February 5, 2024 Show with Keith Foskey on “The Calvinism of Martin Luther” PLUS Michael Shultz on “Calvinism & the Love of God”
No description available
Transcript
Live from historic downtown Carlisle, Pennsylvania, home of founding father James Wilson,
19th century hymn writer George Duffield, 19th century gospel minister George Norcross, and sports
legend Jim Thorpe, it's Iron Sharpens Iron.
This is a radio platform in which pastors, Christian scholars, and theologians address the burning
issues facing the church and the world today.
Proverbs, chapter 27, verse 17, tells us iron sharpens iron, so one man
sharpens another.
Matthew Henry said that in this passage, we are cautioned to take heed with whom we converse and directed to
have in view in conversation to make one another wiser and better.
It is our hope that this goal will be accomplished over the next two hours, and we hope to hear from you, the listener,
with your own questions.
And now, here's your host, Chris Arnson.
Good afternoon, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania, Lake City, Florida, and the rest of humanity
living on the planet Earth who are listening via live streaming at ironsharpensironradio
.com.
This is Chris Arnson, your host of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio, wishing you all a happy Monday on this fifth day of
February 2024.
I initially want to just give another big heartfelt thanks, word of thanks,
to my Iron Sharpens Iron Radio listeners for praying for my brother Andy,
who was taken from his nursing home several days ago to the hospital because he had
dangerously life -threatening low levels of oxygen that had a lot to do
with his aspirating food and liquid, which is when food and liquid gets into
your lungs and most often and very often leads to pneumonia.
And they prevented my brother from eating and drinking the entire day
yesterday.
I visited him in the hospital, urged the doctors and the nurses to
reconsider their strict protocol because my brother felt like he was being tortured.
They gave in.
They gave him food and drink, although it was the pureed food and thickened liquid diet that he hates, but it was still
nourishment.
And today, after visiting him, he is a lot better.
There was no negative result from feeding him, and he is being,
God willing, released and returned to the nursing home tomorrow.
So thank you so much.
Keep praying for my brother, especially in regard to salvation, but also for his physical well -being.
Well, we have a double -header today.
We have two pastors who are theologically reformed, and they are also
both speaking at the Open Air Theology Conference coming up later this month
in Tullahoma, Tennessee, on the theme, Why Calvinism?
And for the first hour, we have to do that very thing, to promote that conference.
We have Pastor Keith Foskey, a dear friend of mine, who is one of the pastors at Sovereign Grace
Family Church in Jacksonville, Florida, and his topic today will be the
Calvinism of Martin Luther, a subject that has always fascinated me.
In the second hour, we're going to be joined by Michael Schultz, Pastor of Antioch Baptist Church
of Lewisburg, Kentucky, and Associate Professor of Church History at Forge Theological Seminary,
and he's going to be addressing Calvinism and the love of God.
Gee, is there such a thing?
Is that an oxymoron?
That's what I've always heard.
But anyway, first of all, it's my honor and privilege to welcome you back to Iron Trip and Zion Radio.
My dear friend, Pastor Keith Foskey.
Well, Chris, thanks for having me on again.
I'm looking forward to our conversation today and looking forward to the conference.
So thanks so much for having us.
First of all, explain briefly, as you can, the fine congregation
where you pastor, Sovereign Grace Family Church of Jacksonville, Florida.
Yes, sir.
I am, as you said, I'm one of the three elders here at Sovereign Grace Family Church, and I serve as the
preaching pastor.
And I have been the pastor here since 2006.
I'm in my 18th year serving this congregation, and we are
a Reformed Baptist church.
We hold to the First London Confession, which is the 1646 edition of that
confession.
And so that sometimes brings an eyebrow or two when people hear that we're not holding
to the 1689 confession.
So if anybody's interested in knowing why, they can go to our website at sgfcjacks .org and they can see an
article that I've written on the subject of the confession and why we hold to the First London Confession.
And that's, as I said, I serve with two other elders, Pastor Andy Vontouro, who
you're friends with Chris, who you introduced us and we became good friends and he now serves here, and Pastor
Michael Collier.
So that's our church here in the Ocean Way area of Jacksonville.
Yes, and in fact, I know that I've said this before on the show when I've had you on, but Pastor
Andy was, before I was married to my wife, my late wife, Julie, who
is now in heaven for over a decade now, Pastor Andy was one of my late
wife's pastors, First Baptist Church of Lindenhurst, Long Island, New York, before he moved to
Florida.
But please extend to him my warm and loving greetings in Christ.
If anybody wants more details on Sovereign Grace Family Church of
Jacksonville, Florida, you can go to
sgfcjacks
.org, sgfcjacks .org, and God willing, we will
be repeating that later on.
Now, if you could briefly tell us about the
conference, the Open Air Theology Conference where you are speaking in Tullahoma, Tennessee.
Yes, sir.
Last year, I had the opportunity to attend the Open Air Theology Conference there, and
that's where I met Dr. Michael Schultz, who will be on with us or with you in just a little.
While.
And the conference last year was from Shadows to Substance, and I was there not as a speaker,
but as a participant, and I was doing interviews while I was there.
And I got a chance to meet Jeffrey Rice, who is the one who is promoting this, and Haps Addison,
who is promoting this.
They're the ones there in Tullahoma with the church there.
It's a Reformed Baptist church.
And they told me last year, they said, we are planning to do
another conference in February 2024, and it was going to be on the subject of Calvinism.
Well, I have a show.
My show is called Your Calvinist Podcast, and so they knew I was a Calvinist
just by the virtue of the name of the show.
And so they said, hey, we're doing this Calvinist podcast.
We would like for you to come and speak.
And that's when we began to talk about what it was I would be speaking on.
And I actually was the one who said I would love to talk about the Calvinism of Luther.
And Jeff kind of turned and looked at me a little bit, and he said, I like that.
I like that idea.
So that was how I got involved.
And Jeff is really, he's a wonderful man.
He has a heart for the Lord.
He has a heart to see this ministry happening through this conference.
And he has got so many guys coming this year that are just guys I can't believe that I'll be sharing
the chancel with not only James White, who obviously is a mutual friend of ours, but also
Sam Waldron and Tom Buck and
Claude Ramsey, one of my favorite preachers.
Claude Ramsey, the most beautiful of all Calvinists, Claude Ramsey.
He's a beautiful man.
And Matt Slick, who is a tremendous intellect, wonderful man.
And I got to meet him last week.
I was so excited because I've been a great admirer of his for many years.
So it's going to be awesome.
And I only listed a few of the names.
The guys who are going to be there are going to be great.
Yeah, that would include also Brandon Scalf, Kevin Hay, and
Haps Addison, and Jamie Terry, unless one of those men, I think there was one
brother who had to leave the roster due to a conflict schedule conflict, but
I don't know if any of them are among those men or that man.
But anyway, if anybody wants more details on this, this event, which is being held
right around the corner, February 21st, 22nd,
23rd, and 24th will be a debate featuring Dr. James R. White of Alpha Omega Ministries
with Jason Breda, I can't remember how to pronounce that, on the Reformed Doctrine
of the Atonement.
Or should I say the Reformed Doctrine of the Atonement is biblical and important.
And again, I find that an interesting title, because even those who hate Calvinism think it's
an important doctrine, but an important in that it should be avoided at all costs.
And of course, we believe it is important because we believe it makes complete sense
when you are logically consistent about your understanding of what actually occurred
on Golgotha when Christ gave up the ghost and
completely, 100%, and perfectly appeased the wrath of God and
finalized the redemption of his children.
So if you want more details on that conference,
go to openairtheology .com, openairtheology .com.
Now, obviously, if you know as many conservative Lutherans as I do,
most of whom are from the Missouri Synod, but there are some from other synods as well,
they are likely, most of them, going to be upset by the very notion of your theme, the
Calvinism of Luther.
And first of all, I know that you recognize, historically, that although there was an
overlap in their ministries on earth in the
16th century, Luther, chronologically, was the first of the
Reformers, when you consider Luther and Calvin, obviously, the Reformers before Luther,
proto -Reformers, and so on.
But you're not saying that somehow Calvin
was a—even though we agree with him more clearly and
fully—you're not saying that Calvin was the preeminent Reformer above Luther, or
that Luther was somehow condescending himself to embrace
Calvin's teachings that he later would hear?
You're just saying that what Luther originally believed about important things, especially
involving the nature of man before regeneration and the will of man,
he was saying things that Calvin would later agree with.
Am I in the right ballpark there?
Yeah, and let me kind of unpack, if you don't mind, sort of
where the title came from.
Obviously, you're right.
Luther, we would consider to be a first -generation Reformer, and Calvin, in some ways, is a second -generation Reformer.
Calvin was just a boy when Luther nailed the 95 Theses to the door of the Church of.
Wittenberg.
So, we understand that it's anachronistic to say the Calvinism of Luther, because there was
no such thing as Calvinism when Luther was beginning.
You've heard the term clickbait online.
You name a video or a show, something that's intended to raise the eyebrow,
something that's intended to cause people to go, what does he mean by that?
And that was sort of why, when I said to Jeff Rice, I said, hey, the Calvinism Luther, and when he looked at me, he knew
what I was saying, and he smiled.
I like that, and that's why, because it's intended to be somewhat prodding.
My goal is, when I give this message, is that every Lutheran who
hears it would have to agree that what I'm saying is correct, even if they may not agree with
some of the conclusions that I reach.
I hope that I am factually accurate when I present what Luther
wrote.
And also, to say this, and I recently had a conversation
with a Lutheran pastor from the UK, and he said, you know, Luther wrote
almost a new book every few weeks, and Luther's amount of writing was so ridiculously prolific
that it's hard sometimes to say what Luther's position was on anything, because
he would evolve, and his ideas would grow and change, just like anyone, but someone who's
thinking as fast as he was and is publishing as voluminously.
As he was.
My argument is going to be, essentially, that Luther and Calvin
shared a doctrine of anthropology, and that was the doctrine of man, which
gave rise to both of their views.
