The Emptiness of Secularist Jurists Demonstrated; Twitter Bookmarks

Well greetings welcome to the dividing line here. We are in the big studio mainly because I just didn't want to make rich move all these cameras to the little studio. Have to do something about that. I'm not sure what exactly we're gonna do, but I I actually think rich likes doing it.

There's he gets this little twinkle in his eye when he's crawling around amongst wires. And and he he talks to himself constantly by the way I mean you know rich is around when he's talking, but he's only talking to himself and and So he's you know about 60 B, and that's 0 DB and no.

It just I sort of sit back, and you know okay, whatever so here. We are four days post-operative here and Pushing it probably a little bit too hard people tend to do that. I'm I'm sort of feeling it, but I've just got so much to catch up on.

I just I What am I supposed to do. July is coming fast. Less I've got I've got less than two months before my next trip and You know lots of stuff to do between now and then and I've fallen so far behind physically.

As far as fitness is concerned. It's gonna be pretty tough to get caught back up, so you just got to push it and There's no reason for me not to push it because the issue that I've been having. Once it's taken care of and it's until it happens again.

It doesn't really matter how hard you're pushing yourself. You're not gonna make it happen faster or slower anything else, so you just do what you got to do so anyway I was looking at Various things that I had stuck in My Bookmarks folder on Twitter and And you know you'll see stuff in a boy.

We thought that'd be something to be worth talking about and you stick in there. And then you don't think about it, and so I wanted to sort of clean some of that out. Which means we'll probably be covering a lot of different topics today thinking biblically for all of us who are biblicists and are not ashamed to say that we are and continue to go those of you who keep redefining it in some other way as if That means you only have the Bible and can only use Bible words.

Stop it Quit it. I have on the board. I was disappointed last week Cruz Was one of the people defending IVF and stuff. I realized that's complicated issue, but it's. It was disappointing, but he was questioning Sarah Netburn Now Sarah Netburn.

The Biden regime. I don't call it administration never have from the beginning. It is a regime. It is an anti-american treasonous regime. It is intent upon destroying everything that makes America America.

And.

Of course it's people it's populated by people who have been Trained in this way of thinking for decades now and. So the Biden regime has nominated this woman judge Sarah Netburn for the Southern District of New York.

Sarah Netburn and Cruz went after her for a decision that she made.

She.

Placed a 6-foot -2 tall man. Now again, I live in the real world. I live in the world of reality. I live in a world that doesn't play games and insanity. No morals, no ethics. Nothing like that. This is a man.

He has male genitalia and even if you Remove the male genitalia. He's still a man. There's something called chromosomes. There when we when we dig up a body That was buried, you know 4 ,000 years ago.

We can still determine whether this was a male or female you can do that a number of different ways. The skeletons are different and The you know. If you you could happen to find DNA you'd be able to tell from the DNA whether this is a male or female.

This is a male serial rapist. Who confessed to having raped a Nine-year-old boy, and I think a 17 year old female. So an equal opportunity rapist now in a just society. He would have been executed by now.

That's what God's law. He would have been executed by now. But this isn't a just society. We don't believe that life matters and In fact, we are our moral and ethical brains have been rotted so badly.

That we don't realize That when we go, oh, you know, we should just put them in prison and you know, give them, you know. Food and clothing and medicine and if they want to have sex change operations, they can do that and you know.

It's insanity and it will it's part of the the death rattle of Western society and So here's this man six foot two serial rapist self-admitted. Who decides he's a gal? Okay, that's insanity. It's rebelling.

It's stupid. It's ridiculous. No society that will last for any period of time at all. Will even give a second look if there was a meaningful judge Involved in this they should have immediately gone. You're nuts.

Go back to yourself. What are in the end of that? But no, it ends up before Sarah Netburn and Sarah Netburn is.

A.

Secular nutball. The product of the university training of today. There is no reason to respect university training today. Hello. I don't know why we keep doing this if If you are not taught to be able to think rationally If you are if you can literally look at a six foot two tall man and go hi, sweetie.

Why are we respecting this. I I have no earthly idea none. Sarah Netburn Sends this six foot two male to a female prison because he says he's a woman and you know, I. Let's say on my 30th birthday. Someone had Given me a fiction story about this happening.

