National Strategy for Counter Terrorism Against Christians

July 4th Introduction and the Claim That Christians Are Being Targeted

Hey, Scott, what brings you in at the pharmacy?

I'm thinking about getting one of the updated COVID -19 vaccines.

Great. Do you know which type of vaccine you'd like? There's more than one? Yep, there are different types of vaccines available. You can learn more about them at wedovaccines .com. If you have questions or want to make an appointment, give me a call.

What was that website again?

Wedovaccines .com. Thanks, I'll check it out. This message was brought to you by Novavax.

Okay, round two. Name something that's not boring. Laundry? Ooh, a book club. Computer solitaire, huh? Ah, sorry, we were looking for Chumba Casino. That's right. ChumbaCasino .com has over a hundred casino-style games.

Join today and play for free for your chance to redeem some serious prizes. ChumbaCasino .com. No purchases necessary.

Full report included by law. 18 plus terms and conditions apply. See website for details. You know, happy 4th of July. Sorry that this episode is going to be a scary one for American citizens that actually are patriots and believe in patriotism because, well, this episode is going to show that those of you who are patriots, those of you who believe in Christianity, your American government is targeting you.

We might need a new Independence Day coming up soon. One, two, three!

Welcome to The Rap Report with your host, Andrew Rappaport, where we provide biblical interpretation and application. This is a ministry of Striving for Eternity and the Christian Podcast Community. For more content or to request a speaker for your church, go to strivingforeternity .org.

All right, I am your host, Andrew Rappaport, and this is The Rap Report. I am joined by my faithful sidekick, Bud the Wiser. How you doing, Bud? Good day, sir. How are you? I like that shirt. You've got a nice Striving for Eternity shirt on.

God exists.

Yes, he has spoken. That's right, and he does and has. That's a wonderful thing. You know what occurred to me in your opening, biblical interpretation and application? That's not what you're planning to do today, actually.

You're doing domestic policy interpretation and application.

Unfortunately, folks, I'm going to tell you, you need to stay tuned to the end of this. This will be a longer than normal podcast. I know that. I apologize for that. There's just no way I can see getting through as much as what we have for you today without this taking some time.

At the end, though, is going to be crucial and important. We're going to be basically going through and looking at how the American government is going to be targeting those of us who want to live by biblical principles, and they're going to be targeting us.

They've laid out a game plan for that. We're going to go through this game plan. What we plan to do today is go through a very lengthy document. It's 30 pages, 32 pages long, that the government has put out that is called the National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism.

It sounds good, and when you read through this, you might think it looks good, but I'm going to show you how to read through this, and at the end, what I want to do is give some biblical principles, give some encouragement for Christians, and I want to make sure that we as Christians know who's in control and where things are headed, and so that we are ready for what may be coming our way or what will be coming our way.

I don't even think it's a maybe anymore. There's a lot going on, and with our country, right now it sure seems like we have a country that we live in that is starting to target Christians and those that are conservative, and they're not even shy about it anymore.

They're starting to come right out and say it more and more, and that's what we're going to cover today. So this is going to be one of those episodes that's more about culture and how we as Christians should be thinking about it, but unfortunately to get through this, there's a lot of material that we need to go through so that you're aware of it.

Okay, so folks, I'm sorry, I'm really sorry. This is torture.

But Andrew, this is critically important. I mean, Christians, I think largely, at least faithful Christians, recognize the need to be discerning when they're hearing something coming from the pulpit or when they see something in the curriculum of their Sunday school class or whatever.

We need to apply the mind of Christ and use Berean discernment there, but that's not the only place. We also have to do it like Menevissacar with what's going on in our times. How do we understand what's going on, and how do we filter everything through a biblical worldview so discernment doesn't stop when you leave the doors of the church?

Yeah, and you're going to see that the things that they list here, and folks, if you're going, well, hey, I don't care about politics. This isn't really so much about politics. It really is not political as much as it is, this is the culture in which we now live.

This is how they're going to let us know exactly how they plan to target us. And it's going to be interesting because as we go through this document, you're going to see there's subtleties they put in here to make it clear who's in their scopes.

So let's go through this. So this is put out from the White House. There's two documents that have been out. There was a March 21 assessment, so 2021 in March, that gave an assessment that brought about this June 15th basically statement or briefing from the White House.

And so it is called National Security for Countering Domestic Terrorism, June 21. This is the first time anything like this has been put out. This is a first and this is something that Biden directed his team to do to come up with a comprehensive review of domestic terrorism within the first hundred days of his administration.

