Should Men Have Gentle and Quiet Spirits?

then what you're gonna have is you're gonna have pastors or husbands or fathers who think it's actually sinful to even dare to suggest that someone else might be wrong in their understanding of scripture.

Warning, the following message may be offensive to some audiences. These audiences may include, but are not limited to, professing Christians who never read their Bible, sissies, sodomites, men with man buns, those who approve of men with man buns, man bun enablers, white knights for men with man buns, homemakers who have finished

Netflix but don't know how to meal plan, and people who refer to their pets as fur babies. Viewer discretion is advised. People are tired of hearing nothing but doom and despair on the radio.

The message of Christianity is that salvation is found in Christ alone. Or forfeit any hope of salvation, any hope of heaven.

The issue is that humanity is in sin and the wrath of almighty

God is hanging over our head. They will hear his words, they will not act upon them, and when the floods of divine judgment, when the fires of wrath come, they will be consumed and they will perish.

God wrapped himself in flesh, condescended, and became a man, died on the cross for sin, was resurrected on the third day, has ascended to the right hand of the father where he sits now to make intercession for us.

Jesus is saying there is a group of people who will hear his words, they will act upon them, and when the floods of divine judgment come in that final day, their house will stand.

Welcome to Bible Bashed, where we aim to equip the saints for the works of ministry by answering the questions you're not allowed to ask.

We're your host, Harrison Kerrig, and Pastor Tim Mullett, and today we'll answer the age old question, should men have gentle and quiet spirits?

Now, as we kick this episode off, Tim, what Bible verse do you have for us? Well, yeah, the obvious Bible verse is to read 1

Peter 3, one through six. Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives when they see your respectful and pure conduct.

Do not let your adorning be external, the braiding of hair and the putting on of gold jewelry, the clothing you wear, but let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God's sight is very precious.

For this is how the holy woman who hoped in God used to adorn themself by submitting to their own husbands. As Sarah obeyed

Abraham, calling him Lord, and you are her children if you do good and do not fear anything that's frightening. You know, when you read that Bible verse, the first thing

I thought of is I bet this applies to men, too. I mean, it's obviously the natural reading of the passage is to say that it did.

No, I think I was trying to mess with people online. I was trolling them just to see what would happen when

I asked this question online. So I was, I mean, I am not above trolling anyone, but I had asked a question along the lines of, is there ever a time and a place for a husband to raise his voice to a disrespectful wife?

And a lot of people were losing their mind and basically saying that that should never happen. So a husband should never raise their voice.

So, you know, a lot of them were basically hearing me say, well, a lot of the ladies were hearing me say at that point,

I'm asking, is it okay for a husband to yell at their wife? But, you know, that's not what

I was asking. I was asking, is it okay for a husband ever to raise his voice to a disrespectful wife?

And they had simply no category for that. So that put it in my mind, that gave me an idea. I wanted to see what would happen if I would ask, you know, are husbands supposed to adorn themselves with a gentle and quiet spirit for their wife, too?

Because if you're not allowed to raise your voice at all, then that seems like at least part of what the quiet part might be talking about, the idea of raising your voice.

And so then I wondered, well, maybe, do they see anything different there, you know, with the gentle and quiet spirit?

Is that only for women to men or is that just basically, you know, a two -way command there?

And I think it was like 55 % said that, yeah, they should both have a gentle, quiet spirit towards each other.

Yeah, no, I looked at the poll just a few minutes ago and the people saying that it did apply to men, that option won in the poll.

And I didn't look to see how many people - I think it was like 55 to 45 or something like that. Something roughly like that.

Yeah, yeah, so 129 votes total and 53 % of them said, yes, men should also have gentle and quiet spirits according to 1

Peter 3 anyway, which is, I'm gonna be honest, that's pretty concerning.

You know, okay, and now, now, now, to be fair, I think at least based off of what some people were, you know, saying in their actual comments and their arguments for it, a lot of them were not, for whatever reason, they weren't actually pointing to 1

Peter 3 to prove that men should have a gentle and quiet spirit.

They were pointing to other things in the Bible. So things like, you know,

Paul's listing of the fruit of the spirit, right? Where gentleness is one of those fruits of the spirit.

I think another one was maybe some of Jesus' teachings.

