Social Media Censorship and the Christian

One, two, three! Welcome to The Rap Report with your host, Andrew Rapoport, where we provide biblical interpretation and application. This is a ministry of striving for eternity in the Christian podcast community.

For more content or to request a speaker for your church, go to.

Strivingforeternity .org. All right, welcome to The Rap Report. I am your host, Andrew Rapoport, along with my trusty sidekick, Bud the Wiser. Greetings. Thank you for that. Hey, your bud sign is off.

I can fix that. Usually when we record here, there we go, there's Bud in bright lights. Now I feel better. The world is normal again. How are you doing? I'm doing well. We'll get to that in a moment. What we're going to talk about today, folks, is kind of what we started with two weeks ago.

We did a thing on the national strategy of dealing with counterterrorism. Very, very, unfortunately, scary episode. It was a long one. I think Bud said I was obviously too ramped up, too much knowledge on the subject.

I went off for two hours and Bud barely said a word. We're going to try to rectify that this episode. We made Bud do a lot of research this one, so he could have lots to say. This is really a continuation of that.

What we're going to deal with today is dealing with examples and things from Facebook, Twitter, elsewhere, where you're seeing social media and what they define as how they're trying to take care and protect people.

Really, we would call that censorship. We're going to show that today in this episode. I want that to be seen. I want you to realize this is going on. One of the reasons that we're going to do this and we're going to get to the show, we're going to try to get the point across to each one of us is the world is against us, folks.

Just wake up to that fact. It's time to be woke in a real way. Truthfully, woke means being born again. That's really what it should mean. You're dead in your sins, and then you're born again. That's woke.

You woke up from deadness. We'll talk about woke and things like that. The thing that you see is that in this idea of trying to protect people, social media is not really protecting. They're censoring.

They're no different than communist China. A lot of people then are going, well, we got to fight this. We got to fight this. Well, okay, you can, but Christian, realize the biggest thing for us is not to try to fight the culture.

It's to try to convert the culture. Obviously, we don't do the converting God does, but guess what? God, what does he say in Romans 10? He says he's not going to spray the gospel in the air. That's not what he's planning to do.

He could have people just Bibles and people read the Bible, but the reality is he wants a preacher. How are they going to hear? How are they going to believe unless they hear? How are they going to hear if someone doesn't preach?

Well, we got to be preaching the gospel so that they hear the gospel and so that they would get saved. That's where we got to focus. Really, although we're going to talk a lot about issues in culture today, we're going to talk a lot about social media, what I really want you to focus in on is the fact that, Christian, our focus needs to be on the gospel.

Our focus needs to be on recognizing what we need to do in a culture that is very much against us. That's going to be the overarching thing that we hope you'll get across. Now, I will mention, last week I had the privilege of being on Voice of Reason Radio.

I encourage you to go listen to that one. We talked about a tweet that was out by Joya Micah. She has obviously blocked me on all social media now. It's really kind of funny, bud, because I told her she was going to block me on Facebook.

She was like, no, I won't. I just kept looking. Because I said it, she didn't block me right away. She waited three months, but she did block me when I hadn't been saying anything about it. She just remembered.

I think her pride, she was like, well, I'm not going to let him be proven right. Because I said, folks, watch, she will be blocking me because I criticized her. She waited several months, but then got back to it.

We dealt with a tweet she said about that we should be Christ-like and not biblical. Chris and I went through, what does that mean? Look at the definitions. It was a privilege to be on there. If you listen to Voice of Reason Radio that just dropped last night.

I'm not on Twitter. We could talk about that today. Why? I've been kind of shadow banned from Twitter and that became a useless platform for me. I think the rumor that I heard, Voice of Reason Radio, their episode was on Owen Strand's book, Christianity and Wokeness.

The way I understand it is on Twitter, I guess Chris Honhold is giving away three signed copies. That's how I think I heard that on his podcast. I could be wrong, folks, but go listen to his podcast. See if I heard that correctly.

