Do not listen b/c Transgenderism defeats Atheism | Rapp Report Weekly 003 | Andrew Rappaport | SFE | Striving for Eternity

On today's rap report, we're going to discuss the issue of transgenderism. And I'm telling you right now, up front, this is one you're probably not going to want to listen to, especially if you profess to be an atheist.

Because the issue of transgenderism, well, it completely and utterly demolishes the argument of atheism. We're going to discuss that on today's show. We're going to go through and for evidence of this, we're going to look at none other than Bill Nye, the science guy.

Yeah, we're going to look at what he says and see whether or not there's actually science behind this that's actually refuting the argument of atheism. We'll probably talk about our Bible giveaway we're doing and some other things.

We'll probably play some games as usual. So stay tuned for a good show. Welcome to The Rap Report with Andrew.

Rapaport, where we provide biblical interpretations and applications. This is a ministry of Striving for Eternity. For more content or to request a speaker or seminar for your church, go to.

Strivingforeternity .org. All right. Well, welcome to the weekly edition of The Rap Report. This is the longer edition. I hope you are subscribed to and listening regularly to the daily edition. Those are a two-minute podcast daily.

So they're short, quick, dealing with different things. I think the last week that we've been dealing with is the issue of logical fallacies. We've gone through to help you identify what some of the typical logical fallacies are.

We've dealt with things like the straw man argument, the ad hominem argument, poisoning the well, and then we're going to wrap it up with a view of what makes a logical argument both valid and sound and what are the differences between validity and soundness when we talk about logical arguments.

So I hope you're getting those. Those are just two minutes. You can consume the entire week's worth in 10 minutes. So I hope that you subscribe to The Rap Report. You can look it up on any podcast app that you have, download that, and you'd be able to listen to those.

I would also ask, would you do us a favor and write a review on iTunes, Google Play, TuneIn, and Spotify, and all the others where we are, all those places where we are. If you would write a review in wherever you can, that would just help us so we know that you're being blessed by this, that you're watching these, enjoying these.

We hope that you're getting a lot out of this. I should say that I am Andrew Rapaport from Striving for Eternity. If you want to find out more about Striving for Eternity, go to strivingforeternity .org.

The Bible Giveaway and a Warning for Younger Viewers

Now, we're going to deal with an issue today that is a little bit more sensitive maybe to younger viewers. I would say that if you are an adult, you may want to listen first before you let your children listen, just as a precaution.

Also, I should note that we are giving away a Preacher's Bible. That's one of the New American Standard Bibles, that a very heavy cover paper so that when you take notes, it doesn't bleed through. It's a $200 Bible, nice goatskin, very soft cover, and we are giving that away April 15th.

How do you enter? Well, easy. You either follow Andrew Rapaport on Twitter or follow Striving for Eternity Ministries on Facebook and then share the Rapaport episodes everywhere you can and hashtag rap report.

That's rap with two Ps. If you do that, we will see that and we'll be announcing the winner April 15th. That's going to be something we really look forward to doing for you. Before we get into this topic, I just want to play a quick commercial for us before we get into this and that gives folks who are listening some time to get the little ones maybe in another room.

All right. Thank you, Todd, for that. I do encourage you to get What Do They Believe? and that is a good book on dealing with different religions. I happen to know the author pretty well being him. All right.

Transgenderism as a Challenge to Atheism

So, this week's rap report is one you should not listen to. I'm telling you in this episode, we are going to prove that transgenderism, if that's right, if we're going to argue for transgenderism, that the arguments made for transgenderism defeat the argument for atheism.

They make the argument for atheism self-refuting. Many atheists have been pushing for transgenderism. We're going to get to that later and I'm going to show you how that refutes itself when they do that.

Now, let me give you a quote from Chaz Bono. He's a transgender. He says, quote, there's a gender in your brain and a gender in your body. For 99 of people, those things are in alignment. For transgender people, they're mismatched.

That's all it is. It's not complicated. It's not neurosis. It's a mix-up. It's a birth defect like a cleft palate, unquote. Now, what you end up seeing in this quote is that he is trying to normalize definitions by giving them new terminology.

He's basically trying to say that this is just a birth defect. It's just something that we got wrong at birth and we need to straighten out by maybe with a cleft palate through surgery or things like that.

But he's trying to normalize it in this quote. And when we deal with a transgender, we have to realize that we're dealing with new definitions of terminology in an attempt to normalize something that was previously identified as a mental illness.