We all would have gone. You'd never get that crazy. Well, here we are. Well, here we are.

And.

And of course the Biden regime wants to reward her for her complete insanity because that's what they want. They are seeking to destroy this society. And they're smiling and they don't they don't care if anybody knows it doesn't matter to them.

Their voter is going to vote for them and it doesn't matter what they do. It doesn't matter whether they're the people voting for them can't afford groceries anymore. It doesn't matter where they lock them in 15-minute cities, which are also called concentration camps.

It doesn't matter if all their liberties and freedoms are taken away from them. They'll still vote for them. Because they dole out the money that they've printed on the printing press in the back room and so.

The the founders knew that that was a danger and so this nation was not originally designed to allow any of this to happen, but Court decision after court decision step after step step after step takes time but even something that was Grandly designed can be taken apart fully and has been taken apart fully and that's that's where we are today.

So Ted Cruz goes after Sarah Netburn and I thought it was well worth Listening to this clip because Just because here we go.

In your court what matters more. The rights of individuals or your political ideology. I.

Apply the law to the facts. I asked a question which matters more. My political ideology doesn't matter at all.

So I don't believe you.

Okay, I was just completely through. I Appreciate I Appreciate Cruz Trying to do what he's doing. But that really wasn't the best question. There is a much more basic Issue facing us in situations like The rights of individuals.

Um.

Political ideology. What we're. You know, we no longer function on the idea that there is a.

Moral.

An object an objective morality. That should be referred to here. Most people just don't don't believe in objective morality any longer and you can't even really Pretend it even in our political process, which means that political process will die of its own eventually.

And I think this case demonstrates that You are willing to subjugate the rights of individuals to satisfy your political ideology. This case Involves a male defendant who raped a nine-year-old boy. Was he guilty of that?

Yes, the petitioner pled guilty to that. Okay, so he raped a nine-year-old boy he also.

Raped a 17 year old girl. Was he guilty of that? He pled guilty. The petitioner pled guilty that crime as well.

So was he guilty? I.

Hope so because she pled guilty to it. He was a he when he did this. That's correct.

One year after being released again, he was convicted of having child pornography. Is that correct?

I'm unclear on exactly the time frame that you're at.

But but the petitioner was convicted of distributing child pornography child pornography that was images of adults violently raping children.

Abhorrent conduct. Okay for which there are real victims.

And this individual I just have to ask abhorrent conduct in in whose world in Whose opinion who gets to who gets to determine these things? We're just this close to saying that's not abhorrent that was just simply that's how they're born that's what they want to do that.

But I'm objectivity is gone. There is no objective moral standard any longer.

And.

You know, there's a lot of discussion going on right now about the Constitution and You know, is it too late for the Constitution? Things like that. It's not a matter of is it too late for the Constitution?

The issue is is it too late for this society?

And.

A lot of people are quoting John Adams which who I have been quoting on this subject for years and years and years. I was quoting that Adams quote long before I ever heard anyone use the term Christian nationalism.

Long before that and.

Adams was the one who said that the Constitution Cannot provide guidance. It cannot rule it cannot function for an immoral irreligious people, it's only for a moral and religious people and obviously His context and the context of everyone around him.

Religious wasn't just some vague Idea it was Christian. Now, it could be different kinds of Christian. For most the colonies it didn't include Roman Catholicism, but it was Christianity and God's law and the Bible.

That was the assumed moral fabric. To which appeal could be made. We now live in a secular society. Where there is no there can be no appeal made to such things and so the honest question is Can you go back to the Constitution and what would that require.

Well it would. It would require a massive change on the part of the populace. The population itself it would require a massive revival. That rarely happens historically apart from major judgment national calamity invasion war famine pestilence whatever.

And.

So that's where that's where a lot of these questions are now coming from is What do you do? When the people of the nation are themselves So degraded and One of the primary mechanisms of the degradation has been the public indoctrination system the government indoctrination system So degraded morally and ethically that they can't live up to The standards of the Constitution which can grant to them freedoms and liberties.

Freedoms and liberties require a Christian view of mankind otherwise they have to be They can only be given to The people who can then use the power to take freedoms liberties from others to give them to themselves.

Tyranny of all the different forms. So yeah when you hear Graduates of Brown University like this Talking about horrific behaviors on whose standards. That's the question Joel.