And I do think there's a distinction in Lutheran theology of predestination and Calvinistic theology of
predestination, but both of their theologies of election and
predestination was birthed out of an anthropology that was itself a
product of their relying heavily on the teachings of Augustine.
And so, that's really the argument.
I want to look at the Council of Orange, where the argument of semi -Pelagianism came in.
I want to look at Augustine himself.
And so, that's where I'm coming from.
Yes, and we who are Calvinists, and we have dialogue with our Lutheran friends,
and I have many Lutheran friends that I hold in very high esteem.
I've interviewed many Lutherans on this show.
In fact, one of them, Evan McClanahan, pastor of the First Lutheran Church of Houston, Texas,
regularly features Dr. James R. White at his church to preach and also to be involved in
debates.
And I have a feeling he may be one of the minority of Lutherans who may be applauding things we're saying today.
But when we dialogue with our Lutheran friends, from what we remember
about what Luther taught and wrote, especially in regard to his debate with
Erasmus on the bondage of the will, we are mystified about the conclusions
that many, if not most, Lutherans come to today.
And I know that they would be horrified to ever be compared to Arminians, but there seems to be
a much more similarity between modern Lutheranism and Arminianism than
between modern Lutheranism and Calvinism in the 21st century anyway.
Am I right?
Yeah, well, I agree with where you're going.
I think it goes both ways in that we look at Luther and we say,
you know, how can you not see the Calvinism of Luther?
And you understand what I mean by that.
Yeah, how can you not see Luther's views based upon the bondage of the will?
But then the Lutheran pastors, you know, good godly men, you know, like
Dr. Jordan Cooper and others, would look from the other direction and say, yes, but that
does not comport with the Book of Concord and the other documents
that we hold to.
And they will be the first to tell you they don't hold to Luther's writings, they hold to the Book of Concord and those things,
which are their documents that they're holding to that
are not saying some of the things as dogmatically or as maybe
as monergistically as Luther's
bondage of the will.
The bondage of the will seems to be the big issue.
And they'll say, well, you don't really like Luther.
I've heard Lutheran pastors say, reformers don't like Luther, they like the bondage of the will,
and they don't like anything else he wrote.
And I think that's kind of funny because, you know, there are a lot of things that Luther wrote and things that he
said that we probably wouldn't agree with.
And so there may be a little bit of truth to that.
We like the bondage of the will because it agrees with us, you know, and there's a little bit of confirmation bias there.
But they would say that it doesn't necessarily agree with us because of his other writings.
And so there is some there's debate there as to what Luther's real position was.
As I said earlier, it's hard.
It's sort of like nailing jello to a wall.
It's a little hard to do with Luther sometimes.
Yeah, yeah.
The specific where he was coming down.
But as far as their view being more in line with the Arminian view, the
Arminian view of a prescience that God sees the
action of the will and determines his election based upon
foreseen faith, that would certainly not comport with Luther's
view in the bondage.
Of the will.
That's the exact thing he's opposing in the bondage of the will.
So before you elaborate, go ahead.
Before you elaborate more about the main points that you wanted to make, wasn't the
divide that Luther and Calvin had personally, along with
Zwingli, more in regard to the sacrament of the Eucharist and the
implications of it over and above anything else that is
typically highlighted within the theology of Calvinism?
Well, certainly.
The divide between Luther and Zwingli was the table.
The Marburg Colloquy, where they met and they had 15
points of doctrine to discuss.
They agreed on 14, but one that they could not agree on was the doctrine
of the table.
Luther was convinced that this is my body was a
literal statement, meaning this is the body of Christ, and he took a real presence view
of the bread and the cup, which is still believed in Lutheran theology.
But not transubstantiation.
No, and there is a distinction to be made.
Rome incorporates so much
into the doctrine of transubstantiation that Lutherans don't
incorporate, but real presence
is not transubstantiation.
There's a difference in doctrine there, and sometimes Lutherans are accused of believing in
consubstantiation, but they don't like that word.
Yes, I've heard that.
Most of them don't like that phrase, so I try to avoid it.
I simply say real presence because I think that's fair to what they believe,
and the Calvinistic view of spiritual presence is really based on Calvin's
understanding of the hypostatic union, because Calvin
obviously believed, as we do, that Christ is vera homo vera deus, he is fully God and fully
man, and as being fully man and remains fully man even in his glorified
state, he is now sitting at the right hand of the Father.
So Calvin would say he is in his humanity, he is not omnipresent, therefore he's not in the bread or in the
cup, but spiritually he is omnipresent.
So Calvin would say that he could be and is spiritually present in the cup and the bread,
and so that's the battle there.
That's the distinction is whether he's physically there or spiritually there.
How do we understand the difference?
What is real presence?
I asked a group of Lutheran pastors if I would be able to take communion in their church, and they
said no, and I was totally fine with that.
Didn't anger me or anything, because this is what one of them said.
He said, he says, you're not buying what we're selling.
He said, because we're telling you—go ahead.
I was invited to participate in the Lord's Supper at a Missouri Synod Lutheran church.
I'm not going to say where, because even though the man's retired, he still might get in trouble, but I said
to him, I do not believe, I do not agree exactly with what Lutherans believe about the
Lord's table.
Should I participate?
And he said, if you would like to, you are welcome.
And another conservative Lutheran said, oh no, he shouldn't have done that.
So I know that there are some disagreements even amongst them.
Sure, yeah, and I know another man who is a Calvinist, but he's
a member of a Lutheran church.
He grew up as a Presbyterian, but the church that he's in, he had to join because of
where he was located and different things.
The only church he could join, and kind of a long story.
But at the end of the day, he told me he takes communion and his pastor is well aware of his convictions, and I was
surprised by that.
I was surprised that there was no issues there.
But like you said, I guess it depends on who's in charge.
Right, but we have to go to our first commercial break, and when we come back, obviously, we want to have you focus on
the commonalities of authentic Lutheranism
and historic Calvinism.
And if you have a question, send it immediately, because Pastor Keith is only on for the first 54
minutes of this broadcast.
We have Michael Schultz following him.
So if you could send in your questions to ChrisArnson at gmail .com, and give us your first name at
least, city and state and country of residence, that would be great.
Don't go away.
We'll be right back.
Civilian ownership of body armor is about increasing decentralized power, and by comparison,
reducing the advantages of centralized power.
The danger of centralized power is often represented by the word king.
As Americans, we hate the word king applied to any mere man.
We are Armored Republic, and in a republic, there is no king but Christ.
Arm yourself with tools of liberty at armoredrepublic .com.
Iron Radio, praise God for the generous monthly financial support of Royal Diadem
Jewelers, educated by and affiliated with the American Gem Society,
Jewelers of America, and the Gemological Institute of America.
For the perfect custom -designed engagement ring, or any one -of -a -kind piece of jewelry created
exactly according to your imagination and specifications, Royal Diadem Jewelers
has you covered.
No matter where you live in the world, Royal Diadem will walk you step -by -step through every stage of the
process, and even hold a high -tech internet virtual visit using state -of -the -art jewelry design
technology to serve you.
They start by listening carefully to determine your needs.
They're interested in making what you want, not what they want to sell you.
From rough design to digital model, to photorealistic image, to wax prototype model, to
the finished product, they're continually listening to your input, likes and dislikes,
making any changes necessary along the way.
This will ensure that your custom jewelry will turn out exactly as you dreamed, and well beyond your
expectations.
Visit royaldiadem .com.
That's royaldiadem .com today.
Sterling Vanderwercker, owner of Royal Diadem Jewelers, his wife, Bronnie, his business partner
and manager, Brian Wilson, and the entire family, thank you all for listening to, praying for,
and supporting the work of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
And please, folks, do not forget that royaldiadem .com is still offering Iron
Sharpens Iron Radio this mind -blowing opportunity.
They are giving us 100 of the profits from any sale of jewelry to an
Iron Sharpens Iron Radio listener simply by that listener saying, I heard about royaldiadem .com
on Iron Sharpens Iron Radio when they are purchasing their jewelry or having it custom designed.
I'm asking you, please, if you have any intention to buy jewelry for yourself or have something custom designed,
a one -of -a -kind piece of jewelry for yourself or for somebody you love, and Valentine's Day is right around the corner,
please go to royaldiadem .com today to get the ball rolling on your purchase because we have
no idea when they're going to pull the plug on this offer where we get 100 of the profits from any sale of jewelry
to one of our listeners simply by that listener mentioning Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
So go to royaldiadem .com today and mention Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
We are now back with Keith Foskey.
We are talking about the Calvinism of Luther, and our email address is chrisorrenson at gmail .com if
you have a question.
So if you could, Keith, I want you to pick up the ball now and begin to highlight what
is most in common between what is known as Calvinism, Reformed theology,
Sovereign Grace theology, and what was going on in Martin Luther's mind during the
Reformation.
Well, right away, again, I think it boils down to an anthropology
which has its roots in Augustinian thought.
And so if I could, I want to go back actually a step further and simply
address what we mean by Augustinian thought in regard to anthropology.
Anthropology obviously is the doctrine or the study of man.
And as many people know, Augustine had a
debate with a man named Pelagius, and there's a lot
of arguments right now online, people who are saying
that Pelagius didn't really believe the things that are attributed to him.
I've had this conversation with Leighton Flowers.
Many people know who that is.
He's one of the foremost men on the internet who oppose Calvinistic
teachings, and he and I are very friendly.
We talk to each other, and we've had this conversation.
He doesn't believe that everything attributed to Pelagius was actually believed by Pelagius.
But for the sake of simplicity, understanding those arguments are out there, what
is believed or what has been taught that Pelagius taught was that man had the ability in and
of himself to respond to God's
offer of the gospel without the aid or without the
necessity of any type of prevenient grace, that he had the ability to
respond.
And Augustine did not believe that.
Augustine believed that man had to be given grace to be enabled
to respond.
And so that became the Augustinian -Pelagian divide.
And that would lead to a later council, the Council of Orange, where
they were debating not at that point Pelagianism, because Pelagianism had already been condemned.