And actually, we're going to see from a psychologist who makes that argument. One transgender poster had some interesting statistics that we need to be aware of. Here are the statistics. Quote, 34 of trans people attempt suicide.

64 are bullied. 73 of trans people are harassed in public. 21 of trans people avoid going out in public due to fear, unquote. Now, I don't know if these statistics are accurate, but let's just say they are.

The thing that this doesn't do is give a comparison to other groups. There's plenty of other groups of teenagers who don't feel comfortable going out in public. They don't. They attempt or feel the need to attempt suicide.

They feel bullied. They feel harassed. So, the question is, is this, these statistics given something that is true only of those that are in the transgender community? This is the thing we have to deal with.

We have to be aware of the fact that these statistics are going to be true truthfully for many teenagers. And that's really where most of these statistics come from. Many people of that age in our society are unfortunately feeling the need to take their own life because of being bullied.

Unfortunately, we also see some that don't take their own life right away. They take others' lives. The question is, you know, just because they're bullied, does that mean that we should make changes?

We should stop the bullying. We should keep anyone that's afraid of going out because they're going to be bullied. Well, we should try to work on preventing the bullying. That's for sure. But our culture today is that the LGTB community are the ones that are actually doing the bullying.

And this is not even arguable anymore. You do not see them making lawsuits against Islam or other groups. It's Christianity. And they are going out of their way to do this. They're going out of their way to go after Christians, specifically targeting Christians.

I've said this before in different podcasts, different shows I've been on. But in the 1980s, when I was in college, late 80s, I remember I had, I was the only, there weren't too many of us on college campus during Christmas break.

Being most, basically the international students, my folks lived in Florida. I was in New Jersey. So, I didn't go home. And so, basically, there was no one there but the RA. That's Resident Assistant.

He came over to me. Okay. I admit he was drunk. I, to this day, don't know if he was just trying to see my reaction to looking at a homosexual magazine. I don't know if he had those inclinations and was just trying to gauge my reaction.

But I do know is he asked me to read an article that he saw in the magazine. Now, he said he got the magazine in the janitor's closet. Don't know. Interesting article though. The article he wanted me to read was an article trying to argue for how to make homosexuality mainstream.

This article laid out a game plan back in the late 80s. And basically, this game plan that they had was that they had to be a victim. But they wanted to be a victim of people that actually wouldn't victimize them.

So, they wanted to be a victim of people who would seem like in the culture to be going after them when they don't actually go and do any harm and wouldn't go suing them and things like that. And they gave an argument of why Christians should be that group.

The reason they said that is because Christians wouldn't actually do anything. The article actually said, the Christians will actually, in the end, push our agenda and help us. But we have to always remember we must be the victim.

That was basically the paraphrase of what their argument was. Which is very, very interesting because it's exactly what we ended up seeing. They led this to a T. They went into the schools playing the victim saying that because they're victimized, they need to be accepted.

They need to teach acceptance. They need to go into schools to get acceptance. And then they can go into working with corporations and companies to try to help make a plea and get donations to prevent the bullying and the attacking that the Christians are doing.

And then they would be able to go after the Christians and start suing them. The reality is, years ago when I was a child, the argument for homosexuality is you shouldn't have an issue with what we do in our own bedroom.

The argument that was returned, the reaction argument, was it's not going to stay in the bedroom. And as we see today, it hasn't. And what do they have now tried to do? They try to say Christianity should be restricted to the church.

Where they wanted to come out of the bedrooms, they want to restrict Christians. And this is what we end up seeing. And this is why I do think this is a major issue. This is something that has to be dealt with.

And the reason so many Christians deal with this issue is really because we are reacting. We are responding to the communities and the cultures attack on us. And when we're not actually doing the attacking.

So I would argue that the ones being bullied are the Christians. And we're being bullied by those who claim to be bullied. All right. But you know, the real issue I see in this is, and I will give a quote from, and I'm going to mispronounce the name, Andreeleka Pelajiga.

I'm sorry. Couldn't get that right. But what you see in this quote is an argument that not only does it need to, do they argue for acceptance, but they want celebration. Look at this quote. Quote, we're human beings, and this is a human life.

This is reality for us. And as we ask for acceptance and validation for what we say we are, it is a basic human right. Unquote. Now, first off, this is actually a logical fallacy known as begging the question.

