Keep sharing good news without ads.
No description available
Elephant won't fight.
There's nothing left but the spotlight.
Hold my beer, you can find me in the moonlight.
You can say what you want.
You can say what you want, what you want around me.
You can say what you...
I'm wits in the deep end and I can't find my assigned seat to sit in.
My theology don't fit in.
Black sheep of the Reformation sheep pen.
To the Reformed, I'm just another Baptist, baptized again.
The bastard child of Anabaptist.
Hostage child of Reformation society.
We don't need your education.
Give me a Bible and a brookshelf of dead men.
Cigars, bourbons, and beer cans.
Bow ties, tattoos, and bearded men.
Making Reformation great again.
Alright, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Open Air Theology Show.
My name is Jeff and I am one of the pastors and elders of Covenant.
We are a Reformed Baptist church in Tallahoma, Tennessee.
If you're ever in the area, please stop by and check us out.
Worship the Lord with us.
And I'm passing it over to this dork fish over here.
Is that me or are you pointing to nothing?
Okay.
I am Pastor Brayden.
I am the pastor of Valley Baptist Church in Hagerman, Idaho.
We are a small fellowship that gathers in southern Idaho on the Lord's Day, like today at 11
a .m.
If you live in this area, I would love to invite you to come worship the King of Kings with ourselves as we just
revel and celebrate the resurrection of Christ.
And I'll pass.
And I'm just also Reformed ex -Mormon as my YouTube channel and it's a blessing to be a co -host with people like
this.
No mic working.
Yahoo down here.
No mic and headsets weren't working.
So if my mouth is going and my sound is coming out later, it's Brayden's
fault.
Anyway, my name is Tom Shepherd and I am a member of Grace Bible Church here in Birney, Texas.
And excited.
We had a great Lord's Day today.
I'm just excited to be a co -host here at Open Earth Theology with these yahoos talking about
your typology today.
Well, it's definitely a joy to have you a part of Open Earth Theology.
So, I mean, you already said your Lord's Day was good.
So what did your pastor preach on?
So today was a it was a special day.
It was we had one baptism, a lady named Erica, young lady named Erica, gave her testimony.
She was baptized today.
And then we had a fellowship meal afterwards.
But he preached on what baptism was being identified in Christ, a picture of what is what
has actually happened to us.
And then the method and the model all about being baptized is that we don't baptize children, that it's upon a
profession of faith.
And then he talked a little bit about, you know, what the model was in Scripture, as who
it was that actually got baptized.
And it was always following, believing, always following a confession of faith.
So my Lord, well, my Lord's Day was good.
I was I was able to preach this, my 70th, 70th, 70th
message, number 75.
OK, of the Gospel of John.
And it was really good.
We had a new family show today.
They drove from Murfreesboro, Tennessee, so about 45 minutes away.
And they, you know, according to them, they absolutely love the service.
They plan on coming back next week.
And the Lord is growing our church.
I mean, like, I don't know if y 'all if y 'all heard, but there's something going on in Tallahoma, Tennessee.
And, yeah, y 'all need to come and be a part of it.
It's really great.
So, yeah, something in the water, something in the bourbon.
But, yeah, yeah, yeah.
So it was a really good Lord's Day.
I'm so thankful for my co -pastor, Pastor, Pastor Cal, co -elder and
his family.
And also, I don't know if I informed anyone of this, but there's a possibility
that we're going to get a new church building.
And it's it is really nice.
Like, compared to where we are, we're basically and, you know, have you ever been to a
hole in the wall bar?
We're basically the hole in the wall church.
And but but the building that we're looking at, it is gorgeous.
It's an actual church building.
The church that was originally there was planted in 1969.
They just recently closed down and June 30th of this year.
And and they left everything.
It was as if they were raptured and we were left behind.
Right.
Or or or as they were having service, there was a bomb threat.
They left and no one has come back yet.
I mean, everything is still there.
I mean, it's going to take us if we get it, it's going to take us about a week to clean everything up.
However, it's a beautiful church and and we will actually have a building that looks like a
church that we can actually have signs.
And so we're excited.
If you would, please, please keep that in your prayer request.
Yeah.
But the Lord will grant us this building.
Yeah, I'm so excited, brother.
That's that will be awesome.
That'll be absolutely fantastic.
My church service today was an absolute blessing.
I have the opportunity to preach in Galatians 2, verse 21, all the way to
chapter three, verse four.
And the title of today's message is Foolish.
It's talking about how Christians and it's something that we have to keep ourselves from.
Is the church of Galatia started off knowing they were justified by faith in Christ?
Hey, check your microphone.
I can hardly hear you.
Is that better?
No. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You're good. Is that better?
So the churches of Galatia were able to have people come in and convince them that by
mutilating and circumcising themselves, that that's how they were maintaining this righteousness or
maintaining and being perfected in the flesh.
And Paul's very quick to call them foolish and that they were bewitched.
And so it was just a great reminder that not only does salvation first purchase us, but it keeps
Christ keeps us and he maintains our salvation through his righteous life.
And that it is all the way until we are glorified and beyond that, that we are saved by Christ alone.
So it is a good blessing to be in there.
I also got some really good, exciting news I can't announce yet.
We know it, but we can't tell you.
I know.
Y 'all better be waiting.
I'm so excited about to be able to finally announce it publicly and whatnot.
So anyway, I can't say more or else I'll end up saying it.
He brought you to it.
He'll bring you through it.
That's right.
So anyway, what are we talking about today, gents?
Well, we're talking about two tier typology.
But before we get into two tier typology, I think it's best to begin with typology.
Like what is typology?
And a lot of times what I like to do is I like to use a structure of a menu.
So so this right here is not a menu.
However, it is a bulletin for our church.
So whenever you go to a restaurant, right, they hand you a menu.
And if you're like me, you like pictures.
I don't I don't like to read something and I not know what it looks like.
And so I like a menu like a restaurant that gives me pictures.
And if I see something on the menu that I want, a lot of times, you know, if I'm at a Mexican restaurant or something like
that, I can't read those words.
I just point my listen.
Give me this.
All right.
Well, they take my menu and then they bring me back the substance.
They don't bring me back the menu.
And so when it comes to typology, it's the understanding that that there's a type.
There's a shadow and there's an anti type.
There's a substance.
And so the type is a shadow of something.
The anti type is the substance of something.
I am not my shadow.
But from my shadow, there's certain features that you can tell about me.
And so and so, you know, you know, like this is something that we'll probably bring out in the two tier
typology.
But but something that's really clear in scripture is that when John the Baptist sees Jesus, he
says, behold, the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.
And so that Pascal lamb was a pitcher.
It was a type.
It was a shadow of something greater, that greater being Jesus
Christ.
Now, if you want to explain to tier typology, Brayden.
Yeah, I'm a present something on the screen just to show here.
But as I'm going there, I want to encourage the audience and let you know that you have come to the right place to learn about typology.
