Die Arche Noah und die Finsternis Vollständiger Film - The Ark and the Darkness (GERMAN SUB)

The Film Introduction and Invitation to Support the Project

I'm Ralph Stream, the writer, director, and producer of the ARK in the Darkness, the movie you're about to watch. I want to encourage you all to share the movie with as many as you can and to please also consider supporting us on Patreon, as well as contributing to our Indiegogo campaign where you can secure a copy of the director's cut version of the film, which includes additional segments such as Giants and the Bible, Dinosaur Legends, Deluvial Proofs, and the Truth About the

So with all that said, please enjoy the theatrical version of the ARK in the Darkness.

I'm Ralph Stream, the writer, director, and producer of the ARK in the Darkness, the movie. I want to encourage you all to share the movie with as many as you can and to please also consider supporting us on Patreon, as well as contributing to our Indiegogo campaign.

Why Genesis and the Flood Matter for History and Science

Giants and the Bible, Deluvial Proofs, and the Truth About the They don't show you the historical credibility of Genesis and that it really holds up very well in our scientific age. So on the one hand it is a lack of information and on the other...

Fear of people.

It is the reason why they don't believe much of what the Bible says is true, real history, and real science. The fear of looking stupid, as well as the intimidation by people who moderate scientific programs and wear white lab coats.

I think they are simply afraid of looking stupid. But if you actually look at things not only superficially and take into account the feasibility and historicality, it is almost inevitable, plausible.

Conventional secular scientists think that the present is the key to the past. The Bible tells us, however, that the past is the key to the present. It makes no sense to understand why the world is the way it is today.

Not just the geology, but all of humanity. The Ark and the flood of sins are important to understand why the world is the way it is today and how we came here. Everyone is interested in their history and the flood of sins is crucial to understand our roots.

In the early 19th century, when the idea of millions of years arose, it developed as a result of a conscious rejection of the flood of sins and biblical chronology. Most church representatives came to the conclusion that the flood of sins was not global, not really geologically significant, and that the age of the earth did not matter.

And so the flood of sins was simply forgotten in the next 100 to 150 years. And it is still largely ignored by most Christians today. They just don't think about it. Not even in connection with the age of the earth.

But it is of great importance.

We can go back and, for example, see what happened in the fossil record. He sent the flood of sins to punish evil. That is why God sent the flood of sins. It is important to punish evil. That is justice.

The reason why the ark is so incredibly relevant for the flood of sins is because of the sin of man and the judgment. The Bible clearly shows that we are now approaching the time when the second global judgment will come.

If we do not understand the first global judgment or do not believe in it, we will not be prepared for this last global judgment. And the consequences of the last global judgment could not be more important for all of us.

In fact, it is about no less than heaven or hell.

Creation, the Fall, and the Curse on the World

The Holy Bible. A book inspired and designed by God, written by his people, that goes back to the beginning of real human history, to the true origins of man. A book that teaches that the earth is not millions of years old, as we have been made to believe.

A book that teaches that we do not originate from monkeys, chimpanzees or a primeval soup, but a book that instead introduces us to our Creator. A loving, merciful and just God. A God who created a beautiful world in which the entire planet was once like a paradise.

A world that he gave us to populate and multiply us in it. In Genesis we see that God had completed the entire creation in six literal days and that in fact everything he had created was very good. In a period of four days, God had created and prepared heaven and earth.

And it was on the fifth day that he began to create the sea creatures, both large and small. And on the same day he also created all the exotic flying creatures that flew in the open firmament of the beautiful sky.

On the sixth day he created all the majestic land animals, including all the dinosaurs, together with humanity. He also planted a garden and in the middle of it the tree of life. But there was another tree that God had also planted in the garden, one of which God commanded man not to eat.

Unfortunately, mankind used their free will to sin against their holy and just God. With free will consequences come. And in this case the consequences of sin plunged all of humanity into darkness.

Before the fall of sin, God saw everything he had done and it was very good. Perfect. It was as it should have been. It came as it was intended.

At the end of chapter 1 it says that it was very good. God saw everything he had done and it was very good. And we get an idea of how good it was in the last three verses of the creation report, when God says that both man and animals and birds were vegetarians.

They did not eat each other. They ate the plants and the fruits of the plants. That tells us a lot about how good the world was originally.