I can't remember exactly, but - A few of them,

Jesus says, Matthew 11, 29, take my yoke upon you and learn from me for I'm gentle and lowly in heart and you'll find rest for your souls in me, essentially, for my yoke is easy and my burden is light.

So some of them use that. I saw one argument for, you know, from 1

Timothy saying that Christians should lead, you know, peaceful and quiet lives and so because of that, men ought to be gentle and gentle and quiet in spirit.

So in fairness to the people who are saying yes, they weren't, you know,

I want to assume, I want to assume that they were probably misunderstanding the question a little bit because if we're just saying, hey, look, you know, 1

Peter 3 specifically says that women should have a gentle and quiet spirit and it even says that the beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit is unfading, you know, all very effeminate kind of language right there.

So for someone to read a passage like that just in a vacuum and say, yes, men should also have a gentle and quiet spirit if I'm just being honest here, it's just lazy and ignorant reading of scripture.

I mean, we don't read anything else like that. Yeah, so part of the way

I worded it, I worded it in such a way that a reasonable person should have understood that I was talking about 1

Peter 3, meaning, I mean, I asked very specifically, should husbands also adorn themself like in a gentle and quiet spirit towards their wives?

So I use the language of adornment and that's the language of 1 Peter 3, but I mean, it very well could be that they just, it passed over their head that I was making reference to that for some reason because they didn't even know what 1

Peter 3 says and if that's the case, they're probably not really liable judges of what the right answer is in general if they didn't even know what the verse appealed to, but I think there's different ways to read these passages in general, meaning like the idea of, like if you're just to look at the language itself in 1

Peter 3, a wife should adorn herself with a gentle and a quiet spirit. I think

I've seen a lot of individuals online, particularly ladies who have kind of a loud personality and who talk in a loud kind of way, who

I bet I could probably get people pretty riled up if I asked if ladies should be quiet, like if they should have a quiet disposition in general.

I think even the reformed ladies wanna fight that a little bit because they don't think that this verse is really about volume level at all.

Does that make sense? Yeah. Like, and I would say that, I don't think it really is about volume level in the first instance, but I don't think that you can divorce the concept itself from having anything to do with volume level.

So maybe if we could just try to think about the topic first with what the words are saying, and then what do they mean together, and then how do they apply with different genders?

Like maybe that could be a good strategy to talk about what we're even talking about here, but with the quiet word, you do have like a quiet spirit.

So the idea of a quiet spirit in general, in the Greek, it is like, you do have a word that's talking about being a tranquil, like a tranquil spirit, a quiet spirit, meaning a spirit that isn't like at war, so to speak.

Does that make sense? Like, so the idea is like, a lady shouldn't be loud and boisterous in the language of Proverbs, which means like, hey, look at me,

I'm the center of attention. Pay attention to me, do what I say, and I'm the contentious, quarrelsome kind of woman.

So you have like the prostitute in Proverbs who is loud. She's described as loud like, and I do think that has like a volume component obviously, like meaning like commanding attention.

Everyone look at me, right, and do what I say. And then you have the contentious woman who obviously is going to have volume issues too, right?

So like this idea of this quiet, tranquil spirit means you have a person, like a lady who has a disposition that isn't like a warlike disposition, it's like a peaceable disposition, it's a submissive disposition in that way.

It's not like her heart isn't a heart that's looking to fight. Does that make sense?

Her heart is looking to follow, and that'll even show up in, I mean, I do think that that has some like volume kind of connotations for sure, in a way that I think a lot of the ladies who, you know, who might have a tendency to fight that kind of thing, they could do well to think about even the way they're communicating in terms of volume even.

But then like the idea of gentleness, I mean, I think with gentleness, you have an idea that is predominantly, like here's the thing, it's predominantly associated with women, but then it's not, like there are obviously passages where both

Jesus and Paul described himself as being characterized by this language also too, okay?

So like the idea of gentleness is the, the word is praus, essentially, and like the idea is it's basically like pertaining to not being overly impressed by one's sense of self -importance.

Gentleness, humble, considerate, meek in that way. So, you know, the idea of gentleness in this way is really the opposite of proud, right?

It's the opposite of proud. And I think, you know, the way you interpret these two words together, gentle and quiet together, you either have, like whatever way you go, you have to explain why

Peter is saying this specifically to women and not to men. And the problem is whatever route you go, it's offensive in different ways, okay?