Six foot two. Biologically a man a minute ago. You said that when this Man decided that he was a she you you said this individual was quote. I wrote it down sober and entirely a female. That phrase struck me as remarkable.

Did this individual have male genitalia? I Think what I said, or at least that is a verbatim quote entirely a female.

Sorry. What I meant to say was hormonally a female. Okay, but that's what.

Hormonally a female. Okay, you've got male genitalia. You're six foot two. You went through puberty as a male. You're a serial rapist and you are now Hormonally a female. I have no respect for someone that can be this dull this deceived.

This is a cult. It's a cult. You know, I had experience in my 20s dealing with the moonies. Okay, I had some fascinating experiences dealing with the moonies in those days even helped get a guy out of the moonies.

Very beginning of this ministry long long time ago and so I've. I've seen people Who are who are in cults and we're talking mind control cults. There's the face of one a Judge in the judiciary of the United States of America.

There is no reason to respect someone that can literally sit there and say well. She's hormonally a female. Right. Okay. That's that's why she can assault females. Sexually there's a little bit of a problem here.

Yeah, it's it's insanity. It's not entirely.

Did this individual have male genitalia? Yes, so you took a six-foot-two serial rapist serial child rapist with male genitalia and he said, you know, I'd like to be in a women's prison and. Your answer was that sounds great to me.

Let me ask you something. The other women in that prison. Do they have any rights?

Okay, I get it. I Get that this Judge Should be held accountable for endangering the women in base. I get it, but that's not the basic and foundational issue and maybe from Cruz's perspective We've already lost that that battle and so we can only fight it up here.

Which means we can never really fight it at all, but the issue is dealing with reality how Stupid morally and ethically. Do you have to be? They have a six-foot-two cross-dressing person. Serial rapist staying in front of you goes.

I'm a girl now and you go. Okay. How stupid do you have to be? Seriously this woman shouldn't be a school crossing guard. Let alone a judge and if these the people we have how long can this last? How long can this laugh.

Is that a question? Yes, the other women in that prison. Do they have any rights? Of course, do they have the right not to have a six-foot-two man? Who is a repeat serial rapist put in as their cellmate?

Senator Cruz I considered the facts presented to me and I reached a decision. I asked you a question.

I asked you a question. Do they have a right not to have a six-foot-two man? Who is a serial rapist put in as their cellmate to those women have a right to that?

Every person who's incarcerated has the right to be safe in their space, but you didn't think so.

You didn't think so and in fact, I'm gonna give some quotes from your order because Senator Kennedy is right. This is not a judge's order. This is a political activist. By the way, the beginning of your order big says at birth.

People are typically assigned to gender. I got to say that would astonish a lot of Americans. A lot of Americans think you go to the hospital a baby is born. And he's congratulations. You have a little boy a little girl the assigned to gender.

I know you went to Brown, but it sounds like it's in a college faculty lounge.

And there's our problem and there's our problem we've. You know, I remember decades and decades ago hearing this insanity in the faculty lounges in the papers being presented. And you know what we did.

We just went. Yeah, there's those there's those university not nutcases again trying to get published and and we dismissed it because well It's just it's that's it's gonna stay there. It didn't stay there and we should have known it wasn't gonna stay there.

But to me, I just thought this is so insane. It has to stay limited to that realm where you can have insanity and it's considered normal. But we were wrong and Here it is out in the open and they they do not seem to be ashamed at all.

She's sitting here thinking what a Neanderthal man she has she has been taught to look back at centuries of Western jurisprudence and common law and Theology as having been so far beneath where we are now.

So so much lower than we are. That's what she's sitting there thinking. She's not embarrassed and until we start seeing evidence of the movement of the Spirit of God. Causing these people to be ashamed of their thinking in their words and their behavior.

It's just gonna keep going on like this with.

No bearing on reality the Bureau of Prison argued. What I'm saying right now that if you put this person in a female prison There will be a risk of sexual assault to the women. And you know what you did.

You said you didn't care about the women. Have you dealt. In what universe is someone who is a serial repeat child rapist? Not at a risk of reoffending Senator as I do in every case. I know you've been told to repeat the line.

I follow the law. I asked a question in what universe is Someone who is a serial repeat child rapist not at risk of reoffending.

