June 24, 2003

Webcasting around the world from the desert metropolis of Phoenix, Arizona, this is The Dividing Line. The Apostle Peter commanded Christians to be ready to give a defense for the hope that is within us.

Yet to give that answer with gentleness and reverence. Our host is Dr. James White, Director of Alpha Omega Ministries and an Elder at the Phoenix Reformed Baptist Church. This is a live program and we invite your participation.

If you'd like to talk with Dr. White, call now at 602 -973 -4602 or toll free across the United States. It's 1 -877 -753 -3341. And now with today's topic, here is James White.

Travel, Teaching, and the King James Only Question

Well and good morning and welcome to The Dividing Line. Yes, we are live today. We haven't been live for quite some time now. We weren't around last week. Tuesday morning we were teaching at the beautiful campus of the Golden Gate Baptist Theological Seminary in Mill Valley.

I found it ironic that the Southern Baptist Convention came to Phoenix and during the very days when the Southern Baptist Convention came to Phoenix, the Southern Baptist sent me to Golden Gate. I was in beautiful Mill Valley, California.

In fact, look at that.

My WebShot desktop just put the Golden Gate Bridge up on the screen here and I drove across that twice. I remembered this time anyway to bring my money to pay the toll. The first year I went up there, as I was leaving and I was getting ready to I had taught for two weeks.

They do things much shorter now. It's just two days instead of two weeks. But as I was leaving, I hit the McDonald's down there at the 101 in Seminary Drive, used up the last of my money, head across the bridge and go, oops, forgot a little something there.

Oh, was that oh, a little pause there.

Let's see.

Sound off. There we go. Micah just messed me up yet again. That boy, I tell you, we're going to have to do something about him. Give him his own special room where he can play all of his sounds. Anyway, we had a good time up there while the Southern Baptist Convention was here in Phoenix.

And then we went to Houston on Thursday and had some interesting experiences coming back. But that's not why you tune in to listen to The Dividing Line, to hear about my interesting experiences. Well, I suppose the debates and things like that, but I wasn't debating.

I was just driving a vehicle back from Houston and did get to visit wonderful Ozona, Texas. Yes, Ozona, Texas does exist. It's about 60 miles from anything else. I tell you, that is a big state. It's very big.

It's wide, and there's not a lot out there. And when that back tire exploded, I was awful glad that it did so where it did because it would have been a long drive anyplace else. So, anyway, it was quite the adventure, but the Lord got us through it.

We got back, and we are here and taking your phone calls at 877 -753 -3341, 877 -753 -3341. And I've invited a particular individual to call in today just to give you a little background here. Last evening, I was working on an article for publication and watching the chat room and every once in a while participating.

And a person came in. Actually, it was a couple, but using one nick came in the channel and started asking questions about the King James Only issue. And that's not unusual at all in light of the publication of the King James Only controversy and the fact that that book continues to be used as a textbook in many colleges and seminaries across the land.

And when you do searches on various topics related to King James Only-ism, our website will come up. And so it remains an issue that, of course, we deal with. We do so primarily out of consistency, I think.

I do believe that King James Only argumentation, aside from simply being based upon circular argumentation and false premises, also is extremely damaging to meaningful, apologetic defense of the inspiration, preservation, and accuracy of the Bible.

And so I think that in dealing with individuals who have questions about those things, King James Only-ism is a detriment. And if we're going to be consistent, then we should speak out against it as well as anything else that is false.

We need to be consistent. We need to be accurate. And so I saw the questions were being asked, and eventually Who I Was came out. I mean, I don't just immediately go, Hi, I'm James White. Can I answer your question?

Because people do come in, and they will, in essence, monopolize my time. And we have folks who come in, and once they find out who I am, it's just like, Oh, goodness. Well, let me ask you this. And could you write a book for me and channel on this?

And it just sometimes is, well, I'll be very honest, and these folks were not. I'm not talking about them. But sometimes some folks can be extremely annoying, especially when I try to point out, you know, I'm actually working on something now.

And they get really upset that I won't just stop everything I'm doing and just sit here and talk to them about whatever question they've ever, ever, ever, ever wanted to ask. And it doesn't happen all the time, but the folks in the channel know it does happen more often than it doesn't.

