So I would like to have to be fair the same amount of time
19:42
So let me finish with the Bible first and then we can go on to the Quran now once we once we look at the manuscript
19:48
Tradition we come to realize that there are major problems there If there are so many differences almost 5 ,700 manuscripts in Greek Are to be found
20:00
Today if there are so many difference in the manuscripts We we need to find out which manuscript comes from Matthew or Luke or Mark or John If they were inspired firstly we have to establish whether they ever they were ever inspired if they were inspired
20:18
Which manuscript is the inspired word of God because they all differ and then
20:24
The dilemma is that the editors must decide which word
20:30
Goes into the Bible now. I have a book here Nestle famous Nestle and Allen Greek English and New Testament if we open the book it's got
20:41
English translation with the Greek text Side by side and if we look look at the footnotes it gives us the variant readings what the text actually says
20:50
Okay, and there are thousands of variant readings so My question is my contention is who made this text the
20:58
Greek Testament who made it? If if the manuscript tradition is uniform, then we would have one
21:06
Bible coming from the evangelists themselves, but it's not uniform Why do I say this Bruce Metzger one of the leading scholars in this field?
21:14
In his book a textual commentary on the Greek New Testament on the page number 11 He states of the approximately 5 ,000
21:21
Greek manuscripts of all or part of the New Testament That are known today know to agree exactly in all particulars confronted by a mass of conflicting readings editors must decide
21:35
Which variants deserve to be included in the text and which should be? Relegated to the apparatus although at first it seems it may seem to be a hopeless task
21:46
Amid so many thousands of variant readings to sort out those that should be regarded as original textual scholars have developed certain generally acknowledged criteria of evaluation these considerations depend it will be seen upon probabilities and Sometimes the textual critics must weigh one set of public probabilities against another
22:07
The range and complexity of textual data are so great that no neatly arranged or mechanically
22:13
Contrived set of rules can be applied with mathematical precision I'm finishing each and every
22:20
Variant reading needs to be considered in itself and not judged merely according to a rule of thumb so Metzger is what he's saying that It is the editors who decide what goes in the
22:31
Bible obviously God or not Matthew Mark and Luke and effectively you've told us Essentially what James did that there were inevitably a number of variations in the manuscript transmission over time
22:41
So just to conclude and my contention is not about the variation my contention Is that we don't have what
22:48
Matthew Mark Luke and John wrote to even today, okay? So we're too far removed in terms of the copies to know what they originally wrote in there
22:56
That's right. It is the editors who are deciding what goes in the Bible and just not Evangelist just briefly kind of to bring in the
23:02
Quran aspect do you feel that therefore the Quran has some kind of superior way of Transmission because you have this kind of in a sense this quite controlled type of transmission where Older versions were destroyed and when you know
23:18
Osman was it Brought together in one if you like that the official version.
23:23
It's a very good question firstly there is no comparison between the Bible and the Quran as James pointed out because these two documents are
23:31
Completely distinct documents their independent documents, and they don't share similar history
23:39
Bible was compiled during chaotic Three centuries of Christian experience under Roman persecution and the
23:49
Quran was compiled under So the
23:56
Caliphs came together Who was this man the question is who is this man? And is he copying the
24:02
Quran from himself is he making it up or is he copying an earlier source now? James already pointed out and in the time of Abu Bakr who came to power immediately after Prophet Muhammad he was confronted by Omar And Omar came to him asking him to compile the
24:22
Quran And then they came together and they decided that Quran should be put in one codex
24:28
Because at the time it was written written on many materials such as bones rocks leaves
24:34
So they collected the Quran in the time of Abu Bakr Which is immediately after the death of the Prophet and Abu Bakr was one of the earliest companions of Prophet Muhammad imagine if the
24:44
Christians had this claim imagine if the Christians had Peter or James or one of the one of the disciples of Jesus Christ writing
24:54
The Bible himself that would be a superior claim. I would accept that claim however
25:00
We don't have that claim coming from the Bible coming to the case of Uthman when he burned the copies
25:05
Uthman's compilation was purely to do with the text and it's Standardization rather than changing the text or adding or subtracting he had nothing to do with that all he did was he unified the
25:19
Arab tribes on one mode of recitation and that was the purpose of his compilation and the variant
25:29
Copies Which were written by illiterate Arabs for their own convenience and which were full of mistakes
25:35
He asked them to burn them not that he sent armies out to burn them. He never forced anyone
25:41
There is no report suggesting that he asked people to burn them for for the sake of Unanimity on the text of the
25:49
Quran. Well, we've had quite a long introductory section there In fact, it's almost taken us to the end of this first part
25:55
So what I'll do is we'll we'll we'll end Slightly early here and allow James so that I don't have to break you in mid -flow in your response
26:02
To come back on that in the next section and we'll be able to have a little more time To do that in the next section.
26:08
You're listening to unbelievable. We're asking today, which is more trustworthy the Quran or the Bible? we've been hearing about the different views from our guest
26:15
James White and Adnan Rashid on how both texts have been transmitted down the centuries and We'll be asking questions.