Creation was in a state of innocence. This is a fundamental element of God's character. He is good. God is not the source of evil or death.

God came into the garden, he had a community with man, and they could actually communicate with him and see him. This is our understanding of the state of the world before the fall of sin. They could have lived forever.

God had warned man beforehand, if you eat of it, you will die. But he ate. God said, you will certainly die.

God said, you have been taken away from the dust. You shall return to the dust. Sin came into the world through one man, and death through sin. Adam and Eve began to die physically. The fall of sin. It affected the whole of creation.

It was cursed. The whole of creation is in mourning. It is in the slavery of mortality.

Unfortunately, the effect of the fall of sin can now be seen everywhere in our world. In this broken world we see death, violence, corruption, lies, hate and sin.

Man was banished from the place of God's immediate presence. This community was not restored. Man now has to work in the sweat of his face, and finally he will return to the dust from which he was made.

This has happened to the world. The term entropy describes this quite well. That everything is subject to decay, dissolution and finally death. The whole world is so. It has, so to speak, a limited durability.

It changed the world profoundly. Everything was decayed. Even the human soul. Even the creatures were affected. They became carnivorous or poisonous. Diseases and viruses arose that were otherwise harmless.

Everything has changed. Even the plants.

They became weeds. The field fruits withered. The soil was cursed. Thorns and thorns began to grow. We do not live in the original, very good creation. We live in a fallen creation. The fall of sin was a massive, catastrophic event of world-changing significance.

So everything was really decayed. It was a tragedy at the highest possible level. The evil had to attack before God practiced his first judgment.

God had created a beautiful world. Everything in it was once very good. But when man broke God's commandment, the world of man fell into sin and death, which only got worse over time. And it was not only man who was decayed, but everything under his rule.

Animals became carnivores and turned against each other and against man. Where once the earth was filled with God's goodness, it was now filled with the celebration of evil, with endless violence. Paradise, along with the innocence of man, was lost.

Jesus Christ would later explain to us that the world would be just like Noah's days.

The Pre-Flood World, Noah's Days, and the Global Flood

Most flood geologists point out that the world, the earth, had a warmer, milder and more global climate. Evolutionists also believe that. It is not only due to continental shifts that we find pine forests and the fossils of dinosaurs in the Antarctic.

Not only because these continents were once somewhere else, but because the earth had a warmer, milder, more global climate. More dense, lush vegetation, clearly greener forests, which extended further in the direction of the pole and away from the equatorial zones.

Today we simply do not have this special kind of forests, which could completely produce the current coal, and which could provide the huge amounts of carbon that would have been necessary for today's coal fleet.

Instead, it would have needed a more lush, warmer, forested, and with much more vegetation populated earth.

It is clear that the amount of vegetation in the world before the flood was much more magnificent and lush. Today's world is like a desert compared to this pre-flood world. A much more balanced topography, a much more pleasant climate, a much more lush vegetation and animal world.

We have many creatures in the fossil record that are just like today, but they were much bigger. So, gigantism. This clearly indicates that the world before the flood was much better suited for biological life.

There were probably no impassable mountains, no huge desert areas. Because God had created the world to be inhabited. Mankind had probably begun to destroy their environment. In general, the Bible speaks of the wickedness of man.

After Genesis chapter 6, everything in the heart of man was always evil. And the earth was filled with lust because of man. For me, it would have been a very frightening place to live.

All the intentions and thoughts of the human heart were always evil. The earth was full of violence. All flesh had ruined its way on earth. So there were excessive sins, violence, and evil. And God said, I will destroy the earth.

The remnant, Noah and his family, however, found grace in God's eyes. Apparently they were not among those who were ruined, and God took this remnant of mankind and preserved it.

One thing that interests people is the lifespan of the people before the flood. Noah was 600 years old. And after he had left the ark, he lived another 350 years. He was 950 years old when he died. But his sons, who left the ark, did not live that long themselves.

They were only about 500 years old. And then came the next generation. And the next 400 years, 300 years, until Terach, Abraham's father, who was over 200 years old. Abraham was 175 years old. It was an exponential decline in lifespan.

Adam and Eve had no mutations. The first ten patriarchs before the flood had very low mutation rates. And they all lived about the same length. Something happened during the flood. And as a result of this, there was this almost incredible degeneration of mankind.