If it's on Twitter, it must be true, correct? Okay. You've been doing a bunch of articles, Bud, on the SBC, a ton of them on different topics. You've dealt with what went on with the convention. You dealt with a number of things with Ed Litton and the plagiarism.

You've dealt with things about, which I think is the great article on the SBC got the wrong black man. Because if Ed Litton resigns, then you have Lee who's black, but he's not woke. He's not a critical racism theory kind of guy.

He's the wrong kind of black man. You make in the article a great point. Okay, hey, getting rid of Litton would be an appeal to both groups. Not only do you replace a white guy with a black guy, but you get to say that you got rid of the white guy to appeal to the conservatives because he was plagiarizing.

Yet, they're not doing that. I wonder why. There's a word for it. It's called hypocrisy. Oh, that's right. Yes. You also deal with some of the hypocrisy in an article on Al Mueller. You have that. You also have a great article for folks who are in the SBC on leaving the SBC.

That's another article. I will admit the funnier article is one you did, Babylon B style on life weight selling sermons. An interesting thing this week though, with all that SBC stuff, we've talked with the world is watching.

They said that. My whole their problem is they're focused on the world is watching and that's why they want to push critical race theory. My argument is God is watching and that's why the plagiarist guy should step down.

John Harris on his, I think it was John Harris on his podcast, had talked about the fact that in the Southern Seminary, they specifically say that this service that J .D. Greer had a testimony on, he removed it.

He asked them to remove his testimony, of course, but he used their service and said how that service, I forget what it is that Justin Peters had mentioned, DAS? Docent group. DASR group. Docent group.

They made J .D. Greer look good. It's interesting how many people have 143 sermons in Romans. Just interesting as if they all were maybe using that same group. How many of them have the same titles? That's done for people to start doing is looking at all of these big name preachers, especially going through the Docent group and look at who has recommended them and then go through all their sermon lists online and go, oh, let's figure out how many people have the exact same title, names of their sermon titles and number of sermons and start looking there.

I bet you're going to find that you're going to see a lot of people that have identical sermons. The other thing I interesting is, as you know, I do some stuff still with IT and I help out one of a major Fortune 500 company.

Every year, they put on a software symposium where you get people coming in to talk about software and the advances within software. Very interesting because one of the things I do in leading that symposium is I work with teams, about 50 people who are going to be reviewing all the papers that come in.

This week, I got an email from someone saying, hey, here's a paper and I happen to notice that it's basically right from this website and that website. Yeah. And so, what did we do? Well, we're canning that article or that paper.

That abstract is being rejected. Why? Plagiarism. So, for the SBC that says the world is watching in a secular capacity, I would not allow plagiarism. Why in the world would I accept it in a capacity in the church?

You're just being a pharisee. Thank you. Oh, that wasn't a good thing. No. I thought being Jewish, that was a compliment. I'm sorry.

On the other side of the argument, remote.

Social Media, Censorship, and the Christian Response

So, Bud, we're starting a little bit late today, I know, and that's throwing you off a bit. I'm sorry. I called you and said, we need to start a little late. I can't remember the reason. Why did we have to start late?

You overslept. Oh, that's right. Now, why did you find that interesting?

Why did you find that strange? Because I know you sleep like 45 minutes a night or something.

Usually three hours, and it's only because my wife made me promise that I'd sleep every night, but I've been sleeping. Look, you don't understand. I've been running about a half marathon a day. So, that helps with getting a little bit more sleep.

So, I got up to like four to five hours of sleep I've been doing lately. But yesterday, I did try something. I got into a sauna. And so, after I run and then a lift, I got into a sauna, and it was late in the evening.

And so, I actually slept six straight hours. I haven't done that in years. But maybe it's also because I have like the world's best mattress topper. I mean, I'm just saying, I got the MyPillow pillow, the MyPillow mattress topper.