As we two years ago put together a.
Is that showing through on your guys's side at all?
I'll pull it up.
OK, go ahead and pull that up there.
There we go.
Sweet.
We did a conference on from shadows to substance, which was dealing with
And so I would argue and put forth that I think 1689 Federalists have some of the most deepest
and and true understanding of what typology is in scripture.
Something that I have right here for us is from a sermon that I just recently gave at
another church in California.
But I have something I just wanted to read here for us to define what to two tier typology is, which
comes underneath the umbrella.
It's under the umbrella and the definition of typology.
We're not trying to give a different definition to typology.
It's just a more robust, a more exhaustive definition of it.
And so the the the definition is is here.
It's two tier typology in 1689.
Federalism refers to the theological concept where Old Testament people, events and
institutions.
First tier serve as types or shadows that pointed forward to greater New Testament
realities.
Second tier fulfillment in Christ.
These typological structures highlights how the Old Covenant symbols such as
Israel, the temple and sacrifices find their ultimate completion and true meaning in Christ and his
work in the New Covenant, revealing the continuity and fulfillment of God's redemptive
plan.
I'll hit stop sharing now at that point.
But all that being said is it's saying that not only was was
the lamb just a type of Christ, but the like Jeff said
that John looking at Jesus saying, behold, the lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world.
He's referencing the Passover lamb in that the sacrificial lamb.
And there was something that that sacrificial lamb did do and fulfill in the Old Testament.
That is the first tier.
And it's served its purpose and it served a purpose back then.
And that understanding gives you a better, more robust understanding of what the
anti type, the second tier, fulfills in Christ.
And so we have examples today that we're going to talk about with that.
And so I would I would turn it over to Tom to be able to look at some examples.
If I can real quick answer a question, a servant of Christ asked a question.
And so that was Solomon Solomon's porch.
And I went there probably for about a month or two months.
It's actually how I met my co -elder, Pastor Cal Cernulia.
So, yeah, I used to go there, but I never served at that church.
OK, OK, so we can look at a couple of examples, and I'm actually got these examples
out of Samuel Renahan's book, The Mystery of Christ, His Covenant and Kingdom.
And on page 32 there, we can look at, for example, John 32, 33, where
Jesus calls himself the John what?
John 6, 32 and 33.
John 33, I was like, I ain't got that book.
Where Jesus calls himself the true bread and he connects the bread with the wilderness to himself.
So John 6, 32 says, truly, truly, I say to you, it was not Moses.
Was it not Moses who gave me the bread from heaven?
But my father gives you the true bread from heaven for the bread of God that he for the bread of
God is he who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.
This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like the bread that the fathers ate and died.
Whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.
The bread was not the bread was not a lesser version of Jesus, but it pointed to
him.
So the bread that came in that they ate, they died.
It still served its purpose.
They died, but it pointed to the bread of life.
Who is the bread of life?
Which is Christ.
There's another one.
Paul says in 1st Corinthians 10, 4, it says, and all drank from the same spiritual
drink for they drank from the spiritual rock that followed them.
And the rock was Christ.
The Old Testament believers drank from the rock, which was Christ.
The rock and its water were not Jesus Christ, but they portrayed who Jesus
Christ was.
They found salvation in the rock, the water as they drank.
But it wasn't salvific salvation, but it pointed to Christ who takes away the sins of the world, who could
wash you clean.
You drink Christ and you have a salvation in him.
There's a couple others here.
Let me go.
Let me go on.
Referring to the Jewish mosaic laws, Paul says in Colossians 2, 17, these
are the shadows of the things to come.
But the substance belongs to Christ.
The Jewish mosaic law look forward to Christ and his kingdom, but they were not themselves Christ and his
kingdom.
The Hebrew writer makes the arguments repeatedly referring to the Israelites tabernacle in the temple.
In the temple, he says in Hebrews 8, 5, they shall serve a copy and shadow of the heavenly things.
For when Moses was about to erect the tent, he was instructed by God saying, see that you
make everything according to the pattern that was shown to you on the mountain.
And in Hebrews 9, 23 and 24 says, thus is it.
It is necessary for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these rites.
But the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.
For Christ has entered not into a place with human hands, which are copies of the
true things, but into heaven itself, not to appear to the presence of God on our behalf.
For since the law has been a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true
forms of realities.
So all of these examples show types are substantially distinct from
their antitypes.
So they're not the same.
They're not the same substance, but a different thing that pointed to the substance with Christ.
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
The Bible, like I've been preaching to the gospel of John, as you all know, and
like, like the earthly and the heavenly is like,
like, it's really giving me a new understanding.
Like there is the earthly and there is the heavenly.
You have the under the old covenant.
You have the earthly kingdom people, the physical descendants of
Abraham.
And then you have the heavenly, the spiritual descendants, the earthly and the
heavenly.
The heavenly is the spiritual descendants of Abraham.
And so the earthly kingdom people of Israel had they had
their fulfillment right under the old covenant.
And in the new covenant, it's the heavenly kingdom people, which is both Jew
and Gentile.
You can be a physical descendant of Abraham.
As and also be a spiritual descendant of Abraham.
So you have this this two tier typology, meaning that his his covenant people, the Jews
had their place that their position was to bring about
the seed.
So so so there was a seed promise to Eve in Genesis chapter three,
verse 15.
That seed passes to Abraham.
And it's in the sea that comes from Abraham was to keep the law, keep the
covenant and keep the covenant, inherit the land and bless the nations.
That seed passes all the way through the descendants of Abraham,
the physical descendants of Abraham.
And so the purpose of this physical descendants of Abraham was to bring about the seed, which is
So it finds its fulfillment in Christ.
So through Christ, we have the spiritual descendants of Abraham.
And the good thing about the new covenant is that those who believe in that physical seed that
would come would not only be a physical descendant, but a spiritual
descendant.
And so the the earthly points to the heavenly.
And so here in the new covenant, it's the same idea.
So the old covenant had its fulfillment.
Now that we're in the new covenant, the old covenant was pointing to the new covenant and the new covenant
has its fulfillment.
All of it's wrapped up in Christ.
So we we have to understand that we remember that there was a mystery of Christ, that there was a like you said, the promised seed.
And so during Moses's time, Christ hadn't been revealed to them completely.
But they were told to sprinkle the blood over the over the doorway.
So the firstborn of every every person that that was sprinkled over wouldn't die.
And so they did that.
They sprinkled the blood over the doorway.
It saved them salvificly.
But what did it point to?
No, it didn't save them salvificly.
It did not save them salvificly.
So it saved their life.
It saved their life.
It didn't save them salvificly.
So the pascal lamb, like, you know, for everyone that was there that that night in Israel, that
death angel was coming through.
If they would have put that blood over the door, their firstborn son would have not died.
And so by applying that blood, it served the purpose for which it was supposed to.
But it was also pointing to something greater.
And it's the lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.
So his blood covering that cross, covering us
as a substitute.