26:22
Like what about the different accounts that both have of Jesus's crucifixion What about other writings that were floating around at the time?
26:29
We'll be finding out more from our guests in just a moment's time here on the show that gets you thinking You're listening to unbelievable on premiere
26:42
Christian radio Welcome back to the show. It's the Quran and the
26:48
Bible under discussion today, which is more trustworthy. We're asking and We've got with us
26:53
Adnan Rashid from the hitting Institute Muslim on the show James White director of alpha and Omega ministry is also with us
27:00
I'll send links to both these gentlemen's websites where you can find more information about their ministries with the podcast of this show
27:07
That's at premier .org UK forward slash unbelievable So coming back to you
27:15
James obviously and then a lot of information there, but I mean a lot of it you've obviously come across directly before through primary source of Adams there was
27:26
Bart Ehrman and what he has to say about the and Metzger So so I think to sum up your contention
27:36
Adnan it is that The Bible has arrived in this fashion where we can't get back to the original text
27:42
Therefore we can't know if they were inspired. Anyway, we don't we certainly don't have the inspired version now
27:48
Whereas the Quran it, you know had this kind of as you described Controlled form of transmission which makes it a lot more reliable in that sense.
27:57
So your responses James. Well one thing's for certain Bart Bruce Metzger did not come to that conclusion
28:03
Bart Ehrman has but our butterman is not a believer in God any longer I lecture on this all the time and we just had
28:10
I think a classic example of giving only part of the information when you Tell people there are 400 ,000 variants in the
28:15
New Testament. I start off my lectures giving that same information and I say well think about there's only 138 ,162 words in the
28:22
Nessian Greek text of the New Testament That's three variants per word and we just had the quote there is not one sentence uniform in the manuscript tradition these are these are statements that that Really do not deal honestly with the text of the
28:38
New Testament For a couple reasons first of all 99 % of those variations cannot be translated into another language
28:45
They have to do a spelling orthography the movable new things like that that in no way shape or form Can even be explained to someone who doesn't read
28:52
Greek in the first place. There are approximately 1 ,500 to 2 ,000
28:58
Meaningful that is they change the meaning of the text and viable which means that they could possibly be original
29:03
Ascribe in the 15th century who had a bad morning and introduced a reading No one had ever seen before is not exactly relevant to actually the establishment of the text in the
29:12
New Testament That number also needs to be understood on another basis And that is the more manuscripts you have the more variants you're gonna have if you have only one manuscript of a book how many variants?
29:20
You're gonna have none But how much we have thousands of manuscripts of the Quran, but we don't have that same problem
29:28
But I'm but I'm not I'm not addressing the issue of the Quran at this moment. I'm pointing out that if you have
29:33
Five thousand seven hundred and approximately fifty nine manuscripts a catalog today
29:38
You're going that's approximately 1 .3 million pages of handwritten text remember the New Testament Existed almost twice as long as the
29:46
Quran in a merely handwritten form Now when you actually look at the number of meaningful and viable variants it adds up to about one per three pages
29:56
It's a very different story than the numbers that were just presented The reality is however that has nothing to do with either the authorship of the
30:05
New Testament And it's not a matter that editors just sit around determine what's in the Bible because the very same text that Adnan has there
30:13
Gives you all that information. And so for example as I'm preaching through the book of Hebrews right now in my church
30:18
I examine all the textual variants that impact that even though the book of Hebrews has some of the fewest
30:24
Textual variants of any New Testament book But still I'm going to examine those textual variants and if they're relevant as they were in Hebrews 2 9
30:34
I will raise those issues in my explication exegesis of the text So it's not the editors that have come along and said oh
30:41
This is all you get to see we Christians are wide open with this I mean we publish these things last evening
30:47
I gave to my Islamic opponent a copy of the any T any 27 diglot that has even more textual information than that volume has
30:55
Here's here's our information. I would like to have a critical edition of the
31:00
Quran that likewise Provides and we're starting to get close the recent publication of the top copy manuscript from Turkey Does have a list of textual variants between the major manuscripts produced within it?
31:12
But not to the point where you have for example, what's in this text? What's on my screen? Where I have the same information you can you can click on any of these manuscripts you can see where they're housed when they were written what they contain and Eventually, I think you're gonna be able to click on all those and see images of them high -resolution images yourself
31:30
So that it's not a bunch of editors telling me what's there I have the ability to look at this information myself
31:37
And that's I think is already working on that James just to come in to comment on James point
31:43
I know a German scholar personally is a friend of mine His name is Michael Marx who is dealing with one of the collections of some of the earliest copies of the
31:52
Quran and he has thousands of photographs coming from a Collection which was done in the early 19th century by one of the
32:02
German scholars in was lost and he studied these manuscripts and And and when he studied the text and I spoke to him personally.
32:08
He assured me personally that there are no shocking Revelations in my findings.