This is where you must start with the conclusion that is trying to be argued before you accept the question. Okay. So the argument here is you must accept that this lifestyle is a human right. And then they go on to try to argue that that's the conclusion.

But notice what it says. This is a reality for us, and we ask for acceptance and validation. This means that they want to be celebrated. They want even Christians, and this is why they go after, and they're challenging Christians and suing Christians who don't celebrate their lifestyle.

That's a form of bullying, no matter how you look at this. Okay. So throughout this argument, I would challenge someone to ask the questions, does this apply to a serial rapist or a murderer? They were born that way.

They make that argument. The pedophile says he was born this way. Is being born this way, make it a human right? Does this automatically give us a right to say that this has to be not only accepted, but validated?

Should we do that with the serial rapist who wants to be left alone because he feels he was born this way? Should they be celebrated? Should they be accepted? Should they be validated? No, there is a difference between the way we are born and the responsibilities we have to society and the morality that we must live by.

And this is the issue that we have to deal with. Now, before we embark further into this discussion, what I would like to remind us is the fact that we are talking about people and not issues. I understand how easy this is to argue for politicizing this issue.

This is a political issue. I agree. But as Christians, we are dealing with people, not the issues. Our battle is not a battle in the government realm. Our battle is not a battle of political issues. Our battle is a spiritual one for the souls of those who are going to spend eternity either having eternal life with Christ or spend eternity in a lake of fire.

Our battle and our concern should always be as Christians for the individuals who are struggling and make no bones about it. People who are transgendered are struggling. This is the whole thing that pushes this issue.

This is the whole thing you end up seeing. If you speak as I have to people that are transgendered, you will hear the struggle. You will hear the battle that goes on within themselves. We have to realize these are hurting people.

We need to reach out and lovingly care for them. That is our mission as Christians. These are individuals who are struggling both to fit in into society and also to fit in with themselves. Most of them, not all, but most of them are not trying to make some political statement.

Yet many Christians and conservatives will argue with them over political things when they're not even concerned. They just want to live their own life. However, they do want acceptance from the culture.

Many of them are being caught in crossfire between people who want to make political issues. Let me give a challenge to the Christians listening. We need to be focused on people that will face God as a judge, not on the issues of our country.

10 ,000 years from now, the political issues of our country don't mean a thing. In fact, Christians, I've said this before on the different podcasts we've done, whether it be with Muslim immigrants or with guns.

As Christians, we need to be more focused on God's kingdom than America. We need to be focused on that which is going to last for eternity. So let's begin with the question, what is transgenderism? And we hear it talked a lot about, but you know, up until a few years ago, one's gender was determined by biology.

Whether you had an X chromosome or a Y chromosome made you, you know, male, female, you looked at the chromosomes. Gender had always been a scientific issue based on anatomy and chemistry of the chromosomes, your DNA.

But transgenderism has to do with the way people think and feel their gender actually is rather than what the chromosomes or anatomy prove out. Therefore, transgenderism has more to do with the way people identify themselves than the chemical makeup of their body.

Thus, this is not about biology, but about the soul or spirit. It's not about science. It's about psychology. If transgenderism is true, then we are more than just chemical reactions, as our atheists will argue.

And we're going to look at this in more detail. When we recognize that a major, or sorry, when we recognize that a majority of children who experience strong feelings that they were born the wrong gender grow out of those feelings by adolescence, then we have to realize that the encouragement of five and six-year-old children to change their gender when they will probably grow out of this, well, it would be wrong.

It would be wrong to encourage something that growth on its own will rectify. And many of these people are being hurt. We're going to look at one example in a bit, but many of them are being hurt. There was an article just recently that I saw of a 10-year-old drag kid.

He doesn't say drag queen, but he is been doing drag for four years now. He started from watching a TV show when he was two. This has been encouraged by his parents. And that is a thing we have to recognize.

The parents are involved in this. The parents are having an effect on this. And that is something we have to recognize, that this is not being done just by a decision-making of a six-year-old to say, I want to be a drag kid and go out and do these things.

So please recognize this. A lot of this is our culture and more so parents that are encouraging this. And many of them are, a lot of times you have single moms who are encouraging boys to act like girls.

There's articles that we saw, I recently saw of where they're trying to teach girls, they're teaching the boys to play in a kitchen and teach the girls to say no to them. Well, adults are trying to force kids to accept the values they want them to accept.