There was a very amazing decline in life expectancy. If you represent the data in graphical form, it is amazing, because the data come directly from the Bible. You do not expect scientific data, but the information in the Bible follows a strict decay curve.

It is breathtaking.

In the Bible we are told that the people before the flood were almost 1 ,000 years old. The average age of the people at that time was surprisingly high compared to today, so that it is quite difficult for some to understand how such a great longevity was even possible.

An important key lies in the age data given to us in the book Genesis. These data show that the lifespan of the descendants of Adam after the flood follows a clearly recognizable pattern. Mathematically speaking, we speak of exponential decline.

This means that if you graphically represent the lifespan of the people after the flood, you do not see a linear curve that falls continuously. You would expect that if the data were invented. But instead you see an exponentially decaying curve with smaller variations, because no two people are the same.

Did those who recorded these age data in the course of history swear to deceive an exponential decline in the data? On the contrary, the data reflect exactly what one would expect in the aftermath of a global disaster.

Because you can clearly see a strong initial decline in the lifespan, immediately after the flood. The reason was catastrophic environmental changes. This means no longer access to the nutritious food of the lost pre-flood world, as well as genetic mutations that did not exist before.

The truth is that at the time of recording these metrics, no one would have thought of them as an exponential decline curve if they had wanted to invent the data. This decline curve is actually the result of a real flood disaster that can be proven by the evidence.

The objections against the flood are usually that one makes a fool of oneself and laughs out loud. At best, one asks, and where is all the water? And where did the water come from? And then one spits about the arch.

There was a special on the Discovery Channel with the title Noah's Ark, the true story, in which actors portrayed the traditional biblical version of Noah's Ark. And then they showed the audience what it really was.

Noah wore a tunic with a naked torso, had a shaved head and looked like an Egyptian. And the ark was a beer can. I'm not kidding. Look for yourself, Discovery Channel, Noah's Ark, the true story. But where do you want to know that from?

You claim that this is the truth. And then of course we look at how the ark falls apart, because it was supposedly structurally unstable.

When I was a master's student at Ohio State University, I looked at the geometry of the cross-section, length and width, of the ark. According to the measures in the Bible. And I found out that it is dynamically stable 90 degrees in inclination mode, 90 degrees in gear mode.

That means it turns 90 degrees and comes back.

It is stable. Not that such an inclination would not have caused problems for the passengers, but that shows the stability of the ark. It is clear that whatever the passengers would have had to endure in the flood, the ark would have been structurally stable.

This is the ark in 1 to 200 scale. I put it in a swimming pool and we attached a small measuring device and that's how we were able to scale the waves. And you know what? Even with scaled 150 meter high waves, it was still stable.

It never tilted. 150 meters. A tsunami is 30 meters high. That shows you the dynamic stability of the ark. Most living things did not have to be on the ark. Most plants also not. And not most insects either.

Only the creatures that breathe with lungs. Most species live in the ocean and get along well in a flood. Therefore, the Bible does not say that Noah should take two of each species on the ark. But he should take two of each biblical species.

The same word from Genesis 1 for different created species, which should multiply according to their species. And so we think that there were probably only about 1 ,400 species and about 7 ,000 animals on board the ark.

Average size, perhaps like a large sheep or a small cow. But most creatures were much smaller. But we are not talking here, for example, about two dogs, two German shepherd dogs, two wolves and two coyotes.

Noah only took two dog species on the ark. Because we know from modern genetics that there is an enormous genetic variation that is embedded in the DNA of each individual species. Therefore, creative scientists have thoroughly investigated how a created species compares to our modern classification system.

And they think that in most cases it corresponded to the family level. Evolutionists simply exaggerate because they focus on species. According to evolutionists, it would not have been possible to accommodate all species of life on earth on a ship of the size of the ark.

Even if you consider how huge the ark actually was. The ark, about 15 meters high, 25 meters wide and over 150 meters long, is the largest wooden ship ever built by man. Second comes the gigantic, 100-meter-long wooden ship USS Wyoming from 1909.

No matter how big the ark was, to think about how the ark could accommodate all these species of life is a good opportunity to better understand the ingenious construction of the ark. First of all, it must be noted that marine life, insects, invertebrates and all plant species did not have to go on the ark.

You have to know that God commanded Noah to only take the land invertebrates on board. And if you reduce these animals to the genealogical classes, which are described in the book Genesis as species, you can significantly reduce the number of the necessary animal species, to about 1 ,400 species or about 6 ,750 animals in total.