Saves us from the wrath of God.
Theirs was not salvificly.
Theirs was a physical life being saved.
Ours is salvificly spiritual.
So the picture was the picture was those who entered this area and the blood is covering their
covering them.
They will be saved with their physical life pointing to being saved eternally
in Christ.
So those who are in Christ are saved salvificly.
That's what I know.
And I that absolutely factual.
I would go back to Jeff's picture of that real fast.
Abraham looking to the stars.
One side of the fulfillment of that is his multiple physical offspring that he had that came from him.
They still are existing today.
There's still several offspring from Abraham.
Guess what?
It is innumerable.
It's a large sum of people now.
But that it is a greater fulfillment in and not the children of the flesh, but the children of the promise, according to
Galatians chapter three.
So that is a clear example of two tier typology where there is a type given, which is the stars.
It's physically fulfilled in the physical people.
But then the second anti type, the true fulfillment of it is in Christ.
Somebody somebody said that they they heard that Presbyterian say that two tier typology is is Jesus.
I would respond and say, of course, they would say that because they have to hold to that or else their whole
system would fall apart.
I wanted to show an example on the screen here.
If you pull that up, let me know because I cannot see you guys right now.
Is it up there?
Yep.
Perfect.
What do you mean?
You can't see us.
So I'm looking at this screen right now.
The logo screen.
I'm looking at this and I can't see you guys.
Just let me know if I lose you for any reason.
No, you're good.
So Hebrews eight is the absolute kicking out the legs from Presbyterian
theology.
With the covenant of grace in here.
It talks about a covenant of being made with the house of Israel and the way that and this is a
reformed Baptist.
Federalist is going to say that this is applied directly to the elect.
Anybody that is in Christ, a .k .a. the elect, is the covenant that God that they're brought into this covenant
relationship through Christ.
So meaning children should not take the covenant sign until they are professing believers.
The this flies in the face to Presbyterians.
And so, therefore, they go to the Jeremiah 31 text and they say, well, you see when it says in here
that the covenant being made with the house of Israel and all the people knowing him.
This is talking about the exile of Babylon after they after they are brought back into the land and released from
Cyrus, that they would they would just come back to being in a state of more people knowing him.
So there were still unbelievers in the nation of Israel when they were released from Babylon.
But the great majority believed in him.
And therefore, this this text here in Jeremiah 31 is not saying is
not talking about.
It's not saying that everybody will actually know Christ, but a great majority of them will.
And then they'd come back to Hebrews eight and say, you see, that's why we can bring children to the covenant that might not know, might
not actually know God.
But the issue with that is how is Paul intending for us to understand the way that he's writing
this?
It has to be the question.
And it is meant for us to understand that, though Jeremiah first wrote it
specifically talking about the nation of Israel being held in captivity, Babylon, there was a greater
fulfillment that Paul applies to the church and the elect today.
Right here, I have an example of how this works.
So Hosea 2 is a text that shows verse 23.
It says, and I will sow her for myself in the land and I will have mercy on no mercy.
And I will say to not my people, you are my people and he shall say, you are my God.
Hosea is prophesying about the captivity of Babylon
and their eventual release from that captivity.
So this is fulfilled in 500 B .C., somewhere around that time.
Well, every Presbyterian that is a Calvinist, as most are, loves
Romans nine.
And let's look how Romans nine uses this text that was applied and fulfilled in 500 B .C. physically.
Let's see how Romans nine uses it.
We'll go ahead and read verse 22.
What if God showing to desiring to show his wrath and to make known his power has endured with much
patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction in order to make known the riches of his glory for vessels of
mercy, which he has prepared beforehand for glory.
Even us whom he has called not from the Jews only, but also from the Gentiles.
Let me pause there and say Paul saying what I'm about to say applies to both Jew and Gentile.
Those that have faith in Christ have been prepared beforehand for glory.
As indeed, he says in Hosea, those who were not my people, I will call my people
and her who was not beloved, I will call beloved.
And in this very place or in the very place where it was said to you, you are not my people there.
They will be called the sons of the living God.
Now, pause that.
How is Paul saying that the ultimate fulfillment of this text is to be applied
today to those that are in Christ?
But Hosea wrote it specifically talking about the physical redemption of the people of Israel, not
salvificly from Babylon back to the land of Jerusalem, which then
that just gives so much more credence to covenant theology.
Because Paul is saying this Israel, the people who were not my people are now called my people.
This Israel is made up of Jew and Gentile.
There's a reason.
There's a reason why Arminianists try to use that exact same argument against
Calvinists that the Presbyterian is using against the reformed Baptist.
Be consistent.
If you want to hold Romans 9 as a Calvinistic text, you need to be a reformed Baptist.
Because you're not applying two tier typology correctly.
And that's the danger that we see also in dispensationalism.
Because a dispensationalist will come to that text and not point to Romans 9.
So, yeah.
So a dispensationalist would say the Old Testament authors had a certain meaning and whether the author attend at that time.
And I really like what, by the way, Beal wrote, who is a OPC pastor.
He said Old Testament passages contain thick descriptive meanings and unravel layer
after layer subsequent stages of canonical revelation.
This means that Old Testament passages can be understood more deeply in light of the developing
revelation of parts of the Old Testament, especially in the new.
The Old Testament authors had a true understanding of what they wrote, but they didn't have an exhaustive
understanding of what they wrote.
So when they were writing something back then at that time to whoever they were writing to,
he intended exactly what was going on.
Whatever the Holy Spirit was moved through him to write, communicate.
But he had an understanding of what he was writing.
Did he have an exhaustive understanding of what it pointed to?
No, nobody did.
It was a mystery that was found in Christ in the New Testament.
That's why we read the Old Testament in light of the new.
100%.
And that's, by the way, an OPC pastor.
He's Presbyterian.
So he did hold to typology, at least in some places.
And Ben pointed out that I did a series on federalism on my YouTube, on my
church's YouTube channel.
And and I did.
And I've learned a lot more concerning since then.
And so I'm thinking within a couple of years, I'll probably do a new one on it.
And, you know, not saying that I'll delete the old one, but to bring to light some of the other new
findings I see now, you know, I preached through Galatians.
And now I would love nothing more than to preach to Galatians because I've learned so much more about Galatians.
I've preached through Hebrews and now I want to preach through Hebrews again.
What would you say?
Because I think a lot of people will make this argument as well, that sometimes people will say unless
unless the type, it's not a typology unless it explicitly says it
in the New Testament.
Why?
Why would we not hold to that?
Well, I would say it's a cop out.
Because because what I see as a structure given to us by the
apostles in the New Testament on how to interpret the Bible.
This is why I am a 1689 Federalist.
Listen, like like whenever, you know, like like I've had my theological journey.
And eschatology used to be so much fun to me.
And listen, eschatology is fun.
Like having that conversation.
It is absolutely fun.
However.
Baptist covenant theology.