I think that's it. Now, I will say that MyPillow is running a massive overstock sale right now. And I am thinking of getting their MyPillow weighted blanket that's 50 off right now. So, I am thinking about that.

But I can only get the 50 off with a promo code. So, do you happen to know a promo code I could use, Bud? SFE, I think. That would be a good one to use, because that would not only get me a weighted blanket and save 50%, but support Striving for Eternity and this program.

So, that's a good idea. I might have to do that. But that is something I am looking at getting, because I do like weighted blankets, and it's on sale. But the mattress topper I got, I don't know if it's still on sale.

They had a two-inch mattress topper on sale for 50 off with a promo code. I have the three-inch, which I absolutely love. If you've been listening to this show, you know that I have been enjoying my sleep a lot more.

I will admit that I don't know if it was the running that has gotten me sleeping more, to four to five hours, or if it's that mattress topper, but they do seem to coincide. I'm just saying. Actually, no, actually, the more I think about it, no, the running did start earlier, because I've been running for a while, just not that much.

But yeah, I guess it's the mattress topper getting me sleeping more. All right. So, folks, we are supporting You're not woke, literally. Yeah, I'm not fully awake yet. But this show is supported by MyPillow.

We appreciate when you guys go out there, go to mypillow .com, and you can order there and use promo code SFE, or call 1 -800 -873 -0176. That's 800 -873 -0176. I would strongly suggest getting the mattress topper, strongly, and the MyPillow pillow.

I'm looking forward to this winter. I plan on having the slippers and the robe that they have. So, I'm looking forward to that. So, with that, we should talk about, before we get into our show, because this kind of coordinates with the show, we should talk about the funniest post I've seen on Facebook this week.

Yes. Okay. So, my friend, Darren Stid, who Okay. First off, I did like him. He was on Apologetics Live with me, so I kept calling him Darren Stud just to see his reaction. He liked that. But here's his post.

I told you about this this morning, bud. This was hysterical. I saw this this week. This gets the award for funniest post of the week. It's creative, makes you laugh. You can also do this on your own Facebook.

Try this. It works well. I may actually You know what? I think I'm going to steal it. I'm going to do this right now. I wonder if I share it, whether this works. Let me share it with friends and see if that'll work as well.

But I've just shared it on my Facebook, so we'll see if it works. Bud can go out to my Facebook and see if it works the same. But here's what Darren said. This post right here is about to be the dumbest, most inaccurate, most irrational thing you've ever seen on my Facebook wall.

To find out more, click the link below. Oh, also, COVID vaccine. What happens when you post that? Well, you get a link that Facebook immediately puts up that says, visit the COVID -19 Center for Vaccine Resources.

Get vaccine information. That is hysterical. That was brilliant that he did that. All you have to do is say COVID vaccine, and Facebook will automatically, magically put that link in there. Now, how long did that take?

Well, as we saw, I mean, I could take a snapshot of this. It says, just now, I just shared it, folks, just saying that, and I read to you what it said on my wall with the COVID vaccine link. That's how quick it is.

What we want to talk about is the fact that this is the thing you end up seeing with Facebook and Twitter. They're doing these algorithms to search through everything that you have, and they're taking action on things that you do.

In fact, Bud, you just shared with me, Owen Strand, we mentioned the podcast that Voice of Reason had done on his book, Christianity and Wokeness. It seems that they're doing the same thing they did with Votie Bacham's book, Fault Lines.

People are posting a link to his book, and now, all of a sudden, it says, this content is unavailable. Facebook is removing Christianity and Wokeness and Fault Lines. Now, what's with these two books?

Well, these two books happen to be two books that are against the view of being woke of this critical racism theory. Facebook and Twitter and the like are going out of their way to make sure you don't find anything they don't want you to see.