Rather than teaching acceptance, they're trying to encourage a change in gender, but we're going to miss. So let's deal with this. There's many theories of how what's called gender dysphoria occurs. Some people think that it has to do with the brain, that people have a male brain in a female body or a female brain in a male body.

Some others think that it's just the psychological environment of the childhood that's the dominant factor. But the reality is when you look at these things, no one really knows what causes this gender dysphoria.

Then again, neither does anyone know the reason why rapists and murderers that continue doing those act that way either. There's many factors that come into play. And I think many of those factors really come down to the breakdown of the family.

I think that's the biggest issue that we have to deal with. And one of the big issues that must be addressed from our culture is the fact that we've moved away from thinking and reasoning as a society into a feeling-based society.

That's a major change. This change is not unique. It's happened many times before. We've seen it in Nazi Germany. We've seen it with Mao Tse Tung. We've seen many times in culture where a culture changes from thinking-based to feeling-based.

It is done often for reasons of keeping control, being able to make major shifts in a culture. And it can be very dangerous. Why? Because people aren't thinking through these things. Now, we know that the professing atheists will always say they're the reasonable ones.

They use intelligence. They have to come up with websites like we're smart. I guess we wouldn't know it if they didn't tell us, just saying. But this becomes significant with issues of atheism, because as the atheists are going to argue that they have science and reason on their side, however, these atheists are also pushing an issue of transgenderism as normal.

I saw this firsthand in the 2016 Reason Rally, when a major part of their platform was to address and push the LGTB agenda. This was their platform. This is a rally of professing atheists trying to make a difference politically.

And the major part of their platform was to push this view. And this view, as we're going to get to, demolishes the atheist worldview. See, transgenders speak about differences between gender that they're assigned at birth and the gender that they identify with.

They speak about having a gender that can be identified outside of the chromosomes, outside of their DNA, their chemicals, outside of what science would say. When they speak of gender identity, they mean that a person's internal sense of his own gender.

And so this is an argument against atheism. This proves atheism false, because atheism is going to argue that we are just chemical reactions. When you look at atheism, that there is no God. We're just purely a material world.

We are the results of chemical reactions and nothing more. Then we should be completely driven by our chemicals, by the autonomy that makes us up. When we are chromosomes, our DNA should dictate. If we have male chromosomes and our anatomy is male, then genetically we're male and we should act male.

We should identify male and the same for female. But when we talk about transgenderism, we're talking about how someone feels or identifies themselves. Well, right now you've blown atheism out of the water.

Why? Because it's not about chemicals. It's not about that chromosomes that you had, whether an X or Y chromosome. No, it's all about the identity. Therefore, the acceptance of transgender identity defeats the argument for atheism.

Transgender identity is not based on chemical reactions, chromosomes, or anatomy. It is based on something outside of the material world. It is based on the immaterial feelings of a human being that you cannot explain without an immaterial source.

We are more than just chemical reactions. I'm going to say that though I do care and feel for those transgenders who are struggling out there, and I'll tell you right up front, if you are struggling, if you're a transgender and you're struggling, I will be more than willing to talk with you.

You can email me. Email us at info at strivingforeternity .org. I'll be happy to talk with you and try to help you with that struggle because you should not have to struggle. We should try to work with you to help you with that struggle.

But the fact that you have the struggle, the fact that you identify as something of a different gender than you are chemically made, something different than the way you were born scientifically, biologically, means that you are not just a sum of chemical reactions.

And this is a huge thing. You know, there are those who are, and we should deal with this. There are those less than 1 of, of what is there like 7 billion people in the world that have this unique condition where you're not able to actually tell if they're male or female.

They seem to have both body parts, but both are not functioning properly. And so what ends up happening there is you, you have those children, typically either it's medically taken care of. That is like a cleft palate type of thing where, so that they can function as one of the two genders.

Now people will look at that small percentage and say, see, it's not a binary thing. It's not male or female because you have some that are both or, or intersex is what it's now called. Well, that's a very small fragment and we shouldn't accept that the whole culture on less than 1%.

But we should not be surprised by any of this for, we have a society that has been attempting to reject biblical revelation with the concept that there is no such thing as objective, absolute truth. They want to give up those absolutes because they can't explain those absolutes without God.

And so in their change and their, their shift from an absolute objective truth, our culture has gone to a truth that is subjective. It is not only is it a subjective truth, but it is one that you're not allowed to have any external authority outside of the individual, whether that be the government, whether religion, family, no other authority should tell us what to do, but ourselves, how we identify.