32:13
There is no new worse. There is no old worse. There are no Major variants there are spelling mistakes common spelling
32:22
Scribal errors and apart from that there are no shocks But in the Bible is a totally different story now
32:30
James is trying to put it very eloquently And he's trying to put the main issue aside what I read from Metzger was
32:36
Shocking for me when I read it for the first time I was amazed that how can scholars like James White claim the infallibility of the
32:46
Bible when Metzger is very clearly stating and he's one of the major authorities in this field He's stating editors must decide and the text is based upon probabilities.
32:57
So there there are heavy Editors are only deciding what is placed in the main reading of the text
33:06
This is simply a matter of what is going to be the main reading and what is going to be in the notes
33:11
That's the only thing he's talking about there I don't just simply doesn't understand what Metzger is talking about if you read
33:17
If you if you if you read Metzger's own conclusions, he does not come to Adnan's conclusion and I would like to point out
33:25
That if we do if we well, he continued to believe that the Bible's Word of God sir so it's just simply a matter of recognizing the difference between a a what's the main reading of a text and what's placed in the footnotes which
33:40
Believed that the Bible is the infallible Word of God. This is my contention and I don't think you ever believe
33:46
I guess You will get into a discussion on the whole area of what does infallible mean
33:51
I suppose I mean Without wanting to go too much down that road I do want to hear as well James your response to the way that the
33:59
Quran is transmitted Now and then makes this point that as far as he's concerned, you know
34:05
Muhammad's right -hand man was basically able to pick up from where Muhammad left off in giving us a sure account of what
34:13
Muhammad actually Muhammad told us at least We trust the Hadith that if you want to know what the Quran says you go to Ibn Masud Not to those that actually do the compilation.
34:23
That's one of the reasons that it Masood Did not appreciate what Uthman did and there's a lot of sources that indicate there was strong friction there
34:30
And the fact that his readings continue, for example, if you look at the fogs palimpsest manuscript of surah 2 222 you see evidence there by comparing the fogs manuscript with the current with monic version of not only
34:43
Total editing but the word orders changed grammatical terminations are changed clear editing has taken place between those two versions now
34:50
I'm hoping that the kind of work that he was just making reference to Would indicate these things would go through the early tafsir literature
34:58
Which lists many variant readings they didn't have any problem with that at that time It hadn't the theology hadn't developed a point where that would be an issue
35:06
It was acceptable to discuss those things in in modern context that that has changed
35:11
But that needs to be a part of any type of critical edition of the Quran that would come out now I would expect that there would be again because the mechanism of transmission fewer of those
35:21
Than you have in the free transmission. But again, this takes us back to In the hadith itself we are told that there are certain ayahs mentioned specifically in those texts
35:33
One is in surat al -taba in certain surah 9 That was found with one person only one source now
35:41
We already know that many of the Qura had died the Battle of Yamama and so this sort of brings us
35:46
I think maybe transitionally to the discussion that you would also mention There's only one ayah in the
35:53
Quran that denies the crucifixion of Jesus surah 4 157 How do we know that there were not others that had been lost?
36:02
There are early sources that specifically said that there were things that were lost because many of those
36:07
Qura had died How do we know in light of surah 4 157 which has no hadith commentary?
36:13
That is not 157 is this somewhat controversial part of the
36:20
Quran which claims that Jesus did not die on the cross that he That it was well
36:26
There are different as I understand it interpretations of what it could mean whether he swooned and came back to life
36:32
Or there was someone else was crucified in his very quickly. Let me deal with James Some of the contentions he raised he said
36:40
Ibn Masud is the man Prophet asked his companions to go to if they want to learn The Quran Prophet never said
36:46
Ibn Masud is the only man to go to he pointed out four personalities And Ibn Masud was one of them
36:52
Ubaid bin Ka 'b was another one So there are other people you can go to learn the Quran from so Ibn Masud is not the only authority
36:59
James pointed him out because he is a convenient reference the Christians use
37:05
For their sessions now James has demonstrated Very poor knowledge of Islamic history unfortunately
37:12
And I don't expect James to know the Islamic history accurately because his field is biblical theology and Textual criticism, so let me educate
37:24
James on the history of Islam Ibn Masud never had a problem with Othman When it comes to the text of the
37:33
Quran his contention was that I was one of the earliest companions of Prophet Muhammad, and I wasn't consulted in The codification of the
37:43
Quran which was codified by the Quran by Othman and what do the scholars have to say about this if James Did his homework, and he looked at looked at some of the major scholars in this field he would have
37:55
He would have been very careful in making these claims Watt and Bell to Montgomery Watt was a
38:02
Christian practicing Christian scholar And he states in his book introduction to the Quran that the
38:08
Quran as it stands today is essentially Othmanic and the companions of Prophet Muhammad carried out a very good job in Transmitting the text of the
38:17
Quran and the manuscript variation he's talking about James is talking about they are to do with vowels Marks diacritical marks and and most of them are to do with the recitation of the
38:27
Quran rather than the text itself rather than the missing verses Added verses what we find with the
38:32
Bible Bible has chunks missing and chunks added We know that I mean Gospel of Mark chapter 16 verse 9 to 20
38:39
It's an addition later edition if we look at the textual tradition Gospel of John chapter 7 verse 53 to 8 11 is another later edition
38:49
Johanin comma another Example 1 John 5 7 another edition, so we don't have these problems in the
38:56
Quran We if James can pull out one of the manuscripts early meniscus, which we have hundreds of them
39:01
We have hundreds of them And I can give you the source as well Islamic awareness org is a website where you can find the pictures of these manuscripts
39:08
Coming from the mid first century of Islam You can go and check whether there are any variants or whether whether there are any
39:15
New or old verses now James made a point that maybe the worst is pertaining to Jesus Christian crucifixion
39:21
God went missing it's like Bible Or the
39:27
Quran For that matter was transmitted by one or two people now It wasn't the case
39:33
Prophet Muhammad had hundred thousand companions Every single of them had to recite the
39:38
Quran five times a day every single day for the Quran To go missing would have been a major issue there would have been wars over this because the companions of Prophet Muhammad they
39:50
Argued with each other on minor issues. For example praying to Two rakats
39:58
Two units of prayer or four units of prayer. They argued over these issues. How do we recite this? How do we recite that verse is going missing is out of question.
