Tis The Season To Be Mocking - [2 Corinthians 10:3-5]

Bethlehem Bible Church iconBethlehem Bible Church

1 view

0 comments

00:00
Father, thank you for this morning. Thank you for the Unseasonably warm weather that we've been enjoying and just thank you for the blessings that we have and This country of being able to come and worship you and to study your word and father.
00:13
We just pray that this morning We would be edified that we'd be stirred to love and good works and to just be reminded again about the importance of Knowing scripture and knowing you and father.
00:26
Would you bless each one here in Christ's name? Amen well This yeah,
00:32
I it's just been amazing to me this week. I don't know if you guys play Play pay any attention to Twitter or Facebook or any of that stuff
00:41
But when I say tis the season to be mocking I don't mean that I'm going to mock
00:47
You know this isn't like I'm gonna Some some kind of roast of the class or something like that seems to me that this is the time of year when it has become fashionable to mock
00:58
Christianity Few things were out this week Some big shot has a
01:05
TV show About creation or whatever and he put out some tweet this week about he was talking about somebody's birthday on December 25th who changed history and of course he meant
01:19
Isaac Newton is correct And you know, of course the you know, the punchline is well, it wasn't
01:25
Jesus of course, Jesus wasn't born on December 25th, and he would figure that a famous scientist might know that kind of thing, but I digress
01:35
Sometimes I think we're intimidated by science intimidated by numbers and I thought
01:40
I would give you some encouragement this morning Eric metaxas wrote this he's a he's an author.
01:50
I think he's a Christian I think he is anyway Listen to this.
01:56
I found this part this fascinating in 1966 Time magazine if you remember ran a cover story saying that God is
02:07
Dead that was the theory Many have accepted the cultural narrative that he's obsolete
02:15
That as science progresses there is less a need for God to explain the universe And he says yet it turns out that the rumors of God's death were premature
02:28
He goes on to say he says the same year Time magazine fame featured the now famous headline
02:35
Carl Sagan famous astronomer announced that there were two Listen to that two important criteria for a planet to support life.
02:44
In other words, there were two things that were essential To support life you had to have the right kind of star that is to say a
02:52
Sun some kind of light The right kind of star and a planet the right distance from that star so, you know, there's the
03:02
Sun here's the earth You know perfect situation for life Says given the roughly octillion one followed by 24 zeros planets in the universe
03:17
There should have been about septillion one followed by 20 But in other words one of a thousand planets capable of supporting life, but a lot of life out there, you know and now think about 1966
03:30
God is dead then Carl Sagan later on says this about planets in the meantime, we've had Star Trek, you know where every planet you go to as a new life -form, you know, etc, etc
03:39
So all these cultural things seeping in in fact, I remember one One Star Trek movie.
03:46
Yes, I have seen it Where they're there they go back in time and they're looking at this little puddle
03:52
Where life supposedly springs forth from which you know? Okay But this is the culture in which all this stuff comes to Let's see with such spectacular odds.
04:06
In other words that one of a thousand planets was gonna have life, you know We need to be doing something right so they set up this
04:13
Anybody wouldn't know what SETI is not Yeti, you know, it's not the abominable snowman Russ search for extraterrestrial intelligence this organization that was you know going to listen to everything and sort through it and figure out if there were
04:29
Life -forms out there and one in a thousand planets. Come on and who's to who's arrogant enough?
04:35
This is the thinking who's arrogant enough to think that we are the most advanced people so And did you know this is great the government's
04:47
I mean this will surprise most of us The government was actually helping to support SETI until 1993
04:54
Your tax dollars at work trying to find you know, all this life that was definitely out there
05:03
Now in as of 2014 because it still exists SETI still exists How many?
05:11
Evidences of life out there and other planets have they found Zero and that's followed by as many zeros as you want
05:22
Metaxas writes what you know, he says what happened as our knowledge of the universe has increased and this is this is kind of the crux of this this morning
05:31
What happens to science the Word of God? Let me just put it this way. Does the Word of God change? No, does truth change?