This is what the culture is valuing. It values the autonomy of the individual. We have a culture, which is one that's supposed to challenge the, have the individual challenge radically anything that, that they see as being unfit.

You're not supposed to challenge the way the individual identifies themselves. Hint, hint, except if you're a Christian. Christianity is supposed to be challenged by our culture, but anyone else that's okay.

As we've seen earlier, this does not apply to rapists and murderers who say they're born that way. So therefore the culture does make distinctions between the inclinations that someone has at maybe birth or after childhood and the way that they should behave within culture and whether culture should accept it.

So the fact that somebody feels that they were born a rapist does not give them the right to carry that out. And we should not accept that in our culture. The culture for a long time has been at war with Christianity.

We've seen this a long time ago. We saw this with the issue of marriage. Marriage has been under attack for a very long time. And we saw this in not only the attacking the husband and wife and promoting divorce, but we've seen this in the redefinition of marriage.

And now the gender issue is being attacked. And atheists support much of this. They support this because they have a common enemy that they want to defeat, and that is Christianity. That's why they'll side with Muslims.

They'll side with transgenders. They'll side with anyone that will go against Christianity. However, in their attempt to defeat Christianity, they have accepted an argument that defeats their worldview.

Now, as we address the issue of transgender identity, we move from the realm of science, as we've said, where the claim is to have evidence to one of psychology. This really is where the realm fits. And we should quote, since we're dealing with this, a well-known psychologist, an expert in his field, Dr. Paul R. McHugh.

Now, he's the former psychiatrist in chief at John Hopkins University. He was a distinguished service as a professor of psychiatry, who said that transgenderism is a, quote, mental disorder, unquote, that merits treatment.

That sex change is, quote, biologically impossible, unquote. And that people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder. I'll have the links to that article in the show notes so you can look it up.

You know, we see this with Alan Anthony, E-L-A-N. I forget. I don't know how to pronounce that. But he's a man who transitioned at the age of 19 and transitioned back from, he transitioned from male to female at age 19 and transitioned back to a male 20 years later.

And he says this, quote, I started to realize that I could have dealt with my own issues so much better without changing my body because that brought so many more difficulties. De-transitioning is not an unusual as one might expect, but it is underground for a number of reasons.

And the trans community is not happy with discussing this, unquote. I'll have that article also linked. But what you end up seeing there, what you end up seeing there is here is a man who was struggling.

He can no longer have children because of the surgery. And he regrets that. Many atheists have a desire to overturn God's divine order and in doing so, want to overturn God's created order of male and female.

But in return, what they have done is defeated their own worldview. One must ask, where does the insanity stop? People seem to be able to see a difference between someone like a Rachel Dunzell, who is a civil rights activist, who claimed that she identified as being a black when she was actually born white.

And she got exposed. She blamed her parents even for forcing her to try to live white when she was actually black. People can see a difference there and can identify the difference between someone who is black and someone who is white and see that she can claim this identity and it doesn't work.

The same is true, unfortunately, for gender identity. Now, I don't say this in any way to be mean at all. I have a care for anyone who is struggling with this. We do need to reach out as a society and help them, not encourage it.

The damage that is being done to our society will not be known for many years. In fact, a group of American pediatrics have been outspoken against the practice of providing hormone treatment to children.

They made a statement that said, quote, young children are being permanently sterilized and surgically maimed under the guise of treating a condition that would otherwise resolve itself in 80 of them.

This is criminal, unquote. Don't blame me for saying that. Those are experts in the field of science and medicine. One underlying issue with transgender identity is the idea or concept that true freedom is found in asserting our radical independence in trying to be what we identify as rather than what we are.

And what the Bible teaches us is that our true freedom is when we embrace who we are. Abandoning our nature does not lead to freedom. It leads to death. The simple reality is that atheism focuses on the body, on chemicals, chromosomes, and believe that there is no immaterial part of humans.

We are just the product of chance and chemical reactions. And atheism believes we're the product of these things and everything we do is a result of material entities. And yet, transgenderism focuses on the soul and not the chemistry, not the chromosomes, not the anatomy of the human being.

This focuses on how one feels and identifies. These are two diametrically opposed worldviews that cannot coexist. If transgender identity is real, then atheism is false. As the transgender identity issue is discussed, let us go to those who profess atheism and let us see some clear examples that the transgenderism issue defeats their own worldview.