By the time of the Council of Orange, they were debating semi -Pelagianism, which was the idea
that God and man sort of worked together, that there was a
synergism that was happening.
And even that was condemned.
And so by the time you get to Luther and Calvin, what you have is you have a pretty robust
understanding of the Augustinian doctrine of man, which is that man is,
without the grace of God, unable to respond positively to
the gospel.
And that was something that Luther believed.
That was something that Calvin believed.
Both of them would take that understanding in slightly different directions.
And if you ask a Lutheran pastor, he would say the problem with Calvin was double predestination.
And they would say in Lutheranism, you don't have double predestination.
And so that's where the divide often comes.
But the issue still remains the same because of this understanding of man's
inability.
And this is why sometimes I love R .C. Sproul's phrase, because he said, sometimes we don't say total
depravity.
Sometimes we say radical inability.
Man was so affected by the fall, man.
And when I say man, I mean all mankind was so affected by the fall that he no
longer would will to respond positively to God's offer of the
gospel apart from a working of God in his heart,
apart from a changing of his heart.
And there's so many passages that could be cited in regard to that.
You know, the leopard can't change his spots.
The Ethiopian can't change his skin.
Neither can the, can you do good or accustomed to doing evil.
That's one of the passages that's often sought.
Jesus's words in John 6, where he says, no man can come unless it's granted to him by the
father.
Those are passages which are often cited.
There's none who does good, not even one.
Romans chapter 3, the person who is in the flesh cannot obey the law of God.
Romans chapter 8, doesn't desire to, neither can he desire to.
Those are things.
So that anthropology is what is shared by Luther and Calvin, and so
that's where I'm seeing this connection point.
And yes, both lead to two different denominations and ultimately become two different strands
of theological thought, but that's the seed
out of which both of those are growing.
And before I take a listener question, do you think from your
dialogues with Lutherans that they are misunderstanding double predestination?
Because many that I've heard explain double predestination are not explaining it accurately.
They're equating it with equal ultimacy, and they are explaining it in such a way
as if man had a morally clean slate,
and God either makes them holy and worthy of heaven, or he makes them
wicked and sinful and reprobate and unworthy of
heaven and worthy of hell, and as if God is doing a divine
supernatural work in both ends of the spectrum of humanity, whereas
Calvinists just believe that God leaves men in their own sin, that men are made from the same lump of clay,
but he rescues some of us, his elect, and he leaves others to pay the penalty of
their own sin.
So do you know if the Lutherans are misunderstanding what double predestination is about?
I think they are defining it in the terms of equal ultimacy.
So what you just said is correct.
I think the way they define double predestination is that God has, from eternity,
determined to save some and damn others.
Now, here's where the issue comes in.
I personally am one that typically says, I don't like the term double predestination, because it
leads to the thought of equal ultimacy, which you just properly described.
Equal ultimacy is that God does the same act of reprobation that he does in
the act of election, and that's not the case.
Neither Calvin nor Luther taught that.
Both of them would teach that the passing over of the
non -elect is not the same as the active grace that is provided to the
elect, and that's the difference.
And here's what's funny when I've talked to, again, Lutheran pastors and trying to really, I want to represent them properly.
I want to hear them.
I don't want to misrepresent them.
That's one thing James White, I'm very thankful for him, and having learned from him many years, he really tries to understand
his opponents, and I'm thankful for that.
I want to, and not that Lutherans are my opponents.
That sounded weird.
But what I mean is when you're discussing something, you want to understand the other side.
You want to understand what they're saying.
And in one of my conversations, I remember specifically being told
that they were willing to leave some things to a divine
mystery and that, yes, God elects, but we don't,
there seems to be a withholding of saying that in the election
of some, he's leaving out the others, but that's the obvious
reality, that if there's 10 people and God chooses five, then five are unchosen.
Therefore, the result of that is they're going to get their just desserts, which is eternal
perdition.
But the action on God's part, trying to alleviate from him any culpability,
and that's a big issue, and that is, is God responsible
for a man's eternal condition if he goes to hell?
Is God the one who should be held accountable for that versus the person
himself?
And none of us are saying that, but that's the issue, is in double predestination or equal
ultimacy, you got one, like you said, one neutral man, and God can either give him election
and grace and make him a son of the kingdom, or he can give him reprobation and
wickedness and make him a son of hell, but he started neutral, and that's the problem, is nobody's neutral.
We're all wicked.
Right.
By the way, our listener is from Jupiter, Florida.
How close is that to you?
I'm not actually sure.
I think it's South Florida, so I am just about on the Georgia border, so I'm as north
Florida as you can get.
So I think that's pretty south of us.
Okay.
Well, Amethyst in Jupiter, Florida says, to your knowledge,
did Luther go as far as Calvin when understanding the nature of humans,
that not only was a work of grace needed for the
totally depraved sinner to believe, but also a heart transplant was required, and
regeneration preceded that person's faith?
That is a really good question, and first of all, I just want to say the name Amethyst is a
very nice name.
Yes, it is.
It's interesting, and a very pretty name.
I cannot speak with authority and say exactly Luther's position
on regeneration preceding faith, but based on his arguments and the
bondage of the will, it would seem to be that that would be the natural
conclusion, and here's why.
He believed that faith was the result of the work
that's done in baptism.
Obviously, he believed in baptismal regeneration, so he believed that, and that's another
important issue, is if you believe in baptismal regeneration and you baptize an infant, that
infant is therefore regenerated, and faith that flows out of that comes as a result of that regeneration,
but he believed that the sacrament and the word together worked into
bringing about faith.
So, I'm not sure if it would be as cut and dry as simply saying what we believe, which is that
faith is preceded by regeneration, but certainly, logically, based upon that, it
would have to be.
Okay.
Thanks, Amethyst, and we have another question, and this will probably be the final question
from audience members because Pastor Keith has to leave us in about 18 minutes.
Maybe we could squeeze another one in, but I'm not sure.
But anyway, Philbert in Massapequa Park, Long Island, New York, wants to
know, most Lutherans that I'm aware of today believe a genuinely born -again
Christian can lose his or her salvation.
Did Luther also believe that?
Yeah, I think he did, and this kind of goes back to when I said
earlier, even though they had an anthropology that was similar or the same, that
seed, that anthropological seed, it produced two somewhat different
strains of theology and the doctrine of apostasy,
and this is something that we need to step back and just address.
Everyone, in one way or another, has a doctrine of apostasy because the Bible has too many
passages that talk about people falling away to not address it in some way.
I mean, it really is a very rare thing to find someone who just holds to an
absolute one saved, always saved, without giving any
credence to the idea that someone could make a profession and fall away.
And so the difference is the question of whether or not you believe someone could be regenerated and
then lose the grace of justification or lose that benefit of having been
regenerated.
So again, going back to the Lutheran doctrine of baptismal regeneration, if regeneration occurs
and then later the person rejects Christ, that would have to be a rejection of
salvation, because it came as a result of the initial work of regeneration, which came through
baptism.
So I do believe the modern Lutheran view that men can
lose their salvation, I believe that was held by Luther.
Again, I'm willing to be corrected on that, but based upon other things that I've read, and again, Luther is so prolific, so
much writing is there, you might can find somewhere where he quoted the opposite.
But the Calvinistic view, obviously, is that if a man does fall away,
man or woman does fall away, then that because of the belief
in eternal election and regeneration preceding faith, that we would say that
whatever faith he possessed or professed was not truly possessed, and it was a
false faith, much like Simon in the book of Acts, the magician who sought
to get the Holy Spirit's power by money and would eventually
turn into a false professor.
And we would say, as in Matthew 7, it says, when Jesus said, depart from me, I never knew you,
didn't say I knew you for five minutes, or I knew you for five years, or I knew you for 10 years, he said, I never knew you.
And so, the Calvinistic understanding is that if a person falls away completely, then they
were never truly of the faith.
I'm sorry, I'm going to squeeze one more question in because it's so good.
Christiana from Deerfield, Massachusetts, says, did Martin Luther, as do
all Lutherans today, believe in baptismal regeneration because it seems to defy
Martin Luther's understanding of sola fide?
And I think that's an excellent question because it does seem to be oxymoronic.
Now, I know that Luther did not come up with or coin the five solos of the
Reformation, but apparently all five of those solos are found in various places in his writings.
And certainly, sola fide is the thing that Lutherans, conservative
Lutherans, appear to champion more than any of the other solos.
But anyway, do you find that odd that he believed in both?
That's an interesting and funny question, and I'm actually glad somebody asked it because
this is a question that I hear Lutherans have to address a lot, and I think it's a fair question.
I do think, however, that their answers in general are satisfactory to them,
obviously.
And I didn't mean that to sound sarcastic, but even though it kind of came out that way, what I mean is that I think
that they are making a distinction between
regeneration and justification, okay?
And so, regeneration occurs in the baptismal fount,
and then the justification is a work of grace that is dependent
upon faith.
And so, there is a distinction that they're making, and they're still saying justification is by faith alone.
Regeneration causes faith not necessarily immediately, but there can be a
time between when the person's regenerated and when the person experienced faith, but that's, I think, where
the distinction lies.
And I'm trying to be fair to them, and please, if you're a Lutheran pastor and your head's exploding right now, know that I'm not trying to
misrepresent you if I am, but I do think that because of the distinction between regeneration and
justification, that's where the distinction would be made.
They could still say, we hold the sola fide because we're still saying you're justified by faith alone, not by what
happened in the baptismal waters.
Even though the baptismal waters made it possible for you to exercise faith, even though the baptismal waters
did this work in you, it was a means of grace, that's the term, or you know, there's
grace in baptism that is still
dependent upon faith alone.
And so, I think that's how they would argue for that distinction.
Well, I want you—.
And that's a big difference.
Go ahead.
I'm sorry.
No, you could continue.
I just wanted to say I want you to hold the floor now because you only got about six minutes.
So, but anyway, continue your thought there.
I was just going to say, the distinction in baptismal understanding among
Presbyterians, Lutherans, and Baptists is interesting because Lutherans believe that
baptism produces regeneration.