40:07
No scholar ever asserted this Okay, and yet surah 2 222 is not just vowel pointing because vowel pointing hadn't been introduced at that time
40:15
It is specific editing Ubaid and Cobb had a different number of surahs There are it's it's unfortunate that we have to say
40:24
Well, if you just do your homework, actually if we do we we discover that there's our other variants involved
40:30
In these very early manuscripts, which I do have in my library and I've taken the time to obtain those things
40:36
But the reason I brought up surah 4157 is because the fact that it's the hadith that say it's not me saying it's the hadith
40:44
That say that in both those compilations in six five and I am five of ten from my Sahih al -Bukhari that there were particular portions of the
40:52
Quran that were found with one person at each time and The one that was found the second time had been missed in the first compilation
41:00
The point being that said, okay, it may be a separate issue But you want to say the point being is how sense you we only have one verse that denies the crucifixion
41:10
You see Christian theology. You don't build upon one verse, but here you have the entire Let's allow
41:18
James to finish his but here you have the entire presentation of the denial of the historical belief the crucifixion
41:25
Based upon a single verse that I think is what raises can you read the verse for us?
41:31
Says and that they speaking of the Jews said and boasts we killed Christ Jesus son of Mary the
41:37
Apostle of Allah But they killed him not nor crucified him But so it was made to appear to them and those who differ therein are full of doubts with no certain knowledge
41:46
But only conjecture to follow for over surety. They killed him not then the next ayah 158 says now nay
41:52
Allah raised him up unto himself and Allah is exalted in power and wise There are many interpretations of what now for me this one interests me in the context of this program because this is a clear issue where there's a difference between the
42:04
Quran and the Bible in terms of a historical event and The question if we're asking if we're applying it to this example, which is more trustworthy
42:12
Now, why do you say the Bible has to win on this particular issue that Jesus was crucified as the
42:18
Bible tells us and died rather than the The Quran the only reason that Islam denies the crucifixion is based on 40
42:28
Arabic words Written over 600 years after the event in a completely different language Separated by over 700 miles from from the actual events themselves with no connection to first century sources of information
42:40
All the first any source of information that can reasonably be said to originate in the first century supports the crucifixion of Jesus And at this point
42:53
Bruce Metzger Bart Ehrman all of them would all be united on this Even the the liberals like a
42:59
John Dominic Crossan who I've also debated Says that one of the most most basic facts of history that we can ascertain is the crucifixion of Jesus now
43:09
Of course, he believes Jesus is taken out for the cross buried in a shallow grave and then eaten by dogs So that doesn't really help a whole lot the
43:15
Jesus seminar perspective But the point is the first century witness all of anything that comes in the first century the first hundred years after crucifixion speaks of Jesus being crucified and yet you go six centuries over half a millennium away and One verse becomes enough to throw overthrow all of that I think that illustrates the anachronistic nature of Islamic theology that looks backwards through the lens of the
43:39
Quran is the final authority in all things and Anything that's contradictory of that is simply dismissed
43:46
Just quickly. I would like to do with Jim James's point to do with two missing verses of the
43:52
Quran if James read the Hadith Volume 6 book 61
43:57
Hadith number 509 carefully you would come to realize that they've been sabit is talking about Collecting the
44:05
Quran and the Quran has been collected entirely in this entirety Quran has been collected only two verses are missing
44:13
What does he mean by missing he has memorized the Quran himself he knows the Quran by heart when we go to another report
44:20
Reported by if not Hajar al -askarani in his book of fatwa body We come to realize that Abu Bakr the caliph at the time had ordered him to take the
44:30
Quran in its written form With two witnesses who saw the Quran that very parchment written in the presence of the
44:37
Prophet himself And that is the only way he can accept the Quran And put it down in writing in the
44:44
Codex so they knew that verse by heart He knew that this verse exists
44:49
But what he was lacking was two witnesses with a written written parchment and only one man came forward with that parchment and the other
44:57
Hadith clarifies this issue. This is why I insist that James knowledge About the textual preservation of Quran is superficial.