So the question was asked, so I started answering the questions. And a certain person was brought up, and do you remember this name? And I'm like, No. Because you've got to realize, when you send an email through the website to our ministry, there's about a 95 to 98 chance that I will not see it.

Because it is sent to volunteers, and unless there's some compelling reason why it would have to come to me, I'm just not going to see it. There's no way I could ever respond to all of them, even if I did.

I would never write another book. I'd never do another broadcast, never do another debate, if all I did was sat there and responded to emails. And so this name was brought up because the couple that was asking the question said, Well, look, there's this individual, and he's really pressing us on this issue of King James-only-ism, and he says that you're a liar, and your book is filled with lies, and that he has written to you.

Okay, well, what's this person's name? So I'm given the name, and I keep pretty complete archives, as best as I can. I mean, everybody knows that sometimes you have hard drive crashes, and you lose particular archive files, and so it's not 1 ,000 complete, but I try to do a pretty good job in keeping rather complete archives of what does come into my email accounts, other than the tons and tons of spam, which I am just getting absolutely sick about, and would love to see some legislation that would put these people behind bars.

But anyways, I think anyone in my position, you know exactly what I mean at that point, isn't it? Aren't you tired of spending the first thing in your morning, every day, deleting all that garbage? But anyhow, deep breath, we continue on.

And so I did a search in my archives, and lo and behold, I turned up, as I recall, three messages. And the first message was on the King James Only stuff, and the second message was on Calvinism. And the second message was sort of funny, because it basically was, I wrote to you about the King James thing, but now, after listening to what you said about Dave Hunt, the first thing is about Tom Holland, the second thing is about Dave Hunt, so I guess he was listening to archived copies of The Dividing Line or something.

I'm not sure what he was listening to. And you need to do a debate, and you need to have a fair moderator, which of course I had already done a debate in, where was that? Indianapolis with Tom Holland, and had a moderator and stuff like that.

And I guess I must have responded to him. I could not find anything in my outgoing files, so maybe it was done through AOL or something. I don't even recall where it was initially sent to. This was an AOL address.

And then I had one response, which I could tell I would not have responded to, given the level of belligerence in the email. But evidently, either myself or someone had mentioned, well, we do have certain guidelines as to who we will debate, and it really doesn't look like you would have the background to do that in a formal debate and things like that.

So that was all we saw. Well, it turns out this is the individual. And so I sent an email to the individual and said, hey, if you're out there telling folks that I'm a liar, that my book is filled with lies, and that in fact in one of the emails I would refute your Calvinism, but it's too simplistic to do so, too childish, as I recall was the term, to even waste time doing so, call in.

I mean, this is the dividing line. This is people who support this ministry and are interested in what we're doing and find what we're doing to be a relevant thing. Listen to this program, and this would be the time to do so.

So I've given the number, sent the number, even an AOL instant message last night. Again, extended the invitation to this particular person from back, I think it's in North Carolina, to call and to explain why a person who is a Christian would be going around telling other Christians that I am a liar.

Here is an opportunity not only to tell two people, but to tell the whole audience why this assertion we made. So I don't see anything on the phone system that would indicate that that invitation has been accepted.

When it was offered by the individuals themselves to the person, they declined at that point, but I spoke with them afterwards by AOL instant messenger and said, hey, here's your opportunity. If you say I'm a liar, prove it.

Call him. And, of course, what it does is it does illustrate an element of King James-only-ism and the mindset of King James-only individuals. I disagree very strongly with all sorts of folks, but there's a difference between saying someone is wrong about what they believe and calling them a liar.

One is a pejorative emotion-creating term, and everyone knows that. I mean, when you say someone's a liar, what you're saying is you know that you're wrong, and you are intentionally distorting the truth.

I think that's true about some individuals, but even then I think it should be something that is reserved for at least a situation where you can document what you're saying and demonstrate beyond all question that the individual about whom you're speaking knows that what they're saying is a lie and is doing so for a particular purpose.

Otherwise, you just simply say this person is in error, and leave it to intelligent individuals to discover for themselves whether the person is honest or dishonest, whether they're just simply ignorant, whether they are dedicated to a level of tradition, or whether they're actually a liar.

Leave it to that.

Just running around calling people liars when you don't even know them and will not substantiate what you're saying just is unfortunately very common on the part of King James Only advocates, but again it should be something that I don't think any of us would wish to engage in or model or follow that kind of a method of behavior.