I think they missed that date, but I guess they made it in the March one. But what we end up seeing in this is that they're touting this as a wonderful thing. So let's deal with this right from the beginning.

I'm going to read what, well, it's signed by Biden, but it's not it's one of those rubber stamp signatures. I don't even know if Biden read this. If he did, he probably doesn't even remember what it said.

But he whispered his signature.

Yeah, he whispered it. If you haven't listened to last week's episode. If this is but this is supposedly Biden's reason for this. And so he says too often in the past several years, American communities have have felt the wrenching pain of domestic terrorism.

Now, how does he define that? Well, he tells us black church members slaughtered during Bible study in Charleston. Now, OK, did that happen? Yes. Why does he bring that one up? Because they were black.

He emphasized that a black church. What you're going to see missing is the white church that was shot up in Texas. What you're going to see missing is any kind of thing where you have churches that are other than this one black church.

That's the only time you're going to see that reference that you're going to see a church as the victim throughout this entire document. Is this one time? And why? Because he mentions black church. OK, yet there's been lots of churches that have been targeted.

Now, they do mention a synagogue in Pittsburgh targeted for supporting immigrants. That's very interesting. They noted the one synagogue in Pittsburgh that was targeted for supporting immigrants. They didn't mention the black guys that were traveling in New York and just shooting Jewish people.

They didn't talk about the synagogues that were being burned at the hands of black people. Didn't mention those. OK, a gunman spraying bullets at the El Paso Walmart targeting Latinos. So you see what they end up doing is it's black.

It's immigrants. It's Latinos. And they ignore all the others. But here's what he ends up saying. It goes against everything our country strives to stand in for in the world and poses a direct challenge to the American national security, our democracy and our national unity.

This is the thing you're hearing throughout on media and everywhere. You're going to see it throughout this document. Our democracy is at stake. Folks, listen, Biden just came out and said and we said this last week, right, that he has nukes and F -15s and we can't overtake him because he's got nukes and F -15s.

We can't we can't overturn a tyrannical government. And yet at the same time, January 6th, where there wasn't a single gun, supposedly the whole democracy was at stake. He can't make up his mind. The reality is throughout this book, this document, they're going to be laying out a case for that.

There's this violence, violent domestic terrorism, and that this is challenging our democracy. And that's the reason for all this. Now, when you argue you're challenging democracy, they just pulled off a coup, folks.

They they've pulled off a coup without a gunfire. We're going to get to that at the end. But the reality is, like it or not, Biden was legitimately voted as president only because, well, like it or not.

The Electoral College, the way it works, they don't have to actually go with what their state's majority is. They can vote any way they want. Even if the majority was overwhelming for Trump, they could vote for Biden.

In fact, for some of those conservatives, you may remember there was a pitch for many of the conservatives saying, look, you know that the election was stolen. So vote at that for Trump. Now, had all these people in the Electoral College voted for Trump against what the numbers were saying, would any of the conservatives have been complaining then?

No. But so when we look at that, you have to realize Biden is president by the laws of the land because the Electoral College, whether we like it or not, did he get the majority vote? There's no mathematical way that's possible.

You know, there was the what you end up seeing right now is the federal government is trying to make sure that they can continue to steal elections from this time forward. OK, they pulled off the coup, but they got to keep it going.

The next election will be a big one. And what they need to do before the 2022 election is either get this thing passed in Congress that will allow them to steal every election here going forward. In other words, make this a one party country where they're in control and no one can stop them.

Or they need to make sure anyone that would vote conservative is out of the picture. And this document is to do exactly that. That's going to be what we're going to go through. Now, in this, Biden writes that throughout here, there's going to be a couple of key words you're going to see throughout this document that I'm going to bring up over and over again.

The word violence and non-government partners. We're going to go through that. But Biden ends up saying in this introduction that violence that violates law, threatens public safety and infringes on free expression of ideas.

You know who is obviously, overwhelmingly absent from this entire document, bud? What one group or maybe two groups could you think of that as you read through this, everything in this document applies to and yet they're being supported by the government?

Could it be Black Lives Matter and Antifa?

I mean, yeah, I mean, it is very opening paragraph. I'm thinking, wait a minute, BLM, Antifa, further on into it where we're so concerned about, you know, human flourishing and and personal, you know, livelihood being a lot.

I mean, Planned Parenthood, isn't that a problem? No, those things fit the narrative. Correct. But a whole lot of other things don't.