45:04
I would refer to James I will refer James to go to another work known as the history of the text of the
45:11
Quran Done by Dr. Mustafa al -azami an amazing piece of work and he breaks everything down Beautifully and James can go back to that work and and probably come up with some more impressive arguments in future coming back to the point of 157 that every single source
45:31
Christian source from the first century Talks about the crucifixion and it's in one of the established facts
45:36
And historians agree upon this and I accept that I accept the major Biblical historians are in agreement as far as the crucifixion of Christ is concerned because that's what the information states
45:49
This is what the text states and the other text is quite for example gospel of Thomas, which is another
45:57
Point I wish to raise in this friendly interaction James in one of his videos he which he posted on YouTube titled
46:07
Adnan Rashid and The New Testament and in this video James Asserted that I made obnoxious claims about the gospel of Thomas and other issues, which have we have already covered
46:18
So gospel of Thomas, what was my obnoxious claim about the gospel? I stated that gospel of Thomas originates from an earlier tradition
46:27
Than the synoptic tradition, this is the claim I made which is based upon the scholarly opinion
46:34
Which I will come to address in a minute. So gospel of Thomas doesn't talk about as it stands today it doesn't talk about the crucifixion crucifixion is not to be found anyway and majority of the scholars
46:46
Believe that gospel of Thomas actually originates from a tradition which was parallel to Q tradition
46:52
You see Q tradition being the Source that Mark and that's true one. That's not
46:58
Mark Matthew Matthew Matthew. Okay, so it was a parallel tradition which It came from an earlier tradition than the synoptic tradition doesn't talk about the crucifixion
47:08
So what the scholars have in front of them is the four gospels and then some of the later text written by the
47:14
Roman Tacitus then we have Josephus which is Which was interpolated by later
47:21
Christian hands This this gospel Thomas you believe comes from some earlier source.
47:26
It doesn't mention the crucifixion However, the Quran still mentions the crucifixion. It just says he doesn't because the
47:31
Christians have through these centuries Christians have come to believe in crucifixion as a source of redemption.
47:37
Okay Christians see the crucifixion of the Christ as As an act done by God himself to come come on earth and Kill himself for for the sins of mankind to pay for the sins of mankind.
47:53
So it's a central issue for the Christians This is why the Quran addresses the issue.
47:59
Okay, James Does this gospel of Thomas and where it might have come from have any bearing on this as far as you're concerned?
48:05
Um, no, none whatsoever. The gospel of Thomas is a sayings collection that amazingly enough we only know it from two
48:13
Greek papyri that disagree from one another from the no earlier than around 200 and Then a
48:21
Coptic version that is much expanded from about 150 to 200 years later It's interesting that we don't trust the
48:28
New Testament because the text variation the gospel Thomas has the worst possible textual history You could possibly have so if we're gonna be consistent
48:34
We wouldn't even be discussing it because we don't can't know what the New Testament said that we certainly can't have a clue what the gospel Thomas said but it is a collection that grows it is very deeply influenced by Valentinian Gnosticism The idea that has anything to do with the first century is pure speculation based upon form criticism
48:50
You will not find any shred of information Historically to substantiate this it's all based upon Well, I think that Syrian Christianity was made of a people who didn't marry and things like that and so I find parallels here and and you will find literally dozens of Theories being promoted in scholarly literature today about the origination of the gospel
49:10
Thomas the fact the matter is you can't trace it back that far There's no evidence of it And as to what it has to do with the crucifixion
49:17
Well, absolutely nothing whatsoever because once again when we ask the simple question of the centrality of the crucifixion to anything that we can
49:26
Trace to the first century it is all through there and that based upon Justin I just want to point out a
49:33
Text that you know, the the Quran claims to be Mubinun clear perspicuous easy to understand and yet Surah 4157 is one of the least
49:42
Mubinun texts you could possibly ever encounter we have the majority of Muslims in the world believing that surah 4157
49:50
Teaches that someone was substituted for Jesus someone else was crucified in Jesus place and yet in the
49:56
United States You can look up Assad's publication his commentary on the on the Quran and he points out
50:02
There's no reason to believe this whatsoever and that in fact Surah 158 when it says Jesus was lifted up most
50:07
Muslims believe that means that Jesus was taken up to to Allah and yet Rafah who that is used there is never used of physically lifting someone up.
50:15
It's exalting someone. So there's all sorts of Clarity should be rally on this program with his own version, which is that he has a wound and was laid in and then he
50:25
Actually understands her forms to seven to say that that crucified and killed are two separate things that he was crucified
50:33
But that he was not killed and that he was was raised up after being late
50:39
From your point of view now, I will let you respond to this. Is there a theological reason that you would put as to why?