So we will make room. If in the midst of other calls, if you have other issues you'd like to bring up, oh, by the way, by the way, by the way, a couple of things. From what I was told, and let me make sure this is the case, are the MP3s of the PACWA debate, yes, okay, they were uploaded last night, and so if you look at the main page, and why is the ad column wider than it used to be?

Do you notice that? It doesn't quite fit in there. I just brought it up for the first time.

It's, oops.

It's real pretty. It's just wider than the header now is all. That will be fixed in time. But if you look at the main page and just ignore the lack of symmetry for the moment, you will see the great debate 2003 at the top.

Is the Roman Catholic priesthood biblical and ancient? Dr. James White versus Father Mitchell PACWA, now available on audio, video, and MP3. You got carried away with duct tape. You're watching the Red Green Show, huh?

Yes, our website comes up, and it comes complete with duct tape. Available in all three formats, audio, video, and MP3. So you will be able to obtain that now. And if you have done that, you may have some comments now that you've had a chance to listen to it, other than just hearing my responding to it.

So don't forget that. And then, oh, okay. How's this going to work? Because you didn't mention it in the advertisement here. You'll notice a long lost book is listed on the ad column of the website. And it is called The Sovereign Grace of God.

But those of you who have known me for many, many, many, many, many, many, many years should know that this is, and in fact we need to make note of this, this is the reprint of God's sovereign grace. Now, like I mentioned a few weeks ago, I don't know why the title changed.

But here's the idea. The Sovereign Grace of God is the 1990 book that I wrote. It's my friendly introduction to the doctrines of grace. It hasn't been edited. It hasn't been changed. It's the same text as what I wrote in 1990.

It was a small blue book. In fact, let me reach up here. It was 159 pages long. And so it's not a real, it's not a long scholarly tome. It's not like the Potter's Freedom in the sense that it has, you know, has to deal with Greek phrases and things like that.

So if you're looking for a book to introduce someone to the doctrines of grace, this is a good book. This is my attempt to do so in a friendly fashion. It's been reprinted very nicely. And here's the promotion.

And anyone who orders it today, you will get this anyways. If you buy the new edition, a copy of the new edition of The Sovereign Grace of God, then you will get one copy of the original 1990 edition for free along with it.

Now, we have limited supply. What happened was at the very same time that the new printing came out, someone gave us a box, which is about 50 maybe, 50, 60 copies at the most, of the original. And I just didn't feel that we could sell the originals, which are, you know, 12, 13 years old now, as a new book.

They're still in good shape, but I just didn't think we could do that. And besides that, with the new one out, the timing just wasn't good. So the promotional offer is, especially since, in my experience, my friends anyways have used this book and they keep giving it away.

And they have to get more of them because they give them away. Well, this way you can get two of them for one, the price of one. So as long as the supplies last, two for one offer, you get one of the new ones and one of the original blue edition, The Sovereign Grace of God.

And if you scroll up just a little bit from that, you will see Drawn by the Father is also in print for $5 .50. And that's my study of John 6, 35 through 45. That's even shorter. In fact, do I have it?

I don't see it in my little author thingy-mabobby there. I'll have to grab one of those. The original version of it was only, I don't know, 60, 65 pages long or something like that. It's more of a booklet.

But it's a study of John 6. And that is just such a powerful passage that it can be an even friendlier introduction to the Doctrines of Grace. So there you go. Both those books, which have been favorites of a lot of folks, are now back in print, available from us.

And so lots of people have been asking about it. And so they are there. So I wanted to let everybody know about that, know of the availability of those books. And so if you order them, you will get them.

We don't have second... We don't have originals of Drawn by the Father. You order one Drawn by the Father, you get one Drawn by the Father. But as far as God's Sovereign Grace, which is now the Sovereign Grace of God, then you not...

I don't know what not means, but that's okay. It's left without a context. You have Drawn by the Father as well? We have a box of the originals of those?

How many?

Lots of them. Oh, so we're going to use the same thing there? We're going to do the same thing there?

We have 80?

80 of the originals.

Wow.

Okay, so same promo there? Yes.

Okay.

All right.

I'll take it back. We will put on the website, the promotion is the same for the one. If you buy God's Sovereign Grace, you get one of the originals. If you buy Drawn by the Father, you also get one of the originals.