It's so much fun.
Like, it doesn't matter what passage of scripture you give to me.
I can use Baptist covenant idealism and give you the what I
would believe is the proper interpretation by using the examples given to us
by the apostles in two tier with two tier typology.
So all we're doing is is is is that we are submitting.
So it's all like acts to 42.
It says to devote yourselves to the teachings of the apostles.
Also, if you are a teacher, you need to devote yourselves to the
interpretation of the apostles.
How did the apostles interpret the scriptures?
The scriptures that they had was the Old Testament.
What you're saying, it's not a one time thing that if it just doesn't explicitly say it, but that we should actually apply
this hermeneutic in general, because this is a pattern that the apostles used.
Absolutely.
And I think to not do so, you are.
You are building a wall between yourself and the proper interpretation.
Well, so this is what Second Timothy 315 says that it says, and that from childhood, this is Paul
writing to Timothy and that from childhood, you have known the sacred writings, which are able
to make you wise and to salvation through faith, which is in Christ Jesus.
This is this is Paul telling him, look at the Old Testament and you will see it.
It's obvious it's there.
When you are converted and you have eyes that can see, you will see Christ on every page of
the Old Testament.
I mean, Jesus, when appearing to the disciples on the road to advance, he he he
he opens up things from Moses and all the prophets and shows how these things were concerning him
teaching of him.
There is there is typology everywhere.
Let me ask you this.
Is there a specific place in the New Testament where it says that Jesus
is the seed that was promised to Eve that would crush the head of the serpent?
Not directly, no.
See, it's not directly.
You have to really study and dive into it.
And so and so by that argument, we cannot say that that that that's the proto
evangelium announcement of the gospel.
So if they want to use that argument, then they cannot hold to Genesis 315 as being
about Jesus Christ on that cross, bruising the head of the serpent.
You know, I mean, I was going to say, go ahead.
Sorry, Nehemiah Cox.
He talks about this too.
Cox.
Is it Cox?
C -O -X -E.
Get it right, man.
Have respect for the dead.
And he says this, Nehemiah Cox.
If this is the method of interpretation practiced by the apostles, and if it is probably
if it properly handles the mystery of Christ as a mystery, then we are not only
allowed to use it, but we are required to use it.
Boom.
A .W. Pink says this.
I'll drink to that.
Amen.
It is not sufficiently realized by many of the Lord's people that the historical
portions of the Old Testament scriptures are something more than a record of events which transpired
thousands of years ago.
You're breaking up, son.
You're breaking up.
No.
Am I really?
Badly?
Well.
Give me a second, y 'all.
Give me a second.
I'm going to probably lose you for a moment because I'm in a hot spot.
That's okay.
If you go off the screen, we're going to make fun of you.
My wife's watching.
Don't do that.
She hears us make fun of you all the time.
That's the second nature.
She makes more fun of me than you guys.
You know what?
I like and I'll just go ahead.
I was reading A .W. Pink through, I think it was through the Joseph story,
and he was talking about, you know, how his father had a special love for him.
It wasn't by accident.
He's a representative that's pointing to the father and crying.
Can you hear me?
Hello?
Can you hear me now?
Nothing.
I can hear you.
Nice. All right.
It's working better now, I think.
Let me read this.
This quote.
A .W. Pink says, which I think this touches on exactly what Jeff is talking about with many Christians not
willing or not able in their own mind to rationalize several things.
That's what's going on, man.
You're breaking up again.
I just got some Internet.
A .W.
I've got a potato up here as my router.
So leave me alone.
A .W. Pink says, it is not sufficiently realized by many of the Lord's people that the historical
portions of the Old Testament scripture are something more than a record of events which transpired thousands of years
ago.
They are written not only for our information, but also for our edification.
They are full of valuable instructions, and they contain precious illustrations and striking exemplifications of
the truth.
He then goes on to say, the great purpose of God in the word is set to
support Christ in his glory, and therefore Moses, the
Psalms, and all the prophets are full of him.
Every page of scripture is designed to point us to Christ.
One hundred percent.
Did I break up?
It was good.
At the same time, I do think that it's important that we don't force it when it's not there.
A hundred percent.
If it's not speaking about Christ, then it's not speaking about Christ.
Like he's not.
I wouldn't say that we are to turn, you know, like the whole idea of turning over every rock.
We're not to turn over every verse to find Christ.
But when it's there. It's intended to be there.
Yeah, we need to recognize it.
So, I mean, you look at Joseph when he was imprisoned, and he saved his
brothers.
You know, there was a salvation.
I mean, he was a type of Christ when he forgave his
You know, when his dad had a special kind of love on him, it's a representative.
It's pointing to who the father is.
And Joseph, who was rejected by his very own brothers, who, I mean, it's all typological.
When you look at the Israelites turning and betraying Joseph the same way
that Joseph's brothers did him.
You know, sold him in.
But that points to Judas being sold into slavery, being sold,
being betrayed the same way his brothers betrayed him.
I mean, that's all typological.
Yeah, even John 1, he came unto his own and his own did not receive him.
So the Jews rejecting the Messiah is a fulfillment of the brothers
selling Joseph into slavery.
Like, refusing to accept him as a prophet, right?
Refusing to accept him as the one that whom they are going to bow down to.
Ooh, that sounds a lot like Christ.
And then the grace.
Then the grace.
He repensed on his brothers.
He could have killed them for what they did to him.
But he didn't.
He won't wait.
Or look at the simple fact that Scripture says, out of Egypt, I've called my son.
Speaking of the Israelites.
What does Matthew say?
Talking about Christ.
Jesus is the true and better Israel.
Well, even in the book of Haggai, when Haggai is a prophet telling the people to build the
temple, even in that text, Hebrews applies that better temple that will not be shaken to what
Christ has accomplished in his ministry.
So it's over and over and over.
And let's be clear, in Haggai, when they finished that temple, that's what Haggai was prophesying about was the physical temple.
That's what he was wanting the people to complete.
But then Hebrews says, well, it was ultimately pointing towards Christ.
I mean, Ezekiel, the temple in Ezekiel, where the water is flowing up.
Jesus makes it clear, tear down this temple and I will rebuild it in three days.
Speaking of his own body.
And yet we have dispensationals out here sending money to Israel so they can build the third temple.
When Jesus is the final and third temple, also in
some ways typifies us because we, as the body of Christ individually, we are
temples of God.
What the heck is going on?
You got all this information on us.
Is that from this?
It was.
Spear fingers.
I have no clue.
That's something you brought up in the whole of the menu illustration.
When you have a menu and you're ordering a plate of food and the food comes and you have it in front
of you.
Why would you still hear focus on the menu when your steak is right in front of you eating it?
You know, or be like asking, hey, I want the menu back.
I don't want this.
I don't want the substance.
I want the picture.
I mean, it doesn't make any sense at all.
Why would we go back to the to the things that pointed to Christ when we have Christ?