Presbyterians typically don't believe that, even though I'm finding some who do, which is really odd,
but there are some that do.
But generally, Presbyterians would say that baptism is the sign of entrance into the covenant community.
Therefore, when we baptize a child, it's because we believe he's part of the covenant community.
And Baptists believe that baptism is also a
sign—it's a sign given to us—but that is to accompany faith.
It's not to come before someone believes, and that's why we're called credo Baptists, which means that I believe,
and therefore I'm baptized.
So the Lutheran view of baptism is different than the
Presbyterian view in that they do believe regeneration occurs where
the Presbyterian typically does not, even though they're both baptizing infants.
I just wanted to make that point.
And I want you to hone in now on your main points that you'd like to make to further entice our
listeners to attend the conference and to hear your entire lecture on the Calvinism of Luther.
Well, I've given you sort of a taste of what I'm going to talk about.
I'm going to start with a brief overview of Luther's life and
theology, and then I'm going to compare that with Calvin, and then I'm going to go back to Augustine.
But one of the things I also want to address—and we only have an hour to preach, so
it'll be limited—but one of the arguments that's being made
right now is that Augustine himself was influenced by
Manichaean Gnosticism.
And therefore, if it is true that Augustine was a Gnostic, then therefore
Luther's view of Man is Gnostic, and Calvin's view is Gnostic.
So one of the things I hope to do in my message is to show that the argument
that Augustine's view was a Gnostic view of Man, I hope to show that
that is not the case.
So maybe that'll be a little enticing for people who may be interested.
You might say, well, that seems like a departure from the Lutheran thing, but it's really not, because my point is to simply say this.
I believe Luther and Calvin had the same view on the nature of Man because of their relationship to Augustine's teaching.
I believe Augustine, of course, got it from Scripture.
I believe they got it from Scripture.
But if there is the introduction of Manichaean Gnosticism in the fourth century in the life of
Augustine, and that's the reason why he believed these things, then that is, according to those who oppose
Reformed theology, that's where the major problem is.
So I'm hoping to address that in the message and show that I don't think that that's actually the case.
Even though I do understand Augustine was a Gnostic prior to becoming a Christian, I don't believe that that
necessarily means that that influenced his doctrine of Man.
Now, in the three minutes that we have left, please explain your
understanding of Melanchthon and how you believe, as do many other Calvinists,
that Melanchthon unfortunately steered the ship in a different
direction than Luther after Luther's homegoing to heaven, and that is why we have
a Lutheranism today that is far more contrary to the
doctrines of sovereign grace and Calvinism.
Well, again, in every attempt I can, I want to be fair, and if you were to ask a Lutheran
pastor that question, he would say Melanchthon did not change Luther's views,
he clarified.
Them.
But I do know a number of conservative Lutherans who despise Melanchthon.
Oh, okay.
Well, that's good.
Yeah.
So the idea, though, among some is that he was clarifying some
of these more difficult things, Luther's view of the will and things like that, and that's what ended up in the official
teaching, and again, Book of Concord, things like that.
So that's where I say some would say
Melanchthon was a hero, some would say he was a villain, and not villain, but as far as how he
handled being the successor there, and I
think it's difficult to know for sure how
much adjusting was done.
But obviously, like you said, today the differences are pretty stark between a Calvinistic
and a Presbyterian and a Lutheran church.
You're going to see several important distinctions.
Well, Pastor Keith, as always, it has been a joy having you on the program.
I much prefer when you're on for two hours, but perhaps the next time
your schedule will be accommodating to that.
And once again, I want to remind our listeners about your church website for
Sovereign Grace Family Church in Jacksonville, Florida.
That is S -G -F -C -JACKS, that's J
-A -X, dot org, S -G -F -C -JACKS dot org.
And just to let you know, I don't know if it's only my computer, but it's not opening up your website for some reason.
But thank you so much, brother.
You did a great job, as you always do, and I look forward to your return to the show.
Well, I appreciate you, Chris.
Thank you so much, and thank you to the audience, and may God bless you.
All righty, and please don't go away, folks.
We're going to our midway break right now, and our second guest for the
second hour of the show is Michael Schultz.
And Michael is another one of the speakers at the Open Air Theology Conference this month,
where Keith Foskey, who you just heard, and other speakers are on the roster.
And Michael is the pastor of Antioch Baptist Church in Lewisburg, Kentucky,
and on the faculty of Forge Theological Seminary.
So please don't go away.
We're going to be right back with Michael Schultz and his discussion of Calvinism and the love of God
when we return.
Supporting and sending for the spread of the gospel to the ends of the earth.
We're delighted to be a part of Chris Arnzen's Iron Sharpens Iron radio advertising family.
At Lindbrook Baptist Church, we believe the scriptures of the Old and New Testaments to be the inspired Word of
God, inherent in the original writings, complete as the revelation of God's will for salvation
and the supreme and final authority in all matters to which they speak.
We believe in salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ.
This salvation is based upon the sovereign grace of God, was purchased by Christ on the cross, and is
received through faith alone, apart from any human merit, works, or ritual.
Salvation in Christ also results in righteous living, good works, and appropriate respect
and concern to all who bear God's image.
If you live near Lindbrook, Long Island, or if you're just passing through on the Lord's Day, we'd love to have you come and join
us in worship.
For details, visit lindbrookbaptist .org.
That's l -y -n -brookbaptist .org.
This is Pastor Keith Allen of Lindbrook Baptist Church, reminding you that by grace you have been saved through
faith, and that not of yourselves.
It is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast.
The Lord bless you in the knowledge of himself.
I'm Brian McLaughlin, president of the SecureComm Group, and an enthusiastic supporter of Chris
Arnson's Iron Sharpens Iron radio program.
The SecureComm Group provides the highest level of security, closed -circuit television, access control,
and communication systems for Manhattan's top residential buildings, as well as churches, commercial properties,
municipalities, and more.
We custom -install exactly what you need to protect yourself, including digital recording, off
-site viewing, and connectivity from most smart devices.
From simple code -activated systems to the latest technology using facial recognition, the
SecureComm Group has it.
We also provide the latest in intercom and IP telephone systems.
In addition, we provide superior networking platforms.
We'll create, maintain, and secure your local network.
Whether it's a Wi -Fi or hardwire network, we'll implement the latest secured firewall,
endpoint solutions, and cloud backup.
I would love to have the honor and privilege of helping protect the lives and property of Iron Sharpens Iron
radio listeners and their associates.
For more details on how the SecureComm Group may be of service to you with the very latest in security
innovations, call 718 -353 -3355.
That's 718 -353 -3355.
Or visit SecureCommGroup .com.
That's SecureCommGroup .com.
This is Brian McLaughlin of the SecureComm Group, joining Chris Arnzen's family of advertisers to keep
Iron Sharpens Iron radio on the air.
Puritan Reformed is a Bible -believing, kingdom -building, devil -fighting church.
We are devoted to upholding the apostolic doctrine and practice preserved in Scripture alone.
Puritan Reformed teaches men to rule and lead as image -bearing prophets, priests, and
kings.
We teach families to worship together as families.
Puritan is committed to teaching the whole counsel of God so that the earth will be filled with the knowledge of
God as the waters cover the sea.
We sing the Psalms, teach the law, proclaim the gospel, make disciples, maintain discipline, and exalt
Christ.
This is Pastor David Reis of Puritan Reformed in Phoenix, Arizona.
Join us in the glorious cause of advancing Christ's crown and covenant over the
kings of the earth.
Puritan Reformed Church.
Believe.
Build.
Fight.
PuritanPHX .com.
I'm Phil Johnson, Executive Director of Grace to You with John MacArthur.
I've been a frequent guest on Iron Sharpens Iron radio, and I highly recommend this show.
But today I want to tell you about one of its advertisers, Rare Document Traders, far and
away my favorite source for quality Charles Spurgeon memorabilia.
Are you looking for that special, unique gift for your pastor or missionary friend or a loved one?
Why not purchase a piece of church history that any believer would cherish?
Rare Document Traders is your one -step source for Spurgeon's handwritten manuscripts and letters, as well as other
rare books and collectible items from church history.
In 15 years that they've been in business, they've earned a stellar reputation in the Reformed community with thousands
of satisfied customers all around the world, including me.
Visit RareDocTraders .com today.
That's RareDocTraders .com.
Don't forget to mention you heard about them on Iron Sharpens Iron radio.
That's RareDocTraders .com.
It's such a blessing to hear from Iron Sharpens Iron radio listeners from all over the world.
Here's Joe Riley, a listener in Ireland who wants you to know about a guest on the show
he really loves hearing interviewed, Dr. Joe Moorcraft.
I'm Joe Riley, a faithful Iron Sharpens Iron radio listener here in Atai in County Kildare, Ireland,
going back to 2005.
One of my very favorite guests on Iron Sharpens Iron is Dr. Joe Moorcraft.
If you've been blessed by Iron Sharpens Iron radio, Dr. Moorcraft and Heritage Presbyterian Church of Cumming,
Georgia are largely to thank since they are one of the program's largest financial supporters.
Heritage Presbyterian Church of Cumming is in Forsyth County, a part of the Atlanta metropolitan area.
Heritage is a thoroughly biblical church, unwaveringly committed to Westminster standards, and Dr. Joe
Moorcraft is the author of an eight -volume commentary on the larger catechism.
Heritage is a member of the Hanover Presbytery, built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets,
Jesus Christ himself being the chief cornerstone, and tracing its roots and heritage back to the great Protestant
Reformation of the 16th century.
Heritage maintains and follows the biblical truth and principles proclaimed by the reformers, scripture alone,
grace alone, faith alone, Christ alone, and God's glory alone.
Their primary goal is the worship of the Triune God that continues in eternity.
For more details on Heritage Presbyterian Church of Cumming, Georgia, visit heritagepresbyterianchurch
.com, that's heritagepresbyterianchurch .com, or
call 678 -954 -7831, that's 678 -954 -7831.
If you visit, tell them Joe Roiligan, Iron Sharpens Iron Radio listener, from Attoye in County Kildare, Ireland,
sent you.
