Marty Sampson’s Instagram Article, Faithfulness, and then 30 Minutes of Open Phones

Greetings and welcome to The Dividing Line, my name's James White. It's the bottom of the hour, which is unusual for us, but I'm headed for South Africa tomorrow, so I've got a lot of stuff going on and we just gotta get it in when we can sneak it in.

That's how it works. So I just read this, so I wanted to go ahead and start with this. It is time for the Church to rediscover the preeminence of the Word and to value the teaching of the Word. We need to value truth over feeling, truth over emotion.

And what we are seeing now is the result of the Church raising up influencers who did not supremely value truth, who have led a generation who also did not believe in the supremacy of truth. And now those disavowed leaders are proudly still leading and influencing boldly away from the truth.

Is it any wonder that some of our disavowed Christian leaders are letting go of the absolute truth of the Bible and subsequently their lives are falling apart? Further and further, they are sinking in the sea, all the while shouting, Now I have found the truth!

Follow me! Brothers and sisters in the faith all around the world, pastors, teachers, worship leaders, influencers, I implore you, please, please, in your search for relevancy for the Gospel, let us not find creative ways to shape God's Word into the image of our culture by stifling inconvenient truths, but rather let us hold on even tighter to the anchor of the living Word of God, for He changes not.

The grass withers and the flowers fade away, but the Word of our God stands forever. Isaiah chapter 40, verse 8. I was just reading from a Facebook article that was posted by John Cooper. If you don't know who John Cooper is, he is lead singer for a Christian heavy metal band, I guess.

I'm not sure. I don't know how to define the various ones. Skillet. Skillet. Yes, they are. Yes, they are. Nice to welcome you to this century. But yes, Skillet is the name, and obviously, he's referring to what has taken place in regards to Marty Sampson and what has taken place.

You know, there's already numerous articles have been written and posted, and of course, this happened very shortly after the Joshua Harris situation. I mentioned sort of third person at some point in something I wrote recently that someone had coined the phrase tsunami of apostasy.

Well, that someone was me. I put that in the third person, so certain people are running around, I wonder who did that? No, that was me. And, you know, we're seeing this. I said, I also said, I think this morning, yesterday, that apostasy is for those who are in love with the acclaim of this society, it's virtue signaling.

It's see how virtuous I am. I'm willing to give up my Christianity to be a good person culturally. Because you need to understand, the culture is moving as fast as it possibly can to a position where everything Jesus says is good, they are going to say is bad, and you need to admit that.

And if you ever once believed it, you will be just burned alive. I mean, there is one thing is absolutely certain about the new religion of critical theory in our society. There is no redemption. There is no forgiveness.

I didn't save it, but there was a, there was some, oh, there was an actress who was fired from a position in some show they're doing because one picture turned up of her wearing blackface. Now, why? Was it in college?

It doesn't matter. You're out. You're gone. There's no, she could be the most woke person on the planet now. It does not make any difference. There is no redemption. There is no forgiveness. There is no work salvation in this religion.

It is unforgiving. It's thoroughly pagan, just like the old pagan religions where there was, there was no second chance. Well, there's no second chance here either. It's pretty, pretty intensive. But anyway, John Cooper was referring to the Marty Samson situation.

And when I read the Instagram post, which has now been pulled down, I made the comment on Facebook, somebody else posted, I think Jeff Durbin posted it. And I said, you could drive a truck through the holes in that argumentation.

And it's absolutely true. And of course, let me just mention a bunch of people have jumped onto the bandwagon saying, Oh, well, we saw this coming a long time ago, because, because his, the lyrics are just terrible.

It only took a little while before someone put up a post I saw someplace else saying, be a little bit more slow here, be a little bit more careful. Well, the reason being that most of us do not know the names of the authors of even, even if you stick to the Trinity Hymnal, okay, about as conservative a source of hymnology as you're going to find, the Trinity Hymnal actually has a theological standard in regards to what is included in it.

And even if you were to go to the Trinity Hymnal, I could point you to hymns written by people who may be later apostatized. One of the most beautiful hymns, one of the most meaningful hymns I have ever sung, and most of us have sung it more than once, is It Is Well With My Soul.