05:39
No does science change? Yes, well, why is that isn't science true?
05:46
True science is true, right? but the problem is as they get more information than the science changes listen to this as Our knowledge of the universe has increased it became clear that there were far more factors necessary for life than Sagan suppose
06:02
Carl Sagan this brilliant man said there were two necessary factors Well, then he decided that there were 10 and then he said there were 20 and then there were 50
06:15
So the number of potentially, you know, what happens as the number of factors necessary to support life
06:21
Increases then the number of planets that potentially support life Decreases so whereas we went from Septillion number of planets that probably had life on them to a few thousand and then it kept plummeting and Metaxas Rice he says even
06:40
SETI proponents acknowledge the problem one of them said in 2006 article in light of new findings and insights
06:48
We should quietly admit that the early estimates may no longer be tenable as factors continue to be discovered
06:57
This is Metaxas again. He says the number of possible planets hits Number of possible planets that could support life.
07:05
We've gone from septillion this great man of science Carl Sagan people still like to quote him Carl Sagan said there were a septillion number of planets that had life and now the number of planets that they think could support life is
07:18
Zero our planet shouldn't even support zero life. Let's listen this says
07:26
Including this one probability said if you just looked at the odds said that we should not exist
07:34
Human life should not be here Today, there are more than 200 known parameters necessary for a planet to support life
07:41
Every single one at which must be perfectly met or the whole thing falls apart without a massive planet now, this is interesting in light of Movies like the recent exodus one which posited, you know asteroids creating the or parting the
07:57
Red Sea, but without a massive planet like Jupiter nearby whose gravity will draw asteroids away a
08:04
Thousand times as many would hit the earth's surface as do now So the odds against life in the universe are simply astonishing
08:14
Yet here we are any of these 200 Conditions he says can every one of those many parameters have been perfect by accident here on earth at one point at what point?
08:27
Is it fair to admit that science suggests? We cannot be the result of random forces
08:34
And I like that how far do you have to go before you say well, maybe there's something more to it
08:40
There's more the finally to or the fine -tuning necessary for life existing on a planet is nothing compared with the fine -tuning required for the universe to exist at all the universe to exist astrophysicists now know that there are four values of fundamental forces these four are gravity electromagnetic force and strong and weak nuclear forces
09:09
And he writes that they were determined less than 1 millionth of a second after the Big Bang allegedly happened
09:16
Then he goes on to write alter any one value and the universe could not exist Let me try that again alter any one value and the universe could not exist the entire thing
09:29
We've already decided that life could can exist here and now the universe shouldn't exist and he says if the ratio between the nuclear strong force and the
09:37
Electromagnetic force was off by the tiniest fraction of the tiniest fraction by even one part in one quintillion
09:45
Then no stars could have formed at all And then you get back to the number of parameters necessary to support life, etc, etc, etc, and it just gets overwhelming so one atheist says
09:59
That when he started looking at all these numbers his atheism was greatly shaken all this stuff, you know and so When I read this
10:12
One one passage of Scripture comes to mind and what do you suppose that is? There are a few but I mean there's one that comes readily to mind for me
10:22
Let's open a Romans 1 and I want to look there first because this is this is the one you know
10:27
And I want to just encourage us To to We're going to see as 2nd
10:36
Peter 3 says, you know mockers mocking This is what they do scoffers scoffing and even the smartest people in the world
10:49
Holding down the truth Let's read Romans 1 verses 18 to 20 and who has that yeah,
11:01
Russ There's and they were made they didn't just pop into existence.
11:07
There's one Presupposition there's one fundamental assumption that Christians have and that is that God exists and from that we can posit the rest of Everything if there's a
11:22
God who is as described as the Bible and he exists then everything else makes sense
11:28
The unbeliever has to posit You know, not not just against all odds against all reason
11:36
But he has to actively suppress the truth and unrighteousness psalm 14 one says what the fool has said in his heart
11:45
There is no God now. Does that mean? Psalm 14 is that talking about a stupid person?