When we look at what's been going on for the last 15 months or whatever was 13, 15 months of the Black Lives Matter riots, Antifa riots, they have done over two billion dollars worth of damage. Murder rate and crime rate in these cities are up in some places two hundred percent.

They're they're arguing for defund the police. In fact, I think it's hysterical that the Democrats can't run away from their own policies fast enough. Now, now they're trying to say it was Trump that wanted to defund.

It was the Republicans that were defunding. What? I don't I don't know a single Republican that was arguing for defund the police. But now all of a sudden they were the ones that were that were doing it.

And pushing this isn't all the Democrats in all the cities. Now, here's the thing that I want you to think about as we go through this. There's a talk about violence and the violence that would affect political views.

What in the world was Black Lives Matter? In fact, during the election, if you went to the donation page for Antifa, you know where you went. You went right to Joe Biden election campaign. That's where your money went.

If you went, you clicked on Antifa to give them money and went right to Joe Biden. That is to affect a political party. That is to push a political agenda. And how did they use it? They used terrorism.

BLM and Antifa are terrorist organizations, but they are not defined as such here. Why? Well, we're going to get to that because it all comes down to the agenda, really the color of skin of the agenda, not necessarily the the color skin of the of the protester, but of the agenda.

So he ends up Biden is saying that all these factors preventing domestic terrorism and reducing the factors that fuel it demand a multifaceted response across federal government and beyond. That beyond is going to be important.

That beyond is important because what he's going to do is throughout this is it is the justification of illegal activity. Wait a minute, Andrew, what do you mean illegal activity? Well, there's certain things that the federal government is not allowed to do without court order, like spying on its own civilians, killing its own civilians, doing things without trial, without giving American citizens the right to be able to defend themselves.

And with this entire document is is to basically allow for beyond federal government, in other words, big tech or whoever they want to be able to spy on you because they can't. The laws prevent them from doing it.

So they want to work with people that are going to be able to do it. They're legally not allowed to do what there's there's restrictions on them. So this is an argument when they say beyond federal government and beyond is to get businesses and the businesses can go, well, this is our this is just our algorithms.

Our algorithms do this. And we're going to show you that this is already happening. They say it's happening. We're going to give you the evidence in a little bit. So stay tuned. Some of you already have seen the evidence on your Facebook and we'll talk about that.

So but it's not when they say beyond, they even say, you know, Biden even says in here that that it is with our allies and foreign partners. Now, think about that. If it's our allies, those are foreign countries we work with who are our foreign partners, then foreign partners that are not our allies.

Those are not allies, which would be our enemies that are foreigners. OK, so he's willing to work with people who are not our allies. I mean, why would foreign countries he's working with foreign countries to be able to spy on American citizens?

That could never happen. Really? General Flynn. I mean, that's exactly what happened with him. What with what Obama and Biden, he was there, by the way. What they did was to spy on on Trump and to be able to try to wiretap Trump.

They ended up basically making up a whole thing where they went to a foreign intelligence. Then, if you're not familiar with everything that happened with Flynn, basically what they did was they found someone that happened to have the same name as someone that was working with Flynn or they're working with the president, Trump, and that this guy was in Russia and a banker met at a bank with Russia because he happened to have the same name that allowed them to then say, oh, see, we're not really, you know, listening in, spying in on Trump.

We're on this foreign guy. But because he's talking to this guy that's in that talking to Trump, then we can listen to that guy. They come up with these foreign reports that that we now know are all made up with the Steele dossier that was paid for by Hillary.

All this that was developed so that they could spy on on Trump before the Trump election. Now, what's really interesting about that, by the way, but historically, Hillary Clinton was involved in the investigating Watergate.

What was Watergate? Watergate was where they ended up trying to, you know, Nixon was trying to basically spy out his his his the Democrats to see what they were doing before the election. And so they broke in the office and checked that out.

Now, the interesting thing was Hillary Clinton in that she was the one who ended up saying that they couldn't find the impeachment documents because because the impeachment prior to that, you actually had to have evidence of impeachment.

And she ended up writing a document of impeachment that superseded any others that just said you had to have the look of impropriety. The irony of history is that that document that Hillary Clinton wrote to try to get Nixon impeached is the very document that impeached her husband.

Furthermore, what you end up seeing is Hillary did exactly what she was charging Nixon with is is paying is paying for a dossier so that they could spy on her competition. OK, now, Biden says all this project is to unite Americans.