They're great giveaway books, the type of books you want to put three or four of them in your car, and you can give them out like a tract. Anyway, we do have a call, so let's go ahead and go to our first caller.

This is Paul in Springfield, Missouri.

Hi, Paul.

Hi.

How are you doing?

Pretty good. Actually just rushing to type my order in for the books.

While they still exist, right?

While they still last. What a deal.

I didn't know we had Drawn by the Father.

That's cool.

Anyway, that's one of my favorite little books. I've known so many folks that have been challenged on the doctrines of grace by that, so that's cool. What can we do for you, Paul?

Well, just to let you know, I really love your ministry and appreciate the work that you guys do. I was wondering though if anybody around Alpha Omega had heard yesterday's edition of the Bible Answer Man.

I happened to hear it last night, and Hank Hanegraaff was speaking to a caller. The young man called in with a specific question about the doctrine of limited atonement. He asked Hank what he thought about it, whether it was something that is orthodox or unorthodox.

It was quite interesting to hear the way Mr. Hanegraaff responded to him because rather than dealing with the immediate issue of the question of the atonement, he ran straight to Romans 9. Basically dealing with election and skipping the issue of the atonement and what it accomplishes for us and things of that nature.

He went ahead with his strong assertions of libertarian freedom using his argument that Romans 9 is quoting the Old Testament and that God is really not capricious in his election. I understand that Hank is obviously in breath.

We've gotten a number of calls. Obviously I did not listen yesterday. I'm trying to remember exactly what I was doing, but for some reason between four and five here in Phoenix yesterday I was doing something else.

I tried to, in fact I was scanning radio stations while I was driving back from Houston last week trying to find something so I could listen in. I have not had any conversations with Hank on this subject.

I'll just go ahead and tell folks they've been working on trying to get a program put together on this subject with me as the reformed representative since April of the year 2002. We simply can't get an Arminian to go on with me.

We've been trying to get George Bryson. He's taken his little booklet and expanded it out to a book titled The Dark Side of Calvinism, if you can believe that. I personally would rather not do it with George because if anyone has listened to the debate that we did, I don't believe that he did very well.

I don't believe he can handle the exegesis. All he does is say, well if it's true then it means this. Of course my perspective is, well you start off with the word of God and then you deal with the ramifications later on.

I don't believe that George is really in a position to be able to do meaningful exegesis. He thinks that it's an argument against Calvinism to just simply quote Calvin and expect everybody to be shocked.

I thought so too. I heard that debate and the same impression.

I can pretty much guarantee you that there are many people who, because of their tradition, believe that he did just wonderfully in that debate. I know I sit around and just shake my head and go, but he didn't answer any of these questions.

But I've talked to people who thought that he did. So I would rather not do it with... Obviously I have expressed many times I would be very, very happy to go on The Bible Answer Man with Norman Geisler and to address the issues of our books.

But he isn't interested in doing that. There are other people who have been invited and so far nothing has happened. I have been wide open. In fact, the folks at CRI will tell you that I have, as recently as last year, within the past six months, well actually it will be nine months now, because this issue came up and because many illustrations that I use in presenting the Doctrines of Grace have been specifically addressed on the program, I've offered to travel to California to sit down and talk with Hank about these issues.

But it hasn't happened. And so I'm wide open to it. I did talk with Hank in 1997 about these issues, but 1997 is a long time ago now. And I was very open in saying this is why I'm a Reformed apologist.

This is why I think it's important. This is how I see it relating to the issue of apologetics. But it's very clear that after his book, Resurrection, where Hank went to print holding a libertarian perspective, that he has hardened in that position.

And I would like to be able to, you know, when I hear Hank saying, no Calvinist has ever answered this for me, I want to put my hand up and say, Hank, that's not the case. I've talked to you about these things.

I'd be more than happy to respond to your charge of fatalism and more than happy to talk about responsibility and issues like that. But it just hasn't happened. And I remain open to it. But at the same time, when these assertions are being made within the apologetic realm, everybody knows where I stand.

And so we get calls and people. I even took the time, what was it, about two months ago, that he had a man on, I forget who it was now. Actually, I had not heard of him before. And I played some of the comments that he made that were very Arminian.

And I responded to them. But I hope that I do so in such a way as to do so within an intercollegiate format. I'm not trying to put anybody down. I'm just simply reiterating the fact that the fact of the matter is, the objections that I hear being made have been answered over and over and over again.