11:54
You know when if we say Carl Sagan is a fool, that would be true because he said in his heart
11:59
There is no God, but does that mean that Carl Sagan is dumb? The idea of a fool in Scripture doesn't necessarily have in it the idea of a lack of IQ It has to do with a moral crookedness
12:15
A you know if if You know true north is the direction we ought to be heading if that is obedience that that is
12:23
Righteousness then the fool is one who is Going off on his own direction
12:30
We could say in fact, I would say there are a lot of similarities between psalm 14 and Romans 1
12:37
It's that idea of variance from truth variance from what is known
12:42
I like what Lawson says he says when the
12:47
Bible speaks God speaks and his voice drowns out every other opinion, and that's what these are these are opinions
12:57
These are opinions, but this is this is it's coming from the outside, but it's also coming from the inside the church another passage
13:05
I like to refer to 2nd Corinthians 10 verses 3 to 5 and I think this has to do with both
13:12
Believers and unbelievers let's look at that 2nd Corinthians chapter 10 verses 3 to 5
13:24
And this is a good one because I think it's misused by people who? would profess
13:30
Christ If somebody would read that please 2nd Corinthians chapter 10 verses 3 to 5 yeah, go ahead
13:38
Now What what is this? How is this passage misused? This is a passage about spiritual warfare, right?
13:50
You know every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God, and it has this picture of you know literally
13:57
Fortresses you know and assaulting fortresses. That's kind of the the picture here, but what sorts of things?
14:04
How do people use this Christian people use this passage or people who profess Christ? Let's put it that way.
14:16
I'm sorry flow Well, that's good.
14:22
I mean you're you're talking right. I'm talking wrong. You know she says think rightly by taking every thought captive Yes, that is correct.
14:28
I don't want correct answers though Thank You flow Is somebody else who has a wrong thing that they'd like to say and get you know for no how's this passage misused?
14:42
Yeah, Bruce Yeah, it's like it's like to assert power and Dominion over demons
14:55
Right somebody else, but what do we know we know that false ideas false theologies?
15:04
false science Is really what it's the It is the doctrine of demons there they come from the father of lies
15:14
So what we want to do and ultimately what this passage is talking about is we take things captive to the
15:20
Word of God Well, what do we do we compare what people say with Scripture and which one wins?
15:27
Scripture I don't really care what Carl Sagan says with all due respect to Carl Sagan when he says there are two necessary functions
15:35
I don't care if he says there's two ten twenty all I know is what the Bible says the Bible says
15:40
God said let there be Light and there was light God created everything
15:48
My presupposition and it's not my presupposition. I don't own it It's what the
15:54
Bible says Bible says that there is an eternal God who spoke and existence leapt into being he always existed and he spoke and everything came into being and once I have that then
16:07
I can Fill in my worldview around that But what these people are doing literally is walking around the dark and trying to feel their way to the truth and they can't do it
16:19
It is the quintessential blind leading the blind When we talk about the
16:25
Bible and the fact that we can rely on it and there's going to be some emphasis on that on this this year we talk about its
16:35
Inspiration and we talk about its inerrancy Inspiration just means that it is breathed out by God.
16:43
It's or inerrancy means that it Well, what does inerrancy mean?
16:50
without error and There's another part of it here from the Chicago Statement of Faith and that is it doesn't have any mistakes
16:59
But also that it doesn't affirm anything. That's contrary to fact. In other words, it doesn't It doesn't affirm false falseness
17:08
Nothing untrue. It doesn't affirm Okay, so a question from these are from 2008 with Roger Nicole little interview he did
17:20
Question he's asked the inerrancy of Scripture is a controversial doctrine in some quarters and believe it or not.
17:26
It still is today there are Christians who they might say they
17:32
Affirm inerrancy, but they don't so he says this questioner says, how do you define inerrancy?
17:39
And how is the term given to being misunderstood and he says inerrancy is an articulation
17:46
Explicit of the nature. I don't even want to read that part Let me just read this the question therefore is what can be defined as an error?