Well, like it comes down to that, that, you know, Plato's the allegory of the cave.
So you have these guys there.
They're trapped in the cave.
Again, Plato, look it up, find the picture.
I didn't I didn't think to have one.
And so like they're chained up.
This is all they know.
There's a fire pit behind them.
You got people that walk by make noises.
They have these like shadow figures.
And they thought that that was the substance or really that is the shadow.
One day, magically, the shackles falls off of one guy.
He goes out and he sees the world.
He sees that there's this big sun and there's things in front of the sun that cast a shadow.
He goes back in to tell the people, hey, these things are not the substance.
It's the shadow.
And they refuse what he is saying.
And they they rather be with what they know, the shadow, than to
understand the substance.
And that's what Presbyterianism is.
Dispensationalism is is they came out, see it and then went back in.
OK, here we go.
Here we go.
They think it's supposed to.
Yeah, that's it.
So.
So as you see on this one side, you got these guys behind the wall.
They're shackled.
And then there's this fire.
And then there's people walking through making noises there that they have horses.
They have different kinds of shapes of animals.
And those who are chained up, they're seeing these things, thinking that this is the reality.
They don't understand that it's a shadow of the substance.
And so all these things in Scripture, they point to something greater.
The Paschal Lamb, the land of Canaan.
So in the land.
Yeah. Yeah.
And I want to get there as well.
So the land of Canaan, the land of Canaan was to house a people.
It was promised to Abraham.
And we see here in Hebrews chapter 11.
It says it says verse 13.
It says these all died in faith, not having received the things promised, but
having seen them and and greeted them from afar and having
knowledge that they were strangers and exiles on Earth.
For people who speak thus, make it clear that they were seeking a
homeland.
Speaking of, you know, Canaan was this place that was promised to them.
Verse 15.
If they had been thinking of a land from which they had gone out, they
would had opportunity to return, meaning they're not actually thinking of the physical
land.
Verse 16.
But as it is, they desired a better country.
That is a heavenly one.
Therefore, God is not ashamed to be called their God for he has
prepared for them a city.
Speaking of the new Jerusalem.
The heavenly land of Canaan fulfilled its purpose and housing.
It was that promised land, a land flowing with milk and honey.
The old covenant, the Abrahamic, the Mosaic covenant that was added to the Abrahamic covenant.
It was keep the law and live in the land.
That that that that was the Mosaic covenant.
If you keep the law, you can live in the land.
You break the law, you have to you'll be removed from the land.
And we see that happen several times.
Abraham knew this land.
He left this land.
He didn't come back to it because he was looking for a greater land.
And it's the land to come in the new heavens and the new earth.
And that that being that all the not yet.
And it's more tangible than if you were to go right now, fly to Jerusalem and stand in the land of
Canaan, the land of Jerusalem.
You can touch it.
But the greater fulfillment is when Jesus Christ returns and the new heavens and the new earth
come to earth.
That is what Abraham was looking to.
So Abraham, being the man of faith, saw a physical land and he knew that that
was not the land that he was looking to.
He was looking to something greater.
And yet today we have Christians who are focused on the earthly and they're not looking
to the heavenly.
My advice to them would be this.
Come on over to all millennialism and be a covenant and be a reformed Baptist who host
to 1689 federalism.
Because this this conversation, we wanted to do this conversation because we were discussing.
As an amillennialist saying that we have something already, but not yet.
Too many Christians like premillennialists and postmillennialists are wanting the not yet to be right
now.
And therefore they they ignore what we already have today in Christ.
They want what we are.
Listen, it's scary.
Like this is this is a frightening reality that many Christians have been duped into thinking.
I have to have what's not yet.
And I can't and I am going to ignore what already is in the process.
If you think that today that just having faith in Christ is only salvation, which is a miracle and
wonderful and great in itself.
But if that's it, you are ignoring the rest of the things that Christ has brought and accomplished to us.
Hebrews tells us that we are in the land.
He tells us that we're sat with him in the heavenly places.
He says we're part of that true mountain of Zion, that we are part of heavenly Jerusalem, that we
have come to the festal gatherings.
Like if you don't like this is this is the issue.
I think premillennialists and postmillennialists, you don't take church seriously.
Amillennialists are the only ones that are saying we have it now.
And this is what we're celebrating on the Lord's Day right now.
What they're looking forward to.
We're we're we have it now.
We are living in it now.
We are right now living in God's heavenly kingdom as his heavenly kingdom
people in an already and not yet.
Going going to a great picture of two tier typology, the two functions
in Hebrews states that the blood of goats and bulls cannot take away the sin.
And yet the blood did take away sin.
This is the clearest example of typology and the function that I'm reading out of it.
Renningham's book.
Again, the blood and goats of the bulls took away the sins only on the level of purification of the flesh.
The earthly right.
The earthly.
But it could not purify the conscience.
Animal blood was a way to satisfy the demands of the Mosaic covenant in order to remain in Canaan.
Physical promises in order to be in good standing with God.
He would be good in good standing with God, and he would reap temporal promises, good things, blessings
within within the nation Israel.
But it could never satisfy the demands of the covenant of works in order to escape hell.
The beauty of the typology is that some that in some time this entire system was designed to
teach the Israelites about the substitutionary atonement and the remissions of sins through the
blood of Christ.
This is what it pointed to.
So so the typology function on two levels.
The earthly level.
The animal sacrifices had a real function and purpose and meaning, and that meaning was substantially distinct
from the anti type Christ.
The blood of goats and bulls is not the blood of Christ, and their forgiveness was not the
forgiveness that Christ's blood affords.
Nevertheless, they made Christ's forgiveness known.
So it pointed to Christ.
That's two tier type typology right there.
You see it clearly in Chapter 10.
Well, all of most of all Hebrews is landed out.
The Chapter 10 beginning in verse one kind of walks through what you're saying.
That's good stuff, man.
I'm telling you, man, if you want to have if you want to study the Bible and have a blast
at doing so, adopt two tier typology and have one system to
interpret the Bible from beginning to end from Genesis to Revelation.
And we call it Baptist covenant idealism.
You know, and what it is, is it's basically the hermeneutic that that everybody's adopted
from from the time that's that's studying the Bible, which is which is comparing Scripture to Scripture.
You're looking at the Old Testament through the lens of Christ through the lens of the New Testament.
It sure is the way that Christ first taught the Scripture, and it sure is the way that Paul applies the
Scripture.
It's it's just the way to do it.
So. So.
So look at it.
So the Ark Noah's Ark, it had an earthly fulfillment.
What was it?
It was to say Noah, his wife, his three sons and their
wives, eight people, including animals in the earth.
It had a it had it had a physical fulfillment.
Yes.
Go over to Peter.
First Peter, chapter three.
And it compares that to Christ.
That arc points to a greater fulfillment that we enter
into to save us from the wrath of God.
That's right here.
Typology.
That's true.
Well, go ahead.