Iron Sharpens Iron Radio first launched in 2005.
The publishers of the New American Standard Bible were among my very first sponsors.
It gives me joy knowing that many scholars and pastors in the Iron Sharpens Iron Radio audience have been
sticking with or switching to the NASB.
I'm Dr. Joseph Piper, President and Professor of Systematic and Homiletical Theology at Greenville
Presbyterian Theological Seminary in Taylors, South Carolina, and the NASB is
my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Chuck White of the First Trinity Lutheran Church in Tonawanda, New York, and the NASB
is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Anthony Methenia of Christ Church in Radford, Virginia, and the NASB is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Jesse Miller of Damascus Road Christian Church in Gardenville, Nevada, and the NASB
is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Bruce Bennett of Word of Truth Church in Farmerville, Long Island, New York, and the
NASB is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Rodney Brown of Metro Bible Church in Southlake, Texas, and the NASB is
my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Jim Harrison of Red Mills Baptist Church in Mayapac Falls, New York, and the NASB
is my Bible of choice.
Here's a great way for your church to help keep Iron Sharpens Iron Radio on the air.
Pastors, are your pew bibles tattered and falling apart?
Consider restocking your pews with the NASB, and tell the publishers you heard about them
from Chris Arnzen on Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
Go to nasbible .com.
That's nasbible .com to place your order.
This is Pastor Bill Sousa of Grace Church at Franklin, here in the beautiful state of Tennessee.
Our congregation is one of a growing number of churches who love and support Iron
Sharpens Iron Radio financially.
Grace Church at Franklin is an independent, autonomous body of believers which strives
to clearly declare the whole counsel of God as revealed in Scripture through the person and work
of our Lord Jesus Christ.
And of course, the end of which we strive is the glory of God.
If you live near Franklin, Tennessee, and Franklin is just south of Nashville, maybe 10 minutes,
or you are visiting this area, or you have friends and loved ones nearby, we hope you will
join us some Lord's Day in worshiping our God and Savior.
Please feel free to contact me if you have more questions about Grace Church at Franklin.
Our website is gracechurchatfranklin .org.
That's gracechurchatfranklin .org.
This is Pastor Bill Sousa wishing you all the richest blessings of our sovereign
Lord, God, Savior, and King Jesus Christ today and
always.
Hello, my name is Anthony Uvino, and I'm one of the pastors at Hope Reform Baptist Church in Corum, New York, and
also the host of the reformrookie .com website.
I want you to know that if you enjoy listening to the Iron Sharpens Iron Radio show like I do, you can now find it on the
Apple's iTunes app by typing Iron Sharpens Iron Radio in the search bar.
You no longer have to worry about missing a show or a special guest because you're in your car or still at work.
Just subscribe on the iTunes app and listen to the Iron Sharpens Iron Radio show at any time, day or night.
Please be sure to also give it a good review and pass it along to anyone who would benefit from the teaching and the many
solidly reformed guests that Chris Arnzen has on the show.
Truth is so hard to come by these days, so don't waste your time with fluff or fake news.
Subscribe to the Iron Sharpens Iron Radio podcast right now.
And while you're at it, you can also sign up for the reformrookie .com podcast and visit our website and the YouTube
page.
We are dedicated to teaching Christian theology from a Reformed Baptist perspective to beginners in the faith, as
well as seasoned believers.
From Keech's Catechism and the Doctrines of Grace to the Olivet Discourse and the Book of Leviticus, the Reform
Rookie podcast and YouTube channel is sure to have something to offer everyone seeking Biblical truth.
And finally, if you're looking to worship in a Reformed church that holds to the 1689 London Baptist Confession
of Faith, please join us at Hope Reformed Baptist Church in Corham, New York.
Again, I'm Pastor Anthony Avino, and thanks for listening.
Charles Haddon Spurgeon once said,.
Give yourself unto reading.
The man who never reads will never be read.
He who never quotes will never be quoted.
He who will not use the thoughts of other men's brains proves that he has no brains of his own.
You need to read.
Solid Ground Christian Books is a publisher and book distributor who takes these words of the Prince of Preachers to heart.
The mission of Solid Ground Christian Books is to bring back treasures of the past to minister to Christians in the present and
future, and to publish new titles that address burning issues in the church and the world.
Since its beginning in 2001, Solid Ground has been committed to publish God -centered, Christ -exalting
books for all ages.
We invite you to go treasure hunting at solid -ground -books .com.
That's solid -ground -books .com and see what priceless literary gems from the past to
present you can unearth from Solid Ground.
Solid Ground Christian Books is honored to be a weekly sponsor of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
Please don't forget folks, solid -ground -books .com is experiencing a huge
crisis in book sales.
If you really love this show, and you really love the best in Christian literature,
from the 16th century Protestant Reformation all the way through our modern day, please
go to solid -ground -books .com and make as large a purchase of books as you
possibly can.
That will not only help one of our major sponsors, solid -ground -books .com,
continue supporting this program financially, but it will also bless you and
anyone that you love for whom you are purchasing books, and that includes yourself,
because as I said, you will get nothing but the finest in Christian literature that
has ever been unearthed from obscurity.
There are books that solid -ground -books .com has brought back into print
that they have discovered which were hidden by the rubble of time for centuries, some of them,
and they have brought them back into print and astounded and blessed and edified and challenged many in the body of
Christ.
And also they bring back, or should I say, bring into print for the very first time the
works of modern authors like Dr. James R. White of Alpha and Omega Ministries.
So please come to the rescue, if you can, of one of our most important advertisers, solid -ground
-books .com, and make as large a purchase of books today as you possibly can.
At solid -ground -books .com, mention Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
That's very important.
Before I return to, or should I say, introduce to you my second
guest, who is a first -time guest, Michael Schultz, who will be addressing
Calvinism and the love of God in the last hour.
Before I do that, I just have some important announcements to make.
Folks, if you really love this show and you do not want it to disappear from the airwaves, please go to
ironsharpensironradio .com, click support, then click, click to donate now.
You could donate instantly with a debit or credit card in that fashion.
If you prefer a snail mail, there will also be a physical address that appears on your screen where you can
mail your checks made payable to Iron Sharpens Iron Radio when you click support
at ironsharpensironradio .com.
If you want to advertise with us, whatever it is, as long as it's compatible with what I believe, send me an email
to chrisorensen at gmail .com and put advertising in the subject line.
We need your advertising dollars just as much as your donations.
Please remember, I never want anybody listening to give your own church less money than you normally give your own
church where you're a member in order to bless us with a financial gift.
Never do that.
And also, if you're really struggling to survive, wait until you're back on your feet and more stable financially before you send us
a financial gift.
The Bible is clear that we're primarily to use the money with which God has blessed us to provide for our church and
family.
And providing for my radio show is obviously not a command of God.
But if you love the show, you don't want it to disappear.
You want to elongate its life and you have the
money above and beyond your ability to provide for church and family.
You have extra money for benevolent, recreational or trivial purposes.
Please share some of that extra money with us so that we can continue to exist.
Go to ironsharpensironradio .com and then click support and then click
to donate now.
And last but not least, if you are not a member of a Christ -honoring, biblically
faithful, theologically sound, doctrinally solid church like Sovereign Grace Family Church in
Jacksonville, Florida, or the other church that is pastored by my second
guest, Antioch Baptist Church of Lewisburg, Kentucky, I have
extensive lists spanning the globe of biblically faithful churches and I've helped many people all over the world find churches
sometimes very close to them.
If you are in that position of not having a biblically faithful church on, send me an email to chrisarnson at
gmail .com.
That's also the email address where you can send in a question to Michael Schultz about Calvinism and the love
of God.
That's chrisarnson at gmail .com.
Give us your first name at least, city and state and country of residence.
And it's my honor and privilege to welcome you for the very first time to Ironsharpensiron Radio, Pastor Michael Schultz.
Yeah, it's an honor to be here, Chris.
Thank you so much for having me on.
Tell our listeners about the fine church where you are pastoring.
Antioch Baptist Church in Lewisburg, Kentucky, is a very small community sort of
country church.
We average about 60 people every Sunday, which is great.
I'm very comfortable with that.
I know everybody in my church and we're able to really notice when somebody's not here.
I get to spend a lot of time visiting with my members.
So I'm very thankful to be at a small church.
And we're just a rural country church that does the very best we can with what we've got.
And I've got some great deacons and good members around me that God has blessed me.
With.
So I'm very thankful to be out here.
If people are looking for us, Lewisburg is a little bitty town in western Kentucky, just west of Bowling Green.
Great.
And if anybody wants to look up that website, find out more about Antioch Baptist
Church in Lewisburg, Kentucky, go to abclewisburg, and that's spelled L -E -W
-I -S -B -U -R -G, ky .wordpress .com,
abclewisburgky .wordpress .com.
Well, we have a tradition here, as you know, Michael, when we have a first time guest, we have that guest give a summary
of their salvation testimony, and I'd love to hear your story.
Oh, man, wonderful.
So I was not raised in a Christian household.
We were what you might call Christian adjacent.
We occasionally attended church holidays and things of that sort, but no sort of religious
commitment whatsoever.
And actually, when I was a preteen, the church that we attended on occasion
removed my family because they didn't approve of interracial dating.
And my sister, as a white person, my sister was dating a young man that was mixed, and so they asked us
to leave.
Wow.
And so—.
What decade was this?
That was in 2006, brother.
Wow!
Where on earth was that?
You don't have to say the name of the church, but what region of the United States?
This was in East Tennessee, just down out of the foothills of Appalachia.
I mean, we were—it was a town.
It wasn't some, you know, little country church.
This was a major church in a town.
And yeah, it was incredibly unfortunate.
Would they disapprove of a swarthy Sicilian dating and marrying a
Swede?
I'm positive it was more of, what do you look like?
That kind of thing.
It was very much just a product of the culture.
Sure.
Wow, that's scary.
Go ahead.
Yeah, yeah.
And, you know, we had a good pastor at the time, but the deacons really ran the church.