17:54
And what doesn't in the errancy therefore avoid? Says, you know, you have to avoid error if that's not properly understood then some people will have a mistaken
18:05
Mistaken notice and notice of what we want or notion mistaken notion of what we want to assert
18:11
Says inerrancy does not come as a result of testing all statements of Scripture and finding them to be true
18:18
Because if that were the case, we would never end this job What is he saying he's saying if you examine everything and you go off on a fact -finding
18:28
Mission to find out if it's true, then you will there will be no ending to the investigation. Well, why?
18:34
Because guess what? Not everything in Scripture has Happened yet. That doesn't mean it's not true.
18:40
Just means it hasn't happened yet So you can't you can't validate everything but what the scripture says is true and it's amazing, you know as time goes on I mean pastor
18:53
Mike mentioned earlier and Probably for those of you were in the first service.
18:58
It might have even escaped your notice Anybody you remember where he said that the the
19:04
Jacob's Ladder was found in the in the tomb of King Tut Now what's the significance of that?
19:16
You know, is that something where you should just grab your Bible and go? Well, I know the Bible's true because they found a reference to Jacob's Ladder in King Tut's tomb
19:26
No, but what what that means is that keep the Jacob's Ladder was known at the time
19:33
King Tut was buried and all these things, you know, these aren't just Legends that grew up and somebody wrote them down and you know, they became this
19:42
This isn't Greek mythology. In other words, this is the truth and as Archaeology and as science evolves and as it grows guess what it eventually catches up with the truth
19:56
I like this question to To dr.
20:05
Nicole. He's the questioner says where do we see the bad fruit of a faulty view of inerrancy today?
20:13
He says Nicole says we find that That challenge in churches where people say we ought to receive
20:21
Practicing homosexuals as members now. Listen, he says scripture has clearly said that Homosexuality is so nefarious
20:30
That those who practice it may be punished with death like nefarious. Now, there's a word you don't hear every day
20:36
Some say okay. Well, those things are in the Bible, but it represents customs of that time
20:42
So there's no authority of God in there but if you have liberty to do that, in other words, that's
20:48
Thousands of years old we're not bound by that anymore And Nicole says but if you have liberty to do that, then you can take it wherever it
20:57
You could take whatever it says and say well that's for the olden days Therefore he says our feelings practices and sin
21:08
Begin to be the authority instead of God the damage is terrific So again, let's go back to 2nd
21:15
Corinthians chapter 10 verses 3 to 5 He says Nicole says this is this is the way the church is going now our feelings
21:25
Practices in our sin begin to have authority instead of God What are we here now, you know supposed
21:32
Christians saying well, what's wrong with homosexual marriage? everybody should be has the right to be happy and if marrying somebody from the same sex makes someone happy then
21:43
So be it How could God say no to that? We have to be affirming What does 2nd
21:52
Corinthians 10 say Paul writes in the inspirational Holy Spirit? We have to take everything we have to Test it.
21:58
We have to capture it as it were compare it to the Word of God Another question for dr.
22:07
Nicole. He says Why does there seem to be a recurring pattern of voices within evangelicalism?
22:13
challenging the doctrine of inerrancy And he writes about the case of a thesis
22:21
By one of his colleagues who's writing about the New Testament And he says that he had a view contrary to the prescribed approach to scripture and he was rejected for his doctoral thesis
22:32
On the grounds that he did not sufficiently acknowledge this critical view or the critical view.
22:37
What's he saying here? He's saying that this man wanted to write his Thesis understanding the
22:43
Old Testament to be true and be inspired and to be accurate and because he refused to take
22:50
Excuse me to take a liberal critical view of the Old Testament.
22:56
He was not permitted to write his thesis And this is not uncommon I had a seminary professor
23:03
Who said now he was at Dallas? And this was 20 some odd years ago and his professor told him
23:13
He said if you do not Interact with the liberal sources that we give you you will not not surmount the program here at Dallas Theological Seminary This is the way things are going.
23:26
This is the church now That is has a more Dispassionate a more reasoned approach
23:37
Supposedly to scripture than it used to and the truth is what the church at large is doing right now slowly
23:44
But surely in accepting what the world says about the Bible is they are Becoming more and more like the world the church is
23:56
I Want to just say a word about this
24:02
I hear this Who wants to?