Yeah, yeah, I especially think it's confusing because, you know, no one is going to come around and say that, hey, you know, like I think it's one thing to,

I think it's one thing to, you know, think that 1 Peter 3 also applies to men, you know, because there's other places in the

Bible that say that all Christians, you know, are supposed to be gentle in some way, right?

But then the quiet part is really, you know, I don't know.

I mean, I guess unless you try and go like, well, you know, the Bible says be quick to listen, slow to speak, therefore that means somehow be quiet.

I don't know, that's like a, that is, like I said, it's one thing to think that the gentle thing applies to all people.

I really don't understand how anyone can come to the conclusion that the quiet part applies to men and women the same exact way, especially in the context of 1

Peter 3. So here's the two options that come to mind, but then either one of these options are not, no one's going to like them, okay?

All right. That's our specialty. All right, there's three options. There's three options, and this is,

I'll start with the one that a lot of people said online, and this is not right. So when they say gentle and quiet spirit, they're basically the ideal, the strategy was to ignore the actual words that are being used, so gentle and quiet, ignore those, and then basically conclude that that phrase means submissive, okay?

So gentle and quiet means submissive, and then that should be for women. But then the problem is that that's, so then those kind of people would say, hey, quiet has nothing to do with volume whatsoever.

Gentleness, basically, who knows why that was there? But basically, the idea is to be submissive. So the point was, the point though is in the passage, these two words are being used to elaborate on what submission looks like, but then you can't ignore, you can't ignore the actual description.

Does that make sense? Right, right. Like meaning, like if you just say, hey, that gentle and quiet means to be submissive or whatever, then like the problem though is just to say, yes, this is in the passage which is talking about submission, but then it's giving you a description of what submission actually looks like, right?

So then you need that description. You can't just say, hey, it just means submissive, whatever that means. It's like, well, no, this is giving you a description of what a submissive woman's adornment towards her husband will actually look like, and it'll be gentle and quiet, right?

So in that way, so one, so the first attempt is just basically to say, who knows what the words mean?

They just mean being submissive, so therefore be submissive, and they lose any like explanatory power as to what submission actually means in that way.

The second way to do it, and I don't know that anyone would like this, would be to say that, okay, both men and women should be gentle and quiet, characterized by gentleness and quietness in the same way, right?

Mm -hmm. As distinct ideas, except that women are being told to do this because they're naturally not.

Does that make sense? Mm -hmm. Yeah, yeah. So the thing that makes it distinct is that like they're naturally, as a result of the fall, really bad at being gentle and quiet.

They're gonna be like way worse at it than men, right? So if you just camp out in this kind of framework for a second, what that would be, the idea would be, why does

Peter tell women to do it? Because you're awful at it, as a result of the fall. Your desire is gonna be to master your husband.

You're gonna try to rule over him and dominate him, so you need to be told very specifically, do you need to fight that temptation in a way that the men, they're already, as a result of the fall, gonna be humble and compliant towards your wife.

Does that make sense? And so they don't need to be told it because they've already got it down. They're just like 100 times better at it than you.

Is that why Peter later on started talking about husbands, treat your wives with consideration as a delicate vessel because they're not able to, they're just not able to do these things as well as guys?

Is that what it was? So, well, you see, yeah, that would be one way to interpret it, and I don't know that a lot of people would like that one.

The other way to interpret it is that there's something about a lady's disposition that ladies should be much more characterized by these adjectives than men.

Like meaning, if you were to take both of them together, you have the gentle, gentle one is not being overly impressed by one's sense of self -importance, humble, considerate, meek, like a godly woman who clothes herself in humility, consideration, meekness, not being impressed by her own sense of self -importance.

So there's a unique kind of feminine, like this should be more characterized by women in general than men, particularly as you're letting it be a description of submission in that way.

And then like the quiet part, or the quiet spirit, the tranquil, well -ordered spirit in that way, like the peaceable spirit, like ladies aren't made for fighting and war and contention and everything else in that way, like that may be, those may be more masculine traits in general.

Does that make sense? Yeah. Like so, and I think there's probably, I think there's probably like elements of both of those things that are at work in this kind of passage to where I think it is a little more complicated than what people realize, but I think there's elements of both, like meaning,

I think as a result of a fall, women are obviously gonna try to rule over their husbands and they need to be told very specifically, hey, you need to be submissive to your own husbands, you're gonna wanna fight them, right?