This is organized. Now, folks, I want you to recognize something. We're going to go through, what we had said we were going to do some weeks ago, we're going to do today is go through their community standards on Facebook, Twitter, to show what their rules are for things so that you understand.

This goes along, if you have not listened to the episode we did, and you should have, by the way, the episode we did two weeks ago. If not, you really should go back to that one only because the reason I'm saying that you should go back to that is because the one we did on the National Strategy for Counterterrorism Against Christians, we did that because, excuse me, that shows you what their target is.

They're looking to target Christians or people that they choose to target. They're coming up with, they're saying they are domestic terrorists. Real quick synopsis, we went through basically what the Biden administration has revealed as their plan to deal with domestic terrorists, and they explain who they think domestic terrorists are.

Violent domestic terrorists, and you say, well, fine, that's not me. Well, they're going to say they want to get them before they're violent, so they're going to do profiling. What are they going to profile?

If you want to protect your privacy from them spying on you, you are in that category. If you think there might have been fraud in the 2020 election, you're in that category. It's amazing because they've said fraud in every time a Republican wins, the Democrats and media claim that there was fraud, but this election somehow that makes you a terrorist.

Saying that Trump was working with Russia in 2016 is not terrorism, but saying that there was fraud by Americans in 2020 is terrorism. You go figure that difference out, but do you not believe everything that the Biden administration is saying about COVID -19?

You're a terrorist. Do you think that there's an overreach of the government? You're a terrorist. All those things put you in the category, and what that document said is that the government will work with private sectors.

What private sectors? Social media. This is why we're saying part of what gets you identified as a terrorist in their eyes is moving off of the platforms that the liberal government is working with. This started under Obama.

Remember, folks, this is the thing that Obama said. He wants to fundamentally change America. You all thought he was talking about socialism. He was. He was talking Marxism, but how was he going to get it?

This is how he got it, to get the major companies to push his agenda, to be working with the major social media platforms to influence the news, to censor the news, and that's what we are now talking about today.

A lot of times on this show, we'll talk about biblical interpretations for things. We also talk about giving you an understanding of our culture from a biblical perspective. What we want to do here is, like we did two weeks ago, we're going to go through a lot of things that are going to be going through what is actually going on.

Then at the end, we want to give you encouragement, but we have to lay a lot of groundwork first. This is stuff that you're not seeing. Yes, you've known these things exist. You hear people talk about it.

What we want to do is actually give you evidence. That's what we're going to do here. Before we get started, anything that you want to start us off with, because I said you're going to do a little bit more talking this time.

You're definitely going to be talking for sure when we get into talking about Section 230. Section 230. I think it's important to.

Understand. We've all, as participants in Facebook, we've tacitly agreed to these policies. We're at the mercy of these policies so far as we're on that platform and on Twitter and other social media that would be in the same vein.

That's important. It ties directly to this whole Biden move about handling domestic terrorism that we did that show on, which folks really do need to go back and listen to that. Then drill down into this episode where we're talking about particularly social media and then particularly how it affects Christians.

You'll ultimately see where is the real target going? Because we can't, as Christians, we can't forget there is an enemy behind this narrative. There is an enemy that is against our Lord, against the gospel, against our faith that is driving all this narrative.

It's being done by people with debased minds and.

Evil intent. Correct. Let me start. I want to start with this Facebook's community standards. I'm going to read some things from there. Violence and incitement. Let me read the paragraph of their rationale for this policy.

We aim to prevent potential offline harm that may be related to content on Facebook. I'm going to stop there. Where's the harm actually occurring there? Offline. Offline. Oh, okay. Offline. Right off the bat, Facebook is saying, they're going to monitor what you're going to do when you're not on Facebook.

Okay. So, they're basically with this saying, if you notice, they're saying, you know, indirectly, they have to do this because they feel that they are indirectly responsible for what happens off their platform by the content on their platform.

Okay. Which is a very interesting admission. Why? Because, well, Facebook wants to say that, you know, they wanted to blame, if you remember January 6th, you remember that day of infamy, right? Oh, wow.