And I think it's going to be anything but. So let's go through this document. Let me go through the introduction. Then there's going to be four pillars. I'm going to try to do this quickly. Bud, just wave your hand if there's something you need to add.

So I want to. Well, right now, I want to insert something here because it relates to what you just said. This document, this introduction that Biden has given says, you know, this includes working with our critical partners in state, local, tribal and territorial government governments and in civil society, the private sector, academia and local communities.

And then, as you noted, as well as with our allies and foreign powers, academia and private sector. This is a broad scale approach. This this is not something that's just going to come under the auspices of homeland security.

But it reminded me of a quote because I'm a quote guy. You may know that. Yeah, I do. Jay Gresham Machen, who valiantly fought the liberalism primarily within the church. But he made this statement. What is today a matter of academic speculation begins tomorrow to move armies and pull down empires.

This is what we're seeing in this document. You mentioned BLM. BLM's agenda is a complete political paradigm shift. It is anarchy. They are wanting to establish essentially a new world order. And it is based on on the issue of race.

So as you go through this, you know, keep that in mind. These are not new ideas. These have been percolating throughout mainly academia, but certainly within the halls of, you know, those who lust for power.

And what you end up seeing is the real insurrection was what was going on in CHOP and CHAZ, where they they basically said they are their own country. They said they're no longer the United States. They took over entire city blocks.

That's an insurrection. And it was a violent one. You know what ended up happening with that? We have President, Vice President Harris, who supported paying for people to get out of jail so they could be back on the streets and doing this again.

So what you end up seeing is that they actually support the very thing this document says is a problem. You look at this in the instruction. It says it has over the centuries taken many American lives and spilt much American blood, especially in communities deliberately, deliberately and viciously targeted by on the basis of hatred and bigotry.

After the Civil War, for example, the Ku Klux Klan waged a campaign of terror to intimidate black voters. Who was the party of the Ku Klux Klan? Wow. Let me think. Yeah. The Democrats. Who is it that that was trying to suppress the blacks?

The Democrats. Who was it that was that was voting for the Civil Liberties Act? The Republicans. Which party was was started because they they wanted the essential agenda item was ending slavery. The Republicans.

There was the Whig Party and the Democrat Party. And the Republican Party was founded on the ending of on the abolition of slavery. And somehow they try to say it's the Republicans that are the white supremacists.

So they say the Klan and other white supremacists. That's another thing you're going to see throughout this document. White supremacist. OK, because they have a strange definition for that. But the Klan and other white supremacists continue to terrorize black Americans.

Continue. Now, here's the thing. You do not see lynchings of blacks like you did during the Democrat Klan days. But we do see over and over again right now where blacks are beating up or killing whites and nothing's being done about.

In fact, I have a friend of mine whose pastor's son and associate pastor's son was walking around Portland and they were jumped by eight eight plus black men, adult men and beaten to a pulp, basically.

And the police told him there's nothing they could do about it. Why? Because it's happening too often that you have black on white crimes, people being killed. They had the guy in New York, I think it was New York, that he killed a white guy.

And he was they have him on video saying, I want to kill a white man. It's all his fault. OK, so you end up seeing this, that they are this is the Klan of today is Black Lives Matter trying to affect political a political goal.

The irony of it is the Black Lives Matter of today is pushing for the very party that wanted them to stay enslaved and was the party of the Ku Klux Klan. So the Democrat Party hasn't changed. They just changed.

They're still using the same terroristic tactics. They just changed which, you know, now they were going for the white supremacy. Now they want to go for black supremacy. That's basically what it comes down to.

Now, let's look at the examples they give of this in their introduction. The shooting and killing of 23 people in a retail store in El Paso. We mentioned that. Why did they mention those? They're Latino.

So to focus on that. The killing of peaceful protesters in Charlottesville, the shooting and killing of three people in a festival in Gilroy. Three people. Why? Each of these that we see is they focus in on color of skin, the racism or something that pushes the liberal agenda.

The arson committed at a mosque. Oh, so it's a mosque. That's, you know, the appalling violence and xenophobia against Asian Americans. Now, that's really interesting because we and we've talked about this previously on that on the show that five minutes before that guy goes in and he didn't shoot those those Asians that were at the massage parlor because they were Asian.

He was very clear why he did it. He did it because he visited those parlors. He had a problem with pornography and obviously was doing other things at those parlors. And he was taking it out on them, not because they were Asian, but because his pornography.