24:09
Let's talk about the Council of Nicaea 325 AD How many are familiar at all with the
24:15
Council of Nicaea 325 AD raise your hand if you were there? What are some of the things that are said about the
24:26
Council of Nicaea? This is a church council 325 AD What are some of the things that are said currently about that council?
24:34
Yes Okay, it's when what books were in the
24:41
Old Testament or We're in the canon of Scripture were decided that there was a cabal and an organization you know that kind of seized control of this and Excluded some books.
24:55
Well, what were the books that they excluded from Scripture the secret
25:00
Gospels the ones that nobody's supposed to read Well, they're secrets,
25:05
I guess that's one word for them we call them what I heard I heard over here Okay, the
25:10
Gnostic books, you know like the my favorite, you know, and this one ever gets old for me
25:16
I laugh every time I tell it the Gospel of Thomas Familiar with that one gospel
25:23
Thomas neither a gospel nor written by Thomas. Thank you very much. I Mean people are like, how could they exclude the
25:32
Gospel of Thomas? Well, you know, we know that was written probably about 180 150 180
25:39
AD So we know it wasn't written by Thomas So why would we want to include it in?
25:46
the Bible But you know when people start ranting and raving about the
25:52
Gospel of Thomas, I just like to see do you know what's in it? Because it says that Jesus it quotes
25:58
Jesus as saying unless a woman turns into a man. She can't get to heaven Now that may be cool for some people today
26:06
But I digress
26:14
Okay, the the Council of Nicaea then was not a place where? You know, they treat it like it was some big
26:22
Conspiratorial thing where this group now, I just think how brilliant those men must have been 325 AD They didn't have computers and yet somehow they managed to come out of that council
26:33
Getting rid of all these spurious books that would have conflicted with the other ones Keeping these 66 books that we have today
26:42
And yet somehow It's coherent. They didn't have computers so they can compare things to make sure there were no contradictions, but we have a coherent
26:51
Bible today. Well, how did they do that? Those must have been some brilliant guys What did the
27:00
Council of Nicaea actually do did they decide what books were gonna be in the
27:06
Bible? No We have those lists. We have them before 325
27:13
AD what they did was They did a few things from the nature of Jesus, but they also
27:21
Said these other books do not belong in scripture. They just excluded books that did not belong I mean if you have a a myriad of books
27:30
But you want just some to be recognized as inspired as canonical Then what do you do you exclude the ones that aren't canonical and how do you decide that?
27:40
Well, I like to put it this way, you know, because even my Mormon friends will assault the Council of Nicaea and they'll say well this is when you know, they they edited the books and they did this and they did that and they made sure that you know,
27:53
The the truth was expunged so we wouldn't know all the Mormon secrets Okay, you can believe that if you want
28:04
But what actually happened is God this the supreme being
28:10
Who's in charge of everything who orders everything kept his word intact and the
28:16
Council of Nicaea Simply affirmed what God had done Can we trust the
28:22
Bible is it not just inspired but inerrant yes And when we say it's inerrant it has no mistakes.
28:29
Well, what does that mean? I mean you can look in your Bible and you say well, wait a minute. I have in my
28:35
Bible it has mark 16 verses 9 to 20 and Then it says it marks it off.
28:42
It says well those verses aren't in the Bible. How can you say that? My Bible is inerrant or You know my my
28:49
Bible has At the end of John chapter 7 the beginning of John chapter 8.