50:48
this verse Made this point that Jesus wasn't crucified. What would have been the theological reason for I think it's the same theological reason
50:55
We see in in Muslims today. You can you can walk down a street in in sub -saharan Africa and Talk to a
51:03
Muslim who has never had almost any education at all and their first objection to your presentation The gospel would be
51:08
Allah would never allow one of his apostles one of his sent ones one of his resolve to die in that way
51:15
I think that remains that there is a misunderstanding that People do not understand that Jesus said no one takes my life from me.
51:23
I give it of my own accord I give it freely the crucifixion was a horrible thing the crucifixion.
51:29
The very term was not used by many people in proper society back then because to speak of it was was
51:35
Spoken of in hushed terms because it was such a vile way to die No Roman citizen could be crucified that was beneath them.
51:41
And so to say that the Messiah The sent one would die in this way
51:48
Well as Paul said to Jews a stumbling block to Gentiles foolishness, but to we who are being saved
51:55
Christ the power of God the wisdom will allow you to respond and I'm afraid we're just getting towards the end of this section
52:00
So rather than interrupts you in mid -flow again I'll give you a little more time in the next section
52:06
Adnan to respond to that and Fascinating discussion thus far and we've gone into areas of the transmission the different traditions that obviously the
52:14
Bible and the Quran come out of I'm sure you've been as fascinated as I have to kind of hear that the different perspectives
52:20
Represented here in the studio James White is director of alpha and Omega ministries Do check out them at a omin org and I'll put a link up with the podcast as well
52:31
Adnan Rashid from the hitting Institute I haven't got an address for that Adnan but perhaps by the end of the show we can
52:37
You can write that down for me and we'll let the listener know and If you want to respond in any way to anything you're hearing love to hear from you as usual You can email unbelievable at premier dot org dot
52:49
UK You can also phone and leave me a voicemail message for me to play out on a coming program.
52:55
That's oh, wait Four five six fifty two fifty two fifty two and select option eight Don't forget and there's a vast archive now of unbelievable programs
53:04
And I'm going to link to a couple of them that have a particular reference to our topic today With this current podcast so do check that out at premier dot org dot
53:13
UK forward -slash Unbelievable, thank you for listening this afternoon We're going to be concluding this debate in a couple of minutes time here on premiere
53:21
Welcome back to this the final part of our show Don't forget lots of other things to come here on premier Christian radio
53:27
If you've never listened if you're only a podcast listener I do urge you to check out the fuller website of premier radio and see the other programs
53:35
We have on offer premier dot org dot UK if you are enjoying today's program I'm sure you'll want to be here next week at the same time
53:42
Because James White is returning to have an interaction with Sir Anthony buzzard and Anthony is actually someone who denies that the earliest
53:53
Christians believed in the Trinity in the way that Christians today would say they do We'll be having that discussion on the
54:00
Trinity This is a particular area that James has spent a lot of time looking into so should be a fascinating discussion on Whether the
54:07
Bible supports the Trinity whether the earliest Christians believed in the Trinity in Jesus being
54:13
Jesus the Son God the Father the Holy Spirit and those all being part of the
54:18
Godhead So do join us again at the same time for that on the show next week You're listening to unbelievable on premier
54:30
Christian radio But today's topic is the Quran and the Bible which is more trustworthy
54:36
We've been asking been a fascinating interaction we've been going at it just in the last section gentlemen on the question of surah 157 the
54:45
Crucifixion did Jesus die on the cross Different interpretations is what
54:50
James was saying on this no no consensus among Muslims about what exactly that verse means and obviously very different to what we believe are the the sources we have in Christendom the
55:03
Bible and James dismissed very quickly the Gospel of Thomas there at Nan anything you were wanting to respond to as far as that goes
55:13
Yes, I'll come back to Gospel of Thomas in a minute first. I would like to say something about James's claim that the crucifixion is the point which somehow proves the
55:28
The errancy of the Quran the Quran is in error As far as the crucifixion is concerned no
55:36
That's not true in order for you to prove Quran wrong you must prove the
55:41
Bible to be infallible You must prove the Bible itself is giving the accurate story about Jesus Christ Even if we look at the
55:50
Gospel of John we see it presenting a high Christology Gospel of John sums are somehow
55:55
Excuse my language sexes up the life of Jesus Christ, and it turns him into Into a demigod from a prophet from a
56:04
Messiah right so you feel it's like a progression. It's more theologized That's right I mean This is what the scholars have to say
56:10
Paul and Anderson one of the scholars on the Gospel of John he states that the Gospel of John it was edited is has been touched by many hands and It's a progressive text.