I was going to say, look at look at the the brazen serpent of the Old Testament.
I touched on it today.
Right there.
It says that the people who were bitten by the snakes, when they looked at the brazen serpent, they were healed.
They were healed physically.
Does that mean that they were healed?
No, physically.
Oh, when we look to Christ, we are healed salvificly.
Are you saying that's pointing to something better?
Yeah, absolutely.
Way better.
I mean, which is better to be healed physically or to be healed
spiritually?
And I'll give you an example for you to think about.
So so Jesus is in a house.
He's preaching and teaching.
And these four friends have a friend who is unable to walk.
They cannot get into the house.
And so they go up on top of the roof.
They lift the latch.
I don't think they tore into the roof because at this time they would be a lot of people.
The Jews would hang out on the roofs.
Because it was cooler at night.
Wow.
So that incident.
Yes. Yeah.
I ruined it.
And so they pull up the latch and they lower their friend who is paralyzed down
inside.
The first thing Jesus did was not heal the man.
He forgave his sins.
The second thing he did was heal them.
And I ask you this.
If you were in that man's place, what would be the the greatest
need?
The forgiveness of sins or the healing of his physical body?
The forgiveness of sins.
The earthly points to a greater reality, a greater substance.
And that is eternal life with God for all.
So eternal life with God.
Our sins are forgiven.
Well, and then go back to the premillennialists and the postmillennialists.
You're making the same mistakes that the Pharisees were making.
What did they think was the greater miracle that day?
The physical side of things.
Because anyone can claim to forgive sins.
But it's only God that can do that.
But you can raise this person.
They were wanting the physical signs over and over and over again.
And it wasn't good enough.
It wasn't good enough.
That's why it's so important.
That's why I think all millennialists get this right.
They're celebrating truly the fullness of what Christ has brought to us today in the new covenant.
While also expecting that Christ is coming again.
Say that again.
We're celebrating.
Why are we celebrating?
Because it's what the Lord has done.
Today is the Lord's day for Pete's sake.
What are we doing?
We have what God has promised to us.
Like right now.
So take Isaiah chapter 9.
So let's turn there real quick.
Oh, is this when you're going to say something about me?
What?
You were going to talk about how God has really helped reform you.
And the spirit has helped aid into that.
But I'm the real catalyst is what you're supposed to say.
And you're supposed to say thank you.
This is the part where you say thank you.
Thank you for making me.
Brayden, you have challenged me and helped on my theology.
Put a period there.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
Have you changed your theology on certain things by arguing with me?
I can't hear what you're saying, right?
That's what I thought you jack leg.
Listen.
Look, I will unashamedly say that you have helped me tremendously, Jeff.
You have helped me too.
Look, I don't even need to say however after that.
I'll just say thank you.
Because I already said it.
Isaiah chapter nine.
Look at verse six.
For to us, a child.
Excuse me.
For to us, a child is born to us.
A son is given.
So that has a literal fulfillment.
Like if you're pointing to Christ, because there is a two tier typology here.
The second tier has a literal fulfillment.
Mary gave the Virgin gave birth to a son.
So now we're going to see this spiritual fulfillment, which a lot of people are saying, no, this is going to happen.
And when he returns and there's going to be a thousand years, so on and so forth.
These premillennials. It says in the government shall be upon his shoulders.
His name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace and the
increase of the government and peace.
There will be no end on the throne of David and over his kingdom to
establish it, to hold on, to establish it and to uphold it with
justice and righteousness from this time forth and forevermore.
The zeal of the Lord of hosts will do this.
Now, I say that that when Christ came.
He not only is he has he has this started,
it's being fulfilled.
Acts chapter two tells us that when he rose from the dead, he sat on the throne of David.
He is ruling and reigning and he's putting all of his enemies under his feet.
This is not something that's going to happen whenever he does a rapture of the
church.
He returns to the earth for a thousand years and he's establishing this physically.
This is a spiritual prophecy.
And I would argue that this spiritual prophecy has more substance than anything that is earthly
that we find in the Old Testament.
Why would why would we want Christ on a physical throne right now?
We want him in heaven at the right hand of the father forever interceding for those who are in him.
And in fact, it says that we are seated with him in the heavenly places in Christ Jesus
right now.
Already, even though we're sitting right here, we're seated with him right now.
Increasingly.
So Jake is he'll be a member of our church next week.
Yeah, we're going to have him on here one day.
So Jake knows that I'm optimistic, but he also knows that my optimistic is different than from a
postmortem optimistic.
But I am optimistic Christ right now.
He is ruling.
He is raining.
He is putting all of his enemies under his feet.
And the last enemy to be destroyed is death.
And sin has a connection with death because when Adam sin, sin
and death came into the world.
When he when Christ comes back and he puts the last enemy under his feet
death.
That means there will also be no more sin.
What's up?
I'm not going to worship him.
I don't know if you guys can even see it right now.
It's not a question and comment.
What you just stated, the joys that we have in Christ currently are not tied with the
world physically getting better or being born Christianized.
We're saying we have this now.
Now.
Right now.
They had it in the first century.
Peter, when he died gruesomely, had the joy that we have today.
It doesn't come and go.
It's here.
It don't matter the harshest persecution.
You being burned at the stake.
You have it now.
And there's victory now.
There's victory already.
It's done.
It's finished.
They are.
If you believe the doctrine of saints.
It's okay.
I'm trying to figure out a psychology.
Historically.
Listen, I'm millennialism is where it's at.
Although I do think that the name deceives, right?
Because we, we, we, we believe that the king, this,
this millennial is first advent to second advent.
And this is why I would argue that, that all modern day post meals are really all meals.
And because we believe the same, they believe the same thing that we believe is that, that,
that the millennium is right now from first advent to second advent.
And we will be post mill in the sense that we believe that, that when Christ returns
will be the end of the millennium.
And so it's kind of, there's kind of an overlap there.
But historical post meal, go ahead.
No, that's exactly what I was going to say.
Go ahead.
Not yet.
So the historical post mill are pointing to a future time of a, of a literal,
some say literal, some say it doesn't have to be literal of a thousand years of peace on earth.
Prior to Christ coming again.
Prior to Christ coming.
That will basically.
There's a point that this golden age hits and then that golden age is, is the.
They kind of fall on the same sword as a dispensationalist.
Like you were saying earlier, right?
They're looking for earthly blessings and fulfillment.
And we would say, no, we have this fulfillment and it doesn't have to be earthly blessings, but it is what we've
received in our, our, our, our Pauline Geneseo, our regeneration, our being united
with Christ and his death.
I am in him.
He is in me.
I am filled with the Holy Spirit.
I am the bride of Christ.
I long to be with my bridegroom, so on and so forth.
And I would just say that the post mills today are really just, and I say this in severe love,
right?
But there are mills that are ignoring the rest of chapter 20 after verse six, because it says
that after verse six, that Satan will be released, deceive the nations and encircle the camp of
Christians.