28:55
It has these spurious verses in there How can you see my Bible is inerrant? I'm not talking about the printed copy that you have
29:04
When we say something when we say the Bible is inerrant. What are we talking about? We're talking about in the original
29:11
Autographs, which means the original manuscripts the original copies those that were originally written down by the inspired authors
29:19
So you say well, what good does that do? I don't have the autographs. I don't have the original copy
29:24
I have my printed copy that you say is riddled with errors. I didn't say that by the way And if you have the
29:30
MacArthur study Bible, it's definitely not riddled with errors. Okay, sorry How do we know that the
29:40
Bible that we have today is reliable, how do we know that How do we know that it's inerrant
29:54
It says so that's definitely one way right it testifies to itself God testifies to it
30:01
How else do we know that we compare scripture with scripture? Okay Okay textual criticism
30:18
I'm not gonna do an entire course in that. I'm just gonna spend a moment. I'm gonna say this Here's what textual critics do there's a higher criticism where they
30:27
Completely destroy the Bible and that's not what I'm talking about textual criticism is we have manuscripts. We have thousands of Manuscripts, which is amazing
30:36
What do you think about that? I mean there aren't thousands of much of anything Thousands of manuscripts and what they're able to do even as they find later manuscripts like the the
30:46
Dead Sea Scrolls and things like that Pull these manuscripts all together and they look at them and they compare them and they go
30:53
Okay, none of these are the original copy but by comparing them and seeing the errors that are made like You know, here's an example in English if I say there
31:06
What goes through your mind What's that? What's there and If I'm speaking, you know, what's there?
31:15
How do you know which there's there because the there that's there is belonging to them or there or you know by context and But it's sometimes not obvious when we type it which there we mean because what do we do?
31:33
We spell it incorrectly like for example, let's say I'm dictating something to you and I say there even if you got
31:40
Spellcheck and if you don't have spellcheck, why not? Even if you have spellcheck if you misspell it the odds are really good
31:49
Here we are back to the odds thing That it's going to Ignore the mistake like if I say
31:58
They're going to church this afternoon Then you know, it's
32:03
T H E Y apostrophe R E But you type, you know,
32:08
T H E R E Spellcheck isn't gonna catch that but if somebody's reading this later if somebody's reading what
32:17
I dictated to you later They'll look at it and go. Well, that was a mistake That obviously was the wrong there.
32:24
And so they'll correct it and that's exactly the sort of thing. That's not Exactly analogous, but it's pretty close to what goes on in textual criticism.
32:33
So they look at these different manuscripts They see where the where the discrepancies are and there aren't that many but where one manuscript will differ from another and then they'll
32:42
Try to work their way back and they'll compare all these different manuscripts. They might have Dozens or hundreds of the same passage and they'll look at them and the older manuscripts now listen to this carefully the older Manuscripts tend to be what do you think more accurate or less accurate?
33:02
More accurate is the correct term, right? The older it is the closer it is back to the original manuscript the more accurate it tends to be
33:10
Because those things get copied over time they become less and less Accurate little what more errors will creep into it.
33:17
But by comparing all these different manuscripts and we have some that Date back. I mean there are some that date back to a few that date back to You know two three hundred and I think there's one now that's around 180 or something like that But most of them are about the seventh
33:37
Seventh through ninth centuries But yeah, and there's a whole great big thing I don't want to spend more time on it
33:44
But there's a whole great big thing about how they would Copy these and the thing the methods that they would use and so they use all this
33:50
Information to kind of deconstruct what's there and to get it back into its original Form so when
33:57
I say that we have God's Word today, I think with a high degree of confidence
34:03
We can say that it's right You know because they they they've done all this work already
34:09
So talking about that now I was reading that I think this is a
34:16
Catholic website. Somebody said Well, you know 2nd Timothy 3 16 and 17.
34:22
What does it say? It says, you know, the Word of God is Inspired okay, and they say but that when
34:30
Timothy wrote that well, what books was he talking about? He was talking about the old or when
34:36
Paul wrote it to Timothy he was writing about the Old Testament, right? So that's all that inspiration applies to Is that true?
34:48
Well, no, I mean certainly I mean if you want to say that that only applies to the Old Testament Then you what are you gonna say about the words of Jesus the words of Jesus were inspired
34:56
Well, certainly the red letters what let's look at 2nd Peter a good reminder for us this morning 2nd
35:02
Peter chapter 3 And what somebody read? verses 16 and 17 place
35:11
Yeah, go ahead. Well, see, you know, there was a little error there because I've typed 2nd
35:19
Peter 3 verses 15 and 16, but I very clearly said 16 and 17 Why I don't know why but there's an error that we can unpack.