And you've probably heard the story, the man's loss of his, his wife and daughters and, and, you know, he's on a ship and the captain says, this is where the ship went down and, and this is when he starts writing it and, you know, all that's beautiful, but there's also some evidence, it's disputed on some levels, but there's, there's evidence that that particular author then went to Israel and got involved with basically a cult.

So does that mean you don't sing It Is Well With My Soul? For some people, yes. I mean, I honestly, I know some people and, and I know some people that's exactly the. And, in fact, they're probably right now doing doctrinal checks on the names of any authors who wrote either the music or the lyrics for any hymn that they will ever willingly sing in public again.

There are people like that. Most of us don't do that and don't feel the need to do that. Unless, you know, there, there is, there are two songs in the Trinity Hymnal and I always mix them up. One of them is by Faber and I think it's Faith of Our Fathers.

Yeah, I mix up Faith of Our Fathers and The Church's One Foundation, but Faber did Faith of Our Fathers and Faber was a Roman Catholic. The song initially had a verse praying to Mary to convert England back to Romanism.

And I just don't sing it. But there are a lot of other people that do. I know how much reinterpretation of the originally intended meaning is required to sing that song. And I, since I know that, you know, most people, in fact, I probably just ruined it for a bunch of you.

You're now going to be Googling it. You're gonna be finding that verse and going, ah, and, and, okay, I get it. But what if you sung that song and you, you put it in the right context and you interpret things in, in the right way, theologically speaking, which means not interpreting it in the originally intended view of the author.

Well, the author is dead and this isn't scripture. So I don't see a problem with that. But if I know it and can't get it out of my mind, then it's a problem. And so there are hymns in our hymn books written by Unitarians and stuff like that.

And if you know it and it causes you a problem, fine. But why go looking for it? Why, why, why try to drag that up? And you'd never be able to sing congregationally again. Not that many people sing congregationally anymore anyways.

When I mean congregationally, I mean in harmony of parts and stuff like that anyway. So there have been a bunch of people, I've, I don't know, I don't know Hillsong music. I'm sure that I've been to church someplace that sang a Hillsong song, but I, you know, how could you know until you get to the last slide anyways, if they even bother putting that information on it?

So I'm not, I'm not sitting there, you know, I'm not going to sing a single thing in here until I've examined all of the slides and know exactly who wrote what. But I've been told anyways, that Marty Sampson had some of the better of Hillsong's songs.

I mean, you look them up and my screen filled up with all the songs this guy has written over the years, a large number. And that obviously is causing a lot of people to go, well, how does this work? How can that be?

I mean, how, and I understand. Let's say that, let's say that one of your favorite worship ballads, worship songs was written by Marty Sampson and that you have had strong spiritual experiences of encouragement to pray and to serve Christ and so on and so forth.

And they've been connected with that song. And now you're sitting there going, wait a minute. Does that mean what I experienced was invalid, untrue? And the same question comes up, you know, a lot of young people.

I remember I just drove by, I was driving back from California, Colorado, and the route that I took this time took me through New Mexico. And I drove by Glorietta, which is just outside of Santa Fe, a lot closer to Santa Fe than I remembered when we were on the bus.

But anyway, and I went to a large Southern Baptist church back in high school. And my junior and senior years in my junior, senior summers, we went to Glorietta and they were great experiences, very formative, very important.

And what if I found out that one of the preachers that the Lord had used to encourage me or challenge me ends up becoming an apostate? Does that mean the Lord didn't use that to encourage me? No, none of that follows, none of that follows.

I was looking at, and I'm going to look at Marty Sampson's statement, but I wanted to remember from Colorado, I mentioned Demas and Paul's experience with Demas. Did you look them up? It's fascinating.

There are three references to Demas in the New Testament, all of course, in Paul's epistles. When Paul writes to the church at Colossae, he says, Luke, the beloved physician sends you his greetings and also Demas.

So in greeting the church there in Colossae, Demas sends his greetings and is with Paul when he writes this. Likewise, you have greetings in Philemon, verse 24, as do Mark, Aristarchus, Demas, Luke, and my fellow workers.