If your eschatology has to have a glorious heralding in of
Christ to come back, that goes against what revelation 20 says, because right after that, it says that
that's, that's when it's done.
That's when, when judgment takes place is after that.
So Christ comes back to a world that's seeking the blood of his bride.
So like, I don't see anything I disagree with.
Because physical fruit, the growth of Christ's kingdom on that
inevitably changed the world in a real physical way.
Not necessarily.
I wouldn't say necessarily.
I mean, I mean, like, it's going to change.
So it depends on how far you extend that physical way.
The kingdom of God is growing right now.
We know that.
It's the mustard seed.
Exactly.
It's growing, but go look outside.
You don't see it.
It's invisible.
And I mean, you might have some places in some areas in South America where they're experiencing some revival and stuff
like that, but it's not necessarily.
I mean, it didn't work out so well for the apostles.
There will never be an earthly establishment of the kingdom of God until Christ returns.
For if there's ever a time where you can say, look, there it is, then you might as well get rid of Pauline
Genesea, because no one can see the kingdom of heaven unless they're born again.
Weeds and tares grow together.
The weeds and tares.
Now, however, there is physical aspects of fruit, right?
If you are faithful with little, God will bless you with much.
And as and again, it started with twelve, started with twelve and year after year after year,
the church is growing.
It's growing.
It's that stone that was cut out by no human hands that strikes the statue that becomes a
mountain that covers the earth.
However, there's no physical, tangible substance to it outside of the people that are in it.
I just I just I just said that.
Yeah, we would be saying the living conditions are way better than five hundred.
I mean, you know, again, it depends on where you go.
I mean, here.
I mean, I mean, are we doing better?
I mean, I see a D.
I see us digressing.
The more the more we've learned through through technology and all that.
There was more distractions.
The the depravity of man is still raging.
Like like Braden said, that the way the wheat and tare grows together, the kingdom of God is going to grow together.
But the majority of people, the fact of the matter, if you're waiting for for the majority of people, that this entire world is going to be Christian.
It's not going to happen.
It's not now.
Now, to the point of the post mills defense, like there's there is no established
number.
Like is it is it 50 percent?
Is it 75 percent?
Is it 95 percent?
Like there's the there's no way.
Yeah, there's no way to weigh that.
Like like I myself, I believe that the church.
You know, like so, you know, this as well as I do, when things are going good, sometimes people don't really
rely on God.
They only call out to God when things are going wrong in their life.
There's this old song, you know, that the God on the mountaintop is the God in the valley.
He's the same God.
But but when things are going good, people don't see a need to call upon him.
So I have the understanding of.
So when I talk about my optimism, my optimism, it would be in persecution.
I believe the church thrives in persecution.
Whenever things are going good, the church doesn't do so well.
So my my view of victory being on the window as well with victories and what Christ has done
for me on that cross.
That's where the victory is.
It's already won.
Well, well, not only in victory, because we're always we're always thinking that he's only glorified in salvation.
God is also glorified in judging sinners because he's righteous and just so God's word is
going to accomplish exactly what he sets out to do.
And that might be save some and that might be judged some and throw them in hell.
Either way, God is glorified.
He's glorified in his mercy and his grace and his love by the people whom he chooses to save.
And he's also glorified by condemning those.
He doesn't want to have anything to do that.
He's let them go.
He's forsaken them.
You know, so he gets victory either way.
He's glorified because he's God.
And so he's going to accomplish exactly what he sets out to do.
And by grace, we're saved.
And I would just say doing the 1689 covenant idealism, reform
Baptist idealism, whatever we're calling it again.
I forgot what it was.
But when you look at Revelation 11, which is about the two witnesses, that's talking about the entirety of all
what I would argue is all the elect, all the people of God in Christ.
And then you tie that recapitulation to Chapter 20.
And guess what we see?
We see the same story being told to us over and over again.
And the question has to be closed.
Yes, the church does grow in persecution, but there will be a day that the world will not look good.
And that that's when Christ comes again.
That's what it's when it's when all the nations are staring at the dead bodies of the two in the street.
When Satan is released for a short time.
Revelation 20.
Satan is released and they come and they circle
about the camp.
That's when Christ comes again.
So, again, I don't think Christ comes to the world proclaiming and shouting out with trumpets because of how
well it's been changed by Christianity.
No, Christ comes to a world saying murder them, murder them, murder them.
And he vindicates the bride in that last moment.
There's going to be a great falling away.
We know that there's a great falling away.
I think I think it's important that you just said when Satan is released.
But at the same time right now, he's he's he's bound in the fact that he cannot prevent the
gospel from going to accomplish exactly what he set out to do.
Satan is bound in terms of what the gospel is going to be.
And Satan is bound in the sense, too, that he he though he curtailed is is
is a great way of looking at this.
Satan is not just this free agent doing whatever he wants.
God is using a lot.
I think that's the devil is God's devil.
I think God has ownership over the devil.
And he not able to break the God's sovereign plan.
Gosh, well, the point I'm going with is that in
Revelation 20, what's being taught here is the confidence that we should have as Christians, that Satan
will not destroy the bride of Christ.
Even when even when the two witnesses are looking when the whole world has been deceived in the whole world that
hates Christ and the two witnesses comes and stares at them or comes in and circles the camp.
We're still not ultimately conquered by the world.
Christ vindicates us.
So even when things look absolutely.
So, again, the picture painted there is it looks dreary outside.
It looks terrible and horrid outside.
Meanwhile, the kingdom is growing.
Meanwhile, it's going.
And also the pattern of Scripture for the last 2000 years, Jake, is that there's been a remnant.
There's been a remnant all the way through the pattern.
That is the pattern.
And just as Christ conquered and suffering.
Yeah, we too.
Yeah, yeah.
The church conquers and suffering.
We're going to bear the marks.
We're going to bear the scars.
We're going to bear the bear the trials and the tribulations.
What does he say?
They will hate you because they hate me.
I don't ever see a day where where Christianity reigns in such a way that we're paraded
as as as something great and in the eyes of the world.
And if that was the day, I would not I would not expect Christ to be coming anytime soon.
If that day was to take place.
Let's say if in 100 years from now, the world was very welcoming to Christianity.
Scripture sends this lean to say Christ comes back on a dark day.
A dark day when they're trying to kill the church.
Revelation 11, Revelation chapter 20.
The church is the church is persecuted to the point of being stomped out, which is not going to be
stomped out.
But, you know, on the on the looks like it looks like it.
And that's I don't think that's pessimism.
I think that's optimism that Christ is going to come back for his church and that he's growing.
But so the two.
Can I answer this question?
This is really good.
Who are the two witnesses?
So first of all, the text will let you know that it's not to write.
It says the two witnesses are the two olive trees and the
two lampstands.
Now, what's two plus two for.
So we cannot take the number two as literal.
So the olive tree.
So Jesus is the olive tree.
We are the new covenant.