And I don't hear exegetical responses being offered to the key passages. And until that starts happening, the discussion is not being moved forward as far as I am concerned.

I would agree. I mean, just what I heard last night, for example, and there's been other excerpts that I've heard as well, is just this basic gut-level emotional kind of response, rather than really digging into the text of Scripture to see what it says, the same thing that you had with Mr. Bryson.

If this is true, love can't be genuine.

Yeah, it is. And it is disappointing to me because, as I said, it doesn't move the discussion forward into modeling for that huge audience the necessity of engaging in meaningful exegetical study of the text of Scripture and being consistent.

Because I did get to catch, I think, one program last week, and Hank was talking about God's purposes in the universe and all these things. And I couldn't help but, I think it was, yeah, it was a morning.

They do the half-hour morning thing where they take selected calls and sort of put them together. And I was working out. It was the one workout I got last week between trips. And I was listening to Hank addressing this one lady, and he still addresses that issue the way he used to.

And I just, out loud, because I was alone. Well, the dog was with me, and she's used to my talking to myself anyways. Out loud I said, but Hank, you can't consistently say that anymore in light of your position on libertarian free will.

And so, yeah, I do that. And I think any Reformed person who listens to the program, you still enjoy a lot of what you hear, but those calls will come in. You just want to go, now, come on, let's have a discussion of the biblical basis of these issues on the air.

Let's get the best person in there, and let's do some exegesis. Let's do this. But so far it hasn't happened, and we hope that it someday will.

I do, too. And the thing is that...

Actually, it's not his favorite subject to address. He's been, I think, pretty clear about that. He has adopted that position, and so he's going to get challenged on it more often. But he used to, when he would address the issue and he would do so, and he'd sort of say, well, certain people say this, certain people say that.

Here's the books that present both sides and move on. Even then, you could tell in his voice that that's just not his favorite subject to address. But now that he's taken a position, you can't help but then have to really respond to what is said and the means by which you have defined your position.

There's just no way around it. Anyways, well, thank you for calling in today, Paul. I appreciate it.

Oh, thank you.

I hope you enjoy those books.

I will.

All right.

God bless. Bye-bye. 877 -753 -3341 is the phone number. I hope you will join the program right after this break.

Early man is such a rarity today. So many stars, strong and true, quickly fall away. Answering those who claim that only the King James Version is the word of God, James White, in his book, The King James Only Controversy, examines allegations that modern translators conspired to corrupt scripture and lead believers away from true Christian faith.

In a readable and responsible style, author James White traces the development of Bible translations, old and new, and investigates the differences between new versions and the authorized version of 1611.

You can order your copy of James White's book, The King James Only Controversy, by going to our website at www .aomin .org. What is Dr. Norman Geisler warning the Christian community about in his book, Chosen but Free, A New Cult, Secularism, False Prophecy Scenarios?

No, Dr. Geisler is sounding the alarm about a system of beliefs commonly called Calvinism. He insists that this belief system is theologically inconsistent, philosophically insufficient, and morally repugnant.

In his book, The Pottish Freedom, James White replies to Dr. Geisler,. But the Pottish Freedom is much more than just a reply. It is a defense of the very principles upon which the Protestant Reformation was founded.

Indeed, it is a defense of the very Gospel itself. In a style that both scholars and laymen alike can appreciate, James White masterfully counters the evidence against so-called extreme Calvinism, defines what the Reformed faith actually is, and concludes that the Gospel preached by the Reformers is the very one taught in the pages of Scripture.

The Pottish Freedom, a defense of the Reformation and a rebuttal to Norman Geisler's Chosen but Free. You'll find it in the Reformed Theology section of our bookstore at www .aomin .org. This portion of the dividing line has been made possible by the Phoenix Reformed Baptist Church.

The Apostle Paul spoke of the importance of solemnly testifying of the Gospel of the grace of God. The proclamation of God's truth is the most important element of his worship in his church. The elders and people of the Phoenix Reformed Baptist Church invite you to worship with them this coming Lord's Day.

The morning Bible study begins at 9 .30 a .m. and the worship service is at 10 .45. Evening services are at 6 .30 p .m. on Sunday and the Wednesday night prayer meeting is at 7. The Phoenix Reformed Baptist Church is located at 3805 North 12th Street in Phoenix.