Yeah. Yeah. That was the day that Pelosi worked with the FBI and Capitol Police to allow people to come in and act like tourists in the Capitol building, take selfies, and walk around and be invited in and be given the, you know, free to reign to walk around and take pictures.

And that was horrible. It was horrible. In fact, do you know how many people have been charged with insurrection? 500 people have been arrested. Over 500. You know how many have been charged with insurrection?

Not one. Not a single one. In fact, they're being held. Here's what my theory is with this. They're being held in solitary confinement for all this time, since January 6th. Many of them are in solitary confinement.

There haven't been charges against them yet, for many of them. And those that have had charges are things like trespassing. I don't know how they're trespassing. Like, you know, they were invited in, but we already have one guilty plea.

Okay. The first one, they haven't had any cases. None have gone to trial that I know of, but one that was plea bargained. Why? Because a grandmother wants to see her family. She said that the police waved her in, but what did she have to do?

To get out of jail, she had to plead guilty and read a whole bunch of books about what a racist she is, and before the judge admit that she is evolving on the issue of racism, and she apologizes for her white supremacy.

Why has that become important? Because what they want is a narrative. They want to say, see, see, all these Trump supporters that were protesting that day, they're a bunch of white supremacists, because they can't actually find evidence that they're white supremacists.

So what are they going to do? They're violating the law, because they're not giving them due process. They're supposed to have a very quick trial, pre-trial, to see if there's enough information for a trial and be given bail.

And there has to be justification if they're kept in jail without bail. These guys haven't even had that bail hearing, and so the due process is being denied them. Why are they in solitary confinement?

That's for the worst, because this is all about an agenda to push. They want to get these people so willing to, they'll do anything to get out of jail. They'll plead guilty to anything, okay? And so far, as far as I know, only two cases have gone forward.

Sorry about that. So what we end up seeing is, because that really isn't the main point of what we're discussing, but I got off Wait, was that a rabbit trail? It was a rap A rap trail. Okay, so we aim to prevent potential offline harm that may be related to content on Facebook.

While we understand that people commonly express disdain or disagreement by threatening or calling for violence in non-serious ways, we remove language that incites or facilitates serious violence. We remove content, disable accounts, or work with law enforcement that we believe there is a genuine risk of harm or direct threats to public safety.

We also try to consider the language and context in order to distinguish casual statements from content that constitutes a credible threat to public or public safety. In determining whether a threat is credible, we may also consider additional information, like a person's public visibility and the risks to their physical safety.

In some cases, we aspire to conditional threats directed at terrorists or other violent actors. In other words, saying terrorists deserve to be killed is an example they give. And we deem those non-credible, absent specific evidence to be contrary.

Okay, so let me break some of these down, and I'm not going to be able to go through all my show notes that I gave to you, bud. I just know that upfront, but notice it. They're going to remove language.

They're saying they have the ability to remove language that they believe. So here's the thing. Facebook, whether you know it or not, when you first signed up for Facebook, you signed up to give away the fact that this is public information.

I don't know if you recognize that. When Facebook started, what they did was have you sign that everything you put on there is public information. That's what allowed them to sell your photos and make the money off it.

Yes, they resell your photos that you took, or images of you. You don't get the money. They get the money because you, knowingly or not, accepted their rules, their agreement that says it's public information.

Why did they do that? They originally did that because they said this is supposed to be free speech. They wanted everything to fit under free speech, which is public domain. They wanted it to be able to be where if the government has to come after some information for law enforcement purposes, they didn't want to have to make them have to get court orders.

Therefore, if it's in public domain, they can just hand it over. Very interesting because they pick and choose what they want to hand over. We've had plenty of cases where you see a killer that they clean up their Facebook page after the person dies.