56:23
It doesn't come from one mind or one hand now The issue of crucifixion in the
56:29
Quran Quran is very explicit in stating that the the Jewish claim that we killed him now
56:35
How does Muhammad sallallahu alayhi wa sallam and how does Prophet Muhammad know that the Jews make this claim? They don't make this claim in the
56:41
Bible They make this claim in the Talmud now I don't believe that Prophet Muhammad had a Hebrew Scroll of Talmud in front of him or a
56:49
Hebrew Codex of Talmud in front of me And he was copying from that and then he was coming back to the Christian theology to correct everything
56:56
Prophet Muhammad was an illiterate shepherd in Mecca. He could not been a theologian let alone someone who would be commenting on Delicate issues such as crucifixion and Trinity and so on and so forth so Prophet Muhammad Couldn't have made this up so Quran tells us that the
57:13
Jewish claim which is made in the Talmud is false that we killed the Messiah and Quran states from our catalogue
57:19
Well, I can should be Allah whom he was he was not killed He was not so with would that then leave the only option is that it was simply divinely revealed to Muhammad that this is the case
57:30
That's regardless of any texts that might have been out there regardless of any history. There is no there is no evidence whatsoever
57:37
For the claim James made that they may be a worse about crucifixion which went missing This is an obnoxious claim and not even a child can make this this claim now coming back to the issue of sub
57:49
Sahara sub Saharan Nomad who would be asked about the crucifixion he would simply say that a prophet of God or a
57:56
Messiah a man of God couldn't Have been killed like this Quran clearly clearly states that many prophets who came before were killed a
58:04
Prophet being killed is not a big deal if he was crucified it wouldn't have been a major issue It's interesting because when
58:10
I've done this before other other Islamic scholars have taken a different line to you and have and have more or less agreed with what
58:16
James said which is no this this Would have been a terrible you know this God would never do that to Jesus because of the the status
58:23
Jesus has in Islam It's seen as it couldn't be that way, but you would disagree I disagree because the
58:29
Quran clearly states that Jesus did not die. He wasn't crucified That's why
58:34
I have a problem with the assertion that he was crucified, but if he was crucified Should the
58:40
Quran have said that he was crucified or he was killed Because I can establish the
58:46
Quran to be the Word of God through other means Well, let's get a quick response or James and then come back to gospel
58:52
Thomas Then we'll have to wrap up Yusuf Ali in his commentary on the Quran this specific point says the
58:57
Orthodox Christian churches make it a cardinal point of their doctrine that his life was taken on the cross that he Died and was buried on the third day
59:03
He rose in the body with his wounds intact and walked about and conversed and ate with his disciples and was afterwards taken up bodily Notice how he puts this this is necessary for the theological doctrine of blood sacrifice and vicarious atonement for sins
59:15
Which is rejected by Islam that almost sounds like he thinks this is something it was created
59:21
Because of a pre -existing belief in this concept of vicarious atonement so on and so forth rather than flowing forth from this the fact the matter is that What I've said about surah 4 1 2 7 it's not that they're
59:35
Lost verses or something My point is when you base things upon a single verse when we know that other verses had been missed
59:42
That raises questions about that method of transmission of the text Which is controlled because you have to believe that that committee that did it got it, right?
59:51
And here we have a situation think about the standards that are being used here Adnan is taking the words of a single person who had no direct
01:00:00
Connection with the issues surrounding Jesus life and death that live 600 years later and Using those to overthrow the eyewitnesses of the actual events and I've often asked my
01:00:12
Muslim friends Would you take the words of someone who lived in the 12 or 13 hundreds that comes along?
01:00:18
Doesn't speak Arabic comes from another place far removed from from Mecca or Medina And he says
01:00:25
I'm a prophet and guess what the hijra never took place Are you simply gonna accept what he says because he claims to be a prophet and overthrows a very central part of your faith on that basis when when the
01:00:38
Quran puts words in Jesus mouth that there's no historical evidence he ever said and yet that is accepted on the basis of one person and yet the entire manuscript tradition in the
01:00:48
New Testament that goes back to the very Origination of the faith is overthrown. I see that as a clear example of the anachronism
01:00:56
Of the Islamic approach to these things and it's a use of double standards and that's a real problem
01:01:03
You did want to move on to the Gospel of Thomas. So what what did you want to sort of clarify on?