You can call for further information at 602 -26-GRACE. If you're unable to attend, you can still participate with your computer and real audio at prbc .org where the ministry extends around the world through the archives of sermons and Bible study lessons available 24 hours a day.

Roman Catholicism, the Gospel, and Book Promotion

More than any time in the past, Roman Catholics and Evangelicals are working together. They are standing shoulder to shoulder against social evils. They are joining across denominational boundaries in renewal movements.

And many Evangelicals are finding the history, tradition, and grandeur of the Roman Catholic Church appealing. This newfound rapport has caused many Evangelical leaders and lay people to question the age-old disagreements that have divided Protestants and Catholics.

Aren't we all saying the same thing in a different language? James White's book, The Roman Catholic Controversy, is an absorbing look at current views of tradition in Scripture, the papacy, the mass, purgatory and indulgences, and Marian doctrine.

James White points out the crucial differences that remain regarding the Christian life and the heart of the gospel itself. They cannot be ignored. Order your copy of The Roman Catholic Controversy by going to our website at aomen .org.

Yes, it's a pilgrim's progress.

I want to thank you, Brother Steve Camp, whose sonorous voice I heard on my cell phone while sitting. I shouldn't mention this because it sounds like it's all I ever do. But when you're driving 750 miles in one day, there's a limited cuisine available to you.

And so I was in the drive-thru line at McDonald's in Tucson, just off of I -10. What is that? Calabra Road? Whatever it is up there. And my cell phone went off, and there was Steve. And so we were chatting before I put in that order.

Anyway, 877 -753 -3341 is the phone number. If you would like to participate today, we still have plenty of lines open for that one special person. And you know who you are. Feel free to call in. Like I said, let's put it this way.

If I told someone, if I was going over to someone's house and I was saying, such and such a person is a liar. You shouldn't read their books because they're full of lies. And then I found out that they found out about it and that they invited me to come on their radio program to explain it.

I can guarantee you, I would be there. I think it's just a matter of doing what's right. So the lines are open. It's 877 -753 -3341 for anyone who would like to do so. So those of you in the chat channel, someone asked a question, and I would like to address it.

Wisdom, Knowledge, and James 1:5

The question was asked, and it is a common question, actually. Well, it's a common issue that I wanted to address. The person that asked said, what is the functional difference between knowledge and wisdom in James 1 .5?

And the reason this comes up, any of you who have spoken with LDS individuals, especially with the missionaries, when talking about the issue of the LDS testimony, individuals will say, well, I asked God in accordance with James 1 .5.

In fact, allegedly Joseph Smith, Jr. went out into the woods in 1820, in the spring of 1820, to ask of God what church would be true in light of the promise of James 1 .5, which in the King James Version says, If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not, and it shall be given him.

The English Standard Version says, if any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask God, who gives generously to all without reproach, and it will be given him. Now, the issue that I raise with the LDS person, and I'm not sure if this is the context of the question that was asked in channel, but many LDS people will say, see, here's where the Bible says that you should pray about whether something is right or wrong.

That is, that prayer should be a formative element of your epistemology in determining revelation. And I very quickly point out to individuals, that's not what James 1 .5 is saying. Wisdom and knowledge are not the same thing.

Wisdom is the proper use of knowledge, as that comes up many times in, for example, the book of Proverbs, that speaks so much of having a godly wisdom. James is not saying, if any of you lacks knowledge of whether there is one God or many gods.

For example, ask God, and he will give you some special revelation. Instead, when we want to know about God's truth, we go to God's word, and God's word is sufficient to give us that revelational truth.

Wisdom is the use of the knowledge, the revelation that God has given to us. Wisdom is properly utilizing our minds and having an attitude that is not like the attitude that puffs up when we have knowledge, but instead is an attitude of maturity.

And so, James 1 .5 is talking about wisdom, not knowledge. And I hope that that is useful to the individual who asked the question on the issue of the subject of wisdom in James 1 .5. And when you hear an LDS person raising that issue and quoting James 1 .5, hopefully you'll be able to give an answer.

I believe, it's been so many years, I don't remember now, but I would assume that if you go to the LDS section of our webpage, go to Apologetics and then Mormonism, you will see there the 100 verse memorization system, which was written on a boat anchor.