The animals did not have to be overgrown and could also be smaller young animals that fit easier into the ark, ate less, made less dirt and, because they lived longer, produced more offspring. With about 6 ,750 animals on board, we can now also estimate that about 1 ,400 cages were needed.

If you consider that only 20 of the volume was needed for storing food, you can see that there was still a lot of space left for cages and infrastructure. This remaining volume was enough to accommodate about 850 freight wagons.

It is not surprising that the measurements given by the god of the ark proved to be optimal for stability. If we magnify the ark, it seems that modern cruise ships have learned from the measurements of the ark, because you can see striking similarities in shapes and proportions.

It is striking that the ark has effects up to the present and leads to far-reaching implications in almost every area of ​​science. This includes barominology, botany, hydrodynamics, anthropology and more.

No matter how convincing the scientific argument is, we must not forget that it was God who orchestrated everything. It was God who made the decision that the time had come to create the world. And it was God who was ultimately responsible for the salvation of all those on board the ark.

Peter on the Last Days and the Flood

In the Bible, in 2 Peter's letter, we read that in the last days, before Jesus Christ returns to this world to judge, people will deliberately ignore the testimony of the flood of sin. As the Bible explains to us, they will deliberately ignore the fact that there was a flood of sin.

Peter makes it clear that in the last days people will gossip about the Bible and the return of Jesus Christ. They will change according to their own desires, just as the people of Noah did until the judgment of God fell upon them.

Just as Noah trusted God and was obedient to the commandment to build the ark, and as Noah believed that God would save her from the terrible consequences of the flood of sin, so we must also firmly believe that God was in any case fully capable of preserving Noah, his family and all the creatures that were on board the ark.

Is it for God, who created the whole universe and everything in it out of nothing, too difficult to preserve life as he imagined it? Of course not! We therefore do not want to belong to those whom Peter prophesied that they would ignore the evidence for the flood of sin.

Indeed, we live in the last days before the return of Jesus Christ. Instead, we want to belong to those whose names are inscribed in heaven and who trust God and his word. The Bible explains that on the day when the flood of sin began, all the creatures that bore the burden of life together with Noah and his family were on board the ark.

And it was God himself who locked them all into the ark to save them from the coming judgment over the world.

The global nature of the flood of sin is described in the biblical text, especially when you look at the terms used. The flood of sin itself is called Mabul.

The Hebrew word Mabul. It is only used in one place in the Old Testament. In Psalm 29, verse 10, it is said that God as king over the flood.

It is a unique term that distinguishes the flood of sin from other floods.

It was a unique flood. First, we want to talk about the flood itself, the purpose of the flood of sin. It was not just about disposing the sinful man of the earth. Genesis 6 shows that it was also about the destruction of all land animals and birds that were not on the ark, about the destruction of the habitat of the earth.

And only a global flood could achieve this. Next, we want to talk about the ark. The purpose of the ark was not to save a few animals so that Noah could found a farm after the flood. After Genesis 7, 3, it was much more about preserving descendants on the whole earth.

Here we have a repetition of universal terms.

Everything under the whole sky, on the whole earth, everything that carries the odom of life.

These words appear 60 times in Genesis 6. Alle, jeder, unter dem Himmel. When these words are repeated, the impression is given. We also have to look at the duration of the flood of sin.

371 days. Why such a huge flood, if it was only local? Why did it take so long? And why did it take so long to go back?

A local flood could not last that long. Let's look at the water depth. The flood of sin covered all the high mountains, everywhere under the sky. And since the water level leveled, it meant a global flood.

When the Holy Scripture in Genesis 7 explains that the water rose about 8 meters above the high mountains, even if you assume that the mountains were not as high as they are today and were formed only towards the end of the flood of sin, the water still rose to its own level.

With a local flood, however, it is obviously not necessary to build an ark.

If the flood of sin was only a local event in the Middle East, the ark was completely unnecessary. The animals would not have had to go on board. And God could have told Noah and his family to go on vacation in Europe or Egypt.

Noah and his family could have gone to a safe place. So why an ark at all? Why such a large ark? Why all animals and birds? Birds can fly away. And there are animals elsewhere, if it is only a local flood.

This idea that everything is accommodated in the ark, namely two of each kind, means that you want to save all life on earth.