And so they totally changed the narrative here. But five minutes before that, they were saying Asians have white privilege. They're there. You know, they don't deserve all this special handling like other minorities.

And then right after that, the Democrats went, oh, we could use this. Stop Asian hate. And all of a sudden this is this is a racial crime. OK. And so and then it's the surge in anti-Semitism. Semitism.

Now, it's interesting because the only anti-Semitism they want to mention is the anti-Semitism that happens of Jewish people that are trying to help immigrants, illegal immigrants. Yeah. They don't have other examples there.

No, but they've got to add that in there because that's a significant voting bloc.

For the Democrats. Yes. Yeah. And so here's here's the real thing, though. And look at this next paragraph. Domestic terrorist attacks in the United States also have been committed frequently by those opposing our government institutions.

So if you disagree with the government now, we have been hearing for a year now with Black Lives Matter has been marching that they want to tear down the government. In fact, they've been tearing down all the statues and and the Democrats have been praising that we should we should allow for that.

You know, the reality is this is they are supporting the very thing this document attacks. You know, I find it very interesting. But you and I talked about this before we went live. But in Canada right now, which is a little bit further ahead of us, unfortunately, on this, you have these we've talked about these three pastors where there's been big news of their arrest.

There's a lot of police forced to arrest them. You have multiple cars. They're dragged out of their house with their crying kids sitting there. I mean, like, you know, and by the way, we're glad that Pastor Tim is is free now.

But, you know, they he wasn't resisting at all. But they had to, you know, when Pastor James Coates was arrested, they had to handcuff him and put leg shackles on him like he was he went in to be arrested.

He he knew that they wanted him. He went in. You know, it's all for to make it look bad. And then what did they have this this weekend or this week when they had their their holiday in Canada? They're tearing down statues of the queen.

No police there at all. Amazing. The police are all concerned is the threat of a pastor preaching at church on Sunday. You know, the the nerve to do that. That's what's coming here, folks. And to oppose the government institution, that is exactly what Antifa and and Black Lives Matter.

That is their agenda. That has been their talking points. They have been very clear about that. They are trained Marxists who want to take down the capitalist system. They are against the American system.

They say all of our government institutions are systemically racist and have to be torn down and rebuilt. And yet they're not included in this document. Now, look at the examples we have here. I find these examples really interesting.

In 1995, the largest single act of domestic terrorism in U .S. history and the largest. OK, remember this. The largest with OK, just 1995. All right. An anti-government violent extremist detonated a bomb in the Alfred Murr building, a federal building in Oklahoma City, killing how many?

One hundred and sixty eight people. Now, but I'm not sure about my math. I really I'm having trouble. But I think 2001 might be after 1995.

And I believe if you're going by chronology.

Yeah, I believe that the three thousand people that died in the Twin Towers alone, just they're not counting the Pentagon and the plane that went down, just those three thousand people, I think three thousand is more than one hundred and sixty eight.

Yeah. OK, I'm just trying to check my math because I believe that was an act of terrorism on domestic soil. And so when they say the largest act, the largest act, by the way, was a guy that was liberal.

He wasn't conservative. He hated the government. He had very you know, he was more an Antifa type of guy. I want to tear down the entire government. He wasn't conservative. But they paint him that way.

Then they say in 2016, anti authority, violence, extremist, ambushed and shot and killed five police officers in Dallas. Again, those were liberals doing that, the Democrat Party. In two in 2017, a lone government gunman wounded four people at a congressional baseball practice, a lone gunman who is Democrat.

Oh, in fact, he even told you why he did it. Bernie Sanders, he believed what Bernie Sanders said. And he said he he was a Bernie follower and he was doing it. Who did he? This is what they then collect here.

They don't talk about this stuff when it doesn't fit their narrative. He shot Republicans at a Republican baseball practice. And then this is the key. And just months ago on January 6th, twenty twenty one, America's witness, Americans witnessed an unprecedented attack against a core institution of our democracy, the U .S. Congress.

See, this is what has started this. And we're going to talk about the March thing because that's where a lot of this is rooted in. But it is all about January 6th. Folks, January 6th was not a riot. It was not an insurrection.

It was a peaceful protest with over four hundred thousand people that were there. They have they had roughly a hundred people that were in most of them invited in the building. Out of all the people they've arrested and they're looking to arrest anyone that was even there.

They have five hundred people that have been in jail with no trial, no most of them, no charges that have been in solitary confinement, no due process, which is which is supposed to be given to them. And yet not a single gun has been found.