So what do we see from these two references? We see that Demas was in the inner circle. He was involved in apostolic ministry. He was acknowledged by an apostle of Jesus Christ as a valued brother, someone he would include greetings from, both to Philemon and to the church at Colossae.

So he is in the inner circle. He's not just someone on the outside. This would be someone with whom Paul would have had many intimate conversations. He would have been aware of, well, as anybody knows, you get involved in ministry and there are wonderful, great things that you share amongst the pastors and elders of a church.

And then there's all the other stuff, all the sin and the disappointment and the failure and repentance and restoration, sometimes sin and failure and no repentance and restoration. It all goes with the territory.

And Demas was in the middle of it. He would have seen all of it, would have heard all of it. And there is nothing, there is no reason to believe that when Paul writes Colossians and Paul writes Philemon that he suspects anything that, no, Demas is listed right along with Luke who remains his beloved brother right to the end, Luke does.

So, that's what makes 2 Timothy 4 .10 all the more important because if you look at the text, for Demas, having loved this present age, this present age, not world, it's not cosmos, it's Iona. Having loved this present age has deserted me and gone to Thessalonica.

It's literally Demas, for Demas, me abandoned, having loved the present age and has gone to Thessalonica. I think there's personal hurt there. He pushes the accusative pronoun right to the front, me, he has abandoned.

And then the description is, having loved the now age, this present age, he loved it and that's why he abandoned me and he went to Thessalonica. And I had never thought about this before, but was he with Paul when Paul was in Thessalonica?

Had something caught his eye? Had someone caught his eye? I don't know. I don't know where Demas was from. But there seems to be something really personal in that particular section. Now someone on Twitter just pointed out that there's positive things said about everybody except Demas.

I don't think you can read anything into that in Colossians 4 because it's just giving greetings. Colossians 4 .14, Aspazitai Humaso, Luke greets, Luke, the beloved physician, greets you and Demas. It's just, I don't think you can read anything into that at that particular point in time.

But certainly, once you get to 2 Timothy, which is right at the end of Paul's life and Paul's ministry, there is a, if you dare open yourself up in ministry to establishing relationships, putting your heart out there, if you're in seminary, if you're in Bible college, can I just tell you something ahead of time?

Here's what you're going to be facing. You are going to get that heart stabbed repeatedly by people that you've given the shirt off your back to, by people you've prayed for, sacrificed for, who've professed their love for you.

It's going to happen. And one of two things, on the natural realm, there are only a couple of ways you can respond to that, and I've seen both many times. Either you develop a rhinoceros hide so that someone can try to stab at you all they want and they can't get through because your skin is just so hard.

Which also means you don't have any more meaningful relationships. You become isolated. There are a number, you look down through history, there are a number of theologians who basically, by the end of their life, you could tell that's the route that they went and they were now loners.

They might speak highly of the church, but they weren't involved in it any longer because they couldn't get along with anybody and had been hurt too many times and were just, they just pushed everything out of the way.

So that's it. That's no more. Or you get the people who just get burned out. And in our day, they become IT guys. Seems to be the direction to go. How many former ministers have you heard of that are working in the computer field now?

It's a very large number. Just decide, you know what? I can't keep doing this. A battery has to be recharged once in a while or it will go flat. And, you know, I've got a new Garmin thing, a little teeny tiny watch, and it does an amazing amount of stuff for a teeny tiny little thing.

And one of the new things it's got is body battery. It's basically an algorithm that analyzes your sleep and how much working out and stuff you've done and says, this is about where your battery is for the day.

It's so far, it's been interesting to look at anyways. I suppose the longer you wear it, the better it is. If there was a spiritual battery that Garmin could come up with to help you out, maybe it would show just how close to yellow and red most ministers are, spiritually speaking.

And many just decide, you know what? Just going to move on, going to move on. That's what happens. Somewhere in between those two is the balance. You have to recognize there's going to be the hurt, that's a reality, but you can't become so enslaved to that that you lose the calling.