Only a global flood fits the purpose of the ark. If we look at the size of the ark, it was simply far too large for a local flood.

We also have the theological basis that the people who lived in another region and were not part of the flood of sin question the thought of a judgment about humanity, which destroyed the earth because of its wickedness.

Because God says that he saw the wickedness of the people who were on earth, not only in one place, but everywhere. In the New Testament we have 2 Peter 3, verses 5 -7. There the flood of sin, which destroyed the old world, is compared to a future judgment that will come over the coming or present world.

If there was a local judgment in the past, there should also be a local judgment in the future. In the second resurrection of Christ, he will judge the world in a global event.

If the flood of sin was really just a local event, do you think that if Jesus returns, it will also be just a local event? No, it will be a worldwide judgment. And I would like to add one last thing,.

Namely that we cannot find the Garden of Eden. People look at the description of the geography where the Garden of Eden was located after Genesis chapter 2. But the reason why we cannot find the Garden of Eden is that the world was destroyed by the flood of sin.

It is now buried, deep under hundreds of meters of sediment deposits. And that means that the flood of sin was not a local flood. The Bible makes it clear to us that God saw everything he had done. And behold, it was no longer very good.

All flesh had lost its way on earth. The day of judgment had now come. God said, I want to bring the flood of water over the earth to cover all flesh that has life in it under the whole sky. Everything that is on earth shall perish.

And God covered all that existed on the earth, from man to animal. Only Noah remained and what was with him in the ark.

Every geologist who does not believe in the flood of sin believes that the planet Mars had a global flood disaster. Creationists suspect, like the world geologists, that there were floods on Mars. But we think that the flood of sin occurred at the time.

Maybe an asteroid storm hit the inner planets of the rock. Our planet is currently 70 covered with water, on average about 3 .5 km deep. But they can't believe that we once had a flood of sin. They believe in a global flood on Mars, but do not want to accept that there are many indications for the flood of sin.

Where did all the water come from for the flood of sin? I mean, where did it come from and where did it go? Our earth is 3 quarters covered with water, which is several kilometers deep. It's still all there.

The most frequently asked questions are, where did the water come from for the flood of sin? And where did it go? And the answers are very easy to find in the model of catastrophic plate tectonics.

The process of catastrophic plate tectonics is very similar to conventional plate tectonics. The main difference is the speed or rate with which the processes take place. Today, the plates move on average only a few centimeters per year in the flood of sin.

A billion times faster. The flood of sin began with these sources due to the deep ocean. The Bible says,.

The sources of the great depth broke up. The Mediterranean back is about 70 ,000 kilometers long. The rest is underwater. That's why it's called the Mediterranean back. When everything happened at the same time, the seabed was pushed up.

And then the Mediterranean back broke up all over the world at about the same time. In this first phase, the sea level rose by about 1 .5 kilometers. A flood wave caused by the sudden rise of the seabed rushed to the continent.

That was phase 1 of the flood of sin. The second phase began with that the windows of heaven were opened.

It is no coincidence that in the Holy Scripture a order is given. The sources of the depth break up. That's the crust that breaks up. The water was thrown into the atmosphere by superconducting steam rays.

Then it fell down again as global, flood-like rain.

In the flood of sin, it rained for 40 days and 40 nights. But in total, the water stayed 150 days above the earth.

So if it says in the Bible, the sources of the great depth break up, that describes the break-up of the flood-like crust. Melted material expands when it solidifies. The new seabed therefore expanded and pushed the sea level up.

That means that the seabed actually rose. The seawater also rose and covered the continent. The new seabed cooled down and shrunk. That's why the seabed sank and the seawater flowed down again. The waters of the flood of sin are still present on the earth's surface today.

They simply flowed into the new ocean basins that were created by the flood of sin. In fact, 70 of the earth is still covered by water.

The water is still here. It reaches deep into the created graves. Some of the graves are 13 to 16 kilometers deep. If we had lower land formations and a higher seabed, our earth would most likely be a pure water planet without a land surface.

With so much water, it makes no sense to ask where all the water is going. It's still here. And it's easy to explain that the same water once sufficed to flood the earth, but the situation has changed so that the water is now in deeper basins.

No problem in the flood of sin model.

Many have already heard of the theory of Pangaea. This theory states that the continents were once connected to a supercontinent, which then broke apart by plate tectonics. Catastrophic plate tectonics is essentially very similar to conventional plate tectonics.