01:01:10
The issue of the Gospels being infallible themselves I mean if Christ was really crucified this assertion is based upon the
01:01:19
Gospels which were written After the writings of Paul Paul died in 60
01:01:24
CE That's what the scholarly opinion suggests and then the first gospel was written the Gospel of Mark in the year 60 to 70 between these 10 years so Gospels were written after the writings of Paul and Paul is the first person who asserts the the the significance of this crucifixion
01:01:42
He died for our sins He must have resurrected if his crucifixion didn't exist if his resurrection didn't happen what we preach is vain
01:01:51
Right. So in my opinion my personal humble opinion, I'm a student. I'm not a scholar like dr
01:01:57
James White is in my personal opinion. My studies lead me to believe that these four
01:02:03
Gospels are Theologically driven they were written for theological purpose to substantiate a theological case
01:02:11
Why was the Gospel of Thomas rejected as a canonical document why the question is
01:02:18
James James's contention would be that because it is Gnostic But what do the scholars have to say first of all about his dating which
01:02:25
James? Contested in his video according to I mean, this is what the the scholar who was writing this
01:02:35
Document his name is April D Democratic Yeah Sorry Democratic I'm not too familiar with some of the names
01:02:46
Do apologize for that according to this school of thought the Gospel of Thomas was a
01:02:51
Gnostic gospel The school of thought she's talking about is Helmut Koester James Robinson Robinson and then their students
01:02:58
Marvin Mayer is one of them Marvin Mayer is one of the leading scholars in this field When it comes to the Gnostic scriptures and then according to them
01:03:05
Gospel of Thomas is a Gnostic document not in the sense of a fully mature
01:03:11
Gnostic system But in some proto Gnostic sense however it was not dependent on the New Testament or composed late because the genre of the
01:03:19
Gospel of Thomas was earlier and more Primitive than the New Testament Gospels the scholars such as Robinson Koester and their followers such as Marvin Mayer are stating clearly that the
01:03:32
Gospel of Thomas was Written earlier than the synoptic tradition and the date the allocate to this gospel is approximately approximately 50
01:03:42
CE 50 see we'll get a quick response from James and then we're gonna have to go to final thoughts
01:03:48
We're out of time my point the point I'm trying to make very quickly Gospel of Thomas if the tradition it originates from as the gospel stands today because it's definitely not the original form the scholars
01:04:01
Argued that the original Gospel of Thomas Doesn't exist today We don't have a copy of that what we have today is a proto
01:04:08
Gnostic gospel and some other scholars actually dispute that a claim As well James like to he likes to put it as a black and white issue
01:04:17
It's not black and white Gospel of Thomas is not Gnostic by default. There are scholars.
01:04:22
We have disputed this claim such as this lady herself The conic yeah, that's right.
01:04:28
She has she actually Asserts that Gospel of Thomas is not Gnostic at all so the scholars need to come out, okay?
01:04:36
Very the final thought final thought I'm sorry. I apologize. It's very important This is this what I'm leading to okay.
01:04:42
Why was the Gospel of Thomas rejected why? because of its non -conformity with the legal thought of the church at the time
01:04:54
For example Bruce Metzger in his book the canon of the New Testament on the page 251 he states a basic prerequisite for canonicity was conformity to what was called the rule of faith
01:05:07
That is the congruent Congruity of a given document with the basic Christian tradition recognized as normative by the church
01:05:15
So you're saying there was a kind of there was a closed system And you couldn't get in if you were if it was sort of outside that room in other words the
01:05:22
Gospel of Thomas presents A different God a completely different worldview than the rest of the Bible therefore No one ever took it seriously as being an actual part of the canon it presents a
01:05:31
God that the Muslims would never believe and I'm it's it shocks me really when Muslims promote this material because Gnosticism is so far removed from Islam and presents such a
01:05:41
God that would be reprehensible. I did not Let me just let me let the words speak for themselves
01:05:51
Jesus said if those who lead you say to you see the kingdom is in the sky Then the birds the sky will precede you if they say to you it is in the sea then the fish will precede you
01:05:59
Rather the kingdom is inside you and it is outside of you when you come to know yourselves Then you will become known and you will realize it is you who are the sons of the
01:06:06
Living Father But if you will not know yourselves no is the word gnosis. That's where we get Gnosticism. You dwell in poverty
01:06:12
It is you who are that poverty that's from the Gospel of Thomas. It is very clearly tinged very deeply with Gnosticism There is no documentary evidence.
01:06:20
Deconic is pushing a feminist agenda And you will find anything in feminist theology and any ancient work is subject to be used in this way
01:06:31
Again, I think we have massive double standards here We have Deconic being used on a foundation that Adnan Rasheed would never allow anyone to do anything regards
01:06:40
Muhammad Muhammad's wives the Quran the Hadith anything anywhere near this there's a gross double standard that's being used here
01:06:49
Just simply We're gonna have to draw it to a close and very quickly I just simply would would point people to reading the rest of these citations read the rest of Deconic's article
01:06:58
You'll see those things. I have it here on my screen Look at what Metzger actually said about the trustworthiness and realize one thing
01:07:06
Bart Ehrman in our debate I asked him if you create your own Greek New Testament, how much would it differ?
01:07:12
From the current Nessie Island text and he agreed it would differ less from the current Nessie Island text than the
01:07:18
King James differs From the New American Standard Bible. So anyone who thinks that this is just this wholesale revision
01:07:24
Just simply hasn't delved deeply enough into what even Bart Ehrman is saying radical a scholar as he is well, it's been a fascinating show and Well, I don't think we probably need to in a sense
01:07:36
No way where you guys finish up on the end of this is but it's been fascinating for me to have this interaction obviously
01:07:43
The material you're drawing on had none is obviously contested a great deal by by James there in terms of this gospel of Thomas but I'll certainly be happy to post up any links you gents might have to relevant information on that and Thank you for both for joining me on the show today.
01:07:59
It's been a fascinating discussion And if you want to get in touch I'm going to be giving you the details of how to do that as we look at some of your feedback in the last few
01:08:07
So my thanks again to my guest James White director of alpha and Omega ministries and Adnan Rashid of the hitting
01:08:14
Institute have joined me on today's program and You can find details for them both with the web with the webcast with the podcast