I told a story before about the very wise minister that I had seen mistreated by a fellow Christian. I followed him into his office and said, how do you put up with that? And he looked at me and he said, if you ever get your eyes off the shepherd and onto the sheep, you'll burn out of the ministry very quickly.

And he was exactly right. It has to be, you know, Paul endured the end because it was the high calling of Jesus Christ, not the high calling of this person or Demas or whatever else it might be. And he recognized that, and certainly, you know, Paul probably would have, Paul probably would have really, I mean, he had supernatural insight into things, and yet there was someone close to him.

Remember, he had Onesimus almost dies, and Paul does not heal him because it wasn't God's will. Did he feel fooled, deceived by Demas? How many things he had shared with Demas? Did he feel like he had failed with Demas?

That's a possibility. Hard to say. But anyway, the wife's asking me if I'm at the airport. She's got, got the wrong day. Yeah, that's tomorrow. Okay, had to let her know that. So there you go. Anyway, didn't mean to be distracted there.

There are a lot of feelings that Paul could have had about this. And so, if it could happen to an apostle, then we should recognize that it can and does happen. It doesn't make it any less painful, any less spiritually dangerous, not only for the person committing the act of apostasy, obviously, but for those around, it has spiritual parallels to suicide because it's incredibly, I mean, suicide is just one of the most damaging things to everyone around you, you could ever do.

I mean, when I was a hospital chaplain, you know, when someone died of natural causes, someone died of an accident, a car accident or whatever else it might be, at least there was the possibility of resolution, acceptance.

There was such, you know, suicide is just, puts it in a completely different plane. That resolution is next to impossible. There's always the questions. And there's always every loved one around you, rejection, rejection, I wasn't enough.

What did I do? I mean, it just complicates the grieving process horribly. And there are spiritual parallels because on a spiritual level, you walk away from Christ, the book of Hebrews is pretty clear about what that means and what it says and what the results are going to be and everything else.

So you have to recognize that. And yet the people around, deeply influenced by it as well, deeply hurt by it. I mean, this man has stood in front of thousands and you can dislike the music, musical style, context, lights, whatever, but you can't sit there and say he's never sung in front of Christians.

He did. And so you look at that and you go, what does that mean in regards to the gospel and God's ability to keep and the whole nine yards? So I point this out just simply so that again, we can see that in this era of the new covenant, there are still those who have false faith.

And so, like I said, I read what he said and my immediate comment was, there's got to be something more here. There's got to be something more here. So here's what it says, time for some real talk. I'm genuinely losing my faith and it doesn't bother me.

Like what bothers me now is nothing. I'm so happy now. So at peace the world, it's crazy. This is a soapbox moment here, so here I go. How many preachers fall? Many. No one talks about it. How many miracles happen?

Not many. No one talks about it. Why is the Bible full of contradictions? No one talks about it. How can God be loved yet send 4 billion people to a place all because they don't believe? No one talks about it.

Christians can be the most judgmental people on the planet. They can also be some of the most beautiful and loving people, but it's not for me. I am not in anymore. I want genuine truth, not the I just believe it kind of truth.

Science keeps piercing the truth of every religion. Lots of things help people change their lives, not just one version of God. Got so much more to say, but for me, I'm keeping it real. Unfollow if you want.

I've never been about living my life for others. All I know is what's true to me right now, and Christianity just seems to me like another religion at this point. I could go on, but I won't. Love and forgive.

Absolutely. Be kind. Absolutely. Be generous and do good to others. Absolutely. Some things are good no matter what you believe. Let the rain fall. The sun will come up tomorrow.". Now, let's look through this.

I'm genuinely losing my faith, and it doesn't bother me. Now immediately, I just have to go, it doesn't bother you? What bothers me now is nothing. I am so happy now, so at peace with the world. Nothing that he's going to say in this provides us with any reason, not only why we should believe this, but even understand how this is a rational thought.

I guess, I mean, I could read into it that he was not at peace with the world because he was believing untrue things. But to say that Marty Samson's current epistemology is incoherent and self-contradictory would be to speak very kindly.