You're gonna wanna be loud, you're gonna wanna be boisterous, you're gonna wanna be the contentious woman in that way, but you need to have the kind of humility to put yourself, needed to put yourself under the authority of your husband, right?

So like, that's gonna require a certain kind of humility that he is not gonna have to have towards you in the same way, right?

So he doesn't, like, he needs to be humble and like a humble person in general, but he doesn't need to be like humble in the sense of he's under your authority humble, right?

Does that make sense? And then he needs to have a, like he doesn't need to be like a warmonger or he doesn't need to be like a fighter towards you either, but then in the same kind of way, like it is his job to lead and it's your job to follow.

So this, like being peaceable for a woman looks differently than being peaceable for a man, right? So like the idea, like meaning, like you're supposed to be subject to your husband, even if he doesn't obey the word and win him over without a word with your chase and respectful conduct.

So the idea is that both, I think, here's the thing, both husband and wife take on these adjectives, but not in the same way.

Does that make sense? And then when you put them both together in this way, and then you say, hey, you know, should a husband be gentle and quiet towards his wife, just like a wife should be towards her husband?

Well, the answer is obviously not, you know? Like, no, no, like, but they should both take on these character traits in different ways towards each other.

And then a woman should much more be characterized by these things as her standard mode of being, whereas like a man is made to fight in ways that women aren't made to fight.

And there's more lawful uses of a man exercising those fighting impulses than there are for women to do too.

Well, and I think that makes a lot of sense when you look at Jesus's life, for example, because, you know, was

Jesus humble? Yes, absolutely. I mean, he was God in the flesh.

I mean, he came and took on the form of a servant. I mean, you know, he showed humility in a way that none of us ever will in our entire lives.

So what, you know, was he humble? Yes. You know, was he often quiet at times?

Sure. But then, you know, it wasn't Mary Magdalene going around, making a whip and driving people out of the temple either.

Right. Like you brood of vipers who warned you to flee from the wrath to come. There may be no lawful use for a woman really to do that, you know, except maybe with children.

You know what I'm saying? But there may, there's very - I don't know though if it's the best parenting strategy to call your children brood of vipers.

Yeah. Well, I mean, if they need it. Even if you might want to, even if you might want to.

So the idea is like, you have different adjectives that are used. You know, and so,

I mean, even the Bible will say things like this, meaning like Jesus says, like, you know, take my yoke upon me and learn from me for I'm gentle and lowly in heart, right?

Paul says, but we were gentle among you like a nursing mother taking care of her own children. And like, that's, you know, that's like, there's parallels, right?

There's parallels. But then what happens is that when people see these things, they basically say, well, hey, there's nothing different about a man being gentle than a woman being gentle.

But the problem is that like, when Paul is being gentle among the church, like a nursing mother, he's in no way comparable to the way an actual nursing mother would be towards her infant.

You get what I'm saying? Like it's an analogy that you're meant to make significant allowances for in your mind and meaning like how it actually looks in practice, right?

So like gentleness for a man looks very different than gentleness for a woman. So if he's saying, hey, you know, we were gentle with you.

Like we didn't go to war against you at the beginning. There are points where he does go to war against churches.

Right, am I gonna have to come to you with a rod? Well, like there's a place for a man, like a man's standard disposition should be peaceable, right, and quiet.

And there are times where, you know, men need to lay aside that in a way that women don't have as many, like that more summarize their disposition in general than it does with men.

Does that make sense? So men are made to fight, like fight the enemies. Women aren't made to fight all the enemies in the same kind of way.

So in that way, what's happening is people are just equivocating. So you basically have words that have different kinds of applications to different genders, but they're not the same application.

Does that make sense? Yeah, yeah, yeah. So with the command in 1

Peter 3, I mean, it's not right to say that 1

Peter 3 applies to men, right? Oh, no, absolutely not. So what 1

Peter 3, those words in that context, in that instruction, that is a unique gender -specific instruction to women, that basically just to say that, hey, yeah, you should be submissive towards your husbands.

And what that's gonna look like, right, is that you're not gonna be at war fighting your husband. You're gonna have a peaceable, quiet, you know, spirit.

You're not gonna be sassing him all the time. You know, you're not gonna be yelling at him all the time. You're gonna be known, like, you're gonna have a gentle, sweet, humble, submissive disposition towards him, right?