It was one of those sort of things.
And to my understanding, to this day, the pastor never even knew that it happened.
So real unfortunate and a scary thing as a pastor to even think that could be possible.
But I became—you know, I was very young at that point.
I was 10 or 11 years old, and that really put a sour taste in my mouth for religion altogether,
Christianity in particular, church attendance, certainly.
And so I became very recalcitrant and just distasted
with Christianity.
And I had a friend who was about twice my age.
He was in his early 20s, and he attended a meeting at a church just out of town with this
screaming preacher.
And he came back and he said, Michael, you've got to come here.
This guy is hilarious.
It is absolutely hilarious.
He stands up and he screams for an hour, and then everybody just goes down to the altar and they just cry and
weep.
And people all through the sermon time, they're just shouting and hee -hawing and all this.
He said, you've got to come see it.
And so we went out and we sat in the peanut gallery, you know, and, you know, we—amen !—and all this and made
fun of the whole thing.
And we went once or twice, just making fun of it.
And then he was pretty well done going.
And I said, you know, I just don't—I don't know why.
I kind of want to keep going.
Wow.
And so I got one of the deacons at that church to give me a ride, and I kept going for about.
A year.
And I honestly—this is a very weird thing that I haven't heard a lot of people say, although I think it's
probably true for many people.
I do not remember the exact day that I became a Christian, but I know when I
went to that meeting the first time, I absolutely despised Christianity.
And at some point in that year, God completely changed me and saved me.
And by the end of that year, I was asking questions about what kind of school do I need to go to
to be a preacher?
You know, I feel like if this is true, I really need to be telling people.
And if I'm going to say I believe it, I need to live like it.
And so I was very fortunate that that church, even though it was a very humble church—the pastor had
no formal education and essentially a shooted, very IFB kind of
church—nevertheless, those guys were great at compelling me
to go out and share the faith and evangelize and read my Bible and rely on the
Scriptures and trust God that he could prepare me for the ministry.
And I'm very thankful that that screaming preacher outside of town was there.
Amen.
And I do have a number of very close friends who are IBF guys.
It's actually amazing how much they seem to love me, even though they radically oppose my Calvinism and some
other things.
But people have to be very careful about broad brushing and slandering our brothers in that realm
because they're not all the same.
Yeah, that's very true.
And I value people that differ from me, even if they differ from me,
because if they still hold to the fact that Scripture is our supreme authority and they interpret
it differently, I can live with that.
I just value that experience.
And even though they would probably cry their eyes out if they knew that I was a Calvinist and teaching at a
seminary, I think that God really blessed me by having them there.
Oh, in fact, since you brought it up, tell us about Forge Theological Seminary.
Amen.
Forge is a wonderful seminary.
I'm glad that I've gotten connected with it.
Somewhat new, started in 2015, so not nearly as old as a lot of the seminaries.
But Forge specializes in distance education so that if you're in the ministry somewhere,
you don't have to uproot your ministry and try to move to get theological education.
And the other emphasis that we really try to push is affordability.
So, you know, you're not going to pay $5 ,000 a semester, $10 ,000 a semester to go.
The way that we do it is we have every program from certificate programs all the way up to doctoral
programs and charge on a monthly rate.
So the subscription model that everybody's kind of turning to, Forge was one of the first schools to take that
on.
So right now, if you're going for a certificate through a Master of Divinity degree, you'll pay $60 a
month to get theological education.
If you're going for a Doctor of Theology, you'll pay $80 a month.
We just lowered it.
So the way that that works is you can take as many or as few courses as you like at a time.
They're asynchronous, so you begin them whenever you want to, but you only have 20 weeks to complete them once you start.
If you take longer than 20 weeks, you fail the course.
And so if you want to take one or three or five courses at a time, that's up to you.
But you have to complete them in that window.
And what that does is it frees up your financial capability to where if you're taking one course a month,
it's going to cost you $60.
If you take five courses a month, it's going to cost you $60.
And you can complete your degree program as quickly or as slowly as you like with financial
flexibility at that.
And with that said, the academic rigor that we offer, it's a thoroughly reformed and confessional seminary.
Every person on the faculty has to affirm either the Westminster or one of the London Baptist confessions.
And so we firmly believe in the doctrines of grace and confessionalism and Reformed Theology.
And we just want to be a resource to guys who can't afford a traditional education and don't want to uproot their ministries.
And if anybody wants more information, go to Forge .Education.
Forge .Education.
Well, one of the subjects being addressed at the Open Air Theology
Conference later this month in Tullahoma, Tennessee, is Calvinism and the love of God.
You are going to be speaking on that.
And Calvinism and Calvin himself and Calvinists themselves
have been truly slandered by those outside of our camp of theology.
They have a totally unhistoric understanding of
where Calvin and even his heirs today
stand on the love of God and their mind.
In fact, there are non -Calvinists who have literally described our understanding of God as a
monster.
We could go on and on and on.
But really, anybody who believes in hell, in eternal
punishment in hell, is really going to wind up in the same
dilemma of trying to defend the love of
God and the theodicy.
And there are full -blown universalists who believe everybody, including Satan and his legions
of demons, are going to be in heaven.
That is not only unbiblical, but it is a horrific answer to the
reality of sin and the answer of God
to that.
So, if you could explain in your own words why this is such an
important issue to clarify to not only our fellow Calvinists, but to
those surrounding us who are outside of our theological camp, as they say.
Yeah, so that's a very important clarification too, is that when I'm preaching this at the conference, this
sermon that I'm going to have on Calvinism and the love of God, I'm not just going to be aiming at
defending Calvinist or defending Calvinism against claims from the outside that
we are unloving or that the God that we present is a monstrous deity that does
not love.
I'm also going to be taking my own fair share of shots at those in
the Calvinist community who are guilty of that.
Because it is the case that there are many people, particularly in the younger generation of which I'm a part,
that we cut our teeth on guys like Mark Driscoll.
And although we might have Luther and Calvin and J. Gresham
Mosh and others on our shelves, we've not read them.
And so, there are a lot of guys that call themselves Calvinist and they are taking now pulpits coming out of
seminaries and they really do not understand how to reckon Calvinism and the love of
God because they have never read the people who really formulated this whole
system.
So, there are two errors that I'm going to try to stave off at this
conference.
One is on the liberal side and the other is on the conservative side.
The liberals tend to say something along the lines of, if God loves me, he will
not ask me to change.
That's generally the way that they look at it.
And that's their idea of love in every circumstance.
If you're the parent of a gay child or a transgender person, you will see
that kind of come to light.
They'll say, if you really love me, you'll accept who I am.
And that's the idea behind it.
And that's an error.
It's entirely untrue to conceive that if someone loves you, they will not ask you
to change anything whatsoever.
The opposite end of the spectrum, though, is also erroneous, where you have
the far wing of the conservatives who say, because God does not love sin,
therefore, he does not love those who are in sin.
And that is also a problem.
Because if we really dive into this idea that God does not love sinners,
then we end up really discrediting our own salvation.
Because we love him because he first loved us.
Ephesians 1 talks about how that in love he predestined us.
So the very salvation that we have received from God was the result of him loving us.
Although we were yet sinners, Christ died for the ungodly.
So we can't say God does not love sinners, and yet we also can't say God loves sinners so much
he doesn't want them to change.
So that's what I'm going to be focusing on in this sermon at the conference, trying to help
people really understand that a Calvinist does believe that God loves, but they
also believe that God loves people enough to call them to change.
Now, I don't know if you're going to disagree with me, but I believe that
although there is a sense that God universally loves
his creation and all humans in it, he only has
a parental and spousal love for his elect.
He only loves his elect like a groom loves a
bride.
In fact, I don't think that Paul's exhortation, do husbands love their wives.
As Christ so loved the church and laid his life down for her, I don't think it would make sense if
Jesus loved the reprobate in the same measure and in the same way.
So if you could respond to that.
Yeah, absolutely.
That's completely agreeable, because historically we've identified three different ways that
God loves.
So there's the first type that we call the benevolent love of God, and that's what you would call the love of
creation.
It's this love that God has simply of his own being.
This is first job for God is love.
He expresses this to everything.
There's a second element called the beneficent love of God.
It's where we get the word benefit.
And this is the love that God pours out on everything.
It's beneficial to the things that are loved because he gives them things out of his love.
And even that we could say God pours out on the reprobate, the unrepentant, the unregenerate, even the
unelect.
Because Christ says God makes the sun to rise and fall on the wicked and the just, and he causes the rain to fall on
the good and the evil.
And you're right.
There is a third element of the love of God that historically has been called the love of complacency.
Complacency is a word that's kind of fallen out of usage, or at least it's changed in common vernacular today.
If you're complacent, that means you're lazy or inactive.
But the love of complacency historically has meant more of what we would define as the love of
satisfaction, the love of pleasure.
And so if I said, I love my children, I don't mean
that I pour love on them in the sense that I give them toys and things.
That's true, but that's not what I mean by that.
And I certainly don't love my children in the same way that I love Mexican food.
It's a totally, you know, it's an entirely different thing.
Yeah, of course.
You love the Mexican food more.
Some days.
No, I'm kidding.
Oh, no, but this love of complacency is that thing.
It brings me so much pleasure.
You know, that's really what makes me happy.
And although we know that God's impassibility dictates that we be very careful about how that we refer to
this, it is nevertheless true that God does take pleasure in the people who have faith in
him because the Bible says as much, says exactly the inverse.
It is impossible to please God without faith.
And if so facto, the inverse is true.
Those who have faith do please God.
So, yes, there are different ways that God loves.
And I'm glad that you have a nuanced understanding about that to be able to even say
that for everyone, including the unregenerate, reprobate, apostate, that God does have
a general love.
But what I find is that, again, many of the guys that are taking pulpits now
or who are now coming into the reformed or Calvinist community do not have that nuance.
And so if you are to ask them, does God love sinners?
They'll say, no, God hates sinners.
Psalm five, five.
And all of a sudden we have a we have a problem because you end up
with validation of what the critics have been saying, which is that Calvinists do not
believe God loves lost people.