So he asks, how many preachers fall? Many. No one talks about it. Let's just stop right here. No one talks about it? I suppose it's possible, because if he's as big a name as people say he was, maybe people assumed something.

I've had a lot of people say, I don't have any personal experience with it, but I've had a lot of people say that Hillsong as a movement, very shallow in its theology, very shallow in its teaching. But it's really, I made the comment on Facebook, it would have taken 30 seconds for him to Google answers to any one of the objections that he raises.

Serious answers, in-depth answers, answers that men like myself and others have been providing really since the second and third centuries, quite honestly. So here's someone who seemingly lives in an echo chamber in a very small, glib, little world, and lots of preachers fall, and many people talk about it, not necessarily talking about it overly well or overly fairly or anything else, but yeah.

No one talks about it. No, they do. How many miracles happen? Not many. No one talks about it. Well, we've been talking about that for a long time, and there's a lot of discussion of that particular issue and how to define things, but here is a situation where theology matters and how you define what is and what is not actually a miracle is very, very, very important.

But is it probable that Marty Sampson has never read B .B. Warfield's work on the nature of miracles and things like that? Yeah, that's highly, highly likely, in fact. Why is the Bible full of contradictions?

No one talks about it. Yeah, well, which is why I can promise you. I can promise you that not this coming weekend, well, it might come up this coming weekend, depending, but the weekend after that in Durban, South Africa, especially in one of the two debates, I can assure you in my debate with a particular Muslim opponent that I will have to explain minimally, minimally eight alleged contradictions, minimally.

And I think I'll do so successfully because they are issues that I've dealt with literally for years. And so once again, I sort of doubt that Marty Sampson read any commentaries on the Chicago Statement on Inerrancy, any of the lengthy books that have been written on the whole subject, encyclopedias, whatever it might be.

This no one talks about it tells me that maybe we have here a situation where wisdom would say that if you're going to put people in a position of ministry in the church, and especially a ministry that requires them to travel, you might want to make sure they're firmly grounded first, or somewhere down the road, no matter how talented they are, their soul might get destroyed and it'll be your responsibility, a little bit of wisdom there.

Um, how can God be love yet send four billion people to a place all because they don't believe? Now there's someone who does not understand. I mean, I wonder, I didn't take the time, I did, sorry, I do not have the time with this trip coming up.

But it would be interesting to see in how many of his songs he actually answered that question if he had understood what he was writing. That's what that's what causes so many people to be confused and concerned.

Because how could someone like this say these words if they once wrote words that answered their own questions? And the only answer is they were using language that they really didn't know what it meant or what it meant had no reality in their own life.

And does that mean I could be seeing them in that way? That's where the issue, I think, comes up for most people, really does. Um, so, uh, the whole issue of sin, well, look, let's just, let's be straight up.

Most evangelical Christians' anthropology does not include actually believing that God's judgment is just to bring condemnation for a single sin. I mean, we have been so deeply influenced by worldly thought at that point that, there you go.

And it's not because they don't believe, there could be a theological issue right there. It's because they're sinners and God is just. Grace is an issue there. Christians can be the most judgmental people on the planet.

They can also be some of the most beautiful and loving people. I'm not sure exactly what that's supposed to mean. Not only can Christians be some of the most judgmental people on the planet, Calvinists can be some of the most judgmental people on the planet.

But it's not for me. Why? What you have that's better. If it's not for you, then Marty, you need to adopt a worldview that's consistent. But you don't. Every single thing you say after this screams that you have not thought this through at all.

And you've never seen the foundational truths of the faith that give rise to concepts such as beauty, and truth, and forgiveness, and everything else. Or you've forgotten them, or you're just simply denying them.

My gut feeling is there's something else going on in this situation. That's my gut feeling. We may never know, in this life anyways. And I don't know that we'll know in the next. Next, I want genuine truth, not the I-just-believe-it kind of truth.

If what you thought was the Christian faith is just a I-just-believe-it kind of truth, then you are, in essence, a victim. That doesn't give you any rights, and it isn't going to be an excuse for God.