With the exception that the time scale and events focus on the flood of sin year instead of millions of years of slow processes. Maybe it surprises you that it was a man named Abraham Ortelius, a famous cartographer from the 16th century, who first suggested that the flood of sin could have been responsible for this at the time of Noah, separating America from Europe and Africa.

Centuries later, another Christian named Antonio Snider Pellegrini proposed the modern concept of continental shift for the first time. He illustrated on the basis of two maps that the continents of the world were once connected to each other.

This was decades before the German geologist Alfred Wegener proposed his own version of this theory, which, falsely, made him enter into history as the father of continental shift. Antonio Snider Pellegrini, on the other hand, was denied this title of honor.

His past was that he quoted the book Genesis. He said that he had discovered that at the beginning of creation there was only one continent. The book Genesis serves as a template for what happened to the earth in the past during the flood of sin.

It began with what the Bible calls the opening of the sources of the great depths. It was not until the 1950s that technology was discovered, which was originally developed to locate submarines underwater, these gigantic scars of the sources of the great depths that had broken up in accordance with the Bible.

How could a thousand-year-old book give evidence of what was on the seabed? The Bible says that at first the sources of the great depths broke up. That is, the crust of the earth broke up and emitted magma, generating steam rays that shot up into the sky.

Then we read that the windows of heaven were opened. That is, the water vapor thrown into the sky fell down as rain again. This rain lasted 40 days and 40 nights, according to the Bible. The supercontinent described in the book Genesis began to break apart next.

The newly created continents first moved in different directions and collided before they reached their final destination. This closed sea roads and formed volcanoes and mountains in America and Europe, such as the Appalachians and the Zagros Mountains.

Melted magma formed a new seabed that expanded and increased the separation between the new continents. Scientists will later discover that the seabed at the mid-Atlantic back is much younger than the seabed in other parts of the world, in accordance with the biblical model.

As this newly created volcanic soil expanded more and more, it emerged under the west coast of North America, stopped and came free again and caused massive tsunamis, which carried sediment and marine life and flooded the land.

During this subduction, the Schatzky back rose and the Rocky Mountains began to form, together with the Independence Dike Swarm, a 650-kilometer-long volcanic region that emitted so much ash that it covered half of America.

As the western inland sea formed at this time, the last dinosaurs were also affected by tidal waves, together with marine life, and finally buried in sediment, sand and ash. Towards the end of the tidal wave, the activity slowed down.

The seabed stopped expanding and began to cool down. When the new massive seabeds cooled down and pulled together again, the water flowed back into the new deeper seabeds. Billions of fossils remained all over the earth, impressive indications of a worldwide catastrophic flood.

The strongest indication of a global flood is the structure of the sedimentary sequence. Everywhere on earth, under their feet, there are hundreds of different horizontal layers with, as a rule, smooth border areas between the layers.

The only possibility of how this sediment structure could arise are global processes that generated the sedimentary sequence in a single global event.

Everywhere on earth, the layers are flat, without any clear rifts. Think of the Grand Canyon. You see these flat pancakes, one on top of the other, always flat. They are basically erosional. They formed as follows.

At the beginning of the tidal wave, there were movements in the crust. The movements of the crust cause earthquakes. Earthquakes in the water cause tsunamis. The tsunamis that arose in the area of the world's oceans then raced across the continents.

When the tsunami lost its power, the sediment from the water settled on the ground. A flat layer of sediment formed on the ground. The first layer. Another earthquake, perhaps a week or a day later, triggered a tsunami and brought sediment from another part of the earth.

The tsunami lost its power. The sediments in the water settled on the ground and formed another flat layer. Without erosion. Again, a third tsunami brings sediments.

Third layer. My simulations show that a tsunami was large enough to sweep across an entire continent.

These layers arose underwater. That is why they are so confusing for many people. It is fascinating to see how scientists explain their excavation sites. For example, in the Dinosaur Provincial Park. There you can find 10 ,000 dinosaurs buried in this flat layer.

When you ask the responsible paleontologist how these 10 ,000 dinosaurs got into this flat layer, he says they died in a flood in the river. Oh, and what did the riverbed look like? It was very flat. They say there was a rippling river that was strong enough to bury 10 ,000 dinosaurs at a length of 8 kilometers.