The only violence that was discovered was a police officer shooting an unarmed woman. The police officer that they said died because he was beaten to death with a fire extinguisher. They later said he was trampled, but the coroner's report revealed he had a stroke.

And oh, by the way, there were pictures of him not only inviting the protesters in, but taking pictures with the protesters. That was a peaceful protest, which our Constitution allows. Nothing like what we have had with the two billion plus dollars worth of damage in our cities for over a year by Black Lives Matter and Antifa.

That is a true insurrection that we see what they're doing because they want to overturn the government. That is their stated goal. What ended up happening on January 6th was the desire for many people to have an audit, to have the ballots audited before that the vote was confirmed.

And in fact, if you go listen to the Verdict podcast with Ted Cruz, he lays out the timeline. And when you look at that timeline and you look at the timeline of the events that day, you end up seeing what happened on January 6th.

And we're going to spend a little bit of time on January 6th because this is so crucial to everything this document is doing, because it shows you who they're targeting. What you end up seeing is that that day they were that Ted Cruz and I think it was 17 others that were planning to soon as Arizona announced that they were that before Arizona, when they got up to give their their seal of what they how they're that they were going to go for Biden, there was going to be a call for an audit, a 10, 10 or 14 day audit so that every state would be audited.

OK, now here's the interesting thing. Just as Arizona got up, that's when the Capitol Police said, we got to move, we got to move, everyone's got to move. That held up the proceedings and they moved from one place to another place to then a secure location.

Interesting because they moved from not right to the secure location. One of the things that happened was they moved. And when you look at the other the timeline of the events, you have the people that were and we now know this, that there was Black Lives Matter and Tifa people in the only section of the building where it looked like there was violence going on in that Capitol.

And that's the one that the footage everyone sees where they're banging on the doors and people climbing the walls. But here's the interesting thing. You know, that woman that was shot. If you watch that video, there were police officers right behind her.

Soon as she shot and falls to the ground, there's a whole group of people, police officers right there. They give a thumbs up so they know, hey, we're here. Don't be shooting anymore. And then they start taking care of her.

The police were there. How violent could it have been? Why were the police doing nothing? In fact, Pelosi refused extra police from the Capitol. She refused the extra police, the National Guard that Trump wanted.

So this was all staged. It was all staged. How do we know? Because what ended up happening was they ended up when they ended up opening the doors because not enough protesters were in there. The police ended up.

We have video of them opening doors and waving people in. And that second time that the Capitol Police moved the Congress, they moved them so that they would see the protesters. What were these violent protesters doing?

Taking selfies, taking pictures. They were on a tour of the Capitol. They were invited in by Capitol Police. They didn't think they were doing anything wrong. They were just in getting to see their Capitol building.

Now, if the Democrats were so against protesting at Congress doing so when they're in session, why didn't they complain during Brett Kavanaugh's hearing when protesters made it all the way into the to the hearings to demand that the hearings be stopped?

And what you didn't see is anyone crying back then. They just waited till they left the Capitol. Police didn't move everybody. The irony is when you look at the timeline, the Capitol Police moved the Congress that first time before there was anyone in the Capitol building.

So so you have to understand some folks, this was all a setup. Now, this is all conspiracy theory, by the way, what I'm telling you, they're going to say that's all conspiracy. Remember, they also said it's all conspiracy that the coronavirus was in a lab.

That's now. Oh, they did know that Fauci even knew that the fact that, you know, that it was from a lab was conspiracy. The fact that you would say that there was anything, any kind of mishandling of an election, that's conspiracy.

Can we talk about New York now? You know, where they where they had one hundred and thirty eight test ballots that were in there for the liberal candidate that just happened to get in there. And because the more conservative kind of cried foul, they had to say, OK, we got to throw the whole thing out.

Well, I thought we can't say that there's mishandling that goes on in an election. That's conspiracy theory. You see, what they do is they want to shut down anyone that disagrees with them. That's what this is all about.

And that's what this whole document is going to be about. It's going to be about things that they're they're not dealing with, what the real domestic terrorism is. The real domestic terrorism is Black Lives Matter and Antifa, the ones that want to overturn our government system for a Marxist system.

And they want to use terror and fear to get you to do that. And it is working. Why? They have raised over a billion dollars in money to Black Lives Matter. Now that goes to paying for four million dollar homes for, you know, the people that run Black Lives Matter.