Sir I looked at the facts that were before me in this case all of the evidence including the statements of every Warden who had supervised this petition. I have to say.

If I think what she's saying is.

That.

There were people who submitted briefs on this motion.

Who.

Went. Oh. She is wonderful and This woman goes. Oh I'll believe what she says because she's a she and. To recognize he's actually a he goes against the narrative of my worldview. So he was right with the first question.

What's more important your? Ideology. And obviously her ideology is most important because as a secularist, that's all they have. That that's all there is. I think that's what she was saying. If I were the father of one of those women and.

You decided that my daughter's cellmate Was going to be a six-foot-two man who over and over and over again committed violent sexual assault. I would say the entire justice system is absurd and it is clear on your record your political Ideology matters a heck of a lot more than the rights of those women that you endangered.

I think you're a radical and I think you have no business being a judge.

Well, that's obvious. Okay, let's let's just be obvious that that's obvious that she has if you have a Woman Pretending to be a judge Who does who makes this kind of decision. Again in a in a Same moral world that would be the end.

But we're not in a sane moral world and it can anger us and it angers me. By the way, because I'll forget this if I don't I was riding yesterday again, I When when everything went south for me on the trip, I was I'd gotten back to us 500 kilometers ahead of my yearly goal as far as how far I want to ride and Then everything crashed and burned and so yesterday, I'm you know, so I'm I'm Starting to try to undo that damage and Try to at least catch up some of it.

And so part of that is just having time in the saddle pedaling and So you've got to have stuff to listen to and so I Put together I grabbed Mike wingers Benny Hinn Video which came out. I don't know about a month and a half ago, I guess.

And.

I think it's four and a half hours long and Believe you me. I I know how much work goes into Having if you go four and a half hours and you're playing video clips And you have taken time. There was one of them that he was.

There's one of him he was showing where This you know, it's in one of these huge rallies and He points out that what Hinn says is he's not doing the healing. The only people he brings up on stage are the people who have already been healed and And now They're demonstrating that they've been healed but what he did with this especially this one woman who had Cancer had metastasized into her shoulder and what he did is he he Took the time to go into The audio and You know crank up because Benny's over here with the microphone and They're over there.

So so what they're saying is very difficult to hear. So he'd go in and try to crank up the audio so that you could hear what the person was actually saying and I guess at one point I guess Mike's mom had passed away last year from pancreatic cancer and They had someone brought up on stage who had allegedly just now been healed of pancreatic cancer and What Hinn does with this person these are all these people all just props Kosti Hinn has talked about the editing process and the vetting process and all this stuff that that goes on at these crusades and.

And.

You know Mike said I'm really having to pray here because I know how painful this is I watched my mom die of it and to see him knocking this woman over knowing the agony this is causing her and Then trying to get her to say that she's been healed or the pains gone and the pain isn't gone.

And he.

He.

Well did lose it at one point said you're said says to him. You're such a scumbag He said and I don't blame him the slightest bit for saying that and not just because of the situation was mom, but it just but for I think it was four and a half hours and So I just wanted to thank Mike for doing that.

I I don't know that I could stomach Doing something that long. I I thought this morning. I didn't get around to doing it. I would like to contact Justin And ask him if anyone has reliable information on the total income The total amount of money that has been donated to Benny Hinn ministries since its founding.

I would think at least on some level that kind of data is out there because As he pointed out at the beginning, you know Benny Hinn goes to Africa and has Astonishing numbers of people hundreds and hundreds of thousands of people That come to his crusades and I would say these kinds of individuals are some of the Benny Hinn and people like him.

Not only are they just wolves just feeding on on the ignorant masses But they are probably the greatest hindrance to the progress of the true gospel In the entire continent of Africa.

And.

So I didn't finish I didn't ride that long and I was listening at faster speed to try to get through it a little bit quicker. But look it up on YouTube Mike Winger and his just put Mike Winger Benny Hinn.

And it'll it'll pull up and I think you'll find it to be very useful. Very helpful. So anyway Speaking of apostates There's a lot of them a lot of them out there. I grabbed this video from Protestia a Couple weeks ago.

This guy looks familiar to me. The name looks familiar to me too. What was the? PC USA. Yeah, Mark Sandlin PC USA president church of the Covenant. PC USA is the guy's name. I Don't know. You know it I Could be completely wrong.