Facebook does it, not the person who committed the crimes, but it's like they cleaned up these. You see these black kids who commit murder, and all of a sudden, it's all cleaned up because when they get killed by a white cop, all of a sudden, all the pictures with them with guns and threatening to kill people, kill cops, all that's gone.

Facebook removed it after the guy died. Amazing. Was that to prevent other harm? You see, they've set themselves up in public domain, but they're setting themselves up as they're the arbiter of the censorship, and they get to decide what needs to be censored, but then they want their cake and eat it too.

We're going to get to that with Section 230. We're going to make sure we get to that because what they're doing is saying, hey, we're protected by this. Section 230, if you don't know what it is, Bud's going to go through this, but that protects them from the government coming in and censoring them, but they're acting as well the Chinese government.

They're acting on behalf of, like the Chinese government to censor, and they're acting on behalf of who? Well, let's be clear. Joe Biden, the Biden administration, the spokesman for the Biden administration said this, in terms of actions we have taken or we're working to take, I should say from the federal government, we've increased disinformation research and tracking within the Surgeon General's office.

We're flagging problematic posts for Facebook that spread disinformation. They have agreed, they've acknowledged that they are working with Facebook and other organizations, which if you listened two weeks ago, we said that's what they said they're going to be the strategy of dealing with terrorists, domestic terrorists.

They're going to work with private companies. They're going to work with social media companies to be able to do the spying that the government cannot do. Folks, this is unconstitutional. It is unconstitutional.

Why? Because Facebook right now is acting as government. They are censoring speech, public speech, which fits under the First Amendment. It is free speech. You have the right to say it. They'll say that, hey, they're protected by Section 230 under free speech, that they don't censor, but yet here they're being, they will censor.

Let's take a look at some posts that have been censored. I sent some of these to you. Just some examples of this that fit under this, because when you click on their link, this is where you get sent to.

Here's one from, I'm not going to give last names, but Justin, we've reviewed your comment and found it goes against our community standards on hate speech. When you click on it, you get to the article that I read.

What did he say? What was the thing that was so bad? Here's what he wrote. He wrote to answering someone's question in my Christian Apologetics Facebook group. He was answering the question to someone, what does respecter of persons mean?

That's a theological term. He gave an answer, a respecter of persons, meaning no one earned God's favor for salvation. All men are desperately wicked. God calls who he wills without respect of persons.

Read Romans 9. Read the whole chapter so you don't miss anything. Great read. That sounded pretty violent, didn't it? Hate speech. That is hate speech. What in there could possibly be hate speech? Calling all men desperately wicked.

Desperately wicked. Where did he get that from, folks? The Bible. That is from Scripture. That is hate speech in there. So, Danny in our group, one of the admins that I have helped me moderate that group, he says, dear ones, we have just received a Facebook strike, or warning, as it were, that what was and what was it for, you ask?

For this line right here, quote, because all men are desperately wicked, unquote. Seriously, that's it. Facebook, quote, suggested, unquote, that I remove the person slash member that made it. Under absolutely no circumstance will I do that.

I'd rather die a martyr's death than cower to the powers to be. So, dear ones, please press on. Keep fighting for the standing on biblical solid doctrine and accurate theology, because in the end, that's what we have that's worth fighting for.

That one got removed. Oh, for hate speech. So, what did I do? Well, see, I understand how the technology works. So, where Danny typed that all out, I took what Danny said and took a picture of it and put that into the group and made it an announcement.

Why? Because it's easy to search. We have computers that can search text very quickly, very easily. That's when you do big data. It's basically dealing with all of this text and being able to search it really, really rapidly.

That's how Google searches all these websites. So, when you type something in, and we're going to give a reason why you shouldn't be using Google anymore, you should use DuckDuckGo. I will give evidence for that in a few minutes.

So, I took it, made this into a picture because that they can't scan the same way. And so, that's still up there. That'll be removed probably eventually when the Facebook Nazis, when the Facebook SS decide they're going to find it.

