Is the King James Bible the Only Divinely Authorized English Translation?

WWUTT iconWWUTT

6 views

For a transcript of this video, click here: http://wwutt.com To subscribe to the podcast, click here! http://wwutt.podbean.com

0 comments

00:02
King James -only -ism is the belief that the 1611 King James Version of the Bible is the only divinely authorized
00:09
English translation, while modern translations corrupt the Bible. It's not just a deception, it's a satanic conspiracy against the
00:16
Word of God. The most glaring flaw with this doctrine is not one verse in the Bible supports it. And that's pretty much it.
00:23
It's a false doctrine. Now, if someone wants to use the King James Bible, that's fine, if you can understand it.
00:28
But to say it's the only translation God approved is a lie. King James -only -ists argue the
00:33
KJV is translated from the majority texts, while modern versions are from corrupt Alexandrian texts.
00:39
But the Byzantine texts used by King James translators were no older than the 11th century. We now have access to older and more reliable texts, closer to the originals.
00:47
King James -only -ists say modern translations removed references to Christ's Lordship and deleted entire
00:53
Bible verses. But the Byzantine texts added these verses to the original text and the extra references to Christ's Lordship.
00:59
It's just extra pious language from some overly ambitious scribes. King James -only -ists say the 1611 authorized version is the only true
01:07
Bible. Unless you have a King James Bible, you don't have a Bible. You need a King James 1611 authorized version.
01:13
Actually, no one uses the 1611, which also included the Apocrypha. Today's King James Bible is the 1769 revision.
01:21
God has preserved His Word, which we have in some very good translations of the Bible. Jesus said,
01:26
Heaven and Earth will pass away, but My Word will never pass away, when we understand the text.