So in that context, those words mean you need to have a submissive, humble, you know, quiet, following disposition towards your husband that's peaceable.

Like, you probably wanna put all that in there. You know, that's what it means. Like, peaceable, you know, humble, quiet, follower.

You're not there to tell your husband, like, the hundred ways in which he's messed up every single day and make every active leadership he has hard.

Like, you're there as a follower role who, you know, you're not there just to be a thorn in the side, like, a loud, boisterous, contentious

Proverbs 31 woman, for sure. So that has a very specific application there. And then there's other ways in which, like, there's ways in which a husband might be gentle towards his wife.

And there's certainly ways in which a husband should be peaceable towards his wife. You know, but that more means he's humble as the leader, like a humble leader, not like a humble follower, right?

And he's, you know, peaceable as a leader would be peaceable to a subordinate. Not peaceable as a subordinate would be to a, you know, superior in rank in that way, for sure.

Okay, so why then is it that so many Christians, you know,

I mean, why is it that, you know, when you put a poll out like this, most of the people say, yes, you know, this command applies to both.

I mean, why, how have we gotten to a place where, you know, we're so convinced that men should follow all of the same exact commands women have, even to the point of like a command specifically addressed to women now applies to men in their mind as well?

Yeah, well, I mean, that's, I mean, the idea is that it's egalitarianism essentially. So the idea of egalitarianism is that we're all the same, we're all, you know, there's nothing different.

We're basically interchangeable parts. Men and women are the same functionally. I mean, there's only superficial differences in the minds of many people.

So like God's like arbitrarily given men certain roles and given women certain roles.

And what you can't really do, you know, you can't really do this at all is you can't come along and point out the differences between men and women.

You can't do that. So you basically have to view men and women as functionally the same, you know? So we're, the only difference really is that, like in the minds of many people is that like a lady is actually a superior man.

And I'm not saying that like as men go on their own way, bitter kind of person or something like that.

People think when I say these things that I'm just somehow bitter about it or something, but like the idea is I'm just, I'm speaking like the language of pure logic right now, okay?

So like there's nothing emotional happening right now. This is just pure logic. So think it through. If men and women are the same, but then women also can make babies and feed them with their bodies, it seems to me that a woman is a better man.

Does that make sense? Yeah. Meaning like women, if women can do everything a man can do and she has additional things she can do that men can't do, she's better than a man, right?

So she's a better biological creation at that point because she has more inherent usefulness to them. But the issue is it's just, that's not really the way it works.

And like men and women are just very different. They're made to do very different things. Women are made biologically to care for children.

And that's why even, you know, when Paul even used an analogy, we were like a, you know, a nursing mother to you.

He's, you know, he's basically just saying that there is an aspect of our pastoral care to you that in some small shadowy way mirrors like a woman's care for a child.

And everyone is supposed to make allowances in their mind to say that, but not even close, right? It's not even close to the same, but you know, in one small way we can see how there might be a slight parallel or something like that.

But the idea is that people, they think of men and women as the same, deep down. They think of them as the same.

And part of it is because you're not really allowed to just talk about the differences. So the moment you start talking about the differences, then it's just like, you come across like the, you know, the 10 -year -old boy or something looking at the 10 -year -old girl saying,

I can beat you up, right? Like that's what, and that's what many people are trained. And so what's happened is like in a polite society, men shouldn't go around talking about all the ways in which they're better at things than women, right?

Right. Like that isn't really good form, you know, but then the issue is that when you're living in a society that's constantly praising women, like the society we live in, like their strategy for praising women is to tell women they're good at all the things that they're actually objectively bad at.

Does that make sense? Yeah. So it's like, you go girl, you're strong, you're powerful, you're courageous.

It's like, this is a joke, you know? Like these are the things that men are strong at. Like men are strong and powerful and courageous.

Like women are not, you know, they're, this is like biology and math and science are all converging together and God's word converging together to paint an entirely different picture that no one's allowed to talk about.

But what actually happens is when you tell like the ladies that they're strong and powerful and courageous, and then they're living in a society that protects them from ever having to find out how weak they are, then they might actually believe you, you know?

So, but then the issue is like with, at every single level, what happens is like the society is saying, hey, women could be good leaders, you know?