But I just have this feeling that I've had some communication contact something. But if you want to know how far PC USA has gone You know, I've told the stories before about where the PC USA was back in the 1980s when I was at a large Southern Baptist Church, and I ran a television camera and Sometimes Sometimes we get hired to to do stuff for other people and Friend of mine who's now at Apologia Also did that kind of work even though at a much higher level than I did and He had been at the PC USA Convention in Phoenix when they made their first big capitulation to the homosexual movement and.

And.

I had a number of PC USA professors in seminary as well and.

So.

This has been going on for a long time. When I did the debate with Barry Lynn in 2001 I believe it was. That was at a PC USA Church, and they were one of the last PC USA churches that was trying to hold out.

Trying to hold on. And you know that they've all lost out they've. Anyone who continue to have almost any level of biblical faithfulness has had to abandon the PC USA. Well, how bad does it. How? What happens?

When a denomination goes full. Bore woke. Well, this is what happens. So here is a brief one minute and four seconds. Here is a PC USA minister. At least it's a guy. I suppose there's something to be said there.

Denying the Deity of Christ in PCUSA

Answering the question. Do you believe Jesus was God?

Do you think Jesus was God? Well If you look at the synoptic Gospels Matthew Mark and Luke During his life and in his teachings Jesus doesn't even seem to believe he is God. That idea actually was added much later like in the Gospel of John and It's likely you know something that was just written into his story.

And for me actually Jesus not. Being God is a good thing it's actually a very good thing if if what we hope to get from the life and teachings of Jesus is to Learn how to love one another and how to develop a closer relationship and understanding of God through it.

And I for me that is what it's about. It's much more helpful To see a person who is actually a person doing it rather than a God doing it. It's it's even hopeful now. Do I do I believe that Jesus had a unique relationship with God?

Well, it's hard for me to read the Gospels and to think anything other than that. But I don't need him to be God in order to believe that.

Okay, so here's here's where the the PC USA has gone.

You.

Know. There's supposed to be a confessional standard called the Westminster Confession of Faith. But all of that, you know. Once the Bible becomes a living document that you can interpret as you wish.

And that's what you just heard. You know, what you just heard is the impact of the Bart Ehrman style.

A.

Perspective being applied to theology and So what you'll hear in and again, you need to recognize this. This is this is true in the vast majority of seminaries and everything else today. Fan on there we go.

Turn the fan on so we can stop sweating up here and Turn there we go. Yeah now we'll hopefully cool it off a little bit in here. This is This is so normal in the majority of Bible colleges and seminaries that most of the people listening this in this audience would be stunned.

Hopefully if you've been listening for a long time, you've heard me say over and over again. We're in the minority. Well, the reasons I don't buy these Majority scholarship arguments because they're bogus.

This is this is what you get at Fuller this is what you get all over the place is what you just heard. There is no they do not believe even when I was at Fuller and Fuller was much more conservative back then.

Even when I was there the idea that Hmm so you're saying the synoptics and John are giving us Contradictory views of Jesus because he said we read Matthew Mark and Luke. Because he's got admit you read John that's pretty clear even Bart Ehrman says that and Back when I was there what you would hear was Well, there is a There is a tension in the text a Tension I don't know how many times I heard there's a tension and So fundamentally what that ends up leaving you with is I get to choose Which aspect of the text I want to put emphasis on and I can't tell you you're wrong to put emphasis someplace else.

That's why I can still see the guy's face in my mind. Don't remember his name, but I I can see his face in my mind real nice fellow that started at Fuller at the same time I did here in the Phoenix extension and Over the years that I went there He ended up when he graduated with he graduated with an MDiv in confusion.

He knew what he believed when he started he didn't know what he believed me finish and He wasn't the only one that had that happen to him if you didn't if you came in Not knowing what you believed. You weren't going to be given any encouragement To actually solidify your beliefs.

You're gonna be getting a lot of encouragement to desolidify Your beliefs in a context like that. But at the same time one of the things that this does Emphasize and I I wish I had The link I wonder. Yeah, I don't think I could find it anymore.

I did some somewhere Between 2010 and 2017 somewhere in that time period I Did a series of sermons? Where I presented the deity of Christ from the gospel of Mark and.