The covenant.
Gentiles are grafted into an already existing olive tree, which is God's people.
We believe as Reformed Baptists that the church listen, dispensationalists, don't get your
paintings up and open a bunch.
We are Israel.
And you go to Revelation.
So if you look in Revelation, chapter one, Revelation, chapter one, we get there real
quick.
Revelation, chapter one.
It speaks about lampstands.
But I mean, you get over here to verse.
Let's look.
Verse 19, it says, right.
Therefore, these things that you have.
I mean, so no, no, no.
It's Revelation, chapter one, verse 20.
As for the mystery of the seven stars that you saw in my right hand and the
seven golden lampstands, the seven stars.
Are the angel of the seven churches and the land and the seven lampstands are the
seven churches.
And so the lampstand represents the church.
And so you have to all of trees.
This is God's people.
Israel and the lampstands is the church.
The church is Israel.
And we, as God's people, the two prophets are
prophesying, calling people to repentance throughout the church age.
And so that's how we would recognize that two churches in the in the letters sent to the seven
are not given a rebuke.
And so Christ already establishes in the book what the lampstands mean.
The reason why God or why Christ in that revelation uses two witnesses is he's saying those
other churches are not being faithful witnesses right now.
Two witnesses, two lampstands.
He's talking about the faithful church that is going forth with the gospel.
They're representative of all the elect.
That's what that's what they represent, ultimately.
And the church is Israel.
So it's not Moses and Elijah or Elijah and Enoch.
It's us.
The book of Revelation tells us who it is.
It's that simple.
And then you go to Zechariah and then go to Zechariah.
I can't remember the exact chapter.
And then Romans chapter 11.
Well, and then also think about what that would mean, because you have to take the grammatical historical approach as well with this, that this
letter is written to suffering churches who see a dark and dreary,
depressing world outside that's calling for their blood.
And what does this encourage them?
Think think of them for a moment.
If you are one of the churches that received a rebuke and you're sitting there thinking, I'm not being
one of the faithful witnesses.
I've lost my I've lost my first love like that would be convicting.
And now think about if you were one of the faithful witnesses, you're being told the world's going to hate you.
They're going to kill you.
But great news.
Christ will vindicate the church.
And so listen, the book of Revelation is written to a suffering church, suffering churches,
and is meant to give them the ultimate hope that Christ Jesus is king and he will come back one day.
And that to die in the flesh means nothing for us.
That's for our death is securing Christ and his resurrection has secured our life.
That's an incredible tattoo.
Three crosses.
It must be Michelle must be talking about you, Jeff.
Got three crosses on my hand.
That's the one he punches somebody.
He's given the gospel at the same time.
Good stuff.
Now, before we end it, we wanted there was one that we wanted to end on concern
and typology.
I can't remember what it was.
Yeah, I remember.
It was Hebrews eight verse 13.
The new covenant.
I thought that's what I thought it was.
I can't remember.
I know we might have touched said something.
I think I might have said something.
The first talking about the old covenant, the covenant of Moses that says whatever is growing old is ready to whatever is
obsolete is growing old and ready to disappear.
So that covenant have very tangible promises, earthly blessings, required
obedience.
And Christ says that end of that is served as a copy.
Verse five.
It served as it served as a copy and a shadow of heavenly things.
So speaking of the law is served as a copy and a shadow of heavenly things, which
is fulfillment is in Jesus Christ.
Hey, brother.
So so I don't know when we were supposed to be interviewing Braden
concerning Mormonism.
And we would like the show afterwards.
We would like to interview you concerning Jehovah Witnesses.
That would be awesome.
I can't remember if you said that you had the way for you to be able
to get on a podcast and be interviewed.
So let us know if you don't.
You'll just have to go sit on Jeff's lap as both be recorded at the same time.
No, no.
Did he?
We have a lot of Jehovah's Witnesses here in Texas.
I mean, they are all over.
They don't say nothing.
They just they just hang out in their little literature stands and they don't say anything.
Let's say I wouldn't want to do that.
But.
It's going to make your butt cheek.
It's cheek tingle again.
Remember that testosterone shopping?
Your gross stories.
Oh, my God.
I got a weak stomach.
I can't handle that grossness.
Why does it make you do it?
I did say the word.
But today in my sermon.
Like, but God being rich in mercy.
Is that like B .U .T .T.
Oh, you use the B .U.
Double hockey stick or button?
No, it's not.
Double cross.
That's H .E. Double hockey stick.
Yeah, I got down and I was like, you use the word, but and I'm like, there's something wrong with it.
I'll face this summer one time called Abraham a pimp.
Also, assemblies of God at that time.
You got to give me a pass.
Always reforming, Jeff.
Always.
Yeah, always reforming.
Anyway, we'll close with that.
Braden, any last words?
I don't know.
I don't know how to.
Love you guys.
Subscribe.
Share this around.
Tell your friends and family.
First of all, about Christ and then have them subscribe to open air theology.
Won't you tell them about our conference coming up?
Got some good news.
Since you hear about Christ justifying those that have faith in him on this show, that's not
the ends for a Christian life.
We're called to be sanctified.
And that's what we're doing this next year's conference on in twenty twenty five in Tullahoma, Tennessee.
The address is still to be announced because there's a chance there might be a change of address if you
brothers and sisters are praying for Jeff to get that new church.
So hopefully that thing is in Jeff's hand, Jeff and his church's hands, because that'll be a great blessing for them
on the Lord's Day and just overall as a church in general.
But also, that'd be a great place to do a conference.
But regardless, it's in Tullahoma, Tennessee, February twenty twenty five.
The title of the conference is called War, and it's on the topic of sanctification.
There's going to be some great speakers, of which I am the least.
So please go check it out.
And I'm just going to go ahead and say this.
It's possible that there might be two open air theology conferences.
What's going on out there?
Just not just one, but two.
Hey, did you know where there's also a lot of Jehovah's Witnesses?
California.
Are there?
There's a lot.
Where did he go?
Jake, California, California and Texas.
We're going to take you up there.
I'll meet you there.
Any last words, Tom?
I mean, just we appreciate you guys watching.
We love doing this.
We love being able to talk about God and and the stories that we're going through.
We hack on each other and we love each other.
We love you guys to keep on.
Keep on watching and share it.
We have a glass doing it.
And as was stated earlier, please, please, please keep us in your prayers.
Keep our church in your prayers, concerning that we might have an opportunity to get a an actual church
building.
I haven't been able to sleep.
They gave me the key the other day.
I've been able to go through there and just check it out and allow people from our congregation to go check it out.
It's really nice.
It would be a wonderful blessing.
So if you all would please covet with me and praying that the Lord will give this,
give us this church building, that would be fantastic.
And if you're ever in Tallahoma, Tennessee, during the conference or after the conference or
before the conference, please come check us out.
Come worship with us.
It would be a great joy to have you.
And as always, hallelujah.
Hollaback!