But if all you've been exposed to is the I-just-believe-it kind of truth, what you're going to find out is that's all secularism can grant you, in toto. And that's not what the Christian faith is based upon.

It's not just an I-just-believe-it. But your next line, as science keeps piercing the truth of every religion, doesn't sound like you've thought through what the basis of science even is, or what science is.

Or how science can guarantee you truthfulness. How you can have truthfulness in an utterly random world. And the biggest thing, Marty, is why did you even say, I want genuine truth? Where does that come from?

If you have abandoned a rational ground for thinking that truth exists and that you should want it and want to live in light of it, if you are nothing but a soon-to-cease, fizzing bag of chemicals with no past and no future, no design, no transcendent value, then why, Marty, why do you want genuine truth?

Where does this desire come from? Have you thought through how you could even obtain it? And you're borrowing from the worldview you're abandoning. If you didn't know that, then it's time for you to learn that.

And my prayer would be that you would learn that. That before going off and joining homosexual marches, like some people have done in their apostasy, before you do that, you might want to find out that when you kept saying, no one talks about it, no one talks about it, you were wrong.

You were simply factually wrong. And a lot of people have talked about it and talked about it in depth and consistently. You might want to think about that. Lots of things help people change their lives, not just one version of God.

Well, Marty, you're really focused primarily upon yourself right now. And so I guess you don't recognize how man-centered all of that is. No one's going to argue that there hasn't been some type of, for example, positive impact upon someone joining the Marines, getting some discipline, getting some order in their life, getting their hair cut.

But when you say change their life, why, Marty, does your new worldview, which you clearly haven't even begun, it is amazing how many people will abandon one when they have nothing to put in its place, nothing there.

It's just, well, I want out of this one. So I'm going to go somewhere else. Even if you haven't figured out where it is you're going to go. That's sort of what you're talking about here. But you are making conclusions where you're borrowing from the system that you're then saying you've decided is wrong.

And you don't have a foundation in whatever new system you're going to adopt for even thinking that your previous actions were rational or truthful. It's really weird. That's why I said you could just drive a bus through the logical holes.

It's an Instagram post. I get it. It may have been tapped away on a phone. I think phones suck out most logic just because they're phones and you're typing with your thumbs. But then you say, not just one version of God.

Version of God. See, everything you're saying is a creature putting himself in the middle and trying to judge everything around him. If you had ever had any meaningful instruction in the Christian faith, you would know that as a Christian, you recognize your creatureliness, which means you're not in the center.

God is in the center. You relate to God and through God relate to everything else, science, history, art, law, whatever it might be, through God, because he's big enough to be in the center and we're not big enough to be in the center.

But anything you could go to from here, especially with your scientism talk, you're going to have to be in the center and you're going to have to do all this figuring out on your own. It's a tough job.

Real tough job. It's an impossible job. But people keep trying. So, when you talk about just one version of God, it's like mankind gets to make these things up on his own, rather than dealing with what you should have been taught was the triune God, who is the only source for absolute truth, a proper understanding of our role in the universe, transcendent meaning, morality, ethics, these things like that.

Got so much more to say, but for me, I'm keeping it real. Well, actually, if it wasn't real before, I suppose you're in a better position now. It's hard to talk to people who think they're believers and really not.

At least you're getting to the point where you recognize you're not. Maybe you'll hear what we're saying. Unfollow if you want. I've never been about living my life for others. All I know is what's true to me right now, and Christianity just seems to me like another religion at this point.

Well, you don't tell us what's true to you right now, but you do go on to say, love and forgive absolutely. Why? Give me your new worldview that gives me a rational reason for believing this. What does love mean?

What does forgive mean? Forgive what? Forgive based upon what standard? Why would there need to be forgiveness? If you are nothing but the accidental conjunction of stardust, and everything is, according to current cosmologies, then there's no meaning to the term love.

As soon as your brain stops functioning, anything you loved is irrelevant. Anything you wrote is irrelevant. Every song you ever wrote is irrelevant. The beauty of music is irrelevant. And certainly forgiveness is.

