Historical vs. Observational Science 2 (Classroom Series)

You say evolution is based on scientific facts, but they take unrelated animals and fit them next to each other to talk about how they evolved from one another.

They take things like this dinosaur fossil and make presumptions about its age to fit their theory.

Yes, scientists have pieced together the puzzle of evolution, but using solid scientific inferences.

But that's historical science, not observational science. Historical science is like piecing together a puzzle, but in the end you may not get the right picture.

Real science uses observation, testing, and repetition. That's how we got people on the moon. You can't do that in the past.

So, since both creation and evolution are based on the past, they're both ideas that are built upon faith.

And I think that it takes a lot less faith to believe in a well -designed universe by an intelligent creator.