And they're powerful and they're strong and they're courageous and they're independent and you know, all this stuff, they don't need a man.

And so every single one of those things are just lies. They're all lies. A woman was not made independently.

She was made for man, right? So all those things are lies. And then what actually happens is in the minds of many people, they don't understand that men and women are different creatures that are made for different purposes.

And then if they believe the Bible at all, the Bible just says, hey, the guy's a leader. We don't know why, right?

Like we have no idea why God made man a leader and a woman a follower because we've been telling women for years that they could lead just as well as a man.

We've been telling women for years that they're strong and powerful, courageous. We don't need, like why do we even need men for anything, right?

Like men are just useless. Like they're all rapists, you know? And -

Well, who would be the comedic relief in all of the 90s sitcoms? I mean, it's true.

So then once you get to that point, like you have arbitrary commands, a man's supposed to technically lead somehow, but you gotta be really careful with that because if he does try, then he's gonna be a chauvinist and misogynist and everything else.

And if he does think, hey, there's things I'm better at than my wife, like maybe God made me a leader and her a follower because I'd be a better leader than her.

And if we let her lead, maybe it'd be a disaster. Like if you say something like that, people think you just demean women and you're misogynist and you hate women or something.

And so, but then the end of the day though is, yeah, if we let men make the babies, how would that go?

You know? It would go equally bad, you know? I mean, it really would.

So think it through. But so like, we're okay with women being superior. We're not okay with like men having anything that's unique.

And so then when you come to passages like this and then you see like words that, like there may be certain senses in which a man and women do take on like the same kind of traits, you're not able to see how they're applied differently based on functional differences, role differences and everything else.

And so what you end up with is just a scenario where people, they really don't know. They're not allowed to say, they've been cowed into not being allowed to say men and women are different.

They have different roles. Well, it's really concerning too, because I think you brought this up last week, but you mentioned this idea when we were talking about Paul's charge to the men in the

Church of Corinth to act like men, right? I mean, he just says it that plainly.

And there was a comment you made that I thought was pretty interesting when we were talking about that, where you pointed out that a lot of people actually, a lot of Christians actually look at a command like that, and they don't actually read it as a gender -specific command almost.

They read it more as a, hey, men, act like Christians.

Yeah, that's exactly what I mean. And so this issue seems a little bit like it's the same problem, it's just on the other end of the spectrum where now we're talking about, hey, here's a command given specifically to women.

And I mean, it is objectively to women and only women in 1

Peter 3. And you have this command that says, let's see.

Let your adorning be. Yeah, adorn yourself with a gentle and quiet spirit, right?

And so you have this command very specifically to women, and the impulse of many is to say, this applies to both genders, right?

And so it's very interesting that when it comes to the command given specifically to men, this saying, act like men, that somehow means just general

Christianity. That might as well say, men of Corinth share the gospel.

Right, that's what it means. Because that's how people are reading it. But then when it comes to the command given to women, it's a, well, that's actually for everybody.

You know, that seems really concerning to me because it really does seem like in a lot of ways we are trying to neuter men as much as possible in terms of their ability to lead, in terms of their ability to properly defend their families and their church from things like false teaching.

I mean, like, I think if you were to, if you were to entrust the same people who are saying 1

Peter 3 is a command to everyone, not just women, you would have a group of people who, if they had been there when

Christ had done half of the things that he had done, they would have condemned him for it. Yep, yep.

You know, so when he's driving people out of the temple who are trying to profit.

That isn't very gentle and quiet. Profit, yeah, I mean, like they would have rebuked him for it, right?

Right. I mean, when he's talking to the rich young ruler and he's just straight up, you know, you've got to do this.

Well, that's what they want. That's what they want right now. I mean, that's why, you know, the standard pastor that they want to hire is going to be the kind of person who basically is a submissive kind of pastor, right?

I mean, basically the kind of pastor who's not going to step on anyone's toes and who is going to be, you know, but what the standard church wants is they want the guy to apply what

Peter is telling a woman to apply by gentle and quiet spirit to everyone around them. So he's just a milquetoast effeminate man without a spine who, you know, basically just submits to anyone and everyone.

That's what they want. Right, but then I think the reason that's so concerning is because it seems like it leaves the church, you know, the big

C church, the universal church, or at least the American church in this really dangerous position where,

I mean, essentially you just have people who will not defend the church from things, from false teaching.