Forgive what? Your body's going to decay and become stardust again, and that's all there is to it. Why use these terms? Because you're made in the image of God, Marty, that's why. You're made in the image of God.

You have to use these terms. That's how God made us. Be kind absolutely. You have nothing to define absolutely with. Absolutely by what standard? Absolutely amongst humans, but not animals? Absolutely amongst all?

You could become a vegan tomorrow? And maybe you're just going to starve yourself to death because it's not very nice to plants to eat them either, and they're just as much stardust as you are. So be kind absolutely.

What's kind? Why isn't it kindness for you to spread your genotype far and wide in the human population? Because that's the best way to leave part of you behind. Why isn't that kind? I can come up with a worldview where that's kindness, right?

Be generous and do good to others absolutely. You are such a thief. You are stealing from the entire worldview that you're now saying you don't believe to prop up this thing that sounds like a bunch of virtue signaling to me.

I'm so virtuous. Listen to me. I'm going to use all these buzzwords, though they have zero meaning, none in my worldview. Sounds great. Be generous. Do good to others absolutely. Just don't ask me to define what good to others is or what generous is.

Some things are good no matter what you believe. Have you tried to... Have you written this out, Marty, and seen if it actually makes any sense? Because some things are good because God made them to be good, and whether you believe it or not doesn't matter, but you're going exactly away from that.

You can't tell us what's good, so what you believe is irrelevant. None of this makes a lick of sense. Let the rain fall. The sun will come up tomorrow. You sure about that? We could get into some radical skepticism now that you have no theistic worldview, but this sounds like some sort of fatalism.

Let the rain fall. The sun will come up tomorrow, and yeah, eventually the bag of water that is you, the bag of fizzing chemicals that is you will cease functioning and be absorbed back into the system, and therefore everything you did, everything you ever will do is meaningless.

It is irrelevant. There's no transcendent meaning. Nothing there. It's dead end, man, and you're sitting here trying to make it sound all lovely by stealing from the very worldview that once gave you these.

It gave you these words. It gave you these concepts. You may not have recognized that. You may not have been taught that. I'm sorry. Maybe it's now time for you to start finding out what you were singing about all those years.

Maybe it's time to find out what you were singing about all those years. So that's what John Cooper was talking about, and he is exactly right. And like I said, any of you out there know John Cooper, I would like to talk to John Cooper.

I would like an email, something, follow on Facebook, whatever, because I really, really appreciated what he had to say. And his music has powered me up more than one hill in the past. It does help keep the legs pounding when you're on a, well, let's see the, well, last Saturday was Mount Lemmon.

That was, yeah, that was pretty, pretty tough, though that's not what I was listening to. I was listening to lectures on Mount Lemmon. It's probably why I didn't go all that fast. But if I want to go fast, that definitely is an assistance along those lines.

So look, I know everyone, I'm seeing all sorts of discussion. It's one of the reasons I think God allows this kind of thing to happen. And I mean, you, if you've ever struggled with Hebrews, you've already worked through all this.

Maybe not, maybe not in the sense of making application to your favorite songwriter or performer or whatever else it might be. But if you have dealt with what Hebrews says to us, if you have dealt with the reality that it specifically makes reference to those who have walked away from the faith and then turns around and says, we are convinced of better things concerning you, things which accompany salvation, even though we speak in this fashion.

Again, put this together with what I said from Colorado a couple of weeks ago, where we went through the parable of the soils. We went through 1 John 2, Hope Chapel, the sermon that I preached, Hope Chapel in Colorado Springs a week ago Sunday was from Hebrews 6.

So I touched on that specific section as well. And you have to put it all together. You have to see how it all relates. And when you do, you really find a major chasm between the consistency of reformed theology and being able to maintain the centrality of Christ, the power of Christ to save all of those that are given to him, Solus Christus, Soli Deo Gloria, Sola Fide, Sola Gratia, four of the five solas will be demonstrated when you look at this and have a biblical understanding of the concept of apostasy.

You don't get that with one saved, always saved. You don't get that with the anti-lordship stuff. They just skip the whole problem by saying everyone who's ever tipped the hat toward God, they're getting there.