35:27
So let me read verse 15 instead and count the patience of our Lord as salvation
35:33
Just as our beloved brother Paul also wrote to you according to the wisdom given him Given him by whom, you know
35:40
Obviously the Lord as he does and all his letters when he speaks in them of these matters and then he says, you know
35:45
Which they do to the other scriptures so implying that not really implying but saying that the letters of Paul were
35:55
Scripture Scripture So Peter, you know
36:02
Peter obviously disagreed with this Catholic writer here. The first Pope disagreed with him
36:08
If Sorry, sorry They have all kinds of silly objections doesn't the fact that Luther wanted to remove?
36:18
How do you respond to this Luther wanted to remove Hebrews James Jude and Revelation from the Canon? Does that mean that he knew that these books were not inerrant?
36:28
No, and even if that was what Luther thought well Luther would just be
36:34
Wrong. He's just a guy Isn't saying that the
36:40
Bible is inspired by God and verified to the believer by the Holy Spirit circular reasoning In other words, you're relying on God to tell you that it's the
36:50
Word of God. I'm okay with that Here's a here's the thing
36:59
I Said this before I'll say it again everyone has circular reasoning and unbeliever believes what he believes because Because he believes it his circular reasoning is
37:17
Unique to him. It's based on his own fallible understanding of the universe even
37:22
Carl Sagan as brilliant as he was You know went from Believing there were a septillion planets
37:29
That could survive or could have life to many fewer and now if you were alive today
37:35
I think he'd probably say yeah, it's probably not too likely They're fallible
37:43
Now when people accuse me of being of having circular reasoning I say, you know what you're right Here's the difference between me and you
37:51
Your circular reasoning and it is circular is based on your own belief system My circular reasoning is based on the
37:58
Bible. I believe that the Bible is the Word of God and everything it says is true and any, you know questions about life or Morality or anything else all go back to Scripture and that's my source and you say well, that's you know
38:14
How do you know it's right because it says that it's right. Well, that's certainly reasoning Yes, how do you know you're right because I'm right?
38:22
Okay. Well, that's not a circular reasoning It is ultimately circular reasoning for both of us.
38:31
It's just in my circles outside of me What about this question aren't there errors in the Bible doesn't the
38:36
Bible teach that the Sun orbits around the earth? No, it doesn't. I'll just get to the punchline there. The earth is flat.
38:42
No, it doesn't They're all manner of things here
38:47
I'm gonna be moving kind of quickly now I got I have to confess. I was listening to R.
38:53
C. Sproul a couple weeks ago That's not part of my confession, but it really got me thinking about this here Here's what he said, and I thought this was just so profound just talking about apologetics and reasoning and how much we can study
39:07
Scripture or trust Scripture Because people are trying to explain
39:14
Existence apart from God, which is the height of foolishness Because it simply cannot be done
39:21
But he says R. C. Sproul says he went to I think it was Harvard and he gave a presentation to their philosophy department
39:29
And he said I proposed to them that there were three ways that something can come into existence
39:34
You know what those three ways were? Three ways something can come into existence What's that No No, this is philosophy.
39:46
So he's you know, he's waxing eloquent Three ways that something can come into existence number one
39:56
Russ Okay, you're kind of skipping ahead but yeah, well, how about this
40:02
I'll give you the first one and then we can see if we Can work something out something can exist because it has
40:09
Always existed. Okay, that's one number two it is Created by an already existing being and number three is one that's really interesting to me
40:21
And maybe not so obvious He says the existing thing created itself
40:31
And I thought and then he went on to explain why that was a dumb idea He said
40:40
He said because for something to exist or something to create itself it would have to Exist before I created
40:50
That's pretty profound So so listen to this RC I look this one up online.
40:58
He said he was recently reading an essay by a well -known Nobel winning physicist
41:06
He says whose name will remain unstated so as not to embarrass him Who argued that the idea of spontaneous generation?