Right. Because, you know, because you've taken, because you've taken this gentle and quiet,

I mean, essentially a submissive, a command to be submissive, you've taken it so far to mean it must apply to you the same way it applies to women, then what you're going to have is you're going to have pastors or husbands or fathers who think it's actually sinful to even dare to suggest that someone else might be wrong in their understanding of scripture, which then leads to it, you know, a whole cavalcade of issues down the line for the church as well.

Yeah, and that really came out in the other poll that I was making, you know, where I was basically asking, is there ever a time and a place where a husband should raise his voice towards a disrespectful wife?

And overwhelmingly people just weren't having it, you know, like in that way, like meaning they were just really uncomfortable.

A lot of people were just really uncomfortable with the idea that a husband would ever speak in a firm tone of voice to his wife at all, because they have the same rules, like in their mind, it's like the same rules of communication apply in every way.

And I mean, if you really want to cause a lot of consternation with Christians, you know, just try to think about what are the rules of communication from husbands to wives and from wives to husband.

And, you know, the way they work is that they're just actually a different set of rules. And people don't realize that, like meaning, you know, when the

Roman centurion is looking at Jesus and asking him to heal his servant or whatever, and Jesus says, okay, we'll go and do it.

He says, you don't have to go. You can just say a word and they'll be healed because I understand how authority works. I tell one man to go, you know, this way, and he goes this way.

And I tell another man to do this and he does it. And so that's like the way authority relationships work is that there's different expectations for how communication works within them, meaning like commands go down the authority ladder, requests go up.

So Esther, you know, goes to Ahasuerus and has to appeal to them and ask him a question to do something.

Whereas, you know, Ahasuerus down to Esther gives commands. Like that's the way all authority relationships works.

That's the way that a husband and wife relationship works where a husband, like a wife is told to obey her husband because that means he's giving her instructions.

He's telling her things to do. And in the minds of many people, like if a husband were to give his wife a command, they don't have any category for that because the rules are the same.

Does that make sense? Like in their mind, but then biblically, the way authority relationships work is commands go down and requests go up.

So just like your kid shouldn't say to you, hey, you know, go get me some milk. Dad, go get me some milk, right?

Like your kid shouldn't say that because that's the command they should ask. Like, dad, can you please go get me some milk?

Well, there's different ways that communication works and there's different, like that shows up in a wide variety of ways as husband and wife even relate to each other.

So there's just gender differences across the board and a lot of this is related to authority relationships. So what people want is they want the submissive man, right?

And so then they'll use like connections with these kinds of words in other passages basically to say the relationship is actually the same but then it's a very different kind of relationship.

Okay, well, I think that's a good place for us to wrap up the conversation on.

And, you know, like I was saying earlier, this is, from my perspective, this certainly is a pretty concerning trajectory that we're on right now.

If the majority of people are willing to say that a command obviously addressed to women is also applies to men.

I mean, there's just so many issues that come from that. And, you know, in certain, like you said, Tim, certainly men are still, men ought to still be gentle, right?

But they ought to be gentle in the way that men ought to be gentle and not in the way that women ought to be gentle.

And so we've talked about all of that, but it's worth remembering as we wrap up the conversation on.

So we thank all you guys for tuning in and listening and all the ways that you support us, whether it's on social media, interacting with us, commenting on the videos, liking our videos and subscribing.

That does go a long way. So go ahead and do that if you haven't already, if you're on YouTube. And we thank you guys for all of the financial support that you give us week in and week out every month to help us continue to do this stuff.

And if that's something that you want to start doing to support us by giving financially, then you can go to our

Patreon link. It's down in the description and you can sign up to support us financially there as well.

And we appreciate all of that. And so until we see you guys on the next one, thank you.

This has been another episode of Bible Bashed. We hope you have been encouraged and blessed through our discussion. We thank you for all your support and ask you to continue to like and subscribe to Bible Bashed and share our podcasts with your friends and on social media.

Please reach out to us with your questions, pushback, and potential topics for us to discuss in future episodes at BibleBashedPodcast at gmail .com

and consider supporting us through Patreon. If you would like to be Bible Bashed personally, then please know that we also offer free biblical counseling which you can take advantage of by emailing us.

Now, go boldly and obey the truth in the midst of a biblically illiterate world who will be perpetually offended by your every move.