And so we need to have a nuance about that, that, yes,
sinners and also God hates sinners.
But what I'm finding is that we're very comfortable saying God hates sinners.
We are not very comfortable saying God loves them.
And we're willing to say that God hates them without a lot of nuance.
We're not willing to say God loves them unless we spend 30 minutes talking about what that means.
So that may be a reaction to the fact that for the last couple of generations, people have developed a
poor understanding of what it means to say God loves you.
But I think we need to be very careful about overreacting and overcorrecting on that.
Okay, we have Wilhelm in
Jordan Village, Connecticut.
And Wilhelm asks, there are Calvinists that I have encountered
who disagree with one another over what John 3 .16
actually means.
There are some Calvinists who have told me that God so loved the world
actually means that he loved his elect who would eventually
believe from every tribe and tongue and people and nation, as John later
describes the world in the book of Revelation.
There are other Calvinists who say, no, that verse is describing every single human
on the planet that has ever lived and ever will live, regardless of whether they are of the elect or of
the reprobate, but they are differently
loved, as was just mentioned earlier, that he only has a specific
saving love for his elect and not for the non -elect.
Does either of those explanations fit yours?
So yeah, my understanding of John 3 .16 is rather straightforward and would probably be acceptable
to most of the people who are not even in the Calvinist camp, because that verse in particular,
I don't take that as referring to atonement.
And many Calvinists do, and probably most Calvinists believe that that verse refers in some sense to atonement,
and that's one of the reasons that they want to limit the word world to referring only to the elect.
I could go into really the full passage as to why I don't think that's the case, but the
question directly seems to be, is there any form of official
stance that Calvinists take on John 3 .16 as to who God loves in that passage?
Would I be fairly representing that question, you think, Chris?
I assume you are.
It sounds like it.
Okay.
So the answer is no.
So Calvinists have absolutely nothing approaching a consensus
on what that verse means as far as who the world is.
So I'll just give you an example.
More recent would be A .W. Pink.
I've actually got a pamphlet of his that you can get at Chapel Library for free called Does God Love Everyone?
And his conclusion is no, because he goes straight to John 3 .16, and he will take you as
far as he can to show you that world only means the elect.
But if you read John Calvin, which I take to be the definitive source on
Calvinism, John Calvin, when he wrote his commentary on John, this
is his statement regarding John 3 .16.
He says, Faith in Christ brings life to all, and that Christ brought life because the Heavenly
Father loves the human race.
Later on, he says the importance of the term world, which he used, is that nothing
will be found in the world that is worthy of the favor of God, yet he shows himself to be reconciled to
the whole world when he invites all men without exception to the faith of Christ.
So John Calvin took the word world to mean every person to ever
live.
Men like A .W. Pink entirely disagree.
I favor Calvin's interpretation.
I do believe that in that passage, world means every person to ever live, that God loved them in
such a way that if they would simply have faith in Christ, they would not perish but have everlasting life.
So I don't think that there's anything even approaching a consensus on that.
But I would say if you're not a Calvinist or if you're considering Calvinism and getting tripped up on John 3
.16, read it the way that you think it reads, and then keep reading.
Because I was not convinced of Calvinism because of Ephesians 2 or Romans 9.
I was convinced of Calvinism because of John 1, and many others have been convinced of Calvinism
because of John 6 and John 14.
John 6 is a good one.
So yeah, if you're thinking about it or you're doubting Calvinism because you're in John 3,
although there's plenty there, you know, the spirit moves where it wants, no man can say one way or another, that you could
make a very clear defense of what we might call Calvinism from John 3.
And John 10 is a masterpiece for the doctrines of grace.
Yeah, right.
There's a conversation of the sheep there.
Yeah, so I don't think that you need to be tripped up or
held back from endorsing something that might approach Calvinism because you think world means everybody,
nor do I think that you should be ashamed of yourself if you think world means elect.
I think there's room in Calvinism for either interpretation, or at least I hope so, because I hold to the
approach that Calvin did, while most of my friends and brothers in the faith probably hold to what A .W. Pink did.
Okay, when we come back from our final break, we're going to get a question from Francis
in Coropolis, Pennsylvania.
I hope I'm pronouncing that right.
And the email address, if you want to join us, and you better send in your question immediately because we're rapidly running out of time,
chrisarnson at gmail .com.
Don't go away.
We'll be right back with Michael Schultz in Calvinism and the love of God.
James White of Alpha Omega Ministries here.
If you've watched my Dividing Line webcast often enough, you know I have a great love for getting Bibles and other
documents vital to my ministry rebound to preserve and ensure their longevity.
And besides that, they feel so good.
I'm so delighted.
I discovered Post Tenebrous Lux Bible rebinding.
No radio ad will be long enough to sing their praises sufficiently, but I'll give it a shot.
Jeffrey Rice of Post Tenebrous Lux is a remarkably gifted craftsman and artisan.
All his work is done by hand from the cutting to the pleating of corners to the perimeter stitching.
Jeffrey uses the finest and buttery soft imported leathers in a wide variety of gorgeous colors like the
turquoise goat skin tanned in Italy used for my Nestle All in 28th edition with a navy
blue goat skin inside liner and the electric blue goat skin from a French tannery used to rebind a
Reformation study Bible I used as a gift.
The silver gilding he added on the page edges has a stunning mirror finish resembling highly polished chrome.
Jeffrey will customize your rebinding to your specifications and even emboss your logo into the leather,
making whatever he rebinds a one -of -a -kind work of art.
For more details on Post Tenebrous Lux Bible rebinding, go to
ptlbiblerebinding .com.
That's ptlbiblerebinding .com.
Every day at thousands of community centers, high schools, middle schools, juvenile institutions,
coffee shops, and local hangouts, Long Island Youth for Christ staff and volunteers meet with young people
who need Jesus.
We are rural and urban, and we are always about the message of Jesus.
Our mission is to have a noticeable spiritual impact on Long Island, New York by engaging young people in the lifelong
journey of following Christ.
Long Island Youth for Christ has been a stalwart bedrock ministry since 1959.
We have a world -class staff and a proven track record of bringing consistent love and encouragement to youths in
need all over the country and around the world.
Help honor our history by becoming a part of our future.
Volunteer, donate, pray, or all of the above.
For details, call Long Island Youth for Christ
at 631 -385 -8333.
That's 631 -385 -8333.
Or visit liyfc .org.
That's liyfc .org.
Hi, this is John
Sampson, pastor of King's Church in Peoria, Arizona.
Taking a moment of your day to talk about Chris Arnson and the Iron Sharpens Iron podcast.
I consider Chris a true friend and a man of high integrity.
He's a skilled interviewer who's not afraid to ask the big penetrating questions, while always defending the key
doctrines of the Christian faith.
I've always been happy to point people to this podcast, knowing it's one of the very few safe places on the internet
where folk won't be led astray.
I believe this podcast needs to be heard far and wide.
This is a day of great spiritual compromise, and yet God has raised Chris up for just such a time.
And knowing this, it's up to us as members of the body of Christ to stand with such a ministry in prayer
and in finances.
I'm pleased to do so and would like to ask you to prayerfully consider joining me in supporting Iron
Sharpens Iron financially.
Would you consider sending either a one -time gift or even becoming a regular monthly partner with this ministry?
I know it would be a huge encouragement to Chris if you would.
All the details can be found at ironsharpensironradio .com where you can click support.
That's ironsharpensironradio .com.
I'm Dr. Tony Costa, Professor of Apologetics and Islam at Toronto Baptist Seminary.
I'm thrilled to introduce to you a church where I've been invited to speak and have grown to love,
Hope Reformed Baptist Church in Corham, Long Island, New York, pastored by Rich Jensen and Christopher
McDowell.
It's such a joy to witness and experience fellowship with people of God like the dear saints at Hope Reformed Baptist Church
in Corham, who have an intensely passionate desire to continue digging deeper and deeper into
the unfathomable riches of Christ in His Holy Word, and to enthusiastically proclaim
Christ Jesus the King and His doctrines of sovereign grace in Suffolk County, Long Island and
beyond.
I hope you also have the privilege of discovering this precious congregation and receive the blessing
of being showered by their love as I have.
For more information on Hope Reformed Baptist Church, go to hopereformedli .net.
That's hopereformedli .net or
call 631 -696 -5711.
That's 631 -696 -5711.
Tell the folks at Hope Reformed Baptist Church of Corham, Long Island, New York that you heard about them from Tony Costa
on Iron Sharpens Iron.
If you love Iron Sharpens Iron Radio, one of the best ways you can help keep the show on the air is
by supporting our advertisers.
One such faithful advertiser who really believes in what Chris Hansen is doing is
Daniel P. Buttafuoco, serious injury lawyer and Christian apologist.
Dan is the president and founder of the Historical Bible Society.
Their mission?
To foster belief in the credibility of scripture as the written Word of God.
They go to various churches, schools and institutions to publicly display a rare
collection of biblical texts along with a fascinating presentation by Mr. Buttafuoco
demonstrating the reliability of scripture.
To advance the cause of the gospel, they created a beautiful perfect facsimile of the
genealogy of Jesus Christ from the original engravings contained in a first edition
1611 King James Bible.
This 17th century hand -engraved chart shows the family tree of Jesus Christ
going back to Adam and Eve.
This book is complete with gorgeous full -size illustrations of Noah's Ark and the Tower of
Babel and an explanation of why the genealogy of Jesus is so important for his claims
to the throne of the universe.
Originals of this work are in museums and nobody has ever made it accessible to the
public in a large book form before.
You can have your own copy of this 44 -page genealogy book for a donation of $35
or more.
Visit historicalbiblesociety .org.
That's historicalbiblesociety .org.
Thanks for helping to keep Iron Sharpens Iron Radio on the air.
Hi, I'm Buzz Taylor.
Chris Arnzen of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio has had a long -time partnership with our friends at
CVBBS, which stands for Cumberland Valley Bible Book Service.