41:14
That is something spontaneously coming in being should be as abandoned and science once and for all
41:21
Spontaneous generation means that something comes into being with no cause it comes from nothing and RC writes so far so good
41:27
I was pleased to see a scientist debunk the myth of all myths He says that something can come from nothing
41:35
That out of nothing everything came into being he says this myth is still pervasive in the scientific community with respect to Chance and he says chance is giving credit or given credit for creating the universe
41:49
RC goes on to say he says however such a prodigious feat is beyond the capabilities of chance
41:56
Chance can do nothing because it is nothing. It's merely a word we use to explain mathematical possibilities
42:02
It is no thing it has no power He says so I'm glad this physicist repudiated spontaneous generation
42:10
He says my gladness abruptly turned to astonishment when the scientists said we must have a new model
42:16
We must speak in terms of gradual spontaneous generation RC says
42:25
I couldn't believe what I was reading gradual spontaneous generation says how can something gradual be?
42:32
spontaneous Says our scientists wanted to debunk the myth that something can come suddenly from nothing and replace it with a better myth that something can come
42:43
Gradually from nothing And RC says I use this illustration only to show that even the most astute scientists can fail they fall short
42:55
Why is that? Because they're suppressing the truth and unrighteousness they look around they see order
43:02
But order presupposes what an orderer and so what do they want to do?
43:10
Suppress that suppress it so get rid of them right can't be there
43:15
So they'll tie themselves up into knots even saying well. You know what there are a septillion planets where life
43:24
Could possibly exist Well, no actually Probably a hundred well.
43:30
No actually there can't be any but it's still science It doesn't matter how absurd it is it is science
43:40
We expect unbelievers to do that, but it's amazing to watch people who say that they're
43:45
Christians Redefine sin Right Homosexuality other things we're gonna see the world as the world goes the church is going to and it is hard to watch
44:00
Redefine sin redefine salvation Redefine the nature of man
44:07
Redefine the nature of God I Mean the most famous Christians I Think how to you know just go like this all the time
44:20
Christians The most famous Christians in the United States are people that could not give you the gospel if you said here's a thousand dollars
44:29
I'll give you five minutes. Please tell me the gospel I Expect half of them would probably say make a ten thousand you got a deal.
44:43
They don't know the gospel So what's the solution? What is the solution to all this you know if you're if you're interacting with somebody who says you know they're too smart
44:53
To believe the Bible they're too smart to believe in a God who created all things
44:59
They're too smart. You know you're stupid What does the
45:05
Bible say about that? What's that fool says in his heart, there's no
45:15
God well it also says the first Corinthians what that the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are
45:23
Perishing so what that person is really telling you is I am drowning. I am perishing
45:30
I Need a lifeline Will you throw me a lifeline your response should be what?
45:45
well That's good for you Be warm be filled
45:57
Rescue the perishing throw him a lifeline give them a little gospel Say listen everything you need to know about life and death
46:07
Is in this book you need to study it It's gonna tell you who you are Who God is the fact that you have a problem whether you don't want to hear it or not whether you want to hear it?
46:16
or not That one day you're gonna answer you're gonna stand before a holy God you're gonna answer for everything you've done in your life
46:23
And unless you can say that all my sins have been forgiven in the Lord Jesus Christ because of his perfect life his death on The cross his resurrection
46:31
Unless you could say that unless you could say that you are in Christ. You're going to spend eternity in hell
46:39
Mockers will come with their mocking our response needs to be compassion love and the cross
46:47
Let's pray father Even during this holiday season
46:54
As Christianity has become Fashionable to laugh at to mock as the
47:03
Bible has become the punchline for TV shows showing the stupendous nature of the universe and how wonderful things are and yet they
47:15
Ascribe all of this to random chance knowing in their hearts That such things cannot be
47:23
Lord would you give us the clarity of thoughts resolution in our hearts
47:34
Compassion love a Desire to see the loss come to Christ to rejoice as They do father would you grant us the courage to present the truth of Scripture Whatever the accusation may be
47:54
Whatever The jokes whatever the the chiding whatever
48:01
Father the truth is that you save sinners By the preaching of your gospel make us faithful servants of the