But here's another one that I found from Wesley. Now, Wesley got this thing. Wesley, we received your comment and found it goes against our community standards on harassment and bullying. What did he say?

You ready, bud, for harassment and bullying? Here we go. I'm looking at it. Wow. Here we go. Here's what he said. He responded to someone and said, if that's what you want to believe, bud, you're obviously a literal brick wall.

That is so harassing. I mean, this is nothing like what I, you want to challenge folks, go into the leftist Facebook groups, go into the pro-Biden groups. You want to see what harassment and bullying looks like?

You want to see what hate speech looks like? Go in there and read it. I joined some of those groups just to see the victory all and hatred. They're still bashing Trump, wishing he would die. We're going to get to that in a moment that that's not allowed, but they can do that all the time when it's Trump saying that someone, no, but I don't think he was talking to you just for the record when he said, no, that's what you want to believe, but it wasn't, he was talking to a guy named Rick.

So it wasn't you just so people recognize that. I mean, you're bud, the wiser,.

Not just bud. So brick wall used to be, you know, like a compliment, high school football. I was called the brick wall when I played high school foot and that was like a badge of honor. In fact,.

I have a literal badge. Is that brick wall? Isn't that like what's Andrew Jackson was, you know, he was the stone wall and was on wall. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, but you're obviously a literal brick wall. I mean, in the context it's, I'm guessing like thinking about it, he's saying the guy just.

Isn't thinking through things. Well, it's got little laughter emojis and head slapping. And,.

You know. Yeah. I'm not great with the emoji stuff. I don't read emoji. Well.

Yeah. Well, I mean, I don't even know how to put them on there, but obviously they're reading a tone in here that I can't read.

Yeah. I mean, but how does this fit the definition? I mean, is this, is this like some, you know, it's amazing because they're going to even by their own definition, they're going to protect terrorist groups.

Okay. From people that are against terrorism. Like you can't say a terrorist deserves to die. And yet you go into these other groups and you'll see Trump, they could say Trump should die. You know, they could bash him all day long, even though he's not present anymore, but Hey, you know so, so let's, let's look at, let me continue with what they say for the violence here.

Let me read some things that fit under. What is, how do they define violence? Well, let me quote from, from their Facebook standards, quote, threats that continue to lead to death and other forms of high severity violence targeting people or places where threat is defined as any of the following statements of intent to commit high severity violence.

This includes content where a symbol represents a target and, or includes a visual of an adornment or, or a method or method to represent violence calls for high severity violence, including content where no target is specific specified, but a symbol represents the target and, or includes a visual of the armament or method that represents violence statements advocating for high severity violence, uh, as a spur, uh, well actually aspirational or conditional statements to commit high severity violence.

I'm just, but, but I'm just, I'm really determined. I'm just, I'm, I'm, let me go back to those Facebook posts that were removed. I'm just, I'm, I'm confused. Um, all men are desperately wicked. All I'm trying to figure out, wait, I'm trying to, I'm, I, I can't, I'm, I'm trying, but I'm trying to see how that fits under this, this definition here.

Um, they were targeting, uh, people, all men, who are they targeting? I guess they're targeting every single human being. Is that it saying all men are dead, but what's, what's the high severity violence in there?

I'm, I'm, I'm not quite sure if I get that, uh, calling someone a literal brick wall. Uh, I don't know. I'm having a hard time with this, but I really, really am.

You think their algorithm is picking up when something is maybe Christian?

Maybe, maybe, you know, like, you know, you can post white fragility, but you can't post Christianity and wokeness or, you know, Bodhi Bakkam's fault lines.

Gotta be conspiracy. We're just engaged in conspiracy here.

There's gotta be reasons. There's gotta be more. I mean, they probably tell us what we can and can't post, right? I mean, that would be a fair thing to do on Facebook. They, they, yeah, I will admit Facebook gave us more information than Twitter.