They specialize in supplying Reformed and Puritan books and Bibles at discount prices that make them affordable for
everyone.
CVBBS has been a family -owned book service since 1987, operating out of Carlisle, Pennsylvania.
They seek to bring you the best available Christian books and Bibles at the best possible prices.
Unlike other book sites, they make no effort to provide every book that is available or popular because, frankly,
much of what is being printed is not worth your time.
That means you can get to the good stuff faster.
It also means you don't have to worry about being assaulted by the pornographic, heretical, and otherwise faith
-insulting materials promoted by the secular book vendors.
Browse the pages at ease, shop at your leisure, and purchase with confidence at Cumberland Valley
Bible Book Service.
Order online at CVBBS .com.
That's CVBBS .com.
Or you can order by phone at 1 -800 -656 -0231.
That's 1 -800 -656 -0231.
Please let our friends at CVBBS know that you heard about them on Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
In the Iron Sharpens Iron Radio audience have been sticking with or switching to the NASB.
I'm Dr. Joe Morecraft, pastor of Heritage Presbyterian Church in Cumming, Georgia, and
the NASB is my Bible of choice.
I'm Anthony Uvinio, founder of TheReformRookie .com and co -founder of New York Apologetics, and the
NASB is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Tim Bushong of Syracuse Baptist Church in Syracuse, Indiana, and the NASB is my
Bible of choice.
I'm Eli Ayala, founder of Revealed Apologetics and staff member with the Historical Bible Society, and the NASB
is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Josh Miller of Grace Bible Fellowship Church in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and the
NASB is my Bible of choice.
I'm Joe Bianchi, president of Calvi Press Publishing in Greenville, South Carolina,
and the NASB is my Bible of choice.
I'm Pastor Jake Korn of Switzerland Community Church in Switzerland, Florida, and the
NASB is my Bible of choice.
Here's a great way for your church to help keep Iron Sharpens Iron Radio on the air.
Pastors, are your pew bibles tattered and falling apart?
Consider restocking your pews with the NASB, and tell the publishers you heard about them
from Chris Arnzen on Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
Go to nasbible .com, that's nasbible .com to place your order.
I'm Brian McLaughlin, president of the SecureComm Group, and an enthusiastic supporter of Chris Arnzen's
Iron Sharpens Iron Radio program.
The SecureComm Group provides the highest level of security, closed circuit television, access control,
and communication systems for Manhattan's top residential buildings, as well as churches, commercial properties,
municipalities, and more.
We custom install exactly what you need to protect yourself, including digital recording,
offsite viewing, and connectivity from most smart devices.
From simple code activated systems, to the latest technology using facial recognition, the
SecureComm Group has it.
We also provide the latest in intercom and IP telephone systems.
In addition, we provide superior networking platforms.
We'll create, maintain, and secure your local network.
Whether it's a Wi -Fi or hardwire network, we'll implement the latest secured firewall,
endpoint solutions, and cloud backup.
I would love to have the honor and privilege of helping protect the lives and property of Iron Sharpens Iron
Radio listeners and their associates.
For more details on how the SecureComm Group may be of service to you with the very latest in security
innovations, call 718 -353 -3355.
That's 718 -353 -3355.
Or visit securecommgroup .com.
That's securecommgroup .com.
This is Brian McLaughlin of the SecureComm Group, joining Chris Arnzen's family of advertisers to keep
Iron Sharpens Iron Radio on the air.
I'm Dr. Joseph Piper, President Emeritus and Professor of Systematic and Applied Theology
at Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary.
Every Christian who's serious about the Deformed Faith and the Westminster Standards should have and use
the eight -volume commentary on the theology and ethics of the Westminster Larger Catechism
titled Authentic Christianity by Dr. Joseph Moorcraft.
It is much more than an exposition of the Larger Catechism.
It is a thoroughly researched work that utilizes biblical exegesis as well as historical and
systematic theology.
Dr. Moorcraft is pastor of Heritage Presbyterian Church of Cumming, Georgia, and I urge everyone looking
for a biblically faithful church in that area to visit that fine congregation.
For details on the eight -volume commentary, go to westminstercommentary .com,
westminstercommentary .com.
For details on Heritage Presbyterian Church of Cumming, Georgia, visit
heritagepresbyterianchurch .com, heritagepresbyterianchurch .com.
Please tell Dr. Moorcraft and the saints at Heritage Presbyterian Church of Cumming, Georgia that Dr. Joseph
Piper of Greenville Presbyterian Theological Seminary sent you.
And don't forget, folks, Iron Sharpens Iron Radio is sponsored in part by the law firm
of Buttafuoco Associates.
If you are the victim of a very serious personal injury or medical malpractice, please call
Dan Buttafuoco, my dear friend since the 1990s, at 1 -800 -NOW -HURT, 1 -800 -NOW -HURT,
or visit his website, 1 -800 -NOW -HURT .com, 1 -800 -NOW -HURT .com.
Please always mention that you heard about them from Chris Arnzen of Iron Sharpens Iron Radio.
Also, if you're a man in ministry leadership, you're invited to the next Iron Sharpens Iron Radio free
pastor's luncheon on Thursday, June the 6th, 11 a .m. to 2 p .m. at Church of the Living Christ in
Loisville, Pennsylvania.
It's absolutely free of charge, and not only will you eat for free and enjoy the fun, fellowship, rest, and
relaxation of your colleagues in ministry for free, you'll also be hearing a message by
my keynote speaker, Dr. Joel Beeky, who is founder and president of the Puritan Reform Theological
Seminary in Grand Rapids, Michigan, all free of charge.
And every man attending will also leave with a heavy sack of free brand new books, personally selected by
me and donated by Christian publishers all over the United States and United Kingdom.
Everything is absolutely free.
If you want to register, send me an email to chrisarnzen at gmail .com, and put pastor's luncheon in the subject line.
We're now back with Michael Schultz, and we have a question from a listener in Carapolis,
Pennsylvania, who says, must we not be very careful when we approach the lost, especially
people we don't even know, and make proclamations to them that Jesus loves them?
We have to be careful to bring up some of the nuances you have mentioned earlier, because otherwise,
lost men may relish in the fact that Jesus loves them so much, he could not
possibly ever send them to hell.
I think that's a very good point.
That is, and that's the most common reason that people right now are fraying away from the declaration of the
love of God, and there's validity to that.
My only pushback against that is something that I've already mentioned, is that if you
would unabashedly say that God hates sinners, I don't think we have any
right to say that, and yet be hesitant to say God loves them.
It would be malpractice to so favor one doctrine of the Bible, which
is that God does hate sinners, we know that's true, and yet to neglect another doctrine of the Bible, which is that
God loves them.
For example, just to show that God takes this very seriously, when you read Revelation 2, and you
get to the church at Ephesus, that church is commended for having faithful doctrine,
they endured faithfully, although the culture around them was increasingly debased, and they seem to have
even engaged the culture around them.
Christ commends them for all of that, and then he says, I am about to close your church,
and the reason I'm gonna do that, is because you are neglecting love.
And so, it's an incredible thing that Jesus says, all your doctrine is right,
and you're enduring faithfully, and you're even engaging your community and your culture for my
cause, for my name, and I would rather your church be closed if you do all of that
while neglecting love.
And I'm convicted by that, because the questioner is very right.
When we say to someone, this lost person, Jesus loves you, they
do tend to take that to mean, Jesus is very pleased with me, and he would never ask me
to change who I am.
That is not what we mean, but at the same time,
would we then say, well, I don't want to tell them that God hates them,
because that'll drive them away from God as well.
And I don't think that that would be the approach that we generally take.
We're very open about God's anger with sin, and you'll even see, you
know, there are guys like Jeff Durbin, who there's a TikTok or something floating around of him saying,
the apostles never went out and told people that Jesus loved them.
And again, that may be true, but they also didn't go around telling everybody that God hated
them.
But nevertheless, both of those things are true.
So I really, I think that we need to be very careful with the church at Ephesus in
mind, with the tendency to overcorrect, because you
had the Joel Osteens of the world, who just want everybody to know how much God loves them
and how proud of them he is.
And when I talked to Dr. Foskey, just the previous guest on the show about this a few weeks ago, he mentioned Rick
Warren had said that to a group of businessmen, not even in a church setting, he just told a group of businessmen
that God loves them very much.
And his famous quote was, God's not mad at you, he's mad about you.
Yeah, whatever that means.
And we have these slogans like that, you know, God hates the sin, but not the sinner.
And we say, well, no, that's not true.
And the classic one is he doesn't send the sin to hell, he sends the sinner to hell.
But yet again, when we say God hates you, we're not specifying there.
We really need to be careful about being very loosey -goosey in
proclaiming the hatred and the anger and the wrath of God while being very withdrawn
in proclaiming the love and the benevolence and the grace and the favor of God.
And I think that if we're going to favor one over the other, which would be an
error either direction you go, it seems to me, based on the church at Ephesus,
that Christ has told us we are absolutely not allowed to neglect love.
That's not permitted.
And we must never forget, we Calvinists especially, that we don't know who the elect are,
and God loved the elect before the foundation of the world, even if that elect
individual is not yet regenerate and is still a prostitute, is
still perhaps on death row in prison.
We don't know who God's elect are until they repent.
And we got to remember Romans chapter 5, 8 through 9,.
But we
are out
of time.
I would love to discuss this in a part two with you at some point.
And because only one hour on the show goes by like lightning, I want to remind our listeners
of some very important contact information.
Forge Theological Seminary, where my guest is on the faculty, associate professor of
church history, I believe.
That's forge .education, forge .education.
And let's not forget also about the church where he pastors, Antioch Baptist Church of
Lewisburg, Kentucky, abclewisbergky .wordpress
.com.
Abclewisbergky .wordpress .com.
Thank you so much, Michael Schultz.
You've been a joy to interview, and I look forward to your return.
Don't forget about the Open Air Theology website as well, openairtheology .com,
openairtheology .com for the conference later this month where Michael is speaking.
I want you all to always remember for the rest of your lives that Jesus Christ is a far greater Savior
than you are a sinner.