Let's go to none other than Bill Nye, the science guy. And we're going to see in these videos, I want to play a couple of videos. We're going to first play a couple of commercials, so it gives me time to set some things up.

But we're going to go to some commercials. And after that, I want to play some videos from Bill Nye, the science guy, and see how he defeats his.

Own argument. We'll be right back. Can you answer the following questions for your children or for the person to whom you are witnessing? Number one, is the New Testament reliable? Two, can you explain the Trinity to me?

Three, how is Jesus both God and man? And a slew of other questions you will be able to answer if you get Andrew Rappaport's new book, What Do We Believe? It will help you a ton. Get your copy at whatdowebelievebook .com.

Whatdowebelievebook .com.

Striving for Eternity is a Christ-centered ministry focused on equipping people for eternity. And they provide speakers and seminars that come to your church with expertise in theology, hermeneutics, world religions, creation science, evangelism, presupposition of apologetics, church history, and expertise in sexual abuse in the church.

For details on their seminars and to request a speaker for your church, go to strivingforeternity .org. Striving to make today an eternal day for the glory of God. All right, so here we have Bill Nye,.

The science guy, dealing with ice cream sexuality. Now, I'm going to say that we have our friends from the council. If you're not familiar with the council, you can go to do a search on your podcast app for the council.

They put out some regular podcasts. They haven't been putting out some recently, just saying, guys, but they're here and as they want to chime in on these videos. Now, I will link these two videos that we're going to show and discuss so that you have them and you can see them if you're listening on the podcast.

So let's play this.

But not everyone sees it this way. But there are lots of flavors to sexuality.

Why are we here, vanilla? Damn.

Oh, this again? Come on. Okay, so this again is that these are ice creams, ice cream cones of different flavors. And what you have is, what they're screaming about is ice cream conversion therapy. So the idea here that you're going to see is there are different flavors of ice cream.

And the argument is going to be made in this is that there's different flavors of sexuality. And if you listen closely, Bill Nye destroys himself on this. Okay, so this deals with ice cream conversion.

Let's listen.

Stubbs, settle everybody, settle. Now, I've spoken to some of you about my theories on the.

Nature of being ice cream, which have no basis in science.

Now, notice that they're arguing that this has no basis in science, right? That's their argument. They're making that claim that this is something that has... Now, notice that the... So you get the idea.

This is vanilla. Vanilla is supposed to represent the Christian. He's supposed to be the one that everyone's going to be against. Everyone else fits in well with each other, but not vanilla. Vanilla wants to convert everyone to himself.

That's going to be the argument.

It's the science of feeling. And as vanilla, I feel that I am the most natural of the ice creams. And therefore, the rest of you should just go ahead and also be vanilla. It's the one true flavor.

No one can make you stop being strawberry, strawberry.

Okay. Now, notice this. This is the beauty of this argument. He says, no one can stop you being strawberry, strawberry. What is strawberry? Strawberry was strawberry. This whole argument is the idea that someone can change their gender.

But what this ice cream argument is actually doing is saying, well, if you're born male, you remain male. If you're born female, you must be female. No one can make you change. You see how they end up undermining.

Their own argument? I just think that he's trying to import a racial undertone to try and equate it to a sexual preference or a sexual undertone in this. It just seems like he's taking racial arguments and bringing them into this whole idea of gender and sex.

But is that not how we've seen this culture. Do it though, Vince? I mean, have we not seen them try to argue that sexuality is like the racial issue,.

Is a civil right in the same way? So, I mean, with this argument, you're right. You could make the, why am I assigned to one race then? It would be, you can make the same argument for that. So you pretty much make everything absurd.

You just are what you think.

You are. And the rapist can make the same argument and the same with the murderer.

John, what do you think? Well, two tactics that I've discovered on this, and this is a common tactic. First of all, one issue is, you notice the one ice cream guy with the British accent. Well, why is it that they put a British accent guy on there?

Because, and this is something that they do a lot on the media, on the news and all that. They stick a British guy onto and start talking about whatever science. It's a tactic that they say, well, if he has a British accent, he must know what he's talking about because he's intelligent.

And so I think that it's a common tactic, I think, that I see. I mean, secondly, the second thought I thought was, doesn't a strawberry ice cream start off as vanilla? And then they just put strawberries in.