I.

I would just highly recommend highly suggest to everybody that if you if you want You know people will ask me, you know, what can I do to Strengthen my Christian life strengthen my devotional life. Strengthen, you know do things that it's gonna make me a stronger Christian.

Well, let me suggest something to you. Investing the time To learn how to recognize Mark's testimony to the deity of Christ. That involves understanding What synoptic Gospels are Old Testament backgrounds?

There's a lot to this but Becoming proficient in the scriptures enough to be able to sit back and hear someone like this guy going well. Yeah, if you read mark.

At that doc.

And go no, that's. That's not true. And in fact, there's tremendous consistency between Matthew Mark Luke and John and all this stuff that you've been taught in seminary is really bogus and and it doesn't seem to me that there's probably almost any meaningful discussion as To how bogus it is in those seminaries any longer.

I Was Fuller's token fundamentalist in the late 1980s graduated in 89. So even then It was becoming less and less normative to have any voice that questioned the left-leaning Consensus and I doubt it exists at all now in that in that context at all.

So I would just you know When you read Mark chapter 14 and you see Jesus quoting from Daniel 7 and Psalm 110 and Identifying himself as the Son of Man and the high priest tears his robes. You heard the blasphemy.

What further witnesses what need witnesses? It's not enough to just have that written down the flyleaf your Bible in the bag. When you can Identify the sources. See how the input together. Make the application and explain why the high priest is going Blasphemy right there that's.

That's when you've you've managed to glom on to something and and go with it from there. Okay I hope this is gonna work. I mean got one more here. Okay, hold on a second wait a minute. Do that. There we go.

All right. Now this is really badly done and I don't know all the context here. But a Fellow by the name of Timothy Gordon. I know he is Other than he's a sophist and if you don't know what a sophist is.

You haven't read much about. I've read much of the Reformers respond Roman Catholicism. Timothy Gordon Says no Protestant will debate the epistemology of solo scriptura with me because of this proof. Watch until the end now, it's not long.

It's two minutes and 13 seconds. So at least you can. The nice thing about this is you can sort of get the outline. There's so many times People will post something and and I'd sort of like to respond to it, but you'd have to invest two hours and put something together from the 40 minute mark and from the 48 minute mark and from the hour and 12 minute mark put it all together to finally have what the argument is and I Don't have two hours to do that.

So I I generally don't. But It is helpful. I mean we have done this over and over and over and over again on the dividing line down through the down through the decades. We certainly have dealt with inerrancy inspiration canon the need to properly Categorize what we're talking about very frequently.

These things are you know, since they're related But not identical people will mix the categories and it becomes very confusing at that point. But the vast majority of evangelical preaching and and teaching in our churches and in a lot of our seminaries will not deal with Challenges like this and Certainly, it's obvious to me amongst Roman Catholics.

Because this is the Roman Catholic argument there is very little self-reflection as to the ambiguity of their own position and What I mean by that I'm probably gonna I would totally freak rich out if I stood up.

I don't know. I might make it I Might make it I'm gonna try it. Anyways, let's see. Yeah. See I yeah, see I'm too tall for it. Yeah. Okay, so anyway We press on. Roman Catholics think that because they have a Allegedly infallible canon That they have no epistemological issues in regards to how that canon was Defined they also don't seem to recognize that the people who have been defending The idea of inspiration Mechanisms of inspiration consistency of scripture have not been the Roman Catholic the Jesuits pretty much put an end to that.

Many of them do not have any idea How Violent the attacks of Rome were on the Reformation and hence on the original language text of the Bible for example. So much of what I have to deal with with people pushing TR only ism and stuff like that came out of a time period where Reformers the Reformation was fighting for its existence against the counter-reformation and the attack was against the validity of scripture as a whole they the Jesuits and the counter-reformation were trying to make.

The.

Bible dependent upon the church and so what they don't realize is if if You find information online that helps to defend the historicity consistency and Interpretation of Scripture inspiration of Scripture it probably didn't come from Roman Catholics.

It came from believing conservative Protestants and.

In.

This day with Francis. With the with the collapse of any kind of meaningful argument. That there is a Unchanging apostolic tradition. Did you hear we played it yesterday? I could pull it up. But did you hear?